teresa maguire, alex neill february 2006 algebraic thinking through number workshop presented at...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Algebraic Algebraic Thinking through Thinking through
NumberNumberWorkshop presented at
National Numeracy Facilitators Conference
February 2006Teresa Maguire and Alex Neill
![Page 2: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
BackgroundBackground
ARB resources
Why algebraic thinking?
![Page 3: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Historical development of Historical development of algebraalgebra
Historical development of algebra
Ordinary language - rhetorical
Unknowns – finding value for a letter or letters
Givens – relationships, functions, generalised number, variables, parameters
56 - = 29
= 4 +
![Page 4: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Pre-algebraPre-algebra
How early can you start teaching algebra?
Pre-algebraic thinking
![Page 5: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Research Question:Research Question:
What do students need to know and need to be able to do in order to think algebraically?
![Page 6: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Pre-algebraic conceptsPre-algebraic concepts
Equality
Number properties
Identity [ a + 0 = a, a – a = 0 ]
Commutative [a + b = b + a]
Associative [ a + (b + c) = (a + b) + c]
Distributive [ a (b + c) = (a b) + (a c) ]
![Page 7: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Pre-algebraic conceptsPre-algebraic concepts
Symbolic relationships
If x = 5
then 3x = 15
not 3x = 35
![Page 8: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Pre-algebraic conceptsPre-algebraic concepts
Relationships/relational thinking
14 + x = 25 + 17
Solving equations
+ = 6
![Page 9: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Our researchOur research
A local Wellington school – decile 9, roll of 200
Who?
Year 4s
What?
6 lessons over 3 weeks
Where?
![Page 10: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
MethodologyMethodology
2 lower achievers, 2 average achievers, 2 higher achievers
Pre- and post-tests:
30 pupils, including some Year 5s
Pre- and post-interviews:
Six students
3 girls, 3 boys
![Page 11: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Additional informationAdditional information
Interviews videotaped
Lessons
Teacher – observer
Books
![Page 12: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
EqualityEquality
=What does the equals
sign mean to you?
![Page 13: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Prior ideas Prior ideas (from pre-interviews (from pre-interviews and classroom discussion)and classroom discussion)
You use it at the end of an equation to show what
two numbers added together is.
A bit of a pause then it gives the
answer.
Tells you the answer
The total
A pause before the answer
![Page 14: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Prior ideasPrior ideas
You put it there between the answer so it separates it and shows that
1 + 1 = 2 not 1 + 1 2.
It has two meanings – the same and what the two numbers equal together.
To separate the equation from the answer
When two numbers are the same (like 2 and 2 are the same or 1 + 1 is the same as 2)
![Page 15: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
First lessonFirst lesson
Challenge beliefs
True/False number sentences
Different formats:85 + 75 = 160
7 = 4 + 3
6 = 6
3 + 5 = 3 + 5
3 + 2 = 5 + 3
3 + 5 = 4 + 4
Students write their own
![Page 16: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Student number sentencesStudent number sentences
50 = 25 + 25 8 + 8 = 15 + 1
19 = 9 + 1 + 5 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 8 = 1 + 2 + 5
3 + 8 = 3 + 8 162 = 162
70 + 100 = 160 + 10 6 – 3 + 2 – 1 = 4 + 1 – 1
10 = 4 + 4 + 2 5 x 5 = 5 x 5
50 = 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 2 x 6 = 3 x 4
168 + 26 = 163 + 31 18 + 3 = 14 + 7
![Page 17: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
EqualityEquality
Cuisenaire Rods (8 = …)
Journal entry:
“I think the equals sign means…”
![Page 18: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Journal Entries – Equality Journal Entries – Equality (n =27)(n =27)
Response Number
The same as 14
The answer/the total/the equation ends17
The break/splits the eqn. from the answer 2
Can go any/everywhere in a maths eqn. 2
Many different things 3
Other (e.g. it’s helpful) 2
![Page 19: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Equality – post-test ideas Equality – post-test ideas (n = 28)(n = 28)
Response Number
The same as 12
The same as or the answer to the problem 9
The answer 4
A break before the total 1
A lot of things 1
No answer 1
![Page 20: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Equality – post-interview Equality – post-interview (n =6)(n =6)
The same as or it can separate the equation from the answer. (2 students)
Two meanings. What two numbers equal together or the numbers are
the same.
In number sentences it can mean the answer. Like 2 + 3 is the same
as 4 + 1.
The answer or it has to be balanced. The numbers have to be the same or equal the same on both
sides.
The same as or here is the answer.
![Page 21: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
True/False Number sentencesTrue/False Number sentencesPre-test Pre-test (n = 28)(n = 28)
Problem % Correct
5 + 4 = 9 100 (T)
7 = 1 + 6 75 (T)
5 + 4 = 9 + 3 79 (F)
7 + 2 = 3 + 6 68 (T)
6 + 1 = 7 + 5 79 (F)
(2 + 6) + 3 = 2 + 9 54 (T)
![Page 22: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
True/False Number SentencesTrue/False Number SentencesPre-interviews Pre-interviews (n = 6)(n = 6)
5 + 2 = 4 + 3 4 correct (T) – 2 incorrect
It’s backwards.
It’s the same one except it’s got plus
3.
Because 5 does not equal
4!
False. No, true because 5 + 2 = 7 but that equals 4 so it must be false because it’s got a, it equals
3, it should be 7.
2 + 4 = 6 all 6 correct (T)8 = 3 + 5 5 correct (T) – 1 incorrect
2 + 4 = 6 + 3 4 correct (F) – 2 incorrect
![Page 23: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Pre-interviews continuedPre-interviews continued
5 + 3 = 8 5 + 3 = 8 but + 2, it should equal 10.
3 + 4 = 7 not 3.
5 + 3 = 8 + 2 5 correct (F) – 1 incorrect
(3 + 4) + 5 = 3 + 9 4 correct (T) – 1 incorrect
1 unable to answer
![Page 24: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Open Number SentencesOpen Number SentencesPre-test Pre-test (n = 28)(n = 28)
Problem % Correct
2 + = 8 96 5 = 2 + 79
= 1 + 7 64
6 + 2 = + 5 61 8 + 1 = 3 + 61 + 4 = 2 + 5 61
![Page 25: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
7 = 4 +
5 + = 9 All correct
Open Number SentencesOpen Number SentencesPre-interview Pre-interview (n = 6)(n = 6)
11. Because 7 + 4 = 11.
2. Because 2 = 2.
4. 4 + 2 = 6. Also it can be the other way around – 6 + 2 =
something. Equals 8.
= 2 + 6
![Page 26: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Open Number SentencesOpen Number SentencesPre-interview Pre-interview (n=6)(n=6)
9.Because 4 + 5 = 9.
2.I added on to 4 to get
to 6.
4 + 5 = + 3
7 + 2 = 4 + All correct
+ 4 = 6 + 1
![Page 27: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Balancing Equations Balancing Equations
Concrete to abstract
Balance scales and multiblocks
Worksheet A – Balance Pans
In each diagram of scales below, draw in the number of black blocks needed on the right-hand side to make the scales balance.
= = =
![Page 28: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
More balancingMore balancing
= =
= =
For each balance pan diagram below, write an equation to show that the sides are the same as each other (equal).
Worksheet B – Balance Pan Number Sentences
![Page 29: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Interesting responseInteresting response
5 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 14
4 + 4 + 5 + 3 = 16
5 + 4 + 6 + 3 = 18
7 + 3 + 9 + 1 = 20
![Page 30: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Open Number SentencesOpen Number Sentences
Worksheet C
e) 8 + 3 = 6 +
a) 6 + 2 = + 5
b) 7 + = 10 + 2
c) + 1 = 3 + 4
d) 5 + 7 = + 9
![Page 31: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Did it make a difference? Did it make a difference? (n = 28)(n = 28)
96100
6193
6196
6189
6493
79100
Pre-test
% correct
Post-test
% correctProblem
3 + = 9
+ 4 = 2 + 6
9 + 1 = 3 +
4 + 3 = + 5
= 4 + 6
6 = 2 +
![Page 32: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Additive IdentityAdditive Identity
14 + = 14 18 – 18 =
42 + 67 – 67 – 23 + 23 =
17 + 48 – 48 = 29 + 38 – 29 =
21 + 14 – 14 = 35 + 12 – 12 + 23 – 23 =
![Page 33: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
What the students said: Student 1What the students said: Student 1
48 + 48 + 17. 16 + 7 = …
17 + 48 – 48 =
I see you’re doing some calculating there. When you look at that number sentence can you think of an
easier way to do this that doesn’t involve any calculating? Can you see any relationship between the numbers that might make it easier to find the
answer?
That some of them are even. That there’s a takeaway in there.
So that’s 17 plus 48 basically. So if you put another 48 on the end, you’re just
taking it away. Well, no, that’s not going to work.
![Page 34: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
What the students said: Student 2What the students said: Student 2
21 + 14 – 14 =
21.21 + 14 is 35, takeaway 14… is the number that you
added to 14.
Right. OK, so did you actually do some calculations there? Did you add up the numbers in your head or did you just see that there was some relationship?
Yeah. I added up the numbers, then I took the 4 away, the 14 away.
![Page 35: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
What the students said: Student 2What the students said: Student 2
35 + 12 – 12 + 23 – 23 =
What did you do that time?
35
I rushed through the other numbers to see if you could do anything.
What could you do? Did you find you could do anything?
No, because it goes plus 12, takeaway 12, plus 23, takeaway 23. So there’s not much point in adding.
Right, because what happens if you add something then take it away?
Um, sometimes it gets confusing.
![Page 36: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
More from Student 2More from Student 2Right. So in this one you knew that if you added
12 then took away 12 and added 23 and took away 23 you would get what?
Um, 35.
Which is what? The number…
At the very start.
![Page 37: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
What the students said: Student 3What the students said: Student 3
21 because if you take away 14 from 14 it’s a zero then there’s a 21 at the beginning.
21 + 14 – 14 =
![Page 38: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Additive IdentityAdditive Identity
True/False number sentences
49 + 0 = 49
64 + 23 = 64
123,456 + 0 = 123,456
Rules/conjectures about zero
![Page 39: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Ideas about 0Ideas about 0
Basically 0, it is nothing (like in 8 + 0).
Maybe you can just leave it out when you have a plus zero.
It’s a trick/It’s a confusion.
You’re still using the same number.
Pretend it isn’t there.
![Page 40: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
More ideas about zeroMore ideas about zero
I think of it as nothing, but if it’s at the end of a number you have to take notice of it.
When you add zero to a number it doesn’t really change anything.
But 05 would be the same as 5.
If it’s before a number you are just filling in the gaps.
Multiplicative identity.
![Page 41: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Conjecture 1 about zeroConjecture 1 about zero
When you add zero with another number it doesn’t change the number you started with.
a + 0 = a
![Page 42: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Conjecture 2 about zeroConjecture 2 about zero
When you take away zero from a number it doesn’t change the number you started with.
a – 0 = a
![Page 43: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
True/False number sentences about zeroTrue/False number sentences about zero
Worksheet D
Look at each number sentence below. Circle if it is True or False.
i) 8 + 0 = 8 True or Falseii) 11 - 11 = 11 True or Falseiii) 0 + 95 = 0 True or Falseiv) 53 - 0 = 53 True or Falsev) 50 + 0 = 500 True or False
![Page 44: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Conjecture 3 about 0Conjecture 3 about 0
11 – 11 = 0 or
a – a = 0
If you take away the same number from the one you started with you get zero.
![Page 45: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Student’s true number sentencesStudent’s true number sentences
1 + 50 000 + 10 = 11 + 40 000 + 10 000 - 0
1 000 + 0 = 999 + 1 11 – 0 – 11 = 0
33 + 8 – 0 = 33 + 8 + 0
150 + 50 = 200 + 0
20 + 0 + 5 = 25
2 + 8 = 10 + 0
11 = 11 - 0
500 + 0 = 500 + 100 - 100
![Page 46: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Finding the zeroFinding the zero
6 + 5 – 5 =
12 + 7 – 7 =
6 + 5 = 11, minus 5: take 5 back again. Just like
adding zero.
Add 7 then take away 7, it’s the same.
Same as what?
12 + 0 = 12.
![Page 47: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Finding the zeroFinding the zero
38 + 27 – 27 =
I started with 38 + 27 then I said “Oh, no”, then I noticed you’d added 27 then taken away 27.
38 + 0 = 38
You could swap the plus and the minus around to make 38 – 27 + 27 =
![Page 48: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Finding the zeroFinding the zero
85 + 44 – 85 =
79 + 23 – 79 =
44. Because 85 + 44 – 85 doesn’t make a difference because it’s got
85 – 85.
I took out the 23 and got 79 – 79 then I put the 23 back in.
![Page 49: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Finding the zeroFinding the zero
Worksheet E – Can you find the zero??
Find the answers to each of the following problems without doing any calculating.
a) 25 + 16 – 16 = e) 28 + 36 – 36 + 52 – 52 =
b) 33 + 41 – 41 = f) 28 – 28 + 95 + 15 – 15 =
c) 50 + 37 – 50 = g) 78 – 44 + 44 =
d) 62 + 74 – 62 = h) 67 – 67 + 55 – 23 + 23 =
![Page 50: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
““Tricky” number sentencesTricky” number sentences
5 + 500 000 – 500 000 =
225 – 25 + 200 + 25 – 200 = 225
80 + 60 + 70 + 266 – 60 + 20 – 70 – 266 =
7000 + 20 – 20 + 30 = 7030
100 000 000 + 450 – 100 000 000 =
86 + 72 – 6 – 80 = 72
263 433 222 611 – 0 + 1 – 0 = 433 222 611 + 263 000 000 000 +0 +0 +0 + 1
![Page 51: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Did it make a difference?Did it make a difference?
8 + = 8
48 + 79 – 79 – 35 + 35 =
85 + 95 – 28 – 85 + 28 =
6 + 0 + 8 = 27 + 64 – 27 =
79 + 107 – 68 – 79 + 68 =
![Page 52: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Post-interview conversationPost-interview conversation
How about this one?[79 + 107 – 68 – 79 + 68]
107. Because 79 – 79 equals zero and 68 take, oh, wait, no, it doesn’t. That [points to 79 – 79] equals zero and
um….[pauses]
You’re thinking about those 68s are you? What are you thinking about them?
That the 68 was there [points to –68], but then… The 68 got tooken away but then it came back here [points
to +68] so I need to add 107 and 68. 175.
So if you take that 68 off and then you add it back on again, you have
to add that 68 onto the 107?Yeah
.
![Page 53: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
CommutativityCommutativity
And now over to Alex…
The Commuter Tiz Property
a + b = b + a
![Page 54: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Commutativity – Prior IdeasCommutativity – Prior Ideas (n=6)(n=6)
Recognition (Type 1)
What sign should you put in the box (<,=,>)?
3 + 8 8 + 3 100%
9 + 12 21 + 9 67%
35 + 27 27 + 35 100%
83 + 47 74 + 38 100%
254 + 326 236 + 542 83%
![Page 55: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Commutativity – Prior Ideas Commutativity – Prior Ideas (n=28)(n=28)
Variable – “as yet unknown” (Type 2)
Fill in each box to make the equation true.
Correct Wrong + 24 = 24 + 19 36% (10) 0
42 + 31 = 31 + 46% (13) 73, 104
53 + = 74 + 53 36% (10) 21
12 + 69 = + 12 36% (10) 81
Reason for errors: = means ‘and the answer is’
![Page 56: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Intervention (Type 1)Intervention (Type 1)
True or False?
Discuss whether these sentences are true of false.
3 + 8 = 8 + 3
10 + 12 = 12 + 10
31 + 42 = 42 + 13
25 + 46 = 46 + 25
![Page 57: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Commutativity – Class Commutativity – Class (n=28)(n=28)
Its actually true because the numbers are just
swapped around.
The same numbers are on each side.
Its like a reflection of each other (uses hands to show this).
3 + 8 = 11 and 8 + 3 = 11
It needs to be 3 + 8 = 3 + 8
![Page 58: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Commutativity – Class Commutativity – Class (n=28)(n=28)
Write your own True or False number sentences.
72 + 83 = 83 + 72 T
44 + 61 = 16 + 44 F
35 + 82 + 34 = 82 + 34 + 35 T
231 + 123 = 321 + 132 F
905 + 509 = 509 + 905 T
36 + 80 – 80 + 0 = 0 + 80 – 80 + 36 T
70046 + 70064 = 70064 + 70046 T
![Page 59: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Commutativity – Class Commutativity – Class (n = 28)(n = 28)
Make a general rule
It doesn’t matter if the numbers are swapped around on each side of a number
sentence, its still the same.
It doesn’t matter if the numbers are swapped around on each side of the
number sentence. If the numbers are the same, the number sentence will still balance
If the numbers on each side of a number sentence are the same, the number sentence will balance.
![Page 60: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Number lineNumber line
Introduce the number line as a model:
Write the number sentence that this number line shows.
Draw the number line to show 12 + 6 = 6 + 12
![Page 61: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Commutativity - Class Commutativity - Class (n=28)(n=28)
Introduce a variable “as yet unknown” (Type 2)
28 + 15 = 15 +
Did anyone start calculating?
Did you need to?
67 + = 58 + 67
372 + 183 = + 372
All students did a worksheet based on this, and everyone could get it, even those without the required computational skills.
![Page 62: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Did it make a difference? Did it make a difference? (n=28)(n=28)
36100
46100
3696
3696
Pre-test
% correct
Post-test
% correctProblem
75 + = 89 + 75
61 + 48 = 48 +
+ 35 = 35 + 27
15 + 58 = + 15
![Page 63: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Students’ own representationsStudents’ own representations
Show why 6 + 8 = 8 + 6.
Swapping – commutativity (7)
The numbers have just been swapped around.
Because what ever is on this side has to be on that side.
6 + 8 = 8 + 6
because it is Jorh sort arend.
![Page 64: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Students’ own representationsStudents’ own representations
Equal – computational (4)
Number line (1)
6 + 8 = 14 and 8 + 6 = 14
![Page 65: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Students’ own representationsStudents’ own representations
Balance models (5)
Ordered (3)
Unordered (2)
![Page 66: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Students’ own representationsStudents’ own representations
Others
It is the same!
![Page 67: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Associativity – Prior Ideas Associativity – Prior Ideas (n=28)(n=28)
Variable – “as yet unknown” (Type 2)
Fill in each box to make the equation true.
Correct(2 + 7) + = 2 + (7 + 5) 36% (10)
18 + (13 + 15) = (18 + 13) + 46% (13)
(285 + ) + 176 = 285 + (88 + 176) 36% (10)
![Page 68: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Who can think associatively?Who can think associatively?
Answers Freq
5, 15, 88 7 All but 1 understood “=“
5, 15, - 3 Mainly understood “=“
2, 15, 88 3 Mainly understood “=“
Wrong or missing 15 6 mainly understood “=“
9 did not understand “=“
![Page 69: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
= is necessary= is necessary
To think associatively, students need to have a good idea of what = means.
(6 of the 7 who got all the pre-test questions on associativity correct had a correct or largely correct view about what = means)
To think commutatively, students need to have a good idea of what = means.
(all 10 who got the pre-test questions on commutativity correct had a correct or largely correct view about what = means)
![Page 70: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
= is not sufficient= is not sufficient
Several students who seemed to understand what = means could not correctly answer the questions on commutativity or associativity.
= is necessary, but not sufficient.
Teach meaning of = first, and commutativity and associativity fall into place easily.
![Page 71: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
What are the culprits?What are the culprits?
3 + 4 =
28 - 5 =
26 + 5 – 7 =
4 5 =
18 6 =
x + 3 = 7
Black boxes
![Page 72: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
What are some solutions?What are some solutions?
3 + 4 = 5 + 2
7 = 6 + 1
7 = ? + 1
“What does ‘=‘ mean?”
Does “Three plus four equals” make sense?
![Page 73: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Calculators can help!Calculators can help!
Scaffolds learning
by removing lower level skills to help discover higher level ones.
486 + 368 = 368 + 486 T/F
Allows exploration, discovery and understanding to develop.
81 = 9, 9 9 = 81
90 9.467, 9.467 9.487 90
Works for any number!
White Box
![Page 74: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Calculators can help!Calculators can help!
Models the correct use of =
3 + 4 =
3+4 <exe> 7
Balance model
3+4=5+2 7=7
3+4=7+2 No solution
![Page 75: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
IdentityIdentity
7 + 0 = 0 No solution
7 + 0 = 7 7=7
7 – 7 = 0 0=0
x + 0 = 0 No solution
x + 0 = 1 x=1
x + 0 = x x=x
314 * 1 = 1 No solution
314 * 1 = 314 314=314
x * 1 = x x=x
![Page 76: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Commutativity / AssociativityCommutativity / Associativity
4 + 8 = 8 + 4 12=12
479 + 368 = 368 + 479 847=847
479 + 368 = 378 + 469 847=847
x+ y = y + x x+y=x+y
(47+86)+26= 47+(86+26) 159=159
(x+y)+z=x+(y+z) x+y+z=x+y+z
7+34+48-34 = 48-7 41=41
![Page 77: Teresa Maguire, Alex Neill February 2006 Algebraic Thinking through Number Workshop presented at National Numeracy Facilitators Conference February 2006](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051819/55164cad550346a2698b4a0f/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Teresa Maguire, Alex NeillFebruary 2006
Solving equationsSolving equations
Provides scaffolding on applying identity properties
x+3 = 7 (+,-,, or by 3 or 7)
3x=7 (+,-,, or by 3 or 7)
(7x+6) 3 = 5x (+,-, or by 3, 5, 6 or 7)