texas symposium, melbournedecember 14th 2006 theoretical properties of ly cooling radiation’ mark...
TRANSCRIPT
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
Theoretical Properties of Ly Cooling Radiation’Mark Dijkstra (CfA)
Collaborators: Z. Haiman, M.Spaans & A. Lidz
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
‘Theoretical Properties of Ly Cooling Radiation’Mark Dijkstra (CfA)
Collaborators: Z. Haiman & M.Spaans
.
motivation
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
‘Theoretical Properties of Ly Cooling Radiation’Mark Dijkstra (CfA)
Collaborators: Z. Haiman, M.Spaans & Lidz
Outline of talk
• Gas cooling & Ly emission• Observable properties of Ly cooling emission (DHS 06a,b)
• Observable properties of continuum cooling radiation (D, submitted to MNRAS)
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
Gas cooling
Primordial Cooling curve
T < 6.e4 K: H cooling dominates
Thoul & Weinberg ‘95
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
The Impact of Cooling on Gas Collapse
• Adiabatic collapse:Gas shell virializes at r=rmax/2
And heated to virial T of halo
• Turn on cooling mechanismtcool<<tdyn
Gas cools to 1e4 K rapidly
Thoul & Weinberg ‘95
€
Tvir =106 M
1011M⊕
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
2 / 31+ zcol
5
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
The Impact of Cooling on Gas Collapse.
• Gas collapses at T=1e4 K (no virial shock, for M<Mcrit)
• Cooling @ T=1.e4 K is dominated by collisional excitation of H– Collisions to 2p and 2s
states of H– 2p 1s: Ly cooling– 2s 1s: 2- emission
Thoul & Weinberg ‘95
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
Gas cooling.
• Gas cooling is dominated by Ly emission
• Spatially extends up to ~100 kpc.• Luminosities in the range L=1e42-
1e44 erg/s
(Haiman et al ‘00, Fardal et al ‘01, Yang et al ‘06)
Yang et al ‘06
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
Lyman Alpha ‘Blobs’
Steidel et al. (2000)
• Observed Spatially extended Ly emission up to ~ 100 kpc.
• Several tens have been discovered at z=3-5. (e.g. Matsuda et al, 2004; Saito et al, 2006/2007)
• Luminosities ~ 1e42-1e44 erg/s
• Powered by cooling radiation?
• Alternatives:– Obscured starburst/AGN– Shock heating by superwinds.– Fluoresence (next talk)
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
Ly Cooling Radiation: Properties
• Observational signatures of cooling radiation?
• Cooling clouds are optically thick to Ly-> radiative transfer (RT). Well studied problem (> 60 years)
HARD
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
Ly Transfer
• A simple problem: a Ly source inside a uniform static neutral H cloud.
• Calculate emerging spectrum Harrington ‘73, Neufeld ‘90, DHS06a
• Generally no analytic solution can be found:
– Monte-Carlo.
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
Ly Transfer
• Calculate Ly transfer through series of models representing cooling clouds
• Goal: To extract basic properties of Ly cooling radiation
• Use Monte-Carlo: follow individual photons through the collapsing cloud.
• The code is reliable.
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
Ly Transfer
• Cute: deuterium• N_H=2e19
(static)
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
Ly Cooling Radiation: Properties
Frequency->
Data: Smith & Jarvis, 2007
Radius
Su
rfa
ce b
righ
tne
ss
• Use Monte-Carlo method to calculate emerging Ly spectrum+surface brightness profiles.
• Result 1: Radiative Transfer of Ly through collapsing (optically thick) gas results in a blueshift of the line. The opposite is true for outflows.
• Frequency off-set of Ly-line constrains gas motion.
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
Ly Cooling Radiation: Properties
• What if one can’t tell whether there is an off-set?• Ly cooling radiation has frequency dependent
surface brightness profile:
Red: reddest 15% of Ly
Blue: bluest 15% of Lya
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
Ly Cooling Radiation: Properties
• Why a frequency dependent surface brightness profile?
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
Ly Cooling Radiation: Properties
• Caution:Spectra shown are affected by IGM. The impact of the IGM is non-trivial
(e.g. Santos ‘04; D, Wyithe & Lidz ‘07)
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
Ly Cooling Radiation: Properties
• Has cooling radiation from cold accretion been seen?
– Perhaps (e.g. talk by M.Rauch)– Saito et al’07 find asymmetric Ly profiles
with enhanced blue emission.
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
Ly Cooling Radiation: Properties
• Cooling radiation seen?
Wilman et al ‘05
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
Cooling Radiation: Properties
Part II(=short)
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
2- Cooling Radiation: Properties
• 1 collisional excitation 1s2p is accompanied by 0.6 excitations 1s2s • 2s1s++, 2 photons have combined energy of 10.2 eV.• Results in continuum emission redward of Ly-a. The spectrum of this
emission has been calculated by Spitzer & Greenstein (‘51)
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
2- Cooling Radiation: Properties
• How weak is continuum? Prominence of Ly line relative to continuum is quantified by the equivalent width (EW)
€
FLyα = EW × f λ (1216)
EW=1000-1500 Å
Emitted restframe EW
However IGM opaque to Ly;
Observed restframe EW
EW< 200 Å
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
2- Cooling Radiation: Properties
• Shape of continuum can also ‘betray’ cooling
Cooling powered or resonant scattering or recombination emission?
Texas Symposium, MelbourneDecember 14th 2006
‘Theoretical Properties of Ly-a Cooling Radiation’Mark Dijkstra (CfA)
Collaborators: Z. Haiman & M.Spaans
Summary• Gas cooling is accompanied by copious Ly emission (especially the
‘cold’ mode).
• Observational signposts of this emission are:– Intrinsic blueshift of line– Steepening of surface brightness towards bluer Ly wavelength– Faint continuum redward of Ly with weird spectrum.
– Caution: Absence does not immediately rule out cooling radiation.
• Currently, no convincing observational evidence exists, but d/dt(almost convincing) > 0.