the case for communicationpanoslondon.panosnetwork.org/wp-content/files/2007/09/... ·...
TRANSCRIPT
The case for communication
in sustainable development
Promoting dialogue, debate and change
ii
©PanosLondon,2007
Formoreinformation,contact:
PanosLondon9WhiteLionStreetLondonN19PDUnitedKingdom
tel+44(0)2072781111fax+44(0)2072780345
PanosLondonispartoftheworldwidePanosNetworkofindependent
institutesworkingtoensureinformationisusedeffectivelytofosterdebate,pluralismanddemocracy.Formoreinformationseewww.panos.org
Acknowledgements
The case for communicationwaswrittenbyKittyWarnock,PanosLondon’sSeniorAdvisor,communicationfordevelopment;EmrysSchoemaker;andMarkWilson,ExecutiveDirectorofPanosLondon.
ThispapersupportsandcomplementsAt the heart of change: the role of communication in sustainable development,whichwascommissionedbytheUKGovernment’sDepartmentforInternationalDevelopment(DFID).Backgroundresearchandacomprehensiveliteraturereviewwereconductedforbothofthesepapers,alongwithaseriesofinterviewsintheUKandothercountries.PanosLondonisgratefulforthegeneroussupportofadistinguishedadvisorygroupofinternationalexpertsincommunication,politicalscience,economicsanddevelopment,whichassistedandadvisedintheresearchandwritingofthesepapers.Themembersofthisgroupwere:
LishanAdamCharlieBeckettRobertChambersPeterdaCostaJamesDeaneMargaretGallagherMaryGoodyearEmmaGrantLawrenceHaddadBirgitteJallovRhadikaLalPaulMartin
AdditionalsupportwasreceivedfromMarkGalloway,TeresaHanley,MarkHarvey,MyriamHorngren,DavidPage,JonTinker,WarrenFeek,AlexWynterandthestaffofPanosLondon.
Allviewsexpressedinthepaper,however,arethoseofPanosLondon.
At the heart of change andThe case for communicationareavailablefromwww.panos.org.uk/heartofchange
RobinMansellMikeMooreRichardMorganSinaOdugbemiAidaOpoku-MensahAlexRentonFionaRobertsDavidSouterEamoinnTaylorF.F.TusubiraMylesWickstead
1
Contents
IntroductionCommunication:what,why–andwhynow?PoliticsandgovernanceAdiverse,engagedandempoweredcivilsocietyEconomicdevelopmentWhycommunicationneedssupportWhatneedstobedoneandwhoneedstodoitConclusion
2
6
10
23
33
43
56
60
�
Withonlyeightyearstogountil2015–thetargetdatefortheMillenniumDevelopmentGoals(MDGs)1–itisclearthatcurrentdevelopmenteffortsarenotdeliveringtheresultstheworld’spoorneedandtheglobalcommunitypromisedintheMillenniumDeclarationsignedbytheleadersof189countriesinSeptember2000.Atpresent,twooutofeveryfivepeoplearelivingonlessthanUS$2aday.Fiftycountries,24oftheminsub-SaharanAfrica,withacombinedpopulationofalmost900millionpeople,arefallingbehindonatleastoneoftheMDGs.2ThelatestWorldBankforecastspredictthatby2015morethan600millionpeoplewillstillbelivingonUS$1aday,andasitnotedinits2006reportontheMDGs:‘withoutmeasuresthatacceleratechange,manycountriesmayfallshortofthetargets…By2010wewillknowwhetherthegoalscanbeachieved.Ifbythenwehavenotcommittedthenecessaryresources,adoptedreforms,andimplementedeffectivenewprograms,itwillbedifficulttomakefurthercoursecorrections.’3
Whyare‘measuresthatacceleratechange’tolifthundredsofmillionsofpeopleoutofabsolutepovertyprovingsohardtoachieveindevelopingcountries?Thisisthesinglemostimportantquestionfacingtheworld,andthereisbroadagreementontheexplanatoryfactorsthatdrivepolitical,economicandsocialdevelopment.Theyincludeacountry’sclimate,geographyandaccesstonaturalresources,4itsinstitutionsandleadership,5historyandculture,6andprevalenceofconflictwithinitsbordersandwithitsneighbours.7Thesefactorsare,inturn,affectedbybroaderinternationalissues,suchaspoliticalalliancesandblocs,tradepolicies,andlevelsandpatternsofinternationaldebtforgivenessandaidrelief.8
Thereis,however,considerabledisagreementbetweenpoliticians,economists,developmentexperts,academicsandpractitionersontherelativeimportanceofthesefactorsandtheirpreciserelationshipstooneanother.
n Theinternationaldonorcommunityisincreasinglyconcentratingitsattentionontheconceptof‘goodgovernance’–thenotionthatastate’scapabilitytoperformitskeyfunctions,responsivenesstoitscitizens’aspirationsandneeds,andaccountabilitytothemforwhatitdoesarecentraltoestablishingsustainableandfar-reachingdevelopment.
n Manynon-governmentalorganisations(NGOs)warnagainsttakingtoo‘statist’anapproach,stressinginsteadtheimportancetosuccessfuldevelopmentofbuildingmoreempoweredandengagedcitizensina‘civilsociety’thatreflectsthecompetitiveandcollaborativedynamicsofpeoplelivinginthecountry.
n Economistscontinuetoargueovertherightbalanceoffreeandregulatedmarkets,acceptablelevelsofequityandefficiency,andtheimpactof‘free’and‘protectionist’traderulesoneconomicdevelopment.Buttheyallstresstheneedforlegalprotectionofassetsandcapital;aneducatedlabourforce;andthebuildingofastrongscientificandtechnologicalbaseifacountryistogenerateconsistenteconomicgrowth.9
Introduction
1TheeightMDGsaretheinternationaldevelopmenttargetsagreedbyeverycountry’sleadersattheMillenniumSummitin2000andreaffirmedattheWorldSummitinNewYorkinSeptember2005.Seewww.un.org/millenniumgoalsfordetails
2UNDP(2005)Human Development Report 2005
3WorldBank(2006)World Development Indicators 2006http://devdata.worldbank.org/wdi2006/contents/Section1_1.htm
4See,forexample,JaredDiamond(1998)Guns, germs and steel: A short history of everybody for the last 13,000 years,London:Vintage
5See,forexample,DouglassCNorth(2005) Understanding the process of economic change,(Revisededition)Princeton,NewJersey:PrincetonUniversityPress;andPaulCollier(2007)The bottom billion: Why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it,NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress
6See,forexample,DavidLandes(1998)The wealth and poverty of nations: Why are some rich and others so poor?NewYork:W.W.Norton;andLawrenceEHarrison(2006)The central liberal truth: How politics can change a culture and save it from itself,NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress
7See,forexample,AzarGat(2006)War in human civilization,Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress
8See,forexample,JeffreySachs(2005)The End of Poverty;MartinWolf(2005)Why Globalization Works,NewHaven,YaleNotaBene;andforadifferentview,ErikReinert(2006)How rich countries got rich, and why poor countries stay poor,London:Constable&Robinson
9Ontheneedforastrongscientific/technologicalbase,seeTheEconomist,3February2007,p11
Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
� Introduction
Thispaperdoesnotaddressitselfdirectlytothesedebates,whichareextensivelycoveredelsewhere.Insteaditfocusesonavitalelementessentialtoeachofthem,butwhichisconsistentlyignoredormarginalisedindevelopmentanalyses,debatesandinterventions:allofthesehumananddevelopmentalprocessesrelyontheflowofinformationandcommunicationbetweenindividualsandgroups.Effectivecommunicationbuildsrelationships,engendersdebate,facilitateschoices,enablesinformeddecisions,helpsbuildcoalitionsandalliances,andacceleratesandgenerateschange.
The case for communication10showsthateffectiveinformationandcommunicationprocessesareprerequisitesforsuccessfuldevelopment.Theyarethelifebloodofgoodgovernance(centraltopoliticaldiscourseandpower,andlyingattheheartofcapable,responsiveandaccountablestates);anintegralpartofempoweringandenablingahealthy,vibrantcivilsociety;essentialforthecreationofefficientandeffectiveeconomies;andacriticalcomponentofsocialadaptationandofsocietiesdealingsuccessfullywithachangingworld.
Atitsheart,development–ifitistobesustainable–mustbeaprocessthatallowspeopletobetheirownagentsofchange:toactindividuallyandcollectivelyusingtheirowningenuityandaccessingideas,practicesandknowledgeinthesearchforwaystofulfiltheirpotential.ItrequireswhateconomistAmartyaSencalls‘realfreedoms’,11thecapacityforpeopletoparticipateinadiverserangeofdecisionsthataffectthem,andtoenjoyspecific‘functional’12aspectsthatconstituteahealthylife.Investingresourcesinprocessesthatenablepeopletotakeamoremeaningfulpartindebatesanddecision-makingprocessesandmakemoreinformedchoices,iscentraltorealisingthese‘freedoms’andtoeffectivedevelopmentandpovertyreduction.Enablinggreaternumbersofpeopletospeak,engageandrespondtooneanotherisultimatelyequippingthemtotakepoliticalresponsibility,whichisakeyingredienttoestablishingdeepandsustainablechange.13
Indeed,anincreasedpowerandabilitytocommunicateiswhatpoorpeoplewishforthemselvesasmuchasthemoretangibledevelopmentbenefitstargetedbytheMDGs.WhentheWorldBankasked40,000poorpeoplein1999whattheydesiredmost,having‘avoice’wasoneofthemostfrequentreplies,secondonlytoimprovedincomeandbasicnecessities.Notbeingabletohaveasayindecisionsthataffectedtheirliveswasidentifiedasakeyelementofpovertyinitself.14
Thispaperthereforeaddressesthechallengeofusingcommunicationmorepowerfullyasanagentofchangetoestablishfaster,moresustainabledevelopment.Afterashortchaptersettingoutthecontext,The case for communicationexplorestherolesinformationandcommunicationprocessesplayinallofthekeyelementsthatfosterdevelopment:
n first,inequitableandinclusivepoliticalprocesses
n second,innationalandinternationalgovernanceprocessesthatareeffective,responsiveandaccountable
n third,insupportingengagedcitizensanddynamiccivilsociety
n fourth,ingeneratinginclusiveeconomicgrowth,sustainablelivelihoodsandtransparent,efficientandequitablemarkets
n fifth,inestablishingandprotectingafree,pluralisticmediaenvironmentinwhichmediaoutputsaremanyanddiversebutalsoofhighquality.
10Thispaperisalonger,moredetailedexpositionoftheargumentssetoutinAt the heart of change: The role of communication in sustainable development.Bothdocumentsareavailableat:www.panos.org.uk/heartofchange
11The‘capabilityapproach’isaconceptualframeworkthatwasdevelopedbyAmartyaSenandMarthaNussbaumforunderstandingsocialstatesintermsofhumanwelfare.Itemphasisesthefunctionalcapabilities(‘substantialfreedoms’,suchastheabilitytolivetooldage,engageineconomictransactions,orparticipateinpoliticalactivities).SeeMCNussbaumandAKSen(1993)The quality of life,Oxford:ClarendonPress
12FunctioningsarewhatSenterms‘valuablebeingsanddoings’.Theycanbeelementary (escapingmorbidityandmortality,nourishment,mobility);complex(self-respect,participationincommunitylife,abilitytoappearinpublicwithoutshame);general(capabilitytobenourished);orspecific (capabilitytomakeparticularchoices).ThenotionoffunctioningsinfluencedtheempiricalmeasurementsthatunderpintheUnitedNationsDevelopmentProgramme’sHuman Development Index,whichgoesbeyondeconomicmeasurementstoincludehealthandeducationdata.Formoreonfunctionings,seeAKSen(1985)Commodities and capabilities,Amsterdam:North-Holland;andNussbaumandSen(1993)
13AstheBritishdiplomatRobertCooperhasnoted:‘Itisstrangethatwedonotthinkmoreofourownhistorywhenwethinkofdevelopment.ThegradualincreaseingrowthratesinthelasttwocenturiesinEuropemirrorsthegrowthofthestate.Thegradualeliminationofpovertyreflectsthegrowthofpoliticalpoweramongthepoor…Peopledevelopthemselves:outsiderscannotdoitforthem.RobertCooper,‘Themysteryofdevelopment’,Prospect,Number120,February2006,p37
14WorldBank(1999)Voices of the Poor,WashingtonDC:WorldBank
Itsimportanceandubiquitydemandthataholisticviewbetakenofinformationandcommunicationprocessesinasociety,insteadofthead hocorfragmentaryapproachpolicymakersoftentakeatthemoment.Open,inclusive,participatoryinformationandmediachannelsalsoneedtoberecognisedasoneofthemostimportantres publica (publicgoods)thatbenefitallcitizensandmaximisedevelopmentimpacts.15Onecharacteristicofpublicgoodsisthatthemorepeopleusethem,thegreaterthecommonbenefit.Communicationprocessesshouldberegardedaspublicgoodsbecause–asthispapershows–theycontributetoasociety’sdevelopment,governance,peaceandprosperity.Likeotherpublicgoods,communicationprocessescostmoneytoproducebuttheproducerdoesnotalwaysprofitfromthem,andmanykindsofknowledgeandinformationbecomemorevaluablethemoretheyareused(asdothenetworkingsystemslinkingthemtogether).
Mostpoliticians,businesspeopleandeveryoneworkinginanykindofcollectiveenterpriseintuitivelyrecognisethateffectivecommunicationisfundamentaltotheirsuccess.Yetitisfrequentlyoverlookedindevelopmentalanalyses,developmentprojectsandpolicymaking.Policymakersoftenlacksufficientknowledgeofwhatspecificstepstheycantaketostrengthencommunicationprocesses;andevenwhentheyknow,sometimesthepoliticalwilltotakethemisabsent.Afterall,enablingmorepeopletobebetterinformedandtoengageandparticipatedirectlychallengesexistingpowerstructures.Inaddition,despiteplentifulanecdotalevidenceandastrongempiricalbaseshowingtheimportanceofcommunicationinenablingandcreatingtheconditionsforsuccessfuldevelopment,argumentshavenotalwaysbeenmarshalledcogentlyenoughandinanaccessibleway.Thisiswhatthispaperseekstoaccomplish.Itisspecificallyaimedatthosepolicymakers,advisors,academicsanddevelopmentpractitionerswhocanmakethelinkbetweentheoryandpracticeandtakealeadershiprolebyplacingcommunicationattheheartofhigh-levelpolicydiscourse,programmeplanningandprojectimplementation.
ReachingtheMDGsin2015willrequirehugeinvestmentsofpoliticalwillandfinancialresourcesbygovernmentsinboththedevelopedandthedevelopingworld;butitwillalsorequireabelatedrecognitionthatcommunicationiscentraltoallaspectsofsustainabledevelopment.The case for communicationconcludes,therefore,withacalltoactionbynationalandinternationalpolicymakersandleaders.Inordertorealisethepotentialofcommunicationinmaximisingdevelopmentoutcomes,weaskthemto:
Build more open, transparent information and communication systems and political cultures
Governmentsandinstitutionsmustaccepttherealityofanetworkedworld,thatwillshapepoliticsandcivilsocietyinwaysthatareonlyjuststartingtoemerge,andadapttocitizens’expectationsoftransparencyandaccountabilitybyestablishingandrealisinglegalrightstofreedomofspeechandaccesstoinformation.
Treat information, communication and the media as public goods and invest accordingly
Governmentsshouldrecognisethatmediaandcommunicationarepublicgoods.Theyshouldtakemeasurestoenablethegreaterparticipationofpoorandmarginalisedpeopleinsocial,economicandpoliticalprocesses;andinvestinstrengtheningthoseareasthatthemarketalonemaynotprovide,suchastelephoneaccessforpoorpeopleorhigh-qualitypublicinterestjournalism.
�
15
‘Publicgoods’isaneconomictermreferringtogoodswhich,onceproduced(orexisting),benefitallmembersofasociety–forinstance,educationorjudicialsystems
Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
Take a holistic view of communication processes and integrate communication into development planning and implementation
Governmentsanddevelopmentplannersmustrecognisethatcommunicationisattheheartofsuccessfuldevelopment:itsroleshouldbespecifiedinalldevelopmentanalysisandplanning,andadequateresourcesoffunding,expertiseandplanningmustbeinvestedtomakeithappen,includingexploitationoftherevolutionarynewopportunitiesofferedbyinformationandcommunicationtechnologies(ICTs).
Invest in media development
Adiverse,dynamicandfreemediaisvitaltodevelopment.Thiscanbeaccomplishedbyestablishingmediafreedomandasupportiveregulatoryenvironment;strengtheningmediainfrastructure,capacityandprofessionalism;andsupportingimprovementsinthequalityanddiversityofmediacontent.
� Introduction
�
Development
Whatisdevelopment?Mostexpertswouldagreethat–regardlessoftheparticulareconomicorpoliticalsystemusedtoproduceit–thegoalsofdevelopmentincludeimprovedmaterialconditionsforeveryone;greaterequityinaccesstotheworld’snaturalresourcesandwealth;improvedrealisationofhumanrights,freedomandsecurity;improvedchoices,self-determinationandpowertoinfluenceone’sownlifeandconditions;andsustainability.Achievementofthesegoalsentailschangesateverylevel:withinhouseholdsandcommunities,insocieties,statesandbusinesses,andininternationalrelations.Theyarenotgoalsthatcaneverbeachievedabsolutelyandforalltime:theyinvolvecontinuingprocessesofdialogue,competition,negotiation,exchange,adaptationanddecision-making–inwhichallsectorsofsociety,includingpoorandmarginalisedpeople,needtoparticipate.Theseprocessesarelargelyprocessesofcommunication.
Muchdevelopmentplanningtodayisfocusedonreducingpoverty.Thereisdebateabouttherelativeimportanceoflowincomes,otherelementscontributingtothequalityoflife,andinequalityindefiningpoverty.Butmostanalystswouldagreethatforanyimprovementinthelivesofthepoortobelastingandsustainable,itmustincludestrengtheningthepowersofpoorpeopletoparticipateintheprocessesofdevelopment–andthismeansstrengtheningtheircapacitytocommunicate.
Poorpeople,andpeoplewhoaremarginalisedandpowerlesswithintheirowncommunities,arebydefinitionexcludedfrommanythings,includingmanykindsofcommunication.Onesideofcommunicationisreceiving information.Constraintsonpoorpeople’scapacitytoreceiveinformationcanincludenon-literacy,distancefromsourcesofinformation,notspeakingthemajorityorofficiallanguages,andlackofelectricitythatlimitstheavailabilityofradiosandtelevisions.Theothersideofcommunicationistheabilitytogiveinformation,tomakeone’svoiceheardandtoparticipateindiscussionanddebate.Poorpeople’scapacitiestomaketheirvoicesheardarealsolimited:theylackaccesstopowerfulpeople;untiltheveryrecentspreadofmobilephones,mostpoorpeoplehadnotelephonewithinreach.UsingcomputersandtheInternetisexpensiveandneedsskills.Andwithincommunities,socialcustomsandpowerstructuresoftenkeepsomegroups,especiallywomen,silent.Strengtheningpoorpeople’spowertoshareinformationandengageindialoguewouldleadtomajorchangesinthelivesofmostnations,notonlydevelopingones.
Communication
Digitalandelectronic,printandinterpersonalcommunicationareallpartofthe‘communicationecology’ofsocieties,statesandinstitutions,andareincludedintheconceptofcommunicationinthispaper.Weincludealltypesofcommunication:fromplannedcommunicationcampaigns(forinstanceinhealth,politicsoreducation)tounplannedflowsofcommunication(suchaspersonalinteractions,informalgatheringsandthegrowingglobalwebofvirtualrelationships);artandentertainmentaswellasfactualinformation.Processesofgatheringandorderingknowledgeandinformationarepartofcommunication,aswellastheprocessesofsendingandsharinginformation.
Communication: what, why – and why now?
Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
�Communication:what,why–andwhynow?
TheLatinrootoftheword‘communication’iscommunicare,‘toshare’.Wecommunicatetoshareourpointofview.Thisisacorehumantraitwithinandbetweenfamilies,friends,colleaguesandstrangersateverylevelinsociety.Thosewespeaktomay,ormaynot,bepersuadable.Ifbothsidesarelisteningtoeachother–thatis,‘sharing’thediscussion–adialogueensueswhichmayresultinagreement,oranagreementtodiffer,orunresolvedoppositionorconflict.Inthispaper,‘communication’meanstwo-wayexchange,nottheone-waypassingofinformationfromagivertoareceiver.Itmeansgivinginformation,andalsoreceivinginformationandlisteningwitharealpossibilityofresponding.
What is communication for development?
Recognisingtheimportanceofcommunicationinbringingaboutdevelopmentchangeisnotnew.Overthepast50yearsmanyanalysesofhowcommunicationworksindevelopmenthaveseenthetargetsofcommunicationprincipallyasreceiversofinformationandideas.Theaimhasbeentotransmitinformationtopersuadepeopletochangetheirbehaviourinrespectofaspecificareaoftheirlives–familyplanning,forexample,oragriculturalpractices.Atfirst,communicationwasseenasasimplematterofasendergivingamessagetoareceiver.Partlyinfluencedbytheexperienceoftheadvertisingindustry,theideagrewthatthemessageandthemediumhadtobecarefullymatchedtothereceiver’sideasandsocialcontext.Informationcampaignsbegantobemorecarefullydesigned,withrepresentativesofthetargetaudienceoftenhelpingtoidentifywhatneededtobesaidandhowtosayit.Formany,thisiswhatdevelopmentcommunicationis:plannedcommunicationcampaigns,oftenusingavarietyofmedia,toachievespecificchanges.16Withinthisapproach,theideaisnowwellestablishedthatpeople’sbehaviourismorelikelytochangeiftheyarenotjustpassiverecipientsofmessagesbutaremoreactivelyinvolvedintheprocess:discussionisbetterthanlistening.
Anotherfundamentalideagaininggroundisthatmanydevelopmentchangesrequirechangeinwholecommunities,notjustinindividuals.17Forinstance,awomancannotinsistherpartneruseacondomifhedoesnotaccepttheneedorobligationtodoso;andheismorelikelytodothisifithasbecomethenorminhissociety.Powerrelationsandtheattitudesofthecommunityaremoresignificantelementsinthedecisionthanthewoman’sfactualknowledgeofthedangersofunprotectedsex.Relatedtothisconceptthatchangeisasocialprocess,thereisincreasinginterestbydevelopmentcommunicationexpertsinanalysinghowideasarespreadwithinsocietiesandcommunities–whoaretheopinionleaderswithinacommunity,whichsourcesofinformationaremosttrusted,andwhatarethepathsalongwhichnewideasandbehavioursspreadthroughcommunities.Newideasaremorelikelytobeadoptediftheyareintroducedtothecommunitybytrusted‘changeagents’or‘communicationintermediaries’.18
Inthispaperwearearguingparticularlyforgreatersupportfortheothersideofcommunication–for‘voice’.Ifdevelopmentisunderstoodasprocesses inwhicheveryoneinasocietymustbeabletoparticipate,thisaspectofcommunicationisfundamental.Supportforcommunicationindevelopmentdoesnotjustmeanprovidingmoreinformationtopoorpeople.Itmeansenablingthemtoparticipate,toengageactivelyintheirdevelopmentthroughparticularcommunicationprocesses:articulatingviews,participatingindecision-making,actingoninformation,speakingandgettingaresponse,usingwhateverchannelsofcommunicationareavailable.Ofcoursenotallformsofcommunicationincludeparticipatoryprocesses–manysimplyaimtopersuadeorpassinformation.Butallformsofparticipationareessentiallycommunicationprocesses.19
16Foraconciseoverviewofchangingapproachestocommunicationindevelopment,seeSilvioWaisbord(2001)Family tree of theories, methodologies and strategies in development communication: Convergences and differences. PreparedfortheRockefellerFoundation:seewww.comminit.com/stsilviocomm/sld-2881.html
17Seeforexample:www.communicationforsocialchange.org/strategy.php
18Twootherthreadsintheclusterofideasthatmakeupthebroadfieldof‘communicationfordevelopment’areworthmentioningbecausetheyaredistinct,andcancausemisunderstanding.Firstly,‘strategiccommunication’isatermsometimesusedtorefertoaplannedcampaigninitiatedbyanoutsidebody(forinstance,agovernmentoraninternationalNGO)usingdifferenttypesofcommunicationtobringaboutvoluntarychangeintheattitudesandbehaviourofanaudience.Strategiccommunicationtreatstheaudiencewithrespect–whichdifferentiatesitfrom‘spin’.Thisisimportant:‘communication’inthepublicmindhasbecometaintedby‘spin’andbyfearsthatcommunicationfromgovernmentsandmajorcorporationsmaybedeceitfulandmanipulative.Secondly,theterm‘communicationfordevelopment’issometimesusedtorefertopublicrelations/publicaffairseffortsbygovernmentsoraidprogrammes
19WQuarryandRRamirez(2004)Communication for development: A medium for innovation in natural resource management,IDRC&FAO,p23.QuarryandRamireznotethat‘Communicationandparticipationareessentiallytwosidesofthesamecoin’,andidentifythreefunctionsofcommunication:1.communicationtoinform(policiesetc),2.communicationtoeducate(health,socialmarketing,etc),3.participatorycommunication(useofcommunicationtoolstoenableparticipation)
� Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
Thisemphasison‘voice’isnotentirelynew.Forinstance,attheWorldCongressonCommunicationforDevelopmentinOctober2006,anumberofdevelopmentorganisationswithadistinguishedhistoryofprovidinginformation,includingtheUNFoodandAgricultureOrganization,agreedthatdevelopmentorganisationsshouldprioritise‘therightandpossibilityforpeopletoparticipateinthedecision-makingprocessesthataffecttheirlives’.20
Thedifferentchannelsofcommunicationstraddlebothinformationandvoiceaspects.Media(traditionalmassmedia–printandbroadcasting)giveinformationbutalsoexpressvoicesandenableparticipationbyexplaininggovernmentandpoliticalprocessesandprovidingaplatformfordebate.Communitymediainparticularenabledebateandvoice.ICTs(informationandcommunicationtechnologies–suchastelephones,computerandInternet)canalsobeusedtoreceiveinformation,butthegreatpotentialtheyofferforactiveengagementisonlystartingtobeexploited.WithnewICTs,everyuserispotentiallyanactivecreatorofinformation,avoiceaswellasapairofears.
Insupportingeitheraspectofcommunication–receivinginformationorgivingvoice–itisnotenoughtoprovidethecommunicationtechnologiessuchasphones,radiosorsatellites.Technologiesmakenodifferenceuntiltheyareused.Sodevelopmentsupportshouldalsoincludemakingsurethetechnologiesarereallyaccessible(intermsoflocation,costorsocialcustoms),buildingskillstousethem,creatingcontent,anddevelopingsystemsandculturesofusingthem.Inthe1990s,ICTenthusiastswereover-optimisticthattechnologiesthemselveswouldtransformsocieties.Manyprojectssuchasruraltelecentreswereestablished,withoftendisappointingresults.Experienceshowedthattherearemanybarrierstousingatechnology:costandreliability,skillsandmanagement,lackofusefulcontent,oralackoffitbetweenthenewtechnologiesandtheexistingcommunicationneedsandflowsofthetargetcommunity.Thestartingpointforanyinitiativetostrengthencommunicationflowsmustbetheexistingcommunicationcapacitiesandhabitsoftheintendedbeneficiaries.
Werecognisethatnotallcommunicationisbenignfromthepointofviewofdevelopment.Opinioncanbemanipulated,truthcanbehiddenordistorted,mediacanbeusedtopromotetheinterestsofpowerfulelites,peoplecanbeexploited.Thebenefitsofmorecommunicationbringwiththemthedangersofworsecommunication.Judicious,transparentandpubliclyacceptedregulationandcontrolshouldbepartoftheresponse.Butinafreesocietymuchoftheresponsibilitymustliewiththeaudiencefordistinguishingthegoodfromthebad,theempoweringfromthemanipulative.Audiencesmustlearntorecognisetheirowninterests,andtobeproactiveinchallenging,inseekinginformationthemselvesandinproducingmediaoftheirown.Groupswhoaregenerallyunder-represented,includingwomen,needtobeactivetomaketheirvoicesheardandcontributetopublicdiscourse.
Whynow?
TheintroductionoftheprintingpresswithmovabletypeinEuropeover500yearsagoledtorevolutionarychanges,asknowledgeandinformationbecameincreasinglyaccessibleandaffordable.TheexplosivegrowthofICTsinthelasttwodecadesisbringingasecondGutenbergrevolution:transformingthewaysthatpeoplecommunicateandshareknowledgewithoneanother,andprofoundlychangingthedynamicsofsocial,politicalandeconomiclife.Thiscommunicationsrevolution–includingtheInternet,mobiletelephonesandnewmediachannels–offersimmenseopportunitiesforpeopletoaccessmoreinformationandknowledge,whichtheycanusetoimprovetheirlives.Butitalsorisksexpandingthechasmbetweenrichandpoor,betweenthosewhoenjoytheaccessandskillstoutilisethesenewinformationandcommunicationchannelsandthosewhodonot.
20www.devcomm.org/worldbank/admin/uploads/New%20documents/Rome%20Consensus.doc
�
WiththeMDGsasawidelysharedgoal,unprecedentedinternationalattentionisbeinggiventothemoral,political,economic,socialandsecuritychallengesofglobalunder-development.InJune2007theG8meetingoftherichestcountriesintheworldconcentrated,forasecondtimeintwoyears,onsupportingdevelopmentinAfricabyaddressingtheissuesofgoodgovernance,sustainableinvestment,peaceandsecurity.GlobalaidvolumesarepromisedtorisetoUS$125billionayearby2010(upfromUS$106.8billionin2005).21Donoranddevelopingcountrygovernmentsaretryingtoshakeoffyearsofdevelopmentfailureandcommitthemselvestomakingdevelopmentaidmoreeffective.BothpledgedinMarch2005toacttogethertoensurethisscaled-upaidisincreasinglycoordinated,bettermanagedandmoreeffective.22IntheParisDeclarationonAidEffectivenessthesignatoriescommittedthemselvestotheir‘respectiveaccountabilitytotheircitizensandparliamentsfortheirdevelopmentpolicies,strategiesandperformance’.
Communicationprocessesofthekindwedescribeinthispapermustformanessentialpartofachievingthesegeneralcommitments,andtheMDGsthemselves.Accountabilityisrealisedthroughtheactiveengagementofcitizens,asweargueinthefollowingsection.AchievingtheMDGsneedssocialchangewithincommunitiesaswellaseffectivedeliveryofservicesbygovernments,bothofwhich,tobesustainable,needprocessesofdebateandnegotiation.ButthereislittleornomentionofcommunicationineitherthegeneralcommitmentsortheMDGs,becausetheydonotstateindetailhowthedesiredgoalsaretobeachieved.
Webelievethatunlesscommunicationisclearlyidentifiedfromthestartasoneoftheessentialelementsofachievingtheagreedgoals,itislikelytobeneglectedandunder-resourced–andsothecommitmentsmaycometonothing.
Developmentorganisationsandgovernmentshavealreadyrecognisedtheroleofinformationandcommunicationindevelopmentinanumberofrecentinitiatives.23Butdespitethisswellofopinion,communicationisstillnotrecognisedwhereitneedstobe,attheheartofdevelopmentplansandcommitmentsateverylevel.SointhegatheringeffortofthedevelopmentcommunitytoachievetheMDGs,itistimelytocallforturningthespotlightoncommunicationnow.
Communicationisalsobecomingmoreurgentforotherreasons.Thepaceoftechnologicalchangeinthecommunicationfieldleavesgovernments,institutionsandanalystsstrugglingtokeepup.Thereisalackofskillsateverylevelrelatingtonewtechnologicaldemandsandpossibilities,fromcommunity-leveljournalismtogovernmentministriesandtelecommunicationsregulatoryauthorities;andthereisinsufficientinvestmentininfrastructure,training,legalandregulatoryprocessesandthesystemicchangesneededinallinstitutionstoadapttothechallengesandopportunitiesofcommunication.
Finally,theimpactofcommunicationandinformationprocessesonsocietiesofeverykindisgoingtoincreaserapidlyinthecomingdecades.Thevolumeandspeedofinformationflows,andthenumberofpeoplewhohaveaccesstothem,isrisingfast,whilecostsdecline.24Asthetake-up,reachandimpactofmobilephones,citizenjournalismandblogs,localandregionalbroadcasting,andinternational‘net’coalitionsaroundissuesexpand,governmentsandmainstreammediainstitutionsarebeingleftbehind.Howeverhardtheytry,theycannotcontroltheircitizens’orconsumers’accesstoinformation,orresistthedemandformoreaccessiblecommunicationsamongpeopleandbetweenpeopleandtheirgovernments.Theyneedtofindwaysofembracingthesechangesthattheycannotresist.
21Manydoubtwhetherthispromisewillbefulfilled.AreportfromtheOrganisationforEconomicCooperationandDevelopment(OECD)inApril2007foundthatoveralldevelopmentaidhadfallenin2006forthefirsttimesince1997.www.oecd.org/document/17/0,2340,en_2649_37413_38341265_1_1_1_37413,00.html
22TheOECDParisDeclarationonAidEffectiveness:Ownership,Harmonisation,Alignment,ResultsandMutualAccountability,seewww.oecd.org/document/18/0,2340,en_2649_3236398_35401554_1_1_1_1,00.html
23Forexample,theUNICTTaskforce;theG8DigitalOpportunitiesTaskForce;UNDPworkonAccesstoInformation;theWorldSummitontheInformationSocietyin2003and2005;theWorldCongressonCommunicationforDevelopment2006;theCommissionforAfrica;DFID’s2006DevelopmentWhitePaper;WorldBankWorldDevelopmentReportsonKnowledgeandPoverty.AcompilationoftherecommendationssetoutintheseandotherdocumentshasbeencompiledbyPanosLondonandcanbefoundonthePanosLondonwebsite,www.panos.org.uk/heartofchange
24Forinstance,between2000and2004,thenumberofmobilephonesubscribersinsub-SaharanAfricaquadrupled,raisingthetotalnumberofphonesubscribersfrom31per1,000to84per1,000.(2006WorldDevelopmentIndicatorsdatabase,WorldBank,16April2006).EvenmorestartlingisthecurrentincreaseofnewmobilephoneusersinIndia,wheresevenmillionnewsubscribersarebeingaddedtothemobilenetworkseverymonth.SeeFinancialTimes,‘India&GlobalisationSpecialReport’,26January2007,p6
Communication:what,why–andwhynow?
10 Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
The political nature of development
Developmentinvolvesnotjusttheexpansionofresources,skillsandpowerinanygivenstatebutalsothepoliticalprocessesof‘state/societybargaining’overtheirdistributionthatoccurwithinit.25Thisistrueonaglobalscaleaswellaswithinnationsandcommunities.Sodevelopmentisfundamentallypolitical.Itinvolvesenablingthosewhoareexcludedtogainagreaterandmorejustshareofpowerandresources,throughparticipationinpolitical,policyanddecision-makingprocessesateverylevel.
Anewwillingnesstodealwithpoliticsindevelopmentdiscourseisemerging,inbothrichandpoorcountriesandinsomemajordevelopmentinstitutions.Theneedtoaddresspoliticalprocessesaswellastechnicalaspectsofgovernanceinterventionshasbeenhighlightedindonorinitiativessuchasthe‘DriversofChange’analysis,‘PowerAnalysis’andsomeWorldBankpoliticalandinstitutionalanalyses.26In2006HilaryBenn,thentheUK’sSecretaryofStateforInternationalDevelopment,statedthat:‘Developmenthastobeaboutgettingthepoliticsrightbecausedevelopmentandprogresscannotbeachievedifthepoliticalsystemexcludesthemajority.’27
Communicationiscentraltothepoliticalprocessandtheexerciseofpower.Infact,theentirepoliticalprocess,theexchangebetweencivilsocietyandpoliticalinstitutions,isatheartacommunicativeact.Peoplehavetobeabletoexpresstheirneedsanddemandfulfilmentofgovernmentpromisesandapropershareofacountry’sresources.Peopleandtheirgovernmenthavetodebatepolicyoptions,prioritiesandstrategies.
ProgresstowardstheMDGsneedspro-poor,people-centredpoliticalprocessesthatputvoiceandaccountabilityattheheartoftherelationshipbetweenthecitizenandthestate.Healthypoliticalprocessesneedhealthy,opencommunicationenvironments–communicationprocessesthatsupportparticipation,inclusiveness,responsivenessandequity.Thisisallthemoresignificantasthemassivegrowthindemocracies28combinedwiththeongoingrevolutionincommunicationtechnologiesincreasescitizens’rightsandopportunitiestocommunicateandengageinpoliticaldebateandactivities.
Politiciansandotherpolicymakersinthedevelopedworldareintuitivelyawareoftheimportanceofcommunication,yetdevelopmentinitiativesoftenappeartoignorecommunicationinthedevelopingworld.Acommitmentbykeystakeholderstosupportopeninformationandcommunicationchannelsofallkindsinacountry,includingpromotingthevoicesofpoorandmarginalisedpeople,wouldhaveprofoundconsequencesforitspolitical,economicandsociallife.Theaimofsuchacommitmentwouldbetocreatean‘opensociety’inwhichthecitizens,politiciansandstateofficialscandiscuss,knowandfulfiltheirdutiesandresponsibilitiestooneanotherinawaythatoffersthebestchanceto‘getthepoliticsright’andgeneratethemostconduciveenvironmentfordevelopment.
Politics and governance
25‘Signpoststomoreeffectivestates:Respondingtogovernancechallengesindevelopingcountries’,InstituteofDevelopmentStudies(IDS)report,June2005
26DriversofChangestudiesarepartofDFID’sefforttounderstandprocessandopportunitiesforchange;SIDA’spoweranalysiscontributestounderstandingtheroleofpowerdynamicsindevelopment;theWorldBank’sToolsforInstitutional,Political&SocialAnalysis(TIPS)arepartofthePovertyandSocialImpactAnalysis(PSIA)approach
27HilaryBenn,speechtotheDemosthinktank,23October2006,see:www.demos.co.uk/files/File/HB_speech_-_final.pdf
28SeethelatestfiguresfromtheHuman security report 2005: War and peace in the 21st Century,HumanSecurityCentre,UniversityofBritishColumbia,NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress,p151
11
Supporting good governance
‘Gettingthepoliticsright’maybeoneofthekeystodevelopment,butbilateralandmultilateralaidorganisationsarenotabletointerveneformallyanddirectlyinarecipientcountry’spolitics:thiswouldviolatethenormsofinternationalrelations,aswellasbeingincompatiblewiththeircommitmenttopartnershipwithgovernments.Theconceptof‘goodgovernance’offersawayroundthisdilemmabyfocusingonthetechnicalaspectsofgovernment.
Governancecanbedefinedinmanyways.Someconcentrateontherelationshipofgovernmentwithcivilsociety;othersfocusontherelationshipbetweenindividuals,communities,societiesandthenaturalenvironment.29Somefocusontheroleandperformanceofgovernmentitself:indeed,thestressongovernancehasarisenpartlybecauseashigherlevelsofofficialaidaregranteddirectlytosupporttheoveralloperationsofdevelopingcountrygovernments(‘budgetsupport’),donorshaveanobligationtotrytoensurethattheirmoneyiswellspent.Governanceofothersocialandeconomicinstitutions,includinglargecorporations,andtheirrelationswithsociety,isalsoimportant.However,thischapterfocusesongovernment.
TheUKGovernment’sDepartmentforInternationalDevelopment(DFID)WhitePaperin2006definedgovernanceasthestate’s:
n capabilitytoperformitskeyfunctions
n responsivenesstoitscitizens’aspirationsandneeds
n accountabilitytoitscitizens.30
Goodgovernanceinanystateisrootedinthecreationofapoliticalsysteminwhichtheaggregationofpublicdemandleadstoconsensus-basedpolicyformation.Thisaggregationofpublicwantsintopolicyislicensedbypublicopinion,whichgrantspoliticalauthoritytoitsgovernmentatelections.
Discussionsofgoodgovernancecanbecontentiousbecausepeoplesometimesusethetermasifitwassynonymouswithdemocracy.Butitisnot.31ExternalinterventionstoreplicateNortherndemocraticmodelsofstateinstitutionsandpoliticalprocessesindevelopingcountrieshaveenjoyedlimitedsuccess,inpartbecausetheyhavereplicatedtheformsbutnotthecontent.Withoutdeep-rootedprocessesof‘state/societynegotiation’,32democraticinstitutionshavelittlemeaning.33
Anyconceptionof‘goodgovernance’mustincludeanactivepublicsphereinwhichsocietalissuescanbeopenlydebated,consensusreachedordisagreementsmanaged,andanationalsenseofcommunityestablished.Approachestopoliticalprocessesthatpredominantlyfocusonelections,representationandtheruleoflaw–andconceiveofcitizenssimplyasvoterswhoexpresstheirconsentfromtimetotimebutleavegovernancetoelectedrulersandelites–areinadequate.Technically‘democratic’electionprocesses,forinstance,cancoexistwithhighlevelsofcorruptionandwithweakcivilsociety.Thisconceptionofcitizenshipmissesthebroaderrolesandactivitiesthatcitizensfulfil;andisincreasinglychallengedbythegrowthinaccesstoinformationandmedia,whichmeansthatpeopleareevermoreinformedandabletoparticipateinlocalandglobalassociations.
29TheWorldBankdefinesgovernanceas:‘Thetraditionsandinstitutionsbywhichauthorityinacountryisexercisedforthecommongood’inDKaufmann,‘Backtobasics’inFinance and development,September2005,Volume42,Number3;DFIDdefinesitas:‘…howcitizens,leadersandpublicinstitutionsrelatetoeachotherinordertomakechangehappen’inEliminating world poverty: Making governance work for the poor,UKWhitePaperonInternationalDevelopment,2006;theUNDPas:‘Theexerciseofeconomic,politicalandadministrativeauthoritytomanageacountry’saffairsatalllevels’inUNDP,OsloGovernanceCentre.TheConcordCotonouWorkingGroup(June2006)whichincludesinputfromActionAid,Aprodev,Bond,CNCD,Eurodad,Eurostep,FERN,PollenandVENROdefinesgovernanceas:‘themanagementofrelationshipsbetweenhumanbeings,betweensocieties,betweenmankindandthebiosphere’
30DFID(2006)Eliminating world poverty,p20(seenote29)
31Democracyitselfisacontentiousterm,inpartbecausetherearesomanydifferingconceptions(direct,representative,liberal),eachofwhichhasdifferentforms.However,theprinciplesofdemocracy–asoutlinedbyWesternpoliticalphilosophersfromLocke,MadisonandJohnStuartMillthroughtocontemporarytheoristssuchasJürgenHabermas–centreonideasofparticipation,dialogueandpublicdeliberation.AmartyaSen(‘Thediverseancestryofdemocracy’,FinancialTimes,13June2005)notesthattheunderlyingprinciples–‘theopportunityofparticipatoryreasoningandpublicdecisionmaking’–haveverywidehistoricalrootsthatincludetheBuddhistCouncilsofthesixthcentury,legalcodesforminorityrightsunderMughalEmperorAkbarinIndia,andthehighpositiongiventotheJewishphilosopherMaimonidesinEmperorSaladin’scourtinCairo.WhiledemocracymaybeaWesternconcept,theprinciplesofparticipationandpublicdebateunderpinningitarefarbroader
32‘Signpoststomoreeffectivestates’,IDS2005,seenote25
33SeealsoLHarrison(2006),The central liberal truth: How politics can change a culture and save it from itself (seenote6)
Politicsandgovernance
1� Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
Goodgovernanceisnotuniversallyacceptedasausefulfocusfordevelopmentplanning.Criticsfeelthatitoftenplacestoomuchfocusonthepowersofgovernment,withtoolittleonthecapabilitiesofpeople.Amorefundamentalcriticismisthatbyfocusingoncorruptionandontechnicalchangesindevelopingcountrygovernments,the‘goodgovernanceagenda’distractsattentionfrommajorissuesofinternationalpowerimbalances.Inotherwords,criticsseethegoodgovernanceapproachasawayforthegovernmentsofrichcountriestoblamethepoor,insteadoffullyrecognisingtheirownroleinovercomingunder-development.34
Itiscertainlytruethattheconceptofgoodgovernance,whichincludestechnicalaspectsaswellaspowerrelations,islessdirectlychallenging–bothtodevelopinganddevelopedcountrygovernments–thantheconceptofpoliticalchange.
However,fewwoulddisputethat‘goodgovernance’matters–asadevelopmentgoalinitselfandasacriticalenablerforimprovedhumanwelfare.Initsbroadsenseofthemachineryofstateprovidingaccountablegovernmentthatenablesdevelopmentinpartnershipwithempoweredcitizenry,goodgovernanceprovidessecurity,stabilityandanenvironmentinwhichpeoplecanmakethemostoftheirlives.Itenablesapoliticalsystemthatbuildscitizens’senseofinclusion,fairness,voiceandparticipationindecision-making.Itpromotestheruleoflaw.Itisgoodforeconomicgrowthandthepursuitoflivelihoods,encouraginginvestmentandenablingproductionandtrade.Thereisagrowingbodyofresearchdemonstratingitsimportance.The2006 Global Monitoring ReportonprogressontheMillenniumDevelopmentGoals(MDGs)suggeststhatgoodgovernancecanincreasethegrowthrateofgrossdomesticproduct(GDP)percapitaby1.2percentagepoints35andpercapitaincomesuptofourfold.36TheWorldBankestimatesthatinthelongrun,improvementsinthequalityofgovernancemayleadtoathreefoldincreaseineconomicgrowthanddevelopmentoutcomes.37
Itisequallyclearthat‘goodgovernance’ishardtocreate,evenwherepoliticalwillispresent.Attheheartoftherelationshipsbetweenandamongdifferentstateandnon-stateactorsareflowsofinformationandcommunication.Goodgovernancecannotbeachievedwithoutconcentratingmoreattentionandinvestmentonthesemultipleflowsofcommunicationandthetechnologiesthroughwhichtheyarefacilitated.Yetthisisbecomingmorecomplicatedandchallenging.
Inthepast,communicationwaslimitedandthe‘publicsphere’withinwhichmostpeoplelivedwasrelativelysmall.Localandtraditionalcommunitydecision-makingstructuresdominatedthis‘publicsphere’,whichwasinformedbylimitedexternalinformationandoftengovernment-controlledmassmedia.Thesewerethespacesinwhichdebatewasconducted,consensusformedandcoalitionsbuilt.Nowtherearemanymoresourcesofinformationavailabletomanymorepeople,andmuchgreaterlevelsandscopeofcommunicationflows,globallyaswellaswithincountries.Thismeansthatbuildingconsensusisharder,andthepossibilityofinfluencebyasingleactorisreduced.Yetconsensusisarguablyevermoreimportant.Thespreadofrulebydemocracyratherthandiktat,risingexpectationsandgreaterindividualfreedom,theneedtosharedwindlingresources–allthesepointtoaneedforincreasednegotiationindifferentspheresoflife,andmoreacceptanceofnegotiatedsolutions.Governmentsneedtowintheconsentandsupportoftheircitizens–notthesedaysbypropagandathroughstate-controlledmedia,butthroughinformationandpersuasiontobuildunderstanding,acceptanceandownership.Theboundarybetweentheinevitabletaskofademocraticgovernmenttobuildconsensus,and‘spin’–themanagementofpublicopinion,includingofmedia,seenasdeceitfulandsuppressingdebate–isblurry,butitisjustasimportantindevelopingasindevelopedcountries.
34Thisisalegitimatecritiquewhenthosesamecountriessimultaneouslyrestrictorstymiediscussionsonthemanagementofglobalresourcesandotherglobalgoods(suchasCO2emissionsandpublichealthissues),andreformsinthegovernanceofinternationalsystems(suchastradingrules)andmultilateralorganisations(theWorldBankandIMF).Criticsalsochargedonorswithusingtheabsenceofgoodgovernanceasanexcuseforthefailureofrecentdevelopmentstrategiessuchasstructuraladjustment.Thechargeofhypocrisyisalsosometimesvalid:richcountriesdonotalwaysinsistonthesameanti-corruptionmeasuresforthemselvesthattheydemandofdevelopingcountries
35Rivera-Batiz’s2002studyfoundthataone-standarddeviation(or0.26)ofhisqualityofgovernanceindexincreasesthegrowthrateofGDPpercapitaby1.2percentagepointsperyear.SeeFLRivera-Batiz(2002)‘Democracy,governanceandeconomicgrowth:Theoryandevidence’inReview of Development Economics,Vol.6,No.2,pp225–247
36WorldBanktrackingofgovernanceindicatorsshowsaone-standarddeviationinoneofthesixgovernanceindicators(VoiceandAccountability,PoliticalInstabilityandViolence,GovernmentEffectiveness,RegulatoryBurden,RuleofLaw,Graft)leadsto2.4–4-foldincreaseinpercapitaincomes.SeeWorldBankGovernanceIndicators2006
37WorldBankGovernanceIndicators.TheWorldBank’sGlobal Monitoring Report 2006 stressedthevitalroleofgoodgovernanceinreducingpoverty.Aconcentrationoncorruptioninthedevelopingworldmixescauseandeffect:corruptionisthesymptom,notthecause,ofbadgovernance
1�
Newtechnologiesprovideaplatformthatneitherthestatenortraditionalpublicspherescancontrol.GovernmentssuchasChina’sthatarestilltryingtoimposecontrolovertheircitizens’accesstocommunicationmaynotbeabletoholdbackthefloodmuchlonger.Governmentshaveachoice:embracethenewtechnologiesandforgenewrelationshipswiththeirpeopleor,likeJosephEstrada,theformerpresidentofthePhilippines(toppledin2001by‘smartmobs’coordinatingthroughmobilephones38),facethepowerofnewlyenabledcivilsocieties.
Forgovernmentstoengageeffectivelyindialoguewiththeircitizens(andexternalstakeholders),theywillrequiremorevaried,nimble,openandactivelyengagedstrategiesoflistening,respondingandbeingaccountabletotheneedsofthepeople.Thisistrueforallpoliticalsystems.InVietnam,atapressconferenceinJanuary2007toannouncetheprimeminister’sfirsteveronlinechatwithmembersofthepublic,PhamVietDung,editoroftheVietnamGovernment’swebsite,said‘theonlineforumshighlighttheresponsibilitypoliticalleadershaveinlisteninganddiscussingissuesofpublicconcern’.39
Belowweoutlinethecentralityofcommunicationandinformationinhelpinggovernmentstomeetthesechallenges:theirroleinpromotingastate’sresponsivenessandaccountability,andinboostingitscapacities and capabilities.Theimportanceofcommunicationtotheroleofcivilsociety–bothasthepartnerforgovernment(holdingitaccountable),andinitsownrightinthedevelopmentofahealthypublicsphere–isthesubjectofthenextchapter.
State responsiveness and accountability
Responsiveness
Stateresponsivenessisthewaygovernmentstakeaccountoftheircitizens’aspirations,expectationsandneeds,andrespondtothem.Responsivestatesrequiregovernmentsthatcancommunicatewithcivilsocietyandbasetheformationandimplementationofpolicyontheneedsandconcernsoftheircitizens.Greaterconsultationandresponsivenessincreasepublicownershipandtrustingovernment,andtendtoincreasetheeffectivenessofpolicies.Butthemeansbywhichthisinteractioncantakeplacearefrequentlyignoredorunder-resourcedbygovernments,andtoooftenthevoicesofthewealthyandpowerfularethosewhichare‘heard’bygovernmentsandthewiderpublic,andbecomemoreinfluentialthanthoseofthepoor.Governmentshaveobligationstoallcitizens,andshouldmakespecialeffortstoprovidechannelsandmechanismstoensurepoorandmarginalisedpeoplecanmaketheirvoicesheard.
Assessmentsofpovertyandthedesignofpovertyreductionstrategiesthatarebasedontheparticipationofthepoorthemselves–suchasParticipatoryPovertyAssessments(PPAs)andtheemphasisonconsultationinthePovertyReductionStrategyPapers(PRSPs)–havepotential,whentheyarewellimplemented,asmodelsofcommunicationprocessesthatcansupportresponsivepolicymakingandgoodgovernance.40
Accountability
Accountabilityisacrucialelementofgoodgovernance.Agovernmentmustbeanswerabletoitscitizensforwhatitdoes.Accountabilityisrealisedthroughperiodic politicalprocesses,butalsothroughongoingtransparency,andmonitoringofagovernment’sperformance.Allofthesearecommunicationprocesses.
38‘Smartmobs’isatermcoinedbyHowardRheingoldtodescribesocialgroupsnewlyempoweredthroughevolvingcommunicationtechnologiessuchastheInternet,onlinechattools,mobilesandthenewopportunitiespresentedbynetworks.HowardRheingold(2002)Smart mobs: The next social revolution,CambridgeMass:PerseusBooksGroup
39http://vietnamnews.vnagency.com.vn/showarticle.php?num=01POL250107
40SeetheforthcomingpaperfromPanosLondon,Making poverty the story: Time to involve the media in poverty reduction Available at www.panos.org.uk
Politicsandgovernance
1� Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
Accountabilityisoftenseenasamattermainlyoffinancialreportingtoshowthatfundshavebeenusedproperly,butitismuchmorethanthat.Peopleshouldbeabletojudgewhetherpolicydecisionsarebeingproperlyimplemented,andholdtheirgovernmentsaccountableforfulfillingthepromisesonwhichtheywereelected.Poorpeoplecanbeinvolvedinthis,throughdifferenttypesofcommunicationprocess.Forinstance,NGOsinruralIndiaarecreatingnewplatformsandarenasforthearticulationofaccountabilityclaimsthroughinformalpublichearingsandtheconstructionof‘People’sDevelopmentPlans’.41
Transparencyisanessentialcomponentinmakingsystemsandprocessesofallkindsaccountabletotheirusers,stakeholdersandconsumers–notonlyfornationalgovernmentsbutalsoforinternationalbodiesandtheprivatesector.42Countriesthataremoretransparent,forexampleintheprovisionofeconomicinformation,havebettergovernanceindicatorsforgovernmenteffectiveness,regulatoryburden,voiceandaccountability,theruleoflaw,bureaucraticefficiencyandcontractrepudiation,andriskofexpropriation.43
Transparencydemandsclear,predictableanddocumentedprocessesofdecision-makingandimplementation;withinformationabouttheseprocessesbeingmadeavailabletocitizensandtherightofaccesstothisinformationbeingaccordedtothem.
Accessforallcitizenstoinformation–heldbygovernmentsbutalsobytheprivatesector–isanessentialcomponentofaccountability.Itenablescitizenstounderstandpoliciesandprocessessothattheycanquestionthemandenterintoinformeddialogue.44In2006nearly70countriesaroundtheworldhadadoptedcomprehensivefreedomofinformationlegislationtofacilitateaccesstorecordsheldbygovernmentbodies,andanother50wereintheprocessofdoingso,45thoughfrequentlythisprocessisveryprolonged.FreedomofinformationlegislationhasbeenpendinginGhanaandNigeriaforsixyears,andtheZambianGovernmenthasbeenrunning‘consultations’onpotentiallegislationsince2001.46Meanwhileinsomedevelopedcountries,governmentsareactuallytryingtoclawbackcitizens’rights:in2006theUKGovernmentconsideredrestrictingitsexistingfreedomofinformationpractices,apparentlyasacost-cuttingmeasure,47makingitharderforcampaignersandjournaliststoaccessinformationpotentiallyembarrassingtoministers.Accesstoinformationlegislationisneeded,therefore–butcivilsocietyandthemediaalsohavetoseeitsvalueanduseit.TheorganisationArticle19worksnotonlytogetfreedomofinformationlegislationintroduced,butalsotohelppeopletoseehowitcanbenefitthem,andtostrengthenthecapacityofgovernmentstoimplementit.48
Transparencyreducesopportunitiesforcorruption.49‘Sunlightisthebestdisinfectant,50USSupremeCourtJusticeLouisBrandeisfamouslyobserved,andtheevidencebearsthisout.51Loweringlevelsofcorruptionlimitsthediversionofinvestmentandaidflows;promotesequityinaccesstodecision-makingandservices;andbuildstrustingovernmentandinstitutions.Itisanecessary,thoughnotasufficient,measureforachievinggoodgovernance.Keyareaswheretransparencycanbefocusedtoreducecorruptionincludeappointmentsandotherhumanresourcespractices(throughtheintroductionofopenandmeritocraticrecruitmentmethods,electronicselectionprocesses,andclearcriteria-basedcareerpaths);andbudgetarycontrol(throughensuringno‘off-budget’accounts,clearbudgetprojections,incomeandexpenditureassumptions,regularprogressreports,wideparticipationandsharingofdraftbudgets,andtransparentaccountingstandards).52
41PNewellandJWheeler(2006)Rights, resources and the politics of accountability: Claiming citizenship – rights, participation and accountability,London:ZedBooks,p3
42MMooreandGTeskey(2006)The CAR Framework: Capability, accountability, responsiveness. A discussion note for DFID Governance and Conflict Advisors, Brighton: IDS
43RIslam(2003)Do more transparent governments govern better?PolicyResearchWorkingPaper3077,WorldBank,citedin:ABellverandDKaufmann(2006)‘Transparenting transparency: Initial empirics and policy applications’,TheWorldBankInstitute
44InMexico,thepassingofaccesstoinformationlegislationempoweredinformationintermediaries.Mostofthoseaccessinginformationunderthenewlegislationarebusinesses,academicsandjournalists.Ofthe150,000requestsreceivedupto2006,over50percentarefrombusinesspeopleandacademics,journalistsandotherbureaucrats(JuanPabloGuerrero,AccesstoInformationCommissioner,Mexico,presentationatWorldCongressonCommunicationforDevelopment,Rome,October2006)
45DBanisar(2006)Freedom of information around the world 2006: A global survey of access to government information laws, PrivacyInternational
46AfricanMediaDevelopmentInitiative:Researchsummaryreport,BBCWorldServiceTrust,2006
47The Economist,23December2006,p46
48www.article19.orgThenameoftheorganisation,Article19,istakenfromtheUniversalDeclarationofHumanRightsArticle19,whichreferstofreedomofexpression
49Indeed,somedevelopmentagenciesusethetermalmostexclusivelywithinthecontextofcorruption,leadingtocriticismsthattheyareonlyblamingdevelopingworldgovernmentsforfailurestoreachdevelopmentgoals
50LBrandeis(1914)Other People’s Money, and How the Bankers Use It, NewYork:FAStokes
51DKaufmann,‘Backtobasics–10mythsaboutgovernanceandcorruption’inFinance and Development – a quarterly magazine of the IMF,September2005,Vol42,No3
52UtsteinAnti-CorruptionResourceCentre:www.u4.no/helpdesk/faq/faqs2c.cfm
1�
TransparencyInternational(TI)hasfoundthatlawsandsanctionsseemtobelesssuccessfulinreducinglevelsofcorruptionthanpublicvoluntaryagreementstorefrainfromcorruptpractices.TIhasdevelopedwhatitcalls‘integritypacts’,53inwhichagreementstomaintaincertainstandardsaremadebetweenpublicofficialsandtheprivatesector,forinstance,ormultinationalcompaniesandtheirpartners.Theirsuccessdependsonthebroadpubliccommunicationoftheircontent:citizenshavetoknowwhatthesignatoriesofthepacthavecommittedto.
Citizenparticipationcanalsocontributetoreducingcorruption.54InBolivia,forexample,citizenparticipationinannualplanning,budgetingandoversightonmunicipalhospitalhealthboardshadastrongercorrelationtoreducedcorruptionthanotheranti-corruptioninterventionsthatfocusedonpublicsectormanagementvariables(suchasrelativewages,internalenforcementofrules,andtheautonomyofagencybyfiat).55
Box 1 Transparent procurement reduces corruption
InPakistan,theKarachiWaterandSewerageBoardinstitutedanopenandtransparentbiddingprocessthatwasmonitoredbyTransparencyInternational.Makingpubliclyavailabletheprocurementdocumentsandprocessdemonstratedhowtheapplicationofano-bribesintegritypactcouldberolledoutacrossothercontractsforconsultancyservicesandallserviceprovision.Theintroductionoftransparencyinitiativesresultedinanetsavingestimatedatnearly20percentofthepreviouslyestimatedcostofthecontract.56
Statisticalanalysisshowsthatincreasedpenetrationofinformationandcommunicationtechnologies(ICTs)andmassmediaisassociatedwithlowerlevelsofcorruption.57Inastudythatanalysedacomprehensivedatasetofqualityofgovernanceandmediaindicators,58researchersfoundthatwheremediaandICTpenetrationwasgreater,corruptionlevelswerelower–withthemostsignificantindicatorbeingnewspapercirculation.
Governmentsmaybereluctanttoimprovetransparencyandthepowerofpeopletomonitortheirperformance;and,ofcourse,themostsophisticatedITsystemwillnotincreaserealtransparencymuchifthepoliticalwillfortransparencyisabsent–atseniorlevelsofgovernmentorlowerdowninbureaucraciesandimplementingagencies.Externaldevelopmentagenciescannotcreatepoliticalwill–buttheymaybeabletoinfluencegovernmentsbydemonstratinghownewtechnologicalopportunitiesandacultureofopennesswillbenefitratherthanthreatenthem.Communicationcaninspiregreaterpublicsupportandcontributetopoliticalgainssuchaslongertenure.59
Themonitoringofgovernmentperformance,particularlybycivilsociety,isanimportantaccountabilitymechanism.Monitoringcancoveravarietyofissues,suchasfinancialmanagementandqualityofservicesprovided.Ideally,governmentsshouldsetthemselvescleartargetsandmaketransparentplansforachievingthem,andmaketheseknowntocitizens–sothatcitizenscanfollowprogressandunderstandconstraints.Thisisanenormouschallengeforgovernmentsanddoesnotoftenhappeneitherinrichordevelopingcountries,butsmallexamplesshowitspower.Monitoringalsorequiresanincreasedcapacityofcitizenstofollow,assessandrespondtogovernmentperformance,anditcanbecarriedoutthroughavarietyofmechanisms–forinstance,citizenreportcardsandsocialaudits.
53DevelopedbyTransparencyInternational,theIntegrityPact(IP)isatoolaimedatpreventingcorruptioninpubliccontracting.Itconsistsofaprocessthatincludesanagreementbetweenagovernmentoragovernmentdepartment(atthefederal,nationalorlocallevel)andallbiddersforapubliccontract.Itcontainsrightsandobligationstotheeffectthatneithersidewill:pay,offer,demandoracceptbribes;colludewithcompetitorstoobtainthecontract;orengageinsuchabuseswhilecarryingoutthecontract.TheIPalsointroducesamonitoringsystemthatprovidesforindependentoversightandaccountability
54GGray-Molina,EPérezdeRada,EYañez,‘TransparencyandAccountabilityinBolivia:DoesVoiceMatter?’Inter-AmericanDevelopmentBank,LatinAmericanResearchNetwork,OfficeoftheChiefEconomist,Workingpaper#R-381December1999,p29
55DKaufmann,GMehrezandTGurgur(2002)‘Voiceorpublicsectormanagement?Anempiricalinvestigationofdeterminantsofpublicsectorperformancebasedonasurveyofpublicofficials,’WorldBankResearchWorkingPaper,June2002,p29
56TransparencyInternationalPakistanandGreaterKarachiWaterSupplyScheme(2003)Integrity Pact: A Pakistan Success Story,Karachi,p5
57SBandyopadhyay(2006)Knowledge-driven economic development,EconomicsSeriesWorkingPapersNo267,DepartmentofEconomics,UniversityofOxford
58Thedatasetconsistedof:WorldBankQualityofGovernanceIndicators2004,countryassessmentsfromtheInternationalCountryRiskGuide,FreedomHousecountryrankings,ReporterswithoutBordersassessmentsofmediafreedom
59LNeuman(2006)Making public institutions transparent: The cornerstones of an open society,paperpreparedfortheWorldCongressonCommunicationforDevelopment
Politicsandgovernance
1� Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
Box 2 Citizen Report Cards (CRCs) improve public services in Bangalore, India
ThePublicAffairsCentre(PAC),anNGOinBangalore,India,haspioneeredtheuseofCitizenReportCards(CRCs).ThefirstreportcardonBangalore’spublicagenciesin1994coveredmunicipalservices,watersupply,electricity,telecomsandtransport.Serviceusersgavetheirratingoftheservices,thefindingswerewidelypublicisedthroughthemedia,andpublicofficialsandcivicgroupswerebroughttogetherthroughworkshopsandseminars.Theincreasedpublicawarenessofgovernmentinefficienciesreportedlytriggeredtheformationofmorethan100civicgroupsindifferentpartsofIndia.
Agencieswereratedandcomparedintermsofpublicsatisfaction,corruptionandresponsiveness.Almostallthepublicserviceprovidersreceivedlowratingsfromthepeople.ThethirdCRConBangalorein2003showedasurprisingturnaroundinthecity’sservices.Itnotedaremarkableriseinthecitizenratings.Notonlydidpublicsatisfactionimproveacrosstheboard,butproblemincidenceandcorruptionseemedtohavedeclinedperceptiblyintheroutinetransactionsbetweenthepublicandtheagencies.DecisivestepshadbeentakenbytheagenciestoimproveservicessincethefirstCRC.60
KeytothesuccessofmonitoringtoolssuchasCRCsisanopenanddemocraticenvironment–withoutspaceforparticipation,CRCshavelittleimpact.Inaddition,politicalwillfromgovernment,civilsocietyandthemediaisimportant.
Politicalprocessesareattheheartofhowaccountabilityisrealised;andelectionsarethemostvisibleofthemechanismsthroughwhichcivilsocietycanrewardorsanctionitsrepresentatives.Clearly,technologyandimprovedlevelsofcommunicationalreadyplayimportantrolesinensuringelectoralregistrationandaccurateandtimelyresults.61Newcommunicationtechnologiesarebeingusedinmanywaystoimprovethequalityofelectionsandpublicconfidenceinthem–essentialfactorsinneworhighlycontesteddemocraticprocesses.Forexample,journalists,NGOsandordinarycitizensareusingmobilephonestoreportfromremotepollingstationsandincreaselevelsofscrutiny.Electronicvotinghasbeenshowninsomecasestoincreaseconfidence,bygivinginstantaneousresultsandfeweropportunitiesformeddlingwithresults.
Communicationsandmediaalsosupportelectionsbyhelpingpoliticalpartiescampaignand‘getoutthevote’,informingvotersofthelocationoftheirpollingstationsandhowtovoteatthem.Broadcastmedia,radioandinterpersonalcommunication(‘workingthephones’)areallwell-establishedtoolsinthepoliticalactivist’stoolkit,andmobilephonesandtextmessagingareincreasinglyusedforcampaigning.
Butbeforeelectionsareheld,politiciansandpeoplehavetoengageinothercommunicationprocesses.Meaningfulchoicebycitizensdepends,amongotherthings,ontheirhavingknowledgeofcandidates’andparties’programmes,promisesandperformance;andtheopportunitytodebatetheseandrelatethemtotheirownconcerns.Politicalpartieshavetobeformed,agendasdevelopedandsupportsoughtfromthepublic.Peopleneedtodevelopthehabitofpoliticaldebatearoundcontentandissuesratherthanjustpersonalities.Allrelyoneffectivecommunicationchannels,andopinionpolls,assembliesandpublicdebates,face-to-facecanvassingandmanyothertypesofcommunicationarecriticaltothequalityofthepoliticalprocess.62
60The third Citizen Report Card on public services in Bangalore,PublicAffairsCommitteeIndia,2003
61HDeegan(2003)‘ElectionsinAfrica–Thepasttenyears:Anassessment,’ElectionsInAfricaSeriesBriefingPaperNo2,TheRoyalInstituteOfInternationalAffairs
62Seenote41
1�
Governance and the media
Mediaareanessentialcomponentofaccountability.Theycanreportonandinvestigatethedecisionsandbehaviourofthepowerful,exposingcorruptionandprovidingspacesforissuestobedebatedandagendasdeveloped.InDevelopment as Freedom,65AmartyaSenfamouslyarguedthatnofaminehasevertakenplaceinacountrywhichhasmulti-partypoliticsandfreemedia.FurtherresearchbytheLondonSchoolofEconomicsfoundthata1percentincreaseinnewspapercirculationisassociatedwitha2.4percentincreaseinpublicfooddistributionanda5.5percentincreaseindisasterreliefexpenditures.66
Therelationshipbetweenanationalgovernmentanditsmediaisinevitablyantagonisticattimes,indemocraciesaswellasinauthoritarianstates.Journalismisadangerousprofession:inthe10yearsfrom1996to2006,atleast657journalistshavebeenmurdered,themajorityinpeacetime,andonlyoneineightoftheirkillershasbeenprosecuted.67
However,mostgovernmentsarecommittedinprincipletoestablishingtheregulatoryandenablingenvironmentwhichallowsmediathe‘space’tospeakandactfreely.68Itiswhensuchpoliticalwillandprotectedspaceareabsentthatthemediacannot,orfail,toholdgovernmentstoaccount.Recentacademicfindingshavesupportedtheintuitiveandwidely-acceptedargumentthatfreemediapromotepoliticalfreedom.Researchacross97countriesaroundtheworldfoundthat‘governmentownershipofthepressisassociatedwith...lowerlevelsofpoliticalrightsandcivilliberties’.69Stateswithlittlepoliticalfreedomarethosewhereattacksonthefreedomofthepressarefrequent–forinstance,NorthKorea,Eritrea,Cuba,Myanmar,ChinaandTurkmenistanarealldescribedas‘majorculprits’ofmediarepressioninthe2007‘ReporterswithoutBorders’PressFreedomsurvey.
63JohnLloyd(2004)What the Media are Doing to Our Politics,Constable:London,p143
64‘MobilePhonePlaysRoleinFreeKenyanElections’6January2003,source:BillKagaitoDemocraciesOnline,postedontheCommunicationInitiativewebsite:www.comminit.com
65ASen,Development as Freedom(1999)Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress
66TimothyBesleyandRobinBurgess(2002)‘Politicaleconomyofgovernmentresponsiveness–theoryandevidencefromIndia’inQuarterly Journal of Economics,November2002
67InternationalNewsSafetyInstitute(2007)Killing the Messenger: Report of the global inquiry by the International News Safety Institute into the protection of journalists, Brussels
68InDecember2006theUnitedNationsSecurityCouncilunanimouslypassedResolution1738condemningattacksonjournalistsandothermediaprofessionalsandemphasisingtheresponsibilityofstatestoendimpunityandprosecutethoseresponsibleforseriousviolations
69Djankovetal(2003)‘Whoownsthemedia?’Journal of Law and Economics, XLVI:341–381
Box 3 Mobile phones and elections in Africa
TheavailabilityofmobilephoneswasfoundtomilitateagainstcorruptpracticesinGhanaandSenegal,withEuropeanUnion(EU)observerswitnessingagreaterdepthofinvolvementbecauseoftheeaseoftelephonecommunication.Politicalorganisationsweregreatlyassistedintheirmonitoringactivitiesbybeingconstantlyandimmediatelyincontactaseventsoccurred.Equally,observerscouldpromptlypublishontheInternetanyelectoralirregularitiesorincidencesofcoercionastheywerereportedbyphonefromthefield.
InKenya,themassiveuseoftextmessagingcrashedthemobilephonenetworkduringthefinalstagesoftheelectionin2002aspeopleusedtelephonestomobiliseeachotherandmonitorthepollingbooths.Politicalgroupsdevelopedcell-phonenumberdatabasesallowingpeopletocontacteachotherandthoseatthepollingstationstocallforsupportwhenneeded.Campaignsmadeuseofshortmessagingservicesandelectionresultsweredisseminatedassoonastheywerecounted,eveninthemostremoteareas.Thisuseofmobilephonescontributedtomoreeffectivecampaigning,greatertransparencyandlessballotrigging.64
Themediaalsoplayaparticularlyimportantrole.Themediarevealcontextandframecoveragetoallowjudgementstobemadebycitizensbasedontheissuesratherthantheperformanceofthesubjects.63Debatearoundtopicalissuesissharedwidelythroughthemediainopeneditorials,discussionprogrammes,phone-inradioshows,and‘questiontimes’withpoliticalcandidates.
Politicsandgovernance
1� Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
Inordertoholdthepowerfultoaccountthemedianeedtobefree,inclusiveandplural.‘Free’meanslegallyandinpracticefreetomaketheirowneditorialdecisionsandpublishinformationandopinionscriticalofthoseinpower.Italsomeansfreefinancially–thatis,amediahouseshouldnotbedependentongovernmentoranysinglesourceforitsincome.‘Inclusive’meansmediashouldreflectthevoices,concernsandlanguageofdifferentelementsofsociety,includingthepoorandmarginalised.‘Plural’meansdiverseinscope,scaleandaudience–includingnationalmassmediaaswellaslocal,communityandcitizenmedia–andalsodiverseintheirownership.Anapparentpluralityofmediacanbedeceptive:theincreasingconcentrationofmediaownershipinmanymarketsmeansthatdespiteaplethoraoftitlesandoutletstheactual‘voices’,interestsandviewsreflectedmaybeextremelylimited.
Pluralityofownershipisimportantbecausenosinglemediaoutletcouldbeexpectedtoreflectallthevoiceswithinitssociety.Mediaorganisationsandentitiesoperateaccordingtotheirownagendasandpriorities,businessopportunitiesandconstraints.Theyarenotneutralinthemselves,butpartial,andmustattractandkeeptheiraudienceandconsumers,aswellassatisfyingtheexpectationsanddemandsofownersandstaff.Onlywhenmediaarediverseandpluralisticinbothformandcontentcanthecompetitionofvoices,opinions,factsandinterestsbefullyengaged;andwhenthistakesplace,governmentsandthepowerfulinallsectorsofsocietyarefarmorelikelytobeheldaccountable.
Whatistoooftenoverlookedisthatfortrulyindependentandpluralisticmediatoexist,therealsoneedstobepluralismofmediacontent.Thequalityaswellasquantityofmediacontentmatters.Achievinghigh-qualityandengaged,informedandrespectedmediaisfirstandforemostaresponsibilityofthemediathemselves.Simplythroughtheirdeterminationtoscrutiniseandaskdifficultquestions,journalistsandmediaownersstimulatecitizenstodemandandprovideaccountabilitymoreeffectivelyinturn.Ofcourse,citizenshavetherighttochoosethekindofmediatheywant,butthemediahavearealinterestinhelpingtoestablishapublicofeducatedconsumerswhoaremedialiterate,andknowwhattheywantandneed.
Thekindofmedianecessarytosupportgoodgovernance,accountabilityandempoweredcitizensismediawithquality contentthatservesthepublicinterest.Governmentsneedtobepersuadedofandcommittedtothemediaasa‘publicgood’andtosupportthemthroughpublicservicelegislationandopen,independentregulationpromotinghighjournalisticandmediastandards.Thechallengeofenablingsuchpublicinterestmediaisdiscussedinmoredepthinthesection–Whycommunicationneedssupport(onpage43).
Box 4 Media, power and accountability
Therearenumerousexamplesoftheabilityandimportanceofthemediainholdingpower-holderstoaccount.In2001anIndianonlinenewspaper,Tehelka.com,tapedsecretvideofootageofseniorpoliticians,bureaucratsandarmyofficersapparentlyreceivingmoneyinconnectionwithadefencedeal.ThesubsequentpublicoutrageledtotheresignationofthepresidentoftherulingBharatJanataParty(BJP).PublicopinionandTehelka’scampaignforintegrityappearedtoreflecteachother,butthestaterespondedbyattemptingtogagbroadermediacoverageanddetainingTehelka’sstaff.70InPeruinthe1990s,theheadofthesecretservice,VladimirMontesinosTorres,paiduptoUS$1,500,000tobuymediahouses’silenceoverwidespreadcorruptionandmaintainhiscontroloverthestate.Interestingly,thiswasmuchmorethantheUS$5,000–10,000hepaidtobribeindividualjudges,apparentlydemonstratingtheimportanceheattributedtothemediaasopposedtothejudiciaryinholdingpowertoaccount.
70ReporterswithoutBorders(2003)AnnualPressFreedomReport
1�
State capacity and public service delivery
Agreatdealofdevelopmentattentionispaidtodaytomakingstatesmoreeffectiveandefficient–whethertheideologicalcontextisof‘big’or‘small’government.Theconceptofaneffectivestatedoesnotnecessarilyimplyatop-down‘statist’ordominantgovernment,butonethatperformsthe‘supplyside’ofgoodgovernancewell.Thisincludes:
n setting,disseminating,monitoringandenforcinglaws,rulesandregulations
n ensuringgovernmentpoliciesareputintopracticeeffectively,transparentlyandhonestly
n deliveringpublicservicesefficientlyinwaysthatmeetpeople’sneeds
n creatingtheconditionsforinvestmentandtrade,andpromotinggrowthinjobsandincomes
n allocatingresourcesanddistributingwealth.
Informationandcommunicationprocessesandtechnologieslieattheheartofeverystate’scapacitytoperformthesevitalfunctions.ICTsofferhugepotentialinimprovingthecapabilitiesandperformanceofstatebodiesastheyservetheircitizens,makingtheiruseofinformationmoreeffective,andleadingtobetteravailabilityofpublicinformation,amoreresponsivecivilserviceandincreasedqualityofservicedelivery.7170
However,technologiesinthemselvesarenota‘goldenkey’tochange–theyonlyaugmentthepoliticalwilloftheinstitutionsbehindthem.Asaseniormanagerofcomputercompany,AdobeSystems,pointedout,‘ICTisanimportantandpowerfultoolforchangeandthekeytoitssuccessliesinempoweringpeople–bothcitizensandpublicsectorstaff.’72Changemanagementprogrammesareessentialtoenablethecultureofbureaucraciestoadaptfortheeffectiveandefficientdeliveryofservices.Theseneedstrongleadershipwhichlistensandrespondstopractitionersandcitizens.TheincreaseduseofICTsingovernmentisofnouseifthegovernancesystemsdonotacknowledgepublicneedsandthecommunicationneedsandcapacitiesofthepeople,oriftheinformationbeingusediswrong.
Ausefuldistinctionissometimesmadebetween‘e-government’(theuseofICTstoincreasetheinternalefficiencyofgovernment)and‘e-governance’(theuseofICTstostrengthendealingsbetweengovernmentandcitizens).Obviouslythebenefitsof‘e-governance’extendonlytothosewhohavethenecessaryskillsandaccesstothetechnology,butwiththiscaveatICTscanhelpgovernmentbebothmoreefficientandmoreopeninmanyways,suchas:
n gathering and using statistical information,onthebasisofwhichplanscanbemadeforbestuseoflimitedresourcesforservicedelivery
n documents, record-keeping, and archiving onlinecanincreaseexternalaccessandefficientsharingofinformationinternallyandexternally,helpinggovernmentbureaucraciescommunicateamongthemselvesandwithbusinessesandcitizens
n administrative efficiency gainscanbemadethroughtheincreaseduseofcomputers(accompaniedbytrainingandcapacitybuilding),andthenetworkingofdifferentgovernmentdepartments
71Therearealsomanyexamplesofwasteandfailureinlarge-scalegovernmentICTprojects(forexample,seePrivateEye,27February2007,issue1179);aswellasfearsthattoomuchgovernment-heldinformationmightthreatencitizens’freedom
72AJonesandLWilliams(2005)How ICT? Managing at the front line,WorkFoundation&AdobeSystems
Politicsandgovernance
�0 Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
n transparency of processes suchasstaff recruitment. Makingcivilserviceappointmentprocessestransparentthroughadvertisements,independentselectionboards,andselectionprocessestakingplaceonlineandbeingdocumentedinthemediahelpstoensureappointmentsandpromotionareonmerit,therebyincreasingthequalityofserviceandlegitimacyintheeyesofthepublic
n greater public knowledge ofthelegalsystem,enabledthroughaccesstolegislation,educationandpubliclyavailableinformation,isimportantinhelpingtopreventarbitraryapplicationsofthelaw.Widespreadreportingonlegalproceduresandtheeasyavailabilityofcourtrulingsensuresthatjusticeisnotonlydonebutseentobedone,buildingconfidenceinthelawandthestate.
Box 5 E-governance in India
InBhoomi,Karnataka,India,priortotheintroductionofICTs,recordsonownershipofeachparceloflandweremaintainedby9,000villageaccountants.Therewere20millionrecordsoflandownershipinvolving6.7millionfarmersinthestate.Requestsforthealterationoflandrecords,forinstanceintheeventofsaleorinheritance,couldtakeuptotwoyearstoprocess.Requestsforcopiesofownershiptitle,forinstancetosecureabankloan,couldtakeupto30days.Bothinvolvedpaymentofbribes.Nowthatthedocumentshavebeencomputerised,theycanbeobtainedonthespotthroughoneofthe187kiosksinlocalofficesforasmallfeeof15rupees.73
73WorldPublicSectorReport2003E-Government at the Crossroads,UN-ECOSOC,2003
Publicservicedelivery
Themoreeffectiveandequitabledeliveryofpublicservicessuchashealth,educationandsecurityindevelopingcountriesisafundamentalrequirementiftheMDGsaretobeachieved.Publicservicedeliveryneedstobeefficientintermsofmanagementofresourcesandinputs;transparentforaccountability/anti-corruptionpurposes;andisoftencollaborative(betweengovernment,theprivatesectorandNGOs)formaximummobilisationofpotentialprovidersandresources.Strategiesandprioritiesneedtohavepeople’sbroadunderstandingandconsent;anddeliveryhastobedesignedinresponsetousers’needsandcultures,otherwisepeoplewillnottakeuptheservicesoffered.Serviceprovisionalsohastoberesponsivetofeedback,formonitoringandstrengtheningimpact.Alloftheserequirementsinvolvedifferenttypesofcommunicationprocesses.
Communicationatthepolicylevel
Indevelopedaswellasdevelopingcountries,theprovisionofservicesinvolveschoicesonhowtoallocateresourcesanddeliverservicesmostefficientlyandequitably.Thesechoicesand‘reforms’areoftencontroversial:forinstance,whethertousepublicorprivateproviderstodeliverbasicservices;orwhetherserviceusersshouldpay,orprovisionshouldbefreeatthepointofuse.Irrespectiveoftherightsandwrongsofdifferentapproaches,consultationwithandparticipationofthepublicinthedecision-makingprocessisessentialtoensurethattheneedsofallareaddressedandtohelpgainconsenttoandownershipofwhateverpoliciesarechosen.Inaddition,transparencyincontracts,plans,targetsandbudgetswillhelpbuildtrustandensurethatpoorandmarginalisedpeoplegaintheirfairshareoftheservicesaswellasricherones.
�1
Communicationassistsdeliveryofservices
Thedeliveryofpublicservicesismoreefficientwhenusershavetheopportunitytoprovidefeedbackandinputonthedesignofservicedelivery.ExamplesincludetheuseofmobilephonestoprovidepublicserviceinformationinIndia,e-complaintcentrestotrackservice-usersatisfactioninPakistan,andonlinewaitinglistsinCroatia.74
Whetherprovidedbythestateorprivatesector,orpartnershipsofthetwo,servicedeliverymustbeaccountabletothepublic,includingthepoor.Basicelementsofthisaccountabilityincludetransparencyofprocurementprocesses,contracts,sourcesoffinanceandbudgets.Userparticipationinthedesignofserviceshasalsobeenshowntoproducedeliverymechanismsthatmatchpeople’shabitsandprioritiesandgaintheirtrust;whilemanyexperimentshaveshownhowcitizenanduserparticipationinthemanagementofservicesandresourcescancontributetoaccountabilitywhilealsoincreasingefficiency(although,asnotedearlier,suchtransparencyisnotcommoneitherindevelopedordevelopingcountries).Forexample,enablinguserstoparticipateinwatermanagementthroughuserforumscanhelpensureservicedeliveryistargetedandefficient.OnewaterresourcesmanagementprojectintheGulfofMexicothatusedvideotofacilitatetheparticipationofwaterusersresultedinarateofreturn7percenthigherthanoriginallyplanned.75
Enablingparticipationrequirestheeducationandmobilisationofserviceusersthroughdifferentcommunication,monitoringandfeedbackprocesses.Publicationofstatisticalresearchandindependentimpactassessments,CitizenReportCards,telephone‘hotlines’andindependentombudsmencangiveserviceusersthecapacityandtoolstheyneed.
ICTscansupportmoreefficientmanagementofinputsandstaffofservicedeliveryorganisations,fromsimpletaskssuchasmanagingrecordsororganisingmeetings,tomorecomplexonessuchasanalysingstatisticsanddecision-making.TheuseofICTscanenablesupplychainstofunctionmoreeffectivelyinserviceprovision,justasitdoesinproductionandretailing.MonitoringmechanismssuchasPublicExpenditureTrackingSystemscanplayakeyroleinthemanagementofastrongercivilserviceandmoreefficientservicedelivery–butitisthewidespreadcommunicationofthedatawhichmakesthemeffective.
74Formoredetails,seeGSharma,NRajandBShadrach(2005)Knowledge and research programme on improving efficiency of pro-poor public services,OneworldSouthAsia/DFID
75Seenote19
76RReinikkaandNSmith(2004)Public expenditure tracking surveys in education in Peru, Uganda and Zambia,InternationalInstituteforEducationalPlanning,Ethicsandcorruptionineducationseries,UNESCO;RReinikkaandJSvensson(2004)The Power of Information: Evidence from a newspaper campaign to reduce capture, PolicyResearchWorkingPaper3239,WorldBank
Box 6 Making education more effective in Uganda
In1996theGovernmentofUgandaincreasedspendingonprimaryeducation,butsawlittleimpactonschoolenrolmentlevels.PublicExpenditureTrackingSystems(PETS)collecteddatafrom250schoolsandfoundthatonly13percentofintendedgrantsactuallyreachedschools.Thegovernmentrespondedbypublishingthemonthlytransfersofpublicfundstothedistrictsinnewspapers,broadcastinginformationonthetransfersonradio,andrequiringprimaryschoolstopostinformationoninflowsoffunds.Theobjectiveofthis‘informationcampaign’wastopromotetransparencyandincreasepublicsectoraccountabilitybygivingcitizensaccesstotheinformationtheyneededtobeabletounderstandandexaminetheworkingsofthegrantprogrammeforprimaryschools.Thisempoweredcitizenstoholdallthestakeholderstoaccountanddrewattentiontowheremoneywasbeingmis-spent.Asaresult,insteadof13percent,around80percentofeducationfundsbeganreachingschools.76
Politicsandgovernance
�� Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
Politics and governance: conclusion
Inthissectionwehaveshownhowthepoliticalprocessandgoodgovernancedependonandarecharacterisedbyeffectivecommunicationprocesses.Transparency,accountabilityandparticipationarerealisedthroughcommunication.77Informationandcommunicationprocessesofmanykinds,includingthegrowingpossibilitiesofICTsandtheessentialroleoffree,independentandpluralisticmedia,arecentraltotheformationofopen,healthypoliticalactivityandtoanincreasedlevelofresponsiveness,accountabilityandcapabilityofastatetoperformitskeyfunctions.
Responsivepolicymaking,effectivegovernmentalaccountabilityandefficientservicedeliveryalsodependontheexistenceofacivilsocietythatcanformulateandassert(ie,isabletocommunicate)anagendaandopinionofitsown.Itistotheroleofthemedia,informationandcommunicationinthedevelopmentofavibrant,powerfulcivilsocietythatwenowturn.
77TheyarekeyvariablesintheWorldBank’s‘VoiceandAccountability’QualityofGovernanceIndicators
��
Thefocusofdevelopmentispeople–theyareattheheartofchange.Sometimesdevelopmentplannerstendtoseepeoplemainlyas beneficiariesofdevelopment–ofimprovedhealthcare,forinstance.Butofcoursepeoplearealsothemainactorsinachievingdevelopment:choicesofagriculturaltechniquesmadebythousandsoffarmersadduptomoreorlesssustainablefoodproduction;effortsbymillionsofpoorfamiliestoputtheirdaughtersthroughschooladduptogreaterequalityforwomenandhealthierfamilies.
Thepreviouschaptershowedtheimportanceofcivilsocietyasanessentialpartnerofgovernmentsinestablishinggoodgovernance.‘Competentcitizens’–individualswhocanparticipateinpoliticalprocessesandpolicydebate,andholdgovernmentaccountable–formthe‘demandside’ofgoodgovernance.Researchintocitizenshiphasfoundthatdevelopmentinterventionsaimingtoestablisheffectiverelationshipsbetweenstatesandcitizensneedtoworkonbothsidesofthissupplyanddemandequation.Focusingonlyonstrengtheningthestateanditscapacitytoproviderightsdoeslittletofacilitateprocessesofchange.Rather,itismorelikelytostrengthenthestatusquo.78
Inthemodernworldveryfew,ifany,peopleliveindependentlyofgovernments.Governmentsshapemanyaspectsofpeople’slivesmoreorlessdirectly–butthereareotheraspectsoflife,andthusofdevelopment,inwhichpeopledooperatelargelyoutsidethereachofgovernment.
Differentdevelopmenttheoriesandapproachesfocusonsocialgroupingsatdifferentlevels.Somefocusonindividuals,forinstanceasconsumers.Somelookatfamilies,forinstanceatthepowerofwomentomakedecisionswithintheirhouseholds.Theinfluenceofcommunities,forinstanceinmanagingnaturalresources,orofsocieties,forinstanceinshapingattitudestoHIV,canbethefocus.Peopleascitizens,intheirrelationshipstogovernment,areimportant,aswehavealreadyseen,whileglobalconsumersandglobalnetworksarebecomingincreasinglyimportant.(Ofcoursealltheselevelsareoverlappingandinterrelated.)Thischapterfocusesontherolespeopleandsocialinstitutionsplayindevelopmentapartfromgovernment–andtherolescommunicationplaysinthese.
Individuals and individual rights
Individuals
Thewelfareofindividualsistheultimatemeasureofsuccessfuldevelopment,andprogressindevelopmentconsistsofindividualsgainingincreasedcapacitiestodothings–tomanagetheirlivelihoods,toprotecttheirownhealth,tobringuptheirownchildren,torespecttheirneighboursandcontributetociviclife.ThecentralityofindividualshasbeenarticulatedbyeconomistAmartyaSen,whodescribesthegoalofdevelopmentastheachievementbyindividualsof‘realfreedoms’.Freedoms,accordingtoSen,areachievedthroughindividualshaving‘functionalcapabilities’–suchastheabilitytolivetooldage,ortheabilitytoengageineconomictransactions.79Communicationmustbepartofachievingthesecapabilities:individualsmusthavethecapacitytoreceiveinformation,tocommunicatetheirownvoices,andtonegotiatewithothers.
A diverse, engaged and empowered civil society
78JGaventa(2005)‘Seeinglikeacitizen:Reclaimingcitizenshipinaneoliberalworld’,IDS,November2005,p17
79Seefootnotes11and12
Adiverse,engagedandempoweredcivilsociety
�� Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
Formanydevelopmentorganisationstoday,thegoalofdevelopmentistherealisationofhumanrightsforeveryone.Inarights-basedapproach,asforSen,individualsarethefocusandthemeasureofdevelopmentinterventions.Butalthoughrightsareenjoyedbyindividuals,theyarerealisedinrelationtocommunitiesorsocieties.Forinstance,awoman’srighttoequalityhastobewoninitiallyfromthemeninherfamily;aminority’srightnottobethesubjectofdiscriminationhastobewonfromthesocietyofwhichitisapart.Inaddition,manyrightshavetobegranted,guaranteedorprotectedbygovernments–forinstance,manygovernmentshavetakenontheobligationtoprovideshelterandhealthcareforeveryone.Communicationisthusanessentialpartofarights-basedapproachtodevelopment.First,peoplehavetoknowwhattheirrightsare.Thentheactionstheytaketoclaimtheirrightsarelikelytoincludenegotiation,argument,complaint,lobbying,networkingandmobilisingotherclaimants,andpoliticaldiscourse.Somerights,suchaswomen’srighttoequality,arehinderedbytheattitudesandculturesofwholesocieties.Effortstoachievesuchrightsasthesehavetoinvolvelong-termcommunicationeffortsthroughmassmediaandculturalproducts,educationsystems,andsocialandgovernmentinstitutions.Inaddition,governmentsareoftentheprincipalviolatorsofindividuals’rights,soprotectingrightsinvolvesarangeofcommunicationactivitiesatnationalandinternationalleveltoinfluencegovernments.
Citizenshiprightsandpowers,likebasichumanrights,areenjoyedbyindividuals.Buttheyonlyexistwhentheyhavebeenestablishedbyastate,andtheyareoftenexercisedthroughassociationsandinstitutions,includingpoliticalparties.Realisationofcitizenshiprights,therefore,involvesmanytypesofcommunication,astheprevioussectionindicated.Massmediacanplayanimportantrole–forinstance,theycanconveyinformationandideastomanyindividuals,whoarefreetochoosehowtorespond.
Communicationrights
Somedevelopmentthinkershaveproposedthata‘righttocommunicate’shouldbeestablishedasanadditionalhumanright.80Communicationissuchafundamental,indeeddefining,humancharacteristic,thatitseemstomakesenseintuitivelythatweshouldhavesucharight.Theproposednewrightisanextensionofthealreadyexistingrighttofreedomofexpression(Article19oftheUniversalDeclarationofHumanRights).81Itmakesexplicittheneedformeansofmakingcommunicationreal:theabilitytospeakisofnouse,afterall,ifnoonehearsandresponds.Butfarfrombeingcommonsense,theproposednewrighthasaverycontroversialanddivisivehistory,whichisnotyetresolved.
Theideaemergedinthe1970s,andfromthestartcontroversywasactedoutlargelywithintheUnitedNationsEducational,ScientificandCulturalOrganization(UNESCO).Ononeside,supportingthenewrighttocommunicate,werethosewhowereconcernedthatacommitmenttothecompletelyfreeflowofinformation,shapedonlybythemarket,wasresultingindominanceofmedia,infrastructureandcontentbybigcorporations,anddominanceofNorthernoverSouthernvoices.Ontheothersidewerethosewhoregardedinterventioninthe‘freeflow’andthemarketasinfringingonfreedom.AUNCommissionappointedin1976tolookintothesubjectpresenteditsreportin1980.82Thereportconcludedthatthecommunicationneedsofdemocraticsocietydidrequireextensionoftheexistingrighttoincludeelementsofanewconcept,therighttocommunicate,andrecommendedthatthe‘implicationsoftherighttocommunicate[should]befurtherexplored’.However,theUN’sacceptanceofthisfindingwasverysoonunderminedbytheColdWarandNorth–Southtensionsoftheperiod–whichcontributedtoaweakeningofUNESCO,andwhichstillcoloursthedebateonarighttocommunicatetoday.
80Foranoverviewofthehistoryandcurrentstatusofthedemandfora‘righttocommunicate’,seeforinstance,CampaignforCommunicationRightsintheInformationSociety(CRIS)(2005)Assessing communication rights: A handbook, www.crisinfo.org
81‘Everyonehastherighttofreedomofopinionandexpression;thisrightincludesthefreedomtoholdopinionswithoutinterferenceandtoseek,receiveandimpartinformationandideasthroughanymediaandregardlessoffrontiers.’UniversalDeclarationofHumanRights,Article19,UnitedNations1948
82Many Voices, One World,reportoftheInternationalCommissionfortheStudyofCommunicationProblems(the‘MacBrideCommission’),oftenreferredtoastheMacBrideReport,presentedtotheUNGeneralAssembly,1980
��
Thetopicswhichwouldbecoveredbyanewrightareclosetotherecommendationsbeingmadebythispaper–theyincludetheneedforpoorpeopletohaverealaccesstomeansofcommunication,theimportanceofthoseinpowerlisteningtothepoor,accesstoinformation,thevalueoflocalmedia,andthequestionofsupportingthelanguagesandculturesofminoritiesormarginalisedpeople.Mostdevelopmentthinkerswouldprobablyagreethatthesethingsareallpartofasustainable,inclusiveandwell-governedsociety.Sowhyistheideaofanewrightnotmorewidelysupported?Oneoftheobjectionstoitisthattheexistingrighttofreedomofexpressionisalreadysufficientlycomprehensive.Someopponentsareuncomfortablewiththeelementofcompulsiontheyseeintheproposednewright:ifpeoplearegiventherighttobeheardaswellastospeak,thatseemstoimplythatsomeonemustbecompelledtolistentothem.Amoregeneralobjectionisthataninternationalinstrumentdealingwithfundamentalrightsshouldnotgointodetailsofhowthoserightsarerealised.
Campaignersforimprovedcommunicationarenowtendingtotakeadifferentapproach.Insteadofdemandingtheestablishmentofanewandcomprehensive‘righttocommunicate’theyareconcentratingonrealisationofanumberofalreadyexistingrightsandcommitmentsthatrelatetocommunication,underthebanner‘Communicationrights’–includingaccesstoinformation,universalaccesstotelecommunications,andprotectionofminoritycultures.
Families and communities
Families
Mostpeoplelivenotalonebutinfamilies,andsorealisationofindividuals’theoreticalrightsandpowersdependsonrelationshipswithinthefamily.Families–nuclearandextended–areimportantsocialorganisationsforenablingindividuals’welfareandtheirabilitytomanagetheirlivelihoodsandsurviveshocks.Forinstance,inmanyculturesfamiliesregularlypoolresourcestohelpindividualmemberswithmajoreventssuchasweddings,educationorillness.Insome,theobligationofwealthiermembersofextendedfamiliestosupportthepoorermembersisamajormechanismforsocialsupport,distributionofresourcesandaccesstojobs(whichhas,ofcourse,negativeresultsfordemocracyaswellaspositiveonesfortheindividualsconcerned).Suchrelationshipsareenabledbycommunication.AstudyofhowpoorpeopleinIndia,TanzaniaandMozambiqueusedtelephonesfoundthatoneofthemostcommonuseswastokeepincontactwithscatteredfamilymembers.83Mobilephonesarefrequentlyusedtoarrangetransferofmigrants’remittancesbacktotheirfamilymembersathome.Poorpeoplearewillingtopayalargerproportionoftheirincomethanrichpeopledotokeepintouch.
83‘Theeconomicimpactoftelecommunicationsonrurallivelihoodsandpovertyreduction:AstudyofruralcommunitiesinIndia(Gujarat),MozambiqueandTanzania’,CommonwealthTelecommunicationsOrganisation,October2005
Adiverse,engagedandempoweredcivilsociety
�� Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
Familiesarethelocusandmechanismforreproducingsociety’sattitudesandindividualidentities(forinstance,genderidentity).Familiesshapeindividuals’self-perceptions–includinggenderinequalityandexpectationsofparticipationinpubliclife;familiesshapemembers’attitudesandtheirbehaviourinmanypersonalspheressuchashealth,sex,ordiet;andfamilieshaveanimpactpracticallyonindividuals’opportunities–forinstanceregardingeducation,mobilityormarriage.Inshort,familiesinfluencemanyaspectsofindividuals’freedomsandcapabilities,whichthemselvesarethebasisofdevelopment.Communicationwithinfamilies,therefore,isacrucialelementofdevelopment.Bydefinition,itishardforexternaldevelopmentagents(suchasgovernmentsorserviceproviders)tointervenedirectlyincommunicationwithinfamilies.Butmanydevelopmentcommunicationeffortsseektoinfluenceinternalfamilycommunicationindirectly–forinstance,throughgivinginformationaboutbirthspacingtowomenatclinics,abouttheenvironmenttochildrenatschools,oraboutsafesexualbehaviourtoyoungmeninbars.Massmedia(suchassoapoperas,informationspotsanddiscussionprogrammesonradio)canbedesignedtostimulatediscussionwithinfamilies;andcommunicationthroughrespectedcommunityfigures(suchaspriestsandimams)insocialspacesusedbylargenumbersofpeople(suchaschurchesandmosques)isalsointendedpartlytoinfluencediscussionanddecision-makinginfamilies.
Communities
Individualsandfamiliesalmostallliveincommunities,andtheirlivesareshapedbytheircommunities’cultureandsocialstructuresandaccesstoresources,andtheirownabilitytobenefitfromthese.Manydevelopmentinterventionsfocusonstrengtheningthecapacitiesofcommunitiestomanageresources,livelihoods,publichealth,andsoon,sustainablyandonbehalfofallcommunitymembers–forinstance,strengtheningtheskillsandcapacitiesofcommunity-levelhealthcareworkers,supportingnegotiationprocessesforcommunitiestomanagewaterresourceswithoutconflict,orhelpingfarmerspooltheirresourcesformoreefficientpurchasingandmarketing.Allsuchcommunity-leveldevelopmentinterventionsdependoncommunication,includingdiscussion,identifyingproblemsandsolutions,acquiringandsharinginformation,negotiation,agreement,jointmanagementprocesses,andmutualaccountabilityprocesseswithinthecommunity.Communitiesarenotisolatedandself-sufficientthesedays,andanothermajorfunctionofcommunicationistosupportthecapacityofcommunitiestocommunicatewithhigherauthoritiesandoutsidebodies–localandnationalgovernments,businesses,andNGOs–toholdthemaccountable,claimentitlements,andputcommunityconcernsontheagenda.Governmentandotheroutsidebodiesalsoneedtocommunicatewithcommunities,forinstancetoenableeffectivedeliveryandtake-upofservices.Forexample,somehealthservicesworkwithtraditionalbirthattendantstoensurethatruralwomenwhoneedmorespecialisedmedicalcareareabletogetit.
��
Thefocusoncommunitiesasanimportantlocusofdevelopmentchangegrewinpartfromadeepeningunderstandingofhowcommunicationworks.Firstly,peoplelearnmoreeffectivelyandadoptnewideasastheirownwhentheylearnfromtheirpeers,andwhentheycanrespondandengageindialogue,ratherthanwhentheypassivelyreceiveinformationfromoutside.Secondly,ifadevelopmentstrategyrequirescommunitiestoadoptnewhabitsorsystems–forexample,protectingalocalforest,orpayingfortheirhouseholdwater–thenewsystemismorelikelytobeacceptedandsuccessfulifpeoplehavebuilt‘ownership’byparticipatinginidentifyingandsettingitupthemselves.Thecommunicationprocesshastobemuchmorethansimplytellingpeoplethatsomethingishappening.Thirdly,itisnoteasyforindividualstoadoptnewpersonalbehaviourunlesstheculturetheyarepartofalsochanges:safesex,forinstance,hastobecomethenorminayoungman’speergroupbeforehewillpractiseithimself;andafamilyismorelikelytopayforitsdaughterstobeeducatedifthishasbecometheexpectationinitscommunity.Anyefforttochangeindividuals’behaviourhastotargetthewholecommunity.84Developmentthinkingtodayisincreasinglyrecognisingthelinkbetweenparticipatorycommunicationandempowerment–thatis,increasedindividualandcommunitysenseofcapacitytomanagetheirlivesandachievechange.85
Box 7 Oral history triggers community action in Jamaica
MochoisapoorareaofJamaica,oftenscornedasbackwardbyotherJamaicans.Fortyyearsofbauxitemininghasdamagedtheenvironment,increasingvulnerabilitytohurricanes.Panostrainedcommunitymemberstointerviewresidentsabouttheirpersonalexperiencesandideasforsolutions.Collectionandpublicationofthese48personalstoriesrenewedthecommunity’sinterestinitshistoryandculturalheritage,aswellastriggeringanumberofotherinitiativesforcommunityactivitiesandcollectiveaction:plansincludeuseofphotographytodocumenttheenvironmentaldamage,ahurricanevulnerabilityassessment,andestablishmentofacommunitydisaster-managementcommittee.
Agroupofyoungpeopleisworkingtoproduceabi-monthlycommunitynewsletteronenvironmentalissues;acommitteehasbeenformedtoexplorethepotentialofcommunitytourism.CommunitymembershavealsobeenrepresentingMochoonthenationalandinternationalscene,includingjoininganinternationalmarchagainstclimatechangein2007.TalksarealsounderwaywithanothervulnerablecommunityontheJamaicancoasttoreplicatetheprojectandsharelessonslearnt.
Journalistsfromthenationalmediahavecoveredsomeoftheprojectactivities,includingaccompanyingcommunityrepresentativestoameetingwiththebauxiteminingcompanytoseekactiononrestoringdamagedonebymining.Thepublicitygiventothismeetingledtothecompanyrespondingtothepeople’sdemandsintwodays,insteadofwaitingweeksormonthsastheyhaveusuallydone.Thecommunityplanstocontinuedocumentingtheirnegotiationswiththecompany–akeytoolfortransparency.86
84TheseideasthatcommunicationshouldbeconceivedasasocialprocessratherthanastransactionsbetweenindividualsarebeingpromotedbytheCommunicationforSocialChangeConsortium,amongothers.Seewww.communicationforsocialchange.org
85AninfluentialthinkeraboutempoweringpoorpeoplewasPaoloFreire,whosawsocialchangeasresultingfromchangesinindividualandcommunityself-awareness,whichthemselvesresultedfromcommunity–leveldiscussion.SeeforexamplePFreire(1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed,newedition1996,transMyraBergmanRamos,London:Penguin
86Local voices, global choices: The Mocho oral testimony project,Jamaica:PanosCaribbean
Adiverse,engagedandempoweredcivilsociety
�� Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
Communityradio
Communityradioisatypeofcommunicationchannelthatisgainingsupportindevelopmentthinkingandpractice.Communityradio,accordingtothestrictdefinition,isradiothatisownedandrunbyacommunity(ageographiccommunityoracommunityofinterest).However,thetermisalsosometimesusedtocoverradiostationsthatarelocalbutownedbylocalornationalgovernment,privateownersorreligiousinstitutions.
Thedefiningcharacteristicofcommunityradioisthatitprovidesinformationrelevanttoitsaudience,localnews(thoughinsomecountriesbroadcastinglawforbidscommunitystationsfrombroadcastingnews,limitingthemto‘development’topicssuchashealthandagriculture)andaplatformforlocalvoicesanddebate.Throughphone-inprogrammes,studiodiscussionsandinterviewsanddebatesrecordedinthefield,communityradioprovidesopportunitiesforpeopletodiscussdevelopment,politicalandsocialissuesoflocalandcurrentconcern,andsometimestoquestionleadersandpublicfigures.Forexample,RadioProgress,amemberofGhana’sCommunityRadioNetwork,airedaprogrammeoftestimoniesfromlocalpeopleabouthowtheyexperiencepoverty.Oneofthespeakersmentionedlackofinformationaboutwhathealthcarewasavailabletopoorpeople.Afterthisbroadcast,healthcareofficialsrespondedbyincreasingpublicityabouttheNationalHealthInsuranceScheme.
Suchprogrammesareavaluablespaceforhelpingcommunitiesidentifyandunderstandissues,formulatesolutions,andensureinclusion–allaspectsofactivecommunity-levelengagementinpubliclifeanddevelopment.Communityradioalsoplaysavaluableroleinpromotinglocallanguagesandcultures.CommunityradioislongestablishedinLatinAmericaandsomepartsofAfrica,andgovernmentsinotherAfricancountriesarestartingtograntmorelicencestocommunitybroadcasters.87InIndia,legislationallowingcommunityradiowasadoptedin2006.Everywhere,akeyproblemisfinancing,aspoorcommunitiesgenerallylackresourcestomaintainaradiostationthemselves.Onesolutionissubsidyfromgovernmentorexternalaiddonors,butincreasingnumbersofcommunitystationsindifferentdevelopingcountriesareshowingthatself-relianceispossiblethroughpartnershiporotherwell-thought-outsustainabilitystrategies.88
Box 8 Community radio and popular protest in Nepal
CommunityradioiscreditedwithamajorroleinthetransitiontodemocracyinNepal.InFebruary2005,inresponsetoworseningconflictbetweenthegovernmentandMaoistrebels,theKingsackedthegovernment,closedthetelephoneandInternetsystemsandbannednewsreporting.Nepal’snetworkofcommunityradiostationsfoundingeniouswaysofdefyingtheban:forinstance,forbiddenfrombroadcastinganythingbutmusictheystartedtosingthenews.Thentheybecamemoreopenlydefiant,informingpeopleoftheirrightsandthedutiesofgovernment,hostingtalkshows,andencouragingpeopletocomposeprotestsongs.Theybroadcastregularmessagesurgingpeacefulratherthanviolentprotest.Thiscontributedtobringingfourmillionpeopleoutontothestreetscallingforaresolutionofthepoliticalcrisis.
87Foranoverviewofthecurrentstateofcommunityradio,seeCommunityRadioSocialImpactAssessment2007,AMARC,http://evaluation.amarc.org
88SeeSHughes,SEashwar,VJennings(eds)(2004)How to Get Started and Keep Going: A guide to Community Multimedia Centres,UNESCO
��
Society and civil society organisations
Beyondlocalcommunities,publicopinion,socialattitudesandhabitsandaspirationsatnationalandinternationallevelareveryimportantfordevelopment.Forinstance,society’sattitudestowomen,ortheattitudesofthemajorityinacountrytominorities,shapethelifeopportunitiesofmanypeopleinthosesocieties,especiallythosewhoarepooranddisempowered.Communication,especiallythroughthemedia,playsakeyroleinshapingpublicattitudes.Themediacanprovideforumsfordiscussingchangesfacingsocieties,newideas,socialandpoliticalconflicts.Mediacanalsopresentemergingrolemodels(forexample,ascharactersinsoapoperas)andcanofferplatformsforminoritiesandmarginalisedgroupstospeakforthemselves.
Bothfactualandentertainmentmediaareimportant:developmentagenciesmakesophisticatedandsuccessfuluseof‘edutainment’,inwhichinformationanddebateonimportantandcomplexsocialchallengesareembeddedinappealingmusicordramaticstory-linesenactedbyengagingcharacters.SouthAfrica’sSoul Cityisawell-knownexampleofthelatter:along-runningandsuccessfulradioandTVdramaseriescoveringissuestodowithHIVandAIDS,healthandinterpersonalrelationships,thatreaches70percentofSouthAfrica’spopulation.89ResearchstronglysuggeststhatithasreducedHIV-andAIDS-relatedstigmainthecountry.
Thisismediawithadeliberatedevelopmentpurpose.Ofcoursemostmediacontentisnotlikethis.Increasingnumbersoftheworld’speopleenjoyentertainment,oftenforeign-produced,asnewtechnologiesandliberalisedglobalmediamarketsallowmushroomingnumbersofTVandradiochannels.Itistooearlytotellwhatimpactthiswillhave.Socialanalystsoftenworryaboutit;theyfearthatsuchimportedsoapoperasandmusic,thatappeartobearnorelationtopeople’sreallives,aredisempoweringpeople,creatingpassivityandunrealisticexpectations,aswellasintroducingalienculturalhabits.Butothersbelievethatentertainmentmediathatintroducenewideas,aspirationsandpossibilitiesmayalsohavepositiveresults.
Providingpeoplewithinformationisonlypartofthecommunicationthatisneededtochangesocietalattitudesandindividualbehaviour.The20-yearstruggletoovercometheHIVandAIDSpandemicoffersanobjectlessoninwhatkindofcommunicationworksandwhatdoesnot.AnanalysisbyPanosLondonin2003concludedthatwhileenormouseffortandhugeamountsofmoneyhadbeeninvestedinpreventioncampaignsusingthemedia,informationdisseminationandmessaging,themostsuccessfulcommunicationstrategieswentbeyondwhatiscalled‘socialmarketing’andtop-downmassmediacampaigns,andfosteredenvironmentswhere‘thevoiceofthosemostaffectedbythepandemiccanbeheard’.Itconcludedthat‘onlywhenpeoplebecometrulyengagedindiscussionsandtalkingaboutHIV,doesrealindividualandsocialchangecomeabout’.90
Someanalystslookingatsocieties–developedaswellasdeveloping–haveidentifiedwhattheycall‘socialcapital’asanimportantelementofahealthysociety.AmericanwriterRobertPutnam,whopopularisedtheconceptintheEnglish-speakingworldinrecentyears,definedsocialcapitalas‘socialnetworksandthenormsofreciprocityandtrustworthinessthatarisefromthem’,andhighlightedinterpersonalassociations,sharednormsgainedthroughpersonalinteraction,andindividuals’engagementinciviclifeaskeyelements.91Sincethe1990stheconcepthasbeenpartofmuchdevelopmentthinking.TheWorldBankidentifiedsocialcapitalasanassetthatreducesthevulnerabilityofpoorpeople.92Socialcapitalisalsoidentifiedaskeytopeople’slivelihoods,inthe‘livelihoodsanalysis’approachtodevelopmentusedbyDFIDandotheragencies.
89www.soulcity.org.za
90PanosLondon(2003)Missing the Message?20 years of learning fromHIV/AIDS,PanosLondon,pages1and46,www.panos.org.uk
91RPutnam(2000) Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community, NewYork:SimonandSchuster.Theconceptsunderpinningsocialcapitalcanbetracedbacktothe19thcenturyandworkbyJamesMadison,AlexisdeTocquevilleandothers.JohnDeweyreferredto‘socialcapital’inSchool and Societyin1900,whilePierreBourdieudistinguishedbetweeneconomic,culturalandsocialcapital.Theconceptisquitevariable,andincludesissuesofclassandpowertovaryingdegrees
92SeeforinstanceCMoser(1998)‘TheAssetVulnerabilityFramework:ReassessingUrbanPovertyReductionStrategies’,inWorld Development,Vol26No1,pp1–19,Elsevier
Adiverse,engagedandempoweredcivilsociety
�0 Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
Communicationcapacitiesfacilitatethesekindsofassociationsandactivities.Thestudyoftheimpactoftelecommunicationsandlivelihoodscitedabove93foundthattelephonescontributetosocialcapital,andastudyofworldvalues,whichlookedatsocialcapitalin47nationsbetween1995and1997,foundapositivecorrelationbetweenwidespreadaccesstomassmediaandsocietieswithhighsocialcapital.94Ontheotherhand,PutnamarguesthattheriseofentertainmentmediawasamaincauseoftheperceiveddeclineinsocialcapitalintheUS–tohaveapositiveeffect,communicationhastobeinterpersonal.
SocialnetworksareenabledparticularlythroughtheinterpersonalcommunicationoftelephonesandtheInternet,andthroughphysicalassociation.Forexample,inUganda,discussionandknowledge-sharinginpersonalcommunicationnetworksmadepeoplefeelthatHIVandAIDSaffectedthempersonally,promotingchangesinbehaviour.95Similarly,theHIVandAIDSsocialmovementinSouthAfricawasenabledthroughinterpersonalcommunicationanddrivenbyadesiretobuildassociationsandfindinformationfromotherssharingthesameexperiences.96Theactive,empoweredandengagedcitizenswhoeventuallyformedtheTreatmentActionCampaignexercisedconsiderableinfluenceastheyharnessedthecommunicationtoolsofadvocacy,massmovementandpoliticalpressuretoinfluencetheSouthAfricanGovernment’spoliciesonantiretroviral(ARV)drugs.
Civilsocietyorganisations
Theterm‘civilsociety’issometimesusedtorefertoorganisationsandassociations.Thenumberandvibrancyofsuchassociationsistakenasanindicatorofthequalityofanation’slife.Civilsocietyorganisations(CSOs)canincludeorganisationsforculturalandleisureactivities,suchasfootballclubsorthebowlingclubsofPutnam’stitle;professionalassociations,tradeunionsandinterestgroups;activists’groupsandself-helporsupportgroupsonissuesoridentityquestions(forinstance,women’sgroups);andNGOsthatprovideservices.Sometimesreligiousinstitutionsareincludedinthedefinition,sometimesnot.
Clearlysuchassociationscanbeimportantinsupportingindividuals–supportingtheiridentityandprovidingopportunities,socialsupport,andservices.Theyalsoplayaroleinpoliticallifeandaspartofthe‘demandside’ofaccountabilityandgoodgovernance,functioningasameansofbringingtogetherindividualstolobbyforrightsortoinfluencepolicy,aggregatingdemand,andchannellingpeople’svoices.
Communicationofmanykindsisfundamentaltosuchgroups:interpersonaldialogue;networkingandorganisingviaphone,Internet,andemail;gatheringinformation,managingitandchannellingittomembers;debateandarticulationofissuesanddemands;outreachtowiderpublicsthroughpublications,performances,Internetormassmedia;linkswithsimilargroupsatgloballevelviaemailandInternet;andadvocacyanddirectlobbyingofgovernment.Forgroupsthatareformedbyorthatservepoorandmarginalisedpeople,strengtheningtheircapacitiestocommunicatecanboosttheorganisations’capacitiestoserveandempowertheirmembership.
93Seefootnote83
94PNorris(2002)EditorialVol7(1)Social Capital and the News Media,theHarvardInternationalJournalofPress/PoliticsOnline
95ECGreen(2003)Rethinking AIDS prevention: Learning from success in developing countries,WestportCT:GreenwoodPress
96PanosLondon(2006) Speaking freely, being strong:HIV social movements, communication and inclusive social change – a case study in South Africa and Namibia,PanosLondon.Availableatwww.panos.org.uk/speakingfreely
�1
CSOsrepresentingdifferentgroupswithdifferentinterestsmaycompeteandconflictwithoneanotheraswellaswiththewidernationalinterest.Anopen‘publicsphere’fordebate,inmediaandotherways,isneededforthiscompetitiontoworkitselfout.Mediacanprovideinformation,challengeandaskquestions,andprovideaplatformfordebates.TransparencyisalsoneededabouthowindividualCSOsaccessresourcesandinfluence,especiallyiftheygrowstrongenoughtobypassformalpoliticalprocessesandhaveinformalandnon-accountableinfluenceongovernments.ThemembershipandleadershipofCSOsaregenerallynotelected,makingthemvulnerabletoquestionsabouthowinclusivetheyareandwhotheyrepresent.AndtheremaybeissuesofinclusionandexclusionwithintheCSOsthemselves–whohaspower,whomakesdecisions?TransparencyisasdesirableforCSOsasitisforgovernments.97
Global civil society
Asdigitalcommunication–Internet,emailandtelephones–makesinternationalcommunicationeasier,people’shorizonsareexpandingmoreandmorebeyondthebordersofthecountryinwhichtheylive.Manyissuesgobeyondthejurisdictionofindividualstates–environmentalissuessuchasclimatechange,socialissuessuchaswomen’sequality,politicalissuessuchasmarginalisationofthepoor–andpeopleareusingnewcommunicationtechnologiestoexchangeinformation,debateandmobiliseforactionaroundsuchissues.The‘networksociety’98or‘globalcivilsociety’99isstartingtochangethecharacteroftheworldcommunity(althoughatpresentthe‘network’mainlyincludeswealthierandmoreurbanpeople).
GlobalgovernanceexpertMaryKaldorpointsoutthatmoreandmorepeopleareparticipatinginpublicdiscourse,andpoliticaldebatecannolongerbetheprovinceofasmallelite.Thecharacteroftheworldcommunitywillinfuture,shebelieves,beshapedbythewayitsmembersconfer.‘Acrosstheworld,socialmovements,singleissuegroups,students’,workers’,women’sandpeasants’associations,non-governmentalorganisations,churches,foundationsandInternet-basedcommunitiesaremobilisinginpursuitofobjectivesthatnosinglestatecandeliver.Governments,globalisedcorporationsandinternationalinstitutionsarerespondingtopressurefromsuchquartersonanevermoretransnationalbasis.’AlthoughnewcommunicationtechnologiescanalsobeusedeffectivelybygroupscommittedtoviolencesuchasAlQaeda,mostofthe‘growingthrongoftransnationalactors…relyondialogueratherthanviolence…Infuture,transnationaldialoguecouldenablenegotiationtosupersedeviolenceashumanity’sdefaultinstrumentforresolvingdifferences.’100
Thedangersandlimitationsofglobalcivilsocietyarethesameasthosefornationalcivilsociety.Itcanbedifficultforaudiencestojudgethecredibilityandlegitimacyofapieceofinformationoranorganisationtheyhavefoundintheultra-democraticspaceoftheInternet,anditcanbeaseasytomobilisepeoplearoundanextremistagendaasademocraticone.Thesolutionstotheseproblemsmustbemoretransparency,andfreedebateamonganincreasinglymedia-literateanddiscriminatingpublicandpoliticians.Massmediawhichcanfilterandanalyseinformation,provideobjectivesynthesisandestablishthemselvesastrustedandauthoritative‘brandnames’willbeincreasinglyimportantifavibrantcivilsocietyistobeforged.
97ThefirststepsarebeingtakentowardsstandardsoftransparencyforinternationalNGOs.TheInternationalNon-GovernmentalOrganisationsAccountabilityChartersetsoutcorevaluesandoperatingprinciplesthatincludegoodgovernanceandmanagement;andmulti-stakeholderengagement.Italsomakesspecificreferencetorespectforuniversalprinciplessuchashumanrights,independence,responsibleadvocacy,effectiveprogrammes,non-discrimination,transparencyandethicalfundraising.Asof2006signatorieswereActionAidInternational,AmnestyInternational,CivicusWorldAllianceforCitizenParticipation,ConsumersInternational,GreenpeaceInternational,OxfamInternational,theInternationalSavetheChildrenAlliance,SurvivalInternational,InternationalFederationofTerredesHommes,TransparencyInternationalandWorldYWCA
98‘Networksociety’isthetermcoinedbyManuelCastellstorefertothechangesthatthetechnologiesofelectroniccommunicationhavebroughttothefundamentalsofsociety(conceptualisedastheeconomy,thestateanditsinstitutionsandthewayspeoplecreatemeaningintheirlivesthroughcollectiveaction).However,Castellsrecognisedthatthemajorityoftheworld’spopulation,lackingaccesstomeansofcommunication,werenot(yet)partofthenetworksociety.SeeMCastells(1998)The end of the Millennium, the information age: Economy, society and culture,VolIII,CambridgeMA;Oxford:Blackwell(secondedition2000)
99‘Globalcivilsociety’isthetermusedbyMaryKaldor,directoroftheCentrefortheStudyofGlobalGovernanceattheLondonSchoolofEconomics
100MKaldor(2007)‘ThebeaconsofBabel’inGlobal Voice: Britain’s future in international broadcasting,London:Premiumpublishing
Adiverse,engagedandempoweredcivilsociety
Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment �� �� Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
A diverse, engaged and empowered civil society: conclusion
Peoplearethemainactorsinachievingdevelopment,whetherasindividuals,insocialgroupsorassociations,orinwidernetworks.Itistheactionsandattitudesofindividuals,shapedbythecommunitiesinwhichtheylive,thatcreateopportunities,protecthealth,andmanageresources.Goodgovernancerequires‘competentcitizens’andactivecivilsocietyorganisationsaspartnerswitheffectivegovernments,demandingafairshareofresourcesandholdinggovernmentaccountable.Communicationistheessenceoftheinteractionsthatshapesocietiesandindividuallives:communicationinfamiliesandcommunities,inassociationsandinstitutions,betweengovernmentsandpeople,betweenprovidersandusersofservices,andwithsocietyatlargethroughmassmedia.Allpeoplemusthaveaccesstodifferentcommunicationchannels–telephonesandInternet,face-to-facediscussions,andmedia–iftheyaretoplayanactivepartinpoliticalanddevelopmentprocesses.
�� Section
Mostpeopleacceptthatareductioninabsolutepovertyisoneofthemaingoalsofdevelopment,andthateconomicgrowthisanecessaryconditionforit.101Butthereisconsiderabledisagreementoverwhatkindofgrowthisneededandhowbestitcanworktoenablepoorpeopletoliftthemselvesoutofpoverty.102Theassumptionthatthebenefitsofeconomicgrowth‘trickledown’spontaneouslyandequitablytoallsectorsofsocietyisnolongerwidelyheld,andmosteconomistsagreethatgovernmentshavearesponsibilitytoregulateandinterveneinmarketstomeetpovertygoalssuchaspromotingtheparticipationofthepoorineconomicactivity.Whatis,andwillremain,contentiousiswhatshouldbethe‘mix’betweenfreedomandinterventioninmarketsinacountryatanygiventime,andwhatdegreeofredistributionisdesirableandeffectiveforreducingpoverty.
Thissectionofthepaperwillshowthatwhateverthemixoffreedomandcontrol,openandparticipatorycommunicationandinformationprocessesareattheheartofhealthyandsustainableeconomicdevelopment.Itwillshowtherolecommunicationplaysinimprovedandmoreeffectiveeconomicpolicymaking;anditscentralityinestablishingandsustaininganenablingenvironmentthatencourageshealthyandmoreequitableeconomicgrowth.Itexaminestheimportanceofinformationandcommunicationtoinfrastructuralinvestmentprojects,andtheircontributiontobuildingsustainablelivelihoodsforthemillionsofpeoplewholiveandworkinruralareas.Theenvironmentalchallengesfacingthewholeworld,suchasclimatechange,andthoseaffectingspecificlocalities,likesoilerosionorshortageoffreshwater,alsorequireintenseandpermanentcommunicationprocessesinwhichindividuals,statesandinternationalbodiesallhavetobeengaged–tolearnfacts,debateresponses,agreeonactionsandmonitorperformance.
Communicationinthefunctioningofmarkets
Theeconomictheoryofmarketshasalwaysrecognisedtheimportanceofcommunication.AdamSmith’stheoretical‘economicman’actedrationallyonthebasisofperfectmarketinformation.Thefactthatinformationisnearlyalwaysimperfect–highlightedamongothersbyNobellaureateProfessorJosephStiglitz103andhiscolleagues–onlyreinforcestheobviouspointthatthemoreinformationaproducer,traderorconsumerhas,thebetter.Whereinformationflowsfreely,marketsandbusinessesgrowandthestatecanregulateeffectively;andthisistruefordevelopingaswellasdevelopedeconomies.Informationandcommunicationarecriticalfactorsinsupportingalltypesofeconomicactivity,fromsmall-scaleagriculturetotransnationalfuturestrading.Communicationisfundamentaltocreatinganenablingenvironmentforinvestmentandenterprise;tothefunctioningofmarkets;totheefficiencyofproductionprocessesandprovisionofservices;andtocreditandbankingfacilities.
Fromadevelopmentperspective,thekeypointisthatpoorpeopleandsmallproducersaregreatlydisadvantagedbecausetheyusuallysufferfrompossessingmuchlessinformationandlessabilitytocommunicatethanrichpeopleandbigproducers.Effortsareneededtoovercomethisinformationdeficit,toimprovecompetitionandconsumerchoice,createmoreeffectivemarkets,andcontributetowardsmoreequitableeconomicgrowth.
Economic development
101Forinstance,DFIDdefinesitsobjectiveasriddingtheworldofextremepoverty(www.dfid.gov.uk);theWorldBankasglobalpovertyreductionandtheimprovementoflivingstandards(www.worldbank.org);andOxfamasfindinglastingsolutionstopovertyandsuffering.Povertyreductionasagoalofdevelopment–thoughheadlinedintheMDGs–isdisputedbysomecritics,whofeelthatitfocusesonthesymptomsratherthanthewidercausesofpoverty,whichtheyseeasimbalancesinpowerandaccesstowealthglobally
102Someanalystsobservethateconomicgrowthderivingfromparticipationintheglobalisedeconomywidenswealthgaps.Theyarguethatgrowthineconomicactivitywithincountries,andpromotionoftheneedsofsmallproducers,haveamorebeneficialimpactonpovertylevelsthanparticipationintheglobaleconomy.See,forinstance, The Least Developed Countries Report 2004: Linking International Trade with Poverty Reduction, UnitedNationsConferenceonTradeandDevelopment
103See,forinstance,‘TheContributionsoftheEconomicsofInformationtoTwentiethCenturyEconomics’Quarterly Journal of Economics,115(4),November2000,pp1441-78
��Economicdevelopment
��
Box 9 Regulation, information and the market
InIndiainthe1970stherewasascarcityofgood-qualityfreshmilkbecausemuchofthemilkproducedwaswatereddowntoincreaseprofits.Becausetherewasnowayabuyercouldfindoutmilk’sbutterfatcontent,low-quality(cheaper)milkdroveouthigh-qualitymilk.TosolvetheproblemtheIndianNationalDairyDevelopmentBoardmeasuredbutterfatcontentandcreatedbrandnamesthatbuiltbuyers'trustinthemilkquality.AsaresultthequalityofmilkavailableinIndiaimproved.104
Makingeconomicpolicy
Aswehavealreadyexploredinthesectiononpoliticsandgovernance,openandparticipatorycommunicationprocessesarecentraltomoreinclusive,effectiveandpro-poordevelopmentoutcomes.Thisisalsotrueinthevitalareaofnationaleconomicpolicymaking,wheretheimplicationsofthechoicesmadehaveprofoundconsequencesonthescaleanddistributionofwealthandpower.Thearticulationanddebateofdifferenteconomicpoliciesandchoicesisacentralfeatureofpoliticaldiscourse,involvingthegovernment,politicalparties,tradeunions,businessgroups,academiaandothercivilsocietyorganisations.However,theviewsandinterestsofpoorpeopleandmarginalisedgroupsareoftenignoredordrownedout.
ItwaspartlytoredressthisimbalancethattheWorldBankintroducedthePovertyReductionStrategyprocessinthelate1990s,whichattemptedtoestablishamechanismforthedevelopmentofnationalstrategiestoreducepoverty,whichwouldberunbynationalgovernmentswiththeparticipationofawiderangeofstakeholdersandinterestedgroups,includingthepoor.ManyPovertyReductionStrategyPapers(PRSPs),aswellasaddressingwelfareissues,includesomeeconomicsectorsofparticularrelevancetothepoor;andconsultation,participation,monitoringandreviewarebuiltintothePRSPprocess.However,theconsultationprocessessofarhaveoftenbeenincomplete,notincludingadequateparticipationofpoorpeoplewhoarethetargetsofthestrategies.Forexample,Uganda’sfirstPRSPhighlightedagricultureasoneproductivesectorthatneededtogrowinordertoprovideopportunitiesformanypoorpeopletoimprovetheirincomes.Butitfailedtotakeintoconsiderationthefactthatlargepartsofthecountry’sproduction,andalargeproportionofitspoorpeople,werepastoralists.ThePRSPfocusedoncommercialhorticultureforexport,andfailedtoincludesomesimplemeasuresthatcouldhavehelpedpastoralistsincreaseandprofitmorefromtheexportofmeatandlivestock.Pastoralists–inmostcountriesamongthemostmarginalisedgroups–hadnotbeenconsultedbecausetheywerenot‘visible’tothecity-basedpolicymakers.
Debatehasbeenlimitedinotherrespects.SomecriticshavepointedoutthatwhiletheoverallcontentofPRSPsmaybeopentodebatewithinacountry,thefundamentaleconomicpolicyorientationofthePRSPhasnotbeenupfordiscussion.Theychargethattheliberalisationoftradeandmarketsandotherfeaturesofthe‘WashingtonConsensus’havebeenassumedasthemacro-economicbasisforpovertyreduction,andtherehasbeennopossibilityofanalysingandchallengingtheimpactoftheseinanindividualcountry’suniquesituation.Norhavethespecificmeasurestoimplementthestrategiesoftenbeenopenfordiscussion.Debateandpolicyprescriptionshavebeenchannelledandincomplete.105
104RKlitgaard(1991)Adjusting to Reality,SanFrancisco:ICSPress
105FormoreinformationondebatesaboutPRSPs,seeWho’s richer, who’s poorer? A journalist’s guide to the politics of poverty reduction strategies,PanosmediatoolkitonPRSPsNo1,London:PanosLondon(2005)
Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
�� Section ��
Communication,informationandparticipationchallengesarealsoattheheartoftacklingtheinequalitiesrelatedtointernationaleconomicpolicymaking.Theopenness,transparencyandaccountabilityofmanyinternationaleconomicbodiesandforums–suchastheIMF,WorldBankandWorldTradeOrganization(WTO)–isweakorsubjecttocontroversy;andfrequentlytheinformationavailabletonegotiatorsfromdevelopingcountriesonmanyhighlycomplexandtechnicalissuesisfarfromadequate.
Thisproblemisnotconfinedtopolicymakersandtechnicians.Thelackofsufficientlydetailedlocalmediacoverageindevelopingcountriesofthekeyexternaldrivingforcesofchange–suchastheimpactofclimatechange,andinternationaltradeandsubsidyregimes–leadstopublicdisengagementfromtheseissues,andtheviewsandperspectivesofmembersofthepublicarenotintegratedintonationalandinternationalfora.Asaresult,policymakingispoorerandpolicyisalmostcertainlymoredifficulttoimplement.Thepublicneedstobeinformedmoreconsistentlyandtoahigherlevelonthesepoliticalandeconomicpolicyissues.Thiscanonlyhappenifthemediaitselfunderstandsandreportsaccuratelyandknowledgeablyonwhatareoftenhighlytechnicalissues.Journalistsmustbesupportedtounderstandthesecomplexissues,whileeditorsandownersmustfindwaystobalancetheircommercialimperativeswiththeirpublicinterestfunctiontoenableinformedstakeholderdecision-making.106
The enabling environment
Ruleoflaw,transparencyandreducedcorruption
Someaspectsofgoodgovernancearefundamentalforcreatinganenvironmentinwhichenterpriseonanyscalecanflourish.Establishingtheruleoflaw,securityandstability,transparencyofbusinessandeconomicrelationships,andpredictabilityofcontractsallcreateconfidenceandencourageinvestment,bothinternationalandlocal.Theyareessentialpartsofacultureofopennessandtransparency,accesstoinformation,andeffectivepublicscrutinyprocesses.Forexample,researchhasshownthatwhereinformationaboutcontractsandtheirenforcementistransparent,privateinvestmentisstronger.107(Therearecounter-examples:forexample,therewasaflourishingandcompetitivemarketinmobilephoneprovisioninSomaliaduringyearswhentherewasnogovernment.108However,thisexampleshowstheeffectoffreedomfromgovernmentconstraintsinSomalia,comparedwiththedominanceofcumbersomestatemonopolyprovidersinmanyothercountriesatthetime.)
Wheretransparencyandtheruleoflawareabsent,inpoliticalsystemsofallkinds,corruptionflourishes.Economicandbusinesscorruptiondistortsandreducesgrowthandinvestmentbecauseitintroducesinefficienciesandunderminestheknown‘rulesofthegame’.Studiesshowthatanincreaseofonepoint(onascaleof1-10)inthecorruptionindexofacountrytranslatesintoa0.9percentreductioningrowthrate,andreducestheproportionthatinvestmentcontributestoGDPby4.7percent.109Obviouslytherearewinnersaswellasloserswhencorruptionisthenorm–butthewinnersarethosewithmostmoney,powerandcontactswiththeelite.Reducingcorruptioncreatesamorelevelplayingfieldforsmallerbusinesses,aswellasbuildingtrustandasenseofempowermentamongordinarycitizens.
106Tobegintoaddressthe‘informationgap’withinthemediaandinthepublicsphere,inDecember2005PanosbroughtateamofjournalistsfromAfricanandAsiancountriestotheWorldTradeOrganization’ssixthministerialsummitinHongKong.Theaimwastostrengthenthejournalists’knowledgeoftheissuessothattheycouldreportmoreeffectivelyinthemediaathome.Forsomeofthefeaturestheyproduced,seewww.panos.org.uk
107ZDrabekandWPayne(2002)‘TheImpactofTransparencyonForeignDirectInvestment’,Journal of Economic Integration,Vol17No4
108HHassan,‘Thephoneskeepringinginworld’spoorestcountry’,PanosFeature,22July2003,www.panos.org.uk
109S-JWei(1997)‘HowTaxingisCorruptiononInternationalInvestors’,NationalBureauofEconomicResearch(US)WorkingPaperSeries,WorkingPaper6030
Economicdevelopment
��
Box 10 The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative
TheExtractiveIndustriesTransparencyInitiative(EITI)waslaunchedattheWorldSummitonSustainableDevelopmentin2002toincreaselevelsoftransparencyaboutpaymentsbyminingcompaniestogovernments,andaboutthesharingofrevenues.Itreliesongovernmentsofcountriesrichinnaturalresourcestotakethelead–soitwillnotworkifthepoliticalwillislacking.BySeptember2006around20countrieswereimplementingit,andthreecountrieshadproducedreports(Nigeria,GuineaandAzerbaijan).AconsortiumofinternationalNGOsismonitoringtheimplementation,andtheycommentthatsofarthereisnomechanismforencouragingcompaniestobeastransparentabouttheiroperationsincountriesthatarenotpartoftheinitiativeasinthosethatare.Theinitiativewouldbestrengthened,intheviewoftheseNGOs,iftherewaspressurefromthecompanies’homecountriesforthesamestandardsoftransparencyacrossalltheiroperations.110
110TheNGOconsortiumincludesSavetheChildren,OpenSocietyInstitute,CAFOD,Care(UK),WorldVision,SecoursCatholique,andGlobalWitness
111DKaufmannandABellver(2005)‘TransparentingTransparency’inInitial Empirics and Policy Applications,Preliminarydraft,September,WorldBank
112www.doingbusiness.org/ExploreTopics/StartingBusiness/
113HdeSoto(2000)The Mystery of Capital,London:BlackSwan,p232
114GlobalInternetGeography–TeleGeography2004,PriMetricaInc.Seewww.telegeography.com
115‘TradePolicyTrends:ServingtheBusinessInterests’,SpeechbyHaruhikoKuroda,President,AsianDevelopmentBank,attheAsia-EuropeBusinessForum,Helsinki,Finland10September2006
Simplerandmoretransparentbureaucraticprocedures
Governmentscanfacilitateeconomicactivitybymakingbureaucraticandregulatoryproceduressuchasbusinessregistration,licensingprocesses,andimport/exportproceduressimpler,faster,cheaperandmoretransparent.ICTs,massmedia,systemsreform,knowledgeandinformationmanagementcanallbebroughtintoplaytoachievethis.Reducingtimeandcostsandincreasingtransparencyandpredictabilityarebeneficialforlargeenterprisesbutevenmoresoforsmallones,forwhomthecostsofcomplyingwithbureaucracyarehigherinrelationtotheirsize.Incountrieswithlowlevelsoftransparency,registeringanewbusinesscostsmorethanfourtimeswhatitcostswheretheleveloftransparencyishigh.111InMozambique,totakejustoneexample,toregisterabusinessofficiallyrequires13procedures.Thewholeprocesstakesanaverageof113daysandcosts85.7percentofaveragepercapitaannualgrossnationalincome(GNI).InSweden,bycontrast,threeproceduresarerequired,takinganaverageof16daysandcostingonly0.7percentofpercapitaGNI.112
Accesstocapital
Accesstocapitalisoftenamajorproblemforsmallbusinessesandthusasignificantconstraintonincreasingeconomicactivity.Poorpeoplelackassetswhichcanbeacceptedassecurityforloans.Thisisnotnecessarilybecausetheydonothaveassets,ratherthattheycannotreleasethecapitalwithinthem.EconomistHernandodeSotopointedoutthatmillionsofpoorpeoplepossesslandandhouseswhicharenotformallyregistered.Systemsto‘obtainandorganiseknowledgeaboutrecordedassetsinformswecancontrol’couldenablemanypoorpeopletobecome‘bankable’.113Thisisamassivepotentialeconomicbenefitofmoreorganised,transparentandaccessibleinformationsystems.TheexperienceoflandregistrationinKarnataka(seeBox5onpage20)demonstrateshowICTscanmakelandregistrationinformationmoreaccessibletoreleasecapitalandsupportgrowth.
ICTinfrastructureandservices
Inthepastcoupleofdecades,theexplosionofglobaltradeandwealthhasmatchedtherevolutionarygrowthininformationandcommunicationtechnologies.Forexample,between2003and2004AsiasawaverageInternettrafficgrowby434percent,114whileintra-regionaltradeinEastAsiaroseto55percentoftotalworldtradebytheendof2005,upfrom43percentoftotaltradeintheearly1990s.115Althoughthepreciserelationshipofcauseandeffecthasnotbeendefinitivelyproven,itistruethattoattractinternationalbusinessandcapitaltodayacountryneedstoprovideinternational-standardICTfacilities.
Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
�� Section
Reliableandaffordabletelephonesanddigitalconnectivityarealsoimportantforsmallbusinesses.InvestmentinICTscanleadtoefficiencygains,increasedproductivityandgrowthforsmallandmediumenterprises(SMEs)aswellasformajorenterprises.116Onestudyfoundthatindevelopingcountries,salesgrewby3.8percentandemploymentby5.6percentforenterpriseswhichutilisedICTs,comparedto0.4percentand4.5percentforthosethatdidnot.117Untilafewyearsago,telecomscompaniestendednottoinvestinprovidinginfrastructureandserviceswheretheuserswouldmostlybepoorpeople,astheythoughtthereturnsontheirinvestmentwouldbesmall.RecentlytheyhavebeguntorecognisethatthepotentialdemandamongSMEs(andamongpoorpeopleingeneral–seepreviouschapter)fortelecomsservicesdoesinfactofferprofitableinvestmentopportunities.
Mobilephonesubscriptionshavegrownfivefoldto1.4billionindevelopingcountriessince2000.118Before2006only10percentofthepopulationofsub-SaharanAfricahadnetworkcoverage,buttodaymorethan60percentdoandthisisexpectedtoreach85percentby2010.119OneofthewaysICTsarestartingtohelpsmallproducersinmanycountriesisbyenablingthemtofindoutthepricestheirproductsarefetchinginlocalandnationalmarkets–usingtelephones,textmessaging,ortheInternet.Accesstothisinformationputstheminastrongerpositionfornegotiatingpriceswithmiddle-men;orenablesthemtocutoutthemiddle-menaltogetherandincreasetheirownincome.
116Global Trends and Policies – Information and Communications for Development,2006,WorldBank
117SDutta(Insead),ALopez-ClarosandIMia(WorldEconomicForum), Global Information Technology Report 2005–2006
118MFoster,‘CellPhonesVitalinDevelopingWorld’,WashingtonPost,27January2007
119‘Buy,cell,hold:ThespreadofmobilephonesinAfrica’,The Economist25January2007
120DUptonandVFuller,The ITC eChoupal Initiative,28October2003.Revisiondate:15January2004
121AnoverviewofICTsatIDRC,www.idrc.ca/en/ev-48418-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html
122www.manobi.net
Box 11 ICTs empowering producers
TheIndianTobaccoCorporation(ITC),amajoragriculturalconglomerate,createdanetworkof‘e-Choupals’(Internet-connectedcomputers)inruralcommunities.TheoriginalpurposewastoimprovethesupplychainforproducebeingsolddirectlytoITC–providingfarmerswithlower-costinputs,informationandtransparentguaranteedprices.SinceJune2000,over5,200e-ChoupalInternetkioskshavebeenestablishedtoserve3.5millionfarmersin31,000villages.IntimeITCrespondedtodemandandallowedfarmerstousethekioskstofindinformation,includingmarketpriceinformation,aboutotherproducts.Farmerscanaccessdailyclosingpricesonlocalmarkets,whichallowsthemtotaketheirproducetothebestpayingmarket.Usingthesystem,farmers’earningsincreasebyupto20percent,whilethecompanybenefitsfromareliablesupplychainanddistributionmechanism.120
In2003Manobi,aprivatetelecommunicationscompanyinSenegal,formedapartnershipwiththreelocalfishingunions,twotelecommuni-cationscompanies(AlcatelandSonatel)andtheCanadianInternationalDevelopmentResearchCentre(IDRC).Fishermenandfarmerscancheckthemarketpricesfortheirproducetwiceaweekusingtheircellphones.Onefarmer,MrCheikhBa,saidheusestheknowledgegainedofworldmarketpricestomorethandoublethepricehereceivesfromintermediariesforhisgrapefruit.‘IfIdidnothavetheManobisystem,’hesaid,‘Iwouldcertainlyhaveacceptedabargainpriceinfearthatthebuyerwouldleaveandleavemestuckwithmyproduce.’
Researchshowsthatfoodproducersusingthisservicehaveseentheirincomesincreasebyanaverageof15percent.121By2006therewereover3,500SenegaleseproducersconsultingtheManobiagriculturalmarketpricesbyshortmessageservice(SMS).122In2006,ManobiandtheInternationalInstituteforCommunicationandDevelopment(IICD)enteredintoapartnershiptodevelopsimilarinitiativesinBurkinaFaso,Ghana,Mali,UgandaandZambia.
Ofcourse,theinformationcouldalsobeprovidedfreeonlocalradiostationsorinnewspapers!
��Economicdevelopment
��
ManyotherexamplesexistofhowthespreadofICTsisthrowingupnewandinventivesolutionstotheproblemsofcredit,moneytransfersandbankingforthepoor.Forinstance,palmtopcomputerslinkedbywirelesstotheirbank’smaincomputersystemcanbeusedbyloanofficersvisitingclientsinruralareastoinputdatadirectlyandspeeduptransactions.Similarly,low-costcomputerconnectivityallowsbankstofranchisecreditservicestooperatorsinruralareas123–forinstance,villageshop-keepers–ortooperatecreditandbankingfacilitiesthroughcreditcardsandATMsinruralareas.Theneedforsuchservicesisenormous:forinstance,in2005,accordingtotheUnitedNations,globalmigrantsremittedUS$232billion,ofwhichupto20percentwaslostontheway,mostlyinbankchargesorfraud.
Box 12 Mobile banking
SouthAfricanssendabout12billionrand(US$1.5billion)eachyeartotheirrelativesinotherpartsofthecountry–moneythatisusuallysentinformallyandoftenbyortosomeofthe16millionpeoplewithoutabankaccount.Butwhattheydohave–atleast30percentofthisgroup–aremobilephones.ThesepeoplearenowbeingtargetedbymobilephonecompaniessuchasWizzitofferingbankingservicesviatextmessagethatpromiseasecurewayofmovingmoneywithoutthecostsofinformaltransferorthetravelrequiredtoaccessmoney.In2006Wizzithadhalfamillioncustomers–eightoutoftenofwhomhadnobankaccountandhadneverusedanATM.124
Intellectualpropertyandthecostofknowledge
Intoday’sworld,thecreationandexchangeofknowledgeisamajoreconomicactivity–whetheritisthroughpatentsontechnologyanddiscoveries,forinstanceinthefieldsofmedicine,informationtechnology(IT)oragriculture;brands;orcopyrightsonartisticproductsorscientificarticles.Inrecentyearstheintellectualproperty(IP)systemhasextendedintonewareas(tocover,forinstance,micro-organismsanddiscoveriesconnectedwithagriculture)andaroundtheworld(becausenationalintellectualpropertyprotectionisarequirementforcountriesjoiningtheWTO).
Theargumentforitisthatthediscovery,creationandsharingofknowledgemustbeprofitable,inordertostimulatethecontinuedflowofinnovation,creativityandexchangethatisanessentialelementofmodernsocietyandmoderneconomies.WithastrongIPsystem,knowledgeisindeedprofitableforitscreators,ownersanddistributors.However,thedownsideofastrongIPsystemisthatacquiringandusingknowledgecanbeexpensive.Ingeneral,developingcountriesareatadisadvantageandbenefitlessfromintellectualpropertythanrichones,becausehistoricallytheyhaveproducedlesspatentedknowledge,andfewervaluablebrandsandsaleableresearchfindings–partlybecausemosthaveonlyrecentlyintroducedintellectualpropertylegislation.
123SMathison(2005)‘BuildingMicrofinancethroughICTinnovation’,in Information and Communication Technologies and large-scale poverty reduction: Lessons from Asia, Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean,PanosandtheSwissAgencyforDevelopmentandCooperation
124‘Phoneyfinance:Mobiletelephonyandbanking’, The Economist,26October2006
Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
�� Section
ThespreadofIPprotectionthrowsupchallengesfordevelopingcountriesandpoorpeopleandinstitutions,forwhichsolutionsareonlystartingtobefound.Somecriticshavearguedthatdevelopingcountriesshouldbeallowedtoutilisenewtechnologies,patentsandintellectualpropertyforfree–asmanynowdevelopedcountriesdidwhentheywereatanequivalentstageofdevelopment.125Onechallengeisthattraditionalcommunitiesarevulnerabletohavingtheirtraditionalknowledgeandresources‘pirated’byrichcompanies(whicharegenerallyfromdevelopedcountries).Inordertoturnsuchknowledgetotheirownprofit,developingcountriesmustintroduceIPrulesoftheirown–butdesigningsystemsforprotectingcollectively-ownedandtraditionalknowledgeresourcesisdifficult,sincethepurposeofpatentandcopyrightwasspecificallytorewardnewcreationbyindividuals.
Asecondchallengefordevelopingcountriesisthatscientificknowledgeisoftensubjecttocopyright,andacquiringithasbecomeverycostly.(ThiswasoneofthesubjectsofanAfricanUnionmeetingonscienceandtechnologyinFebruary2007.)Thepriceofscientificjournalscanbeprohibitive.Forexample,anannualsubscriptiontoElsevierBrainSciencecostsoverUS$15,000,andtheInternationalJournalofSocialEconomicscostsoverUS$9,000.ResearchfromCornellUniversityonthecostof312coreagriculturalandbiologicaljournalsfoundthatintheperiod1988to1994,thepriceperpageincreasedby64.7percentforalltitles.126Thepricesofagriculturaljournalsfromcommercialpublishersincreasedasmuchas77.8percent.Thecostofsuchjournalsputsessentialknowledgewellbeyondthereachofmanyinstitutionsandorganisations,despitethefactthattheresearchisoftenpubliclyfunded.
Communication and participation in major infrastructure projects
Thehistoryoflarge-scalepublicandprivatesectorinfrastructureinvestmentsinthedevelopingworldislitteredwithfailures.Why?Therearemanyreasons,butoftenprojectsareplannedwithoutsufficientconsultationandinvolvementofpotentialusersandbeneficiaries–inshort,thereistoolittlecommunication.Large-scaleinfrastructure,extractiveandcommercialprojectshaveamassiveimpactonpeopleinthevicinity;andgovernmentsneedtoanalysethegainsandlossesinconsultationwiththoseaffected,andnegotiateprofit-sharing,compensationmeasuresandmitigationstepswiththeinvestorbeforegrantingthelicencestobeginthework.Governmentconcerntoattractinwardinvestmentsinanincreasinglycompetitiveinternationalenvironment,oritsunwillingnesstohavelocalpeopleinvolvedorsharefullyinthebenefitsofprojects,meansthattheconsultationandresponseprocessisfrequentlynominalorhighlyconstrained.Evenwherelegitimatenationaleconomicorpoliticalobjectivesclashwithlocalinterestsorviews,includingpeopleaffectedatthebeginningofprojectplanninggivesthebestchancethatcompromisecanbereached,costsandbenefitssharedmoreequitablyandagreaterlevelof‘ownership’andacceptancecreated.
125SeeHChang,‘Protectingtheglobalpoor’,Prospectmagazine,July2007
126WOlsen(1998)‘PriceStudyofCoreAgriculturalandBiologicalJournals’,reportfromtheFacultyTaskforce,DivisionofBiologicalSciences,AlbertRMannLibrary,CornellUniversity
��Economicdevelopment
�0
Thisisevenmorethecaseforprivatesectorinvestments,becauselocalorinternationalcompaniesdonothavethesamelegitimacyasnationalgovernmentsindealingwiththeaffectedpopulation.Realdialogueandparticipationandeffectivecommunicationwithlocalpeoplecanmakeanenormousdifferenceinhelpingcompaniesobtaina‘sociallicence’tooperate.This‘sociallicence’comesfrompeoplefeelingconfidentthattheyknowwhatwillhappenandwhatcostsandbenefitswillaccruetothemandtheircommunitiesfromtheinvestment.Investmentsinhigh-impactdevelopmentssuchasmining,orsensitivepublic–privatepartnershipsfordeliveryofpublicservicessuchaswater,canbeunderminedbypublicoppositionifcommunicationisneglected–despitethecompaniesconcernedhavinglegalauthoritytodobusiness.127Wherethepublicandprivatesectorengageindialogue,thesenseofownershipincreases,reducinginefficiencyandwaste.128Sometimes,itisnottheobjectivesofdevelopmentprojectsthatpeopleobjectto,butthefactthattheyhavenotbeenincludedineithertheplanningorthebenefits.Peoplewantasayintheirfuture.Wherecommunicationprocessesareusedproperly,investmentsaremoreefficient.
Allaspectsofgoodgovernanceapplytomajorinvestmentprojectsforbothpublicandprivatestakeholders:governmentandprivatecompaniesmusthavethecapacitytodelivertheprojectefficientlyandeffectively;beresponsivetotheconcernsandinterestsoflocalpeople;andaccountable tothem–thegovernmentfornegotiatingandstickingtoafavourabledealanddistributingbenefitswidely,andthecompanyforfulfillingitsobligations.Communicationandparticipatoryprocessesofallkindswillhelpcompaniestofulfilthesecriteria(forinstance,communityconsultationsandscrutinyprocesses,information-sharinganddebatethroughappropriatemediatoensurepeopleaffectedunderstandtheimpacts,andinvolvementoflocalpeopleinpolicydecision-making).Therealityisthattheremaybeablurrylinebetweensophisticatedcommunicationwhichseeksto‘manufactureconsent’,andgenuineconsultationwithawillingnesstoengagewithpeopleandpossiblychangeplans.Butincreasedandopeninformationandcommunicationprocessesarebytheirnaturemorelikelytoexposewhereconsultationsanddialoguearespeciousorineffectual.
Building sustainable livelihoods
Accesstoandmanagementofnaturalresources–forestry,agricultureandfisheries–isthebasisoflivelihoodsformillionsofruralpeoplearoundtheworld.Naturalresourcesareamajorelementinmanynationaleconomies,andhowtheyareexploitediscrucialtothelong-termfoodsecurityandsustainability,ornot,ofhumanity’sdevelopment.
Thechallengesofpoverty,naturalresourcedegradationandfoodinsecurityareallcloselylinked.Incountrieswheremorethanonethirdofthepopulationareundernourished,70percentofpeoplerelyonagriculturefortheirlivelihoods.Intheworld’sleastdevelopedcountries,82percentofruralhouseholdsarepoor.129Producers,andtheircommunities,sufferthemostandhavethemosttogainfrommanagingtheirresourcestoincreaseproductivity.Theymustdealwiththesharpendofresourcedegradation.Themanagementofnaturalresourcesisthereforeakeychallengeindevelopmentandpovertyreduction.
Thehistoryofenvironmentandnaturalresourcemanagementhasbeendrivenbytheprovisionoftechnicalpackages.Communicationtopromotethesehastendedtobemainlythetop-downgivingofinformation–forinstance,informationaboutdifferentagriculturaltechniquesorinstructionsnottocutdowntrees.However,theseapproacheshaveproducedverylittleprogresstowardstheMillenniumDevelopmentGoalofreducingthenumberofundernourishedpeoplebyhalffrom1990to2015.130Thenumberofhungrypeoplegrewfrom791millionin1997to852millionin2002.131Technicalinputsandtop-downone-waycommunicationarenotenough.
127Forinstance,areportcommissionedbyShellconcludedthatthecompanies’‘sociallicence’(publicsupportforthecompanytooperate)tooperateinNigeriawas‘fasteroding’.Unlessthecompanychangeditscommunicationandengagementstrategy,itwouldbeunabletooperateinNigeriabeyond2008.WACGlobalServices(December2003)‘PeaceandSecurityintheNigerDelta:ConflictExpertGroupBaselineReport,WorkingPaperforSPDC’,Lagos
128BHerzbergandAWright,‘Competitivenesspartnerships–Buildingandmaintainingpublic-privatedialoguetoimprovetheinvestmentclimate:Aresourcedrawnfromthereviewof40countries’experiences’www.publicprivatedialogue.org
129‘TheStateofFoodInsecurityintheWorld2004’,FoodandAgricultureOrganizationoftheUnitedNations
130‘TheStateofFoodInsecurityintheWorld2006’,FoodandAgricultureOrganizationoftheUnitedNations
131WorldFoodProgramme,2007
Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
�1 Section
Recently,fornaturalresourcesasforotheraspectsofdevelopment,therehasbeenashifttowardsrecognisingthat‘peopleareattheheartoftheecosystem’.132Toaddresspovertyandenhanceproductivity,producersmustbeempoweredtoparticipateinthemeansandprocessesofproduction.Overthelast30years,communicationfordevelopmentprojectsallovertheworldinthissectorhaveshownhowfarmersmustbeinvolvedinthedevelopmentandadoptionofnewcropsandtechnologies,andthemanagementofcreditfacilities,marketinformationandaccessstrategiesinordertoensurethattheyareappropriate,effectiveandefficient.
Communicationstrategieswhichareinclusiveandparticipatoryarekeytothis,forwheneffortstosupportthemanagementofnaturalresourcesdonotincludesufficientcommunicationcomponents,theyoftenfail.Forexample,anevaluationofanunsuccessfulprogrammetosupportbetterwaterandsanitationmanagementinGhanafoundthatthe‘absenceofamediaandcommunicationsstrategymeantthatissuesliketraditionaluse,familyandhouseholddynamicsappeartohavebeenjustplainignored’.133Whenparticipatoryformsofcommunicationareusedwhicharegenuinelyreceptivetowhatlocalpeoplehavetosay,resource-managementeffortshaveagreaterchanceofbeingsustainable.134
Box 13 Communication for natural resource management
InTanzania,droughtandfloodaremajorproblems–particularlyasrainwaterrun-offcausesfurtherfloodinganderosion.Initialgovernmenteffortsencouragedfarmerstousedrought-resistantcropsanddivertrun-offwaterawayfromcrops,butwithlittlesuccess.Throughparticipatoryapproaches,theSoil-WaterManagementResearchGroupatSokoineUniversityhelpedfarmerssharelocalknowledgewithotherstakeholderssothattogether,usingGeographicInformationSystems(GIS),theycoulddeveloprun-offwatermanagementtechniquesthatweresharedthroughmedia,workshopsandtrainingcourses.
Asaresult,farmersdemandrainwaterharvestingtechnologyandgovernmentpolicyrecognisesrainwaterharvestingasasolutionratherthanaproblem.WhenthePresidentofTanzaniaannouncedanewWaterManagementStrategy,rainwaterharvestingwasthetoppriority.135
Theimportanceofcommunicationisbecomingevenmoreapparentgiventhegrowingimpactofthemajorenvironmentalchallengesthatthreatenthelong-termdevelopmentofalltheworld’spopulation.Someofthesechallengesareglobal,wherethethreattothe‘commons’affectseveryone–suchasclimatechange,over-fishingandlossofbiodiversity–andaneffectiveresponsemustbesharedbyallcountries.Othersaremorelocalintheirincidenceandimpact,suchaslossofsoilfertility,shortageoffreshwater,pollutionandwastedisposal.Dealingwithalloftheseissuespresentssomeofthemosturgentcommunicationchallengesfacingtheworldtoday.Theyrequirethesharingoffactualandscientificinformation;debateonimpactsandpolicyresponses;negotiatingactionbetweengovernmentsandcivilsocietynationally,andgovernmentsamongthemselvesglobally;discussingandagreeingtrade-offs,compensations,mechanismsandmeasures–allofwhichdependontransparentmonitoringprocessesandaccountabilitymechanisms.
132QuarryandRamírez(2004),seenote19
133SKendie(1999)‘WaterSupply,SanitationandHygiene:AnalysisofConnectingFactorsinNorthernGhana’,UniversityofBradfordDevelopmentandProjectPlanningCentreDiscussionPaperSeries2No20;seeSummaryandLinksatwww.comminit.com/evaluations/idkdv2002/sld-2388.html
134Ruralextensionisthesharpendofcommunicationlearningeffortstobringagriculture,healthandbusinesspracticestoruralpeople.Extensionworkersareavitallinkbetweencommunitiesandruraldevelopmentinstitutionsandenablethecommunicationofinformationbetweenboth.StudiesinKenyasuggestthatonaveragea100percentincreaseinextensionworkersperfarmtranslatestoa13percentincreaseinyield:seeEEvenson(1998)‘TheEffectsofAgriculturalExtensiononFarmYieldsinKenya’,DiscussionPaperno.798,EconomicGrowthCenter,YaleUniversity
135QuarryandRamirez(2004),seenote19
�1Economicdevelopment
��
Economic development: conclusion
Inthissectionwehavearguedthatopenandparticipatoryinformationandcommunicationprocessesarecentraltorealisingthepotentialofallformsofeconomicdevelopment.TherearestrongcorrelationsbetweenthegrowthofICTsandtheexplosionofglobaltradeandwealth,butcommunicationalsosupportstheeconomicactivitiesofsmallproducersandthepoor.Anenablingenvironmentoftransparencyandsimplebureaucracyencouragesenterpriseandinvestment;low-costandreliableICTssupportproduction,marketingandaccesstocapital.Anopenpoliticalenvironmentinwhichthepoorareabletoparticipateineconomicpolicymakingsupportsthedevelopmentofpro-poorpolicy.Information,participatorydiscussionsandnegotiationsarealsoessentialforthesuccessofmajorprojectssuchaslargeinfrastructureprojects,andforsustainablemanagementofthenaturalresourcesthatareessentialtolivelihoodsofmanysmallfarmers,tonationaleconomies,andtothefutureoftheworld.
Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
�� Section
Inthispaperwehaveshownthatcommunication–theexchangeofinformation,anddialogue–isanessentialpartofallthefundamentalprocessesofdevelopment.Itispartofgoodgovernance,ofthelifeofanempoweredanddynamicsociety,andofeconomicdevelopmentandpovertyreduction.Noneoftheseprocessescantakeplacewithoutcommunicationbetweenandamongallsectorsofsocieties,withinandamongnations.
Wearguethatsupportforcommunicationshouldbeakeyelementinanydevelopmentsupportandplanning.Theroleofcommunicationshouldbemoreclearlyidentifiedindevelopmentanalysisandplanningbygovernmentsanddevelopmentagencies,fromhigh-levelinternationalagreementsdowntolocal-levelresourcemanagementprojects.Atpresentcommunicationisoftentakenforgrantedorneglected,withtheresultthattoofewresourcesandtoolittleexpertisearedevotedtoit.Butifmoreattentionwaspaidtocommunication,developmentoutcomeswouldbebetter–specificsectoralinitiativeswouldbemoreeffective,andthecapacitiesofsocietiesandgovernmentstorespondtodevelopmentchallengeswouldbeincreased.
Whyarewesayingthatmoresupportneedstobegiventocommunication?Withthespreadofpoliticalfreedomandofnewcommunicationtechnologiesinthepasttwodecades,thequantity,speedandaccessibilityofcommunicationareadvancingrapidlyallovertheworld:newmediahouseshaveblossomed,thedevelopmentoftheInternethasintroducedaquantumleapintheamountofinformationandcommunicationpossible,andthedemandformobilephoneshasfarexceededexpectations,includingamongrelativelypoorpeopleindevelopingcountries.Thisallsuggeststhatcommunicationisdoingwellanddoesnotneedmoredevelopmentsupport.Butitdoes,asthefollowingsectionwillshow.
Communication as a public good
Marketmechanismsarenotalwaysthemosteffectiveinmeetingtheneedsofpoorandmarginalisedpeople–anditistheirneedsthatshouldbeattheheartofdevelopmentstrategies.Poorpeopleareoftenunabletoaccesscommunicationchannelstoreceiveinformationandmaketheirviewsknownoutsidetheirimmediatesocialenvironment.Thereisnonewspaperdistribution,telephonelandlinesorsatellitefootprintinmanyruralareas;thereislittlebroadcastingandlessInternetcontentinminoritylanguages;politiciansdonotvisitconstituentswhohavenoeconomicpower.Inaddition,manypeople–women,youngandoldpeople,theverypoor,andothermarginalisedgroups–arefurtherconstrainedintheircapacitytocommunicatebylocalculturesandpowerstructures.Ifthereisoneradioinahousehold,themanlistenstoit;ifanInternetkioskisajourneyaway,awomanmaynotbeallowedtogothere.
Why communication needs support
��Whycommunicationneedssupport
Noraremarketmechanismsgenerallygoodatprovidingpublicgoods.‘Publicgoods’isaneconomictermreferringtogoodswhich,onceproduced(orexisting),benefitall–forinstance,education,orjudicialsystems.Acharacteristicofpublicgoodsisthatthemorepeopleusethem,thegreaterthecommonbenefit.Panosbelievesthatcommunicationshouldberegardedasapublicgoodbecauseitcontributestodevelopment,goodgovernance,peaceandprosperity.Likeotherpublicgoods,communicationprocessescostmoneytoproducebuttheproducercannotalwaysprofitfromthem.Therearemanyexamples.Forinstance,inruralareaswhereincomesarelow,theprovisionofICTservicesmaynotbeprofitableeventhoughitenablesmanydevelopmentprocessestotakeplace.Goodqualityjournalismisexpensiveandessentialtogoodgovernance,butmaynotsellenoughnewspapersorattractenoughadvertisingtothenewspaperorradiostationtobeprofitable.Manykindsofknowledgeandinformationarepublicgoods–theybecomemorevaluablethemoretheyareused;andsodonetworkingsystemslinkingdifferentsourcesofinformation.
Weargue,therefore,thatdevelopmentplanningshouldregardinformationandcommunicationaspublicgoods,andshouldseektosupportthem.‘Support’doesnotnecessarilymeanfinancialsupport.Itmayalsomeangovernmentsmakingpolicychanges,andopeninguporinterveninginmarketsforcommunicationservices;orinternationalorganisationsleadingbyexampleinopeningtheiroperationstopublicscrutiny;orCSOsgivingmorestatusandpowertotheircommunicationofficers.Supportshouldgenerallyseektofillgapsandredressmarketfailures(forinstance,failuretoprovideICTservicesinruralareas)ratherthantoover-ridethemarket–becausethemarketisbetterthanmonopolyorgovernment-managedservicesatensuringtheinnovation,competitionandefficiencythatarenecessaryifcommunicationistomakeitsfullcontributiontodevelopment.
Treatingcommunicationasapublicgooddoesnotmeanthatgovernmentsshouldcontrolit.Freedomofexpression,andfreedomtoestablishandusedifferentchannelsofexpression,isasine qua nonofavibrantcommunicationenvironmentsupportiveofdevelopment.
The public service role of media
Indevelopingcountries,patternsofmediareachvaryenormously,withnewspaperreadershipstrongerinurbanareas,radiothesinglemostimportantmediuminAfrica,andtelevisionbecomingincreasinglypervasiveinAsiaandSouthAmerica.Forpeopleeverywhere,richandpooralike,themediaaretheprimaryprovidersofnewsandinformationfromoutsidethecommunity,andmediacoveragereflectsandaffectseveryaspectofcultural,social,politicalandeconomiclife.Themedia(referringheremostlytotraditionalmassmedia–printandbroadcasting)playafundamentalroleininformationandcommunicationprocesses.Mediasupportandenableallaspectsofgoodgovernance:politicalprocessesandthenegotiationofpower;relationshipsbetweenpeopleandgovernment;andgovernmentresponsiveness.Mediaareaforumfordebatingpolicyoptionsandstrategiesandforgovernmenttogainpeople’sconsentandtrust.Mediaplayadefiningroleinaccountability,transparency,monitoring,andreducingcorruption.Communitymediaarejustasimportantasnationalmedia.Forexample,‘inNorthernMalilocalradiostationsbroadcasttheannualEvaluationofCommuneperformanceanditsconsequencesforcapitalbudgetsupport.Followingthesebroadcaststhemayorsofpoorlyperformingareaswhosegrantshavebeenreducedareoftensaidtohidefromtheirconstituentstoavoidrecrimination.’136
136KYAmoako,ExecutiveSecretaryofUNECA,writinginNewEconomy,September2004,citedinMaryMyersetal(2004)The Impact of ICD in Africa: A paper for the Commission for Africawww.commissionforafrica.org/english/report/background/mary_myers_et_al_background.pdf
Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment ��
�� Section
Mediaarealsopartofcivilsociety.InMozambique,thecommunitymediamovementhasbeendescribedas‘themostpowerfulpeople’smovementinMozambiqueatthemoment’.137Mediacanreflectthedifferentvoicesthatmakeupsociety,thedifferentissuesthatconcernitandtheclashofopinionswithinit.Mediahelparticulateneedsanddemands,shapeopinionandattitudes,formcoalitionsandmovements.Mediaareaplatformforpoliticalandculturalexpressionandself-realisationofindividualsandgroups,andcanplayaroleinsocialcohesion.Theyenabledebateonsocialandculturalissuesassocietiesdealwithchange(forinstance,ingenderrelations).Mediacanenablereflectionandengagementinglobalaswellaslocalandnationalissues.
Allthesefunctionsrequiremediathatareableandwillingtoperformapublicservicerole.138Apublicserviceroleisnotlimitedtopublicly-owned,state-ownedorcommunitymedia.Commercialandreligiousmediacanalsofulfilit,combinedinvariousdegreeswiththeirotherfunctionsofentertainment,profitorevangelism.UKjournalistandwriterJohnLloydhasnotedthatforthemediatofulfilthispublicserviceroleinempoweringcitizenstheymusttelltruthsinthreeways:throughthe‘clashofopinion’thatcharacterisesthepoliticalprocess,throughinvestigationthatfuelstheengineofaccountability,andthe‘truthofcitizenship’–theexplanationofcontextandevents,thenarrativeofwhichopinionandrevelationarepart.139Theessentialsofpublicservicemediaareaccessibility,includingforpoorandmarginalisedpeople,andqualitycontent:contentthatistrue,informative,andreflectsdifferentvoicesandperspectives.Inotherwords,contentthatisbasedongoodjournalism.
Buttheexistenceofmediaabletofulfilthepublicservicerolecannotbetakenforgranted.Apartfromgovernmentinterference,therearemanyotherchallengestogoodqualitymediaservingthepublicinterest.Indeedsomeanalystsquestionwhethermediacanbeexpectedtofulfilthisfunctionatall.Inafreesociety,itisargued,mediaarecommercialventuresandmustoperateassuch,providingwhatevertypeofcontentisprofitable.Theveryconceptofpublicservicemediaisalsosometimeschallenged.Itimpliesanidealofmediaastellersofobjectivetruth–anidealthatsomeanalystsfeelisaWesternconcept,notuniversallydesiredorexpectedbymediaprofessionalsoraudiencesinalldevelopingcountries.Developmentsupportseekingtostrengthenthepublicserviceroleofmedianeedstotreadadelicatepathamongthedifferentrealitiesoffreemarket-drivenmediainafreesociety.
Muchdevelopmentdiscussionofandsupportformediafocusesonmedia’sfreedomfromgovernmentcontrolandinterference.Ithighlightsthisasthecriticalfactorinenablingmediatoplaytheir‘watchdog’roleinpoliticalaccountabilityprocesses.Freedomfromgovernmentcontrolorinterferenceisofcourseanessentialconditionforthis,butitisnotasufficientconditionforthekindofpublicservicemediawhichwearguearesoimportant.Mediamayhaveformalindependencefromgovernment,butbecontrolledbypeopleclosetopoliticalparties,specialinterestgroupsorrulingelites.Theconcentrationofmediaownershipbyelitesisamajorissueinmanypartsofthedevelopedaswellasthedevelopingworld.
137BJallov,‘WomenandCommunityRadioinMozambique’,tobepublishedinFeminist Media Studies,Vol7.3,September2007
138Theterm‘publicservice’mediaisusedheretorefertomediacontentthataddressesissuesofpublicconcern,forthepublicgood–asdistinctfrommediathatispurelyforentertainmentorcommercialpurposes,andfrommediathatpromotesconflictanddivision.Itdoesnotimplyownershipofmediabythestateorthepublic
139Lloyd(2004),seenote63
��Whycommunicationneedssupport
��
Economicconsiderationsalsolimittherealfreedomofmanymedia.Privately-ownedmedia,andsomegovernment-andpublicly-ownedmedia,havetomakeaprofit,byappealingtoanaudienceandadvertisers.Competingforanaudience,mediaareunderpressuretoprovideentertainmentandtosoothetheirreadersorlistenerswithwhattheywanttohearratherthanchallengingthem.Theneedtoattractadvertisersalsocreatespressure–toappealtorichersectionsofthepopulationratherthanthepoorwhodonotconstituteaprofitablemarketforadvertisers.Theexperienceofmanycountrieswhentheyliberalisedtheirmediainthe1980sand1990saspartofthedemocratisationprocesswasthattheygainedenormouslyinnumbersofmediaoutlets,butthenewoutletswereconcentratedincities,andthequalityofwhatwaspublishedorbroadcastdidnotimprove.Thekindofjournalismthatfulfilsthepublicservicerole–journalismthatinvolvesseekingandcheckinginformation,questioningandanalysingit,andgatheringdifferentperspectivesonissues–isexpensivetocarryout,andmaynotbeprofitable.
Itisthequality of content thatmakesmedia,whetherpubliclyorprivatelyowned,meaningfulactorsindevelopment.Thatiswhatneedstobesupported–becauseitmaynotthrivewithoutsupport.High-qualitymediacontentthatpromotesthevoicesandinterestsofthepoorrequiresmanyconditions,inthecreationofwhichgovernments,aiddonors,themediathemselves,andcivilsocietyallhavearoletoplay.
Supportingthepublicserviceroleofmedia
Onedesirableconditionisfinancialsecurity.Someanalystsseefinancialsecurityasthemostimportantfactorinbuildingstrongpublicservicemedia.Ifmediaaresufficientlywellresourced,theyargue,professionalismandthequalityofcontentwillimproveandtheneedsofaudienceswillbemet.
Communityradiosoftenneedfinancialsupport,sincetheresourcesofthepoorcommunitiestheyservearenotsufficienttosupportthem.Communitymediahelptoempowerpoorpeopleandareavitalelementinpromotingtheirparticipationinpoliticallife.Commercialandpublicmediacanalsobenefitfromfinancialsupport,toenablethemtosendjournalistsaroundthecountryandgivethemthetimeneededtoinvestigateissuesandanalyseinformation.
Fordevelopmentagencieswhosesupportmainlygoestogovernments,itmaynotbeeasytofindwaysofsimultaneouslysupportingmediawhichthegovernmentmayseeashostile.Ontheotherhand,insomecountriesgovernmentsthemselvesseethatgoodqualitymediaareapublicgoodevenwhentheyvoiceopposition,andsupporttheminvariousways–throughreducedtaxes,subsidisedinputs,ordirectfinancialsupport.
Adequatebasicinfrastructureandservicesarealsoimportant.Itisdifficulttorunamediahouseiftheelectricitysupplyiserratic,whileInternetconnectivityandtelephonesfacilitategoodandtimelyjournalism.
Pluralownershipofmediaisessential.Regulationisneededtolimitconcentrationofownership,promotecompetitionandperhapsfacilitatetheentryofsmallactorssuchascommunityradiostationsintothemarket.Legislationandlicensingconditionsshouldnotimplycontrolbygovernment:theyshouldbeindependentandcontrolledbycivilsocietyorthemediaitself,andbeimplementedtransparently.Inmanycountriesatpresentlicencesforcommunitymediainparticulararebannedorheavilyregulated,limitingtherangeofperspectivesandbreadthofdiscussioninthepublicsphere.Likefreedom,pluralownershipisnotasufficientconditionforavibrantpublicmediasphere:ownershipbyanoppositionpoliticalparty,forinstance,isnomorelikelytoprovidebalancedandhigh-qualityreportingthanownershipbythepartyinpower.
Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
�� Section
Goodmedianeedskilledandprofessionaljournalists.Inmanycountriestraininghasnotbeenabletokeepupwiththenumberofjournalistsrequiredbyliberalisedmedia,andthetrainingonofferdoesnotmeettoday’sneeds.Supportforjournalismtraining(andmediamanagement)isneeded,buttheprofessionalism,standardsandstrengthofthemediaprofessionscanalsobehelpedbysupportingstrongermediainstitutionssuchaseditors’associationsandjournalistunions.Financialviabilityisalsorelevant:whenmediastrugglefinancially,journalists’salariesarenothighenoughtoattractandretainskilledpeople,soexperienceandlearningarelost.
Journalistscannotpractiseunlesstheycangetinformation,includinginformationfromgovernmentandstateinstitutions.Accesstoinformationlegislationandeffectiveimplementationofitareessentialifmediaaretoholdgovernmentandotherpublicactorsaccountable.
Thereareverydifferentviews,inallcountries,aboutthedegreetowhichmediacontentshouldbecontrolled.Shouldthepublicbeprotectedfrom‘hatemedia’andfromsociallyunacceptablecontentsuchaspornography?Isregulationthebestwaytoensurethattheinterestsofminoritiesandmarginalisedgroupsarerepresented,andthatthemediaprovides‘publicservice’contentandobservesprofessionalstandards?Thisisacontentiousareaineverycountryintheworld.Whatdegreeofoversight,regulationandobligationiscompatiblewithfreedomandafunctioningmarket?Andbywhom?PanosLondonbelievesthatoversightbythemediaitself,andbycivilsociety,ratherthanbygovernment,ismostlikelytobecompatiblewithgoodgovernance.RadioMilleCollines,whichhelpedtoincitethegenocidalviolenceinRwandain1994,issometimespresentedasanexampleofthedangersoffree,unfetteredmedia.Whilethisisanextremeexample,mediamanipulationofpublicopinionisunfortunatelynotuncommon.Thebestantidotetosuchmanipulation,however,isadiversityofmedia,notrestriction.Pluralisticindependentmediathatareinclusiveandresponsivetodiversityhavehistoricallyplayedavitalroleinpreventing,mockingorchallengingvoicesthatbreedextremism.Asarecentpublicationlookingattheeffectofmediaondevelopmentpointsout:‘Healthypublicspherescanhostawiderangeofviewswhichcandiluteintolerance.Policymakersshouldincreasesupportformediaassistanceprogrammestowidenaccessformoderatevoicesandbalanceddiscourse.’140Inshort,liberalisation,pluralisationandregulationarerequiredforbalancedmediaenvironmentsandcontentprovision.
Civilsocietyorganisationsandgovernmentcancontributetoimprovingthequalityofdebateinthemedia,iftheyseemediaasapartner,valueitscontributionasanindependentsocialactorandactivelyseektoengagewithit.
Lastbutnotleastoftheconditionsinwhichpublicservicemediacanthrive,iscriticalanddemandingaudiences.Mediawillbeabletosupplygood-qualitypublicinterestcontentifaudiencesdemandit,butareunlikelytodosootherwise.Audiencesshouldbeabletodistinguishgood-qualitymediafrombad,objectivityfrompartisanship,opinionfromanalysis,andinvestigativereportingfromslander.
Theimportanceofmediafordevelopmenthasbeenrecognisedinseveralrecentinitiativesbygovernmentandmultilateraldevelopmentagencies,andbymediaorganisationsthemselves.Therehasalsobeenmuchdiscussionamongmediasupportorganisations,inconsultationwithdevelopingcountrymedia,onhowmediacanmosteffectivelybesupported.Theoverarchingchallengeistostrengthentheperception–amonggovernmentsandmainstreammedia–thatactiveandpluralmediaareapublicgood.
140GlobalForumforMediaDevelopment,MediaMatters,London,2007,p6
��Whycommunicationneedssupport
Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment ��
Mediaasapublicsphere
Anassumptionimpliedinmuchdiscourseaboutmedia,includingintheprecedinganalysis,isthatthereisa‘publicsphere’forwhichmassmediaareaprincipalforum.141Debateofpublicissues,buildingconsensusonpolicy,shapingopinion,buildingcohesionandinclusion–alltheserequirethatthepublicinanycountryshouldhavetosomedegreeacommonexperienceofmedia.Thismightbethroughasmallnumberofagenda-settingnewspapersorbroadcastprogrammes,forexample,andalimitednumberofnewsbulletinsregardedasauthoritative.Thissituationhasexistedinthepastandstilldoestoday.Mostcountrieshavehadalimitednumberofmainstreamnationalnewspapers,andinmanycountriesthegovernmentorapublicbroadcasterhashadamonopolyoftheairwaves.Thecontentofthislimitedmediaworldwassubjecttoknown,ifnotalwaysapplied,professionalnormsandstandards.
Butthisshared‘publicsphere’isstartingtofragment,indevelopedandalsoindevelopingcountries.Withmedialiberalisationandcheapertechnology,audienceshavemanymoreformalmediaoutletstochoosefrom,whiletheInternetisenormouslyexpandingthepossibilitiesofinformalmedia.Anyindividualorgroupcanproduceitsownmediaoutput:websites,blogs,citizenjournalism.Theincreaseinfreedomand‘voice’iscertainlydemocraticinsomerespects,butwhatdoesitmeanforaudiences?Theyhavetochoosebetweenanenormousrangeofoptions.Thecontentofthe‘informal’mediahasgenerallynotbeenfilteredbyprofessionaljournalisticstandardsandoftenmakesnoclaimstobeingobjectiveorauthoritative–theoppositeisoftentrue.Boththevolumeofmediacontentavailable,andnewdeliverymechanisms–forinstance,selectedTVstreamedstraighttoamobilephone–makeitpossibleforeveryindividualtoselecthisorherownmediacontent,avoidingthemainstreamandpublicdiscoursealtogetherifsheorhewishes.Thisrepresentsanincreaseinindividualfreedomandself-expression,butpotentiallyalossforpublicengagement.
Wecannotyetknowwhatwillbethelong-termconsequencesofthesechangesinthemediascene.ItwillalmostcertainlybeimpossibleandundesirabletorestricttheproductionofinformalmediacontentontheInternet.Traditionalmassmediaarestrugglingtoadapttothecompetitionfromnewmedia,butthehighcostsofprovidingprofessionalpublicservicejournalismwillbeincreasinglyhardtomeet.Fromthepointofviewofsupportingthemedia’sroleindevelopment,afewthingsareclear:
n Mediathemselvesneedsupporttoreflectonandadapttothechangingscene
n Thepublicneedtobecomemoreeducatedanddiscriminatingintheirconsumptionofmedia–sothattheycanmakemeaningfulchoicesfromthewealthofmediaavailabletothem
n Governmentsneedtolearnhowtoengagewiththenewpossibilities.(Asalways,thelinebetweenengagementindebateandattemptingtocontrolandinfluencedebateisafineone.)
n Public,governmentandmediamustdebatethechangingsceneandagreeonrules,expectationsandlimitationsandhowtorealisethese.
141TheconceptofthepublicspherewasdevelopedbyJurgenHabermas.SeeforinstanceJHabermas(1962)The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society,transTBurger,1991,MITPress,CambridgeMA;JHabermas(1985)The Theory of communicative action: Reasons and the rationalisations of society (Vol 1) and Lifeword and system: A critique of functionalist reason(Vol2),TransTMcCarthy,BostonMA:BeaconPress
Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment ��
�� Section
Box 14 Media for peace and democracy, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
‘Citizen’sjournal’(JournalduCitoyen)isaweeklyinsertinKinshasa’smaindailypapers,aimedatstrengtheningcitizens’understandingofdemocracyandDRC’speaceprocess.EstablishedinSeptember2005,aheadofthe2006elections,Journal du CitoyenisajointprojectofPanosParisandBelgianNGOApefe,undertheauspicesoftheDRC’sHighMediaAuthority.
InthetenseandvolatileatmosphereofDRC’stransitionfromcivilwartopeace,highqualityinformationandeditorialneutralityareessential.Journal du Citoyenoffersacombinationofnewsreports,practicaladvice,graphics,andprofilesofcandidates–thequalityofwhichhasbeenuniversallypraised.Itisproducedbyaneditorandateamoffreelancejournalists.
Through2006theJournal du Citoyengrewrapidlytoachievethelargestprint-runofanyCongolesenewspaper.InKinshasa,8,500copiesareprintedandafurther11,000areproducedbyphotocopyingoremailedandprintedintheprovinces.Itisalsodisseminatedelectronicallyandhasawebsite.
InDecember2006,aspartoftheUN/AfricanUnion-supportedpeaceprocessintheGreatLakesregion,theheadsorrepresentativesof11statesintheregionsignedapactforsecurity,stabilityanddevelopmentattheendofasummitheldattheUNinNairobi.TheeditorofJournal du Citoyenand17journalistsfromDRC,RwandaandBurundiweretheretocoverthesummit–almosttheonlyindependentAfricanjournalistspresent.SomeoftheirreportsweregatheredintoaspecialGreatLakeseditionofthe Journal du Citoyen,whichmarkedtheendofitssuccessfulfirstyear.
Gettingmediasupportright
Indevelopingcountriestheresourcesorpoliticalwillaresometimeslackingtosupportindependentmedia.Howcandonorsandotherstakeholderssupportmediaandcommunicationfordevelopment?Thisisparticularlychallengingwhenanincreasingmajorityofaidisbeingchannelledthroughdirect‘budgetsupport’togovernmentsinthedevelopingworld,makingitmorepoliticallydifficultfordonorstosupportnon-governmentmediaorpressuregovernmentstoliberalisemediaandaccesstoinformation.Whatcantheydo?Possibilitiesinclude:
n pressingdevelopingcountrygovernmentstorecognisethelong-termvalueofmediaandinformationandpassfreedomofinformationandaccesstoinformationlegislation
n supportingthelegislativedevelopmentofopenmediaregulatoryenvironmentsbygovernments;andensuringthattheyaremaintainedbyindependent,well-financedregulators
n supportingtheprofessionalismofmediathroughcapacitybuilding,includingsupportforcollegialself-regulatoryandcapacity-buildingprocessesamongmediathemselves
n supportingdevelopmentofinfrastructure
n strengtheningcivilsociety’scapacitiestoproduce,consumeandengagewithmediaandcommunication.
��Whycommunicationneedssupport
ICT Issues
Likethetraditionalmassmedia,ICTsarespreadingrapidly,includinginpoorcountries,andsoatfirstglancetheymaynotseemtobecandidatesfordevelopmentsupport.Indeed,themobilephonesectorissometimestakenasanexampleofhowwellthemarketprovideswithoutinterventionfromgovernmentordevelopmentagencies–atechnologywillspreadifthedemandexists.142ThesimpleviewofadigitaldividebetweenrichcountriesthathaveplentifulaccesstoICTsandpoorcountriesthatdonot,common10yearsago,isnotoftenheardtoday,butaswithmassmedia,therearemanyareasinwhichtheunfetteredmarketisnotshapingtheICTsectortoprovide‘publicgoods’mosteffectively.Ontheotherhand,inmanycountriestheconstraintonpoorpeople’saccesstoICTsisnotthefailureofafreemarketbutcontinuinggovernmentintervention,throughprotectionofanationaltelecommunicationsprovider.
ICTsasapublicgood
ICTsareapublicgoodatthenationallevel,forseveralreasons.Aswehaveseen,ICTsenableeconomicgrowth:inthewordsofManuelCastells,‘Informationtechnologyisnotthecauseofthechangeswearelivingthrough.Butwithoutnewinformationandcommunicationtechnologiesnoneofwhatischangingourliveswouldbepossible.’143SmallbusinessesaswellaslargeonescanbenefitfromICTs,aswehaveshown.GovernmentscanuseICTsinmanywaystoimprovetheirperformance,forinstanceintheprovisionofhealthandotherservices.ICTsarepotentiallyatooltodevelopandexpandallthesocialinclusionandpoliticalengagementprocessesthispaperhastouchedon,whichareincreasinglyseenasfundamentaltodevelopment.ButallthesebenefitsofICTsfordevelopmentwillonlyberealisedifICTsareuniversallyaccessible,reliableandaffordable,whichisunlikelytobeachievedbythemarketalone,butrequiresdeliberatepolicyfromgovernments.
The‘publicgood’characteristicsofICTsareevenclearerattheglobalthanatnationallevel.Communicationisaglobalnetwork,theInternetisaglobalphenomenon;thusmanyaspectsofinfrastructureandserviceprovisionarealsoglobal,suchasradiospectrum,androutingofinternationalcalls.
SomedevelopmentanalystshavearguedthatnewICTsshouldnotbetheobjectofdevelopmentaidbecausetheyarenotusefultothepoor:comparedwithbasicneedssuchasfoodandwater,theycontendthatcommunicationisaluxury,andtheInternethaslittlecontentthatisrelevantforpoorpeople.Attheotherextreme,inthe1990stherewastremendousenthusiasmforthestepchangesitwasthoughtICTscouldmakeforpoorandruralpeopleiftheywereintroducedasdevelopmentprojects,anenthusiasmthathasnotbeenborneoutbyexperiencesofar.TherealtruthaboutthevalueofICTsfordevelopmentprobablyliessomewhereinbetween.Thesceptics’argumentsareheardlessoftenasthemomentumofusingICTsgrowsandasmanyofthebenefitsoutlinedinthispaperarerecognised;whiletheenthusiasts’fervouristemperedbyamorenuancedunderstandingthattechnologiesintroducedwithoutbeingbasedintheexistingcommunicationculturesandhabitsofpeopledonotbringchange.ThegapbetweenICT‘haves’and‘have-nots’isitselfadevelopmentissue:asNorthern/rich/urbanlifebecomesmoredependentonICTs,theexclusionofthosewithoutaccesstothetechnologiesortheskillstousethembecomesmoreserious.
142Fourtimesasmanypeoplehadaccesstomobilephonesthantofixed-linephonesinsub-SaharanAfricanin2004;by2010,85percentareprojectedtohavenetworkcoverage.Mobilephonesubscriptionshavegrownfivefoldto1.4billionindevelopingcountriessince2000.InIndia,7millionnewsubscribersjoinedmobilenetworksinJune2007.(Source:JRibeiro‘Indiaaddsrecord7millionmobileusersinJune,’www.infoworld.com,25July2007).(Forsourcesoffigures,seePanosLondon(2007)At the heart of change: The role of communication in sustainable development,footnotes35and36)
143MCastells(1999)‘InformationTechnology,GlobalisationandSocialDevelopment’,UnitedNationsResearchInstituteforSocialDevelopment(UNRISD),DiscussionPaperNo114,September1999
Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment �0
�1 Section
Likemedia,ICTsneedsupportfromgovernmentsanddevelopmentagenciesiftheyaretofunctioninwaysthatfullysupporttheinclusionofthepoorindevelopmentprocesses.ICTsshouldbetreatedasanelementofdevelopment,intermsofbothfinancialsupportand(equallyimportant)asregardspolicy,regulationandplanning.Iftheyarenot,theymayinsteadcontributetowideningthewealthgapbetweenrichandpoorwithinandbetweencountries.Anumberofissuesthatneedparticularattentioninclude:therightpolicybalanceforinvestmentandinclusion;theopensourcesoftwaredebate;andinternationalinfrastructure.
Therightpolicybalanceforinvestmentandinclusion
Experienceshowsthatcompetitionamongprivateprovidersresultsinbetterandlower-costtelecommunicationsservicesthanprovisionbyagovernmentorpublicly-ownedprovider.Butatthesametime,thispaperisarguing,themarketcannotbereliedontomeettheneedsofthepoor.Governmentshavetofindtherightbalancebetweenpoliciestoattractprivateinvestmentintotheirtelecommunicationssectorsandpoliciestoensureinclusionanddevelopment.
Opinionsdifferwidelyaboutthesocialimpactsofprivatisingprovisionofotherserviceslikewaterorhealthcare,butintheICTsectorthebenefitsofcompetitionareveryclear:lowercosts,higherqualityofservices,technologicalinnovation,andinnovationinservicesandpricingstructures.ThereneedstobecompetitionamongdifferentprovidersofphoneandInternetinfrastructureandservices,forinstancebetweenrivalmobilephoneoperators.Governmentsmostlyrecognisethis,andsincetheadventofmobilephoneservicesinthemid-1990s,thetelecommunicationssectorhasbecomeoneoftheveryfewsectorstoattractahighlevelofforeigndirectinvestmentindevelopingcountries,accountingfor11.5percentofthetotalforeigndirectinvestment(FDI)flowsofUS$1.7trillion.144Between1990and2003,122of154developingcountriesfinancedtheirtelecommunicationsinfrastructurewithforeigninvestment.
WTO’sBasicTelecommunicationsAgreementhasbeenastronginfluenceonopeningupthemarket.AsofJune2005,104ofthe148WTOmemberstateshadmadecommitmentstoopeninguptelecommunicationsservices.However,inmanycasestheopeningupislimitedandthecompetitionplayingfieldskewed.Fiftypercentofdevelopingcountriesretainedmonopoliesoninternationaltelephony,largelybecausetheyseethisasasourceofrevenueforthemselvesratherthanasapublicserviceandpublicgood.Manygovernmentsprotectandprivilegetheirnationaltelecommunicationsoperator.Protectionmaybedeliberate,forinstancebyallowingthenationallandlineoperatortoenterthemarketformobileservices,orbyrestrictingprivatecompanies’accesstoessentialinfrastructuresuchassatellites.Otherbarrierstoinvestmentmayresultfrominertiaratherthandeliberatepolicy:outdatedpolicyontheallocationofspectrum,forinstance,orcumbersomeproceduresforapprovalofimportedtechnologies.TheWTOAgreementallowsmemberstatesatransitionperiodofprotection,andmanystatesaremakingfulluseofthis,withtheresultthatthemovetowardsfullandopenmarketcompetitionishappening,butmoreslowlythanitmight.
LimitedfreedomofthemarketisamajorfactorintheprohibitivelyhighcostsoftelephoneandInternetuseinmanydevelopingcountries.In2004theaveragecostofathree-minutecalltotheUSwasUS$0.77fromhigh-incomecountries,andUS$1.95fromlow-incomecountries.Onemonth’saverageuseoftheInternetwasUS$45.50inlow-incomecountriesin2004,comparedwithUS$20.90forthesameusageinhigh-incomecountries.145
144Global Trends and Policies (2006) Information and Communication for Development, WashingtonDC:WorldBank
145Asinnote144above
�1Whycommunicationneedssupport
��
PromotinglowerpricesisoneofthemostimportantthingsgovernmentscandotoenablepoorpeopletomakeuseofICTs.‘Bottomofthepyramid’marketsaregainingrecognition,intelecommunicationsasinothereconomicsectors,whereasufficientnumberofsmallusersbringcostsdownandmakeaserviceviable;butdespitethisthereisclearevidenceinmanyemergingeconomieslikeIndiathatunregulatedmarket-drivengrowthtendstoleadtoconcentrationofservicesaroundurbanareas,whereinfrastructureandsupportareeasierandcheapertoprovide,andthemarketcontinuestoneglectruralvillages.MostgovernmentshavemadeacommitmenttoprovidinguniversalaccesstotelephonesandInternet,thatis,toputtingtelephonesandInternetwithineasyreachofeveryoneinthecountry.Theyareexploringwaysofachievingthis,forinstancethroughcross-subsidyschemesordirectfundingofruralICTdevelopment.Spectrumallocationisanotherareainwhichgovernmentinterventionmaybeneeded.Ifbandwidthisauctionedfreely,thehighestbiddersarelikelytobemobilephoneorcommercialTVcompanies,whereasifgovernmentshaveanoverallviewofcommunicationasapublicgood,theycanreservesomespectrumfornon-profitableuserssuchascommunityradiostations.
Overall,governmentsandtheprivatesectoraremakingprogresstowardsrealisingthepotentialofICTsforthepoor,butthereisstillalongwaytogo.Developmentagenciescanprovidefinancialsupportaswellassupportforpolicymakingprocessesandstrengtheningcapacitytomanagenewsystemsandinstitutions.
Box 15 Mission 2007: Taking ICTs to every Indian village
India’s‘Mission2007:Everyvillageaknowledgecentre’programmeaimstoscaleuptonationalleveltheuseofICTsforpovertyreductionandsocialequity,introducingtoeveryvillageinIndiatelecentresthat‘areopentoall,irrespectiveofage,sex,religion,caste,andlevelofliteracyandeducation’.146
Thekeytothisinitiative’ssuccesswillbethatitisdrivenbytheGovernmentofIndiainpartnershipwithcivilsociety(professionals/academics,includingtheMSSwaminathanResearchFoundationandOneWorldSouthAsia),theprivatesector(theNasscomFoundation),anddonors(InternationalDevelopmentResearchCenter(IDRC),CanadianInternationalDevelopmentAgency(CIDA)andtheSwissAgencyforDevelopmentandCooperation).Mission2007isimportantbecauseitrepresentsamodelforthekindof‘scaling-up’necessaryifICTsaretorealisetheirpotentialfordevelopment.
146‘India’s“Mission2007”:Everyvillageaknowledgecentre’,byMSSwaminathan,www.panos.org.uk/iwitness
Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
�� Section
Theopensourcesoftwaredebate
Manygovernmentsandinstitutionsareconsideringwhethertoswitchtousingopensourcesoftwareastheirnationalorinstitutionalstandard.147Theopensourcemovementisspreading–in2006‘Apache’operatingsystemswereusedby61.44percentofwebserversandApachewasgrowingfasterthanproprietaryalternatives.TheperceivedadvantagesofopensourcesoftwareincludelowerICTcostsinthelongterm;proprietarysoftwarefirmsprofitbyconstantlyupgradingtheirproductsandensuringtheoldproductsbecomeobsoleteandhavetobereplaced.Forpoorcountries,makingmajorinvestmentsinsystemsthatwillsoonbeobsoleterepresentsaconsiderablecost.Oneadvantageofanopensource-basedsystemisthatitcanbedesignedinsuchawaythatitcanbeupdatedincrementally.AnotheradvantageisthatopensourceisseentooffermoreflexibilityfordevelopmentofsoftwareusinglanguagesotherthanEnglish:atpresent,InternetcontentisoverwhelminglyinEnglish,andthelanguageofsoftwareandsystemsisEnglish.Opensourcewillmakeiteasierfornon-Englishspeakerstocreatetheirowncontentandfindcontentthatisusefultothem–akeyfactorintheusefulnessoftheInternetforthepoor.ChampionsofopensourcealsopointoutthatadoptingopensourcefreesagovernmentorinstitutionfromdependenceonNorthern/richcountrytechnologies,allowingthemtofosterdevelopmentoftalentandICTresourcesintheirowncountries.
Butthechoiceofopensourceisnotclearcut.Opponentspointtothelackofskillsandexperienceinusing,supportinganddevelopingopensourcesoftwareinmostdevelopingcountries,andtothepossibleinefficienciesthatwillresultfrommovingawayfromtheproprietarysystemsthatdominateallfields.Theshort-termcostsofswitchingarealsosignificant:staffofinstitutionsandallusersofIThavetobetrainedinnewsystems,forinstance.
Theargumentshavebeenintenseoverthepastfewyearsandwhethertoswitchfromproprietarytoopensourceisamajorpolicydecision,forprivateinstitutionsaswellasforgovernments.(GovernmentsaremajorpurchasersofICTs:inAfrica,governmentspendingsupports70percentoftheICTindustry.)Thechoicemaybecomelessdifficultinthefutureasproprietarysoftwarecompaniesarestartingtoseevalueinembracingopennessratherthanresistingit:forinstance,MicrosoftCorporation’sSharedSourceInitiative,announcedin2001,allowsalimitedsharingoftheWindowssourcecodewithgovernments,companiesandeducationalinstitutions.Itisalsopossibleforgovernmentstoadoptprocurementpoliciesthatallowforamixtureofopenandproprietarystandards.148
Supportisneededtohelpgovernmentsandinstitutionswiththedecision-makingprocesses.Iftheydecideinfavourofopensource,supportisalsoneededforthehighinitialcostsoftransition–training,adaptingsystemsandinstitutions,softwaredevelopment,andpubliceducation.149
Internationalinfrastructure
Internationalcommunicationfrommanydevelopingcountriesisverycostly,contributingtothehighcostsofICTuse,particularlyincountriesthatlackup-to-dateinternationalinfrastructure.Forexample,thecountriesofEasternAfricadonothaveanunderseaopticalfibrenetworklinkingthemwithoneanotherortherestoftheworld.Internetusersintheregionareforcedtoaccessoverseaswebsitesviasatellitelinksthatareslow,unreliableandprohibitivelyexpensive.Thecurrentratefor1MegabitofbandwidthinEasternAfricaisbetweenUS$7,500andUS$12,000permonth.IfaprojectedcablelinkwasinstalledalongtheeastAfricancoast,expertscalculatethatthecostwouldcomedowntoaslittleasUS$500toUS$800amonth.150
147Opensourcesoftware,orFreeandOpenSourceSoftware(FOSS),isdistinctfrom‘proprietary’software.Proprietarysoftwareisdevelopedandsoldasaprofitablebusiness,oftenbymajorcorporationssuchasMicrosoft,whichholdcopyrightoverthesoftware,oftenrestricthowitcanbeused,andgenerallykeepthe‘sourcecode’–thebasicinstructions–hiddensothatuserscannotcopyoradaptthesoftware.Opensourcesoftwaredevelopersbelieveinthefreesharingofknowledgeandsellorgiveawaytheirsoftwarewiththesourcecodeincluded,toenableuserstocopyandadaptthesoftwarethemselves
148See,forexample,RGhosh(2005)OpenStandardsandInteroperabilityReport:Aneconomicbasisforopenstandards,MERIT,UniversityofMaastricht,http://flosspols.org/deliverables/FLOSSPOLS-D04-openstandards-v6.pdf
149Formoreinformationonopensourcepolicyoptions,see Giving away secrets: Can open source convert the software world?PanosmediatoolkitonICTsNo5(2007),PanosLondon
150BJopson(2007)‘Kenyalaysgroundforcablebroadbandlink’,FinancialTimes,9July2007,London
��Whycommunicationneedssupport
��
EastAfricamaybelaggingfurthestbehind,butotherregionswouldalsobenefitfromupgradingandincreasingthebandwidthavailablethroughtheirexistingunderseafibreopticcables.ThecostofcommunicationacrosstheAtlanticisatitslowestleveleverandstillfalling,whichexpertsattributetothelargenumberandhugecapacityofunderseacablesacrosstheAtlantic.151
Internationalcommunicationinfrastructurebenefitsallparties,andistoocostlyordifficultforasingleinvestortoprovide.Ithashistoricallybeenbuiltlargelybycollaborationbetweenstates,whohavebeen,forexample,theprincipalstakeholdersinsatellites.Butthiswasforreasonsofstate,particularlyforsecuritypurposes,andtherewaslimitedscopeforwiderinvolvement.Now,aswithnationaltelecommunicationssystems,privateinvestmentoramixtureofpublicandprivateisgenerallyseenasmostdesirable:privateinvestmentbringsthebenefitsofinnovationandflexibilityaswellasfinance.Butthechallengesofmanagingcollaborationamongdifferentgovernmentsandlocalandglobalprivateinvestorsareenormous,withthevarietyofstakeholdershavingdifferentinterestsandwaysofworking.
TheEastAfricanSubmarineCableSystem(EASSy)projectillustratessomeofthechallenges.Theprojectplanstoinstallabadly-neededhigh-bandwidthsubmarinecablefromSouthAfricatoSudan,whichwilllinkAfrica’seastcoast,aswellasseveralland-lockedcountriestooneanotherandtherestoftheworld.Theprojectwasfirstmootedbytelecommunicationscompaniesintheregionin2002.TheEASSyinvestors’consortiumnowconsistsof21companiesfrom15countries,aswellasthreeinternationalcompanies.Gettingfromtheinitialproposaltosigningtheconstructioncontract(on29May2007)152hastakenoverfouryears–andsomeimportantissuesofhowthedifferentstakeholderswilluse,financeandprofitfromthecablearestillunresolved.Oneofthedifficultissuesstilltobefinalisedisthedefinitionof‘openaccess’tothecableandwhatexactlythismeans.Theinvestorsagreethateveryoperatorintheregionthatwishestoshouldhaveaccesstobandwidth,butnotnecessarilythesamecapacityoratthesameprice–marketcompetitionshouldapply.Opponentsofthisview,whoincludetheNewPartnershipforAfrica'sDevelopment(NEPAD),Internetserviceproviders,networkoperators,andNGOs,wantEASSytoberegardedasapublicgoodwhichcouldcontributesignificantlytouniversaltelecommunicationsservice,andthustodevelopment,intheregion.Theyarguethattheinvestors’preferredmodelwoulddisadvantagesmallertelecommunicationsoperators,smallerorpoorercountries,andlessprofitableusers.Theywant‘openaccess’tomeanthateveryoperatorhasequalaccessintermsofcapacityandpricing.
ThereisaneedfordevelopmentagenciesanddonorstosupporttheprocessesofdebateandnegotiationforEASSy,andtoensurethattheneedsofthepoorareproperlyconsidered.
151
Seewww.telegeography.com/productsGlobalBandwidthForecastService
152www.eassy.org
Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment ��
�� Section ��
What needs to be done and who needs to do it
153ForacompilationbyPanosLondonoftherecommendationsmadebysomekeyinternationalconferences,seeMapping declarations and statements on communication for development.Availableatwww.panos.org.uk/heartofchange
Thereismuchtobedone.Aswehighlightedinthispaper’sintroduction,manygovernments,donors,internationaldevelopmentorganisationsandNGOsalreadyknowmanyofthethingsthatneedtobechangedandthereisaplethoraofdeclarations,charters,agreements,pledgesandotherstatementsofprincipleandcallstoactioninthisfield.153Whatismissingisa‘holisticview’thatputsallofthesepiecestogetherintoanintegratedframework.Supporttothemedia,theestablishmentoflegalrightstofreedomofspeechandaccesstoinformation,thedevelopmentandexploitationoftherevolutionarynewopportunitiesaroundinformationandcommunicationtechnologies,buildinggreaterparticipationofpoorandmarginalisedpeopleandintegratingtheir‘voices’intosocial,economicandpoliticalprocesses,shouldallbeseenasanintegrated,mutuallyreinforcingwhole.
Suchacoherentvisionwouldpromotetheformationof‘opensocieties’whereinformationandcommunicationprocessesareseenaspublicgoodsthatbenefitallcitizensandgenerateandmultiplydevelopmentimpacts.Thefollowingrecommendationsneed–fundamentally–therequisitepoliticalwilltobeaccomplished.Buttheyalsorequiregreaterfinancialresources,leadership,expertiseandawillingnesstoenterintopartnershipsofmutualinterestwithmanystakeholders.
Agenda for action
1 Buildmoreopen,transparentinformationandcommunication
systemsandpoliticalcultures
n Governmentsshouldpromotemoreopen,participatoryinformationandcommunicationenvironmentsandthedevelopmentofapublicspherewitharighttocommunicate,byestablishingfreedomofexpressionandfreedomofinformationlegislationandsupportingtheiruse.
n Governmentsneedtowinthesupportandengagementoftheircitizensiftheyaretogovernpeacefullyandeffectively.Todothis,theyneedtoengagewithcitizensusingthemultiplechannelsofinformationandcommunicationthatareincreasinglyavailable,andsupportpeople’sexpectationsoftransparencyandtheirdesiretoshareinformationfreely.
n Governmentsshouldensuretheirowninternalcultureandadministrativesystemsareorientedaroundtransparency,dialogueandlistening.Thisrequiresinstitutionalchangeandtraining,aswellaspoliticalcommitment.
n Tobenefitfromnewopennessonthepartofgovernments,citizensneedtohavethecapacitiesandskillstomakeuseoftheopportunitiesofferedtothem.Thisrequiresinvestingineducation,skillsandbasicinfrastructure,aswellasdesigningcommunicationprocessesthatmatchtheculturesandsocialconditionsoftheintendedusers.
n Donorscansupportcivilsocietyorganisationsandotheractors(suchastheprivatesector)tousefreedomofinformationlaws,tomonitorgovernmentperformanceandholdgovernmentsaccountable,tolobbyandparticipateinmoreopenpolicymaking(suchasPRSPs);andtobeincreasinglytransparentthemselves.Alltheseprocessesneedexpertisetodesignandleadthem,andtrainingandorganisationalchangetoimplementthem.
�� Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
n Donorscanpersuade,helpandsupportgovernmentstoseethelong-termbenefitsanddevelopthepoliticalwillforopenandparticipatorycommunicationsystemsandprocesses;andsupporttheirdevelopment.
2 Treatinformation,communicationandthemediaas‘publicgoods’
andinvestaccordingly
n Governments,donorsandtheprivatesectorshouldapproachcommunicationandinformationprocesses–includingthemedia–as‘publicgoods’,withinvestmentandresponsibilitiesdividedaccordingly.
n GovernmentsshouldensurethatreliableandaffordableICTsareavailableforeveryone.TheyshouldfacilitatetheoperationofthemarketbyopeningnationalICTsectorstocompetitionininfrastructureandservices:competingprivateprovidersaremoreeffectivethanstateprovidersinbringinginnovation,qualityandlowcosts.
n Governmentsshouldalsofillthegapsinmarketprovisionofcommunicationsandmediathroughregulationorsupport,inareaswherethemarketdoesnotmeettheneedsofpoorandmarginalisedpeople.Thismightmean,forinstance,subsidiesfortheprovisionoftelephoneservicestopoorpeopleorremoteareas;orregulationoffrequencyallocationtoensurethatnon-profitusers(suchascommunityradiostations)arenotsqueezedoutbyprofitableactors(suchasmobilephonecompanies).
n Mediainafreecompetitivemarketsufferfinancialpressuresthatoftenmilitateagainsttheircapacitytocarryouthigh-qualitypublicinterestjournalism.Governmentsanddevelopmentorganisationsshouldseekinnovativewaystoprovidefinancialsupportforpublicinterestmediacontentwithouteditorialinterferenceandwithoutundulyunderminingtheoperationofthemarket.(Thisisachallengefordevelopedaswellasdevelopingcountries.)
n Governmentsshouldacttoaddressissuesthatarebeyondthecompetenceofindividualprivatesectoractors.Suchissuesmightinclude,forinstance,provisionofelectricitytoruralareas;developmentofsoftwareforlocallanguages;orleadershiptobringtogetherneighbouringgovernmentsandprivatesectoractorstosolveproblemsofinternationalICTinfrastructure.
n Governmentsandotherinstitutionsneedtolearnaboutandreflectonthecostsandbenefitsofswitchingtoopensourcesoftwarestandards.Potentialbenefitsincludedesigningandintroducingsystemswhichwillbeabletoabsorbnewtechnologicaldevelopmentsinthefutureratherthanneedingtobereplaced.
n Developmentaiddonorsshouldsupportgovernmentsintheiractionstoredressmarketfailures.
n Aiddonorsshouldalsosupportgovernmentsintheprocessesofdesigningandintroducingnewinformationandcommunicationsystems;andinbuildingtheenvironmentofskills,training,andbasicinfrastructure(suchaselectricity)withoutwhichnewICTscannotbeeffectivelyused.
n InternationaldonorsshouldalsosupportthedifficultprocessesofnegotiatinginternationalICTagreements–forgovernance,andforbuildingandmanaginginternationalinfrastructure.Thedifferentpartnersinvolved–includinggovernments,privatesectorandcivilsocietyorganisations–oftenhavedifferentshort-terminterests,andthemodalitiesofworkingtogetherforlong-termandwiderbenefitareonlystartingtoemerge.
�� Section ��Whatneedstobedoneandwhoneedstodoit
3Takeaholisticviewofcommunicationprocessesandintegratecommunicationsintodevelopmentplanningandimplementation
n Governmentsshouldtakeaholisticviewofinformationandcommunicationprocesses.Theyshouldestablishanoverarchingpolicyframeworkforenablingcommunicationtohelpmeettheirdevelopmentgoals(incorporatingmedia,ICTs,knowledge,skillsandcapacities,institutionalreforms).Aholisticapproachmeansstartingfromtheperspectiveofthepoorandthemarginalisedandunderstandingtheflowsofinformationandcommunicationthataffecttheirlives.Thiscommunicationanalysiswillinvestigatethesocialaspectsofinclusion/exclusionfromcommunication.Whoisexcluded,whyandwhatcanbedone?
n Supportforcommunicationshouldbeakeyelementinanydevelopmentsupportandplanning.Theroleofcommunicationshouldbemoreclearlyidentifiedindevelopmentanalysisandplanningbygovernments,internationalorganisationsanddevelopmentagencies,fromhigh-levelinternationalagreementsdowntolocal-levelresourcemanagementprojects.
n Governmentsanddevelopmentorganisationsshouldbuildtheirownknowledgeofandexpertiseincommunicationinallitsaspects,atseniorlevels.Addressingthisshouldbeamatterofurgency.154
4Investinmediadevelopment
Theestablishmentandmaintenanceofadiverse,dynamicandfreemediaisvitaltodevelopment.Theimportanceofgettingthemedia‘right’isespeciallygreatinyoungdemocracies,asmediaplaysanimportantroleinformingthenatureofsociety.Theimportanceofmediafordevelopmenthasbeenrecognisedinseveralrecentinitiativesbygovernmentsandmultilateraldevelopmentagenciesandbymediaorganisationsthemselves.Therehasalsobeenmuchdiscussionamongmediasupportorganisations,inconsultationwithdevelopingcountrymedia,onhowmediacanmosteffectivelybesupported,mostrecentlyintwoinitiativesaimedatstrengtheningAfrica’smedia.155Theseanalyseswereconsistentinhighlightingthefollowingareasifmediadevelopmentistotakeplace:
i) Establish media freedom and an enabling and supportive regulatory environment
n Governmentsshouldestablishasecurebaseofindividualfreedomofexpressionandaccesstoinformation;andlegislationwhichsupportsandcodifiesitsoperation.Thisincludeslegislationonlibelanddefamation,whichshouldbeclearandconsistentlyapplied.
n Regulationisneededtolimitconcentrationofownershipandpromotecompetition.Legislationandlicensingconditionsshouldnotimplycontrolbygovernment;theyshouldbeindependentandcontrolledbycivilsocietyorthemediaitself,andbeimplementedtransparently.
n Regulationtofacilitatetheentryofsmallactorssuchascommunityradiostationsintothemediasectorshouldbeadopted.Inmanycountriesatpresent,licencesforcommunitymediainparticulararebannedorheavilyregulated.
n Internationaldonorsshouldsupporttheprocessesofdevelopmentoflegislation,includingpublicconsultation,andthetrainingandinstitutionalchangesneeded–ingovernments,mediaandcivilsociety–toensurenewlawsareproperlyimplemented.
154Seealsotherecommendationsfromthe2006WorldCongressonCommunicationforDevelopmentinRomeatwww.devcomm.org/devcomm/OutcomesTheRomeConsensus/tabid/250/Default.aspx?macroId=15µId=1501
155SeetheUnitedNationsEconomicCommissionforAfrica(Draft-2006)The case for strengthening media in Africa: Framework and proposals at:www.uneca.org/africanmedia/;andtheBBCWorldServiceTrust(2006)African Media Development Initiative at:www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/trust/specials/1552_trust_amdi/index.shtml
Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment ��
n Internationaldevelopmentorganisationsfaceadilemma:theirdevelopmentpartnersaregenerallygovernments,andsotheycannotsupportmediafreedomdirectlyincountrieswhosegovernmentsareopposedtoit.However,theymaybeabletosupportprocessesofdebateandreflectionamonggovernments,mediaandcivilsocietyinthesecountries,inordertopromoteaclimateinwhichthegovernmentsmighteventuallymovetowardsopeningupthemedia.
ii) Support the development of media infrastructure and long-term sustainability
n Governmentsshouldfindwaysofprovidingdirectandindirectsupporttofosterhigh-qualitypublicinterestmediacontent.
n Governmentsshouldensuretheprovisionofadequatebasicinfrastructureandservices,whicharevitallyimportantforthemediatoworkeffectively–suchaselectricitysupplies,Internetconnectivityandtelephones.
n Communityradiostationsinparticularmayneedfinancialsupport,sincetheresourcesofthepoorcommunitiestheyservearenotsufficienttosupportthem.Suchsupportmaybeprovidedbygovernmentsbutalsobyinternationaldonorsandcivilsocietyorganisations.
iii) Build media capacity and professionalism
n Governments,internationaldonorsandmediasupportorganisationsshouldallcontributetosupporting:
n traininginjournalism(andmediamanagement).Goodmedianeed skilledandprofessionaljournalists
n establishinganddevelopingjournalismandmediainstitutionssuch asassociationsandunions.Thesecanhelptobuildthe professionalism,standardsandstrengthofthemediaprofessions
n Initiativestogivejournaliststhespecialistknowledgetheyrequireto understandandreportoneconomic,environmental,healthandother policyissues,bothatthenationalandinternationallevels.
iv) Support improvement in the quality and diversity of media content
n Governmentsshouldintroducepolicyandregulatoryframeworksandsupportsystemsforencouragingandsupportinglocalmediacontent(whichcostsmuchmoretoproducethanreproducingglobalmediacontentsuchasimportedsoapoperas).Internationaldevelopmentandmediasupportorganisationscandirectlysupportsuchinitiativesandlocalcontentproduction.
n Media,mediainstitutionswithincountries,andinternationalsupportorganisationsshouldallplayaroleindevelopingthepublic’s‘medialiteracy'.Thiswouldenableaudiencestodistinguishgoodqualitymediafrombad,objectivityfrompartisanship,opinionfromanalysis,andinvestigativereportingfromslander.
n Governments,internationalorganisationsandthemediathemselvesshouldsupportpublicdebateonthenorms,standardsandexpectationsofthemedia–tobuildawarenessandsharedstandardsonfreedom,content,andsocialresponsibility.
n Civilsocietyorganisationsandgovernmentcancontributetoimprovingthequalityofdebateinthemediaiftheyseethemaspartners,valuetheircontributionasindependentsocialactorsandactivelyseektoengagewiththem.
�� Section ��
Helpingthebillionsofpeoplecurrentlylivinginabsolutepovertytoimprovetheirlivesisthegreatestchallengefacingtheworld.Atthesametimetheeffectsofclimatechangeandotherenvironmentalproblems–whicharelikelytoaffectpoorpeopledisproportionately–havetobeaddressed.Governments,theprivatesector(increasinglywithstate-levelresources–theBillandMelindaGatesFoundationhasresourcesofapproximatelyUS$31.9billion)andtheinternationalcommunityrecognisethemoralandpracticalurgencyofthechallenge.
Theessentialcomponentsofwhatneedstobedonearesimplystatedbutexceedinglydifficulttoaccomplish:leadersmustestablishtheruleoflawandhealthy,responsivepoliticalsystems;governmentsmustgovernbetter;sustainableandequitableeconomicgrowthmustbeachieved;andcivilsocietymustbestrengthenedandempowered.TheMDGshavesetaseriesofambitioustargetsthataddresssome–butnotall–oftheessentialneeds.AchievingtheMDGsandthelarger,morefar-reachingtaskswillrequirehugeinvestmentsofpoliticalwillbygovernmentsinthedevelopedandthedevelopingworld;thecreationofmoreequitableeconomicgrowthandinternationaltrade;andtheestablishmentofamoreopenpublicspaceinwhichcitizensindividuallyandcivilsocietycollectivelycandiscuss,critique,contendandcontributetogether.
Asthispaperhasargued,noneofthiswillhappeninasustainablewayunlessfree,openinformationandcommunicationflowsandprocessesaredeveloped,nurturedandmaintained.Communicationiscentraltoallaspectsofdevelopment.Itisaprerequisiteforbetter,moretransparentandaccountablegovernance,andforwealthcreationandeconomicgrowth.ItunderpinsalltheMDGsandisarguablyascentralaneedofhumanbeingsasfood,shelter,healthandsecurity.
Governmentsanddevelopmentactorsneedtorecognisethecentralroleofinformationandcommunicationindevelopment–especiallytheimportanceofstrengtheningthecapacitiesofpoorandmarginalisedpeopletoparticipateinpoliticalanddevelopmentprocesses.Addressingthechallengeofcommunicationisurgent.NewICTscanexpandopportunitiesforpoorandmarginalisedpeopletoparticipate–butstrategicsupportisneededtoensurethatICTsfulfiltheirdevelopmentpotentialratherthanwideningthewealthgapbetweenrichandpoor.Theestablishmentandmaintenanceofdiverse,dynamicandfreemediaisalsovitaltosuccessfuldevelopment.Theimportanceofgettingthemedia‘right’isespeciallygreatinyoungdemocracies,asmediaplayanimportantroleinformingthenatureofsociety.
Conclusion
�0 Thecaseforcommunicationinsustainabledevelopment
Strategicsupportforcommunicationmustbebasedontherecognitionthatopennessandtransparencynurturegoodgovernanceandparticipatorypoliticalanddevelopmentprocesses;thatcommunicationandmediaarepublicgoods;andthatcommunicationmustbeincludedinalldevelopmentinterventions.Aholisticviewofcommunicationisneeded,whichstartsfromtheperspectiveofthepoorandembracesallchannelsandtypesofcommunication–ICTs,media,face-to-facecommunication,sector-specificinitiativesandgeneralinfrastructureandsystems.Neglectingortakingapartialviewofcommunicationleadstomissedopportunities,failuresofdevelopmentinitiatives,highercostsandmaligneffectssuchasdivisivenessandexclusion.
Allstakeholdersindevelopmenthavearoletoplayintheagendaforactionproposedinthispaper–governments,donors,privatesectorinvestors,civilsocietyorganisationsandthemedia.Communicationshouldbeidentifiedasanessentialelementofalldevelopmentcommitments,analysesandplans–atglobal,nationalandsectorallevels.FormalcommitmentstocommunicationshouldbeincludedinsuchundertakingsastheParisDeclarationonAidEffectivenessandtheUNMillenniumDeclaration,aswellasinnationaldevelopmentstrategies.Thesecommitmentsmustbemorethanemptyrhetoric–tobecomerealitytheyneedinputsofplanning,skillsandresources,justlikeanyotherdevelopmentgoal.Theyrequireleadershipandexpertiseatthehighestlevel.Unlesssuchcommitmentsaremadeandactedupon,developmentinterventionswillcontinuetofailandtheworld’spoorwillcontinuetobesidelined.
About Panos London
Inclusive
Webelievethatembracingtheviewsofpoorandmarginalisedpeopleisessentialforsustainableandeffectivedevelopment.
Takingpartindialogueanddebatecontributestoahealthyandvibrantsociety.
Empowering
Webelievethatpoorandmarginalisedpeopleshoulddriveandshapethechangesneededtoimprovetheirlives.
Weenablepeopletoshareinformationandideas,speakoutandbeheard.
Balanced
Webelievepeopleneedaccessibleinformationreflectingawiderangeofviews.
Thisallowsthemtomakeinformedchoicesaboutcrucialissuesthathaveanimpactontheirlives.
Diverse
Werespectdifferentviews,valuelocalknowledgeandencouragearangeofapproachesinourworkworldwide.
Webelievethatfreedomofinformationandmediadiversityareessentialfordevelopment.
Illuminating
Weshedlightonignored,misrepresentedormisunderstooddevelopmentissues.
Webelievethattheviewsofpoorandmarginalisedpeoplegivegreaterinsightintotheirlivesandofferuniqueperspectivesonthechallengestheyface.
www.panos.org.uk Imagecreditstoptobottom sven torfinn | panos pictures
marc french | panos pictures borje tobiasson | panos pictures karen robinson | panos pictures giacomo pirozzi | panos pictures
PanosLondon9WhiteLionStreetLondonN19PDUnitedKingdom
ThetargetdatefortheMillenniumDevelopmentGoalsisonlyeightyearsawayyetmillionsofpeoplestillliveinpoverty,withoutaccesstocleanwater,agoodeducationandanyhopeofequalaccesstolocalandinternationaleconomies.
Whilepoliticians,economistsanddevelopmentexpertsdisagreeonthebestwaytochangethissituation,The case for communication in sustainable developmentarguesthatcommunicationandinformationareessentialtowhateverdevelopmentpathisfollowed.Communicationcanbeapowerfulagentofchangeandcanenablepeopletocreatechangeforthemselves.Indeed,withoutcommunicationandinformationbeinganintegralpartofeverydevelopmentintervention,thereportconcludesthattheseinterventionswillcontinuetofailandtheworld’spoorwillforeverbesidelined.
tel+44(0)2072781111fax+44(0)[email protected]
CoverimageBelongingtoacooperativegroupgivesthesewomeninCameroonthechancetocommunicatetheirviewsmorewidely.Sustainabledevelopmentdemandsthatpeopleparticipateinthedebatesanddecisionsthataffecttheirlives.
giacomo pirozzi | panos pictures