the accretion mode - morphology link in radio-loud agn jets: towards a more complete unification...
TRANSCRIPT
The Accretion Mode - Morphology Link in Radio-Loud AGN jets:
Towards a More Complete Unification Scheme
Eileen Meyer
Rice UniversityUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County
(Space Telescope Science Institute)
26 June 2012Black Holes by the Black Sea
Istanbul, Turkey
2/26Introduction 2/28
“From the Blazar Sequence to the Blazar Envelope: Revisiting the Relativistic Jet Dichotomy” ApJ (2011) 740:98
“Radio Loud AGN Unification: Jet Power, Orientation, and Accretion Mode” (in preparation, Georganopoulos et al.)
Markos Georganopoulos, UMBC
Giovanni Fossati, Rice University
Matt Lister, Purdue University
3/26Introduction 3/28
SMBH106-1010 Msol
Accretion Disk → Luminosities up to ~ 1046 erg/, peak in UV
Molecular Torus → size up to ~pc
Broad Line Region (BLR): 10-100 ld
l
Narrow Line Region (NLR): scales > MT(seen at all angles)
l
Relativistic Jet, Γ = 2-40
Up to ~Mpc
θ
Major Questions- How are Jets formed and launched from the SMBH?- What creates the RQ/RL divide? - Role of Accretion Mode and/or Spin?
Radio Loud AGN- Jets in radio galaxies vs. blazar view- Morphology/Structure of the Jet?- Site of the gamma-ray emission? → Georganopoulos talk this afternoon- Is there an accretion mode dichotomy?
→ what can we learn from studying large populations?
4/26Introduction 4/28
Radio Galaxy
Blazars
Zeroth Order: Orientation-based Unification:
FR I: brightest at the center, “plumey jets” FR II: brightest in
the lobes, collimated jets
Direct view of the jet!
5/26Introduction 5/28
Radio Loud AGN Unification(beyond orientation)
FR I
FR II
Radio Galaxy Morphology
Blazar Spectral Type
Low power, weak lines)
High power, high excitation spectra
FSRQ
BL Lac
(Many notable exceptions!)
ADAF
Thin disk
6/26Introduction 6/28
RL AGN: Unification Problems
- FR I/II morphology divide not strictly luminosity (accretion rate?)
- Evolution – positive/negative?
- Mixed spectral types (many low-excitation FR II)
- low-power FSRQ, high-power BL Lacs
- Problems with the Blazar Sequence...
7/26Introduction 7/28
The Blazar View of the Relativistic Jet
Synchrotron emission
Inverse Compton(source of upscattered
photons not well understood)
Isotropic Radio Emission from Slowed Plasma in the Lobes
Peak frequency, wide range
8/26Introduction 8/28
The Blazar Sequence
Row 1 Row 2 Row 3 Row 40
2
4
6
8
10
12
Column 1
Column 2
Column 3
+ Jet Power Increases- νpeak decreases+ Lpeak/LR Increases+ IC dominance increases+ BLLs to FSRQ spectral change
9/26Introduction 9/28
Sources here were found (Nieppola 2006, Landt 2006, Caccianiga 2004)
BL Lacs: Jet Power uncorrelated with νp
How does continuous sequence match morphology/accretion divide?
Part I: The Blazar Envelope 10/28
Relativistic Beaming
θ
Θ increasing
Relativistic Doppler Boosting of Apparent Luminosity is dependent on θ, Γ. 4:1
Part I: The Blazar Envelope 11/28
Hypothesis: The Blazar SequenceEnvelope
Jet Power Increases (blue → red)Along 0° path (gray): Lp increases
νp decreases
Departing from the sequence, sources drop in Luminosity and frequency as θ increases
Need to measure: Orientation (θ) Intrinsic Jet Power
(good Lp, νp )
Hypothesis: The Blazar Sequence
Part I: The Blazar Envelope 12/28
Part I: Revisiting the Blazar Sequence
Is there a monoparametric Sequence?
(1) Measure (unbeamed) Jet Power
(2) Measure the alignment – how does angle of observations affect what we see?
– Hint: Jet structure may become more apparent at large θ
(3) Build Up a large Sample – better SED sampling
Part I: The Blazar Envelope 13/28
Methods
Lobe Emission “sticks up”
Core is faint in the radio (not beamed)
II. Orientation: Radio Core DominanceCavity Power
(P*ΔV/time)
Extended, Low-frequency PowerCavagnolo, et al. 2010
Part I: The Blazar Envelope 14/28
Results
BLLs
Radio Galaxies
FSRQ & BLLs
Part I: The Blazar Envelope 15/28
Results“Simple jet”
(single Γ)
“Decelerating Flow” model (Georganopoulos et al 2005)
Two Branches?
Part I: The Blazar Envelope 16/28
New Hypothesis: A Strong/Weak Dichotomy?
Strong Jets:– All High Lkin (> 1044.5 erg s-1), some lower Lkin
– (Nearly) All FSRQ, many BL Lacs
– Low νp (< 1015 Hz), Reach highest Lp
– Associated with FR IIs (based on Lkin)
Weak Jets:– Only at low Lkin (< 1044.5 erg s-1)
– (Nearly) All BL Lacs
– All high νp (> 1015 Hz), some low νp?– Associated with FR Is (based on Lkin)
S
W
Part I: The Blazar Envelope 17/28
New Hypothesis: A Strong/Weak Dichotomy?
Next Questions:1) Is the divide real?2) Linked to Accretion Mode? Spectral Type mixed?3) Jet Power? (not clean divide)4) Sequence 'broken'?
Part I: The Blazar Envelope 18/28
Some Questions Answered
Low νp , low Lp sources?→ These appear to be misaligned.
Lkin (Lext) does not vary with νp for BL Lacs?→ Consistent with our findings: Horizontal movement due to velocity
gradients in jet
Sources at low νp have range of Lkin?
→ Consistent with our findings: All 'misalignment paths' meet at low νp
Part II: Accretion and the Broken Sequence 19/28
Part II: Accretion Mode and the Broken Power Sequence
Accretion Modes – driving the FR I/FR II divide?
Critical value m'~10-2.5
Ghisellini et al. 2001
Jet Power
BH mass
Part II: Accretion and the Broken Sequence 20/28
(Mass estimates from reverberation mapping, velocity dispersions,
mass-luminosity scalings)
Lkin
, θ, °… m?
Weak Jets = Inefficient Strong Jets = Efficient
Part II: Accretion and the Broken Sequence 21/28
The Broken Power Sequence
Inefficient
Efficient
Part II: Accretion and the Broken Sequence 22/28
The Broken Power Sequence
Part II: Accretion and the Broken Sequence 23/28
The Broken Power Sequence
Part II: Accretion and the Broken Sequence 24/28
The Meaning of Spectral Type: BL Lacs on the strong branch?
Part II: Accretion and the Broken Sequence 25/28
The Meaning of Spectral Type: BL Lacs on the strong branch?
1:4 Δfrequency:ΔLuminosityδ/δ
0 = ν
peak/ν
0
Part II: Accretion and the Broken Sequence 26/28
Summary: The Broken Power Sequence
log Lkin=43m'= 1x10-4
log Lkin=44.5m'= 1x10-2.5
Let's follow 109msol SMBH at 0° (log Ledd ~ 47)
log Lkin=45m'= 1x10-2
log Lkin=46m'= 1x10-1
Conclusions/Key Observations+ Suggestion of Two populations: “weak” / “strong”
+ Jet Power important, but not fundamental: Accretion Mode Difference?
+ Spectral types (FSRQ, BLL) are affected by beaming, not reliable!
+ Observations consistent with a change in accretion mode at a critical rate of ~ 10-2 Eddington rate, linked to a divide in jet SED characteristics.
+ The sequence may exist in 'broken' form:
Next Steps
- Complete a detailed study of high-energy emission seen by Fermi
- Expand the sample to include narrow-line Seyfert galaxies
- Look at VLBI data: jet speeds, morphologies
- Expand the sample
- Radio Galaxies need to be studied more
The end(this slide intentionally left blank)
Part II: Accretion and the Broken Sequence 30/28
Part III: The High-Energy Properties of RL AGN
Part II: Accretion and the Broken Sequence 31/28
Synchrotron Self-Compton (SSC) versus
External Compton (EC)
SSC – upscatter synchrotron photons-IC peak is a “copy” of synchrotron
-beaming pattern is the same:
L ~ δ3+α synchrotron peak or IC peak
EC – upscatter photons from outside the jet (BLR, molecular torus, accretion disk?)
-beaming pattern is different:
L ~ δ3+α synchrotron peak
L ~ δ4+2α IC peak
(For radio, Lcore/Lext ~ L ~ δ3+α, α ~ 0.2 )
Part II: Accretion and the Broken Sequence 32/28
EC in powerful jets?Trend of increasing Compton Dominance (Rp) with Rce – only for most powerful sources!
Many “strong jets” down here – SSC?
Part II: Accretion and the Broken Sequence 33/28
Apparent Jet Speed
Part II: Accretion and the Broken Sequence 34/28
Apparent speed is maximum in the middle of the correlation, as expected.
Part II: Accretion and the Broken Sequence 35/28
EC in powerful jets?Trend of increasing Compton Dominance (Rp) with Rce – only for most powerful sources!
Many “strong jets” down here – why?
Part II: Accretion and the Broken Sequence 36/28
EC versus SSCVery High Power jets → ECVery High Power jets → ECModerately High Power jets –> ? SSC?Moderately High Power jets –> ? SSC?
Only Very High Power FSRQ show this collective behavior: A possible clue to the Gamma-ray emission site?
BLR versus Molecular Torus: IF SSC dominates in moderate FSRQ, synchrotron energy density must be greater than external photon energy density - while the reverse holds in powerful FSRQ. This can be cast as a critical value of Lorentz Factor :
MT: critical value ~ 16BLR: critical value ~ 8
Part II: Accretion and the Broken Sequence 37/28
If the plasma emitting in different zones (e.g., radio versus gamma-ray) have
different speeds (Γ), and thus different δ
and the relationships will not be linear!
The larger the difference, the more curvature
Part II: Accretion and the Broken Sequence 38/28
What can we learn from Fermi ?
Rce, Lkin can predict Lg1.1,1.5,1.4,1.3,1.5
Part II: Accretion and the Broken Sequence 39/28
Beaming Patterns: Expectations
Synchrotron: generally, L = L0δp+α (p=3 or 2) → LR = LR,0δ3+α' while Lp = Lp,0δ4 (ssc)
-or- Lp = Lp,0δ6 (EC)
[assume δ are the same...]
X not seen?
Part I: The Blazar Envelope 40/28
Orientation (Rce)
Expectation:As core dominance increases, νp will increase
No single track?
41/26Introduction 41/28
Low Luminosity High Luminosity(ADAFs?) (thin-disk?)
RL: FR I & BL Lacs FR II & FSRQ
RQ: Seyferts quasars
AGN
XRBs ? low hard state high soft state
Part I: The Blazar Envelope 42/28
Orientation (Rce)
Clear break between RG, blazars
“striping” - indicates that Lkin and L0 are linked