sustainable employee practices leading to high employee
TRANSCRIPT
Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management, Delhi
LBSIM Working Paper Series
LBSIM/WP/2020/10
Sustainable Employee
Practices Leading to High
Employee Engagement:
Identifying the priorities
Moni Mishra
August,2020
LBSIM Working Papers indicate research in progress by the author(s) and are brought out to elicit
ideas, comments, insights and to encourage debate. The views expressed in LBSIM Working Papers
are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the LBSIM nor its Board of
Governors.
WP/August2020/10
LBSIM Working Paper
Research Cell
Sustainable Employee Practices Leading to High Employee Engagement: Identifying the
Priorities
Moni Mishra
_____________________________________________________________________________
Abstract
Purpose: With sustainability becoming an area of growing concern for businesses globally,
there is a need for organizations to identify the priorities in terms of sustainability themes which
will act as integrative mechanisms and bind changes in the strategic initiatives of organizations.
As the ability of organizations to respond to changes in the external environment becomes
crucial, they embrace integrative and innovative HRM mechanisms to meet the demands. The
purpose of this paper is to identify and discuss some of these sustainability themes on the basis
of which organizations need to prioritise their sustainability concerns in organizations which
also promote higher levels of employee engagement.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The present investigation is carried out with the aid of a
systematic and extensive review of extant literature on sustainability related concerns indicated
by organizations as they embrace changes in the external business environment.
Findings: By focussing on sustainability as a primary integrative mechanism, organizations are
creating an environment in the workplace where employees exhibit a high level of engagement
with work through the behaviours that organizations need to drive better results.
Originality / Value: The paper identifies and highlights the impact of the sustainability themes
which provide a framework to organizations and aid them in embracing change in the external
business environment.
Research limitations/Implications: This is a research study based on extant literature review,
which could be further enriched by empirically examining sustainability themes taken up by
organizations and their impact on the level of employee engagement.
Practical Implications: It is suggested that organizations should make efforts to build and
promote sustainable employee practices identified and prioritised through this research exercise
so as to enhance greater levels of engagement with work and also address employee well-being,
thus boosting the productivity and business performance.
Key words: Sustainability, Employee Engagement, Integrative mechanism, Innovative HRM
practices, Sustainable employee practices
Paper Type: Conceptual Paper
Sustainable Employee Practices Leading to High Employee Engagement: Identifying the
Priorities
Introduction
It is important to understand the significance of sustainability for organizations today. The
advent of globalization and the diffusion of new and varied technologies have caused a series of
complex social, economic and political changes. These changes have had a deep impact on work
and organizations. It has been seen that in recent years, organizations have begun to redefine
their strategic initiatives and weave them into integrative mechanisms, such as sustainability
(Mishra, 2014) for superior performance. Organizations face a number of challenges during
shifting of
Associate Professor, Department of Organizational Behaviour &Human Resource Management,
Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management, Delhi, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
alignments in the course of changing business environments globally. During these times,
organizations engage with redesigning their internal processes to build sustainable competitive
organizations (Som, 2005). Hence a vital component in thisprocess that helps organizations to
leverage themselves in the current times is a culture of sustainability.
Organizations are seriously considering providing and creating best sustainable practices with
people-oriented goals. Human Resource Management (HRM) practices and employee-level
outcomes such as engagement and employee well-being have been found to be significantly
related (Sivapragasam and Raya, 2017). This becomes relevant in the light of the fact that
though a relationship between financial success and the organizations’ commitment to
management practices supporting people oriented goals has been demonstrated through various
studies (Sivapagasam and Raya, 2017), in reality the focus on people-oriented goals has been
diluted and achieving short term financial performance has taken precedence.
Studies have shown that sustainable HRM, broadly defined as practices designed to make
employees more able and more willing to remain in employment at present and in the future
(Van Vuuren and Van Dam, 2013) is largely driven by the employer (Richards, 2020). It is
indicated that employee centred forms of sustainable HRM need to be promoted as these have
the potential to create micro forms of corporatism, where wider political structures such as trade
unions and self-organized employees are absent.
Concerns around sustainability, which have been woven into the basic fabric of a large number
of diverse organizations in varied contexts, have been the focus of this review. Emerging themes
of sustainability, anchored in organizations and manifested through an array of strategic
initiatives, have been mapped. These initiatives have acted as binding forces or integrative
mechanisms for organizations enabling them to cope with the fast-changing business
environment.
The article aims to first, examine the concept of sustainability implemented in organizations as
an integrative mechanism. Second, it aims to identify and prioritise sustainability themes on the
basis of which organizations need to leverage their sustainability concerns and also promote
high levels of employee engagement through expression of such concerns.
The article is structured as follows. First, the methodology is detailed and discussed. Second, the
extant literature on sustainable employee practices and HRM is discussed. In this discussion
attempts are made to identify key characteristics of sustainable employee practices and HRM.
Key findings are discussed in the final section, indicating a vision for the future, and iterating
that envisioning sustainability as something ‘fundamental’ to organizational existence and
excellence is an imperative in today’s global context.
Methodology
The methodology followed in formulating the paper is broadly based on systematic review. Such
an approach requires an analysis of as many already existing studies as relevant (Thorpe, et al.,
2005). From a research perspective, the fact that the conceptualisation of sustainability identified
in these studies is flexible and often novel in nature, there is a need to consider the relational and
embedded qualities of knowledge by which this concept is framed, qualities that resist
conceptualization as some form of separable material asset. The approach taken is suited to the
aims of this study as it is based on a reliable knowledge base accumulated from a range of
studies (Tranfield et al., 2003). Further the approach adopted also allows for the generation of
new research ideas (Borenstein et al., 2005).
The article was approached in the following way. First a literature search was conducted using
the following databases: Emerald, Sage, and Ebscohost. Next, preliminary searches were
conducted, using key terms such as ‘sustainability’, and were accompanied with further search
terms ‘employee’, ‘HRM’, ‘work’ and so on, followed by more refined and advanced searches.
The following key themes emerged: sustainability through i. corporate social responsibility, ii.
green human resource practices and management, iii. talent management, iv. employee voice
and employee well-being v. organizational commitment and citizenship behaviour vi. leadership
vii. corporate sustainability, and viii. innovative HRM in healthcare and other sectors. 45
research papers (all journal articles) were identified to explore and map the subject for the final
review and analysis. Each of these themes has been found to contribute significantly towards
enhancing employee engagement.
Emerging Sustainability Themes: Representations in Current Literature
As evidenced from literature review, long term sustainability has been acknowledged as one of
the most important drivers of organizational growth and organizations have begun to translate
sustainability into their basic values apart from the vision and mission of the organization
(Mishra, 2014).‘What promotes sustainability?’ is the question which directs the thematic
classification of sustainability as indicated in the review of literature.
i. Sustainability through Corporate Social Responsibility
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices have been found to impact corporate
performance (Sharma et al., 2019) leading to higher job retention and employee motivation. The
benefits of adopting CSR practices as a long-term policy for the organization have also been
highlighted. This may be directly linked with large companies accepting the importance of
strong, sustainable company policies (Jakobsen, et al., 2017; Schieffer et al., 2014). Chiang
(2010) has suggested that company strategy can be integrated with CSR to improve the
company’s profile, job satisfaction levels of employees and employee engagement – all of which
contribute to sustainable success.
ii. Sustainability through Organizational Commitment and Citizenship Behaviour
Together with CSR, socially responsible HRM (SRHRM) has been an area of research interest
in recent years and is indicative of significant new insights. In the backdrop of the social identity
perspective, perceptions of SRHRM have been examined through research. The results revealed
that among employees in the Indian context employees’ perceptions of SRHRM including legal
compliance HRM, employee oriented HRM, general corporate social responsibility (CSR)
facilitation HRM and general CSR conduct are related to higher engagement in extra role
behaviour (Gahlawat, 2018).
A reasonable number of positive employee work attitudes and behaviours can be attained by
focusing on CSR related HRM practices such as equal opportunities in HRM, adequate training
and development facility, appointment of CSR staff, compliance with all labour laws, rewarding
employees for CSR and so on. Managers working in multinational companies who
simultaneously engage with CSR issues across multiple institutional environments will be
benefited (Surroca et al., 2013). It is a significant study as it provides an overview of socially
responsible practices successful in Indian business environment and also provides a better
understanding of CSR issues that managers of multinational institutions would have to face
while working in India.
Another primary contribution of the study is that it has put the HRM function in limelight by
demonstrating that CSR no more exists only as the sole territory of marketing and public
relations department in organisations but can also be blended into HR policies specifically in
forms of legal compliance HRM, employee oriented HRM, general CSR facilitation HRM and
general CSR conduct. Another important lesson for HR practitioners is that they need to fully
understand how the organisational members interpret and respond to organisational CSR
policies.
As these are the employees’ subjective perceptions of organisational CSR efforts which have
turned out to be vital for positive employee outcomes, it might be significant if managers put
efforts informing organisational members about CSR efforts consistently. Frequent
communication regarding CSR activities needs to occur to reinforce employees’ perceptions
towards their organisation and job. Further, considering multiple paths, it is also suggested that
only providing a CSR focused HR policy or initiative may not prove sufficient in generating
citizenship behaviour from employees. The policies and practices must address the need to
simultaneously enhance work motivation and job satisfaction among employees (Gahlawat et
al., 2018).
iii. Sustainability through Employee Voice and Employee Well Being
Several studies have conceptualized and examined the relationship between employee
engagement and employee commitment with mediating roles of employee voice and employee
well-being. Findings clearly indicate that the research community is in strong agreement about
engaged employees demonstrating certain positive behavioural manifestations, such as co-
operation with authority and colleagues which benefit the employees and the organization,
ultimately leading to demonstration of voice behaviour on the part of the employees (Salanova
et al., 2008). It is also noted that employee commitment behaviour is observed as a result of the
sense of meaning and fulfilment which employees derive from the job by being part of voice
behaviour (Balain et al., 2009).
It is important to understand that there is no single road map which will work as the ‘magic
formula’ for all organizations – every organization starts from a different place and has a unique
journey and destination. However, ‘positive beneficial actions directed at employees by the
organization contribute to the establishment of high-quality exchange relationships…that create
obligations for employees to reciprocate in positive, beneficial ways’ (Setton, Bennet & Liden,
1996). Hence it is imperative that organizations identify factors which are valued by employees
and also recognize that employees are key stakeholders of organizations so as to facilitate
organizations to achieve excellence.
iv. Sustainability through Green HRM
Studies have been taken up to explore green human resource management in India in recent
years (Mishra, 2017). Environmental training, green recruitment, performance appraisal,
employee involvement and compensation are green human resource practices which have been
indicated as desirable for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour in the organizations. Data
analyses also revealed that crucial factors to facilitate green behaviours among employees are
top management support and mutual learning among departments. Hence an interdisciplinary
framework for building holistic sustainable organizations is proposed by integrating learnings
from green human resource management, green supply chain management, competitive
advantage strategy and green corporate social responsibility.
‘Green organizational culture and adoption of green strategy’ were green human resource
management (GHRM) indicators which were identified to be significant in the automotive sector
(Raut et al., 2019). It must be acknowledged that together with benefits accruing to the
environment, GHRM will facilitate organizations in saving valuable resources for the coming
generations. It will also promote cross-cutting through appropriate GHRM strategies to achieve
economic sustainability. In the current times, when industry sectors are often impacting the
environment dimension of sustainability negatively, adopting sustainable practices increasingly
becomes the need of the hour, as also emphasized by NGOs, and government organizations. In
that context, employees play a vital role in green transformation which is the need of the hour.
For HR specialists, this research is significant as it will help them to identify key indicators to be
considered for enhancing the organizations’ environmental performance.
v. Sustainability through Talent Management
Studies in the field of talent management indicate that given the present level of interest in
organizational research related to sustainable work and employment, and in the journey to
achieve organizational and human sustainable outcomes through human resource practices,
laying emphasis on responsible management and ethical aspects in organizational talent
strategies and practices becomes imperative and non-negotiable (Anlesinya et al., 2019). In that
light, talent philosophies, organizational justice theory and stakeholder theory need to be evoked
and closely referred to while making critical choices related to talent acquisition and
management. Contributions of such studies find merit in postulating that responsible talent
management practices promote achievement of multilevel sustainable outcomes such as decent
work, and both employee and organizational well-being.
vi. Sustainability through Leadership
Research has focussed on the development of a model of sustainable leadership which is seen to
be especially relevant during times of economic uncertainty. It is postulated that the uncertain
and changing business environment, leading to increasing incidences of behavioural deviance,
require changes in workplace leadership styles. Leadership styles of MK Gandhi and JRD Tata
have been closely analysed based on spiritual humanistic ideology (integrity, ethics and social
values, Knowles, Towmey and Abdul-Ali, 2009). These leaders have had sustainable influence
in political and business domains for many decades. Hence the study validates the sustainability
of their leadership based on spiritual humanistic ideology and opens possibilities of extending
the model to the current times. It is considered to be relevant during these uncertain times, when
there is a need not only for organisational transformation but also social transformation, and one
of the routes through which this may be brought about is the spiritual humanistic value-based
leadership (Pathak Sharma and Singh 2013). Similar ideas reverberate in another research work,
which examines the role of spiritual family values in shaping Tata as a sustainable business
(Mohapatra et al., 2018). The extant workplace spirituality literature posits that the role of
spiritual and religious values is vital for organisations and individuals to prosper. Using
historical data and biographical method, this research traces the history of Tata and examines the
causal mechanism between spirituality and sustainable business.
vii. Sustainability through Corporate Performance
Research was undertaken to explore the disclosure of corporate sustainability practices and
examine the association between sustainability performance and financial performance in the
Asian context considering firms from India and Japan (Laskar, 2017). It was seen that the
average level of disclosure is higher in case of Japanese firms as compared to Indian firms.
Analysis also revealed that the environmental factor is more dominating in influencing the
financial performance in Japan whereas in India it is the social factor that dominates the
financial performance.
With growing environmental and social concerns worldwide, the present decade has witnessed a
paradigm shift of the business forms from traditional financial expectations to corporate
sustainability (CS). Corporate sustainability is a broad societal guiding model that incorporates
three concepts – economy, society and environment. According to this concept of the triple
bottom line, every organisation must put an effort to give equal importance to society
environment and economy (Elkington, 1994) and such performances must be communicated in
the form of Sustainability Report or Business Responsibility Report. The broad concept of CS
and encompassing short term and long term economic, social and environmental performances
have been indicated to emerge as strategic levers for a firm to maintain healthy relationship with
the stakeholders (Cortez & Cudia, 2011) and eventually to fulfil the broad dimensions of
sustainable development (Gladwin, Kenelly & Krause, 1995).
Recent research has also looked at the current status of corporate sustainability practices in small
and medium enterprises (SMEs). Findings indicate that the SMEs, specifically those in Asian
emerging markets, are lagging behind in terms of CS practices. Although CS is a well-practiced
area in big organisations, social and environmental practices are grossly neglected in SMEs. A
collaborative mode of operation, government policy and facilitation, and supporting organisation
culture can positively influence SME sustainability performance and hence improve their
financial performance (Das et al., 2020). It is important to understand that sustainability needs to
be understood both in terms of sustainability of individual firms as well as in terms of having a
sustainable, resilient SME business population (Gray and Jones 2016).
Measures which can potentially reduce corruption and system of bribery in small medium
enterprise business such as transparent governance, legal and regulatory framework, fiscal
discipline and accountability are extremely important and can enhance the ease of doing
business in developing economies.
viii. Sustainability through Contextual Ambidexterity in Managing Healthcare
Malik and Mitchell (2017) explore the role of HR practices in facilitating contextual
ambidexterity and innovations in healthcare in India. They found evidence of the use of sets of
high involvement HRM practices for exploration of new ideas and efficiency driven HRM
practices for creating contextual ambidexterity in the case organisations. It was also found that
managerial/ leadership style played an important role in building cultures of trust, openness,
risk-taking and employee empowerment, supported by an appropriate mix of intrinsic and
extrinsic rewards.
In light of the emerging economy research context, the study highlights the role of HR related
initiatives beyond formal HR practices in creating contextual ambidexterity. It also reveals the
degree to which contextual idiosyncrasies enhance understanding of the role of HR in
facilitating innovations in emerging economies. Ambidextrous organisations are those that are
successful in “simultaneously exploiting existing competencies and exploring new
opportunities” without affecting their core business (Raisch et al., 2009). There are inherent
tensions in managing such a duality (March, 1991), and research into how firms manage these
tensions is growing (O'reilly and Tushman, 2011) especially regarding organisations that face
resource constraints – both internal and external. Such contexts amplify the need to balance
exploration activities with the incremental exploitation of current activities (Cao, et al., 2009).
Lessons to be learnt for both developed and developing country practitioners from this study
indicate that HR practices can play a central role in innovation despite research constraints. In
the healthcare industry where a productive output is based almost entirely on the knowledge and
performance of its HR, unpackaging the HRM role in facilitating organisational processes that
underlie innovation becomes an important requirement.
Another research titled ‘Challenges in the Sustainability of a Targeted Healthcare Initiative in
India’ (Balooni et al., 2012) raises sustainability issues in a targeted health initiative namely the
Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY). This unique health insurance initiative targets the
population to address the inquiry in healthcare in the Indian societal context. This initiative has
been analysed because it is a unique case of a public private partnership in the development
sector arena in India being used as an instrument for improving the healthcare system on a large
scale. It has seen initial successes but the sustainability of this initiative is threatened mainly by
the lack of information, heterogeneity in access, institutional shortcomings and long-run
escalation of costs. It is indicated that while the government is employing a public private
partnership to implement this initiative, there is a need to simultaneously use this model to
augment the existing health infrastructure to make this initiative sustainable and effective
(Balooni et al., 2012).
This research points to the fact that the Government of India is quickly expanding the scope of
this initiative with the intention to create a universal healthcare scheme. However, it is suggested
that a matching health infrastructure needs to be created for catering to the growing demand for
health services. It is suggested that rather than relying upon the public private partnership model
to supplement the implementation of the RSBY, the Government could simultaneously
strategize a public private partnership model to expand the current health infrastructure
particularly given the fact that the targeted beneficiaries of this initiative generally inhabit
remote and underdeveloped areas. The effectiveness of this initiative also needs to be evaluated
periodically in order to overcome its troubles during its growth trajectory.
Deciphering New Codes of Sustainability
As I embark upon this research exercise, the coronavirus outbreak has hit the world – first and
foremost a human tragedy affecting hundreds of thousands of people. It is also having a growing
impact on the global economy. Unravelling the path to the next normal becomes an imperative,
as Governments launch unprecedented public-health and economic responses. The arena of
HRM and people practices in organizations will witness a sea-change in the coming times.
Sustainability definitions will also undergo drastic revisions. Leaders of organizations will need
to organize their thinking and processes as they lead through the crisis. A McKinsey brief
(March 30, 2020) highlights certain factors as critical in the current scenario, which must be
attended to urgently to keep organizations moving on the survival path: increasing
communication by organizations, and balancing the needs of business with expectation setting
and morale building, so employees know that their well-being is on top of mind. Organizations
also need to change working norms, making remote work practical and simple, whenever
possible. They must also focus on protecting people’s health, with whatever measures are
appropriate to the workplace: positive hygiene habits, personal protective equipment, amended
sick-leave policies – whatever it takes to ensure health and safety. All these factors will deeply
impact organizational behaviour and people practices in organizations.
In the urgency of the moment, it is difficult to fathom the actions that might be needed in the
coming times. Amid the chaos, what is clear is that leaders need to think about the next horizons
of COVID 19. The article ‘Beyond coronavirus: The path to the next normal’ (McKinsey Brief,
2020) elucidates and explains five possible horizons that executives and leaders may implement
and use to ensure an organization’s rapid response, adaptation to change and re-emergence in a
position of strength. With the ‘five Rs model’, there is an attempt to provide leaders with an
integrated perspective on the unfolding crisis and an insight into the coming weeks and months.
The ‘five Rs model’, which proposes five horizons, across which leaders need to think and act,
is as follows: i. resolve - address the immediate challenges that COVID-19 represents to the
institutions, workforce, customers, technology and business partners, and take basic steps to
protect liquidity; ii. resilience - address near-term cash management challenges, and broader
resiliency issues during virus-related shutdowns and economic knock-on effects; iii. return -
create a detailed plan to return the business back to scale quickly as the virus evolves and knock
on effects become clearer; iv. re-imagination - re imagine the “next normal” - what a
discontinuous shift looks like, and implications for how the situation should re-invent; and v.
reform - be clear about how the regulatory and competitive environment in an industry may
shift.
‘Resolve’ may also be interpreted to mean making hard decisions on immediate challenges on
the part of the organization - resolve employee, customer, supply chain, immediate liquidity, and
technology concerns. Foremost emerging concerns for the organization related to employees
may be the following – are the policies for the employees working, for example, safety,
productivity? How well? How does the organization adapt to new developments, for example
longer closures of business? Examples of some actions to be focused upon may be as follows:
a. continuous evaluation of financial models: stress-testing financial forecasts based on latest
developments (for example longer than two-week closures and adjusting policies
accordingly)
b. monitoring productivity: comprehensive set of KPIs is being tracked via dashboards (e.g.,
focus and productivity versus utilisation)
c. tracking incidence: clear reporting mechanism for suspected / confirmed covid-19 infections
and database that tracks cases;
d. redeploying “idle” talent against areas of the business experiencing demand surges: making
short term adjustments to workforce deployment to maximize productivity and minimise
service disruption
e. partnering with other companies to deploy “idle” talent externally for the good of the
broader community.
It is also proposed to develop a nerve centre to plan for the next phase. Decoding the new
normal and ensuring that the organisation has a strategy to navigate it, is an important part of the
work of a nerve centre approach. Approaches such as using a portfolio of initiatives and
planning for decision making under uncertainty, for instance, can go a long way towards
creating a compass for business leaders to follow.
As regards employees, and their engagement with work, companies also need to invest and
prioritise to protect the safety and moral of employees unable to work from home (WFH).
Research suggests (McKinsey Brief, 2020) non work-from-home employees face a unique set of
concerns -
1. perceived unfairness: having to continue going into work while other employees take home
with their families;
2. safety risk: significant increase in potential exposure to disease, (e.g., commute, customers
and other employees in the workplace)
3. perceived value: employees don't feel as valued by the company and that their safety is not
prioritised
4. fear of illness: in addition to clinical harm (e.g., fever, body aches), they are fearful of being
isolated from their families if ill.
However, it has also been indicated that best-in-class companies are finding new ways to
address employee concerns by protecting them from unnecessary risk. A major US retailer
offers flexible work policies including relaxing absenteeism policy (i.e., allowing worker to stay
home for personal reasons); some food delivery companies are minimising contact between
deliverers and customers (example cashless payment only, leaving bags at door, all employees
provided mask and gloves); leading UK retailer are extending benefits to include backup child
and elderly care (up to 25 days) and mental health benefits (example, teletherapy sessions);
leading Italian banks are limiting operating hours for all branches with access granted only upon
prearranged appointment to minimise contact and increase sanitization time; global coffee shop
retailer is offering 14 days of “catastrophe pay” for US workers exposed to covid-19, over 60,
pregnant or having underlying health issues (in addition to existing sick pay).
As per the McKinsey brief, four key levers to maximize engagement and productivity of work
from home have been observed for employees, which gain special significance for this study. It
is reported that China demonstrated a decrease in energy level during the pandemic.
Respondents to the survey attributed the declining energy value to three primary factors -
blurred boundary between work and life, anxiety deepening as the epidemic unfolded, and
telecommuting unsuitable for current workflows. Energy level, however, started to improve as
increasing normalcy was established aided by four levers that companies used
1. People: Provide psychological safety (example, delegate decision making powers, role model
empathy); communicate practical WFH tips (example family communication, physical and
mental need management)
2. Structure: Define career objectives and key results (OKRs) to effectively set and
communicate goals and outcomes; allow high degree of autonomy in decision making with
collaboration across business units
3. Process: Establish clear contents (example pre-scheduled daily and weekly meetings,
frequent check-ins); define clear and integrated workflows, align strategic goals and
clarifying roles and responsibilities
4. Technology: Leverage a suite of digital tools/new media to address specific work needs; set
up an effective ergonomic, digitally enabled remote working environment to ensure
productivity.
A plan ahead team has been visualized to assist and offer quick responses to the rapidly
changing current circumstances using the following five frames: organizations a. should get a
realistic view of the starting position; b. develop scenarios for multiple versions of its future; c.
establish its posture and broad direction of travel; d. determine actions and strategic moves that
are robust across scenarios; and e. set trigger points that drive the organisations to act at the right
time.
A nerve centre design, based on military commander principles, has been proposed as an
effective strategy to deal with this unprecedented situation which the business organizations are
facing. The core concept is to create an organisation that can observe, orient, decide and act
(OODA) faster than the environment, drawing from John Boyd's concept of the OODA loop.
Illustrative examples of the next normal of how organisations may configure are as follows:
drastic changes may happen for levers such as
where work happens- remote working is fully accepted, for example, 25% of white-
collar labour is fully remote, including radiologists, financial analysts, consultants, and
other, while earlier white-collar employees remained "in the office";
how people organise-leaner, more ‘agile’ structure leveraging the gig economy for
project-based execution as compared to traditional pyramidical structure to cover all
functions needed to execute projects;
how decisions are made- strategy remains centrally set and coordinated; all operational
decisions decentralized with a bias for speed and test and learn mentality while earlier it
was defined process for execution of tasks (for example command and control); and
workforce size and composition- gig economy utilized for all workers (full time
employees make up less than 20% of labour force) viola workforce predominantly
consists of full-time employees
This is a general outline which has been carved and contextual tailoring may be required in case
organizations intend to take these design suggestions forward. Senior leadership support and
participation will be a necessary prerequisite and will go a long way in making these design
applications successful in enabling organizations to emerge stronger in these extremely
challenging times.
Conclusion
The discourses indicate that sustainable management has become an unquestionable agenda for
organisations globally. A sustainability mindset is seen to be developing along with tangible
successes in organizations. This sustainability mindset must be linked to and reflected in
sustainable employee practices. Diverse sustainability themes have been identified and
prioritised in this paper. These themes are reflected through in organizations through multiple
strategies implemented as integrative mechanisms for consolidating and harmonizing
organizational processes and growth.
With the coronavirus pandemic making a phenomenal global impact in the last few months, the
next normal, regarding how organizations work and engage people, will undergo drastic
changes. The next normal will look unlike any in the years preceding the pandemic. Leaders of
organizations, managers, executives, employees, academicians, practitioners, the Government –
all stakeholders - need to brace themselves for the new and emergent reality, and at the same
time, be in a state of readiness to restructure and re-emerge stronger, with hope and optimism.
References
Anlesinya, A. and Amponsah-Tawiah, K. (2020), "Towards a responsible talent management
model", European Journal of Training and Development, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-
print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-07-2019-0114.
Balain, S., & Sparrow, P. (2009). Engaged to perform (CPHR White Paper). Lancaster, UK:
Lancaster Management School.
Balooni, K., Gangopadhyay, K. and Turakhia, S. (2012),”Challenges in the Sustainability of a
Targeted Health Care Initiative in India”, IIM Kozikhode Society and Management Review,
Volume: 1 issue: 1, page(s): 21-32 https://doi.org/10.1177/227797521200100104
Bhar, S. (2019), “Introducing Phenomenological Research Methodology in Sustainable
Consumption Literature: Illustrations From India”, International Journal of Qualitative
Methods, Volume 18 https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919840559
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J. and Rothstein, H. (2009), Introduction to Meta-
Analysis, Wiley, Chichester.
Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E. and Zhang, H. (2009), “Unpacking organizational ambidexterity:
dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects”, Organization Science, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp.
781-796
Chiang, C.S. (2010), “How corporate social responsibility influences employees job
satisfaction in the hotel industry”, UNLV Theses/Dissertations/Professional
Papers/Capstones.Paper598.
Cortez, M., & Cudia, C. (2011). The virtuous cycles between environmental innovation and
financial performance: Case study of Japanese automotive and electronic companies. Academy
of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 15(2), 31-44
Craven, M., Liu, L., Mysore, M., Singhal, S., Smit, S. and Wilson, M. (2020), COVID-19:
Implications for business. Executive Briefing, McKinsey & Company.
Das, M., Rangarajan, K. and Dutta, G. (2020), "Corporate sustainability in SMEs: an Asian
perspective", Journal of Asia Business Studies, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 109-138.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-10-2017-0176
Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win–win-win business strategies
for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.
Gahlawat, N. and Kundu, S. (2018), "Exploring the connection between socially responsible
HRM and citizenship behavior of employees in Indian context", Journal of Indian Business
Research, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-01-2018-0014
Gladwin, T.N., Kennelly, J.J., & Krause, T.S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable
development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management
Review, 20(4), 874–907.
Gray, D. and Jones, K.F. (2016), “Using organisational development and learning methods to
develop resilience for sustainable futures with SMEs and micro businesses: the case of the
“business alliance”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol.23No.2,
pp.474-494.
Gupta, M. (2017), “Engaging Employees at Work: Insights From India”, Advances in
Developing Human Resources, Volume: 20 issue: 1, page(s): 3-10
https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422317741690
Jakobsen, O., Zolnai, L. and Chatterji, M. (Eds)(2017),Integral Ecology and Sustainable
Business, Series Contributions to Conflict Management, Peace Economics and Development,
Vol. 26, Emerald Publishing, Bingley.
Jena, L. K., Bhattacharyya, P. and Pradhan, S. (2017), “Employee Engagement and Affective
Organizational Commitment: Mediating Role of Employee Voice among Indian Service
Sector Employees”, Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, Volume: 21 issue: 4,
page(s): 356-366 https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262917733170
Knowles, R. N., Twomey, D. F., Davis, K. J., & Abdul-Ali, S. (2009). Leadership for a
sustainable enterprise. In J. Wirtenberg, W. G. Russell & D. Lipsky (Eds.), The sustainable
enterprise fieldbook: When it all comes together (pp. 26–56). New York, NY and Sheffield,
UK: AMACOM and Greenleaf Publishing.
Laskar, N., Chakraborty, T. K., and Maji, S. G. (2017), “Corporate Sustainability Performance
and Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from Japan and India”, Management and
Labour Studies, Volume: 42 issue: 2, page(s): 88-106
https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X17707659
Malik, A., Boyle, B. and Mitchell, R. (2017), "Contextual ambidexterity and innovation in
healthcare in India: the role of HRM", Personnel Review, Vol. 46 No. 7, pp. 1358-1380.
https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2017-0194
Mansi, M., Pandey, R. and Ghauri, E. (2017), "CSR focus in the mission and vision statements
of public sector enterprises: evidence from India", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 32 No.
4/5, pp. 356-377. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-01-2016-1307
March, J.G. (1991), “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning”, Organization
Science, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 71-87.
Mishra, M. (2014). Sustainable Employee Practices. In Jauhari, V. (Ed.) Managing
Sustainability in the Hospitality and Tourism Industry – Paradigms and Directions for the
Future. NJ: Apple Academic Press, pg 335-362.
Mishra, P. (2017), "Green human resource management: A framework for sustainable
organizational development in an emerging economy", International Journal of
Organizational Analysis, Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 762-788. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-11-2016-
1079
Mohapatra, S. and Verma, P. (2018), “Tata as a Sustainable Enterprise: The Causal Role of
Spirituality”, Journal of Human Values, Volume: 24 issue: 3, page(s): 153-165
https://doi.org/10.1177/0971685818774116
O’Reilly, C.A. III and Tushman, M. (2008), “Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving
the innovator’s dilemma”, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 28, pp. 185-206.
Pathak, P., Sharma, R. R., & Singh, S. (2013). Reinventing society: Search for a paradigm.
New Delhi: MacMillan
Pradhan, R. K., Dash, S. and Jena, L. K. (2017), “Do HR Practices Influence Job Satisfaction?
Examining the Mediating Role of Employee Engagement in Indian Public Sector
Undertakings”, Global Business Review, Volume: 20 issue: 1, page(s): 119-132
https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150917713895
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G. and Tushman, M.L. (2009), “Organizational
ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance”,
Organization Science, Vol.20 No. 4, pp. 685-695.
Raut, R., Gardas, B., Luthra, S., Narkhede, B. and Kumar Mangla, S. (2020), "Analysing green
human resource management indicators of automotive service sector", International Journal of
Manpower, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-09-2019-0435
Richards, J. (2020), "Putting employees at the centre of sustainable HRM: a review, map and
research agenda", Employee Relations: The International Journal, Vol. ahead-of-print No.
ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-01-2019-0037
Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Job resources, engagement and proactive behaviour.
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 116–131.
Schieffer, A. and Lessem, R. (2014), “Integral development: realising the transformative
potential of individuals”, Organisations and Societies, Gower Publishing, Aldershot.
Setton, R. P., Bennet, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived
organizational support, leader member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 81(3), 219–227.
Sharma, E. and Tewari, R. (2017), “Engaging Employee Perception for Effective Corporate
Social Responsibility: Role of Human Resource Professionals”, Global Business Review,
Volume: 19 issue: 1, page(s): 111-130 https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150917713277
Sharma, N., Venkat Raman, A. and Dhaked, S. (2016), Human Resource Challenges in
Indian Public Health Services”, South Asian Journal of Human Resource Management,
Volume: 3 issue: 2, page(s): 173-190 https://doi.org/10.1177/2322093716677414
Sharma, R. R. (2019) “Evolving a Model of Sustainable Leadership: An Ex-post Facto
Research”, Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, Volume: 23 issue: 2, page(s): 152-
169 https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262919840216
Sharma, S. and Mishra, P. (2019), "Hotel employees’ perceptions about CSR initiatives and
their potential to support the skill India initiative", Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism
Themes, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 78-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-10-2018-0064
Shukla, K., Purohit, M., and Gaur, S. P. (2017), “Studying ‘Make in India’ from the Lens of
Labour Reforms”, Management & Labour Studies, Volume: 42 issue: 1, page(s): 1-19
https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X17690842
Singh, S. and Mittal, S. (2019), "Analysis of drivers of CSR practices’ implementation among
family firms in India: A stakeholder’s perspective", International Journal of Organizational
Analysis, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 947-971. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-09-2018-1536
Sivapragasam, P. and Raya, R. P. (2017), “HRM and Employee Engagement Link: Mediating
Role of Employee Well-being”, Global Business Review, Volume: 19 issue: 1, page(s): 147-
161 https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150917713369
Som, A. (2005), “Building Sustainable Organizations through Restructuring: Role of
Organizational Character in France and India”, International Journal of Human Resource
Development and Management, 3(1):2-16 (Lead Article).
Surroca,J., Trib¨o, J.A. and Zahra, S.A.(2013),“Stakeholder pressure on MNEs and the transfer
of socially irresponsible practices to subsidiaries”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.56
No.2, pp.549-572.
Thorpe, R., Holt, R., Macpherson, A. and Pittaway, L. (2005), “Using knowledge within small
and medium-sized firms: a systematic review of the evidence”, International Journal of
Management Reviews, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 257-281.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. (2003), “Towards a methodology for developing
evidence informed management knowledge by means of systematic review”, British Journal
of Management, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 207-222.
Uraon, R.S. (2017), “Examining the Impact of HRD Practices on Organizational Commitment
and Intention to Stay Within Selected Software Companies in India”, Advances in Developing
Human Resources, Volume: 20 issue: 1, page(s): 11-43
https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422317741691
Van Vuuren, T. and Van Dam, K. (2013), “Sustainable employment by vitalizing: the
importance of development opportunities and challenging work for workers’ sustainable
employability”, in De Lange, A. and Van der Hejiden, B. (Eds), Life-long Employability?
Perspectives on Sustainable Employment at Work: Intervention and Best Practice,
Vakmedianet, Alphen san de Rijn, pp. 357-376.
Venkataraman, A. and Joshi, C. S. (2019), “Who Am I? An Ethnographic Study Exploring the
Construction of Organizational and Individual Self among Indian IT Employees”, IIM
Kozhikode Society and Management Review, Volume: 9 issue: 1, page(s): 72-83 http://doi.org/
10.1177/2277975219859774
Vihari, N.S. and Rao, M. K. (2018), “Antecedents and Consequences of Sustainable Human
Resource Management: Empirical Evidence from India”, Jindal Journal of Business Research,
vol. 7, 1: pp. 61-85.
________________________________________________________________________________
LAL BAHADUR SHASTRI INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT, DELHI
PLOT NO. 11/7, SECTOR-11, DWARKA, NEW DELHI-110075
Ph.: 011-25307700, www.lbsim.ac.in