systems of classification order from chaos when you need a new pair of shoes, what do you do? you...
TRANSCRIPT
Systems of Classification
Order From Chaos
• When you need a new pair of shoes, what do you do? You probably walk confidently into a shoe store, past the tens or hundreds of pairs of shoes you don’t want and straight to the kind you do want. How do you find them? Shoes are organized in the store in categories. People organize objects by grouping similar objects together.
Section 18-1
Interest Grabber
Go to Section:
Systems of Classification
1.Consider the task facing early biologists who attempted to organize living things. How might they have begun?
2.Suppose that you have been given a green plant, stringy brown seaweed, a rabbit, a mushroom, a worm, and a grasshopper. You’ve been asked to organize these things into categories that make sense. How would you do it?
3.Decide on your categories and write each on a sheet of paper. Next to each category, write the defining characteristics of that category. Then, write in the organisms that fall into each category.
Section 18-1
Go to Section:
Systems of Classification
• 18–1 Finding Order in DiversityA. Why Classify?
B. Assigning Scientific Names1. Early Efforts at Naming
Organisms
2. Binomial Nomenclature
C. Linnaeus’s System of Classification
Section 18-1
Section Outline
Go to Section:
Systems of Classification
KEY CONCEPT Organisms can be classified based on physical similarities.
Systems of Classification
What is the purpose of classification?
**Taxonomy:
The study of classification and giving each organism a unique name.
Why not use common names?
Binomial Nomenclature:
The 2-part scientific name each species is given.
Genus:
A group of closely related species.
Taxon: A group or level of organization
Systems of Classification
Classification• grouping of objects based on similarities (clothes,
dishes, etc.)
Humans like to organize their world so early on we grouped or classified everything we saw.
.
Systems of Classification
Systematics
• classification system that groups organisms according to evolutionary relationships– Based on common descent (idea that any two
organisms can trace back to a common ancestor)– identifies species, determines their relationships to
known organisms, and gives them names.
Systems of Classification
1. Organize huge amounts of information
~1.5 million species named
A MINIMUM of 10 million different kinds of organisms expected
Systems of Classification
2. Accurate identification of existing and new species
http://www.igreens.org.uk/archeopteryx_solnhofen3.jpg
http://extra.listverse.com/amazon/edge/echidna.jpghttp://www.show.me.uk/dbimages/chunked_image/2007_0538.jpg
Systems of Classification
3. Consistent names for communication
• Cougar, mountain lion, snow cat, screaming cat, panther, puma
• 30+ common names
Systems of Classification
Scientific names help scientists to communicate. – Some species have very similar common names.– Some species have many common names.
Systems of Classification
4. Demonstrates relationships between organisms
Systems of Classification
5. Make hypotheses about life
http://www.mc.maricopa.edu/dept/d10/asb/origins/hominid_journey/central.html
Systems of Classification
SPECIES = Group of similar organisms that can mate and produce offspring
Number of species of living organisms in the world? Probably a minimum of 10 million different organisms.
HOW can we group and name these organisms?
Classify = to organize things into GROUPS based upon
HOW do grocery stores classify different things?
HOW do department stores classify different things?
Systems of Classification
Problem with common names
1) Names are not the same in all languages
2) Names in different countries mean different things - corn in England means callus
NEED a system of classification that is understood by ALL scientists throughout the world = Binomial Nomenclature (understood by everyone in the world)
Systems of Classification
History of ClassificationAristotle
(Greek philosopher 384-322 B.C.)
• developed the first accepted system of biological classification
•Grouped organisms by how they looked
http://westernparadigm.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/aristotle.jpg
Systems of Classification
Aristotle
PROBLEMS:•Birds, bats, and flying insects together even though little in common besides ability to fly.• Very few groups - as more organisms discovered , many did not fit easily into Aristotle’s groups.
BUT Many centuries passed before Aristotle’s system was replaced.
Systems of Classification
Linnaeus developed the scientific naming system still used today.
**Taxonomy is the science of naming and classifying organisms.
A taxon is a group of organisms in a classification system.
White oak:Quercus alba
Systems of Classification
History of ClassificationCarolus Linnaeus (Carl von Linné)
(Swedish Botanist 1707-1778)"Father of Modern Classification"
2. Hierarchical Classification
Organisms organized into groups of increasing inclusiveness by morphology
1.** Binomial NomenclatureDeveloped a naming system for giving each group a unique two part scientific name
Systems of Classification
Binomial nomenclature is a two-part scientific naming system.
– **uses Latin words – scientific names always written in italics – **two parts are the genus name and species descriptor
Systems of Classification
A genus includes one or more physically similar species.– Species in the same genus are thought to be closely
related.– Genus name is always capitalized.
A species descriptor is the second part of a scientific name.– always lowercase– always follows genus
name; never written alone
Tyto alba
Systems of ClassificationBinomial Nomenclature Linnaeus
Bi (two) nomial (name)
1. First part of name = genus
– first letter ALWAYS capitalized2. Second part of name = specific or species name
– first letter NEVER capitalized3. Both words UNDERLINED or in ITALICS
4. LATIN based
Systems of Classification
Every species has a unique two part scientific name.
•Panthera leo is the scientific name for an African lion
•Panthera (beasts) is the genus name
• leo (lion) is the specific name
Systems of ClassificationBinomial Nomenclature - more • Two different organisms cannot be given the same binomial name – (may have same first name = same genus or
same second name if in different genera)• Names usually have clues: often
• Describes the appearance (Tyrannosaurus rex – tyrant/lizard king)
• Describes the distribution (carolinensis – from North/South Carolina)
• Describes the discoverer or famous scientist (darwinii)
Systems of Classification
Sugar Maple – Acer saccharum
Systems of Classification
Brown Bear (Grizzly Bear) – Ursus arctos
Systems of Classification
Great White Shark – Carcharodon carcharias
Systems of Classification
Checkpoint
1. What is systematics and why is it important?
2. Who is Carl Linnaeus?
3. Write the species name of humans according to Binomial nomenclature.
4. What is a species?
5. What is a genus?
28ANY QUESTIONS?
Systems of Classification
Linnaean System is Hierarchal.
Larger groups are more inclusive and smaller groups are more specific.
• For example, the phylum Chordata includes both lions and lionfish, but the genus Panthera includes only lions & other large cats – no fish!
Systems of ClassificationHierarchical Classification
•Kingdom•Phylum•Class•Order•Family•Genus•Species
Kids Playing Chicken OnFreeways Get Squashed.
There were 7 Levels of Biological Classification when I learned them.
Systems of Classification
**Linnaeus’ classification system has seven levels.
• Each level is included in the level above it.
• **Levels get increasingly specific from kingdom to species.
Systems of Classification
The Linnaean classification system has limitations.
Linnaeus taxonomy doesn’t account for molecular evidence.– **The technology didn’t exist during Linneaus’ time.– Linnaean system based only on physical similarities.
Systems of Classification
Physical similarities are not always the result of close relationships. Sometimes siiliarities are due to environment
Genetic similarities more accurately show evolutionary relationships.
Systems of Classification
How does it work?• Each grouping is a taxon (pl. taxa) = group of
animals defined by a shared set of traits• Every living thing that we know of fits into one of
the six kingdoms• **Each level gets more specific as fewer
organisms fit into each successive group (taxa)
Systems of Classification
Panthera leo
Panthera pardus Panthera tigris
Felis catus Lynx candensis Acinonyx jubatus
Felidae – the Cat Family
Systems of Classification
Checkpoint
1. List the hierarchy of classification from kingdom to species.
2. What is a taxon (plural taxa)?
3. Are there more species in an order or in a class?
36ANY QUESTIONS?
Systems of Classification
One Big Family?
• How can you determine if one organism is closely related to another? It may seem easy, but it isn’t, and looks are often deceiving. For example, roses and orchids are both flowering plants, but roses grow on bushes or vines and have thorns. Many orchids don’t even grow in soil—they can grow in trees! Rose and orchid blossoms look very different, and roses and orchids cannot produce hybrids, or offspring of crosses between parents with different traits.
Section 18-2Interest Grabber
Go to Section:
Systems of Classification
• 1. Do you think roses and orchids are closely related? Explain your answer.
• 2. Now, apply the same logic to dogs. Different breeds of dogs—such as a Labrador retriever and a collie—can breed and produce offspring. So what is the difference between the rose-orchid combination and the Lab-collie combination?
• 3. What defines a species? Is appearance important? What other factors might be considered?
Section 18-2Interest Grabber continued
Go to Section:
Systems of Classification
• 18–2 Modern Evolutionary ClassificationA. Problems With Traditional
Classification
B. Evolutionary Classification
C. Classification Using Cladograms
D. Similarities in DNA and RNA
E. Molecular Clocks
Section 18-2
Go to Section:
Systems of Classification
KEY CONCEPT Modern classification is based on evolutionary relationships.
Systems of Classification
Evolutionary Classification:
Classification based on lines of evolutionary descent or history.
Derived characteristics:
Recent adapted characteristics not found in older members of the same descent line.
Cladogram:
Diagram that shows evolutionary relationships among a group of organisms.
**Molecular Clock:
A model that shows how long two species have been evolving independently.
Systems of Classification
Cladistics is classification based on common ancestry.
**Phylogeny is the evolutionary history for a group of species.– evidence from living species, fossil record, and
molecular data– **shown with branching tree diagrams
Systems of Classification
**Cladistics is a common method to make evolutionary trees.
– classification based on common ancestry– species placed in order that they descended from
common ancestor
Systems of Classification
DNA studies have shown that at the molecular level many species show important similarities.
The genes allow scientists to trace genetic history for an organism.
Classification Systems TODAY - Based on SIMILARITIES that reflect Genetic RELATIONSHIPS: Scientists today use> DNA sequencing> Amino acid sequencing> Radioactive dating/fossil record> Similarities in embryological development> Homologous and vestigial structures
Systems of ClassificationEvolutionary Classification
Phylogeny – study of how living and extinct organisms are related
goal: classify organisms according to common ancestry rather than similarities and differences
Members of same genus share a more recent ancestor to each other than to other species in their order.
The higher/larger the taxa, the farther back the common ancestor
Systems of ClassificationEvolutionary Classification
Clade – taxa that include a single common ancestor and all of its descendents living or extinct– Should include all species from that ancestor and
exclude all species NOT from that ancestor
**Cladogram – shows how species are related and branched over time according to shared derived characters– Derived characters - traits passed to members in a
given lineage; homologous
Systems of Classification
TRADITIONAL CLASSIFICATION
CLADOGRAM
Appendages Conical Shells
Crab Barnacle Limpet Crab Barnacle Limpet
Crustaceans Gastropod
Molted exoskeleton
Segmentation
Tiny free-swimming larva
Section 18-2Traditional Classification Versus Cladogram
Go to Section:
Systems of Classification
TRADITIONAL CLASSIFICATION
CLADOGRAM
Appendages Conical Shells
Crab Barnacle Limpet Crab Barnacle Limpet
Crustaceans Gastropod
Molted exoskeleton
Segmentation
Tiny free-swimming larva
Section 18-2Traditional Classification Versus Cladogram
Go to Section:
Systems of Classification
• A cladogram is an evolutionary tree made using cladistics.
– **A clade is a group of species that shares a common ancestor.
– Each species in a clade shares some traits with the ancestor.
– Each species in a clade has traits that have changed.
Systems of Classification
**Derived characters are traits shared in different degrees by clade members.
– basis of arranging species in cladogram
– more closely related species share more derived characters
– represented on cladogram as hash marks FOUR LIMBS WITH DIGITS
Tetrapoda clade1
Amniota clade2
Reptilia clade3Diapsida clade4
Archosauria clade5
EMBRYO PROTECTED BY AMNIOTIC FLUID
OPENING IN THE SIDE OF THE SKULL
SKULL OPENINGS IN FRONT OF THE EYE & IN THE JAW
FEATHERS & TOOTHLESS BEAKS.
SKULL OPENINGS BEHIND THE EYE
DERIVED CHARACTER
Systems of Classification
FOUR LIMBS WITH DIGITS
**•Nodes represent the most recent common ancestor of a clade.
• Clades can be identified by snipping a branch under a node.
Tetrapoda clade1
Amniota clade2
Reptilia clade3Diapsida clade4
Archosauria clade5
EMBRYO PROTECTED BY AMNIOTIC FLUID
OPENING IN THE SIDE OF THE SKULL
SKULL OPENINGS IN FRONT OF THE EYE AND IN THE JAW
FEATHERS AND TOOTHLESS BEAKS.
SKULL OPENINGS BEHIND THE EYE
NODE
DERIVED CHARACTER
CLADE
Systems of Classification
Molecular data may confirm classification based on physical similarities.
Molecular data may lead scientists to propose a new classification.
** Molecular evidence reveals species’ relatedness.
DNA is usually given the last word by scientists.
Systems of Classification
KEY CONCEPT Molecular clocks provide clues to evolutionary history.
Systems of Classification
Molecular clocks use mutations to estimate evolutionary time.
**Mutations add up at a constant rate in related species.– This rate is the ticking of the molecular clock.– As more time passes, there will be more mutations.
DNA sequence from ahypothetical ancestor
The DNA sequences from twodescendant species show mutationsthat have accumulated (black).
The mutation rate of thissequence equals one mutationper ten million years.
Mutations add up at a fairlyconstant rate in the DNA of species that evolved from a common ancestor.
Ten million years later—one mutation in each lineage
Another ten million years later—one more mutation in each lineage
Systems of Classification
**Scientists estimate mutation rates by linking molecular data and real time.
– an event known to separate species– the first appearance of a species in fossil record
Systems of Classification
Different molecules have different mutation rates.– higher rate, better for studying closely related species– lower rate, better for studying distantly related species
**Mitochondrial DNA and ribosomal RNA provide two types of molecular clocks.
Systems of Classification
**Mitochondrial DNA is used to study closely related species.
grandparents
parents
child
Nuclear DNA is inherited from bothparents, making it more difficult totrace back through generations.
Mitochondrial DNA ispassed down only from the mother of each generation,so it is not subject to recombination.
mitochondrialDNA
nuclear DNA
– mutation rate ten times faster than nuclear DNA– passed down unshuffled from mother to offspring
Systems of Classification
**Ribosomal RNA is used to study distantly related species.
– many conservative regions– lower mutation rate than most DNA
Systems of Classification
Dichotomous Keys
• Tool to determine the identity of an organism by going through a series of paired choices
• Dichotomous means "divided in two parts“• each alternative leads to another question until the
item is identified• Keys are identification tools & do not propose an
evolutionary history.
Systems of Classification
Cladogram- with shared derived characters
Systems of Classification
Where would you put a hairy, carnivorous animal without retractable claws?
Systems of Classification
Cladogram
Where would you put an animal with claws but no fur or feathers?
Systems of Classification
• What are two ways you could you find out?
Are hyenas more closely related to dogs or cats?
http://z.about.com/d/healing/1/0/f/N/gtotem_hyena.jpg
Systems of Classification
My Way or the Highway
• Categories that are used to organize an assortment of things should be valid. That is, they should be based on real information. However, categories should be useful, too. Suppose that you are taking a survey of traffic. You sit at the side of a busy intersection and record the vehicles you see in one hour.
Section 18-3Interest Grabber
Go to Section:
Systems of Classification
1. What categories could you use to organize your count of vehicles?
2.Look at your list of categories. Are all of them equally useful?
3. Is there more than one valid and useful way to organize living things?
Section 18-3
Interest Grabber continued
Go to Section:
Systems of Classification
• Kingdoms and DomainsA.The Tree of Life
Evolves
B.The Three-Domain System
C.Domain Bacteria
D.Domain Archaea
E.Domain Eukarya1. Protista
2. Fungi
3. Plantae
4. Animalia
Section 18-3
Go to Section:
Systems of Classification
Classification is always a work in progress.
The tree of life shows our most current understanding.
**New discoveries can lead to changes in classification.– Until 1866: only two kingdoms,
Animalia and PlantaeAnimalia
Plantae
Systems of Classification
Classification is always a work in progress.
The tree of life shows our most current understanding.
New discoveries can lead to changes in classification.– Until 1866: only two kingdoms,
Animalia and Plantae
– 1866: all single-celled organisms moved to kingdom Protista
AnimaliaProtista
Plantae
Systems of Classification
Classification is always a work in progress.
• The tree of life shows our most current understanding. • New discoveries can lead to changes in classification.
– Until 1866: only two kingdoms,Animalia and Plantae
– 1938: prokaryotes moved to kingdom Monera
– 1866: all single-celled organisms moved to kingdom Protista
AnimaliaProtista
Plantae
Monera
Systems of Classification
• The tree of life shows our most current understanding. • New discoveries can lead to changes in classification.
– Until 1866: only two kingdoms,Animalia and Plantae
Classification is always a work in progress.
– 1938: prokaryotes moved to kingdom Monera
– 1866: all single-celled organisms moved to kingdom Protista
Monera– 1959: fungi moved to own kingdom
Fungi
Protista
Plantae
Animalia
Systems of Classification
The tree of life shows our most current understanding.
New discoveries can lead to changes in classification.– **Until 1866: only two kingdoms,
Animalia and Plantae
Classification is always a work in progress.
– 1938: prokaryotes moved to kingdom Monera
– 1866: all single-celled organisms moved to kingdom Protista
– 1959: fungi moved to own kingdom
– 1977: kingdom Monerasplit into kingdoms Bacteria and Archaea
AnimaliaProtista
Fungi
Plantae
Archea
Bacteria
Systems of Classification
**rRNA research by Carl Woese revealed two genetically
Different groups of prokaryotes. This resulted in splitting the Kingdom Monera into two kingdoms; Bacteria and Archea.
His findings about the differences lead to the three domain system.
Systems of Classification
KEY CONCEPT The current tree of life has three domains.
Systems of Classification
The three domains in the tree of life are Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya.
Domains are above the kingdom level. – proposed by Carl Woese based on rRNA studies of
prokaryotes– domain model more clearly shows prokaryotic diversity
Systems of Classification
**Domain Bacteria includes prokaryotes in the kingdom Bacteria.
– one of largest groups on Earth
– classified by shape, need for oxygen, and diseases caused
Systems of Classification
– known for living in extreme environments
**Domain Archaea includes prokaryotes in the kingdom Archaea.
– cell walls chemically different from bacteria
– differences discovered by studying RNA
Systems of Classification
Domain Eukarya includes all eukaryotes.
– kingdom Protista
Systems of Classification
Domain Eukarya includes all eukaryotes.
– kingdom Protista– kingdom Plantae
Systems of Classification
Domain Eukarya includes all eukaryotes.
– kingdom Protista– kingdom Plantae– kingdom Fungi
Systems of Classification
**Domain Eukarya includes all eukaryotes.
– kingdom Protista– kingdom Plantae– kingdom Fungi– kingdom Animalia
Systems of Classification
EUKARYA (eukaryotic – one or more cells)
Kingdoms and Domains (underlined)
(extremophiles & unique bacteria)
(true bacteria)
Systems of ClassificationHierarchical Classification
•Domain•Kingdom•Phylum•Class•Order•Family•Genus•Species
Dumb Kids Playing Chicken
On Freeways Get Squashed.
With Domains = 8 levels
Systems of Classification
**Bacteria and archaea can be difficult to classify.
– transfer genes among themselves outside of reproduction
– blurs the linebetween “species”
– more researchneeded tounderstand prokaryotes
bridge to transfer DNA
Systems of Classification
Section 18-3Concept Map
are characterized by
such as
and differing which place them in
which coincides withwhich coincides with
which place them in which is subdivided into
Living Things
Kingdom Eubacteria
Kingdom Archaebacteria
Eukaryotic cellsProkaryotic cells
Important characteristics
Cell wall structures
Domain Eukarya
Domain Bacteria
Domain Archaea
Kingdom Plantae
Kingdom Protista
Kingdom Fungi
Kingdom Animalia
Go to Section:
Systems of Classification
DOMAIN
KINGDOM
CELL TYPE
CELL STRUCTURES
NUMBER OF CELLS
MODE OF NUTRITION
EXAMPLES
Bacteria
Eubacteria
Prokaryote
Cell walls with peptidoglycan
Unicellular
Autotroph or heterotroph
Streptococcus, Escherichia coli
Archaea
Archaebacteria
Prokaryote
Cell walls without peptidoglycan
Unicellular
Autotroph or heterotroph
Methanogens, halophiles
Protista
Eukaryote
Cell walls of cellulose in some; some have chloroplasts
Most unicellular; some colonial; some multicellular
Autotroph or heterotroph
Amoeba, Paramecium, slime molds, giant kelp
Fungi
Eukaryote
Cell walls of chitin
Most multicellular; some unicellular
Heterotroph
Mushrooms, yeasts
Plantae
Eukaryote
Cell walls of cellulose; chloroplasts
Multicellular
Autotroph
Mosses, ferns, flowering plants
Animalia
Eukaryote
No cell walls or chloroplasts
Multicellular
Heterotroph
Sponges, worms, insects, fishes, mammals
Eukarya
Classification of Living Things
Section 18-3Figure 18-12 Key Characteristics of Kingdoms and Domains
Go to Section:
Systems of Classification
KingdomsEubacteria
Archaebacteria
Protista
Plantae
Fungi
Animalia
DOMAIN EUKARYA
DOMAIN ARCHAEA
DOMAIN BACTERIA
Section 18-3Figure 18-13 Cladogram of Six Kingdoms and Three Domains
Go to Section:
Systems of Classification
• What are the three domains of life?
Systems of Classification
Human Classification
Homework: Complete a full classification list for humans. Include the eight taxa in order and name of each group that humans belong.
Systems of Classification
Full classification of human
• Domain Eukarya• Kingdom Animalia• Phylum Chordata• Class Mammalia• Order Primates• Family Hominidae• Genus Homo• Species sapien