Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan

Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2

October 19, 2016

Agenda

• Welcome / Introductions

• Master Plan Process and Project Status

• Forecast of Aviation Demand

• Overview of Facility Requirements

• Next Steps

• Open Discussion

Public Involvement Program

• Technical Advisory Committee Meetings

• Airport Advisory Committee Briefings

• Tallahassee City Commission Briefings

• Public Open House

• Airport Website

Technical Advisory Committee• Community leaders that provide input into long-range

planning for City consideration.• Intended as a forum to freely present issues, ideas, and

provide guidance in planning for future aviation facilities.

• Provide diverse representation of community interests and opinions relative to airport development to address all issues of concern to the community and region.

• Provide input related to aviation, community, political, planning and legal issues.

• Public Involvement Role

Master Planning Process

Major Objectives• Optimize the operational efficiency,

effectiveness, capability and safety of the airport;

• Enhance the economic and social value of the airport;

• Meet the long-range aviation needs of the community;

• Ensure that current and future airport plans are environmentally compatible and in harmony with local and regional plans and objectives; and

• Provide planning options that are consistent with these project goals.

Existing Facilities

Importance of Forecasts

• To develop a realistic assessment of market conditions and market performance.

• To address unique local conditions not fully considered in national, macro level forecast efforts.

• To provide a benchmark for comparing current facilities against a reasonable estimate of future demand to define potential future facility needs.

Passenger Enplanements Forecast

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

20

35

Scenario 1 Scenario 2

Airline Operations ForecastYear

Total

Passengers

Scheduled Operations Unscheduled OperationsTotal

OperationsTurboprop Jet Total

% Total

OperationsJet

% Total

Operations

Airline Scenario 1

2015 670,144 2,292 10,936 13,228 99.36% 85 0.64% 13,313

2020 728,803 2,411 11,638 14,049 99.33% 95 0.67% 14,145

2025 794,295 2,569 12,401 14,970 99.31% 103 0.69% 15,073

2030 865,617 2,738 13,213 15,951 99.30% 112 0.70% 16,063

2035 943,295 2,917 14,079 16,996 99.30% 120 0.70% 17,116

AAGR

2015-20351.72% 1.21% 1.27% 1.26% 0.00% 1.74% 0.47% 1.26%

Airline Scenario 2

2015 670,144 2,292 10,936 13,228 99.36% 85 0.64% 13,313

2020 834,787 2,411 13,481 15,892 99.41% 95 0.59% 15,987

2025 1,011,109 2,569 16,086 18,655 99.45% 103 0.55% 18,759

2030 1,087,388 2,738 16,898 19,636 99.43% 112 0.57% 19,748

2035 1,170,136 2,917 17,764 20,681 99.42% 120 0.58% 20,801

AAGR

2015-20352.83% 1.21% 2.46% 2.26% 0.00% 1.74% -0.51% 2.26%

Combined Operations

Combined Operations Forecast

Year

Airline Cargo Military General AviationTotal

OperationsOperations % Total Operations % Total Operations % Total Operations % Total

2015 13,313 22.98% 1,370 2.37% 13,065 22.56% 30,173 52.09% 57,921

2020 14,145 23.48% 1,440 2.39% 13,065 21.69% 31,593 52.44% 60,243

2025 15,073 24.03% 1,513 2.41% 13,065 20.83% 33,081 52.73% 62,733

2030 16,063 24.58% 1,591 2.43% 13,065 19.99% 34,638 53.00% 65,356

2035 17,116 25.13% 1,672 2.45% 13,065 19.18% 36,269 53.24% 68,122

AAGR

2015-20351.26% 0.45% 1.00% 0.18% 0.00% -0.81% 0.92% 0.11% 0.81%

Facility Requirements

• Critical Aircraft Identification• Airfield Capacity and Configuration• Airfield Design Standards• Runway Length Analysis• Runway Strength Analysis• Airfield Lighting, Markings and Signage, and Navigational Aids• Instrument Approaches• Transient Apron and Based Aircraft Storage• Airport Support Facilities• Land Use Considerations• Airport Security Analysis

Critical Aircraft IdentificationAircraft Approach Category (AAC) Airplane Design Group (ADG)

CategoryApproach Speed

(Knots)Group

Tail Height

(Feet)

Wingspan

(Feet)

A <91 I <20 <49

B 91 to <121 II 20 to <30 49 to <79

C 121 to <141 III 30 to <45 79 to <118

D 141 to <166 IV 45 to <60 118 to <171

E >166 V 60 to <66 171 to <214

VI 66 to <80 214 to <262

Critical Aircraft Boeing 757-200 Freighter

Aircraft Type Twin-Engine Jet

Aircraft Approach Category/Approach Speed C / 137 Knots

Airplane Design Group/Wingspan IV / 125 Feet

Runway Design Code (RDC) RDC C-IV

Tail Height 125 Feet

Taxiway Design Group (TDG) TDG-4

Max Takeoff Weight (MTOW) 255,000 Pounds

Max Landing Weight (MLW) 210,000 Pounds

Airfield Capacity

TLH Airfield Capacity Calculations

YearAnnual Hourly

Operations% ASV

(195,000)VFR Peak Hour

% VFR Capacity (74)

IFR Peak Hour% IFR Capacity

(57)2015 57,921 29.70% 13 17.57% 21 36.84%

2035 68,122 34.93% 11 14.86% 29 50.88%Source: Michael Baker International, Inc., 2016.

• 60% Threshold – Plan Improvement

• 90% Threshold – Construct Improvements

– Consider a by-pass taxiway at Runway 9 end

Airfield Design Standards Analysis (Runway 9-27)

Design Standard Required Dimension Runway 9 Runway 27

Runway Design Code (RDC) RDC C-IV

Taxiway Design Group (TDG) TDG-4

RW Approach Visibility Minimums Varies by End 1 Mile CAT II

Runway (RW) Width 150 Feet Meets Standards

RW Safety Area (RSA) Width 500 FeetMeets Standards

RSA Length Beyond RW End 1,000 Feet

RW Object Free Area (ROFA) Width 800 FeetMeets Standards

ROFA Length Beyond RW End 1,000 Feet

RW Obstacle Free Zone (ROFZ) Width 400 FeetMeets Standards

ROFZ Length Beyond RW End 200 Feet

RW Protection Zone (RPZ) Inner Width 9 (500 Feet) 27 (1,000 Feet)

Meets Standards Extends Off Airport (23.9 Acres)RPZ Outer Width 9 (1,010 Feet) 27 (1,750 Feet)

RPZ Length 9 (1,700 Feet) 27 (2,500 Feet)

RW Blast Pad Width 200 FeetMeets Standards

RW Blast Pad Length 200 Feet

RW Shoulder Width 25 Feet Meets Standards

Taxiway (TW) Width 50 Feet Meets Standards

TW Safety Area (TSA) Width 171 Feet Meets Standards

TW Object Free Area (TOFA) Width 259 Feet Meets Standards

Taxilane (TL) Object Free Area Width 225 Feet Meets Standards

TW Shoulder Width 20 Feet No Paved Taxiway Shoulders

RW Centerline to Parallel TW Centerline 400 Feet Meets Standards

RW Centerline to Holdline 250 Feet Meets Standards

RW Centerline to Aircraft Parking Area 500 Feet Meets Standards

TW Centerline to Parallel TW/TL Centerline 215 Feet Meets Standards

TW Centerline to Fixed or Movable Object 129.5 Feet Meets Standards

TL Centerline to TL Centerline 198 Feet Meets Standards

TL Centerline to Fixed or Movable Object 112.5 Feet Meets Standards

RW Surface Gradient and Line of Sight Max ±1.5% Meets Standards

Source: Michael Baker International, Inc., 2016.

Runway 9-27 Design Standards

Runway 18-36 Design StandardsAirfield Design Standards Analysis (Runway 18-36)

Design Standard Required Dimension Runway 18 Runway 36

Runway Design Code (RDC) RDC C-IV

Taxiway Design Group (TDG) TDG-4

RW Approach Visibility Minimums Varies by End ¾ Mile ½ Mile

Runway (RW) Width 150 Feet 150’ (Meets Standards)

RW Safety Area (RSA) Width 500 FeetMeets Standards

RSA Length Beyond RW End 1,000 Feet

RW Object Free Area (ROFA) Width 800 FeetMeets Standards

ROFA Length Beyond RW End 1,000 Feet

RW Obstacle Free Zone (ROFZ) Width 400 FeetMeets Standards

ROFZ Length Beyond RW End 200 Feet

RW Protection Zone (RPZ) Inner Width 18 (500 Feet) 36 (1,000 Feet)

Meets StandardsRPZ Outer Width 18 (1,010 Feet) 36 (1,750 Feet)

RPZ Length 18 (1,700 Feet) 36 (2,500 Feet)

RW Blast Pad Width 200 FeetMeets Standards

RW Blast Pad Length 200 Feet

RW Shoulder Width 25 Feet Meets Standards

Taxiway (TW) Width 50 Feet Meets Standards

TW Safety Area (TSA) Width 171 Feet Meets Standards

TW Object Free Area (TOFA) Width 259 Feet Meets Standards

Taxilane (TL) Object Free Area Width 225 Feet Meets Standards

TW Shoulder Width 20 Feet No Paved Taxiway Shoulders

RW Centerline to Parallel TW Centerline 400 Feet Meets Standards

RW Centerline to Holdline 250 Feet Meets Standards

RW Centerline to Aircraft Parking Area 500 Feet Meets Standards

TW Centerline to Parallel TW/TL Centerline 215 Feet Meets Standards

TW Centerline to Fixed or Movable Object 129.5 Feet Meets Standards

TL Centerline to TL Centerline 198 Feet Meets Standards

TL Centerline to Fixed or Movable Object 112.5 Feet Meets Standards

RW Surface Gradient and Line of Sight Max ±1.5% Meets Standards

Source: Michael Baker International, Inc., 2016.

Airfield Design Standards Analysis

Runway Length AnalysisBoeing 757-200 Freighter Runway Length Requirements

Operation Runway ConditionPratt & Whitney

(PW2040)Rolls Royce

(RB211-535E4)Takeoff Runway 9-27 MTOW, 83 Feet AMSL, 59° F 7,569 Feet 7,369 FeetTakeoff Runway 9-27 MTOW, 83 Feet AMSL, 84° F 7,969 Feet 7,669 FeetTakeoff Runway 18-36 MTOW, 83 Feet AMSL, 59° F 7,667 Feet 7,467 FeetTakeoff Runway 18-36 MTOW, 83 Feet AMSL, 84° F 8,067 Feet 7,767 FeetLanding

BothMLW, Dry Runway, 59° F 5,100 Feet 4,700 Feet

Landing MLW, Wet Runway, 59° F 5,900 Feet 5,400 FeetSources: Boeing 757-200 Aircraft Performance Manual and Michael Baker International Inc., 2016.MTOW –Maximum Takeoff WeightMLW – Maximum Landing Weight

Airfield Pavement Conditions

Airfield Lighting

• Maintain runway lighting (HIRLs)

• Taxiway and apron edge lighting is reaching end of useful service life

– Upgrade taxiway lighting system to LED

– Upgrade apron edge lights to LED

• Rotating beacon near end of useful service life

Airfield Markings

• Existing markings consistent with FAA standards

• Maintain existing airfield marking and surface painted holding position signs

• Consider taxiway edge markings in conjunction with airfield improvements

Airfield Signage

• Maintain existing signage

• Consider signage improvements in conjunction with future airfield development projects

– Replace older signs with LED type

Apron and Aircraft Storage

• Additional 4,266 SY of transient apron required

• Construct 16 additional t-hangars

• Additional 25,000 SF of conventional hangar space required

General Aviation TerminalGeneral Aviation Terminal Demand

Year Factor Square

Feet Peak Hour Operations

GA Existing Terminal

Square Footage

Required Building

Square Footage Surplus (Deficit)

2015 2.5 100 21 11,400 SF 5,250 SF 6,150 SF

2020 2.5 100 23 11,400 SF 5,750 SF 5,650 SF

2025 2.5 100 25 11,400 SF 6,250 SF 5,150 SF

2030 2.5 100 27 11,400 SF 6,750 SF 4,650 SF

2035 2.5 100 29 11,400 SF 7,250 SF 4,150 SFSource: Michael Baker International, Inc., 2016

Fuel StorageProjected Demand and Fuel Storage Requirements

Demand/ Year Commercial

Demand GA Demand Total Demand 7-Day Demand

Available Capacity

Surplus/ Deficit

Jet A

2015 2,280,915 1,184,428 3,465,343 66,641 120,000 53,359

2020 2,497,950 1,220,011 3,717,961 71,499 120,000 48,501

2025 2,742,422 1,257,236 3,999,658 76,917 120,000 43,084

2030 3,016,241 1,296,233 4,312,474 82,932 120,000 37,068

2035 3,323,366 1,337,069 4,660,435 89,624 120,000 30,376

AvGas

2015 N/A 139,445 139,445 2,682 25,000 22,318

2020 N/A 150,081 150,081 2,886 25,000 22,114

2025 N/A 157,150 157,150 3,022 25,000 21,978

2030 N/A 164,546 164,546 3,164 25,000 21,836

2035 N/A 172,293 172,293 3,313 25,000 21,687Source: Michael Baker International, Inc. 2016

Air CargoAir Cargo Facility Space Requirements

YearTotal Cargo

(lbs.)

Total Approximate Cargo (Tons)

Space Ratio Projected Space

Demand (Square Feet)

Existing Available Space

(Square Feet)Surplus/ Deficit

2015 19,045,447 9523 1.0 9523 23,000 13,4772020 21,780,325 10,890 1.0 10,890 23,000 12,1102025 22,891,341 11,446 1.0 11,446 23,000 11,5542030 24,059,029 12,030 1.0 12,030 23,000 10,9702035 25,286,281 12,643 1.0 12,643 23,000 10,357

Source: 2013 Airports Council International- North America (ACI-NA) Air Cargo, Michael Baker International, Inc., 2016.

Terminal Access Terminal Access Roadway Capacity Demand

Year

Total

Peak Hour

Passengers

80% Automobile OtherAvg. Day Peak Hour

Vehicles 1Existing Roadway

Capacity (VPH) 2VPH Surplus/

(Deficiency)

2015 1,000 800 100+200 1,100 1,800 700

2020 1,100 880 110+220 1,210 1,800 590

2025 1,200 960 120+240 1,320 1,800 480

2035 1,420 1,136 142+284 1,562 1,800 238Source: FAA AC 150/5360-13, Planning and Design Guidelines for Airport Terminal Facilities, Michael Baker International, 2016.

Notes:

1) ADPH vehicles includes all arriving and departing passenger traffic. Other includes higher occupancy vehicles and an allowance of an additional 20% for vehicles serving

non-passenger traffic.

2) Capacity per lane at grade primary access road at or below 30 mph = 900 Vehicles per Hour. Estimate that 80 percent of users arrive by private vehicle. Remaining 20

percent arrive via higher occupancy commercial vehicles.

Curb Frontage Terminal Passenger Curb Frontage Requirements

Requirement 2015 2020 2025 2035

Peak Hour Total Passengers 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,420

Vehicle (Lin Ft) Demand 787 865 944 1,117

Existing Curb Length (Lin. Ft.) 950 950 950 950

Existing Double Parking Capacity (Lin Ft) 1 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900

Surplus/(Deficiency) (Lin Ft) 1,113 1,035 956 783Source: FAA AC 150/5360-13, Planning and Design Guidelines for Airport Terminal Facilities; ACRP Report 25, Airport Passenger Terminal Planning and

Design; Michael Baker International, Inc., 2016.

Public ParkingPublic Parking Requirements

ITEM 2015 2020 2025 2035

Peak hour Passengers 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,420

Total Public Parking Space Demand 1 1,500 1,650 1,800 2,030

Long-Term Parking Space Demand 2 1,125 1,237 1,350 1,522

Short-Term Parking Space Demand 3 375 412 450 508

Existing Parking Space Capacity (LT/ST) 1,330/307 1,330/307 1,330/307 1,330/307

Public Parking Surplus / (Deficit) (LT/ST) 170/(68) 93/(105) (20)/(143) (192)/(201)Source: FAA AC 150/5360-13, Planning and Design Guidelines for Airport Terminal Facilities; Michael Baker International, Inc. 2016.

Note:

1) 1.5 times Peak Hour Passengers

2) .Long-term demand = .75 * Total Parking Space Demand

3) Short-term demand = .25 * Total Parking Space Demand

Landside Evaluation Areas

Next Steps

• FAA Forecast Review – Under review

• Facility Requirements – Under review

• Sustainability Visioning – Jan 2017

• Airport Alternatives – Jan 2017

• Public Information Meetings – Jan/Feb 2017

• Alternatives Refinement, ALP, Financial Analysis/CIP – May 2017

• Draft Deliverables – June 2017

Open Discussion