tci 2016 evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

24
Titel presentatie [Naam, organisatienaam] Working Day - Track: Academic Track Cluster Evaluation Teresa Paiva Cláudia Domingues Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

Upload: tci-network

Post on 08-Jan-2017

45 views

Category:

Economy & Finance


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

Titel presentatie[Naam, organisatienaam]

Working Day - Track: Academic TrackCluster Evaluation

Teresa PaivaCláudia Domingues

Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and

business performance

Page 2: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

Teresa PaivaCláudia Domingues

Page 3: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

• Who we are• Theoretical framework• Methodology• Results

OVERVIEW

Page 4: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

Location

Agro Food Technological Center

Page 5: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

7% Medium-size enterprises

27% Small enterprises

64% Micro enterprises/individuals

InovCluster members

Companies

Municipalities

Universities

I&DT Institutions

Associations

14081%

85%

74%

53%

148%

Page 6: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

InovCluster Companies

Main areas Dairy products

Wine and vine

Olive oil

Fish

Cereals

Meat products

Fruits and vegetables

Honey

Complementary areas

Cold Packaging Logistics Equipment Supply

Quality Control

Marketing Design

Page 7: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

• Promote the Network

• Cluster = facilitator

InovCluster Role

COMPETITIVENESS

Page 8: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

1New Products

2New Markets

3Disseminate Members

Products and services

4 Inform 5Knowledge

Transfer 6Projects Development and Support

Main Objectives

Page 9: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

Intervention Units

For the Agroindustry Sector

Page 10: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

10

Evaluation Areas

Organization of joint participation in International Trade Fairs Support companies at the internationalization process Market Monitoring Organization of Business Missions

Page 11: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

11

Evaluation Areas

Intelligence on Research & Development Technologies for Agro Food production:

Events to the dissemination of Trend Reports and improve the innovation

capabilities of our members;

Identification of the regional products that have potential to fit the new consumer

needs worldwide and that can be used to the innovation processes;

Support the process of innovation by facilitation the cooperation between

Companies and the Universities and/or ID&T Institutions;

Dissemination of the innovative products of our members;

Page 12: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

12

Theoretical framework

Exploratory Study

Summative evaluation

Counterfactual impact evaluation

Traditional evaluation perspective on direct beneficiaries

Not every aspects are going to be accountable, only the ones that are possible to measure by the cluster management

Strycznski, 2009

Raines, P., 2002

Page 13: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

13

Methodology

Documental

Survey

Internationalization

RD and Innovation

In the innovation process evaluation we have to acknowledge that the innovation process doesn’t depend only on the cluster project and support since it’s necessary learning and investment process of the business resources; All types of innovation will be registered.

Page 14: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

14

Internationalization Indicators

INDICATOR Starting frame

Goal to achieve

Deadline Results (jan.2015)

A1: Nº of awareness and promotion actions of the project 0 4 June 2015 2

A2: Number of companies present in the actions of awareness and dissemination of project

0 80 June 2015 88

A3: prospect development of awareness/dissemination of project 0 1 June 2015 1

A4: Number of BBP actins performed 0 n.a June 2015 n.aAS: number of actions for the dissemination of results and good practice 0 4 June 2015 0

A6: number of companies in attendance of dissemination of results and good practice

0 80 June 2015 0

A7: number of companies in sectors not agro industrial or actions of dissemination of results and good practice

0 20 June 2015 0

AS: total number of adherent companies 0 20 June 2015 27A9: preparation of catalogues of project presentation 0 13 June 2015 5

AlO: number of international events conducted with the brand "umbrella" Portugal Foods by INOVCLUSTER

0

8 June 2015

5

Project Evaluation impact

(intermediate evaluation)

• Overcome goals of associates engagement

• Nearly reached some indicators of activities execution

Page 15: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

15

Internationalization Indicators

Project Evaluation impact

(intermediate evaluation)

• Clearly business beneficiate of the international project activities, finding new partners and developing their international contacts

INDICATOR Starting frame Goal to achieve

Deadline Results (jan.2015)

R1: number of contacts arising from actions of internationalization

0 250 June 2015 203

R2: number of bilateral meetings (one-to-one) with potential customers in several markets, promoted by the actions of the project: promotional activities, international events and business missions and reverse

0 80 June 2015 64

R3:nºof pre agreements of formalized cooperation between the partners (as a result of the actions of the project)

0 36 June 2015 47

R4: report development with detailed information about the potential international partners (contacts, skills, projects to develop, etc.) 0 11 June 2015 6

R5: matchmaking made by lnovCluster, of meetings between companies and potential customers, in Portugal or in the target market 0 36 June 2015 33

R6:elaboração de relatórios das ações efetuadas0 11 June 2015 6

11: increase in the turnover of companies adhering to the project 0 5% June 2015 n.a

12: increase of turnover resulting from export 0 15% June 2015

n.a13: weight increase of turnover resulting from export (export/turnover total turnover) 0 15% June 2015 n.a

14: number of new countries/export markets of companies adhering to the project 0 1 June 2015 2

15: number of companies present in new countries (contacts and/or effective presence) 0 10 June 2015 49

16: global impact of design on companies face their competitive position (BBP) (evolution) 0 n.a June 2015 n.a

Page 16: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

1616

Internationalization Survey

Diagnosis:

Lack of human resources dedicated to the export process;

Lack of training in essential areas internationalization;

Lack of preparation for international actions (pre, and Post);

Lack of selection strategy/actions on international markets;

Low rate of doing business;

Lack of appropriate promotional material and adjusted to the

markets of interest

Page 17: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

17

Research questions:

When participating in the internacionalization project activities did you conduct business?

Did you started/leveraged your internationalization process with the support of Inovcluster, after your participation?

Following your participation in internationalization actions promoted by Inovcluster, did you already made a deal?

The majority of the interviewed

answer yes

The majority of the interviewed

answer “less than 10% if the times

The majority of the interviewed answer yes but the difference

between yes and no is not big

Internationalization Survey

Page 18: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

1818

Internationalization Survey

Future goals:

Increased rate of implementation of business regarding the

participating companies

Increasing export rate, resulting from the participation of

companies of Castelo Branco in international actions

Establishment of ties with potential importers identified in

international actions

Notes: Almost every interviewed answer that if he wouldn’t have participated in the internationalization project he would be just worried with the operative matters os«f

the company and the main reasons for exportation are to get rid of the product stocks; add value to the product and to diversify their clients

Page 19: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

19

General Indicators

INDICATOR Starting frame Goal to achieve

Results

Nº Cluster members 148 160 168Signed protocols 0 3 6

Work groups 0 3 6Knowledge acquisition / technical and scientific update

0 12 63

Public support promotion 0 20 2Surveys implementation 0 4 10Studies and sectorial data elaboration 0 2 7Inovcluster institutional representation 0 8 21Product development support 0 10 26New business creation support 0 2 2Events organization 0 10 50International Actions organization 0 12 14Number of business participants in the international actions

0 60 139

Communication and PromotionWritten press 0 24 28Online press 0 12 12Press conferences 0 2 1Social network /website 0 144 177

Meetings Participation / OrganizationOperational meetings 0 10 47Bilateral meetings with associates 0 30 84Bilateral meeting with potential associates 0 10 52

Meetings with national institutional management 0 4 0

Overall cluster activity

• Clear innovation promotion activity within

Page 20: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

20

Research questions:

How many interactions with the Cluster and/or CATAA did you have for innovation development?

How many interactions with HEIs and / or others research centers did you have for innovation development?

How many new products did your business launched?

Innovation Survey

Each innovation support process

implies 15 interaction in

average for each

Each innovation support process

implies 12 interaction in

average for each For the business

innovators identified in average one product was

launched

Page 21: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

2121

Products“Os Presidentes” (The Presidents)– nannies in brandy sauce (dessert)

Crackers of Castelo Branco cheese (Snack)Cottage Cheese Toast (cold dessert)

Cheese with cured ham embedded in the mass Goat cheese with various flavours

(Curry, pepper, …) -Shiitake flour

-Shiitake Preserved,- Pâté of shiitake,

- Salt flavoured with shiitake flour, herbs, ginger Mixing cheese cured with herbs

Innovation Indicators – New products launched

Page 22: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

22

CONCLUSIONS

Summative evaluation permitted to access the cluster effectiveness

Counterfactual impact evaluation clearly quantified the cluster effect that wouldn’t exist without the cluster intervention

Inovcluster was effective in its contribution to improve the internationalization process of the local business as seen in the number of post meeting contacts

If the international project wouldn’t have existed the business would remain without improve their exportations and just focusing in the operational management

Inovcluster was effective in its contribution to improve the innovation process of the local business as seen in the number of reunions and contacts between Research centers and

busness and for the number of innovation registered

Without innovation promotion business wouldn’t launch so many new products and/or the new products might not be acepted

Page 23: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

23

Limitations

Number of business involved in the research

No analysis of the origin of the impact effect

No analysis of the impact dimension

No analysis of the temporal effect

Page 24: TCI 2016 Evaluation of the cluster impact on innovation and business performance

24

Teresa [email protected]

Cláudia [email protected]

Luis Pinto de [email protected]

[email protected]

www.inovcluster.ptEdifício do Centro de Apoio Tecnológico Agro-Alimentar

Zona Industrial de Castelo Branco, Rua A6000-459 Castelo Branco

Tel. +351 272 349 100 Fax. +351 272 349 101

CONTACTS

Thank you for

your attention