synthesis - numerical modelling of the strait of gibraltar.pdf

Upload: hapho90

Post on 02-Jun-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Synthesis - Numerical modelling of the Strait of Gibraltar.pdf

    1/18

    SYNTHESIS REPORT

    Master Thesis - Civil Engineering

    Prof. Schleiss Anton, thesis supervisorMr. J. Franca Mario, thesis coordinator

    Mr. Gustav R. Grob, external advisorMr. Zeimetz Fraenz, tutorMr. Smaoui Hassan, tutor

    * Corresponding author.Tel.: +41 78 9121076

    E-mail address: [email protected]

    Numerical modelling of the Strait of Gibraltar for the purpose of a

    project to stabilize the level of Mediterranean Sea from the globally

    rising ocean levels

    Ha-Phong Nguyena*

    aLaboratory of Hydraulic Construction, EPFL, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

    REPORT INFO

    Article history:

    Received 20 June 2014

    Keywords:

    Finite difference

    Numerical model

    Sea level increase

    Strait of Gibraltar

    Tidal barrage

    Tidal simulation

    ABSTRACT

    In recent year, the threat of the rising ocean level due to global warming endangers coastal area. To solve

    flooding problems in the Mediterranean shores, a dam project within the Strait of Gibraltar, called

    MEDSHILD, is proposed in order to lower the sea level of the whole region. The objective of this study is

    to simulate the water exchange through the Strait by considering the tidal forcing and to determine an

    optimal closure that allows keeping the Mediterranean level constant by considering a climate change

    scenario of 50 centimetres. A two dimensional general circulation model called MECCA (Model for

    Estuarine and Coastal Circulation Assessment) is used. It is a sigma coordinates, time varying free

    surface, primitive equation ocean model and uses the implicit finite difference techniques to solve the

    hydrodynamic equations. The model works under the hydrostatic and Boussinesq approximations. The

    domain incorporates actual bathymetry in very high resolution. Uniform horizontal and vertical grid

    spacing of 500 metres is used. The model is forced along the open boundaries (Atlantic Ocean and

    Alboran Sea) through the specification of the semidiurnal tidal heights. As first results, computed M 2and

    S2amplitudes and phases are in good agreement with data in literature. Model results indicate, also, that a

    closed area equal to 90% is sufficient to maintain the Mediterranean constant, coupled with a non-

    negligible increase of the Atlantic level. The potential total annual tidal energy that can be extracted from

    the barrage is assessed to range between 680 and 1364 GWh.

    2014 EPFL. All rights reserved.

    1.Introduction

    Since decade, the Strait of Gibraltar is an area of great strategic

    importance, given its geographical position between Africa and Europe.

    Its position at a crossroad between the Atlantic and the Mediterranean

    constitue a major corridor for maritime traffic. Over the years, many

    projects, like the dam of German architect Srgel or the railway tunnel of

    Lombardi Engineering Ltd, were developed in order to make the Western

    Mediterranean area a key exchange passage between Africa and Europe.

    Nowadays, bridging the gap between the two continents is still relevant,

    but for others reasons than economic. Indeed, many surveys (Nicholls and

    Hoozemans 1996; Gonella et al. 1998; Brochier and Ramieri 2001;

    Nicholls 2002; Snoussi, Ouchani, and Niazi 2008; Vargas Ynez 2010;

    Cronin 2012; Jevrejeva, Moore, and Grinsted 2012; Horton et al. 2014)

    highlighted the threat of the constantly sea level rise on the coastal area of

    the Mediterranean, Black and Red seas. Risk of flooding, erosion, salinity

    intrusion, safety of foundations, to name but a few of the most serious

    cases currently threatening the coastal population, deltas and islands.

    More recently, according to the fifth assessment report on climate change

    of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Church, J.A. et al.

    2013), scientists expect an increase of seal level of 26 cm to 98 cm by

    2100 against 18 cm to 59 cm in the Fourth Assessment Report (Meehl,

    G.A et al. 2007). As a result, the coastal populations and areas will be

    subject to more frequent risk of flooding and erosion, two phenomena

    aggravated by the massive urbanization of seashores.

    It is in this context that the International Sustainable Energy Organisation

  • 8/10/2019 Synthesis - Numerical modelling of the Strait of Gibraltar.pdf

    2/18

  • 8/10/2019 Synthesis - Numerical modelling of the Strait of Gibraltar.pdf

    3/18

  • 8/10/2019 Synthesis - Numerical modelling of the Strait of Gibraltar.pdf

    4/18

    4 SYNTHESISREPORT

    !! !

    !!

    !!

    !!"!

    K is the turbulence energy; l the mixing length defined in Equation (16);

    !!the Prandtl number; !! ! !!!!"#the coefficient of friction.

    2.4.

    Model Grid and Bathymetry

    Area covered by the model contains the Strait of Gibraltar, and is limited

    by the two sub-basins on both sides of the Straits; namely the Gulf of

    Cadiz and the Alboran Sea. The model domain extends longitudinally

    from 6.241 to 4.567 West and 35 to 36.666 North. Horizontal grid is

    made by 306 x 330 grid points. It is characterized by a uniform spacing

    and a high spatial resolution of 500 metres in both directions in order to

    well resolve the dynamic within the Strait of Gibraltar Sannino (2004).

    The model topography was generated by linear interpolation of the depth

    data on to each grid point of the model grid. The depth data were obtained

    from the EMODnet Bathymetry portal (available at http://www.emodnet-

    bathymetry.eu). Model bathymetry is illustrated in Figure (1) with the

    main topographic features (from left to right): Spartel sill, Tangier basin,

    Camarinal sill, Tarifa narrow.

    2.5.Boundary and initial conditions

    As shown in Figure 1 the domain is composed of two open boundaries

    located at the Eastern and Western end of the computation domain. At

    these boundaries, values of surface elevation (!) or mean velocity (!! !)

    should be specified. A lot of setting for open boundary conditions exists,

    however, in this study, boundaries conditions used are the same as used

    by Sannino, Bargagli, and Artale (2002) and Sannino (2004). Indeed, they

    are proven to give the best model results for an application in the Strait of

    Gibraltar. A description of these boundaries is set forth hereafter. For boundary conditions on either side of the computational domain, they

    need to ensure that phenomena (e.g. waves) generated inside the domain

    can freely leave it without being reflected at the boundaries and

    accordingly contaminate the interior solution (Schot 1992; Blumberg and

    Kantha 1985). For the purpose of minimizing the effects due to wave

    reflection at the open boundaries, a force Orlansky radiation condition

    (Orlanski 1976) is used for the sea surface elevation (!). According to

    Bills and Noye (1987), this can be state as follow:

    !!

    !!!

    !!

    !!"

    !!!

    !! !!" !

    !"!

    !!

    !!!

    !! !"!

    !!!

    !

    !! !"!

    !!"!

    Where!!

    ! is the surface elevation at the i grid point for the open

    boundaries at time step n; !" ! !!! !!! the Courant number in x-

    direction; !!"

    !!!the tidal elevation at grid point i and time step n-1;!!" the

    time independent mean sea elevation at grid point i (Bills and Noye 1987;

    Sannino 2004).

    As explained by Sannino (2004), Equation (20) incorporates a radiation

    mechanism that allows the undesired transients to pass through the open

    boundaries, going out of the model basin, without contaminating the

    desired forced solution . In Equation (20), the sea elevation at the grid

    points (!!

    ! ) situated on the open boundaries should be specified. To

    achieve this, values from literature (Candela, Winant, and Ruiz 1990;

    Padman and Erofeeva 2005) has been used. Moreover, as suggested bySannino (2004), sea elevation values must be augmented by the time

    independent mean sea elevation, !!" , equal to 12 metre at the Western

    open boundary and to 0 meter at the Eastern open boundary. These values

    were obtained from the model of Sannino (2004) in the following manner:

    The time independent mean elevation (!!") value used at the open

    boundaries is obtained running the model in barotropic mode. This model,

    as the baroclinic version (three dimensional), has at the eastern and

    western ends of the computational domain two open boundaries where

    values of barotropic velocity and surface elevation must be specified. For

    the surface elevation an Orlansky radiation condition (Orlanski 1976) was

    used at the western boundary while a clamped to zero condition was used

    for the eastern end. For the barotropic velocity a zero gradient condition

    was used at both ends. In this way the barotropic model was able to freelyadjust the western surface elevation, after 180 days of simulation, to about

    12 cm .

    Concerning the velocity, a zero gradient condition is used for the depth

    integrated velocity (!!!).

    As the most energetic system in the Strait of Gibraltar is the tidal

    dynamics, the model is forced at the open boundaries with the tidal

    forcing. The main tidal harmonics are shown in Table 1.

    Table 1 The main tidal harmonic

    Symbol Period [hour] Description

    Semidiurnal components

    M2 12.42 Main lunar constituent

    S2 12.00 Main solar constituent

    Diurnal componentsK1 23.93 Soli-lunar constituent

    O1 25.82 Main lunar constituent

    The semidiurnal tides arise from thegravitational forces of the moon (M2)

    and sun (S2) while the diurnal components originates from the declination

    in the moons orbit about the earth (O1) and the corresponding solar

    declination (K1). In order to study the dynamic of the Strait of Gibraltar to

    tidal forcing, the model is forced with the main semidiurnal (M2and S2)

    components. M2wave has a period higher than 0.5 day because every day

    the moon offset slightly (1/28th turn) whereas the period of S2 is worth

    exactly 0.5 day. Consequently, the two waves will angle slightly towards

    each another. Note also that the amplitude of M2 is larger than S2 (M2 %

    Figure 1 Model bathymetry. The colour levels indicate the water depth in

    meter.

  • 8/10/2019 Synthesis - Numerical modelling of the Strait of Gibraltar.pdf

    5/18

    5

    2.7 S2). Consequently, M2 imposes the period with a small perturbation

    from S2. The choice to limit the simulation to the semidiurnal component

    is justify because 90% of the total kinetic energy in the Strait of Gibraltar

    stem from the semidiurnal components M2 and Ss (Kinder and Bryden

    1987; Kinder and Bryden 1988; Candela, Winant, and Ruiz 1990).

    Finally, the resulting two major semidiurnal surface tidal elevations

    forcing at the open boundaries of the domain is defined as:

    ! !!! ! !! ! !"# !

    !! ! !

    ! ! !!"!

    !

    !!!

    Where!! ! and !

    ! ! are the surface elevation amplitude and phase of

    the nthharmonic of the tidal signal; !!its frequency. The semidiurnal tidal

    elevation amplitude (!! ! ) and phase (!

    ! ! ) are obtained from the

    TPXO 7.1 global model of ocean tides (Padman and Erofeeva 2005). At

    the Western and Eastern boundaries, four and three points are specified in

    MECCA respectively (Table 2). Linear interpolation from these points is

    made for the entire boundaries with satisfactory results as the variation in

    regional amplitude and phase are relatively small.

    Table 2 Semidiurnal tidal elevation amplitude and phase enter at

    the Western and Eastern end of the computational domain for the

    interpolation in MECCA.

    Latitud

    e [N]

    Longitude

    [W]

    M2 S2

    Amplitude

    [m]

    Phase

    []

    Amplitude

    [m]

    Phase

    []

    36.6667 -6.2410 1.0092 54.61 0.3653 79.15

    36.5000 -6.2410 1.0104 54.46 0.3658 78.32

    35.5000 -6.2410 0.9705 56.29 0.3529 82.2

    35.0000 -6.2410 0.9992 54.97 0.3609 80.83

    36.1467 -4.5670 0.2075 53.82 0.0777 81.9

    35.9067 -4.5670 0.2099 55.96 0.0788 83.65

    35.2800 -4.5670 0.2084 59.15 0.0791 86.48

    For example, the tidal signal forced at the middle of the Western

    computational domain is shown in Figure 2. The combination of M2and

    S2, known as beating, has a fortnightly modulation with a period of 14.79

    days.

    Time step is fixed to 10 seconds according to the CourantFriedrichs

    Lewy (CFL) condition.

    2.6.Model experiments

    The model is initially run separately for the M2and S2constituent forcing

    over 123 hours and 131 hours respectively in order to compare the results

    (amplitude and phase) with observed data (Candela, Winant, and Ruiz

    1990; Tsimplis, Proctor, and Flather 1995; Sannino 2004). Once

    validated, the model simulation is integrated for a fortnight period by

    considering the combination of the semidiurnal component.

    Three closures (70%, 85% and 95%) from both side of the Strait and two

    (50% and 70%) starting from the Moroccan side representing the dam are

    considered. The dam site is chosen according to previous geological study

    from Lombardi Engineering Ltd. The five alternatives differ above all in

    terms of the dam closure and site. The dam is 500 metres wide (this

    choice is based on the grid resolution of 500 metres in each direction)

    with a maximum length of 27 kilometres (Figure (3)). Total area

    computed according to the so-called Rectangle Method equals 4025865

    square meters. The model is run again for these configurations.

    In this study, based on these forecast, a climate scenario of 50 centimetres

    is considered. It is implemented in the model by adding a height of 50

    centimetres to the semidiurnal tidal elevation forcing applied at the

    Western open boundary (Atlantic). The simulations were extended for this

    climate scenario by considering the different closures defined previously.

    Figure 2 Semidiurnal tidal elevation forcing applied at the middle of the

    Western end.

    27km

    0.5 km

    Figure 3 (top) Dam site with the main characteristics. (bottom) Cross section

    (b) corresponding to the dam site showing the bottom topography.

    Area = 4025865 m2

  • 8/10/2019 Synthesis - Numerical modelling of the Strait of Gibraltar.pdf

    6/18

    6 SYNTHESISREPORT

    3.Model validation

    A harmonic analysis is made for the tidal elevations and currents in order

    to compare the obtained results with measured data (Candela, Winant, and

    Ruiz 1990; Tsimplis, Proctor, and Flather 1995; Sannino 2004).

    3.1.Tidal elevation

    Compilation from these data of the two semidiurnal components for the

    observed amplitudes and phases are summarized in Table 3 and 4. Also,

    the simulated amplitudes and phases of the semidiurnal tide computed by

    the model are given in order to compare them with the observed values at

    some relevant points (Figure 4) in the Strait of Gibraltar.

    Table 3 Comparison between observed and computed amplitudes

    (A) and phases (P) of M2 tidal elevation.

    Table 4 Comparison between observed and computed amplitudes

    (A) and phases (P) of S2 tidal elevation.

    As it can be observed, a general good agreement between observed and

    Figure 4 Chart of the computational domain showing the geographic

    features referred to in the text. Blue points are the relevant points used forthe comparison between observed and predicted values (exception at

    Tangier and Sebta). Shaded red line represents the dam site.

  • 8/10/2019 Synthesis - Numerical modelling of the Strait of Gibraltar.pdf

    7/18

    7

    computed values of amplitudes and phases for the semidiurnal component

    is found. Indeed, the maximum difference do not exceed 8.6 centimetres

    in amplitude and 8.24 in phase for M2constituent and 4.6 centimetres in

    amplitude and 8.47 in phase for S2constituent. The maximum differences

    (in relative units) are concentrated in coastal regions (e.g. Tarifa, SN, SS)

    since the model grid is not coastal-fitted Sannino (2004).

    Figures (5) and (6) show the computed amplitude and phase contours of

    the simulated M2and S2tidal waves respectively. For the M2chart (Figure

    5.2), it is in good qualitative and quantitative agreement with those

    presented in literature (Candela, Winant, and Ruiz 1990; Tejedor et al.

    1999; Tsimplis 2000). However, the cotidal lines (lines of constant phase)

    of M2differ slightly at the Camarinal sill area causing a deviation toward

    North. This deformation can be explained by the irregularities of the

    topography in this area.

    From Figure (5) two information can be highlighted: (i) the unchangeable

    of the amplitude in the cross-Strait direction except the Eastern part of the

    Tarifa narrow and (ii) a decline of more than two-fold in the M2amplitude

    in the along-Strait direction. Concerning the M2phase, it is characterized

    by a southwestward propagation. For the S2 tidal wave (Figure (6)), the

    same features are observed. The amplitude and phase ratios differences

    between M2 and S2 constituents remain constant throughout the Strait of

    Gibraltar as predicted by Candela, Winant, and Ruiz (1990). The

    amplitude and phase ratios range from 2.5 to 2.8 and from 23.8 to 27.5

    respectively.

    Figure 5 Amplitude (left), in meters, and Phase (right), in degrees, contours of the M 2tidal wave

    Figure 6 Amplitude (left), in meters, and Phase (right), in degrees, contours of the S 2tidal wave.

  • 8/10/2019 Synthesis - Numerical modelling of the Strait of Gibraltar.pdf

    8/18

    8 SYNTHESISREPORT

    3.2.Tidal currents

    In order to describe the motion of fluids within the Strait of Gibraltar, the

    depth integrated velocity (!!!) is computed for the M2and S2constituent

    as well as for the semidiurnal M2S2constituents. Appendix G (refer to the

    report) shows the direction of the velocity field during an entire M 2period

    (12.42 hours) simulation with the module in background for the high

    water at Gibraltar harbour. As expected, the direction of the velocity

    reverses periodically. The velocity is the highest in the area of Camarinal

    sill section. Figure (7) shows a semidiurnal tidal cycle during spring tide

    at Gibraltar (top) and Pt5 (bottom).

    Tidal currents value during the spring tide ranges from 0.06 m s-1 at

    Gibraltar to 1.85 m s-1at the cross section of Camarinal sill. For the neap

    tide (Figure (8)), the currents range from 0.02 m s-1at Gibraltar to 1.02 m

    s-1 at the cross section of Camarinal sill. These values are in quite good

    agreement with Sannino (2004). The fact that the Camarinal sill exhibits

    the highest current was an expected result. Consequently, at the Camarinal

    sill, due to the interaction of the strong tidal flow with the complex

    bathymetry, the currents are not always reverse which means that the

    water column can flow in the same direction twice per day. This result

    should be confirmed with a three dimensional model (Sannino 2004) in

    order to highlight outflow and inflow currents at the Camarinal sill.

    4.Results

    4.1.Basic scenario

    The sea elevation for the semidiurnal tidal cycle during spring tide for a

    closure of 70% (Figure 9) compared to the normal case (without closure)at some relevant point is computed. Only results for spring tide are

    presented as it is the regime with the higher surface elevation. The major

    sea elevation change is at Pt5 with a decrease of 12.6 centimetres

    compared to the normal case. The maximum increase in sea level is at Pt4,

    with an increase of 9.4 centimetres. These points are located to the right

    (Mediterranean) and left (Atlantic) side of the dam respectively. The

    change in sea elevation at other location is: Tanger (+2.8 cm), Sebta (-0.6

    cm), Gibraltar (-1cm), Tarifa (-2.9 cm), Pt1 (-0.3 cm), Pt2 (-1.5 cm), Pt3

    (+1.5 cm).

    Figure 7 Semidirunal (M2S2) tidal cycle during spring tide at Gibraltar(top) and Pt5 (bottom) (see location in Figure 4). Blue line indicates the

    tidal height, green line the corresponding velocity in absolute value.

    Figure 8 Semidirunal (M2S2) tidal cycle during neap tide at Gibraltar (top)

    and Pt5 (bottom) (see location in Figure 4). Blue line indicates the tidal

    height, green line the corresponding velocity in absolute value.

  • 8/10/2019 Synthesis - Numerical modelling of the Strait of Gibraltar.pdf

    9/18

    9

    For a closure of 85% (Figure (10)), the change in sea elevation at the

    locations is: Tanger (+5.9 cm), Sebta (-1.3 cm), Gibraltar (-2.2cm), Tarifa

    (-6.5 cm), Pt1 (-0.5 cm), Pt2 (-2.1 cm), Pt3 (+2.7 cm), Pt4 (+12.1 cm), Pt5

    (-17.2 cm). The same trend is observed with an amplification of the

    increase or decrease in sea level at each location.

    For a closure of 95% (Figure (11)), the change in sea elevation at the

    locations is: Tanger (+21.5 cm), Sebta (-4.2 cm), Gibraltar (-8.2cm),

    Tarifa (-22.5 cm), Pt1 (-1.8 cm), Pt2 (+1.1 cm), Pt3 (+8.2 cm), Pt4 (+24.9

    cm), Pt5 (-34.2 cm). It can be seen that the sea surface variation follow the

    same trend than the two previous cases except for Pt2 who undergoes an

    increase of sea level instead of a decrease as previously observed. This is

    certainly caused by the high degree of obstruction or numerical noise in

    the computation of surface elevation at this point.

    For the closure of 95%, the phase shift is most pronounced with the higher

    closure. Indeed, the signal is perturbed and distorted. This effect is more

    pronounced at Tarifa (Figure 12), Pt3, 4 and 5. This can be explained by

    plotting the stream function corresponding to this closure (Figure (13)).

    The disturbance stems from the fact that eddies and recirculation zones

    appear on both sides of the closure. As the latter points are in this area,

    their signals are deformed. Indeed, water coming from the Atlantic (and

    respectively the Mediterranean) through the closure will form an eddy just

    behind it creating a stagnant region. The streamlines (tangent curve to the

    velocity vector field) form an arc just after passing through the opening.

    At this location, the water is stagnant with small tides. As Tarifa is veryclose, the signal at Tarifa is completely disturbed.

    Total Area = 4025865 m2

    Close Area = 1229670 m2

    Open Area = 2796195 m2

    9.5 km 9.5 km8 km

    Figure 9 Cross section corresponding to the dam site showing the bottom

    topography where shaded blue represents the area closes by the dam. In

    this case, 30% area closed.

    Total Area = 4025865 m2

    Close Area = 2449500 m2

    Open Area = 1576365 m2

    4 km11.5 km 11.5 km

    Figure 10 Cross section corresponding to the dam site showing the

    ottom topography where shaded blue represents the area closes by the

    dam. In this case, 60% area closed.

    Figure 11 Cross section corresponding to the dam site showing the

    ottom topography where shaded blue represents the area closes by thedam. In this case, 90% area closed.

    Total Area = 4025865 m2

    Close Area = 3608600 m2

    Open Area = 417265 m2

    12.5 km12.5 km

    1 km

    Figure 12 Semidirunal (M2S2) tidal cycle during spring tide at Tarifa. Blue

    line indicates the sea elevation for the normal case, green line the sea

    elevation for a closure of 95% of the Strait.

  • 8/10/2019 Synthesis - Numerical modelling of the Strait of Gibraltar.pdf

    10/18

    10 SYNTHESISREPORT

    Figure (14) shows surface elevation difference (maximum absolute sea

    elevation for normal situation minus maximum absolute sea elevation for

    closure situation) for the closure of 70%, 85% and 95% at different

    locations for a semidiurnal (M2S2) tidal cycle during spring tide. The

    closure is expressed in term of percentage closed area (closed area divided

    by total area), which corresponds to 30%, 60% and 90% respectively

    (markers in Figure (14)). Positive values indicate an increase in surface

    elevation and negative value a decrease of sea level. As expected, a

    correlation between the closed area and the increase or decrease of sea

    level difference is established. When the surface elevation increases (at

    Tanger, Pt3 and Pt4), the larger the closed area, the greater the increase.

    Same pattern is observed when the surface elevation decreases (at

    Gibraltar, Sebta, Tarifa, Pt1 and Pt5); the larger the closed area, thegreater the decrease. Sea elevation of points situated to the left of the dam

    tend to increase while it decrease for the points located to the right side.

    Moreover, the closer to the dam the points, the higher the increase (Pt4) or

    decrease (Pt5).

    In order to confirm these results, two others simulations with a closure

    from the Moroccan side is made. Results are presented in the following.

    Figure (15) shows the sea elevation for the semidiurnal tidal cycle during

    spring tide for a closure of 95% compared to the normal case at some

    relevant point. The change in sea elevation at the locations is: Tanger

    (+6.8 cm), Sebta (-1.3 cm), Gibraltar (-2.2cm), Tarifa (-5.7 cm), Pt1 (-0.5

    cm), Pt2 (+3.0 cm), Pt3 (+2.0 cm), Pt4 (+0.3 cm), Pt5 (-18.5 cm). These

    results are in good agreement with the closure of 85% from both sides,

    except at Pt4 where the difference in sea level does not change much

    because of the opening on the Spanish side (contrary to the closure of

    85% on both sides).

    For a closure of 95% (Figure (16)), the change in sea elevation at the

    locations is: Tanger (+30.2 cm), Sebta (-7.4 cm), Gibraltar (-12cm), Tarifa

    (-34.5 cm), Pt1 (-2.8 cm), Pt2 (+14.1 cm), Pt3 (+15.5 cm), Pt4 (+10.3

    cm), Pt5 (-50.5 cm). Same pattern are observed with the important

    deformation of the tidal signal and can be explained as before by plotting

    the streamlines (Figure (17)).

    Figure 13 Stream function for the M2constituent for a closure of 95%.

    Figure 14 Difference in sea elevation of the closures compared to the

    normal case at different location for a semidiurnal tidal cycle (M 2S2)

    during spring tide. Positive value means an increase sea level compared to

    the normal case, negative value a decrease in seal level. X-axis shows the

    closed area (30%, 60%, 90%) corresponding to the closure 70%, 85% and

    95% respectively.

    Total Area = 4025865 m2

    Close Area = 2064500 m2

    Open Area = 1961365 m2

    13.5 km 13.5 km

    Figure 15 Cross section corresponding to the dam site showing the bottom

    topography where shaded blue represents the area closes by the dam. In

    this case, 50% area closed on Moroccan side.

    Figure 16 Cross section corresponding to the dam site showing the

    ottom topography where shaded blue represents the area closes by the

    dam. In this case, 95% area closed on Moroccan side.

    Total Area = 4025865 m2

    Close Area = 3818100 m2

    Open Area = 207765 m2

    8 km 19 km

  • 8/10/2019 Synthesis - Numerical modelling of the Strait of Gibraltar.pdf

    11/18

    11

    Finally, the trend of Figure (14) is confirmed by Figure (18). The higher

    area closed, the higher the increase or decrease in surface elevation

    compared to the normal case. The dam site (closure on both sides or on

    Moroccan side) does not affect the trend for points located far from the

    dam (Sebta, Gibraltar, Tarifa, Pt1, Pt3). This means that for a constant

    closed area, the result is the same no matter where the dam is positioned

    (same longitude but different latitude). Concerning points situated near

    the dam (Pt4, Pt5), different behaviours are observed. For Pt4, when the

    closure is only on the Moroccan side, there is almost no increase in sea

    elevation which is logical since it is an open area. For Pt5, the fact to close

    only the Moroccan side seems to accentuate the decrease of sea level

    compared to the closure on both side. This suggests that the dam site has

    an area of influence on the flow regardless of area closed. From these

    results, it can be seen that a closure of the Strait of Gibraltar can reducethe sea level on the Mediterranean side. However, with counterpart an

    increase of the surface elevation on the Atlantic side.

    4.2.Climate scenario

    Results of simulations by modifying the signal at the Western open

    boundaries (+50 centimetres) and with different closures are presented.

    The increase in sea level is taken into account by increasing the signal at

    the Western end of the computational domain. Figure (19) shows how the

    signal is modified. The rise is not exactly equal to 50 centimetres as linear

    interpolation from four points is made for the Western boundary.

    Figure 19 Semidiurnal (M2S2) tidal cycle during spring tide applied at the

    middle of the Western computational domain.

    The increase in sea level introduced at the Western boundary did not

    spread everywhere throughout the domain in the similar manner. Thesignal decrease as moving away from the Western boundary. For example,

    at Tanger, the climate scenario is still strong (+46 centimetres). But at

    Gibraltar, as the signal passes through rugged bathymetry, friction and

    other phenomena, it decreases in intensity (+8 centimetres).

    The goal with the closure is to ensure that the sea level in the

    Mediterranean stay constant, meaning that the difference between the sea

    level in the normal case (without climate and closure) and the climate

    scenario with closure must be as close as possible to zero for points

    located in the Mediterranean side. If this difference is greater than zero,

    this means that the closure is too much. On the contrary, if the difference

    is below zero, this means that the closure is not enough to keep the level

    constant (equal to the normal case). For example, Figure (20) shows thesurface elevation at Tarifa. If the difference (in term of maximum absolute

    value) between the normal case (in blue in Figure (20)) and the climate

    with closure is positive, this means that the corresponding closure (95%

    and 70% Moroccan side in this case) is enough to ensure the sea level to

    stay constant (in purple and black in Figure (20)). If the difference is

    negative, the closure is not enough (70%, 85% and 50% Moroccan side in

    this case).

    Figure 17 Stream function for the M2constituent for a closure of 70% on

    the Moroccan side.

    Figure 18 Difference in sea elevation of the closures compared to the

    normal case at different location for a semidiurnal tidal cycle (M 2S2)

    during spring tide. Positive value means an increase sea level compared to

    the normal case, negative value a decrease in seal level. X-axis shows the

    closed area (30%, 60%, 90%, 50%, 95%) corresponding to the closure

    70%, 85%, 95% on both side and 50%, 70% on the Moroccan side

    respectively. Pt 2 is not presented for the closure 50% (50% area closed)and 70% (95% are closed) on Moroccan side.

  • 8/10/2019 Synthesis - Numerical modelling of the Strait of Gibraltar.pdf

    12/18

    12 SYNTHESISREPORT

    Figure 20 Semidirunal (M2S2) sea elevation during spring tide at Tarifa for

    different configuration.

    In Figure (21), the difference between the sea level in normal case and the

    climate scenario with different closure is shown for point located in the

    Mediterranean side. A closed area equal to 90% allows maintaining the

    sea level constant at these locations and even reduces the surface elevation

    compared to the actual situation.

    Figure 21 Difference in sea elevation of the closures with climate change

    compared to the normal case at Mediterranean points for a semidiurnal

    tidal cycle (M2S2) during spring tide. Positive value means a decrease in

    sea level compared to the normal case, negative value an increase in sea

    level. X-axis shows the closed area (30%, 60%, 90%, 50%, 95%)

    corresponding to the closure 70%, 85%, 95% on both side and 50%, 70%

    on the Moroccan side respectively.

    Taking a look at the other side of the dam is necessary. Figure (22) shows

    the difference between the sea level in normal case and the climate

    scenario with different closure is shown for point located in the Atlantic

    side. As expected, the more the closure, the more the increase of surface

    elevation at the Atlantic. This important counterpart cannot be neglected.

    Indeed, Moroccan and Spanish coastal area would be flooded due to the

    important increase of surface elevation.

    Figure 22 Difference in sea elevation of the closures with climate change

    compared to the normal case at Atlantic points for a semidiurnal tidal

    cycle (M2S2) during spring tide. Positive value means a decrease in sea

    level compared to the normal case, negative value an increase in sea level.

    X-axis shows the closed area (30%, 60%, 90%, 50%, 95%) corresponding

    to the closure 70%, 85%, 95% on both side and 50%, 70% on the

    Moroccan side respectively.

    4.3.Estimation of annual energy output

    In order to estimate the annual energy that can be extracted from a dam

    exploiting the tidal power through the Strait of Gibraltar, a method based

    on the principle of tidal hydrodynamic is used (Xia et al. 2012). The

    principle is to block the entry and exit tides to create a water level

    differential. As suggested by Charlier and Finkl (2009), the most efficient

    way to operate for tidal barrage is to generate power during ebb tide asshown in Figure (23).

    Figure 23 Sketch of ebb generation mode. Image from Xia et al. (2012).

    The principle described by Xia et al. (2012) is as follows: First, the basin

    (upstream) is filled through the sluice of the barrage until it achieves the

    high tide level. From there, the sluices are closed (filling C-D in Figure

    (23)). The turbines and sluices stay closed until the sea level downstream

    decreases sufficiently to create a water level differential (called starting

    head) across the dam (holding D-A in Figure (23)). Therefore, the turbines

    gate are spun to create electricity (generating A-B in Figure (23)) until the

  • 8/10/2019 Synthesis - Numerical modelling of the Strait of Gibraltar.pdf

    13/18

  • 8/10/2019 Synthesis - Numerical modelling of the Strait of Gibraltar.pdf

    14/18

    14 SYNTHESISREPORT

    estimated annual tidal energy of 1364 GWh is found by using an

    operating efficiency of 0.4.

    5.Summary and Conclusions

    The aim of this project has been the developing of a numerical model able

    to reproduce the circulation through the Strait of Gibraltar by considering

    the tidal forcing. Then, the paper is devoted to determine the size of the

    closure needed to ensure a constant level of the Mediterranean to solve

    flooding problems due to global warming.

    The GCM used in this study is the two dimensional vertically integrated

    tidal model MECCA initially developed by Hess (1986) to study costal,

    estuarine and open ocean circulation. The version used has already been

    successfully implemented for the Strait of Gibraltar by Smaoui andOuahsine (2006). Study domain extends longitudinally from 6.241 to

    4.567 West and 35 to 36.666 North. The model grid has a uniform

    horizontal and vertical spacing of 500 metres. A significant aspect of this

    model is that it solves a prognostic equation for the turbulent kinetic

    energy and uses a semi-empirical expression for the mixing length(Davies, Luyten, and Deleersnijder 1995). At the two open boundaries, the

    model is forced with the semidiurnal M2 and S2 surface elevation. The

    model is run for a complete fortnightly period and a harmonic analysis is

    performed to compare results with observed data. Computed amplitudes

    and phases for the two semidiurnal constituent are in good agreement with

    observed values. Also, results show that the model is able to reproduce

    some major features of the tidal flow in this region: a decline of more than

    two-fold in the M2 amplitude in the along-Strait direction, a general

    invariability of the amplitude in the cross-Strait direction, a

    southwestward propagation of the phases, and a constant amplitude and

    phase ratios differences between M2 and S2 constituents throughout the

    Strait of Gibraltar. However, the two dimensional model has proved its

    limitations concerning the simulation of tidal current and cannot substitutea global modelling of the water circulation in this area (a three

    dimensional model is needed). Since the flow within the Strait is done at

    least in two layers, it is evident that a two dimensional model is not able

    to describe all the exchange and hydraulics circulation aspect due to the

    complex physics present in one of the most complicated region of the

    world.

    Once the model validated, simulations are performed for three closures

    (70%, 85%, 95% corresponding to 30%, 60%, 90% are closed

    respectively) starting both sides of the Strait and two closures (50%, 70%

    corresponding to 50%, 95% area closed respectively) starting from the

    Moroccan side supposed to represent the dam. The location of the latter it

    determined by previous geological reconnaissance. The dam is 500 metres

    wide with a maximum length of 27 kilometres. As a first step, simulationsare made for the basic scenario, i.e. with the actual surface elevation

    specified at the two open boundaries. Sea elevations at some relevant

    points are compared in order to assess the impact of the closure on tidal

    height. For the basic scenario, results show a clear correlation between the

    percentage area closed and the increase or decrease of sea level compare

    to the normal case (without dam): the larger the closed area, the greater

    the increase for points situated to the left of the dam, the greater the

    decrease for points situated to the right side. Also, for points located

    sufficiently far away from either side of the barrage, the dam

    configuration (closure on both side or on Moroccan side only) does not

    affect the increase/decrease trend. Consequently, a closure of the Strait of

    Gibraltar can reduce the sea level on the Mediterranean side. However,

    with counterpart an increase of the surface elevation on the Atlantic side.

    The second step consisted to add 50 centimetres to the semidiurnal tidal

    elevation signal at the Western open boundary supposed to reproduce the

    sea level increase due to global warming. As expected, due to the rugged

    bathymetry and friction, the signal did not spread everywhere throughout

    the domain in the similar manner. By considering the sea level increase of

    50 centimetres, it was found that a closed area equal to 90% allows

    maintaining the sea level constant at points located on the Mediterranean

    side. However, with such closure, the sea level on the Atlantic side

    dramatically increased.

    In the final part of this paper, a first assessment of the annual energy

    output from a barrage within the Strait of Gibraltar is done using a

    theoretical estimation method (Xia et al. 2012). The result indicates that

    the magnitude of the annual energy output from the barrage would range

    between 680 and 1364 GWh depending on the power conversion

    efficiency considered. These values are relative with regard to the surface

    area being considered. Moreover, as these predictions are based on

    simplifying assumptions, a more accurate estimation of the annual energy

    output should be conducted with more detailed information on the dam,

    sluices, turbines and tidal ranges.

    The objective of this study is reached, since its principal aim is the

    understanding of tidal flow in the Strait of Gibraltar for a dam project. In

    the future, a three dimensional version of MECCA model should be

    develop in order to be able to simulate others major features of the flow in

    the Strait, especially to estimate water transports along the whole Strait

    and to provide an estimation of the impact of the barrage on these

    quantities. The simulations have brought to light an important issue

    (increase surface elevation on the Atlantic part) of a closure in the Strait

    of Gibraltar. But it also showed that a barrage with an adapted closing can

    keep the Mediterranean Sea level constant. Two improvement of this

    study can be done in the future: (i) extend the area covered by the model

    to cover the whole Mediterranean Sea in order to avoid forcing the

    Eastern boundary with surface elevation values. As the Mediterranean isan enclosed sea, it will be able to freely adjust to the forcing of the

    Atlantic. From there, one can specify a constant sea level in the

    Mediterranean and optimize the corresponding closure of the Strait; (ii)

    the global mean sea level increase introduced in the model assumes a

    sudden rise of 50 centimetres applied uniformly on the Atlantic. In reality,

    this increase takes place in the long term and is highly nonuniformly

    distributed over the ocean. A solution could be to make a simulation of

    several years with a different sea level increase every year for each

    location.

    Acknowledgements

    I would like to thank my external advisor, Hassan Smaoui (UTC-CETMEF), for his vital guidance during this project. He kindly provided

    his numerical model for the purpose of my work. His deep knowledge in

    oceanography modelling allowed insightful discussions and constructive

    critique of my simulations. I would also like to thank the members of

    FlowScience, Frieder Semler, Dr. Matthias Todte and John Wendelbo for

    their warm welcome in Rottenburg and for their support. I am also

    extremely grateful to Gustav R. Grob (ICEC) for his constant

    encouragement and financial support for my trip to Germany.

    This project was supervised by Prof. Dr. Anton Schleiss, Mario Franca

    and Fraenz Zeimetz from the department of Hydraulic Constructions,

    EPFL. I wish to thank them for their willingness to help and advise

    throughout the duration of the project.

  • 8/10/2019 Synthesis - Numerical modelling of the Strait of Gibraltar.pdf

    15/18

    15

    Finally, a special thanks to my dear family and friends, for their patience

    and for never being short of a few words of encouragement when they

    were needed.

    REFERENCES

    Armi, L., Farmer, D. (1986). Maximal two-layer exchange through a

    contraction with barotropic net flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 164: 27

    51.

    Armi, L. (1986). The hydraulics of two flowing layers with different

    densities. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 163: 2758.

    Armi, L., Farmer, D. (1988). The flow of Mediterranean water through the

    Strait of Gibraltar. Prog. Oceanogr. 21: 1105.

    Baschek, B., Send, U., Garcia Lafuente, J., Candela, J. (2001). Transport

    estimates in the Strait of Gibraltar with a tidal inverse model. Journal of

    Geophysical Research: Oceans 106(C12): 3103331044.

    Berthet, C. (1996). Flow and three-dimensional coastal transport:

    numerical applications. Ph.D. thesis, Universit de Joseph Fourier,

    Grenoble, France (in French).

    Bills, P., Noye, J. (1987). An investigation of open boundary conditions

    for tidal models of shallow seas. In North-Holland Mathematics Studies.

    John Noye, ed. Pp. 159194. Numerical Modelling: Applications to

    Marine Systems. North-Holland.

    Blackadar, A. K. (1962). The vertical distribution of wind and turbulent

    exchange in a neutral atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research 67(8):

    30953102.

    Bleck, R. (2002). An oceanic general circulation model framed in hybrid

    isopycnic-cartesian coordinates. Ocean Modelling 4(1): 5588.

    Bleck, R., Rooth, C., Hu, D., Smith, L. T. (1992). Salinity-driven

    thermocline transients in a wind- and thermohaline-forced isopycnic

    coordinate model of the north Atlantic. Journal of Physical Oceanography22(12): 14861505.

    Blumberg, A. F., Kantha, L. H. (1985). Open boundary condition for

    circulation models. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 111(2): 237255.

    Blumberg, A. F., Mellor, G. L. (1987). A description of a three-

    dimensional coastal ocean circulation model. In Coastal and Estuarine

    Sciences. Norman S. Heaps, ed. Pp. 116. Washington, D. C.: American

    Geophysical Union.

    Bormans, M., Garrett, C. (1989). The effect of rotation on the surface

    inflow through the Strait of Gibraltar. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 19: 15351542.

    Bormans, M., Garrett, C. (1989). The effects of nonrectangular cross

    section, friction, and barotropic fluctuations on the exchange through the

    Strait of Gibraltar. Journal of Physical Oceanography 19(10): 15431557.

    Brandt, P., Alpers, W., Backhaus, J. O. (1996). Study of the generation

    and propagation of internal waves in the Strait of Gibraltar using a

    numerical model and synthetic aperture radar images of the European

    ERS 1 satellite. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 101(C6):

    1423714252.

    Brandt, P., Rubino, A., Sein, D. V., Dmitry, V., Baschek, B., Izquierdo,

    A., Backhaus, J. O. (2004). Sea level variations in the western

    Mediterranean studied by a numerical tidal model of the Strait of

    Gibraltar. Journal of Physical Oceanography 34(2): 433443.

    Brasseur, P., Beckers, J. M., Brankart, J. M., Schoenauen, R. (1996).

    Seasonal temperature and salinity fields in the Mediterranean Sea:

    Climatological analyses of a historical data set. Deep-Sea Research:Oceanographic Research Papers 43: 159.

    Brochier, F., Ramieri, E. (2001). Climate change impacts on the

    Mediterranean coastal zones. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.

    Bruno, M., Mananes, R., Alonso, J., Izquierdo, A., Tejedor, L., Kagan, B.

    (2000). Vertical structure of the semidiurnal tidal currents at Camarinal

    sill, the Strait of Gibraltar. Oceanologica Acta - OCEANOL ACTA 23(1):

    1524.

    Bryden, H. L., Stommel, H. M. (1984). Limiting processes that determine

    basic features of the circulation in the Mediterranean Sea. Oceanologica

    Acta 7(3): 289296.

    Bryden, H. L., Candela, J., Kinder, T. H. (1994). Exchange through the

    Strait of Gibraltar. Progress in Oceanography 33(3): 201248.

    Buchanan, J. Y. (1877). On the distribution of salt in the ocean, as

    indicated by the specific gravity of its waters. Journal of the Royal

    Geographical Society of London 47: 72.

    Candela, J. (1991). The Gibraltar strait and its role in the dynamics of the

    Mediterranean Sea. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans: 267299.

    Candela, J., Winant, C., Bryden, H. L. (1989). Meteorologically forced

    subinertial flows through the Strait of Gibraltar. Journal of Geophysical

    Research: Oceans 94(C9): 1266712679.

    Candela, J., Winant, C., Ruiz, A. (1990). Tides in the Strait of Gibraltar.

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 95(C5): 73137335.

    Carter, D. B. (1956). The water balance of the Mediterranean and Black

    Seas. Drexel Institute of Technology, Laboratory of Climatology.

    Castro, M., Garc!a-Rodr!guez, J., Gonzlez-Vida, J., Macias, J., Pares, C.,

    Vazquez Cendon, M. (2004). Numerical simulation of two-layer shallow

  • 8/10/2019 Synthesis - Numerical modelling of the Strait of Gibraltar.pdf

    16/18

    16 SYNTHESISREPORT

    water flows through channels with irregular geometry. Journal of

    Computational Physics 195(1): 202235.

    Charlier, R. H., Finkl, C. W. (2009). Ocean Energy: Tide and tidal power.

    Springer.

    Church, J.A., Clark, P. U., Cazenave, A., Gregory, J. M., Jevrejeva, S.,

    Levermann, A., Merrifield, M. A., Milne, G. A., Nerem, R. S., Nunn, P.

    D., Payne, A. J., Pfeffer, W. T., Stammer, D., Unnikrishnan, A. S. (2013).

    Sea Level Change. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis.

    Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the

    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K.

    Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex

    and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,

    United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

    Crpon, M. (1961). Influence de la pression atmosphrique sur le niveau

    moyen de la Mditerrane Occidentale et sur le flux travers le Dtroit de

    Gibraltar.

    Cronin, T. M. (2012). Rapid sea-level rise. Quaternary Science Reviews

    56: 1130.

    Dalziel, S. B. (1990). Rotating two-layer sill flows. In The Physical

    Oceanography of Sea Straits. L. J. Pratt, ed. Pp. 343371. NATO ASI

    Series, 318. Springer Netherlands.

    Davies, A. M., Luyten, P. J., Deleersnijder, E. (1995). Turbulence energy

    models in shallow sea oceanography. In Coastal and Estuarine Studies.

    Daniel R. Lynch and Alan M. Davies, eds. Pp. 97123. Washington, D.

    C.: American Geophysical Union.

    Farmer, D., Armi, L. (1986). Maximal two-layer exchange over a sill and

    through the combination of a sill and contraction with barotropic flow.

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics 164: 53 76.

    Garc!a Lafuente, J., Vargas, J., Plaza, F., Sarhan, T., Candela, J.,

    Bascheck, B. (2000). Tide at the eastern section of the Strait of Gibraltar.

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 105(C6): 1419714213.

    Garc!a Lafuente, J., Delgado, J. Criado, F. (2002). Low-frequencyvariability of the exchanged flows through the Strait of Gibraltar during

    CANIGO. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in

    Oceanography(19): 40514067.

    Garca, M. A., Gonzlez, M., Espino, M. I., Snchez-Arcilla Conejo, A.

    (2011). Un modelo numrico en elementos finitos para la corriente

    inducida por la marea. Aplicaciones al Estrecho de Gibraltar.

    Garrett, C., Bormans, M., Thompson, K. (1990). Is the exchange through

    the Strait of Gibraltar maximal or submaximal? In The Physical

    Oceanography of Sea Straits. L. J. Pratt, ed. Pp. 271294. NATO ASI

    Series, 318. Springer Netherlands.

    Gonella, M., Teatini, P., Tomasi, L., Gambolati, G. (1998). Flood risk

    analysis in the upper adriatic sea due to storm surge, tide, waves, and

    natural and anthropic land subsidence. In CENAS. Giuseppe Gambolati,ed. Pp. 313324. Water Science and Technology Library, 28. Springer

    Netherlands.

    Helfrich, K. (1995). Time-dependent two-layer hydraulic exchange flows.

    Journal of Physical Oceanography 25(3): 359373.

    Herbaut, C., Crpon, M. (1996). A sensitivity study of the general

    circulation of the western Mediterranean Sea. Part I: The response to

    density forcing through the straits. Journal of Physical Oceanography -

    Journal of Physical Oceanography 26(1): 6584.

    Hess, K. W. (1986). Numerical model of circulation in Chesapeake Bay

    and the Continental Shelf, vol.6. National oceanic and atmosphericadministration, national environmental satellite, data, and information

    service, assessment and information services center.

    Hess, K. W. (2000). MECCA2 program documentation. U.S. Dept. of

    Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National

    Ocean Service, Office of Coast Survey, Coast Survey Development

    Laboratory.

    Higdon, R. L. (2006). Numerical modelling of ocean circulation. Acta

    Numerica 15: 385.

    Hopkins, T. S. (1978). Physical processes in the Mediterranean basins.

    Estuarine Transport Processes: 269310.

    Hopkins, T. S. (1999). The thermohaline forcing of the Gibraltar

    exchange. Journal of Marine Systems 20: 131.

    Horton, B. P., Rahmstorf, S., Engelhart, S. E., Kemp, A. C. (2014). Expert

    assessment of sea-level rise by AD 2100 and AD 2300. Quaternary

    Science Reviews 84: 16.

    Hs, K. J., Ryan, W. B. F., Cita, M. B. (1973). Late miocene desiccation

    of the Mediterranean. Nature 242(5395): 240244.

    Izquierdo, A., Tejedor, L., Sein, D. V., Backhaus, J. O., Brandt, P.,

    Rubino, A., Kagan, B.A. (2001). Control variability and internal bore

    evolution in the Strait of Gibraltar: A 2-D two-layer model study.

    Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 53(5): 637651.

    Jevrejeva, S., Moore, J. C., Grinsted, A. (2012). Sea level projections to

    AD2500 with a New generation of climate change scenarios. Global and

    Planetary Change 8081: 1420.

  • 8/10/2019 Synthesis - Numerical modelling of the Strait of Gibraltar.pdf

    17/18

    17

    Kinder, T., Bryden, H. L. (1987). The 19851986 Gibraltar experiment:

    data collection and preliminary results. Eos, Transactions American

    Geophysical Union 68(40): 786794.

    Kinder, T., Bryden, H. L. (1988). Gibraltar experiment: summary of the

    field program and initial results of the Gibraltar experiment.

    Lacombe, H., Richez, C. (1982). The regime of the Strait of Gibraltar.

    Elsevier Oceanography Series: 1373.

    Lamb, H. (1994). Hydrodynamics 6th Edition. Fluid dynamics and solid

    mechanics. Cambridge University Press.

    Loget, N., Van Den Driessche, J. (2006). On the origin of the Strait of

    Gibraltar. Sedimentary Geology 188189. The messinian salinity crisis

    revisited next messinian Colloquium: 341356.

    Longo, A., Manzo, M., Pierini, S. (1992). A model for the generation of

    nonlinear internal tides in the Strait of Gibraltar. Oceanologica Acta

    15(3): 233243.

    Maidment, D. (1993). Handbook of hydrology. First edition. New York:

    McGraw-Hill Professional.

    Meehl, G. A., Stocker, T. F., Collins, W. D., Friedlingstein, P., Gaye, A.

    T., Gregory, J. M., Kitoh, A., Knutti, R., Murphy, J. M., Noda, A., Raper,

    S. C. B., Watterson, I. G., Weaver, A. J., Zhao, Z. C. (2007). Global

    Climate Projections. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science

    Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergo ernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin,

    M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L.

    Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom

    and New York, NY, USA.

    Mela, P. (1998). Pomponius Melas description of the world. University

    of Michigan Press.

    Mellor, G., Yamada, T. (1982). Development of a turbulence closure

    model for geophysical fluid problems. Reviews of Geophysics 20(4):

    851875.

    Morozov, E. G., Trulsen, K., Velarde, M., Vlasenko, V. (2002). Internal

    tides in the Strait of Gibraltar. Journal of Physical Oceanography 32(11).

    Munk, W., (1948). Notes on a theory of the thermocline. Sears

    Foundation for Marine Research.

    Nicholls, R. J., Hoozemans, F. M. J. (1996). The Mediterranean:

    vulnerability to coastal implications of climate change. Ocean & Coastal

    Management 31(23). Sustainable Development at the Regional Level:

    The Mediterranean: 105132.

    Nicholls, R. J. (2002). Analysis of global impacts of sea-level rise: A case

    study of flooding. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C

    27(3234): 14551466.

    Nielsen, J. N. (1912). Hydrography of the Mediterranean and adjacentwaters.

    Orlanski, I. (1976). A Simple boundary condition for unbounded

    hyperbolic flows. Journal of Computational Physics 21(3): 251269.

    Padman, L., Erofeeva, S. (2005). Tide Model Driver (TMD) manual.

    Earth & Space Research.

    Parrilla, G., Neuer, S. (2002). Topical studies in oceanography: Canary

    Islands Azores Gibraltar Observations (CANIGO). Deep-Sea Research

    Part II - Topical Studies in Oceanography - DEEP-SEA RES PT II-TOP

    ST OCE 49(17): 34093413.

    Edward, P. L., Atiemo-Obeng, V., Kresta, S. (2004). Handbook of

    industrial mixing: science and practice. John Wiley & Sons.

    Reid, J. L. (1979). On the contribution of the Mediterranean Sea outflow

    to the Norwegian-Greenland Sea. Deep-Sea Res. 26: 11991223.

    Richez, C. (1994). Airborne synthetic aperture radar tracking of internal

    waves in the Strait of Gibraltar. Progress in Oceanography 33(2): 93159.

    Sannino, G., Bargagli, A., Artale, V. (2002). Numerical modeling of the

    mean exchange through the Strait of Gibraltar. Journal of Geophysical

    Research: Oceans 107(C8): 91.

    Sannino, G., Bargagli, A., Artale, V. (2004). Numerical modeling of the

    semidiurnal tidal exchange through the Strait of Gibraltar. Journal of

    Geophysical Research C: Oceans 109: C05011 123 C05011 2323.

    Sannino, G., Carillo, A., Artale, V. (2007). Three-layer view of transports

    and hydraulics in the Strait of Gibraltar: A three-dimensional model study.

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 112(C3): C03010.

    Schot, S. H. (1992). Eighty years of Sommerfelds radiation condition.

    Historia Mathematica 19(4): 385401.

    Schott, G. (1915). Die Gewsser des Mittelmeeres: vorzugsweise nach

    den Arbeiten des dnischen Forschungsdampfers Thor, 1908-1910. E.S.

    Mittler.

    Sharqawy, M. H., Lienhard, J., Zubair, S. M. (2010). Thermophysical

    properties of seawater: A review of existing correlations and data.

    Desalination and Water Treatment 16(1-3): 354380.

  • 8/10/2019 Synthesis - Numerical modelling of the Strait of Gibraltar.pdf

    18/18

    18 SYNTHESISREPORT

    Smagorinsky, J. (1963). General circulation experiments with primitive

    equations, I, The basic experiment. Monthly Weather Review 91(3): 99

    164.

    Smaoui, H. (1996). Three-Dimensional numerical modeling ofhydrodynamics and sediment transport in the eastern part of the English

    Channel and the southern part of the North Sea. Ph.D. Thesis, University

    of Lille, France (in French).

    Smaoui, H., Ouahsine, A. (2006). 2D numerical simulation of the tidal

    flow in the Strait of Gibraltar. Report of the Convention CNRS/CNRST,

    Contract SP105/06.

    Smith, W. H. F., Sandwell, D. (1997). Global Sea Floor Topography from

    Satellite Altimetry and Ship Depth Soundings. Science 277(5334): 1956

    1962.

    Snoussi, M., Ouchani, T., Niazi, S. (2008). Vulnerability assessment of

    the impact of sea-level rise and flooding on the Moroccan coast: The case

    of the Mediterranean eastern zone. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science

    77(2). Land Ocean Interactions in the Coastal Zone, LOICZ: Lessons

    from Banda Aceh, Atlantis, and Canute: 206213.

    Stommel, H., Farmer, H. (1953). Control of salinity in an estuary by a

    transition. J. Mar. Res. 12: 1320.

    Sverdrup, H. U., Johnson, M. W., Fleming, R. H. (1942). The Oceans:

    their physics, chemistry, and general biology. Asia Publishing House.

    Tejedor, L., Izquierdo, A., Kagan, B., Sein, D. (1999). Simulation of the

    semidiurnal tides in the Strait of Gibraltar. Journal of Geophysical

    Research: Oceans 104(C6): 1354113557.

    Tester, J. W. (2005). Sustainable Energy: choosing among options. MIT

    Press.

    Tixeront, J. (1969). Le bilan hydrologique de La Mer Noire et de La Mer

    Mditerrane. International Association of Scientific Hydrology. Bulletin

    14(4): 6169.

    Torsvik, T. (2013). Introduction to computational fluid dynamics and

    ocean modelling. In Preventive Methods for Coastal Protection. Tarmo

    Soomere and Ewald Quak, eds. Pp. 65100. Springer International

    Publishing.

    Tsimplis, M. (2000). Vertical structure of tidal currents over the

    Camarinal sill at the Strait of Gibraltar. Journal of Geophysical Research:

    Oceans 105(C8): 1970919728.

    Tsimplis, M., Proctor, R., Flather, R. (1995). A two-dimensional tidal

    model for the Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research:

    Oceans 100(C8): 1622316239.

    Tsimplis, M., Bryden, H. (2000). Estimation of the transports through the

    Strait of Gibraltar. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research

    Papers 47(12): 22192242.

    Vargas, J. (2004). Fluctuaciones subinerciales y estado hidrulico del

    intercambio a travs del estrecho de Gibraltar. Universidad de Sevilla.

    Vargas, Y. M. (2010). Cambio climtico en el Mediterrneo espaol. Inst.

    Espaol de Oceanografa.

    Wang, D. P. (1989). Model of mean and tidal flows in the Strait of

    Gibraltar. Deep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers

    36(10): 15351548.

    Wang, D. P. (1993). The Strait of Gibraltar model: internal tide, diurnalinequality and fortnightly modulation. Deep Sea Research Part I:

    Oceanographic Research Papers 40(6): 11871203.

    Xia, J., Falconer, R. A., Lin, B. (2010). Impact of different operating

    modes for a Severn barrage on the tidal power and flood inundation in the

    Severn estuary, UK. Applied Energy 87(7): 23742391.

    Xia, J., Falconer, R. A., Lin, B., Tan, G. (2012). Estimation of annual

    energy output from a tidal barrage using two different methods. Applied

    Energy 93: 327336.