sustainability action plan 2

111
1 Dan Henroid and Maric Munn, Sustainability Steering Committee co-chairs Gail Lee, Sustainability Manager Sustainability Action Plan 2.0 October 2014

Upload: others

Post on 08-Nov-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sustainability Action Plan 2

1

Dan Henroid and Maric Munn,

Sustainability Steering Committee co-chairs Gail Lee, Sustainability Manager

Sustainability Action Plan 2.0

October 2014

Page 2: Sustainability Action Plan 2

2

Successes from SAP1.0 • OR, inpt/outpt room recycling, trades scrap metal recycling • Animal bedding/Food/paper towels composting (MC/Campus) • Microfiber mops, Green Seal cleaners across UCSF • Zero Waste & Engagement video, Website 6000 visits/mo

Emissions tracking tool set up, reporting, verification • MBCx, Lighting retrofits, EV charging stations • Annual Sustainability Awards, expand events, posters • Office, lab, and events certifications (40+) • Reusable totes, UHC and OM, Sustainable Foods 23% • SW Diversion rate - Campus 55% -> 63% • EPA grant for EPP flagging, Energy Star and WaterSense

certified product preferences, water conservation projects • Water Audit and Climate Action Plan completed

Page 3: Sustainability Action Plan 2

3 3

Sustainability Action Plan 2.0(2014-2020) What? • Vision for the future of UCSF • Concrete strategies to meet policy goals • A timeline and roadmap to follow • Updated UCOP Sustainable Practices Policy Why? • UCOP reporting • Communication to UCSF community • Document of UCSF sustainability efforts

Page 4: Sustainability Action Plan 2

4

SSC overall vision for 2025 • Zero Waste, less haz waste 2o ↑ regs • LEED platinum & Net Zero buildings • Env Stewardship is embedded, sustainable practices

used by all, consumers ∆ the market • Green products are mainstream • Innovations make ROI better to retrofit old bldgs • Preventive medicine = healthier communities • Good environmental practice is good business

practice • UCSF as leader Env Health/Preventative Medicine • H2O Tx/reuse and efficient equip becomes std

Page 5: Sustainability Action Plan 2

5 5

SAP2.0 WGs

Zero Waste

Procurement

Climate Change

MC SLG

Sustainable Leadership

Group

MC Waste & Procurement

Toxics Reduction

Sustainable Operations

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Compare your progress and how you process to other WGs Get inspired by what the other WGs have done
Page 6: Sustainability Action Plan 2

6 6

Tactics Evaluation Matrix Project name: Description:

Status: Where would it be implemented? Implementation: Who would be in charge for implementing it? Comments:

Environmental impact

Alignment with UCSF mission (health)

Expected environmental benefits Impact on improving health?

Impact on the work environment quality? (wellness, comfort)

Measurability of the environmental impact Does it show UCSF as a leader in healthcare sustainability?

Comments: Comments: ENVIRONMENTAL SCORE HEALTH SCORE

Feasibility Economic impact

What are the main identified barriers? Operating cost: increase or savings? How will this project be perceived by management? Up-front investments, payback period? Can we start with a pilot and replicate it incrementally? Human resources required? Will it develop in-house skills/capabilities for sustainability? Does it reduce/increase risks due to legislation change? Does it reduce/increase risks due to increase in utilities/resources prices? Comments: Comments: FEASIBILITY SCORE ECONOMIC SCORE Timeframe: Contacts, champions, student projects:

Need for further environmental/economic analysis?

template

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Takes some time to fill in this sheet but it will save you much more time later!
Page 7: Sustainability Action Plan 2

7

Tactics Evaluation Example

Page 8: Sustainability Action Plan 2

8

Climate Change Work Group These tactics were selected through a brainstorming session and are not included in the larger projects identified by the Strategic Energy Partnership with PG&E and the concurrent development of the Climate Action Plan as separate document. • Co-chairs, Paul Franke and Travis Clark • Dick Chan, MC Facilities • Peter Davis, Transportation • Kevin Barney, IT • Jamie Hand, Energy Analyst • Bruce Shapiro, Facilities and Central Plant • Maric Munn, CACS • Tim Mahaney, CACS • Lori Yamauchi, CACS • Bob Eaton, CACS

Page 9: Sustainability Action Plan 2

9

Climate Change Strategies Strategies Summary Number of Tactics

Central Plant & Infrastructure Mechanical Equipment Retrofits, Co-gen plants 4

Equipment Efficiency Energy Star, cool roofs, window films 5

HVAC Building management to increase efficiency 5

Incentives & Penalties End user electricity savings campaign 1

IT Energy management systems and data center upgrades 5

Lighting Upgrading to efficienct indoor and outdoor lighting and sensors 6

Misc Ideas Miscellaneous 6

Operational Efficiency Building energy rankings and efficiency software 3

Planning & Reporting Space use optimization, solar hot water, building ranks, etc. 6

Renewables Alternative energy sources from solar hot water to fuel cells 7

Transportation Behavior changes such as carpooling to bike sharing to alternative fuels for shuttles

12

Water Water efficiency tactics 7

Total 67

Page 10: Sustainability Action Plan 2

10

Climate Change: Top 10 Tactics Strategy Tactic Description Score Time Frame

Central Plant & Infrastructure

Mechanical Equipment Retrofit of UC Hall / CSB Commission co-generation plant 16

medium term (2015-2017)

Planning & Reporting Space use optimization Planning provides better management 12

medium term (2015-2017)

HVAC Review AHU Schedules

Air Handling Unit schedules can increase efficiency and comfort inside buildings 13

short term (2013-2015)

HVAC Eliminate simultaneous heating/cooling

Management Best practices in building HVAC can increase energy efficiency 12

long term (2017-2020)

Lighting Eliminate incandescent and halogen Increasing efficient lighting saves energy. 12

short term (2013-2015)

HVAC

More CAV to VAV conversion

Variable Air Volume HVAC system better control fans which save energy. Also, dehumidification is greater with VAV. 11

long term (2017-2020)

Lighting LED outdoor lighting Increasing efficient lighting saves energy. 11

short term (2013-2015)

Planning & Reporting

Rank buildings by energy/water use

Ranking buildings can provide focus for retrofit priority 11

short term (2013-2015)

Planning & Reporting

Solar PV for selected bldgs Solar PV for selected buildings will lowericarbon emissions. 11

medium term (2015-2017)

Misc Ideas MEP design standards

Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing design standards ensure the buildings work as efficient systems 10

medium term (2015-2017)

Page 11: Sustainability Action Plan 2

11

Page 12: Sustainability Action Plan 2

12

Tactics for Funding Requests Tactic Workgroup Score

1. Solar power (PV) for feasible buildings 10

2. Space use optimization 16

3. LED outdoor lighting 11

4.Eliminate incandescent /Halogens 12

Page 13: Sustainability Action Plan 2

13

Climate Change – Time Frames Short Term Medium Term Long Term

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Mechanical Equipment Retrofit of UCHall/CSB

Space use optimization

Solar PV for selected bldgs

Review AHU Schedules

Eliminate incandescent and halogen

Eliminate simultaneous heating/cooling

Rank buildings by energy/water use MEP design standards

LED outdoor lighting More CAV to VAV conversion

Page 14: Sustainability Action Plan 2

14

Climate Change –Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Mission Bay Housing

• This tactic analyzes a photovoltaic system system on Mission Bay Housing.

• This cost-benefit was run as a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with a third-party supplier.

• Beyond monetary benefits, visible solar PV demonstrates to the community that UCSF is committed to going green.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
This exercise
Page 15: Sustainability Action Plan 2

15

Climate Change – Solar PV on Mission Bay Housing (PPA) • Costs:

– PPA rate ($/kWh) • Benefits:

– System output (kWh) – Avoided Utility Rates – Avoided GHG emissions

Page 16: Sustainability Action Plan 2

16

Climate Change: PV on Mission Bay Housing

Lifetime (years) 20 25 30 Simple Payback 4.16

Net Present Value (NPV) $111,213 $185,316 $247,920

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 26.2% 27% 27%

Carbon Savings (mT CO2e) 628 775 919

Carbon Value ($) $8,227 $10,158 $12,041

$ cost per mT CO2e $79.60 $64.50 $54.40

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Based upon Jamie Hand’s calculation; Simple payback first yr benefit/first yr cost; NPV, Rate of Return; Carbon Savings MTCO2e; based on PG&E emissions; Carbon valued based TerraPass Offsets; Cost/MTCO2e based upon the PM cost($30,000)/MT of carbon savings
Page 17: Sustainability Action Plan 2

17

Culture Shift Work Group Tactics identified support overall engagement as well as specific tactics of other workgroups. • Co-chairs, Monica Mapa and Frances Flannery • Ellen Weber, CACS • Jake Blackshear, SOD • Leeane Jensen, Wellness • Jennifer Mannix, CLS • Deborah Fleischer, website writer • Susan Yun, CLS • Lisa Cisneros, Univ Relations • Lisa Hartmayer

Page 18: Sustainability Action Plan 2

18

Culture Shift Strategies Strategies Summary Number of Tactics

Communication Support Communication Efforts for other Work Groups 4

Communication Plan Develop a Communication Plan 6

Education Integrate sustainability into curriculum 7

Events Educate UCSF about sustainability 10

Metrics Data measurement and tools to follow up 3

Personal Promote Personal Commitment and develop employee green benefits 5

Total 35

Page 19: Sustainability Action Plan 2

19

Culture Shift: Top 10 Tactics Strategy Tactic Description Score Time Frame

CommPlan Embed sustainability in job description

Include sustainability efforts to be recognized by supervisors for performance evaluations

20 short term (2013-2015)

Comm Encourage teleconferencing Give away Webcams to promote reduce travel, offer survey to be completed before giving out 15 short term (2013-

2015)

Metrics Annual review

Building sustainability into performance evaluations

14 short term (2013-2015)

Events Greening the Operating Room

Host symposium for west coast. We would provide venue and marketing

13 long term (2017-2020)

Comm Mindful consumption Messaging to event planners

12 short term (2013-2015)

CommPlan Research Public Health

Encourage new research on social and environmental determinants on illness such as reproductive health and the environment.

12 medium term (2015-2017)

CommPlan Research-Sustainable Healthcare

Define target areas of sustainable healthcare research for UCSF to support, and issue a call to outside researchers advising them of the opportunity to locate appropriate projects at UCSF.

12 short term (2013-2015)

Events Work from home day

One day a year encourage employees to work from home to show green empact

12 long term (2017-2020)

Comm Zero waste messaging

Recycle, landfill, compost. Need clear intention by each WG, top 3 key messages, audience clearly defined

11 short term (2013-2015)

Personal Individual awards for staff

Give supervisors ability to award peers and direct reports to recognize individual efforts

10 short term (2013-2015)

Page 20: Sustainability Action Plan 2

20

Page 21: Sustainability Action Plan 2

21

Culture Shift – Time Frames Short Term Medium Term Long Term

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Zero Waste Messaging Greening the OR or similar Mindful Consumption Work from Home Day

Encourage teleconferencing

Individual awards for staff

Sustainable Food Signage

Annual Review/Perf Evaluation

Visits to Food Suppliers

Research Sustainable Healthcare

Embed sustainability in job description

Research Public Health

Page 22: Sustainability Action Plan 2

22

Tactics for Funding Requests Tactic Workgroup Score

1. Encourage telecommuting 15

2. Mindful consumption for events 12

Page 23: Sustainability Action Plan 2

23

Culture Shift – Encourage Telecommuting

• This tactic considers offering $10 gift cards to attract 1,000 UCSF employees in the pilot year to telecommute once a month, saving each person 12 days of commuting each year.

• GC could be offered to managers instead of employees.

• We assumed a 16-mile average Bay Area commute and average fuel economy of 20 mpg.

Page 24: Sustainability Action Plan 2

24

Culture Shift – Encourage Telecommuting

• Costs: – Staff time – Gift card ($10 each) purchase

• Benefits: – UCSF building electricity saved (from avoided staff

computer use) – Reduced GHG emissions from fewer commutes

Page 25: Sustainability Action Plan 2

25

• Set a zero-waste policy for office events • Costs:

– Staff time -Outreach and monitoring – Additional dishwasher loads -Increased energy and

water use • Benefits:

– Savings on disposable materials (plate ware, silverware, handouts, trinkets)

– Progress towards UCSF’s goal of Zero Waste – Use events to educate staff in this area

Culture Shift – Mindful Consumption Events

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Reusables versus compostables: staff confusion about legitimate compostable may lead to improper sorting.
Page 26: Sustainability Action Plan 2

26

Water Conservation WG

These tactics were early iterations of the Water Action Plan concurrently being developed • Co-Chairs, Winnie Kwofie and Bruce Mace • Leialani Hufana

Page 27: Sustainability Action Plan 2

27

Water Conservation Strategies Strategies Summary Number of Tactics

Bathrooms Retrofit bathrooms with water efficient faucets and toilets 6

Irrigation Ensure landscape irrigation is functioning properly 5

Labs Install water efficient appliances in laboratories 2

Total 13

Page 28: Sustainability Action Plan 2

28

Water Conservation: Tactics Strategy Tactic Description Time Frame

Bathrooms

Low Flow Shower Heads Replace All Showerheads with 1.5 gpm short term (2013-2015)

Low Flow Faucets Install 1 gpm Faucet Aerators on All Bathroom Faucets short term (2013-2015)

Toilet Diaphragms Replace Diaphragms in 1.6 gpf Toilets short term (2013-2015)

Water Efficient toilets Replace High Use 3.5 gpf Toilets short term (2013-2015)

Water Efficient tank toilets Replace High Use Tank Toilets medium term (2015-

2017)

Water Efficient urinals Replace Urinals with Quart per Flush Urinals medium term (2015-

2017)

Irrigation

Water Conscious Irrigation Install 16 Station Weather Adjusting Irrigation Controller medium term (2015-

2017)

Water Conscious Irrigation Cap Extra Heads, Remove Some Turf, and Install Drip System short term (2013-2015)

Water Conscious Irrigation Turn off Water in Winter and turn down irrigation on the North side of the building short term (2013-2015)

Water Conscious Irrigation Replace Rotor Heads medium term (2015-

2017)

Water Conscious Irrigation Reduce Tree Over Watering short term (2013-2015)

Labs Autoclaves Retrofit Autoclaves with Quench Kit medium term (2015-

2017)

Spray Valves Replace Spray Valves short term (2013-2015)

Page 29: Sustainability Action Plan 2

29

Zero Waste WG

• Co-Chair Susan Bluestone • Lacrecia Anderson • Daniel Chau • Joey Convento • Yvonne DeSouza • Pilar Deer • Stefan Habelitz, CACS

& Adam Schnirel • Dave Kolsom • Larry Laidlaw • Andrew Lok • Tony Meno • Tim Orozco • Dana Smith • Jim Sobczyk

Page 30: Sustainability Action Plan 2

30

Zero Waste Strategies Strategies Summary Number of Tactics

Waste Recycling

Increase recycling, compost and re-use options and make these services easily accessible throughout campus.

7

Campus Waste

Reduce over-all landfill tonnage through education & outreach and operational efficiencies

11

Total 18

Page 31: Sustainability Action Plan 2

31

Zero Waste: Top 10 Tactics Strategy Tactic Description Score Time Frame

Waste Recycling

Recycling education Targeted education specific to departments 7 medium term (2015-

2017)

Recycling incentives Incentive program for students, faculty, and staff 5 medium term (2015-2017)

Zero waste event coordination Put on events to increase waste diversion

4 medium term (2015-2017)

Department specific recycling trainings

Trainings to educate about waste commonly found in the different departments

4 short term (2013-2015)

Website improvements Enhance website to educate UCSF students, faculty, and staff on waste diversion

4 medium term (2015-2017)

Waste & recycling education awareness campaign Signage, events, pledges, etc., related to recycling

3 short term (2013-2015)

Annual Safety Trainings and Orientation

Incorporate mandatory recycling training into all Annual Safety Trainings and new employee orientations

2 long term (2017-2020)

Campus Composting

Increase compost in labs Increase paper towel composting bins and recycling bins via Lab Waste Reduction Outreach

0 short term (2013-2015)

Reduce options on OfficeMax

Limit the options OfficeMax offers on Bear Buy so that non-preferred products (i.e. styrofoam cups) are not a purchasing option for UCSF Bear Buy customers.

0 short term (2013-2015)

Compostable cutlery

Work toward having all Campus eateries and the Medical Center purchase the same compostable cutlery so the message can be consistent on where to toss this item.

0 short term (2013-2015)

Page 32: Sustainability Action Plan 2

32

Page 33: Sustainability Action Plan 2

33

Tactics for Funding Requests Tactic Workgroup Score

1. Department-specific waste tracking efficiency 4

2. Remote waste sorting education for staff 4

Page 34: Sustainability Action Plan 2

34

Zero Waste – Time Frames Short Term Medium Term Long Term

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Department Specific

Education Incentive Program Zero Waste Events

Department Specific Training

Website Improvements Waste & Recycling

Awareness General Recycling Training

Page 35: Sustainability Action Plan 2

35

Zero Waste – Waste Tracking Efficiency • This tactic considers training lab employees to

sort and consolidate waste materials into central locations

• Bins will also be labeled with official USCF Zero Waste Stickers to be more recognizable and branded.

Page 36: Sustainability Action Plan 2

36

Zero Waste – Waste Tracking Efficiency

Assumptions: Adam Schnirel wrote to explain that Recology pick up costs are based on

frequency and volume of service. After 75% diversion, we do not save money

on the Recology bill for a given location

Assumptions: No additional Labor Costs for the Zero Waste Team to conduct the trainings

Page 37: Sustainability Action Plan 2

37

Zero Waste – Waste Tracking Efficiency

• Costs: – Staff time to develop and distribute stickers – Staff time in training (student team may support this)

• Benefits: – Acquiring real data on waste diversion & hauling

practices – Training will teach employees the value of sorting and

consolidating their waste and allow for fewer bins – Custodial staff time saved by emptying fewer bins

• We assume a total of 15 minutes is saved per lab per week.

Page 38: Sustainability Action Plan 2

38

Zero Waste – Remote staff waste education

• This tactic considers creating a online training and iPhone app to train UCSF employees to sort waste properly

Page 39: Sustainability Action Plan 2

39

Zero Waste – Remote staff waste education • Costs:

– Cost of software development – Staff time

• Benefits: – Custodial time saved from emptying less bins

• Assumptions: – No additional Labor Costs for the Zero Waste Team

to conduct the game app introductions/orientations

Page 40: Sustainability Action Plan 2

40

MC Waste/Procurement • Co-chairs, Jose Watson and Louise Hallberg • Cheryl Cobb • Carl Solomon • Shirley Kedrowski • Andrew Lok • Michael Skehan • Kevin Pattison • Chris Bogan • Lisa Hartmayer • Robin Diehlman

Page 41: Sustainability Action Plan 2

41

MC Waste/Procurement Strategies Strategies Summary Number of Tactics

Procurement Purchasing environmentally conscious products 9

Reduce Reduce consumption and wasteful habits 7

Reuse Expand reuse efforts 10 Recycle Expand recycling efforts 6

General

Incorporate best practices in recycling, composting, procurement and reuse at UCSF facilities to reduce total waste

10

Total 42

Page 42: Sustainability Action Plan 2

42

MC Waste: Top 10 Tactics Strategy Tactic Description Score Time Frame

Recycling Lab, Compost, Pharm expand recycling in ancillary care areas, Lab, Compost, Pharm 16

short term (2013-2015)

Recycling Operating Room / Procedure Room Recycling

Recycleblue wrap used in surgery and procedure rooms, plastic trays, etc. 15

short term (2013-2015)

General Devlop Waste Mgmt Plan

Overall plan for waste segregattion and compliance. Provide incentives, contests, awards 14

short term (2013-2015)

Reuse Reusable med instruments

Switching from disposable to reusable medical instruments, surgical equipment 13

short term (2013-2015)

General Borrow ideas from others

Keep on top of best practices from others that we can adopt , PGH, UCMC WGs 12

medium term (2015-2017)

Recycling Promote Mark's List or Surplus Share

Encourage people to post unneeded items to Marks List 12

short term (2013-2015)

Reuse Increase purchase of reprocessed devices

Increase purchase of reprocessed medical devices from a third party reprocessor 12

short term (2013-2015)

General Signage at point of disposal

Place education signs at waste receptacles to reinforce directions for segregation and disposal 11

short term (2013-2015)

Reduce collect personal care products

Collect personal care products(tissues, shampoo, baby wipes, diapers, etc) for Medshare 11

short term (2013-2015)

Reduce Make double sided copying a default option for APEX Armondo Ocampo is working on this. 11

short term (2013-2015)

Page 43: Sustainability Action Plan 2

43

MC Procurement: Top 10 Tactics Strategy Tactic Description Score Time Frame

Procurement

In-house laundry for microfiber clothes/curtains

Carl is working on this just for inhouse items to save cost of sending out to a 3rd party 18

short term (2013-2015)

Lease/purchase doc mngt evaluate centralized printers/copiers, electronic document storage 16

short term (2013-2015)

Select reusable vs disposable medical instruments

Stainless steel trays, labroscopic instruments, also non-invasive products 16

short term (2013-2015)

Mindful consumption spread the work about mindful consumption with reusables instead of disposables 14

medium term (2015-2017)

Vendors' packaging criteria Prioritize: no packaging, minimal packaging, and returnable/reusable packaging 14

medium term (2015-2017)

recycled stationery, bsn cards, soy inks

beyond copy paper, this would be for printed materials with a recycled symbol printed on it 12

short term (2013-2015)

Std Enviro scorecard similar to KP about certain product selection choices for greener and safer products 9

short term (2013-2015)

Include environmental criteria in value analysis

evalute recyclability, reusability, recycle dcontent, packaging, EOL disposal 6

short term (2013-2015)

Reusable transport packaging

UHC/OM provides toters instead of carcboard boxes, other opportunities. This will be consistent with IC issues with corrogated boxes 0

short term (2013-2015)

Page 44: Sustainability Action Plan 2

44

Page 45: Sustainability Action Plan 2

45

Tactics for Funding Requests Tactic Workgroup Score

1. Point of Collection waste signage 11

2. APEX double-sided printing 10

Page 46: Sustainability Action Plan 2

46

MC Waste and Procurement Short Term Medium Term Long Term

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Collect Personal Care

Products

Reduce Unnecessary Printing

APEX Double Sided Printing

Waste Segregation Training

Print Management System

Reduce Color Copying

Page 47: Sustainability Action Plan 2

47

MC Waste & Procurement – Point of Collection Waste Signage

• This tactic considers producing and placing stickers at a source of waste collection (across 19 retail spaces) – For example, putting a sticker next the napkins that

says “Put me in the compost when you’re finished!”

Page 48: Sustainability Action Plan 2

48

MC Waste & Procurement – Point of Collection Waste Signage • Costs:

– Cost of stickers – Staff time to design and place stickers at 19 retail

spaces • Benefits:

– Reduce GHG emissions from keeping waste out of the landfill (assume 100 meals/ day per retailer)

Page 49: Sustainability Action Plan 2

49

MC Waste & Procurement – APEX Printing

• This tactic considers IT employees to program APEX printing machines to print double sided (they currently print single sided)

• UCSF currently spends $800,000 on paper for the APEX printers

• We assume that programming the printer to print double sided will save 35% of paper

Page 50: Sustainability Action Plan 2

50

MC Waste & Procurement – APEX Printing • Costs:

– Staff time to program printers • Benefits:

– Reduction of paper purchase – Avoided GHG emissions

Page 51: Sustainability Action Plan 2

51

Sustainable Food

• Co-Chair Luis Vargas for the Med Center

• Ami Bhow • Anne Boyle • Dan Miller • Irene Regala • Dan Henroid, CACS • Tom Newman, CACS

• Co-chair Jen Dowd for the campus

• Tamara Villarina • Andrew Lok

Page 52: Sustainability Action Plan 2

52

Sustainable Food Strategies Strategies Summary Number of Tactics

CLS Sustainable food tracking, labeling and procurement 10

NFS Reducing cost of sustainable food, antibiotic-free meat, etc. 10

Waste Reduce waste for sustainable meals 9

Total 29

Page 53: Sustainability Action Plan 2

53

Sustainable Food: Top 10 Tactics Strategy Tactic Description Score Time Frame

Waste Recycle kitchen grease Recycled kitchen grease can be a feedstock for biofuels

11 short term (2013-2015)

NFS Maintain current practices Cage free eggs, antibiotic-free chicken, etc. 9 short term (2013-

2015)

NFS Reduce Costs of Sustainable Food

continually seek vendors with lower costs of sustainable foods

8 short term (2013-2015)

NFS Develop metric for Balanced Meals

Develop metrics to support Health Care Without Harm’s “Balanced Meals” initiative

8 medium term (2015-2017)

Waste Avoid excessive food and garnishes

Avoiding excess food reduces landfill mass and saves the energy and water used to make that food.

8 short term (2013-2015)

NFS Network support for sustainable purchases

Network with other hospitals and institutions to support/grow sustainable purchasing options

7 medium term (2015-2017)

NFS

Develop CSA program Develop a Community Supported Agriculture program for UCSF

6 short term (2013-2015)

NFS Lunch Stop to work with CLS to track sustainable food spending

Work with CLS to use tool developed for sust food tracking

5 short term (2013-2015)

NFS Evaluation of sustainabe food priorities

Evaluate selected food items based upon transportation, heallth impact, environmental impact

5 medium term (2015-2017)

NFS Develop Menu Planning Sub-Committee

Develop of a menu planning sub-committee to the Sustainable Food WG, consisting of key decision makers

5 short term (2013-2015)

Page 54: Sustainability Action Plan 2

54

CLS Sustainable Food: Tactics Strategy Tactic name Description Timeframe

CLS

Sust Food Tracking Tool Establish tool for sustainable and non-sustainable food tracking tool for retailers

short term (2013-2015)

Populate past Retail Data Populate tool with past sustainable food purchases from FY09-10 short term

(2013-2015)

Procure 5% Sust Food Seek to promote all retails to increase Sust food purchases with total goal of 5%

short term (2013-2015)

Food Waste Diversion Program Continue food waste diversion program and education campaign

short term (2013-2015)

Divert 50% food waste Divert 50% of food waste through compost short term

(2013-2015)

Develop Kitchen Equip Guidelines

work w/vendors to develop kitchen equipment guidelines- encourage Energy Star appliances

medium term (2015-2017)

Green cleaning chemicals Work with vendors to use green cleaning chemicals, ware washing, hand soaps

short term (2013-2015)

Create labeling system Create labeling system to highlight sustainable food choices for diners

medium term (2015-2017)

SMART Choice menu Expand SMART choice menu to all retail restaurants medium term (2015-2017)

Community Garden support

Support efforts to create a community garden and establish agro-ecology program

medium term (2015-2017)

Page 55: Sustainability Action Plan 2

55

Page 56: Sustainability Action Plan 2

56

Tactics for Funding Requests Tactic

1. Sustainable food tracking tool

Page 57: Sustainability Action Plan 2

57

Sustainable Food – Time Frames Short Term Medium Term Long Term

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Sustainable Food Tracking

Tool

Populate Past Retail Data

Procure 5% Sustainable Food

Food Waste Diversion Program

Divert 50% Food Waste

Develop Kitchen Equipment Guidelines

Create Labeling System

SMART Choice Menu

Community Garden Support

Page 58: Sustainability Action Plan 2

58

Sustainable Food Tracking Tool

• This tactic considers building a database to track and project food spend across the retail institution

Page 59: Sustainability Action Plan 2

59

Sustainable Food Tracking tool

• Costs: – Staff time to develop and maintain Tracking Tool – Staff time to develop Policy Guidelines

• Benefits: – Potential Carbon savings from the purchase of local

organic food

Page 60: Sustainability Action Plan 2

60

Procurement WG

These tactics are coordinated with the other workgroups tactics where procurement is a integral part. • Dave Kolsom and Sandy Macasieb • Jasvinder Kaur, CACS • Jennifer Rudnick, CACS

Page 61: Sustainability Action Plan 2

61

Procurement Strategies Strategies Summary Number of Tactics

Environmentally Preferable Purchasing

Purchasing environmentally conscious products and supplies 11

Total 11

Page 62: Sustainability Action Plan 2

62

Procurement: Top 10 Tactics Strategy Tactic Description Score Time Frame

Environmentally Preferable Purchasing

Mercury Ban (if approved)

Ban all mercury containing devices except where approved by HazMat Committee 12

short term (2013-2015)

Green Cleaning in Labs Provide centralized dilution stations for bulk green cleaners for labs 12

medium term (2015-2017)

Purchasing Guidelines Energy Efficiency

Evaluate energy efficiency of products and equipment before purchase (non-IT products) 10

short term (2013-2015)

Hot/cold Filtered Water in Staff Kitchens

Move away from bottled water to dispensers in staff kitchens, nursing lounges, etc. 10

medium term (2015-2017)

Green Paper Products

Purchase paper and paper products (bath & facial tissue, paper towels, etc.) that meet US EPA Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines or are GreenSeal-certified 9

short term (2013-2015)

Scorecard Maintain checklist of chemicals used by the manufacturer to score products 8

short term (2013-2015)

Green Chemicals Substitutions

Promote acceptable green alternatives to chemicals currently used in labs 6

medium term (2015-2017)

Water Efficient Purchasing Guidelines

Evaluate water efficiency of products and equipment before purchase 6

medium term (2015-2017)

Purchasing Plan and Guidelines

Identify chemicals of concern and create guidelines for purchasing 5

long term (2017-2020)

Suppliers to Reduce Chemicals of Conern

Get suppliers to reduce chemicals of concern in their products 4

long term (2017-2020)

Page 63: Sustainability Action Plan 2

63

Procurement – Time Frames Short Term Medium Term Long Term

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Purchasing Guidelines for

Energy Efficiency

Hot/Cold Filtered Water in Staff Kitchens

Green Paper Products

Scorecard

Substitute Green Chemicals

Purchasing Guidelines for Water Efficiency

Purchasing Plan and Guidelines

Supplier-side toxics reduction

Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assessment

Page 64: Sustainability Action Plan 2

64

Tactics for Funding Requests Tactic Workgroup Score

1. Purchasing guidelines for energy and water efficiency 10

2. Hot / cold filtered water in staff kitchens 10

Page 65: Sustainability Action Plan 2

65

Procurement: Purchasing Guidelines for Energy and Water Efficiency

• This tactic considers developing guidelines and policy for purchasing only the most energy and water efficient appliances for the UCSF.

• We assume this will save 1% on utility bills.

Page 66: Sustainability Action Plan 2

66

• Costs: – Staff time to develop, distribute, and maintain the

guidelines – Premium for Energy Star appliances

• Benefits: – Increased level of energy efficiency from more

rigorous appliance/equipment procurement standards

Procurement: Purchasing Guidelines for Energy and Water Efficiency

Page 67: Sustainability Action Plan 2

67

Procurement Guidelines Simple Payback 2.2

Return on Investment

5 years -0.23

7 years -0.12

Procurement: Purchasing Guidelines for Energy and Water Efficiency

Page 68: Sustainability Action Plan 2

68

Procurement – Hot / Cold filtered water in staff kitchens

• This tactic considers purchasing and installing point of use (POU) filtered water dispensers for 50 departments (as a pilot).

• This cost UCSF in water and energy, but it will save on water delivery and jug purchase fees.

• As well as provide a significant social and environmental benefit of reducing/eliminating plastic bottle use.

Page 69: Sustainability Action Plan 2

69

• Costs: – Water usage – Energy for heating water

• Benefits: – Elimination of water jug vendor delivery fees – Social justice considerations for bottled water industry

practices – Staff education opportunity around these issues – Reduced GHG emissions from not shipping bottled water

Procurement – Hot / Cold filtered water in staff kitchens

Page 70: Sustainability Action Plan 2

70

Green Building WG

• Co-chairs, Malvin Whang and Deepak Dandekar • Carlowe Connelly, LEED-EBPM • Nora Klebow, CP • Millicent Magiera, Facilities • Tyler Krehlik, Smith Group • Bob Berryman, REO • Patti Mitchell, CACS

Page 71: Sustainability Action Plan 2

71

Green Building/Landscape Strategies Strategies Summary Number of Tactics

Building Materials

Toxics reduction tactics for interior and exterior building materials, development of standards and compliance, cleaning chemicals, among others.

14

Landscape Water efficient and environmentally sensitive landscaping 5

Total 19

Page 72: Sustainability Action Plan 2

72

Green Building: Top 10 Tactics Strategy Tactic Description Score Time Frame

Building Materials

Asbestos/PBC verification/plan Develop a management plan to ensure existance and location of these materials 16

short term (2013-2015)

Mercury Install mercury-free lighting 16 short term (2013-

2015)

Floor Maintenance Chemical used to strip and wax 13 long term (2017-

2020)

No VOC used indoors CARB restrictions for low VOCS, but does not require No VOC 12

short term (2013-2015)

Non-CFC refrigerants Promote the use on CFC-free refrigerants for new construction 12

medium term (2015-2017)

Sustainable Design Standards Develop standard use for all building projects at UCSF 11

short term (2013-2015)

Exterior Copper

Eliminate the use of copper metal roofing, copper granule-containing asphalt shingles, copper gutters and copper cladding. 9

short term (2013-2015)

Lead/Cadmium specification of product purchases without lead or cadmium to be addressed by building stds 7

medium term (2015-2017)

Entry Ways Entry grates to reduce amount of pollutants entering the building 7

long term (2017-2020)

Communicating to Public PR value to public and employees to highlight green building features 6

short term (2013-2015)

Page 73: Sustainability Action Plan 2

73

Green Building/Landscape: Top Tactics Strategy Tactic Description Score Time Frame

Landscape

Conservation Plan Create a conservation plan for existing natural site areas and restore damaged site areas to provide habitat 14

medium term (2015-2017)

Outdoor places

Provide places of respite or the campus to connect patients, staff, visitors to health benefits of the natural environment. 9 short term (2013-2015)

Storm water retention Retention tactis at bioswares, 374 Parnassus, MB Hospitals, IRM, Smith 8 short term (2013-2015)

Reduce Heat island effects

Implement strategies (landscaping, vegatative or green roofing, canopies, underground parking) to reduce heat island. 6 short term (2013-2015)

Gardening Gardening staff, internal competition, demonstration garden -> contribution to the community 6 short term (2013-2015)

Page 74: Sustainability Action Plan 2

74

Page 75: Sustainability Action Plan 2

75

Tactics for Funding Requests Tactic Workgroup Score

1. Building operator training 14

2. Building Energy Use Signage 13

Page 76: Sustainability Action Plan 2

76

Green Building – Time Frames Short Term Medium Term Long Term

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Asbestos / PBC

BOC

Building Energy Use Signage

Floor Maintenance

No VOC Indoors Policy

Non-CFC Refrigerants

Sust. Design Standards

Exterior Copper

Pb/Cd/Hg Policy

Entryways

Public Communication

Page 77: Sustainability Action Plan 2

77

Green Building – Building Operator Training

• This tactic considers training building operators to make buildings operate more efficiently.

• 5 head facilities employees would become certified by the Building Operator Certification program (BOC)

• Those 5 would train 50 other employees for 2 hours, twice a year

Page 78: Sustainability Action Plan 2

78

Green Building – Building Operator Certification (Training) • Costs:

– Staff time attending training and classes – BOC class tuition

• Benefits: – Deeper levels of energy efficiency

• kWh savings • Therm savings • CO2 savings

Presenter
Presentation Notes
BOM training UCOP is offering scholarship to UC staff to attend
Page 79: Sustainability Action Plan 2

79

Green Building– Building Operator Certificate Training

BOC Training Simple Payback 0.24

Return on Investment 5 years 2.77

7 years 2.35 Carbon Savings (metric tons CO2e) 1,119

$ cost / mTon avoided $455

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Above is w/o scholarship With UC scholarship no cost for tuition Train the trainer model
Page 80: Sustainability Action Plan 2

80

Green Building – Building Energy Signage

• This tactic considers creating informational signs to alert occupants and employees of energy use in the office and housing buildings, and ways to save energy.

• We conservatively assume that these signs will save 0.1% on energy use, piloted at the 654 Minnesota St. building.

Page 81: Sustainability Action Plan 2

81

• Costs: – Staff time designing and affixing signs

• Benefits: – Deeper levels of occupant energy conservation – Avoided GHG emissions

Green Building – Building Energy Signage

Page 82: Sustainability Action Plan 2

82

Sustainable Operations

• Chair, Carlowe Connelly • Jamie Hand, Facilities • Steaven Campbell, Facilities • Andrew Bird, MC Real Estate • Zach Quan, Facilities • Angela Hawkins, CACS

Page 83: Sustainability Action Plan 2

83

Sustainable Operations Strategies Strategies Summary Number of Tactics

Operations

Sustainable operations include building management, energy efficiency related to operations, plumbing, and waste. Tactics also include improvements indoor air quality, storm water control, light pollution, among others.

9

Total 9

Page 84: Sustainability Action Plan 2

84

Sustainable Operations: Top 10 Tactics Strategy Tactic Description Score Time Frame

Operations

Green Cleaning Program Establish a High-Performance Cleaning Program 17

short term (2013-2015)

Building Exterior & Interior Management

Develop environmentally sensitive, low-impact building exterior and interior plans; including hardscape management, preserving surrounding ecological integrity. 16

short term (2013-2015)

Energy Efficiency

Establish BMP by Planning, Documenting, and Assessing opportunities for optimal energy efficiency; and investigate, analyze, and implement Commissioning projects for buildings, establishing on-going commissioning programs. 16

long term (2017-2020)

Plumbing Fixture Efficiency

Replace inefficient plumbing fixtures in restrooms, kitchens, office suites for low-flow, water-efficient fixtures and have in place a permanent monitoring system to track water use. 16

medium term (2015-2017)

Tracking & Metering Resource Usage & Waste

Meter utility usage in all buildings, including sub-meters for different systems 15

short term (2013-2015)

Indoor Air Quality Monitoring and Improvement

Enhance indoor air quality levels by optimizing practices that prevent development of IAQ problems in buildings 15

medium term (2015-2017)

Landscaping & Stormwater Control

Storm water management plan infiltrating, collecting and reusing runoff or evapotranspiration runoff from 15% of precipitation falling on UCSF sites. 15

short term (2013-2015)

Light Pollution Reduction Minimize light trespass from buildings 10

short term (2013-2015)

Heat Island Reduction Increase albedo of campus properties 1

long term (2017-2020)

Page 85: Sustainability Action Plan 2

85

Toxics Reduction WG • Co-chairs, Alison Cleaver and Julie Sutton • Matt Carlson and Tim Orozco, EH&S • Carlowe Connelly, Sust Ops • Sara Janssen, KP • Judy Levin, CEH • Lucia Sayer, PSR • Allison Paradise, MyGreenLabs • Tyler Krehlik, Smith Group • Lisa Thompson, CACS • Tracey Woodruff, CACS

Page 86: Sustainability Action Plan 2

86

Toxics Reduction Strategies Strategies Summary #Tactics

Building Material Toxics reduction tactics for interior and exterior building materials, development of standards and compliance, cleaning chemicals, among others.

14

Cleaning Agents Green cleaning in laboratories, leased space, non-clinical areas, and laundry 4

Communication Program for Patients

Pharmicutical take-back programs, green parenting guides, and campaings related to patients at UCSF hospitals

3

Collaborations Collaboration and outreach with NGOs and government agencies, and co-branding efforts with other UCSF departments 2

Electronics Efforts to use only rechargable batteries, purchase longer-lived, upgradable, and low toxicity electronics. Also considers end-of-life disposal and management plan. 7

Environmental Preferrable Purchasing

Includes safe disposal of Gadolinium, developing a scorecard to track purchases of concern, transitioning to DEHP/PVC-free, BPA-free, and latex free products.

5

Furniture Considers toxics in furniture, obtaining a waiver for flame retardants by Fire Marshall, and requesting manufacturers to provide HPD and EPD. 3

Laboratories Suggests subsitutes and alternatives to commonly used laboratory chemicals, recommends chemical tracking and exchanges, best practices, recycling and reporting. 13

Pharmaceuticals Pharmicutical take-back programs and proper waste segregation involving medications. 2

Water Includes wastewater discharge testing, mercury reduction, leachproof plumbing, and suggested regulation of triclosan 4

Total 57

Page 87: Sustainability Action Plan 2

87

Toxics Reduction: Top 10 Tactics Strategy Tactic Description Score Time Frame

Building Material

Asbestos/PBC verfication plan

Develop a management plan to ensure existance and location of these materials 16

medium term (2015-2017)

Furniture Furniture Procurement Consider toxics in furnishings during purchase evaluations to ensure toxics reduction initiatives 14

medium term (2015-2017)

Furniture Flame Retardant Waiver by Fire Marshall Waiver of flame retardants by Fire marshall 14

short term (2013-2015)

Cleaning Green Cleaning in Laboratories

Replace traditional cleaning products with low toxicity products 12

medium term (2015-2017)

Labs LED Microscope lamps Swtich from traditional mercury microscope lamps to LED lamps 12

short term (2013-2015)

Communication for Patients Green Parenting Guide Pilot program SFGH to provide information (and follow-

up) to new parents about toxics risk 11 short term (2013-2015)

Communication for Patients Campaigns

Partner with various departments and UCSF Public Affairs 11 medium term (2015-2017)

Water Reduce Mercury in purchasing

Heavy metals are difficult to reduce in wastewater at the POD, Start wMercury 11

short term (2013-2015)

Building Material

Require standards for low toxic building materials Development standard use for all building projects at

UCSF 10 short term (2013-2015)

Cleaning Green Cleaning in leased space

Replace traditional cleaning products with low toxicity products 10

medium term (2015-2017)

Page 88: Sustainability Action Plan 2

88

Page 89: Sustainability Action Plan 2

89

Tactics for Funding Requests Tactic Workgroup Score

1. Flame Retardant Waiver 17

2. Green parenting guide 11

Page 90: Sustainability Action Plan 2

90

Toxics Reduction: Time Frames Short Term Medium Term Long Term

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Flame Retardant Waiver

Green Parenting Guide

Communicate Pharm Take Back Program

Campaigns

Page 91: Sustainability Action Plan 2

91

Toxics Reduction – Green Parenting Guide • This tactic considers developing a guide for

parents to buy green products – Included in the guide are coupons for discounted

green products • This tactic is hard to quantify, but there are a

number of significant qualitative benefits, such as: – Less toxics in the home and around children – Reduced antibacterial resistance – Better indoor environmental and air quality

Page 92: Sustainability Action Plan 2

92

Toxics Reduction – Green Parenting Guide • Costs:

– Staff time to develop and distribute the guide – Guide printing costs

• Benefits: – People reached and educated about reducing toxics

Page 93: Sustainability Action Plan 2

93

Toxic Reduction – Flame Retardant Waiver

• This tactic considers purchasing and installing furnishings made without flame retardants and approved by the Fire Marshal

• This will save UCSF costs of purchasing products made with added flame retardants

Page 94: Sustainability Action Plan 2

94

Toxic Reduction – Flame Retardant Waiver • Costs:

– Purchase furnishing made with out added flame retardants

• Benefits: – Reduction in the body burden of absorbed chemicals

that have ben shown to cause cancer and reproductive harm.

Page 95: Sustainability Action Plan 2

95

MC Sustainability Leadership Group • Chair, Dick Chan • Matt Carlson and Bert Luistro, EHS • Deepak Dandekar, D&S • Bruce Mace, Facilities • Katy Merwin, D&S • Ramana Sastry, Clinical Engineering • Carl Solomon, Hospitality • Jose Watson, Hospitality • Dan Henroid, CACS • Tim Mahaney, CACS

Page 96: Sustainability Action Plan 2

96

SLG Strategies Strategies Summary #Tactics

Water

condensate recovery, audit/repairs, toilets/faucets, cooling loops, cooling tower mngt, water conservation in food service 10

Leadership

Job descripton, funding, reporting, emp green benefits, reporting structure collaborations, awards, grand rounds, community needs assessment, green guide tool 10

Energy refrigerant leaks, MBCx, lighting, hand dryers, audits, sensors 10

Communication Website, pt education, advertising, sustainability reporting 4

Total 34

Page 97: Sustainability Action Plan 2

97

These tactics were selected from the Practice Greenhealth award application and SLG members as top priorities or areas identified for improvement.

SLG Tactics

Page 98: Sustainability Action Plan 2

98

Tactics for Funding Requests

Tactics

1. Occupancy sensors in storage closets & changing rooms

2. Cool roofs

Page 99: Sustainability Action Plan 2

99

SLG – Time Frames Short Term Medium Term Long Term

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Occupancy Sensors

Cool Roofs

Page 100: Sustainability Action Plan 2

100

Sustainability Leadership Group – Occupancy Sensors • This tactic considers installing occupancy

sensors in supply closets & changing rooms that have fluorescent lights that would otherwise lit 24/7.

• Wall mounted occupancy sensors are a straight replacement for a traditional switch. – Additional wiring (low voltage line) is only required for ceiling mounted

sensors. These small rooms and closets would require only wall mounted applications.

• Not only does this save energy, it reduces the number of lamps to be purchased & replaced.

Page 101: Sustainability Action Plan 2

101

Sustainability Leadership Group – Occupancy Sensors • Costs:

– Sensor costs – Installation costs

• Benefits: – Energy conservation – Lamp savings – Staff replacement time & cost savings – Carbon savings

Page 102: Sustainability Action Plan 2

102

Sustainability Leadership Group – Occupancy Sensors

Occupancy Sensors Simple Payback 1.1 Return on Investment

5 years 4.14

7 years 6.49 Carbon Savings ( metric tons CO2e) 125

$ Cost / metric tons avoided $26.30

Page 103: Sustainability Action Plan 2

103

Sustainability Leadership Group – Cool Roofs • This tactic considers installation of cool roof

coating on the Old Hospital to reduce the Heat Island Effect

• High solar reflectance help reflect sunlight away from a building, reducing roof temperatures – Cool Roofs reduce energy use – Reduce air pollution – Improve human health and comfort

Page 104: Sustainability Action Plan 2

104

Sustainability Leadership Group – Cool Roofs

• Costs: – Installed cost of cool roof

• Benefits: – Electricity cost savings from reduced air conditioning – Avoided GHG emissions

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Check with Dick to see if he wants more detail.
Page 105: Sustainability Action Plan 2

105

Sustainability Leadership Group – Cool Roofs

Cool Roofs

Simple Payback 4.9

Return on Investment

5 years 0.10

7 years 0.61

Page 106: Sustainability Action Plan 2

106

All Top Tactics Evaluation

Ease: Feasibility + Economic Viability

Strategic G

oals Environm

ental +Health

Page 107: Sustainability Action Plan 2

107

Tactics Summary by Payback Period Workgroup Top Tactics Payback (years) Toxics Reduction Flame Retardant Waiver 0 Sustainable Ops Green cleaning program 0 Sustainable Ops Building exterior and interior management 0

MC Waste & Procurement APEX double-sided printing .03 Green Building Development of Building Operator Certification (BOC) training 0.2

Zero Waste Department waste tracking efficiency 0.5 Zero Waste Remote waste sorting education for staff 0.5

Procurement Hot / cold filtered water in staff kitchens 0.6 SLG Occupancy sensors in storage closets 1.1

Toxics Reduction Green parenting guide 1.4 Procurement Purchasing guidelines for energy and water 2.2

Climate Change Solar PV Mission Bay Housing 4.6 SLG Cool roofs 4.9

Culture Shift Encourage telecommuting 7.7 Green Building Energy Use Signage 8.5 Culture Shift Mindful consumption for events -

MC Waste & Procurement Point of Collection waste signage -

Sustainable Food Sustainable food tracking tool - Water Conservation Low flow water fixtures - Water Conservation Water conscious irrigation -

Page 108: Sustainability Action Plan 2

108

Tactics Summary by Carbon Savings/Health Benefits Workgroup Top Carbon Saving Tactics mT CO2 Value $cost/mTon Green Building Development of Building Operator Certification

(BOC) training 1,011 $13,250 $455

Climate Change Solar PV on Mission Bay Housing 775 $10,158 $64.50

SLG Occupancy sensors in storage closets 114 $1,197 $26.30

Workgroup Top Tactics with Health Benefits Benefits Toxics Reduction Flame Retardant Waiver Decreased toxins at UCSF

Culture Shift Encourage telecommuting Better air quality

Green Building Energy Use Signage Energy efficiency

Culture Shift Mindful consumption for events Less waste MC Waste & Procurement Point of Collection waste signage Better waste sorting

Toxics Reduction Green parenting guide Decreased toxins at UCSF

MC Waste & Procurement APEX double-sided printing Less waste

Procurement Purchasing guidelines for energy and water Energy efficiency

Procurement Hot / cold filtered water in staff kitchens Less plastic waste

Zero Waste Department waste tracking efficiency Increased metric accuracy

Zero Waste Remote waste sorting education for staff Less landfill waste

SLG Cool roofs More comfortable buildings

Sustainable Food Sustainable food tracking tool healthier food, less travel

Sustainable Ops Green cleaning program – NO COST Decreased toxins at UCSF

Sustainable Ops Building management – NO COST Energy efficiency

Water Conservation Low flow water fixtures Less water use

Water Conservation Water conscious irrigation Less water use

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Valuation is based on the cost of offset of MT CO2 (Terrapass $13.10)
Page 109: Sustainability Action Plan 2

109 109

SAP 2.0 Review Successes

• Development of a consistent methodology

• Definition of the strategies and identification of tactics

• Development of a tool to guide the tactics evaluation

• Subgroups organization

• Definition of manageable objectives to complete the SAP

Lessons

• Tactics evaluation = quite laborious, hard to motivate volunteers to be active in this process

• Some WGs have “loose” internal connections create more team bonding

• Established process for biannual SAP updates

• Need project coordinator to provide analyses of projects

Page 110: Sustainability Action Plan 2

110

FY14-15 Budget Approved w/Justification TYPE NAME PROGRAM JUSTIFICATION FY14-15 ($) COST SAVINGS EXPLANATION EST SAVINGS

(ANNUAL)

CULTURE SHIFT Mindful Consumption at Events

1,300

GREEN BLDG Building Energy Use Signage Signage to instruct building occupants on use of utility controls.

3,386

For Example: MN Energy= $398,000 with 1% savings= $3980.

3,980

GGREEN BLDG Purchasing Guidelines for Energy & Water

Develop guidelines to purchase energy and water conserving equipment and supplies.

2,600

Energy Star efficient appliances at 654 Minnesota are 17% more efficient, and will save~ $1185/YR (given 15% annual replacement of appliance per year).

1,185

WASTE/PROCUREMENT Water Spouts (For Drinking Fountains & Staff Kitchens)

Reduce cost of bottled water and disposal of plastic bottle waste, Reduce delivery truck traffic to campuses, improving community relations.

17,500

50% savings on bottled water costs for 50 kitchens will save $27,500/YR.

27,500

WASTE/PROCUREMENT Occupancy Sensors in Closets Reduce energy usage in closets where lights are on 24/7.

3,000

Estimated cost of installation will break even in 1st year, $2700 savings each year afterwards

3,000

SUST FOOD Sustainable Food Tracking Tool UCOP Policy Requirement

3,000 Complete development of tool will allow all UC locations to use (possible fee to each campus to recoup costs).

$ -

TOXICS REDUCTION Green Parenting Guide

Educate parents/community to reduce exposure to allergens and unregulated chemicals (that UCSF research has shown to cause health effects such as: asthma, endocrine disruption, cancer, etc.).

6,910

If 5.3 emergency room visits @ $1300 can be averted, the cost of the guide would be covered.

$ -

ZERO WASTE

In Person Training: Department-specific Waste/Recycling/Compost Trainings

In-person customized for waste segregation training is most effective & supplements visual campaigns for outreach and engagement.

3,800

Waste segregation training and process changes will reduce cost of landfill waste.

13,000

ZERO WASTE Remote Training: Lab safety/Waste Module Online Training/iPhone Application

Social media and gaming incentivizes people to learn while waiting for shuttles.

3,800

Example: Waste segregation & training can reduce cost at PCUP by $13,533/yr. Current campus wide cost of $1.3M, with 1% savings of $13,000

FY 14 15 PROGRAMS TOTAL

45 296

48 665

Page 111: Sustainability Action Plan 2

111

111

Thank you! http://livinggreen.ucsf.edu http://brightideas.ucsf.edu