tbr's management consulting webinar
DESCRIPTION
TBR’s second semi-annual iteration of our comprehensive management consulting benchmark provides analysis on areas of growth and investment aligning to the change that has shaped the industry. Acquisition strategies have shifted, growth from technology innovation is positioning firms to win big, and focus areas of cloud, social media, BI/analytics and mobility are driving enterprise clients to invest. Join Senior Analyst Liz Leonard as she discusses•Aggregate increases or declines in performance across the 16 firms covered in the benchmark•Key areas of growth driving enterprise clients to seek consulting led investments•How firms are boosting revenues by leveraging global delivery methods a way similar to IT consultingTRANSCRIPT
TBR
T EC H N O LO G Y B U S I N ES S R ES EAR C H , I N C .
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PRACTICESM
Beyond the Jargon: TBR’s 2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Report
WEBINAR
Liz Leonard ([email protected]), Professional Services Practice Senior Analyst
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc.
TBR’s 2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark provides insights into competitive approaches and opportunities
Management Consulting CY2011 Firm Dynamics
• Talent, technology, facilities
Investments
• Industry specialization
Offerings Strategy
• Resource mix, utilization, profit
Delivery
Key Areas Covered and Questions Answered
2
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc.
Leading firms compete on breadth and depth, align capabilities to opportunities
Vendors currently included in the study are:
Beyond the Jargon: Approach and Vendors
The output of this study includes:
• Executive summary and report comparing headcount, business metrics and vendor strategies
• 16 in-depth profiles on each benchmark consulting firm
• Database and Excel pivot table
• Analyst knowledge transfer
3
Deloitte Accenture McKinsey Mercer
PwC IBM Bain Aon Hewitt
KPMG Capgemini BCG Towers Watson
E&Y A.T. Kearney Booz & Co. Oliver Wyman
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc.
Benchmark firms cluster into groups whose assets vary in relevance to growing demand for technology-enabled business consulting
Focal Points
Management Consulting Benchmark
•Deloitte •Ernst & Young •KPMG •PWC
•A.T. Kearney •Bain •BCG •Booz & Co. •McKinsey
•Accenture •Capgemini •IBM
•Aon Hewitt •Mercer •Oliver Wyman •Towers Watson
Management Consulting Benchmark Segment Overview
Segments
4
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc.
Continued growth in 2011 was born from relevant alignment of offerings with high-priority business issues
Management Consulting Benchmark Revenue Growth
CY2011 Revenue (in $ million) and Revenue Growth (vs. CY2010)
SOURCE: TBR AND BENCHMARK FIRMS
62.3%*
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
De
loit
te
Pw
C
Ern
st &
Yo
un
g
KP
MG
McK
inse
y
BC
G
Ba
in
Bo
oz
& C
o.
AT
Ke
arn
ey
Acc
en
ture
IBM
Cap
gem
ini
Me
rce
r
To
we
rs W
ats
on
Ao
n H
ew
itt
Oliv
er
Wym
an
BigFour
StrategyLed
SolutionsLed
HR/Specialty
*This data point was adjusted to present the data in a more visually readable way.
5
Re
ven
ue
in $
mill
ion
s
Perc
ent
Gro
wth
Yea
r-to
-Yea
r
Management Consulting Revenues and Growth
• Total 2010 to 2011 from $48.3 billion to $56.1 billion, 17.3% YtY growth
• Deloitte, PwC, McKinsey, Accenture, E&Y led in revenues through strategic scale, reputation, breadth and depth
• Growth leaders Aon Hewitt, KPMG, PwC, Accenture, Deloitte driven by key investments, acquisitions
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc.
Industry alignment within service line capabilities and acquired expertise drove leading firms’ positions in 2011
CY2011 Headcount & Revenue Growth in Millions (vs. CY2010)
SOURCE: TBR AND BENCHMARK FIRMS
Deloitte
PwC
Ernst & Young
KPMG
McKinsey
Bain
BCG
Accenture
IBM
Mercer
Towers Watson
Capgemini
Aon HewittHeadcount Growth:
36%; Revenue Growth:
62.3%*
Oliver Wyman
Booz & CoAT Kearney
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
-15% -5% 5% 15% 25% 35% 45%
Re
ven
ue
Gro
wth
%
Headcount Growth %
.
6
Management Consulting Benchmark Headcount and Revenue Growth
Benchmark of Revenues and Headcount
• Benchmark firms drove annual average growth rate of 17.3% in CY2011
• Acquisitions in key growth regions also drove headcount among leaders Deloitte, E&Y and PwC
• Revenue laggards in 2H11, Booz & Co. and IBM GS suffered exposure to weak economies that dragged down management consulting deals.
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc.
Management consulting firms continued to invest, specialize and improve bottom-line results in CY2011
Revenue growth correlates to headcount volume, driving scale of talent demand in an essential relationship-led business.
Investments driven revenues
Leaders go-to-market with deep vertical expertise emphasizing significant growth industries and competitive focus.
Industry-specialized offerings
High utilization rates coupled with lower-cost resource leverage improves operating margin.
Efficiencies enable profit
Key Market Drivers: Headcount and Capacity, Industry Alignment, Efficient Delivery
7
Management Consulting Benchmark Market Drivers
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc.
Firms increased investments in headcount, tools and locations to expand global operations
Benchmark firms expanded consulting headcount, increased technology-led delivery innovations and global footprint.
Investing in people, technologies and
locations
• CY2011 headcount growth enabled breadth and capacity to capitalize on opportunities
• Big Four firms led headcount base and growth through acquisitions and headcount investments aligned to demand, Strategy-led is second largest with relatively slow headcount growth
Investments Growth
8
Management Consulting Investments Overview
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc. 9
Total MC headcount grew to expand capacity in both billable and non-billable employees in CY2011
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
Pw
C
De
loit
te
Ern
st &
Yo
un
g
McK
inse
y
Acc
en
ture
IBM
Me
rce
r
To
we
rs W
ats
on
BC
G
Ao
n H
ew
itt
KP
MG
Ba
in
Oliv
er
Wym
an
Cap
gem
ini
Bo
oz
& C
o.
AT
Ke
arn
ey
Man
age
me
nt
Co
nsu
ltin
g H
ead
cou
nt
Gro
wth
Y/Y
Man
age
me
nt
Co
nsu
ltin
g H
ead
cou
nt
TOTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING BILLABLE VERSUS NON-BILLABLE HEADCOUNT AND GROWTH
Billable Headcount Non-Billable Headcount
Billable Headcount YtY Growth Non-Billable Headcount YtY Growth
TBR
SOURCE: TBR AND COMPANY DATA
Management Consulting Investments Overview
• Aggregate billable headcount growth rate vs. non-billable • Increased leverage of centralized research and client-delivery support
personnel, as firms increased standardization and realize improved profit form leverage of lower cost resources
Billable and Non-Billable Headcount and Year-to-Year Growth
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc.
Fast-growing and core geographies grew as firms compete on scale
Key Geo Insights
• Americas remains home to the majority of resources with 45% of global headcount and 13% YtY growth
• U.S. is single largest country for MC headcount and grew by nearly 14% YtY
• EMEA’s fast growing areas (MENA) enabled 10% headcount growth YtY for the region
• APAC led in growth for CY2011, headcount up 18% however is still smallest global region overall
Americas Total Headcount: 88,200
% of Global Headcount: 45%
Management Consulting Investments Overview
EMEA Total Headcount: 72,100
% of Global Headcount: 36%
APAC Total Headcount: 38,500
% of Global Headcount: 19%
Management Consulting Headcount by Region
10
Average Total Headcount Growth Overall: 10.5%
Benchmark Leaders Headcount Growth Overall: 17.5% (Top 6)
US Total Headcount: 71,350
% of Global Headcount: 36%
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc.
Financial Services and Healthcare present opportunities
Firms increased
capabilities and
offerings that align to
strategic industries to
build depth and
capitalize on growing
demand
Offerings increasingly align to industry
priorities
Management Consulting Industry Overview
Industry-led Growth and Specialization
11
Financial Services Consulting CY11 Revenue and Revenue Growth in Millions (2011 vs. 2010)
Healthcare Consulting CY11 Revenue and Revenue Growth in Millions (2011 vs. 2010)
• Largest vertical remains Financial Services at $14 billion for CY2011
• 17% aggregate revenue growth for financial services on YtY basis
• $4 billion in CY2011, but growing
• 22% average YtY revenue growth per firm for healthcare sector
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc.
Industry-specific expertise drives opportunity for specialization
Tactics to Capture
Opportunity
Vertical
Financial Services
$14 billion
17%
• Acumen in reform, compliance with latest regulations
• Global reporting methods excellence
• Transform operating models, product/service portfolios
• Leverage of analytics, mobility, social media
High Tech, Comm. & Media
$8 billion
18% • Presence,
relationships and knowledge of fast-growing adjacent markets
• Competitive marketing and pricing strategies
• Guide through regional regulatory impact
Industrial Solutions/Manu.
$7 billion
21.2% • Innovation for
efficient supply-chain operations
• Leverage integrated multichannel customer distribution model.
• Develop global expansion plans based on regional analysis.
Energy & Utilities
$8 billion
17%
• Expertise in new service access, infrastructure planning in India and China
• Strategy services for long-term sustainability and optimization of resource mix
• Regional utility insights around Smart Grid technologies
Verticals of Focus With Benchmark Total Leading Vertical Revenues and year-to-year Average Revenue Growth for 2011
12
Management Consulting Industry Overview
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc.
Vertically aligned contribution to firms’ revenues reveal areas of client traction, alignment and investment for firms in 2012
Increasing industry depth across service line offerings in 2011 indicates where firms are heading in terms of both capabilities and focal clientele in 2012
Source: TBR and Benchmark firms Key: LOWHIGH MEDIUM
13
Del
oit
te
Ern
st &
Yo
un
g
KP
MG
Pw
C
AT
Kea
rney
Bai
n
BC
G
Bo
oz
& C
o.
McK
inse
y
Acc
entu
re
Cap
gem
ini
IBM
Ao
n H
ewit
t
Mer
cer
Oliv
er W
yman
Tow
ers
Wat
son
Financial Services 26.2% 29.8% 20.0% 28.1% 11.9% 27.6% 22.3% 18.0% 18.7% 19.0% 19.4% 25.0% 22.3% 34.3% 47.7% 31.3%
Retail 5.6% 6.5% 9.0% 11.9% 22.3% 9.7% 11.2% 6.2% 4.5% 2.1% 4.2% 7.1% 4.7% 10.6% 14.1% 7.5%
Energy & Utilities 9.2% 13.3% 9.9% 15.2% 19.4% 11.7% 12.0% 11.5% 19.9% 18.5% 12.1% 6.3% 16.5% 12.9% 10.2% 13.4%
High Tech, Communications & Media 11.7% 22.5% 16.9% 11.2% 13.8% 16.7% 14.5% 20.9% 13.6% 21.8% 9.3% 9.5% 18.4% 9.2% 6.8% 19.6%
Industrial Solutions/ Manufacturing 15.2% 6.5% 16.5% 6.4% 13.7% 17.5% 11.0% 12.9% 13.2% 12.3% 17.4% 12.4% 20.7% 20.6% 6.8% 11.8%
Public Sector 4.9% 7.0% 11.8% 9.7% 3.9% 5.6% 8.8% 8.4% 13.1% 13.8% 21.0% 10.1% 8.2% 3.9% 2.8% 2.9%
Healthcare 11.7% 7.0% 7.5% 6.4% 7.8% 3.1% 8.4% 4.1% 9.7% 5.5% 5.7% 6.9% 4.6% 2.2% 5.4% 5.2%
Consumer Packaged Goods 12.6% 4.5% 3.4% 9.2% 5.8% 8.1% 3.1% 7.7% 4.0% 6.9% 4.6% 3.6% 1.2% 1.9% 1.9% 0.8%
Other 3.0% 2.9% 5.0% 1.9% 1.3% 0.0% 8.8% 10.3% 3.3% 0.1% 6.3% 19.3% 3.5% 4.5% 4.2% 7.5%
Big Four Strategy-led Solutions-led HR/Specialty
Management Consulting Industry Overview
Industry Revenue Contribution per Firm in CY2011
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc.
MC firms increased utilization through service delivery sophistication
Standardization, resource mix and utilization drove profitability.
Efficient resource leverage
• Increased leverage of standardization, automation, and communication enabled utilization rates for more sophisticated vendors (i.e., Accenture up 100 basis points, McKinsey up 150 basis points since 1H11).
• Efficient internal communications platforms (Yammer, other social media) facilitate multi-location teams’ success and enabled reach to global clientele.
Management Consulting Delivery Overview
Efficient Delivery Methods
14
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
AC
CEN
TU
RE
MC
KIN
SEY
BC
G
BO
OZ
& C
O.
KP
MG
PW
C
BA
IN
IBM
AO
N H
EW
ITT
OLI
VE
R W
YMA
N
TO
WE
RS
WA
TSO
N
ER
NST
& Y
OU
NG
AT
KE
AR
NE
Y
DE
LOIT
TE
ME
RC
ER
CA
PG
EM
INI
Pe
rce
nta
ge
2011 MANAGEMENT CONSULTING UTILIZATION RATE BY VENDOR
SOURCE: TBR AND COMPANY DATA
TBR
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc. 15
Strategy-led firms averaged most profitable segment, holding down costs and driving up utilization in CY2011
RANKING COMPANY
1 33.3% MCKINSEY
2 26.3% BCG
3 23.8% BOOZ & CO.
4 22.5% BAIN
5 20.5% PWC
6 16.8% IBM
7 16.5% DELOITTE
8 16.0% KPMG
9 15.5% AT KEARNEY
10 14.8% ERNST & YOUNG
11 13.9% TOWERS WATSON
12 13.3% ACCENTURE
13 10.5% CAPGEMINI
14 7.5% AON HEWITT
15 6.0% OLIVER WYMAN
16 5.4% MERCER
TOP 3 COMPANIES
TBR
Management Consulting Delivery Overview
Operating Margin Metrics and Benchmark Leaders
• McKinsey’s operating margin is 21% higher than next closest peer, attributed to maturity of its operating methods, high utilization rates and cost containment
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc.
Firms are opportunistic with investments, developing portfolios that align to clients’ highest priorities
How are MC firms meeting demand?
Investing for Growth
Added depth, industry expertise
Innovating for Efficiency, Profit
Management Consulting Trends
Responding and
delivering on the ever-
evolving inventory of
client needs
Reacting to changing
economic climate to
provide the highest-
value services
16
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc.
TBR’s 2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark report includes profiles for 16 vendors with key competitive metrics
Example Firm Profile: Key Competitive Metrics
Semi-annual and Year-to-Year revenue changes
Regional revenue, headcount, partners, billable, non-billable
resource mix
Service line revenue contribution to total
revenue per firm
17
Service Lines 2H11 (% of revenue)
Metrics
1H10 2H10 1H11 2H11 2010 2011 Year to Year 2H10 to 2H11
Americas
Revenue (in $ mill ions) $1,012 $1,106 $1,241 $1,363 $2,118 $2,604 22.9% 23.2%
Headcount 6,150 6,399 6,802 7,202 6,399 7,202
Partners 381 398 426 452 398 452
Bil lable Employees 5,386 5,603 5,958 6,308 5,603 6,308
Non-Billable Employees 764 796 844 894 796 894
U.S.
Revenue (in $ mill ions) $831 $909 $1,021 $1,123 $1,740 $2,144 23.3% 23.6%
Headcount 4,350 4,498 4,815 5,148 4,498 5,148
Partners 269 280 302 323 280 323
Bil lable Employees 3,853 3,984 4,266 4,566 3,984 4,566
Non-Billable Employees 497 514 549 583 514 583
EMEA
Revenue (in $ mill ions) $1,014 $1,068 $1,190 $1,227 $2,082 $2,417 16.1% 14.9%
Headcount 5,200 5,300 5,600 5,890 5,300 5,890
Partners 323 326 348 368 326 368
Bil lable Employees 4,550 4,643 4,907 5,157 4,643 5,157
Non-Billable Employees 650 657 693 733 657 733
APAC
Revenue (in $ mill ions) $318 $360 $417 $449 $678 $867 27.8% 24.9%
Headcount 3,150 3,301 3,598 3,908 3,301 3,908
Partners 167 184 196 210 184 210
Bil lable Employees 2,681 2,809 3,061 3,327 2,809 3,327
Non-Billable Employees 470 492 537 581 492 581
18.4%
14.4%
18.4%
18.1%
14.6%
13.2%
11.1%
12.9%
11.1%
11.6%
12.5%
13.5%
12.6%
12.4%
14.5%
15.4%
Accenture: Management Consulting Geography Metrics
Half-Year Full Year Percent Change
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc.
TBR’s 2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark provides insights into competitive approaches and opportunities
Management Consulting CY2011 Firm Dynamics
• Talent, technology, facilities
Investments
• Industry specialization
Offerings Strategy
• Resource mix, utilization, profit
Delivery
Key Areas Covered and Questions Answered
18
TBR
T EC H N O LO G Y B U S I N ES S R ES EAR C H , I N C .
For additional information please contact:
Liz Leonard, Professional Services Practice Senior Analyst
Alison Crawford, Marketing Director
James McIlroy, Sales Director
www.tbri.com
11 Merrill Drive Hampton, NH 03842
TBR
T EC H N O LO G Y B U S I N ES S R ES EAR C H , I N C .
QUESTIONS
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc.
Terms Defined and Report Overview
21
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc.
Management Consulting Benchmark Metrics: Terms Defined
22
Terminology Definition
Billable Employees Any employees who perform professional services that may or should be billed to clients as part of contractual agreement; these employees contribute more billable hours than non-billable hours to their organization.
Non-billable Employees Any employees who perform professional services or activities common to all clients as part of doing business or in support roles for the organization; these employees contribute more non-billable hours than billable hours to their organization.
Partners
Principal leaders of consulting organizations who often contribute capital and usually share in the risks and profits of the organization; TBR includes all levels of partners and most senior organizational leaders (regardless of title or capital contribution) as part of the management consulting benchmark partner definition and calculations that factor partners.
Attrition Rate
The number of billable employees who voluntarily turn over within a certain period; TBR uses a multichannel approach to attain the information in our attrition rate estimates and assumes the understanding [as a calculation] to be: Attrition rate (%) = Number of billable employees resigned for the period/total number of employees for the period.
Utilization Rate The billing efficiency of an individual or a firm; current utilization rates in the management consulting benchmark are self-reported by the firms based on their calculation. Utilization rate calculation = Number of billed hours for the period/fixed number of expected total work hours for the period, typically between 2,000 and 2,100 hours annually.
Operating Margin/Profitability
Operating margin is equal to operating profit divided by revenue. Operating profit is total revenue less all costs before adjustment for taxes, dividends to shareholders and interest on debt. TBR uses a multichannel approach to attain the information in our profitability rate estimates and assumes the understanding [as a calculation] to be: Operating margin = Operating income/revenue.
Revenue per Employee Revenue per Employee is the ratio that indicates a firm's sales performance in relation to number of employees. TBR assumes the understanding [as a calculation] to be: Revenue per employee = Total revenues/total headcount; for half-year calculations derivative factors are multiplied by two to align to annual performance.
2H11 Management Consulting Benchmark Webinar
TBR
©2012 Technology Business Research Inc.
TBR’s Management Consulting Benchmark provides revenue and resource analysis by region, service line and vertical
Management Consulting Benchmark Report Overview
Vendors Firm Segments Service Lines Regions Verticals Key Metrics Time Period
•Deloitte
•Ernst & Young
•KPMG
•PWC
•AT Kearney
•Bain
•BCG
•Booz & Co.
•McKinsey
•Accenture
•Capgemini
• IBM
•Aon Hewitt
•Mercer
•Oliver Wyman
•Towers
Watson
• Solutions-led
• Strategy-led
• Big Four
• HR/Specialty
•Strategy
•Operations
o HR
o Supply
chain
o Finance &
Accounting
o CRM/
Customer
o Governance,
Risk &
Compliance
•Organization &
Change
•Technology
• Americas
• U.S.-only
• EMEA
• APAC
•Financial
services
•Retail
•Energy &
Utilities
•High Tech,
Comm., and
Media
• Industrial
solutions/
Manufacturing
•Public sector
•Healthcare
•Consumer
Packaged
Goods
•Other
• Revenue by:
o Service line
o Region
o Verticals
• Headcount
(partners, billable,
non-billable) by:
o Service Lines
o Regions
• Operational
Metrics
o Profitability
o Utilization
o Attrition
• Current report
includes data
for:
o 1H10
o 2H10
o 1H11
o 2H11
o CY 2010
o CY 2011
• TBR’s Management Consulting Benchmark is a semi-annual deliverable providing key service line, regional, vertical and operational data and analysis across 16 leading management consulting firms.
• Benchmark deliverables include:
o Executive Summary and Report
o Appendix data
o 16 Individual firm reports
o Database and Excel pivot table Management Consulting Benchmark Coverage
23