the causes and effects of cultural eutrophication at quidenham mere, norfolk, uk. 2011
TRANSCRIPT
Sophie Studley (200389800)
Sophie Studley
The causes and effects of
cultural eutrophication at
Quidenham Mere.
BSc Geography
Geography Dissertation 2011
Contents Page
List of Figures .......................................................................................................................................... 5
List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................... 8
Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................. 9
Abstract ................................................................................................................................................ 10
Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 11
Chapter 2: Aims and Objectives ........................................................................................................... 13
2.1. Aims ............................................................................................................................................ 13
2.2. Objectives ................................................................................................................................... 13
2.3. Hypotheses ................................................................................................................................. 14
Chapter 3: Overview of core themes .................................................................................................. 16
3.1. Eutrophication .......................................................................................................................... 16
3.2. Lake deposits ............................................................................................................................ 17
3.3. Geochemistry ........................................................................................................................... 17
3.4. Micropaleontology ................................................................................................................... 19
3.4.1. Gastropods. .................................................................................................................... 19
3.4.2. Bivalves ......................................................................................................................... 20
3.5. Summary ................................................................................................................................... 22
Chapter 4: The Study Area ................................................................................................................... 23
4.1. Site location and description .................................................................................................... 23
4.2. Site Selection ............................................................................................................................ 24
4.3. Limitations of site chosen ......................................................................................................... 24
Chapter 5: Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 25
5.1. Coring procedure ...................................................................................................................... 25
5.2. Sediment lithology .................................................................................................................... 25
5.3. Sediment composition .............................................................................................................. 26
5.4. Chronology ................................................................................................................................ 26
5.5. Geochemistry ............................................................................................................................ 27
5.6. Magnetic susceptibility ............................................................................................................. 28
5.7. Mollusc Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 29
5.8. Statistics .................................................................................................................................... 30
5.9. Limitations of methods ............................................................................................................. 31
5.10. Ethical Issues ........................................................................................................................... 32
5.11. Summary .................................................................................................................................. 32
Chapter 6: Results ................................................................................................................................ 33
6.1. Sediment Lithology .................................................................................................................... 33
6.2. Sediment composition .............................................................................................................. 33
6.3. Geochemical analysis ................................................................................................................. 36
6.4. Non-parametric analysis (1) ...................................................................................................... 37
6.5. Magnetic susceptibility ............................................................................................................. 38
6.6. Non-parametric analysis (2) ....................................................................................................... 39
6.7. Mollusc Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 39
6.8. Quantitative zonation. ............................................................................................................... 42
6.9. Non-parametric analysis (3)……….. ............................................................................................. 44
6.10. Summary ................................................................................................................................. 45
Chapter 7: Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 47
7.1. When did the eutrophication events happen at Quidenham Mere? ........................................ 47
7.1.1. The onset of the eutrophication process ...................................................................... 47
7.1.2. The onset of the restoration process ............................................................................. 47
7.1.3. Summary ....................................................................................................................... 48
7.2. Possible causes of cultural eutrophication at Quidenham Mere .............................................. 49
7.2.1. Possible causes of the medieval/ post-medieval eutrophication event ....................... 49
7.2.2. Possible causes of the second eutrophication event .................................................... 51
7.2.3. Summary……….. ............................................................................................................. 52
7.3. The effect of cultural eutrophication at Quidenham Mere upon the Mollusca phylum .......... 52
7.3.1. Bithynia tentaculata ...................................................................................................... 53
7.3.2. Gyraulus ......................................................................................................................... 53
7.3.3. Lymnaea ......................................................................................................................... 54
7.3.4. Valvata……….. ................................................................................................................. 56
7.3.5. Pisidium ......................................................................................................................... 57
7.3.6. Summary ....................................................................................................................... 57
Chapter 8: Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 58
8.1. Summary of main finding .......................................................................................................... 59
8.2. Limitations of the study ............................................................................................................. 60
8.3. Significance of main findings ..................................................................................................... 60
8.4. Scope for further study .............................................................................................................. 61
Chapter 9: Bibliography ....................................................................................................................... 62
Chapter 10: Appendix ........................................................................................................................... 76
10.1. Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 76
10.1.1. Loss-on-ignition ........................................................................................................... 76
10.1.2. Geochemical Analysis .................................................................................................. 76
10.1.3. Molluscs Analysis ........................................................................................................ 77
10.2. Results .................................................................................................................................... 77
10.2.1. Sediment lithology ...................................................................................................... 77
10.2.2. Sediment composition ................................................................................................ 77
10.2.3. Geochemical Analysis .................................................................................................. 84
10.2.4. Magnetic Susceptibility ............................................................................................... 87
10.2.4.1. Upper Section ............................................................................................. 87
10.2.4.2. Lower Section .............................................................................................. 89
10.2.5. Mollusc Analysis .......................................................................................................... 92
10.3. Reflective Log ......................................................................................................................... 95
10.4. DSG Report Forms .................................................................................................................. 96
10.5. Interim Report ...................................................................................................................... 104
10.5.1. First Interim Report .................................................................................................. 104
10.5.2. Second Interim Report ............................................................................................. 117
10.6. Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) .......................................................... 134
10.7. Risk Assessment Forms ........................................................................................................ 137
List of Figures
Figure 1. Diagram identifying the main stages of the eutrophication process (Triplepoint
Water Technologies, 2011) .......................................................................................... 17
Figure 2. Diagram of a generalized gastropod. The operculum is a corneous plate that
molluscs secrete over their shell opening to survive predators and periods of drought
(Ghesquiere, 2011). ................................................................................................................. 20
Figure 3. Diagram of a generalized bivalve, with the main features labelled. Note that when
the adductor muscles relax the hinge ligaments expands and the shell opens (Little,
2008).......................................................................................................................................20
Figure 4. A geological map of East Anglia, with the location of Quidenham Mere indicated
(Peglar, 1993). ......................................................................................................................... 23
Figure 5. The local topography of Quidenham Mere and the local landmarks. ..................... 23
Figure 6. Diagram of the Bartington system designed to measure the magnetic susceptibility
of sediments (Nowaczyk, 2001). The loop sensor should be a similar size to the core in order
to produce accurate results. .................................................................................................... 28
Figure 7. A mollusc acquisition curve for the QUID1 core. In order to produce an accurate
acquisition curve, 10 samples were taken from the core at each weight, and the average was
recorded. The plots reaches asymptote at 12 individuals per sample weight. It is therefore
clear that a sample of 20 g should be extracted to achieve a full species representation. .... 29
Figure 8. A comparison between Peglar’s (1993) sediment composition diagram (434 – 1240
cm) and the QUID1 sediment composition diagram (125-830cm). The coloured lines indicate
where the organic and carbonate component correspond. Silica has been recorded first to
allow a clear comparison between the organic and carbonate variables. .............................. 34
Figure 9. A diagram of the sediment lithology and sediment composition, with the
calculated dates identified. ...................................................................................................... 35
Figure 10. The geochemistry of Quidenham Mere from the Medieval Period to the present,
focussing upon the concentration of sodium and potassium. ................................................ 36
Figure 11. The magnetic susceptible elements in the sediments of Quidenham Mere ......... 38
Figure 12. Bithynia tentaculata: Belonging to the gastropod class, this is a common
prosobranch found in slow-moving, well-oxygenated lakes (Kerney, 1999). It can survive well
in lakes with high concentrations of potassium and calcium rich waters (Jokinen, 1992). .... 39
Figure 13. Gyraulus laevis: Belonging to the gastropod class, these pulmonates are
extremely common in clean, quite water (Kerney, 1999). ...................................................... 40
Figure 14. Lymnaea peregra: Belonging to the gastropod class, these pulmonates are found
in a variety of environments, such as rivers, canals and ephemeral ponds (Kerney, 1999). .. 40
Figure 15. Valvata macrostoma: Belonging to the gastropod class, these prosobranchs are
found in slow moving water, well-vegetated, calcium rich waters (Kerney, 1999). They are,
however, extremely rare in The British Isles. .......................................................................... 40
Figure 16. Valvata piscinalis: Belonging to the gastropod class, this is a common
prosobranch found in muddy or silty substrates (Kerney, (1999). Furthermore, this snail is
tolerant to oligotrophic zones and varying carbonate concentrations (Fretter and Graham,
1978; Grigorovich et al., 2005). ............................................................................................... 41
Figure 17. Pisidium sp.: Belonging to the bivalve class, this species is found in a variety of
environments (Kerney, 1999). The diagram shows a generalized Pisidium species. .............. 41
Figure 18. The concentrations of the molluscs at Quidenham Mere, divided by quantitative
zonation. The graph shows that the concentrations of the molluscs increase between the
first (800 – 685) and second (455 -325) episode of cultural eutrophication.. ........................ 44
Figure 19. Peglar’s (1993) pollen stratigraphy of Quidenham Mere. There is a rapid increase
in Cannabaceae, during the medieval period (QM–9b). After a gentle decline of
Cannabaceae, at the end of the subzone QM-9b, Cannabaceae, increases rapidly to a
maximum of 94% during the post-medieval (QM-9c) ............................................................. 49
Figure 20. A proposed explanation of the medieval/post-medieval eutrophication event at
Quidenham Mere. ................................................................................................................... 50
Figure 21. A proposed explanation of the most recent eutrophication event at Quidenham
Mere. ........................................................................................................................................ 51
Figure 22. Diagram of a Lymnaea snail with the main features labelled. ............................... 55
Figure 23. In order to survive in periods of low DO, the snail hangs suspended from the
upper surface of the water by its foot. The snail subsequently takes in oxygen by opening its
pneumostome (Clifford, 1991) ................................................................................................ 56
List of Tables
Table 1. A summary of statistical analysis performed to address aim number two. For the
Anderson-darling test, the data is normally distributed if P > 0.05. For the Spearman’s Rho
test, the two variables are statistically correlated if P < 0.05. ............................................... 37
Table 2. A summary of the statistical analyses performed on the mollusc data. For the
Anderson-darling test, the data is normally distributed if p > 0.05. For the Spearman’s Rho
test, the two variables are statistically correlated if p < 0.05. ................................................ 46
Table 3. Sediment lithology using the terminology of Troels-Smith (1955). The work of Birks
and Birks (1980) also provided additional support. ................................................................ 65
Table 4. Results from the Loss-on-ignition analysis ................................................................ 71
Table 5. Geochemistry results regarding the concentrations of potassium and sodium in the
sediment of Quidenham Mere. ............................................................................................... 73
Table 6. Magnetic susceptibility results from the upper section of the core ......................... 76
Table 7. Magnetic susceptibility results from the lower section of the core. ......................... 78
Table 8. Results from the mollusc analysis. Concentrations of molluscs are in the following
units: concentration per 20g ................................................................................................... 81
9
Acknowledgements
Many thanks go to Ian Lawson for his invaluable help and support during this project. I
would also like to thank John Corr for his assistance during the preparation and
identification of numerous mollusc species. I would like to express my gratitude to Martin
Gilpin and Rachel Gasior for their patience whilst teaching me laboratory methods. Thanks
also go to Richard Preece, Stephen Brooks, Rosemary McIntosh and Ian McIntosh for their
interest in this project. Finally, I would like to thank Margaret and David Studley, Matthew
Fine, Nicole Bridgman and my fellow geographers for their admirable support and
encouragement.
10
Abstract
The results of a geochemical record from the top 8.3 m of sediment retrieved from
Quidenham Mere, Norfolk, are displayed. This, together with results from sediment
composition analysis and magnetic susceptibility, are used to infer and explain periods of
cultural eutrophication at Quidenham Mere since the medieval period. The effects of
cultural eutrophication upon the abundance of molluscs in the sediment have also been
discussed. Two episodes of cultural eutrophication have been determined at Quidenham
Mere. The first episode occurred during the medieval period due to hemp retting and forest
clearance. The second episode, which is a new finding, occurred within the last 200 years
due to the development of Quidenham Hall Parkland. Both of these episodes of cultural
eutrophication caused a significant rise in the concentration of molluscs, followed by a rapid
decline. The abundance of molluscs at this location, therefore, was significantly affected by
anthropogenic activities.
Keywords: cultural eutrophication; Quidenham Mere; geochemical analysis; magnetic
susceptibility; mollusc analysis
Word Count: 10,517
11
Chapter 1: Introduction
“The person who does not worry about the future will shortly have worries about the
present”
Chinese Proverb
Environmental change has been a problem, on a local level, since the beginning of
civilisation. Reasons for this include population growth, agriculture, deforestation and
smelting. There is an increasing concern that anthropogenic activities, especially those
involving a change in land use, are causing a decline in biodiversity (Huggett, 2010).
Although it is extremely difficult to identify the total number of species in the world,
extinctions themselves are normally well documented (Holden, 2008). Understanding
extinctions and loss of biodiversity are therefore important topics in evaluating the effects
of anthropogenic activities.
One of the major causes of loss of biodiversity by anthropogenic activities is cultural
eutrophication. Cultural eutrophication is defined as an excessive input of nutrients and
organic material due to anthropogenic activities. A phylum which is greatly affected by
cultural eutrophication is Mollusca (Russell-Hunter, 1978). Harman and Forney (1970)
showed that eleven species of molluscs were lost from Oneida Lake after fifty years of
increased nutrient input. The molluscan productivity also significantly decreased at this
location. Bovbjerg and Ulmer (1960) and Clampitt, et al., (1960) also recognised this trend
and showed that eleven species of gastropods were lost from Lake Okoboji, Iowa, due to
changes in the trophic level of the lake. Furthermore, Morgan (1970) documented the loss
of six gastropods species from Loch Leven over the last thirty years; a lake noted for
progressive eutrophication. It is therefore clear that anthropogenic activities, which cause
eutrophication, have a deleterious effect upon the ecology of fresh waters.
The interest in cultural eutrophication however declined in the 1980s due to the heightened
interest in acidification, and many paleolimnologists altered their studies to address these
new problems (Smol, 2002). It needs to be acknowledged that cultural eutrophication is still
12
a serious problem, and is a topic that requires further work. This will enable important
questions regarding the management of this phenomenon to be answered. Battarbee, et al.,
(2005) and Cheng, et al., (2007) fully support this idea and argue that more holistic studies
need to be undertaken. Additionally, the study of ecology needs to become more predictive.
Sutherland (2006) argues that subjects such as economics and engineering are looked upon
more highly than ecology as they allow predictions to be made. It is therefore clear that
more paleolimnological work needs to be undertaken regarding cultural eutrophication, in
order to predict the course of present environmental change.
This study therefore investigates the effect of cultural eutrophication upon the abundance
of molluscs at Quidenham Mere, Norfolk. Quidenham Mere is an ideal location for this
investigation as the calcareous marl layers are abundant in molluscs. Furthermore, Cheng, et
al., (2007) documents that this location experienced cultural eutrophication during the
medieval Period. This literature will therefore contribute to the knowledge and
development in this research field.
13
Chapter 2: Aims and objectives
2.1. Aims
1) To identify and date episodes of cultural eutrophication at Quidenham Mere, Norfolk.
2) To produce possible explanations as to why Quidenham Mere experienced episodes of
cultural eutrophication.
3) To record changes in the population of molluscs in the sediment of Quidenham Mere in
response to cultural eutrophication.
2.2. Objectives
1) In order to date the core, a sediment lithology and sediment composition analysis will be
performed.
2) In order to identify and explain the episodes of cultural eutrophication at Quidenham
Mere, the concentrations of potassium (K+) and sodium (Na+) in the sediment will be
calculated and analysed.
3) The further explain the episodes of cultural eutrophication at Quidenham Mere, the
magnetically susceptible elements in the sediment will be analysed.
4) A mollusc record will be produced in order to determine the effects of cultural
eutrophication upon this phylum.
5) Appropriate statistical tests will be performed upon all of the data to prove that the
conclusions of this literature are significant.
14
2.3. Hypotheses
Five hypotheses have been investigated in this literature. These have been carefully
designed to fulfil the aims of the literature.
To fulfil the first aim of this literature the hypotheses are as follows:
1) Research Hypothesis (H1): There is a significant statistical correlation between the
potassium variable and the sodium variable.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is not a significant statistical correlation between the organic
matter variable and the sodium variable.
To fulfil the second aim of this literature the hypotheses are as follows:
2) Research Hypothesis (H1): There a significant statistical correlation between the silica
variable and the magnetic susceptibility variable.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is not a significant statistical correlation between the silica
variable and the magnetic susceptibility variable.
To fulfil the third aim of this literature the hypotheses are as follows:
3) Research Hypothesis (H1): There is a significant statistical correlation between the mollusc
variable and the organic variable.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is not a significant statistical correlation between the mollusc
variable and the organic variable.
4) Research Hypothesis (H1): There is a significant statistical correlation between the mollusc
variable and the potassium variable.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is not a significant statistical correlation between the mollusc
variable and the potassium variable.
15
5) Research Hypothesis (H1): There is a significant statistical correlation between the mollusc
variable and the sodium variable.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is not a significant statistical correlation between the mollusc
variable and the sodium variable.
16
Chapter 3: Overview of core themes
3.1. Eutrophication
Brandt (1901) first documented the process of natural eutrophication, establishing a
relationship between the concentration of plankton and the concentration of nitrogen in
the freshwater lakes of Germany (Smith, 1998). Naumann (1919) later classified waters in
Sweden depending on their nutrient content and Pearsall (1921) documented that an
oligotrophic lake would ‘evolve’ to become a eutrophic lake. The idea of categorising a lake
by trophic states is shared with Dokulil and Teubner (2011). Nowadays the definition of
eutrophication is a much-discussed topic as highlighted by Jørgensen and Richardson (1996).
The most common use of the term, however, is related to the excessive input of mineral
nutrients and organic matter (Harper, 1992). It must also be acknowledged that when we
speak of eutrophication, it is cultural eutrophication that is of most interest, as natural
eutrophication (ontogeny) occurs with the aging process of a lake (Deevey, 1984; Andersen,
et al., 2005).
Cultural eutrophication was first acknowledged as a phenomenon post World War 2, due to
the increased need of fertilizers and pesticides (Moss, et al., 1997; Cheng, et al,. 2007).
Cultural eutrophication is an active area of scientific research, and is the most widespread
environmental problem affecting freshwaters of developed countries (Carpenter, et al.,
1998; Smith, 2003). This is due to the large number of severe problems that it can cause
(Muir, 2009). For example, the primary effect of nutrient enrichment is a change from slow
growing perennial algae (green algae) to fast growing ephemeral algae (blue-green algae)
(Dokulil and Teubner, 2011). This can lead to an increased risk of flooding and the blockage
of water filters. Furthermore, low oxygen levels can develop due to the bacterial
decomposition of algae and macrophytes (Duarte, 1995; Borum, 1996; Cloern, 2001;
Andersen, et al., 2005). Harper (1992) therefore documents that cultural eutrophication can
have a significant negative effect upon the biodiversity of the ecosystem.
17
Figure 1. Diagram identifying the main stages of the eutrophication process (Triplepoint
Water Technologies, 2011).
3.2. Lake Deposits
Lake deposits have been used extensively for the reconstruction of past environments. In
recent years, however, there have been many advances and developments in the
techniques required to analyse and date lake deposits (Anderson, et al., 2007).
Palaeolimnologists now have the capability to generate high quality time-series data in
order to address important issues regarding cultural eutrophication (Battarbee, et al., 2005).
In comparison to other types of deposits, lake sediments provide continuous stratigraphic
records. This is because the sediments can accumulate over several epochs undisturbed by
erosion and weathering (Jenkin, et al., 1941; West, 1991; Anderson, et al., 2007). Lake
sediments can therefore provide a record of the environmental conditions in which the
sedimentation occurred and a record of the biological history.
3.3. Geochemistry
Geochemistry has been used as a valuable tool in palaeolimnology since the 1960s and plays
a central role in this field (Mackereth, 1966). Boyle (2001) argues that geochemical analysis
is extremely important in palaeolimnolgy in order to make conclusions about the
18
environment. However, the analysis of a geochemical record for phosphorous and nitrogen,
the root cause of eutrophication, is extremely difficult (Smol, 2002). This is because (i) the
preservation of phosphorous in sediments is determined by the sorption onto iron oxides,
and redox reactions can therefore affect this process (ii) anoxic conditions can causes the
post-depositional mobility of phosphorous, and phosphate can therefore be returned to the
lake water (Smol, 2002). Enstorm and Wright (1984), who also discusses the difficulties of
measuring past phosphorous concentrations, support this idea. Furthermore, Smol (2002)
reveals that the calculation of past nitrogen levels is fraught with error. It is for these
reasons that the phosphorus and nitrogen concentrations of the sediments at Quidenham
Mere will not be studied.
The concentration of sodium, however, can prove to be an alternative proxy for
eutrophication. A great body of literature has accumulated regarding this idea, despite
controversy over the mechanisms of this process. Provasoli (1969) documents that the
population of blue-green algae, a consequence of cultural eutrophication, increases with
enhanced sodium concentrations. Sharp (1971), who documented that the Twin City Lakes
(Minnesota) developed an extensive blue-green population following high inputs of sodium,
furthers this idea. Makarewicz and McKellar (1985) also acknowledged this relationship, and
Baybutt and Makarewicz (1981) documented that there was a significant correlation
between the increase in blue-green algae and the increase of the concentration of sodium.
There is therefore reason to believe that blue-green algae were present at Quidenham Mere
as it is one of the most common consequences of cultural eutrophication.
Possible explanations for this relationship include the necessary role of sodium to transform
nitrogen to ammonia in nitrogen fixing blue-green algae (Brownell and Nicholas, 1967). NAS
(1969) provides an additional explanation by documenting a strong relationship between
the release of phosphate from the lakebed and the total ionic content of the water. An
increase in the concentration of sodium in the water would therefore increase the
concentration of phosphate in the water, thus resulting in eutrophication. Furthermore,
Makarewicz and McKellar (1985) document that sodium can stimulate the phosphate
uptake in blue-green algae, and thus increase the growth rate. Therefore, an increased
concentration of sodium will result in an enlargement of the blue-green algae population,
and thus lead to eutrophic conditions.
19
Potassium may also be used as a proxy for eutrophication. Leentvaar (1980) documents the
possible role of potassium in the eutrophication process and argues that it is much more
complex than excessive phosphate and nitrogen inputs. This is supported by Wist et al.,
(2009) which argue that an increased concentration of potassium could cause a decline in
the population of blue–green algae (a direct cause of eutrophication). Furthermore,
Emerson and Lewis (1942), Allen (1952) and Kratz and Myers (1955) recorded the
intolerance of blue-green algae to increased potassium concentrations. It is therefore logical
that potassium can act as a recovery mechanism for eutrophication and that an increase in
the concentration of potassium can indicate the final stages of eutrophication.
3.4. Micropaleontology
Micropaleontology is a branch of science concerned with the study of microfossils in order
to reconstruct paleoenvironments (Martin, 2000). A particular fossil commonly used in
micropaleontology are the freshwater molluscs. Freshwater molluscs have an extraordinary
fossil record dating back to the Cambrian Period, and include two classes: Gastropod and
Bivalvia (Sturm, 2006; Dillon Jr., 2000).
3.4.1 Gastropods.
The Gastropoda class is the largest of the molluscan classes containing approximately 150,
000 species (Aktipis, et al., 2008). Gastropods are classified by having a dextral, helically
coiled aragonite shell (Ponder and Lindberg, 2008). They are unique among the classes of
molluscs as they display torsion of the body (Figure 2). (Karleskint, et al., 2009).
Furthermore, the class of gastropoda can be divided into two taxa: Pulmonata and
Prosobrachia (Boss, 1978). Snails of the subclass Prosobranchia are gill breathing, while
snails of the subclass Pulmonata are non-gill breathing. Snails of the latter carry an air
bubble nderneath their shell in order to respire (Sturm, 2006).
20
3.4.2. Bivalves
The Bivalvia class, however, is the second largest of the molluscan classes (Giribet, 2008).
Bivalves consist of a compressed body enclosed by two aragonite and/or calcite valves
(Figure 3). These valves are hinged together dorsally by adductor muscles and by
interlocking teeth (Tunnel, et al., 2010). The shape of the valve however varies between
species and can be either equilateral, inequivalve, or a combination of the both.
Figure 3. Diagram of a generalized bivalve, with the main features labelled. Note that when
the adductor muscles relax the hinge ligaments expands and the shell opens (Little, 2008)
Figure 2. Diagram of a generalized
gastropod. The operculum is a corneous
plate that molluscs secrete over their shell
opening to survive predators and periods of
drought (Ghesquiere, 2011).
21
Freshwater molluscs have gained scientific attention since the 17th century. Merrett (1666),
listed the plants and animals of The British Isles and recorded six species of mollusc. The
study of molluscs remained a lively topic throughout this century and Lister (1678) recorded
the geographical distribution of molluscs within the British Isles. Jeffreys (1982), who
synthesized all existing literature regarding the classification and distribution of molluscs,
significantly advanced this research area. However, Merrett (1666), Lister (1678) and
Jeffreys (1982) have been strongly criticised as being too descriptive (Ložek, 1986). In the
early 1950s, there was a growing sense that the existing paradigm of molluscan study was
unscientific and lacked purpose. A more theoretical approach subsequently occurred,
emphasizing the quantification of data. Studies therefore grow in complexity with the
advance of technology (Miller and Tevesz, 2001). A highlight of this time was the work of
Sparks (1961) which documented the great biostratigraphical significance of molluscs. Talyor
(1960), Ložek (1986) and Keen (1990) also recognised the paleoenvironmental advantages
of the study of molluscs.
Molluscs are an ideal proxy to study the effects of cultural eutrophication. A great body of
literature has accumulated documenting that freshwater molluscs can be used as an
indicator of eutrophic conditions (e.g. Arter, 1989; Nakamura and Kerciku, 2000; Carlsson
2001; Jou and Liao, 2006; Timm, et al. 2006). Furthermore, Dussart (1979) documents that
the abundance of some mollusc species is positively correlated to the concentration of
potassium and negatively correlated to the concentration of sodium. Molluscs are also
advantageous in the field of palaeoecology as they are extremely numerous (Bignot, 1982).
Molluscs inhibit a wide range of sedimentary deposits such as windblown (Miller, et al.,
1994), fissures (Miller, et al., 1994b) and fen peat deposits (Miller and Thompson, 1987). An
additional advantage is that they exhibit wonderful patterns of variation between and
within species. For example, the shape of the operculum and the pattern of the suture can
vary between species. As a result, molluscs can be used for stratigraphic zonation and to
reconstruct former habitat and climatic conditions (Miller, et al., 1985). The most important
advantage, however, is that molluscs are preserved in situ in a long and complete fossil
record. This allows an in depth analysis over a many epochs.
22
3.5. Summary
Scientific investigations focusing upon cultural eutrophication have been limited in recent
years. This has resulted in a poor historical record of this phenomenon (Cheng, et. al., 2007).
Furthermore, there is an uncertainty regarding the extent to which anthropogenic activities
influence natural eutrophication (Cheng, et. al., 2007). There is therefore considerable
scope for more palaeoecological and paleolimnological studies regarding cultural
eutrophication. In order to reduce this phenomenon in the future, greater studies into the
past need to be undertaken. A fuller understanding of the topic will therefore be achieved.
Consequently, anthropogenic activities, that promote cultural eutrophication, will be able to
be successfully managed.
In order to determine the process of cultural eutrophication at Quidenham Mere, the
potassium and sodium content was measured (Grigorovich, et al., 2005). The organic
material content was also measured due to its direct relationship with this phenomenon
(Nixon, 1995). Ongley (2006) and Ortega, et al., (2006), who reveal that the organic matter
content of the sediment increases during eutrophication, support this idea. Rabalais (2010)
further supports this idea by documenting Grigorovich that the increase of organic matter
during eutrophication is due to soil erosion, natural weathering, or human activity. This
multi-proxy method is ideal as it can abolish misleading information provided by single-
proxy studies (Engstrom and Wright, 1984; Boyle, 2001: Birks and Birks, 2006). An increase
in the concentration of sodium is used as an indication to the start of the phenomenon, and
a decrease in the concentration of potassium is used as an indication to the restoration of
the lake. The population of molluscs in the sediment at Quidenham Mere was also studied
in order to evaluate the effects of anthropogenic activities. Molluscs were chosen as they
are susceptible to environmental change, and can therefore produce informative results.
This literature will provide a greater insight into the process of cultural eutrophication, as it
is clear that there are gaps in the knowledge in this field. It will help further the current
state of knowledge by highlighting what effect anthropogenic activities have upon the
population of molluscs at Quidenham Mere. This literature will also aid the development in
this research field.
23
Chapter 4: The study area
4.1. Site location and description
Quidenham Mere is a small shallow lake
located on the eastern edge of Breckland
in south Norfolk, UK (52°30’ N, 1°0’E;
National Grid Reference: TM 040875).
The area is composed of chalky boulder
clay deposited by the Anglian glaciations,
overlying chalk bedrock (Perrin, et al.,
1979) (Figure 4). The lake sediments are
calcareous marls (approximately 12 m),
with abundant shell and Characeae
remains (Cheng, et al., 2007). A thick
layer of dark peat (>2 m) overlies the
calcareous marls.
Quidenham Mere is extraordinary among East
Anglian Meres as it has an inflowing stream,
which drains from approximately 5km to the
south and east (Lewis, et al., 1991). A drainage
network has therefore been added to the fen
woods of the east and north of the Mere (Figure).
The present lake is roughly oval, with a short axis
of 200 m and long axis of about 300m (Lewis, et
al., 1991). There is however evidence that the lake
was greater in size at the onset of the Holocene
epoch (Bennett, et al., 1991).
Figure 4. A geological map of East
Anglia, with the location of Quidenham
Mere indicated (Peglar, 1993).
Figure 5. The local topography of
Quidenham Mere and the local
landmarks (Peglar, 1993).
24
4.2. Site Selection
Quidenham Mere was chosen as the study site for numerous reasons. Previous work at
Quidenham Mere, for example, has only focused upon the fossil pollen and charcoal content
of the sediments. There has been no work, however, focussing upon the nutrient
concentration of the sediments. This is an important variable to investigate in order to
further our knowledge of the eutrophication event at Quidenham Mere. Furthermore,
Cheng, et al., (2007) lacks detail of which species of mollusc where effected by the medieval
eutrophication event. Adding to this, there has been no work focusing upon the top 200m of
the sediment sequence. This literature will therefore give a greater insight into the cultural
eutrophication process and provide a basis for further study of the recent eutrophication
event at Quidenham Mere.
4.3. Limitations of study site
The main limitation of the study site is that the site cannot be accurately dated. The
sediments of Quidenham Mere are highly calcareous and are therefore unsuitable for
radiocarbon dating (Peglar, 1993). This is because ‘hard-water’ errors are likely to occur. The
sediments of Quidenham Mere are also unsuitable for accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS)
as not enough material can be extracted. However, this problem can be overcome by
comparing the sediment composition of Quidenham Mere with the sediment composition
of Peglar (1993) (Chapter 5 provides a full explanation for this criterion).
25
Chapter 5: Methodology
5.1. Coring procedure
Members of The University of Leeds Geography Department, following the standard
procedure of Wright (1967), extracted the Quidenham Mere Core. 8.3 m of core was
recovered using a 5 cm diameter Livingstone corer. However, the exact location of the
coring site at Quidenham Mere is unknown.
5.2. Sediment lithology
Valuable information about former climates and environments can be derived from the
nature of Late Quaternary sediments. For example, the biological, chemical and physical
properties of the sediment can provide information on the environment of deposition.
Furthermore, stratigraphic relationships can provide information on depositional changes
through time, while sediment accumulation rates can provide a proxy record of climate
change (Bell and Walker, 2005). A sediment description was therefore performed prior to
sediment sampling to address all three aims of this literature. Lowe and Walker (1997) agree
that sediment lithology is an important topic to investigate.
The sediment lithology of the core was analysed using the system of Troels-Smith (1955).
The Troels-Smith system was chosen, as other systems for describing organic sediments are
genetic in their character (West, 1977; Birks and Birks, 1980). Furthermore, it recognizes
that sediments are frequently mixtures of elements, thus making it a logical and versatile
approach (Birks and Birks, 1980). The sediment lithology of the core was therefore
described on a five-point scale (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, +) by:
1. The physical properties (colour, dryness, stratification etc.)
2. The composition of the core (silt, marl, lake mud etc.)
(Birks and Birks, 1980).
26
5.3. Sediment composition
Gravimetric analysis’ are of considerable importance in palaeolimnology as they are able to
provide an index of the biological productivity in former lake basins, (Lowe and Walker,
1997). The organic matter content and carbonate content of the core was measured to
calculate the age of the core (section 5.4). The organic content was also measured to
determine the timing of eutrophication at Quidenham Mere. By analysing the organic
matter content and carbonate content of the core, aim number one and two will be
addressed.
Loss-on-ignition was performed at 450°C and 950°C to calculate these variables following
the standard procedure of Hesse (1971). A full description of this method is provided in
Appendix 10.1.1. This method was chosen as Boyle (2001) documents that it is simple and
reliable method to perform. Samples were taken every 5 centimetres, to allow an accurate
comparison with Peglar (1993). The temperature of 450°C was chosen as Ball (1964)
documents that this is an appropriate temperature for the oxidation of organic matter.
Furthermore, Jordan, et al., (2002) documents that this is a sufficient temperature for this
aim. The temperature of 950°C was chosen as Heiri, et al., (2001) documents that this is an
appropriate temperature for carbon dioxide to be evolved from carbonate. Furthermore,
Dean (1974) shows a strong correlation between LOI at 950°C and the carbonate content in
lake sediments. A consistency in the LOI method was implemented in relation to the ignition
temperatures, exposure times and sample size, as recommended by Heiri, et al., (2002).
5.4. Chronology
The chronology of the sediments at Quidenham Mere is an important subject to identify,
and a technique that is frequently used in palaeoenvironmental research. It is particularly
important in this study, as it can help explain why Quidenham Mere experienced
eutrophication. For example, it is possible to determine, by knowing when the phenomenon
occurred, whether it was human induced or whether it was a natural occurrence. This
method therefore corresponds with aim number one, but can also add weight to the other
aims of this literature.
27
The sediments at Quidenham Mere are unsuitable for traditional dating methods. However,
Peglar (1993) provides a tentative chronology for the sediments of Quidenham Mere. This
work is based on the literature of Bennett (1983, 1986, 1988) which provides radiocarbon
dates for similar sites close to Quidenham. It is therefore possible, by comparing the organic
and carbonate peaks on the sediment composition diagram of Peglar (1993) and QUID1, to
calculate approximate age boundaries for QUID1. The results of the dating are shown in
section 6.1.
5.5. Geochemistry
Geochemical analysis of lake sediments has been a crucial technique in paleolimnology since
the work of Mackereth (1966). It plays a valuable role in determining a link between
sediment composition and the environment (Boyle, 2001).
A great body of literature has accumulated documenting that the concentration of
potassium and sodium in sediments can be used to indicate eutrophication (Leentvaar,
1980; Livingstone and Boykin, 1962; NAS, 1969). The concentration of potassium and
sodium of the sediment was therefore recorded to address aims one and two. The
concentration of potassium and sodium were measured using flame atomic absorption
spectrometry (FAAS). Boyle (2001) documents that FAAS is an ideal instrument for
measuring alkali metals as it is simple and produces robust results. Electrothermal atomic
absorption spectrometry (EAAS) was not chosen due to the matrix interference effects of
this apparatus (Boyle, 2001).
The pH of the sediment was measured in order to decide an appropriate method for cation
extraction. If the sample had a pH > 5, ammonium acetate would have been used for the
cation extraction (Gillman, 1979). It the sample had a pH < 5, ammonium chloride would
have been used for cation extraction (Narin, et al., 2000). The pH was recorded at 2 cm
intervals throughout the core using the electrometric method. The samples were then
analysed using FAAS to answer aim two. A full description of this method is provided in
Appendix 10.1.2. This is a sufficient method for interfering past nutrient levels and provides
valuable information on past processes (Boyle, 2001).
28
5.6. Magnetic susceptibility
The concentration of magnetic mineral can be reliably recorded by measuring the magnetic
susceptibility of sediments (Nowaczyk, 2001). This technique is an important
palaeoenvironmental indicator and has grown in popularity over the last two decades
(Mackereth, 1966; Bengtsson and Enell, 1986; Nowaczyk, 2001). Variations in the magnetic
properties of sediments have been used to make conclusions about a number of
environmental process including sediment flux and erosion in lake catchments (Dearing, et
al., 1981; Hirons and Thompson, 1986; Lowe and Walker, 1997). This method was therefore
performed to address aim number two.
For this investigation, the ‘whole core logging technique’ was used, as the recovery rate
from the coring procedure was very good. A MS2C sensor was used, as Dearing (1999)
documents that it is the appropriate apparatus for this study (Figure 6). Furthermore, this
method is a non-destructive technique and simple to perform. The first step of the
procedure was to measure the calibration sample provided by the manufacturer. The
calibration sample is a ferromagnetic material with a high magnetic susceptibility and can
confirm the long-term calibration of the MS2C meter (Dearing, 1999). The susceptibility
meter was subsequently correlated to zero against the magnetic background (Nowaczyk,
2001). Following this step, the whole core was placed into the loop sensor and recordings
were taken every 2 cm. This stratified sampling technique was designed in order to produce
a large and robust data set.
Figure 6. Diagram of the Bartington
system designed to measure the magnetic
susceptibility of sediments (Nowaczyk,
2001). The loop sensor should be a similar
size to the core in order to produce
accurate results.
29
5.7. Mollusc Analysis
Mollusc shells are one of the most common fossil remains in terrestrial Quaternary
sediments and are therefore useful palaeoenvironmental indicators (Lowe and Walker,
1997). An analysis of the mollusc shells was undertaken in order to address aim number
three. The interval and thickness of each sample depends on a variety of factors including
the concentration of molluscs in the sediment and the frequency of the sampling method.
Due to the variation in concentration of molluscs throughout the core, there are no
documented guidelines for the weight or volume of sediment required. A pilot study was
therefore performed to produce a species acquisition curve (Henderson, 1990). A small
subsample of sediment was taken and the number of species present was recorded. The
sample size was then increased in small additions until the plot for number of species
reached asymptote (Griffiths and Holmes, 2000). It is then possible to estimate the mass of
sediment required to achieve full species representation. The results of this investigation
are shown in figure 7.
Figure 7: A mollusc acquisition curve for the QUID1 core. In order to produce an accurate
acquisition curve, 10 samples were taken from the core at each weight, and the average was
recorded. The plot reaches asymptote at 12 individuals per sample weight. It is therefore
clear that a sample of 20 g should be extracted to achieve a full species representation.
30
The molluscan remains were extracted under laboratory conditions following the standard
procedure of De Deckker and Forester (1982). Ložek (1986) and Griffiths (1995) have proved
this method successful. Furthermore, Sparks (1964) documents the high level of accuracy of
this method. Sediment samples were taken every ten centimetres along the core to provide
an extensive data set. All samples were taken from the middle of the core where
disturbance is minimal. Furthermore, the surface of the sediment was carefully removed in
order to avoid contamination (Birks and Birks, 2004). The identification of the molluscan
remains was based on the work of Macan (1977) and Kerney (1999). A full description of this
method is provided in Appendix 10.1.3/
5.8. Statistics
Statistical analyses were performed upon the data, using Minitab 1.6, to prove that the
conclusions of this literature are statistically significant. Anderson-Darling normality tests
were initially performed to determine if the data sets are normally distributed (Dytham,
2011). Following this, Spearman’s rho tests were performed as the data sets, as indicated by
the Anderson-Darling tests, were not normally distributed (section 6.4). Furthermore, the
control variables and the response variables are continuous variables.
In order to address aim one, a Spearman’s rho test was performed using the potassium and
sodium data. In order to address aim two, a Spearman’s rho test was performed using the
silica and magnetic susceptibility data. This was undertaken to determine if the magnetic
susceptibility results can be used to indicate periods of soil erosion, or if the results are
controlled by the input of silica. To address the third aim of this literature, a Spearman’s rho
test was performed upon the mollusc data and the organic, potassium and sodium data. The
aim of this test was to identify if the population of molluscs at Quidenham Mere changed in
response to the episodes of cultural eutrophication.
Quantitative zonation was also performed upon the mollusc data to prove that there is a
significant statistical difference between groups of molluscs. The quantitative zonation was
performed using Psimpoll software and the optimal splitting by information content’ option
was chosen. This is method was chosen because it is robust and reliable (Lawson, 2011).
31
5.9. Limitations of methods
Several limitations regarding the Troels-Smith method, the mollusc extraction and
identification and the magnetic susceptibility method have been identified. The Troels-
Smith sediment description system can sometimes be problematic for the reason that it
relies on descriptive results (Birks and Birks, 1980). The method can therefore lead to
different interpretation by different researchers. However, if the process if followed
accurately, differing results can be kept minimal.
The mollusc extraction method can prove to be difficult due to the use of hydrogen
peroxide. Even though hydrogen peroxide is frequently used for non-marine Mollusca
analysis, several pieces of literature argue that hydrogen peroxide can destroy fragile shells
(Sohn, 1961; Hodgkinson, 1991; Slipper, 1996). Extreme care was therefore taken to ensure
that the mollusc shells were not damaged.
Additionally, the identification of molluscs can be complicated. For example, many mollusc
species vary in their morphology and markings from juvenile to adult stage and their
colouring and fine sculpture due to local environmental conditions (Lowe and Walker, 1997)
Furthermore, fossil remains can be damaged during sediment compaction or by the washing
down of the sediment (Sparks, 1964). Large bivalves for example, are rarely recovered in an
identifiable condition from compacted sediment as they shatter easily (Sparks, 1964). An
additional point to note is the over representation of Bithynia sp. This is because this genus
is more readily preserved in comparison to other genuses due to its think operculum (Figure
2) (Sparks, 1964).
The magnetic susceptibility method can also be difficult to perform accurately. This is
because the sensors are affected by electromagnetic fields, the presence of magnetic
materials and changes in temperature (Dearing, 1999). In order to produce accurate results,
the system of Dearing (1999) was followed precisely.
32
5.10. Ethical Issues
Environmental issues and health and safety issues have been acknowledged in the design of
the methods for this study (Appendix 10.6). For example, laboratory wastes were placed in
waste bags for incineration and all sharp instruments were placed in sharp bins after use.
Furthermore, the findings of the literature are not harmful to others and cannot be used in
a negative way. The findings shall instead add to the literature of paleoenvironments in
Norfolk during the Holocene epoch.
5.11. Summary
The methods have also been designed to address the aims and objectives of this literature.
For example, sections 5.3 – 5.5 have been designed to address aim number one, section 5.6
to address aim number two and section 5.7 to address aim number three. Section 5.2 and
the statistical analysis have been designed, however, to address the three aims of the
literature.
33
Chapter 6: Results
6.1. Sediment Lithology
The sediment lithology of the core has been determined to explain the three aims of this
literature. The results of this analysis are displayed in Figure 8 and 9, and further described
in Appendix 10.2.2. The bottom of core QUID1 is composed largely of calcium carbonate.
Particulate testarum molluscorum become present at 802 cm and remains throughout the
core. The calcareous marl varies in stratification from values 1 – 3 and undergoes a rapid
transition into peat at 360 cm, which remains until 125 cm. The base of the peat is very dark
brown/black and is composed of Sphagnum leaves. In the middle part of this section, the
peat becomes lighter, coarser and contains fragments of herbaceous plants and wood
segments such as Betula. The peat continues becoming lighter above this section and
herbaceous plants and wood segments dominate. The peat then gradually changes to a dark
brown herbaceous peat at approximately 161 cm.
Aim 1: Approximately, when did cultural eutrophication happen at Quidenham Mere?
6.2. Sediment composition
There is a similarity between the trends of the organic and carbonate content throughout
the two cores, however the major features occur at different depths. For example, the
organic content of the QUID1 core first peaks at 770 cm to approximately 34%, while the
organic content of Peglar’s (1993) core peaks at 790cm to approximately 38%. Furthermore,
the carbonate content of the QUID1 core declines to 680 cm, while Peglar (1993) shows that
it declines to 720 cm. Peglar (1993) also shows a slight decline in the organic content at 510
cm, followed by a rise in the carbonate content. This study also found this trend, however
the organic content of QUID1 declines at 420 cm. It is therefore clear that QUID1 differs to
Peglar’s (1993) sediment composition by 40-90 cm.
34
Key to lithology
Figure 8. A comparison between Peglar’s (1993) sediment composition diagram (434 – 1240
cm) and the QUID1 sediment composition diagram (125-830 cm). The key follows the
classification system of Troels-Smith (1955). The coloured lines indicate where the organic
and carbonate component correspond. Red indicates a comparison between the organic
variables and blue indicates a comparison between the carbonate variables. The silica
content is the first variable on the x-axis to allow a clear comparison between the organic
and carbonate variables.
35
Figure 9. Sediment lithology, sediment composition and tentative chronology at
Quidenham Mere. See Key from figure 8 for the sediment lithology.
36
6.3. Geochemical analysis
Figure 10. Geochemical analysis of Quidenham Mere, focusing upon the concentrations
of potassium and sodium.
Two peaks are prominent in the concentration of both potassium and sodium. From the
base of QUID1, the concentration of potassium is approximately 17 mg/kg. The
concentration of potassium peaks at 745 cm (approximately 80 mg/kg) before gradually
decline to approximately 15 mg/kg. This variable then fluctuates greatly between 3 and
21 mg/kg, before rapidly rising to approximately 160 mg/kg. Following a rapid decline in
the concentration of potassium, a peak is prominent at 345 cm (approximately 160
mg/kg). The concentration of potassium then quickly declines and fluctuates between 10
and 20 mg/kg between 325 cm – 125 cm.
The concentration of sodium throughout QUID1 is greater than that of potassium, yet
follows a similar pattern. From the base of QUID1, the concentration of sodium is
approximately 131 mg/kg until it gradually peaks at 765 cm to approximately 200 mg/kg.
This variable then rapidly declines and fluctuates greatly between 50 mg/kg and 140
mg/kg until 455 cm. At 455 cm, the concentration of sodium sharply rises to 310 mg/kg,
before declining rapidly to 150 mg/kg. This is followed by another rapid increase at 395
cm to 342 mg/kg. Following this rise, the concentration of sodium rapidly declines and
greatly fluctuates between 60 and 133 mg/kg throughout the rest of the core.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
12
5
15
5
18
5
21
5
24
5
27
5
30
5
33
5
36
5
39
5
42
5
45
5
48
5
51
5
54
5
57
5
60
5
63
5
66
5
69
5
72
5
75
5
78
5
81
5
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n (
mg/
kg)
Depth (cm)
Distribution in depth of the concentration of sodium and potassium in the sediments of Quidenham Mere.
Potassium
Sodium
37
6.4. Non-parametric analysis (1)
Table 1. A summary of statistical analysis performed to address aim number one. For the
Anderson-darling test, the data is normally distributed if p > 0.05. For the Spearman’s
rho test, the two variables are statistically correlated, to a 95% confidence level, if p <
0.05
The result of the Spearman’s rho test for the sodium and potassium variable shows that
p = 0.758. 0.758 > 0.05, indicating that there is no statistical significant correlation
between these two variables. Ho number one is therefore accepted. This finding was
expected as an increase in the concentration of sodium indicates the onset of the
eutrophication process, while an increase in the concentration of potassium indicates
the onset of the restoration process. The concentration of sodium and potassium can
therefore be used to identify eutrophication at Quidenham Mere.
38
Aim 2: Why did the eutrophication events at Quidenham Mere occur?
6.5. Magnetic susceptibility
Figure 11. The magnetic susceptible elements in the sediments of Quidenham Mere.
The magnetic susceptibility results are displayed in Figure 11. The results reveal a
general increase in magnetic susceptible elements from 830 cm to zero cm. Figure 11
also shows that the core is rich in diamagnetic substances due to the negative values on
the y-axis (Dearing, 1999). One of the diamagnetic substances in the core may be
carbonate. A reason for this suggestion is that the sediment analysis (Figure 8) shows
that QUID1, especially in the lower parts, is highly composed of carbonate. However,
water may also be present in the core, leading to the negative values. On closer
analysis, the results reveal a relatively steady input of magnetic susceptible elements
from 830 cm to 690 cm, with minor fluctuations. Following this, the rate of input rapidly
increases between 690 and 530 cm. The input of magnetic susceptible elements then
becomes relatively steady, with minor fluctuations, between 530 cm and 0 cm.
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
12
5
15
1
17
7
20
3
22
9
25
5
28
1
30
7
33
3
35
9
38
5
41
1
43
7
46
3
48
9
51
5
54
1
56
7
59
3
61
9
64
5
67
1
69
7
72
3
74
9
77
5
80
1
82
7
Mag
ne
tic
susc
ep
tib
ility
Depth (cm)
Distribution in depth of the magnetic susceptibleelements at Quidenham Mere.
39
6.6. Non-parametric analysis (2)
A Spearman’s rho test was performed using the silica and magnetic susceptibility data.
The test shows that r = 0.356, which indicates a weak positive correlation between the
two variables. The results also reveal that p = 0.002. 0.002 < 0.05, which indicates that
there is a statistical significant correlation to a 95% confidence level. H1 number two is
therefore accepted.
Aim 3: To examine the abundance of molluscs at Quidenham mere, in order to
determine how the molluscs responded to cultural eutrophication.
6.7. Mollusc Analysis
At least five species of molluscs are present in the sediment of Quidenham Mere since
the medieval period. These are Bithynia tentaculata, Gyraulus laevis, Lymnaea peregra,
Valvata macrostoma and Valvata piscinalis (Figure 12 - 17). Other genuses were
identified in the sediment, but could not be identified to species level due to damage of
the shell. These are Lymnaeidae sp., Gyraulus sp. and Pisidium sp.
Figure 12. Bithynia tentaculata: Belonging to the
gastropod class, this is a common prosobranch
found in slow-moving, well-oxygenated lakes
(Kerney, 1999). It can survive well in lakes with
high concentrations of calcium and potassium
(Jokinen, 1992).
40
Figure 13. Gyraulus laevis: Belonging to the
gastropod class, these pulmonates are
extremely common in clean, quite water
(Alder, 1838; Kerney, 1999).
Figure 14. Lymnaea peregra: Belonging to
the gastropod class, these pulmonates are
found in a variety of environments, such as
rivers, canals and ephemeral ponds (Kerney,
1999). There is controversy, however, as to
whether these snails can survive in
eutrophic conditions.
Figure 15. Valvata macrostoma: Belonging
to the gastropod class, these prosobranchs
are found in slow moving, well-vegetated,
calcium rich waters (Kerney, 1999). They
are, however, extremely rare in The British
Isles.
41
Figure 16. Valvata piscinalis: Belonging to the
gastropod class, this is a common prosobranch
found in muddy or silty substrates (Kerney,
(1999). Furthermore, this snail is tolerant of
oligotrophic zones and varying carbonate
concentrations (Fretter and Graham, 1978;
Grigorovich, et al., 2005).
Figure 17. Pisidium sp.: Belonging to the
bivalve class, this species is found in a variety
of environments (Kerney, 1999). The diagram
shows a generalized Pisidium species.
The preferred way of displaying mollusc data is by calculating influx rates, using the
following formula: ia = ca/d where ia = influx rate, ca = concentration of molluscs and d =
sediment deposition rate. However, because the sediment deposition rate for
Quidenham Mere is unknown, concentration values have been reported. Proportion
data has not been included in this literature, as this data is affected by the total sum.
Proportion data does not therefore accurately represent the sample.
42
6.8. Quantitative Zonation
Quantitative zonation shows that the mollusc concentration data can be divided into
four statistical significant zones for the mollusc concentration data (Figure 18). These are
from the base upwards:
Zone Q-1: Zone Q-1 is characterised by a low abundance of molluscs. Only Gyraulus sp.
and Pisidium sp. are present in this zone.
Zone Q-2: Bithynia tentaculata is the prominent mollusc species in zone Q-2. The
concentration of Bithynia tentaculata at the base of zone Q-2 is relatively high.
Throughout the zone, the concentration of this mollusc increases, before declining
towards the boundary of zone Q-3. The concentration of Gyraulus laevis, Valvata
macrostoma and Valvata piscinalis increases throughout the zone, while the
concentration of Pisidium sp. remains relatively constant. Lymnaea peregra and
Gyraulus sp. however are relatively scarce within this zone.
Zone Q-3: At the base of the zone, the concentration of molluscs in the sediment is
relatively high. Bithynia tentaculata, Valvata piscinalis, Valvata macrostoma, Lymnaea
peregra, Lymnaea sp. and Gyraulus laevis remain high until 745 cm before declining.
Following this decline, the concentrations of these species remains roughly constant,
with minor fluctuations, throughout the rest of the core. It is important to note that
Gyraulus laevis is not present in every sample throughout zone Q-3. The concentration
of Gyraulus sp. shows a general decline until 635 cm, where the concentration of this
variable is zero. Following this decline, this variable fluctuates around 0.2 individuals per
gram for the rest of the zone. The concentration of Pisidium sp., however, far exceeds
the concentrations of the other molluscs in this zone. Pisidium sp. fluctuates around 0.3
individuals per gram throughout this zone, showing no clear trend.
43
Zone Q-4: Until 395 cm, the concentration of molluscs in the sediment is relatively
steady. At 395 cm, the concentration rapidly increases until a depth of 320 cm. Lymnaea
peregra and Lymnaea sp. show the largest increase, while Pisidium sp. shows the
smallest increase. The concentration of Bithynia tentaculata, Gyraulus sp., Valvata
piscinalis and Lymnaea sp. fluctuates around 0.2 individuals per gram throughout the
rest of the core. Lymnaea peregra, Valvata macrostoma and Pisidium sp. however,
remain relatively constant until 205 cm where the concentrations increase. Following
this rise, the concentrations of these species remains steady, with minor fluctuations
until the top of the core. After the rise in the concentration of Gyraulus laevis between
390 and 320 cm, the concentration of this species remains approximately 0.2 individuals
per gram until the upper boundary of Zone Q-4. This species, however, is absent from
the sample of 275 cm.
44
Figure 18. The concentrations of the molluscs at Quidenham Mere, divided by
quantitative zonation. The graph shows that the concentrations of the molluscs increase
between the first (800 – 685) and second (455 -325) episode of cultural eutrophication.
6.9. Non-parametric analysis (3)
The results of the Spearman’s rho test show that there is a significant mild positive
correlation between the number of molluscs in the sediment and the organic matter
content. H1 number three is therefore accepted. When analysing the individual species
however, H1 number three is accepted for all species bar Gyraulus laevis and Lymnaea
peregra. The results of the Spearman’s rho test show that there is a significant weak
positive correlation between the number of molluscs in the sediment and the
concentration of potassium. H1 number four is therefore accepted. When analysing the
individual species however, H1 number four is accepted for all species bar Gyraulus laevis
and Lymnaea peregra. The results of the Spearman’s rho test show that there is not a
45
significant correlation between the number of molluscs in the sediment and the
concentration of sodium. Ho number five is therefore accepted. The results also reveal
that that there is no correlation between the number of the individual species of mollusc
in the sediment and the concentration of sodium. Ho number five is therefore accepted
for all species.
6.10. Summary
The results have been discussed in way to support the aims of the literature and the
structure of this section has been designed to reflect this. For example, sections 6.2 – 6.3
have been designed to address aim number one, sections 6.4 - 6.6 have been designed
to address aim number two and sections 6.7 – 6.9 have been designed to address aim
number three. The objectives of this literature have also been achieved by the
documented results.
.
46
Variable Bithynia
tentaculata
Gyraulus laevis
Gyraulus sp.
Lymnaea peregra
Lymnaea sp.
Valvata piscinalis
Valvata macrostoma
Pisidium sp.
Total
Anderson-
darling
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
Organic
matter
content
Mild positive
correlation (R
= 0.507, P =
0.000)
Not correlated (P
= 0325)
Mild positive
correlation (R
= 0.478, P =
0.000)
Not correlated (P
= 0.473
Mild positive
correlation (R
= 0.432, P =
0.000)
Mild positive
correlation (R
= 0.417, P =
0.000)
Mild positive
correlation (R =
0.490, P = 0.000)
Weak
positive
correlation
(R =0.315, P
= 0.007)
Mild positive
correlation (R
= 0.487, P=
0.000)
Potassium Mild positive
correlation (R
= 0.447, P =
0.000)
Not correlated (P = 0.119)
Weak positive
correlation (R
= 0.315, P =
0.008)
Not correlated
(P = 0.499)
Weak positive
correlation (R
= 0.292, P =
0.014)
Weak positive
correlation (R
= 0.281, P =
0.018)
Mild positive
correlation (R =
0.538, P = 0.000)
Mild
correlated (R
= 0.479, P =
0.000)
Weak positive
correlated (R
= 0.343, P =
0.003)
Sodium Not correlated
(P = 0.338)
Not correlated (P
= 0.619)
Not correlated
(P = 0.836)
Not correlated (P
= 0.415)
Not correlated
(P = 0.450)
Not correlated
(P = 0.219)
Not correlated (P
= 0.805)
Not
correlated (P
= 0.840)
Not correlated
(P = 0.825)
Table 2. A summary of the statistical analyses performed on the mollusc data and environmental data. For the Anderson-darling test, the data is normally distributed if p > 0.05. For the Spearman’s rho test, the two variables are statistically correlated if p < 0.05.
47
Chapter 7: Discussion
7.1. When did the eutrophication events happen at Quidenham Mere?
The results reveal that two episodes of eutrophication occurred at Quidenham Mere since
the medieval period. The first episode of eutrophication occurred at approximately 800 –
685 cm (medieval/ post-medieval period). This idea coincides with the work of Cheng, et al.,
(2007) who also documented this event. The second episode of eutrophication occurred at
approximately 455 – 325 cm (the last 200 years). No previous literature has focused upon
the 450 – 0 cm section of the profile before, therefore the latter is a new finding.
7.1.1. The onset of the eutrophication process
There is evidence to suggest that the onset of eutrophication at Quidenham Mere occurred
at 800 cm and at 455 cm. The reason for this statement is that the concentration of sodium
increases at these depths. Sharp (1969), Provasoli (1971), Baybutt and Makarewicz (1981)
and Makarewicz and McKellar (1985) support this idea. Furthermore, the organic matter
content increases after the increased concentration of sodium (Figure 8). These depths have
therefore been used as the onset of cultural eutrophication at Quidenham Mere in this
literature. Ongley (2006), Ortega, et al., (2006) and Rabalais (2010) support this idea.
7.1.2. The onset of the restoration process
There is evidence to suggest that the onset of the restoration process at Quidenham Mere
occurred at 685 cm and at 325 cm. The reason for this statement is that the concentration
of potassium declines at these depths. Leentvaar (1980), who documents that the
concentration of potassium can be used as a proxy of eutrophication, supports this idea.
Emerson and Lewis (1942), Allen (1952), Kratz and Myers (1955) and Wist, et al., (2009),
who document that an increased concentration of potassium indicates a change of trophic
levels, supports this idea. Furthermore, the organic matter content is low after the
decreased concentration of potassium (Figure 8). These depths have therefore been used as
48
the onset of cultural eutrophication at Quidenham Mere in this literature. Ongley (2006),
Ortega, et al., (2006) and Rabalais (2010) support this idea.
7.1.3. Summary
Previous paleolimnological studies document that the organic matter content, the
concentration of potassium and the concentration of sodium can be used to identify
eutrophication. This study agrees this knowledge. This is because there is not a significant
statistical correlation between the potassium concentration and the sodium concentration.
Furthermore, the organic matter content increases following a rise in the concentration of
sodium. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that cultural eutrophication
occurred between 800 – 685 cm (medieval/post-medieval) and between 455 – 325 cm (the
last two hundred year). These depths and dates have therefore been used throughout the
rest of the study.
49
7.2. Possible causes of cultural eutrophication at Quidenham Mere
Both episodes of eutrophication will be discussed to gain a fuller understanding of the
impacts of anthropogenic activities at Quidenham Mere.
7.2.1. Possible causes of the medieval/ post-medieval eutrophication event
Cheng, et al., (2007) documents that hemp retting caused Quidenham Mere to become
eutrophic during the medieval/ post-medieval (M/P-M) period. This relationship occurs
because the process of hemp retting causes the organic matter content and nutrient
concentration of the lake to increase. This is because hemp retting involves depositing
bundles of mature Cannabis sativa stems (a member of the Cannabaceae family) into a lake.
Microorganisms in the lake then consume the cellular tissue of the hemp, and the fibre of
the stem becomes available to make sails, ropes, clothes and fishing nets. The results of this
study provide evidence to support this idea. A similar view of Cheng, et al., (2007) is shared
by Yang (2010) who documents that hemp retting caused Quidenham Mere to become
contaminated. Furthermore, Peglar (1993) reports that the percentage of Cannabaceae
increased during the M/P-M period, thus suggesting hemp retting (Figure 19). Cox, et al.,
(2001) who reveal that the process of hemp retting significant effects the local environment,
also advances this suggestion.
Figure 19. Peglar’s (1993) pollen stratigraphy of Quidenham Mere. There is a rapid increase
in Cannabaceae during the medieval period (QM–9b). After a gentle decline of Cannabaceae
at the end of subzone QM-9b, Cannabaceae increases rapidly to a maximum of 94% during
the post-medieval (QM-9c).
50
There is also evidence, however, to suggest that forest clearance may be a possible
explanation for the M/P-M eutrophication event. This relationship occurs as forest
clearance increases the total surface area of bare soil. The rate of erosion therefore
increases, as there is no vegetation to anchor the soil. It is then possible that a weathering
pulse would release chemical ions, such as sodium and potassium, from the sediment into
the lake, thus causing eutrophication (Figure 20) (Palmer, 2011). The geochemical data
shows that the concentration of potassium and sodium in the sediment increases between
800 - 685 cm, thus supporting the idea. Mackereth (1966), who documents that an
increased concentration of potassium and sodium in the geochemical record is an indication
of intense erosion, supports this idea. This view is also supported by Engstrom and Wight
(1984), Brubaker and Anderson (1993) and Foster and Lees (1999) who record that the
geochemistry of lake sediments can be used to deduce the stability of the surrounding area.
Furthermore, Boyle (2001) strongly argues that mineral enrichment, and thus the
concentration of sodium and potassium, is a fundamental indicator of soil erosion. The
magnetic susceptibility data, however, cannot be used to support this idea. This is because
there is a positive correlation between the concentration of magnetically susceptible
elements and the concentration of silica in the sediment. The magnetically susceptible
elements in the sediment do not therefore increase with soil erosion.
Figure 20. A proposed explanation of the medieval/post-medieval eutrophication event at
Quidenham Mere.
51
7.2.2. Possible causes of the second eutrophication event
There is evidence to suggest that anthropogenic activities are the cause of the second
eutrophication event at Quidenham Mere. This paper suggests that vegetation burning, due
to the development of Quidenham Mere, is a possible cause of this event. Peglar (1993),
who documents the high concentration of charcoal in the sediment at this time, supports
this idea. There are two reasons why this relationship exists. The first reason is that the
burning of vegetation would have caused an excessive input of nutrients to enter the Mere
(Figure 21). This idea coincides with Perrow (2002) who reveals that following vegetation
burning, a high proportion of the deposited nutrients are leached from the soil. Chapman
(1989), who documents that phosphorus is leached from the soil after vegetation burning,
advances this idea. Furthermore, Kenworthy (1964) reveals that potassium is rapidly
leached from the soil after burning. It is therefore possible that the excessive input of
nutrients into the Mere, due to vegetation burning, would have resulted in the second
eutrophication event at Quidenham Mere. The second reason to explain this relationship is
that the burning of vegetation would have caused an increased rate of soil erosion and thus
eutrophication (section 7.2.1) (Holden, 2008). The geochemical analysis supports this idea.
Figure 21. A proposed explanation of the most recent eutrophication event at Quidenham
Mere.
52
7.2.3. Summary
There is sufficient evidence to suggest that anthropogenic activities were the cause of both
eutrophication events at Quidenham Mere. A possible cause of the first eutrophication
event was hemp retting and/or forest clearance. A possible cause of the second
eutrophication event was vegetation burning. Anthropogenic activates are therefore a
legitimate explanation.
7.3. The effect of cultural eutrophication at Quidenham Mere upon the Mollusca phylum.
The concentration of molluscs in the sediment at Quidenham Mere is lowest in zone Q-1,
where only Gyraulus sp. and Pisidium sp. are present. A reason for this outcome is that this
zone, as documented in the work of Cheng, et al., (2007), resembles oligotrophic conditions.
The greatest concentration change of molluscs in the sediment occurred in zones Q-3 and
Q-4. A possible reason for this outcome is anthropogenic activities. The statistical testing
supports this idea as it shows that there is a mild positive correlation, to a 95% confidence
level, between the abundance of molluscs in the sediment and organic matter content.
Statistical testing however showed that there is a weak correlation, to a 95% confidence
level, between the abundance of molluscs in the sediment and the concentration of
potassium. This therefore suggests that the organic matter content had the greatest effect
upon the mollusc population out of these two variables. Statistical testing also showed that
there is no correlation between the population of molluscs in the sediment and the
concentration of sodium. This therefore suggests that the onset of the eutrophication
process did not affect the abundance of molluscs at Quidenham Mere. The species of
molluscs found at this location shall therefore be discussed to gain a fuller understanding of
the impacts of cultural eutrophication.
53
7.3.1. Bithynia tentaculata
Evidence suggests that the population of Bithynia tentaculata was affected by changes in
the organic matter content and the concentration of potassium in the sediment. Figure 18
shows that the population of Bithynia tentaculata initially increased during both episodes of
eutrophication at Quidenham Mere, but decreased towards the restoration process of the
Mere. The statistical analysis confirms this. The results therefore imply that the abundance
of this mollusc was altered by the episodes of cultural eutrophication at Quidenham Mere. A
possible explanation for the increased population of this mollusc is their ability to filter feed
in eutrophic waters (Brendelberger and Jiirgens, 1993). Legitimate reasons for the
decreased population of Bithynia tentaculata, however, include:
(i) Bithynia tentaculata are gill breathing and can only survive in well-oxygenated water
(Kerney, 1999; Dillon Jr., 2000),
(iI) Bithynia tentaculata are not able to migrate from their microhabitat after rapid
environmental change,
(iii) Bithynia tentaculata are intolerant to the toxic by-products of hemp retting, such as
hydrogen sulphide (Cheng, et al., 2007).
Cheng, et al., (2007) came to a similar outcome during their work on Bithynia tentaculata at
Quidenham Mere. Dussart (1979), who found a positive relationship between the
abundance of Bithynia tentaculata and the concentration of potassium, also came to a
similar conclusion. Furthermore, these results are in agreement with Ritcher (2001) who
documents an increased depth rate among the Bithynia tentaculata population following a
reduction in the concentration of dissolved oxygen (DO).
7.3.2. Gyraulus
Gyraulus laevis and Gyraulus sp. are discussed to identify the effects of cultural
eutrophication. Evidence suggests that the population of Gyraulus laevis was not affected by
changes in the organic matter content and the concentration of potassium in the sediment.
The statistical analysis confirms this. In other words, the abundance of mollusc was not
significantly altered by episodes of cultural eutrophication at Quidenham Mere. This finding,
54
however, contradicts Arter (1989), Nakamura and Kerciku (2000), Carlsson (2001), Salanki,
et al., (2003,) Jou and Liao (2006) and Timm, et al., (2006) which document that mollusc can
be used as an indicator of eutrophic conditions. This finding also contradicts Dussart (1979)
who found a negative correlation between this variable and the concentration of potassium
and a positive correlation between this variable and the concentration of sodium.
There is also evidence to suggest that the population of Gyraulus sp. was affected by
changes in the organic matter content and the concentration of potassium in the sediment.
Figure 18 shows that the population of Gyraulus sp. initially increased during both episodes
of eutrophication at Quidenham Mere, but decreased towards the restoration process of
the Mere. The statistical analysis confirms this. The results therefore imply that the
abundance of this mollusc was altered by the episodes of cultural eutrophication at
Quidenham Mere. A possible explanation for the increased population of this mollusc is that
they are tolerant to slight eutrophic conditions (Lsyne and Clark, 2009). A legitimate reason
for the decreased population of Gyraulus sp., however, is that they cannot survive in
oxygen-depleted waters (Alder, 1838). Furthermore, these molluscs are intolerant to
hydrogen sulphide (Caldwell, 1975).
7.3.3. Lymnaea
Lymnaea peregra and Lymnaea sp. are discussed to identify the effects of cultural
eutrophication. In recent years, a dispute has arisen as to whether this species can be used
as an indicator of eutrophication. The results from this study shall therefore advance our
knowledge in this field.
Evidence suggests that the population of Lymnaea peregra was not affected by changes in
the organic matter content or the concentration of potassium and sodium. The abundance
of this mollusc was therefore not significantly altered by the episodes of cultural
eutrophication at Quidenham Mere. This finding coincides with Fitter and Manuel (1986)
who document that this species of mollusc are able to survive in a wide variety of
freshwater habitats. This finding, however, contradicts Dussart (1979) who found a positive
55
correlation between the population of Lymnaea peregra and the concentration of
potassium. Dussart (1979) also found a negative correlation between this variable and the
concentration of sodium. This finding therefore challenges existing literature.
There is evidence however to suggests that the population of Lymnaea sp. was affected by
changes in the organic matter content and the concentration of potassium in the sediment.
Figure 18 reveals that the population of Lymnaea sp. initially increased during both episodes
of eutrophication at Quidenham Mere, but decreased towards the restoration process of
the mere. The statistical analysis confirms this. It is therefore likely that the abundance of
this mollusc was altered by the episodes of cultural eutrophication at Quidenham Mere. A
possible explanation for the increased population of this mollusc is that they are able to
survive in oxygen-depleted waters. This is because they are able to hang from the surface of
the water and take in oxygen through its pneumostome (Figure 22 and 23) (Clifford, 1991).
Furthermore, the snail is able to undergo phonological plasticity in order to responds to
periods of low DO (Lodge and Kelly, 1985). A possible explanation for the decreased
population of this mollusc is that they are intolerant to hydrogen sulphide (Calderwell,
1975). Dussart (1979) came to a similar outcome when studying this snail in North West
England.
Figure 22. Diagram of a Lymnaea snail
with the main features labelled.
56
Figure 23. In order to survive in periods
of low DO, the snail hangs suspended
from the upper surface of the water by
its foot. The snail subsequently takes in
oxygen by opening its pneumostome
(Clifford, 1991).
7.3.4. Valvata
Valvata piscinalis and Valvata macrostoma are discussed to identify the effects of cultural
eutrophication. These molluscs have been discussed under the title Valvata, as the results of
the statistical analysis are the same for both species.
Evidence suggests that the population of Valvata was affected by changes in the organic
matter content and the concentration of potassium. Figure 18 shows that the population of
Valvata initially increased during both episodes of eutrophication at Quidenham Mere, but
decreased towards the restoration process of the Mere. The statistical analysis confirms this
(Table 2). It is therefore likely that the abundance of this mollusc was altered by the
episodes of cultural eutrophication at Quidenham Mere. A possible explanation for the
increased population of this mollusc is that the snail is able to survive periods of
eutrophication due to behavioural and physiological plasticity (Lodge and Kelly, 1985).
Furthermore, these molluscs are effective competitors in eutrophic waters, as they can feed
on suspended particles (Grigorovich, et al., 2005). A key explanation for the decreased
population of this mollusc is that it is intolerant to hydrogen sulphide (Calderwell, 1975).
Foot
57
7.3.5. Pisidium
Evidence suggests that the population of Pisidium sp. was affected by changes in the organic
matter content and the concentration of potassium. Figure 18 shows that the population of
Pisidium sp. initially increased during both episodes of eutrophication at Quidenham Mere,
but decreased towards the restoration process of the mere. The statistical analysis confirms
this (Table 2). It is therefore likely that the abundance of this mollusc was altered by the
episodes of cultural eutrophication at Quidenham Mere.
7.3.6. Summary
There is sufficient evidence to suggest that anthropogenic activities at Quidenham Mere
initially caused the population of Bithynia tentaculata, Gyraulus sp, Lymnaea sp., Valvata
piscinalis, Valvata macrostoma and Pisidium sp. to increase. This finding coincides with
Cheng, et al., (2007) who found that an increased concentration of nutrients at Quidenham
Mere caused the population of molluscs to enlarge. There is also evidence to suggest that
the eutrophication process caused the population of these molluscs to decline. A wide range
of literature supports this finding.
58
Chapter 8: Conclusion
8.1. Summary of main findings
The information presented in this paper represents a substantial increase in the range and
quality of data from Quidenham Mere. A new geochemical record provides the
environmental history of Quidenham Mere since the medieval period. This geochemical
record suggests the occurrence of two episodes of cultural eutrophication at Quidenham
since the medieval period. This challenges previous literature, as only one episode of
cultural eutrophication has been recorded at Quidenham Mere. This is therefore a
significant new finding.
The first episode of eutrophication occurred at approximately 800 – 685 cm (medieval/post-
medieval period). Reasons for this outcome include the use of Quidenham Mere as a hemp-
retting pit. Hemp retting would have released a great quantity of nutrients and organic
matter into the Mere, thus causing eutrophication (Cox, et al., 2001; Cheng, et al., 2007).
An additional reason is the clearance of Quercus and Corylus avellana, which would have
resulted in an increased rate of soil erosion into the Mere. The increased input of nutrients
into the Mere, due to soil erosion, may have then promoted eutrophication. This idea
coincides with Peglar (1993) and the geochemical data.
The second episode of eutrophication occurred at approximately 455 – 325 cm (the last 200
years). A reason for this outcome is the burning of vegetation due to the development of
Quidenham Mere Parkland. This idea coincides with the work of Peglar (1993). An increased
rate of soil erosion, due to the clearance of vegetation, may have caused the eutrophication
process. The burning of vegetation may have also caused the leaching of an excessive
quantity of nutrients into the Mere, thus causing eutrophication.
This investigation also provides an accurate mollusc record of Quidenham Mere since the
medieval period. The data shows that Bithynia tentaculata, Gyraulus sp., Valvata piscinalis,
Valvata macrostoma, and Pisidium sp. were affected by anthropogenic activities at
Quidenham Mere. Changes in the percentage of organic matter content caused the greatest
change to the abundance of molluscs. The ending period of the eutrophication process, as
indicated by increased potassium levels, caused the next greatest change to the population
59
of these molluscs. The beginning period of the eutrophication process, as indicated by
increased sodium levels, did not cause a significant change to the population of molluscs.
8.2. The aims of the literature
Overall, the three aims of this literature have been fulfilled to the highest ability possible.
The objectives of this literature have also been fully achieved. Episodes of cultural
eutrophication have been identified by the analysis of the organic matter content, the
potassium concentration and the sodium concentration. Statistical testing also provided
further confirmation. The dating of the eutrophication process, however, requires further
investigation. The first reason for this outcome is that the sediments of Quidenham Mere
cannot be accurately dated. Comparing the sediment composition of Quidenham Mere
with the sediment composition of Peglar (1993) only provided a tentative chronology.
Furthermore, as the phenomenon of eutrophication is a process, a start and end cannot be
identified, and thus dated. Despite this criticism, there is strong evidence to suggest that the
dates recorded in this literature can be used to determine when the Mere experienced
eutrophic conditions, and hence aim number one has been addressed.
Possible explanations as to why the mere experienced cultural eutrophication have been
determined by the analysis of the geochemical record. The magnetic susceptibility results
were, however, unable to add additional support to the conclusions proposed. Nonetheless,
this paper fully supports the idea that anthropogenic activities were the key cause of
eutrophication at Quidenham Mere. Several explanations for each episode of
eutrophication have been documented, and there is strong evidence to accept that the
explanations provided in this literature are legitimate. Furthermore, Peglar (1993) and
Cheng, et al., (2007) supports several of the conclusions proposed in this literature. Aim
number two has therefore been addressed an answered successfully.
60
Changes in the abundance of molluscs have been recorded at Quidenham Mere since the
medieval period. There is evidence to suggest that these changes were caused by cultural
eutrophication. This is because the quantitative zonation analysis places zone boundaries at
the onset of the eutrophication process. The Spearman’s rho test furthers this idea.
However, due to the limitations of the statistical testing (section 8.2) one cannot conclude
that the mollusc population changed due to episodes of cultural eutrophication. Additional
factors may have caused this correlation to be present. Aim number three has therefore
been addressed, but conclusion regarding this aim cannot be produced.
8.2. Limitations of the study
The recognised limitations of this study regard the third aim. For example, the total number
of species extracted from the sample was relatively low. This could not be prevented,
however, as the species acquisition curve revealed that 20 g of sediment was the optimum
sample weight to extract. Additionally, Bithynia sp. may be over represented due to their
thick operculum (Sparks, 1964). Conclusions regarding aim three, therefore, may not be
accurate. Furthermore, correlations and associations do not necessarily imply causation.
Therefore, the results of this study cannot be used to prove that cultural eutrophication
caused the population of molluscs to change; one can only state that there is a correlation
between these two variables.
8.3. Significance of the findings
The overall aim of this paper was to identify the causes of cultural eutrophication at
Quidenham Mere and to document the effects this phenomenon had upon the mollusc
population. In interpretation of the data, it must be realised that the results are only
representative of this location. The conclusions proposed are therefore only legitimate for
Quidenham Mere. Despite this, a significant body of work has accumulated documenting
the negative effects of cultural eutrophication upon the abundance of molluscs, in various
locations. This paper therefore supports this correlation. Furthermore, this paper adds to
the wider issue of environmental change. This is because there is a growing concern that
anthropogenic activities are causing a decline in biodiversity (Huggett, 2010). Future
61
management issues regarding anthropogenic activities can therefore be addressed
appropriately with knowledge of this paper and similar studies.
8.4. Scope for further study
Regarding Quidenham Mere, further studies incorporating a larger population of molluscs is
needed to understand fully the effects of cultural eutrophication. Furthermore, an accurate
dating technique is needed to allow a greater understanding of the causes of cultural
eutrophication at this location. There is also significant scope for further studies regarding
the topic of cultural eutrophication. This is because the interest in this area declined in the
1980s due to a heightened interest in acidification (Smol, 2002). Further studies in this area
will enhance the knowledge of the impacts of cultural eutrophication and allow the field to
become more predictive. Additionally, it will act as a basis of how to manage future cultural
eutrophication problems, and thus prevent environmental change.
62
Chapter 9: Bibliography
AKTIPIS, S. W., GIRIBET, G., LINDBERG, D. R., and PONDER, W. F. 2008. Gastropod. In: W. F.
PONDER, and D. R. LINDERG. Phylogeny and Evolution of the Mollusca. Los Angeles:
University of California Press.
ALDER J. 1838. "Supplement to a catalogue of the land and fresh-water testaceous Mollusca,
found in the vicinity of Newcastle". Transactions of the Natural History Society of
Northumberland and Durham. 1 (3), pp. 337-342.
ALLEN, M. B. 1952. The cultivation of Myxophyceae. Arch. Mikrobiol. 17, pp. 34 -53
ANDERSEN, J. H., SCHLÜTER, L., and ÆRTEBJERG, G. 2005. Coastal eutrophication: recent
developments in definitions and implications for monitoring strategies. Journal of plankton
Research. 28(7), pp. 621 – 628.
ANDERSON, D. E., GOUDIE, A. S., and PARKER, A. G. 2007. Global environments through the
Quaternary: exploring environmental change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ARTER, H. E. 1989. Effect of eutrophication on species composition and growth of
freshwater mussels (Mollusca, Unionidae) in Lake Hallwil (Agrgam Aargau, Switzerland).
Limnologica - Ecology and Management of Inland Waters. 51(2), pp. 87–99.
BALL, D. F. Loss-On-Ignition as an Estimate of Organic Soils Matter and Organic Carbon in
Non-Calcareous. Journal of Soil Science. 15 (1), pp. 84 -92
BATTARBEE, R. W., ANDERSON, N. J., JEPPESEN, E., and LEAVITT P. 2005. Combining
paleolimnological and limnological approaches in assessing Lake Ecosystem response to
nutrient reduction. Freshwater Biology. 50, pp. 1772–1780
BAYBUTT R. I., and MAKAREWICZ J. C. 1981. Multivariate analysis of Lake Michigan
phytoplankton community at Chicago. Bull. Torrey Bot. 108, pp. 255-267
63
BELL, M., and WALKER, M. J. C. 2005. Late Quaternary Environmental Change. London:
Prentice Hall.
BENGTSSON, L., and ENELL, M. 1986. Chemical Analysis. In: B. E. BERGLUNND, ed. Handbook
of Holocene Palaeoecology and Palaeohydrology. Chichester and New York: John Wiley, pp.
423-454.
BENNETT, K. D. 1986. Competitive interactions among forest tree populations in Norfolk,
England, during the last 10000 years. New Phytol. 103, pp. 603-620.
BENNETT, K. D. 1988. Holocene pollen stratigraphy of central East Anglia, England, and
comparison of pollen zones across the British Isles. New Phytol. 109 pp. 237-253
BENNETT, K. D., PEGLAR, S. M., and SHARP, M. J. 1991. Holocene lake sediments in central
East Anglia. In: LEWIS, S. G, WHITEMAN, C. A, BRIDGLAND, D. Central East Anglia and the
Fen Basin. Field Guide. London: Quaternary Research Association, pp 111-118
BENNETT, K.D. 1983. Devensian late-glacial and Flandrian vegetational history at Hockham
Mere, Norfolk, England. I. Pollen percentages and concentrations. New Phytol. 95, pp. 457-
487.
BIGNOT, G. 1982. Elements of micropalaeontology: microfossils, their geological and
palaeobiological Applications. Manchester: Watkiss Studios Ltd.
BIRKS, H. H., and BIRKS, H. J. B. 2006. Multi-proxy studies in Palaeolimnology. Veget. Hist.
Archaeobot. 15, pp. 235 -251.
BIRKS, H.J.B., and BIRKS, H. J. B. 2004. Quaternary Palaeoecology. London: Edward Arnold
BIRKS, H.J.B., and BIRKS, H. J. B. 1980. Quaternary Palaeoecology. London: Edward Arnold
BORUM J. 1996. Shallow waters and land/sea boundaries. In: B. B. JØRGENSEN, and K.
RICHARDSON, eds. Eutrophication in coastal marine ecosystems. Washington DC:L American
Geophysical Union, pp. 179-203
BOSS, K. J. 1978. On the evolution of gastropods in ancient lakes. In: V. FRETTER, and J.
PEAKE, eds. Pulmonates. Volume 2A. Systematics, Evolution and Ecology. London: Academic
Press, pp 385–428
64
BOVBJERG, R. V., and ULMER, M. J. 1960. An ecological catalogue of the Lake Okoboji
gastropods. Proc. Iowa. Acad. Sci. 67, pp. 569 – 577
BOYLE, J. F. 2001. Inorganic geochemical methods in palaeolimnology. In: W. M. LAST, and J.
P. SMOL, eds. Tracking environmental Change using Lake Sediments, Volume 2, Physical and
Geochemical Methods. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 83 – 141
BRANDT, K. 1901. Life in the ocean Annual report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian
Institution for the year ending June 30, 1990. Washington. D.C.: United states Government
printing office.
BRENDELBERGER, H., and JIIRGENS, S. 1993. Suspension feeding in Bithynia tentaculata
(Prosobranchia, Bithyniidae), as affected by body size, food and temperature. Oecologia. 94,
pp. 36-42.
BROWNELL, P. F., and NICHOLAS, D. J. 1967. Some effects of sodium on nitrate assimilation
and nitrogen fixation in Anabaena cylindrica. Plant Physiol. 42, pp. 915-921.
BRUBAKER, H. U., and P. M. ANDERSON. 1993. A 12000 year record of vegetation change
and soil development from Wein Lake, central Alaska. Can J. Botany. 71 pp. 1133 – 1142
CALDWELL, R. S. 1975 Hydrogen sulphide effects on selected larval and adult marine
invertebrate. Water Resour., Research Institut. 31, p. 27.
CARLSSON, R. 2001. Freshwater snail communities and lake classification. An example from
the Åland Islands, Southwestern Finland. Limnologica - Ecology and Management of Inland
Waters. 31, pp. 129–138.
CARPENTER, S. R., CARACO, N.F., CORELL, D.L., HOWARTH, R.W., SHARPLEY, A.N., and
SMITH, V. H. 1998. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters by phosphorus and nitrogen.
Ecological Society of America. 8(3) pp. 559 – 568
CHENG, X., LI, S., SHEN, Q., and XUE, J.. 2007. Response of cultural Lake eutrophication to
Hemp – retting in Quidenham Mere of England Post-Medieval. Chinese Geographical
Science. 17(1) pp. 69-74.
65
CLAMPITT, P. T., WAFFLE, E. L., and BOVBJERG, R. V. 1960. An ecological reconnaissance of
the bottom fauna, Miller's Bay, Lake Okoboji. Proc. Iowa. Acad. Sci. 67, pp. 553 – 568
CLIFFORD, H. F. 1991. Aquatic invertebrates of Alberta: an illustrated guide. Alberta:The
University of Alberta Press.
CLOERN, J. E. 2001. Our evolving conceptual model of the coastal eutrophication problem.
Marine Ecology Progress. 211, pp. 223-253
COX, M., CHANDLER, J., COX, C., JONES, J., and TINLSE, H. 2001. The archaeological
significance of patterns of anomalous vegetation on a raised mire in the Solway Estuary and
the processes involved in their formation. Journal of Archaeological Science. 28(1), pp. 1–18.
De DECKKER, P., and FORESTER, R. M. 1988. The use of ostracods to reconstruct
paleoenvironmental records. In: P. De DECKKER, J. P. COLIN, and J. P. PEYPOUQUET, eds.
Ostracoda in earth sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 175 -199
De DECKKER, P., and FORESTER, R. M. 1988. The use of ostracods to reconstruct
paleoenvironmental records. In: P. De DECKKER, J. P. COLIN, and J. P. PEYPOUQUET, eds.
Ostracoda in earth sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 175 -199.
DEAN, W. E. 1974. Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments
and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition: Comparison with other methods. J. Sed. Petrol.
44, pp. 242–248.
DEARING, J. 1999, Magnetic susceptibility. In: J. WALDER., F. OLDFIELD, and J. P. SMITH, eds.
Environmental magnetism: a practical guide. Technical Guide, No. 6. London: Quaternary
Research Association. pp. 35 – 62.
DEEVEY E. S. 1984. Stress, strain and stability in lacustrine ecosystems. In: E. Y. HAWORTH.,
and J. W. G. LUND, eds. Lake Sediments and Environmental History. Leicester: Leicester
University Press. pp. 377–405
DILLON JR., R. T. 2000. The ecology of Freshwater Molluscs. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
DOKULIL, M. T., and TEUBNER, K. 2011. Eutrophication and Climate Change: Present
Situation and Future Scenarios. In: A. A. ANSARI, S. S. GILL, G. R. LANZA, and W. RAST.
Eutrophication: causes, consequences and control. London: Springer
66
DUARTE, C. M. 1995. Submerged aquatic vegetation in relation to different nutrient
regimes. Ophelia. 41, pp. 87-112.
DUSSART, G. B. J. 1979. Life cycles and distribution of the aquatic gastropod molluscs
Bithynia tentaculata, Gyraulus albus (muller), Planorbis planorbis and Lymnaea peregra
(muller) in relation to water chemistry. Hydrobiologia. 67, (3) pp. 223-239
DYTHAM, C. 2011. Choosing and Using Statistics: A Biologist's Guide. Chichester: Wiley
EMERSEN, R., and LEWIS, C. M. 1942. The photosynthetic efficiency of phycocyanin in
Chroococus and problem of carotenoid participation in photosynthesis. J. Gen. Physiol. 25,
pp. 579-595
ENGSTORM, D. R., and WRIGHT, H. E. 1984. Chemical stratigraphy of lake sediments as a
record of environmental change. In: E. Y HANWORTH, and J. W. G. LUND, eds. Lake
sediments and Environmental History. Leicester: Leicester University Press. pp. 11 – 68
FOSTER, I. D. L., and J. A. LEES. 1999. Changes in the physical and geochemical properties of
suspended sediment delivered into the headwaters of LOIS river basins over the last 100 yrs:
a preliminary analysis of lake and reservoirs in the English Midlands. Hydrobiologia. 214, pp.
107 – 114
FRETTER, V., and A. GRAHAM. 1978. The prosobranch mollusks of Britain and Denmark; Part
3: Neritacea, Viviparacea, Valvatacea, terrestrial and fresh water Littorinacea and Rissoacea.
Journal of Molluscan Studies Supplement. 5, pp. 101-150
GHESQUIERE, S. A .I. 2011. Apple Snails. [online]. [Accessed 05/01/2011]. Available from:
http://www.applesnail.net/
GILLMAN, G. P. 1979. A proposed method for the measurement of exchange properties of
highly weathered soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 17, (1) pp. 129 – 139.
GIRIBET, G. 2008. Bivalvia. In: W. F. PONDER, and D. R. LINDERG. Phylogeny and Evolution of
the Mollusca. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
67
GRIFFITHS, H. I. 1995. European Quaternary freshwater Ostracoda: a biostratigraphic and
palaeobiogeographic primer. Scopolia. 34, pp. 1-168
GRIFFITHS, H. I., and HOLMES, J. A. 2000. Non-Marine Ostracods and Quaternary
Palaeoenvironments. London: Quaternary Research Association.
GRIGOROVICH, I. A., MILLS, E. L., RICHARDS, C. B., BRENEMAN, D., and CIBOROWSKI, J. J. H.
2005. European Valve Snail Valvata piscinalis (Müller) in the Laurentian Great Lakes Basin.
Journal of Great Lakes Research. 31, pp. 135 – 143.
HANN, T. 2005. Respiration rates in Bithynia Tentaculata (gastropoda: bithyniidae) in
response to acclimation temperature and acute temperature change. Journal of Molluscan
Studies. 71, pp. 127–131.
HARMAN, W. N., and FORNEY, J. L. 1970. Fifty years of change in the molluscan fauna of
Oneida Lake, New York. Limnol. Oceanogr. 15, pp. 454-460
HARPER, D. 1992. Eutrophication of Freshwaters. London: Chapman and Hall
HEIRI, O., LOTTER, F., and LEMCKE, G. 2001. Loss on ignition as a method for estimating
organic and carbonate content in sediments: reproducibility and comparability of results.
Journal of Paleolimnology. 25 (1), pp. 101 – 110
HENDERSON, P. A. 1990. Freshwater Ostracods. London: The Linnean Society of London.
HESSE, P. R. 1971. A textbook of Soil Chemistry Analysis. London: William Clower and Sons.
HIRONS, K. R. and THOMPSON, R. 1986. Palaeoenvironmental application of magnetic
measurements from inter-drumlin hollow lakes sediments near Dunganon, Co. Tyrone,
Northern Ireland. Boreas. 15(2), pp. 117 – 135.
HODGKINSON, R. L. 1991. Microfossil processing: a damaging report. Micropaleontology. 37
pp. 320-326
HOLDEN, J. 2008. An Introduction to Physical Geography and the Environment, Second
Edition. Essex: Harlow
68
HUGGETT, R. 2010. Physical Geography: the key concepts. Oxon: Routledge
JEFFREYS, J. G. 1862. British Chronology 1. Land and freshwater snails. London: (Publisher
Unknown)
JENKIN, B. M, MORTIMER, C. H., and PENNINGTON, W. 1941. The study of Lake Deposits.
Nature. 147 pp. 496 – 500
JOKINEN, E. 1992. The Freshwater Snails (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of New York State. New
York: The University of the State of New York, The State Education Department, The New
York State Museum, Albany, New York 12230
JORDAN, P, RIPPEY, B., and ANDERSON, J. 2002. The 20th century whole-basin trophic
history of an inter-drumlin lake in an agricultural catchment. The Science of The Total
environment. 297(1-3), pp. 161-173
JØRGENSEN, B. B., and RICHARDSON, K. 1996. Eutrophication in Coastal Marine ecosystems.
In Coastal and Estuarine Studies 52. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.
JOU, L. J., and LIAO, C. M. 2006. A dynamic artificial clam (Corbicula fluminea) allows parsi-
mony on-line measurement of water borne metals. Environmental Pollution. 135, pp. 41–52
KARLESKINT, G., TURNER, R., and SMALL, J. 2009. Introduction to Marine Biology. Canada:
Yolanda Cossia.
KEEN, D. H. 1990. Significance of the record provided by Pleistocene fluvial deposits and
their included molluscan faunas for palaeoenvironmental reconstruction and stratigraphy,
case studies from the English Midlands. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimat. Paleoecology. 80, pp. 5
– 34
KENWORTHY, J. B. 1964. A study of the changes in plant and soil nutrients associated with
moorburning and grazing. PhD thesis, University of St Andrews, UK
KERNEY, M. 1999. Atlas of the Land and Freshwater Molluscs of Britain and Ireland. Essex:
Harley Books.
69
KRATZ, W. A., and MYRES, J. 1955. Nutrition and growth of several blue- green algae. Amber.
J. bot. 42, pp. 282 – 287
LAWSON, I. 2011. Email to Sophie Studley. 28 February 2011
LEENTVAAR, P. 1980. Eutrofhication, Nature Management and the Role of Potassium.
Aquatic Ecology. 14 (1-2) pp. 22 – 29
LEWIS, S. G., WHITEMAN, C. A., and BRIDGLAND, D. R. 1991. Central East Anglia and the Fen
Basin: Field Guide. London: Quaternary Research.
LISTER, M. 1678, Historiae animalium Angliae tres tractatus (History of England, and the
treatment of animals) London: (Publisher Unknown)
LITTLE, C. 2008. Lecture 2. Graptolites and biostratigraphy, lecture notes distributed in
SOEE1500 Understanding the Earth 2. University of Leeds, 02 March
LIVINGSTONE, D. A., and BOYKIN, J. C. 1962. Vertical distribution of phosphorous in Linsley
Pond Mud. Limnol. Oceanogr. 7, pp. 57-62.
LODGE, D. M., and KELLY P. 1985. Habitat disturbance and the stability of freshwater
gastropod populations. Oecologia. 68, pp. 111-117.
LOWE, J. J., and M. J. C. WALKER. 1997. Reconstructing Quaternary Environments (2nd
edition) Longman: Essex.
LOŽEK, V. 1986. Mollusca analysis. In: B. E. BERGLUND, ed. Handbook of Holocene
Paleoecology and paleohydrology. Chirchester: John Wiley and Sons. pp. 149 - 163
LSYNE, S. J., and CLARK, W. H. 2009. Mollusc Survey of the Lower Bruneau River, Owyhee
County, Idaho, U.S.A. American Malacological Bulletin. 27(1/2), pp. 167-172.
MACAN, T. 1977. A key to the British Fresh-and Brackish-water Gastropods: Fourth Edition.
Kendal: Titus Wilson and Sons Ltd.
MACKARETH, F. J. H. 1966. Some chemical observations on post-glacial lake sediments.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 250
(765) pp. 165 – 213
70
MAKAREWICZ, J. C., and MCKELLAR, D. A. 1985. Growth response of Anacystis nidulans to
sodium and phosphate availability. Hydrobiologia. 121, 129-137.
MARTIN, R. E. 2000. Environmental micropaleontology: the application of microfossils to
environmental Geology. New York: Springer.
MERRETT, C. 1666. Pinax rerum naturalium Britannicarum (Summary of the natural British
things) London:Cave Pulleyn
MILLER, B. B., and MIRECKI, J. E., and FOLLMER, L. R. 1994a. Pleistocene molluscan faunas
from central Mis- sissippi valley loess sites in Arkansas, Tennessee, and southern Illinois.
Southeastern Geolog. 34, pp. 89 – 97.
MILLER, B. B., and TEVESZ, M. J. S. 2001. Freshwater Molluscs. In: J. P. SMOL, H. B. BIRKS,
and W. H. LAST, eds. Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments, Volume 4.
Zoological Indicators. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 153 - 173
MILLER, B. B., and THOMPSON, T. A. 1987. Environmental changes in the Cowles Bog area,
Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, during the past 4500 years. In: C. D. A. RUBEC, and R. P.
OVEREND, eds. Proceedings, Symposium ’87, Wetlands/Peatlands, August 23 -27. Alberta:
Edmonton, pp. 341 – 348
MILLER, B. B., GRAHAM, R. W., MORGAN, A. V., MILLER, N. G., McCOY, W. D., PLAMER, D. F.,
SMITH, A. J., and PILNY, J. J. 1994b. A biota associated with Matuyama-age sediments in
west-central Illinois. Quaternary Research. 41, pp. 350-365.
MILLER, B. B., KARROW, P. F., and MACKIE, G. L. 1985. Late Quaternary molluscan faunal
changes in the Huron basin. In: P. F., KARROW, and P. E. CALKIN, eds. Quaternary evolution
of the Great Lakes, Geol. Assoc. Can. Special Paper 30. pp. 95 – 207
MORGAN, N. C. 1970. Changes in the fauna and flora of a nutrient enriched lake.
Hydrobioloogia. 35, pp. 545 -553
MOSS, B., MADGWICK, J., and PHILLIPS, G. 1997. A Guide to the Restoration of Nutrient-
enriched Shallow Lakes. London: Springer
71
MUIR, P. 2009. Eutrophication. [Accessed on the 12/12/2010]. Available from:
http://people.oregonstate.edu/~muirp/eutrophi.htm
NAKAMURA, Y., and KERCIKU, F. 2000. Effects of filter-feeding bivalves on the distribution of
water quality and nutrient cycling in a eutrophic coastal lagoon. Journal of Marine Systems.
26, pp. 209–221.
NARNIN, I, SOYLAK, M, ELÇI, L., and DOGAN, M. 2000. Determination of trace metal ions by
AAS in natural water samples after pre-concentration of pyrocatechol violet complexes on
an activated carbon column. Talanta. 52, pp. 1041-1046.
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. 1962. Eutrophication: causes, consequences, correctives;
proceedings of a symposium. Washington: Printing and Publishing Office National Academy
of Sciences.
NAUMANN, E. 1919. Aspects on the ecology of limnoplankton with special focus on
phytoplankton. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 13 pp. 51–58.
NIXON S. 1995. Coastal marine eutrophication: a definition, social causes, and future
concerns. Ophelia. 41, pp. 199-219
NOWACZYK, N. R. 2001. Logging of magnetic susceptibility. In: W. M. Last, and J. P. Smol,
eds. Tracking environmental Change using Lake Sediments, Volume 1, Basin Analysis, Coring
and Chronological Techniques. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 155 – 162.
ONGLEY, E. D. 1996. Control of water pollution from agriculture – FAO of the United
Nations, FAO irrigation and drainage paper 55. Rome.
ORTEGA, B., CABALLERO, M., LOZANO, S., VILACLARA, G., and RODRÍGUEZ, A. 2006. Rock
magnetic and geochemical proxies for iron mineral diagenesis in a tropical lake: Lago Verde,
Los Tuxtlas, East–Central Mexico. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 250(3-4), pp. 444-458
PALMER, S. 2011. Email to Sophie Studley. 23 February 2011
72
PEARSALL, W. H. 1921. The development of vegetation in the English Lakes, considered in
relation to the general evolution of glacial lakes and rock basins . Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 92, pp.
259 - 284
PEGLAR, S. M. 1993. Mid-and late-Holocene vegetation history of Quidenham Mere,
Norfolk, UK interpreted using recurrent groups of taxa. Vegetation History and
Archaeobotany. 2, pp. 15-28.
PERRIN, R. M. S, ROSE, J., and DAVIES, H. 1979. The distribution, variations and origins Of
pre-Devensian tills in eastern England. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 287B, pp. 535-570
PERROW, R. M. 2002. Handbook of ecological restoration: Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press
PONDER, W. F., and LINDBERG, D. R. 2008. Molluscan Evolution and Phylogeny. In: W. F.
PONDER, and D. R. LINDERG. Phylogeny and Evolution of the Mollusca. Los Angeles:
University of California Press.
PROVASOLI, L. 1969. Algal nutrition and eutrophication. In: National Academy of Sciences.
Eutrophication: Causes, consequences and Correctives. Washington: Printing and Publishing
Office National Academy of Sciences. pp. 574-593
RABALAIS, N. N. 2010. Eutrophication of Estuarine and Coastal Ecosystems. In: R. MITCHELL,
and J. D. GU, eds. Environmental Microbiology, Second Edition. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons,
Inc. pp. 115 -137.
RICHTER, T. 2001. Reproductive biology and life history strategy of Bithynia tentaculata
(Linnaeus, 1758) and Bithynia leachii (Sheppard, 1823) [online]. [Accessed 03/01/2011]
Available from: http://edok01.tib.uni-hannover.de/edoks/e002/327030496.pdf.
RUSSELL-HUNTER, W. D. 1978. The ecology of freshwater pulmonates. In: V. FRETTER, and J.
PEAKE, eds. Pulmonates. Volume 2A. Systematics, Evolution and Ecology. London: Academic
Press.
SARKAR, D. 2005. Physical and Chemical Methods in Soil Analysis. New Delhi: New Age
International Ltd.
SHARP, R. W. 1971. Road salt as a pollution element. In: R. H. HAWKINS, ed. Proceedings:
Street Salting-Urban Water Quality Workshop. SUC Forestry. New York: Syracuse. pp. 70-73
73
SLIPPER, I. 1996. Early Turonian Ostracoda: the Melbourn Rock fauna from Abbots Cliff,
Dover, England. In: M. C. KEEN, eds. Proceedings of the 2nd European Ostracodologists’
Meeting. London, British Micropalaeontological Society. pp. 49 -56
SMITH V.H. 2003 Eutrophication of freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems – A global
problem. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 10, pp. 126–139
SMITH, V. H. 1998. Cultural eutrophication if inland estuarine, and coastal water. In: M. L.
PACE, and P. M. GROFFMAN, eds. Successes, Limitations, and Frontiers in ecosystem Science.
New York: Springer, pp. 7 – 69
SMITH, V. H. 1998. Cultural eutrophication if inland estuarine, and coastal water. In: M. L.
PACE, and P. M. GROFFMAN, eds. Successes, Limitations, and Frontiers in ecosystem Science.
New York: Springer, pp. 7 – 69
SMITH, V. H. 2003. Eutrophication of freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems: a global
problem. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 10, pp. 1–14
SMOL, J. P. 2002. Pollution of Lakes and Rivers. A Paleoenvironmental Perspective. London:
Arnold
SOHN, I. G. 1961. Techniques for preparation and study of fossil ostracods. In: R. C. MOORE,
ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, Part Q, Arthropoda 3, Crustacea, ostracoda.
Lawrence: University of Kansas Press and the Geological Society of America. pp 64-70.
SPARKS, B. W. 1961. The ecological interpretation of Quaternary non-marine Mollusca.
Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London. 172, pp. 71 - 80.
SPARKS, B. W. 1964. Non-marine Mollusca and Quaternary Ecology. Journal of Animal
Ecology. 33, pp. 87 – 98.
STURM, C. F., PEARCE, T. A., and VALDÉS A. 2006. The mollusks: a guide to their study,
collection, and preservation. Florida: Universal publishers.
SUTHERLAND W. J. 2006. Predicting the ecological consequences of environmental change:
a review of the methods. J. Appl. Ecol. 43 pp. 599–616
74
TALYOR, D. W. 1965. The study of Pleistocene nonmarine molluscs in North America. In: H.
E. JR. WRIGHT., and D. G. FREY, eds. The Quaternary of the United States. Princeton:
University Press. pp 597 – 611.
TAYLOR, D. W. 1960. Late Cenozoic molluscan faunas from The High Plains. U.S. Geolog.
Survey Professional. Paper. 337, pp. 1 – 94
TIMM, H., MÖLS, T., and TIMM, T. 2006. Effects of long-term non-point eutrophication on
the abundance and biomass of macrozoobenthos in small lakes of Estonia. Proc. Estonian
Acad. Sci. Biol. Ecol. 55(3), pp. 187–198
TRIPLEPOINT WATER TECHNOLOGIES, 2011. Pond Algae 101 - Why your pond is green.
[online]. [Accessed 6 December 2010]. Available from:
http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://www.triplepointwater.com/pond/Element
s/eutrophication.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.triplepointwater.com/pond/pondalgae101.ht
ml&usg=__uihJJ67bJu8gQz8d4jOwH-
5TwNM=&h=292&w=565&sz=43&hl=en&start=38&zoom=1&um=1&itbs=1&tbnid=657QuP
S483A97M:&tbnh=69&tbnw=134&prev=/images%3Fq%3Deutrophication%26start%3D20%
26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26ndsp%3D20%26tbs%3Disch:1&ei=trd-TdveHI-
WhQfAjfWmBw
TROELS-SMITH, J. 1955. Karakterisering af lose jordarter (characterization of unconsolidated
sediments). Damn. Geol. Unders. IV. 3, pp. 1-73.
TUNNELL, J. W., ANDREWS, J., BARREREA N. C., and MORETZSOHN. 2010. Encyclopedia of
Texas Seashells: Identification, Ecology, Distribution, and History. China: Everbest Printing
Co.
WATMAN, 2009. Leadership in separations technology for life sciences. [online]. [Accessed
20 October 2010]. Available from: http://www.whatman.com/filterpapers.aspx
WEST, R. G. 1991. Pleistocene Palaeoecology of Central Norfolk, a study of environments
through time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
WEST, R.G. 1977. Pleistocene Ceology and Biology. London: Longman
75
WIST, W., McEACHERN, R. J., and LEHR, J. H. 2009. Water Softening with Potassium Chloride:
Process, Health, and Environmental. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons
WRIGHT, H. E. 1967. A square-rod piston sampler for lake sediments. J. sediment petrol. 37
pp. 975-976
YANG, H. 2010. Historical mercury contamination in sediments and catchment soils of Diss
Mere, UK. Environmental Pollution. 158(7), pp. 2504-2510.
76
Chapter 10: Appendix
10.1. Methodology
A detailed methodology is provided for loss-on-ignition, geochemical analysis and mollusc
analysis.
10.1.1. Loss-on-ignition
In order to perform this loss-on-ignition, samples were taken every 5 centimetres along the
core. This stratified sampling strategy was chosen in order to allow an accurate comparison
with Peglar (1993). The weights of the crucibles were then measured (Wc) and filled 2/3 full
of sediment. Following this, the crucibles were re-weighed (Wcs), positioned on a metal tray
and placed in a muffle furnace at 105°C. After 24 hours, the temperature of the furnace was
lowered to 50°C for safety reasons. The samples were then transferred to a desiccator to
cool. After cooling, the weight of the crucible and ignited soil were then weighed (Wd) and
the percentage moisture was therefore calculated using the following formula: 100 x (Wcs -
Wd)/ (Wd- Wc). This process was repeated at 450°C and 950°C to calculate the organic and
carbonate content of the core, respectively. Calculations following the standard procedure
of Heiri, et al., 1999 were used to calculate the values of these variables.
10.1.2. Geochemical Analysis
In order to perform the electrometric method, a 20 g sample was mixed with 50 ml of
deionised water and allowed to equilibrate (Sarkar, 2005). An electrode was then inserted
into the mixture and the pH was read directly of the meter (Cheswoth, 2008). To prepare
the samples for the FAAS, 5g of air dried soil was weighed and carefully placed into a clean,
dry shaking bottle. As the entire pH results were > 5, the samples were mixed with 125 mL
of 1M ammonium acetate. The solutions were then placed on a shaker for 1 hour, in order
to ensure that the samples were thoroughly mixed. The final preparation step was to filter
the solutions through Whatman number 1 filter paper, ensuring that the first 5-10 mL was
77
rejected. Whatman number 1 filter paper was used, as it is the appropriate piece of
equipment for this process (Whatman, 2009). The samples were then analysed using FAAS.
10.1.3. Molluscs Analysis
20g samples were extracted every 10 cm along the core. This stratified sampling method
was designed to produce a reliable set of data. The sediment samples were then digested
using 30ml of c. 10% hydrogen peroxide and 70 ml distilled water. The samples were then
placed in a fume cupboard overnight in order to digest. To extract the molluscan remains,
the liquid samples were passed through a 125-micron sieve and were thoroughly washed
with deionised water to remove any chemical residue. The molluscan remains were then
removed with the aid of a moistened brush under a low powered binocular microscope as
recommended by the literature of Lowe and Walker (1997).
10.2. Results
Sets of results that are too large to be incorporated into the main body of the literature,
have been recorded in this section. The purpose of including them is to allow further
research to be undertaken. This will allow a greater understanding of the topics highlighted
in this literature.
10.2.1. Sediment lithology
A summary of the sediment composition of QUID1, as determined by the Troles-Smith, is
shown in Table 4.
10.2.2. Sediment composition
A summary of the results from the loss-on-ignition are shown in Table 5.
78
Depth (cm) Colour Description
Nigror (Nig) Stratificatio (Strf)
Elasticitas (Elas)
Siccitas (Sicc)
Sediment Composition
Notes
125-161 Dark Brown 3 0 3 3 Th4 [part.test.(moll)1]. Lower Boundary very gradual over 1.5 cm.
161-197 Light Brown 2 0 3 3 Dh2, Gs2 [part.test.(moll)1]. Lower boundary sharp over 0.5 mm.
197-210 Light brown dark Brown
4 0 3 3 Tb Sphagni1, Dh2, Gs1
[test.(moll)1]. Lower boundary sharp over 0.5 mm.
210-268 Dark Brown 2 1 3 3 Tb Spagni3, Dh1 [part.test.(moll)1]. Lower boundary gradual over 1.5. cm.
268-360 Dark Brown/black
1 2 3 2 Tb Spagni4 [part.test.(moll)1]. Lower boundary very gradual over 1 cm.
360-519 Darkish cream/Beige
1 3 3 2 Ag2, Lc2, [part.test.(moll)1]. Lower boundary gradual over 1.5 cm.
519-620 Creamy-white 1 1 3 2 Ag1, Lc3
part.test.(moll)1]. Lower boundary very gradual over 1.75 cm.
620-662 Darkish cream/Beige
1 3 4 2 As3, Lc1 part.test.(moll)1]. Lower boundary very gradual over 1.75 cm.
662-775 Creamy-white 1 1 4 1 As1, Lc3 [part.test.(moll)1]. Lower boundary gradual over 2 mm. In middle of core at approximately 740 cm there is a detrital layer of 1 cm
775 - 802 Darkish cream/Beige
2 2 3 2 As3, Lc1 part.test.(moll)1]. Lower boundary sharp over 1 mm
802 – 830
Darkish cream 3 2 2 2 As3, Lc1
Table 3. Sediment lithology using the terminology of Troels-Smith (1955). The work of Birks and Birks (1980) also provided additional support.
79
Sample depth (cm) Cruicible mass (g) Cruc. + wet sed. mass (g) Cruc. + dry sed. mass (g) Wight after 450°C (g) Wight after 950°C (g)
125 11.2876 16.1689 12.0539 11.3497 11.32
130 10.8207 15.6001 11.5213 11.0676 10.879
135 11.9403 16.1098 12.5742 12.0222 12.0017
140 10.9566 15.9163 12.1545 11.727 11.5095
145 11.1739 16.176 12.149 11.6983 11.5822
150 11.5517 15.2443 12.0683 11.6493 11.6261
155 12.933 17.4657 13.717 13.2352 13.1181
160 11.896 16.7134 13.0663 12.7891 12.375
165 11.7836 17.701 13.7966 13.5376 12.5385
170 11.7973 17.9559 14.1499 13.9288 13.2185
175 11.1141 17.7948 13.6686 13.3862 12.6076
180 12.1855 16.3706 13.5824 13.3407 12.8977
185 12.4256 17.336 13.8243 13.4237 13.0678
190 11.8112 16.731 13.2142 12.8838 12.3985
195 12.5381 16.9863 13.2798 12.9732 12.6717
200 12.41 17.6742 13.2969 12.7928 12.5935
205 11.5896 16.0577 12.5288 12.0264 11.7975
210 10.2419 15.4156 11.5784 11.0524 10.7687
215 12.3908 17.9546 12.9073 12.6709 12.4987
220 10.857 16.9302 14.5226 14.2107 13.0215
225 10.864 16.954 11.7859 11.4089 11.0971
230 11.1459 16.7183 13.2704 13.053 12.5076
235 12.3074 17.7189 14.1209 13.8532 13.4894
240 11.8276 16.955 13.8569 13.5687 13.1951
245 11.4047 17.4041 14.0987 13.4586 12.8239
250 12.2769 17.4108 14.3205 14.1871 13.603
255 11.2189 16.6407 13 12.9196 12.18
80
260 11.1821 16.215 12.98 12.8795 12.0846
265 12.5938 17.7949 14.7551 14.5694 14.0586
270 11.1969 16.4781 13.1478 12.946 12.5294
275 11.4563 16.601 13.509 13.3515 12.5374
280 11.0901 17.4464 13.8299 13.6228 12.5299
285 10.7018 15.7795 13.0687 12.9867 12.0138
290 12.2913 16.816 14.3505 13.9856 13.3135
295 10.7595 17.2386 13.9221 13.5995 12.4993
300 10.7866 15.9845 13.2705 13.1688 12.1378
305 6.6582 11.1899 8.4613 7.9713 7.3169
310 10.8328 16.3305 13.2236 13.0076 12.0479
315 10.9607 16.3379 13.4455 13.3656 12.0158
320 10.2035 15.943 12.9157 12.5911 11.4433
325 12.2316 17.0506 14.6184 14.0245 13.2456
330 13.9368 18.6257 16.1231 15.4554 14.6052
335 12.0931 16.6432 14.5087 13.55923 12.8146
340 10.2953 15.0855 12.6822 11.997 11.0716
345 13.5117 18.5166 15.8303 15.0194 14.3967
350 11.154 16.5627 13.7948 12.728 11.9996
355 10.7562 16.3066 13.59 12.3798 11.6965
360 11.6404 16.8096 14.1288 13.5087 12.6196
365 10.4966 15.5944 13.9424 13.2443 12.0101
370 11.2457 16.0783 13.5537 13.0957 12.2228
375 11.7027 16.8135 14.0122 13.5519 12.4401
380 10.6447 15.9462 13.3105 12.8162 11.4069
385 11.9517 16.3815 13.3105 12.9985 12.2012
390 6.2301 11.2074 8.657 8.2418 7.0899
395 6.5952 11.2434 8.9288 8.6083 7.4007
81
400 7.3536 12.4436 9.9004 9.6023 8.2562
405 6.6249 11.7446 9.1354 8.9321 7.58733
410 11.8513 16.9564 14.4543 14.3245 12.8973
415 11.192 16.5582 14.0032 13.8698 12.9789
420 11.0873 16.0111 13.7669 13.6781 12.8101
425 12.7846 17.6752 15.3374 15.2576 14.4116
430 10.545 15.321 13.2117 13.0277 12.0184
435 11.1772 16.5785 13.9889 13.7087 12.6039
440 11.2369 17.2432 14.4134 14.1217 12.7966
445 10.9078 16.2275 13.7161 13.3368 12.3136
450 12.5811 17.5927 15.2532 14.9865 14.0145
455 11.9597 17.7234 14.8467 14.2585 13.1222
460 11.6273 16.3927 14.059 13.7889 12.76034
465 12.2735 18.6796 15.5919 15.2996 13.8181
470 10.2126 15.4862 13.2029 13.0144 11.6722
475 11.1342 17.4541 14.3693 14.0742 12.7228
480 11.4043 16.4249 13.9102 13.7839 12.6769
485 10.8131 15.9519 13.4337 13.3454 12.1964
490 11.5193 16.3167 13.8269 13.7496 12.6901
495 11.0656 16.9203 14.1081 14.007 12.7807
500 11.0983 16.0964 13.8011 13.7108 12.4895
505 11.6798 16.7832 14.3795 14.3137 13.0014
510 11.7493 16.7411 14.4783 14.3712 13.0594
515 12.0783 17.1009 14.9844 14.8759 13.8089
520 12.6324 17.7001 15.7044 15.6094 14.4116
525 10.335 15.484 13.5491 13.2108 11.9882
530 11.0449 16.005 13.7793 13.6841 12.6501
535 11.646 16.459 14.2209 14.0953 12.9413
82
540 12.2165 17.763 15.2556 15.1439 13.8849
545 12.239 17.978 15.448 15.3443 13.9179
550 6.7811 11.6438 9.3053 9.1971 8.0062
555 6.55 11.495 9.229 9.136 7.9304
560 6.3624 11.983 9.2884 9.1759 7.8166
565 6.5899 12.2964 9.6424 9.5279 8.0236
570 6.8799 11.5333 9.0165 8.8789 7.7196
575 6.5046 11.2404 9.2602 9.1458 7.8057
580 12.5748 16.6654 13.6852 13.5474 12.9689
585 11.2055 16.246 13.9473 13.8382 12.3282
590 11.479 16.3713 14.0564 13.9569 12.6916
595 12.2628 17.1983 14.9277 14.8055 13.4068
600 13.3351 18.4735 15.6164 15.4816 14.4133
605 11.9413 16.7134 14.4126 14.2639 13.0999
610 11.8797 16.8109 14.4189 14.2512 12.9005
615 11.645 16.5987 14.3986 14.2009 12.8847
620 12.9873 17.8964 15.6753 15.4984 14.0937
625 11.0667 16.0519 13.398 13.2911 11.8613
630 10.8465 15.6146 13.0705 12.9648 11.8472
635 11.0157 16.593 13.6806 13.531 12.2492
640 11.3797 16.5077 13.8349 13.7403 12.6097
645 10.6511 15.9599 13.2914 13.1799 11.9683
650 12.3828 16.9496 14.652 14.5575 13.5123
655 12.5295 16.9358 14.297 14.156 13.3141
660 11.8602 16.4813 14.0627 13.9578 12.9452
665 11.3152 16.7774 13.8651 13.7273 12.6997
670 11.1427 16.5013 13.9092 13.8074 12.6778
675 12.081 17.16 14.4843 14.36 13.3643
83
680 11.0515 16.4993 13.6253 13.5285 12.5461
685 12.0062 16.8854 14.4962 14.359 13.3396
690 11.1243 16.1933 13.577 13.4358 12.4258
695 11.7822 16.1699 14.158 14.0524 12.9663
700 11.9489 16.8717 14.4746 14.343 13.1253
705 11.7595 16.7392 14.3986 14.2686 12.9678
710 11.4964 16.7934 14.1497 13.9943 12.3194
715 6.6534 11.1515 10.5248 10.1963 7.6826
720 6.4375 11.3928 9.5984 9.2787 7.3112
725 6.4214 11.9063 10.2664 9.7448 7.4926
730 6.6241 11.9107 9.8435 9.1427 6.9942
735 6.5377 11.7932 10.2664 9.2499 7.0024
740 7.3629 12.7801 9.8435 9.2397 7.8262
745 6.3546 11.7836 8.6796 8.1869 6.9789
750 6.5056 11.805 10.1616 8.8634 7.0641
755 6.4981 11.5404 9.0298 8.4652 7.0358
760 6.7456 11.7794 9.243 8.5624 7.0021
765 6.4871 11.9781 9.7956 8.6946 6.5001
770 7.3329 12.3487 10.3758 9.3332 7.3343
775 6.9532 11.9993 10.4983 9.3524 6.9953
780 11.4973 16.5993 14.1097 13.497 11.7629
785 11.4084 16.4397 14.4596 14.0074 12.3986
790 6.7317 11.7245 11.0948 10.5061 8.3956
795 6.7725 11.4627 11.0133 10.6033 8.6186
800 6.516 11.3865 11.099 10.7356 8.6926
805 7.0158 12.5462 12.196 11.6697 9.41348
810 7.291 12.1547 11.8622 11.6704 9.7458
815 6.5375 11.2982 10.9425 10.6974 8.5486
84
820 6.5964 11.4269 11.0665 10.8783 8.8911
825 6.5506 11.6237 11.2508 11.0138 8.8863
830 6.4533 11.6545 11.2128 11.0079 8.1501
Table 4. Results from the loss-on-ignition analysis. The silica content in this literature was calculated by the following formula: 100 - (organic +
carbonate).
10.2.3. Geochemical Analysis
Depth (cm) Sodium concentration (mg/kg) Potassium concentration (mg/kg)
125 87.74378814 11.96506202
135 68.61080398 11.10606539
145 74.32098765 11.35802469
155 114.5721978 15.83719365
165 118.2378039 19.62244405
175 126.4147589 18.51778695
185 92.71930346 13.63519169
195 91.73493068 24.54529226
205 133.0777436 12.07510717
215 73.006023 13.18164304
225 117.8796676 10.26128742
235 76.59437233 6.550834476
245 94.73984684 18.2097368
255 129.2731269 14.22740296
265 100.8521887 13.80861263
275 75.77435856 16.61497563
285 100.7924025 9.705935055
295 92.98727381 7.428735373
85
305 76.12759286 6.281154526
315 78.30439512 8.057043871
325 78.96702055 8.073305615
335 79.24931933 5.105017503
345 74.46723442 132.9415057
355 93.2779834 159.2977893
365 72.61744427 15.07628601
375 99.93337775 158.2278481
385 80.27096345 157.8499129
395 342.6156141 14.66931875
405 147.2028951 1.499520154
415 160.4579665 3.493641572
425 211.5609618 5.295328008
435 308.4964238 9.087872357
445 290.3668825 11.77163037
455 210.0587563 6.26666934
465 62.23328592 2.469574838
475 74.97110748 2.988881361
485 86.47019559 9.86063634
495 139.0480518 4.445586027
505 130.9766022 2.543234995
515 75.31530003 2.993354752
525 51.32612967 2.701375246
535 131.0084919 6.214824096
545 131.2552502 8.500340014
555 52.53356173 9.958969048
565 106.5830412 21.66121854
575 63.25408795 11.6585966
86
585 80.9565952 6.536867935
595 135.9102992 0.749505326
605 64.79008014 8.970934173
615 61.738887 12.74770541
625 89.75031261 9.832197168
635 80.43044154 7.563991367
645 71.33939718 10.15595585
655 132.3684263 12.41730078
665 121.5635399 3.961337347
675 89.61632396 7.87835815
685 105.2890801 30.90825024
695 64.24503403 4.712956165
705 53.7381776 48.98922237
715 58.23485894 50.2369384
725 53.50136726 51.51983514
735 165.5427981 71.6339631
745 191.813933 69.20345817
755 198.9524544 81.71261521
765 200.7921388 70.18951168
775 199.5878186 22.76001441
785 191.3433624 5.582962828
795 159.0633219 17.95468339
805 129.3928757 1.745183294
815 131.0413553 15.44593921
825 131.1948981 13.49433238
Table 5. Geochemistry results regarding the concentrations of potassium and sodium in the sediment of Quidenham Mere.
87
10.2.4. Magnetic Susceptibility
10.2.4.1. Upper Section (125 – 513 cm)
Depth (cm) Magnetic Susceptibility (SI)
Depth (cm) Magnetic Susceptibility (SI)
Depth (cm) Magnetic Susceptibility (SI)
125 0
255 -3.9
385 -4.4
127 -0.1
257 -4
387 -4.3
129 -0.2
259 -4.1
389 -4.3
131 -0.5
261 -4
391 -4.3
133 -0.6
263 -4
393 -4.2
135 -0.6
265 -4.1
395 -4.3
137 -0.7
267 -4.1
397 -4.3
139 -0.9
269 -4.1
399 -4.3
141 -0.9
271 -4.2
401 -4.3
143 -1
273 -4.1
403 -4.3
145 -1.2
275 -4.2
405 -4.2
147 -1.3
277 -4.2
407 -4.3
149 -1.3
279 -4.2
409 -4.2
151 -1.5
281 -4.2
411 -4.2
153 -1.5
283 -4.3
413 -4.2
155 -1.5
285 -4.2
415 -4.2
157 -1.6
287 -4.3
417 -4.1
159 -1.6
289 -4.3
419 -4
161 -1.7
291 -4.2
421 -4
163 -1.7
293 -4.3
423 -3.9
165 -1.8
295 -4.3
425 -3.8
167 -1.9
297 -4.4
427 -3.9
169 -1.9
299 -4.3
429 -3.8
171 -2
301 -4.4
431 -3.8
88
173 -2.1
303 -4.3
433 -3.8
175 -2.2
305 -4.4
435 -3.8
177 -2.2
307 -4.3
437 -3.9
179 -2.2
309 -4.3
439 -3.8
181 -2.4
311 -4.3
441 -3.8
183 -2.4
313 -4.4
443 -3.9
185 -2.5
315 -4.4
445 -3.9
187 -2.5
317 -4.4
447 -4
189 -2.6
319 -4.3
449 -4
191 -2.6
321 -4.2
451 -3.9
193 -2.6
323 -4.1
453 -4
195 -2.6
325 -4
455 -4
197 -2.6
327 -3.9
457 -4
199 -2.7
329 -4
459 -4
201 -2.7
331 -3.9
461 -4
203 -2.7
333 -3.9
463 -4
205 -2.8
335 -3.9
465 -4.1
207 -2.8
337 -3.9
467 -4.1
209 -2.9
339 -3.9
469 -4.1
211 -2.9
341 -4
471 -4.2
213 -2.9
343 -3.9
473 -4.2
215 -3
345 -4
475 -4.2
217 -2.9
347 -4
477 -4.2
219 -2.9
349 -4
479 -4.3
221 -2.8
351 -4
481 -4.2
223 -2.8
353 -4.1
483 -4.3
225 -2.7
355 -4
485 -4.3
227 -2.6
357 -4
487 -4.3
89
229 -2.7
359 -4.1
489 -4.4
231 -2.8
361 -4.2
491 -4.4
233 -2.9
363 -4.2
493 -4.3
235 -3
365 -4.3
495 -4.3
237 -3.4
367 -4.2
497 -4.4
239 -3.4
369 -4.3
499 -4.4
241 -3.5
371 -4.3
501 -4.4
243 -3.6
373 -4.3
503 -4.5
245 -3.7
375 -4.3
505 -4.4
247 -3.8
377 -4.3
507 -4.3
249 -3.8
379 -4.2
509 -4.4
251 -3.9
381 -4.3
511 -4.4
253 -3.9
383 -4.3
513 -4.5
Table 6. Magnetic susceptibility results from the upper section of the core.
10.2.4.2. Lower Section (515 – 829 cm)
Depth (cm) Magnetic Susceptibility (SI)
Depth (cm) Magnetic Susceptibility (SI)
Depth (cm) Magnetic Susceptibility (SI)
515 -4.4
643 -10.8
771 -12.6
517 -4.3
645 -10.8
773 -12.7
519 -4.4
647 -10.9
775 -12.9
521 -4.4
649 -11
777 -12.9
523 -4.4
651 -10.9
779 -13.2
525 -4.4
653 -11
781 -13.2
527 -4.9
655 -11.1
783 -13.2
529 -5
657 -11.2
785 -13.1
531 -5.1
659 -11.4
787 -13.2
533 -5.3
661 -11.4
789 -13.2
90
535 -5.3
663 -11.4
791 -13.2
537 -5.5
665 -11.6
793 -13.2
539 -5.7
667 -11.6
795 -13.2
541 -5.9
669 -11.4
797 -13.2
543 -6
671 -11.7
799 -13.1
545 -6.1
673 -11.8
801 -13.2
547 -6.2
675 -11.9
803 -13.2
549 -6.4
677 -11.9
805 -13.1
551 -6.5
679 -12.1
807 -13.3
553 -6.6
681 -12.1
809 -13.3
555 -6.7
683 -12.2
811 -13.4
557 -6.9
685 -12.2
813 -13.4
559 -6.9
687 -12.3
815 -13.4
561 -7.1
689 -12.3
817 -13.4
563 -7.2
691 -12.4
819 -13.5
565 -7.3
693 -12.4
821 -13.5
567 -7.5
695 -12.4
823 -13.4
569 -7.6
697 -12.4
825 -13.5
571 -7.7
699 -12.3
827 -13.5
573 -7.8
701 -12.4
829 -13.5
575 -7.9
703 -12.4 577 -8
705 -12.4
579 -8.1
707 -12.4 581 -8.2
709 -12.4
583 -8.4
711 -12.4 585 -8.5
713 -12.1
587 -8.6
715 -12.4 589 -8.7
717 -12.3
91
591 -8.8
719 -12.1 593 -8.8
721 -12.3
595 -8.9
723 -12.3 597 -9
725 -12.2
599 -9.1
727 -12.1 601 -9.2
729 -12
603 -9.2
731 -12 605 -9.3
733 -12.1
607 -9.3
735 -12.1 609 -9.4
737 -12.1
611 -9.2
739 -12.1 613 -9.3
741 -12.3
615 -9.2
743 -12.2 617 -9.3
745 -12.2
619 -9.2
747 -12.2 621 -9.3
749 -12.3
623 -9.3
751 -12.3 625 -9.9
753 -12.4
627 -10.1
755 -12.3 629 -10.2
757 -12.4
631 -10.3
759 -12.5 633 -10.3
761 -12.5
635 -10.3
763 -12.6 637 -10.3
765 -12.5
639 -10.5
767 -12.5 641 -10.6
769 -12.6
Table 7. Magnetic susceptibility results from the lower section of the core.
92
10.2.5. Mollusc Analysis
Depth (cm) Bithynia tentaculata
Valvata piscinalis
Valvata macrostoma
Lymnaea peregra
Lymnaea sp. Gyraulus laevis
Gyraulus sp.
Pisidium sp.
125 6 3 5 3 6 4 3 9
135 5 5 4 3 5 1 3 10
145 5 3 6 5 6 4 6 5
155 4 2 7 3 7 6 5 6
165 6 5 5 4 7 5 4 11
175 4 1 6 4 4 3 6 14
185 4 3 5 3 6 7 3 12
195 5 3 4 3 7 4 7 10
205 4 3 4 2 6 5 5 9
215 2 2 4 1 3 4 8 8
225 2 5 3 1 3 3 6 6
235 4 3 2 3 5 5 4 10
245 3 2 1 3 3 4 5 8
255 2 4 3 2 2 5 6 9
265 3 2 2 3 4 1 5 7
275 4 4 3 3 5 0 7 5
285 3 2 2 2 4 5 6 6
295 3 2 1 4 4 4 5 8
305 2 2 2 1 4 5 8 6
315 1 2 1 1 1 4 7 7
325 3 1 2 4 2 3 5 6
335 5 3 2 10 5 7 6 5
345 9 10 9 19 17 14 20 7
355 8 7 8 17 18 20 15 8
93
365 9 6 11 22 20 14 15 8
375 8 8 9 22 22 5 16 10
385 6 6 7 16 21 10 11 6
395 2 2 4 4 4 5 5 2
405 2 5 1 3 5 5 3 1
415 2 3 1 4 4 2 4 2
425 4 4 4 5 4 1 6 1
435 2 2 2 6 2 1 3 1
445 3 2 2 4 4 2 6 3
455 3 5 1 5 3 3 5 3
465 4 4 1 5 6 1 4 4
475 3 3 2 3 4 2 2 6
485 3 2 2 4 4 3 2 5
495 2 2 1 5 3 2 2 7
505 2 2 2 3 3 0 3 6
515 3 4 3 3 4 2 3 4
525 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 5
535 1 4 1 1 1 2 5 3
545 2 3 2 1 1 1 3 4
555 2 2 2 2 1 2 4 6
565 3 2 4 2 1 0 4 5
575 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 5
585 2 3 4 3 1 1 3 4
595 2 3 2 4 3 1 3 6
605 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 5
615 1 1 2 3 4 1 4 4
625 1 1 1 1 2 1 4 3
635 2 1 3 1 2 3 0 6
94
645 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 5
655 1 1 1 2 3 2 1 7
665 2 2 1 3 4 2 2 2
675 2 2 1 1 4 2 1 3
685 1 2 2 0 4 0 5 6
695 1 2 3 2 2 2 1 5
705 3 1 2 2 2 1 2 7
715 3 1 1 1 5 1 4 6
725 2 1 3 1 2 0 4 5
735 2 1 1 1 5 1 3 4
745 6 7 8 5 6 4 3 4
755 8 8 7 8 6 6 5 3
765 7 7 5 6 5 5 6 4
775 2 3 2 0 2 2 0 1
785 4 4 3 1 1 3 0 2
795 5 1 2 0 1 1 1 2
805 4 1 1 0 0 1 0 2
815 3 2 1 0 1 0 1 1
825 3 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
830 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Table 8. Results from the mollusc analysis. Concentrations of molluscs are in the following units: concentration per 20g.
95
10.3. DSG Reflective log.
The purpose of the DSG meetings was to provide support to other students. At the
beginning of this module, I found the task of planning, undertaking and writing the
dissertation very daunting. However, the DSG meetings made the process significantly
easier. The peer-group meetings were helpful for support and encouragement. They
provided a time to discuss information and to share generic issues such as queries regarding
statistical analysis, word limits, plagiarism and structure. They also improved my team
working ability.
However, the full group meetings and the one to one meetings with Ian Lawson, were the
most useful. They gave me a fantastic opportunity to meet new people who were also
undertaking a palaeo-dissertation and to discuss any queries with my tutor. I found them
useful as Ian Lawson sometimes suggested ideas to other students in the group, which I
could also use in my study. They were also useful as my tutor was supportive and motivated
me when problems occurred.
The only criticism I have with the DSG meetings is regarding the peer group meetings. As I
worked alongside the peer group members in the laboratory, I sometimes felt that extra
meetings were not necessary. This was because we naturally discussed our dissertations and
the progress that we had made. Furthermore, the other students of the peer group were
undertaking a similar dissertation to one another. I therefore felt that I could not make a
great scientific input into their dissertation, but I tried to be supportive at all times.
Overall, I found the DSG meetings a success. By having these meetings, a now feel that I
have the confidence to undertake a scientific investigation with limited support. They not
only provided me with encouragement, but also provided constructive solutions to any
problems that I encountered. I thoroughly enjoyed helping my peers, and hope that I was
supportive to them.
96
10.4. DSG Report Forms
GEOG3600 Dissertation
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
NB Continuous discussions about progress occurred virtually every day before Christmas
due to all three members working in close association in the labs and microscope rooms.
This allowed problems to be addressed and solved quickly.
104
10.5. Interim Report
10.5.1. First Interim Report
The history of human activity at Quidenham Mere, interpreted by ostracod and mollusc
analysis.
INTRODUCTION
Central East Anglia is abnormal for Southern
England in containing a number of natural lake
basins (Lewis, et al., 1991). Bennett, et al., (1990)
documented a complete Holocene sequence in
the calcareous marls at Quidenham Mere,
Norfolk. Recent work at Quidenham Mere has
focused upon fossil pollen, charcoal as well as
biological indicators, such as chironomids and
molluscs (Peglar, 1992). It is reported that
Quidenham Mere underwent a whole
eutrophication event, which started in the Tudor
period and finished in the Victorian period
(Xianoying, et al., 2007). It is argued that Quidenham Mere experienced this phenomenon
due to an extreme input of nutrients from hemp retting, as the Mere was used as a hemp
pit during the Post-Medieval period (Xianoying, et al., 2007). There has been no work;
however, that reports the concentration change of nutrients at Quidenham Mere over this
time span. There is also limited work focussing on ostracods concentration throughout the
sequence. The aim of this literature therefore is to give a greater insight into the cultural
eutrophication process. Adding to this is the use of ostracods and nutrient concentration as
a palaeoenvironmental indicator.
Map of East Anglia showing the
location of Quidenham Mere (QM)
(Peglar, 1992).
105
OVERVIEW OF CORE THEMES
2.1 Eutrophication
The process of eutrophication was first documented by the work of Brandt (1901). Brant
(1901) established a relationship between the concentration of plankton and the
concentration of nitrogen in the freshwater lakes of Germany (Smith, 1998). Naumann
(1919) who classified waters in Sweden depending on their nutrient content (Martin and
Teubner, 2010) advanced this idea. Cultural eutrophication however was first acknowledged
as a phenomenon post World War 2, due to the increased need of fertilizers and pesticides
(Moss, et al., 1997; Xiaying et al., 2007). It is documented that cultural eutrophication can
cause severe water problems such as anoxic conditions and turbid waters (Martin and
Teubner, 2010; Holden, 2008). There is controversy however over whether cultural
eutrophication is a recent event or whether it has occurred in the past, yet been restored
(Xiaying, et al., 2007). It is clear that there is a lack of data in the historical record of cultural
eutrophication. There is also limited literature that explores the influence of human activity
on the eutrophication phenomenon under natural background (Xiaying, et al., 2007).
2.2 Lake deposits
Lake deposits have been used extensively for the reconstruction of past environments. In
recent years, however there have been many advances and developments in the techniques
required to analyse and date lake deposits (Anderson, et al., 2007). In comparison to other
types of deposits, lake sediments commonly provide continuous stratigraphic records (West,
1991). This is because they accumulate for great periods undisturbed by erosion and
weathering (Jenkin, et al., 1941; Anderson, et al., 2007). Lake sediments can therefore
provide a record of the biological history of lakes and the environmental conditions in which
sedimentation occurred.
106
2.2 Micropaleontology
Micropaleontology is a branch of science concerned with the study of microfossils in order
to reconstruct paleoenvironments (Martin, 2000). A particular fossil commonly used in
micropaleontology are ostracods. Ostracods are marine and freshwater microscopic
bivalved crustaceans that are frequently fossilized in sediments from the Cambrian period
(Athersuch, et al., 1989; Siveter, et al., 2010). These fossils were first analysed by the work
of O. F. Müller in 1776 (Griffiths and Holmes, 2000). Ostracods have remained a lively topic
and have grown in complexity with an advance of technology. It was the work of Jones
(1850) however who documented the great biostratigraphical significance of ostracods
(Griffiths and Holmes, 2000). Subsequent work has revealed that ostracod fossils are an
ideal factor for studying paleoenvironments (Evans and Griffiths, 1993). An advantage of
ostracods in the field of palaeoecology is that they are very numerous (Bignot, 1982; Butlin
and Menozzi, 2000). Ostracods inhibit practically every aquatic environment, even physically
demanding environments such as temporary pools, hypersaline lakes and hot springs
(Athersuch et al., 1989; Henderson, 1990). An additional advantage is that they exhibit
wonderful patterns of difference within and between the species (Butlin and Menozzi,
2000). Changes in salinity, temperature, hydrogen ion concentration (pH), oxygen
concentration, depth, substrate and food supply of the surrounding environment can
therefore be determined (Athersuch, et al., 1989). The most important advantage however
is that ostracods are preserved in situ in a long and complete fossil record (Butlin and
Menozzi, 2000). This allows an in depth analysis over a vast period of years.
2.3 Conclusion
A great body of literature has accumulated in recent years on the study of palaeontology in
Central East Anglia (Bennett, 1990; Lewis, et al., 1991). It is clear that most sites, which
contain a complete Holocene record in East Anglia, have only been studied palynologically
and not by any other means. There is therefore considerable scope for more
palaeoecological and paleolimnological examination in this region. The analysis of ostracods
and cations (K+ and Na+) in the sequence will therefore provide greater knowledge of the
eutrophication event at Quidenham Mere.
107
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
3.1. Aims
1) To analyse the organic and carbon content of the core.
2) To analyse the magnetic minerals in the core and identify the depositional history of
area.
3) To reconstruct past nutrient levels of the last 600 years at Quidenham Mere.
4) To construct a high resolution record of the ostracods preserved in the sequence
focusing on the eutrophication event, which started in the Tudor period and finished
in the Victorian.
3.2. Objectives
1) To perform loss-on-ignition on the core at 450 °C and 950°C to produce an organic
and carbonate record to establish the organic and carbon content of the sediment.
2) To perform magnetic susceptibility on the core to identify any soil erosion events at
Quidenham Mere.
3) To describe the core using the Troels-smith method to identify the depositional
history of Quidenham Mere.
4) To carry out a geochemistry analysis of the elements K and Na in order to show the
impact of the eutrophication event, and whether it has been restored.
5) To use this nutrient analysis to determine where on the sequence to carry out a high
resolution ostracod analysis.
6) To use the nutrient and ostracod analysis to interfere anthropogenic effects on the
landscape.
METHODOLOGY
4.1. Magnetic susceptibility (completed 25/10/2010)
Magnetic susceptibility was performed to measure the quantity of magnetic minerals in the
sample in order to identify any soil erosion event that occurred at Quidenham Mere
(Schaetzl and Anderson, 2005). Recordings using a magnetic susceptibility meter were taken
108
every 2 centimetres along the core. This stratified sampling method provided a sufficient
amount of data to draw a valid conclusion from.
4.2. Geochemistry analysis
To record the levels of Na and K throughout the core, an analysis will be performed using an
Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (AAS) (Sperling, et al., 1999; Boyle, 2001). The pH
throughout the core will first be measured in order to decide an appropriate method for
cation extraction. The pH will be recorded at 100cm intervals throughout the core using the
electrometric method. In order to perform the electrometric method, a 20 g sample will be
mixed with 50 ml of deionised water and allowed to equilibrate (Sarkar, 2005). An electrode
will then be inserted into the mixture and the pH will be read directly of the meter
(Cheswoth, 2008). If the sample has a pH > 5, ammonium acetate will be used for the cation
extraction (Gillman, 1979). It the sample has a pH < 5, ammonium chloride will be used for
the cation extraction (Narin, et al., 2000). This method has been documented as successful
in previous literature. To prepare the samples for the atomic absorption spectrophotometer
(AAS), 5g of air-dried soil will be weighed and carefully placed into a clean, dry shaking
bottle. The samples shall then be mixed with either 125 mL of 1M ammonium acetate or 40
ml of 1M ammonium chloride depending on the pH of the sample (Narin, et al., 2000). The
solutions shall than be placed on a shaker for 1 hour, to ensure the samples are thoroughly
mixed. The final preparation step is to filter the solutions through Whatman number 1 filter
paper, ensuring to reject the first 5 – 10 mL. Whatman number 1 filter paper will be used to
achieve accurate results (Whatman, 2009). The samples will then be analysed using the AAS.
A standard curve will then be constructed to calculate the concentration values. This is a
sufficient method for interfering past nutrient levels and will provide valuable information
on past processes (Boyle, 2001).
4.3. Ostracod analysis
The sub-sampling of core sediments requires careful thought (De Deckker and Forester
1988; Griffiths and Holmes 2000). The interval and thickness of each sample depends on a
variety of factors including the concentration of ostracods in the sediment and the
109
regularity of the sampling method. Due to the variation of ostracod concentration
throughout the core, there are no documented guidelines for the weight or volume of
sediment required. A pilot study will therefore be performed to produce a species
acquisition curve (Henderson and Walker, 1986). A small subsample of sediment will be
taken and the number of species present will be recorded. The sample size will then be
increased in small additions until the plot for number of species reaches asymptote
(Griffiths and Holmes, 2000). It will then be possible to estimate the mass of sediment
required to achieve full species representation.
It is extremely difficult to pick ostracod valves from raw sediment samples. Pre-treatment is
therefore required to carefully break down the sediment into individual grains (Griffiths and
Holmes, 2000). The sediments shall then be prepared for analysis using the standard
hydrogen peroxide method. This method was chosen as it has been successful in previous
studies. (De Deckker, 1982; Griffiths, 1995). Samples will be taken every ten centimetres
throughout the core and every 1 centimetre where the eutrophication event occurred. This
will provide a high-resolution analysis. The lake sediment samples shall then be digested in
c. 10% hydrogen peroxide and placed in a fume cupboard overnight in order to digest. To
extract the ostracods, the samples shall be passed through a 125 micron sieve and
thoroughly washed with distilled water to remove any chemical residue. Even though
hydrogen peroxide is frequently used for ostracod analysis, there are several pieces of
literature which argue that hydrogen peroxide can destroy fragile shells (Sohn, 1961;
Hodgkinson, 1991; Slipper, 1996). Care shall be taken therefore to produce accurate results.
4.4. Loss on ignition (LOI)
LOI will be performed to calculate the total organic matter and the total organic carbon of
the core. To calculate the total organic matter, samples will be taken every centimetre along
the core. The weight of the crucibles will then be measured (Wc) and filled 2/3 full of
sediment. The crucibles will then be re-weighed (Wcs) and positioned on a metal tray and
placed in a muffle furnace at 450°C. After 24 hours, the temperature of the furnace will be
decreased to 50°C for safety reasons. The samples will then be transferred to a desiccator.
110
The weight of the crucible and ignited soil will be weighed (Wi). LOI will then be calculated
using the following formula: % LOI = 100 x (Wd -Wi)/(Wd-Wc). This process will then be
repeated at 900°C to calculate the total organic carbon of the core. This method is the
standard procedure used to determine LOI (Hesse, 1971). It will therefore provide reliable
results.
RESULTS
5.1. Magnetic susceptibility results
The magnetic susceptibility analyse did not show any significant input of the magnetic
minerals throughout the core. This implies that there were no important soil erosion events
during the Tudor period until the Victorian period at Quidenham Mere. This outcome
corresponds with my predictions.
TIMETABLE
6.1. Timetable of important dates
111
Date Event/Deadline Action
Friday 5th
November
2010
Meeting with Ian Lawson
(11:00 pm)
Learn how to identify ostracods
in the sample.
Monday 7th
November
Lab work: Description of the
core
(i) Description of the core using
the terminology of Troels-Smith.
(ii) Book AAS induction with Jon
Corr.
Tuesday 8th
November
Lab work: LOI
DSG meeting
(i)Preparation of sample to
determine organic content of
core.
Wednesday 9th
November
Lab work: LOI (i)Weighing of samples
(ii) Preparation of samples to
determine carbon content of
core.
Thursday 10th
November
Lab work: LOI Weighing of samples.
Friday 11th
November
Troels-smith Write up of Troels-smith
sediment description.
Monday 13th –
Tuesday 30th
November
Lab work: Ostracods and AAS Analysis of ostracods and
nutrient content of the samples.
Wednesday 1st
-15th
December
Write up of dissertation Introduction and Literature
Review
Thursday 16th
– Friday 31st
December
Write up of dissertation Methods write up.
Monday 1st
December -
Saturday 15th
January
Write up of dissertation Analysis and start of discussion
section
112
Sunday 16th
January –
Wednesday 2nd
February
Second Interim Report 1500 words including finalized
aims and objectives, methods of
analysis and key research
findings.
Thursday 3rd
February –
Monday 28th
February
Write up of dissertation Write up of Discussion and
Conclusion sections
Tuesday 1
March –
Wednesday
16th March
Editing Overall research. Is discussion
logical?
Wednesday 16
March 2011
Final deadline (i)Hand in of dissertation (hard
copy and CD version) including
DSG forms, two interim reports,
reflective, commentary and risk
assessment forms.
(ii)Hand in of Student Evaluation
on Dissertation and Mentor
Evaluation form.
6.2. Timetable of DSG meetings
Tuesday 9th November Discuss any problems of LOI laboratory work.
Tuesday 16th November Discuss any problems of Troels-Smith analysis/ write up.
Tuesday 23rd November Discuss any problems of ostracod analysis or results from
AAS.
Tuesday 30th November Highlight any problems of ostracod analysis or results
from AAS.
Tuesday 7th December Talk with group about the content of the introduction
and literature review sections of the dissertation.
Tuesday 11th January Discuss any problems found in the write up of the
method, analysis and discussion sections of the
dissertation.
113
Tuesday 18th January Talk about second Interim Report.
Tuesday 25th January Discuss any problems found in the second Interim Report
and any ideas for discussion section.
Tuesday 1 February Highlight any problems in the discussion section.
Tuesday 8 February Highlight any problems in the discussion section.
Tuesday 15 February Highlight any problems in the discussion section.
Tuesday 22 February Highlight any problems in the discussion section.
Tuesday 1st March Discuss how an appropriate layout for the dissertation
and any final problems with dissertation.
Tuesday 8th March Discuss any final problems with dissertation
Tuesday 15th March Review how to submit the dissertation.
References
ANDERSON, D. E., GOUDIE, A. S., and PARKER, A.G. 2007. Global environments through the
Quaternary: exploring environmental change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ATHERSUCH, J., HORNE, D. J., and WHITTAKER, J. E. 1989. Marine and Brackish Water
Ostracods. London: The Linnean Society of London.
BENNETT, K. D., SIMONSON, W.D., and PEGLAR, S. M. 1990. Fire and man in the post-glacial
woodlands of eatern England. Journal of Archaeological Science. 17, pp. 237 – 253
BIGNOT, G. 1982. Elements of micropalaeontology: microfossils, their geological and
palaeobiological Applications. Manchester: Watkiss Studios Ltd.
BOYLE, J. F. 2001. Inorganic geochemical methods in palaeolimnology. In: W. M. Last, and J.
P. Smol, eds. Tracking environmental Change using Lake Sediments, Volume 2, Physical and
Geochemical Methods. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 83 – 141
114
BRANDT, K. 1901. Life in the ocean Annual report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian
Institution for the year ending June 30, 1990. Washington. D.C.: United states Government
printing office.
BUTLIN, K. R., and MENOZZI, P. 2000. Open questions in evolutionary ecology: do ostracods
have the answers. Hydrobiologia. 419, pp. 1-14
CHESWORTH, W. 2008. Encyclopaedia of Soil Science. Dordrecht: Springer
De DECKKER, P. 1982. Late Quaternary ostracods from Lake George, New South Wales.
Alcheringa. 6, pp. 305-318
De DECKKER, P., and FORESTER, R. M. 1988. The use of ostracods to reconstruct
paleoenvironmental records. In: P. De DECKKER, J. P. COLIN, and J. P. PEYPOUQUET, eds.
Ostracoda in earth sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 175 -199
DOKULIL, M. T., and TEUBNER, K. 2010. Eutrophication and climate change: Present
situation and future scenarios. In: A. ANSARI, ed. Eutrophication: Causes, consequences and
control. New York: Springer, pp. 1 – 17.
EVANS, J. G., and GRIFFITHS, H. I. 1993. Holocene mollusc and ostracods sequences: their
potential for examining short-time scale evolution. In: LEES, D.R. and D.Walker, eds.
Evolutionary Patterns and Processes. London: Academic Press pp. 125–137
Gillman, G. P. 1979. A proposed method for the measurement of exchange properties of
highly weathered soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 17(1), pp. 129 – 139
GRIFFITHS, H. I. 1995. European Quaternary freshwater Ostracoda: a biostratigraphic and
palaeobiogeographic primer. Scopolia. 34, pp. 1-168
GRIFFITHS, H. I., and HOLMES, J. A. 2000. Non-Marine Ostracods and Quaternary
Palaeoenvironments. London: Quaternary Research Association.
HENDERSON, P. A. 1990. Freshwater Ostracods. London: The Linnean Society of London.
115
HENDERSON, P. A., and WALKER, I. 1986. On the leaflitter community of the Amazoniam
blackwater stream Tarumazinho. Journal of Tropical Ecology. 2, pp. 1-17
HESSE, P. R. 1971. A textbook of Soil Chemistry Analysis. London: William Clower and Sons
HODGKINSON, R. L. 1991. Microfossil processing: a damaging report. Micropaleontology. 37,
pp. 320-326
HOLDEN, J. 2008. An Introduction to Physical Geography and the Environment, Second
Edition. Essex: Harlow
JENKIN, B. M, MORTIMER, C. H. and PENNINGTON, W. 1941. The study of Lake Deposits.
Nature. 147, pp. 496 – 500
JONES, T. R. 1850. Description of the Entomostraca of the Pleistocene Beds of Newbury,
Copford, Clacton, and Greys. Annals and magazine of Natural History (Series 2). 6, pp. 245-
282
LEWIS, S. G., WHITEMAN, C. A. and BRIDGLAND, D. R. 1991. Central East Anglia and the Fen Basin: Field Guide. London: Quaternary Research.
MARTIN, R. E. 2000. Environmental micropaleontology: the application of microfossils to
environmental Geology. New York: Springer.
MOSS, B., MADGWICK, J. and PHILLIPS, G. 1997. A Guide to the Restoration of Nutrient-
enriched Shallow Lakes. London: Springer.
NARNIN, I, SOYLAK, M, ELÇI, L., and DOGAN, M. 2000. Determination of trace metal ions by
AAS in natural water samples after pre-concentration of pyrocatechol violet complexes on
an activated carbon column. Talanta. 52, pp. 1041-1046.
NAUMANN, E. 1919. Aspects on the ecology of limnoplankton with special focus on
phytoplankton. Svensk Bot. Tidskr 13, pp. 51–58.
116
PEGLAR, S. M. 1992. Mid-and late-Holocene vegetation history of Quidenham Mere,
Norfolk, UK interpreted using recurrent groups of taxa. Vegetation History and
Archaeobotany. 2, pp. 15-28
SARKAR, D. 2005. Physical and Chemical Methods in Soil Analysis. New Delhi: New Age
International Ltd.
SCHAETZL, R. J. and ANDERSON, S. 2005. Soils: genesis and geomorphology. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
SIVETER, D. J., BRIGGS, D. E. G., SIVETER, D. J. and SUTTON, M. D. An exceptionally preserved
myodocopid ostracod from the Silurian of Herefordshire, UK. Proceedings of the royal
society b-biological sciences. 277(1687), pp. 1539 – 1544
SLIPPER, I. 1996. Early Turonian Ostracoda: the Melbourn Rock fauna from Abbots Cliff,
Dover, England. In: M. C. KEEN, eds. Proceedings of the 2nd European Ostracodologists’
Meeting. London, British Micropalaeontological Society. pp. 49 -56
SMITH, V. H. 1998. Cultural eutrophication if inland estuarine, and coastal water. In: M. L.
PACE, and P. M. GROFFMAN, eds. Successes, Limitations, and Frontiers in ecosystem Science.
New York: Springer, pp. 7 – 69.
SOHN, I. G. 1961. Techniques for preparation and study of fossil ostracods. In: R. C. MOORE,
ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, Part Q, Arthropoda 3, Crustacea, ostracoda.
Lawrence: University of Kansas Press and the Geological Society of America. pp 64-70.
SPERLING, M. and WELZ, B. 1999. Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Chichester: Wiley
WATMAN, 2009. Leadership in separations technology for life sciences. [online]. [Accessed
20 October 2010]. Available from: http://www.whatman.com/filterpapers.aspx
WEST, R. G. 1991. Pleistocene Palaeoecology of Central Norfolk, a study of environments
through time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
XIAOYING, C., SHIJIEM, L. I., QING, S. and JING, X. 2007. Response of cultural Lake
Eutropication to Hemp – retting in Quidenham Mere of England Post-Medieval. Chinese
Geographical Science. 17(1), pp. 69-74
117
10.5.2. Second Interim Report
The effect of human activity at Quidenham Mere since the medieval period, interpreted
by mollusc and nutrient data.
1.0 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
1.1. Aims
5) To produce sediment lithology diagram and a sediment composition diagram of the
core.
6) To produce a magnetic susceptibility graph of the core.
7) To reconstruct past nutrient levels of the last 600 years at Quidenham Mere.
8) To construct a high resolution record of the molluscs preserved in the sequence.
1.2. Objectives
7) To perform loss-on-ignition on the core at 450°C and 950°C to produce an organic
and carbonate record to establish the organic and carbon content of the sediment.
8) To describe the core using the Troels-Smith (1955) method in order to identify the
depositional history of Quidenham Mere.
9) To perform a magnetic susceptibility analysis on the core to identify whether
eutrophication was caused by human activity or by soil erosion.
10) To perform a geochemistry analysis of the elements K and Na in order to show the
positioning and impact of eutrophication at Quidenham Mere.
11) To examine the high-resolution mollusc record to decipher the ecological impact of
eutrophication at Quidenham Mere.
2.0. RESULTS
2.1. Sediment Analysis
The sediment lithology of the core was analysed using the system of Troels-Smith (1955).
The organic content and carbonate content of the core was calculated from loss-on-ignition
at 450°C and 950°C, respectively, following the standard procedure of Hesse (1971).
2.1a. Sediment Lithology
The bottom of core QUID1 is composed of calcium carbonate. Particulate testarum
molluscorum become present at 802 cm and remain throughout the core. The calcareous
118
marl varies in stratification from values 1 – 3 and undergoes a rapid transition into peat at
360 cm, which remains to 125 cm. The base of the peat is very dark brown/black and is
composed of sphagnum leaves. In the middle part of this section, the peat becomes lighter,
coarser and contains fragments of herbaceous plants and wood segments such as Betula.
The peat continues becoming lighter above this section and herbaceous plants and wood
segments dominate. The peat then gradually changes to a dark brown herbaceous peat at
approximately 161 cm.
119
2.1b Sediment composition
Figure 2. A comparison between Peglar’s (1993) sediment composition diagram (434 – 1240
cm) and the QUID1 sediment composition diagram (125-830cm). The coloured lines indicate
where the organic and carbonate component correspond.
There is a similarity between the trends of the organic and carbonate content throughout
the two cores, however the major features occur at different depths. For example, the
organic content of the QUID1 core first peaks at 750 cm to approximately 37%, while the
organic content of Peglar’s (1993) core peaks at 790cm to approximately 37%. Furthermore,
the carbonate content of the QUID1 core declines to 670 cm, while Peglar (1993) shows that
it declines to 710 cm. Peglar (1993) also shows a slight decline in organic content at 500 cm
followed by a rise in the carbonate content. This study also found this trend, however the
organic content of QUID1 declines at 420 cm. It is therefore clear that QUID1 differs to
Peglar’s (1993) sediment composition by 50-80 cm.
120
2.3. Magnetic Susceptibility
Figure 3. The input of magnetic susceptibly elements in QUID1. The magnetic susceptibility
results from QUID1 reveal a general increase of magnetic susceptible elements from 830 cm
to 0 cm. The results also show that the core is rich in diamagnetic substances (Dearing,
1999). This finding is in agreement with the QUID1 sediment analysis. On closer analysis, the
results reveal a relatively steady input of magnetic susceptible elements from 830 cm to 690
cm, with minor fluctuations. Following this, the rate of input rapidly increases between 690
and 530 cm indicating a period of soil erosion. Following this, the input of magnetic
susceptible elements becomes relatively steady, with minor fluctuations, between 530 cm
and 0 cm.
121
2.4. Nutrient Analysis
Figure 4. The geochemistry of Quidenham Mere from the Medieval Period to the present,
focussing upon the concentration of sodium and potassium (NB values <0 have been
recorded as 0. This is because the concentration < the blank value).
Two peaks are prominent in the concentration of sodium and potassium. From the base of
QUID1, the concentration of potassium is approximately 1 mg/kg. The concentration of
potassium peaks at 745 cm (23 mg/kg) before gradually decline to 0 mg/kg. This variable
remains at 0 mg/kg to 385 cm, before rapidly rises to 0.5 mg/kg. Following a rapid decline in
the concentration of potassium, another peak is prominent at 345 cm (58 mg/kg). The
concentration of potassium then quickly declines and fluctuates around 2 mg/kg between
325 cm – 125 cm.
The concentration of sodium throughout QUID1 is greater than that of potassium, yet
follows a similar pattern. From the base of QUID1, the concentration of sodium is
approximately 6 mg/kg until it gradually peaks at 765 cm to 33 mg/kg. This variable then
relatively rapidly declines and fluctuates greatly between 0 mg/kg L and 11 mg/kg until 455
cm. At 455 cm the concentration of sodium sharply rises to 77 mg/kg, before declining
rapidly to 12 mg/kg. This is followed by another rapid increase at 395 cm to 90 mg/kg.
Following this rise, the concentration of sodium very quickly declines and greatly fluctuates
around 4 mg/kg throughout the rest of the core.
122
2.5. Mollusc analysis
Figure 5. The change in abundance of molluscs in the sediments of Quidenham Mere. Two
sharp peaks are prominent, one at 745 cm – 765 cm and the second at 345 cm and 385 cm.
Following these peaks, the abundance of molluscs rapidly declines to a value similar to that
prior to the peak. The abundance of molluscs at 125 cm < the abundance of molluscs at 830
cm.
123
2.6. Statistical Analysis
Variable Potassium Sodium Organic Material Magnetic
susceptibility
Potassium Not correlated
(P = 0.758)
Slightly
Positively
correlated (PC =
0.476, P = 0.000)
a) 125-600 cm:
not correlated (p
= 0.208).
b) 600 – 830 cm:
not correlated (P
= 0.136).
Sodium Not correlated (P
= 0.758)
Not correlated (P
= 0.474)
a) 125-600 cm:
not correlated (P
= 0.121)
b) 600 – 830 cm
not correlated (P
= 0.384)
Organic Material Slightly
Positively
correlated (PC =
0.476, P = 0.000)
Not correlated
(P = 0.474)
a) 125-600 cm:
not correlated (P
= 0.690)
B) 600 – 830 cm
not correlated (P
= 0.547).
Magnetic
susceptibility
a) 125-600 cm:
not correlated (p
= 0.208).
b) 600 – 830 cm:
not correlated (P
= 0.136).
a) 125-600 cm:
not correlated (P
= 0.121)
b) 600 – 830 cm
not correlated (P
= 0.384)
a) 125-600 cm:
not correlated (P
= 0.690)
B) 600 – 830 cm
not correlated (P
= 0.547).
Table 1. A summary of statistical analysis performed on the eutrophication indicators of
Quidenham Mere (PC = Pearson's correlation). When p < 0.05, there is a statistical
correlation between the two variables.
124
Mollusc /
eutrophication
indicator
Bithynia
tentaculata
Gyraulus
sp.
Lymnaea
sp.
Valvata sp. Pisidium sp.
Potassium Positively
correlated
(PC = 0.447,
P = 0.000)
Positively
correlated
(PC = 0.315,
P = 0.008)
Positively
correlated
(PC = 0.292,
P = 0.014)
Positively
correlated
(PC =
0.283, P =
0.017)
Positively
correlated
(PC =0.315,
P = 0.007)
Organic matter Positively
correlated
(PC = 0.507,
P = 0.000)
Positively
correlated
(PC = 0.478,
P = 0.000)
Positively
correlated
(PC = 0.432,
P = 0.000)
Positively
correlated
(PC =
0.508, P =
0.000)
Positively
correlated
(PC = 0.479,
P = 0.000)
Table 2. A summary of the statistical mollusc data-set of Quidenham Mere (PC = pearson's
correlation). If p < 0.05, the two variables are statistical correlated with one another.
3.0 DISCUSSION
3.1. Identifying eutrophication
In order to determine the process of eutrophication at Quidenham Mere, the nutrient
content, and the organic matter content were analysed (Grigorovich, et al., 2005). This
multi-proxy method is ideal as can abolish misleading information provided by single-proxy
studies (Birks, 2006: Xianoying, et al., 2007). The potassium content was used as an
indicator of eutrophication as the work of Leentvaar (1980) documents that potassium
increases during this phenomenon. The organic matter content is also an indicator of
eutrophication as the work of Ongley (2006) and Ortega, et al., (2006) reveals that the
organic matter increases during eutrophication. The work of Rabalais (2010) further
supports this idea by documenting that the increase of organic matter during eutrophication
is due to soil erosion, natural weathering, or human activity. The sodium content however
was used in this investigation as an indicator of the onset of the eutrophication. This is
125
because the work of Livingstone and Boykin (1962) documents that eutrophication is
directly related to the ionic content of the water. This is further advanced by the work of
NAS (1969) which reveals that sodium promotes eutrophication.
The nutrient and organic matter results agree with previous literature. The data shows that
there is a significant statistical positive correlation between the organic content variable and
the potassium concentration variable. This idea coincides with the work of Ongely (1996).
The results also show that there is no significant statistical correlation between the organic
matter variable and the sodium concentration variable. This idea coincides with the work of
Livingstone and Boykin (1962), NAS (1969) and Ongley (2006).
It is therefore clear that two episodes of eutrophication occurred at Quidenham Mere
between the Medieval Period and the present day. The first episode of eutrophication
occurred at approximately 775- 675 cm (Medieval-Post Medieval period) .This idea coincides
with the work of Xiaoying, et al., (2007). The second episode of eutrophication occurred at
approximately 400 – 300 cm (the last 200 years). No previous literature has focussed upon
the 450 – 0 cm section of the profile before, therefore the latter is a new finding.
3.2 What was the cause of the Medieval-Post Medieval (M-PM) eutrophication event at
Quidenham Mere?
Magnetic susceptibility measures the quantity of magnetic susceptible element in a sample
and is a good proxy for soil erosion (Hirons and Thompson, 1986; Nowaczyk, 2001). By
analysing the magnetic susceptibility results for Quidenham Mere, we are able to identify
the cause of the eutrophication events.
The data shows that the negative correlation between the organic/potassium variable and
the magnetic susceptibility variable is not statistically significant for the M-PM
eutrophication event. Furthermore, the positive correlation between the sodium variable
and the magnetic susceptibility variable is not statistically significant. It is therefore clear
that soil erosion was not the main causes of this eutrophication event. Consequently,
anthropogenic activities are a legitimate r to explain the M-PM eutrophication event. This
126
idea corresponds with the work of Xiaoying, et al., (2007) which documents that the M-PM
eutrophication event occurred due to the cultivation of Cannabis sativa within the Mere.
This work has been advanced by Yang (2010) which documents that the region surrounding
Quidenham Mere has been contaminated over the last thousand years due to hemp-retting.
Furthermore the work of Peglar (1993) reveals that Cannabis sativa increased during the M-
PM period (Figure 6). Hemp retting would have therefore caused the Mere to become highly
eutrophic due to an increase of nutrients and organic matter (Xiaoying, et al., 2007).
Figure 6. Peglar’s (1993) pollen stratigraphy of Quidenham Mere. There is a rapid increase in
Cannabis sativa during the Medieval period (QM–9b). After a gentle decline of Cannabis
sativa at the end of the subzone QM-9b, Cannabis sativa increases rapidly to a maximum of
94% during the Post Medieval (QM-9c).
127
3.3 What was the cause of the most recent eutrophication event at Quidenham Mere?
The data shows that the positive correlation between the organic/potassium/sodium
variable and the magnetic susceptibility variable are not statistically significant for the most
recent eutrophication event. Quidenham Mere therefore became eutrophic at this time due
to anthropogenic activities and not soil erosion. This idea coincides with the work of Peglar
(1993) which documents that the Mere was used as parkland during the last 200 years.
Peglar (1993) also explains that the high charcoal concentration during this period was due
to the development and maintenance of the parkland. It therefore seems logical that the
development of the parkland, by forest clearing and fertilization, caused an excess of
nutrients and organic matter to enter the water system, thus causing the Mere to become
eutrophic. Furthermore, the burning of the vegetation would have released nitrate into the
atmosphere, which would have entered the water system and caused the Mere to become
eutrophic (Moss, 2008).
3.4. What effect did eutrophication at Quidenham Mere have upon the abundance of
molluscs?
a) Bithynia tentaculata
The results show that there is a significant statistical positive correlation between the
Bithynia tentaculata variable and potassium/organic content variable. It is therefore clear
that the eutrophication process initially caused an increase of Bithynia tentaculata. This is
due to the species ability to filter feed in eutrophic and human influenced waters
(Brendelberger and Jiirgens, 1993).
However, it is clear from the dataset that the population of Bithynia tentaculata declined
following the excessive input of nutrients. This was due to low DO and the toxic by-products
of hemp retting, such as hydrogen sulphide (Xiaoying, et al., 2007). This finding is in
agreement with the work of Xiaoying, et al., (2007) who found a marked decrease in
Bithynia tentaculata during the M-PM eutrophication event of Quidenham Mere. This idea
also concurs with the work of Richter (2001) which documents that low DO can cause a
decline in the Bithynia tentaculata population. Furthermore, the work of Kermey (1999)
128
documents that Bithynia tentaculata are not common in oxygen-depleted waters. It is
therefore clear that the population of Bithynia tentaculata at Quidenham Mere declined
due to (i) the mollusc being gill breathing (ii) the inability of the mollusc to migrate from its
microhabitat after rapid environmental change (Hann, 2005).
b) Gyraulus sp.
The results show that there is a significant statistical positive correlation between the
Gyraulus sp. variable and the potassium/organic variable. It is therefore clear that the
eutrophication process initially caused an increase in the Gyraulus population. This idea
coincides with the work of Lysne and Clark (2009) which documents that Gyraulus are
tolerant of eutrophic waters and high nutrient levels. The Gyraulus population then
experienced a rapid decline due to species’ intolerance to hydrogen sulphide (Xiaoying, et
al., 2007).
c) Lymnaea sp.
There is a significant statistical positive correlation between the Lymnaea sp. variable and
the potassium/organic variable. It is clear that the eutrophication process initially caused an
increase in the Lymnaea population. This is due to the snail’s ability to take in oxygen
through its pneumostome (Clifford, 1991) (Figure 7). Furthermore, the work of Lodge and
Kelly (1985) documents that Lymnaea undergoes a phonological plasticity in order to
respond to periods of low dissolved oxygen. Following this increase, the Lymnaea
population experienced a quick decline due to species’ intolerance to hydrogen sulphide
(Xiaoying, et al., 2007).
Figure 7. Diagram of a Lymnaea snail
with the main features labelled. In
order to survive in periods of low DO,
the snail hangs suspended from the
upper surface of the water. The snail
subsequently takes in oxygen by
opening its pneumostome (Clifford,
1991).
129
d) Valvata sp.
There is a significant statistical positive correlation between the Valvata sp. variable and the
potassium/organic variable. It is clear that the eutrophication process initially caused an
increase in the Valvata population. This finding coincides with the literature of Lodge and
Kelly (1985) which documents that Valvata can survive periods of eutrophication due to
behavioural and physiological plasticity. Furthermore, the work of Grigorovich, et al., (2005)
documents that Valvata is an effective competitor in eutrophic water as it can feed on
suspended particles. Following this increase, the Valvata population experienced a rapid
decline due to species’ intolerance to hydrogen sulphide (Xiaoying, et al., 2007).
a) Pisidium sp.
The results show that there is a significant statistical positive correlation between the
Pisidium sp. variable and the potassium/organic variable. It is clear that the eutrophication
process initially caused an increase in the Pisidium population. The data set however clearly
shows that the abundance of Pisidium only slightly declined following the excessive input of
nutrients. This finding agrees with the work of Caldwell (1975) which reports that bivalve
molluscs are more resistant to hydrogen sulphide than gastropod molluscs.
4. Significance of main findings
In recent years, a debate has arisen about whether cultural eutrophication is a modern
event, or whether it has occurred in the past, yet been restored (Xiaoying, et al., 2007).
There is also controversy over the extent to which human activity influences the process of
eutrophication. The findings from this literature will therefore add to previous knowledge in
order to further our understanding of this topic.
In addition to this, the study site is of great importance as there is limited work focussing
upon Quidenham Mere. There has been no work, for example, that reports the
concentration change of nutrients at Quidenham Mere since the medieval Period.
Furthermore, the work of Xiaoying, et al., (2007) lacks details of which species of molluscs
where effected by the M-PM eutrophication event. Adding to this, there is no literature
documenting the most recent eutrophication event at Quidenham Mere. This literature will
130
therefore give a greater insight into the cultural eutrophication process and provides a basis
for further study of the recent eutrophication event at Quidenham Mere.
5. APPENDIX
5.1 Outstanding work
In order to produce a thorough and scientific dissertation more work is required. For
example, a Troels-Smith diagram using the Psimpoll software is required. I have also
organised a meeting this week with Rachel Gasior to learn how to report less than figures
for the geochemistry analysis. Furthermore, a greater body of literature must be read in
order to demonstrate a detailed understanding of the main themes.
5.2 Dissertation Headings
List of figures
List of Tables
Acknowledgment
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Aims and Objectives
2.1 Aims
2.2 Objectives
3. Overview of core themes
3.1 Eutrophication
3.2 Lake deposits
3.3 Micropalaeontology
4. Study Area
4.1 Site location and description
4.2 Site Selection
4.3 Limitations of site chosen
5. Methodology
5.1 Sediment description and stratigraphy
5.3 Sediment sampling
5.4 Magnetic susceptibility
5.5 Geochemistry
5.6. Mollusc identification
5.7. Limitations of methods
131
6. Results
6.2 Stratigraphy
6.3 Magnetic susceptibility
6.4 Nutrient Analysis
6.5 Mollusc analysis
7. Discussion
7.1 Identify eutrophication
7.2. What was the cause of the eutrophication events
7.3. What effect did the eutrophication events have upon the abundance of
molluscs?
8. Conclusion
8.1 Summary of main finding
8.2 Significance of main findings
8.3 Scope for further study
9. Bibliography
10. Appendix.
10.1 Risk assessment form
10.2 DSG Report logs
10.3 DSG Reflective log
10.4 Interim Report 1 and 2
5.3 References
BIRKS, H. H. and BIRKS, H. J. B. 2006. Multi-proxy studies in Palaeolimnology. Veget. Hist.
Archaeobot. 15, pp. 235 -251.
BIRKS, H. H. and BIRKS, H. J. B. 1980. Quaternary Palaeoecology. Edward Arnold, London
BRENDELBERGER, H. and JIIRGENS, S. 1993. Suspension feeding in Bithynia tentaculata
(Prosobranchia, Bithyniidae), as affected by body size, food and temperature. Oecologia. 94,
pp. 36-42.
CALDWELL, R. S. 1975 Hydrogen sulphide effects on selected larval and adult marine
invertebrate. Water Resour., Research Institut. 31, p. 27.
CLIFFORD, H. F. 1991. Aquatic invertebrates of Alberta: an illustrated guide. Alberta:The
University of Alberta Press.
132
DEARING, J. 1999, Magnetic susceptibility. In: WALDEN, J., OLDFIELD, F. and SMITH, J. P. eds.
Environmental magnetism: a practical guide. Technical Guide, No. 6. London: Quaternary
Research Association. pp. 35 – 62
GRIGOROVICH, I. A., MILLS, E. L., RICHARDS, C. B., BRENEMAN, D. and CIBOROWSKI, J. J. H.
2005. European Valve Snail Valvata piscinalis (Müller) in the Laurentian Great Lakes Basin.
Journal of Great Lakes Research. 31, pp. 135 – 143.
HANN, T. 2005. Respiration rates in Bithynia Tentaculata (l.) (gastropoda: bithyniidae) in
response to acclimation temperature and acute temperature change. Journal of Molluscan
Studies. 71, pp. 127–131.
HESSE, P. R. 1971. A textbook of Soil Chemistry Analysis. London: William Clower and Sons.
HIRONS, K. R. and THOMPSON, R. 1986. Palaeoenvironmental application of magnetic
measurements from inter-drumlin hollow lakes sediments near Dunganon, Co. Tyrone,
Northern Ireland. Boreas. 15(2), pp. 117 – 135.
HORNUNG, M. and LANGAN, S. J. 1999. Nitrogen deposition: sources, impacts and
responses in natural and semi-natural ecosystems. In: S. J. LANGAN, ed. The impact of
Nitrogen Deposition on Natural Semi-Natural Ecosystems. Netherland: Kluwer Academic
Publishers, pp. 1 – 14.
KERMEY, M. 1999. Atlas of the Land and Freshwater Molluscs of Britain and Ireland. Essex:
Harley Books.
LEENTVAAR, P. 1980. Eutrophication, nature management and the role of potassium. Aquatic
Ecology. 14(1-2), pp. 22-29.
LIVINGSTONE, D. A. and BOYKIN, J. C. 1962. Vertical distribution of phosphorous in Linsley
Pond Mud. Limnol. Oceanogr. 7, pp. 57-62.
LODGE, D. M. and KELLY P. 1985. Habitat disturbance and the stability of freshwater
gastropod populations. Oecologia. 68, pp. 111-117.
133
LSYNE, S. J. and CLARK, W. H. 2009. Mollusc Survey of the Lower Bruneau River, Owyhee
County, Idaho, U.S.A. American Malacological Bulletin. 27(1/2), pp. 167-172.
MOSS, B. 2008. Ecology of fresh waters. Man and Medium, Past to Future: Third edition.
Oxford: Blackwell.
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. 1962. Eutrophication: causes, consequences, correctives;
proceedings of a symposium. Washington: Printing and Publishing Office National Academy
of Sciences.
NOWACZYK, N. R. 2001. Logging of magnetic susceptibility. In: W. M. Last, and J. P. Smol,
eds. Tracking environmental Change using Lake Sediments, Volume 1, Basin Analysis, Coring
and Chronological Techniques. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 155 - 162 .
ONGLEY, E. D. 1996. Control of water pollution from agriculture – FAO of the United
Nations, FAO irrigation and drainage paper 55. Rome.
ORTEGA, B., CABALLERO, M., LOZANO, S., VILACLARA, G. and RODRÍGUEZ, A. 2006. Rock
magnetic and geochemical proxies for iron mineral diagenesis in a tropical lake: Lago Verde,
Los Tuxtlas, East–Central Mexico. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 250(3-4), pp. 444-458.
PEGLAR, S. M. 1993. Mid-and late-Holocene vegetation history of Quidenham Mere,
Norfolk, UK interpreted using recurrent groups of taxa. Vegetation History and
Archaeobotany. 2, pp. 15-28.
RABALAIS, N. N. 2010. Eutrophication of Estuarine and Coastal Ecosystems. In: R. MITCHELL,
and J. D. GU, eds. Environmental Microbiology, Second Edition. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons,
Inc. pp. 115 -137.
RICHTER, T. 2001. Reproductive biology and life history strategy of Bithynia tentaculata
(Linnaeus, 1758) and Bithynia leachii (Sheppard, 1823) [online]. [Accessed 03/01/2011]
Available from: http://edok01.tib.uni-hannover.de/edoks/e002/327030496.pdf.
TROELS-SMITH, J. 1955. Karakterisering af lose jordarter (characterization of unconsolidated
sediments). Damn. Geol. Unders. IV. 3, 1-73.
134
XIAOYING, C., SHIJIEM, L. I., QING, S. and JING, X. 2007. Response of cultural Lake
eutrophication to Hemp – retting in Quidenham Mere of England Post-Medieval. Chinese
Geographical Science. 17(1) pp. 69-74.
YANG, H. 2010. Historical mercury contamination in sediments and catchment soils of Diss
Mere, UK. Environmental Pollution. 158(7), pp. 2504-2510.
10.6. Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH)
The COSHH forms have been included to show that the methods were performed safely.
135
136
137
10.7. Risk assessment forms
The risk assessment for the initial dissertation plan has been enclosed. Unfortunately, the
results from Stow Bedon, Norfolk were not included in this report, as they lacked scientific
significance.
138