tension in the void -...

42
A-Void Dark Energy Observational constraints Tension in the Void arXiv:1201.2790 Miguel Zumalac´ arregui Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona with Juan Garcia-Bellido and Pilar Ruiz-Lapuente Modern Cosmology Workshop 2012, Benasque Miguel Zumalac´ arregui Tension in the Void

Upload: others

Post on 24-Mar-2020

10 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

Tension in the VoidarXiv:1201.2790

Miguel Zumalacarregui

Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona

with Juan Garcia-Bellido and Pilar Ruiz-Lapuente

Modern Cosmology Workshop 2012, Benasque

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

Outline

1 A-Void Dark EnergyThe Standard Cosmological ModelInhomogeneous Universes

2 Observational constraintsThe BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

3) Conclusions

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The Standard Cosmological ModelInhomogeneous Universes

The Standard Model of Cosmology

Commercial name: ΛCDM c©

Ingredients

GR + FRW + Inflation + SM + CDM + Λ

Theory of Gravitation: General Relativity

Ansatz for the metric: Homogeneous + Isotropic

Initial conditions: Inflationary perturbations

Standard particle content: γ, ν’s, p+, n, e−

Cold Dark Matter: some new particle species

Cosmological constant: Λ

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The Standard Cosmological ModelInhomogeneous Universes

Beyond Homogeneity

Homogeneity + Isotropy −→ Spherical Symmetry

The Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi metric

ds2 = −dt2 +A′2(r, t)

1− k(r)dr2 +A2(r, t) dΩ2

Two expansion rates: HR = A′/A′ 6= A/A = HT

Matter/curvature profile k(r) ⇒ ΩM (r)

Expansion rate H0(r) ⇒ time to big-bang tBB(r)

Homogeneous Big-Bang: tBB(r) = t0

Relates H0(r)↔ ΩM (r) up to a constant H0 ↔ t0

¶¶ Evolution from very homogeneous state at early times

+ ρb ∝ ρm → growth of an spherical adiabatic perturbation

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The Standard Cosmological ModelInhomogeneous Universes

Beyond Homogeneity

Homogeneity + Isotropy −→ Spherical Symmetry

The Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi metric

ds2 = −dt2 +A′2(r, t)

1− k(r)dr2 +A2(r, t) dΩ2

Two expansion rates: HR = A′/A′ 6= A/A = HT

Matter/curvature profile k(r) ⇒ ΩM (r)

Expansion rate H0(r) ⇒ time to big-bang tBB(r)

Homogeneous Big-Bang: tBB(r) = t0

Relates H0(r)↔ ΩM (r) up to a constant H0 ↔ t0

¶¶ Evolution from very homogeneous state at early times

+ ρb ∝ ρm → growth of an spherical adiabatic perturbation

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The Standard Cosmological ModelInhomogeneous Universes

Beyond Homogeneity

Homogeneity + Isotropy −→ Spherical Symmetry

The Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi metric

ds2 = −dt2 +A′2(r, t)

1− k(r)dr2 +A2(r, t) dΩ2

Two expansion rates: HR = A′/A′ 6= A/A = HT

Matter/curvature profile k(r) ⇒ ΩM (r)

Expansion rate H0(r) ⇒ time to big-bang tBB(r)

Homogeneous Big-Bang: tBB(r) = t0

Relates H0(r)↔ ΩM (r) up to a constant H0 ↔ t0

¶¶ Evolution from very homogeneous state at early times

+ ρb ∝ ρm → growth of an spherical adiabatic perturbation

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The Standard Cosmological ModelInhomogeneous Universes

Beyond Homogeneity

Homogeneity + Isotropy −→ Spherical Symmetry

The Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi metric

ds2 = −dt2 +A′2(r, t)

1− k(r)dr2 +A2(r, t) dΩ2

Two expansion rates: HR = A′/A′ 6= A/A = HT

Matter/curvature profile k(r) ⇒ ΩM (r)

Expansion rate H0(r) ⇒ time to big-bang tBB(r)

Homogeneous Big-Bang: tBB(r) = t0

Relates H0(r)↔ ΩM (r) up to a constant H0 ↔ t0

¶¶ Evolution from very homogeneous state at early times

+ ρb ∝ ρm → growth of an spherical adiabatic perturbation

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The Standard Cosmological ModelInhomogeneous Universes

Beyond Homogeneity

Homogeneity + Isotropy −→ Spherical Symmetry

The Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi metric

ds2 = −dt2 +A′2(r, t)

1− k(r)dr2 +A2(r, t) dΩ2

Two expansion rates: HR = A′/A′ 6= A/A = HT

Matter/curvature profile k(r) ⇒ ΩM (r)

Expansion rate H0(r) ⇒ time to big-bang tBB(r)

Homogeneous Big-Bang: tBB(r) = t0

Relates H0(r)↔ ΩM (r) up to a constant H0 ↔ t0

¶¶ Evolution from very homogeneous state at early times

+ ρb ∝ ρm → growth of an spherical adiabatic perturbation

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The Standard Cosmological ModelInhomogeneous Universes

Beyond Homogeneity

Homogeneity + Isotropy −→ Spherical Symmetry

The Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi metric

ds2 = −dt2 +A′2(r, t)

1− k(r)dr2 +A2(r, t) dΩ2

Two expansion rates: HR = A′/A′ 6= A/A = HT

Matter/curvature profile k(r) ⇒ ΩM (r)

Expansion rate H0(r) ⇒ time to big-bang tBB(r)

Homogeneous Big-Bang: tBB(r) = t0

Relates H0(r)↔ ΩM (r) up to a constant H0 ↔ t0

¶¶ Evolution from very homogeneous state at early times

+ ρb ∝ ρm → growth of an spherical adiabatic perturbationMiguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Observations in adiabatic LTB universes

ìì-2 0 2 4 6 8 10

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

r @ GpcD

t@G

yrD

constant t H z =0L

t H z =1L

t H z =100 L

constant Ρ

CMB

z~1100

Homogeneous state at

early times, large r

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Observations in adiabatic LTB universes

ìì

øøWe are here

-2 0 2 4 6 8 10

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

r @ GpcD

t@G

yrD

constant tH z =0L

tH z =1L

tH z =100L

constant Ρ

CMB

z~1100

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Observations in adiabatic LTB universes

ìì

øøWe are here

ç

çç

çç

çç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

çççç

ç

çç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ççççç

ç

çç

çç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

çç

çç

ç

ç

ç

çç

çççç

ç

çççç

ççççç

ç

ççç

ççç

ççççççç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

çççç

çç

çç

çççç

ç

ççç

ç

çç

çç

çç

ççç

çç

ç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

ç

çççç

çççç

çç

ç

çç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

çç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

çç

çç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

-2 0 2 4 6 8 10

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

r @ GpcD

t@G

yrD

constant tH z =0L

tH z =1L

tH z =100L

constant Ρ

CMB

z~1100

Ia SNe zd1.5

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Observations in adiabatic LTB universes

ìì

øøWe are here

ç

çç

çç

çç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

çççç

ç

çç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ççççç

ç

çç

çç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

çç

çç

ç

ç

ç

çç

çççç

ç

çççç

ççççç

ç

ççç

ççç

ççççççç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

çççç

çç

çç

çççç

ç

ççç

ç

çç

çç

çç

ççç

çç

ç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

ç

çççç

çççç

çç

ç

çç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

çç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

çç

çç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

õ

õ

õ

õ

õ

õ

õ

-2 0 2 4 6 8 10

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

r @ GpcD

t@G

yrD

constant tH z =0L

tH z =1L

tH z =100L

constant Ρ

CMB

z~1100

Ia SNe zd1.5

BAO zd0.8

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Observations in adiabatic LTB universes

ìì

øøWe are here

ç

çç

çç

çç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

çççç

ç

çç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ççççç

ç

çç

çç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

çç

çç

ç

ç

ç

çç

çççç

ç

çççç

ççççç

ç

ççç

ççç

ççççççç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

çççç

çç

çç

çççç

ç

ççç

ç

çç

çç

çç

ççç

çç

ç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

ç

çççç

çççç

çç

ç

çç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

çç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

çç

çç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

õ

õ

õ

õ

õ

õ

õ

ôô

-2 0 2 4 6 8 10

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

r @ GpcD

t@G

yrD

constant tH z =0L

tH z =1L

tH z =100L

constant Ρ

CMB

z~1100

Ia SNe zd1.5

BAO zd0.8

Relate to early time

and asymptoticvalue

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Baryon acoustic oscillations - Standard Rulers

-Sound waves in the baryon-photonplasma travel a finite distance

-Initial baryon clumps → more galaxies

-Statistical standard ruler

LTB: Do these clumps/galaxies move? → Geodesics

r +

[k′

2(1− k)+A′′

A′

]r2 + 2

A′

A′tr = 0

t r ⇒ Constant coordinate separation (zero order)

Alonso et al. 1204.3532: N-body ⇒ locally ∼ FRW w ΩM (r)

February et al. 1206.1602: Linear PT ⇒ ∼ 1% shift

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Baryon acoustic oscillations - Standard Rulers

-Sound waves in the baryon-photonplasma travel a finite distance

-Initial baryon clumps → more galaxies

-Statistical standard ruler

LTB: Do these clumps/galaxies move? → Geodesics

r +

[k′

2(1− k)+A′′

A′

]r2 + 2

A′

A′tr = 0

t r ⇒ Constant coordinate separation (zero order)

Alonso et al. 1204.3532: N-body ⇒ locally ∼ FRW w ΩM (r)

February et al. 1206.1602: Linear PT ⇒ ∼ 1% shift

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Baryon acoustic oscillations - Standard Rulers

-Sound waves in the baryon-photonplasma travel a finite distance

-Initial baryon clumps → more galaxies

-Statistical standard ruler

LTB: Do these clumps/galaxies move? → Geodesics

r +

[k′

2(1− k)+A′′

A′

]r2 + 2

A′

A′tr = 0

t r ⇒ Constant coordinate separation (zero order)

Alonso et al. 1204.3532: N-body ⇒ locally ∼ FRW w ΩM (r)

February et al. 1206.1602: Linear PT ⇒ ∼ 1% shift

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Baryon acoustic oscillations - Standard Rulers

-Sound waves in the baryon-photonplasma travel a finite distance

-Initial baryon clumps → more galaxies

-Statistical standard ruler

LTB: Do these clumps/galaxies move? → Geodesics

r +

[k′

2(1− k)+A′′

A′

]r2 + 2

A′

A′tr = 0

t r ⇒ Constant coordinate separation (zero order)

Alonso et al. 1204.3532: N-body ⇒ locally ∼ FRW w ΩM (r)

February et al. 1206.1602: Linear PT ⇒ ∼ 1% shift

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

The physical BAO scale

Coordinate BAO scale on lightcone known X

Physical distances given by grr = A′2(r,t)1−k(r) , gθθ = A2(r, t)

lR(r, t) =A′(r, t)

A′(r, te)learly, lT (r, t) =

A(r, t)

A(r, te)learly

LTB: evolving (t), inhomogeneous (r) and anisotropic lT 6= lR

FRW → only time evolution!

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

The physical BAO scale

Coordinate BAO scale on lightcone known X

Physical distances given by grr = A′2(r,t)1−k(r) , gθθ = A2(r, t)

lR(r, t) =A′(r, t)

A′(r, te)learly, lT (r, t) =

A(r, t)

A(r, te)learly

LTB: evolving (t), inhomogeneous (r) and anisotropic lT 6= lR

FRW → only time evolution!

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

The physical BAO scale

Coordinate BAO scale on lightcone known X

Physical distances given by grr = A′2(r,t)1−k(r) , gθθ = A2(r, t)

lR(r, t) =A′(r, t)

A′(r, te)learly, lT (r, t) =

A(r, t)

A(r, te)learly

LTB: evolving (t), inhomogeneous (r) and anisotropic lT 6= lR

FRW → only time evolution!

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

The physical BAO scale

Coordinate BAO scale on lightcone known X

Physical distances given by grr = A′2(r,t)1−k(r) , gθθ = A2(r, t)

lR(r, t) =A′(r, t)

A′(r, te)learly, lT (r, t) =

A(r, t)

A(r, te)learly

LTB: evolving (t), inhomogeneous (r) and anisotropic lT 6= lR

FRW → only time evolution!

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

The observed BAO scale

Observations → galaxy correlation in angular and redshift space

Geometric mean d ≡(δθ2δz

)1/3δθ =

lT (z)

DA(z), δz = (1 + z)HR(z) lR(z)

Different result than FRW

dLTB(z) = ξ(z) dFRW(z)

ξ(z) = rescaling = (ξ2T ξR)1/3

Inhomogeneous, anisotropic 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

1.0

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

z

ΞHz

L

Geom. Average

H ΞT2

ΞR L1 3

Transverse

rescaling ΞT

Radial

rescaling ΞR

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

The observed BAO scale

Observations → galaxy correlation in angular and redshift space

Geometric mean d ≡(δθ2δz

)1/3δθ =

lT (z)

DA(z), δz = (1 + z)HR(z) lR(z)

Different result than FRW

dLTB(z) = ξ(z) dFRW(z)

ξ(z) = rescaling = (ξ2T ξR)1/3

Inhomogeneous, anisotropic 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

1.0

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

z

ΞHz

L

Geom. Average

H ΞT2

ΞR L1 3

Transverse

rescaling ΞT

Radial

rescaling ΞR

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

MCMC data and models

ìì

øøWe are here

ç

çç

çç

çç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

çççç

ç

çç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ççççç

ç

çç

çç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

çç

çç

ç

ç

ç

çç

çççç

ç

çççç

ççççç

ç

ççç

ççç

ççççççç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

çççç

çç

çç

çççç

ç

ççç

ç

çç

çç

çç

ççç

çç

ç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

ç

çççç

çççç

çç

ç

çç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

çç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ççç

ç

ç

çç

çç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

çç

ç

ç

ç

ç

ç

õ

õ

õ

õ

õ

õ

õ

-2 0 2 4 6 8 10

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

r @ GpcD

t@G

yrD

constant tH z =0L

tH z =1L

tH z =100L

constant Ρ

CMB

z~1100

Ia SNe zd1.5

BAO zd0.8

-GBH profile: Ωin,Ωout, R, ∆R, H0, fb

- WiggleZ + Carnero et al.

- Union 2 Compilation

- H0 = 73.8± 2.4→ SNe luminosity prior

- CMB peaks information(simplified analysis)

Adiabatic LTB models: Ωout = 1 and open Ωout ≤ 1

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Adiabatic GBH, asympt. flat Ωout = 1

Filled: SNe+H0, BAO+CMB, Dashed: BAO , CMB peaks, Supernovae

Depth of the Void:

SNe → Ωin ≈ 0.1 (< 0.18)

BAO → Ωin ≈ 0.3 (> 0.2)

New: 3σ Away!!!

Local Expansion Rate:

SNe+H0 → hin ≈ 0.74

BAO+CMB → hin ≈ 0.62

known, worse if full CMB used

Do asymptotically open models work better?

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Adiabatic GBH, asympt. flat Ωout = 1

Filled: SNe+H0, BAO+CMB, Dashed: BAO , CMB peaks, Supernovae

Depth of the Void:

SNe → Ωin ≈ 0.1 (< 0.18)

BAO → Ωin ≈ 0.3 (> 0.2)

New: 3σ Away!!!

Local Expansion Rate:

SNe+H0 → hin ≈ 0.74

BAO+CMB → hin ≈ 0.62

known, worse if full CMB used

Do asymptotically open models work better?

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Adiabatic GBH, asympt. flat Ωout = 1

Filled: SNe+H0, BAO+CMB, Dashed: BAO , CMB peaks, Supernovae

Depth of the Void:

SNe → Ωin ≈ 0.1 (< 0.18)

BAO → Ωin ≈ 0.3 (> 0.2)

New: 3σ Away!!!

Local Expansion Rate:

SNe+H0 → hin ≈ 0.74

BAO+CMB → hin ≈ 0.62

known, worse if full CMB used

Do asymptotically open models work better?

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Adiabatic GBH, asympt. flat Ωout = 1

Filled: SNe+H0, BAO+CMB, Dashed: BAO , CMB peaks, Supernovae

Depth of the Void:

SNe → Ωin ≈ 0.1 (< 0.18)

BAO → Ωin ≈ 0.3 (> 0.2)

New: 3σ Away!!!

Local Expansion Rate:

SNe+H0 → hin ≈ 0.74

BAO+CMB → hin ≈ 0.62

known, worse if full CMB used

Do asymptotically open models work better?Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Adiabatic GBH, asympt. open Ωout = 1 Ωout ≤ 1

Filled: SNe+H0, BAO+CMB, Dashed: BAO , CMB peaks, Supernovae

Depth of the Void:

SNe → Ωin ≈ 0.1

BAO → Ωin ≈ 0.3

Still 3σ Away!!!

Local Expansion Rate:

Ωout ≈ 0.85↔ higher Hin

t0 ∝ 1/Hin → t0 . 12Gyr

Only better H0, but Universe too young

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Best fit models

Tension in the Void

Bad fit to SNe and BAO

SNe measure distanceBAO: distance+rescaling

complementary probes

Strongly ruled out

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

1.0

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

z

ΞHz

L

Geom. Average

H ΞT2

ΞR L1 3

Transverse

rescaling ΞT

Radial

rescaling ΞR

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Conclusions

BAO and SNe alone strongly rule out the GBH model withhomogeneous Big Bang and baryon fraction

Possible ways to save large void models:

Change the profile ΩM (r)?

Inhomogeneous Big Bang ↔ free H0

Large scale isocurvature ρb = fb(r) ρm

Purely geometrical result, whatever Luminosity & BAO scale⇒ Standard Rulers vs Standard Candles

BAO are a powerful complement to SNe in more generalinhomogeneous models

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Conclusions

BAO and SNe alone strongly rule out the GBH model withhomogeneous Big Bang and baryon fraction

Possible ways to save large void models:

Change the profile ΩM (r)?

Inhomogeneous Big Bang ↔ free H0

Large scale isocurvature ρb = fb(r) ρm

Purely geometrical result, whatever Luminosity & BAO scale⇒ Standard Rulers vs Standard Candles

BAO are a powerful complement to SNe in more generalinhomogeneous models

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Conclusions

BAO and SNe alone strongly rule out the GBH model withhomogeneous Big Bang and baryon fraction

Possible ways to save large void models:

Change the profile ΩM (r)?

Inhomogeneous Big Bang ↔ free H0

Large scale isocurvature ρb = fb(r) ρm

Purely geometrical result, whatever Luminosity & BAO scale⇒ Standard Rulers vs Standard Candles

BAO are a powerful complement to SNe in more generalinhomogeneous models

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Conclusions

BAO and SNe alone strongly rule out the GBH model withhomogeneous Big Bang and baryon fraction

Possible ways to save large void models:

Change the profile ΩM (r)?

Inhomogeneous Big Bang ↔ free H0

Large scale isocurvature ρb = fb(r) ρm

Purely geometrical result, whatever Luminosity & BAO scale⇒ Standard Rulers vs Standard Candles

BAO are a powerful complement to SNe in more generalinhomogeneous models

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Conclusions

BAO and SNe alone strongly rule out the GBH model withhomogeneous Big Bang and baryon fraction

Possible ways to save large void models:

Change the profile ΩM (r)?

Inhomogeneous Big Bang ↔ free H0

Large scale isocurvature ρb = fb(r) ρm

Purely geometrical result, whatever Luminosity & BAO scale⇒ Standard Rulers vs Standard Candles

BAO are a powerful complement to SNe in more generalinhomogeneous models

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Conclusions

BAO and SNe alone strongly rule out the GBH model withhomogeneous Big Bang and baryon fraction

Possible ways to save large void models:

Change the profile ΩM (r)?

Inhomogeneous Big Bang ↔ free H0

Large scale isocurvature ρb = fb(r) ρm

Purely geometrical result, whatever Luminosity & BAO scale⇒ Standard Rulers vs Standard Candles

BAO are a powerful complement to SNe in more generalinhomogeneous models

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Backup Slides

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Supernova Ia - Standard Candles

Standar(izable) Candles: ≈ Same (corrected) Luminosity

DL(z) =

√Luminosity

4π Flux= H−1

0 f(z,ΩΛ,ΩM ) (FRW)

difficult to model SNe ⇒ Intrinsic Luminosity unknown!!

For any L, comparison of low and high z SNe very useful

FRW: Luminosity degenerate with Hubble rate⇒ need L to determine H0

In LTB not quite true ⇒ convert constraint

H0 = 73.8± 2.4 Mpc/Km/s ↔ L = −0.120± 0.071 Mag

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Supernova Ia - Standard Candles

Standar(izable) Candles: ≈ Same (corrected) Luminosity

DL(z) =

√Luminosity

4π Flux= H−1

0 f(z,ΩΛ,ΩM ) (FRW)

difficult to model SNe ⇒ Intrinsic Luminosity unknown!!

For any L, comparison of low and high z SNe very useful

FRW: Luminosity degenerate with Hubble rate⇒ need L to determine H0

In LTB not quite true ⇒ convert constraint

H0 = 73.8± 2.4 Mpc/Km/s ↔ L = −0.120± 0.071 Mag

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

Supernova Ia - Standard Candles

Standar(izable) Candles: ≈ Same (corrected) Luminosity

DL(z) =

√Luminosity

4π Flux= H−1

0 f(z,ΩΛ,ΩM ) (FRW)

difficult to model SNe ⇒ Intrinsic Luminosity unknown!!

For any L, comparison of low and high z SNe very useful

FRW: Luminosity degenerate with Hubble rate⇒ need L to determine H0

In LTB not quite true ⇒ convert constraint

H0 = 73.8± 2.4 Mpc/Km/s ↔ L = −0.120± 0.071 Mag

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void

A-Void Dark EnergyObservational constraints

The BAO scale in LTB universesMCMC analysis

MCMC: FRW-ΛCDM reference model

Using BAO scale, CMB peaks, Supernovae and H0+BAO+CMB+SNe

BAO ∼ SNe: Arbitrarylength/luminosity (beforeadding CMB/H0)

CMB constraints muchweaker than usual1− Ωk . 1%

⇒ don’t take our CMB constraints too seriously

Miguel Zumalacarregui Tension in the Void