terahertz spectroscopy for the solid state characterisation of amorphous systems
TRANSCRIPT
Terahertz Spectroscopy for the Solid StateCharacterisation of Amorphous Systems
Juraj Sibik and Axel Zeitler
Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge,Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3RA, [email protected]://thz.ceb.cam.ac.uk – www.pssrc.org
19 June 2015
Outline
IntroductionDielectric SpectroscopyTerahertz Radiation
Amorphous MaterialsWhat Can be Measured at THz Frequencies?Model System: PolyalcoholsCrystallisationStability Prediction
Summary
Introduction Dielectric Spectroscopy
Dielectric Spectroscopy
105 106 107 108 109 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021
103 102 101 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 10-6 10-7 10-8 10-9 10-10 10-11 10-12 10-13
Visible Light
Infrared UltravioletRadiowaves Microwaves X-rays Gamma
1 MHz 1 ZHz1 EHz1 PHz1 THz1 GHz
Frequency / Hz
THz
1 nm1 m1 mm1 m1 km
Wavelength / m
Complementary technique to terahertz spectroscopy at lowerfrequencies
2 of 31
Introduction Dielectric Spectroscopy
Absorption Mechanisms
I This technique spansthe frequency rangeover 102 to 1012 Hz
I Dipoles and chargesrespond to theexcitation by anexternal electric fieldand move as a wholeduring relaxation
I ε = ε′ + iε′′ = (n + iκ)2
where α = 4πκ/λ0
Image source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/file:Dielectric_responses.svg 3 of 31
Introduction Dielectric Spectroscopy
Dielectric Relaxation – Molecular Mobility
α-relaxation
I Structural relaxationprocess
I Relaxation time changesfrom 10−12 to 102 s uponglass transition
I Concept of cooperativelyrearranging regions(CRR)
β-relaxations
I Local motions involvingthe entire molecule orintra-molecularreorientations
I Much faster than αrelaxations
I Commonly observedeither as a separate peakor as a high frequencywing of the α-relaxation.
G. Adam, J.H. Gibbs, The Journal of Chemical Physics. 43, 139 (1965). 4 of 31
Introduction Dielectric Spectroscopy
Dielectric Relaxation in Amorphous Solids
I α and β relaxation process areseparated in frequency (but arevery broad and often overlap)
I The secondary β-relaxationprocesses are typically related tolocal mobility
I It is possible to directly measure therelaxation times using dielectricspectroscopy
H. Wagner, R. Richert, J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 242, 19 (1998).S. Bhattacharya, R. Suryanarayanan, 98, 2935 (2009). 5 of 31
Introduction Terahertz Radiation
What does Terahertz Radiation Refer to?
1 0 5 1 0 6 1 0 7 1 0 8 1 0 9 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 5 1 0 1 6 1 0 1 7 1 0 1 8 1 0 1 9 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 1
1 0 3 1 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 - 1 1 0 - 2 1 0 - 3 1 0 - 4 1 0 - 5 1 0 - 6 1 0 - 7 1 0 - 8 1 0 - 9 1 0 - 1 0 1 0 - 1 1 1 0 - 1 2 1 0 - 1 3
V i s i b l e L i g h t
I o n i s i n g
T r a n s p a r e n c y
I n f r a r e d U l t r a v i o l e t
T r a n s p a r e n c yS p e c t r o s c o p i c I n f o r m a t i o n
T H zR a d i o w a v e s M i c r o w a v e s X - r a y s G a m m a
1 M H z 1 Z H z1 E H z1 P H z1 T H z1 G H z
F r e q u e n c y / H z1 n m1 µm1 m m1 m1 k m
W a v e l e n g t h / m
0 . 0 1 0 . 1 1 1 0 1 0 0F r e q u e n c y / T H z
1 . 0 1 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 0 . 0
H y d r o g e n - b o n d i n g s t r e t c h e s a n d t o r s i o n s ( l i q u i d s )
S e c o n d a r y d i e l e c t r i c r e l a x a t i o n s ( s o l i d )
I n t r a m o l e c u l a r v i b r a t i o n a l m o d e s
C r y s t a l l i n e p h o n o n v i b r a t i o n s ( s o l i d )
W a v e n u m b e r / c m - 1
M o l e c u l a r r o t a t i o n s ( g a s )
6 of 31
Introduction Terahertz Radiation
Vibrational Spectroscopy
Mid-infrared
Intramolecular ModesInformation about the structure of a single
molecule, identification of molecules
Terahertz
Intermolecular ModesInformation about the structure anddynamics of molecular interaction
7 of 31
Introduction Terahertz Radiation
Terahertz Time-Domain Spectroscopy
0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0
- 8
- 6
- 4
- 2
0
2
4
6
8
1 0
1 2
THz e
lectric
field
/ a.u.
t i m e / p s1 2 3 4 5
0 . 1
1
1 0
1 0 0
powe
r / a.u
.f r e q u e n c y / T H z
Typical terahertz pulse in time-domain (left) and frequency components of the pulse (right).Coherent sub-picosecond pulses, bandwidth of 0.1 to 4.0 THz, excellent signal-to-noise
detection
8 of 31
Introduction Terahertz Radiation
Terahertz Time-Domain Technology
I In THz-TDS both amplitude and phase of the electric fieldis measured and not just its intensity
I This means that the complex refractive index can beextracted directly without resorting to Kramer-Kronigrelations:
Esam(ω)
Eref(ω)= T(ω)eiφ(ω)
I In terms of absorption coefficient and refractive index:
α(ω) = −2d
ln[(nm + n)2
4nmnT(ω)
]n(ω) = 1 +
φ(ω)cωd
I This can also directly be expressed in terms of dielectriclosses:
n = n + iκ =√ε =√ε′ + iε′′
9 of 31
Outline
Introduction
Amorphous MaterialsWhat Can be Measured at THz Frequencies?Model System: PolyalcoholsCrystallisationStability Prediction
Summary
Amorphous Materials What Can be Measured at THz Frequencies?
Amorphous Materials
http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/Materials/Structure/solidstate.htmJ. Bicerano, D. Adler, Pure & Appl. Chem., 59, 101 (1987) 10 of 31
Amorphous Materials What Can be Measured at THz Frequencies?
Disordered Materials – Losses at THz Frequencies
Amorphous Solids and Supercooled Liquids
I Mid-IR: Bond vibrations, slight shift andbroadening compared to crystallinematerials
I THz: No phonon vibrations occur as thereis no long range order
I At lower frequencies molecular rotationsand translations take place
I These molecular motions can be describedby the first order decay of macroscopicpolarisation as proposed by Debye in hisdielectric relaxation theory
11 of 31
Outline
Introduction
Amorphous MaterialsWhat Can be Measured at THz Frequencies?Model System: PolyalcoholsCrystallisationStability Prediction
Summary
Amorphous Materials Model System: Polyalcohols
Dielectric Response of Amorphous Materials
S. Kastner et al., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 357, 510 (2011). 12 of 31
Amorphous Materials Model System: Polyalcohols
Dielectric Response of Amorphous Materials
S. Kastner et al., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 357, 510 (2011). 12 of 31
Amorphous Materials Model System: Polyalcohols
Amorphous Sorbitol
100 150 200 250 3000
50
100
150
200
1.5 THz 1.0 THz 0.5 THz
α [c
m-1
]
100wt% sorbitol
T [K]
TgGlass transition
Structural relaxation at Tg leads to increase in absorption
J. Sibik et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 11931 (2013). 13 of 31
Amorphous Materials Model System: Polyalcohols
Amorphous Sorbitol
100 150 200 250 3000
50
100
150
200
1.5 THz 1.0 THz 0.5 THz
α [c
m-1
]
100wt% sorbitol
T [K]
TgGlass transition
Subtle but noticeable change in absorption below Tg – origin?
J. Sibik et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 11931 (2013). 13 of 31
Amorphous Materials Model System: Polyalcohols
Secondary Relaxation in Polyalcohols
A. Döss et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.095701. 14 of 31
Amorphous Materials Model System: Polyalcohols
Terahertz Spectroscopy of Polyalcohols
100
10-1
100
300 K
80 K
120 K 190 K
'' ()
(THz)
(a) glycerol
100
150 K 230 K
240 K
90 K
(THz)
(b) threitol
100
310 K
80 K
180 K 250 K
(THz)
(c) xylitol
100
310 K
(THz)
180 K 260 K
(d) sorbitol
90 K
101 102(cm-1)
101 102(cm-1)
101 102(cm-1)
101 102(cm-1)
The blue and red circles highlight the losses in the proximity of 0.65 Tg and Tg
respectively.
The sample of threitol recrystallised above 250 K – no data above this temperatureare shown.J. Sibik et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 1968 (2014). 15 of 31
Amorphous Materials Model System: Polyalcohols
Terahertz Spectroscopy of Polyalcohols
0.5 1.0 1.50.1
0.3
0.5
0.7
T
T
(iii)(ii)
1.00 Tg
sorbitol(+0.1) xylitol threitol(+0.1) glycerol(-0.1)
''(=
1 TH
z)
T/Tg
0.65 Tg
(i)
The sample of threitol recrystallised above 250 K – no data above this temperatureare shown.J. Sibik et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 1968 (2014). 15 of 31
Amorphous Materials Model System: Polyalcohols
Terahertz Spectroscopy of Polyalcohols
I At temperatures well below Tg, atemperature-independent microscopic peak isobserved, which persists into the liquid phaseand which is identified as being due tolibrational/torsional modes.
I For 0.65 Tg < T < Tg, additional thermallydependent contributions are observed, and wefound strong evidence for its relation to theJohari-Goldstein secondary relaxation process.
I Clear spectroscopic evidence is found for asecondary glass transition at 0.65 Tg, which is notrelated to the fragility of the glasses.
I At temperatures above Tg, the losses becomedominated by primary α-relaxation processes.Our results show that the thermal changes in thelosses seem to be underpinned by a universalchange in the hydrogen bonding structure of thesamples.
0.5 1.0
Molecular relaxations
0.67 Tg
'' THz
T/Tg
Tg
VDOSJG-
Libration-vibration motions
Decoupling (independent of m)
J. Sibik et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 1968 (2014). 16 of 31
Outline
Introduction
Amorphous MaterialsWhat Can be Measured at THz Frequencies?Model System: PolyalcoholsCrystallisationStability Prediction
Summary
Amorphous Materials Crystallisation
Phase Transitions – in situ Spectroscopy
0 . 7 5 0 . 9 0 1 . 0 5 1 . 2 0 1 . 3 5 1 . 5 0 1 . 6 5 1 . 8 0
0 . 5
1 . 0
1 . 5
2 . 0
2 . 52 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 5 0 5 5 6 0
w a v e n u m b e r / c m - 1
abso
rbanc
e / a.
u.
f r e q u e n c y / T H z
f o r m I I I
f o r m I
Conversion of carbamazepine form III to I at 433 KTerahertz spectroscopy is very sensitive to changes in supramolecular structure
J.A. Zeitler et al., Thermochimica Acta. 436, 71 (2005). 17 of 31
Amorphous Materials Crystallisation
Phase Transitions – Kinetics
Kinetics of the solid state transition. Mechanism occurs assolid-gas-solid transition and can be resolved using THz-TDS.
J.A. Zeitler et al., ChemPhysChem. 8, 1924 (2007). 18 of 31
Amorphous Materials Crystallisation
Amorphous vs. Crystalline Organic Solids
1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 00 . 0
0 . 5
1 . 0
1 . 5
2 . 0
2 . 5 a m o r p h o u s c r y s t a l l i n e
Abso
rbanc
e (de
cadic
)
W a v e n u m b e r [ c m - 1 ]
Crystalline vs. amorphous indomethacine.
C.J. Strachan et al., Chem. Phys. Lett. 390, 20 (2004). 19 of 31
Amorphous Materials Crystallisation
Relaxation and Crystallisation
1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 002468
1 01 21 4
Abso
rbanc
e (de
cadic
)
W a v e n u m b e r [ c m - 1 ]
654321
330-340 K
1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 002468
1 01 21 4 65432
Abso
rbanc
e (de
cadic
)
W a v e n u m b e r [ c m - 1 ]
1
340-356 K
1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 002468
1 01 21 4 65432
Abso
rbanc
e (de
cadic
)
W a v e n u m b e r [ c m - 1 ]
1
357-368 K
1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 002468
1 01 21 4
Abso
rbanc
e (de
cadic
)
W a v e n u m b e r [ c m - 1 ]
654321
410-440 K
J.A. Zeitler et al., J. Pharm. Sci. 96, 2703 (2007). 20 of 31
Amorphous Materials Crystallisation
Change in Absorbance
2 9 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 3 2 0 3 3 0 3 4 0 3 5 0 3 6 0 3 7 0 3 8 0 3 9 0 4 0 0 4 1 0 4 2 0 4 3 0 4 4 0 4 5 00 . 5
1 . 0
1 . 5
2 . 0
3 0 0 3 1 0 3 2 0 3 3 0 3 4 0 3 5 00 . 9 0
0 . 9 5
1 . 0 0
1 . 0 5
f o r m IT g f o r m I I Ig l a s s ys t a t e
Norm
alise
d abs
orban
ce (d
ecad
ic)
T e m p e r a t u r e [ K ]
f e a t u r e 1 f e a t u r e 2 f e a t u r e 3 f e a t u r e 4 f e a t u r e 5 f e a t u r e 6
r u b b e r ys t a t e
c r y s t a l l -i s a t i o n
p h a s e t r a n s i t i o n
At Tg sample relaxes and crystallises subsequently at higher temperature.
J.A. Zeitler et al., J. Pharm. Sci. 96, 2703 (2007). 21 of 31
Amorphous Materials Crystallisation
Crystallisation Kinetics
0 1 20
40
80
120
160
200
240a )
α (c
m-1)
Frequency (THz)
320 325 330 335 340 345
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
r a , amorphous fraction
r c , crystalline fraction
Avrami-Erofeev fit
Temperature (K)
r a, r c
b )
a) Terahertz spectra of paracetamol crystallising form the amorphous phase. Asthe crystallisation progresses distinct vibrational modes emerge from the VDOS.
b) Kinetics of the crystallisation process and corresponding fit using theAvrami-Erofeev model.
J. Sibik et al., Molecular Pharmaceutics. 11, 1326 (2014). 22 of 31
Amorphous Materials Crystallisation
Crystallisation of Amorphous Paracetamol
Spectra of the three observed polymorphs
J. Sibik et al., Molecular Pharmaceutics. 11, 1326 (2014). 23 of 31
Amorphous Materials Crystallisation
Crystallisation of Amorphous Paracetamol
0 1 2 30100200300400
300350400450
Temperature (K)
Frequency (THz)
(cm
-1)
Crystallisation and subsequent phase transitions
J. Sibik et al., Molecular Pharmaceutics. 11, 1326 (2014). 23 of 31
Amorphous Materials Crystallisation
Crystallisation of Amorphous Paracetamol
10
30
50
300 350 400 450
10305070
507090110
300 350 400 450
180240300360
T (K)
(cm
-1) (a)
0.7 THz
1.0 THz
LIIIIII
(b)
(cm
-1)A
1.5 THz(c)
(c
m-1)
2.5 THz(d)
T (K)
(cm
-1)
J. Sibik et al., Molecular Pharmaceutics. 11, 1326 (2014). 23 of 31
Amorphous Materials Crystallisation
Crystallisation of Amorphous Paracetamol
0 1 2 30
100
200
300
0.6 0.9
20
40
(cm
-1)
Frequency (THz)
325 K 330 K 335 K
0 25 50 75 100 Wavenumber (cm-1)
1 20
100
200
300 300 K 330 K 335 K 470 K fit
n (c
m-1
)Frequency (THz)
20 40 60Wavenumber (cm-1)
Deviation from power law: onset of crystallisation
n (ν)α (ν) = A + C (ν − ν0)q
J. Sibik et al., Molecular Pharmaceutics. 11, 1326 (2014). 23 of 31
Amorphous Materials Crystallisation
Crystallisation of Amorphous Paracetamol
0
10
20
30
40290 300 310 320 330 460470
120
130
140
290 300 310 320 330 4604701.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
T (K)
A (c
m-1)
(a)
(b)
C (c
m-1TH
z-q)
(c)
T (K)
q
I In paracetamol the crystallisation from the amorphousphase is observed to form III
I Subsequent phase transitions occur to forms II and Ibefore the sample melts
I This observation is in agreement with a previous studyof paracetamol by low frequency Raman scattering
I The featureless spectra of the supercooled liquid andliquid melt can be fitted using a power law model
I The melt spectrum is dominated by the dielectricrelaxation as well as the VDOS, while in thesupercooled liquid the contribution due to the dielectricrelaxation vanishes close to Tg (q changes from 2 in theglassy state to 1 in the liquid melt state)
I Using the simple power law model introduced previously,the onset of crystallisation can be determined precisely
J. Sibik et al., Molecular Pharmaceutics. 11, 1326 (2014). 24 of 31
Amorphous Materials Crystallisation
Crystallisation Below Tg
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.00
100
200
(b)(a)
310 K
Naproxen
() (
cm-1)
(THz)
100 K
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.250
100
150
200
250 1.2 THz 1.5 THz 1.8 THz
(T/T
g) (cm
-1)
T/Tg
0.67 Tg
~4x faster
Seeded crystallisation: rate increases at ≈ 0.67 Tg!Role of molecular mobility below Tg
J. Sibik et al., Molecular Pharmaceutics, doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00330(2015). 25 of 31
Outline
Introduction
Amorphous MaterialsWhat Can be Measured at THz Frequencies?Model System: PolyalcoholsCrystallisationStability Prediction
Summary
Amorphous Materials Stability Prediction
Amorphous Drug Stability
J. Sibik et al., Molecular Pharmaceutics, doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00330(2015). 26 of 31
Amorphous Materials Stability Prediction
Amorphous Drug Stability
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.220
25
30
35
40
45
50
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50
50
100
150
320 K
Indomethacin
Paracetamol
(cm
-1)
Frequency (THz)
80 K 0.67 Tg
Paracetamol Indomethacin
1.0
THz (c
m-1)
T/Tg
J. Sibik et al., Molecular Pharmaceutics, doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00330(2015). 26 of 31
Amorphous Materials Stability Prediction
Amorphous Drug Stability
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3 paracetamol indomethacin flufenamic acid simvastatin
linear fit0
T/Tg
J. Sibik et al., Molecular Pharmaceutics, doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00330(2015). 26 of 31
Amorphous Materials Stability Prediction
Prediction of Amorphous Stability
J. Sibik et al., Molecular Pharmaceutics, doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00330(2015). 27 of 31
Summary
Terahertz Spectroscopy
I The terahertz molecular dynamics is strongly related to the molecularmobility governing the stability of amorphous drugs.
I While molecular relaxations are often extracted by dielectric spectroscopy orDSC and used to predict the stability of the amorphous drugs, concerns havebeen raised about the robustness of these methods.
I DSC is useful mainly for measurements of molecular mobility around andabove Tg, but cannot be easily used to measure molecular mobility at lowertemperatures.
I Measurements by dielectric spectroscopy are very useful to measure thelocal mobility in terms of JG-β relaxation, except for cases where thisrelaxation is submerged in the α-relaxation.
I In contrast, terahertz spectroscopy does not suffer from this limitation as itmeasures fast motions and only indirectly resolves the effect of the JG-βrelaxation, which may in principle be observed even when no clear JG-βpeak is present (such as in the case of indomethacin).
28 of 31
Summary Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
I Dr Korbinian Löbmann and Professor Thomas Rades (Copenhagen)I U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC,
EP/J007803/1)
29 of 31
Summary Acknowledgments
Literature I
I G. Adam and J. H. Gibbs, On the temperature dependence of cooperative relaxation properties in glass-forming liquids,The Journal of Chemical Physics, 43:139, 1965.
I S. Bhattacharya and R. Suryanarayanan, Local Mobility in Amorphous Pharmaceuticals-Characterization andImplications on Stability, 98(9):2935–2953, January 2009, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jps.21728.
I A. Döß, M. Paluch, H. Sillescu, and G. Hinze, From Strong to Fragile Glass Formers: Secondary Relaxation inPolyalcohols, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88(9), February 2002, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.095701.
I S. Kastner, M. Köhler, Y. Goncharov, P. Lunkenheimer, and A. Loidl, High-frequency dynamics of type B glass formersinvestigated by broadband dielectric spectroscopy, J. Non-Cryst. Sol., 357(2):510–514, January 2011,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.06.074.
I J. Sibik, S. R. Elliott, and J. A. Zeitler, Thermal decoupling of molecular-relaxation processes from the vibrationaldensity of states at terahertz frequencies in supercooled hydrogen-bonded liquids, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 5(11):1968–1972, 2014a, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jz5007302.
I J. Sibik, E. Y. Shalaev, and J. A. Zeitler, Glassy dynamics of sorbitol solutions at terahertz frequencies., Phys. Chem.Chem. Phys., 15(28):11931–11942, July 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3cp51936h.
I J. Sibik, M. J. Sargent, M. Franklin, and J. A. Zeitler, Crystallization and Phase Changes in Paracetamol from theAmorphous Solid to the Liquid Phase, Molecular Pharmaceutics, 11(4):1326–1334, March 2014b,http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/mp400768m.
I J. Sibik, K. Loebmann, T. Rades, and J. A. Zeitler, Predicting Crystallisation of Amorphous Drugs With TerahertzSpectroscopy, Molecular Pharmaceutics, page 150619135054002, June 2015,http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00330.
30 of 31
Summary Acknowledgments
Literature II
I C. J. Strachan, T. Rades, D. Newnham, K. C. Gordon, M. Pepper, and P. F. Taday, Using terahertz pulsed spectroscopyto study crystallinity of pharmaceutical materials, Chem. Phys. Lett., 390(1-3):20–24, May 2004,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2004.03.117.
I H. Wagner and R. Richert, Spatial uniformity of the β-relaxation in D-sorbitol, J. Non-Cryst. Sol., 242(1):19–24, 1998.
I J. A. Zeitler, P. F. Taday, K. C. Gordon, M. Pepper, and T. Rades, Solid-State Transition Mechanism in CarbamazepinePolymorphs by Time-Resolved Terahertz Spectroscopy, ChemPhysChem, 8(13):1924–1927, 2007a,http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200700261.
I J. A. Zeitler, P. F. Taday, M. Pepper, and T. Rades, Relaxation and crystallization of amorphous carbamazepine studiedby terahertz pulsed spectroscopy, J. Pharm. Sci., 96(10):2703–2709, October 2007b, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jps.20908.
I J. A. Zeitler, D. A. Newnham, P. F. Taday, C. J. Strachan, M. Pepper, K. C. Gordon, and T. Rades, Temperaturedependent terahertz pulsed spectroscopy of carbamazepine, Thermochimica Acta, 436(1-2):71–77, October 2005,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2005.07.006.
31 of 31