sustaining aquaculture · pdf file · 2013-10-13sustaining aquaculture growth 02...
TRANSCRIPT
SUSTAINING AQUACULTURE GROWTH
CONSU LTAT ION DRA F T
How do we sustain the growth in aquaculture that is needed?
02
SUSTA INING AQUACULTURE GROWTH
02
How do we sustain the growth in aquaculture that is needed?
CONTENT Page
02.01 CURRENT STATE 1
What is the current status of aquaculture and how does it differ geographically and by production type?
02.02 TRENdS ANd ExpECTAT iONS 4
What are the current trends in aquaculture production and what is the evidence for this? / How are current trends expected to evolve in the coming decade?
02.03 KEY UNCERTA iNT iES 5
What are the key uncertainties surrounding conclusions about the current state of aquaculture? / How do these uncertainties differ by geographic region or aquaculture sector? / What are the key uncertainties that will affect likely futures for the sector?
02.04 KEY iSSUES 6
What are the key issues that need to be addressed to improve aquaculture sector governance and production practices to sustain sector growth? / Do these issues differ for different parts of the aquaculture sector? / Why is this?
02.05 SUCCESSES 7
Are there any examples or promising approaches that illustrate the ways in which problems in this area have been successfully addressed?
02.06 REFERENCES ANd RELATEd REAdiNG 8
ABOUT TH iS dOCUMENT
This briefing paper is part of a series aimed at providing accessible summaries of key issues for the fish food system. Combining empirical data summaries with informed opinion and perspective we hope that these papers will both inform and stimulate debate and dialogue among stakeholders. Each brief was prepared by the Fishing for a Future secretariat, drawing on opinions and analysis provided by an expert in the topic area; this paper was prepared with support from Dr D. Little and Dr J. Bostock.
Comments and critique are welcome and should be sent to [email protected].
What is the current status of aquaculture and how does it differ geographically and by production type?
AqUACULTURE pROdUCES HALF THE wORLd’S F iSH FOR diRECT
CONSUMpT iON.
AqUACULTURE pROdUCT iON iS pREdOMiNANTLY iNLANd iN FRESHwATER.
CH iNA iS BY FAR THE MOST dOMiNANT, FOLLOwEd BY THE REST
OF ASiA .
AqUACULTURE pROdUCT iON
BY REG iON 2010
pROdUCT iON FOR d iRECT
HUMAN CONSUMpT iON*
iN M iLL iON TONNES
KEY POINTS
AqUACULTURE CApTURE
63.6
19.3
44.3
67.2
55.7
11.5
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
* 2011 figures calculated from Table 1 FAO (2012). (Assumes all aquaculture production is directly consumed)
Marine
Inland
1
CURRENT STATE 02.01Ref.
CONT iNENT pROdUCT iON 2010 (T )
China 36,734,215
Asia (Excl. China) 16,566,942
Europe 2,523,179
South America 1,883,134
Africa 1,288,320
North America 693,294
Oceania 183,516
61.4%22.7%
0.3%
2.2%
4.2%
3.1%
1.2%
Source: FAO (2012)
BR IEF ING PA PER 02 / SUSTA INING AqUACULT URE GROwT h
CONTRiBUT iON TO Gdp
pROdUCT iON iNTENSiTY
2
KiLOGRAMS pER
SqUARE K i LOMETER
pERCENT Gdp
SOME SMALLER COUNTRiES HAvE ESpEC iALLY iNTENSE pROdUCT iON
(BANGLAdESH, EGYpT, v iETNAM, ECUAdOR).
A RELAT ivELY SMALL CONTRiBUT iON TO MOST ECONOMiES, BUT
wiTH SOME ExCEpT iONS iN AGRiCULTURE dEpENdENT ECONOMiES
ExpERiENC iNG RApid GROwTH (E .G . BANGLAdESH ANd v iETNAM).
KEY POINTS
Source: Institute of Aquaculture using FAO and CIA data sources
Source: Institute of Aquaculture using FAO and CIA data sources
0 – 25
25 – 50
50 – 100
100 – 250
250 – 500
500 – 1,000
1,000 – 2,500
> 2,500
Zero or missing data
< 0.1
0.1 – 0.25
0.25 – 0.5
0.5 – 1
1 – 2.5
2.5 – 5
> 5
Zero or missing data
AqUACULTURE pROdUCT iON BY CULTURE ENviRONMENT
pROpORT iON OF pROdUCT iON
66%+of total production involves some feeding
3
dOMiNANT SpEC iES GROUpS
Salmon dominate diadromous fish production, followed by milkfish
Carps dominate freshwater fish production, followed by tilapias
Clams dominate mollusc production, followed by oysters
White leg shrimp dominate brackishwater production
1
2
3
4
THE pREdOMiNANT pROdUCT iON SYSTEMS ARE EARTHEN
pONdS (FRESH ANd BRACKiSHwATER), FOLLOwEd BY OFF BOTTOM
CULTURE SYSTEMS FOR MOLLUSCS.
AN iNCREASiNG pROpORT iON OF pROdUCT iON iS ACHiEvEd
wiTH FEEdS.
Calculated from data used in Hall et al. (2011) Source: FAO (2012)
FRESHwATER MA iNLY F iSH
BRACKiSHwATER MA iNLY SHR iMpS/pRAwNS
MARiNE MA iNLY MOLLUSCS
Freshwater fishes
Crustaceans
Diadromous fishes
Other species
Crustaceans
Freshwater fishes
Diadromous fishes
Marine fishes
Molluscs
Molluscs
Diadromous fishes
Marine fishes
Crustaceans
Miscellaneous animals
2010
1
3
4
2010
1
3
4
2010
1
2
3 4
BOTTOM CULTURE
CAGES & pENS
OFF-BOTTOM CULTURE
pONdS
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%6%
9%
48%
37%
02.02Ref.
BR IEF ING PA PER 02 / SUSTA INING AqUACULT URE GROwT h
TRENdS ANd ExPECTAT IONSWhat are the current trends in aquaculture production and what is the evidence for this? / How are current trends expected to evolve in the coming decade?
CURRENT TRENdS
> Aquaculture has been the fastest growing animal production sector for the last four decades, but growth is slowing. > The proportion of marine culture is falling relative to freshwater. Marine share of total aquaculture produc-tion fell from 34% to 30% between 2006 and 2011. > Prices are rising.
The total market for aquaculture products will rise and the sector is likely to grow to meet this demand.
Areas with lower growth rates may encourage the sector to seek economies of scale; areas with faster growth rates may see new entrants and greater commercial risk taking.
Key input costs (feed, fertilizer, power, fuel) are likely to rise, driving efforts to greater efficiency.
Shrimp, salmon, tilapia, pangasius, sea bass and bream are likely to consolidate their dominance, but there is room for many niche products to fit local cultures.
Small and medium enterprises will continue to dominate the sector.
LiKELY FUTURE TRENdS
AqUACULTURE pROdUCT iON GROwTH RATE
wORLd AqUACULTURE vALUE dEvELOpMENT(NOMiNAL T ERMS)
4
1981 –
1990
1991 –
2000
2001 –
2010
2011 –
2020dECAdE
10
8
6
4
2
0
GR (%)
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
2000 2010 2020
YEAR
3000
2000
1000
0
US$ TRiLL iON
pROdUCTiON (MiLL iON TONNES)
YEAR
assume no growth in fisheries
assume fisheries grow at 0.7% p.a.
Production forecast (Hall et al., 2011)
Global consumption rises to 22.5 kg/y
Total fish trade
Technological advances in aquaculture
Baseline scenario
Ecological collapse of fisheries
Global consumption remains at 1996 levels (15.6 kg/y)
Aquaculture
Capture
Production targets (national data)
Wijkstrom (2003)
FAO (2004)
IFPRI (2003)
Ye (1999)
Source: OECD-FAO (2011)
Source: Hall et al. (2011)
Circles denote projections of future aquaculture production based on various supply and demand assumptions.
Source: OECD-FAO (2011)
KEY UNCERTA INT IESWhat are the key uncertainties surrounding conclusions about the current state of aquaculture? / How do these uncertainties differ by geographic region or aquaculture sector? / What are the key uncertainties that will affect likely futures for the sector?
02.03Ref.
FEEd USE iN CH iNA
HOw SOON wiLL CH iNA ANd SE ASiA MOvE
AwAY FROM LOw TROpHiC SpEC iES
TOwARdS THOSE dEpENdENT ON FEEdS?
> Traditional carp species continue to make up the majority of aquaculture production, but the culture of other freshwater finfish species is growing rapidly.
CATASTROpHiC LOSS TO diSEASE
wHERE ANd wHEN wiLL THE NExT MAjOR
diSEASE CRiS iS OCCUR? / HOw qUiCKLY
CAN wE ExpECT TECHNOLOGiCAL BREAK-
THROUGHS iN diSEASE pREvENT iON
(vACC iNE dEvELOpMENT)?
> Chile: salmon production fell 50% between 2007 and 2010 due to infectious salmon anaemia (ISA). > Shrimp: in 1996 direct and indirect costs attributa-ble to shrimp viral diseases was US$3 billion annually ~40% of the total production capacity.> Significant losses can occur in most types of system although they may not be as noticeable in more exten-sive systems.
FEEd TECHNOLOGiES
HOw qUiCKLY CAN wE ExpECT TECHNO-
LOGiCAL BREAKTHROUGHS iN FEEdS
(REdUC iNG dEpENdENCY ON F iSH OiLS)?
> Availability and price of fish oil will continue to rise without suitable and economically viable substitutes (plants or microalgae). > In tandem with the need by the livestock sector as a whole, innovation here will have a major influence on future development – it could happen quickly.
> Closer integration of fish waste streams and by-product use is also occurring, which will further reduce dependency on other feed sources.
CERT iF iCAT iON ANd ACCOUNTABiL iT Y
MECHANiSMS
HOw FAST ANd HOw FAR wiLL
CERT iF iCAT iON dEvELOp?
> An increasing (but still small) level of certification, but the certification processes are under pressure from a range of stakeholders.> The limitations of farm-only certification are becoming clear (major environmental impacts in off-farm parts of the value chain, e.g. feed ingredients). > Several food scandals (e.g. “horse-meat” in Europe) have increased focus on supply chain management. > Issues of labour rights and ethics are becoming more prominent.
iNdUSTRY CONSOLidAT iON
HOw FAST ANd HOw FAR wiLL SECTOR
CONSOLidAT iON GO?
> With very few exceptions, aquaculture still lacks the scale that might support the significant costs of innovation (e.g. breeding programmes). > Consolidation into larger business models to develop and sustain such technology development can be expected, but how far this will go is unclear.
5
BR IEF ING PA PER 02 / SUSTA INING AqUACULT URE GROwT h
ENviRONMENTAL pERFORMANCE, SOC iAL pERFORMANCE ANd FOOd SAFETY
ENvIRONmENTAL PERfORmANCE> A process of improving traceability of all products is underway for almost all trade between the global South and North, and environmental certification is increasing.> A major issue is differentiating the value of products from very diverse systems:
> Small scale less intensive producers have potentially fewer environmental costs, but cannot afford to certify, are inherently more difficult to trace and often suffer from weak governance.> Intensive producers often have higher environmental costs, but are more likely to be traceable and certifiable under current norms.
SOC IAL PERfORmANCE> Recent ethical labour issues concerning shrimp processing using illegal migrant labour in Thailand is an example of the type of social issue that will need to be addressed by the sector.
fOOd SAfETY> Sourcing of feed ingredients may become a critical food safety issue in the future. For example, current oversight levels by European supermarkets disallow GMOs, and UK supermarkets refuse inclusion of feather meal, a common feed ingredient, in diets.
FEEdS
> A tightening of feed supplies globally, particularly in the light of expected climate change predictions
and growth in demand make innovation in this area crucial.> There is expected to be increasing pressure on pre-mium grade fishmeal and oils, making the search for compatible products to spare their use more urgent. > Closer integration of fisheries and aquaculture in terms of by-product use is a certainty; one major challenge is the retention and processing of geograph-ically dispersed ‘wastes’ for value addition. > Innovations in soy could be transformative. These include post-harvest processing (soy protein con-centrates) and genomics and plant breeding. Such developments, and similar progress on other plant sources, will reduce pressure on marine derived feed ingredients.
THE pOLiCY ENviRONMENT
> The state of property rights and risk aversion is probably a key reason for the relative lack of ‘external’ investment in aquaculture in developing countries. The most developed corporate models have only occurred where property rights are clear and/or have been negotiated to provide exclusive access. > Where private sector investment does occur, a key question is whether it will lead to intensive produc-tion for commodity markets that has negative con-sequences for the parallel development of the more diversified, extensive approaches that are currently persisting, and indeed expanding.> Appropriate policy and support services that will encourage and sustain small and medium enterprise aquaculture in developing countries will be key to ensuring sector investment and growth.
6
02.04Ref.KEYISSUESWhat are the key issues that need to be addressed to improve aquaculture sector governance and production practices to sustain sector growth? / Do these issues differ for different parts of the aquaculture sector? / Why is this?
ONE STOp SHOp MOdELS
The Sidai one-stop shop model is showing promise in supporting smallholder livestock farmers and herders in East Africa. The use of one-stop shops has been demonstrated for aquaculture in Asia but further development could be informed by assessment of this African-based innovation in social enterprise.
http://www.farmafrica.org/kenya/sidai
ExTENSiF iCAT iON
Extensification of aquaculture is a growing trend in a number of contexts, from integration with agricul-tural irrigation to the ranching of aquatic animals, and coastal seaweed and bivalve production. Risk aversion and health management concerns have also increased the use of polyculture for export orientated production.
vALUE CHAiNS L iNKiNG dEvEL-OpiNG COUNTRY pROdUCERS TO NEw MARKETS
Private sector investment has resulted in the building of a large and still growing market in the US (cur-rently tilapia is the 4th most popular seafood). The momentum, begun by companies such as Regal Springs in Indonesia and Honduras, has resulted in Latin America becoming a hub for supplying the North American market with fresh product, and a much larger market for frozen fillets is developing in Asia, principally China.
http://www.regalsprings.com/tag/indonesia
pUBLiC pRivATE iNvESTMENTS iN ETHiCAL vALUE CHAiNS
WAB trading, a German-based SME has developed internal control systems that now support traceable organic shrimp production with thousands of farmers in Bangladesh, allowing access to premium markets for high quality products.
7
02.05Ref.SUCCESSES
Are there any examples or promising approaches that illustrate the ways in which problems in this area have been successfully addressed?
BR IEF ING PA PER 02 / SUSTA INING AqUACULT URE GROwT h
8
REfERENCES ANd RELATEd REAdING
02.06Ref.
Anderson, J. L. 2007. Aquaculture and fisheries: complement or competition. Global trade conference on aquaculture No. 9:231-236.
Bostock, J. C., B. McAndrew, R. Richards, K. Jauncey, T. C. Telfer, K. Lorenzen, D. C. Little, L. G. Ross, N. Handisyde, I. Gatward, and R. Corner. 2010. Aquaculture: global status and trends. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365:2897-2912.
Brugère, C., and N. Ridler. 2004. Global aquaculture outlook in the next decades: an analysis of national aquaculture production forecast to 2030. FAO Fish-eries Circular No. 1001 47pp.
FAO. 2004. Future prospects for fish and fishery products: medium-term projections to the years 2010 and 2015. FAO Fisheries Circular FIDI/972-1.
FAO. 2012. The state of world fisheries and aquacul-ture (SOFIA) - 2012. 230pp.
Hall, S. J., A. Delaporte, M. J. Phillips, M. Beveridge, and M. O’Keefe. 2011. Blue Frontiers: Managing the Environmental Costs of Aquaculture. The WorldFish Center, Penang, Malaysia.
IFPRI. 2003. Fish to 2020. Supply and demand in changing global markets. IFPRI, Washington DC.
Muir, J., D. C. Little, J. A. Young, and J. C. Bostock. 2009. Growing the wealth of aquaculture: perspec-tives and potential. 46pp.
OECD. 2010. Globalization in fisheries and aquacul-ture: Opportunities and challenges. 157pp.
OECD/FAO. 2011. Agricultural Outlook 2011 - Fish. OECD Publishing, Wijkstróm, U. N. 2003. Short and long-term prospects for consumption of fish. Veteri-nary Research Communications 27:461-468.
Wijkstróm, U. N. 2003. Short and long-term prospects for consumption of fish. Veterinary Research Communications 27(suppl. 1):461-468.
Ye, Y. 1999. Historical consumption and future demand for fish and fishery products: Exploratory calculations for the years 2015/2030. FAO Fisheries Circular 946.
BRiEF iNG pApERS
01 SUSTA iN iNG F iSH STOCKS
What are the key levers for improving capture fisheries governance to sustain the resource base – how do these change for different types of fishery?
02 SUSTA iN iNG AqUACULTURE GROwTH
How do we sustain the growth in aquaculture that is needed?
03 COpiNG wiTH CL iMATE CHANGE
How can we climate proof our fish production systems?
04 THE wEALTH TO wELFARE CONT iNUUM
What economic roles are wild capture fisheries best placed to play and under what circumstances?
05 THE FUTURE OF dEMANd
How will the demand for fish evolve and what are the implications of anticipated changes?
06 MEET iNG NEEdS
How can the fish food system best meet the needs of poor consumers to address food and nutrition security challenges?
ALL BR iEF iNG pApERS ARE AvA iLABLE FOR dOwNLOAd AT
www.F iSH iNGFUTURE .ORGPdf
pLEASE SENd ALL COMMENTS TO Bp.FEEdBACK@F iSH iNGFUTURE .ORG
www.F iSH iNGFUTURE .ORG
F iSHERiES ANd AqUACULTURE
iN THE 21ST CENTURY:
AN iN iT iAT ivE FOR GLOBAL ACT iON
iN iT iAT ivE SECRETARiAT:
Dr. Stephen J. HallWorldFish, Penang, MalaysiaEmail: [email protected]
Andreas SchafferThe Earth Observatory of Singapore, SingaporeEmail: [email protected]
Paper made fromrecycled material
100% RECYCLED