teaching strategy karen stewart emr 6015. includesdoes not include perceptual handicaps brain...

11
THE USE OF INSTRUCTIONAL ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Teaching Strategy Karen Stewart EMR 6015

Upload: ralf-rodgers

Post on 22-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Teaching Strategy Karen Stewart EMR 6015. INCLUDESDOES NOT INCLUDE  Perceptual handicaps  Brain injury  Minimal brain dysfunction  Dyslexia  Developmental

THE USE OF INSTRUCTIONAL ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH SPECIFIC

LEARNING DISABILITIES

Teaching StrategyKaren Stewart

EMR 6015

Page 2: Teaching Strategy Karen Stewart EMR 6015. INCLUDESDOES NOT INCLUDE  Perceptual handicaps  Brain injury  Minimal brain dysfunction  Dyslexia  Developmental

What is a Specific Learning Disability?

INCLUDES DOES NOT INCLUDE

Perceptual handicaps Brain injury Minimal brain

dysfunction Dyslexia Developmental aphasia

(Raymond, 2012)

Learning problems as a result of visual, motor, hearing disabilities

Mental retardation Emotional disturbance Environmental, cultural,

or economic disadvantage

IDEA 2004 DefinitionA disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes

involved in understanding or in using language, spoken or written, which disorder may manifest itself in an imperfect ability to listen,

speak, read, write, spell, or do mathematical calculations.

Page 3: Teaching Strategy Karen Stewart EMR 6015. INCLUDESDOES NOT INCLUDE  Perceptual handicaps  Brain injury  Minimal brain dysfunction  Dyslexia  Developmental

Assistive Technology (AT)

Assistive Technology Act, 2004:

“Any item, piece of equipment or product system, whether acquired commercially off the shelf, modified, or customized, that is used to increase, maintain, or improve the functional capabilities of a child with a disability” (Bouck, Flanagan, Miller & Bassette, 2012).

Page 4: Teaching Strategy Karen Stewart EMR 6015. INCLUDESDOES NOT INCLUDE  Perceptual handicaps  Brain injury  Minimal brain dysfunction  Dyslexia  Developmental

Examples of AT

Digital text book (Bouck et al., 2012)

Graphic organizing and cognitive software (Cobb, nd)

Speech-to-text or text-to-speech software (Forgrave, 2002)

Math software and grammar checks (Haq & Elhoweris, 2013)

iPod Touch or iPad (Cumming & Rodriguez, 2013)

Laptops (Eden, Shamir & Fershtman, 2011)

Page 5: Teaching Strategy Karen Stewart EMR 6015. INCLUDESDOES NOT INCLUDE  Perceptual handicaps  Brain injury  Minimal brain dysfunction  Dyslexia  Developmental

Practical Implementation (Uses)

Digital text book Allows students reading below grade level to

have access to content knowledge

Graphic organizing software Allows students organize thoughts for writing

prompts

Grammar checks Helps students revise written work

Page 6: Teaching Strategy Karen Stewart EMR 6015. INCLUDESDOES NOT INCLUDE  Perceptual handicaps  Brain injury  Minimal brain dysfunction  Dyslexia  Developmental

Practical Implementation

Speech-to-text and laptops Allows students with fine motor, handwriting,

OT difficulties to still share ideas and complete assignments, as well as increase spelling skills

Text-to-speech software Correct reading errors and allow access to

content knowledge

Math software Software for learning multiplication tables,

money counting, and other skills (Haq & Elhoweris, 2013)

Page 7: Teaching Strategy Karen Stewart EMR 6015. INCLUDESDOES NOT INCLUDE  Perceptual handicaps  Brain injury  Minimal brain dysfunction  Dyslexia  Developmental

Research Conducted Kidspiration- electronic graphic-organizing computer based story mapping

software used to teach the nine story grammar components. The story grammar components are title, characters, setting, time, problem, solution, outcome, reaction, and theme (Wade, Boon & Spencer, 2010).

Why? 80% of students with SLD struggle with reading comprehension Often fail to monitor and assess comprehension skills while reading

Student demographics-Title I school; two 3rd grade and one 4th grade student; all SLD and received reading, spelling and writing in self-contained class; all other subjects in general ed

Outcome-The 3 students in the test group had increases of 44%, 52%, 63% from their baseline scores in comprehension of the story grammar components

Limitations: Very small test group

(Wade et al., 2010)

Page 8: Teaching Strategy Karen Stewart EMR 6015. INCLUDESDOES NOT INCLUDE  Perceptual handicaps  Brain injury  Minimal brain dysfunction  Dyslexia  Developmental

More Research Laptops and spelling skills for students with learning disabilities

Why? Spelling deficits can be caused by difficulty with phonological

processing, slow learning pace, reading and writing difficulties, and many others.

Student demographics- 93 Israeli middle school students aged 13 to 16; all students LD and in classes of 10 to 13 students; inclusion in general education where appropriate; 54 students were in the experiment group and 39 in the control group

Students in experimental group significantly improved spelling skills as opposed to the control group

(Eden et al., 2011)

Page 9: Teaching Strategy Karen Stewart EMR 6015. INCLUDESDOES NOT INCLUDE  Perceptual handicaps  Brain injury  Minimal brain dysfunction  Dyslexia  Developmental

Other Uses of AT

Not just for instructional academics Physical impairments Behavioral modifications Life skills Improve quality of life

Page 10: Teaching Strategy Karen Stewart EMR 6015. INCLUDESDOES NOT INCLUDE  Perceptual handicaps  Brain injury  Minimal brain dysfunction  Dyslexia  Developmental

Summary

Overall, there are positive outcomes to using AT in conjunction with instruction in the classroom. Just as with any other teaching strategy, if ever an AT does not work for the student, then the use of that particular AT should be revisited and changed if needed.

Page 11: Teaching Strategy Karen Stewart EMR 6015. INCLUDESDOES NOT INCLUDE  Perceptual handicaps  Brain injury  Minimal brain dysfunction  Dyslexia  Developmental

References Bouck, E., Flanagan, S., Miller B., & Bassette, L. (2012). Technology in action: Rethinking everyday technology as

assistive technology to meet students’ IEP goals. Journal of Special Education Technology, 27(4), 47-57.

Cobb, A. (n.d.). Assistive technology: Enhancing the life skills of students with learning disabilities. Distance Learning.

8(4), 47-57.

Cumming, T., & Rodriguez, C. (2013). Integrating the iPad into language arts instruction for students with disabilities:

Engagement and perspectives. Journal of Special Education Technology, 28(4), 43-52.

Eden, S., Shamir, A., & Fershtman, M. (2011) The effect of using laptops on the spelling skills of students with learning

disabilities. Educational Media International, 48(4), 249-259.

Forgrave, K. (2002). Assistive technology: empowering students with disabilities. Clearing House, 75(3), 122-126.

Haq, F., & Elhoweris, H. (2013). Using assistive technology to enhance the learning of basic literacy skills for students

with learning disabilities. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 3(4), 880-885.

Raymond, E. (2012). Learners with mild disabilities: A characteristics approach. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Wade, E., Boon, R., & Spencer, V. (2010). Use of Kidspiration software to enhance the reading comprehension of story

grammar components for elementary-age students with specific learning disabilities. Learning disabilities: A

contemporary journal, 8(2), 31-41.