targets versus extension family planning

Upload: ritika-kaushik

Post on 02-Mar-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/26/2019 Targets Versus Extension Family Planning

    1/14

    Targets versus Extension Education: the Family

    Planning Programme in Uttar Pradesh, India

    R O B E R T E.E L D E R , JR.

    INTRODUCTION

    indeveloping countries, face the difficult task ofbringing ab out needed social

    in a

    relatively sho rt time . Those governm ents which claim

    to

    be dem ocratic are faced

    ofbringing abo ut such change in a manner consistent with the

    s proclaimed values.Inthese societies, tensions have frequently resulted because ad-

    a

    quantifiable am oun t of change should take

    aspecified period , as well as requiring inform ation on the reasons for change to be

    This paper utilizes data from the family planning programme

    in

    U ttar Pradesh, Ind ia,

    in

    to take precedence over the extension-education aspect of anadministrative pro-

    atthe rate of approximately two per cent per year, swallowing up a

    or po rtion of economic gains when the Indian government early in 1963 initiated a program me

    in

    materializing and U ttar Pradesh , being one

    of

    the least developed Indian

    lagged far behind most others in early efforts.*

    During 1964 and 1965, several new concepts were introduced into the p rogram me s metho-

    ^ The data presented

    in

    the paper which follows result from

    a

    multi-phase study of the U ttar Pradesh Family

    to

    114 block extension educa tors, 100 health assistants and 56 block dev elopment officers.

    a 60 per cent response.

    a

    check on the validity

    of

    statements made by the family p lanning and development staff

    anassessment of the demographic characteristics of 1,606

    ectomy cases from seven districts in Utta r P rade sh; a on e-district, 22 village survey of villagers attitude s towa rd

    a survey of the attitudes of 42 members of the legislative assembly from 28 districts in Uttar

    samples were intentionally overlapped in order to include attitudes from as many of U ttar Prad esh s

    districts as possible and ultimately every district was included in some phase of this study. Fo r further informa-

    inregard todata collection including the q uestionnaires as they were admin istered, see R obe rt E.Elder,

    a

    N orth Indian State, (unpublished Ph .D . dissertatio n. Du ke U niversity, 1971X

    s I-V III, pp. 355-439. Hereafter this will be cited as Elderop

    cit

    ^ Government of Ind ia, Departm ent of Family Planning D irective No./40/63FP ,Family Planning Programme

    (New Delhi,4October 1963).

    ^ Uttar P radesh, Departm ent of Family Planning Directive N o. FP/4057/E12/65 from S. L. Talvar to all District

  • 7/26/2019 Targets Versus Extension Family Planning

    2/14

    250 ROBERT E. ELDfiR, JR .

    than a family planning worker, who motivated the case to come for the operation.^ In 19

    following the approval of the Lippes loop as a safe and effective method of female contracept

    by the Indian Council of Medical Research, the Centre approved and requested the States

    institute a similar scheme with slightly smaller incentives for the intra-uterine contracep

    device.^

    Closely connected with the creation of these two programmes was the introduction of

    'target' concept. Beginning in 1965, each State was given and encouraged to achieve a tar

    based on its population of couples eligible for family planning. States with the best achieveme

    received awards and publicity, thus encouraging a spirit of healthy competition.

    In 1966, one additional achievement technique, the 'drive' or 'family planning fortni

    was introduced. These were two-week periods in which the staffs of various departments as w

    as family planning p ersonnel were given targets and encourag ed to m ake special efforts to achi

    them. Beginning in 1966, the number of declared fortnights national, state, and local, w

    increased each year, until in1968,from August until January, with the exception of two two-w

    periods in October and Nov ember, the family p lanning program me in U ttar P radesh was occup

    in one continual drive.

    The introduction of these new methods risked pushing family planning workers in

    direction of a quantity-oriented approach to family planning, but also raised a number of ad

    tional problems. What would be the effect of multi-agency fortnights on relationships betw

    different categories of block level workers and on family planning staff morale Would it

    possible for revenue and development workers who were totally untrained in family planni

    to bring properly motivated, demographically valid cases to family planning camps The inc

    tive of ten rupees represented a large sum of money for an Indian peasant, approximately f

    times his daily wage. Would this be extension education, or bribery? Would a high-press

    programme encourage voluntary change or engender negative feelings on the part of the tar

    population Finally, in a programme the future support of which would depend on a popula

    elected legislature, how would negative popular reactions to the programme affect legislat

    attitudes of support for family planning The remainder of this paper has been devoted to exp

    ing the issues raised above and reporting negative ramifications of the programme methodol

    outlined above.

    ADMINISTRATIVE METHODOLOGY AND THE FAMILY PLANNING WORKER

    According to the Raina Report, extension educators were to be the key to family plann

    extension edu cation in the block. W hat was the effect of targets, drives and incentives on the w

    ^ Utta r P radesh, De partmen t of Fam ily Planning Directives No. F P/l 104/XVI

    1-49/64 Intensification

    of St

    zation

    under

    the Family

    Planning

    Scheme (Lueknow, 18 April 1964), p. 1. The incentive fee to be given to the

    being motivated was increased shortly after the imp lementation of the program me from ten to 15 rupees.

    ^ Utta r P radesh, D epartme nt of Family Planning D irective No. nil, Intra-uterine Contraceptive Device

    Programme

    from

    i

    5-/7-65

    (Lueknow, June 1965), p. 1.

    Information in regard to the continuous-drive situation became known to this author because of relation

    established with different training centres throughout the State. Training centres were unable to procure suffic

    trainees from the field because of the reluctance of superior officers to release them for training during the d

    periods.

    ^ The Raina Report refers to B. L. Raina,Family Planning ProgrammeReport for1962 63(New De lhi: G

    ment Press, April 1963). In consultation with the block medical officer and f emale surgeon the extension educ

    was required to plan and organize extension services in collaboration with other block

    staff

    foster and main

    co-operative and productive relationships with both formal and informal leaders in the block, organize meet

  • 7/26/2019 Targets Versus Extension Family Planning

    3/14

    TARGETS VS EXTENSION EDUCATION

    251

    which they perceived and attempted to implement their role? In the spring of 1968, a survey

    sconducted involving 114 block extension educators in which an attempt was made to answer

    question.^ To summarize briefly, the study discovered that although family planning workers

    receiving training in extension education techniques, once they went into the field they

    perceived that it wasthe number of cases rather than their quality that wasmost important

    their superior officers. The 114 respondents, when asked whether their superior officers were

    interested in extension education techniques than the fulfilment oftargets gave the answers

    in Table 1.

    TABL E 1.Block extension

    educators'

    composite ssessmentofsuperior

    officers'

    commitmenttoqu lit tivevs. qu ntit tive progr mme

    Number

    97

    106

    107

    106

    104

    Officer

    Block Medical Officer

    District Family Planning Officer

    Block Development Officer

    Sub-Divisional Magistrates

    TASOS*

    *

    Total average

    Quanti-

    tative

    5 8

    74

    8 4

    9 3

    7 7

    superior officer score.

    Quali-

    tative

    4 2

    2 6

    16

    7

    2 3

    Significance

    Not signif.

    001

    001

    001

    001

    Source:

    Elderop. cit. Block Extension Educator Administered Questionnaire , p. 189.

    Superior

    officers were tending to punish subordinates who proved unable to fulfil their

    on a regular basis. The method most frequently utilized was dismissal or the threat of

    Dismissal

    however, was not the only method utilized to punish the worker. His pay could

    stopped, his touring allowance (expense account) might be cut off, or he might receive a

    that if his record did not improve he would be

    dismissed.

    ^

    Thatinsecurity of tenure and role ambiguity contributed to lowered morale on the part of

    planning workers was indicated by the low job satisfaction scores given them by their

    officers presented in Table 2 below.

    TABLE 2. Job diss tisf ction of block extensioneduc torsasviewedby district

    f mily pl nning officersandblock development officers

    Number

    34

    56

    Officer

    District Family Planning Officer

    Block Development Worker

    Block extension.educator

    Satisfied Not satisfied

    16

    25

    84

    75

    Significance

    001

    001

    Source:

    Elderop .cit. Mailed District Family Planning Officer Questionnaire and Adminis-

    tered Block Development Officer Questionnaire, pp. 357, 409.

    For a brief explanation of the manner in which various parts of this study were carried out see footnote 1.

    The author was unable to ascertain the exact number of dismissals each year, but a fairly accurate estimate was

    le. 34 district family planning officers who responded to a written mailed questionnaire involving their job

    There were 510 blocks represented in the 34 districts. This would appear to indicate a termination level

  • 7/26/2019 Targets Versus Extension Family Planning

    4/14

    252 ROBERT E. ELD ER, JR.

    Block extension education reflected a dissatisfaction rate still higher than the estimates

    their superio rs. Only two out of 18 interviewees were satisfied with their job . Mo st seemed aw

    tha t their perform ance was less than satisfactory, bu t generally attribu ted job difficulties to fac

    beyond their control: low status, lack of power, and the constant threat of dismissal. A bl

    extension educator from Allahabad District accurately reflected the feelings of block extens

    educators interviewed when he said:

    M y mo rale is very mu ch dow n. There is n o reward even if I do the best w ork. As the jo

    only temporary, the threat of dismissal always hangs over my mind. Because of this, I have

    give more time to flattery an d acting as a yes-man to the oflicers and less time to my actual wo

    Otherwise, these people m ay repo rt against me and I ll be turned out the next day. Here we

    getting m ore than Rs. 300 ifwecan get even 200; with self respect and security of

    job,

    we wo

    resign this next

    REL ATIO NSH IPS BETWEEN DIFFEREN T CATEGORIES OF WORK ERS AND MU LTI-

    A G E N C Y F O R T N I G H T C O N C E P T

    An increasingly large pa rt o fthe family p lanning w orke rs inability to procure cases was due to

    fact that multi-agency fortnights forced them to compete for targets with members of ot

    agencies. Each of th e stafl s with w hom the family plan ning w orkers w ere being forced to comp

    possessed suflicient power to command favours and/or obedience from villagers. The blo

    development staff controlled seeds, fertilizers, and the granting of loans. Members of the hea

    st ff such as the sanitary engineer, administered food adulteration statutes and thus had c

    siderable control over the merchant castes, and revenue workers dealt with tax collection a

    land redistribution. Even basic health workers brought medicines to the villages and so posses

    some power.

    All these categories of workers had been of some assistance to family planning workers

    making con tacts with villagers prior to the institution of multi-agency family plann ing fortnights

    However, at the point where they became involved in the family planning programme th

    also became subject to targets and the threat of

    dismissal.

    ^

    In competition with more powerful revenue and development staffs, family planning work

    were not able to compete on an equal basis. Table 3 indicates comparative achievement statist

    for family planning, revenue and planning staffs in seven districts of Uttar Pradesh during a t

    month period in 1968-1969.

    When revenue and development workers were forced to achieve targets, co-operation w

    family planning workers virtually ceased and competition became intense. Two examples giv

    by family planning worker interviewees show the sort of competitive situation which existed.

    Case I: Taken at the Cam p

    A., a health assistant from Jaunpur District, had worked two days in Kyothali Villa

    preparing two cases for a family planning vasectomy camp which was to be held near the blo

    dismissal rate reported by block extension educators was comparable to that given by the district family plann

    officers, it is easy to see that the overall discipline rate w as considerably higher. E lder,

    op . cit..

    Part 3, Block Ext

    sion E ducators A dministered Questionnaire , p. 369.

    ^ Block Extension Edu cator, A llahabad D istrict, Oral Com munication, Jan uary 1969.

  • 7/26/2019 Targets Versus Extension Family Planning

    5/14

    TARGETS VS EXTENSION EDUCA TION 253

    namasthe

    (hello, greetings). Before he could greet them, B., a

    lekhpal

    (revenue worker)

    bighasof

    C , a health assistant from M athu ra D istrict, motivated two cases for vasectomy. The village

    Because there was no officer in the block with sufficient interest in the cause of the family

    behalf,

    the lot of the health assistants and block extension

    ^

    T A B L E 3 . Vasectomy cases brought by family planning. revenue and planning

    staffs

    in

    first ten mon ths of

    1968 69

    Divisions

    Lucknow Division A

    Meerut Division A

    Lucknow Division B

    Lucknow Division C

    Agra Division A

    Nainital Division A

    Meerut Division B

    Planning

    414(28%)

    157(28%)

    168(32%)

    405(51%)

    1,270(27 )

    979 (40%)

    608 (32%)

    4,001 (32%)

    Revenue

    518(35%)

    111(20%)

    152(2900)

    109(14%)

    3,061 (65%)

    683 (28%)

    448 (24%)

    5,082(41 )

    Family

    planning

    *500(34%)

    *192(35o)

    115(22^)

    277 (35/)

    347(17%)

    494 (20 0)

    514(27%)

    2,439(20 )

    * This figure includes cases brought by both Health and Famil>

    Others

    34(2 / )

    92(17%)

    88(17O

    0(0%)

    26 (Po )

    318(13%)

    335 (18%)

    893(7%)

    ' Planning

    Total

    1,466

    552

    523

    791

    4,704

    2,474

    1,905

    12,415

    Staff.

    Source : These figures were collected from statistics available at seven district planning bureau s

    visited during the month of December 1968.

    WO STUDIES OF CASE QUALITY

    SINGH PRAI ST UDY, 1 96 6

    above, family planning

    The result, according to extension educator interviewees and newspaper coverage of the

    rogramme, was that the cases that were brought were having little impact on efforts to lower the

    individuals who were sick, or too young, as well as a large number of untouchables.'^

    '* Health Assistant Jau npu r District, Oral Com mu nication, Novem ber 1969,

    '* Health Assistant Math ura District, Oral Comm unication, October 1968.

  • 7/26/2019 Targets Versus Extension Family Planning

    6/14

    254 ROBERT E . ELDER , JR.

    Although research in this area has been extremely limited, such studies as have been car

    out tend to support these findings. Prior to January 1969, only two studies on vasectomy

    been undertaken in Uttar Pradesh.

    One of these carried ou t by the State Family Planning De partm ent in 1965, indicated tha

    least 30 per cent of all cases operated on for vasectomy were over age. A more intensive st

    undertaken early in 1966 analysed 1,000 persons motivated for vasectomy in the Baraba

    District. Investigators looked at records at the primary health clinics where the operations

    been carried out and questioned each patient on his age, marital status, and number of childr

    living and deceased. The essence of the findings are presented in Tables 4 and 5 blow.

    T A B L E

    4 . ge of vasectomy respondents as recorded and

    verified

    Age

    Below 30 years

    30-39

    40-44

    45-49

    50 and above

    Official records

    1

    23

    29

    33

    14

    On the spot verification

    3

    17

    14

    17

    49

    Source: Ranbir Singh, 'A Study of Sterilization Cases in a District of Uttar

    Pradesh', Research Section, Rural Health Division, Planning Research

    Action Institute (Lucknow: 1966, unpublished, mimeographed, 20 pp.), p. 13.

    T A B L E 5.

    Types of persons vasectomized

    Types

    Having wives 45 or older

    Unmarried

    Widower or separated

    With wives below 45 years of age

    (1) Having one or no child

    (2) Having two female children

    (3) Ha ving two c hildren excluding (2) above with the

    youngest child not exceeding five years

    Total

    Per cent

    35-5

    6 0

    21 0

    1-7

    0 4

    2 4

    67 0

    Source: Ranbir Singh, 'A Study of Sterilization Cases', p. 15.

    As is evident from these tables, substantial discrepancies existed between the ages record

    in ofiicial records and the actual ages as verified by this investigation team. 67 per cent of

    cases examined did not meet government requirements for a valid vasectomy.

    E L DE R S T U D Y , 1 9 6 8

    In December 1968, the author attempted to discover whether variations in the quality of ca

    brought by different agencies might be a major factor contributing to the rising number

    Vasectom y', 3 July 1967, p. 3 ; 'Seventy-two Year O ld M an U ndergoes Vasectomy', 3 May 1968, p. 7; 'For

  • 7/26/2019 Targets Versus Extension Family Planning

    7/14

    T RGETS

    VS

    EXTENSION EDUC TION

    255

    T A B L E

    6. Percentage of husb nds45 years of age or over brought in for

    vasectomy by

    different gencies

    H u s b a n d s

    Dist r ict

    Aligarh

    Almorah

    Barabanki

    H ar do i

    Lucknow

    Meerut

    Muzzafarnagar

    Naini tal

    Si tapur

    Base

    Mean Percentage

    over 45

    Total by

    district

    167

    19 1

    2 0 4

    118

    291

    14 2

    2 7 4

    17 2

    4 7

    1606

    Family

    planning

    2 0 %

    3 1 %

    26//

    27/o

    3 7%

    9 %

    13%

    35/o

    25//

    28/o

    Revenue

    4 7 %

    46/o

    43//

    22/o

    43/o

    2 3 %

    4 9 %

    44/o

    3 5 %

    39%

    Percentage

    Planning

    43//

    4 1 %

    35/o

    1 1 %

    38/o

    4 6 %

    28/o

    33/o

    17%

    33/o

    of total

    Heal th

    80/o

    0 %

    55/o

    60/o

    9 o

    I3/o

    1 0 %

    2 0

    3 3 %

    3 1 %

    Other

    0

    0

    13/

    0

    0

    0

    2 7 %

    0

    0

    4 %

    Sou rce: Inform ation for Tab le 6 was procured from a selected sam ple of vasectom y patien ts

    from the distr icts me ntioned abo ve, 10 Dece mb er 1968 - 14 Jan ua ry 1969.

    T A B L E 7.

    Husbands with

    wives

    aged 38 or over by agency

    District

    Al igarh

    A l m or ah

    Barabanki

    H ar do i

    Lucknow

    Meerut

    Muzzagarnagar

    Naini tal

    Si tapur

    Base

    Mean Percentage

    Total by

    district

    165

    185

    198

    118

    2 92

    14 7

    2 72

    157

    4 7

    1581

    Family

    planning

    1 6 %

    2 3 %

    2 6 %

    2 2 %

    20/o

    17%

    23/o

    2 1 %

    0 %

    19%

    Revenue

    4 6 %

    54/o

    2 4 %

    52/o

    49/o

    37/o

    52/o

    3 1 %

    50 %

    4 4

    Planning

    6 9%

    2 0 %

    73/o

    17%

    4 9 %

    4 6 %

    30/o

    1 1 %

    4 1 %

    4 0 %

    Heal th

    6 0 %

    20//

    5 2 %

    50/o

    4 6 %

    2 8 %

    18%

    0 %

    67/o

    3 8 %

    O t h e r

    0

    2 5 %

    33/o

    67/o

    2'o

    0 %

    37/o

    2 0 %

    O^^o

    2 0 %

    Source: Information for Table 7 was obtained from a selected sample of vasectomy patients

    from the districts mentioned a bov e, 10 Dec emb er 1968 - 4 Janu ary 1969.

    As was indicated in Tables 6 and 7 above, revenue staff workers were bringing in larger

  • 7/26/2019 Targets Versus Extension Family Planning

    8/14

    256 ROBERT E. ELDER, JR.

    As

    regards proportions of patients who did not meet vasectomy criteria, results were alm

    asdiscouraging as the Singh Study cited above. Table 8 presented below indicates that 62 p

    centof the men in the sample tested had wives aged 38 or over, five or more children, or both.

    Itmight be argued that for a relatively recent programme involving the type ofsocialchan

    required, the family planning programme was making substantial progress. Elderly people,

    thosewho had large families, were making some demographic contribution to the programm

    In

    addition, a nucleus of family planning acceptors was being created in each village which wo

    make vasectomy appear less and less anti-social for those who still remained to be motivate

    If this was the government s intention, then the present policy may in some cases have be

    successful.

    TAB L E 8. Number of men in the sample with wives aged 38 or over five or

    mor

    children

    or both

    District

    Aligarh

    Almorah

    Barabanki

    Hardoi

    Lueknow

    Meerut

    Muzzafarnagar

    Nainital

    Sitapur

    Total number

    t Total number

    Total

    number

    cases

    165

    185

    198

    118

    292

    147

    157

    47

    1,581

    of cases

    of cases

    Number of

    of men with

    Number of Five or

    casesf

    wife 38 or over

    92

    60

    98

    45

    128

    51

    81

    28

    21

    in which data on

    in which data on

    163

    205

    203

    107

    301

    147

    261

    170

    47

    1,604

    wives were

    number of

    more

    children

    84

    87

    47

    51

    128

    61

    121

    78

    67

    available.

    children were

    Number

    with

    both

    129

    122

    75

    201

    11

    151

    96

    28

    available.

    Source:

    Information for Table 8 was obtained from a selected sample of vasectomy cases

    from the districts mentioned above, 10 December 1968 to 14 January 1969.

    Yet the government was making frequent pronouncements about the number of birt

    preventedby vasectomies performed each year. Until the autumn of 1968 it had made no eff

    tocollect the age breakdown of patients undergoing vasectomy and may have been misleadi

    itselfas to the number of births it was in fact preventing. Furthermore, the distortions wh

    occurred

    daily as a result of the pressure to achieve targets were having as great a negative

    and a woman aged 38 approximately 24

    years.

    45 and 38 years and over were selected as cut-off ages for males

    females respectively, not only because it was reasonable to assume that a man or woman will have achieved m

    of his or her family by this time, but also because of the distortion of agefiguresdiscussed in the early PRAI stu

    Age is very diflficult to ascertain at the village level and in a programme where popular acceptance is not equa

    the targets which must be achieved it is likely that age distortion continued to occur at approximately the s

    frequency as was ascertained in the PRAI study. District Family Planning Officers interviewed, with one except

    gave estimates of invalidity ranging from 50 per cent to 75 per cent and agreed that statistics given in case c

    and vasectomy registers were, generally speaking, understated. For this reason the relatively high percentage

    marginal cases which appeared in this sample gave some cause for alarm. If all case ages were increased by

    five years, between 40 and 45 per cent of the cases in the sample selected would be invalid on the basis of age alo

    ^ Although it is fairly easy to understand why the bringing in of wives over age is no positive contribution

    lowering of the birth rate, the category of five or more children presented in Table 8 deserves explanation. Si

    the programme is attempting to limit families to two or three children, vasectomizing family heads who have

  • 7/26/2019 Targets Versus Extension Family Planning

    9/14

    T RGETS

    VS

    EXTENSION EDUC TION

    2 5 7

    w s just as likely that programme policies

    ER TTITUDES TOW RD F MILY PL NNING

    T A B L E 9 . Programmeorg niz tion andimplement tionas perceived by villagers

    multipleresponse

    Affirmative Per

    Base 335 responses cent

    The workers rarely visit the villages, no systematic education programme is

    conducted.

    Workers only talk of loop or vasectomy; they do not talk of anything else

    W orkers are scolded by people wherever they go. People even chase them ou t

    of the village. They do this because they talk only of vasectomy.

    People are only forced to become acceptors but the follow-up of the case

    after vasectomy does not happen.

    Workers come and collect data about family members. People get scared.

    The wrong type of people are forced to take vasectomy simply to inflate the

    numbers.

    People are given allurements and false promises are made. Sugar, blankets,

    and even land are promised, bu t these promises are not often kept.

    Pradhans

    (village leaders) are used to pu t pressure on prospective acceptors.

    Workers come and make night halts, properly educate people, do not force

    people to accept exhibitions, cinema shows are organized. Sometimes,

    meetings are also organize d by them . 31 9-3

    We have had little contact with the programme or its personnel and could

    not give an answer in regard to programme organization or implementa-

    tion. 103 30 7

    Source: Elder, op. cit., Village Level Qu estionnaire, p. 415.

    81

    55

    8

    9

    49

    9

    30

    4

    24-2

    164

    2-4

    2-7

    146

    2-7

    9 0

    1-2

    T A B L E 10 .

    Whether

    Base 335

    It should be continued to run as it

    It needs revisions and changes

    Do not know

    the

    progr mme

    is

    organizationneeds

    any revision

    Frequency

    43

    132

    160

    Per

    cent

    12-8

    39-4

    47-8

    Source: Elder, op. cit.. Question 1 1, Village Level Qu estionn aire, p. 415.

    Village respondents were asked three questions in regard to the attitudes which they held

    toward family planning workers and the programme as it was currently being administered:

    he manner in which the family planning programme was organized (Table 9), whether they

  • 7/26/2019 Targets Versus Extension Family Planning

    10/14

    258 ROBERT E. ELDE R, JR .

    long-range goals of family planning, and yet were periodically confronted with the nega

    results of a target-oriented, time-bound programme which left a number of acceptors dissatisf

    At best, their reactions were to suggest that changes must take place before the program

    would gain acceptance. Moreover, a substantial percentage of the sample studied (49 per ce

    who were willing to make suggestions in regard to the programme, would have abolished

    altogether.

    T A B L E 1 1 .

    Suggested modifications of programm e m ade b y respondents who

    felt that modifications should take place - multipleresponse

    Per-

    Base 132 Frequency cent

    More emphasis on education, efforts to be more concentrated on females -

    more frequent visits by workers - efforts and demonstration of recanaliza-

    tion of vasectomy.

    Vasectomy operation should be performed only on eligible couples.

    More emphasis should be on mass publicity and group meetings.

    There should be extensive follow-up of acceptors.

    More efforts should be on making female acceptors for IUCD, tubectomy,

    etc. - as they can effectively prevent pregnancies more than men. Muslims

    should also be asked to accept family planning.

    Treatment of sterile couples.

    There should be efforts to popu larize simple me thods. Associated problem s

    such as sepsis, bleeding, etc. should be minimized by providing medicines. 10 7-6

    Workers should not manipulate or make false promises or force acceptance.

    Prom ises should be fulfilled. 5 3-8

    Workers and government officials should accept family planning first.

    Legislation in supp ort of the progra mm e should also be passed. 3 2 3

    Lands should be given as incentive for vasectomy. Programme should be run

    through acceptors. Marriage age should be raised to 28 for males and 22

    for females. 4 3-0

    Family planning should be eliminated altogether. It is against religion.

    Vasectomy leads only to impotence and causes both physical and mo ral 64 48-5

    deterioration.

    14

    12

    11

    10

    8

    7

    106

    9 1

    8-3

    7-6

    6 1

    5-3

    Source: Elder,

    op. cit.

    Village Level Qu estion naire, p. 415.

    ttitudesof ElectedRepresentatives

    In a dem ocratic contex t popu lar d issatisfaction will be mirrored in the attitude s of elected offici

    and, in a democratic state, administrators operate and implement programmes only at the d

    cretion of popu larly elected officials. The section w hich follows p resents results of an examinat

    of the attitudes of a selected sample of Uttar Pradesh legislators in an effort to ascertain t

    extent to which such a reaction had already occurred.^^

    One area of legislator opinion which was examined concerned the manner in which

    programme was being implemented and whether or not they felt that their constituents w

    favourably inclined toward it. Respondents were asked to estimate what percentage of

    patients in their district brought in for family planning were demographically invalid and w

    percentage they thought were brought in by non-extension education as opposed to extensi

    education techniques. Respondents answers are presented in Tables 12 and 13.

  • 7/26/2019 Targets Versus Extension Family Planning

    11/14

    TARGETS VS EXTENSION EDUCA TION 259

    T A B L E 12.

    How many of the cases being brought in for vasectomy and loop

    in yourconstituency are valid?

    Responses -

    invalid

    90 and over

    70-89

    50-69

    25-50

    0-25

    r e q u e n y

    28

    3

    4

    5

    2

    r

    e n t

    67

    7

    2

    5

    Source: Elder, op. cit. 'M.L .A. Qu estionnaire,' p. 438.

    29

    7

    3

    2

    69

    7

    7

    5

    2

    T A B L E 13. What percentage

    of th e

    cases being brought

    i nfrom your

    constituency

    havebeenproduced bynon extension education techniques

    Responses - Per

    non-educational Frequency cent

    90 and above

    70-89

    50-69

    25-50

    0-25

    No answer

    Source: Elder,

    op. cit.

    'M.L.A. Questionnaire', p. 438.

    ssure to achieve was particularly strong, many people who could make little or no con tribution

    When questioned on the opinions of their constituents concerning family planning, the

    T A B L E 14. What percentageof yourconstituency wouldyou say i sfavourableto

    t h e family

    planning programme

    as it is currently being

    administered ?

    Per

    Unfavourable Frequency cent

    90 and above

    70-80

    50-69

    25-49

    0-25

    Source: Elder,

    op. cit.

    'M.L.A. Questionnaire,' p. 438.

    It is evident from responses presented in Tables 12 to 14 that legislators had concluded that

    34

    6

    2

    8

    4

    5

  • 7/26/2019 Targets Versus Extension Family Planning

    12/14

    26o

    ROBERT E . ELDER , JR.

    Responses presented above indicated that a significant majority of Uttar Pradesh legisla

    in mid-1969 felt that the programme as administered was neither popular nor effective. On

    basis of these feelings, they were unwilling to grant additional funds for the present programm

    53 per cent of the sample studied suggested that funds be cut. In terms of development, fam

    planning was clearly at the bottom of their lists.

    Unless a popular base of support for the programme is created, the central governm

    will have to sup port it indefinitely. Such a con sensus w ill be difficult to create w ithou t the hel

    elected representatives, the majority of whom in 1969 were hostile to the programme. They

    T A B L E

    15 . Rankthefive activities listed belowin terms oftheir

    importance to India sdevelopment

    Activities Frequency

    Agriculture 181

    Education 147

    Ru ral industries 127

    Ru ral health 110

    Fam ily planningf 71

    * First ranks in priority were given five points, last ranks one and totals

    for 42 respondents added for each development area in order to obtain

    figures presented above.

    t The Governm ent of India had given family planning num ber two

    priority in the Fourth Five Year Plan, In light of this, the fact that family

    planning was given such a low priority by Uttar Pradesh legislators is

    especially significant.

    Source: Elder, op. eit., M ,L,A. Questionnaire, p, 438,

    T A B L E 16, Shouldallocations in regardtofamily planning be raised or lowered

    or remain the same

    Responses Frequency Per

    cent

    Should receive less

    Raised without qualification

    Raised if properly utilized

    Remain the same*

    Stopped completely

    * This could be seen as a negative statement because at this time most of the money for the

    financing of family planning programmes is being given to the State by the Centre,

    Source: Elder, op. eit., M ,L.A . Qu estionnaire, p, 434,

    that family planning was already being given far greater priority than it deserved. It is like

    that a major reason for both pop ular and legislative hostility tow ards the program me was cau

    by the distortions which had occurred as a result of the changes in programme methodolo

    begun in 1965.

    8

    5

    6

    9

    14

    19

    12

    14

    21

    33

  • 7/26/2019 Targets Versus Extension Family Planning

    13/14

    TARGETS VS EXTENSION EDU CATION 26 I

    The large-camp, large-incentive approach assembles as many as 100 doctors in mobile

    The theory behind this approach is that when large numbers of people from a given area

    The large-camp approach has seemingly solved the problem of target achievement, but what

    Case quality figures at the Gorakhpur camp have not yet been

    Another disturbing factor concerns the quality and quantity of case follow-up. Because of

    es they have no t even b rought in themselves

    Sepsis in even a small number of cases may further

    Further, the emphasis of the large incentive fee approach represents a rejection of the exten-

    on education appro ach. E xtension edu cator s mo rale, which was already low, may have

    ^^ Oral comm unication w ith Professors George and Ruth Simm ons, Popu lation Planning Staff University of

    ld also be app ropriate at this time to express appreciation to Eric Brown, my student assistant, for providing

  • 7/26/2019 Targets Versus Extension Family Planning

    14/14