survey report - s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com

U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation October 2009

Survey Report Southern California Regional Brine-Concentrate Management Study – Phase I Lower Colorado Region

Survey_Report.doc iii

Contents

Page Abbreviations and Acronyms .................................................................................. vii 1 Introduction and Study Objectives ............................................................... 1

1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Study Objectives ........................................................................................ 3 1.3 Study Components ..................................................................................... 3 1.4 Report Objectives ....................................................................................... 4

2 Survey Process ................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Development of the Survey Framework .................................................... 6

2.1.1 Wastewater Treatment Plant Permit and Water Quality Information ........................................................................................... 7

2.1.2 Wastewater Treatment Plant Flow Information ................................... 8 2.1.3 Groundwater Desalter and Groundwater Cleanup Treatment Plant

Capacity and Discharge Data ............................................................... 8 2.1.4 Industrial Discharger Data.................................................................... 9 2.1.5 Ocean Outfalls, Land Outfalls, and Brinelines/Interties ...................... 9

2.2 Regional Meetings .................................................................................... 10 2.3 Data Collection Process ........................................................................... 13

2.3.1 Public Agency Survey ........................................................................ 13 2.3.2 Private Facility Data ........................................................................... 13

2.4 Data Review and Gap Analysis ................................................................ 16 2.4.1 Wastewater Treatment Plant Permit and Water Quality

Information ......................................................................................... 17 2.4.2 Wastewater Treatment Plant Flow Information ................................. 17 2.4.3 Groundwater Desalter and Groundwater Cleanup Treatment Plant

Capacity and Discharge Data ............................................................. 18 2.4.4 Industrial Discharger Data.................................................................. 18 2.4.5 Ocean Outfall Information ................................................................. 18 2.4.6 Wastewater Treatment Plant Land Outfalls, and Sewer

Interconnection Information ............................................................... 19 3 Regional Brine-Concentrate Outlook ......................................................... 21

3.1 Ventura County Region ............................................................................ 21 3.1.1 Brine-Concentrate Facilities ............................................................... 23 3.1.2 Regional Summary ............................................................................. 28

3.2 Los Angeles County Region .................................................................... 30 3.2.1 Brine-Concentrate Facilities ............................................................... 32 3.2.2 Regional Summary ............................................................................. 39

3.3 Inland Empire Region .............................................................................. 43 3.3.1 Brine-Concentrate Facilities ............................................................... 45 3.3.2 Regional Summary ............................................................................. 52

3.4 Orange County Region ............................................................................. 59 3.4.1 Brine-Concentrate Facilities ............................................................... 59 3.4.2 Regional Summary ............................................................................. 68

3.5 San Diego County Region ........................................................................ 72

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY – PHASE I SURVEY REPORT

Survey_Report.doc iv

3.5.1 Brine-Concentrate Facilities ............................................................... 74 3.5.2 Regional Summary ............................................................................. 82

3.6 Brine-Concentrate Water Quality ............................................................. 87 3.7 Southern California Overview.................................................................. 91

3.7.1 Brine-Concentrate Flow Summary ..................................................... 91 3.7.2 Water Supply Summary ..................................................................... 95 3.7.3 Comparison of Survey Results with Past Reclamation Studies ......... 99

4 Lessons Learned and Challenges for Brine-Concentrate Projects ........ 103 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 103 4.2 Calleguas MWD Salinity Management Program ................................... 103

4.2.1 Project Description ........................................................................... 103 4.2.2 Brine Management ........................................................................... 105 4.2.3 Implementation Issues ...................................................................... 105

4.3 South Bay Ocean Outfall Study ............................................................. 106 4.3.1 Project Description ........................................................................... 106 4.3.2 Brine Management ........................................................................... 108 4.3.3 Implementation Issues ...................................................................... 109

4.4 Laguna County Deep Well Injection Project ......................................... 109 4.4.1 Project Description ........................................................................... 109 4.4.2 Brine Management ........................................................................... 110 4.4.3 Implementation Issues ...................................................................... 111

Tables Table 1.1 List of BEMT Members ........................................................................... 1 Table 2.1 Regional Meetings ................................................................................. 11 Table 2.2 Identified Survey Participants by Subregion .......................................... 12 Table 2.3 Summary of Surveys Received and Completed ..................................... 13 Table 2.4 Private Discharge Facilities in Southern California ............................... 14 Table 3.1 Wastewater and Groundwater Brine-Concentrate Sources in the

Ventura County Region .......................................................................... 25 Table 3.2 Wastewater and Groundwater Brine-Concentrate Sources in the Los

Angeles Region ...................................................................................... 33 Table 3.3 Wastewater and Groundwater Brine-Concentrate Sources in the

Inland Empire Region ............................................................................ 47 Table 3.4 Wastewater and Groundwater Brine-Concentrate Sources in the

Orange County Region ........................................................................... 63 Table 3.5 Wastewater and Groundwater Brine-Concentrate Sources in the San

Diego County Region ............................................................................. 75 Table 3.6 RO Concentrate Water Quality Examples ............................................. 87 Table 3.7 Key Water Quality Parameters in Wastewater RO Concentrate ............ 88 Table 3.8 Key Water Quality Parameters in RO Concentrate ................................ 90 Table 3.9 Summary of Brine-Concentrate Generated in Southern California

for the Existing and Ultimate Conditions ............................................... 93 Table 4.1 Phased Schedule for Completion of the Salinity Management

Project .................................................................................................. 104


Survey_Report.doc v

Figures Figure 1.1 Southern California Study Area...............................................................2 Figure 2.1 Schematic of the Survey Process .............................................................6 Figure 2.2 Schematic of the Data Review Process..................................................17 Figure 3.1 Schematic of the Survey Summary Process ..........................................21 Figure 3.2 Major Wastewater, Groundwater, and Outfall Facilities in the

Ventura County Region..........................................................................22 Figure 3.3 Wastewater and Groundwater Brine-Concentrate Sources in the

Ventura County Region – 2010..............................................................24 Figure 3.4 Wastewater And Groundwater Brine-Concentrate Sources in the

Ventura County Region – Ultimate........................................................27 Figure 3.5 Brine-Concentrate Flow Summary for Ventura County Region ...........28 Figure 3.6 Water Supplies That Result in Generation of Brine-concentrate in

the Ventura County Region....................................................................29 Figure 3.7 Major Wastewater, Groundwater, and Outfall Facilities in the

Los Angeles County Region ..................................................................31 Figure 3.8 Wastewater and Groundwater Brine-Concentrate Sources in the Los

Angeles County Region – 2010 .............................................................37 Figure 3.9 Wastewater and Groundwater Brine-Concentrate Sources in the Los

Angeles County Region – Ultimate .......................................................38 Figure 3.10 Brine-Concentrate Flow Summary for the Los Angeles County

Region ....................................................................................................39 Figure 3.11 Water Supplies That Result in Generation of Brine-Concentrate in

the Los Angeles County Region ............................................................40 Figure 3.12 Major Wastewater, Groundwater, and Outfall Facilities in the

Inland Empire Region ............................................................................44 Figure 3.13 Wastewater and Groundwater Brine-Concentrate Sources in the

Inland Empire Region – 2010 ................................................................46 Figure 3.14 Wastewater and Groundwater Brine-Concentrate Sources in the

Inland Empire Region – Ultimate ..........................................................51 Figure 3.15 Brine-Concentrate Flow Summary for the Inland Empire Region ........52 Figure 3.16 Water Supplies That Result in Generation of Brine-concentrate in

the Inland Empire Region ......................................................................53 Figure 3.17 SARI System..........................................................................................55 Figure 3.18 Flow Summary for SARI Reach 1.........................................................56 Figure 3.19 Flow Summary Comparison for SARI Reach 8 (SARI Reach IV) .......56 Figure 3.20 Major Wastewater, Groundwater, and Outfall facilities in the North

Orange County Region...........................................................................60 Figure 3.21 Major Wastewater, Groundwater, and Outfall Facilities in the South

Orange County Region...........................................................................61 Figure 3.22 Wastewater and Groundwater Brine-Concentrate Sources in the

North Orange County Region – 2010 ....................................................62 Figure 3.23 Wastewater and Groundwater Brine-Concentrate Sources in the

South Orange County Region – 2010 ....................................................65


Survey_Report.doc vi

Figure 3.24 Wastewater and Groundwater Brine-Concentrate Sources in the North Orange County Region – Ultimate .............................................. 66

Figure 3.25 Wastewater and Groundwater Brine-Concentrate Sources in the South Orange County Region – Ultimate .............................................. 67

Figure 3.26 Brine-Concentrate Flow Summary for North Orange County Region .................................................................................................... 69

Figure 3.27 Brine-Concentrate Flow Summary for South Orange County Region .................................................................................................... 69

Figure 3.28 Water Supplies That Result in Generation of Brine-concentrate for North Orange County Region ................................................................ 70

Figure 3.29 Water Supplies That Result in Generation of Brine-concentrate for South Orange County Region ................................................................ 71

Figure 3.30 Major Wastewater, Groundwater, and Outfall Facilities in the San Diego County Region ............................................................................. 73

Figure 3.31 Wastewater and Groundwater Brine-Concentrate Sources in the San Diego County Region – 2010 ................................................................. 79

Figure 3.32 Wastewater and Groundwater Brine-Concentrate Sources in the San Diego County Region – Ultimate ........................................................... 80

Figure 3.33 Brine-Concentrate Flow Summary for the San Diego County Region .................................................................................................... 82

Figure 3.34 Water Supplies That Result in Generation of Brine-concentrate in the San Diego County Region ................................................................ 83

Figure 3.35 Major Wastewater, Groundwater, and Outfall Facilities in Southern California ................................................................................................ 92

Figure 3.36 Summary of Brine-Concentrate Generated in Southern California by Region ............................................................................................... 94

Figure 3.37 Wastewater and Groundwater Brine-Concentrate Sources in Southern California – 2010 .................................................................... 96

Figure 3.38 Wastewater and Groundwater Brine-Concentrate Sources in Southern California – Ultimate .............................................................. 97

Figure 3.39 Brine-Concentrate Flow Summary for Southern California .................. 98 Figure 3.40 Water Supplies That Result in the Generation of Brine-concentrate

in Southern California ............................................................................ 98 Figure 3.41 Scenario Definitions ............................................................................ 101 Figure 3.42 Brine-Concentrate Flow Summary and Scenarios for Southern

California .............................................................................................. 102 Figure 4.1 Calleguas Regional Salinity Pipeline ................................................... 104 Figure 4.2 San Diego County Regional Brineline ................................................. 107 Figure 4.3 Laguna County Sanitation District Deep Well Injection Site .............. 110

Attachments Attachment A Sample Survey Attachment B Sample Regional Meeting Invitation and Presentation Attachment C Survey Data

Survey_Report.doc vii

Abbreviations and Acronyms afy acre-feet per year

ATF Advanced Treatment Facility

AWPF Advanced Water Purification Facility

AWTF Advanced Water Treatment Facility

AWTP Advanced Water Treatment Plant

BBARWA Big Bear Area Regional Wastewater Agency

BEMT Brine Executive Management Team

BMP best management practice

BOD biochemical oxygen demand

CBDA Chino Basin Desalter Authority

CCWMP Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan

CEC Constituents of Emerging Concern

CEQA California Environmental Quality Act of 1970

cfs cubic feet per second

CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System

COD Chemical Oxygen Demand

CSD Community Services District

DATS Deep Aquifer Treatment System

DWI deep well injection

DWP Department of Water and Power

EDR electrodialysis reversal

EMWD Eastern Municipal Water District

gpd gallons per day

GREAT Groundwater Recovery Enhancement and Treatment

GRIP Groundwater Reliability Improvement Program

GWR Groundwater Replenishment

IEEC Inland Empire Energy Center

IEUA Inland Empire Utilities Agency

Initiative Southern California Water Recycling Projects Initiative


Survey_Report.doc viii

IPR indirect potable reuse

IRWD Irvine Ranch Water District

IX ion exchange

JOS Joint Outfall System

JPA Joint Powers Authority

LCSD Laguna County Sanitation District

MBR membrane bioreactor

MF microfiltration

mgd million gallons per day

MM management measures

MNWD Moulton Niguel Water District

MWD Municipal Water District

MWDSC Metropolitan Water District of Southern California

NF nanofiltration

NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

O&M operation and maintenance

OCSD Orange County Sanitation District

OCWD Orange County Water District

PPTP Principal Potable Treatment Plant

PS precipitative softening

RCWD Rancho California Water District

Reclamation United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation

RO reverse osmosis

RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board

SBOO South Bay Ocean Outfall

SALT_PROC Salt Solidification and Sequestration

Sanitation Districts

The Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County

SAR sodium adsorption ratio

SARI Santa Ana Regional Interceptor

SAWPA Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority

SBOO South Bay ocean outfall

SCCWRRS Southern California Comprehensive Water Reclamation and Reuse


Survey_Report.doc ix

Study

SCWD South Coast Water District

SDCWA San Diego County Water Authority

SGU Shallow Groundwater Unit

SMP Salinity Management Plan

SOCWA South Orange County Wastewater Authority

SONGS San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station

SPARRO Slurry Precipitation and Reverse Osmosis

SS suspended solids

SWP State Water Project

TDS total dissolved solids

TIRE Terminal Island Renewal Energy

TMDL total maximum daily load

TOC total organic carbon

TSS total suspended solids

TVRI Temescal Valley Regional Interceptor

U.S. United States

USDW underground source of drinking water

USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency

USGVMWD Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District

UV ultraviolet

VSEP vibratory shear enhanced processing

WDR Water Discharge Requirements

WMWD Western Municipal Water District

WPCF Water Pollution Control Facility

WPCP Water Pollution Control Plant

WRD Water Replenishment District of Southern California

WRF Water Reclamation Facility

WRP Water Reclamation Plant

WWTF Wastewater Treatment Facility

WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant

ZLD zero liquid discharge

Survey_Report.doc 1

1 Introduction and Study Objectives This section of the report has the following subsections:

Introduction Study Objectives Study Components Report Objectives

1.1 Introduction

The Southern California Regional Brine-Concentrate Management Study is a collaboration between the United States (U.S.) Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and 14 local and state agency partners. Table 1.1 provides a list of the agencies represented on the Brine Executive Management Team (BEMT). The project is funded on a 50/50 cost-sharing basis between Reclamation and the cost-sharing partners, who together form the BEMT. The purpose of the BEMT is to formulate, guide, and manage technical activities of the study. Figure 1.1 shows a map of the study area.

TABLE 1.1 LIST OF BEMT MEMBERS

List of BEMT Members

City of San Bernardino Orange County Sanitation District

California Department of Water Resources Otay Water District

City of San Diego Rancho California Water District

Inland Empire Utilities Agency San Diego County Water Authority

Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority

Los Angeles Department of Water and Power U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Western Municipal Water District

National Water Resources Institute/ Southern California Salinity Coalition

Hemet

Oxnard

Perris

Irvine

Ontario

Banning

Anaheim

Fillmore

El Cajon

Redlands

Hesperia

Elsinore

Torrance

Glendale

San Diego

Encinitas

Escondido

Oceanside

Riverside

Lancaster

Long Beach

Victorville

Carpinteria

Los Angeles

Port Hueneme

Apple Valley

Palm Springs

San Clemente

Thousand Oaks

Big Bear Lake

Santa Barbara

FIGURE 1.1 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA STUDY AREASOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I ±

\\cheron\projects\USBR\381333BrineStudy\GIS 08/25/2009

San DiegoCounty Region

NorthOrange County

Region

Inland EmpireRegion

SouthOrange County

Region

Los Angeles County Region

Ventura CountyRegion

Boundaries

Study Area

California/Mexico Border

Features

Major Cities

Highways

Rivers

Water Bodies

Mexico

California

0 10 20Miles


Survey_Report.doc 3

1.2 Study Objectives

The objectives of this study are twofold:

• To assess the brine-concentrate landscape in southern California including brine-concentrate management technologies, regulatory environment, existing infrastructure, and future needs

• To make recommendations for Phase 2 pilot/demonstration projects

To accomplish these objectives, the study will develop six reports that ultimately will be incorporated into a final study report.

1.3 Study Components

The Southern California Regional Brine-Concentrate Management Study has six major components. Each component is focused on providing a piece of the southern California brine-concentrate management landscape. Each component will be summarized in a draft report that will be incorporated into the Final Study Report. The six components of the study are:

• Survey Report – A regional survey to collect data from local agencies about the brine-concentrate landscape in southern California

• Regulatory Issue and Trends Report – A summary of regulatory issues and trends associated with implementing a brine-concentrate project in southern California

• CECs Report – A summary of constituents of emerging concern (CECs) and how regulation of CECs might affect brine-concentrate management in southern California

• Institutional Issues Report – A summary of organizational structures that can be used to foster collaborative relationships between agencies implementing brine-concentrate management projects

• Brine-Concentrate Management Treatment and Disposal Options Report – A summary of brine-concentrate technologies and identification of potential local and regional solutions

• Pilot/Demonstration Project Recommendations Report – A list of recommended pilot/demonstration projects that could be implemented in the inland and coastal areas southern California

These six reports will be incorporated as appendices in the Final Study Report. The Final Report will provide highlights and conclusions of the six component reports in an executive summary format.


Survey_Report.doc 4

1.4 Report Objectives

This report was developed to provide an overview of brine-concentrate management in southern California by identifying existing and future concentrate management projects, issues facing implementation of concentrate management, and the amount of concentrate produced. The data in this report were collected by performing a southern California regional survey of wastewater and concentrate generators.

The report focuses on the survey process and results. It is organized into three sections:

• Survey Process • Survey Data Review • Summary of Brine-Concentrate Overview in Southern California

The survey process section describes the development of the survey framework, as well as the process of collecting data from local agencies. The data review section describes the survey data received from local agencies and discusses data gaps. Finally, the summary section of the report provides an overview of brine-concentrate management in southern California, as well as issues and constraints facing the implementation of these projects.

Survey_Report.doc 5

2 Survey Process A regional survey was undertaken to assess the concentrate management outlook in southern California. The basis of this survey was data and information developed as part of previous regional efforts including the Southern California Comprehensive Water Reclamation and Reuse Study (SCCWRRS) and the Southern California Water Recycling Projects Initiative (Initiative). These data were developed over a 10-year period (last updated in 2007) and compiled from local agencies based on responses to past surveys that focused on water recycling in southern California.

The survey undertaken as part of this effort expanded the type and detail of information requested to focus primarily on brine-concentrate production and disposal facilities. These facilities include brine lines, ocean outfalls, land discharges, wastewater and advanced treatment facilities (that is, reverse osmosis [RO] or concentrate generators), groundwater desalters, and concentrate management facilities. The data collected on concentrate management facilities included treatment methods, capacities, and water quality. Data were collected for current year (2008) and for future planning years. Data for future planning were collected in 5-year increments for planning years 2010 through 2035.

The study area encompassed in this report covers over 6 million acres. Because of the large area covered and the local nature of existing brine-concentrate disposal mechanisms (that is, brine lines and ocean outfalls), the study area was segmented into four geographical areas:

• Inland Empire • Los Angeles County/Ventura County • Orange County • San Diego County

These regional areas allowed data to be collected and analyzed in smaller subregions so that concentrate management facilities could be more easily identified, and a clearer picture of the issues facing concentrate management in a particular region could be viewed.

The following subsections of this report introduce and discuss the survey development process by describing how the survey framework was established and how data were collected. A schematic of the survey process is presented in Figure 2.1.


Survey_Report.doc 6

FIGURE 2.1 SCHEMATIC OF THE SURVEY PROCESS

2.1 Development of the Survey Framework

The survey was developed in coordination with the BEMT for distribution to water and wastewater agencies in southern California, as well as for collection of key information for certain industrial brine-concentrate facilities. The BEMT identified key information to be collected as part of this study during the development of the Plan of Study. These data included information on quantity and quality of water in wastewater, groundwater, and concentrate facilities. In addition, the BEMT identified a number of specific questions/issues to be addressed:

• What upgrades, modifications, or facilities are planned to satisfy additional needs for water supply and brine-concentrate disposal?

• What volumes of local water supplies are available based on existing and future brine-concentrate management projects?

• Do opportunities exist to co-locate brine-concentrate management facilities with existing wastewater treatment plants (WWTP)?

• What factors affect or restrict coastal and inland brine-concentrate management?

• What are the “lessons learned” and challenges for facility design, regulatory compliance and permitting, and operation and maintenance (O&M)?

The study team used the information requested by the BEMT along with existing data from the SCCWRRS and Initiative studies as the bases of the survey framework. The existing data included information about the water quantity and quality at 102 WWTPs or water reclamation plants (WRPs), 28 groundwater desalter and ion exchange (IX) facilities, as well as 11 ocean outfalls.

The survey was developed in a Microsoft Excel-based workbook that contained four separate survey components—each component on a separate worksheet. The survey worksheets focused on data pertaining to wastewater treatment quality and quantity,

Survey Process


Survey_Report.doc 7

groundwater cleanup and desalting, industrial dischargers, and conveyance facilities. Conveyance facilities included brinelines, key WWTP interties, land outfalls, and ocean outfalls. Each of the survey components was organized geographically and alphabetically. A sample survey is provided in Attachment A. The six components that comprised the survey database are described in the following subsections.

2.1.1 Wastewater Treatment Plant Permit and Water Quality Information

This component of the survey contained data pertaining to WWTP effluent water quality and brine-concentrate water quality characteristics. This survey component also identified National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, state discharge requirements, and reuse permit requirements for each facility. These data were needed to determine the quality of concentrate being produced currently and in the future. The water quality of the concentrate is important because it can affect an agency’s ability to comply with Water Discharge Requirements (WDR) water quality limits. Specifically, this survey focused on collecting data regarding:

• Sewage Source Information – This was used to determine type of flow (that is, domestic, industrial, groundwater desalters, and environmental cleanups) and characteristics of average influent total dissolved solids (TDS).

• WWTP Discharge Information – This included discharge location, type, and percentage of flow going to each type of discharge (that is, stream, ocean, brineline, percolation, downstream WWTP, and reuse), as well as the location of the nearest brine-concentrate disposal.

• NPDES or State Discharge Permit Requirements – This information included permit limits for parameters such as TDS, hardness, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N), and pH.

• Reuse Permit Limits – This information included permit limits for TDS, as well as other potential reuse limits that could result in the implementation of advanced treatment (that is, RO).

• Average Effluent Quality – This included averaged measured concentrations of parameters such as TDS, hardness, BOD, TSS, NH3-N, pH, residual chlorine, and other parameters pertinent to discharge limits or that could result in the implementation of advanced treatment (that is, RO).

• Process Type for Tertiary Treatment and Disinfection – This included the type of tertiary treatment used (that is, cloth media, dual media sand filtration, fuzzy filter, Dynasand, and membrane filtration), as well as the type of disinfection used (that is, free chlorine, chloramine, combination of free chlorine/chloramine, ultraviolet irradiation, and ozonation).

• Existing Concentrate Treatment Information – This information included the technology used, as well as water quality for existing brine-concentrate management applications.


Survey_Report.doc 8

2.1.2 Wastewater Treatment Plant Flow Information This component of the survey focused on collecting information pertaining to existing and projected treatment capacity, average daily flow, maximum daily flow, and recycled water usage for a facility. This information was collected for existing and future planning years. Future planning years were collected in 5-year increments from 2010 to 2035. Calculating the amount of brine-concentrate produced is important because it can assist in identifying capacity constraints in brinelines and outfalls that could limit future discharges. Specifically, this survey focused on collecting data regarding the following information:

• Facility Information – This included the facility name, owner, location, and year constructed.

• Wastewater Treatment Capacities and Flows – This included the treatment capacity, as well as average daily and maximum daily flows for primary, secondary, tertiary, and advanced treatment processes.

• Recycled Water Production – This included identifying a percent allocation of recycled water usage for groundwater recharge (RO and Non-RO), reservoir augmentation (RO), seawater intrusion barrier (RO and Non-RO), industrial (RO and Non-RO), agriculture irrigation, environmental and habitat, construction and dust control, landscape irrigation, and miscellaneous uses.

• Concentrate Production – This included treatment capacity, as well as average daily and maximum daily flows for any brine-concentrate production.

2.1.3 Groundwater Desalter and Groundwater Cleanup Treatment Plant Capacity and Discharge Data

Another type of information collected was related to groundwater cleanup and desalting facilities. Information about the location, type, water quality, and quantity of groundwater cleanup and desalting facilities was included in the survey. This information is important because, as the availability of imported water decreases and production costs increase, agencies are implementing additional groundwater projects. These groundwater projects possess degraded water quality that agencies would not have considered an economically feasible water supply in the past. Specific information collected about groundwater projects included the following:

• Facility Information – This included the facility name, owner, location, year constructed, treatment method, constituents of concern in groundwater, purpose of project, and brine-concentrate discharge location.

• Concentrate Water Quality Information – This included information on the brine-concentrate water quality including parameters such as TDS, total organic carbon (TOC), temperature, NH3-N, pH, silica, calcium, bromide, strontium, sulfate, arsenic, perchlorate, and phosphate.

• Treatment Capacities and Flows – This included quantification of treatment capacity, as well as average daily and maximum daily flows.


Survey_Report.doc 9

• Concentrate Production – This included quantifying treatment capacity, as well as average daily and maximum daily flows for any brine-concentrate production.

2.1.4 Industrial Discharger Data The fourth part of the survey was focused on collecting information about industrial dischargers. Information collected about major dischargers was grouped by downstream discharge facility. The list of industrial dischargers was primarily from Pretreatment Program Reports prepared for the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Understanding the type of flow discharged to each of the outfalls is important because it indicates the potential type of constituent loading and flows that originate at different dischargers. This is particularly important as the drought in California continues, increased water reuse occurs, and decreased infiltration and inflow occur in sewers and brinelines. These factors result in changes to the blending and dilution of concentrate inflows to WWTPs and ocean outfalls, as well as impacts to benthic organisms and noncompliance with WDR permit limitations. The industrial discharge component of the survey collected the following information:

• Receiving Facility Information – This included the agency name and location of the receiving facility, downstream WWTP or outfall facility, and the discharger’s name.

• Discharger Information – Information included the owner’s name, location, pretreatment method, and discharge limitation or permit requirements.

• Type of Discharger – This identified the type of discharger as biotechnical, pharmaceutical, manufacturing, utilities, medical, or hospitality.

• Discharge Water Quality Information – This included water quality information including TDS, BOD, chemical oxygen demand (COD), NH3-N, nitrate-N, total nitrogen, pH, temperature, and trace organics.

• Discharger Flow Data – Information included flow data collected for maximum daily flow, instantaneous flow, and average daily flow conditions.

2.1.5 Ocean Outfalls, Land Outfalls, and Brinelines/Interties Information was collected about brine-concentrate conveyance facilities to determine if existing facilities are adequate to satisfy future water quality and capacity needs. The same information was collected for ocean outfalls, land outfalls, brinelines, and key WWTP interties. The survey on conveyance facilities included:

• Facility Information – This included information about the facility name, owner, location, year constructed, type of flow, and contributing WWTP or other facilities. For brinelines and interties, the locations of ends of pipe also were provided.

• Pipeline Information – This included pipeline information such as pipe material, length, size, capacity, planned expansions or additions, and information about problems in the conveyance facilities such as scale formation.


Survey_Report.doc 10

• Discharge Water Quality Permit Limits/Information (ocean outfalls only) – This information included the NPDES permit number and water quality requirements such as TDS, hardness, BOD, TSS, NH3-N, pH, toxicity, and metals.

• Discharge Water Quality Information – This included information regarding the water quality in the system such as TDS, hardness, BOD, TSS, NH3-N, pH, toxicity, and metals.

• Pipeline Capacity and Flows – This information included the pipeline capacity, average daily flow, and maximum daily flow for the current year (2008) and future years (2010 to 2035 in 5-year increments).

• Cost Information (brinelines/interties only) – This information included costs for discharge, energy, and O&M.

2.2 Regional Meetings

Once the survey framework was developed, the next step was to contact local agencies to request data and information. From past data collection efforts on the SCCWRRS and Initiative studies, it was determined that conducting a series of regional meetings would be the best method to increase participation in the survey. The regional meetings focused on providing a study overview and outlining the data survey request.

Invitees to these regional meetings were developed using existing databases of information, BEMT member contacts, and advertisements in area professional societies and newsletters. The initial step in this process was to use existing data from SCCWRRS and the Initiative to identify potential agencies to include in the survey request. The BEMT also assisted in identifying additional agencies that should be surveyed. Prior to conducting the regional meetings, the meetings were advertised using a number of different methods including:

• Emails to Inland Empire, Los Angeles, and San Diego chapters of WateReuse • Email to California Rural Water Association • Email to San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) partner agencies • Email to Santa Ana River Dischargers Association • Advertisement in the newsletter of the Association of Ground Water Agencies

In addition, Reclamation published a press release about the survey and regional meetings. Members of the public, organizations, and agencies interested in this study were invited to attend. Advertising the meetings increased the number of agencies that were aware of and interested in participating in the study. Four regional meetings were conducted throughout southern California in 2008. The locations and dates of the regional meetings are presented in Table 2.1. These meetings were used to inform the attendees about the approach and schedule for the survey, as well as to encourage participation in the survey. A sample of



Reclamation’s press release, a meeting invitation, and a presentation are provided in Attachment B.

Fifty-six representatives from water and wastewater agencies, resource agencies, and the consultant community attended the four regional meetings. A list of these agencies is presented in Table 2.2. Additional survey participants were identified through information from the RWQCB discharge permit holders and county and state waste management boards. A total of 46 agencies were identified as potential survey participants.

TABLE 2.1 REGIONAL MEETINGS

Area Date Number of Attendees L oc ation

Inland Empire November 14, 2008 14 Santa Ana Watershed Protection Agency (SAWPA) Office

Riverside, California

Los Angeles County/ Ventura County

December 4, 2008 5 Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWDSC) Office

Los Angeles, California

Orange County December 11, 2008 12 South Orange County Wastewater Authority (SOCWA) Office

Dana Point, California

San Diego County December 2, 1008 25 SDCWA Office

San Diego, California



TABLE 2.2 IDENTIFIED SURVEY PARTICIPANTS BY SUBREGION

Inland Empire

Los Angeles County

Orange County

San Diego County

Ventura County

City of Corona Department of Water and Power

Central Basin Municipal Water District

City of San Clemente

City of Chula Vista

Calleguas Municipal Water District

City of Redlands City of Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation

City of San Juan Capistrano

City of Escondido

City of Camarillo; Sanitation District

City of Rialto County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County

Irvine Ranch Water District

City of Oceanside

Camrosa Water District

City of Riverside Groundwater Replenishment District of Southern California

Moulton Niguel Water District

City of San Diego

City of Oxnard; Public Works Administration

City of San Bernardino Municipal Water District

Los Angeles County Department of Public Works; Office of Water Recycling

Orange County Sanitation District

Fallbrook Public Utilities District

City of Simi Valley

Eastern Municipal Water District

Los Angeles Department of Water and Power

Orange County Water District

Otay Water District

City of Thousand Oaks

Inland Empire Utilities Agency

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California

Southern California Water District

Padre Dam Municipal Water District

County of Ventura

Lake Arrowhead Community Services District

Newhall Land Company

SOCWA Ramona Municipal Water District

Rancho California Water District

West Basin Municipal Water District

Santa Fe Irrigation District

SAWPA Sweetwater Authority

Western Municipal Water District

Vallecitos Water District

Yucaipa Valley Water District



2.3 Data Collection Process

Data were collected using two methods. For public agencies, the survey was used to collect data. For private or other nonpublic facilities, information was collected from the California NPDES permit databases that are maintained by the RWQCBs.

2.3.1 Public Agency Survey The survey was sent electronically to the 46 identified agencies. Each agency then completed the survey components relevant to their agency. For example, the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County sent in surveys for wastewater quality and quantity, brineline/interties, industrial dischargers, and ocean outfalls. Any missing or incomplete data were identified and the study team worked with the agency to fill in these data gaps (as described in the next section of the report).

The data collection process occurred between December 2008 and August 2009. The responsibility of contacting agencies regarding missing or incomplete data was shared among the BEMT members, Reclamation, and the study team. As a result of the data collection process, survey data were received from 42 of the 46 identified agencies (91 percent). Of the 42 surveys received, 41 were complete with no missing or incomplete data. Table 2.3 presents the number of surveys received and completed in each subregion. Based on the responses received from these agencies, a total of 122 wastewater treatment plants were identified, as well as 53 groundwater desalting facilities, 19 ocean outfalls, and 28 major brinelines/interties.

TABLE 2.3 SUMMARY OF SURVEYS RECEIVED AND COMPLETED

Subregion Number of Survey Meeting Participants

Number of Surveys Received

Number of Surveys Completed

Inland Empire 12 12 12

Los Angeles County 8 8 8

Orange County 8 8 8

San Diego County 11 9 8

Ventura County 7 5 5

Total 46 42 41

2.3.2 Private Facility Data Information on industrial outfalls was collected through the California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) database, which is accessed through the www.waterboards.ca.gov website. A list of all major (discharges greater than 1 million gallons per day [mgd]) and minor NPDES permits by RWQCB is available. Information was sought for Regions 4, 8, and 9. The database and

http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/�



website allow access to individual permits, amendments, and other regulatory documents.

The industrial information corresponded to power plants, refineries, and shipbuilding sites. Seventeen sites were identified. The NPDES permit information available through the CIWQS database revealed four other sites having permits for ocean discharge. Three of these were naval bases and the fourth was SeaWorld Park – all four sites are in the San Diego region. Table 2.4 provides a list of the private facilities in southern California.

Information on discharge location and general nature (and for some cases water quality) of discharge is available in the NPDES permits. More specific information on the length, material, and future plans of the outfalls was sought through direct contact to the industrial sites. In all cases these requests were turned down due to security reasons. Discharge for the power plants was typically via one or two outfalls.

TABLE 2.4 PRIVATE DISCHARGE FACILITIES IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

Facility Name Agency /

Discharger

Location Receiving

Water Notes City County

Power Plants

Mandalay Generating Station

RRI Energy Mandalay, Inc.

Oxnard Ventura Pacific Ocean

Ormond Beach Generating Station

RRI Energy Ormond Beach, Inc.

Oxnard Ventura Pacific Ocean

Scattergood Generating Station

Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (DWP)

Playa Del Rey

Los Angeles Santa Monica Bay (Pacific Ocean)

Redondo Generating Station

AES Redondo Beach, LLC

Redondo Beach

Los Angeles Santa Monica Bay (Pacific Ocean)

El Segundo Generating Station

El Segundo Power, LLC

El Segundo Los Angeles Santa Monica Bay (Pacific Ocean)

Harbor Generating Station

Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (DWP)

Wilmington Los Angeles Los Angeles Harbor (Pacific Ocean)

Haynes Generating Station

Los Angeles DWP Long Beach

Los Angeles San Gabriel River (within the estuary)

Long Beach Generating Station

Long Beach Generation LLC

Long Beach

Los Angeles Long Beach Harbor (Pacific Ocean)

Generating Station, Huntington Beach

AES Huntington Beach LLC

Huntington Beach

Orange Pacific Ocean





Discharger

Location Receiving


SONGS UNIT 2 Southern California Edison – San Clemente

San Clemente

Orange Pacific Ocean Dedicated outfall

SONGS UNIT 3 Southern California Edison – San Clemente

San Clemente

Orange Pacific Ocean Dedicated outfall

Encina Power Plant

Cabrillo Power 1 LLC

Carlsbad San Diego Pacific Ocean 863.5 mgd

South Bay Power Plant

Duke Energy North America, LLC

Chula Vista San Diego South San Diego Bay

Uses discharge channel

Refineries

Los Angeles Refinery, Carson Plant

ConocoPhillips Company

Carson Los Angeles Dominguez Channel within the estuary

One discharge point; 11 mgd of treated wastewater

El Segundo Refinery

Chevron USA, Inc. El Segundo Los Angeles Santa Monica Bay (Pacific Ocean)

Up to 27 mgd: 6.45-mgd refinery wastewater, 2.34-mgd treated petroleum (hydrocarbon) contaminated shallow well groundwater, 4-mgd intermittent sources, 14-mgd rainfall runoff which may be contaminated

Shipbuilding

BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair (formerly Southwest Marine Shipyard)

Southwest Marine Inc.

San Diego San Diego San Diego Bay

Approximately five sources with less than 0.5 mgd; largest periodic effluent is up to 9 million gallons used as floating drydock ballast

National Steel & Shipbuilding Co

National Steel & Shipbuilding Co


Nine discharge points; minor discharges totaling less than 5 mgd; largest periodic discharge is floating ballast 110 mgd





Discharger

Location Receiving


Naval Base

Naval Base San Diego

US Navy Southwest Division


Multiple sites with many discharge points

US Naval Base Coronado


San Diego San Diego Pacific Ocean A number of low-volume discharge sites

US Naval Base Point Loma


San Diego San Diego Pacific Ocean Mostly low-volume discharge sites; includes 6-mgd multistage flash cooling water discharge

Miscellaneous

SeaWorld, San Diego

Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

San Diego San Diego Mission Bay 9.36 mgd via two outfalls

2.4 Data Review and Gap Analysis

The next step in the data collection process was to identify and, where possible, resolve gaps in data, as shown on the schematic of the data review process presented in Figure 2.2. To accomplish this, a review of each of the survey components was conducted to assess the quality, level of detail, and adequacy of the data. A summary of the usefulness of the data in each survey component, as well as an explanation of how data gaps were filled is provided in this section.

The completed data compiled during the survey are provided in Attachment C, in which each survey component is provided as follows:

• Attachment C.1 - Wastewater Treatment Plant Permit and Water Quality Information

• Attachment C.2 - Wastewater Treatment Plant Flow Information

• Attachment C.3 - Industrial Discharger Data

• Attachment C.4 - Ocean Outfall Information

• Attachment C.5 - Brinelines, WWTP Land Outfalls, and Sewer Interconnection Information

The information contained in these attachments is based on responses from survey participants and collected as part of the survey process.



FIGURE 2.2 SCHEMATIC OF THE DATA REVIEW PROCESS

2.4.1 Wastewater Treatment Plant Permit and Water Quality Information

Survey responses and data collection for this component provided representative data for each region of the study area for analysis. Key data such as the discharge location and nearest brine-concentrate facilities were approximately 90 percent complete. Data compiled as part of the Initiative were substituted for missing data on this survey. Discharge permit information and effluent quality data obtained from the survey requests were less complete; however, these data were adequate for the analysis. In addition, some data were completed using information obtained from the RWQCBs.

2.4.2 Wastewater Treatment Plant Flow Information Gathering data on WWTP flows in southern California was very important; therefore, much of the data collection, review, and secondary collection efforts focused on resolving gaps in these data. In particular, identification of wastewater plants with existing or planned membrane processes was critical, as these data are used to project future brine-concentrate flows and to identify regions with potentially critical brine-concentrate management issues. These data also were used to help complete and verify the brineline and outfall components. Of the 119 plants identified in this survey, 22 plants projected generating brine-concentrate flows by their ultimate buildout.

Where agencies did not respond or provide complete data on plants identified as having or planning to use membranes, efforts were made to complete this portion of the survey through previous reports, internet data sources, environmental documents, and through previous data survey efforts such as the Initiative. Overall, the data collected for this component were successful. Projections of flows for 2020 through 2035 might have lower accuracy in a few cases because of changing priorities in planning, as well as the level and detail of planning that an agency completes for future years.

Data Review Process



2.4.3 Groundwater Desalter and Groundwater Cleanup Treatment Plant Capacity and Discharge Data

Data collection efforts for groundwater desalters and cleanup facilities focused on plants that generated brine-concentrate. A total of 53 groundwater desalters and cleanup site plants were identified as part of the survey. Of these facilities, 51 had projected some level of brine-concentrate generation by ultimate buildout.

Where agencies did not respond or provide complete data, follow-up calls, previous reports, internet sources, environmental documents, and previous data from the Initiative and research surveys were used to complete the data. Overall, these data are complete; however, projections of future flows might be less accurate as a result of varying levels of agency planning.

2.4.4 Industrial Discharger Data Only about a dozen agencies responded to the request for industrial discharge data that might be pertinent to brine-concentrate management issues. Because the wastewater and groundwater projections were much more vital, little effort was made to collect additional data for this component. In addition, many agencies do not collect this type of data. The data collected were deemed adequate for purposes of providing the study team with a snapshot of the type of users, TDS levels, water quality, and discharge or permitting concerns. A majority of the data came from annual Pretreatment Program Reports.

2.4.5 Ocean Outfall Information Overall, 19 public and private industrial outfalls were identified. Initial data collection efforts yielded limited responses, of which most provided only partial information. Additional effort was made to fill in data gaps for public facility outfalls in southern California. Where brine-concentrate flows were high or potentially problematic in terms of capacity limitations or water quality, additional efforts were made to clarify the survey data collected and to resolve gaps. However, for many of the outfalls, data were difficult to collect or difficult to compile in a structured survey due to the complexities of how agencies manage outfalls and how outfalls are permitted. For example, capacity limits provided as survey responses by some agencies are the non-pumped limits. However, most have the ability to pump discharges above this amount through their outfall during peak flow and/or high-tide conditions. These also can be permit-listed values, leading to a wide range of special conditions. For example, some outfall permit limits are based on the capacities at the upstream WWTPs and WRPs that discharge to the outfall system, but the outfall system is capable of conveying flows greater than this permitted limit.

In general the data collected for the public agency outfall were adequate for identifying potential problems related to the brine-concentrate projects for that region. For private industrial outfalls, only a minor amount of data is available from their permits as obtained from the RWQCBs. The study team made efforts to collect these data; however, a majority of the private dischargers would not release information for security reasons. If any of these outfalls are deemed as a potential brine-concentrate management option for a region or agency, then it is recommended that the private owner be contacted to obtain information.



2.4.6 Wastewater Treatment Plant Land Outfalls, and Sewer Interconnection Information

Original data collected under the Initiative effort were limited and incomplete for brinelines, land outfalls, and sewer interconnections; initial requests on this survey component were not comprehensive. For this reason, additional efforts were made to resolve data gaps after the initial survey requests by means of multiple communications with agencies or by utilizing information found in other reports and documents. Similar to the ocean outfall, capacity data for some of these systems might have some discrepancies. In addition, flow data tend to vary greatly because of peak flows and because some systems to convey treated or untreated sewage water along with brine-concentrate flows. Overall, the data collected for these facilities enabled the study team to identify and quantify those regions and system where brine-concentrate management issues are likely to occur in the future.


3 Regional Brine-Concentrate Outlook The final step in developing the survey process was to analyze data and summarize key data to develop a clear picture of the outlook for brine-concentrate management in southern California, as presented in the schematic shown in Figure 3.1. The following subsections summarize the results from each region, as well as the overall study area. FIGURE 3.1 SCHEMATIC OF THE SURVEY SUMMARY PROCESS

3.1 Ventura County Region

Nine wastewater facilities, seven groundwater desalters, and three outfall systems exist or are planned in the Ventura County region. Figure 3.2 shows the major WWTPs/WRPs, groundwater desalters, and brine conveyance facilities. Conveyance facilities in this region include brinelines and public and private outfalls. Currently, the existing facilities that generate brine-concentrate are in the Oxnard area. In the future, brine-concentrate facilities will develop along the Salinity Management Plan pipeline (SMP). The SMP is a new brineline being constructed in phases; its alignment runs from a western terminus in the inland area northeast of Oxnard to the Simi Valley in the east.

Survey Summary

&3&3

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

# ##

#*#*

#*

#*

#*#*

Oxnard WWTP

Camrosa WRF Camarillo WRP

Hill Canyon WWTP

Moorpark WWTP

Simi Valley WQCP

Ahmanson Ranch

Tapia WRF

D

tu101

tu101tu118tu126

tu23

§̈¦5

tu27

tu101

tu34

tu1

tu1

tu23

tu27

tu118

tu33 tu126

tu23

tu101

tu101

Oxnard Ocean Outfall

Ormond Beach Effluent Pipeline (Reliant Energy LLC)

Oxnard AWPF

Hueneme Outfall



Ventura WWTP

West Simi Valley Desalter

Camarillo Groundwater Desalter (Wells A & B)

South Las Posas Desalter (Moorpark Desalter)

Somis Desalter

Camrosa Groundwater Desalter

Malibu Mesa WRF

Malibu WPCPTrancas WPCP

GREAT Program Desalter Facility

Port Hueneme Water Agency Desalter


FIGURE 3.2 - MAJOR WASTEWATER, GROUNDWATER, AND OUTFALL FACILITIESIN THE VENTURA COUNTY REGIONSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I

Wastewater Treatment Plants#* Land Discharge

#* Recycled Water Only

# Stream Discharge

#* Ocean Discharge

#* Other

Desalination Facilities

&3 Existing Groundwater Desalter

Planned Groundwater Desalter

" Proposed Seawater Desalination Plant

Industrial Ocean OutfallsPower Plants

Industrial/Others

Wastewater OutfallsWastewater Outfalls

Planned or Potential Ocean Outfall

Existing Brineline or Interconnector Sewer

Planned or Potential Brineline orInterconnector Sewer

FeaturesHighways

Rivers

Water Bodies

±0 2 4

Miles



3.1.1 Brine-Concentrate Facilities As part of the survey, nine facilities were identified as existing or planned brine-concentrate generators as shown in Table 3.1. Figures 3.3 and 3.4 show the locations of the brine-concentrate facilities and relative scale of projected brine-concentrate flows for the 2010 and ultimate timeframes. In the Ventura County region, brine-concentrate generation increases approximately sixfold between the existing (2.68-mgd) to the ultimate buildout (15.84-mgd) condition. Under existing conditions, two facilities generate brine-concentrate—the Groundwater Recovery Enhancement and Treatment (GREAT) Program Desalter Facility in Oxnard and the Port Hueneme Water Agency Brackish Water Desalter. In 2010, the amount of brine-concentrate generated will almost double when the Oxnard Advanced Water Purification Facility (AWPF) comes online. For ultimate buildout, three facilities generate 78 percent of the brine-concentrate. These facilities include the Oxnard AWPF, the GREAT Program Desalter Facility, and the Camarillo Groundwater Desalter (Wells A and B). Information about these facilities is provided in Attachment C.

Two publicly owned outfall facilities are in the Ventura County region. The Oxnard Ocean Outfall System is projected to convey 3.63 mgd of brine-concentrate by 2010 and 10.31 mgd by 2035. This system receives flows from the Oxnard WWTP, Oxnard AWPF, and the GREAT Program Desalter Facility through a brineline. The Hueneme Outfall is projected to convey up to 0.8 mgd of brine-concentrate flow by 2010 and up to 5.30 mgd by 2035. The Hueneme Outfall conveys flow from five WWTPs/WRPs, six desalters, and the Calleguas SMP system.

In addition to the publicly owned outfall facilities, the Ventura County region has two major NPDES permits for power plants discharging to the ocean. One of these discharges to the ocean at Mandalay County Park between the cities of Ventura and Oxnard. The other private outfall facility discharges to the ocean through the Ormond Beach Effluent Pipeline ocean outfall owned by Reliant Energy, LLC.

Also, the Las Virgenes Municipal Water District has two discharges to Las Virgenes Creek. These stream discharges originate from the Ahmanson Ranch facility and the Tapia Water Reclamation Facility (WRF). Additionally, the Ventura WWTP, operated by the Ventura Regional Sanitary District, discharges into the Ventura Channel.

#*

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

# ##

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

* **

Oxnard WWTP


Hill Canyon WWTP

Moorpark WWTP

Simi Valley WQCP

Ahmanson Ranch

Tapia WRF

D

tu101

tu101tu118tu126

tu23

§̈¦5

tu27

tu101

tu34

tu1

tu1

tu23

tu27

tu118

tu33 tu126

tu23

tu101

tu101



Oxnard AWPF

Hueneme Outfall



R d d G

Ventura WWTP





Somis Desalter



Malibu Mesa WRF

Malibu WPCP

Trancas WPCP


FIGURE 3.3 - WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCESIN THE VENTURA COUNTY REGION - 2010SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I

Wastewater Treatment Plants#* No Brine-Concentrate Generated

#* Less than 0.5 mgd

#* Between 0.5 and 1 mgd

#* Between 1 and 3 mgd

#* Greater than 3 mgd

Desalination FacilitiesNo Brine-Concentrate Generated

Less than 0.5 mgd

Between 0.5 and 1 mgd

Betwen 1 and 3 mgd

Greater than 3 mgd


Planned or PotentialOcean Outfall

Existing Brineline orInterconnector Sewer

Planned or Potential Brineline orInterconnector Sewer


Industrial/Others

FeaturesHighways

Rivers

Water Bodies

±0 2 4

Miles



TABLE 3.1 WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCES IN THE VENTURA COUNTY REGION

Ventura County Region Current (as of end of 2008) Planning Year 2010 Planning Year 2015 Planning Year 2020 Planning Year 2025 Planning Year 2030 Planning Year 2035 Planning Year

Ultimate

Facility Name Facility Owner

Average Daily Brine/ Concentrate

Flow (MGD)

Maximum Daily Brine/ Concentrate

Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT INFORMATION

Ahmanson Ranch Las Virgenes MWD - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23

Oxnard AWPF City of Oxnard - - 1.75 1.75 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56

GROUNDWATER CLEAN-UP AND DESALTER INFORMATION

Camarillo Groundwater Desalter (Wells A and B)

City of Camarillo – Public Works Water Division

- - - - 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10

Camrosa Groundwater Desalter (Conejo No. 3 and Woodcreek Wells)

Camrosa Water District - - - - 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40

GREAT Program Desalter Facility City of Oxnard 1.88 1.88 1.88 1.88 1.88 1.88 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75

Port Hueneme Water Agency Brackish Water Desalter

Port Hueneme Water Agency 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80

Somis Desalter Calleguas MWD - - - - - - 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40


Calleguas MWD - - - - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

West Simi Valley Desalter City of Simi Valley - - - - - - 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 4.00

Total 2.68 2.68 4.43 4.43 9.55 9.55 13.43 13.43 13.43 13.43 13.43 13.43 15.84 15.84 15.84 19.24

#*

#*

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

# ##

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

* **

Oxnard WWTP


Hill Canyon WWTP

Moorpark WWTP

Simi Valley WQCP

Ahmanson Ranch

Tapia WRF

D

tu101

tu101tu118tu126

tu23

§̈¦5

tu27

tu101

tu34

tu1

tu1

tu23

tu27

tu118

tu33 tu126

tu23

tu101

tu101



Oxnard AWPF

Hueneme Outfall



R d d G

Ventura WWTP





Somis Desalter



Malibu Mesa WRF

Malibu WPCP

Trancas WPCP


FIGURE 3.4 - WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCESIN THE VENTURA COUNTY REGION - ULTIMATESOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I

Wastewater Treatment Plants

#* No Brine-Concentrate Generated






No Brine-Concentrate Generated

Less than 0.5 mgd


Betwen 1 and 3 mgd

Greater than 3 mgd

Wastewater Outfalls

Wastewater Outfalls



Planned or Potential Brineline or Interconnector Sewer

Industrial Ocean Outfalls

Power Plants

Industrial/Others

Features

Highways

Rivers

Water Bodies

±0 2 4

Miles



3.1.2 Regional Summary

Brine-Concentrate Flow Summary In the Ventura County region, projected brine-concentrate flows increase from 2.68 mgd in 2008 to 15.84 mgd by 2035. Figure 3.5 shows a summary of these projected flows. A majority of this flow (100 percent in 2008 and over 57 percent in 2035) is generated from existing and planned groundwater desalters. The remaining brine-concentrate flow is generated from advanced treated MF/RO processes at WWTPs/WRPs. The GREAT Program Desalter Facility is currently the primary generator of brine-concentrate, but the planned Oxnard AWPF will generate most of the flow in the future. As shown in Figure 3.5, brine-concentrate will be treated starting in 2010 at the Oxnard AWPF using wetlands. This treatment will begin by treating 1.8 mgd of brine-concentrate via wetlands prior to disposal via ocean outfall in 2010, and the flow will increase to 6.8 mgd by ultimate buildout. FIGURE 3.5 BRINE-CONCENTRATE FLOW SUMMARY FOR VENTURA COUNTY REGION

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 ULT

Year

Flow

(MG

D)

Maximum Daily Flow Average Daily Flow Treated Brine Flow

Note: Brine generation is from wastewater treatment and groundwater desalting.

Water Supply Summary The scarcity of water supply continues because of the limited availability of imported water and the drought, which make even more important the development of reliable and locally controlled water supplies. Groundwater desalting and water reclamation are two methods of developing new reliable and locally controlled water supplies. Consequently, developing a long-term plan for brine-concentrate management for the Ventura County region is of importance. The SMP system is a key component of being able to develop these locally controlled water supplies.

As shown in Figure 3.6, nearly 9 mgd of water supply is currently produced from the use of RO treatment processes. In the future, the projected amount of water supply is approximately 48 mgd, which is more than a fivefold increase in water supplies produced via facilities that will generate approximately 16 mgd of brine-concentrate.



Groundwater supplies generated from these treatment processes increase from approximately 9 mgd to over 30 mgd by 2020. A majority of this flow originates from the GREAT Program Desalter Facility. The use of RO to recover water from WWTPs/WRPs results in an increase of water supply from 0 mgd in 2008 to approximately 17 mgd by 2035. This water is produced for groundwater recharge at the Oxnard AWPF. FIGURE 3.6 WATER SUPPLIES THAT RESULT IN GENERATION OF BRINE-CONCENTRATE IN THE VENTURA COUNTY REGION

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 ULT

Year

Ave

rage

Dai

ly F

low

(MG

D)

Groundwater Supplies Water Reuse

Note: Figure includes WWTP/WRPs, groundwater recharge, seawater intrusion barrier, and brackish groundwater.

Specific Brine-Concentrate Management Projects and Issues In the Ventura County region, a majority of the brine-concentrate generated is disposed of via brinelines and ocean outfalls. Calleguas’ SMP system is key to the region being able to develop brackish groundwater resources. If the SMP is not constructed, then desalting in inland areas will depend on the ability to implement another brine-concentrate treatment or disposal mechanism. Even with the implementation of the SMP and Oxnard brine-concentrate wetlands projects, issues exist that need to be resolved to ensure the success of these projects.

Calleguas SMP System – The Calleguas SMP will be constructed in nine phases and will ultimately connect the West Simi Valley Desalter with the Hueneme Outfall. The SMP will eventually connect six desalters, five WWTPs/WRPs, and a number of industrial dischargers. The initial phase of construction of the project began in 2004 and is scheduled to be completed in 2019. The capacity of the SMP is 20 mgd, which should be sufficient to convey brine-concentrate flow to the ocean. However, if all upstream WWTPs/WRPs discharge all of their flows, then the SMP will not have adequate capacity.

Oxnard AWPF Brine-Concentrate Treatment Wetlands – The AWPF is a part of the City of Oxnard’s Groundwater Recovery Enhancement and Treatment program.



The focus of the GREAT program is to use existing water resources more efficiently. To this end, the AWPF will provide the City with reclaimed water that can be used for landscape and agricultural irrigation, industrial process water, and groundwater recharge. The AWPF will be constructed in two phases—the initial phase will treat approximately 8 to 9 mgd of secondary effluent and produce 6.25 mgd of product water; the build-out phase will treat approximately 33 to 37 mgd of secondary effluent and produce 25 mgd of product water. The AWPF will use microfiltration, RO, and advanced oxidation to treat the secondary effluent. The use of RO will result in generation of brine-concentrate.

A portion of the brackish concentrate that an RO system generates will be treated by an innovative wetlands system intended to reduce nutrients, heavy metals, and other toxic compounds while demonstrating the ability to use the concentrate as a beneficial resource. This treatment will begin in 2012 by treating flows ranging from 0.01 to 0.1 cubic feet per second (cfs) of brine-concentrate in a demonstration wetlands. Depending on the wetland performance, the demonstration wetland has hydraulic capability for up to 1.0 cfs. Discharge from the demonstration wetland will be returned to the Oxnard WWTP. This unique application of wetlands treatment is the first of its kind being used to reduce the volume of concentrate flows that use the ocean for an ultimate disposal locale. The City of Oxnard would like to use brine-concentrate to assist in rehabilitating an existing degraded wetland that feeds into the ocean. A long-term study of the efficacy of the brackish wetlands needs to be undertaken to determine if this water could be used to feed these existing degraded wetlands.

3.2 Los Angeles County Region

Twenty-eight wastewater facilities, 8 groundwater desalters, and 6 outfall systems exist or are planned in the Los Angeles County region. Figure 3.7 shows the major WWTPs/WRPs, groundwater desalters, and brine conveyance facilities. Conveyance facilities in this region include brinelines, WWTP interties, as well as public and private outfalls. The Joint Outfall System and Hyperion Outfall are the largest existing brine-concentrate facilities in the system. These systems handle over 90 percent of the flow in the Los Angeles County region.

&3

&3

&3

&3&3

&3

&3

&3

&3

&3

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

###

#

##

#

# #

#

#

###

#

#

#

#

#

#

###

#

#

#*

#*

#*

#* #*

#*#*#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

Goldsworthy Desalter

Marvin C. Brewer Desalter

Tustin Desalter

Frances Desalter

Baker WTP

Irvine Principal Potable Treatment Plant (P

Irvine Non-Potable Shallow Groundwater U

Upland Ion Exchange Facility

Pomona Ion Exchange Facility

Ch

Chino Desalter I

Temescal Desalter

WRP

Hill Canyon WWTP

Simi Valley WQCP

Ahmanson Ranch

Tapia WRF

Donald C. Tillman WRP Burbank WRP

Los Angeles/Glendale WRP

Edward C. Little WRF

Hyperion WWTP

Whittier Narrows WRP

San Jose Creek WRP

Los Coyotes WRP

Carson Regional WRP

Joint WPCP

Long Beach WRP

Leo J. Vander Lans Treatment Facility

Terminal Island WWTP

OCSD Plant #1

Green Acres ProjectMichelson WRP

Pomona WRP

IEUA Regional Plant #1

Western R

Corona WWTP #1

Corona WW

Carbon Canyon WRP

Chino Institution For Men


Corona WWTP #

S

Chino Hills Ion Exchange Facility

tu101

tu118

tu23

tu101

tu101

§̈¦405

§̈¦5tu14

§̈¦5

§̈¦210

tu134

tu134 §̈¦210

§̈¦210

tu170tu27

§̈¦10

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦10§̈¦10

§̈¦210 tu30

§̈¦10

§̈¦

§̈¦5

tu91

tu55

tu91

§̈¦710

§̈¦605

§̈¦110

§̈¦110

§̈¦105§̈¦105

tu1

tu23

tu27

tu23

tu126

tu101

tu118

tu1

tu2

tu1

tu42

§̈¦405

tu66

tu60

tu60

tu60

§̈¦1

tu57

tu57

tu90

§̈¦405

tu39tu1

tu22

tu39

tu72

tu91

tu1

tu19

tu19 §̈¦605

tu2

tu2

tu2tu2

tu39

tu39

tu83

tu55

Valencia WRP

Saugus WRP

Private Industrial Outfall #2


Hyperion 1-mile Bypass Outfall

Hyperion 5- mile Outfall

Brewer Desalter Outfall

Terminal Island Outfall

Joint Outfall

Carson Refinery

El Segundo Refinery







Ontario Ion Exchange

Monte Vista WD Ion Exchange


Wells 21 & 22

llo Groundwater Desalter (Wells A & B)


ater Desalter

Chevron PlantExxon Mobil Plant

La Canada WRP

Groundwater Reliability Improvement Program (GRIP)

Malibu Mesa WRF

Newhall Ranch WRP

West Basin WRP - Barrier Treatment

Malibu WPCPTrancas WPCP

Beverly Hills Desalter

Chino Ion Exchange Facility


FIGURE 3.7 - MAJOR WASTEWATER, GROUNDWATER, AND OUTFALL FACILITIESIN THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I



# Stream Discharge

#* Ocean Discharge

#* Other






Power Plants

Industrial/Others

Wastewater Outfalls

Wastewater Outfalls



Planned or Potential Brinelineor Interconnector Sewer

Features

Highways

Rivers

Water Bodies

±0 3 6

Miles

#*

#*

#*

Lake Hughes CWTF

Palmdale WRP

Lancaster WRPSTATE HWY 138

STATE HWY 138

STA

TE H

WY

138

STA

TE H

WY

14

Northern Facilities

See Inset For Northern Facilities



3.2.1 Brine-Concentrate Facilities As part of the survey, 18 facilities were identified to be existing or planned brine-concentrate generators as shown in Table 3.2. Figures 3.8 and 3.9 show the locations and the relative scale of projected brine-concentrate flows for the 2010 and ultimate timeframes for the brine-concentrate facilities. In the Los Angeles County region, brine-concentrate generation increases approximately fourfold between the existing (6.71-mgd) to the ultimate buildout (27.1-mgd) condition. In addition, the West Basin Municipal Water District (MWD) WRPs currently generate over 50 percent of the brine-concentrate in the Los Angeles County region. In 2010, over 70 percent of the brine-concentrate is projected to be generated at the West Basin MWD WRPs (4.50-mgd) and Pomona Ion Exchange (IX) (4.5-mgd) facilities. At ultimate buildout, four facilities are projected to generate almost 80 percent of the brine-concentrate. These facilities include the West Basin MWD WRPs, Pomona IX Facility, Donald C. Tillman WRP, and the Groundwater Reliability Improvement Program (GRIP). Information about these facilities is provided in Attachment C.

There are four publicly owned outfall facilities in the Los Angeles County region. The Joint Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF) outfall system is projected to convey 12.02 mgd of brine-concentrate by 2010 from WWTP and groundwater desalter sources and approximately 14.24 mgd by 2035. This system receives flows from eight WRPs and seven groundwater desalters through five brinelines or system interties. The Terminal Island Outfall is projected to convey up to 1 mgd of brine-concentrate flow from the Terminal Island Advanced Water Treatment Facility (AWTF) by 2010. The Hyperion outfall conveys flow from 6 WWTPs/WRPs, one desalter, and one brineline to the ocean. This outfall is projected to discharge approximately 4.05 mgd of brine-concentrate by 2010 and up to 7.35 mgd by 2035.

In addition to the publicly owned outfall facilities, the Los Angeles County region has six major NPDES permits for power plants and two for refineries discharging to the ocean or a contiguous estuary. Two of these outfalls are located near the Hyperion WWTP outfall and discharge to the Santa Monica Bay, two discharge to the Los Angeles/Long Beach Harbor area, one discharges to the Wilmington Drain within the estuary, and one discharges to the San Gabriel River within the estuary.

The Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County (Sanitation Districts) also have two stream discharges in the Santa Clarita Valley. These stream discharges originate from the Valencia WRP.



TABLE 3.2 WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCES IN THE LOS ANGELES REGION

Los Angeles County Region Current (as of end of 2008) Planning Year 2010 Planning Year 2015 Planning Year 2020 Planning Year 2025 Planning Year 2030 Planning Year 2035 Planning Year

Ultimate



Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Donald C. Tillman WRP

City of Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation

- - - - - - 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30


WRD/Upper San Gabriel Valley MWD-Owners Los Angeles Community Services District (CSD) – Operators

- - - - 2.84 2.84 7.25 7.25 7.25 7.25 7.25 7.25 7.25 7.25 7.25 7.25


WRD (Owner) City of Long Beach (Operator)

0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.20 1.05 1.20

Newhall Ranch WRP Newhall Ranch Sanitation District

- - - - 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15

Terminal Island WRP City of Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Valencia WRP Los Angeles CSD - - - - 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53

West Basin-Carson Regional WRP-RO

West Basin MWD 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63

West Basin WRP-Barrier Treat

West Basin MWD 1.88 1.88 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63

West Basin WRP-Chevron Plant-RO

West Basin MWD 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65

West Basin WRP-Exxon Mobil-RO

West Basin MWD 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48



TABLE 3.2 BRINE-CONCENTRATE GENERATORS IN THE LOS ANGELES REGION (CONTINUED)

Los Angeles County Region Current (as of end of 2008) Planning Year 2010 Planning Year 2015 Planning Year 2020 Planning Year 2025 Planning Year 2030 Planning Year 2035 Planning Year

Ultimate



Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Beverly Hills Desalter City of Beverly Hills 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30

City of Chino Ion Exchange Facility

City of Chino/ LA County

0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06

Goldsworthy Desalter WRD/ City of Torrance

0.63 0.83 0.63 0.63 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25


West Basin MWD 0.39 0.39 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45


Monte Vista WD/ City of Chino

- - 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40

Ontario Ion Exchange City of Ontario - - 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40


LA County - - 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50


City of Upland/ IEUA/ LACSD

0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06

TOTAL 6.71 6.92 12.82 12.82 17.48 17.48 25.20 25.20 27.07 27.07 27.07 27.07 27.07 27.22 27.07 27.22

#*

#

#

#

#

*

*

*

*

#*

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

##

#

# #

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

###

#

#

*

*

*

**

*

*

*

*

*

**

*

*

*

*

**

*

* *

*

*

**

*

*

*

*

***

*

*



Tustin Desalter

Frances Desalter

Baker WTP





Ch

Chino Desalter I

Temescal Desalter

WRP

Hill Canyon WWTP

Simi Valley WQCP

Ahmanson Ranch

Tapia WRF




Hyperion WWTP


San Jose Creek WRP

Los Coyotes WRP

Carson Regional WRP

Joint WPCP

Long Beach WRP



OCSD Plant #1


Pomona WRP


Western R

Corona WWTP #1

Corona WW

Carbon Canyon WRP



Corona WWTP #

S


tu101

tu118

tu23

tu101

tu101

§̈¦405

§̈¦5tu14

§̈¦5

§̈¦210

tu134

tu134 §̈¦210

§̈¦210

tu170tu27

§̈¦10

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦10§̈¦10

§̈¦210 tu30

§̈¦10

§̈¦

§̈¦5

tu91

tu55

tu91

§̈¦710

§̈¦605

§̈¦110

§̈¦110

§̈¦105§̈¦105

tu1

tu23

tu27

tu23

tu126

tu101

tu118

tu1

tu2

tu1

tu42

§̈¦405

tu66

tu60

tu60

tu60

§̈¦1

tu57

tu57

tu90

§̈¦405

tu39tu1

tu22

tu39

tu72

tu91

tu1

tu19

tu19 §̈¦605

tu2

tu2

tu2tu2

tu39

tu39

tu83

tu55

Valencia WRP

Saugus WRP







Joint Outfall

Carson Refinery

El Segundo Refinery












Deep Aquifer Treatment Plant (DATS)

Wells 21 & 22



ater Desalter


La Canada WRP


Malibu Mesa WRF

Malibu WPCP

Newhall Ranch WRP

Trancas WPCP



FIGURE 3.8 - WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCESIN THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGION - 2010SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I








Less than 0.5 mgd


Betwen 1 and 3 mgd

Greater than 3 mgd




Planned or Potential Brineline or InterconnectorSewer


Industrial/Others

FeaturesHighways

Rivers

Water Bodies

±0 3 6

Miles

#*

#*

#*

Palmdale WRP

Lancaster WRP

Lake Hughes CWTF

STATE HWY 138

STATE HWY 138

STA

TE H

WY

138

STA

TE H

WY

14

Northern Facilities


#

#

*

*

#

#

#

*

*

*

#

#

#

*

*

*

#

#

#

*

*

*

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

# #

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

###

*

*

**

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

**

*

* *

*

*

**

*

*

*

*

***



Tustin Desalter

Frances Desalter

Baker WTP





Ch

Chino Desalter I

Temescal Desalter

WRP

Hill Canyon WWTP

Simi Valley WQCP

Ahmanson Ranch

Tapia WRF




Hyperion WWTP


San Jose Creek WRP

Los Coyotes WRP

Carson Regional WRP

Joint WPCP

Long Beach WRP



OCSD Plant #1


Pomona WRP


Western R

Corona WWTP #1

Corona WW

Carbon Canyon WRP



Corona WWTP #

S


tu101

tu118

tu23

tu101

tu101

§̈¦405

§̈¦5tu14

§̈¦5

§̈¦210

tu134

tu134 §̈¦210

§̈¦210

tu170tu27

§̈¦10

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦10§̈¦10

§̈¦210 tu30

§̈¦10

§̈¦

§̈¦5

tu91

tu55

tu91

§̈¦710

§̈¦605

§̈¦110

§̈¦110

§̈¦105§̈¦105

tu1

tu23

tu27

tu23

tu126

tu101

tu118

tu1

tu2

tu1

tu42

§̈¦405

tu66

tu60

tu60

tu60

§̈¦1

tu57

tu57

tu90

§̈¦405

tu39tu1

tu22

tu39

tu72

tu91

tu1

tu19

tu19 §̈¦605

tu2

tu2

tu2tu2

tu39

tu39

tu83

tu55

Valencia WRP

Saugus WRP







Joint Outfall

Carson Refinery

El Segundo Refinery













Wells 21 & 22



ater Desalter


La Canada WRP


Malibu Mesa WRF

Malibu WPCP

Newhall Ranch WRP

Trancas WPCP



FIGURE 3.9 - WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCESIN THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGION - ULTIMATESOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I







Less than 0.5 mgd


Betwen 1 and 3 mgd

Greater than 3 mgd






Industrial/Others

FeaturesHighways

Rivers

Water Bodies

±0 3 6

Miles

#*

#*

#*

Palmdale WRP

Lancaster WRP

Lake Hughes CWTF

STATE HWY 138

STATE HWY 138

STA

TE H

WY

138

STA

TE H

WY

14

Northern Facilities





Brine-Concentrate Flow Summary In the Los Angeles County region, projected brine-concentrate flows increase from 6.71 mgd in 2008 to 27.07 mgd by 2025. Figure 3.10 shows a summary of these projected flows. A majority of this flow (over 75 percent) is generated from advanced treated microfiltration (MF)/RO processes at WWTPs and WRPs. The remaining brine-concentrate flow is from existing and planned groundwater desalters. West Basin WRPs are currently the primary generators of brine-concentrate; however, in the future, the planned GRIP will generate the most flow. As shown in Figure 3.10, no agencies currently plan to implement brine-concentrate reduction or zero liquid discharge (ZLD) treatment technologies. FIGURE 3.10 BRINE-CONCENTRATE FLOW SUMMARY FOR THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGION

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 ULT

Year

Flow

(MG

D)


Note: Brine-concentrate generation is from wastewater treatment and groundwater desalting.

Water Supply Summary The scarcity of water supply continues because of the limited availability of imported water and the drought, which make even more important the development of reliable and locally controlled water supplies. Groundwater desalting and water reclamation are two methods of developing new reliable and locally controlled water supplies. Consequently, developing a long-term plan for brine-concentrate management for the Los Angeles County region is of great importance.

As shown in Figure 3.11, over 30 mgd of water supply is currently produced from the use of RO treatment processes. In the future, the amount of water supply is projected to be approximately 118 mgd, which is an almost fourfold increase in water supplies from facilities that will generate brine-concentrate. To supply this additional water, approximately 27.07 mgd of brine-concentrate will be generated. Groundwater supplies generated from these treatment processes increase from



approximately 16 mgd to 30 mgd by 2020. The use of RO to recover water from WWTPs/WRPs results in an increase of water supply from approximately 15 mgd in 2008 to 88 mgd by 2035. A majority of this increase is from operation of the Pomona IX Facility and GRIP, both of which use membrane processes to improve water quality so that an existing source can be used for water supply. FIGURE 3.11 WATER SUPPLIES THAT RESULT IN GENERATION OF BRINE-CONCENTRATE IN THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGION

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 ULT

Year

Ave

rage

Dai

ly F

low

(MG

D)



Specific Brine-Concentrate Management Projects and Issues In the Los Angeles County region, a majority of the brine-concentrate produced is disposed via brinelines, interties, and ocean outfalls. Even with the available discharge mechanisms in the region, there are a number of locations where changes in discharge permits or increased water reuse might benefit from implementation of different brine-management strategies. These potential projects and issues were identified from deficiencies noted in the data, information from survey respondents, or information obtained via the regional meetings. In the Los Angeles County region, nine potential projects and issues were identified, each of which is described below. Also, described below is one project not in the Los Angeles County region but is being planned by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWDSC).

Hyperion WWTP Water Quality – Water quality at the Hyperion WWTP might be affected by advanced treatment at the Donald C Tillman WRP. This advanced treatment would be driven by the need to provide high-quality recharge water for the East Valley Recharge Project. The planned recharge project would result in the implementation of RO at the Donald C Tillman WRP, which would generate up to 3.3 mgd of brine-concentrate. This concentrate is unlikely to result in a significant change in water quality at the Hyperion WWTP because Hyperion currently handles



an average daily flow of 320 mgd. However, if inflows to the Hyperion WWTP drop because of upstream water reuse and the brine-concentrate impacts the influent water quality to the Hyperion WWTP, then this could impact the influent water quality to the West Basin MWD. This would impact West Basin MWD’s Title 22 recycled water users and impact their RO operations at their WRPs. West Basin MWD WRPs serve polished water to a number of industrial users for cooling water and boiler make-up water. These uses require consistently high-quality water as specified in the user contracts. If the water quality changes significantly, then West Basin MWD’s ability to satisfy these user requirements will be jeopardized.

West Basin MWD Water Quality Requirements – As discussed above, the West Basin MWD WRPs serve polished water to a number of industrial users for cooling water and boiler make-up water. If the water quality changes significantly, then the ability of West Basin MWD to meet its user requirements are jeopardized. Recently due to changes in water quality from the Weymouth WTP, West Basin MWD has had difficulty supplying consistent water quality to users. Water quality fluctuations at Weymouth WTP are the result of different mixes of State Water Project (SWP) water and Colorado River water, both of which serve as water supply sources for Weymouth WTP. Due to recent court decisions that limit the amount of SWP water that can be pumped out of the California Bay-Delta system, more Colorado River water has been used as a supply for the Weymouth WTP. This has resulted in increased TDS at the WTP, which has affected the ability of West Basin MWD to meet user water quality requirements.

The Groundwater Reliability Improvement Program – The Water Replenishment District of Southern California (WRD), the Upper San Gabriel Valley MWD (USGVMWD), and the Sanitation Districts are investigating the feasibility of implementing an indirect potable reuse project that would treat up to 48 mgd of effluent from the San Jose Creek WRP. This product water (46,000 acre-feet per year [afy]) would be used to recharge the central and main San Gabriel groundwater basins. The initial stage of this project is planned to be online by 2015 and the final stage is planned to be in place by 2020. The projected brine-concentrate flows resulting from this project are 2.84 mgd by 2015 and 7.25 mgd by 2020. This project would most likely use existing industrial brinelines or interties between the San Jose Creek WRP and the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP).

C. Marvin Brewer Desalter Outfall – The C. Marvin Brewer Desalter uses RO to treat water from a saline groundwater plume prior to supplying the water to users in the West Basin MWD service area. TDS in the groundwater plume is approximately 3,600 milligram per liter (mg/L). Currently, brine from the desalter is conveyed to the Joint Outfall System (JOS) for ocean discharge. West Basin MWD is investigating the potential use of another outfall at the AES Redondo Generating Station.

Leo J. Wander Lans Plant Expansion – WRD is planning an expansion at the Leo J. Vander Lans Plant to produce another 3,000 to 5,000 afy of water. This expansion would allow imported water used to recharge the Alamitos Barrier Project to be replaced. The plant uses MF, RO followed by UV disinfection of treat recycled water for groundwater recharge. These processes would generate approximately



0.53 mgd of brine for discharge to the Long Beach WRP via a sewer. This project will double the brine discharged to the sewer, which will exceed the sewer capacity. A volume reducing technology is necessary to reduce flows so that the brine can be discharged to the sewer.

JOS Rehabilitation or Repair – The Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County have been investigating methods to rehabilitate or repair the JOS. The condition of the JOS has not been surveyed in a number of years and might not be safe to dewater so its condition can be assessed. For this reason, the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County is investigating alternatives to take the existing JOS offline either for a short period to assess the condition of the system or for a longer period to repair or rehabilitation the system. Advanced treatment might be necessary to satisfy water quality requirements if the flow from the JOS is discharged to the Los Angeles Harbor or reused for groundwater recharge. Use of advanced treatment would result in the need to implement concentrate management.

Terminal Island Renewal Energy Project (TIRE) – The TIRE is a project developed by the City of Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation that is the nation's first and only full-scale application of deep well injection (DWI) technology to convert biosolids into green power and simultaneously sequester greenhouse gases. This project has been injecting brine-concentrate along with Terminal Island WWTP biosolids for the past 13 months via a 6,000-foot-deep well. However, the amount of brine-concentrate that can be injected is limited due to the capacity of the well used for the TIRE project. The addition of brine-concentrate to biosolids creates a bioslurry that is easier to inject than the biosolids alone. The bioslurry is approximately 6 to 8 percent solids. Biosolids without brine-concentrate might not have enough liquid to use for DWI. For gas recovery or energy production in the future, the existing monitoring wells would have to be converted to extraction wells; however, this cannot be done until the biosolids injected create enough pressure.

Currently, all of the biosolids from the Terminal Island WWTP are being injected. To expand injection of brine-concentrate, another well(s) would need to be developed. This well could be shallower (depth of 2,000 feet) than the existing well as long as any underground sources of drinking water (USDW) are not affected. In addition, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Class V well will have to be permitted, which includes water quality requirements for TDS.

Santa Clarita River Chloride Total Maximum Daily Load – In the Santa Clarita area, the Saugus and Valencia WRPs, which are owned and operated by Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, are facing discharge limitations for chloride. These discharge limits are based on total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) that have been established to improve water quality on the 303(d)-listed Santa Clara River. Currently, the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County is working with the RWQCB to determine the amount of chloride that can be discharged from these two plants.

The Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County has submitted a plan to treat 3.2 mgd of flow from the Valencia WRP using advanced treatment processes (RO, that is) prior to discharge. This advanced treatment will result in concentrate generation of



approximately 0.57 mgd in an inland area where access to brinelines does not exist. For this reason, the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County is investigating the use of DWI for concentrate disposal. If the RWQCB does not accept the existing discharge plan and if discharge limitations become more rigid creating the need for additional advanced treatment, the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County would likely use a combination of volume-reduction technologies as an initial process before DWI or an ocean outfall were constructed.

Newhall Ranch WRP – The Newhall Ranch WRP is planned for construction in 2015. The Newhall Ranch WRP will discharge to the Santa Clara River; therefore, the discharge will have to satisfy TMDL requirements for chloride and nitrogen. To comply with these requirements 1 mgd of RO treatment will be provided and DWI will be used to dispose of the brine-concentrate. Currently, feasibility studies are being performed on DWI.

Antelope Valley Power Generation – In the Antelope Valley, solar power generators create brine-concentrate as a waste product. This brine-concentrate is generated from the advanced treatment of recycled water for process water at the solar facilities. Currently, the brine-concentrate generated from these pilot solar projects is conveyed to the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County WRPs in Lancaster and Palmdale for disposal. The Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County does not want to be responsible for disposal of the brine-concentrate over a long term. The solar power generators most likely would implement evaporation ponds to dispose of brine-concentrate from the full-scale power generating facilities. However, ZLD might have to be used if the RWQCB will not permit evaporation ponds.

San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Water Recovery Demonstration Project – The MWDSC has approved a project to develop environmental documentation in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA). This project would recover excess agricultural flows in the San Joaquin Valley using a series of shallow collection wells. The water from these wells will be treated using pressure filters and chemical treatment for pretreatment, followed by RO to remove salts. The RO system is proposed to produce 9.4 mgd of permeate, which will be blended with a split stream to produce a total of 10 mgd of product water. The brine-concentrate from the RO system will be handled using an enhanced evaporation system that consists of spray evaporators used in conjunction with evaporation ponds. For this project, over 25 acres of earthen-lined ponds will be used.

3.3 Inland Empire Region

There are 33 wastewater facilities and 14 groundwater desalters that exist or are planned in the Inland Empire region; no ocean outfall systems are in the Inland Empire region. However, the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) brineline discharges to the ocean through the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) ocean outfall No. 1. Figure 3.12 shows the major WWTPs/WRPs, groundwater desalters, and brine conveyance facilities in the Inland Empire. Conveyance facilities in this region include brinelines and WWTP interties.

&3

&3

&3

&3

&3&3

&3

&3

&3

&3

&3

&3

&3

"

###

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

###

# #

#

#

###

# #

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

###

#

#

#

## #

#

#

#

#

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

Tustin Desalter

Frances Desalter

Baker WTP

Irvine Principal Potable Treatment Plant (PPTP) Desalter

Irvine Non-Potable Shallow Groundwater Unit (SGU) Desalter

City of San Juan Capistrano Groundwater Desalter

South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project



Chino Desalter II

Chino Desalter III

Chino Desalter I

Lower Bunker Hill

Yucaipa Valley Regional Water Supply Renewal Project

Temescal Desalter

Arlington Desalter

Anita Smith Ion Exchange Facility

Menifee Desalter

Perris Desalter II

Perris Desalter I

eles/Glendale WRP


San Jose Creek WRP

Los Coyotes WRP

Long Beach WRP


WWTP

OCSD Plant #1

Green Acres Project

Groundwater Replenishment System

OCSD Plant #2

Michelson WRP

Los Alisos WRP

El Toro WWTP

Regional Treatment Plant

Coastal Treatment Plant

3A Plant

Oso Creek WRP

Chiquita WRP

Robinson Ranch WRP

Jay B Latham WWTP

Camp Pendleton WWTP #12

Pomona WRP



Rialto WWTPRIX WRP

Colton WWTP

San Bernardino WRP Redlands WWTP

Riverside Regional WQCP

Western Riverside Co WWTP

Corona WWTP #1 Corona WWTP #2

Carbon Canyon WRP

Chino Institution For MenIEUA Regional Plant #5

Corona WWTP #3Western Water Recycling Facility

Moreno Valley WRF

Perris Valley WRP

Lake Elsinore Regional WWRF

Railroad Canyon WWRF

Hemet/San Jacinto WRF

Santa Rosa WRF

Temecula Valley Regional WRF

Banning WWRP

Beaumont WWTP #1

Henry N. Wocholz WWTP

Running Springs

Big Bear Area RWA WWTF

Stringfellow Pretreatment Facility


San Clemente WRP

tu134 §̈¦210

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦10§̈¦10

§̈¦210 tu30

§̈¦10

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

tu91

tu55

tu91

§̈¦710

§̈¦605

§̈¦105

tu42

tu66

tu60

tu60

tu60

tu60

§̈¦215

§̈¦215

§̈¦10

§̈¦10

§̈¦10

§̈¦15

§̈¦215

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

tu91

§̈¦215

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

tu215

tu215

tu30

tu30

tu30

tu57

tu57

tu90

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

tu1

§̈¦405

tu39tu1

tu22

tu39

tu72

tu19

tu19 §̈¦605

tu2

tu2

tu2

tu39

tu39

tu138

tu83

tu55

tu73

tu133

tu71

tu371

tu79

tu74tu74

tu74

tu79

tu243

tu74

tu18

tu18

tu38

tu38

tu38

tu30

Island Outfall

Huntington Beach Power Generation Fac. Outfall

OCSD Outfall #1

OCSD Outfall #2

Aliso Creek Ocean Outfall

San Juan Creek Ocean Outfall

Huntington Beach Generating Station

Carson Refinery





Wells 21 & 22

Lee Lake Water DistrictHorsethief Canyon

AlberhillEVMWD Regional Wastewater Reclamation Plant

La Canada WRP


Nichols Water Reclamation Plant


Grass Valley WWTP


Inland Empire Energy Center

FIGURE 3.12 - MAJOR WASTEWATER, GROUNDWATER, AND OUTFALL FACILITIESIN THE INLAND EMPIRE REGIONSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I

Wastewater Treatment Plants#* Land Discharge#* Recycled Water Only# Stream Discharge#* Ocean Discharge#* Other

Desalination Facilities&3 Existing Groundwater Desalter

Planned Groundwater Desalter" Proposed Seawater Desalination PlantIndustrial Ocean Outfalls

Power Plants

Industrial/Others

Wastewater OutfallsWastewater OutfallsPlanned or PotentialOcean OutfallExisting Brineline or Interconnector SewerPlanned or Potential Brineline or Interconnector Sewer

FeaturesHighwaysRiversWater Bodies

±0 4 8

Miles




3.3.1 Brine-Concentrate Facilities As part of the survey, 17 facilities were identified as existing or planned brine-concentrate generators and are listed in Table 3.3. Figures 3.13 and 3.14 show the locations and relative scale of projected brine-concentrate flows for the 2010 and ultimate timeframes for the brine-concentrate facilities. In the Inland Empire region, three desalting facilities account for over 60 percent of the brine-concentrate currently generated. These facilities are the Chino Desalter I (1.90 mgd generated), Chino Desalter II (1.20 mgd generated), and the Temescal Desalter (1.76 mgd generated). The generation of brine-concentrate in the region is planned to triple the existing average daily flow of 7.83 mgd to 23.70 mgd by the ultimate buildout condition. Nine facilities will be generating brine-concentrate in 2010, and this expands to 17 facilities by 2035. Brine-concentrate flows increase to 13.62 mgd in 2015 when the Perris II Desalter comes online and the Chino Desalters I and II are expanded. By buildout six desalters comprise over 55 percent of the total brine-concentrate flow produced. These facilities are the Chino Desalters I and II, Perris Desalter I, Lower Bunker Hill Desalter, and the Yucaipa Valley Regional Water Supply Renewal Project. Information about these facilities is provided in Attachment C.

Because of its geographic location, no publicly or privately owned ocean outfall facilities are in the Inland Empire region. The only flow that can be discharged to the ocean is conveyed to OCSD outfall No. 1 via the SARI pipeline. The SARI brineline is projected to convey nearly 11 mgd of brine-concentrate by 2010 from groundwater desalters, and approximately 23.5 mgd by 2035 from groundwater desalters and the Santa Rosa WRF. The capacity of the SARI is 30 mgd.

Two facilities in the Inland Empire region do not discharge brine-concentrate to the SARI brineline system—the Grass Valley WWTF and the Big Bear Area Regional Wastewater Agency (BBARWA) WWTF. The Grass Valley WWTF is owned and operated by the Lake Arrowhead Community Services Department and discharges wastewater via a land outfall to the Hesperia percolation ponds, which are adjacent to the Mohave River. In addition, the BBARWA WWTF will dispose of brine-concentrate using evaporation ponds in Lucerne Valley for crop irrigation. Currently, these fields are used to grow fodder crops and are irrigated with recycled water.

#*

#*

###

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

###

# #

#

#

###

# #

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

##

#

#

#

## #

#

#

#

#

***

*

**

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

**

*

*

***

* *

*

*

***

* *

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

**

**

*

*

*

** *

*

*

*

*

Tustin Desalter

Frances Desalter

Baker WTP







Chino Desalter II

Chino Desalter III

Chino Desalter I

Lower Bunker Hill


Temescal Desalter

Arlington Desalter


Menifee Desalter

Perris Desalter II

Perris Desalter I

eles/Glendale WRP


San Jose Creek WRP

Los Coyotes WRP

Long Beach WRP


WWTP

OCSD Plant #1

Green Acres Project


OCSD Plant #2

Michelson WRP

Los Alisos WRP

El Toro WWTP



3A Plant

Oso Creek WRP

Chiquita WRP

Robinson Ranch WRP

Jay B Latham WWTP


Pomona WRP



Rialto WWTPRIX WRP

Colton WWTP





Carbon Canyon WRP



Moreno Valley WRF

Perris Valley WRP




Santa Rosa WRF


Banning WWRP

Beaumont WWTP #1


Running Springs




San Clemente WRP

tu134 §̈¦210

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦10§̈¦10

§̈¦210 tu30

§̈¦10

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

tu91

tu55

tu91

§̈¦710

§̈¦605

§̈¦105

tu42

tu66

tu60

tu60

tu60

tu60

§̈¦215

§̈¦215

§̈¦10

§̈¦10

§̈¦10

§̈¦15

§̈¦215

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

tu91

§̈¦215

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

tu215

tu215

tu30

tu30

tu30

tu57

tu57

tu90

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

tu1

§̈¦405

tu39tu1

tu22

tu39

tu72

tu19

tu19 §̈¦605

tu2

tu2

tu2

tu39

tu39

tu138

tu83

tu55

tu73

tu133

tu71

tu371

tu79

tu74tu74

tu74

tu79

tu243

tu74

tu18

tu18

tu38

tu38

tu38

tu30

Island Outfall


OCSD Outfall #1

OCSD Outfall #2




Carson Refinery



Grass Valley WWTP

South Coast WD Groundwater Recovery Facility






Wells 21 & 22



La Canada WRP



FIGURE 3.13 - WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCESIN THE INLAND EMPIRE REGION - 2010SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I





#*Greater than 3 mgd


Less than 0.5 mgd


Between 1 and 3 mgd

Greater than 3 mgd

Wastewater OutfallsWastewater OutfallsPlanned or Potential Ocean OutfallExisting Brineline or Interconnector SewerPlanned or Potential Brineline or InterconnectorSewer

Industrial Ocean OutfallsPower PlantsIndustrial/Others


±0 4 8

Miles




TABLE 3.3 WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCES IN THE INLAND EMPIRE REGION

Inland Empire Region Current (as of end of 2008) Planning Year 2010 Planning Year 2015 Planning Year 2020 Planning Year 2025 Planning Year 2030 Planning Year 2035 Planning Year

Ultimate



Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)



Big Bear Area RWA - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06

Grass Valley Wastewater Treatment Facility

Lake Arrowhead Community Services Department

- - - - - - - - 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08

Santa Rosa WRF Rancho California WD

- - - - 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.005 0.005



Western Municipal Water District

- - - - - - - - - - - 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08

Arlington Desalter Western Municipal Water District

0.87 0.87 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30

Chino Desalter I Chino Basin Desalter Authority/ IEUA

1.90 2.00 1.90 2.00 2.20 2.30 2.20 2.30 2.20 2.30 2.20 2.30 2.20 2.30 2.20 2.30

Chino Desalter II Chino Basin Desalter Authority/ Jurupa

1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70

Chino Desalter III Chino Basin Desalter Authority

- - - - - - - - - - - 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.43

Inland Empire Energy Center (IEEC)


0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Ion Exchange Facility (Chino Hills)

City of Chino Hills/ IEUA

- 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34

Lower Bunker Hill Desalter

Unknown - - - - - - - - - - - 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75

Menifee Desalter Eastern Municipal Water District

0.92 1.57 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90

Perris Desalter I Eastern Municipal Water District

0.68 1.50 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.12

Perris Desalter II Eastern Municipal Water District

- - - 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75



TABLE 3.3 WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCES IN THE INLAND EMPIRE REGION (CONTINUED)

Inland Empire Region Current (as of end of 2008) Planning Year 2010 Planning Year 2015 Planning Year 2020 Planning Year 2025 Planning Year 2030 Planning Year 2035 Planning Year

Ultimate


A verage Daily B rine/ C oncentrate

F low (MG D)

Maximum Daily B rine/ C oncentrate

F low (MG D)


F low (MG D)


F low (MG D)


F low (MG D)


F low (MG D)


F low (MG D)


F low (MG D)


F low (MG D)


F low (MG D)


F low (MG D)


F low (MG D)


F low (MG D)


F low (MG D)


F low (MG D)


F low (MG D)

Stringfellow Facility California Department of Toxic Substances Control

- 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10

Temescal Desalter City of Corona 1.76 2.05 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80



- - - - - - - - - - - 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

Total 7.83 9.68 10.66 10.76 13.62 13.72 13.62 13.72 13.70 13.80 13.70 13.80 23.60 23.70 23.60 23.70

#*

#*

#

#

#*

*

*

###

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

###

# #

#

#

###

# #

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

##

#

#

## #

#

#

#

***

*

**

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

**

*

*

***

* *

*

*

***

* *

*

*

*

*

*

*

**

**

*

*

** *

*

*

*

Tustin Desalter

Frances Desalter

Baker WTP







Chino Desalter II

Chino Desalter III

Chino Desalter I

Lower Bunker Hill


Temescal Desalter

Arlington Desalter


Menifee Desalter

Perris Desalter II

Perris Desalter I

eles/Glendale WRP


San Jose Creek WRP

Los Coyotes WRP

Long Beach WRP


WWTP

OCSD Plant #1

Green Acres Project


OCSD Plant #2

Michelson WRP

Los Alisos WRP

El Toro WWTP



3A Plant

Oso Creek WRP

Chiquita WRP

Robinson Ranch WRP

Jay B Latham WWTP


Pomona WRP



Rialto WWTPRIX WRP

Colton WWTP





Carbon Canyon WRP



Moreno Valley WRF

Perris Valley WRP




Santa Rosa WRF


Banning WWRP

Beaumont WWTP #1


Running Springs




San Clemente WRP

tu134 §̈¦210

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦10§̈¦10

§̈¦210 tu30

§̈¦10

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

tu91

tu55

tu91

§̈¦710

§̈¦605

§̈¦105

tu42

tu66

tu60

tu60

tu60

tu60

§̈¦215

§̈¦215

§̈¦10

§̈¦10

§̈¦10

§̈¦15

§̈¦215

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

tu91

§̈¦215

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

tu215

tu215

tu30

tu30

tu30

tu57

tu57

tu90

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

tu1

§̈¦405

tu39tu1

tu22

tu39

tu72

tu19

tu19 §̈¦605

tu2

tu2

tu2

tu39

tu39

tu138

tu83

tu55

tu73

tu133

tu71

tu371

tu79

tu74tu74

tu74

tu79

tu243

tu74

tu18

tu18

tu38

tu38

tu38

tu30

Island Outfall


OCSD Outfall #1

OCSD Outfall #2




Carson Refinery



Grass Valley WWTP







Wells 21 & 22



La Canada WRP



FIGURE 3.14 - WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCESIN THE INLAND EMPIRE REGION - ULTIMATESOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I





#*Greater than 3 mgd


Less than 0.5 mgd


Betwen 1 and 3 mgd

Greater than 3 mgd

Wastewater OutfallsWastewater OutfallsPlanned or PotentialOcean OutfallExisting Brineline or Interconnector SewerPlanned or PotentialBrineline or InterconnectorSewer

Industrial Ocean OutfallsPower PlantsIndustrial/Others


±0 4 8

Miles





Brine-Concentrate Flow Summary In the Inland Empire region, projected brine-concentrate flows increase from 7.83 mgd in 2008 to 23.60 mgd by 2035. Figure 3.15 presents a summary of these projected flows. A majority of this flow (over 99 percent) is generated from existing and planned groundwater desalters. The remaining brine-concentrate flow is from advanced treated MF/RO processes at WWTPs/WRPs. Chino Desalter I and the Temescal Desalter are currently the primary generators of brine-concentrate; however, in the future, the planned Lower Bunker Hill Desalter and the Yucaipa Valley Regional Water Supply Renewal Project will generate most of the flow. As shown in Figure 3.15, only a small amount of brine-concentrate treatment is planned in the region. The Santa Rosa WWTF will implement a small volume-reduction technology facility (0.3 mgd) starting by 2015 to reduce the amount of brine-concentrate flow entering the SARI system. By 2025, the amount of brine-concentrate flow treatment using volume-reduction technology is projected to increase to 0.08 mgd when the Grass Valley WWTF begins operation of a brine concentrator. Treatment of brine-concentrate will expand in 2035 when the BBARWA WWTF begins operations of a facility with volume-reduction technology. FIGURE 3.15 BRINE-CONCENTRATE FLOW SUMMARY FOR THE INLAND EMPIRE REGION

0.0

4.0

8.0

12.0

16.0

20.0

24.0

28.0

2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 ULT

Year

Flow

(MG

D)



Water Supply Summary The scarcity of water supply continues because of the limited availability of imported water and the drought, which make even more important the development of reliable and locally controlled water supplies. Groundwater desalting and water reclamation are two methods of developing new reliable and locally controlled water supplies. Consequently, developing a long-term plan for brine-concentrate management for the Inland Empire region is of importance. The Inland Empire has



been investigating and implementing projects to address salinity impacts for a number of years. In fact, nine desalters are either existing or planned to be operation in the region by 2010. These desalters are being implemented for two reasons—(1) to maintain the salt balance in the region and (2) to develop a locally controlled, reliable water supply.

As shown in Figure 3.16, over 30 mgd of water is currently generated from the use of RO treatment processes. In the future, the amount of water supply is projected to be approximately 97 mgd, which is more than a threefold increase and will generate approximately 24 mgd of brine-concentrate. Groundwater supplies generated from these treatment processes increase from approximately 30 mgd to nearly 87 mgd by 2035. The use of RO to recover water from WWTPs/WRPs for water reuse will result in an increase of water supply from approximately 0.012 mgd in 2008 to approximately 10.27 mgd by 2035. FIGURE 3.16 WATER SUPPLIES THAT RESULT IN GENERATION OF BRINE-CONCENTRATE IN THE INLAND EMPIRE REGION

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 ULT

Year

Ave

rage

Dai

ly F

low

(MG

D)



Specific Brine-Concentrate Management Projects and Issues In the Inland Empire region, a majority of brine-concentrate generated is disposed of via the SARI system. Even with the available discharge mechanisms in the region, there are a number of locations where limitations in discharge capacity or increased water reuse might benefit from implementation of different brine-management strategies. These potential projects and issues were identified from deficiencies noted in the data, information from survey respondents, or information obtained via the regional meetings. In the Inland Empire region, six potential projects and issues were identified, each of which is described below.



SARI Capacity Issues – The SARI system capacity is limited at Reach 8 to 30 mgd of flow. Some concern arises due to potential projects and existing discharges that this capacity could be exceeded. As seen in Figure 3.17, the SARI system connects Orange County to the Inland Empire at Prado Dam. The SARI system has two main existing feeders—the existing Temescal Valley Regional Interceptor (TVRI) and the SARI Reach IV system that extends to the San Bernardino WRP. In addition to the existing system, three additional extensions are planned for the SARI system. They are the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) brineline, Temecula Valley brineline, and the Yucaipa-SARI pipeline. The EMWD brineline extension and the Temecula Valley brineline will connect to the TVRI at the Railroad Canyon WWRF. The Yucaipa-SARI extension will connect industrial users and the Henry N. Wolcholz WWTP to the SARI system at the San Bernardino WRP.

Figure 3.18 shows the projected flows in Reach 1 of the SARI pipeline. Projections show that there is approximately 10 mgd of available capacity during maximum daily flows. However, as shown in Figure 3.19, projections for available capacity in Reach 8 (SARI Reach IV) of the SARI system differ based on source of the projections. OCSD provided flow projections in Reach 8 (SARI Reach IV) of 15 mgd for 2008 and increasing to approximately 20 mgd in 2035. For the same reach, Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) projections were 13 mgd in 2008 and increasing to over 28 mgd by 2035. In addition, the Upper SARI Planning Study estimated flows to be over 13 mgd in 2008 and increasing to over 35 mgd by 2020.

These projections exceed the 30-mgd capacity of the SARI Reach 8/Reach IV; therefore, SAWPA and its member agencies are looking for opportunities to reduce or remove flow to the SARI system. Currently, SAWPA is investigating the long-term viability of the SARI system for salt export. Two ways exist to reduce flow in the SARI system—(1) remove domestic wastewater flows entering the system and build a separate system to handle these flows, and (2) implement brine-concentrate volume-reduction or -elimination technologies. Brine-concentrate management can be implemented on the SARI system at local agency facilities or at a centralized location.

In addition to capacity issues, the SARI system also has solids settlement problems and scaling in its system. Suspended solids (SS) concentrations of 100 mg/L have been measured in the SARI system in portions of the pipeline receiving primarily groundwater brine with SS of less than 1 mg/L. Also, the SARI has occurrences of SS concentrations of over 200 mg/L in composite flow from all dischargers.

Suspended solids could be driven by the existence of a supersaturated condition for calcium, magnesium, and silica. These constituents precipitate in the pipeline causing the formation of suspended solids and sedimentation, which occur primarily when the brine is not sufficiently diluted by other flows. Under normal operating conditions, brine constitutes approximately 25 percent of the flow.

&3

&3

&3

&3

&3&3

&3

&3

&3

&3

&3

&3

&3

"

###

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

###

# #

#

#

###

# #

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

###

#

## #

#

#

#

#

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

Tustin Desalter

Frances Desalter

Baker WTP




Upland Ion Exchange FacilityPomona Ion Exchange Facility

Chino Desalter II

Chino Desalter III

Chino Desalter I

Lower Bunker Hill

Yucaipa Valley RegionalWater Supply Renewal Project

Temescal Desalter

Arlington Desalter


Menifee Desalter

Perris Desalter II

Perris Desalter I


San Jose Creek WRP

Los Coyotes WRP

Long Beach WRP

OCSD Plant #1

Green Acres Project


OCSD Plant #2

Michelson WRP

Los Alisos WRP

El Toro WWTP



3A Plant

Oso Creek WRP

Chiquita WRP

Robinson Ranch WRP

Jay B Latham WWTP


Pomona WRP



Rialto WWTP

RIX WRPColton WWTP





Carbon Canyon WRP



Moreno Valley WRF

Perris Valley WRP




Santa Rosa WRF


Beaumont WWTP #1

Henry N. Wocholz WWTPStringfellow Pretreatment Facility


San Clemente WRP

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦10

§̈¦ tu

§̈¦10

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

tu91

tu55

§̈¦605

tu60

tu60

tu60

tu60

§̈¦215

§̈¦215

§̈¦10

§̈¦10§̈¦15

tu91

§̈¦215

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

tu215

tu215

tu30

tu57

tu57

tu90

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

tu1

§̈¦

tu39tu1

tu22

tu39

tu72

tu9

tu19 §̈¦605tu39

tu55

tu73

tu133

tu71

tu79

tu74tu74

tu74

tu79

tu38

AES Huntington BeachPower Generation Fac. Outfall

OCSD Outfall #1

OCSD Outfall #2



SONGS UNIT 3








Wells 21 & 22



SARI Reach IVD

Yucaipa - SARI Line

SARI Reach III

SARI Reach IVB

EMWD Proposed Brineline

SARI Reach I

TVRI Line (SARI Reach V)

Temecula Valley Brineline

SARI Reach IVE

SARI Reach II

SARI Reach IVA

IEUA System Outfall Pipeline

SARI Reach IV

(54.7 MGD)

(29.7 MGD)

(14.7 MGD)

(2.9 MGD)

(28.2 MGD)

(8.3 MGD)


FIGURE 3.17 - SARI SYSTEMSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I



# Stream Discharge

#* Ocean Discharge

#* Other

Wastewater OutfallsWastewater OutfallsPlanned or Potential Ocean Outfall




" Proposed Seawater Desalination PlantIndustrial Ocean Outfalls

Power Plants

Industrial/Others

SARI Brineline SystemEMWD Proposed BrinelineIEUA System Outfall PipelineSARI Reach ISARI Reach IISARI Reach IIISARI Reach IV

SARI Reach IVASARI Reach IVBSARI Reach IVDSARI Reach IVETVRI Line (SARI Reach V)Temecula Valley BrinelineYucaipa - SARI Line

±0 3 6Miles

Note: Reported SARI Brineline System flows represent average daily flows projected by planning year 2035



FIGURE 3.18 FLOW SUMMARY FOR SARI REACH 1

FIGURE 3.19 FLOW SUMMARY COMPARISON FOR SARI REACH 8 (SARI REACH IV)

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

Year

Flow

(mgd

)

Capacity Average Daily Flow (OCSD)Average Daily Flow (SAWPA) Projected (2002 SAWPA Study)

Adjusted Projection(Assumes elimination of domestic flows and reduction of brine discharge)

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

Year

Flow

(mgd

)

Capacity

MaximumDaily Flow

AverageDaily Flow



Creation of a funding mechanism to fund SARI upgrades, such as a sinking fund, is being investigated. Implementation of technologies to reduce or eliminate brine-concentrate could be a solution to this issue and are being investigated as part of SAWPA’s Salinity Watershed Management Program. In addition, this study will investigate the pros and cons of centralized versus satellite facilities.

Chino Desalters – The Chino Basin Desalter Authority (CBDA) has worked with Western MWD to pilot test pellet softening at the Arlington Desalter. The purpose of the pilot test was to evaluate if pellet softening reduces a scale-forming mineral and thereby reduces scale formation in the SARI line. Another advantage for the use of pellet softening is the reduction in the amount of brine-concentrate discharge to the SARI system. The CBDA is considering implementing this technology at the Arlington and Chino desalting facilities.

Ion Exchange Facility (Chino Hills Desalter) – The City of Chino Hills is considering connecting the Chino Hills Desalter to the SARI system due to cost considerations of discharging to the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Brine Interceptor system. SARI disposal costs are cheaper if the disposal has higher concentrations of BOD or other organics; however, disposal via the Brine Interceptor system is cheaper if TDS is the only constituent found in high concentrations. The Chino Hill IX Facility is operated intermittently to reduce nitrates and salts.

Santa Rosa WRF Brine-Concentrate Management – Rancho California Water District (RCWD) is planning to implement a multiple regional project that will help reduce water demands from the State Water Project. One project proposed as part of this effort is to build a demineralization/desalination plant to reduce TDS levels to less than 500 mg/L in recycled water from EMWD’s Temecula Valley WRP. This will enable up to 16,000 afy of recycled water to be reused in the basin for agricultural use. However, current plans include approximately 5 mgd of advanced treatment, which will include MF followed by RO. This treatment will result in the need to implement a volume-reduction technology by 2015 to reduce flow to the TVRI/SARI system. Brine-concentrate generation from the RO system will be approximately 0.3 mgd by 2015 and will expand to 0.7 mgd by ultimate buildout. If a brine-concentrate volume reduction technology system is employed, then the reject stream would be reduced to 0.002 mgd by 2015 and 0.003 mgd by ultimate buildout. This project will require the construction of the Temecula Valley brineline extension of the TVRI/SARI system.

EMWD Brine-Concentrate Volume Reduction – EMWD is investigating expanding the EMWD brine management system that connects to the TVRI/SARI system. Currently, this system connects EMWD’s groundwater desalters to the TVRI/SARI system. In the future, EMWD is considering allowing industrial dischargers to dispose brine in the EMWD brine management system. In addition to expanding the brine management system, EMWD has been investigating a number of different brine-concentrate volume reduction and zero liquid discharge technologies. These technologies include electrodialysis reversal (EDR), membrane distillation, forward osmosis, slurry precipitation and reverse osmosis (SPARRO), Salt Solidification and Sequestration (SALT_PROC), brine concentrator, evaporation ponds, and precipitative softening (PS)/RO. EMWD recently completed pilot testing



a number of these technologies; however, no decision has been made on what technology to implement.

City of Corona Temescal Desalter – The City of Corona might need to reduce the amount of brine-concentrate discharged to the SARI system. A likely volume-reduction technology to be used is PS as a pretreatment for RO, which would be similar in nature to the pellet softening being tested at the Arlington Desalter and would need to be pilot tested prior to implementation.

San Bernardino WRP – The City of San Bernardino is considering implementing advanced treatment at the San Bernardino WRP for treatment of recycled water for groundwater recharge in the Bunker Hill basin. Up to 15 mgd of RO might be added to the San Bernardino WRP. If this project is implemented, a brine-concentrate management technology could be implemented to reduce the amount of brine-concentrate disposed of via the SARI system to that amount owned in the system by the City of San Bernardino.

Big Bear Groundwater Recharge Project – BBARWA has proposed the implementation of advanced treatment to produce recycled water for groundwater recharge. The advanced treatment proposed at the BBARWA Facility consists of MF, RO, followed by ultraviolet disinfection (UV) with advanced oxidation (e.g., the addition of hydrogen peroxide). A natural by-product of the RO component of this treatment train is the production of a concentrate (reject) stream. The BBARWA Advanced Treatment Facility (ATF) will be a 1.17-mgd plant that will produce approximately 160,000 gallons per day (gpd) of concentrate (reject) stream. This reject stream would either be further reduced or disposed using a brine-concentrate management technology.

Lake Arrowhead Groundwater Recharge Projects – The Lake Arrowhead CSD has identified potential need for advanced treatment to produce recycled water for indirect potable reuse project (IPR) at Lake Arrowhead. The IPR project would provide advanced treatment at the Grass Valley WWTP for up to 1.5 mgd. The process would produce approximately 1.1 mgd (approximately 1,200 afy) of product water and approximately 0.4 mgd of concentrate. The quantity of concentrate would be further reduced using a brine concentrator then conveyed via the existing wastewater disposal outfall pipeline to evaporation ponds at the existing wastewater disposal site in Hesperia.



3.4 Orange County Region

Sixteen wastewater facilities, 10 groundwater desalters, and 4 outfall systems exist or are planned in the Orange County region. Figures 3.20 and 3.21 show the major WWTPs/WRPs, groundwater desalters, and brine conveyance facilities in North Orange County and South Orange County, respectively. Conveyance facilities in this region include brinelines, WWTP interties, as well as private and public outfalls. The publicly owned outfalls in the region are the OCSD outfall (which receives flow from the SARI system), the Aliso Creek outfall, and the San Juan Creek outfall.

3.4.1 Brine-Concentrate Facilities As part of the survey, 12 facilities were identified as existing or planned brine-concentrate generators and are listed in Table 3.4. Figures 3.22 through 3.25 show the locations of these brine-concentrate facilities, as well as the relative scale of projected brine-concentrate flows for the 2010 and ultimate timeframes for both North and South Orange County. In Orange County, the generation of brine-concentrate increases to nearly four times the 2008 level (12.87 mgd) to approximately 46.05 mgd by ultimate buildout. The Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System is the major brine-concentrate source from 2008 through 2015. By 2015, the South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project comes online and will generate 15 mgd brine-concentrate that will be discharged through the South Orange County Wastewater Authority’s (SOCWA) San Juan Creek Ocean Outfall. These two sources will comprise over 80 percent of the brine-concentrate that will be generated under the ultimate buildout conditions. Information about these facilities is provided in Attachment C. Three publicly owned outfall facilities are in the Orange County region, two of which are in South Orange County. The OCSD outfall is projected to convey 12.84 mgd of brine-concentrate from wastewater and groundwater desalter sources by 2010 and 23.49 mgd by 2030. This system receives flows from four WWTPs/WRPs and four groundwater desalters in Orange County in addition to the flows from facilities in the Inland Empire through the SARI brineline. The SARI brineline originates in the Inland Empire region and conveys brine-concentrate flow from the Inland Empire region and from North Orange County. In addition to the SARI system, flows from the Francis Desalter, Deep Aquifer Treatment System (DATS), Wells 21 and 22, and the Tustin Desalter are planned to be conveyed to the OCSD outfalls via the Orange County regional brineline. The two remaining publicly owned outfall facilities are located in South Orange County. The Aliso Creek outfall is projected to convey approximately 1.06 mgd of brine-concentrate flow by 2010 and 2.01 mgd by 2015 from one WWTPs/WRPs and three groundwater desalters through two brinelines or system interties operated by SOCWA. The SOCWA effluent transmission main conveys brine-concentrate, processed wastewater, and unused recycled water flows from the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) Baker WTP, Irvine Principal Potable Treatment Plant Desalter (PPTP), Irvine Non-Potable Shallow Groundwater Unit Desalter (SGU), Los Alisos WRP, El Toro WWTP, Regional Treatment Plant, and the Coastal Treatment Plant. The upper portion of this main is proposed to connect the IRWD Baker WTP, PPTP, and SGU to the existing transmission main at Los Alisos WRP.

&3

&3

&3

&3

&3

&3

&3

&3

"

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

# #

#

###

#

## #

#

#

#

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

Tustin Desalter

Frances Desalter

Baker WTP





Chino Desalter II

Chino Desalter III

Chino Desalter I

Temescal Desalter

Arlington Desalter

Anita Smith Ion Exchan

San Jose Creek WRP

Los Coyotes WRP

Long Beach WRP


OCSD Plant #1

Green Acres Project


OCSD Plant #2

Michelson WRP

Los Alisos WRP

El Toro WWTP



3A Plant

Oso Creek WRP

Chiquita WRP

Robinson Ranch WRP

Jay B Latham WWTP

C

Riverside Regio


Corona WWTP #1

Corona WWTP #2

Carbon Canyon WRP



Corona WWTP #3Western Water Rec


Railroad Canyon


§̈¦405

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

tu91

tu55

tu91

§̈¦710

§̈¦605

§̈¦105

tu42

tu60 tu60

§̈¦15

tu91

§̈¦15

tu57

tu90

§̈¦5

tu1

§̈¦405

tu39tu1

tu22

tu39

tu72

tu91

tu

tu19

tu83

tu55

tu73

tu133 tu74

AES Huntington Beach Power Generation Fac. Outfall

OCSD Outfall #1

OCSD Outfall #2



Carson Refinery



Wells 21 & 22

Lee Lake Water Horsethi

A

antn Plant

Nichols Water Reclamation Pla



FIGURE 3.20 - MAJOR WASTEWATER, GROUNDWATER, AND OUTFALL FACILITIESIN THE NORTH ORANGE COUNTY REGIONSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I



Planned Groundwater Desalter" Proposed Seawater

Desalination PlantIndustrial Ocean Outfalls

Power PlantsIndustrial/Others

Wastewater OutfallsWastewater OutfallsPlanned or PotentialOcean OutfallExisting Brineline orInterconnector SewerPlanned or PotentialBrineline or InterconnectorSewer


±0 2 4

Miles

&3&3

&3

&3

&3

&3

"

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

###

#

## #

#

#

#

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

Tustin Desalter

Frances Desalter

Baker WTP





Menifee Desalter

Perris Desalter II

Perris Desalter I

#1

OCSD Plant #2

Michelson WRP

Los Alisos WRP

El Toro WWTP



3A Plant

Oso Creek WRP

Chiquita WRP

Robinson Ranch WRP

Jay B Latham WWTP





Fallbrook Plant #1



San Luis Rey WWTPCamp Pendleton WWTP #13

Lower Moosa

Perris Valley WRP



Santa Rosa WRF

Temecula Valley R

San Clemente WRP

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

§̈¦

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

tu215

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

tu1

tu22 tu55

tu73

tu133

tu76

tu79

tu74

tu74




SONGS UNIT 3

SONGS UNIT 2

Wells 21 & 22

Rainbow MW




Camp Pendleton - Northern Tertiary Treatment Plant

Inland Empire Energy CenterDeep Aquifer Treatment Plant (DATS)



FIGURE 3.21 - MAJOR WASTEWATER, GROUNDWATER, AND OUTFALL FACILITIESIN THE SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY REGIONSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I



Planned Groundwater Desalter" Proposed Seawater

Desalination PlantIndustrial Ocean Outfalls


Wastewater OutfallsWastewater OutfallsPlanned or PotentialOcean OutfallExisting Brineline or Interconnector SewerPlanned or PotentialBrineline or InterconnectorSewer


±0 2 4

Miles

#*

#

#

*

*

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

# #

#

##

#

## #

#

#

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

**

*

* *

*

**

*

** *

*

*

Tustin Desalter

Frances Desalter

Baker WTP





Chino Desalter II

Chino Desalter III

Chino Desalter I

Temescal Desalter

Arlington Desalter


San Jose Creek WRP

Los Coyotes WRP

Long Beach WRP


OCSD Plant #1

Green Acres Project


OCSD Plant #2

Michelson WRP

Los Alisos WRP

El Toro WWTP



3A Plant

Oso Creek WRP

Chiquita WRP

Robinson Ranch WRP

Jay B Latham WWTP

C

Riverside Regio


Corona WWTP #1

Corona WWTP #2

Carbon Canyon WRP





Railroad Canyon


§̈¦405

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

tu91

tu55

tu91

§̈¦710

§̈¦605

§̈¦105

tu42

tu60 tu60

§̈¦15

tu91

§̈¦15

tu57

tu90

§̈¦5

tu1

§̈¦405

tu39tu1

tu22

tu39

tu72

tu91

tu

tu19

tu83

tu55

tu73

tu133 tu74


OCSD Outfall #1

OCSD Outfall #2



Carson Refinery





Wells 21 & 22


A

antn Plant



FIGURE 3.22 - WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCESIN THE NORTH ORANGE COUNTY REGION - 2010SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I









Less than 0.5 mgd


Between 1 and 3 mgd

Greater than 3 mgd

Wastewater Outfalls

Wastewater OutfallsPlanned or PotentialOcean OutfallExisting Brineline orInterconnector SewerPlanned or Potential Brineline or InterconnectorSewer


Power Plants

Industrial/OthersFeatures

HighwaysRiversWater Bodies

±0 2 4

Miles



TABLE 3.4 WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCES IN THE ORANGE COUNTY REGION

Orange County Region Current (as of end of 2008) Planning Year 2010 Planning Year 2015 Planning Year 2020 Planning Year 2025 Planning Year 2030 Planning Year 2035 Planning Year

Ultimate



Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)



OCWD 10.68 10.68 12.35 12.35 17.65 17.65 17.65 17.65 17.65 17.65 17.65 17.65 23.00 23.00 23.00 23.00


SOCWA - - - - 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.20



IRWD 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17

Frances Desalter IRWD/OCWD - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50

Tustin Desalter IRWD/OCWD 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.48 0.32 0.48 0.32 0.48 0.32 0.48 0.32 0.48 0.32 0.48 0.32 0.48

Wells 21 & 22 IRWD - - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Baker WTP IRWD - - - - 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81



0.60 0.60 1.20 1.20 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40


IRWD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00


IRWD 0.88 0.88 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06

South Coast Water District – Groundwater Recovery Facility

South Coast Water District

0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43


Five-agency JPA - - - - 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00

Total 12.87 12.87 15.31 15.47 37.99 38.20 37.99 38.20 37.99 38.20 37.99 38.20 45.84 46.05 45.84 46.05

#*

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

##

#

## #

#

#

#

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

**

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

**

**

*

** *

*

*

*

Tustin Desalter

Frances Desalter

Baker WTP





Menifee Desalter

Perris Desalter II

Perris Desalter I

#1

OCSD Plant #2

Michelson WRP

Los Alisos WRP

El Toro WWTP



3A Plant

Oso Creek WRP

Chiquita WRP

Robinson Ranch WRP

Jay B Latham WWTP





Fallbrook Plant #1




Lower Moosa

Perris Valley WRP



Santa Rosa WRF

Temecula Valley R

San Clemente WRP

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

§̈¦

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

tu215

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

tu1

tu22 tu55

tu73

tu133

tu76

tu79

tu74

tu74




SONGS UNIT 3

SONGS UNIT 2


Inland Empire EDeep Aquifer Treatment Plant (DATS)

Wells 21 & 22

Rainbow MW






FIGURE 3.23 - WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCESIN THE SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY REGION - 2010SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I


#* No Brine-Concentrate Generated#* Less than 0.5 mgd





No Brine-Concentrate GeneratedLess than 0.5 mgdBetween 0.5 and 1 mgd

Between 1 and 3 mgd

Greater than 3 mgd

Wastewater Outfalls

Wastewater OutfallsPlanned or PotentialOcean OutfallExisting Brineline orInterconnector SewerPlanned or Potential Brineline or InterconnectorSewer



Features


±0 2 4

Miles

#*

#

#

*

*

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

# #

#

##

#

## #

#

#

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

**

*

* *

*

**

*

** *

*

*

Tustin Desalter

Frances Desalter

Baker WTP





Chino Desalter II

Chino Desalter III

Chino Desalter I

Temescal Desalter

Arlington Desalter


San Jose Creek WRP

Los Coyotes WRP

Long Beach WRP


OCSD Plant #1

Green Acres Project


OCSD Plant #2

Michelson WRP

Los Alisos WRP

El Toro WWTP



3A Plant

Oso Creek WRP

Chiquita WRP

Robinson Ranch WRP

Jay B Latham WWTP

C

Riverside Regio


Corona WWTP #1

Corona WWTP #2

Carbon Canyon WRP





Railroad Canyon


§̈¦405

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

tu91

tu55

tu91

§̈¦710

§̈¦605

§̈¦105

tu42

tu60 tu60

§̈¦15

tu91

§̈¦15

tu57

tu90

§̈¦5

tu1

§̈¦405

tu39tu1

tu22

tu39

tu72

tu91

tu

tu19

tu83

tu55

tu73

tu133 tu74


OCSD Outfall #1

OCSD Outfall #2



Carson Refinery





Wells 21 & 22


A

antn Plant



FIGURE 3.24 - WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCESIN THE NORTH ORANGE COUNTY REGION - ULTIMATESOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I


#* No Brine-Concentrate Generated#* Less than 0.5 mgd#* Between 0.5 and 1 mgd




No Brine-Concentrate GeneratedLess than 0.5 mgdBetween 0.5 and 1 mgdBetween 1 and 3 mgd

Greater than 3 mgd

Wastewater Outfalls

Wastewater OutfallsPlanned or PotentialOcean OutfallExisting Brineline orInterconnector SewerPlanned or PotentialBrineline or InterconnectorSewer



Features


±0 2 4

Miles

#*

#*

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

##

##

#

## #

#

#

#

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

**

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

**

*

**

**

*

** *

*

*

*

Tustin Desalter

Frances Desalter

Baker WTP





Menifee Desalter

Perris Desalter II

Perris Desalter I

#1

OCSD Plant #2

Michelson WRP

Los Alisos WRP

El Toro WWTP



3A Plant

Oso Creek WRP

Chiquita WRP

Robinson Ranch WRP

Jay B Latham WWTP





Fallbrook Plant #1




Lower Moosa

Perris Valley WRP



Santa Rosa WRF

Temecula Valley R

San Clemente WRP

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

§̈¦

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

tu215

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

tu1

tu22 tu55

tu73

tu133

tu76

tu79

tu74

tu74




SONGS UNIT 3

SONGS UNIT 2


Inland Empire EDeep Aquifer Treatment Plant (DATS)

Wells 21 & 22

Rainbow MW






FIGURE 3.25 - WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCESIN THE SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY REGION - ULTIMATESOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I


#* No Brine-Concentrate Generated#* Less than 0.5 mgd





No Brine-Concentrate GeneratedLess than 0.5 mgdBetween 0.5 and 1 mgd

Between 1 and 3 mgd

Greater than 3 mgd

Wastewater Outfalls

Wastewater OutfallsPlanned or PotentialOcean OutfallExisting Brineline orInterconnector SewerPlanned or PotentialBrineline or InterconnectorSewer



Features


±0 2 4

Miles



The San Juan Creek outfall conveys brine-concentrate, processed wastewater, and unused recycled water flows from five WWTPs/WRPs, two groundwater desalters, and the proposed South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project via system interties to the ocean. This outfall is projected to discharge over 1.4 mgd of brine-concentrate by 2010 and up to 16.83 mgd by 2015. The increase in brine-concentrate flows is primarily from the South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project.

In addition to the publicly owned outfall facilities, the Orange County region has three major NPDES permits for power plants discharging to the ocean. One of these outfalls is located near the OCSD outfalls in Huntington Beach and discharges to the ocean. The other two industrial outfall facilities are located in San Clemente and discharge to the ocean through a designated private outfall.

The Nichols WRP, operated by the Santa Margarita Water District, and the Robinson Ranch WRP, operated by the Trabuco Canyon Water District reuse 100 percent of their wastewater for irrigation.


Brine-Concentrate Flow Summary In the Orange County region, projected brine-concentrate flows increase from 12.87 mgd in 2008 to 45.84 mgd by 2035. Figures 3.26 and 3.27 show a summary of these projected flows for both North and South Orange County. Currently, a majority of the brine-concentrate flow (83 percent) is generated from the GWR System. By 2015, over half (20.19 mgd) of the brine-concentrate generated in the County will be from groundwater desalters and the proposed South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project. As shown in Figures 3.28 and 3.29, no agencies are currently planning to implement brine-concentrate reduction or ZLD treatment technologies. The number of facilities generating brine-concentrate increases from 7 facilities in 2008 to 11 facilities by 2015, and to 12 facilities for ultimate buildout when the Frances Desalter comes online.



FIGURE 3.26 BRINE-CONCENTRATE FLOW SUMMARY FOR NORTH ORANGE COUNTY REGION

0.0

4.0

8.0

12.0

16.0

20.0

24.0

28.0

32.0

2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 ULT

Year

Flow

(MG

D)


Note: Brine generation is from wastewater treatment and groundwater desalting. FIGURE 3.27 BRINE-CONCENTRATE FLOW SUMMARY FOR SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY REGION

0.0

4.0

8.0

12.0

16.0

20.0

2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 ULT

Year

Flow

(MG

D)

Maximum Daily Flow Average Daily FlowTreated Brine Flow Brine-Concentrate Flow Without SOCODP

Note: Brine-concentrate flows include the South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project which will dicharge to SOCWA's San Juan Creek outfall.

Note: Brine generation is from wastewater treatment and groundwater desalting. These projections include the South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project.



Water Supply Summary The scarcity of water supply continues because of the limited availability of imported water and the drought, which make even more important the development of reliable and locally controlled water supplies even more important. Groundwater desalting and water reclamation are two methods of developing new reliable and locally controlled water supplies. Consequently, developing a long-term plan for brine-concentrate management for the Orange County region is of great importance.

As shown in Figures 3.28 and 3.29, approximately 74.4 mgd of water supply in Orange County is currently produced from the use of RO treatment processes (69.0 mgd in North Orange County and 5.4 mgd in South Orange County). In the future, the amount of water supply is projected to reach approximately 189.7 mgd (149 mgd in North Orange County and 40.7 mgd in South Orange County). These water supplies produced via facilities that will generate approximately 45.84 mgd of brine-concentrate. This water supply includes the proposed South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project which is planned to discharge brine reject through SOCWA’s San Juan Creek Ocean Outfall. This is the only seawater desalination facility in southern California that is planned to discharge out an existing wastewater outfall. All other planned seawater desalination facilities are planned to discharge out existing private outfalls or via new outfalls. The use of RO to recover water from WWTPs/WRPs will result in increased water supply from approximately 60.52 mgd in 2008 to a potential of 130 mgd at the OCWD’s GWR System. FIGURE 3.28 WATER SUPPLIES THAT RESULT IN GENERATION OF BRINE-CONCENTRATE FOR NORTH ORANGE COUNTY REGION

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 ULT

Year

Ave

rage

Dai

ly F

low

(MG

D)





FIGURE 3.29 WATER SUPPLIES THAT RESULT IN GENERATION OF BRINE-CONCENTRATE FOR SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY REGION

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 ULT

Year

Ave

rage

Dai

ly F

low

(MG

D)

Groundwater Supplies Water Reuse Water Supplies Without SOCODP

Note: Water supplies include the South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project


Specific Brine-Concentrate Management Projects and Issues In the Orange County region, a majority of brine-concentrate produced is disposed via three ocean outfalls. Even with the available discharge mechanisms in the region, there are a number of locations where limitations in discharge capacity or increased water reuse might benefit from implementation of different brine-management strategies. These potential projects and issues were identified from deficiencies noted in the data, information from survey respondents, or information obtained via the regional meetings. In the Orange County region, five potential projects and issues were identified, each of which is described below.

Moulton Niguel WD (MNWD) Golf Course Recycled Water Projects – The MNWD is currently working with three golf courses to potentially serve recycled water to their greens. Advanced treatment might be required for water serving the greens, which would create a brine-concentrate waste stream. The golf courses are currently investigating potential onsite brine-concentrate disposal mechanisms, including using the existing ponds on the course as evaporation ponds.

OCSD Outfall Water Quality Limitations – OCSD might not be able to continue to meet WDR if brine-concentrate levels do not have adequate blending with wastewater. OCSD has stringent WDR limits for ammonia and hardness, which restricts the amount of brine-concentrate that can be discharged. This could become a significant issue if the use of recycled water for groundwater recharge increases in Orange County and the Inland Empire while the amount of domestic wastewater is decreased in the SARI system. If a brine-concentrate management technology is required, the efficacy of the technology can be tested at the OCWD membrane test laboratory.



Newport Back Bay Nitrogen-Selenium Program – This is a 5-year program to address nitrogen and selenium in the Newport Bay Watershed to be in compliance with the requirements of an NPDES permit (Order Number R8-2004-0021) issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. Studies have found that ambient groundwater concentrations in the watershed frequently exceed numeric limits for selenium established in the permit. A pilot/demonstration project was completed in 2006 that identified RO as a potential best management practice (BMP) for the treatment and removal of nitrogen and selenium. The brine-concentrate from the pilot test was disposed of via OCSD sewers. If RO is implemented across the watershed to reduce nitrogen and selenium levels in groundwater, a second process, such as a brine concentrator, might be added to obtain higher water recovery rates. The addition of brine-concentrate management technologies would enable Orange County to maximize water supply from the groundwater treatment.

South Coast Water District (SCWD) Groundwater Recovery Project – The SCWD uses greensand filtration and RO to recover groundwater with high concentrations of TDS, iron, and manganese. Currently, the project is having difficulty complying with discharge limitations due to the high concentrations of iron and manganese in the backwash water. The discharge is considered an industrial discharge and must comply with stringent water quality requirements. SCWD is considering implementing new technologies to treat brine-concentrate prior to discharge to the ocean that would comply with permit limits.

South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project – The San Juan Creek Outfall could have problems complying with WDR requirements because of particulates in the flows from the proposed South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project. This new desalination project will consist of approximately one-third of the flow in the San Juan Creek outfall. Therefore, constituents of concern in the desalination ocean concentrate (such as turbidity, settleable solids, pH levels, metals, arsenic, iron, and manganese) will affect the quality of the water that is discharged from the outfall. In addition, this project could face the same regulations that are driving the SCWD to implement brine-concentrate management due to high concentrations of iron and manganese.

3.5 San Diego County Region

Thirty-three wastewater facilities, 13 groundwater desalters, and 6 publically owned outfall systems exist or are planned in the San Diego County region. Figure 3.30 shows the major WWTPs/WRPs, groundwater desalters, and brine conveyance facilities. Conveyance facilities in this region include brinelines, WWTP interties, as well as public and private outfalls. The two largest outfalls in the region are the Point Loma outfall and the South Bay ocean outfall.

http://www.ocnsmp.com/pdf/TR8-2004-0021.pdf�

&3

&3

&3"

#

##

##

#

##

#

##

#

###

#

## #

#

# #

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

##

#

#

#

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*#*



Mission Basin Desalting Facility

Richard Reynolds GW Demineralization Facility

North River Groundwater Desalter

Coastal Treatment Plantq

Jay B Latham WWTP





Fallbrook Plant #1




La Salina WWTP

Lower Moosa Canyon WRF

Valley Center WWTP

Hale Avenue WRFMeadowlark WRP

Gafner WRF

Carlsbad WRPEncina WPCF

Santa Maria WPCF4-S Ranch WTP

Rancho Santa Fe WPCFFairbanks Ranch WPCF

Whispering Palms WPCF

San Elijo WRF

North City WRP Padre Dam WRF

Ralph W Chapman WRFPoint Loma WWTP


San Clemente WRP

South Bay WWTP

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

tu78

§̈¦5§̈¦805

§̈¦15

tu163

§̈¦805

tu52

§̈¦15

§̈¦8

tu94§̈¦5

tu117

§̈¦5 §̈¦805

§̈¦8

tu67

tu67

tu54

tu94

tu94

tu78

tu78

tu76

tu76

tu76

tu78

tu71

tu371

San Vicente WWTP



Oceanside Outfall

Encina Outfall Pipeline

San Elijo Ocean Outfall

Point Loma Outfall

South Bay Ocean Outfall

Proposed Camp Pendleton Outfall

Balboa Park Groundwater Desal FacilitySeaWorld 2

SeaWorld 1

SONGS UNIT 3

SONGS UNIT 2

Encina Power Plant





National Steel & Shipbuilding

Skyline Ranch WRFCamp Pendleton AWT Plant

San Pasqual Groundwater Desalter

Mission Valley Groundwater Desalination Project

Rainbow MWD Desalination Facility

Ramona Desalting Facility

Rancho Del Rey Well Desalination

San Diego FormationGroundwater Desal Facility

San Dieguito Desalting Facility

Santee Desalination Facility



Camp Pendleton - Southern Tertiary Treatment Plant

Otay River Desalination Plant

Chula Vista MBR Treatment Plant


FIGURE 3.30 - MAJOR WASTEWATER, GROUNDWATER, AND OUTFALL FACILITIESIN THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I


#* Land Discharge


# Stream Discharge

#* Ocean Discharge

#* Other






Power Plants

Industrial/Others

Wastewater Outfalls

Wastewater Outfalls




Features

Highways

Rivers

Water Bodies

±0 3 6

Miles



3.5.1 Brine-Concentrate Facilities As part of the survey, 18 facilities were identified as existing or planned sources of brine-concentrate as listed in Table 3.5. Figures 3.31 and 3.32 show the locations of these brine-concentrate facilities and the relative scale of projected brine-concentrate flows for the 2010 and ultimate timeframes. In the San Diego region, the maximum daily generation of brine-concentrate increases more than eightfold between 2008 (2.7 mgd) and the ultimate buildout of these facilities (22.7 mgd). In 2010, two users are projected to generate over 60 percent of the brine-concentrate—the Richard Reynolds Groundwater Demineralization Facility and the Camp Pendleton Advanced Water Treatment Plant (AWTP). By ultimate buildout, the Carlsbad WRP, North City WRP, and the Mission Basin Desalting Facility are projected to replace these facilities as the largest sources of brine-concentrate (almost 50 percent of the total flow). Information about these facilities is provided in Attachment C.

Six publicly owned outfall facilities are in the San Diego County region. These outfalls are the proposed Camp Pendleton outfall, Oceanside outfall, Encina outfall, San Elijo outfall, Point Loma outfall, and the South Bay outfall. The proposed Camp Pendleton outfall is projected to convey 1.29 mgd of brine-concentrate by 2010. This system will receive flows from the Camp Pendleton WWTP No. 13, Camp Pendleton AWTP, and Camp Pendleton Southern Tertiary Treatment Plant.

The Oceanside outfall receives treated wastewater flows from the Camp Pendleton WWTP No. 1 and No. 2, La Salina WWTP, San Luis Rey WWTP, and Fallbrook Plant No. 1 via three brinelines/interties. This outfall is projected to receive 0.6 mgd of brine-concentrate by 2010 and up to 3.9 mgd by 2035 from the Mission Basin Desalting Facility.

The Encina outfall receives discharges from the Carlsbad WRP, the Encina WPCF and the Gafner WRF. Flow from the Carlsbad WRP and Gafner WRF are conveyed to the ocean outfall via the Leucadia County Water District Brineline. The Encina outfall is projected to convey 0.6 mgd of brine-concentrate by 2010 and 2.4 mgd by 2035 from the Carlsbad WRP.

The San Elijo outfall system consists of an outfall and two brinelines or system interties. The Hale Avenue WRF and the San Elijo WRF discharge to the ocean outfall. Also, the proposed San Pasqual Groundwater Desalter may connect to the outfall via the proposed San Pasqual Groundwater Desalter brineline. This outfall is projected to discharge up to 1.9 mgd of brine-concentrate by 2015 from these facilities. In addition, the Palomar Energy Plant in Escondido discharges 1.0 mgd of brine from its cooling process directly to this outfall line.



TABLE 3.5

WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCES IN THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGION

San Diego County Region Current

(as of end of 2008) Planning Year 2010 Planning Year 2015 Planning Year 2020 Planning Year 2025 Planning Year 2030 Planning Year 2035

Planning Year Ultimate



Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Carlsbad WRP Encina Joint Powers Authority

0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40

Hale Avenue WRF City of Escondido - - - - 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35

North City WRP City of San Diego 0.19 0.52 0.19 0.52 0.19 0.52 4.60 4.60 4.60 4.60 4.60 4.60 4.60 4.60 4.60 4.60

Padre Dam WRF Padre Dam MWD - - - - 0.23 0.45 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

San Vicente WWTP Ramona MWD 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02


Balboa Park Groundwater Desalination Facility

City of San Diego - - - - 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15

Camp Pendleton AWT Plant

Camp Pendleton - - 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29


City of Oceanside 0.60 0.66 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90

Mission Valley Groundwater Desalination

City of San Diego - - - - 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40


Sweetwater Authority/ Otay Water District

- - - - 0.70 0.70 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80


Rainbow MWD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.67 0.67


Ramona MWD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.06 0.06

Rancho del Rey Well Desalination

Otay Water District - - - - - - - - 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05

Richard Reynolds Groundwater Demineralization Facility (Phase I and II)

Sweetwater Authority 0.80 0.91 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50

San Diego Formation Groundwater Desalination Facility

City of San Diego/San Diego County Water Authority

- - - - 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.45 0.45



TABLE 3.5 WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCES IN THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGION (CONTINUED)

San Diego County Region Current

(as of end of 2008) Planning Year 2010 Planning Year 2015 Planning Year 2020 Planning Year 2025 Planning Year 2030 Planning Year 2035

Planning Year Ultimate



Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


Flow (MGD)


San Dieguito Basin Task Force

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.34 1.34


City of San Diego - - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00


Padre Dam MWD/ Helix WD

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.75 0.75

Total 2.21 2.71 4.20 4.53 7.78 8.33 15.37 15.37 15.42 15.42 15.87 15.87 19.66 19.66 22.72 22.72

#*

#

#

*

*

#

##

##

#

##

#

##

#

###

#

## #

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

##

#

#

#

*

**

**

*

**

*

**

*

***

*

** *

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

**

**

*

*

*







Jay B Latham WWTP





Fallbrook Plant #1




La Salina WWTP


Valley Center WWTP


Gafner WRF





San Elijo WRF




San Clemente WRP

South Bay WWTP

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

tu78

§̈¦5§̈¦805

§̈¦15

tu163

§̈¦805

tu52

§̈¦15

§̈¦8

tu94§̈¦5

tu117

§̈¦5 §̈¦805

§̈¦8

tu67

tu67

tu54

tu94

tu94

tu78

tu78

tu76

tu76

tu76

tu78

tu71

tu371

San Vicente WWTP



Oceanside Outfall



Point Loma Outfall



Balboa Park Groundwater Desal Facility

SeaWorld 2

SeaWorld 1

SONGS UNIT 3

SONGS UNIT 2

Encina Power Plant






Skyline Ranch WRF








San Diego FormationGroundwater Desal Facility









FIGURE 3.31 - WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCESIN THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGION - 2010SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I









Less than 0.5 mgd


Between 1 and 3 mgd

Greater than 3 mgd

Wastewater Outfalls

Wastewater Outfalls



Planned or PotentialBrineline or InterconnectorSewer


Power Plants

Industrial/Others

Features

Highways

Rivers

Water Bodies

±0 3 6

Miles

#*

## **

#*

#

#

*

*

#

##

##

#

##

#

##

#

##

#

## #

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

*

**

**

*

**

*

**

*

**

*

** *

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

**

*

*

*

*







Jay B Latham WWTP





Fallbrook Plant #1




La Salina WWTP


Valley Center WWTP


Gafner WRF





San Elijo WRF




San Clemente WRP

South Bay WWTP

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

tu78

§̈¦5§̈¦805

§̈¦15

tu163

§̈¦805

tu52

§̈¦15

§̈¦8

tu94§̈¦5

tu117

§̈¦5 §̈¦805

§̈¦8

tu67

tu67

tu54

tu94

tu94

tu78

tu78

tu76

tu76

tu76

tu78

tu71

tu371

San Vicente WWTP



Oceanside Outfall



Point Loma Outfall



Balboa Park Groundwater Desal Facility

SeaWorld 2

SeaWorld 1

SONGS UNIT 3

SONGS UNIT 2

Encina Power Plant






Skyline Ranch WRF








San Diego Formation Groundwater Desal Facility









FIGURE 3.32 - WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCES INTHE SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGION - ULTIMATESOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I









Less than 0.5 mgd


Between 1 and 3 mgd

Greater than 3 mgd

Wastewater Outfalls

Wastewater Outfalls





Power Plants

Industrial/Others

Features

Highways

Rivers

Water Bodies

±0 3 6

Miles



The Point Loma outfall is projected to convey 0.19 mgd of brine-concentrate by 2010 and up to 6.11 mgd by the ultimate condition. This system receives flows from the North City WRP, Padre Dam WRF, Point Loma WWTP, Santee Desalination Facility, and potentially the Mission Valley Groundwater Desalination project and the proposed Balboa Park Groundwater Desalination Facility. The Padre Dam WRP, Mission Valley Groundwater Desalination project, and the Santee Desalination Facility will discharge flow to the Point Loma ocean outfall via East Mission Gorge Interceptor System.

The South Bay ocean outfall (SBOO) is planned to receive flows from the South Bay WWTP, Chula Vista Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Treatment Plant, North River Groundwater Desalter, Otay River Desalination Plant, Richard Reynolds Groundwater Demineralization Plant, San Diego Formation Groundwater Desalination Facility, International Boundary Water Commission Treatment Plant and potentially the Mission Valley Groundwater Desalination Project. This flow will be conveyed via four brinelines or system interties to the ocean and includes the planned San Diego Regional Brine Conveyance System that is expected to discharge through the SBOO by 2015. The SBOO is projected to discharge 2.4 mgd of brine-concentrate by 2015 and another 4.0 mgd of flow from the Chula Vista MBR plant. Based on the SDCWA’s recent draft report, San Diego Regional Concentrate Conveyance System Feasibility Study (2008), up to 12.55 mgd of flow would be conveyed through this system by 2035. This flow includes processed wastewater effluent, RO reject flows from groundwater desalters, as well as planned industrial brine discharges.

In addition to the publicly owned outfall facilities, the San Diego County region has two major NPDES permits for power plants, three for naval base facilities, two for shipbuilding facilities, and there is an outfall at SeaWorld. Four naval facilities and the South Bay Power Plant discharge to San Diego Bay and South San Diego Bay; SeaWorld discharges to Mission Bay; the Encina Power Plant discharges to the ocean near the Encina outfall.

In addition to the outfall facilities, several wastewater treatment and desalting facilities discharge to streams and percolation ponds in San Diego County. The Santa Maria Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF) and San Vicente WWTP, both of the Ramona MWD, discharge wastewater using stream discharge. Stream discharge to the San Luis Rey River originates from the Rainbow MWD Desalination Facility. Currently, Richard Reynolds Groundwater Demineralization Facility discharges to the Sweetwater River but will discharge to the San Diego regional brineline in the future. In addition, the Fairbanks Ranch WPCF, Lower Moosa Canyon WRF, Skyline Ranch WRF, and Whispering Palms WPCF discharge to percolation ponds. Camp Pendleton WWTP No. 3, No. 9, and No. 11 also discharge to percolation ponds for recharge as a seawater intrusion barrier.




Brine-Concentrate Flow Summary In the San Diego County region, projected average daily brine-concentrate flows will increase from 2.7 mgd in 2008 to approximately 22 mgd at buildout. Figure 3.33 shows a summary of these projected flows. A majority of this flow (over 60 percent) is generated from existing and planned groundwater desalters. The remaining brine-concentrate flow is from advanced treated MF/RO processes at WWTPs/WRPs. The Richard Reynolds Groundwater Demineralization Facility is currently the primary generator of brine-concentrate; however, in the future, the Mission Valley Desalting Facility and North City WRP will add to the flows. As shown in Figure 3.33, a number of different agencies currently are planning to implement brine-concentrate reduction or zero liquid discharge (ZLD) treatment technologies. These facilities include the Hale Avenue WRF (1.35 mgd at ultimate buildout) and San Vicente WWTP (0.02 mgd at ultimate buildout) that generate brine-concentrate. FIGURE 3.33 BRINE-CONCENTRATE FLOW SUMMARY FOR THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGION

0.0

4.0

8.0

12.0

16.0

20.0

24.0

2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 ULT

Year

Flow

(MG

D)



Water Supply Summary The scarcity of water supply continues because of the limited availability of imported water and the drought, which make even more important the development of reliable and locally controlled water supplies, especially in San Diego County where a majority of the water supply is imported. Groundwater desalting and water reclamation are two methods of developing new reliable and locally controlled water supplies. Consequently, developing a long-term plan for brine-concentrate management for the San Diego County region is of great importance.

As shown in Figure 3.34, more than 4 mgd of water supply is currently generated from the use of RO treatment processes. In the future, the amount of water supply is projected to be approximately 49 mgd. This is more than a tenfold increase in water



supplies that will be created by facilities that will generate approximately 22 mgd of brine-concentrate. Groundwater supplies generated from RO membrane treatment processes increase from approximately 4.1 mgd to 45.0 mgd at buildout. The use of RO to recover water from WWTPs/WRPs results in an increase of water supply from 0 mgd in 2008 to 4.5 mgd by 2020. FIGURE 3.34 WATER SUPPLIES THAT RESULT IN GENERATION OF BRINE-CONCENTRATE IN THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGION

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 ULT

Year

Ave

rage

Dai

ly F

low

(MG

D)



Specific Brine-Concentrate Management Projects and Issues In the San Diego County region, a majority of brine-concentrate generated is disposed of via six ocean outfall systems. Even with the available discharge mechanisms in the region, there are a number of locations where limitations in discharge capacity or increased water reuse might benefit from the implementation of different brine-management strategies. These potential projects and issues were identified from deficiencies noted in the data, information from survey respondents, or information obtained via the regional meetings. In the San Diego County region, five potential projects and issues were identified, each of which is described below.

North San Diego Farming Brine/Concentrate Project(s) – In the northern San Diego region, the majority of growers have parcels of 10 acres or less, which causes difficulties in implementing the requirements of monitoring and reporting for these operations. The RWQCB is developing a conditional waiver (No. 4) for discharges from agricultural and nursery operations. This waiver will require monitoring and installation of management measures (MMs) or BMPs for discharges from agricultural and nursery operations if discharges contain pollutants that can percolate to groundwater or infiltrate to surface waters via runoff. Discharges are defined to include emissions from growing operations, irrigation return flows, and stormwater



runoff. Currently, agricultural and nursery operations are required to install MMs and BMPs; however, no enrollment, monitoring, or reporting requirement exists.

The new conditional waiver will require enrollment in a monitoring group by December 31, 2010. For agricultural operations, the new waiver will specify that discharging pollutants with the ability to adversely affect the beneficial uses of water should be minimized or eliminated, and it will prohibit altering surface water unless a permit to do so has been approved. This new waiver condition, coupled with increasing costs for imported water, forces agricultural and nursery operators to investigate the use of RO. RO could be used to improve water quality from locally controlled degraded groundwater that is not currently usable because of its high TDS. One limitation to the implementation of RO by local users is the disposal of brine-concentrate.

Camp Pendleton – Currently, Camp Pendleton has five WWTPs located in the southern portion of the base. There is a plan to consolidate WWTPs No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, and No. 13, construct a new regional WWTP, and maximize the use of tertiary-treated effluent on the base. This new treatment plant will manage 2.71 mgd of average day influent and have a maximum capacity of 5 mgd. Excess flow from the new WWTP will be discharged using the existing Oceanside ocean outfall. In the northern portion of the base, construction of an Advanced Water Treatment Facility and a new ocean outfall are planned. The AWTF would include granulated activated carbon and RO processes to reduce the concentrations of TDS, TOC, and corrosivity in the groundwater. This plant would construct a new ocean outfall near to or connect to the existing outfall at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS).

Ramona MWD – The Ramona MWD is implementing RO to address TDS and nutrient loading concerns in the basin. The RWQCB established a TDS limit of 550 mg/L on the WDR for the San Vicente and Santa Maria WWTPs. The limit required the installation of RO to comply with discharge limits and to use recycled water in the area. Currently, the brine-concentrate from the RO unit is being disposed of at a landfill, but the Ramona MWD is constructing evaporation ponds as a long-term disposal mechanism.

City of Escondido Groundwater Recharge Project – The City of Escondido is investigating the potential for a groundwater recharge project using advanced treated water from the Hale Avenue WRF. For this project, 6 mgd of RO would be treated and recharged in the San Pasqual basin. Brine-concentrate from this project would be disposed of via the existing San Elijo outfall. However, there is limited available capacity in the outfall and this project might exceed this capacity. Consequently, a study is needed to determine if the outfall can manage the brine-concentrate, and if not, to determine what the best method is to reduce brine-concentrate volumes so that the outfall capacity is not exceeded.



San Pasqual Groundwater Desalter Brineline – The City of San Diego is investigating the recovery of degraded groundwater from the San Pasqual basin. The proposed 5-mgd San Pasqual desalter would be located at the site of the existing San Pasqual Water Reclamation Plant, which has recently been shut down by the City. The City of San Diego is currently conducting an 18-month demonstration study for this desalter. The demonstration plant uses nanofiltration and RO membranes to demineralize the groundwater.

The full-scale facility would produce about 1 mgd of brine-concentrate. Potential disposal options evaluated include: sewer disposal through Escondido’s HARRF and subsequent San Elijo Outfall; a 7-mile brine line directly to the San Elijo Outfall; and ZLD. Each of these options has drawbacks including: limited capacity of the San Elijo Outfall, salt loading at HARRF, and costs associated with a brine line or ZLD as a result the City of San Diego is conducting a brine minimization study.

The study is evaluating an innovative approach to maximize the overall RO recovery and minimizing the amount of brine requiring disposal. The reduced flow could be disposed into the closer and smaller City of San Diego’s sewer line that flows to the North City WRP. This additional brine disposal opportunity significantly reduces the need for infrastructure development and improves the City of San Diego’s ability to permit and construct a full-scale groundwater recovery plant.

Mission Valley Groundwater Desalination Project – The City of San Diego is considering desalination of brackish groundwater in the Mission Valley area. This project would be located along the San Diego River near the intersection of Interstates 8 and 15. The project would result in the generation of 2,000 afy of potable water. The desalination process would generate 0.4 mgd of brine-concentrate by 2015. The brine-concentrate would be disposed of in the East Mission Gorge Interceptor System or in the proposed South Bay Ocean Outfall System.

City of San Diego Indirect Potable Reuse Project – The City of San Diego was granted a waiver from secondary treatment standards and has been permitted by the USEPA and RWQCB to use chemically enhanced primary treatment at its Point Loma WWTP. The waiver status is tentative, and is subject to a 5-year review and renewal process. The City of San Diego is actively investigating alternative methods that can off load wastewater flow to the Point Loma WWTP and also increase local water supplies. San Diego is currently performing demonstration testing for an Indirect Potable Reuse (IPR) project at the North City WRP. The City of San Diego is also conducting a study to identify opportunities to increase recycling and beneficial reuse within the service area of the San Diego and Metro Participating Agencies. The outcome of these studies, which will be completed over the next several years, may lead to changes in the brine volumes through the Point Loma Outfall and /or the SBOO from what is represented in this report. Total recycled water beneficial use volumes may also change.



San Diego County Regional Brineline System – SDCWA, in association with the City of San Diego, City of Chula Vista, Otay Water District, and the Sweetwater Authority, evaluated the feasibility of establishing an environmentally sound and cost-effective method to manage the disposal of brine-concentrate flows generated within south San Diego County. The study focused on southern San Diego County, which includes the cities of San Diego, National City, Chula Vista, and Imperial Beach. The study also investigated using this regional brineline to serve the eastern San Diego area cities of El Cajon, La Mesa, and Santee. The concentrate flows would be discharged to the ocean via the existing South Bay Ocean Outfall (SBOO).

The San Diego County Regional Brineline System would generally follow a north to south alignment along the coast of San Diego Bay between the Sweetwater River and the SBOO. Three potential system extensions were identified, which could be implemented as a need arises. These are the Mission Valley Alignment, the City of San Diego Alignment, and the Otay Mesa Alignment. The San Diego County Regional brineline would collect brine-concentrate flows from wastewater treatment plants, groundwater desalters, and industrial dischargers in southern San Diego County. Potential users include facilities that, either currently or in the future, will produce highly saline flows that do not require municipal wastewater treatment, or previously treated flows that do not require additional treatment, prior to ocean discharge. Potential municipal users include groundwater desalination facilities, water treatment plants, and wastewater treatment and recycling facilities. Potential industrial/institutional users include the United States Navy, energy plants, and correctional facilities.

The concentrate flow identified from the potential users in the region is between 11 and 13 mgd. The construction of a regional brineline system could facilitate the development of between 20 and 40 mgd of new water supplies and potentially reduce or eliminate the impacts from current concentrate management practices. The new water supply projects that are currently being evaluated include the proposed expansion of the Reynolds Desalination Plant, the Otay River Desalination Plant, the San Diego Formation Desalination Plant, the Mission Valley Desalination Plant, and the Chula Vista MBR Treatment Plant.1

1 San Diego County Water Authority, San Diego Regional Concentrate Conveyance System Feasibility Study, December 2008.



3.6 Brine-Concentrate Water Quality

Water quality data submitted as part of the survey from agencies is provided in Attachment C. Representative examples of water quality characteristics for brine-concentrate streams from brackish groundwater and a wastewater sources are presented in Table 3.6. The brackish groundwater sample is based on the water quality projections of the EMWD Menifee Desalter RO brine-concentrate. Water quality projections for the wastewater RO brine-concentrate are based on data from the OCWD’s GWR System. Although these sample water qualities provide good representations of constituent concentrations in brine-concentrate, water quality is case specific and varies by location, source water characteristics, and upstream use (for wastewater). While the water quality for both of the samples has a similar concentration of salts, including sodium, calcium, chloride, and TDS, the wastewater sample has higher concentrations of organics such as TOC, nitrite-N, and ammonia-N. The groundwater has higher concentrations of some naturally occurring compounds including barium.

Key water quality parameters are either a regulatory or operational concern when treating or reducing brine-concentrate. The parameters are summarized in Tables 3.7 and 3.8 for wastewater and brackish groundwater brine-concentrate cases. Potential treatment processes for mitigating these parameters are included in these tables and include EDR, vibratory shear enhanced processing (VSEP), PS/RO, enhanced membrane system (EMS), and mechanical and thermal evaporation.

TABLE 3.6 RO CONCENTRATE WATER QUALITY EXAMPLES

Parameter Unit Brackish Water RO Concentrate Water Quality a

Wastewater RO Concentrate

Water Quality b

Total Organic Carbon (TOC) mg/L 1.5 69 Total Hardness (CaCO3) mg/L 3,500 1,920 Calcium (Ca) mg/L 990 513 Magnesium (Mg) mg/L 234 154

Sodium (Na) mg/L 890 1,380 Potassium (K) mg/L 26 91 Total Alkalinity (CaCO3) mg/L 650 910 Sulfate (SO4) mg/L 470 1,660 Chloride (CI) mg/L 2,440 1,425 Nitrate (as NO3) mg/L 88 22 Fluoride (F) mg/L 0.1 5.0 pH - 7.2-7.4 7.9 Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) mg/L 5,700 6,200 Aluminum µg/L NA 184 Antimony µg/L NA 1.0 Arsenic µg/L NA 3.0



TABLE 3.6 RO CONCENTRATE WATER QUALITY EXAMPLES

Parameter Unit Brackish Water RO Concentrate Water Quality a

Wastewater RO Concentrate

Water Quality b

Barium µg/L 660 273 Cadmium µg/L NA 8.1 Chromium (Hexavalent) µg/L NA 10.0 Copper µg/L NA 13.2 Iron µg/L 26 710 Manganese µg/L 8 5 Mercury µg/L NA 0.12 Nickel µg/L NA 133 Selenium µg/L NA 7.0 Silica mg/L 180 145 Silver µg/L NA 1.0 Nitrite-N µg/L 100 200 to 500 Cyanide µg/L NA 35 Ammonia-N µg/L 1,000 75,000 to

100,000 Notes: a Based on EMWD Menifee Desalter RO Concentrate Water Quality Projections b Based on OCWD GWR RO Concentrate Water Quality Projections

TABLE 3.7 KEY WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS IN WASTEWATER RO CONCENTRATE

Constituent Regulatory Concern Operational Concern Mitigation/ Treatment Options

Total Organic Carbon (TOC)

None Promotes organic/ microbiological fouling on membranes. Reduces efficiency of UV disinfection.

Membrane fouling can be best managed by pretreatment and flux selection.

Microbial Parameters

Title 22 disinfected tertiary effluent criteria should be met for coliform.

Promotes microbiological fouling. Provide adequate disinfection per Title 22 requirements

Nitrogen Depends upon usage Ammonia increases chlorine demand. Nitrite, if present, may increase NDMA formation.

Iron and Manganese

None. May oxidize or form complexes with other constituents and promote membrane fouling.

Microfiltration/ultrafiltration and RO will reduce Fe/Mn levels to below the regulatory limits.



TABLE 3.7 KEY WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS IN WASTEWATER RO CONCENTRATE

Constituent Regulatory Concern Operational Concern Mitigation/ Treatment Options

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)

Between 500 and 1,000 mg/L TDS for irrigation water can affect sensitive plants (i.e., citrus). At 1,000 to 2,000 mg/L, TDS can affect crops. TDS for other types of reuse depends on specific use.

High TDS is a direct indicator of elevated levels of sparingly soluble salts that promote membrane scaling, and cause a loss in productivity and deterioration in permeate quality. The sparingly soluble salts of concern include calcium carbonate (CaCO3), calcium sulfate (CaSO4), barium sulfate (BaSO4), calcium phosphate (Ca3(PO4)2), strontium sulfate (SrSO4), calcium fluoride (CaF), and silica (SiO2).

pH adjustment and chemical addition can reduce certain forms of inorganic scaling.

pH None If the pH is too high, it may increase the precipitation tendency of water for carbonate and phosphate salts.

Chemical pretreatment for pH adjustment may be required.

Sodium Excessive sodium in irrigation water as indicated by sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) (when sodium exceeds calcium by more than a 3:1 ratio) contributes to soil dispersion and structural breakdown.

None Post-treatment may be required. Add salts of divalent cations (i.e., calcium, magnesium) to improve SAR.

Chloride Excessive chloride (that is, more than 250 mg/L) can cause leaf injury in plants

None Remove chloride using ion exchange, RO or EDR.

Boron USEPA recommends maximum 0.75 mg/L boron in irrigation water as a long-term goal.

None

Silica None. Silica can limit recovery of NF and RO membranes. Despite antiscalant use, a silica concentration of 140 to 150 mg/L in RO concentrate will limit RO recovery at 50 percent.

Use lime or caustic to increase pH to retard silica scaling.



TABLE 3.8 KEY WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS IN RO CONCENTRATE

Constituent Regulatory Concern Operational Concern Mitigation/

Treatment Options

Total Organic Carbon (TOC)

None Promotes organic/microbiological fouling on membranes. Reduces efficiency of ultraviolet disinfection.

Membrane fouling can be best managed by pretreatment and flux selection.

Nitrate There is no nitrate limit for agricultural irrigation.

Nitrate-N is nutrient and supports microbial growth on nanofiltration (NF), RO, EDR systems.

Iron and Manganese

None. May oxidize or form complexes with other constituents and promote membrane fouling.

RO will reduce Fe/Mn levels to below the regulatory limits.

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)

Between 500 and 1,000 mg/L, TDS in water can affect sensitive plants (that is, citrus). At 1,000 to 2,000 mg/L, TDS can affect crops. Therefore, the acceptable TDS levels for irrigation are somewhere between 500 and 2,000 mg/L. TDS for other types of uses depends on specific requirements.

High TDS is a direct indicator of elevated levels of sparingly soluble salts that promote membrane scaling and cause a loss in productivity and deterioration in permeate quality. The sparingly soluble salts of concern include calcium carbonate (CaCO3), calcium sulfate (CaSO4), barium sulfate (BaSO4), calcium phosphate (Ca3(PO4)2), strontium sulfate (SrSO4), calcium fluoride (CaF), and silica (SiO2).

pH adjustment and chemical addition can reduce certain forms of inorganic scaling.

pH None If the pH is too high, it may increase the precipitation tendency of water for carbonate and phosphate salts.

Chemical pretreatment for pH adjustment may be required

Sodium Excessive sodium in water as indicated by sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) (when sodium exceeds calcium by more than a 3:1 ratio) contributes to soil dispersion and structural breakdown.

None Post-treatment may be required. Add salts of divalent cations (i.e., calcium, magnesium) to improve SAR.

Chloride Excessive chloride (that is, more than 250 mg/L) can cause leaf injury in plants.

None Remove chloride using ion exchange, RO or EDR.



TABLE 3.8 KEY WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS IN RO CONCENTRATE

Constituent Regulatory Concern Operational Concern Mitigation/

Treatment Options

Boron USEPA recommends maximum 0.75 mg/L boron in water as a long-term goal.

None

Silica None. Silica can limit recovery of NF and RO membranes. Despite antiscalant use, a silica concentration of 180 mg/L in RO concentrate will limit RO recovery to 35 percent.

Use lime or caustic to increase pH to retard silica scaling.

3.7 Southern California Overview

There are 119 wastewater facilities, 53 groundwater desalters, and 19 outfall systems that exist or are planned in southern California. Figure 3.35 shows the major WWTPs/WRPs, groundwater desalters, and brine conveyance facilities. Conveyance facilities include brinelines, as well as public and private outfalls. Currently, a majority of the brine-concentrate generated in the study area is disposed of using ocean outfall. The existing facilities that produce brine-concentrate include 10 WWTPs/WRPs and 22 groundwater desalters. The largest generator of brine-concentrate in the study area is the OCWD’s GWR project.

3.7.1 Brine-Concentrate Flow Summary Table 3.9 provides a summary of the brine-concentrate generation for the current (2008) and ultimate buildout conditions. As shown in Figure 3.36, the generation of brine-concentrate increases from approximately 32.3 mgd in 2008 to over 135 mgd in ultimate buildout. In 2012, there is a 15-mgd increase in brine-concentrate generation when the South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project comes online. Another significant project, the Groundwater Reliability Improvement Project, is projected to produce approximately 7.25 mgd in Los Angeles County by 2020. In addition, Calleguas’ SMP Phase 2DEF will be completed, along with a number of groundwater desalters and, in San Diego County, with the North City WRP expansion. The OCWD’s Groundwater Replenishment System is currently being designed to be expanded to 132.19 mgd and could reach 130 mgd in the ultimate condition if influent flows increase over time.

&3

&3&3

&3

&3&3

&3

&3

&3

&3&3

&3

&3

&3

&3

&3

&3

&3

&3&3

"

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*#*

#*#*

#*#*#*

#*#*

#*#*

#*

#*#*

#*#* #*

#* #*#*

#*#*#*

#* #*#*

#* #*#*#*

#*#* #* #*#* #*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*#*

#*#*

#*#*#*

#* #*

#*

#*#*#*#*

#* #*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*#*#*

#*#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*#*#*

#*

#*#*#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*#*#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

tu247

tu101

tu101tu126

tu23

tu101

tu101§̈¦405

§̈¦5tu14

§̈¦5

§̈¦210

tu134

tu134 §̈¦210

§̈¦210

tu170tu27

§̈¦10

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦10§̈¦10

§̈¦210 tu30

§̈¦10

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

tu91

tu55

tu91

§̈¦710

§̈¦605

§̈¦110

§̈¦105§̈¦105

tu101

tu1

tu1

tu23

tu27

tu118

tu33 tu126

tu23

tu126

tu101

tu101

tu118

tu1

tu2

tu1

tu42

§̈¦405

tu66

tu60

tu60

tu60

tu60

§̈¦215

§̈¦215

§̈¦10

§̈¦10

§̈¦10

§̈¦10

§̈¦15

§̈¦215

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

tu91

§̈¦215

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

tu215

tu215

tu30

tu30

tu30

tu57

tu57

tu90

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

tu1

§̈¦405

tu39tu1

tu22

tu39

tu72

tu91

tu1

tu19

tu19 §̈¦605

tu2

tu2

tu2tu2

tu39

tu39

tu138

tu55

tu73

tu133

§̈¦5

tu78

§̈¦5§̈¦805

§̈¦15

tu163

§̈¦805

tu52

§̈¦15

§̈¦8

tu94§̈¦5

tu117

§̈¦5 §̈¦805

§̈¦8 §̈¦8

tu67

tu67

tu54

tu94

tu94

tu94

tu79

tu78

tu78

tu79

tu78

tu76

tu76

tu76

tu78

tu79

tu71

tu371

tu79

tu74tu74

tu74

tu79

tu243

tu74

tu74

tu62

tu18

tu18

tu38

tu38

tu38

tu30


Los AngelesCounty Region

South OrangeCounty Region

North Orange County Region


Inland Empire Region


FIGURE 3.35 - MAJOR WASTEWATER, GROUNDWATER, AND OUTFALL FACILITIESIN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIASOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I


#* Land Discharge


#* Stream Discharge

#* Ocean Discharge

#* Other




" Proposed Seawater DesalinationPlant

Wastewater Outfalls

Wastewater Outfalls





Power Plants

Industrial/Others

Features

Highways

Rivers

Water Bodies

±0 6 12

Miles



TABLE 3.9

SUMMARY OF BRINE-CONCENTRATE GENERATED IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FOR THE EXISTING AND ULTIMATE CONDITIONS

Average Daily Brine-Concentrate Generated (mgd) Region

Groundwater Desalters WWTP Total

EXISTING (2008)

Inland Empire 7.83 0.00 7.83

Los Angeles County 1.43 5.28 6.71

North Orange County 0.49 10.68 11.17

South Orange County 1.70 0.00 1.70

San Diego County 1.40 0.81 2.21

Ventura County 2.68 0.00 2.68

Total 15.53 16.77 32.30

FUTURE (ULTIMATE BUILDOUT – POST 2035)

Inland Empire 23.46 0.14 23.60

Los Angeles County 7.42 19.65 27.07

North Orange County 3.99 23.00 26.99

South Orange County1 18.70 0.15 18.85

San Diego County 13.35 9.37 22.72

Ventura County 9.05 6.79 15.84

Total 75.97 59.10 135.07

Notes: 1Groundwater values for the South Orange County region include brine flows from the proposed South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project which will

discharge brine via SOCWA’s San Juan Creek Ocean Outfall



FIGURE 3.36 SUMMARY OF BRINE-CONCENTRATE GENERATED IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BY REGION

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

120.00

140.00

160.00

2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Build-out

Year

Aver

age

Daily

Flo

w (m

gd)

Inland Empire Los Angeles County Orange County San Diego County Ventura County



The final increase in generation of brine-concentrate is driven by the construction of the Chino Desalter III, Bunker Hills Desalter, Yucaipa Regional Water Supply Renewal Project, expansion of the Oxnard AWTP, and expansion of the Mission Valley Groundwater Desalter. Figures 3.37 and 3.38 show the locations of the brine-concentrate facilities and the relative scale of projected brine-concentrate flows for the 2010 and ultimate timeframes. As shown in Figure 3.39, a number of different agencies are currently planning to implement brine-concentrate reduction or ZLD treatment technologies. For ultimate buildout, these agencies are planning to reduce their brine-concentrate flows to the following levels: Oxnard AWTP (6.56 mgd), Santa Rosa WRP (0.005 mgd), Grass Valley Water Treatment Facility (0.08 mgd), BBARWA WWTP (0.06 mgd), Hale Avenue WRF (1.35 mgd), and San Vicente WWTP (0.02 mgd).

3.7.2 Water Supply Summary The scarcity of water supply continues because of the limited availability of imported water and the drought, which make even more important the development of reliable and locally controlled water supplies, especially in southern California where a large portion of the water supply is imported. Groundwater desalting and water reclamation are two methods of developing new reliable and locally controlled water supplies. Consequently, developing a long-term plan for brine-concentrate management within the study area is of great importance.

As shown in Figure 3.40, over 148 mgd of water supply is currently produced from the use of RO treatment processes in southern California. The amount of water supply is projected to be over 500 mgd in the future. This is over a threefold increase in water supplies produced by facilities that will generate approximately 135.5 mgd of brine-concentrate. Groundwater supplies generated from RO membrane treatment processes increase from approximately 72.8 mgd to 251.8 mgd at buildout. The South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project is projecting a 15-mgd supply and will discharge brine via the SOCWA’s San Juan Creek Ocean Outfall. The use of RO to recover water from WWTPs/WRPs results in an increase of water supply from approximately 75.4 mgd in 2008 to 249.9 mgd by buildout.

#*

#

#

*

*

#

#

#

#

#

*

*

*

*

*

#

#

#

*

*

*

#

#

#

#

#

#

###

##

###

##

#

#

##

## #

# ##

###

# ##

# ###

## # ##

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

##

##

##

###

# #

#

####

# #

#

#

#

#

##

###

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

####

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

*

*

*

*

*

*

***

**

***

**

*

*

**

** *

* **

***

* **

* ***

** * **

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

**

*

*

*

*

*

**

**

**

***

* *

*

****

* *

*

*

*

*

**

***

**

*

*

*

*

*

*

****

*

*

*

**

*

*

*

*

*

*

tu247

tu101

tu101tu126

tu23

tu101

tu101§̈¦405

§̈¦5tu14

§̈¦5

§̈¦210

tu134

tu134 §̈¦210

§̈¦210

tu170tu27

§̈¦10

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦10§̈¦10

§̈¦210 tu30

§̈¦10

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

tu91

tu55

tu91

§̈¦710

§̈¦605

§̈¦110

§̈¦105§̈¦105

tu101

tu1

tu1

tu23

tu27

tu118

tu33 tu126

tu23

tu126

tu101

tu101

tu118

tu1

tu2

tu1

tu42

§̈¦405

tu66

tu60

tu60

tu60

tu60

§̈¦215

§̈¦215

§̈¦10

§̈¦10

§̈¦10

§̈¦10

§̈¦15

§̈¦215

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

tu91

§̈¦215

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

tu215

tu215

tu30

tu30

tu30

tu57

tu57

tu90

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

tu1

§̈¦405

tu39tu1

tu22

tu39

tu72

tu91

tu1

tu19

tu19 §̈¦605

tu2

tu2

tu2tu2

tu39

tu39

tu138

tu55

tu73

tu133

§̈¦5

tu78

§̈¦5§̈¦805

§̈¦15

tu163

§̈¦805

tu52

§̈¦15

§̈¦8

tu94§̈¦5

tu117

§̈¦5 §̈¦805

§̈¦8 §̈¦8

tu67

tu67

tu54

tu94

tu94

tu94

tu79

tu78

tu78

tu79

tu78

tu76

tu76

tu76

tu78

tu79

tu71

tu371

tu79

tu74tu74

tu74

tu79

tu243

tu74

tu74

tu62

tu18

tu18

tu38

tu38

tu38

tu30















Less than 0.5 mgd


Between 1 and 3 mgd

Greater than 3 mgd






Industrial/Others

FeaturesHighways

Rivers

Water Bodies

0 10 20Miles

FIGURE 3.37 - WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCESIN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA - 2010SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I

±

#

#

#

#

#

*

*

*

*

*

##

#

##

**

*

**

#

#

#

#

*

*

*

*

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

#

#

#

#

#

###

##

###

##

#

#

##

## #

# ##

###

# ##

# ##

## # ##

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

##

##

##

###

# #

#

####

# #

#

#

#

#

#

###

##

#

#

#

#

#

####

#

#

###

#

#

#

#

*

*

*

*

*

***

**

***

**

*

*

**

** *

* **

***

* **

* **

** * **

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

**

*

*

*

**

**

**

***

* *

*

****

* *

*

*

*

*

*

***

**

*

*

*

*

*

****

*

*

***

*

*

*

*

tu247

tu101

tu101tu126

tu23

tu101

tu101§̈¦405

§̈¦5tu14

§̈¦5

§̈¦210

tu134

tu134 §̈¦210

§̈¦210

tu170tu27

§̈¦10

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦10§̈¦10

§̈¦210 tu30

§̈¦10

§̈¦405

§̈¦5

tu91

tu55

tu91

§̈¦710

§̈¦605

§̈¦110

§̈¦105§̈¦105

tu101

tu1

tu1

tu23

tu27

tu118

tu33 tu126

tu23

tu126

tu101

tu101

tu118

tu1

tu2

tu1

tu42

§̈¦405

tu66

tu60

tu60

tu60

tu60

§̈¦215

§̈¦215

§̈¦10

§̈¦10

§̈¦10

§̈¦10

§̈¦15

§̈¦215

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

tu91

§̈¦215

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

tu215

tu215

tu30

tu30

tu30

tu57

tu57

tu90

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

tu1

§̈¦405

tu39tu1

tu22

tu39

tu72

tu91

tu1

tu19

tu19 §̈¦605

tu2

tu2

tu2tu2

tu39

tu39

tu138

tu55

tu73

tu133

§̈¦5

tu78

§̈¦5§̈¦805

§̈¦15

tu163

§̈¦805

tu52

§̈¦15

§̈¦8

tu94§̈¦5

tu117

§̈¦5 §̈¦805

§̈¦8 §̈¦8

tu67

tu67

tu54

tu94

tu94

tu94

tu79

tu78

tu78

tu79

tu78

tu76

tu76

tu76

tu78

tu79

tu71

tu371

tu79

tu74tu74

tu74

tu79

tu243

tu74

tu74

tu62

tu18

tu18

tu38

tu38

tu38

tu30

Ventura RegionCounty






FIGURE 3.38 - WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER BRINE-CONCENTRATE SOURCESIN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA - ULTIMATESOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL BRINE-CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT STUDY - PHASE I

±0 10 20

Miles









Less than 0.5 mgd


Between 1 and 3 mgd

Greater than 3 mgd






Industrial/Others

FeaturesHighways

Rivers

Water Bodies



FIGURE 3.39 BRINE-CONCENTRATE FLOW SUMMARY FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

160.0

2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 ULT

Year

Flow

(MG

D)


Note: Brine generation is from wastewater treatment and groundwater desalting. These projections include the South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project. FIGURE 3.40 WATER SUPPLIES THAT RESULT IN THE GENERATION OF BRINE-CONCENTRATE IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

300.0

2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 ULT

Year

Ave

rage

Dai

ly F

low

(MG

D)


Note: Figure includes WWTP/WRPs, groundwater recharge, seawater intrusion barrier, brackish groundwater and 15 mgd from the South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project.



3.7.3 Comparison of Survey Results with Past Reclamation Studies The results of the survey were compared with the Initiative, another Reclamation effort that quantified the amount of brine-concentrate generated in southern California. The Initiative scenarios were as follows:

• Moderate Scenario – This scenario is based on a moderate expansion level of recycled water use, inclusion of desalter facilities that will be online by 2010 (that is, a moderate level of groundwater desalting), and a moderate increase in effluent discharges and flows in brine-concentrate in pipelines. In addition, the maximum recycled water contribution factor for groundwater recharge was assumed to be 100 percent where available capacity exists within a groundwater basin. The amount of brine-concentrate generated in this scenario is based upon the planned advanced treatment processes (RO, for example) that are planned to be in place by 2010.

• Maximum Scenario – This scenario is based on the projected maximum levels of water reuse, implementation of planned and proposed desalter facilities that will be online by 2040 (that is, a maximum level of groundwater desalting), and a maximum or long-term increase of effluent discharges and flows in brine-concentrate in pipelines. In addition, the maximum recycled water contribution factor for groundwater recharged is assumed to be 100 percent where available capacity exists within a groundwater basin. The amount of brine-concentrate produced in this scenario is based upon the planned advanced treatment processes (RO, for example) that are planned to be in place by 2040.

• Extreme-Case Scenario 1 – This scenario focuses on estimating the amount of brine-concentrate produced if regulation changes require all recycled water to be treated using advanced treatment processes (for example, RO) and the planned and proposed 2010 groundwater desalter facilities are implemented. Moderate levels of projected reuse and groundwater desalting are assumed for this scenario. Analysis of this scenario provides an opportunity to illustrate how recycled water regulation changes could affect the amount of brine-concentrate produced in the 2010 timeframe.

• Extreme-Case Scenario 2 – This scenario focuses on estimating the amount of brine-concentrate produced if regulation changes require all recycled water to be treated using advanced treatment processes (such as RO) and all planned and proposed 2040 groundwater desalter facilities are implemented (that is, maximum level of reuse and groundwater desalting). Analysis of this scenario provides an opportunity to illustrate how recycled water regulation changes could affect the amount of brine-concentrate produced in the 2040 timeframe.



• Extreme-Case Scenario 3 – This scenario focuses on estimating the amount of brine-concentrate produced if regulation changes are aggressive and require the implementation of advanced treatment processes (such as RO) on all inland discharges and on other water reuse facilities. Maximum levels of projected reuse and WWTP capacities are assumed for this scenario, as well as all planned and proposed groundwater desalter facilities for 2040 (that is, maximum level of groundwater desalting). This scenario illustrates how regulation changes for inland discharges could affect the amount of brine-concentrate produced in the 2040 timeframe.

• Extreme-Case Scenario 4 – This scenario focuses on estimating the amount of brine-concentrate produced if regulation changes are aggressive, requiring the implementation of advanced treatment processes (such as RO) on all wastewater dischargers and water reuse facilities. Maximum levels (2040) of projected reuse and WWTP capacities are assumed for this scenario. Under this scenario, advanced treatment for all WWTP flows are assumed, as well as implementation of planned and proposed 2040 groundwater desalter facilities (that is, a maximum level of groundwater desalting). Analysis of this scenario will be limited due to the uncertainties in the projections; however, the projections for this condition are intended to illustrate the wide range or variability of projections for brine-concentrate production in southern California.

A synopsis of these scenarios can be seen in Figure 3.41. These scenarios encompass the full range of possible regulatory actions that could occur.



FIGURE 3.41 SCENARIO DEFINITIONS

Scenario Name Description

Conditions Included in Scenario that Produce Brine/Concentrate:

Existing/ Planned

Advanced Treatment at Water

Recycling Plant

Moderate Level

(Year 2010) Groundwater

Recharge with TDS

Exceedance of BPO

Maximum Level

(Year 2040) Groundwater

Recharge with TDS

Exceedance of BPO

Moderate (Year 2010)

Water Recycling

Maximum (Year 2040)

Water Recycling

All Inland Wastewater Dischargers

All Wastewater Dischargers

Groundwater Desalting Facilities Online by Year 2010

Groundwater Desalting Facilities Online by Year 2040

Moderate Advanced treatment implemented to meet BPOs in Year 2010

√ √ √ Maximum Advanced treatment

implemented to meet BPOs in Year 2040

√ √ √ Extreme 1 Advanced treatment

implemented on all recycled water produced in Year 2010

√ √ √

Extreme 2 Advanced treatment implemented on all recycled water produced in Year 2040

√ √ √

Extreme 3 Advanced treatment implemented on all inland wastewater discharges and water recycled in Year 2040

√ √ √ √

Extreme 4 Advanced treatment implemented on all wastewater flows in Year 2040

√ √ √



The survey data of the Initiative and this study were consistent in projecting a fairly consistent amount of brine-concentrate. As seen in Figure 3.42, the study survey data are consistent with the Initiative’s moderate scenario (that is, the study area total data cross the moderate scenario data at 2010). In addition, the survey data are consistent with the Initiative’s maximum scenario. As Figure 3.42 shows, the study area total data have a higher value than the Initiative’s maximum scenario at buildout, which would be approximately equivalent to 2040. The difference between the two values is approximately 26 mgd. The correlation of these data demonstrates that the projections in the Initiative are still valid for the extreme-case scenarios. Changes in the regulations can drastically increase not only the need for RO processes but also the generation of brine-concentrate. If these RO processes are implemented, existing brine-concentrate management measures will not be adequate to manage the amount of brine-concentrate generated, and additional volume reduction, treatment, or disposal mechanisms for brine-concentrate will be needed. FIGURE 3.42 BRINE-CONCENTRATE FLOW SUMMARY AND SCENARIOS FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

Brine-Concentrate Flow Summary and Scenarios - Study Area Total

0

50

100150

200

250

300

350400

450

500

2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 ULT

Year

Flow

(MG

D)

Study Area Total Moderate Scenario Maximum ScenarioExtreme Case 1 / 2 Extreme Case 3 Extreme Case 4


4 Lessons Learned and Challenges for Brine-Concentrate Projects

4.1 Introduction

This section of the report is focused on providing lessons learned and challenges that have faced projects that currently are being or have been studied or constructed. Three case studies are provided, they are:

• Calleguas MWD Salinity Management Program • South Bay Ocean Outfall Study • Laguna County DWI Project

In addition to the information provided in this report, these and other case studies and project implementation information are contained with the Institutional Issues Report, Regulatory Issues and Trends Report, and the Brine-Concentrate Treatment and Disposal Options Report, all of which were also developed as part of this study.

4.2 Calleguas MWD Salinity Management Program

4.2.1 Project Description The Calleguas Regional Salinity Management Program (SMP) consists of a pipeline that collects brine-concentrate from municipal wastewater treatment plants, industrial dischargers, and groundwater desalting facilities in the Ventura County region. The SMP will extend from the city of Simi Valley in the east to Port Hueneme in the west, through the cities of Moorpark, Camarillo, Oxnard, and areas of unincorporated Ventura County. The SMP will be constructed incrementally in phases and will ultimately connect to the proposed Hueneme Outfall shown in Figure 4.1. The first phase of the SMP has been completed, with the last phase planned for completion in 2019. A list of the SMP phases and scheduled construction completion dates are provided in Table 4.1. Pipeline sizes range from 18 to 48 inches and have capacities ranging from 8 to 20 mgd. Implementation of the SMP is being coordinated under the Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan (CCWMP), whose Board includes representatives from cities, water agencies, agricultural interests, natural resource agencies, and environmental organizations.



FIGURE 4.1 CALLEGUAS REGIONAL SALINITY PIPELINE

Source: Calleguas Regional Salinity Management Project, Channel Counties Water Utilities Association, 2008.

TABLE 4.1 PHASED SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OF THE SALINITY MANAGEMENT PROJECT

SMP Phase Anticipated Year of Completion

SMP Phase 1A 2004

SMP Phase 1B 2009

SMP Phase 1C 2008

SMP Phase 1D 2009

SMP Phase 1E Construction to begin in 2009

SMP Phase 2A Construction to begin in 2013

SMP Phase 2B Construction to begin in 2014

SMP Phase 2C Construction to begin in 2015

SMP Phases 2DEF Construction to begin in 2016

SMP Phases 3ABC Construction to begin in 2019



4.2.2 Brine Management The purpose of the SMP is twofold—to remove salt that is building up in the watershed and to improve the reliability of water supplies by developing local groundwater sources in Ventura County. The Calleguas Creek Watershed is experiencing increasing salinity levels in its groundwater due to ongoing point and nonpoint source pollution from urbanization and agriculture. This creates problems for water recycling, agriculture, and habitat. To use the groundwater for potable purposes, it must first be blended with imported water to reduce TDS concentrations and comply with drinking water quality requirements.

In addition to water quality issues, there are also water supply issues. Ventura County is largely dependent on imported water sources from the State Water Project (SWP). Local groundwater sources are not readily usable because of quality concerns regarding TDS and other salts. These salts can be removed through the use of RO membranes; however, these membranes produce a brine-concentrate that must then be managed and disposed. By providing a discharge mechanism, the SMP will enable local brackish groundwater resources to be desalinated and utilized for potable purposes, reducing dependence on imported water and improving local water supply reliability.

4.2.3 Implementation Issues Originally, the SMP project investigated using an existing outfall in the Oxnard area; however, there were two key constraints that limited their use. One constraint was the limit on copper that could be discharged through an existing industrial outfall such as the Ormond Beach effluent pipeline, which is owned and operated by Reliant Energy, LLC. The power plant outfall does not provide adequate dilution for copper and would require additional treatment due to the configuration of the outfall (the outfall is too shallow and short for adequate dilution to occur). Another option was to discharge through the existing Oxnard ocean outfall; however, this outfall did not have available capacity. In addition, using either of the existing outfalls would require re-permitting the outfall to comply with the Ocean Plan water quality standards and with updated NPDES requirements. Consequently, the SMP included construction of a new ocean outfall.

A key issue of concern associated with obtaining an NPDES permit is the capability to provide an adequate visual mixing zone for the brine-concentrate to protect the marine habitat. At existing refinery and power plant outfalls, updating the NPDES permit might be difficult if the existing outfall does not provide adequate mixing and if existing water quality limits preclude the discharge of non-ocean sources of water. Limits on metals are of particular concern because NPDES limits are often below drinking water quality reflecting their bases on the Ocean Plan. For example, the Calleguas MWD SMP new ocean outfall requires a dilution ratio of 72 to 1 based on RWQCB requirements. This ratio is more than sufficient for compliance with the Ocean Plan objectives. To obtain that limit, the Calleguas MWD had to demonstrate by modeling the impact of the ocean outfall configuration on the marine environment.



Qualifications for obtaining a permit to discharge brine-concentrate via an ocean outfall are slightly more stringent than typical NPDES permits for WWTPs. The RWQCB will issue a temporary permit for discharge during design and construction of the treatment facility based on an Environmental Impact Report being in place, acceptable quality and quantity of brine-concentrate, and an approved outfall design. However, the permanent discharge permit will not be issued until the full-scale facility has passed rigorous brine-concentrate quality tests to determine constituent concentrations. For the SMP, the permit application process required the following:

• Outfall diffuser modeling • Water quality modeling • Sampling of anticipated flows

In addition, the quality of the brine-concentrate had to pass a bioassay test prior to issuance of the ocean discharge permit. Instances have occurred when a permanent permit was not issued for an ocean outfall based on results from the bioassay tests on the brine-concentrate.

4.3 South Bay Ocean Outfall Study

4.3.1 Project Description The SDCWA, in association with the City of San Diego, Otay Water District, and the Sweetwater Authority, evaluated the feasibility of establishing an environmentally sound and cost-effective method to manage the disposal of brine-concentrate flows generated in San Diego County. The study focused on southern San Diego County, including the cities of San Diego, National City, Chula Vista, and Imperial Beach. The study also investigated using the South Bay ocean outfall regional brineline to serve the eastern San Diego area cities of El Cajon, La Mesa, and Santee. The concentrate flows would be discharged to the ocean via the existing SBOO. The San Diego County Regional Brineline System would consist of the Mission Valley desalination brineline, the City of San Diego brineline, and the Otay Mesa brineline, as shown in Figure 4.2. The Regional Brineline would collect brine-concentrate flows from wastewater treatment plants, groundwater desalters, and industrial dischargers in southern San Diego County. Potential users include facilities that, either currently or in the future, will produce highly saline flows that do not require municipal wastewater treatment, or previously treated flows that do not require additional treatment, prior to ocean discharge. Potential municipal users include groundwater desalination facilities, water treatment plants, and wastewater treatment and recycling facilities. Potential industrial/institutional users include the United States Navy, energy plants, and correctional facilities.



FIGURE 4.2 SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL BRINELINE

Source: San Diego Regional Concentrate Conveyance System Feasibility Study, San Diego County Water Authority, 2008.



The maximum brine-concentrate flow identified from the potential users is 10.7 mgd. Construction is scheduled to begin in 2012. The City of San Diego brineline is anticipated to convey an average daily flow of 0.12 mgd by 2012. The Mission Valley desalter brineline is anticipated to convey an average daily flow of 1.60 mgd by 2012. The Otay Mesa brineline is anticipated to convey an average daily flow of 0.44 and 1.10 mgd by 2012 and 2020, respectively. The San Diego County regional brineline is anticipated to convey an average daily flow of 6.04 and 9.30 mgd by 2012 and 2025. The maximum capacity of the South Bay ocean outfall is 258 mgd (by gravity) and 333 mgd (pumped), with a current average daily flow of 28 mgd (25 mgd from IBWC and 3 mgd from SBWRP).

4.3.2 Brine Management The purpose of this project is to implement a regional concentrate conveyance facility that would facilitate the development of new, local, reliable water supplies in San Diego County through desalination of brackish groundwater and recycling of wastewater. The proposed conveyance system would reduce salt loadings to the San Diego region by the following means:

• Using existing wastewater treatment and water recycling facilities

• Producing backwash water or other waste streams by potable water treatment plants

• Discharging high-salinity, nonsanitary flows, by industrial operations such as correctional facilities, academic campuses, or hospitals

In 2007, the SDCWA relied on local supplies for 24 percent of its water supply and on imported water from MWDSC for the remaining 76 percent. The 2020 goal for SDCWA is to reduce reliance on imported water from MWDSC to 29 percent of its water supply. To reduce reliance on imported water, SDCWA needs to further develop local groundwater supplies and manage brine-concentrate. Implementation of a regional brineline would facilitate the development of local brackish groundwater supplies in San Diego County and enable SDCWA to export salts from the area.

A regional concentrate conveyance system would require a means of discharging brine-concentrate to the ocean. Consequently, the use of the SBOO for discharge of brine-concentrate is critical to the success of the proposed San Diego Regional Brineline System. The owners of the SBOO, the City of San Diego, and the International Boundary Water Commission support the concept of using the SBOO for brine-concentrate management. The SBOO has sufficient capacity to accommodate projected flows, which are estimated to range between 5 mgd and 15 mgd. The design capacity of the SBOO is 333 mgd under pumped conditions and 258 mgd under gravity-flow conditions.



4.3.3 Implementation Issues Constraints associated with this project primarily involve institutional and organizational issues. For this project to move forward, a number of agencies in the South Bay would need to pool financial resources. To accomplish this, a new organization structure or agreement would have to be developed among these agencies. Possible organizational structures include multiple owners, joint power authority, single owner with contracts, and single owner special district. The institutional structure selected will depend on several issues, including financial viability, circumstances at the time and on how many partners are involved.

Another constraint is the quality of the groundwater sources. Development of the local groundwater sources will involve reclaiming low-quality source water, which would require advanced treatment technologies and would result in higher generation of brine-concentrate.

4.4 Laguna County Deep Well Injection Project

4.4.1 Project Description The Laguna County Sanitation District currently disposes of brine-concentrate via deep well injection. The injection well is an abandoned oil well owned by Greka Oil & Gas, Inc. and operated by Union Sugar (Well No. 13). The well is located in the Santa Maria Valley Oil Field, northeast of Highway 1 in Santa Barbara County, as shown in Figure 4.3.

Brine-concentrate is generated during reverse osmosis treatment of wastewater at the Laguna County Sanitation District WRP. The WRP is located at the western end of Dutard Road near Black Road on a 20-acre parcel (No. 113-240-005) in Santa Maria, California. The average daily flow through the WRP is approximately 2.4 mgd. The treatment facility serves the unincorporated areas of Santa Maria, portions of the city of Santa Maria, and the unincorporated community of Orcutt. The plant processes include screening and grit removal, primary clarification, trickling filters, secondary clarification, membrane filtration (including RO for a portion of the flow) and ultraviolet irradiation. Reverse osmosis brine-concentrate is disposed of into a Class I nonhazardous injection well. The plant is regulated by the RWQCB – Central Coast Region under WDRs and Master Reclamation Permit Order 01-042 adopted May 22, 2001. The injection well is regulated by USEPA permit number CA/000001.



FIGURE 4.3 LAGUNA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DEEP WELL INJECTION SITE

4.4.2 Brine Management The use of injection well technology from the LCSD WRP has been a successful means of RO brine-concentrate management and disposal. Deep well injection to dispose of liquid wastes is an environmentally and technically sound waste disposal method. Deep well injection of liquids began in the petroleum industry to dispose of oilfield wastes and to enhance oil production. Disposal of salt water by injection has been in practice since the 1930s. Today, injection wells are known to exist in almost every state, and a wide range of industries use deep well disposal including food processing, pharmaceutical, paper, mining, automotive, chemical, and petrochemical industries. In some areas, municipalities used deep well injection for wastewater effluent disposal. In California, a significant number of Class II injection wells are used by the oil and gas industry.



The suitability of this technology for a specific application depends on the presence of geologic formations that have the natural capability to store and confine the wastes. The capability of geologic formations to confine liquid is demonstrated in some areas by the presence of oil and gas, often at high pressures. Accumulation of these reserves requires sufficient confinement to prevent them from moving to the surface for millions of years.

For a DWI disposal system to be feasible, geologic formations must have permeability and thickness sufficient for wells to accept the volume of fluid at a rate of disposal and pressure that do not compromise overlying confinement. At least one confining layer is required to minimize the potential for the injected fluids to migrate into the USDW. Water quality in the injection zone must generally include TDS concentrations of over 10,000 mg/L to comply with permitting requirements for Class I nonhazardous injection.

4.4.3 Implementation Issues Although the LCSD DWI site has been implemented, several issues are associated with implementation of DWI for brine-concentrate disposal in general. USEPA requires that Class I nonhazardous waste injection wells be located in geologically stable areas that are free of transmissive fractures or faults through which injected fluids could travel to drinking water sources. Numerous faults traverse southern California, but the continuity and conveyance capacity these faults are not always known. The well operator must verify that there are no wells or other artificial pathways between the injection zone and USDWs through which fluids can travel. The site-specific geologic properties of the subsurface around the well offer another safeguard against the movement of injected wastewaters to a USDW.

Southern California has been extensively penetrated by oil, gas, and injection wells over the last 60 years, with much of the drilling completed in the 1950s. A number of these wells have been plugged and abandoned since they were drilled. There are limited data available on the exact methods and materials used to plug and abandon some of these wells. A detailed review/study is required to evaluate how each of these previously abandoned wells was abandoned or plugged. Depending on the methods used to abandon the wells, remedial plugging might be required to comply with requirements of USEPA. This could require reentering, drilling out existing surface plugs, and replugging at a significant cost.

Another issue facing the use of DWI is that fluids could be forced upward from the injection zone through transmissive faults or fractures in the confining beds, which, like abandoned wells, can act as pathways for waste migration to USDWs. Faults or fractures could have formed naturally prior to injection in the confining zone. Artificial fractures could also be created by injecting wastewater at excessive pressures. To reduce this risk, injection wells would need to be located such that they inject below a confining bed that is free of known transmissive faults or fractures. During well processes, the operators must monitor injection pressures to ensure that fractures are not propagated in the injection zone or initiated in the confining zone.



The brine-concentrate and receiving formation need to be compatible to avoid geochemical reactions in the subsurface. Although quality testing will be completed before injection to minimize incompatibilities, excessive plugging of the formation caused by unforeseen geochemical interactions between the injectate and formation materials or formation fluids could occur.

Survey_Report.doc

Attachment A Sample Survey

Survey_Report.doc

Attachment A.1 – Wastewater Treatment Plant Permit and Water Quality Information

Facility InformationDischarge/Reuse Flows (Put in % Discharged/Reused

Based on Avg. Flow)

Region Treatment Facility Name Operating Agency Address/Location

Year Originally Constructed or

Planned Dom

estic

Indu

stria

l

GW

Des

alte

rs/

Envi

ron.

Cle

anup

s

Oth

er

Tota

l(M

ust t

otal

100

%)

Stre

am

Oce

an

Brin

elin

e

Perc

olat

ion

Dow

nstr

eam

WW

TP

Reu

se(G

W, I

rrig

atio

n, e

tc)

Oth

er (S

peci

fy)

Los Angeles Alamitos Barrier ATP Los Angeles CSD 0% Direct Injection to Seawater Barrier 100%

Los Angeles Burbank WRP City of Burbank 0% Los Angeles River % %

Los Angeles West Basin - Carson Regional WRP West Basin MWD 0% Joint WPCP % % % Sewer

Los Angeles Donald C. Tillman WRP City of LA-Bureau of San 0% Los Angeles River % %

Los Angeles Hyperion WWTP City of LA-Bureau of San 0% Ocean % Outfall

Los Angeles Lancaster WRP Los Angeles CSD 0% Land Discharge %

Los Angeles Joint WPCP Los Angeles CSD 0% Ocean % Outfall

Los Angeles La Canada WRP Los Angeles CSD 0% Golf Course Irrigation 100%

Los Angeles Long Beach WRP Los Angeles CSD 0% Alamitos Barrier ATP, Ocean % %

Los Angeles Los Angeles/Glendale WRP City of LA-Bureau of San 0% 786 Los Angeles River % %

Los Angeles Los Coyotes WRP Los Angeles CSD 0% San Gabriel River % %

Los Angeles Malibu Mesa WTF Los Angeles County Department of Public Works

Los Angeles Palmdale WRP Los Angeles CSD 0% Land Discharge

Los Angeles Pomona WRP Los Angeles CSD 0% San Jose Creek % %

Los Angeles San Jose Creek WRP Los Angeles CSD 0% San Gabriel River % % %

Los Angeles Saugus WRP Los Angeles CSD 0% Santa Clara River % %

Los Angeles Terminal Island WWTP City of LA-Bureau of San 0% Ocean % % Outfall

Los Angeles Valencia WRP Los Angeles CSD 0% Santa Clara River % %

Los Angeles West Basin WRP - Barrier Treat West Basin MWD 0% Direct Injection to Seawater Barrier %

Los Angeles West Basin WRP - Chevron RO (Boilerfeed Water) West Basin MWD 0% Only RO Concentrate to Hyperion

Outfall %

Los Angeles West Basin WRP-Edward C. Little WRF West Basin MWD 0% Hyperion Outfall %

Los Angeles West Basin WRP - Cheveron Nitrification Plant West Basin MWD

Los Angeles West Basin WRP - Exxon Mobil Nitrification/Boilerfeed West Basin MWD

Los Angeles Whittier Narrows WRP Los Angeles CSD 0% Rio Hondo %

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

ADD ADDITIONAL FACILITIES

Wastewater Treatment PlantPermit and Quality Information

Nearest Brine Disposal

(Whether connectedor usedor not)

Sewage Source Information(Put in % of Avg.

Daily Flow)

Avg

. Inf

luen

t TD

S (m

g/l)

Comments Discharge Location(List All)

Discharge Information

\\CHERON\Projects\USBR\381333BrineStudy\T3_Brine_MGMT\T3-1_Survey\Regional Meetings 1\Los Angeles\Spreadsheets_to_Agencies\Survey-WWTPs.xlsSurvey - WWTPs-Wat Qual Page 1 of 4

Facility Information

Region Treatment Facility Name

Los Angeles Alamitos Barrier ATP

Los Angeles Burbank WRP

Los Angeles West Basin - Carson Regional WRP

Los Angeles Donald C. Tillman WRP

Los Angeles Hyperion WWTP

Los Angeles Lancaster WRP

Los Angeles Joint WPCP

Los Angeles La Canada WRP

Los Angeles Long Beach WRP

Los Angeles Los Angeles/Glendale WRP

Los Angeles Los Coyotes WRP

Los Angeles Malibu Mesa WTF

Los Angeles Palmdale WRP

Los Angeles Pomona WRP

Los Angeles San Jose Creek WRP

Los Angeles Saugus WRP

Los Angeles Terminal Island WWTP

Los Angeles Valencia WRP

Los Angeles West Basin WRP - Barrier Treat

Los Angeles West Basin WRP - Chevron RO (Boilerfeed Water)

Los Angeles West Basin WRP-Edward C. Little WRF

Los Angeles West Basin WRP - Cheveron Nitrification Plant

Los Angeles West Basin WRP - Exxon Mobil Nitrification/Boilerfeed

Los Angeles Whittier Narrows WRP

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

ADD ADDITIONAL FACILITI


Permit No.TDS Limit (mg/l)

Hardness Limit(mg/l)

BOD Limit(mg/l)

TSS Limit(mg/l)

Ammonia-Nitrogen

Limit(mg/l)

pH

ResidualChlorine

Requirement(mg/l)

TMDL Permit Limits

(explain)

Note any exceptions, multiple limit

requirements, etc.

Comments(Note any other

discharge limits such as toxicity, heavy

metals, etc.)

PermitNo.

Type of Reuse

Permitted

TDS Limit (mg/l)

Comments(Note any other potential reuse limits, especially

those that could cause the need for Advanced (RO) treatment in the future)

950

N/A

950

N/A

750

750

1000

1000

750

Reuse Permit Information(Please attach permit)

NPDES or State Discharge Permit Information(Please attach permit)




























Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles



TDS (mg/l)

Hardness Limit(mg/l)

BOD Limit(mg/l)

TSS Limit(mg/l)

Ammonia-Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total Nitrogen

(mg/l)pH

Residual Chlorine

Concentration (mg/l)

Source of Data(List All)

Note any other water quality parameters that

may be pertinent to discharge limits or could

result in the need for Advanced Treatment (RO)

Comments(Note any concerns

regarding compounds of emerging concern (CECs)

(including EDCs, disinfection byproducts, PhACs, etc.) and provide

any recent data)

Clo

th M

edia

Dua

l Med

ia -

Sand

Fi

ltrat

ion

Fuzz

y Fi

lter

Dyn

asan

d

Mem

bran

e Fi

ltrat

ion

(MF

or U

F)

Comments(Note any variations, different technology utilized, or planned

changes in future and year) Fr

ee C

hlor

ine

Chl

oram

ine

Free

C

hlor

ine/

Chl

oram

ine

Com

bina

tion

UV

Ozo

natio

n

Comments(Note chemical and

dosage used. Also, note any variations, different technology utilized, or

planned changes in future and year.)

60

550

150

505

644

548

1390

603

660

848

520

535

569

661

2820

794

644

644

644

524

Disinfection Process Type (Place X)Current Effluent Quality (Average Values) Tertiary Treatment Process Type (Place X)




























Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles



TDS(mg/l)

TOC(mg/l)

Ammonia-Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total Nitrogen

(mg/l)pH Temp.

(°C)Silica(mg/l)

Calcium(mg/l)

Bromide(mg/l)

Barium(mg/l)

Strontium(mg/l)

Sulfate(mg/l)

Carbonate(mg/l)

Phosphate(mg/l)

Arsenic(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Perchlorate(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Trace Organcis

(list)Notes

Note disposal method used, technology, energy usage,

provide unit cost info (cost to build, cost to operate, energy

costs, etc.) and planned year of technology change or addition.

Brine-Concentrate Technologies Brine-Concentrate Water Quality Information (Please provide water quality report of RO permeate and source water quality if available)


Survey_Report.doc

Attachment A.2 – Wastewater Treatment Plant Flow Information

Facility Information Current (as of end of 2008)

Treatment Capacity (MGD) Average Daily Flow (MGD) Maximum Daily Flow (MGD) Recycled Water Usage (AFY)

Region Treatment Facility Name Operating Agency

Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

GW

Rec

harg

e(N

on-R

O)

GW

Rec

harg

e(R

O)

Res

ervo

ir A

ugm

enta

tion

(RO

)

Seaw

ater

Intr

usio

n B

arrie

r (N

on-R

O)

Seaw

ater

Intr

usio

n B

arrie

r (R

O)

Indu

stria

l (N

on-R

O)

Indu

stria

l (R

O)

Land

scap

e Irr

igat

ion

Agr

icul

ture

Irrig

atio

n

Envi

ronm

enta

l/H

abita

t Use

s

Con

stru

ctio

n/ D

ust

Con

trol

Mis

cella

neou

s/O

ther

(Spe

cify

in C

omm

ent)

Tota

l

Los Angeles Alamitos Barrier ATP Los Angeles CSD - - - - - -

Los Angeles Burbank WRP City of Burbank 9.0 9.0 9.0 - - -

Los Angeles West Basin - Carson Regional WRP West Basin MWD - - - 5.9 - -

Los Angeles Donald C. Tillman WRP City of LA-Bureau of San 60.0 60.0 60.0 - - -

Los Angeles Hyperion WWTP City of LA-Bureau of San 450.0 450.0 - - - -

Los Angeles Lancaster WRP Los Angeles CSD 10.0 10.0 - - - -

Los Angeles Joint WPCP Los Angeles CSD 385.0 200.0 - - - -

Los Angeles La Canada WRP Los Angeles CSD 0.2 0.2 0.2 - - 0.1 0.1 0.1 - - 107.0 107

Los Angeles Long Beach WRP Los Angeles CSD 25.0 25.0 25.0 - - 13.9 13.9 13.9 - - -

Los Angeles Los Angeles/Glendale WRP City of LA-Bureau of San 20.0 20.0 20.0 - - -

Los Angeles Los Coyotes WRP Los Angeles CSD 37.5 37.5 37.5 - - 22.6 22.6 22.6 - - -

Los Angeles Malibu Mesa WTF Los Angeles County Department of Public Works

Los Angeles Palmdale WRP Los Angeles CSD 8.0 8.0 - - - -

Los Angeles Pomona WRP Los Angeles CSD 15.0 15.0 13.0 - - 9.9 9.9 9.9 - - -

Los Angeles San Jose Creek WRP Los Angeles CSD 100.0 100.0 100.0 - - 78.5 78.5 78.5 - - -

Los Angeles Saugus WRP Los Angeles CSD 6.5 6.5 6.5 - - -

Los Angeles Terminal Island WWTP City of LA-Bureau of San 13.8 13.8 13.8 5.0 - -

Los Angeles Valencia WRP Los Angeles CSD 13.5 13.5 13.5 - - -

Los Angeles West Basin WRP - Barrier Treat West Basin MWD - - - 7.5 - -

Los Angeles West Basin WRP - Chevron RO (Boilerfeed Water) West Basin MWD - - 4.3 4.3 - -

Los Angeles West Basin WRP-Edward C. Little WRF West Basin MWD - - 30.0 - - -

Los Angeles West Basin WRP - Cheveron Nitrification Plant West Basin MWD

Los Angeles West Basin WRP - Exxon Mobil Nitrification/Boilerfeed West Basin MWD

Los Angeles Whittier Narrows WRP Los Angeles CSD 15.0 15.0 15.0 - - 8.3 8.3 8.3 - - -

Los Angeles -

Los Angeles -

Los Angeles -



\\CHERON\Projects\USBR\381333BrineStudy\T3_Brine_MGMT\T3-1_Survey\Regional Meetings 1\Los Angeles\Spreadsheets_to_Agencies\Survey-WWTPs.xlsSurvey - WWTPs-Flows Page 1 of 7



























Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles


ADD ADDITIONAL FACIL

Planning Year 2010


Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

GW

Rec

harg

e(N

on-R

O)

GW

Rec

harg

e(R

O)

Res

ervo

ir A

ugm

enta

tion

(RO

)

Seaw

ater

Intr

usio

n B

arrie

r (N

on-R

O)

Seaw

ater

Intr

usio

n B

arrie

r (R

O)

Indu

stria

l (N

on-R

O)

Indu

stria

l (R

O)

Land

scap

e Irr

igat

ion

Agr

icul

ture

Irrig

atio

n

Envi

ronm

enta

l/H

abita

t Use

s

Con

stru

ctio

n/ D

ust

Con

trol

Mis

cella

neou

s/O

ther

(Spe

cify

in

Com

men

t)

Tota

l

- - - 4.0 3,900 3,900 - - - - - 7,800

9.0 9.0 9.0 - 1,314 1,871 - - - 3,185

- - - 5.9 9,450 1,418 - - 600 11,468

60.0 60.0 60.0 - - 10,000 - - - 10,000

450.0 450.0 - - - - - - - -

21.0 21.0 21.0 - 1,852 15,109 6,560 23,521

385.0 385.0 - - - - - - - -

-

25.0 25.0 25.0 - 7,184 5,604 - - - 12,787

20.0 20.0 20.0 - 1,608 9,695 - 10 - 11,313

50.0 50.0 50.0 - 1,123 6,357 - - - 7,480

15.0 15.0 - - 9,935 9,935

15.0 15.0 13.0 - 2,000 4,181 5,903 - 75 - 12,159

125.0 125.0 125.0 - 59,000 6,996 14,625 - - 2,705 83,325

6.5 6.5 6.5 - - - - - - -

13.8 13.8 13.8 5.0 4,000 4,000 3,478 2,881 - - - 14,359

27.6 27.6 27.6 - - - - - - -

- - - 7.5 16,800 16,800 - - - - - 33,600

- - 5.4 5.4 4,816 - - - - 4,816

- - 50.0 - 11,918 12,641 - - - 24,559

15.0 15.0 15.0 - 8,000 - 50 - - - 8,050

-

-

-




























Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles



Planning Year 2015


Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

GW

Rec

harg

e(N

on-R

O)

GW

Rec

harg

e(R

O)

Res

ervo

ir A

ugm

enta

tion

(RO

)

Seaw

ater

Intr

usio

n B

arrie

r (N

on-R

O)

Seaw

ater

Intr

usio

n B

arrie

r (R

O)

Indu

stria

l (N

on-R

O)

Indu

stria

l (R

O)

Land

scap

e Irr

igat

ion

Agr

icul

ture

Irrig

atio

n

Envi

ronm

enta

l/\H

abita

t Use

s

Con

stru

ctio

n/ D

ust

Con

trol

Mis

cella

neou

s/O

ther

(Spe

cify

in C

omm

ent)

Tota

l

- - - - 3,900 3,900

9.0 9.0 9.0 - -

- - - 5.9 -

80.0 80.0 80.0 - -

450.0 450.0 - - -

10.0 10.0 - - -

385.0 200.0 - - -

-

25.0 25.0 25.0 - -

20.0 20.0 20.0 - -

37.5 37.5 37.5 - -

8.0 8.0 - - -

13.0 13.0 13.0 - -

100.0 100.0 100.0 - -

6.5 6.5 6.5 - -

30.0 30.0 30.0 5.0 4,000 4,000

13.5 13.5 13.5 - -

- - 7.5 7.5 16,800 16,800

- - - - -

- - 30.0 - -

15.0 15.0 15.0 - -

-

-

-




























Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles



Planning Year 2020


Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

GW

Rec

harg

e(N

on-R

O)

GW

Rec

harg

e(R

O)

Res

ervo

ir A

ugm

enta

tion

(RO

)

Seaw

ater

Intr

usio

n B

arrie

r (N

on-R

O)

Seaw

ater

Intr

usio

n B

arrie

r (R

O)

Indu

stria

l (N

on-R

O)

Indu

stria

l (R

O)

Land

scap

e Irr

igat

ion

Agr

icul

ture

Irrig

atio

n

Envi

ronm

enta

l/H

abita

t Use

s

Con

stru

ctio

n/ D

ust

Con

trol

Mis

cella

neou

s/O

ther

(Spe

cify

in C

omm

ent)

Tota

l

3,900 3,900

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

25.0 25.0 25.0 - -

-

-

-

-

-

-

4,000 4,000

-

16,800 16,800

-

-

15.0 15.0 15.0 - -

-

-

-




























Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles



Planning Year 2025

Treatment Capacity (MGD) Average Daily Flow (MGD)

Maximum Daily Flow (MGD) Recycled Water Usage (AFY)

Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

GW

Rec

harg

e(N

on-R

O)

GW

Rec

harg

e(R

O)

Res

ervo

ir A

ugm

enta

tion

(RO

)

Seaw

ater

Intr

usio

n B

arrie

r (N

on-R

O)

Seaw

ater

Intr

usio

n B

arrie

r (R

O)

Indu

stria

l (N

on-R

O)

Indu

stria

l (R

O)

Land

scap

e Irr

igat

ion

Agr

icul

ture

Irrig

atio

n

Envi

ronm

enta

l/H

abita

t Use

s

Con

stru

ctio

n/ D

ust

Con

trol

Mis

cella

neou

s/O

ther

(Spe

cify

in C

omm

ent)

Tota

l

3,900 3,900

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

25.0 25.0 25.0 - -

-

-

-

-

-

-

4,000 4,000

-

16,800 16,800

-

-

15.0 15.0 15.0 - -

-

-

-




























Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles



Planning Year 2030


Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

GW

Rec

harg

e(N

on-R

O)

GW

Rec

harg

e(R

O)

Res

ervo

ir A

ugm

enta

tion

(RO

)

Seaw

ater

Intr

usio

n B

arrie

r (N

on-R

O)

Seaw

ater

Intr

usio

n B

arrie

r (R

O)

Indu

stria

l (N

on-R

O)

Indu

stria

l (R

O)

Land

scap

e Irr

igat

ion

Agr

icul

ture

Irrig

atio

n

Envi

ronm

enta

l/H

abita

t Use

s

Con

stru

ctio

n/ D

ust

Con

trol

Mis

cella

neou

s/O

ther

(Spe

cify

in C

omm

ent)

Tota

l

3,900 3,900

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

25.0 25.0 25.0 - -

-

-

-

-

-

-

4,000 4,000

-

16,800 16,800

-

-

15.0 15.0 15.0 - -

-

-

-




























Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles



Planning Year 2035 Ultimate Build-out

Treatment Capacity (MGD) Average Daily Flow (MGD)

Maximum Daily Flow (MGD) Recycled Water Usage (AFY) Treatment Capacity (MGD)

Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

GW

Rec

harg

e(N

on-R

O)

GW

Rec

harg

e(R

O)

Res

ervo

ir A

ugm

enta

tion

(RO

)

Seaw

ater

Intr

usio

n B

arrie

r (N

on-R

O)

Seaw

ater

Intr

usio

n B

arrie

r (R

O)

Indu

stria

l (N

on-R

O)

Indu

stria

l (R

O)

Land

scap

e Irr

igat

ion

Agr

icul

ture

Irrig

atio

n

Envi

ronm

enta

l/H

abita

t Use

s

Con

stru

ctio

n/ D

ust

Con

trol

Mis

cella

neou

s/O

ther

(Spe

cify

in C

omm

ent)

Tota

l

Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y

Tert

iary

Adv

ance

d (R

O)

Brin

e-C

once

ntra

te F

low

Year

of B

uild

Out

- - - 8.0 3,900 8,000 1,621 - - - - 13,521 - - - 8.0

15.0 15.0 15.0 - 9,450 4,219 - - - 13,669 15.0 15.0 15.0 -

- - - 5.9 5,812 1,418 - - 600 7,830 - - - 5.9

80.0 80.0 80.0 - - 14,290 - - - 14,290 80.0 80.0 80.0 -

550.0 550.0 - - - - - - - 550.0 550.0 - -

26.0 26.0 26.0 - - 1,852 20,710 6,560 29,122 26.0 26.0 26.0 -

400.0 400.0 - - 7,205 - - - - 7,205 400.0 400.0 - -

-

25.0 25.0 25.0 - 2,961 9,907 - - - 12,867 25.0 25.0 25.0 -

50.0 50.0 20.0 - 7,258 20,834 - 10 - 28,102 50.0 50.0 20.0 -

50.0 50.0 50.0 - 14,676 - - 5 14,681 50.0 50.0 50.0 -

22.4 22.4 22.4 - 4,181 9,935 14,116 22.4 22.4 22.4 -

15.0 15.0 13.0 - 2,000 10,128 7,737 - 75 - 19,940 15.0 15.0 13.0 -

125.0 125.0 125.0 - 59,000 ##### - 31,509 - - 2,705 157,490 125.0 125.0 125.0 -

6.5 6.5 6.5 - 16,482 - - - - 16,482 6.5 6.5 6.5 -

30.0 30.0 15.0 5.0 4,000 4,000 - 3,659 - - - 11,659 30.0 30.0 15.0 5.0

30.6 30.6 30.6 - - - - - - - 30.6 30.6 30.6 -

- - - 7.5 ##### ##### 4,816 - - - - 38,416 - - - 7.5

- - 5.4 5.4 13,335 - - - - 13,335 - - 5.4 5.4

- - 50.0 - - 15,303 - - - 15,303 - - 50.0 -

15.0 15.0 15.0 - 8,000 3,000 50 - - - 11,050 15.0 15.0 15.0 -

-

-

-


Survey_Report.doc

Attachment A.3 – Industrial Discharger Data

Discharger Information

Region AgencyDownstream

WWTP or Outfall

Sewer or BrineLine User Name Owner Location Pretreatment

(Note type and purpose)

Note any discharge limitations or permit

requirements

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Industrial Discharger Data or Send Existing Informationin Excel (e.g. Pretreatment Program Documentation)

Receiving Facility(s)

\\CHERON\Projects\USBR\381333BrineStudy\T3_Brine_MGMT\T3-1_Survey\Regional Meetings 1\Los Angeles\Spreadsheets_to_Agencies\Survey-Industrial_Dischargers.xlsSurvey - Industrial Discharge Page 1 of 5


WWTP or Outfall

Sewer or BrineLine User Name

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles



Biotech Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Utilities Medical

Hospitality(Hotels,

Convention Centers)

Other(Specify)

Type of Discharger (Place X)



WWTP or Outfall


Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles



TDS(mg/l)

BOD(mg/l)

COD(mg/l)

Ammonia-Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total Nitrogen

(mg/l)pH

Temp.

(°C)

Trace Organics

(list)Notes

Discharge Water Quality Information



WWTP or Outfall


Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles



Maximum Daily or Instantaneous

Flow(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily orInstantaneous

Flow(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


Flow(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

Planning Year 2010 Planning Year 2015Current (as of end of 2008)



WWTP or Outfall


Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Los Angeles




Flow(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


Flow(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


Flow(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


Flow(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

Planning Year 2025 Planning Year 2030 Planning Year 2035Planning Year 2020


Survey_Report.doc

Attachment A.4 – Ocean Outfall Information

Ocean Outfall Information

Region Outfall Facility Name Operating Agency Location

Year Originally Constructed or Planned

Type of FlowContributing WWTPs or Other

Facilities(List out)

Los Angeles Hyperion 1-mile Bypass Outfall

City of Los Angeles Treated Wastewater

Hyperion WWTPWest Basin WRPLA/Glendale WRPBurbank WRPTillman WRPAhmanson RanchTapia WRF

Los Angeles Hyperion 5- mile Outfall City of Los Angeles Treated Wastewater

Hyperion WWTPWest Basin WRPLA/Glendale WRPBurbank WRPTillman WRPAhmanson RanchTapia WRF

Los Angeles Joint Outfall (12 foot diameter) LACSD Treated Wastewater

Joint WPCPBrewer DesalterLong Beach WRPLong Beach Seawater Desalination PlantAlamitos Barrier ProjectLos Coyotes WRPCarson Regional WRPLos Coyotes WRPWhittier Narrows WRPSan Jose Creek WRPPomona WRPPomona Ion Exchange FacilityUpland Ion Exchange Facility

Los Angeles Joint Outfall (8 foot diameter) LACSD Treated Wastewater

Joint WPCPBrewer DesalterLong Beach WRPLong Beach Seawater Desalination PlantAlamitos Barrier ProjectLos Coyotes WRPCarson Regional WRPLos Coyotes WRPWhittier Narrows WRPSan Jose Creek WRPPomona WRPPomona Ion Exchange FacilityUpland Ion Exchange Facility

Los Angeles Private Industrial Outfall #1 Private Industrial Treated Wastewater West Basin Desalination

Los Angeles Private Industrial Outfall #2 Private Industrial Treated Wastewater LADWP Seawater Desalination Plant

Los Angeles Terminal Island Outfall City of Los Angeles Treated Wastewater Terminal Island WWTP



\\CHERON\Projects\USBR\381333BrineStudy\T3_Brine_MGMT\T3-1_Survey\Regional Meetings 1\Los Angeles\Spreadsheets_to_Agencies\Survey-Outfalls.xlsSurvey - Ocean Outfalls Page 1 of 6


Region Outfall Facility Name Operating Agency


City of Los Angeles

Los Angeles Hyperion 5- mile Outfall City of Los Angeles

Los Angeles Joint Outfall (12 foot diameter) LACSD


Los Angeles Private Industrial Outfall #1 Private Industrial


Los Angeles Terminal Island Outfall City of Los Angeles


Facility Information Pipeline Information

Pipe Material

Length (feet)

Size(inches)

Capacity(MGD)

Planned Expansions, Additions or

Lengthenings? (Please describe and

note the planned year)

Scale Formation Problems

(Please describe)

144 727.0

144 765.0

144

96

60 66.0





City of Los Angeles








Facility Information Discharge Water Quality Permit Limits/ Information

Permit No. TDS(mg/l)

Hardness(mg/l)

BOD(mg/l)

TSS(mg/l)

Ammonia-Nitrogen

(mg/l)pH Temp

(°C)

Residual Chlorine

Concentration(mg/l)

HeavyMetals(mg/l)

Toxicity(YUa)

Trace Organics (including EDCs, disinfection by-

products, PhACs)(mg/l)

Note any additional

information

Comments





City of Los Angeles









TDS(mg/l)

Hardness (mg/l)

BOD(mg/l)

TSS (mg/l)

Ammonia-Nitrogen

(mg/l)pH Temp

(°C)

Residual Chlorine Concentration

(mg/l)

Heavy Metals (mg/l)

Toxicity(Yua)



Note any additional

issues

Comments

Discharge Water Quality Data/ Information





City of Los Angeles









Capacity (MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity (MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

16.0

Planning Year 2010 Planning Year 2015 Planning Year 2020Current (as of end of 2008)





City of Los Angeles









Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity (MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

Planning Year 2030 Planning Year 2035Planning Year 2025


Survey_Report.doc

Attachment A.5 – Brinelines, WWTP Land Outfalls, and Sewer Interconnection Information

Brinelines and WWTP Outfall/Inter-Connection Information

Region Brineline Facility Name Operating Agency Contributing WWTPs or Other Facilities(List out)

End of Pipe Location/Connection


PlannedType of Flow

Los Angeles Proposed Brewer Desalter Brineline WRD Brewer Desalter Redondo Beach Power

Plant Outfall Brine

Los Angeles Brewer Desalter-Joint Intertie LACSD Brewer DesalterProposed Brewer Desalter Outfall/Joint WPCP

Brine

Los Angeles Carson WRP- Joint WPCF Intertie LACSD Carson Regional WRP Joint WPCP Brine

Los Angeles Long Beach WRP - Joint WPCF Intertie WRD

Long Beach WRPAlamitos Barrier ProjectLong Beach Seawater Desalination Plant

Joint WPCP Brine

Los Angeles Los Coyotes WRP - Joint WPCF Intertie LACSD Los Coyotes WRP

LB Wetlands Project Joint WPCP Treated Wastewater

Los Angeles LACSD Brine Interceptor LACSD Whittier Narrows WRPSan Jose Creek WRP Joint WPCP Brine

Los Angeles Pomona Effluent Pipeline LACSD Pomona WRP Pomona WRP/ LACSD Brine Interceptor Treated Wastewater

Los Angeles West Basin Brineline West Basin MWD West Basin WRP Hyperion WWTP Brine

Los AngelesLos Angeles



\\CHERON\Projects\USBR\381333BrineStudy\T3_Brine_MGMT\T3-1_Survey\Regional Meetings 1\Los Angeles\Spreadsheets_to_Agencies\Survey-Brinelines.xlsSurvey - Brinelines Page 1 of 5


Region Brineline Facility Name Operating Agency

Los Angeles Proposed Brewer Desalter Brineline WRD

Los Angeles Brewer Desalter-Joint Intertie LACSD

Los Angeles Carson WRP- Joint WPCF Intertie LACSD


Los Angeles Los Coyotes WRP - Joint WPCF Intertie LACSD

Los Angeles LACSD Brine Interceptor LACSD

Los Angeles Pomona Effluent Pipeline LACSD

Los Angeles West Basin Brineline West Basin MWD




Pipe Material

Length(feet)

Size(inches)

Capacity(MGD)

Planned Expansions, Additions or

Lengthenings? (Please describe

and note the planned year)

Scale Formation Problems(Please

describe)

Solids Settlement Problems(Please

describe)

Any Planned Treatment or Maintenance

Method

16

24














Facility Information Discharge Water Quality Data/ Information Water Quality Limitations

Discharge Order/

Agreement

TDS (mg/l)

Hardness (mg/l)

BOD (mg/l)

TSS(mg/l)

Ammonia-Nitrogen

(mg/l)pH

Heavy Metals(mg/l)



Note any additional

information

Comments Note any specfic limitations to water quality for each brineline















UnitDischarge

Cost

Energy Cost

Operation and Maintenance

Cost

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity (MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

Current (as of end of 2008)Cost Information Planning Year 2010 Planning Year 2015















Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

Planning Year 2030 Planning Year 2035Planning Year 2020 Planning Year 2025


Survey_Report.doc

Attachment A.6 – Groundwater Desalter and Groundwater Cleanup Treatment Plant Capacity and

Discharge Data

Region Facility Name Facility Owner Address/Location

Year Originally

Constructed or Planned

Treatment Method(s) Purpose of Plant Constituents in

Source WaterBrine Discharge Location

(Existing/ Future)

Notes(Include any source or discharge

limitations)

Los Angeles City of Chino Ion Exchange Facility City of Chino Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts) LACSD Outfall Plant not currently in operation

Los Angeles Goldsworthy Desalter WRD/City of Torrance 2001 Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts) 20 year groundwater recovery program

Los Angeles Marvin C. Brewer Desalter WBMWD 1993 Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts) LACSD Outfall Removes saline plume/ Future Redondo Beach

Power Plant Outfall; Surface Discharge

Los Angeles Montclair Ion Exchange City of Montclair Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts) LACSD Outfall

Los Angeles Pomona Ion Exchange Facility IEUA Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts) LACSD Outfall

Los Angeles Upland Ion Exchange Facility City of Upland 2035 Groundwater - Potable Use Nitrates LACSD Outfall

Los AngelesLos AngelesLos AngelesLos AngelesLos Angeles



Groundwater Desalter and Groundwater Cleanup Treatment Plant Capacity and Discharge Data

\\CHERON\Projects\USBR\381333BrineStudy\T3_Brine_MGMT\T3-1_Survey\Regional Meetings 1\Los Angeles\Spreadsheets_to_Agencies\Survey-GW_Desalters_&_Cleanups.xlsSurvey-GW Desalters & Clean Page 1 of 4

Region Facility Name Facility Owner

Los Angeles City of Chino Ion Exchange Facility City of Chino

Los Angeles Goldsworthy Desalter WRD/City of Torrance

Los Angeles Marvin C. Brewer Desalter WBMWD

Los Angeles Montclair Ion Exchange City of Montclair

Los Angeles Pomona Ion Exchange Facility IEUA

Los Angeles Upland Ion Exchange Facility City of Upland





TDS(mg/l)

TOC(mg/l)

Ammonia-Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total Nitrogen

(mg/l)pH Temp

(°C)Silica(mg/l)

Calcium(mg/l)

Bromide(mg/l)

Barium(mg/l)

Strontium(mg/l)

Sulfate(mg/l)

Carbonate(mg/l)

Phosphate(mg/l)

Arsenic(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Perchlorate(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Trace Organcis

(list)Notes

Brine-Concentrate Water Quality Information (Please provide water quality report of RO permeate and source water quality if available)













Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

Average Brine/Concentrate

Flow(MGD)

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

Average Brine/ Concentrate

Flow (MGD)

Is fundingsecure for anyexpansions/new plants?

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


Flow (MGD)

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


Flow (MGD)

- - -

2.5 2.70 2.70 0.81

1.3 1.50 1.50 0.45

- - -

15.00 15.00 4.50

- - -

Planning Year 2010 Planning Year 2015 Planning Year 2020Current (as of end of 2008)













Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


Flow (MGD)

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


Flow (MGD)

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


Flow (MGD)

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


Flow (MGD)

- 7.20 - -

2.70 2.70 - 2.70

1.50 1.50 - 1.50

- 1.60 - -

15.00 24.00 - 15.00

- 3.00 - -

Ultimate Build-outPlanning Year 2030 Planning Year 2035Planning Year 2025


Survey_Report.doc

Attachment B Sample Regional Meeting Invitation

and Presentation

Southern California Regional Brine-Concentrate Management Study The Bureau of Reclamation and 15 southern California water and wastewater agencies have formed a partnership to examine brine concentrate issues in the region. Southern California faces reductions in State Water Project supply and long-term drought forecasts. Reclaiming and recycling wastewater, and desalting ocean and brackish groundwater can provide reliable alternatives to imported water to meet local supply needs. These water supplies, however, require treatment to remove and dispose of brine concentrates - or salts. The focus of this study Phase 1 is on evaluating brine-concentrate management and disposal alternatives, regulatory requirements, emerging and secondary constituents of concern, and recommending solutions to address current and forecasted disposal needs for coastal and inland areas.

Phase 1 recommendations could result in a study Phase 2 implementing one or more demo-pilot projects that address brine-concentrate management.

Study Partners: • California Department of Water Resources • City of San Bernardino Water Department • City of San Diego Water Department • County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County • Inland Empire Utilities Agency • Lake Arrowhead Community Services District • Los Angeles Department of Water and Power • Metropolitan Water District of Southern California • Orange County Sanitation District • Otay Water District • Rancho California Water District • San Diego County Water Authority • Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority • Southern California Salinity Coalition • West Basin Municipal Water District • Western Municipal Water District

For more information, please contact Greg Krzys at: Bureau of Reclamation – Southern California Area Office 27708 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 202 Temecula, CA 92590 Phone: (951) 695 5310 or Email at [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Reclamation, Southern California Entities Form Partnership to Study Regional Brine Management Issues The Bureau of Reclamation and 15 Southern California water and wastewater agencies have formed a partnership to examine brine concentrate issues in the region. Southern California faces reductions in State Water Project supply and long-term drought forecasts. Reclaiming and recycling wastewater, and desalting ocean and brackish groundwater can provide reliable alternatives to imported water to meet local supply needs. These water supplies, however, require treatment to remove and dispose of brine concentrates - or salts. The focus of this study is on evaluating brine-concentrate management and disposal alternatives, and recommending solutions to address current and forecasted disposal needs. To provide information about the study, and seek data that would be appropriate to include in this study, a series of public meetings have been scheduled in the Southern California region. Members of the public, organizations, and agencies that have an interest in this study are invited to attend. An overview of the study will be given at each meeting, and feedback sought from those attending. Meeting dates, locations, and time are noted below: November 14, 2008 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, 11615 Sterling Ave in Riverside from 9:00 AM - 12:00 PM

December 2, 2008 San Diego County Water Authority, 4677 Overland Avenue, San Diego, from 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.

December 4, 2008 Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Room US2-456, 700 North Alameda Street, Los Angeles, from 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.

December 11, 2008 South Orange County Wastewater Authority, 34156 Del Obispo Street, Dana Point, from 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.

Reclamation will also accept written comments on the proposed project, or accept requests from individuals who wish to be placed on a project mailing list. Written comments or requests may be sent to Greg Krzys, Bureau of Reclamation, Southern California Area Office, 27708 Jefferson Ave., Suite 202, Temecula, CA 92590. Mr. Krzys can also be contacted by telephone at (951) 695-5310, or by email at: [email protected].

# # # Reclamation is the largest wholesale water supplier and the second largest producer of hydroelectric power in the United States, with operations and facilities in the 17 Western States. Its facilities also provide substantial flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife benefits. Visit our website at www.usbr.gov.

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.usbr.gov/

Southern California Regional Brine-Concentrate

Management Study - Phase I

Purpose of Meeting

• Provide the history and purpose of the Study

• Explain the survey and data needed

• Obtain Contact Information

• Solicit input and data

• Growing demands• Diminishing supply reliability• Regulatory issues• Local water augmentation

strategies • Emerging rural demands• Help drought proof the region

Southern California Balancing Scarce Water Supplies

State Water Project

~816,000 tons

State Water Project

~816,000 tons

Colorado River

~593,000 tons

Colorado River

~593,000 tons

• Raw water supply– Colorado River Water – State Water Project– Groundwater including

recycled water– Seawater desalination

• Conservation– Domestic– Irrigation– Industrial

Salinity Sources

History of Project

• Southern California Water Recycling and Reuse Study (SCCWRRS)– 8 Year Planning Effort Beginning in 1993– Goal: To Promote More Efficient Use of Total Water

Resources by Increasing Use of Reclaimed Water– Fostered regional partnerships– Examined short- and long-term potential for reuse– Conclusions:

• Long-term shortfalls• Maximizing reuse increases costs• Identified constraints & short term implementation plans

History of Project

• Southern California Water Recycling Projects Initiative

– 5 Year Planning Effort Beginning in 2001

– Examine recycled water issues on a local and regional basis

– Fostered regional partnership on issues facing water recycling

– Successful public information and educational strategies

– Financial support opportunities

– Water quality analysis

History of Project

Southern California Water Recycling Projects Initiative

• Water quality analysis focused on salinity and brine-concentrate management– Salinity impacts on water recycling

– Sources of brine-concentrate

– Scenario-based projections of brine-concentrate flows

– Brine-concentrate technology options

– Identified cost impacts for managing brine-concentrate

– Identified potential solutions and recommendations

History of Project

Southern California Water Recycling Projects Initiative

• Brine-concentrate management conclusions:– Increased brine-concentrate mgt costs = increased recycled

water costs

– More stringent water quality regulations = Increased brine-concentrate flows

– Future water recycling limited by advanced treatment & brine-concentrate mgt

– Water quality regulations, brineline capacity and limits on ocean disposal = need for volume reduction and ZLD solutions

Southern California Regional Brine-Concentrate Management Study

• Conducted by Reclamation and 14 local/ regional agencies and CA DWR

• Focus is to examine and develop solutionsto address brine-concentrate management issues

• Purpose is to identify solutionsand pilot/demonstration projects

Study Components

• Data collection and analysis of brine-concentrate:– Facilities

– Regulations

– Institutional issues

– Compounds of Emerging Concern (CECs)

• Assessment of treatment and disposal mechanisms

• Recommendation for 10 pilot projects for brine-concentrate disposal

• Final project study report

Study Components

Project Timeline

• Survey: Nov - Feb

• Regulatory issues: Nov - Feb

• CECs: Dec - Apr

• Institutional issues: Nov - Feb

• Treatment and disposal options: Dec - May

• Regional and sub-regional solutions: May - Aug

• Final Report: Aug - Oct

Survey

Southern California Brine-Concentrate Management

SurveyRegulatory Issues

and Trends

Identify Southern California

Brine-Concentrate Landscape

Secondary/ Emerging

Constituents

Institutional Issues

Review Existing Documents and

Existing Data

Identify Brine-Concentrate Producing Agencies

Develop Draft Survey and

Incorporate BEMT Comments

Survey Agencies and Collect and Document Data

Identify Data Gaps and Prepare Summary of

Results for BEMT

Follow-up with Surveys to Fill-in

Data Gaps

Analyze Key Questions to

Formulate Brine-Concentrate Picture

Develop and Review Draft

Document with Map

Survey

Task 5Final Study Report

Task 4Brine-concentrate Treatment and Disposal Options

Survey Timeline

• Regional survey meetings: – Inland Empire/Desert/Mountains Region: Nov. 14

– San Diego Region: Dec 2

– Los Angeles/Ventura Region: Dec. 4

– Orange County Region: Dec 11

• Complete surveys: End of Dec

• Summary of data and data gaps: Dec – Jan

• Follow-up with agencies: Jan - Feb

• Survey report: Mar - Apr

Survey Method

• Pre-populated data from previous studies

• Microsoft Excel utilized

• Solicit input– Agency contact list

– Excel surveys to be e-mailed

– Regional meetings

– BEMT members

– Follow-up as needed

Survey Needs

• 5 surveys developed for specific facility types

– WWTPs (including RO plants)

– Groundwater desalters and clean-up facilities

– Industrial dischargers

– Ocean outfalls

– Brinelines

• Surveys will be sent based on facility type

Survey – Data Types• Hard Data

– Capacity, flow, and quality

– Treatment type and permit requirements

– Costs (capital, O&M, energy)

– Planned/potential facility upgrades

• Soft Data– Existing and future permit limitations

– Institutional issues

– Compounds of emerging concern

– Brineline issues (scale formation, solids settling)

WWTP Survey Key Information Needs

• Facility information• Sewage source information• Discharge information

– Type of discharge– NPDES permit information– Reuse permit information– Effluent water quality

• Treatment facility information– Type of treatment (tertiary, disinfection, brine handling)– Capacity, maximum and average daily flows (2010-2035)– Amount and type of reuse (2010-2035)

• Pre-populated with SCCWRRS/Initiative data

GW Facilities Survey Key Information Needs

• Facility information

• Treatment information– Treatment method

– Constituents of concern

– Discharge location

• Concentrate water quality information

• Treatment information– Capacity and average daily flow (2010-2035)

– Average brine-concentrate flow (2010-2035)

Industrial Dischargers Survey Key Information Needs

• Focused on certain types of dischargers– Brine-concentrate flows– CECs– Others that could be relevant to study

• Receiving facility information• Discharger information• Type of discharger• Discharge water quality information• Flow information

– Maximum or instantaneous flow– Daily average flow

• Facility information• Pipeline information

– Size, material, capacity, problems

• Discharge water quality• Permit limits• Flow information

– Average Daily Flow– Maximum Daily Flow– Available Capacity

Ocean Outfall Survey Key Information Needs

• Facility information• Pipeline information

– Size, material, capacity, problems

• Discharge water quality• Permit limits• Flow information

– Average Daily Flow– Maximum Daily Flow– Available Capacity

Brine Line Survey Key Information Needs

Next Steps

• Today– Get contact information

– Assist with questions

– Discuss specific brine-concentrate issues

– Existing brine-concentrate facilities/concerns

– Planned or conceptual facilities

• Complete surveys by end of December

• Follows ups in January

• Develop list of pilot/demonstration projects

Contacts

• Anne Lynch – [email protected]

• Scott Lynch – [email protected]

• Mike Mickley - [email protected]

• Greg Krzys – [email protected]

Survey_Report.doc

Attachment C Survey Data

Survey_Report.doc

Attachment C.1 – Wastewater Treatment Plant Permit and Water Quality Information


Discharge/Reuse Flows (Put in %

Discharged/Reused Based on Avg. Flow)

Region Treatment Facility Name Operating AgencyAddress/

Location

Year Originally

Constructed or

Planned

Do

me

sti

c

Ind

us

tria

l

GW

De

sa

lte

rs/

En

vir

on

. C

lea

nu

ps

Oth

er

To

tal

(Mu

st

tota

l 1

00

%)

Str

ea

m

Oc

ea

n

Bri

ne

lin

e

Pe

rco

lati

on

Do

wn

str

ea

m W

WT

P

Re

us

e

(GW

, Ir

rig

ati

on

, e

tc)

Oth

er

(Sp

ec

ify

)

Inland Empire Banning WWRP City of Banning 0% 170

Inland Empire Beaumont WWTP #1 City of Beaumont 0% 444 Santa Ana River 100%

Inland Empire Big Bear Area RWA WWTF Big Bear Area RWA 0%Irrigation of Fodder Crops in Lucerne

Valley100%

Inland Empire Carbon Canyon WRFInland Empire Utilities

Agency

14950 Telephone Ave

Chino, CA 917101992 99% 1% 100% 437

99% Domestic includes

5% CommercialSanta Ana River 71% 29% SARI

Inland Empire Chino Institution For Men California DOC 0% 100% SARI

Inland Empire Colton WWTP City of Colton 0% 512To RIX WRP for Discharge to the Santa

Ana River100% SARI

Inland Empire Corona WWTP #1 City of Corona 2205 Railroad Street, Corona, CA 85% 15% 100% 726 Temescal Creek 33% 25% 42% SARI

Inland Empire Corona WWTP #2 City of Corona650 E. Harrison Street, Corona,

CA85% 15% 100% 729 Percolation Ponds 100% SARI

Inland Empire Corona WWTP #3 City of Corona3997 Temescal Canyon Road,

Corona, CA95% 5% 100% 787 Temescal Creek 15% 85% SARI

Inland Empire EVMWD-Alberhill EVMWD 0%

Inland EmpireGrass Valley Wastewater Treatment

Facility

Lake Arrowhead

Community Services

District

27000 Pilot Roack Road, Lake

Arrowhead, CA 923521985 100% 100% 240

Hesperia Percolation Ponds adjacent to

Mojave River100% SARI

Inland Empire Hemet/San Jacinto WRF Eastern MWD 0% Percolation Ponds % % TVRI-SARI

Inland Empire Henry N. Wocholz WWTP Yucaipa Valley WD880 W. County Line Rd

Yucaipa, CA 923291986 100% 100% 480 San Timoteo Creek 100% Proposed Yucaipa-SARI

Inland Empire Horsethief Canyon EVMWD 0%

Inland Empire IEUA Regional Plant #1Inland Empire Utilities

Agency

2450 E. Philadelphia Ave

Ontario, CA 917611948 99% 1% 100% 46


5% CommercialSanta Ana River 61% 39% CSDLAC


Agency

12811 Sixth St

Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917291997 99% 1% 100% 409


5% CommercialSanta Ana River 82% 18%


Agency

6063 Kimball Ave

Chino, CA 917102000 99% 1% 100% 459


5% CommercialSanta Ana River 91% 9% SARI

Inland Empire Lake Elsinore Regional WWRF Elsinore Valley MWD 0% 800San Jacinto- Temescal Wash- Lake

Elsinore% % TVRI-SARI

Inland Empire Lee Lake Water District Lee Lake Water District 0% % %

Inland Empire Moreno Valley WRF Eastern MWD 0% Percolation Ponds % % TVRI-SARI

Inland Empire Perris Valley WRP Eastern MWD 0% Percolation Ponds % % TVRI-SARI

Wastewater Treatment Plant

Permit and Quality Information


(Whether connected

or used

or not)

Sewage Source Information

(Put in % of Avg. Daily

Flow)

Av

g.

Infl

ue

nt

TD

S (

mg

/l)

CommentsDischarge Location

(List All)


\\cheron\projects\USBR\381333BrineStudy\T3_Brine_MGMT\T3-1_Survey\T3-1_Survey\Survey-V64_MH.xlsSurvey - WWTPs-Wat Qual Page 1 of 35





Location

Year Originally

Constructed or

Planned

Do

me

sti

c

Ind

us

tria

l

GW

De

sa

lte

rs/

En

vir

on

. C

lea

nu

ps

Oth

er

To

tal

(Mu

st

tota

l 1

00

%)

Str

ea

m

Oc

ea

n

Bri

ne

lin

e

Pe

rco

lati

on

Do

wn

str

ea

m W

WT

P

Re

us

e

(GW

, Ir

rig

ati

on

, e

tc)

Oth

er

(Sp

ec

ify

)




(Whether connected

or used

or not)



Flow)

Av

g.

Infl

ue

nt

TD

S (

mg

/l)


(List All)


Inland Empire Railroad Canyon WWRF Elsinore Valley MWD 0% 800All Recycled Water Produced is Served

to a Golf Course% % TVRI-SARI

Inland Empire Redlands WWTP City of Redlands 0% 420Santa Ana River Discharge and

Percolation Ponds% % SARI

Inland Empire Regional Wastewater Reclamation Plant EVMWD 0%

Inland Empire Rialto WWTP City of Rialto 0%Discharge Flow to RIX WRP for Santa

Ana River Discharge100% SARI

Inland Empire Riverside Regional WQCP City of Riverside5950 Acorn St, Riverside, CA

925041942 0% 626 Santa Ana River 99% 1% SARI

Inland Empire RIX WRP San Bernardino MWD1990 W. Agua Mansa Rd. Colton,

CA 923341996 92% 8% 100% 500 Santa Ana River 100% SARI

Inland Empire Running Springs Running Springs WD 0% Percolation Ponds % %

Inland Empire San Bernardino WRP San Bernardino MWD399 Chandler Pl. San Bernardino,

CA 924081958 92% 8% 100% 566

Discharge Flow to RIX WRP for Santa

Ana River Discharge100% SARI

Inland Empire Santa Rosa WRF Rancho California WD26266 Washington Ave, Murrieta,

CA 92589 1989 98% 2% 100% 780 Reclamation System, Percolation Beds 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 99% SARI

Inland Empire Temecula Valley Regional WRF Eastern MWD42565 Avenida Al Varado,

Temecula, CA 92590 0%

Reach 4 - Wasson Canyon & Sun City

Ponds% 68% % TVRI-SARI

Inland Empire Western Riverside Co WWTPWestern Riverside County

RWA

14634 River Rd

Corona, CA 928801998 98% 2% 100% 716 Santa Ana River 96% 4% SARI

Inland Empire Western Water Recycling FacilityWestern Municipal Water

District

5903 Ave. A

Riverside, CA 925181940's 50% 50% 100%

Full Reuse at Golf Course and

Cemetery100% TVRI-SARI

Los Angeles Burbank WRP City of Burbank 0% Los Angeles River % %

Los Angeles Donald C. Tillman WRPCity of Los Angeles

Bureau of Sanitation

6100 Woodley Ave

Van Nuys, CA

1985

(Planned RO 2019)79% 17% 4% 100% Other = GWI

AVORS to Hyperion Wastewater

Treatment Plant14% 34% 52%

Los AngelesGroundwater Reliability Improvement

Program (GRIP)

WRD/USGVMWD-Owners

Los Angeles CSD -

Operators

Los Angeles Hyperion WWTPCity of Los Angeles


12000 Vista Del Mar

Playa Del Rey, CA1950 75% 17% 8% 100% Other = GWI Hyperion Ocean Outfall 87% 13% Outfall

Los Angeles Joint WPCP Los Angeles CSD24501 South Figuerora St

Carson, CA 907451928 83% 17% 100%

Influent TDS not

currently measuredJoint Ocean Outfall 100% Outfall

Los Angeles La Canada WRP Los Angeles CSD533 Meadowview Drive

La Cañada, CA 910111962 98% 2% 100%

Influent TDS not

currently measuredGolf Course Irrigation 100%

Los Angeles Lake Hughes CWTF

Los Angeles County

Department of Public

Works

17201 Elizabeth Lake Road, Lake

Hughes1990 100% 100% Spray irrigation - Lake Hughes 100%

Los Angeles Lancaster WRP Los Angeles CSD1865 West Avenue "D"

Lancaster, CA1953 99% 1% 100% 518

Average of 2 samples in

2008Land Discharge 100%

Los Angeles Leo J. Vander Lans Treatment Facility

WRD (Owner)

City of Long Beach

(Operator)

2003 - Originally built

Planned to expand in

2011

0% Direct Injection to Seawater Barrier 100% JOS Brine-Sewer Line






Location

Year Originally

Constructed or

Planned

Do

me

sti

c

Ind

us

tria

l

GW

De

sa

lte

rs/

En

vir

on

. C

lea

nu

ps

Oth

er

To

tal

(Mu

st

tota

l 1

00

%)

Str

ea

m

Oc

ea

n

Bri

ne

lin

e

Pe

rco

lati

on

Do

wn

str

ea

m W

WT

P

Re

us

e

(GW

, Ir

rig

ati

on

, e

tc)

Oth

er

(Sp

ec

ify

)




(Whether connected

or used

or not)



Flow)

Av

g.

Infl

ue

nt

TD

S (

mg

/l)


(List All)


Los Angeles Long Beach WRP Los Angeles CSD7400 E. Willow Str

Long Beach, CA1973 95% 5% 100%

Influent TDS not

currently measuredSan Gabriel River/Ocean 63% 37%

Los Angeles Los Angeles/Glendale WRPCity of Los Angeles


4600 Colorado Blvd

Los Angeles, CA1976 78% 18% 4% 100% 786 Other = GWI Los Angeles River 68% 11% 21%

Los Angeles Los Coyotes WRP Los Angeles CSD16515 Piuma Avenue

Cerritos, CA1970 90% 10% 100%

Influent TDS not

currently measuredSan Gabriel River 72% 28%

Los Angeles Malibu Mesa WRF

Los Angeles County


Works

3863 Malibu Country Drive, Malibu 1978 17% 83% 100% Institutional 83%

Spray irrigation Pepperdine University

with emergency NPDES to Maria

Canyon, Malibu.

100%

Los Angeles Malibu WPCP

Los Angeles County


Works

3620 Vista Pacifica St, Malibu 1964 100% 100% Seepage pits - Winter Canyon, Malibu 100%

Los Angeles Newhall Ranch WRPNewhall Ranch Sanitation

District

Hwy 126 at Los Ange4les/ Ventura

County Line

Newhall, CA 91355

not yet built; originally

planned for 2009, but

postponed until about

2015

100% 100% Projected Santa Clara River

Los Angeles Palmdale WRP Los Angeles CSD39300 30th Street East, Palmdale,

CA1952 99% 1% 100% 568

Average of 2 samples in

2008Land Discharge 100%

Los Angeles Pomona WRP Los Angeles CSD295 Humane Way

Pomona, CA1954 97% 3% 100%

Influent TDS not

currently measuredSan Jose Creek 14% 86%

Los Angeles San Jose Creek WRP Los Angeles CSD1965 Workman Mill Road

Whittier, CA 906011971 89% 11% 100%

Influent TDS not

currently measuredSan Gabriel River 54% 46%

Los Angeles Saugus WRP Los Angeles CSD26200 Springbrook Ave

Santa Clarita, CA 913501962 60% 40% 100%

Influent TDS not

currently measuredSanta Clara River 100%

Los Angeles Terminal Island WWTPCity of Los Angeles


445 Ferry Street

Los Angeles, CA

1935

(RO 2006)68% 24% 9% 100% Other = GWI Long Beach Harbor Outfall 92% 8% Outfall

Los Angeles Trancas WPCP

Los Angeles County


Works

6338 Pasea Canyon Drive, Malibu 1963 100% 100% Leach fields - Trancas Canyon, Malibu. 100%

Los Angeles Valencia WRP Los Angeles CSD28185 The Old Rd

Santa Clarita, CA 913551966 98% 2% 100%

Influent TDS not

currently measuredSanta Clara River 97% 3%

Los AngelesWest Basin-Carson Regional WRP-

NitrificationWest Basin MWD 1999 0% Joint WPCP % % % Sewer

Los Angeles West Basin-Carson Regional WRP-RO West Basin MWD 1999 Joint WPCP % % % Sewer

Los Angeles West Basin WRP-Barrier Treat West Basin MWD 0% Direct Injection to Seawater Barrier %






Location

Year Originally

Constructed or

Planned

Do

me

sti

c

Ind

us

tria

l

GW

De

sa

lte

rs/

En

vir

on

. C

lea

nu

ps

Oth

er

To

tal

(Mu

st

tota

l 1

00

%)

Str

ea

m

Oc

ea

n

Bri

ne

lin

e

Pe

rco

lati

on

Do

wn

str

ea

m W

WT

P

Re

us

e

(GW

, Ir

rig

ati

on

, e

tc)

Oth

er

(Sp

ec

ify

)




(Whether connected

or used

or not)



Flow)

Av

g.

Infl

ue

nt

TD

S (

mg

/l)


(List All)


Los AngelesWest Basin WRP-Chevron Plant-

NitrificationWest Basin MWD 0% %

Los Angeles West Basin WRP-Chevron Plant-RO West Basin MWD 0%Only RO Concentrate to Hyperion

Outfall%

Los AngelesWest Basin WRP-Exxon Mobil-

NitrificationWest Basin MWD

Los Angeles West Basin WRP-Exxon Mobil-RO West Basin MWD

Los Angeles West Basin WRP-Edward C. Little WRF West Basin MWD 0% Hyperion Outfall %

Los Angeles Whittier Narrows WRP Los Angeles CSD301 N. Rosemead Blvd

El Monte, CA1962 84% 16% 100%

Influent TDS not

currently measuredRio Hondo 100%

North Orange

CountyGreen Acres Project Orange County WD 1991 100% 100% 8.99 From OCSD Irrigation and Industrial Water Reuse 95%

5% Industrial

(carpet-dying)OCSD Plant #1

North Orange

CountyGroundwater Replenishment System Orange County WD

Planned since 1994,

constructed since

2003, approved 2008

90% 10% 100% 10.44From treated sewer

water

Reuse

RO Brine/Concentrate only to Ocean

(OCSD Ocean Outfall)

1% 49% 50% OCSD Outfall

North Orange

CountyMichelson WRP Irvine Ranch WD 0% 747 Reuse %

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #1 Orange County SD

10844 Ellis Avenue

Fountain Valley, CA 927081924 82% 18% 100% 950

OCSD Ocean Outfall and Transfer of

Flows to GWRS and GAP5% 95% Outfall

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #2 Orange County SD

22212 Brookhurst Street

Huntington Beach, CA 926461959 82% 18% 100% 3000 OCSD Ocean Outfall 100% Outfall

South Orange

County3A Plant

South Orange County

Wastewater Authority

26801 Camino Capistrano

Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 1964 99% 1% 1% 100% 986 San Juan Creek Ocean Outfall 58% 42%

San Juan Creek Ocean

Outfall

South Orange

CountyChiquita WRP Santa Margarita WD

28793 Ortega Highway

San Juan Capistrano, CA 926751986 99% 1% 1% 100% 834 San Juan Creek Ocean Outfall 57% 43%


Outfall

South Orange

CountyCoastal Treatment Plant

South Orange County


28303 Alicia Pkwy

Laguna Niguel, CA 9267799% 1% 1% 100% 1050 Aliso Creek Ocean Outfall 74% 26% Aliso Creek Outfall

South Orange

CountyEl Toro WWTP El Toro Water District

23542 Moulton Pkwy

Laguna Hills, CA 99% 1% 1% 100% 693 Aliso Creek Ocean Outfall 91% 9% Aliso Creek Outfall

South Orange

CountyJay B Latham WWTP

South Orange County


34156 Del Obispo

Dana Point CA 926291962 99% 1% 1% 100% 1050 San Juan Creek Ocean Outfall 100% 0% Outfall

South Orange

CountyLos Alisos WRP Irvine Ranch WD 99% 1% 1% 100% 633 Aliso Creek Ocean Outfall % % % Aliso Creek Outfall

South Orange

CountyNichols Water Reclamation Plant Santa Margarita WD

33608 Ortega Highway

San Juan Capistrano, CA 926751990 100% 100% 920 Land Discharge (Irrigation) 100%






Location

Year Originally

Constructed or

Planned

Do

me

sti

c

Ind

us

tria

l

GW

De

sa

lte

rs/

En

vir

on

. C

lea

nu

ps

Oth

er

To

tal

(Mu

st

tota

l 1

00

%)

Str

ea

m

Oc

ea

n

Bri

ne

lin

e

Pe

rco

lati

on

Do

wn

str

ea

m W

WT

P

Re

us

e

(GW

, Ir

rig

ati

on

, e

tc)

Oth

er

(Sp

ec

ify

)




(Whether connected

or used

or not)



Flow)

Av

g.

Infl

ue

nt

TD

S (

mg

/l)


(List All)


South Orange

CountyOso Creek WRP Santa Margarita WD

27204 East La Paz Rd

Mission Viejo, CA 926911977 99% 1% 1% 100% 828 Irrigation/San Juan Creek Ocean Outfall 100%


Outfall

South Orange

CountyRegional Treatment Plant

South Orange County


29201 La Paz Rd

Laguna Niguel, CA 926771982 99% 1% 1% 100% 850 Aliso Creek Ocean Outfall 37% 63% Aliso Creek Outfall

South Orange

CountyRobinson Ranch WRP Trabuco Canyon WD

21397 Heritage Rd

Trabuco Canyon, Ca 92678 1985 99% 1% 1% 100% 913 Land Discharge (Irrigation) 100%

Chiguita Plant - San Juan

Ocean Outfall

South Orange

CountySan Clemente WRP City of San Clemente

380 Avenida Pico Bldg N

San Clemente, CA 92672 0% San Juan Creek Ocean Outfall % % % SOCWA

San Diego 4-S Ranch WTP Olivenhain MWD16595 Dove Canyon Rd

San Diego, CA 92127 0% San Elijo % % Sewer

San Diego Camp Pendleton WWTP #01 U.S. Marine Corps 0% Effluent to Camp Pendleton WWTP #02Effluent sent to

CP #02

San Diego Camp Pendleton WWTP #02 U.S. Marine CorpsBuilding#17831, Camp Pendleton,

CA 92055-50080%

Uses Camp Pendleton WWTP # 3 for

Brine Disposal100%

San Diego Camp Pendleton WWTP #03 U.S. Marine Corps 0% Percolation for Seawater Barrier %

San Diego Camp Pendleton WWTP #09 U.S. Marine CorpsBldg#43831, Camp Pendleton, CA

92055-50080% Percolation for Seawater Barrier %

San Diego Camp Pendleton WWTP #11 U.S. Marine Corps 0% Percolation for Seawater Barrier %

San Diego Camp Pendleton WWTP #12 U.S. Marine CorpsBldgG#62831, Camp Pendleton,

CA 92055-50080% %

San Diego Camp Pendleton WWTP #13 U.S. Marine Corps 0% %

San DiegoCamp Pendleton-Northern Regional

Tertiary Treatment PlantU.S. Marine Corps Near WWTP #11

EIS released in 2008.

Const. Year Unk. -

assume by 2015

0% %

San DiegoCamp Pendleton-Southern Tertiary

Treatment PlantU.S. Marine Corps Near WWTP #13

Federal Register (EIS)

- released in 2004.

Construction Year

0%New outfall in wave or splash zone off

jetty in Camp Pendleton100%

San Diego Carlsbad WRPEncina Joint Powers

Authority

Avenida Encinas

Carlsbad, CA 92009 0% Uses Encina Outfall as Necessary % % % % Outfall

San Diego Chula Vista MBR Treatment PlantCity of Chula Vista/ Otay

WDChula Vista, CA

2012 (Phase I)

2025 (Phase II)0%

San Diego County Regional Brineline to

South Bay Ocean Outfall% % Outfall

San Diego Encina WPCFEncina Joint Powers

Authority

I-5 freeway Right of Wy, Carlsbad,

Ca920090% Uses Encina Outfall as Necessary % % % Outfall

San Diego Fairbanks Ranch WPCF

Fairbanks Ranch

Community Services

District

16556 Circa Del Norte, Rancho

Santa Fe,, CA 92067 0% Percolation Ponds %

San Diego Fallbrook Plant #1 Fallbrook PUD 0% Oceanside Ocean Outfall 100% Outfall

San Diego Gafner WRF Leucadia CWD 0% 1050 Encina Ocean Outfall % % % Outfall

San Diego Hale Avenue WRF City of Escondido 1973 99% 1% 100% 950 San Elijo Ocean Outfall 77% 23% Outfall






Location

Year Originally

Constructed or

Planned

Do

me

sti

c

Ind

us

tria

l

GW

De

sa

lte

rs/

En

vir

on

. C

lea

nu

ps

Oth

er

To

tal

(Mu

st

tota

l 1

00

%)

Str

ea

m

Oc

ea

n

Bri

ne

lin

e

Pe

rco

lati

on

Do

wn

str

ea

m W

WT

P

Re

us

e

(GW

, Ir

rig

ati

on

, e

tc)

Oth

er

(Sp

ec

ify

)




(Whether connected

or used

or not)



Flow)

Av

g.

Infl

ue

nt

TD

S (

mg

/l)


(List All)


San Diego La Salina WWTP City of Oceanside 90% 10% 100% 1236 Oceanside Ocean Outfall 96% 4% Outfall

San Diego Lower Moosa Canyon WRF Valley Center MWD 0% Percolation Ponds % % New Line

San Diego Meadowlark WRP Vallecitos WD7941 Cornita St, Carlsbad, CA

9200*9 0% Land Discharge % Sewer

San Diego North City WRP City of San Diego4949 East Gate Mall, San Diego,

CA 92121 1997 0% 1100 Point Loma 79% 20% 1% Sewer

San Diego Padre Dam WRF Padre Dam MWD 9300 Fanita Parkway Early 1960's 75% 25% 100% 900Padre Dam WRF and Point Loma

WWTP10% 60% 30% Sewer

San Diego Point Loma WWTP City of San Diego 1962 0% Point Loma Ocean Outfall 100% % Outfall

San Diego Ralph W Chapman WRF Otay WD11901 Singer Lane, Spring Valley,

CA 91978-2096 0% Point Loma % % Sewer

San DiegoRancho Santa Fe WPCF/Santa Fe Valley

WRF

Rancho Santa Fe Com.

Service D

Calzda Del Basque, Rancho Santa

Fe, CA 92067 0% San Elijo % % Sewer

San Diego San Elijo WRFSan Elijo Joint Powers

Authority

2695 Manchester Ave,

Cardiff, CA 92007 0% San Elijo Ocean Outfall % % % Outfall

San Diego San Luis Rey WWTP City of Oceanside 90% 10% 100% 992 Oceanside Ocean Outfall 96% 4% Outfall

San Diego San Vicente WWTP Ramona MWDSan Vicente Rd

Ramona, CA 92065 0% Stream % %

San Diego Santa Maria WPCF Ramona MWD 0% Stream % %

San Diego Skyline Ranch WRF Valley Center MWD 0% Percolation Ponds % %

San Diego South Bay WRP City of San Diego Dairy Mart & Monument Rd, 2002 0% 975 Southbay Ocean Outfall 43% 57% Outfall

San Diego Valley Center WWTP Valley Center MWD

San Diego Whispering Palms WPCFWhispering Palms Comm.

Services D

15525 Via De Santa Fe

Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 0% Percolation Ponds % %

Ventura Ahmanson Ranch Las Virgenes MWD 0% Las Virgenes Creek % % %

Ventura Camarillo WRPCamarillo Sanitation

District

150 E. Howard Road

Camarillo CA 930121955 90% 8% 2% 100% 900 Conejo Creek 77% 23% Calleguas Brineline






Location

Year Originally

Constructed or

Planned

Do

me

sti

c

Ind

us

tria

l

GW

De

sa

lte

rs/

En

vir

on

. C

lea

nu

ps

Oth

er

To

tal

(Mu

st

tota

l 1

00

%)

Str

ea

m

Oc

ea

n

Bri

ne

lin

e

Pe

rco

lati

on

Do

wn

str

ea

m W

WT

P

Re

us

e

(GW

, Ir

rig

ati

on

, e

tc)

Oth

er

(Sp

ec

ify

)




(Whether connected

or used

or not)



Flow)

Av

g.

Infl

ue

nt

TD

S (

mg

/l)


(List All)


Ventura Camrosa WRFVentura Regional SD &

Camrosa WD1995 85% 15% 100% Calleguas Creek 80%

20%

Evaporation

ponds

Calleguas Brineline

Ventura Hill Canyon TP City of Thousand Oaks 0% Conejo Creek %

Ventura Moorpark WWTPCounty of Ventura

Waterworks District No. 10%

Percolation Ponds at Moorpark WWTP

site% Calleguas Brineline

Ventura Oxnard WWTP City of Oxnard305 West Third Street, 3rd Floor,

Oxnard CA 930302012 95% 5% 100% 1700

At initial phase (2012),

the plant will produce

6.25 mgd purified water

for reuse and generate

approximately 1.1-1.5

mgd RO concentrate

Oxnard Ocean Outfall 15% 85% Outfall

Ventura Simi Valley WQCP Simi Valley CSD 98% 2% 100%Arroyo Simi, a Tributary of Calleguas

Creek99% 1% Calleguas Brineline

Ventura Tapia WRF Las Virgenes MWD 0%Mandated Zero Discharge for Part of

Year. Discharges to Stream and other.% %

Ventura Ventura WWTP 0%




Inland Empire Banning WWRP

Inland Empire Beaumont WWTP #1

Inland Empire Big Bear Area RWA WWTF

Inland Empire Carbon Canyon WRF

Inland Empire Chino Institution For Men

Inland Empire Colton WWTP

Inland Empire Corona WWTP #1



Inland Empire EVMWD-Alberhill


Facility

Inland Empire Hemet/San Jacinto WRF

Inland Empire Henry N. Wocholz WWTP

Inland Empire Horsethief Canyon

Inland Empire IEUA Regional Plant #1



Inland Empire Lake Elsinore Regional WWRF

Inland Empire Lee Lake Water District

Inland Empire Moreno Valley WRF

Inland Empire Perris Valley WRP



Permit No.

TDS

Limit

(mg/l)

Hardness

Limit

(mg/l)

BOD

Limit

(mg/l)

TSS

Limit

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen Limit

(mg/l)

pH

Residual

Chlorine

Requirement

(mg/l)

TMDL Permit Limits

(explain)

Note any exceptions,

multiple limit

requirements, etc.

Comments

(Note any other discharge limits such

as toxicity, heavy metals, etc.)

550

R8-2004-0020 550 30/20 30/20 4.56.5-

8.50.1

TR Chromium VI 16.3/8.2 µg/L;

TR Selenium 8.2/4.1 µg/L

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 11.8/5.9 µg/L;

Free Cyanide 8.5/4.3 µg/L

400

CA8000383 700 20 20 4.56.5-

8.50.1 See attached Permit See attached Permit

R8-2007-0052 840 See attached Permit See attached Permit

CA8000395 700 20 20 4.56.5-

8.50.1 See attached Permit See attached Permit

R6V-2002-0008 (WDID#

6B360107001) (Revised

WDR/NPDES Permit

expected in 2009)

208 (total nitrogen as

N)6 - 9

650

CA0105619 540 30 30 4.56.5-

8.50.1

TDS: 540 12-M avg, 320

monthly discharge. BOD &

TSS: 20 avg monthly. 30 avg

weekly

TIN- 6 12-M avg, 4.1 avg monthly, free cyanide

4.3 avg monthly, 8.5 daily max. Bis (2-

ethylhexyl) phthalate:5.9 avg monthly, 11.8

daily max. Coliform: 2.2 median on last 7 days

R8-2006-0010 550 30/20 30/20 4.56.5-

8.50.1




R8-2006-0010 550 30/20 30/20 4.56.5-

8.50.1




R8-2008-0028 550 30/20 30/20 4.56.5-

8.50.1 Free Cyanide 7.3/4.6 µg/L

700

650

650







Inland Empire Railroad Canyon WWRF

Inland Empire Redlands WWTP

Inland Empire Regional Wastewater Reclamation Plant

Inland Empire Rialto WWTP

Inland Empire Riverside Regional WQCP

Inland Empire RIX WRP

Inland Empire Running Springs

Inland Empire San Bernardino WRP

Inland Empire Santa Rosa WRF

Inland Empire Temecula Valley Regional WRF

Inland Empire Western Riverside Co WWTP

Inland Empire Western Water Recycling Facility




Program (GRIP)







Permit No.

TDS

Limit

(mg/l)

Hardness

Limit

(mg/l)

BOD

Limit

(mg/l)

TSS

Limit

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen Limit

(mg/l)

pH

Residual

Chlorine

Requirement

(mg/l)

TMDL Permit Limits

(explain)


multiple limit

requirements, etc.

Comments




700

400

CA0105350 650 20 30 5.06.5-

8.50.1 Free CN limit = 4.2 ug/L

R8-2006-0052 55020 - M,

30 -W

20 - M,

30 -W4.5

6.5 -

8.50.1

R8-2005-0074 69030 - M,

45 - W

30 - M,

45 - W10.0

6.5 -

8.5

94-92 750 N/A 30 30 N/A 39973 N/A N/A

650 EMWD

R8-2008-0005 625 20 20 5.06.5-

8.5

Add'l limits for DP002 (not used). Some limits

based on annual avg.

R8-2003-0113 550 30 306.0-

9.0Metals, THMs, TIN limits in permit

950

NPDES NO. CA0056227 950 20 15 1.46.5-

9.00.10 See website

Too many to list. Can be found at

http://www2.san.ci.la.ca.us/permit/index.html

NPDES NO. CA0109991 30 30 0.03

R4-2006-0042 30/45 30/45 6-9 0.33/0.3/0.23

N/A

N/A

R6V-2002-053, R6V-2002-

053A2

40/60;

10/15/306-9

No quality restrictions with LACSD permit.











Los Angeles Newhall Ranch WRP









Nitrification

Los Angeles West Basin-Carson Regional WRP-RO

Los Angeles West Basin WRP-Barrier Treat

Permit No.

TDS

Limit

(mg/l)

Hardness

Limit

(mg/l)

BOD

Limit

(mg/l)

TSS

Limit

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen Limit

(mg/l)

pH

Residual

Chlorine

Requirement

(mg/l)

TMDL Permit Limits

(explain)


multiple limit

requirements, etc.

Comments




R4-2007-0047 20/30/45 15/40/45 4.2/1.86.5-

8.50.10 Metals

NPDES NO. CA0053953 950 20 15 2.26.5-

8.50.10 See website



R4-2007-0048 20/30/45 15/40/45 4.2/1.86.5-

8.50.10

CA0059099NPDES permit rarely used. Limits too

complicated to include as single values here.

00-030 1000 30 306.5-

8.5

R4-2007-0046 1000 20/30/45 15/40/45 3.87/1.936.5-

8.50.10 Chloride; nitrogen compounds

6-00-57, 6-00-57-A01, 6-

00-57-A02, 6-00-57-A03,

6-00-57-A04

N/A 20/30/45 6-9

R4-2004-0099 750 20/30/45 15/40/45

Varies based on

temperature and pH

according to the

Basin Plan

6.5-

8.50.10

R4-2007-0097 750 20/30/45 15/40/45

Varies based on

temperature and pH

according to the

Basin Plan

6.5-

8.50.10

R4-2005-0031 1000 20/30/45 15/40/45 5.2/1.756.5-


NPDES PERMIT NO.

CA005385615 15 7.4

6.5-

8.50.10 See website



00-100 2000 30 306.5-

8.5

R4-2005-032 1000 20/30/45 15/40/45 5.2/1.756.5-








Nitrification

Los Angeles West Basin WRP-Chevron Plant-RO


Nitrification

Los Angeles West Basin WRP-Exxon Mobil-RO



North Orange

CountyGreen Acres Project

North Orange

CountyGroundwater Replenishment System

North Orange

CountyMichelson WRP

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #1

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #2

South Orange

County3A Plant

South Orange

CountyChiquita WRP

South Orange


South Orange

CountyEl Toro WWTP

South Orange


South Orange

CountyLos Alisos WRP

South Orange

CountyNichols Water Reclamation Plant

Permit No.

TDS

Limit

(mg/l)

Hardness

Limit

(mg/l)

BOD

Limit

(mg/l)

TSS

Limit

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen Limit

(mg/l)

pH

Residual

Chlorine

Requirement

(mg/l)

TMDL Permit Limits

(explain)


multiple limit

requirements, etc.

Comments




R4-2002-0142 750 20/30/45 15/40/45

Varies based on

temperature and pH

according to the

Basin Plan

6.5-

8.50.10

1050

1050

720

R8-2004-0067 100 55 406.0 -

9.00.36

R8-2004-0067 100 55 406.0 -

9.00.36

NPDES - CA0107417 30 30 2426.0 -

9.00.81

NPDES - CA0107417 30 30 2426.0-

9.00.81

NPDES - CA0107611 SOCWA-RECYCLED WATER USE

NPDES - CA0107611 30 30 6266.0-

9.02.09

NPDES - CA0107417 30 30 2426.0 -

9.00.81

NPDES - CA0107611 30 30 6266.0 -

9.02.09 SOCWA-RECYCLED WATER USE

SOCWA-RECYCLED WATER USE






South Orange

CountyOso Creek WRP

South Orange


South Orange

CountyRobinson Ranch WRP

South Orange

CountySan Clemente WRP

San Diego 4-S Ranch WTP

San Diego Camp Pendleton WWTP #01








Tertiary Treatment Plant


Treatment Plant

San Diego Carlsbad WRP

San Diego Chula Vista MBR Treatment Plant

San Diego Encina WPCF


San Diego Fallbrook Plant #1

San Diego Gafner WRF

San Diego Hale Avenue WRF

Permit No.

TDS

Limit

(mg/l)

Hardness

Limit

(mg/l)

BOD

Limit

(mg/l)

TSS

Limit

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen Limit

(mg/l)

pH

Residual

Chlorine

Requirement

(mg/l)

TMDL Permit Limits

(explain)


multiple limit

requirements, etc.

Comments




Plant not covered under

any NPDES PermitSOCWA-RECYCLED WATER USE

NPDES - CA0107611 30 30 6266.0 -

9.02.09 SOCWA-RECYCLED WATER USE

SOCWA-RECYCLED WATER USE

NPDES - CA0107417 City of San Clemente

1200

750 USMC BASE, CAMP PENDLETON






750

ENCINA WASTEWATER AUTHORITY

1300 FAIRBANKS RANCH COMM SERV DIST

450 CALTRANS DISTRICT 11

400

CA0107981 1000 25 30 570 6 - 9 2 CITY OF ESCONDIDO






San Diego La Salina WWTP

San Diego Lower Moosa Canyon WRF

San Diego Meadowlark WRP

San Diego North City WRP

San Diego Padre Dam WRF

San Diego Point Loma WWTP

San Diego Ralph W Chapman WRF


WRF

San Diego San Elijo WRF

San Diego San Luis Rey WWTP

San Diego San Vicente WWTP

San Diego Santa Maria WPCF

San Diego Skyline Ranch WRF

San Diego South Bay WRP

San Diego Valley Center WWTP

San Diego Whispering Palms WPCF

Ventura Ahmanson Ranch

Ventura Camarillo WRP

Permit No.

TDS

Limit

(mg/l)

Hardness

Limit

(mg/l)

BOD

Limit

(mg/l)

TSS

Limit

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen Limit

(mg/l)

pH

Residual

Chlorine

Requirement

(mg/l)

TMDL Permit Limits

(explain)


multiple limit

requirements, etc.

Comments




R9-2005-0136 30 210 6 - 9 0.7

Tuc = 88

Tua = 2.91

CBOD = 25 mg/L

Phenolics Non Chlor = 11mg/L

Phenolics Chlor = 0.35 mg/L

Oil and Grease = 25 mg/L

Settleable solids = 1ml/L

Endosulfan = 0.0016 mg/L

HCH = 0.0007 mg/L

TBT = 0.00012 mg/L

1000

1500 VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT

SAN DIEGO, CITY OF, MWWD

CA0107492 1000

15 mg/l,

30 Day

Ave

15 mg/l,

30 Day

Ave

Total N limited to

6088 lb/year

6.5 to

8.52 PADRE DAM MWD

400 Otay Water District

1500 RANCHO SANTA FE COMM SERV DIST

1200 SAN ELIJO JOINT POWERS AUTH

R9-2005-0136 30 210 6 - 9 0.7

Tuc = 88

Tua = 2.91

CBOD = 25 mg/L

Phenolics Non Chlor = 11mg/L

Phenolics Chlor = 0.35 mg/L

Oil and Grease = 25 mg/L

Settleable solids = 1ml/L

Endosulfan = 0.0016 mg/L

HCH = 0.0007 mg/L

TBT = 0.00012 mg/L

RAMONA MWD

800

1100

1200 SAN DIEGO, CITY OF, MWWD

1100 WHISPERING PALMS COMM SERV DIS

R4-2003-0079 850 20 40 106.5 -

8.50.1

chloride - 150 mg/L (Calleguas

Creek has approved TMDLs

for: OC/PCBs, Metals, salts,

Nutrients, Sediment, Trash

and Toxicity; pending Bacteria.

Only TMDL in permit is 2002

Chloride. Look at RWQCB

website for specific TMDL

limitations. Permit expired for

all Calleguas POTWs in mid

to late 2008.






Ventura Camrosa WRF

Ventura Hill Canyon TP

Ventura Moorpark WWTP

Ventura Oxnard WWTP

Ventura Simi Valley WQCP

Ventura Tapia WRF

Ventura Ventura WWTP

Permit No.

TDS

Limit

(mg/l)

Hardness

Limit

(mg/l)

BOD

Limit

(mg/l)

TSS

Limit

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen Limit

(mg/l)

pH

Residual

Chlorine

Requirement

(mg/l)

TMDL Permit Limits

(explain)


multiple limit

requirements, etc.

Comments




850

850

850

30 30

CA0055221 850 20 15 2 6 - 9 <0.1 Total Maximum Daily Loads

Daily averages & maximum

ug/l, mg/l, lbs. Monthly

averages ug/l, mg/l, lbs.















Facility













Permit

No.

Type of

Reuse

Permitted

TDS

Limit

(mg/l)

Comments

(Note any other potential reuse

limits, especially those that

could cause the need for

Advanced (RO) treatment in the

future)

TDS (mg/l)Hardness Limit

(mg/l)

BOD

Limit

(mg/l)

TSS

Limit

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHResidual Chlorine


Source of Data

(List All)

Note any other water

quality parameters

that may be pertinent

to discharge limits or

could result in the

need for Advanced

Treatment (RO)

Comments

(Note any concerns

regarding compounds

of emerging concern

(CECs) (including

EDCs, disinfection

byproducts, PhACs,

etc.) and provide any

recent data)

450

540

475

524 174 <2 <1 <0.1 TIN: 6.5 7.10 0.00

564

430

Irrigation and

Industrial770 710 70 3.83 1.10 0.10 4.61 7.30 Laboratory Analysis

680 230 6.85 7.40 0.73 14.40 7.45 Laboratory Analysis

Irrigation and

Industrial770 610 280 3.00 0.00 3.35 15.90 7.30 Laboratory Analysis

R6V-2007-0022Landscape

Irrigation300 366 15.00 16.00 0.40 4.00

2008 Annual Ops

report

563

440 150 2.67 <2 <0.2 5.00 6.5 - 8.5 <0.1Riverside Lab and

Test AmericaCOD 14.5

700

501 152 <2 <1 <0.1 TIN: 6.8 7.10 0.00

496 151 <2 <1 <0.1 TIN: 6.7 7.20 0.00

506 178 <2 2.00 <0.1 TIN: 6.5 7.20 0.00

800

580

481

712


Current Effluent Quality (Average Values)





















Program (GRIP)







Permit

No.

Type of

Reuse

Permitted

TDS

Limit

(mg/l)

Comments





future)


(mg/l)

BOD

Limit

(mg/l)

TSS

Limit

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHResidual Chlorine


Source of Data

(List All)


quality parameters



could result in the

need for Advanced

Treatment (RO)

Comments

(Note any concerns

regarding compounds

of emerging concern

(CECs) (including

EDCs, disinfection

byproducts, PhACs,


recent data)



800

410

700

400

629 230 3.00 <2 <2 7.60 6.88 - 7.03 <0.1

489 212 <5 <5 0.39 7.30 7.50

520

509 6.05 <5 7.40 6.45

94-92 Landscape 750 765 N/A <5 <5 ND 7.75 7.10 5.00 Monthly Reports

00-165 Irrigation 713

R8-2008-0005 Irrigation 770 580 184 <3 4.60 <0.1 3.00 7.40 Facility

R8-2003-0113 Irrigation 550 550 <10 <10 9.00 7.00 Facility

550

landscape

irrigation

industrial

594 20.00 15.00 1.30 7.20 <0.1

http://www2.san.ci.l

a.ca.us/permit/index

.html

896 18.00 19.00 35.00 6.80 <0.028



.html

N/A 1349 253 6.00 15.00 34.30 36.70 7.20 <0.1 2007 Annual Report

00-099landscape

irrigation1150 547 4.00 3.00 0.09 <27.9 6.90 7 2007 Annual Report

95-045Spray

irrigation.800 Possibly chloride 663 5.58 5.80 1.96 4.14 7.66

R6V-2006-0009

dust control,

soil

compaction,

and landscape

irrigation

PP - 739

NR - Not

Sampled

AVTTP - 862

MBR - 607

PP - 131

NR - Not Sampled

AVTTP - Not

Sampled

MBR - Not Sampled

PP - 19

NR - 32

AVTTP -<5

MBR - 4

PP - 134

NR - 70

AVTTP -

<3

MBR - 8

PP - 12.5

NR - 28.6

AVTTP - <3.3

MBR - <0.1

PP - 33

NR - 43

AVTTP - <6.6

MBR - <3.8

PP - 7.8

NR - 7.6

AVTTP - 6.5

MBR - 7.8

PP - Not Chlorinated

NR - Not Chlorinated

AVTTP - >17.3

MBR - >18.1

2007 Annual Report

60




















Nitrification



Permit

No.

Type of

Reuse

Permitted

TDS

Limit

(mg/l)

Comments





future)


(mg/l)

BOD

Limit

(mg/l)

TSS

Limit

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHResidual Chlorine


Source of Data

(List All)


quality parameters



could result in the

need for Advanced

Treatment (RO)

Comments

(Note any concerns

regarding compounds

of emerging concern

(CECs) (including

EDCs, disinfection

byproducts, PhACs,


recent data)



87-47 and 97-072landscape

irrigation1000 579 181 <3 <2 1.06 7.40 7.50 <0.05 2007 Annual Report

landscape

irrigation

industrial

726 20.00 15.00 <8.4 17.30 7.40 <1



.html



00-167Spray

irrigation.1000 658 <5 8.40 4.40 19.90 7.00

563 <5 3.70 1.80 21.10 7.30

N/A 573 15.00 74.00 18.50 <33.1 8.20 22 2007 Annual Report






irrigation1000 604 220 <3 <2 0.93 7.30 7.40 <0.1 2007 Annual Report Chlorides

2820 2.00 1.00 0.50 7.30 <0.01

CALIFORNIA

REGIONAL

WATER QUALITY

CONTROL BOARD

REPORT 2005

555 <5 2.80 0.30 4.70 7.30


irrigation1000 679 255 <4 <2.1 0.78 4.80 7.30 <0.1 2007 Annual Report Chlorides

150

150

644







Nitrification



Nitrification




North Orange


North Orange


North Orange

CountyMichelson WRP

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #1

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #2

South Orange

County3A Plant

South Orange

CountyChiquita WRP

South Orange


South Orange

CountyEl Toro WWTP

South Orange


South Orange


South Orange


Permit

No.

Type of

Reuse

Permitted

TDS

Limit

(mg/l)

Comments





future)


(mg/l)

BOD

Limit

(mg/l)

TSS

Limit

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHResidual Chlorine


Source of Data

(List All)


quality parameters



could result in the

need for Advanced

Treatment (RO)

Comments

(Note any concerns

regarding compounds

of emerging concern

(CECs) (including

EDCs, disinfection

byproducts, PhACs,


recent data)



644

644

644



1050

100

1050

Water to OCWD 950 39 31 33 7.8 0.05 OCSD TPODS

Final Effluent Values

include P1, P2 and OCSD

Brine

3000 39 31 33 7.8 0.05 OCSD TPODS

Final Effluent Values

include P1, P2 and OCSD

Brine

97-052 Irrigation 1100 986 3.0 1.2 22.0 7.4 12.9 SOCWA, Database

97-052 Irrigation 1100 880 6.7 2.7 7.6 11.6 SOCWA Database

97-052 Irrigation 1200 1074 5.0 2.4 7.3 11.3 SOCWA Database TDS, Mn

94-3 under Region 8 and

97-52 under Region 9Irrigation 720 693 13.0 13.0 7.2 SOCWA Database

1050 TDS, Fe, Mn

94-3 under Region 8 and

97-52 under Region 9Irrigation 1000 633 <3 2.2 8.3 SOCWA Database

97-052 Irrigation 1100 926 4.0 1.0 8.0 25.9 SOCWA Database TDS, Fe






South Orange

CountyOso Creek WRP

South Orange


South Orange


South Orange













Treatment Plant








Permit

No.

Type of

Reuse

Permitted

TDS

Limit

(mg/l)

Comments





future)


(mg/l)

BOD

Limit

(mg/l)

TSS

Limit

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHResidual Chlorine


Source of Data

(List All)


quality parameters



could result in the

need for Advanced

Treatment (RO)

Comments

(Note any concerns

regarding compounds

of emerging concern

(CECs) (including

EDCs, disinfection

byproducts, PhACs,


recent data)



97-052 Irrigation 1100 828 4.0 2.6 7.6 7.7 SOCWA Database Fe

97-052 Irrigation 1100 848 3.0 3.0 14.0 6.8 11.0 SOCWA Database TDS, Fe, Mn

97-052 Irrigation 1100 913 2.0 3.1 7.6 10.4 SOCWA Database TDS, Fe



1030

00-045 960

980

98-004 Injection 890

755

98-005 600

895

01-352 Irrigation 1300Robert Pierce with

Water Boards

91-078 1300

93-005 Percolation 960

86-041 720

1300

93-70 Irrigation 1000 1000 10 10 15 7 2














WRF











Permit

No.

Type of

Reuse

Permitted

TDS

Limit

(mg/l)

Comments





future)


(mg/l)

BOD

Limit

(mg/l)

TSS

Limit

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHResidual Chlorine


Source of Data

(List All)


quality parameters



could result in the

need for Advanced

Treatment (RO)

Comments

(Note any concerns

regarding compounds

of emerging concern

(CECs) (including

EDCs, disinfection

byproducts, PhACs,


recent data)



1390 13 4 24 7.5Lab Data

1Jan08-30Nov08

93-70 Irrigation 1000 1000 10 10 15 7 2



97-49 Irrigation 1000Limit on BOD and TSS is 30 mg/L, 30

Day Average860

30 mg/l, 30

Day Ave

30 mg/l, 30

Day Ave6.9 to 9.0

>450 mg-min per Liter,

Modal Contact Time >90

min

Permit 97-49, TDS

taken from

Sampling Data

1568 392 95 34 31 6.0 to 9.0


92-004 900


93-07Percolation

Irrigation1200 Boron 0.5mg/L 998 35 6 32 7.4

Lab Data

1Jan08-29Dec08


867

1000

00-203 Irrigation 955 21 9 6.0 to 9.0 0.03

94-080 Percolation 963

800

Non-NPDES File No.: 54-

181 Order 87-132Irrigation 850 800 384 2 1002 2 10 7 <0.1 2007 Annual Report

chloride - 211 mg/L, sulfate

- 282 mg/L, TDS - 1002

mg/L

The salt levels in the

effluent will be reduced

once the Groundwater

Desalter is put into

operation at the end 2011.






Ventura Camrosa WRF



Ventura Oxnard WWTP


Ventura Tapia WRF


Permit

No.

Type of

Reuse

Permitted

TDS

Limit

(mg/l)

Comments





future)


(mg/l)

BOD

Limit

(mg/l)

TSS

Limit

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHResidual Chlorine


Source of Data

(List All)


quality parameters



could result in the

need for Advanced

Treatment (RO)

Comments

(Note any concerns

regarding compounds

of emerging concern

(CECs) (including

EDCs, disinfection

byproducts, PhACs,


recent data)



825

630

680

R4-2008-0083

GWR, All

purpose

irrigation and

industrial

reuse

700

Daily Maximum Limit for Other

Compounds: Oil and Grease: 15 mg/L,

Chloride: 150 mg/L, Sulfate:30 mg/L,

Boron: 1mg/L, Total Nitrogen: 10 mg/L

1700 30 30

No discharge

limit, Discharge

contains 22-25

mg/L

No discharge

limit, Discharge

contains 25-29

mg/L

No discharge

limit. pH is

typically

between 7.4-

7.9

No discharge limit.

Contains some residual

quantities

CA0055221total treated

effluent850 689 20 15 2 11 7 <0.1 2007 Annual Report

800















Facility













Clo

th M

ed

ia

Du

al

Me

dia

- S

an

d F

iltr

ati

on

Fu

zzy

Fil

ter

Dy

na

sa

nd

Me

mb

ran

e F

iltr

ati

on

(M

F o

r

UF

)

Comments

(Note any variations, different

technology utilized, or

planned

changes in future and year) Fre

e C

hlo

rin

e

Ch

lora

min

e

Fre

e C

hlo

rin

e/C

hlo

ram

ine

Co

mb

ina

tio

n

UV

Ozo

na

tio

n

Comments

(Note chemical and

dosage used. Also, note

any variations, different


planned changes in

future and year.)

Continuous Backwash - Single

media (Sand)X

X X X UV is backup

X X

X (MF) on-line in 2010 X X UV in 2010

X X

Single Media - Anthracite X

X

Cloth Filters have been installed,

but not in use. Dual Media

(anthracite/ not sand)

X

X X

Disinfection Process Type (Place X)Tertiary Treatment Process Type (Place X)





















Program (GRIP)







Clo

th M

ed

ia

Du

al

Me

dia

- S

an

d F

iltr

ati

on

Fu

zzy

Fil

ter

Dy

na

sa

nd

Me

mb

ran

e F

iltr

ati

on

(M

F o

r

UF

)

Comments



planned


e C

hlo

rin

e

Ch

lora

min

e

Fre

e C

hlo

rin

e/C

hlo

ram

ine

Co

mb

ina

tio

n

UV

Ozo

na

tio

n

Comments

(Note chemical and




planned changes in

future and year.)


X X

X X Percolation and extraction X

X X

X X

Future expansion - Cloth Filters X

X X X MF/RO (proposed online 2019)

X

XSodium Hypochlorite - 10

mg/L

XSodium Hypochlorite - 50.32

mg/L

Secondary only X Calcium Hypochlorite Tablets

XModifications currently underway

will add 26 MGD tertiary filtersX X

UV is only used for research

purposes

Sodium Hypochlorite - 77.78

mg/L

Ammonia - 0.93 SG - 19.5 %

active




















Nitrification



Clo

th M

ed

ia

Du

al

Me

dia

- S

an

d F

iltr

ati

on

Fu

zzy

Fil

ter

Dy

na

sa

nd

Me

mb

ran

e F

iltr

ati

on

(M

F o

r

UF

)

Comments



planned


e C

hlo

rin

e

Ch

lora

min

e

Fre

e C

hlo

rin

e/C

hlo

ram

ine

Co

mb

ina

tio

n

UV

Ozo

na

tio

n

Comments

(Note chemical and




planned changes in

future and year.)


X


mg/L

Ammonia - 1.71 mg/L

X X


mg/L

Ammonia - 1.73 mg/L

X X

X X Calcium Hypochlorite Tablets

Modifications currently underway

will add 22.4 MGD tertiary filtersX


mg/L

X X


mg/L

Ammonia - 1.78 mg/L

X X


mg/L

Ammonia - 1.74 mg/L

X X


mg/L

Ammonia - 1.88 mg/L

X MF/RO

X Single media anthracite gravity filter X Sodium hypochlorite

X X


mg/L

Ammonia - 1.44 mg/L







Nitrification



Nitrification




North Orange


North Orange


North Orange

CountyMichelson WRP

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #1

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #2

South Orange

County3A Plant

South Orange

CountyChiquita WRP

South Orange


South Orange

CountyEl Toro WWTP

South Orange


South Orange


South Orange


Clo

th M

ed

ia

Du

al

Me

dia

- S

an

d F

iltr

ati

on

Fu

zzy

Fil

ter

Dy

na

sa

nd

Me

mb

ran

e F

iltr

ati

on

(M

F o

r

UF

)

Comments



planned


e C

hlo

rin

e

Ch

lora

min

e

Fre

e C

hlo

rin

e/C

hlo

ram

ine

Co

mb

ina

tio

n

UV

Ozo

na

tio

n

Comments

(Note chemical and




planned changes in

future and year.)


X X X

UV is only used for research

purposes


mg/L

Ammonia - 1.55 mg/L

X

(RO/ MF)

X

(UV/AOX)

Bleach on Primary Effluent and

Secondary Effluent

Bleach on Primary Influent and

Secondary Effluent Dechlor for

both P1 and P2

X X12.5% NaOCl, Automatic

dosage (compound loop)
















South Orange

CountyOso Creek WRP

South Orange


South Orange


South Orange













Treatment Plant








Clo

th M

ed

ia

Du

al

Me

dia

- S

an

d F

iltr

ati

on

Fu

zzy

Fil

ter

Dy

na

sa

nd

Me

mb

ran

e F

iltr

ati

on

(M

F o

r

UF

)

Comments



planned


e C

hlo

rin

e

Ch

lora

min

e

Fre

e C

hlo

rin

e/C

hlo

ram

ine

Co

mb

ina

tio

n

UV

Ozo

na

tio

n

Comments

(Note chemical and




planned changes in

future and year.)




X X Chlorine Gas



12.5% NaOCl, Automatic


X X X














WRF











Clo

th M

ed

ia

Du

al

Me

dia

- S

an

d F

iltr

ati

on

Fu

zzy

Fil

ter

Dy

na

sa

nd

Me

mb

ran

e F

iltr

ati

on

(M

F o

r

UF

)

Comments



planned


e C

hlo

rin

e

Ch

lora

min

e

Fre

e C

hlo

rin

e/C

hlo

ram

ine

Co

mb

ina

tio

n

UV

Ozo

na

tio

n

Comments

(Note chemical and




planned changes in

future and year.)


X X X

X Deep Bed Denitrification Filters X

Only Advanced Primary No Disinfection

X X X X

Xcloth media was put in place early

2007.X






Ventura Camrosa WRF



Ventura Oxnard WWTP


Ventura Tapia WRF


Clo

th M

ed

ia

Du

al

Me

dia

- S

an

d F

iltr

ati

on

Fu

zzy

Fil

ter

Dy

na

sa

nd

Me

mb

ran

e F

iltr

ati

on

(M

F o

r

UF

)

Comments



planned


e C

hlo

rin

e

Ch

lora

min

e

Fre

e C

hlo

rin

e/C

hlo

ram

ine

Co

mb

ina

tio

n

UV

Ozo

na

tio

n

Comments

(Note chemical and




planned changes in

future and year.)


X XHypochlorite. Planned UV

upgrade as early as 2015

X X

X X Aqueous Ammonia 19%















Facility













TDS

(mg/l)

TOC

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHTemp.

(°C)

Silica

(mg/l)

Calcium

(mg/l)

Bromide

(mg/l)

Barium

(mg/l)

Strontium

(mg/l)

Sulfate

(mg/l)

Carbonate

(mg/l)

Phosphate

(mg/l)

Arsenic

(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Perchlorate

(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Trace

Organcis

(list)

Notes

Note disposal method used,

technology, energy usage,

provide unit cost info (cost to

build, cost to operate, energy

costs, etc.) and planned year of

technology change or addition.

Refer to IWRP report for planned

technologies

Brine-Concentrate

Technologies Brine-Concentrate Water Quality Information (Please provide water quality report of RO permeate and source water quality if available)





















Program (GRIP)







TDS

(mg/l)

TOC

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHTemp.

(°C)

Silica

(mg/l)

Calcium

(mg/l)

Bromide

(mg/l)

Barium

(mg/l)

Strontium

(mg/l)

Sulfate

(mg/l)

Carbonate

(mg/l)

Phosphate

(mg/l)

Arsenic

(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Perchlorate

(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Trace

Organcis

(list)

Notes







Brine-Concentrate


Future Brine to AVORS

3000-

4000




















Nitrification



TDS

(mg/l)

TOC

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHTemp.

(°C)

Silica

(mg/l)

Calcium

(mg/l)

Bromide

(mg/l)

Barium

(mg/l)

Strontium

(mg/l)

Sulfate

(mg/l)

Carbonate

(mg/l)

Phosphate

(mg/l)

Arsenic

(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Perchlorate

(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Trace

Organcis

(list)

Notes







Brine-Concentrate


1 mgd RO facility scheduled to be built

30.75 27.80

3.53 mgd RO facility expected by 2015







Nitrification



Nitrification




North Orange


North Orange


North Orange

CountyMichelson WRP

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #1

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #2

South Orange

County3A Plant

South Orange

CountyChiquita WRP

South Orange


South Orange

CountyEl Toro WWTP

South Orange


South Orange


South Orange


TDS

(mg/l)

TOC

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHTemp.

(°C)

Silica

(mg/l)

Calcium

(mg/l)

Bromide

(mg/l)

Barium

(mg/l)

Strontium

(mg/l)

Sulfate

(mg/l)

Carbonate

(mg/l)

Phosphate

(mg/l)

Arsenic

(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Perchlorate

(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Trace

Organcis

(list)

Notes







Brine-Concentrate


No RO






South Orange

CountyOso Creek WRP

South Orange


South Orange


South Orange













Treatment Plant








TDS

(mg/l)

TOC

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHTemp.

(°C)

Silica

(mg/l)

Calcium

(mg/l)

Bromide

(mg/l)

Barium

(mg/l)

Strontium

(mg/l)

Sulfate

(mg/l)

Carbonate

(mg/l)

Phosphate

(mg/l)

Arsenic

(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Perchlorate

(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Trace

Organcis

(list)

Notes







Brine-Concentrate


MBR

3300

Palomar Energy

cooling tower water

which uses recycled














WRF











TDS

(mg/l)

TOC

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHTemp.

(°C)

Silica

(mg/l)

Calcium

(mg/l)

Bromide

(mg/l)

Barium

(mg/l)

Strontium

(mg/l)

Sulfate

(mg/l)

Carbonate

(mg/l)

Phosphate

(mg/l)

Arsenic

(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Perchlorate

(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Trace

Organcis

(list)

Notes







Brine-Concentrate


5400Electrodialysis Reversal Concentrate

discharges to outfall via Point Loma

WWTP

no RO treatment at wastewater plant.






Ventura Camrosa WRF



Ventura Oxnard WWTP


Ventura Tapia WRF


TDS

(mg/l)

TOC

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHTemp.

(°C)

Silica

(mg/l)

Calcium

(mg/l)

Bromide

(mg/l)

Barium

(mg/l)

Strontium

(mg/l)

Sulfate

(mg/l)

Carbonate

(mg/l)

Phosphate

(mg/l)

Arsenic

(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Perchlorate

(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Trace

Organcis

(list)

Notes







Brine-Concentrate


12200 77 176 11 188 8 22 182 827 159 16 3800 1800 18NDMA: 147

ppbPlant is not in operation yet.


Survey_Report.doc

Attachment C.2 – Wastewater Treatment Plant Flow Information

Facility Information Current/End of 2008



Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

Inland Empire Banning WWRP City of Banning 3.00 3.00 0

Inland Empire Beaumont WWTP #1 City of Beaumont 4.00 4.00 4.00 784 784

Inland Empire Big Bear Area RWA WWTF Big Bear Area RWA 4.90 4.90 1.90 1.90 1.90 1.90 13 3304 3317

Inland Empire Carbon Canyon WRF Inland Empire Utilities Agency 10.20 10.20 10.20 10.80 11.50 0

Inland Empire Chino Institution For Men California DOC 0.90 0.90 0.90 0

Inland Empire Colton WWTP City of Colton 9.75 9.75 6.10 6.10 0

Inland Empire Corona WWTP #1 City of Corona 5.50 11.50 9.00 5.30 9.62 8.30 5..5 13.43 9.83 1591 2241 3832

Inland Empire Corona WWTP #2 City of Corona 3.00 3.00 2.93 2.27 3.54 2.70 0

Inland Empire Corona WWTP #3 City of Corona 1.00 1.00 0.56 0.73 0.80 1.68 214 575 789

Inland Empire EVMWD-Alberhill EVMWD 0


Facility

Lake Arrowhead Community

Services District2.50 2.50 1.60 1.60 4.60 4.60 0

Inland Empire Hemet/San Jacinto WRF Eastern MWD 11.00 11.00 8.35 8.35 0

Inland Empire Henry N. Wocholz WWTP Yucaipa Valley WD 8.00 8.00 6.70 3.60 3.60 3.60 4.00 4.00 4.00 0

Inland Empire Horsethief Canyon EVMWD 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.40 468 468

Inland Empire IEUA Regional Plant #1 Inland Empire Utilities Agency 44.00 44.00 44.00 34.50 38.50 0

Inland Empire IEUA Regional Plant #4 Inland Empire Utilities Agency 7.00 7.00 7.00 6.10 7.00 0

Inland Empire IEUA Regional Plant #5 Inland Empire Utilities Agency 15.00 10.50 12.70 0

Inland Empire Lake Elsinore Regional WWRF Elsinore Valley MWD 4.00 3.00 3.00 5.16 5.16 5.16 0

Inland Empire Lee Lake Lee Lake Water District 1.60 1.60 0.90 0.90 40 40

Inland Empire Moreno Valley WRF Eastern MWD 16.00 16.00 6.00 12.58 12.58 6.00 0

Inland Empire Perris Valley WRP Eastern MWD 11.00 11.00 11.00 10.54 10.54 10.54 0

Inland Empire Railroad Canyon WWRF Elsinore Valley MWD 1.30 1.30 1.30 0.78 0.78 0.78 872 872

Inland Empire Redlands WWTP City of Redlands 9.00 9.00 4.20 4.20 2688 2016 4704

Inland EmpireRegional Wastewater Reclamation

PlantEVMWD 8.00 8.00 5.16 5.16 1233 4549 5782

Inland Empire Rialto WWTP City of Rialto 11.70 11.70 11.70 0

Inland Empire Riverside Regional WQCP City of Riverside 40.00 40.00 40.00 31.70 31.70 31.70 37.20 37.20 37.20 252 2240 2492

Inland Empire RIX WRP San Bernardino MWD 40.00 36.70 0

Inland Empire Running Springs Running Springs WD 1.00 1.00 0

Inland Empire San Bernardino WRP San Bernardino MWD 33.00 33.00 25.89 25.89 0

Inland Empire Santa Rosa WRF Rancho California WD 5.00 5.00 5.00 3.20 3.20 3.20 5.00 5.00 5.00 3200 120 3320

Inland Empire Temecula Valley Regional WRF Eastern MWD 14.00 14.00 14.00 12.18 12.18 12.18 1070 1705 2775

Inland Empire Western Riverside Co WWTP Western Riverside County RWA 8.00 8.00 8.00 5.30 5.30 5.30 246 246

Inland EmpireWestern Water Recycling Facility Western Municipal WD 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.60 672 672

Los Angeles Burbank WRP City of Burbank 9.00 9.00 9.00 0

Los Angeles Donald C. Tillman WRPCity of Los Angeles Bureau of

Sanitation60.00 60.00 60.00 49.40 37.50 37.50 58.40 37.50 37.50 241 - 2593 - 12656 - 1137 16626


Program (GRIP)

WRD/USGVMWD-Owners

Los Angeles CSD - Operators0

Los Angeles Hyperion WWTPCity of Los Angeles Bureau of

Sanitation450.00 450.00 320.70 320.70 415.00 320.70 0


Facility and Flow Information

\\cheron\projects\USBR\381333BrineStudy\T3_Brine_MGMT\T3-1_Survey\T3-1_Survey\Survey-V64_MH.xlsSurvey - WWTPs-Flows Page 1 of 28




Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal



Los Angeles Joint WPCP Los Angeles CSD 400.00 400.00 301.50 301.50 428.00 428.00 0

Los Angeles La Canada WRP Los Angeles CSD 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.48 0.48 116 116

Los Angeles Lake Hughes CWTFLos Angeles County Department

of Public Works0

Los Angeles Lancaster WRP Los Angeles CSD 17.00 17.00 1.60 15.20 11.20 1.20 16.10 15.80 1.55 6515 6191 12706

Los Angeles Leo J. Vander Lans Treatment FacilityWRD (Owner)

City of Long Beach (Operator)3.50 3.50 0.53 3.50 0.53 1242 1242

Los Angeles Long Beach WRP Los Angeles CSD 25.00 25.00 25.00 17.84 17.84 17.84 34.20 34.20 34.20 1755 1177 3935 6867

Los Angeles Los Angeles/Glendale WRPCity of Los Angeles Bureau of

Sanitation20.00 20.00 20.00 17.60 14.80 14.80 21.50 14.80 14.80 290 16286 16576

Los Angeles Los Coyotes WRP Los Angeles CSD 37.50 37.50 37.50 31.80 31.80 31.80 68.00 68.00 68.00 1289 5189 20 6498

Los Angeles Malibu Mesa WRFLos Angeles County Department

of Public Works0

Los Angeles Malibu WPCPLos Angeles County Department

of Public Works0

Los Angeles Newhall Ranch WRP Newhall Ranch Sanitation District 0

Los Angeles Palmdale WRP Los Angeles CSD 15.00 15.00 15.00 9.49 9.49 9.50 19.90 19.90 19.90 7042 7042

Los Angeles Pomona WRP Los Angeles CSD 15.00 15.00 15.00 9.49 9.49 9.49 14.43 14.43 14.43 3408 88 3091 1277 7864

Los Angeles San Jose Creek WRP Los Angeles CSD 100.00 100.00 100.00 82.30 82.30 82.30 152.20 152.20 152.20 23629 201 3994 119 201 28144

Los Angeles Saugus WRP Los Angeles CSD 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.52 6.52 6.52 7.50 7.50 7.50 0

Los Angeles Terminal Island WRPCity of Los Angeles Bureau of

Sanitation30.00 30.00 30.00 5.00 15.60 15.60 15.60 4.00 1.00 15.60 15.60 15.60 4.00 1.00 3000 11872 14872

Los Angeles Trancas WPCPLos Angeles County Department

of Public Works0

Los Angeles Valencia WRP Los Angeles CSD 21.60 21.60 21.60 15.96 15.96 15.96 31.10 31.10 31.10 356 356


NitrificationWest Basin MWD 5.90 5.90 5.90 6608 6608

Los Angeles West Basin-Carson Regional WRP-RO West Basin MWD 5.00 5.00 0.75 5.00 0.75 4760 4760

Los Angeles West Basin WRP-Barrier Treat West Basin MWD 12.50 12.50 1.88 12.50 1.88 11900 11900



Los Angeles West Basin WRP-Chevron Plant-RO West Basin MWD 4.30 4.30 0.65 4.30 0.65 4094 4094



Los Angeles West Basin WRP-Exxon Mobil-RO West Basin MWD 3.20 3.20 0.48 3.20 0.48 3584 3584

Los AngelesWest Basin WRP-Edward C. Little

WRFWest Basin MWD 30 30 30 0

Los Angeles Whittier Narrows WRP Los Angeles CSD 15.00 15.00 15.00 7.49 7.49 7.49 9.34 9.34 9.34 4626 913 5539

North Orange

CountyGreen Acres Project Orange County WD 10.00 7.00 10.00 2280 4400 6680





Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal



North Orange

CountyGroundwater Replenishment System Orange County WD 92.53 82.35 80.00 71.20 10.68 71.20 10.68 32791 35000 67791

North Orange

CountyMichelson WRP Irvine Ranch WD 18.00 18.00 18.00 0

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #1 Orange County SD 204.00 204.00 88.00 88.00 125.84 88.00 0

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #2 Orange County SD 168.00 90.00 155.00 90.00 221.65 90.00 0

South Orange

County3A Plant SOCWA 6.00 6.00 2.40 2.22 2.22 1.33 4.46 4.46 1.82 1401 1401

South Orange

CountyChiquita WRP Santa Margarita WD 9.00 9.00 5.00 6.60 6.60 2.30 10.57 10.57 5.00 2576 2576

South Orange

CountyCoastal Treatment Plant SOCWA 6.70 6.70 4.20 3.02 3.00 1.02 4.44 4.44 2.51 872 872

South Orange

CountyEl Toro WWTP El Toro Water District 6.00 6.00 2.60 4.20 4.20 0.34 5.50 5.50 1.10 386 386

South Orange

CountyJay B Latham WWTP SOCWA 13.00 13.00 8.83 8.83 13.90 13.90 0

South Orange

CountyLos Alisos WRP Irvine Ranch WD 7.50 7.10 4.60 2.74 6.57 5.55 3092 3092

South Orange

CountyNichols Water Reclamation Plant Santa Margarita WD 0.09 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.04 26 26

South Orange

CountyOso Creek WRP Santa Margarita WD 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.54 1.54 1.54 2.62 2.60 2.60 1725 1725

South Orange

CountyRegional Treatment Plant SOCWA 12.00 12.00 11.40 10.00 10.00 6.27 12.40 12.40 9.14 6986 6986

South Orange

CountyRobinson Ranch WRP Trabuco Canyon Water District 1.10 1.10 1.10 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.97 0.97 0.97 1030 1030

South Orange

CountySan Clemente WRP City of San Clemente 5.90 5.90 1.10 629 629

San Diego 4-S Ranch WTP Olivenhain MWD 0

San Diego Camp Pendleton WWTP #01 U.S. Marine Corps 1.10 1.10 0








Tertiary Treatment PlantU.S. Marine Corps 0.00 0.00 0





Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal



San DiegoCamp Pendleton-Southern Regional

Tertiary Treatment PlantU.S. Marine Corps 0.00 0.00 0

San Diego Carlsbad WRP Encina Joint Powers Authority 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.60 4.00 4.00 0.60 2319 100 2419

San Diego Chula Vista MBR Treatment Plant City of Chula Vista/ Otay WD

San Diego Encina WPCF Encina Joint Powers Authority 32.00 32.00 0

San Diego Fairbanks Ranch WPCF Fairbanks Ranch Comm. Ser. D 0.20 0.20 0

San Diego Fallbrook Plant #1 Fallbrook PUD 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 2.50 474 474

San Diego Gafner WRF Leucadia CWD 1.00 1.00 1.00 0

San Diego Hale Avenue WRF City of Escondido 17.50 17.50 9.00 13.00 13.00 3.00 17.00 17.00 3.00 3119 627 3746

San Diego La Salina WWTP City of Oceanside 5.50 5.50 0

San Diego Lower Moosa Canyon WRF Valley Center MWD 0.25 0.25 0

San Diego Meadowlark WRP Vallecitos WD 2.00 2.00 2.00 0

San Diego North City WRP City of San Diego 30.00 30.00 24.00 0.60 23.31 22.70 7.35 0.19 23.70 22.70 11.13 0.52 2440 4470 92 7002

San Diego Padre Dam WRF Padre Dam MWD 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 900 560 1460

San Diego Point Loma WWTP City of San Diego 240.00 161.00 362.00 0

San Diego Ralph W Chapman WRF Otay WD 1.30 1.30 1.30 442 442

San DiegoRancho Santa Fe WPCF/Santa Fe

Valley WRFRancho Santa Fe Com. Service D 0.45 0.45 0

San Diego San Elijo WRF San Elijo Joint Powers Authority 3.70 3.70 0

San Diego San Luis Rey WWTP City of Oceanside 10.70 10.70 0.70 0

San Diego San Vicente WWTP Ramona MWD 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.02 0.60 0.30 0.60 0.02 1.20 0.35 0.80 0.02 340 340 680

San Diego Santa Maria WPCF Ramona MWD 1.00 1.00 0.35 0.60 0.35 1.00 0.35 235 30 265

San Diego Skyline Ranch WRF Valley Center MWD 0.02 0.02 0

San Diego South Bay WRP City of San Diego 15.00 15.00 13.50 8.64 8.44 6.43 9.43 9.21 7.13 1497 3666 5163

San Diego Valley Center WWTP Valley Center MWD 0

San Diego Whispering Palms WPCFWhispering Palms Comm.

Services D0.40 0.40 0

Ventura Ahmanson Ranch Las Virgenes MWD 0

Ventura Camarillo WRP Camarillo SD 6.75 6.75 6.75 3.90 3.90 3.90 4.50 4.50 4.50 1000 1000

Ventura Camrosa WRFVentura Regional SD & Camrosa

WD1.50 1.50 1.50 0

Ventura Hill Canyon TP City of Thousand Oaks 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.80 10.80 10.80 0

Ventura Moorpark WWTPCounty of Ventura Waterworks

District No. 13.00 3.00 1.50 0

Ventura Oxnard WWTP/AWPF City of Oxnard 31.70 31.70 22.60 22.60 31.70 31.70 0

Ventura Simi Valley WQCP Simi Valley CSD 12.50 12.50 12.50 9.60 9.60 9.60 18.90 9.60 9.60 30 30 60

Ventura Tapia WRF Las Virgenes MWD 9.00 9.00 9.00 0

Ventura Ventura WWTP Ventura Regional SD 0















Facility








Inland Empire Lee Lake






Plant









Inland EmpireWestern Water Recycling Facility




Program (GRIP)



Facility and Flow InformationPlanning Year 2010


Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ec

ify

in

Co

mm

en

t)

To

tal

5.50 5.50 0

2.50 2.50 2.50 784 784

4.90 4.90 1.90 1.90 1.90 1.90 500 1600 2100

12.00 12.00 12.00 10.80 11.50 4168 300 4468

0.90 0.90 0.90 0

9.75 9.75 6.10 6.10 0

5.50 11.50 9.00 5.50 9.62 8.30 5.50 13.43 9.83 1120 52 1903 5549 8624

3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.54 3.00 40 467 507

1.00 1.00 0.56 0.73 0.80 1.68 214 575 789

0

3.75 3.75 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 200 200

11.00 11.00 9.60 9.60 1000 2002 1900 4200 9102

8.00 8.00 6.70 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0

0.50 0.50 0.40 0.40 475 475

49.00 49.00 49.00 34.50 38.50 25900 4593 827 31320

14.00 14.00 14.00 6.10 7.00 11532 180 11712

15.00 15.00 15.00 10.50 12.70 8700 3432 340 4000 16472

8.00 8.00 8.00 248 3681 200 600 4729

2.30 2.30 0.90 0.90 100 600 20 720

16.00 16.00 6.00 14.90 14.90 6.00 4639 7013 11652

11.00 11.00 11.00 15.60 15.60 15.60 873 6900 2000 5 9778

1.50 1.50 1.50 0.80 0.80 0.80 872 872

9.00 9.00 4.20 4.20 6160 1507 7667

8.00 8.00 7.10 7.10 1120 6813 7933

11.70 11.70 11.70 1170 427 1597

40.00 40.00 40.00 37.90 37.90 37.90 40.00 40.00 40.00 252 2240 2492

50.00 39.00 2500 2500 5000

1.00 1.00 503 503

33.00 33.00 27.50 27.50 5000 5000 4000 500 2800 17300

5.00 5.00 5.00 3.50 3.50 3.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 3600 120 3720

16.00 16.00 16.00 14.30 14.30 14.30 4145 7350 11495

8.00 8.00 8.00 7.10 7.10 7.10 1000 1000

3.00 3.00 3.00 1.30 1.30 1.30 500 1000 1500

9.00 9.00 9.00 1314 1871 3185

60.00 60.00 60.00 49.80 40.00 40.00 58.40 40.00 40.00 243 - 2612 - 12749 - 1145 16748

0

450.00 450.00 342.00 342.00 0






















Los Angeles Terminal Island WRP




Nitrification




Nitrification



Nitrification



WRF


North Orange


Planning Year 2010


Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ec

ify

in

Co

mm

en

t)

To

tal

400.00 400.00 301.50 301.50 428.00 428.00 0

0.20 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.48 0.48 116 116

0

18.00 18.00 18.00 1100 6515 6191 13806

3.50 3.50 0.53 3.50 0.53 3332 3332

25.00 25.00 25.00 17.84 17.84 17.84 34.20 34.20 34.20 1755 1177 10935 13867

20.00 20.00 20.00 17.70 17.70 17.70 290 19534 19824

50.00 50.00 50.00 1289 5189 20 6498

0

0

0

15.00 15.00 15.00 9.49 9.49 9.50 19.90 19.90 19.90 7042 7042

15.00 15.00 15.00 9.49 9.49 9.49 14.43 14.43 14.43 3408 88 7641 1277 12414

125.00 125.00 125.00 23629 201 12894 119 201 37044

6.50 6.50 6.50 6.52 6.52 6.52 7.50 7.50 7.50 0

30.00 30.00 30.00 5.00 15.60 15.60 15.60 4.00 1.00 15.60 15.60 15.60 4.00 1.00 4480 11200 15680

0

27.60 27.60 27.60 356 356

5.90 5.90 5.90 6608 6608

5.00 5.00 0.75 5.00 0.75 4760 4760

17.50 17.50 2.63 17.50 2.63 16800 16800

1.30 1.30 1.30 1456 1456

4.30 4.30 0.65 4.30 0.65 4094 4094

3.80 3.80 3.80 4256 4256

3.20 3.20 0.48 3.20 0.48 3584 3584

50 50 50 11918 12641 24559

15.00 15.00 15.00 7.49 7.49 7.49 9.34 9.34 9.34 4626 913 5539

10.00 7.00 10.00 2280 4400 6680







North Orange


North Orange

CountyMichelson WRP

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #1

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #2

South Orange

County3A Plant

South Orange

CountyChiquita WRP

South Orange


South Orange

CountyEl Toro WWTP

South Orange


South Orange


South Orange


South Orange

CountyOso Creek WRP

South Orange


South Orange


South Orange












Planning Year 2010


Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ec

ify

in

Co

mm

en

t)

To

tal

92.53 82.35 92.53 82.35 12.35 92.53 82.35 12.35 43410 35000 78410

18.00 18.00 18.00 9200 1785 10985

204.00 204.00 92.20 92.20 202.84 120.00 0

168.00 168.00 144.00 144.00 316.80 316.80 0

6.00 6.00 2.40 3.50 3.50 1.75 5.00 5.00 2.40 2016 2016

9.00 9.00 5.00 7.00 7.00 3.20 11.00 11.00 5.00 3584 1007 4591

6.70 6.70 4.20 3.50 3.50 1.50 4.44 4.44 2.51 1680 1680

6.00 6.00 2.60 4.80 4.80 0.40 5.50 5.50 2.00 448 448

13.00 13.00 9.00 9.00 15.00 15.00 0

7.50 7.10 5.00 3.50 6.80 6.00 3920 3920

0.09 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.04 26 26

3.00 3.00 3.00 1.54 1.54 1.54 2.60 2.60 2.60 1725 17 1741

12.00 12.00 11.40 10.50 10.50 7.50 13.00 13.00 10.00 8401 8401

1.30 1.30 1.30 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.30 1.30 1.30 1120 1120

5.90 5.90 1.10 2660 2660

2.00 2.00 2.00 1600 1600

0.00 0.00 0

0.00 0.00 1120 1120

0.00 0.00 504 504

0.40 0.40 224 224

0.00 0.00 784 784

0.00 0.00 224 224

0.00 0.00 1120 1120

0.00 0.00 0
























Valley WRF











Ventura Camrosa WRF



Ventura Oxnard WWTP/AWPF


Ventura Tapia WRF


Planning Year 2010


Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ec

ify

in

Co

mm

en

t)

To

tal

0.00 0.00 0

4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.60 4.00 4.00 0.60 2319 100 2419

32.00 32.00 0

0.28 0.28 0.28 336 336

2.01 2.01 2.01 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 2.50 160 320 480

2.00 2.00 2.00 221 44 265

18.00 18.00 9.00 13.00 13.00 3.00 17.00 17.00 3.00 3000 675 3675

5.50 5.50 0

0.44 0.44 0.44 360 360

3.00 3.00 3.00 3108 548 3656

30.00 30.00 24.00 0.60 23.31 22.70 8.00 0.19 23.70 22.70 11.13 0.52 3115 5693 92 8900

2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 900 560 1460

240.00 164.00 365.00 0

1.30 1.30 1.30 1456 1456

0.60 0.60 0.50 552 120 672

3.70 3.70 3.70 1690 1690

13.50 13.50 5.00 550 550

0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.02 0.60 0.30 0.60 0.02 1.20 0.35 0.80 0.02 340 340 680

1.40 1.40 0.40 0.60 0.35 1.00 0.35 230 30 260

0.02 0.02 28 28

15.00 15.00 13.50 8.64 8.44 6.43 9.43 9.21 7.13 1725 4225 5950

0

0.40 0.40 448 448

0

6.75 6.75 6.75 4.30 4.30 4.30 5.10 5.10 5.10 4814 4814

1.50 1.50 1.50 199 835 1034

14.00 14.00 14.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 13586 13586

3.00 3.00 3.00 757 757

31.70 31.70 8.00 8.00 1.75 22.60 22.60 8.00 8.00 1.75 31.70 31.70 8.00 8.00 1.75 1750 5250 7000

12.50 12.50 12.50 9.70 9.70 9.70 20.00 9.70 9.70 60 30 90

16.00 16.00 16.00 1900 9131 11031

0















Facility














Plant













Program (GRIP)





Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

\Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

5.50 5.50 0

1.40 1.40 1.40 784 784

4.90 4.90 1.90 1.90 1.90 1.90 500 1600 2100

12.00 12.00 12.00 10.80 11.50 4168 300 4468

0.90 0.90 0.90 0

9.75 9.75 6.50 6.50 0

18.00 18.00 15.00 11.60 11.60 6.00 2239 57 1903 7113 11312

3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.54 3.00 40 856 896

1.00 1.00 0.56 0.73 0.80 1.68 214 575 789

2.00 2.00 1.10 1.10 1188 1188

3.75 3.75 1.00 2.30 2.30 1.00 5.20 5.20 1.00 250 250

14.00 14.00 11.00 11.00 1000 2002 1900 4200 9102

8.00 8.00 8.00 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

49.00 49.00 49.00 34.50 38.50 25900 4593 827 31320

14.00 14.00 14.00 6.10 7.00 11532 180 11712

15.00 15.00 15.00 10.50 12.70 8700 3432 340 4000 16472

8.00 8.00 8.00 248 3681 200 600 4729

2.30 2.30 1.00 1.00 110 700 25 835

18.00 18.00 6.00 16.60 16.60 6.00 4639 7013 11652

22.00 22.00 22.00 20.30 20.30 20.30 873 6900 2000 5 9778

1.50 1.50 1.50 1.30 1.30 1.30 1457 1457

9.00 9.00 4.20 4.20 6160 1507 7667

12.00 12.00 9.30 9.30 1120 9335 10455

11.70 11.70 11.70 1170 427 1597

46.00 46.00 46.00 37.90 37.90 37.90 40.00 40.00 40.00 252 2240 2492

50.00 39.00 2500 2500 5000

1.00 1.00 503 503

33.00 33.00 29.60 29.60 10000 6000 4000 700 2915 23615

7.50 7.50 7.50 3.00 0.30 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 0.002 7.50 7.50 7.50 3.00 0.002 5000 9500 14500

23.00 23.00 23.00 15.10 15.10 15.10 4145 7350 11495

12.00 12.00 12.00 9.80 9.80 9.80 240 1860 2100

3.00 3.00 3.00 1.30 1.30 1.30 500 1000 1500

9.00 9.00 9.00 1314 1871 3185

80.00 80.00 80.00 50.70 40.70 40.70 247 - 2,660 - 12,984 - 1,166 17057

18.90 18.90 2.84 18.90 2.84 18000 18000

450.00 450.00 350.00 350.00 0


























Nitrification




Nitrification



Nitrification



WRF


North Orange


Planning Year 2015


Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

\Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

400.00 400.00 301.50 301.50 428.00 428.00 0

0.20 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.48 0.48 116 116

0

18.00 18.00 18.00 1100 6515 6191 13806

7.00 7.00 1.05 7.00 1.05 6664 6664

25.00 25.00 25.00 17.84 17.84 17.84 34.20 34.20 34.20 1755 1177 10935 13867

20.00 20.00 20.00 18.10 18.10 18.10 290 19982 20272

50.00 50.00 50.00 1289 5189 20 6498

0

0

6.80 6.80 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.15 0

15.00 15.00 15.00 9.49 9.49 9.50 19.90 19.90 19.90 7042 7042

15.00 15.00 15.00 9.49 9.49 9.49 14.43 14.43 14.43 3408 88 7641 1277 12414

125.00 125.00 125.00 23629 201 12894 119 201 37044

6.50 6.50 6.50 6.52 6.52 6.52 7.50 7.50 7.50 0

30.00 30.00 30.00 5.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 5.00 1.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 5.00 1.00 4480 28000 32480

0

27.60 27.60 27.60 3.53 3.53 0.53 3.53 0.53 356 356

5.90 5.90 5.90 6608 6608

5.00 5.00 0.75 5.00 0.75 4760 4760

17.50 17.50 2.63 17.50 2.63 16800 16800

1.30 1.30 1.30 1456 1456

4.30 4.30 0.65 4.30 0.65 4094 4094

3.80 3.80 3.80 4256 4256

3.20 3.20 0.48 3.20 0.48 3584 3584

50 50 50 11918 12641 24559

15.00 15.00 15.00 7.49 7.49 7.49 9.34 9.34 9.34 4626 2913 7539

10.00 7.00 10.00 2280 4400 6680







North Orange


North Orange

CountyMichelson WRP

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #1

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #2

South Orange

County3A Plant

South Orange

CountyChiquita WRP

South Orange


South Orange

CountyEl Toro WWTP

South Orange


South Orange


South Orange


South Orange

CountyOso Creek WRP

South Orange


South Orange


South Orange












Planning Year 2015


Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

\Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

132.19 117.65 132.19 117.65 17.65 132.19 117.65 17.65 77014 35000 112014

18.00 18.00 18.00 9200 1785 10985

239.80 239.80 109.00 109.00 239.80 239.80 0

168.00 168.00 144.00 144.00 316.80 316.80 0

6.00 6.00 2.40 3.50 3.50 2.20 5.20 5.20 2.40 2464 2464

9.00 9.00 7.50 8.00 8.00 5.50 11.00 11.00 7.50 6160 6160

6.70 6.70 4.20 0.80 4.00 4.00 2.50 0.60 0.15 4.80 4.80 3.50 0.80 0.20 3920 3920

6.00 6.00 2.60 5.50 5.50 2.00 7.20 7.20 2.60 2240 2240

13.00 13.00 7.00 9.00 9.00 3.50 15.00 15.00 5.00 1680 2240 3920

7.50 7.10 6.00 5.50 7.20 6.00 6160 6160

0.09 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.04 26 26

3.00 3.00 3.00 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 3080 17 3097

12.00 12.00 11.40 11.00 11.00 8.00 14.00 14.00 10.50 8961 8961

1.30 1.30 1.30 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.30 1.30 1344 1344

7.00 7.00 2.20 2660 2660

2.00 2.00 2.00 1600 1600

0.00 0.00 0

0.00 0.00 1120 1120

0.00 0.00 0

0.70 0.70 0.70 224 224

0.00 0.00 0

0.00 0.00 0

0.00 0.00 0

5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1008 1008
























Valley WRF











Ventura Camrosa WRF





Ventura Tapia WRF


Planning Year 2015


Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

\Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

3.25 3.25 3.25 2.00 2.71 2.71 2.71 3.25 3.25 3.25 1624 1624

4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.60 4.00 4.00 0.60 2319 100 2419

2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00

32.00 32.00 0

0.28 0.28 0.28 336 336

2.70 2.70 2.70 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 2.50 160 320 480

2.00 2.00 2.00 221 44 265

21.00 21.00 12.00 6.00 0.90 18.50 18.50 9.00 6.00 0.90 21.00 21.00 10.00 6.00 0.90 3000 1000 4000

5.50 5.50 0

0.44 0.44 0.44 360 360

3.00 3.00 3.00 3108 548 3656

30.00 30.00 24.00 0.60 23.31 22.70 10.00 0.19 23.70 22.70 11.30 0.52 3664 6707 99 10470

4.00 4.00 4.00 2.50 4.00 4.00 4.00 1.20 0.23 4.00 4.00 4.00 2.50 0.45 1344 2240 560 4144

240.00 171.00 365.00 0

1.30 1.30 1.30 1456 1456

0.60 0.60 0.50 552 120 672

3.70 3.70 3.70 1690 1690

13.50 13.50 5.00 550 550

0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.02 0.60 0.30 0.60 0.02 1.20 0.35 0.80 0.02 340 340 680

1.40 1.40 0.40 0.60 0.35 1.00 0.35 230 30 260

0.02 0.02 28 28

15.00 15.00 13.50 8.64 8.44 6.43 9.43 9.21 7.13 1928 4722 6650

0

0.40 0.40 448 448

0

6.75 6.75 6.75 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.90 5.90 5.90 5599 5599

1.50 1.50 1.50 199 835 1034

14.00 14.00 14.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 13586 13586

3.00 3.00 3.00 757 757

40.00 40.00 20.00 20.00 4.38 40.00 40.00 20.00 20.00 4.38 40.00 40.00 20.00 20.00 4.38 10500 1750 5250 17500

17.50 17.50 17.50 9.70 9.70 9.70 20.00 9.70 9.70 60 30 90

16.00 16.00 16.00 1900 9131 11031

0















Facility














Plant













Program (GRIP)





Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

5.50 5.50 0

4.00 4.00 4.00 784 784

4.90 4.90 1.90 1.90 1.90 1.90 1000 1068 32 2100

12.00 12.00 12.00 10.80 11.50 4168 300 4468

0.90 0.90 0.90 0

9.75 9.75 7.00 7.00 0

18.00 18.00 15.00 11.60 11.60 11.60 3359 63 1903 5987 11312

3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.54 3.00 40 856 896

1.00 1.00 0.56 0.73 0.80 1.68 214 575 789

2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2219 2219

3.75 3.75 1.00 2.50 2.50 1.00 5.20 5.20 1.00 300 300

14.00 14.00 12.00 12.00 1000 2002 1900 4200 9102

8.00 8.00 8.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

49.00 49.00 49.00 34.50 38.50 25900 4593 827 31320

14.00 14.00 14.00 6.10 7.00 11532 180 11712

15.00 15.00 15.00 10.50 12.70 8700 3432 340 4000 16472

8.00 8.00 8.00 248 3681 200 600 4729

2.30 2.30 1.20 1.20 120 800 30 950

18.00 18.00 18.00 17.80 17.80 17.80 4639 7013 11652

22.00 22.00 22.00 23.20 23.20 23.20 873 6900 2000 5 9778

2.00 2.00 2.00 1.60 1.60 1.60 1782 1782

9.00 9.00 4.20 4.20 6160 1507 7667

12.00 12.00 11.10 11.10 1120 11284 12404

11.70 11.70 11.70 1170 427 1597

52.60 52.60 52.60 42.00 42.00 42.00 46.00 46.00 46.00 416 6945 7361

50.00 39.00 2500 2500 5000

1.00 1.00 503 503

33.00 33.00 31.90 31.90 13000 6000 4000 1000 3930 27930

7.50 7.50 7.50 3.00 0.30 6.00 6.00 6.00 3.00 0.002 7.50 7.50 7.50 3.00 0.002 6000 9500 15500

23.00 23.00 23.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 4145 7350 11495

12.00 12.00 12.00 11.60 11.60 11.60 240 1860 2100

3.00 3.00 3.00 2.70 2.70 2.70 1500 1500 3000

9.00 9.00 9.00 1314 1871 3185

80.00 80.00 80.00 16.80 66.60 50.70 50.70 16.80 3.30 80.00 80.00 80.00 16.80 3.30 15,008 252 - 2,709 - ##### - 1,188 32380

48.32 48.32 7.25 48.32 7.25 46000 46000

450.00 450.00 358.00 358.00 0


























Nitrification




Nitrification



Nitrification



WRF


North Orange


Planning Year 2020


Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

400.00 400.00 301.50 301.50 428.00 428.00 0

0.20 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.48 0.48 116 116

0

26.00 26.00 26.00 1100 6515 6191 13806

7.00 7.00 1.05 7.00 1.05 6664 6664

25.00 25.00 25.00 17.84 17.84 17.84 34.20 34.20 34.20 1755 1177 10935 13867

20.00 20.00 20.00 18.40 18.40 18.40 290 20318 20608

50.00 50.00 50.00 1289 5189 20 6498

0

0

6.80 6.80 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.15 0

15.00 15.00 15.00 9.49 9.49 9.50 19.90 19.90 19.90 7042 7042

15.00 15.00 15.00 9.49 9.49 9.49 14.43 14.43 14.43 3408 88 7641 1277 12414

125.00 125.00 125.00 23629 201 12894 119 201 37044

6.50 6.50 6.50 6.52 6.52 6.52 7.50 7.50 7.50 0

30.00 30.00 30.00 5.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 5.00 1.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 5.00 1.00 5600 26880 32480

0

27.60 27.60 27.60 3.53 3.53 0.53 3.53 0.53 356 356

5.90 5.90 5.90 6608 6608

5.00 5.00 0.75 5.00 0.75 4760 4760

17.50 17.50 2.63 17.50 2.63 16800 16800

1.30 1.30 1.30 1456 1456

4.30 4.30 0.65 4.30 0.65 4094 4094

3.80 3.80 3.80 4256 4256

3.20 3.20 0.48 3.20 0.48 3584 3584

50 50 50 11918 12641 24559

15.00 15.00 15.00 7.49 7.49 7.49 9.34 9.34 9.34 4626 2913 7539

10.00 7.00 10.00 2280 4400 6680







North Orange


North Orange

CountyMichelson WRP

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #1

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #2

South Orange

County3A Plant

South Orange

CountyChiquita WRP

South Orange


South Orange

CountyEl Toro WWTP

South Orange


South Orange


South Orange


South Orange

CountyOso Creek WRP

South Orange


South Orange


South Orange












Planning Year 2020


Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

132.19 117.65 132.19 117.65 17.65 ##### 117.65 17.65 77014 35000 112014

18.00 18.00 18.00 9200 1785 10985

272.80 272.80 124.00 124.00 272.80 272.80 0

168.00 168.00 144.00 144.00 316.80 316.80 0

6.00 6.00 2.40 3.50 3.50 2.20 6.00 6.00 2.40 2464 2464

9.00 9.00 7.50 8.30 8.30 6.00 12.00 12.00 7.50 6720 6720

6.70 6.70 4.20 0.80 4.00 4.00 2.50 0.60 0.15 4.80 4.80 3.50 0.80 0.20 3920 3920

6.00 6.00 2.60 5.80 5.80 2.40 7.50 7.50 2.60 2688 2688

13.00 13.00 7.00 11.50 11.50 6.00 15.00 15.00 7.00 3360 3360 6720

7.50 7.10 6.00 5.50 7.20 6.00 6160 6160

0.09 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.04 26 26

3.00 3.00 3.00 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 3080 17 3097

13.00 13.00 11.40 12.00 12.00 8.50 15.00 15.00 10.50 8961 8961

1.30 1.30 1.30 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.30 1.30 1344 1344

7.00 7.00 2.20 2660 2660

2.00 2.00 2.00 1600 1600

0

1120 1120

0

0.70 0.70 0.70 224 224

0

0

0

5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1008 1008
























Valley WRF











Ventura Camrosa WRF





Ventura Tapia WRF


Planning Year 2020


Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

3.25 3.25 3.25 2.71 2.71 2.71 3.25 3.25 3.25 1624 1624

4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.60 4.00 4.00 0.60 2319 100 2419

2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00

32.00 32.00 0

0.28 0.28 0.28 336 336

2.70 2.70 2.70 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 2.50 160 320 480

2.00 2.00 2.00 221 44 265

21.00 21.00 12.00 6.00 0.90 20.00 20.00 18.00 6.00 0.90 21.00 21.00 10.00 6.00 0.90 3000 1000 4000

5.50 5.50 0

0.44 0.44 0.44 360 360

3.00 3.00 3.00 3108 548 3656

30.00 30.00 24.00 16.00 4.60 30.00 30.00 24.00 16.00 4.60 30.00 30.00 24.00 16.00 4.60 18000 3664 6707 99 28470

10.00 10.00 10.00 4.50 10.00 10.00 10.00 4.50 1.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 4.50 1.00 5000 2240 560 7800

240.00 164.00 349.00 0

1.30 1.30 1.30 1456 1456

0.60 0.60 0.50 552 120 672

3.70 3.70 3.70 1690 1690

13.50 13.50 5.00 550 550

0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.02 0.60 0.30 0.60 0.02 1.20 0.35 0.80 0.02 340 340 680

1.40 1.40 0.40 0.60 0.35 1.00 0.35 230 400 30 660

0.02 0.02 28 28

15.00 15.00 13.50 8.64 8.44 6.43 9.43 9.21 7.13 1928 4722 6650

0

0.40 0.40 448 448

0

6.75 6.75 6.75 5.80 5.80 5.80 6.96 6.96 6.96 6493 6493

1.50 1.50 1.50 199 835 1034

14.00 14.00 14.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 13586 13586

3.00 3.00 3.00 757 757

40.00 40.00 20.00 20.00 4.38 40.00 40.00 20.00 20.00 4.38 40.00 40.00 20.00 20.00 4.38 10500 1750 5250 17500

17.50 17.50 17.50 9.70 9.70 9.70 20.00 9.70 9.70 60 30 90

16.00 16.00 16.00 1900 9131 11031

0















Facility














Plant













Program (GRIP)





Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

5.50 5.50 0

4.00 4.00 4.00 784 784

4.90 4.90 1.90 1.90 1.90 1.90 1000 1068 32 2100

12.00 12.00 12.00 10.80 11.50 4168 300 4468

0.90 0.90 0.90 0

9.75 9.75 7.60 7.60 0

18.00 18.00 15.00 11.60 11.60 11.60 4479 63 1903 4867 11312

3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.54 3.00 40 856 896

1.00 1.00 0.56 0.73 0.80 1.68 214 575 789

5.00 5.00 3.00 3.00 3362 3362

5.00 5.00 3.60 1.50 0.40 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.50 0.08 6.00 6.00 6.00 1.50 0.08 1200 300 1500

14.00 14.00 12.70 12.70 1000 2002 1900 4200 9102

8.00 8.00 8.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

49.00 49.00 49.00 34.50 38.50 25900 4593 827 31320

14.00 14.00 14.00 6.10 7.00 11532 180 11712

15.00 15.00 15.00 10.50 12.70 8700 3432 340 4000 16472

8.00 8.00 8.00 248 3681 200 600 4729

2.30 2.30 1.30 1.30 130 900 35 1065

18.00 18.00 18.00 18.60 18.60 18.60 4639 7013 11652

22.00 22.00 22.00 25.10 25.10 25.10 873 6900 2000 5 9778

2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2219 2219

9.00 9.00 4.20 4.20 6160 1507 7667

16.00 16.00 12.70 12.70 1120 13077 14197

11.70 11.70 11.70 1170 427 1597

52.60 52.60 52.60 42.00 42.00 42.00 46.00 46.00 46.00 416 6945 7361

50.00 39.00 2500 2500 5000

1.00 1.00 503 503

40.00 40.00 34.40 34.40 19640 7000 5000 1500 4460 37600

7.50 7.50 7.50 3.00 0.30 6.50 6.50 6.50 3.00 0.002 7.50 7.50 7.50 3.00 0.002 6500 9500 16000

23.00 23.00 23.00 17.00 17.00 17.00 4145 7350 11495

16.10 16.10 16.10 13.40 13.40 13.40 5000 5000

5.00 5.00 5.00 3.60 3.60 3.60 2000 2000 4000

9.00 9.00 9.00 1314 1871 3185

80.00 80.00 80.00 16.80 67.80 57.50 57.50 16.80 3.30 80.00 80.00 80.00 16.80 3.30 15008 256 - 2759 - 13468 - 1210 32701

48.32 48.32 7.25 48.32 7.25 46000 46000

450.00 450.00 363.00 363.00 0


























Nitrification




Nitrification



Nitrification



WRF


North Orange


Planning Year 2025


Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

400.00 400.00 301.50 301.50 428.00 0

0.20 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.48 116 116

0

26.00 26.00 26.00 1100 6515 6191 13806

7.00 7.00 1.05 7.00 1.05 6664 6664

25.00 25.00 25.00 17.84 17.84 17.84 34.20 34.20 1755 1177 10935 13867

20.00 20.00 20.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 290 20990 21280

50.00 50.00 50.00 1289 5189 20 6498

0

0

6.80 6.80 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.15 0

22.40 22.40 22.40 22.40 22.40 22.40 7042 7042

15.00 15.00 15.00 9.49 9.49 9.49 14.43 14.43 3408 88 7641 1277 12414

125.00 125.00 125.00 23629 201 12894 119 201 37044

6.50 6.50 6.50 6.52 6.52 6.52 7.50 7.50 0

30.00 30.00 30.00 5.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 5.00 1.00 16.00 16.00 5.00 1.00 5600 26880 32480

0

27.60 27.60 27.60 3.53 3.53 0.53 3.53 0.53 8956 8956

5.90 5.90 5.90 6608 6608

17.50 17.50 2.63 17.50 2.63 16660 16660

17.50 17.50 2.63 17.50 2.63 16800 16800

1.30 1.30 1.30 1456 1456

4.30 4.30 0.65 4.30 0.65 4094 4094

3.80 3.80 3.80 4256 4256

3.20 3.20 0.48 3.20 0.48 3584 3584

50 50 50 11918 12641 24559

15.00 15.00 15.00 7.49 7.49 7.49 9.34 9.34 9.34 4626 2913 7539

10.00 7.00 10.00 2280 4400 6680







North Orange


North Orange

CountyMichelson WRP

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #1

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #2

South Orange

County3A Plant

South Orange

CountyChiquita WRP

South Orange


South Orange

CountyEl Toro WWTP

South Orange


South Orange


South Orange


South Orange

CountyOso Creek WRP

South Orange


South Orange


South Orange












Planning Year 2025


Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

132.19 117.65 132.19 117.65 17.65 132.19 117.65 17.65 77014 35000 112014

18.00 18.00 18.00 9200 1785 10985

303.60 303.60 138.00 138.00 303.60 303.60 0

168.00 168.00 144.00 144.00 316.80 316.80 0

6.00 6.00 2.40 3.50 3.50 2.20 6.00 6.00 2.40 2464 2464

9.00 9.00 7.50 8.50 8.50 6.50 12.50 12.50 7.50 7280 7280

6.70 6.70 4.20 0.80 4.00 4.00 2.50 0.60 0.15 4.80 4.80 3.50 0.80 0.20 3920 3920

6.00 6.00 2.60 5.80 5.80 2.40 7.50 7.50 2.60 2688 2688

13.00 13.00 7.00 12.00 12.00 6.00 15.00 15.00 7.00 3360 3360 6720

7.50 7.10 6.00 5.50 7.20 6.00 6160 6160

0.09 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.04 26 26

3.00 3.00 3.00 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 3080 17 3097

13.00 13.00 11.40 12.00 12.00 8.50 15.00 15.00 10.50 8961 8961

1.30 1.30 1.30 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.30 1.30 1344 1344

7.00 7.00 2.20 2660 2660

2.00 2.00 2.00 1600 1600

0

1120 1120

0

0.70 0.70 0.70 224 224

0

0

0

5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1008 1008
























Valley WRF











Ventura Camrosa WRF





Ventura Tapia WRF


Planning Year 2025


Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

3.25 3.25 3.25 2.71 2.71 2.71 3.25 3.25 3.25 1624 1624

4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.60 4.00 4.00 0.60 2319 100 2419

4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00

32.00 32.00 0

0.28 0.28 0.28 336 336

2.70 2.70 2.70 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 2.50 160 320 480

2.00 2.00 2.00 221 44 265

21.00 21.00 12.00 6.00 0.90 23.00 23.00 18.00 6.00 0.90 21.00 21.00 10.00 6.00 0.90 3000 1000 4000

5.50 5.50 0

0.44 0.44 0.44 360 360

3.00 3.00 3.00 3108 548 3656

30.00 30.00 24.00 16.00 4.60 30.00 30.00 24.00 16.00 4.60 30.00 30.00 24.00 16.00 4.60 18000 3664 6707 99 28470

10.00 10.00 10.00 4.50 10.00 10.00 10.00 4.50 1.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 4.50 1.00 5000 2240 560 7800

240.00 150.00 172.00 150.00 349.00 150.00 0

1.30 1.30 1.30 1456 1456

0.60 0.60 0.50 552 120 672

3.70 3.70 3.70 1690 1690

13.50 13.50 5.00 550 550

0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.02 0.60 0.30 0.60 0.02 1.20 0.35 0.80 0.02 340 340 680

1.40 1.40 0.40 0.60 0.35 1.00 0.35 250 400 30 680

0.02 0.02 28 28

15.00 15.00 13.50 8.64 8.44 6.43 9.43 9.21 7.13 1928 4722 6650

0

0.40 0.40 448 448

0

6.75 6.75 6.75 6.20 6.20 6.20 7.44 7.44 7.44 6942 6942

1.50 1.50 1.50 199 835 1034

14.00 14.00 14.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 13586 13586

3.00 3.00 3.00 757 757

40.00 40.00 20.00 20.00 4.38 40.00 40.00 20.00 20.00 4.38 40.00 40.00 20.00 20.00 4.38 10500 1750 5250 17500

17.50 17.50 17.50 9.70 9.70 9.70 20.00 9.70 9.70 60 30 90

16.00 16.00 16.00 1900 9131 11031

0















Facility














Plant













Program (GRIP)





Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

5.50 5.50 0

4.00 4.00 4.00 784 784

4.90 4.90 1.90 1.90 1.90 1.90 1500 568 32 2100

12.00 12.00 12.00 10.80 11.50 4168 300 4468

0.90 0.90 0.90 0

9.75 9.75 8.20 8.20 0

18.00 18.00 15.00 11.60 11.60 11.60 4479 63 1903 4867 11312

3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.54 3.00 40 856 896

1.00 1.00 0.56 0.73 0.80 1.68 214 575 789

5.00 5.00 4.50 4.50 5042 5042

5.00 5.00 3.60 1.50 0.40 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.50 0.08 6.00 6.00 6.00 1.50 0.08 1200 300 1500

14.00 14.00 13.30 13.30 1000 2002 1900 4200 9102

8.00 8.00 8.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

49.00 49.00 49.00 34.50 38.50 25900 4593 827 31320

14.00 14.00 14.00 6.10 7.00 11532 180 11712

15.00 15.00 15.00 10.50 12.70 8700 3432 340 4000 16472

8.00 8.00 8.00 248 3681 200 600 4729

2.30 2.30 1.40 1.40 140 1000 40 1180

18.00 18.00 18.00 18.90 18.90 18.90 4639 7013 11652

22.00 22.00 22.00 26.60 26.60 26.60 873 6900 2000 5 9778

2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2241 2241

9.00 9.00 4.20 4.20 6160 1507 7667

16.00 16.00 15.00 15.00 1120 15688 16808

11.70 11.70 11.70 1170 427 1597

52.60 52.60 52.60 42.00 42.00 42.00 46.00 46.00 46.00 416 6945 7361

50.00 39.00 2500 2500 5000

1.00 1.00 503 503

48.20 48.20 37.10 37.10 25500 8000 2000 5700 41200

9.00 9.00 9.00 5.00 0.50 7.00 7.00 7.00 5.00 0.003 9.00 9.00 9.00 5.00 0.003 7000 15000 22000

23.00 23.00 23.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 4145 7350 11495

16.10 16.10 16.10 15.00 15.00 15.00 6000 6000

5.00 5.00 5.00 3.60 3.60 3.60 2000 2000 4000

9.00 9.00 9.00 1314 1871 3185

80.00 80.00 80.00 16.80 69.10 58.60 58.60 16.80 3.30 ` 80.00 80.00 16.80 3.30 15008 261 - 2810 - 13716 - 1232 33027

48.32 48.32 7.25 48.32 7.25 46000 46000

450.00 450.00 368.00 368.00 0


























Nitrification




Nitrification



Nitrification



WRF


North Orange


Planning Year 2030


Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

400.00 400.00 301.50 301.50 428.00 428.00 0

0.20 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.48 0.48 116 116

0

26.00 26.00 26.00 1100 6515 6191 13806

7.00 7.00 1.05 7.00 1.05 6664 6664

25.00 25.00 25.00 17.84 17.84 17.84 34.20 34.20 34.20 1755 1177 10935 13867

20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 290 22110 22400

50.00 50.00 50.00 1289 5189 20 6498

0

0

6.80 6.80 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.15 0

22.40 22.40 22.40 22.40 22.40 22.40 7042 7042

15.00 15.00 15.00 9.49 9.49 9.49 14.43 14.43 14.43 3408 88 7641 1277 12414

125.00 125.00 125.00 23629 201 12894 119 201 37044

6.50 6.50 6.50 6.52 6.52 6.52 7.50 7.50 7.50 0

30.00 30.00 30.00 5.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 5.00 1.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 5.00 1.00 5600 26880 32480

0

27.60 27.60 27.60 3.53 3.53 0.53 3.53 0.53 8956 8956

5.90 5.90 5.90 6608 6608

17.50 17.50 2.63 17.50 2.63 16660 16660

17.50 17.50 2.63 17.50 2.63 16800 16800

1.30 1.30 1.30 1456 1456

4.30 4.30 0.65 4.30 0.65 4094 4094

3.80 3.80 3.80 4256 4256

3.20 3.20 0.48 3.20 0.48 3584 3584

50 50 50 11918 12641 24559

15.00 15.00 15.00 7.49 7.49 7.49 9.34 9.34 9.34 4626 2913 7539

10.00 7.00 10.00 2280 4400 6680







North Orange


North Orange

CountyMichelson WRP

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #1

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #2

South Orange

County3A Plant

South Orange

CountyChiquita WRP

South Orange


South Orange

CountyEl Toro WWTP

South Orange


South Orange


South Orange


South Orange

CountyOso Creek WRP

South Orange


South Orange


South Orange












Planning Year 2030


Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

132.19 117.65 132.19 117.65 17.65 132.19 117.65 17.65 77014 35000 112014

18.00 18.00 18.00 9200 1785 10985

330.00 330.00 150.00 150.00 330.00 330.00 0

168.00 168.00 144.00 144.00 316.80 316.80 0

6.00 6.00 2.40 3.50 3.50 2.20 6.00 6.00 2.40 2464 2464

13.00 13.00 13.00 9.00 9.00 8.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 8960 8960

6.70 6.70 4.20 0.80 4.00 4.00 2.50 0.60 0.15 4.80 4.80 3.50 0.80 0.20 3920 3920

6.00 6.00 2.60 5.80 5.80 2.40 7.50 7.50 2.60 2688 2688

13.00 13.00 7.00 12.50 12.50 7.00 16.00 16.00 7.00 3920 3920 7840

7.50 7.10 6.00 5.50 7.20 6.00 6160 6160

0.09 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.04 26 26

3.00 3.00 3.00 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 3080 17 3097

13.00 13.00 11.40 12.00 12.00 8.50 15.00 15.00 10.50 8961 8961

1.30 1.30 1.30 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.30 1.30 1344 1344

7.00 7.00 2.20 2660 2660

2.00 2.00 2.00 1600 1600

0

1120 1120

0

0.70 0.70 0.70 224 224

0

0

0

5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1008 1008
























Valley WRF











Ventura Camrosa WRF





Ventura Tapia WRF


Planning Year 2030


Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

3.25 3.25 3.25 2.71 2.71 2.71 3.25 3.25 3.25 1624 1624

4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.60 4.00 4.00 0.60 2319 100 2419

4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00

32.00 32.00 0

0.28 0.28 0.28 336 336

2.70 2.70 2.70 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 2.50 160 320 480

2.00 2.00 2.00 221 44 265

24.00 24.00 18.00 9.00 1.35 24.00 24.00 18.00 9.00 1.35 21.00 21.00 10.00 9.00 1.35 3000 1000 4000

5.50 5.50 0

0.44 0.44 0.44 360 360

3.00 3.00 3.00 3108 548 3656

30.00 30.00 24.00 16.00 4.60 30.00 30.00 24.00 16.00 4.60 30.00 30.00 24.00 16.00 4.60 18000 3664 6707 99 28470

10.00 10.00 10.00 4.50 10.00 10.00 10.00 4.50 1.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 4.50 1.00 5000 2240 560 7800

240.00 150.00 160.00 150.00 349.00 150.00 0

1.30 1.30 1.30 1456 1456

0.60 0.60 0.50 552 120 672

3.70 3.70 3.70 1690 1690

13.50 13.50 5.00 550 550

0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.02 0.60 0.30 0.60 0.02 1.20 0.35 0.80 0.02 340 340 680

1.50 1.50 1.50 0.60 0.35 1.00 0.35 250 400 30 680

0.02 0.02 28 28

36.00 36.00 13.50 8.64 8.44 6.43 9.43 9.21 7.13 1928 4722 6650

0

0.40 0.40 448 448

0

6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 8.00 8.00 8.00 7557 7557

1.50 1.50 1.50 199 835 1034

14.00 14.00 14.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 13586 13586

3.00 3.00 3.00 757 757

40.00 40.00 20.00 20.00 4.38 40.00 40.00 20.00 20.00 4.38 40.00 40.00 20.00 20.00 4.38 10500 1750 5250 17500

17.50 17.50 17.50 9.70 9.70 9.70 20.00 9.70 9.70 60 30 90

16.00 16.00 16.00 1900 9131 11031

0















Facility














Plant













Program (GRIP)



Facility and Flow InformationPlanning Year 2035 Ultimate Build-out

Treatment Capacity (MGD) Average Daily Flow (MGD) Maximum Daily Flow (MGD) Recycled Water Usage (AFY) Treatment Capacity (MGD)

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te T

rea

tme

nt

Av

g. B

rin

e-C

on

ce

ntr

ate

Flo

w

Ma

x. B

rin

e-C

on

ce

ntr

ate

Flo

w

Ye

ar

of

Bu

ild

Ou

t

7.50 6.00 0 7.50 6.00

8.00 8.00 8.00 784 784 8.00 8.00 8.00

4.90 4.90 1.90 1.90 0.29 1.90 1.90 1.90 1.90 0.06 1.90 1.90 1.90 1.90 0.06 1500 568 32 2100 4.90 4.90 1.90 1.90 0.29 0.06 0.06

20.00 20.00 20.00 10.80 11.50 4371 7150 300 80 11901 20.00 20.00 20.00

0.90 0.90 0.90 0 0.90 0.90 0.90

9.75 9.75 8.20 8.20 0 9.75 9.75

18.00 18.00 15.00 11.60 11.60 11.60 10250 2250 68 12568 18.00 18.00 15.00

3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.54 3.00 1650 106 1756 3.00 3.00 3.00

3.00 3.00 3.00 0.56 0.73 0.80 1.68 214 575 789 3.00 3.00 3.00

5.00 5.00 4.50 4.50 5042 5042 5.00 5.00

5.00 5.00 3.60 1.50 0.40 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.50 0.08 6.00 6.00 6.00 1.50 0.08 1200 300 1500 5.00 5.00 3.60 1.50 0.40 0.08 0.08 2030

27.00 27.00 27.00 13.30 13.30 1000 4150 1900 4500 11550 27.00 27.00 27.00

8.00 8.00 8.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0 8.00 8.00 8.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00

70.00 70.00 70.00 30500 9835 40335 70.00 70.00 70.00

35.00 35.00 35.00 24543 3432 2701 30676 35.00 35.00 35.00

30.00 30.00 30.00 11300 248 2893 7298 21739 30.00 30.00 30.00

16.00 16.00 16.00 4604 600 5204 16.00 16.00 16.00

2.30 2.30 1.40 1.40 140 1000 40 1180 2.30 2.30

32.00 32.00 32.00 6408 10521 16929 32.00 32.00 32.00

60.00 60.00 60.00 3360 4002 10061 2000 5 19428 60.00 60.00 60.00

2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 6160 530 6690 2.00 2.00 2.00

9.00 9.00 4.20 4.20 1256 1950 3206 9.00 9.00

16.00 16.00 15.00 15.00 1120 15688 16808 16.00 16.00

15.70 15.70 15.70 208 2431 2639 15.70 15.70 15.70

52.60 52.60 52.60 42.00 42.00 42.00 46.00 46.00 46.00 416 6945 7361 52.60 52.60 52.60

50.00 39.00 9000 9000 50.00

1.00 1.00 503 503 1.00 1.00

60.00 60.00 45.00 45.00 30000 10000 5000 1500 3500 50000 60.00 60.00

9.00 9.00 9.00 5.00 0.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 5.00 0.003 9.00 9.00 9.00 5.00 0.003 7000 15000 22000 9.00 9.00 9.00 7.00 0.70 0.005 0.005 2050

45.00 45.00 45.00 6173 9106 15279 45.00 45.00 45.00

16.00 16.00 16.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 6000 6000 16.00 16.00 16.00

5.00 5.00 5.00 3.60 3.60 3.60 2000 2000 4000 5.00 5.00 5.00

15.00 15.00 15.00 9450 4219 13669 15.00 15.00 15.00

80.00 80.00 80.00 16.80 70.40 59.70 59.70 16.80 3.30 80.00 80.00 80.00 16.80 3.30 15008 266 - 2862 - 13969 - 1255 33360 80.00 80.00 80.00 16.80 3.30 3.30

48.32 48.32 7.25 48.32 7.25 46000 46000 48.32 7.25 7.25

550.00 550.00 375.00 375.00 0 550.00 550.00


























Nitrification




Nitrification



Nitrification



WRF


North Orange




Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te T

rea

tme

nt

Av

g. B

rin

e-C

on

ce

ntr

ate

Flo

w

Ma

x. B

rin

e-C

on

ce

ntr

ate

Flo

w

Ye

ar

of

Bu

ild

Ou

t

400.00 400.00 301.50 301.50 428.00 428.00 0 400.00 400.00 2010

0.20 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.48 0.48 116 116 0.20 0.20

0

26.00 26.00 26.00 1100 6515 6191 13806 26.00 26.00 26.00 2020

7.00 7.00 1.05 8.00 1.20 7616 7616 7.00 1.05 1.20

25.00 25.00 25.00 17.84 17.84 17.84 34.20 34.20 34.20 1755 1177 10935 13867 25.00 25.00 25.00

50.00 50.00 50.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 290 23230 23520 50.00 50.00 50.00

50.00 50.00 50.00 1289 5189 20 6498 50.00 50.00 50.00 2010

0

0

6.80 6.80 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.15 0 6.80 6.80 1.00 0.15 0.15

22.40 22.40 22.40 22.40 22.40 22.40 7042 7042 22.40 22.40 22.40 2025

15.00 15.00 15.00 9.49 9.49 9.49 14.43 14.43 14.43 3408 88 7641 1277 12414 15.00 15.00 15.00

125.00 125.00 125.00 23629 201 37394 119 201 61544 125.00 125.00 125.00 2010

6.50 6.50 6.50 6.52 6.52 6.52 7.50 7.50 7.50 0 6.50 6.50 6.50

30.00 30.00 30.00 5.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 5.00 1.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 5.00 1.00 5600 26880 32480 30.00 30.00 30.00 5.00 1.00 1.00

0

27.60 27.60 27.60 3.53 3.53 0.53 3.53 0.53 8956 8956 27.60 27.60 27.60 3.53 0.53 0.53 2015

5.90 5.90 5.90 6608 6608 5.90

17.50 17.50 2.63 17.50 2.63 16660 16660 17.50 2.63 2.63

7.50 17.50 2.63 17.50 2.63 16800 4816 21616 17.50 2.63 2.63

1.30 1.30 1.30 1456 1456 1.30

4.30 4.30 0.65 4.30 0.65 4094 4094 4.30 0.65 0.65

3.80 3.80 3.80 4256 4256 3.80

3.20 3.20 0.48 3.20 0.48 3584 3584 3.20 0.48 0.48

50 50 50 11918 12641 24559 50

15.00 15.00 15.00 7.49 7.49 7.49 9.34 9.34 9.34 4626 2913 7539 15.00 15.00 15.00

10.00 7.00 10.00 2280 4400 6680 10.00 2008







North Orange


North Orange

CountyMichelson WRP

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #1

North Orange

CountyOCSD Plant #2

South Orange

County3A Plant

South Orange

CountyChiquita WRP

South Orange


South Orange

CountyEl Toro WWTP

South Orange


South Orange


South Orange


South Orange

CountyOso Creek WRP

South Orange


South Orange


South Orange














Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te T

rea

tme

nt

Av

g. B

rin

e-C

on

ce

ntr

ate

Flo

w

Ma

x. B

rin

e-C

on

ce

ntr

ate

Flo

w

Ye

ar

of

Bu

ild

Ou

t

171.80 153.00 171.80 153.00 23.00 171.80 153.00 23.00 110618 35000 145618 171.80 153.00 23.00 23.00 ULT

33.00 33.00 33.00 18500 18500 33.00 33.00 33.00

330.00 330.00 150.00 150.00 330.00 330.00 0 235.00 235.00 2070

168.00 168.00 144.00 144.00 316.80 316.80 0 168.00 168.00 2070

6.00 6.00 2.40 3.50 3.50 2.20 6.00 6.00 2.40 3534 105 3639 6.00 6.00 2.40 2030

13.00 13.00 13.00 12.50 12.50 12.00 15.60 15.60 13.00 13440 850 14290 13.00 13.00 13.00 2030

6.70 6.70 4.20 0.80 4.00 4.00 2.50 0.60 0.15 4.80 4.80 3.50 0.80 0.20 3920 3920 6.70 6.70 4.20 0.60 0.15 0.20 2025

6.00 6.00 2.60 5.80 5.80 2.40 7.50 7.50 2.60 2688 2688 6.00 6.00 2.60 2020

13.00 13.00 7.00 12.50 12.50 7.00 16.00 16.00 7.00 3920 3920 7840 13.00 13.00 7.00 2030

7.50 7.10 6.00 5.50 7.20 6.00 6160 6160 7.50 7.10

0.09 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.04 26 26 0.09 0.04 1990

3.00 3.00 3.00 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 3080 17 3097 3.00 3.00 3.00 1989

13.00 13.00 11.40 12.00 12.00 8.50 15.00 15.00 10.50 8961 8961 13.00 13.00 11.40 2025

1.30 1.30 1.30 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.30 1.30 1344 1344 1.30 1.30 1.30 2020

7.00 7.00 2.20 2660 2660 7.00 7.00 2.20

2.00 2.00 2.00 1800 1800 2.00 2.00 2.00

0

1344 1344

0

0.70 0.70 0.70 392 392 0.70 0.70 0.70

0

0

0

5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 2016 2016 5.00 5.00 5.00
























Valley WRF











Ventura Camrosa WRF





Ventura Tapia WRF




Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te F

low

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(No

n-R

O)

GW

Re

ch

arg

e

(RO

)

Re

se

rvo

ir A

ug

me

nta

tio

n (

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(No

n-

RO

)

Se

aw

ate

r In

tru

sio

n B

arr

ier

(RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (N

on

-RO

)

Ind

us

tria

l (R

O)

La

nd

sc

ap

e Irr

iga

tio

n

Ag

ric

ult

ure

Irr

iga

tio

n

En

vir

on

me

nta

l/

Ha

bit

at

Us

es

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/ D

us

t C

on

tro

l

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s/

Oth

er

(Sp

ecif

y i

n C

om

men

t)

To

tal

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Te

rtia

ry

Ad

va

nc

ed

(R

O)

Bri

ne

-Co

nc

en

tra

te T

rea

tme

nt

Av

g. B

rin

e-C

on

ce

ntr

ate

Flo

w

Ma

x. B

rin

e-C

on

ce

ntr

ate

Flo

w

Ye

ar

of

Bu

ild

Ou

t

6.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 2016 2016 6.00 6.00 6.00

16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 2.40 16.00 16.00 2.40 2607 100 2707 16.00 16.00 2.40 2.40

4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 2025

36.00 36.00 0 36.00 36.00

0.28 0.28 0.28 336 336 0.28 0.28 0.28

4.60 4.60 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 2.50 280 320 600 4.60 4.60 2.00

2.00 2.00 2.00 221 44 265 2.00 2.00 2.00

23.00 23.00 18.00 9.00 1.35 26.00 26.00 20.00 9.00 1.35 21.00 21.00 10.00 9.00 1.35 3355 2787 6142 26.00 26.00 18.00 9.00 1.35 1.35 1.35 2030

5.50 5.50 0 5.50 5.50

1.00 1.00 1.00 490 490 1.00 1.00 1.00

3.00 3.00 3.00 2040 3279 579 5898 3.00 3.00 3.00

30.00 30.00 24.00 16.00 4.60 30.00 30.00 24.00 16.00 4.60 30.00 30.00 24.00 16.00 4.60 18000 3664 6707 99 28470 30.00 30.00 24.00 16.00 4.60 4.60 4.60 2030

10.00 10.00 10.00 4.50 10.00 10.00 10.00 4.50 1.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 4.50 1.00 5000 2240 560 7800 10.00 10.00 10.00 4.50 1.00 1.00 2020

240.00 150.00 170.00 150.00 349.00 150.00 0 240.00 2022

1.30 1.30 1.30 1456 1456 1.30 1.30 1.30

0.80 0.80 0.50 696 200 896 0.80 0.80 0.50

3.70 3.70 3.70 2120 2120 3.70 3.70 3.70

17.40 17.40 10.00 1500 1500 17.40 17.40 10.00

0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.02 0.60 0.30 0.60 0.02 1.20 0.35 0.80 0.02 340 340 680 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.60 0.02 0.02 0.02

1.80 1.80 1.80 0.60 0.35 1.00 0.35 250 400 30 680 1.80 1.80 1.80

0.02 0.02 28 28 0.02 0.02

36.00 36.00 13.50 8.64 8.44 6.43 9.43 9.21 7.13 1928 4722 6650 21.00 21.00 15.00 2045

0 2045

0.40 0.40 0.40 448 383 65 896 0.40 0.40 0.40

1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.23 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.23 714 714 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.23 0.23

6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 8.00 8.00 8.00 5264 5264 6.75 6.75 6.75

2.50 2.50 2.50 199 1182 1381 2.50 2.50 2.50 2035

14.00 14.00 14.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 13586 13586 14.00 14.00 14.00

5.00 5.00 3.00 1322 1322 5.00 5.00 3.00

40.00 40.00 30.00 30.00 6.56 40.00 40.00 30.00 30.00 6.56 40.00 40.00 30.00 30.00 6.56 19250 1750 5250 26250 40.00 40.00 30.00 30.00 6.56 6.56 6.56

17.50 17.50 17.50 9.70 9.70 9.70 20.00 9.70 9.70 4788 4788 17.50 17.50 17.50

16.00 16.00 16.00 1900 9131 11031 16.00 16.00 16.00

0


Survey_Report.doc

Attachment C.3 – Industrial Discharger Data


Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line

User Name Owner LocationPretreatment


Note any discharge limitations

or permit requirementsBiotech Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Utilities Medical

Hospitality

(Hotels,

Convention

Centers)

Other

(Specify)

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerFrontier Aluminum I

2480 Railroad Street , CoronaArea 1

Clarifier to remove oils and

solids

Chloride, Chromium, Cyanide,

Fluoride, Sodium, Sulfate, TSS, ZincX

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerWest Coast Porcelain

133 No. Sherman, Corona, CaArea 1 Zero Discharge Categorical

Submit Zero Discharge Certification

and Hauker ManifestsX

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerU.S. Battery Mfg.

1675 Sampson Ave. Corona, CaArea 2

Metals Precipitation, pH

adjustment

Chloride, Copper, Hardness, Lead,

Sodium, Sulfate, Sulfide, TSSX

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerCircor Aerospace

2301 Wardlow Cr. Corona, CaArea 1 Zero Discharge Categorical


and Hauler ManifestsX

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerCorona Regional Medical Center

800 So. Main St. Corona, CaArea 1

Silver Recovery for X-Ray

processing

Boron, Chloride, Fluoride, Hardness,

Silver, Sodium, Sulfate, TSSX

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerNatures Specialties

325 Joy St. Corona, CaArea 2 Zero Discharge Categorical



Inland Empire City of Corona SewerChemical Consultants

1850 Wid Turkey Cr. Corona, CaArea 1


solids

Chloride, O&G, Phenol, Na, Sulfate,

Surfactants, TSSX

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerCosmedx Science

475 No. Sheridan Ave. Corona, CaArea 1


solids

Chloride, O&G, Na, Sulfate, Sulfide,

Surfactants, TSSX

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerUniweb

222 Promenade Ave. Corona, CaArea2 Zero Discharge Categorical



Inland Empire City of Corona SewerJayco Interface Technology

1351 Pico St. Corona, CaArea 2 None

Chromium, Copper, Fluoride, O&G,

Silver, ZincX

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerEssential Flavors & Fragrances

1521 Commerce St. Corona, CaArea 1 None Hardness, Na, Sulfate, TSS X

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerFrontier Aluminum II

1990 Railroad St. Corona, CaArea 1 Zero Discharge Categorical



Inland Empire City of Corona SewerLaminated Shim Company

1351 Pico St. Corona, CaArea 2


solids

Cadmium, Chromium, Copper,

Cyanide, Lead, Nickel, O&G, Silver,

Zinc

X

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerArvinyl Metal Laminates

1351 Pico St. Corona, CaArea 1


solids

Cadmium,Chloride,

Chromium,Copper, Cyanide, Lead,

Nickel, Silver, Sulfate, Zinc

X

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerCorona Cogen Plant

2205 RailroadCorona Clarification

Chromium, Copper, TTO's 126

Priority PollutantsX

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerDart Container

150 S. MapleCorona Clarification

Temp.,TDS, Oil & Grease, Chloride,

Fluoride, Sodium, SulfateX

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerUnilever

1930 CaliforniaCorona Clarification Boron, Oil & Grease, TDS X

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerHayden

1521 Pomona RoadCorona Filters

Copper, Lead, Oil & Grease,

Sodium, Sulfate, TDSX

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerWhite Mountain

455 N. SmithCorona Filters

Boron, Hardness, Sodium, Sulfate,

TDSX

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerNasco

1161 OlympicCorona Clarification

BOD, Chloride, Oil & Grease,

Sodium, TDS, TSSX

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerMyers

725 E. HarrisonCorona Clarification

Cadmium, Chloride, Chromium,

Copper, Cyanide, Lead, Nickel,

Silver, Sodium, Sulfate, TDS, TTO's,

Zinc

X

Industrial Discharger Data or Send Existing Information

in Excel (e.g. Pretreatment Program Documentation)

Receiving Facility (s) Type of Discharger (Place X)

\\cheron\projects\USBR\381333BrineStudy\T3_Brine_MGMT\T3-1_Survey\T3-1_Survey\Survey-V64_MH.xlsSurvey-Indust. Sewer Discharges Page 1 of 21


Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line





Hospitality

(Hotels,

Convention

Centers)

Other

(Specify)




Inland Empire City of Corona SewerTalco Plastics

1000 W. RinconCorona Clarification Sulfate, TDS, TSS, Zinc X

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerShell Station

4723 W. Green RiverCorona Filters TTO's Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons X

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerTRM

1433 E. 6th StCorona None

TDS, Hardness, Chloride, Sodium,

SulfateX

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerKaiser

1850 CaliforniaCorona None

Boron, Chloride, Sodium, Sulfate,

TDS, TSSX

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerSun Rich Foods

515 Rincon StCorona Filters and Clarification

BOD, Chloride, Harness, Sodium,

TDS, TSS, Sodium, Sulfate, ZincX

Inland Empire City of Corona Sewer Eibach Springs

264 Mariah CircleCorona Clarification

Cadmium, Chloride, Chromium,

Copper, Cyanide, Lead, Nickel,

Silver, Sodium, Sulfate, TDS, TTOs,

Zinc

X

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerAspetic

484 Alcoa CircleCorona Clarification BOD, TDS, TSS X

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerBagmasters

1160 California Ave, CoronaPlant 1 N/A

Copper, Lead, Chloride, Sodium,

Sulfate, Cadmium, XX

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerDeveloplus, Inc. 235 Deininger Circle,

Corona, CAPlant 1 clarifier Selenium, Zinc, Chloride , Sodium X

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerTri-Cal, Inc. 1029 W. Railroad

Street Corona, Ca 92882Plant 1 clarifier Oil & Grease, TSS X

Inland Empire City of Corona Sewer

R.W. Lyall

2665 Research Drive

Corona, CA

Plant 1 N/A N/A X


Marie Callenders Wholesalers

170 E. Rincon Street

Corona, Ca 92879

Plant 1 InterceptorTotal Hardness, Oil & Grease,

Sodium, Sulfate, Chloride, SulfideX


Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

24555 Wardlow Road

Corona, Ca 92880

Plant 1 N/A X

Inland Empire City of Corona SewerSmurfit-Stone Corrugated Corp

185 N. Smith Ave Corona, Ca 92880Plant 1 N/A

Oil & Grease, Boron, Chloride,

Chromium, Copper, Lead, Nickel,

Sodium, Sulfate, Total Hardness

X


RGF Enterprises

220 Citation Circle

Corona, Ca 92880

Plant 1 N/A N/A X


Allsize Self Storage

2785 Palisades Drive

Corona, Ca 92880

Plant 1 Clarifier Oil & Grease X


Liberty Glass Fabricators, Inc.

1644 Maple Street

Corona, CA 92880

Plant 1 N/A Oil & Grease X


Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

311 Bonnie Circle

Corona, Ca 92882

Plant 1 ClarifierTSS, Chloride, Cyanide, Phenol,

Sodium, SulfateX


United Business Systems

2577 Research Drive

Corona, Ca 92882

Plant 1 N/ABoron, Chloride, Silver, Sodium,

Sulfate, TSS, ZincX


Metal Film Coating

392 Jenks Circle

Corona, CA 92880

Plant 1 N/A Boron, Sodium, Sulfate X


Watson Laboratory

100 Business Center Drive

Corona, CA, 92880

Plant 1 N/A TSS X



Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line





Hospitality

(Hotels,

Convention

Centers)

Other

(Specify)





Watson Laboratory

132 -A Business Center Drive

Corona, CA, 92880

Plant 1 ClarifierTSS, Boron, Chloride, Phenol,

Sodium, Sulfate, CyanideX

Inland Empire Eastern MWD

EMWD Reach IV -

TVRI - SARI -

OCSD Outfall

Brine International Rectifier Temecula pH adjustment NWL Discharge Permit #522 X


EMWD Reach IV -

TVRI - SARI -

OCSD Outfall

Brine Inland Empire Energy Center Menifee NWL Discharge Permit #544 Power Plant

Inland EmpireCity of

RiversideSanta Ana River Sewer

Cardinal Health –

Medical Products and

Services

Cardinal Health –

Medical Products and Services

1660 IOWA AVE, SUITE 100

RIVERSIDE, CA 92507

Reverse Osmosis--unit

removes impurities in the

filtered water.

Must meet City's Local Limit

StandardsX


RiversideSanta Ana River Sewer Pepsi Bottling Group Pepsi Bottling Group

6659 SYCAMORE CANYON BLVD

RIVERSIDE, CA 92507

Reverse Osmosis-units used

to generate water for soft

drinks and bottled water.


StandardsX


RiversideSanta Ana River Sewer Ralphs Grocery Company Ralphs Grocery Company

1500 EASTRIDGE AVE

RIVERSIDE CA 92507

Reverse Osmosis--two

reverse osmosis units used to

generate water for bottling.


StandardsX


RiversideSanta Ana River Sewer Swiss Dairy Swiss Dairy

4221 BUCHANAN ST

RIVERSIDE, CA 92503

Reverse Osmosis--unit used

in the water filtration system.


StandardsX

Inland Empire YVWD WWTP Sorenson Engineering David Sorenson, CEO

32032 Dunlap Blvd.

Yucaipa, CA 92399

pH adjustment, solids

precipitated, ion exchange.

System is designed for

removing metals to meet

discharge limits.

Meet 40CFR433 Metal Finishing

discharge limits.X

Inland Empire YVWD WWTP SkatTrak Diane Stuart (Secretary/Treasurer)654 Avenue K

Calimesa, CA 92320

All categorical process

wastewater is contained and

evaporated. All solids are

hauled off and disposed of

legally.

Facility is permitted to discharge

autoclave and boiler blowdown only. X

Inland Empire YVWD WWTP Hoover Egg Company Jim Hoover33700 Wildwood Canyon Rd

Yucaipa, CA 92399

2,000 gallon Interceptor used

to settle out solids (egg shells) Facility must meet the local limits.

X

Food

processor

(eggs)

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

North Orange

County

North Orange

County

South Orange

CountySOCWA CTP ACOO Chevron Chevron CLB

Activated Carbon for

groundwater clean-uplocal limits and flow

ground water

clean-up

South Orange

CountySOCWA CTP ACOO

City of Laguna Beach

(CLB)CLB CLB Settling and filter local limits and flow

Dry weather

diversion

South Orange


Emerald Bay Service

District (EBSD)EBSD EBSD

Continuous Deflective

Separation (CDS) unitlocal limits and flow

Dry weather

diversion

South Orange

CountySOCWA CTP ACOO Salt Creek City of Dana Point (CDP) CDP Filtration local limits and flow

Dry weather

diversion

South Orange

CountySOCWA IRWD-LAWRP ACOO Dynacast Dynacast IRWD Metal removal and settling local limits and flow X

South Orange

CountySOCWA Chiquita SJCOO Applied Medical I Applied Medical SMWD pH adjustment Federal Categorical Limits X

South Orange

CountySOCWA Chiquita SJCOO Applied Medical II Applied Medical SMWD Filtration Federal Categorical Limits X

South Orange

CountySOCWA Chiquita SJCOO Control Components Inc Control Components Inc SMWD Clarifier local limits and flow X



Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line





Hospitality

(Hotels,

Convention

Centers)

Other

(Specify)




South Orange

CountySOCWA Chiquita SJCOO Flavor Infusion Flavor Infusion CSC Clarifier local limits and flow

Food

Processor

South Orange

CountySOCWA Chiquita SJCOO Pick Up Stix Pick Up Stix CSC pH adjustment and clarifier local limits and flow

Food

Processor

South Orange

CountySOCWA CSCWTP SJCOO AO Group AO Group CSC Clarifier local limits and flow

Food

Processor

South Orange

CountySOCWA CSCWTP SJCOO


(CSC)CSC CSC Settling and filter local limits and flow

Dry weather

diversion

South Orange

CountySOCWA CSCWTP SJCOO Flavorchem Flavorchem CSC

pH adjustment, settling and

clarifierlocal limits and flow

Food

Processor

South Orange

CountySOCWA CSCWTP SJCOO Pick Up Stix Pick Up Stix CSC Clarifier local limits and flow

Food

Processor

South Orange


South Coast Fashion

JewelrySouth Coast Fashion Jewelry CSC Ion metal removal and clarifier Federal Categorical Limits X

South Orange

CountySOCWA JBL SJCOO Alipaz City of Dana Point (CDP) CDP



Dry weather

diversion

South Orange

CountySOCWA JBL SJCOO ARCO ARCO MNWD



ground water

clean-up

South Orange

CountySOCWA JBL SJCOO

City of San Juan

Capistrano (CSJC) RO

Plant

CSJC CSJC Settling and filter local limits and flowPotable Water

Plant

South Orange

CountySOCWA JBL SJCOO Del Obispo City of Dana Point (CDP) CDP



Dry weather

diversion

South Orange

CountySOCWA JBL SJCOO Endevco Endevco CSJC pH adjustment and distillation Federal Categorical Limits X

South Orange

CountySOCWA JBL SJCOO Exxon/Mobil I Exxon/Mobil MNWD



ground water

clean-up

South Orange

CountySOCWA JBL SJCOO Exxon/Mobil II Exxon/Mobil MNWD



ground water

clean-up

South Orange



(SCWD) RO PlantSCWD SCWD Settling and filter local limits and flow

Potable Water

Plant

South Orange

CountySOCWA Outfall

Dana Point Seawater

Desalination Plant

Future JPA (San Clemente, South

Coast WD, San Juan Capistrano,

Moulton Niguel WD, Laguna Co. WD)

So. OC

Proposed Seawater

Desalination Plant (utilizes RO

processing)

TBD

San DiegoCity of Chula

Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

Sharp Chula Vista Medical

Center751 Medical Center Court X


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

PRUDENTIAL OVERALL

SUPPLY740 F St

X

laundry


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

SOUTHWESTERN

COLLEGE900 OTAY LAKES RD

X

School


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

SCRIPPS MEMORIAL

HOSPITAL CHULA VISTA435 H ST X


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallQUALITY LIFT TRUCKS 115 N GLOVER AVE

X

Rental

Equipment


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

ANNEX AUTOMOTIVE,

INC.45 BROADWAY

X

Paint Shop


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

SOUTH BAY AUTO

PARTS908 THIRD AVE

X

Automotive


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallOTAY VALLEY SHELL 4555 MAIN STREET

X

Car Wash


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

CATERING3630 MAIN ST X


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallGCE INDUSTRIES, INC. 1891 NIRVANA AV X


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

SOS METALS SAN

DIEGO635 ANITA ST X



Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line





Hospitality

(Hotels,

Convention

Centers)

Other

(Specify)





Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

ROHR, INC. DBA

GOODRICH

AEROSTRUCTURES

850 LAGOON DR,MZ 1-T X


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

ALLIED WASTE

SERVICES-SAN DIEGO881 ENERGY WAY X


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

DYNEGY SOUTH BAY,

LLC990 BAY BLVD. X


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

UNITED PARCEL

SERVICE2300 BOSWELL CT

X

Car Wash


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallMMC CHULA VISTA, LLC 3497 MAIN STREET X


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

WORLD OIL MARKETING

COMPANY685 H ST

X

Groundwater

Remediation


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallFULLER FORD 560 AUTO PARK DRIVE

X

Car Wash


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallDRESSER-RAND

1675 BRANDYWINE AVENUE,

Suites E & FX


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

ARISE WACO

SCAFFOLD EQUIPMENT676 MOSS STREET

X

Rental

Equipment


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallATC OF SAN DIEGO 3650 MAIN ST, SUITE A

X

Auto Shop


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

ZEPEDA'S RADIATOR

SHOP801 BROADWAY

X

Radiator Shop

San Diego SDMWWD North City WRP sewer various various organics BMPs Organics Control BMP X

San Diego SDMWWD North City WRP sewerToray Membranes USA

Inc13435 Danielson St, Poway organics BMPs Organics Control BMP X membrane mfr

San Diego SDMWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer various various organics BMPs Organics Control BMP X

San Diego Chula Vista Pt Loma WWTP sewerDBA Goodrich

Aerostructures-brineRohr, Inc. 850 Lagoon Dr, Chula Vista none X

San Diego Chula Vista Pt Loma WWTP sewer

DBA Goodrich

Aerostructures-regulated

Conn 210

Rohr, Inc. 850 Lagoon Dr, Chula Vista 40 CFR 433 X


DBA Goodrich


Conn 250

Rohr, Inc. 851 Lagoon Dr, Chula VistapH, Cr redux,ppt/settle,

ultrafiltration, filter press

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer UT;Convention Center City of San Diego 111 W Harbor Dr, SDCarbon Canisters to remove

organics; may eliminate

max authorized flow = 500 gpm;

meter and report flowX

seawater

intrusion

discharge

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer CP Kelko Conn 800 Huber Equity Corporation 2025 E Harbor Dr, SD pH adj pH X X

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer CP Kelko Conn 430 Huber Equity Corporation 2025 E Harbor Dr, SD flow equal + pH adj pH + biokill BMP

San Diego Lemon Grove Pt Loma WWTP sewerCulligan Water Company

of SD IncCulligan Water Company of SD Inc 3515 Olive st, Lemon Grove pH adj

Water

Conditioning



Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line





Hospitality

(Hotels,

Convention

Centers)

Other

(Specify)




San Diego Chula Vista Pt Loma WWTP sewerDynegy South Bay LCC

Conn 200Dynegy and LS Power 990 Bay Blvd, Chulo vista X

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewerUT; USN FISC Point Loma

Fuel AnnexUSN 199 Rosecrans St, SD settle,oil skim, air sparge TPH, Benzene

fuel recovery &

GW

remediation

San Diego El Cajon Pt Loma WWTP sewerGKN Aerospace Chem-

tronics, IncGKN America Corp 1150 W Bradley Av, El Cajon ppt/settle, pH, filter press 40 CFR 433 X


tronics, IncGKN America Corp 1151 W Bradley Av, El Cajon none

San Diego La Mesa Pt Loma WWTP sewer Grossmont Hospital Grossmont Center Dr, La Mesa organics BMPs X

San Diego La Mesa Pt Loma WWTP sewer Grossmont Hospital Grossmont Center Dr, La Mesa none X

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewerEPCOR-Naval Base San

Diego 32nd St @ Harbor Dr, SD X Cogen

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer Naval Base San Diego USN 33rd St @ Harbor Dr, SDShipboard

wastes

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewerNaval Medical Center San

Diego USN 34800 Bob Wilson Dr, SD organics BMPs X

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewerEPCOR - North Island,

Coronado Facility X Cogen

San Diego SD MWWD SBWRP sewer Circle Foods, LLC Circle Foods, LLC 8411 Siempre Viva Rd daf not segregated X

San Diego SD MWWD South Bay WRP SewerEast Mesa and Bailey

detention facilities Federal and State of CA 446 Alta Rd, SD Prison

San Diego Otay Mesa South Bay WRP SewerLS Power Development,

LLCLS Power Development, LLC Energy Center Ln, Otay Mesa X

San Diego Otay Mesa South Bay WRP SewerOtay Mesa Energy Center

LLC Calpine Corporation 647 Alta Rd, SD X

San Diego SD MWWD South Bay WRP SewerRJ Donovan Correctional

Facility CA State Prison System 480 Alta Rd, SD

Combined stream has

grinder; :Planned solids

removal

Remove solids (due to rag problems

in sanitary ww)Prison

San Diego SD MWWD South Bay WRP Sewer Heinz Frozen Foods Heinz, Inc 7878 Airway Rd, SD settling, daf O/G, solids X

San Diego SD MWWD North City WRP Sewer Koch Membrane Syst Trinet, Corp 10054 Old Grove Rd, SD pH adj pH, organics X

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewerCoca-Cola Bottling Co of

SDCoca-Cola Bottling Co of SD 1348 47th St, SD pH adj X

San Diego Poway North City WRP sewer Hallmark Circuits, Inc Hallmark Circuits, Inc 13500 Danielson St, PowaypH, ppt/settle, IX, electrowin,

filter press40 CFR 433 X



Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line





Hospitality

(Hotels,

Convention

Centers)

Other

(Specify)




San Diego Poway North City WRP sewer Hallmark Circuits, Inc Hallmark Circuits, Inc 13501 Danielson St, Poway none X

San Diego SD MWWD North City WRP sewerSalk institute for Biological

StudiesX

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer Steiner Corp dba Alsco 705 W Grape St, SD screening, O/G gravity sep O/G, pH laundry

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer Angelica Textile Svcs 3939 Market St, SD screening, pH adj O/G, pH laundry

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewerAramark Uniform Services

IncAramark Uniform Services Inc 3554 Dalbergia St, SD

emulsion break, ppt/settle,daf,

oil skim, filter pressO/G, pH laundry

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewerGeneral Dynamics

NASSCOShipbuild/repair

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer Hydranautics Nitto Denko America 8270 Miralani Dr, SD none X

San Diego Poway North City WRP sewer Palomar Pomerado Health 15615 Pomerado Rd, Poway organics BMPs Organics Control BMP X

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer Torvac Div of Darling Intl rendering

San Diego SD MWWD North City WRP sewer UT;Traylor/Shea-rem 12298 Almania Rd, SDGW

remediation

San Diego SD MWWD North City WRP sewer UT;Traylor/Shea-rem 14399 Stonebridge Py, SDGW

remediation

San Diego SD MWWD North City WRP sewerUT;Kilroy Realty-constr

dewtr13480 N Evening Creek Dr, SD

GW;

construction

dewatering

San Diego SD MWWD North City WRP sewerPall Filtration &

Separations Group Inc4116 Sorrento Valley Bl, SD X

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer Kyocera Kyocera America, Inc 8611 Balboa Av, SD pH, CN destruct,ppt/settle,

filter press40 CFR 433 X

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer Kyocera Kyocera America, Inc 8611 Balboa Av, SD none X

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer California Creative Foods Douglas Pearson 649 Benet Road pH Adjustment Local Limits X

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer Deutsch Deutsch Corporation 250 Eddie Jones Way

pH Adjustment,

SedimentationCFR 433.15, Local Limits X

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer Elite Metal Dan Rose 2525 Jason Court

pH Adjustment,

SedimentationCFR 433.17, Local Limits X

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer

Genentech Oceanside

FacilityGenentech One Antibody Way pH Adjustment CFR 439.17, Local Limits X X

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer

Genentech Oceanside

Clinical ProductionGenentech 4049 Avenida de la Plata pH Adjustment CFR 439.17, Local Limits X X

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer Hydranautics Nitto Denko Company 401 Jones Road pH Adjustment, Bioreactor Local Limits X

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer Indigo Labs Joe Warne 4039 Calle Platino Suite C pH Adjustment CFR 439.47, Local Limits X

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer Nitto Denko Nitto Denko Company 501 Via del Monte None Local Limits R & D

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer Sepro William Light 4115 Avenida de la Plata pH Adjustment Local Limits X

San DiegoCity of

OceansideLS Sewer Metro Roof Metro Roof Corporation 3093 "A" Industry St Filtration, Press Local Limits X

San DiegoCity of

OceansideLS Sewer Mission Linen Service Mission Linen Corporation 2727 Industry St

Dissolved Air Flotation, Filter

PressLocal Limits Laundry


Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line

User Name
























Receiving Facility (s)

TDS

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

COD

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHTemp.

(°C)

Trace

Organics

(list)

Notes

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

1496 9.76 0.02 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005

0 0 0 0 0 0

578 8.95 0.01 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006

0 0 0 0 0 0

880 159 7.16 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013

0 0 0 0 0 0

877 353 461 7.14 0.20 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007

461 1759 2699 6.36 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005

0 0 0 0 0 0

539 7.40 0.02 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017

463 229 7.71 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008

0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017

383 7.81 0.0009 0.0009 0.0009 0.0009 0.0009 0.0009

680 8.18 0.0093 0.0093 0.0093 0.0093 0.0093 0.0093

0.00 0.005.0 -

10.5

EPA

624,625,608120000 30000 120000 30000 120000 30000

590 0.005.0 -

10.5

EPA

624,625,60824000 18000 24000 18000 24000 18000

883 0.005.0 -

10.5

EPA

624,625,6087000 6000 7000 6000 7000 6000

558 0.005.0 -

10.5

EPA

624,625,6089700 611 9700 611 9700 611

476 0.005.0 -

10.5

EPA

624,625,608435 130 435 130 435 130

1022 4365.0 -

10.5

EPA

624,625,6082126 2100 2126 2100 2126 2100

350 0.005.0 -

10.5

EPA

624,625,6087380 270 7380 270 7380 270

Discharge Water Quality Information Planning Year 2010 Planning Year 2015Current (as of end of 2008)


Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line

User Name

























TDS

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

COD

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHTemp.

(°C)

Trace

Organics

(list)

Notes

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


1084 0.005.0 -

10.5

EPA

624,625,6083826 1667 3826 1667 3826 1667

0.00 0.005.0 -

10.5

EPA

624,625,6081700 51 1700 51 1700 51

2898 0.005.0 -

10.5

EPA

624,625,6085229 5000 5229 5000 5229 5000

960 0.005.0 -

10.5

EPA

624,625,60823385 23000 23385 23000 23385 23000

1645 1190 17876 14535 17876 14535 17876 14535

955 0.00 7500 1993 7500 1993 7500 1993

0.00 1149 78440 54000 78440 54000 78440 54000

572 101.3 8.16 X 0.00055 0.00055 0.00055 0.00055 0.00055 0.00055

495 340 7.85 X 0.000803 0.000803 0.000803 0.000803 0.000803 0.000803

400 X X X 0.00006 0.00006 0.00006 0.00006 0.00006 0.00006

0.004005 0.004005 0.004005 0.004005 0.004005 0.004005

1330 1752.2 X X 0.008007 0.008007 0.008007 0.008007 0.008007 0.008007

480 42.93 7.66 X 0.023761 0.023761 0.023761 0.023761 0.023761 0.023761

100 430 X X 0.0055 0.0055 0.0055 0.0055 0.0055 0.0055

0.000876 0.000876 0.000876 0.000876 0.000876 0.000876

X 0.001095 0.001095 0.001095 0.001095 0.001095 0.001095

390 X X 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005

475 89.5 254 7.20 0.01 0.00979 0.00979 0.00979 0.00979 0.00979 0.00979

635 1043.5 X X 0.003642 0.003642 0.003642 0.003642 0.003642 0.003642

353 X 0.003105 0.003105 0.003105 0.003105 0.003105 0.003105

380 56.5 1020 X X 0.009009 0.009009 0.009009 0.009009 0.009009 0.009009


Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line

User Name






EMWD Reach IV -

TVRI - SARI -

OCSD Outfall

Brine


EMWD Reach IV -

TVRI - SARI -

OCSD Outfall

Brine



Cardinal Health –


Services


RiversideSanta Ana River Sewer Pepsi Bottling Group


RiversideSanta Ana River Sewer Ralphs Grocery Company


RiversideSanta Ana River Sewer Swiss Dairy

Inland Empire YVWD WWTP Sorenson Engineering

Inland Empire YVWD WWTP SkatTrak

Inland Empire YVWD WWTP Hoover Egg Company

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

North Orange

County

North Orange

County

South Orange

CountySOCWA CTP ACOO Chevron

South Orange



(CLB)

South Orange


Emerald Bay Service

District (EBSD)

South Orange

CountySOCWA CTP ACOO Salt Creek

South Orange

CountySOCWA IRWD-LAWRP ACOO Dynacast

South Orange

CountySOCWA Chiquita SJCOO Applied Medical I

South Orange

CountySOCWA Chiquita SJCOO Applied Medical II

South Orange

CountySOCWA Chiquita SJCOO Control Components Inc

TDS

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

COD

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHTemp.

(°C)

Trace

Organics

(list)

Notes

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


884 955.56 X X 0.002106 0.002106 0.002106 0.002106 0.002106 0.002106

45500 100 7.38 29.90 0.075 0.065 0.075 0.065 0.075 0.065

2270 5 <2 7.20 1.2 0.5 1.2 0.5 1.2 0.5

466 255 19 8.38 0.09 0.01 0.09 0.01 0.09 0.01

1456 1300 28 7.90 0.29 0.24 0.29 0.24 0.29 0.24

1272 2074 7.01 0.25 0.21 0.25 0.21 0.25 0.21

2000 3846 7.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.03

2938 136.9 0.50 8.23 0.71 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003

444 119.3 24.5 10.16 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015

1737 2725 19 8.35 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009

7.10 0.002 0.00035 0.002 0.00035 0.002 0.00035

1250 215 7.20TRHC 15.9

mg/L0.072 0.072 0.072 0.072 0.072 0.072

1227 170 7.40 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1

2869 4.2 7.60 0.144 0.0335 0.144 0.0335 0.144 0.0335

8.50 0.01 0.002833 0.01 0.002833 0.01 0.002833

7.10TTO 0.0019

mg/L0.01 0.00222 0.01 0.00222 0.01 0.00222

7.00 0.01 0.009 0.01 0.009 0.01 0.009

7.60 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005


Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line

User Name




South Orange

CountySOCWA Chiquita SJCOO Flavor Infusion

South Orange

CountySOCWA Chiquita SJCOO Pick Up Stix

South Orange

CountySOCWA CSCWTP SJCOO AO Group

South Orange



(CSC)

South Orange

CountySOCWA CSCWTP SJCOO Flavorchem

South Orange

CountySOCWA CSCWTP SJCOO Pick Up Stix

South Orange


South Coast Fashion

Jewelry

South Orange

CountySOCWA JBL SJCOO Alipaz

South Orange

CountySOCWA JBL SJCOO ARCO

South Orange


City of San Juan


Plant

South Orange

CountySOCWA JBL SJCOO Del Obispo

South Orange

CountySOCWA JBL SJCOO Endevco

South Orange

CountySOCWA JBL SJCOO Exxon/Mobil I

South Orange

CountySOCWA JBL SJCOO Exxon/Mobil II

South Orange



(SCWD) RO Plant

South Orange

CountySOCWA Outfall

Dana Point Seawater

Desalination Plant


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall


Center


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

PRUDENTIAL OVERALL

SUPPLY


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

SOUTHWESTERN

COLLEGE


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

SCRIPPS MEMORIAL

HOSPITAL CHULA VISTA


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallQUALITY LIFT TRUCKS


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

ANNEX AUTOMOTIVE,

INC.


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

SOUTH BAY AUTO

PARTS


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallOTAY VALLEY SHELL


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

CATERING


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallGCE INDUSTRIES, INC.


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

SOS METALS SAN

DIEGO

TDS

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

COD

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHTemp.

(°C)

Trace

Organics

(list)

Notes

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


748 367 1135 7.50 0.003 0.001 0.003 0.001 0.003 0.001

1702 1679 2882 6.70 0.005 0.001 0.005 0.001 0.005 0.001

897 467 1635 5.60 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

997 324 7.60 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

2158 2346 5702 7.60 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005

1283 895 1550 6.50 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005

7.20 0.01 0.007212 0.01 0.007212 0.01 0.007212

8.40 0.072 0.011 0.072 0.011 0.072 0.011

7.60 0.05 0.00168 0.05 0.00168 0.05 0.00168

7.80 0.01 0.009 0.01 0.009 0.01 0.009

3651 7.30 0.072 0.0056 0.072 0.0056 0.072 0.0056

8.20 0.001 0.000277 0.001 0.000277 0.001 0.000277

7.80 0.05 0.001 0.05 0.001 0.05 0.001

7.80 0.05 0.001 0.05 0.001 0.05 0.001

6400 7.00 0.3 0.2146 0.3 0.2146 0.3 0.2146

25 25

0.0009 0.0009 0.0009

0.0130 0.0130 0.0130

0.0004 0.0004 0.0004

0.0006 0.0006 0.0006

0.0003 0.0003 0.0003

0.0001 0.0001 0.0001

201 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001

0.0084 0.0084 0.0084

0.0046 0.0046 0.0046

177 0.0006 0.0006 0.0006

0.0001 0.0001 0.0001


Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line

User Name





Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

ROHR, INC. DBA

GOODRICH

AEROSTRUCTURES


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

ALLIED WASTE

SERVICES-SAN DIEGO


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

DYNEGY SOUTH BAY,

LLC


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

UNITED PARCEL

SERVICE


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallMMC CHULA VISTA, LLC


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

WORLD OIL MARKETING

COMPANY


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallFULLER FORD


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallDRESSER-RAND


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

ARISE WACO

SCAFFOLD EQUIPMENT


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallATC OF SAN DIEGO


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

ZEPEDA'S RADIATOR

SHOP

San Diego SDMWWD North City WRP sewer various


Inc

San Diego SDMWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer various


Aerostructures-brine


DBA Goodrich


Conn 210


DBA Goodrich


Conn 250

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer UT;Convention Center

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer CP Kelko Conn 800



of SD Inc

TDS

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

COD

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHTemp.

(°C)

Trace

Organics

(list)

Notes

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


5710 150 7.9 0.0254 0.0254 0.0254

0.0007 0.0007 0.0007

33 8 0.0676 0.0676 0.0676

0.0029 0.0029 0.0029

0.0140 0.0140 0.0140

19 0.0144 0.0144 0.0144

0.0018 0.0018 0.0018

0.0006 0.0006 0.0006

0.0005 0.0005 0.0005

0.0037 0.0037 0.0037

0.0001 0.0001 0.0001

0.0300 0.0300 0.0300

1512 0.0250 0.0250 0.0250

0.0500 0.0500 0.0500

0.0140 0.0140 0.0140

1692 369 0.0200 0.0200 0.0200

2900 20 0.0200 0.0200 0.0200

29995 536 7.16 25

chronic toxicity

2.19 avg; 5.0

max

0.4100 0.4100 0.4100

5699 8824

81000 RO reject

and CT bleed not

segregated

0.5300 0.5300 0.5300

2310 2328

7000 storm +

boiler b/d not

segregated

0.8400 0.8400 0.8400

avg

21,170

max

38,600

avg 509

max 9207.3 0.0340 0.0500 0.0500


Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line

User Name





Conn 200


Fuel Annex


tronics, Inc


tronics, Inc

San Diego La Mesa Pt Loma WWTP sewer Grossmont Hospital



Diego

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer Naval Base San Diego


Diego


Coronado Facility

San Diego SD MWWD SBWRP sewer Circle Foods, LLC


detention facilities


LLC


LLC


Facility

San Diego SD MWWD South Bay WRP Sewer Heinz Frozen Foods

San Diego SD MWWD North City WRP Sewer Koch Membrane Syst


SD

San Diego Poway North City WRP sewer Hallmark Circuits, Inc

TDS

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

COD

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHTemp.

(°C)

Trace

Organics

(list)

Notes

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


avg 2182

max 3270

avg 50

max 1400.0600 0.0600 0.0600

0.0570 0.0570 0.0570

6227

15,500RO/SRW

S and b/d not

separated

0.0330 0.0330 0.0330

0.0150 0.0150 0.0150

0.046 incl san 0.046 incl san 0.046 incl san

0.0100 0.0100 0.0100

0.0200 0.0200 0.0200

21000 750 0.6600 0.6600 0.6600

874 32521,000 gpd brine

not segregated0.35 incl san 0.35 incl san 0.35 incl san

0.0700 0.0700 0.0700

21,000 gpd brine

not segregated0.0510 0.0510 0.0510

1052 516

10.000 gpd ct

bleed not

segregated;

sampling

0.53 w/san 0.024

w/o san

0.53 w/san 0.024

w/o san

0.53 w/san 0.024

w/o san

0.0000 0.1300 0.1300

0.0000 0.0800 0.0800

794 454 7.2-8.8

20,000 gpd brine

not segregated;

sampling

includes sanitary

0.80 w/san 0.057

w/o san

0.80 w/san 0.057

w/o san

0.80 w/san 0.057

w/o san

2204 22686,000 gpd brine

not separated0.1300 0.1300 0.1300

3220 3775 0.1700 0.1700 0.1700

2348 4801

80,000 gpd plant

backwash & RO

reject not

0.3300 0.3300 0.3300

1416 0.0700 0.0700 0.0700


Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line

User Name






Studies

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer Steiner Corp dba Alsco

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer Angelica Textile Svcs


Inc


NASSCO

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer Hydranautics

San Diego Poway North City WRP sewer Palomar Pomerado Health

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer Torvac Div of Darling Intl

San Diego SD MWWD North City WRP sewer UT;Traylor/Shea-rem



dewtr


Separations Group Inc

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer Kyocera


San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer California Creative Foods

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer Deutsch

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer Elite Metal

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer

Genentech Oceanside

Facility

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer

Genentech Oceanside

Clinical Production

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer Hydranautics

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer Indigo Labs

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer Nitto Denko

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer Sepro

San DiegoCity of

OceansideLS Sewer Metro Roof

San DiegoCity of

OceansideLS Sewer Mission Linen Service

TDS

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

COD

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHTemp.

(°C)

Trace

Organics

(list)

Notes

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


0.0005 0.0005 0.0005

715 325

36000 gpd

concentrate not

segregated

0.0570 0.0570 0.0570

3352 1963

4000 SRWS &

2520 boildr b/d

not separated

0.0720 0.0720 0.0720

1241 4968500 SRWS not

separated0.1860 0.1860 0.1860

2402 21252500 SRWS not

separated0.0750 0.0750 0.0750

4850 995 0.0600 0.0600 0.0600

889 413818,500 RO reject

not separated0.0520 0.0520 0.0520

8660 concentrate

not separated0.0370 0.0370 0.0370

11205 9675 0.0200 0.0200 0.0200

1821 110 0.5000 0.5000 0.5000

545 0.0720 0.0720 0.0720

1460 40 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100

714 4564 0.0540 0.0540 0.0540

1000 54 0.0530 0.0530 0.0530

cogen combines

w.process after

sample pt

0.0350 0.0350 0.0350

1429 756.22 2.73 7.62 0.0500 0.0189 0.0500 0.0189 0.0500 0.0189

2586 27.42 16.2 8.64 0.2500 0.1647 0.2500 0.1647 0.2500 0.1647

10218 3.7 11.8 9.7 0.0020 0.0003 0.0020 0.0003 0.0020 0.0003

1391 75.56 0.79 8.64 0.3430 0.1094 0.3430 0.1094 0.3430 0.1094

717 33.1 0.85 8.33 0.1250 0.0576 0.1250 0.0576 0.1250 0.0576

1785 263.36 163.75 6.88 0.4500 0.3539 0.4500 0.3539 0.4500 0.3539

899 70.22 0.56 6.77 0.0003 0.0001 0.0003 0.0001 0.0003 0.0001

304 140.6 0.61 8.65 0.0034 0.0021 0.0034 0.0021 0.0034 0.0021

796 2496.33 3.74 8.26 0.0400 0.0065 0.0400 0.0065 0.0400 0.0065

2010 904.78 83.9 6.77 0.0060 0.0025 0.0060 0.0025 0.0060 0.0025

1709 220.67 0.91 7.19 0.1850 0.0878 0.1850 0.0878 0.1850 0.0878


Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line

User Name

























Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007

0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017

0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008

0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017

0.0009 0.0009 0.0009 0.0009 0.0009 0.0009 0.0009 0.0009

0.0093 0.0093 0.0093 0.0093 0.0093 0.0093 0.0093 0.0093

120000 30000 120000 30000 120000 30000 120000 30000

24000 18000 24000 18000 24000 18000 24000 18000

7000 6000 7000 6000 7000 6000 7000 6000

9700 611 9700 611 9700 611 9700 611

435 130 435 130 435 130 435 130

2126 2100 2126 2100 2126 2100 2126 2100

7380 270 7380 270 7380 270 7380 270

Planning Year 2020 Planning Year 2025 Planning Year 2030 Planning Year 2035


Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line

User Name

























Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


3826 1667 3826 1667 3826 1667 3826 1667

1700 51 1700 51 1700 51 1700 51

5229 5000 5229 5000 5229 5000 5229 5000

23385 23000 23385 23000 23385 23000 23385 23000

17876 14535 17876 14535 17876 14535 17876 14535

7500 1993 7500 1993 7500 1993 7500 1993

78440 54000 78440 54000 78440 54000 78440 54000

0.00055 0.00055 0.00055 0.00055 0.00055 0.00055 0.00055 0.00055

0.000803 0.000803 0.000803 0.000803 0.000803 0.000803 0.000803 0.000803

0.00006 0.00006 0.00006 0.00006 0.00006 0.00006 0.00006 0.00006

0.004005 0.004005 0.004005 0.004005 0.004005 0.004005 0.004005 0.004005

0.008007 0.008007 0.008007 0.008007 0.008007 0.008007 0.008007 0.008007

0.023761 0.023761 0.023761 0.023761 0.023761 0.023761 0.023761 0.023761

0.0055 0.0055 0.0055 0.0055 0.0055 0.0055 0.0055 0.0055

0.000876 0.000876 0.000876 0.000876 0.000876 0.000876 0.000876 0.000876

0.001095 0.001095 0.001095 0.001095 0.001095 0.001095 0.001095 0.001095

0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005

0.00979 0.00979 0.00979 0.00979 0.00979 0.00979 0.00979 0.00979

0.003642 0.003642 0.003642 0.003642 0.003642 0.003642 0.003642 0.003642

0.003105 0.003105 0.003105 0.003105 0.003105 0.003105 0.003105 0.003105

0.009009 0.009009 0.009009 0.009009 0.009009 0.009009 0.009009 0.009009


Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line

User Name






EMWD Reach IV -

TVRI - SARI -

OCSD Outfall

Brine


EMWD Reach IV -

TVRI - SARI -

OCSD Outfall

Brine



Cardinal Health –


Services


RiversideSanta Ana River Sewer Pepsi Bottling Group


RiversideSanta Ana River Sewer Ralphs Grocery Company


RiversideSanta Ana River Sewer Swiss Dairy

Inland Empire YVWD WWTP Sorenson Engineering

Inland Empire YVWD WWTP SkatTrak

Inland Empire YVWD WWTP Hoover Egg Company

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

North Orange

County

North Orange

County

South Orange

CountySOCWA CTP ACOO Chevron

South Orange



(CLB)

South Orange


Emerald Bay Service

District (EBSD)

South Orange

CountySOCWA CTP ACOO Salt Creek

South Orange

CountySOCWA IRWD-LAWRP ACOO Dynacast

South Orange

CountySOCWA Chiquita SJCOO Applied Medical I

South Orange

CountySOCWA Chiquita SJCOO Applied Medical II

South Orange

CountySOCWA Chiquita SJCOO Control Components Inc

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


0.002106 0.002106 0.002106 0.002106 0.002106 0.002106 0.002106 0.002106

0.075 0.065 0.075 0.065 0.075 0.065 0.075 0.065

1.2 0.5 1.2 0.5 1.2 0.5 1.2 0.5

0.09 0.01 0.09 0.01 0.09 0.01 0.09 0.01

0.29 0.24 0.29 0.24 0.29 0.24 0.29 0.24

0.25 0.21 0.25 0.21 0.25 0.21 0.25 0.21

0.04 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.03

0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003

0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015

0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009

0.002 0.00035 0.002 0.00035 0.002 0.00035 0.002 0.00035

0.072 0.072 0.072 0.072 0.072 0.072 0.072 0.072

0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1

0.144 0.0335 0.144 0.0335 0.144 0.0335 0.144 0.0335

0.01 0.002833 0.01 0.002833 0.01 0.002833 0.01 0.002833

0.01 0.00222 0.01 0.00222 0.01 0.00222 0.01 0.00222

0.01 0.009 0.01 0.009 0.01 0.009 0.01 0.009

0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005


Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line

User Name




South Orange

CountySOCWA Chiquita SJCOO Flavor Infusion

South Orange

CountySOCWA Chiquita SJCOO Pick Up Stix

South Orange

CountySOCWA CSCWTP SJCOO AO Group

South Orange



(CSC)

South Orange

CountySOCWA CSCWTP SJCOO Flavorchem

South Orange

CountySOCWA CSCWTP SJCOO Pick Up Stix

South Orange


South Coast Fashion

Jewelry

South Orange

CountySOCWA JBL SJCOO Alipaz

South Orange

CountySOCWA JBL SJCOO ARCO

South Orange


City of San Juan


Plant

South Orange

CountySOCWA JBL SJCOO Del Obispo

South Orange

CountySOCWA JBL SJCOO Endevco

South Orange

CountySOCWA JBL SJCOO Exxon/Mobil I

South Orange

CountySOCWA JBL SJCOO Exxon/Mobil II

South Orange



(SCWD) RO Plant

South Orange

CountySOCWA Outfall

Dana Point Seawater

Desalination Plant


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall


Center


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

PRUDENTIAL OVERALL

SUPPLY


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

SOUTHWESTERN

COLLEGE


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

SCRIPPS MEMORIAL

HOSPITAL CHULA VISTA


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallQUALITY LIFT TRUCKS


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

ANNEX AUTOMOTIVE,

INC.


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

SOUTH BAY AUTO

PARTS


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallOTAY VALLEY SHELL


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

CATERING


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallGCE INDUSTRIES, INC.


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

SOS METALS SAN

DIEGO

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


0.003 0.001 0.003 0.001 0.003 0.001 0.003 0.001

0.005 0.001 0.005 0.001 0.005 0.001 0.005 0.001

0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005

0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005

0.01 0.007212 0.01 0.007212 0.01 0.007212 0.01 0.007212

0.072 0.011 0.072 0.011 0.072 0.011 0.072 0.011

0.05 0.00168 0.05 0.00168 0.05 0.00168 0.05 0.00168

0.01 0.009 0.01 0.009 0.01 0.009 0.01 0.009

0.072 0.0056 0.072 0.0056 0.072 0.0056 0.072 0.0056

0.001 0.000277 0.001 0.000277 0.001 0.000277 0.001 0.000277

0.05 0.001 0.05 0.001 0.05 0.001 0.05 0.001

0.05 0.001 0.05 0.001 0.05 0.001 0.05 0.001

0.3 0.2146 0.3 0.2146 0.3 0.2146 0.3 0.2146

25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25

0.0009 0.0009 0.0009 0.0009

0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130

0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004

0.0006 0.0006 0.0006 0.0006

0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003

0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001

0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001

0.0084 0.0084 0.0084 0.0084

0.0046 0.0046 0.0046 0.0046

0.0006 0.0006 0.0006 0.0006

0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001


Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line

User Name





Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

ROHR, INC. DBA

GOODRICH

AEROSTRUCTURES


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

ALLIED WASTE

SERVICES-SAN DIEGO


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

DYNEGY SOUTH BAY,

LLC


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

UNITED PARCEL

SERVICE


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallMMC CHULA VISTA, LLC


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

WORLD OIL MARKETING

COMPANY


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallFULLER FORD


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallDRESSER-RAND


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

ARISE WACO

SCAFFOLD EQUIPMENT


Vista

San Diego's Metro

OutfallATC OF SAN DIEGO


Vista

San Diego's Metro

Outfall

ZEPEDA'S RADIATOR

SHOP

San Diego SDMWWD North City WRP sewer various


Inc

San Diego SDMWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer various


Aerostructures-brine


DBA Goodrich


Conn 210


DBA Goodrich


Conn 250

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer UT;Convention Center




of SD Inc

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


0.0254 0.0254 0.0254 0.0254

0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007

0.0676 0.0676 0.0676 0.0676

0.0029 0.0029 0.0029 0.0029

0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140

0.0144 0.0144 0.0144 0.0144

0.0018 0.0018 0.0018 0.0018

0.0006 0.0006 0.0006 0.0006

0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005

0.0037 0.0037 0.0037 0.0037

0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001

0.0300 0.0300 0.0300 0.0300

0.0250 0.0250 0.0250 0.0250

0.0500 0.0500 0.0500 0.0500

0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140

0.0200 0.0200 0.0200 0.0200

0.0200 0.0200 0.0200 0.0200

0.4100 0.4100 0.4100 0.4100

0.5300 0.5300 0.5300 0.5300

0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400

0.0500 0.0500 0.0500 0.0500


Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line

User Name





Conn 200


Fuel Annex


tronics, Inc


tronics, Inc




Diego

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer Naval Base San Diego


Diego


Coronado Facility

San Diego SD MWWD SBWRP sewer Circle Foods, LLC


detention facilities


LLC


LLC


Facility

San Diego SD MWWD South Bay WRP Sewer Heinz Frozen Foods

San Diego SD MWWD North City WRP Sewer Koch Membrane Syst


SD


Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


0.0600 0.0600 0.0600 0.0600

0.0570 0.0570 0.0570 0.0570

0.0330 0.0330 0.0330 0.0330

0.0150 0.0150 0.0150 0.0150

0.046 incl san 0.046 incl san 0.046 incl san 0.046 incl san

0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100

0.0200 0.0200 0.0200 0.0200

0.6600 0.6600 0.6600 0.6600

0.35 incl san 0.35 incl san 0.35 incl san 0.35 incl san

0.0700 0.0700 0.0700 0.0700

0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510

0.53 w/san 0.024

w/o san

0.53 w/san

0.024 w/o san

0.53 w/san 0.024

w/o san

0.53 w/san

0.024 w/o san

0.1300 0.1300 0.1300 0.1300

0.0800 0.0800 0.0800 0.0800

0.80 w/san 0.057

w/o san

0.80 w/san 0.057

w/o san

0.80 w/san 0.057

w/o san

0.80 w/san

0.057 w/o san

0.1300 0.1300 0.1300 0.1300

0.1700 0.1700 0.1700 0.1700

0.3300 0.3300 0.3300 0.3300

0.0700 0.0700 0.0700 0.0700


Region Agency

Downstream

WWTP or

Outfall

Sewer or

Brine

Line

User Name






Studies

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer Steiner Corp dba Alsco

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer Angelica Textile Svcs


Inc


NASSCO

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer Hydranautics

San Diego Poway North City WRP sewer Palomar Pomerado Health

San Diego SD MWWD Pt Loma WWTP sewer Torvac Div of Darling Intl




dewtr


Separations Group Inc



San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer California Creative Foods

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer Deutsch

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer Elite Metal

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer

Genentech Oceanside

Facility

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer

Genentech Oceanside

Clinical Production

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer Hydranautics

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer Indigo Labs

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer Nitto Denko

San DiegoCity of

OceansideSLR Sewer Sepro

San DiegoCity of

OceansideLS Sewer Metro Roof

San DiegoCity of

OceansideLS Sewer Mission Linen Service

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Maximum Daily or

Instantaneous

Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005

0.0570 0.0570 0.0570 0.0570

0.0720 0.0720 0.0720 0.0720

0.1860 0.1860 0.1860 0.1860

0.0750 0.0750 0.0750 0.0750

0.0600 0.0600 0.0600 0.0600

0.0520 0.0520 0.0520 0.0520

0.0370 0.0370 0.0370 0.0370

0.0200 0.0200 0.0200 0.0200

0.5000 0.5000 0.5000 0.5000

0.0720 0.0720 0.0720 0.0720

0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100

0.0540 0.0540 0.0540 0.0540

0.0530 0.0530 0.0530 0.0530

0.0350 0.0350 0.0350 0.0350

0.0500 0.0189 0.0500 0.0189 0.0500 0.0189 0.0500 0.0189

0.2500 0.1647 0.2500 0.1647 0.2500 0.1647 0.2500 0.1647

0.0020 0.0003 0.0020 0.0003 0.0020 0.0003 0.0020 0.0003

0.3430 0.1094 0.3430 0.1094 0.3430 0.1094 0.3430 0.1094

0.1250 0.0576 0.1250 0.0576 0.1250 0.0576 0.1250 0.0576

0.4500 0.3539 0.4500 0.3539 0.4500 0.3539 0.4500 0.3539

0.0003 0.0001 0.0003 0.0001 0.0003 0.0001 0.0003 0.0001

0.0034 0.0021 0.0034 0.0021 0.0034 0.0021 0.0034 0.0021

0.0400 0.0065 0.0400 0.0065 0.0400 0.0065 0.0400 0.0065

0.0060 0.0025 0.0060 0.0025 0.0060 0.0025 0.0060 0.0025

0.1850 0.0878 0.1850 0.0878 0.1850 0.0878 0.1850 0.0878


Survey_Report.doc

Attachment C.4 – Ocean Outfall Information


Pipeline Information

Region Outfall Facility NameOperating

AgencyLocation

Year

Originally

Constructed

or Planned

Type of Flow

Contributing WWTPs or Other

Facilities

(List out)

Pipe

Material

Length

(feet)

Size

(inches)

Capacity

(MGD)

Planned Expansions,

Additions or

Lengthenings?

(Please describe and

note the planned

year)

Scale Formation

Problems

(Please describe)

Los AngelesProposed Brewer Desalter

BrinelineWRD

Brewer

DesalterBrine Redondo Beach Power Plant Outfall 16

Los AngelesBrewer Desalter-Joint

Intertie

West Basin

MWD

Brewer

DesalterBrine

Proposed Brewer Desalter Outfall/

Joint WPCP

Los AngelesHyperion 1-mile Bypass

Outfall

City of Los

Angeles

Bureau of

Sanitation

Santa Monica

Bay1951 Treated Wastewater

Hyperion WWTP; West Basin WRP;

LA/Glendale WRP; Burbank WRP

Tillman WRP; Ahmanson Ranch; Tapia

WRF

Precast

Concrete5,384 144 727.0

Los Angeles Hyperion 5- mile Outfall

City of Los

Angeles

Bureau of

Sanitation

Santa Monica

Bay1961 Treated Wastewater

Hyperion WWTP; West Basin WRP;

LA/Glendale WRP; Burbank WRP

Tillman WRP; Ahmanson Ranch; Tapia

WRF

Precast

Concrete27,539 144 765.0

Los AngelesJoint Outfall (12 foot

diameter)LACSD White Point 1966 Treated Wastewater

Joint WPCP; Brewer Desalter; Long Beach

WRP; Leo J. Vander Lans Treat. Facility;

Los Coyotes WRP; Carson Regional WRP;

Whittier Narrows WRP; San Jose Creek

WRP; Pomona WRP; Pomona Ion

Exchange Facility; Upland Ion Exchange

Facility

7,048 144 164.0

Need for new tunnel

outfall being investigated

currently









Facility

10,300 96 106.0

Need for new tunnel


currently




WRP; Long Beach Seawater Desalination

Plant; Alamitos Barrier Project; Los Coyotes

WRP; Carson Regional WRP; Los Coyotes

WRP; Whittier Narrows WRP; San Jose

Creek WRP; Pomona WRP; Pomona Ion


Facility

6,500 72Not Currently

Used

Need for new tunnel


currently


\\cheron\projects\USBR\381333BrineStudy\T3_Brine_MGMT\T3-1_Survey\T3-1_Survey\Survey-V64_MH.xlsSurvey - Ocean Outfalls Page 1 of 20




AgencyLocation

Year

Originally

Constructed

or Planned

Type of Flow


Facilities

(List out)

Pipe

Material

Length

(feet)

Size

(inches)

Capacity

(MGD)

Planned Expansions,

Additions or

Lengthenings?


note the planned

year)

Scale Formation

Problems

(Please describe)










Facility

10,300 60Not Currently

Used

Need for new tunnel


currently

Los Angeles Private Industrial Outfall #1Private

IndustrialTreated Wastewater West Basin Desalination


IndustrialTreated Wastewater LADWP Seawater Desalination Plant

Los Angeles Terminal Island Outfall

City of Los

Angeles

Bureau of

Sanitation

Los Angeles

HarborTreated Wastewater Terminal Island WWTP

Precast

Concrete5,875 60 66.0

North Orange

County

AES Huntington Beach

Power Generation Facility

Outfall

AES

North Orange

CountyOCSD Outfall #1 OCSD Treated Wastewater


Green Acres Project

IEUA Regional Plant #1,3,4,5


Carbon Canyon WRP

IEUA Arsenic Treatment Facility

Beaumont WWTP #1

Wocholz WWTP

Yucaipa Valley Regional Water Renewal

Redlands WWTP

San Bernardino WRP

Colton WWTP

RIX WRP

Rialto WWTP


Chino Desalter I, II, III


Arlington Desalter

Temescal Desalter

Corona WWTP #1,2,3

Moreno Valley WRP


WMWD Arsenic Treatment Facility

WMWD Perchlorate Treatment Facility

March WWTP




Perris Valley WRP

Menifee Desalter

Perris Desalter I, II

EMWD Wastewater Desalting/Recharge

Facility

Santa Rosa WRF


RCP 23,760 78 480 None

Sea Creatures in

port holes are

removed annually





AgencyLocation

Year

Originally

Constructed

or Planned

Type of Flow


Facilities

(List out)

Pipe

Material

Length

(feet)

Size

(inches)

Capacity

(MGD)

Planned Expansions,

Additions or

Lengthenings?


note the planned

year)

Scale Formation

Problems

(Please describe)


North Orange

CountyOCSD Outfall #2 OCSD Treated Wastewater


Green Acres Project

IEUA Regional Plant #1,3,4,5


Carbon Canyon WRP

IEUA Arsenic Treatment Facility

Beaumont WWTP #1

Wocholz WWTP


Redlands WWTP

San Bernardino WRP

Colton WWTP

RIX WRP

Rialto WWTP


Chino Desalter I, II, III


Arlington Desalter

Temescal Desalter

Corona WWTP #1,2,3

Moreno Valley WRP




March WWTP




Perris Valley WRP

Menifee Desalter


EMWD Wastewater Desalting/Recharge

Facility

Santa Rosa WRF


Frances Desalter

RCP 5,280 120 230 None

Sea Creatures in

port holes are

removed annually

South Orange

CountyAliso Creek Ocean Outfall SOCWA

Constructed

1977Treated Wastewater

Coastal TP; Regional TP; El Toro WWTP;

Los Alisos WRP; IRWD SGU, IRWD Baker

TP, IRWD PPTP

RCP 8,600 48

50 MGD

Physical

capacity

Permitted is

32.86 MGD

None





AgencyLocation

Year

Originally

Constructed

or Planned

Type of Flow


Facilities

(List out)

Pipe

Material

Length

(feet)

Size

(inches)

Capacity

(MGD)

Planned Expansions,

Additions or

Lengthenings?


note the planned

year)

Scale Formation

Problems

(Please describe)


South Orange

County


OutfallSOCWA

Placed in use

1978Treated Wastewater

JB Latham WWTP; San Clemente WRP; 3A

Plant; Chiquita WRP; Oso Creek WRP;

South Coast Water District - Groundwater

Recovery Facility; City of San Juan

Capistrano Groundwater Desalter; South

Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project

RCP 11,826 57

24 gravity

107 during

pumping

None

San Diego Camp Pendleton OutfallU.S. Marine

CorpsOceanside, CA Planned Treated Wastewater



Camp Pendleton Southern Tertiary TP

San Diego Encina Outfall Pipeline Encino JPA Treated Wastewater

Encina WPCP

Carlsbad WRP

Gafner WRF

San Diego Oceanside OutfallCity of

OceansideTreated Wastewater

Camp Pendleton WWTP #1 and #2

La Salina WWTP


San Luis Rey WWTP

Fallbrook Plant #1

36 46

San Diego Point Loma OutfallCity of San

DiegoTreated Wastewater

Point Loma WWTP

North City WRP

Padre Dam WRF

144 432

San Diego San Elijo Ocean Outfall San Elijo JPA Treated Wastewater San Elijo WRF 48 24

San Diego South Bay Ocean OutfallCity of San

DiegoTreated Wastewater


South Bay WWTP144

258 gravity

333 pumped

VenturaOrmond Beach Effluent

Pipeline

Reliant Energy

LLCBrine 14 688

Ventura Hueneme OutfallCalleguas

MWD

City of Port

Hueneme

Begin

construction in

2009

Concentrate from

desalters treating

brackish groundwater,

tertiary WW

Camrosa WRF (existing), Camrosa WRF

desalter (planned), Camarillo WRF

(existing), Port Hueneme GW desalter

(existing), Camrosa University desalter

(planned), Camrosa Conejo desalter

(planned), Camarillo desalter (planned),

Somis desalter (planned), Moorpark desalter

(planned)

HDPE/WSP 4500 30 20 None

Ventura Oxnard Ocean Outfall City of Oxnard Treated WastewaterOxnard WWTP/ AWPF

GREAT Program Desalter48 50




Agency


BrinelineWRD


Intertie

West Basin

MWD


Outfall

City of Los

Angeles

Bureau of

Sanitation


City of Los

Angeles

Bureau of

Sanitation


diameter)LACSD


diameter)LACSD


diameter)LACSD

Facility Information Discharge Water Quality Permit Limits/ Information

Permit No.TDS

(mg/l)

Hardness

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

TSS

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHTemp

(°C)

Residual

Chlorine

Concentration

(mg/l)

Heavy

Metals

(mg/l)

Toxicity

(YUa)

Trace Organics

(including EDCs,

disinfection by-

products, PhACs)

(mg/l)

Note any

additional

information

Comments

NPDES

CA010999130 30 8.40 0.028

No effluent limits

prescribed

TUa = 2.8

Tuc = 84

NPDES

CA010999230 30 8.40 0.028

No effluent limits

prescribed

TUa = 2.8

Tuc = 85

R4-2006-

004230/45 30/45 6-9 100 0.33 No Permit Limit

TUa = 5.3

Tuc = 167

R4-2006-

004230/45 30/45 6-9 100 0.33 No Permit Limit

TUa = 5.3

Tuc = 167

R4-2006-

004230/45 30/45 6-9 100 0.3 TUc = 151




Agency

Proposed Brewer Desalter



diameter)LACSD


Industrial


Industrial


City of Los

Angeles

Bureau of

Sanitation

North Orange

County



Outfall

AES

North Orange

CountyOCSD Outfall #1 OCSD

Discharge Water Quality Permit Limits/ Information

Permit No.TDS

(mg/l)

Hardness

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

TSS

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHTemp

(°C)

Residual

Chlorine

Concentration

(mg/l)

Heavy

Metals

(mg/l)

Toxicity

(YUa)

Trace Organics

(including EDCs,

disinfection by-

products, PhACs)

(mg/l)

Note any

additional

information

Comments

R4-2006-

004230/45 30/45 6-9 100 0.23 TUc = 116

NPDES

CA005385615 15 130-330

6.5-

8.5100 0.1

No effluent limits

prescribed

CA0110604

None, but this

does impact

toxicity tests

30 30 6 to 9 0.36See attached

Constituents document

Acute Toxicity 5.7

TUa; Chronic

Toxicity 181 TUc

See attached

Constituents

document

Turbidity 75

NTU; Suspended

Solids 1.0 Ml/l;

Dilution factor 180 to 1 for

certain tests. Sediment

sampling also required.




Agency



North Orange


South Orange



Permit No.TDS

(mg/l)

Hardness

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

TSS

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHTemp

(°C)

Residual

Chlorine

Concentration

(mg/l)

Heavy

Metals

(mg/l)

Toxicity

(YUa)

Trace Organics

(including EDCs,

disinfection by-

products, PhACs)

(mg/l)

Note any

additional

information

Comments

CA0110604

None, but this

does impact

toxicity tests

30 30 6 to 9 0.36See attached

Constituents document

Acute Toxicity 5.7

TUa; Chronic

Toxicity 181 TUc

See attached

Constituents

document

Turbidity 75

NTU; Suspended

Solids 1.0 Ml/l;

Dilution factor 180 to 1 for

certain tests. Sediment

sampling also required.

CA0107611

cBOD Average

Monthly Limit

25 mg/l and

not < 85 %

removal

TSS Average

Monthly Limit

30 mg/l and

not < 85 %

removal

6266.0 -

9.02.09 Maximum Daily

(As 7.57) (Cd 1.04)

(Cr6 2.09)(Cu 2.61)

(Pb 2.09)(Hg 0.0416)

(Ni 5.22)(Se 15.7)

(Ag 0.689)(Zn 18.8)

Acute = 8.1




Agency



South Orange

County


OutfallSOCWA


Corps

San Diego Encina Outfall Pipeline Encino JPA


Oceanside


Diego

San Diego San Elijo Ocean Outfall San Elijo JPA


Diego


Pipeline

Reliant Energy

LLC


MWD

Ventura Oxnard Ocean Outfall City of Oxnard


Permit No.TDS

(mg/l)

Hardness

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

TSS

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHTemp

(°C)

Residual

Chlorine

Concentration

(mg/l)

Heavy

Metals

(mg/l)

Toxicity

(YUa)

Trace Organics

(including EDCs,

disinfection by-

products, PhACs)

(mg/l)

Note any

additional

information

Comments

CA0107417

cBOD Average

Monthly Limit

25 mg/l and

not < 85 %

removal

TSS Average

Monthly Limit

30 mg/l and

not < 85 %

removal

2426.0 -

9.00.808

(As 2.93) (Cd 0.40)

(Cr6 =0.81)(Cu

1.01)(Pb 0.81)(Hg

0.016)(Ni 2.02)(Se

6.06)(Ag 0.27)(Zn

7.28)

3.3

R9-2005-

013630 210 6-9 0.7

see

permit

see

permit

see

permit

CA0108928

CA0109045

25

30

30

30

6 - 9

6 - 91.5

IWTP

SBWRP

CA0064521,

CI-9404

See attached water quality report provided by Calleguas MWD on

2/11/09




Agency


BrinelineWRD


Intertie

West Basin

MWD


Outfall

City of Los

Angeles

Bureau of

Sanitation


City of Los

Angeles

Bureau of

Sanitation


diameter)LACSD


diameter)LACSD


diameter)LACSD


TDS

(mg/l)

Hardness

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

TSS

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pH Temp

(°C)

Residual Chlorine

Concentration

(mg/l)

Heavy Metals

(mg/l)

Toxicity

(Yua)

Trace Organics

(including EDCs,

disinfection by-

products, PhACs)

(mg/l)

Note any

additional issues

Comments Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

896 18.00 19.00 35.00 6.80 <0.1

See Website

http://www2.san.ci.la.c

a.us/permit/index.html

TUa=0.6

TUc=25450.0 321.0

897 18.00 19.00 35.00 6.80 <0.2

See Website



TUa=0.6

TUc=26450.0 321.0

1349 253 6.00 15.00 34.30 7.20 81 <0.1 <0.05TUa = 1.89

TUc = 42

All parameters

measures at

the Joint Water

Pollution

Control Plant

except residual

Chlorine

164.0 208.0 201.0

1349 253 6.00 15.00 34.00 7.00 81 <0.1 <0.05TUa = 1.89

TUc = 42

All parameters

measures at

the Joint Water

Pollution

Control Plant

except residual

Chlorine

106.0 112.0 108.0

Discharge Water Quality Data/ Information Current/End of 2008




Agency




diameter)LACSD


Industrial


Industrial


City of Los

Angeles

Bureau of

Sanitation

North Orange

County



Outfall

AES

North Orange


TDS

(mg/l)

Hardness

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

TSS

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pH Temp

(°C)

Residual Chlorine

Concentration

(mg/l)

Heavy Metals

(mg/l)

Toxicity

(Yua)

Trace Organics

(including EDCs,

disinfection by-

products, PhACs)

(mg/l)

Note any

additional issues

Comments Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


2.00 1.00 0.50 7.30 78 <0.01

See Website



30.0 15.6

Effluent

density

997.9 kg/m3

BOD-T 42 32 35 7.9 79.8 0.07

See attached

Constituents

document

see below

on line 50

in ug/l not

mg/l

See attached Constituents

document

Dilution factor 180 to

1 for certain tests.

Sediment sampling

also required.

480.00 550.00 170.00




Agency



North Orange


South Orange


TDS

(mg/l)

Hardness

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

TSS

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pH Temp

(°C)

Residual Chlorine

Concentration

(mg/l)

Heavy Metals

(mg/l)

Toxicity

(Yua)

Trace Organics

(including EDCs,

disinfection by-

products, PhACs)

(mg/l)

Note any

additional issues

Comments Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


230.00 0.00 250.00

1057 3705.5

cBOD8.7 20.8 6.5 25.0 0.02

As = 0.007, Cd =

ND<0.005,Cr = ND

<0.006,Cu = 0.012,Pb

= ND<0.019,Hg =

ND<.00073,Ni =ND

<0.010,Se =ND

<0.026, Zn =0.034

1.07 50.00 25.00 13.30




Agency



South Orange

County


OutfallSOCWA


Corps



Oceanside


Diego



Diego


Pipeline

Reliant Energy

LLC


MWD


TDS

(mg/l)

Hardness

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

TSS

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pH Temp

(°C)

Residual Chlorine

Concentration

(mg/l)

Heavy Metals

(mg/l)

Toxicity

(Yua)

Trace Organics

(including EDCs,

disinfection by-

products, PhACs)

(mg/l)

Note any

additional issues

Comments Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


1258 412 6.2 7.6 25.9 7.2 25.0

As = < 0.025, Cd =

ND<0.005,Cr =

0.003,Cu = 0.018,Pb =

0.009,Hg =

ND<.00073,Ni =

0.015,Se =ND <0.026,

Zn =0.058

1.35 36.39 29.40 17.70

1270 25 18 Zn 0.02 1.73 32.60

1100 192.00

1100

1360 28.00

2051

See attached water quality report provided by Calleguas MWD on 2/11/09

29.30




Agency


BrinelineWRD


Intertie

West Basin

MWD


Outfall

City of Los

Angeles

Bureau of

Sanitation


City of Los

Angeles

Bureau of

Sanitation


diameter)LACSD


diameter)LACSD


diameter)LACSD


Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

450.0 342.0 450.0 350.0 450.0 358.0 450.0 363.0 450.0 368.0

450.0 342.0 450.0 350.0 450.0 358.0 450.0 363.0 450.0 368.0

164.0 208.0 201.0 164.0 208.0 201.0 164.0 208.0 201.0 164.0 208.0 201.0 164.0 208.0 201.0

106.0 112.0 108.0 106.0 112.0 108.0 106.0 112.0 108.0 106.0 112.0 108.0 106.0 112.0 108.0

Planning Year 2030Planning Year 2010 Planning Year 2015 Planning Year 2020 Planning Year 2025




Agency




diameter)LACSD


Industrial


Industrial


City of Los

Angeles

Bureau of

Sanitation

North Orange

County



Outfall

AES

North Orange


Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


30.0 16.0 30.0 16.0 30.0 16.0 30.0 16.0 30.0 16.0

480.00 335.00 148.00 480.00 351.00 148.00 480.00 372.00 148.00 480.00 372.00 148.00 480.00 406.00 199.20




Agency



North Orange


South Orange


Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


230.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0.00

50.00 25.00 13.30 50.00 25.00 13.30 50.00 25.00 13.30 50.00 25.00 13.30 50.00 25.00 13.30




Agency



South Orange

County


OutfallSOCWA


Corps



Oceanside


Diego



Diego


Pipeline

Reliant Energy

LLC


MWD


Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


36.39 32.00 18.00 36.40 32.00 18.00 36.40 40.00 22.00 36.40 40.00 22.00 36.40 40.00 22.00

32.60 32.60 32.60 32.60 32.60

192.00 192.00 192.00 192.00 192.00

28.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 28.00

20.00 20.00 Unk 20.00 20.00 Unk 20.00 20.00 Unk 20.00 20.00 Unk 20.00 20.00 Unk




Agency


BrinelineWRD


Intertie

West Basin

MWD


Outfall

City of Los

Angeles

Bureau of

Sanitation


City of Los

Angeles

Bureau of

Sanitation


diameter)LACSD


diameter)LACSD


diameter)LACSD


Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

550.0 375.0

550.0 375.0

164.0 208.0 201.0

106.0 112.0 108.0

Planning Year 2035




Agency




diameter)LACSD


Industrial


Industrial


City of Los

Angeles

Bureau of

Sanitation

North Orange

County



Outfall

AES

North Orange


Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Planning Year 2035

30.0 16.0

480.00 406.00 199.20




Agency



North Orange


South Orange


Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Planning Year 2035

230.00 0.00 0.00

50.00 25.00 13.30




Agency



South Orange

County


OutfallSOCWA


Corps



Oceanside


Diego



Diego


Pipeline

Reliant Energy

LLC


MWD


Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Planning Year 2035

36.40 40.00 22.00

32.60

192.00

28.00

20.00 20.00 Unk


Survey_Report.doc

Attachment C.5 – Brinelines, WWTP Land Outfalls, and Sewer Interconnection Information


Region Brineline Facility Name Operating AgencyContributing WWTPs or Other Facilities

(List out)

End of Pipe Location/

Connection

Year Originally

Constructed or

Planned

Type of Flow

Inland EmpireSARI Reach 1 (Interplant

Diversion Pipeline)OCSD

OCSD Plant #1 Ellis Ave to

Brookhurst then continues

to Plant #2

1971 M&I and Brine

Inland Empire SARI Reach 2 OCSDLa Palma/Grove

(Anahiem)1973 M&I and Brine

Inland Empire SARI Reach 3 OCSDRichfield/La Plama

(Anaheim)1973 M&I and Brine

Inland Empire SARI Reach 4 OCSDImperial Hwy/ La Palma

(Anaheim)1973 M&I and Brine

Inland Empire SARI Reach 5 OCSD Featherly Park Boundary 1974 M&I and Brine

Inland Empire SARI Reach 6 OCSD Near Railroad 1976 M&I and Brine

Inland Empire SARI Reach 7 OCSD Green River Cart Path 1976 M&I and Brine

Inland Empire SARI Reach 8 OCSD County Line 1976 SAWPA ONLY FLOW

Inland Empire SARI Reach IV SAWPA SARI Reach III 1975 Brine

Inland Empire SARI Reach IVA SAWPA/ IEUA

Chino Desalter I



Carbon Canyon WRP

SARI Reach IV 1981 Brine

Inland Empire SARI Reach IVB SAWPA

Arlington Desalter

Corona WWTP #1,2

Temescal Desalter

SARI Reach IV 1981, 1996 Brine

Inland Empire SARI Reach IVD SAWPAStringfellow Pretreatment Facility

Chino Desalter II, IIISARI Reach IVA 1990, 1991, 1992 Brine


\\cheron\projects\USBR\381333BrineStudy\T3_Brine_MGMT\T3-1_Survey\T3-1_Survey\Survey-V64_MH.xlsSurvey - Brinelines Page 1 of 30



(List out)


Connection

Year Originally

Constructed or

Planned

Type of Flow


Inland Empire SARI Reach IVE SAWPA

Rialto WWTP

RIX WRP

Colton WWTP

SARI Reach IVB 1994 Brine

Inland Empire YUCAIPA -SARI Yucaipa Valley WD


Redlands WWTP

San Bernardino WRP

SARI Reach IVE not started Brine

Inland Empire

Temescal Valley Regional

Interceptor

(SARI Reach V)

SAWPALake Elsinore Regional WWRF

Corona WWTP #3SARI Reach IVB 2000 Brine

Inland Empire SBMWD - SARI Station San Bernardino MWD SBMWD WRP 1994 Hauled Waste

Inland Empire Temecula Valley Brineline EMWD


Santa Rosa WRF




Interceptor

(SARI Reach V)

Brine

Inland Empire EMWD Proposed Brineline EMWD

Moreno Valley WRF

Smith Ion Exchange Facility



March WWTP

Perris Valley WRP

Menifee Desalter



EMWD Wastewater Desalting/Recharge Facility

Temecula Valley Brineline Brine

Los Angeles Carson WRP- Joint WPCF Intertie LACSD Carson Regional WRP Joint WPCP Brine

Los AngelesLong Beach WRP - Joint WPCF

IntertieWRD

Long Beach WRP


Long Beach Seawater Desalination Plant

Joint WPCP Brine

Los AngelesLos Coyotes WRP - Joint WPCF

IntertieLACSD

Los Coyotes WRP

LB Wetlands ProjectJoint WPCP Treated Wastewater

Los Angeles LACSD Brine Interceptor LACSDWhittier Narrows WRP

San Jose Creek WRPJoint WPCP Brine

Los Angeles Pomona Effluent Pipeline LACSD Pomona WRPPomona WRP/ LACSD

Brine InterceptorTreated Wastewater

Los Angeles West Basin Brineline West Basin MWD West Basin WRP Hyperion WWTP Brine

North Orange

County

North Orange

County




(List out)


Connection

Year Originally

Constructed or

Planned

Type of Flow


South Orange

County3A Effluent Transmission Main

Moulton Niguel Water

District

Oso Creek WRP

3A PlantChiquita Land Outfall 1968 Treated Wastewater

South Orange

CountyNorth Coast Interceptor City of Laguna Beach South Coast WRP Raw Sewage

South Orange

County

SOCWA Effluent Transmission

Main Reach AIRWD

Los Alisos WRP

IRWD-IDP & SGU

SOCWA Effluent

Transmission Main1979

Treated Wastewater-

Brine/Groundwater

Cleanup

South Orange

County


Main Reach BC & DSOCWA

Los Alisos WRP, IRWD IDP, IRWD SGU,

El Toro WWTP,SOCWA Effluent

Transmission Main1979

Treated Wastewater-

Brine/Groundwater

Cleanup

South Orange

County


Main Reach E SOCWA


El Toro WWTP,

Joint Regional Plant,


Aliso Creek Ocean Outfall 1979

Treated Wastewater-

Brine/Groundwater

Cleanup

South Orange

CountySOCWA On Shore Outfall SOCWA


El Toro WWTP,

Joint Regional Plant,


Aliso Creek Ocean Outfall 1979

Treated Wastewater

Brine/Groundwater

Cleanup

South Orange

CountyOrange County Regional Brineline OCWD

Tustin Desalter

Frances Desalter

Irvine Desalter

Irvine DesalterBrine




(List out)


Connection

Year Originally

Constructed or

Planned

Type of Flow


San Diego City of Escondido Outfall City of Escondido Hale Ave WRF San Elijo WRF 2005 Brine

San Diego City of San Diego Brineline City of San DiegoMission Valley Desalination Plant, San Diego

Formation Desalination Plant

South Bay WWTP/

Ocean Outfall (from

Mission Valley Desal

Brineline to San Diego

County Regional Brineline)

2012 Brine

San DiegoEast Mission Gorge Interceptor

SystemPadre Dam MWD

Padre Dam WRF, El Cajon, Lakeside, County of San

Diego Thru Mission Gorge, City of San Diego Flow

added after Mission Gorge

Point Loma WWTP/

Point Loma Outfall

Early 1960's, relined in

early 1990's

PDMWD Discharges

several flow stream

thru the E Mission

Gorge Interceptor

including:


SystemPadre Dam MWD




Point Loma WWTP/

Point Loma Outfall


early 1990'sRaw Wastewater


SystemPadre Dam MWD




Point Loma WWTP/

Point Loma Outfall


early 1990's

Sludge (Primary, WAS,

Chemical & Scum) )


SystemPadre Dam MWD




Point Loma WWTP/

Point Loma Outfall


early 1990'sBrine

San Diego Encina Outfall Pipeline Buena SD Encina WPCFEncina Outfall Pipeline -

JPATreated Wastewater

San DiegoFallbrook - Camp Pendleton

Outfall PipelineFallbrook PUD

Fallbrook Plant #1

Camp Pendleton WWTP #1,2Oceanside Outfall Treated Wastewater

San Diego Leucadia CWD Brineline Leucadia CWDGafner WRF

Carlsbad WRP

Encina WPCF/

Encina OutfallBrine

San Diego Mission Basin Brineline City of Oceanside Mission Basin Desalting FacilityLa Salina WWTP/

Oceanside OutfallBrine




(List out)


Connection

Year Originally

Constructed or

Planned

Type of Flow


San Diego Mission Valley Desal Brineline To Be Determined Mission Valley Desalination Plant

South Bay WWTP/

Ocean Outfall (from

Mission Valley Desalter to

San Diego Formation

Desalter & City of San

Diego Brineline)

2012 Brine

San Diego Otay Mesa Brine Disposal Pipeline Otay WD South Bay WWTPSouth Bay WWTP/

Ocean OutfallProposed on-line 2011 Brine

San DiegoSan Diego County Regional

BrinelineTo Be Determined

Mission Valley Desalination Plant, San Diego

Formation Desalination Plant, Richard Reynolds

Desalination Plant

South Bay WWTP/

Ocean Outfall2012 Brine

San DiegoSan Luis Rey 24" Effluent Force

MainCity of Oceanside San Luis Rey WWTP

San Luis Rey 27" Effluent

Force MainTreated Wastewater



San Luis Rey 36" Effluent

Force MainTreated Wastewater



La Salina WWTP/

Oceanside OutfallTreated Wastewater

San DiegoSan Pasqual Groundwater

DesalterCity of San Diego San Pasqual Groundwater Desalter City of Escondido Outfall 2013 Brine




(List out)


Connection

Year Originally

Constructed or

Planned

Type of Flow


Ventura

Calleguas Regional Salinity

Management Pipeline (SMP)

Phase 1A

Calleguas MWD

Camrosa WRF (existing), Camarillo WRF (existing),

Hill Canyon WWTP (planned), Camrosa desalter

(planned), Camarillo desalter (planned), Somis

desalter (planned), Moorpark desalter (planned), West

Simi Desalter (planned)

unincorporated Ventura

County, Hueneme Road &

Arnold Road

construction complete

2004Brine

Ventura SMP Phase 1B Calleguas MWD








Hwy 1


2009Brine

Ventura SMP Phase 1C Calleguas MWD








Edison Road


2008Brine

Ventura SMP Phase 1D Calleguas MWD







County, Hueneme Road

and Laguna Road


2009Brine

Ventura SMP Phase 1E Calleguas MWD


Hill Canyon WWTP (planned), Port Hueneme GW

desalter (existing), Camrosa desalter (planned),

Camarillo desalter (planned), Somis desalter

(planned), Moorpark desalter (planned), West Simi

Desalter (planned)

Hueneme Beach Parking

Lot A

construction to begin

2009Brine

Ventura SMP Phase 2A Calleguas MWD

Camrosa desalter (planned), Camarillo desalter

(planned), Somis desalter (planned), Moorpark

desalter (planned), West Simi Desalter (planned)


County, Old Lewis Road

about 2,000' north of

Portrero Road


2013Brine






County, Lewis Road &

Cawelti Road


2014Brine





Camarillo, Lewis Road &

Daily Drive


2015

Ventura SMP Phases 2DEF Calleguas MWDSomis desalter (planned), Moorpark desalter

(planned), West Simi Desalter (planned)

Camarillo, Lewis Road &

Las Posas Road


2016

Ventura SMP Phases 3ABC Calleguas MWD West Simi Desalter (planned)


County, Hwy 118 & Grimes

Canyon Road


2019






Inland Empire SARI Reach 2 OCSD







Inland Empire SARI Reach IV SAWPA



Inland Empire SARI Reach IVD SAWPA


Pipe

Material

Length

(feet)

Size

(inches)

Capacity

(MGD)

Planned

Expansions,

Additions or

Lengthenings?

(Please describe

and note the

planned year)

Scale

Formation

Problems

(Please

describe)

Solids

Settlement

Problems

(Please

describe)

Any Planned

Treatment or

Maintenance

Method

RCP 67600 63 to 78 80.0 None None None


RCP 6300 48 61.0 None None None

RCP 6000 48 54.0 None None None


RCP/VCP 9600 42 to 45 37.0 None None None

VCP 1250 39 35.0Relocate River crossing

sectionNone None

VCP 2150 39 30.0Relocate River crossing

sectionNone None

RCP 16416 60 30.1 See commentLine Cleaning and

Inspection

RCP 39379 48 20.7Lining of Unlined RCP

Pipe planned

Minor scale

formation

(Ca, Mg)

Minorline cleaning and cctv

inspection in 2007

RCP 3100 36 26.1

Lining of approximately

3 miles Upstream of

Prado Dam is planned

Line Cleaning and

Inspection

VCP, HDPE,

RCP97623 48 20.0

Repairs to Mission

Tunnel are planned in

the near future

Line Cleaning and

Inspection







Inland Empire


Interceptor

(SARI Reach V)

SAWPA

Inland Empire SBMWD - SARI Station San Bernardino MWD





IntertieWRD


IntertieLACSD




North Orange

County

North Orange

County


Pipe

Material

Length

(feet)

Size

(inches)

Capacity

(MGD)

Planned

Expansions,

Additions or

Lengthenings?

(Please describe

and note the

planned year)

Scale

Formation

Problems

(Please

describe)

Solids

Settlement

Problems

(Please

describe)

Any Planned

Treatment or

Maintenance

Method

RCPP 35507 48 13.5Line Cleaning and

Inspection

HDPE 116650 30 15.0

2.5 None Scale None Flush line periodically

12 2.0

24





South Orange



District

South Orange

CountyNorth Coast Interceptor City of Laguna Beach

South Orange

County


Main Reach AIRWD

South Orange

County



South Orange

County


Main Reach E SOCWA

South Orange


South Orange



Pipe

Material

Length

(feet)

Size

(inches)

Capacity

(MGD)

Planned

Expansions,

Additions or

Lengthenings?

(Please describe

and note the

planned year)

Scale

Formation

Problems

(Please

describe)

Solids

Settlement

Problems

(Please

describe)

Any Planned

Treatment or

Maintenance

Method

ACP 18200 20 - 30 3.5 None NDA None None

RPMP 12102 21 7.5Replacement of all or

part within 10 yearsNDA None None

RPMP & RCP 34728 21 - 27 15.0

Possible Replacement

of RPMP section within

10 years

NDA None None

RCP 17120 36 - 39 32.2 None NDA None None

RCP 5409 48 50.0 None NDA None None





San Diego City of Escondido Outfall City of Escondido

San Diego City of San Diego Brineline City of San Diego


SystemPadre Dam MWD


SystemPadre Dam MWD


SystemPadre Dam MWD


SystemPadre Dam MWD

San Diego Encina Outfall Pipeline Buena SD



San Diego Leucadia CWD Brineline Leucadia CWD

San Diego Mission Basin Brineline City of Oceanside


Pipe

Material

Length

(feet)

Size

(inches)

Capacity

(MGD)

Planned

Expansions,

Additions or

Lengthenings?

(Please describe

and note the

planned year)

Scale

Formation

Problems

(Please

describe)

Solids

Settlement

Problems

(Please

describe)

Any Planned

Treatment or

Maintenance

Method

12.0 1.5

Varies:

Rehabbed

RCP &

PLRCP

33,000' of 27"

thru Mission

Gorge, then

85,000' to

PLWTP

27" thru

Mission

Gorge, Dia.,

72" and

greater as

City of SD

flow is

added.

Total Capacity

is 28 mgd in

27" thru

Mission

Gorge,

PDMWD Peak

Cap = 9.695

mgd

None None None None

Varies:

Rehabbed

RCP &

PLRCP

33,000' of 27"

thru Mission

Gorge, then

85,000' to

PLWTP

27" thru

Mission

Gorge, Dia.,

72" and

greater as

City of SD

flow is

added.

Total Capacity

is 28 mgd in

27" thru

Mission

Gorge,

PDMWD Peak

Cap = 9.695

mgd

None None None None

Varies:

Rehabbed

RCP &

PLRCP

33,000' of 27"

thru Mission

Gorge, then

85,000' to

PLWTP

27" thru

Mission

Gorge, Dia.,

72" and

greater as

City of SD

flow is

added.

Total Capacity

is 28 mgd in

27" thru

Mission

Gorge,

PDMWD Peak

Cap = 9.695

mgd

None None None None

Varies:

Rehabbed

RCP &

PLRCP

33,000' of 27"

thru Mission

Gorge, then

85,000' to

PLWTP

27" thru

Mission

Gorge, Dia.,

72" and

greater as

City of SD

flow is

added.

Total Capacity

is 28 mgd in

27" thru

Mission

Gorge,

PDMWD Peak

Cap = 9.695

mgd

None None None None

2.7 None

10.0





San Diego Mission Valley Desal Brineline To Be Determined

San Diego Otay Mesa Brine Disposal Pipeline Otay WD




MainCity of Oceanside






DesalterCity of San Diego


Pipe

Material

Length

(feet)

Size

(inches)

Capacity

(MGD)

Planned

Expansions,

Additions or

Lengthenings?

(Please describe

and note the

planned year)

Scale

Formation

Problems

(Please

describe)

Solids

Settlement

Problems

(Please

describe)

Any Planned

Treatment or

Maintenance

Method

12.0 1.8

24.0

27.0

36.0

8.0 1.2





Ventura



Phase 1A

Calleguas MWD








Ventura SMP Phases 2DEF Calleguas MWD

Ventura SMP Phases 3ABC Calleguas MWD


Pipe

Material

Length

(feet)

Size

(inches)

Capacity

(MGD)

Planned

Expansions,

Additions or

Lengthenings?

(Please describe

and note the

planned year)

Scale

Formation

Problems

(Please

describe)

Solids

Settlement

Problems

(Please

describe)

Any Planned

Treatment or

Maintenance

Method

HDPE 21,000 48 20

PVC 9,000 48 20

PVC 4,000 48 20

PVC/HDPE 1,300 48 20

CML&C WSP 10,500 48 20

TBD 11,800 30 15

TBD 11,800 30 15

TBD 11,800 30 15

TBD 35,400 24 12

TBD 52,200 24/18 8

















Facility Information Discharge Water Quality Data/ Information

Discharge

Order/

Agreement

TDS (mg/l)Hardness

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

TSS

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHHeavy Metals

(mg/l)

Trace Organics

(including EDCs,

disinfection by-

products, PhACs)

(mg/l)

Note any

additional

information

Comments

1972/1996

CBMWP/OCSD

Agreements

1972/1996

CBMWP/OCSD

Agreements

1972/1996

CBMWP/OCSD

Agreements

1972/1996

CBMWP/OCSD

Agreements

1972/1996

CBMWP/OCSD

Agreements

1972/1996

CBMWP/OCSD

Agreements

1972/1996

CBMWP/OCSD

Agreements

1972/1996

CBMWP/OCSD

Agreements

166 296

4955 2003 112 220 7.38

VSS =152.67

mg/l

SILICA = 131

mg/l

AVG from County Line

3600 500 1200 600 214 7.70VSS =528 mg/L

Si = 24 mg/LData provided by IEUA

All water quality values are

taken at S01, and represent all

of the flow from the Upper SARI

system, Data by SARI reach is

not available.





not available.







Inland Empire


Interceptor

(SARI Reach V)

SAWPA






IntertieWRD


IntertieLACSD




North Orange

County

North Orange

County


Discharge

Order/

Agreement

TDS (mg/l)Hardness

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

TSS

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHHeavy Metals

(mg/l)

Trace Organics

(including EDCs,

disinfection by-

products, PhACs)

(mg/l)

Note any

additional

information

Comments





not available.





not available.

Agreement w/

SBVMWD and

SAWPA

670400 -

2000

47 -

1800

7.6 -

9.31.315 - 5.381 0.00628 - 0.0451





South Orange



District

South Orange


South Orange

County


Main Reach AIRWD

South Orange

County



South Orange

County


Main Reach E SOCWA

South Orange


South Orange



Discharge

Order/

Agreement

TDS (mg/l)Hardness

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

TSS

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHHeavy Metals

(mg/l)

Trace Organics

(including EDCs,

disinfection by-

products, PhACs)

(mg/l)

Note any

additional

information

Comments

CA0107417 980 360 8.0 6.4 7.0

As = < 0.025, Cd =

ND<0.005,Cr =

0.003,Cu = 0.018,Pb =

0.009,Hg =

ND<.00073,Ni =

0.015,Se =ND <0.026,

Zn =0.058

CA0107611 1300 420 9.0 13.4 7.4

As = 0.007, Cd =

ND<0.005,Cr = ND

<0.006,Cu = 0.012,Pb

= ND<0.019,Hg =

ND<.00073,Ni =ND

<0.010,Se =ND

<0.026, Zn =0.034

CA0107611 1250 400 10.0 15.0 7.4

As = 0.007, Cd =

ND<0.005,Cr = ND

<0.006,Cu = 0.012,Pb

= ND<0.019,Hg =

ND<.00073,Ni =ND

<0.010,Se =ND

<0.026, Zn =0.034

CA0107611 1100 380 5.5 8.8 20.5 6.6

As = 0.007, Cd =

ND<0.005,Cr = ND

<0.006,Cu = 0.012,Pb

= ND<0.019,Hg =

ND<.00073,Ni =ND

<0.010,Se =ND

<0.026, Zn =0.034

CA0107611 1100 3805.5

cBOD








SystemPadre Dam MWD


SystemPadre Dam MWD


SystemPadre Dam MWD


SystemPadre Dam MWD







Discharge

Order/

Agreement

TDS (mg/l)Hardness

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

TSS

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHHeavy Metals

(mg/l)

Trace Organics

(including EDCs,

disinfection by-

products, PhACs)

(mg/l)

Note any

additional

information

Comments

R9-2005-0139 900 35 7.3 0.1 0.0

850 320 300 35 7.2

875 26200 8985

4250 1250 <25 <25 <2.5 varies species dependent Low


















Discharge

Order/

Agreement

TDS (mg/l)Hardness

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

TSS

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHHeavy Metals

(mg/l)

Trace Organics

(including EDCs,

disinfection by-

products, PhACs)

(mg/l)

Note any

additional

information

Comments

<25 <30 6.0

900

900

900

6000





Ventura



Phase 1A

Calleguas MWD











Discharge

Order/

Agreement

TDS (mg/l)Hardness

(mg/l)

BOD

(mg/l)

TSS

(mg/l)

Ammonia-

Nitrogen

(mg/l)

pHHeavy Metals

(mg/l)

Trace Organics

(including EDCs,

disinfection by-

products, PhACs)

(mg/l)

Note any

additional

information

Comments

2051 See attached water quality report provided by Calleguas MWD on 2/11/09




CA0064521, CI-

9403See attached water quality report provided by Calleguas MWD on 2/11/09

CA0064521, CI-


CA0064521, CI-


CA0064521, CI-


CA0064521, CI-


CA0064521, CI-


















Facility Information Water Quality Limitations

Note any specific limitations to

water quality for each brineline

Unit

Discharge

Cost

Energy

Cost

Operation and

Maintenance

Cost

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

80.00 60.00 35.00 80.00 66.20 37.50

70.00 41.90 25.20 70.00 41.90 25.20

61.00 39.20 23.10 61.00 39.20 23.10

54.00 37.90 22.34 54.00 37.90 22.34

46.00 33.70 19.40 46.00 33.70 19.40

37.00 32.40 16.90 37.00 32.40 16.90

35.00 30.00 16.90 35.00 30.00 16.90

30.00 28.00 14.70 30.00 30.00 16.00

See Attached Document See comment 3,300 1,270,000 30.10 13.00 13.00 30.10 17.89 17.89

20.70 20.70

26.10 14.70 26.10 14.70

20.00 20.00

Current/End of 2008Cost Information Planning Year 2010







Inland Empire


Interceptor

(SARI Reach V)

SAWPA






IntertieWRD


IntertieLACSD




North Orange

County

North Orange

County

Water Quality Limitations



Unit

Discharge

Cost

Energy

Cost

Operation and

Maintenance

Cost

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


13.50 2.90 13.50 2.90

15.00 8.30 15.00 8.30

$20k/year 2.50 0.0001 0.0001 2.50 0.0001 0.0001





South Orange



District

South Orange


South Orange

County


Main Reach AIRWD

South Orange

County



South Orange

County


Main Reach E SOCWA

South Orange


South Orange





Unit

Discharge

Cost

Energy

Cost

Operation and

Maintenance

Cost

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


SJCOO Permit Limits 3.50 4.20 1.60 3.50 4.20 2.00

ACOO Permit limits $22 / MG

(IRWD)

$70.00/ MG

(IRWD)

$ 7000/ year

(IRWD) 7.50 8.20 4.95 7.50 8.20 3.00

ACOO Permit limits

ETWD & IRWD

would have

costs

15.00 14.20 8.90 15.00 14.50 8.00

ACOO Permit limits 32.20 25.05 13.40 32.20 27.00 12.50

ACOO Permit limits 50.00 25.10 13.40 50.00 27.00 12.50








SystemPadre Dam MWD


SystemPadre Dam MWD


SystemPadre Dam MWD


SystemPadre Dam MWD









Unit

Discharge

Cost

Energy

Cost

Operation and

Maintenance

Cost

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


1.50 1.10 0.90 1.50 1.10 0.90

$35.50/MGD

Transportation

Cost

9.70 5.97 3.77 9.70 6.97 4.37

9.70 5.80 3.60 9.70 6.80 4.20

9.70 0.17 0.17 9.70 0.17 0.17

9.70 0.00 0.00 9.70 0.00 0.00

2.70 2.50 2.00 2.70 2.50 2.00




















Unit

Discharge

Cost

Energy

Cost

Operation and

Maintenance

Cost

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


TBD TBD TBD NA NA





Ventura



Phase 1A

Calleguas MWD













Unit

Discharge

Cost

Energy

Cost

Operation and

Maintenance

Cost

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


See attached

tables on capital

costs &

projected O&M

costs.

20.00 1.50 1.50

20.00 1.50 1.50

20.00 1.50 1.50

20.00 1.50 1.50

20.00 1.50 1.50


















Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

80.00 66.20 37.50 80.00 70.00 52.70 80.00 70.00 52.70 80.00 70.00 54.70 80.00 70.00 54.70

70.00 41.90 25.20 70.00 42.60 27.70 70.00 42.60 27.70 70.00 42.60 29.70 70.00 42.60 29.70

61.00 39.20 23.10 61.00 39.80 25.50 61.00 39.80 25.50 61.00 39.80 27.60 61.00 39.80 27.60

54.00 37.90 22.34 54.00 38.40 24.70 54.00 38.40 24.70 54.00 38.40 27.00 54.00 38.40 27.00

46.00 33.70 19.40 46.00 34.10 21.60 46.00 34.10 21.60 46.00 34.10 23.70 46.00 34.10 23.70

37.00 32.40 16.90 37.00 31.30 18.90 37.00 31.30 18.90 37.00 31.30 20.90 37.00 31.30 20.90

35.00 30.00 16.90 35.00 30.00 18.90 35.00 30.00 18.90 35.00 30.00 20.50 35.00 30.00 20.50

30.00 30.00 16.00 30.00 30.00 18.00 30.00 30.00 18.00 30.00 30.00 20.00 30.00 30.00 20.00

30.10 26.70 26.70 30.10 26.70 26.70 30.10 28.16 28.16 30.10 28.16 28.16 30.10 28.16 28.16

20.70 20.70 20.70 20.70 20.70

26.10 14.70 26.10 14.70 26.10 14.70 26.10 14.70 26.10 14.70

20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00

Planning Year 2030 Planning Year 2035Planning Year 2015 Planning Year 2020 Planning Year 2025







Inland Empire


Interceptor

(SARI Reach V)

SAWPA






IntertieWRD


IntertieLACSD




North Orange

County

North Orange

County

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


13.50 2.90 13.50 2.90 13.50 2.90 13.50 2.90 13.50 2.90

15.00 8.30 15.00 8.30 15.00 8.30 15.00 8.30 15.00 8.30

2.50 0.0001 0.0001 2.50 0.0001 0.0001 2.50 0.0001 0.0001 2.50 0.0001 0.0001 2.50 0.0001 0.0001





South Orange



District

South Orange


South Orange

County


Main Reach AIRWD

South Orange

County



South Orange

County


Main Reach E SOCWA

South Orange


South Orange


Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


3.50 4.20 2.00 3.50 4.20 2.00 3.50 4.20 2.00 3.50 4.20 2.00 3.50 4.20 2.00

7.50 8.20 3.00 7.50 8.20 3.00 7.50 8.20 3.00 7.50 8.20 3.00 7.50 8.20 3.00

15.00 15.00 7.50 15.00 15.00 6.00 15.00 15.00 6.00 15.00 15.00 6.00 15.00 15.00 6.00

32.20 27.00 12.00 32.20 27.00 12.00 32.20 27.00 12.00 32.20 27.00 12.00 32.20 27.00 12.00

50.00 27.00 12.00 50.00 27.00 12.00 50.00 27.00 12.00 50.00 27.00 12.00 50.00 27.00 12.00








SystemPadre Dam MWD


SystemPadre Dam MWD


SystemPadre Dam MWD


SystemPadre Dam MWD






Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


1.50 2.00 1.80 1.50 2.00 1.80 1.50 2.00 1.80 1.50 2.00 1.80 1.50 2.00 1.80

0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12

9.70 6.48 4.06 9.70 1.84 1.84 9.70 1.84 1.84 9.70 1.84 1.84 9.70 1.84 1.84

9.70 5.70 3.50 9.70 0.00 0.00 9.70 0.00 0.00 9.70 0.00 0.00 9.70 0.00 0.00

9.70 0.33 0.33 9.70 0.84 0.84 9.70 0.84 0.84 9.70 0.84 0.84 9.70 0.84 0.84

9.70 0.45 0.23 9.70 1.00 1.00 9.70 1.00 1.00 9.70 1.00 1.00 9.70 1.00 1.00

2.70 2.50 2.00 2.70 2.50 2.00 2.70 2.50 2.00 2.70 2.50 2.00 2.70 2.50 2.00

















Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60

0.70 0.70 0.44 1.80 1.80 1.10 1.80 1.80 1.10 1.80 1.80 1.10 1.80 1.80 1.10

6.04 6.04 7.30 7.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30

1.20 1.20 1.00 1.20 1.20 1.00 1.20 1.20 1.00 1.20 1.20 1.00 1.20 1.20 1.00





Ventura



Phase 1A

Calleguas MWD










Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Capacity

(MGD)

Maximum

Daily Flow

(MGD)

Average

Daily Flow

(MGD)


20.00 4.40 4.40 20.00 10.15 10.15 20.00 10.15 9.02 20.00 10.15 10.15 20.00 11.15 11.15

20.00 4.40 4.40 20.00 10.15 10.15 20.00 10.15 9.02 20.00 10.15 10.15 20.00 11.15 11.15

20.00 4.40 4.40 20.00 10.15 10.15 20.00 10.15 9.02 20.00 10.15 10.15 20.00 11.15 11.15

20.00 4.40 4.40 20.00 10.15 10.15 20.00 10.15 9.02 20.00 10.15 10.15 20.00 11.15 11.15

20.00 4.40 4.40 20.00 10.15 10.15 20.00 10.15 9.02 20.00 10.15 10.15 20.00 11.15 11.15

15.00 0.80 0.80 15.00 6.55 6.55 15.00 6.55 5.42 15.00 6.55 6.55 15.00 6.55 6.55

15.00 0.80 0.80 15.00 6.55 6.55 15.00 6.55 5.42 15.00 6.55 6.55 15.00 6.55 6.55

15.00 0.80 0.80 15.00 6.55 6.55 15.00 6.55 5.42 15.00 6.55 6.55 15.00 6.55 6.55

12.00 5.15 5.15 12.00 5.15 4.02 12.00 5.15 5.15 12.00 5.15 5.15

8.00 1.00 1.00 8.00 1.00 1.00 8.00 1.00 1.00 8.00 1.00 1.00


Survey_Report.doc

Attachment C.6 – Groundwater Desalter and Groundwater Cleanup Treatment Plant Capacity and

Discharge Data




Planned

Treatment Method(s) Purpose of Plant Constituents in Source Water Brine Discharge Location

(Existing/ Future)


limitations)

Inland Empire Anita Smith Ion Exchange Facility Western Municipal Water District

Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts) TVRI/SARI/OCSD Outfall

Inland Empire Arlington Desalter Western Municipal Water District Riverside, CA 1990

Groundwater - Potable Use, recharge

Nitrate, TDS (Salts), Other SARI/OCSD Outfall Sewer Discharge

Inland Empire Chino Desalter I Chino Basin Desalter Authority/ IEUA

6905 Kimball Avenue, Chino, 91708

1998

RO (95% of flow), IX (5% of flow), VOC stripping, chloramination (?)

Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts) SARI/OCSD Outfall Currently produces 10,000 tons of salt.

Permitted by IEUA.

Inland Empire Chino Desalter II Chino Basin Desalter Authority/ Jurupa

probably similar to Chino Desalter 1

Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts) SARI/OCSD Outfall Contact Dan Ducasse at Jurupa for information

on this non-IEUA facility.

Inland Empire Chino Desalter III Chino Basin Desalter Authority 2035 Groundwater -

Potable Use TDS (Salts) SARI/OCSD Outfall Proposed plant whose size has not yet been specified.

Inland Empire Inland Empire Energy Center (IEEC)

Eastern Municipal Water District in operation Treatment for Cooling

Water Use EMWD Reach IV/TVRI/SARI/OCSD Outfall Identified in the CDM Report 2008.

Inland Empire Ion Exchange Facility(Chino Hills)


Built but not currently used

Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts) and Nitrates SARI/OCSD Outfall

Plant is not currently operating, but future flows have been included in the analysis. Managed by City of Chino Hills.

Inland Empire Lower Bunker Hill Desalter Unknown Groundwater TDS (Salts), TCE, PCE, and Perchlorate SARI/OCSD Outfall

Inland Empire Menifee Desalter Eastern Municipal Water District Sun City, CA 2003 RO Groundwater -

Potable Use TDS (Salts); High calcium sulfate EMWD Reach IV/TVRI/SARI/OCSD Outfall

Inland Empire Perris Desalter I Eastern Municipal Water District 2006 RO Groundwater -

Potable Use TDS (Salts) EMWD Reach IV/TVRI/SARI/OCSD Outfall

Inland Empire Perris Desalter II Eastern Municipal Water District 2015 RO Groundwater -

Potable Use TDS (Salts) EMWD Reach IV/TVRI/SARI/OCSD Outfall

Data taken from EMWD WFMP, as well as information from Maryam and Ufuk based on the CDM Report.

Inland Empire Stringfellow FacilityCalifornia Department of Toxic Substances Control

Groundwater - Contamination

VOCs, Heavy metals (cadmium, nickel, chromium, manganese), Organic Pollutants (PCBs, pesticides, sulfates)

SARI/OCSD Outfall

New plant (same size) to permanently replace existing plant at current location and capacity will come online in 2010. Reject stream is landfilled. Product water is discharged into SARI pipeline.

Inland Empire Temescal Desalter City of Corona 745 Corporation Yard Way, Corona 2001 Groundwater -

Potable Use TDS (Salts) TVRI/SARI/OCSD Outfall Sewer Discharge

Inland Empire Yucaipa Valley Regional Water Supply Renewal Project

Yucaipa Valley Water District 2035 Salt Removal from

WTP TDS (Salts) TVRI/SARI/OCSD Outfall RO unit at WTP to increase ability to use recycle water

Los Angeles Beverly Hills Desalter City of Beverly Hills Reverse Osmosis Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts) Hyperion Outfall

Los Angeles City of Chino Ion Exchange Facility


11840 Benson Ave. Chino CA 91708

2005 Ion exchange Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts) LACSD Outfall Joint permit with City of Chino and LA County

Los Angeles Goldsworthy Desalter WRD/ City of Torrance Torrance, CA2001 (Planned expansion for

2011)

Groundwater - Potable Use Chlorides, TDS (Salts) JOS System 20 year groundwater recovery program.

Sewer discharge.

Los Angeles C. Marvin Brewer Desalter West Basin MWD Torrance, CA 1993 Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts) LACSD Outfall Removes saline plume/ Future Redondo

Beach Power Plant Outfall; Surface Discharge

Los Angeles Monte Vista WD Ion Exchange Monte Vista WD/ City of Chino in City of Montclair 2010 Ion exchange Groundwater -

Potable Use TDS (Salts) LACSD OutfallJointly managed by Monte Vista WD and City of Chino. Facility is built and will be online in the next few years.

Los Angeles Ontario Ion Exchange City of Ontario Ion exchange Groundwater - Potable Use Nitrate and possibly other? LACSD Outfall

Los Angeles Pomona Ion Exchange Facility LA County Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts) LACSD Outfall

Los Angeles Upland Ion Exchange Facility City of Upland/ IEUA/ LACSD

1258 W. 9th St. Upland, CA 91786 2007 Ion exchange Groundwater -

Potable Use Nitrates LACSD Outfall Joint permit with LACSD and IEUA


\\CHERON\Projects\USBR\381333BrineStudy\T3_Brine_MGMT\T3-1_Survey\T3-1_Survey\Survey-V64_MH.xlsSurvey-GW Desalters & Clean (2) Page 1 of 18




Planned


(Existing/ Future)


limitations)


North Orange County

Deep Aquifer Treatment Plant (DATS) IRWD On Segrestrom

Near Bear 2002 NF Color Removal Organics, Color OCSD Outfall #1 Brine goes to OCSD. Sewer discharge.

North Orange County Frances Desalter IRWD/OCWD

Northeast Tustin within IRWD Jurisdiction

2010 RO Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts), Nitrates, Hardness Proposed Irvine Brineline -

>SARI/OCSD OutfallIn planning phase, location is in the Northeast Tustin within IRWD Jurisdiction

North Orange County Tustin Desalter IRWD/OCWD 17th Street

Tustin, CA 1990 Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts), Nitrates SARI/OCSD Outfall Sewer Discharge

North Orange County Wells 21 & 22 IRWD

Ex-Tustin Marine Corp. Air Baseat Edinger and Tustin Ranch Rds

2011 / 2012 RO/ NF Groundwater - Potable Use Nitrates, TDS OCSD Plant could expand to 7 MGD with additional

wells. No current plan to add wells.

South Orange County Baker WTP IRWD

Wysteria and Trabucco Canyon Rds.Lake Forest

2012 MFMWD/ Irvine Lake raw water treatment for potable use

SOCWA (Aliso Creek Ocean Outfall)

South Orange County



32470 Paseo Adelanto, San Juan Capistrano CA 92675

2005

Green Sand to remove FE & Mn, followed by RO to lower the total dissolved solids

Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts), Iron (Fe), Manganese (MN)

SOCWA Outfall - with brine high in TDS. The iron and manganese are discharged to the sewer system. (San Juan Creek Outfall)

Brine discharge is limited by the conditions of the permit attached to this e-mail

South Orange County

Irvine Non-Potable Shallow Groundwater Unit (SGU) Desalter IRWD El Toro Airbase

Marine Way 2007 Airstrip/ GAC Groundwater - Contamination TCE, VOCs, TDS SOCWA (Aliso Creek Ocean

Outfall)

Brine/Concentrate Produced is the permeate. IRWD will reuse water if Great Park opens, using RO to reduce TDS. Range is 300-400 gpd. Currently water is not reused ---- treated and discharged.

South Orange County

Irvine Principal Potable Treatment Plant (PPTP) Desalter IRWD 26 Waterworks

Way 2007 RO Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts) SOCWA (Aliso Creek Ocean

Outfall)

South Orange County

South Coast Water District - Groundwater Recovery Facility


33750 Stonehill Dr. Dana Point, CA 92629

2007Reverse Osmosis/ Greensand Filtration

Groundwater-Potable Use TDS (Salts), Iron, Manganese

SOCWA - JB Latham Treatment Plant (San Juan Creek Outfall)

DISCHARGE LIQUID (Concentrate and Iron & Manganese Backwash)

South Orange County

South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project Five-agency JPA Dana Point 2015 RO Seawater Desal for

potable use TDS SOCWA (San Juan Creek Outfall)

San Diego Balboa Park Groundwater Desalination Facility City of San Diego 2012

San Diego Camp Pendleton AWT Plant Camp Pendleton To be located in Hayburn Canyon 2010 GAC, RO,

FiltrationGW Cleanup, Desalting (TDS) TDS, Brine to discharge in wave or splash

zone at jetty in Camp Pendleton

San Diego Mission Basin Desalting Facility City of Oceanside Fireside DriveOceanside, CA 1994 RO Groundwater -

Potable Use TDS (Salts), Iron, Manganese Mission Basin Brineline/ La Salina WWTP/ Oceanside Ocean Outfall

Currently expanding to 6.37 mgd but ultimate size is 13 mgd. The SDCWA report suggests an ultimate expansion of 20 mgd.

San Diego Mission Valley Groundwater Desalination City of San Diego Mission Valley

Basin 2012 RO Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts) Point Loma treatment plant and

ocean outfall

Identified in SDCWA Groundwater Resource Development Report (1997) as a potential source of 1.43 mgd brackish groundwater in Mission Valley alluvial aquifer.

San Diego North River Groundwater Desalter Tia Juana Valley WD Not likely Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts) South Bay Outfall Desalter is still in preliminary study phase. No

size for desalter has been developed thus far.

San Diego Otay River Desalination Plant Sweetwater Authority/ Otay Water District Chula Vista, CA 2015 (Phase I)

2020 (Phase II) RO Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts) San Diego County Regional

Brineline

Identified in SDCWA Regional Concentrate Conveyance System Feasibility Study as a potential brine discharger to the planned regional brineline.

San Diego Rainbow MWD Desalination Facility Rainbow MWD Bonsall Basin Groundwater -

Potable Use TDS (Salts) San Luis Rey River

Identified in SDCWA Groundwater Resource Development Report (1997) as a potential source of 3,000 afy (2.68 mgd) brackish groundwater in Bonsall Basin.





Planned


(Existing/ Future)


limitations)


San Diego Ramona Desalting Facility Ramona MWD Western Santa Maria Basin RO Brackish groundwater

treatment TDS (Salts)

Identified in SDCWA Groundwater Resource Development Report (1997) as a potential source of unknown brackish groundwater in the western/ central part of the Santa Maria basin. Ramona currently extracts potable gw from the eastern part of the basin.

San Diego Rancho del Rey Well Desalination Otay Water District TDS (Salts)

San DiegoRichard Reynolds Groundwater Demineralization Facility (Phase I and II)

Sweetwater Authority Chula Vista, CA 1999 RO Groundwater - Potable Use TDS (Salts) Sweetwater River

TDS of brine stream is about 6,000 ppm, river under tidal influence with TDS of 40,000 ppm; Surface Discharge

San Diego San Diego Formation Groundwater Desalination Facility


San Diego Formation in the mid-City or Balboa Park area

RO Brackish groundwater treatment TDS (Salts)

Point Loma treatment plant and ocean outfall (or South Bay WWTP and outfall)

Identified in SDCWA Groundwater Resource Development Report (1997) as a potential source of at least 1.8 mgd of brackish groundwater in the San Diego Formation.

San Diego San Dieguito Desalting Facility San Dieguito Basin Task Force

Lower San Dieguito Basin RO Brackish groundwater

treatment TDS (Salts)

Identified in SDCWA Groundwater Resource Development Report (1997) as a potential source of 5.35 mgd brackish groundwater in San Dieguito Basin

San Diego San Pasqual Groundwater Desalter City of San Diego Near old San

Pasqual WWTP 2013 RO Groundwater-Potable Use TDS

New 8" - 38,400 foot long brine line to be constructed to connect to Escondido Outfall. Capacity will be 1.2 MGD

San Diego Santee Desalination Facility Padre Dam MWD/ Helix WD Santee Basin RO Brackish groundwater

treatment TDS (Salts) Padre Dam MWD sewer system

Identified in SDCWA Groundwater Resource Development Report (1997) as a potential source of 3 mgd brackish groundwater in the eastern Santee Basin or western El Monte Basin

Ventura Camarillo Groundwater Desalter (Wells A and B)

City of Camarillo - Public Works Water Division

Mailing Address: 601 Carmen Drive Camarillo CA 93010 Desalter Location: 3901 Las Posas Road

TBD Reverse Osmosis

Remove high salts in GW. Product water would replace imported supplies

Mn, Fe, TDS, Sulfate, Chloride, Future - Calleguas Salinity Management Pipeline (point of connection: Las Posas/Lewis Road

VenturaCamrosa Groundwater Desalter (Conejo No. 3 and Woodcreek Wells)

Camrosa Water District 2010RO, possibly pretreatment for iron removal

Brackish groundwater treatment Iron, manganese, sulfate Calleguas SMP

Ventura GREAT Program Desalter Facility City of Oxnard 2008 RO Brackish groundwater treatment High TDS & hardness Oxnard WWTP Outfall

Ventura Port Hueneme Water Agency Brackish Water Desalter

Port Hueneme Water Agency

Perkins Road, Oxnard, CA 1999 RO, NF & EDR Brackish groundwater

treatment High TDS & hardness Current: Oxnard sewer systemFuture: Calleguas SMP

Ventura Somis Desalter Calleguas MWDWest of the South Las Posas Basin Regional Desalter in Somis

2017 RO Brackish groundwater treatment High TDS Calleguas SMP - Phase 2DEF

Ventura South Las Posas Desalter (Moorpark Desalter) Calleguas MWD Moorpark 2017 RO Brackish groundwater

treatment High TDS Calleguas SMP - Phase 2DEF

Ventura West Simi Valley Desalter City of Simi Valley West Simi Valley 2020 RO Brackish groundwater treatment High TDS Calleguas SMP - Phase 3




Inland Empire Arlington Desalter Western Municipal Water District



Inland Empire Chino Desalter III Chino Basin Desalter Authority





Inland Empire Lower Bunker Hill Desalter Unknown

Inland Empire Menifee Desalter Eastern Municipal Water District

Inland Empire Perris Desalter I Eastern Municipal Water District

Inland Empire Perris Desalter II Eastern Municipal Water District


Inland Empire Temescal Desalter City of Corona



Los Angeles Beverly Hills Desalter City of Beverly Hills



Los Angeles Goldsworthy Desalter WRD/ City of Torrance

Los Angeles C. Marvin Brewer Desalter West Basin MWD

Los Angeles Monte Vista WD Ion Exchange Monte Vista WD/ City of Chino

Los Angeles Ontario Ion Exchange City of Ontario

Los Angeles Pomona Ion Exchange Facility LA County



Brine-Concentrate Water Quality Information

TDS(mg/l)

TOC(mg/l)

Ammonia-Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total Nitrogen

(mg/l)pH Temp.

(°C)Silica(mg/l)

Calcium(mg/l)

Bromide(mg/l)

Barium(mg/l)

Strontium(mg/l)

Sulfate(mg/l)

Carbonate(mg/l)

Phosphate(mg/l)

Arsenic(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Perchlorate(mg/l)

(if applicable)

1050

360 3.4 7.4 53 <100 µg/L 9 <3 <2 µg/L <4 µg/L

5650 <2 20 7.2 160 940 1 5 445 <3 5 <.020

5650 <2 20 7.2 160 940 1 5 445 <3 5 <.020

6050 7.9 170 820 1700 0

80,000 7.3 704 0.06 <1 0.004

3600

8.5 12.7




North Orange County

Deep Aquifer Treatment Plant (DATS) IRWD


North Orange County Tustin Desalter IRWD/OCWD



South Orange County



South Orange County

Irvine Non-Potable Shallow Groundwater Unit (SGU) Desalter IRWD

South Orange County

Irvine Principal Potable Treatment Plant (PPTP) Desalter IRWD

South Orange County



South Orange County

South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project Five-agency JPA

San Diego Balboa Park Groundwater Desalination Facility City of San Diego

San Diego Camp Pendleton AWT Plant Camp Pendleton

San Diego Mission Basin Desalting Facility City of Oceanside

San Diego Mission Valley Groundwater Desalination City of San Diego

San Diego North River Groundwater Desalter Tia Juana Valley WD

San Diego Otay River Desalination Plant Sweetwater Authority/ Otay Water District

San Diego Rainbow MWD Desalination Facility Rainbow MWD


TDS(mg/l)

TOC(mg/l)

Ammonia-Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total Nitrogen

(mg/l)pH Temp.

(°C)Silica(mg/l)

Calcium(mg/l)

Bromide(mg/l)

Barium(mg/l)

Strontium(mg/l)

Sulfate(mg/l)

Carbonate(mg/l)

Phosphate(mg/l)

Arsenic(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Perchlorate(mg/l)

(if applicable)

320

750

52 6 - 9 21

6400 6.8 0.014

70000

7,000-10,000

6320 734

7617 3.4 0.21 0.16 7.7 23 53.6 536 10.4 0.39 4.3 974 0.600 0.100 0.011




San Diego Ramona Desalting Facility Ramona MWD

San Diego Rancho del Rey Well Desalination Otay Water District


Sweetwater Authority




San Diego San Pasqual Groundwater Desalter City of San Diego

San Diego Santee Desalination Facility Padre Dam MWD/ Helix WD





Ventura GREAT Program Desalter Facility City of Oxnard



Ventura Somis Desalter Calleguas MWD

Ventura South Las Posas Desalter (Moorpark Desalter) Calleguas MWD

Ventura West Simi Valley Desalter City of Simi Valley


TDS(mg/l)

TOC(mg/l)

Ammonia-Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Nitrate-Nitrogen

(mg/l)

Total Nitrogen

(mg/l)pH Temp.

(°C)Silica(mg/l)

Calcium(mg/l)

Bromide(mg/l)

Barium(mg/l)

Strontium(mg/l)

Sulfate(mg/l)

Carbonate(mg/l)

Phosphate(mg/l)

Arsenic(mg/l)

(if applicable)

Perchlorate(mg/l)

(if applicable)

7617 3.4 0.21 0.16 7.7 23 53.6 536 10.4 0.39 4.3 974 0.6 0.10 0.011

6000

9000 4.6 1.2 1.9 8.0 22.0 100 960 0.2 7.3 3400 <2






























North Orange County



Current (as of end of 2008) Planning Year 2010

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)

Brine/ Concentrate Treatment Capacity

(MGD)

Average Brine/

ConcentrateFlow

(MGD)

Max Daily Brine/

Concentrate Flow (MGD) -

CALCULATED

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)

Max Daily Brine/


CALCULATED


0.00 0.00

4.00 4.00 4.00 0.87 0.87 6.00 6.00 6.00 1.30 1.30

13.33 13.33 12.67 1.90 2.00 13.33 13.33 12.67 1.90 2.00

8.00 8.00 8.00 1.20 1.20 8.00 8.00 8.00 1.20 1.20

0.00 0.00

0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00

0.00 1.70 1.70 1.70 0.34 0.34

0.00 0.00

3.00 2.62 1.54 0.92 1.57 3.00 3.00 2.70 0.90 0.90

5.00 2.47 1.12 0.68 1.50 5.00 5.00 4.70 2.12 2.12

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.26 0.26 0.10 0.10 0.10

15.00 12.53 10.77 1.76 2.05 15.00 15.00 15.00 1.80 1.80

0.00 0.00

3.00 3.00 3.00 0.30 0.30 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.30 0.30

7.20 7.20 7.20 0.06 0.06 7.20 7.20 7.20 0.06 0.06

2.50 2.50 1.88 0.63 0.83 2.50 2.50 1.88 0.63 0.63

1.30 1.30 1.30 0.39 0.39 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.45 0.45

0.00 1.60 1.60 1.60 0.40 0.40

0.00 1.60 1.60 1.60 0.40 0.40

0.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 4.50 4.50

3.74 3.74 3.74 0.06 0.06 3.74 3.74 3.74 0.06 0.06

7.00 7.00 7.00 0.17 0.17 7.00 7.00 7.00 0.17 0.17








South Orange County



South Orange County


South Orange County


South Orange County



South Orange County










Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

ConcentrateFlow

(MGD)

Max Daily Brine/


CALCULATED

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)

Max Daily Brine/


CALCULATED


0.00 0.00

3.00 2.00 2.00 0.32 0.32 3.00 2.00 2.00 0.32 0.48

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

5.14 2.50 2.50 0.60 0.60 5.14 5.14 5.14 1.20 1.20

Not currently. Stimulus funds

are being sought.

0.0004 0.0004 0.00035 0.00035 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.00035 0.00035 0.0004

3.60 3.60 3.60 0.88 0.88 4.32 4.32 4.32 1.06 1.06

0.97 0.97 0.97 0.216 0.22 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.216 0.22

0.00 0.00 No

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 1.29 1.29

2.20 2.20 2.00 0.60 0.66 2.20 2.20 2.00 0.60 0.60

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
























Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

ConcentrateFlow

(MGD)

Max Daily Brine/


CALCULATED

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)

Max Daily Brine/


CALCULATED


0.00 0.00

0.00 0.20 0.00

4.00 4.00 3.50 0.80 0.91 10.00 10.00 8.75 1.50 1.50 No

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 YES

7.50 7.50 7.50 1.88 1.88 7.50 7.50 7.50 1.88 1.88

4.00 4.00 4.00 0.80 0.80 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.80 0.80





























North Orange County



Planning Year 2015 Planning Year 2020

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)

Max Daily Brine/


CALCULATED

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)

Max Daily Brine/Concent

rate Flow (MGD) -

CALCULATED

0.00 0.00

6.00 6.00 6.00 1.30 1.30 6.00 6.00 6.00 1.00 1.30 1.30

15.33 15.33 14.67 2.20 2.30 15.33 15.33 14.67 2.20 2.30

18.00 18.00 18.00 2.70 2.70 18.00 18.00 18.00 2.70 2.70

0.00 0.00

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

1.70 1.70 1.70 0.34 0.34 1.70 1.70 1.70 0.34 0.34

0.00 0.00

3.00 3.00 2.70 0.90 0.90 3.00 3.00 2.70 0.90 0.90

5.00 5.00 4.70 2.12 2.12 5.00 5.00 4.70 2.12 2.12

4.17 4.17 4.17 1.17 1.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 1.17 1.17

0.26 0.26 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.26 0.26 0.10 0.10 0.10

15.00 15.00 15.00 1.80 1.80 15.00 15.00 15.00 1.80 1.80

0.00 0.00

3.00 3.00 3.00 0.30 0.30 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.30 0.30

7.20 7.20 7.20 0.06 0.06 7.20 7.20 7.20 0.06 0.06

5.00 5.00 3.75 1.25 1.25 5.00 5.00 3.75 1.25 1.25

1.50 1.50 1.50 0.45 0.45 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.45 0.45

1.60 1.60 1.60 0.40 0.40 1.60 1.60 1.60 0.40 0.40

1.60 1.60 1.60 0.40 0.40 1.60 1.60 1.60 0.40 0.40

15.00 15.00 15.00 4.50 4.50 15.00 15.00 15.00 4.50 4.50

3.74 3.74 3.74 0.06 0.06 3.74 3.74 3.74 0.06 0.06

7.00 7.00 7.00 0.17 0.17 7.00 7.00 7.00 0.17 0.17








South Orange County



South Orange County


South Orange County


South Orange County



South Orange County










Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)

Max Daily Brine/


CALCULATED

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)


rate Flow (MGD) -

CALCULATED

0.00 0.00

3.00 2.00 2.00 0.32 0.48 3.00 2.00 2.00 0.32 0.48

4.00 4.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 1.00 1.00

19.40 19.40 16.16 0.81 0.81 19.40 19.40 16.16 0.81 0.81

7.00 7.00 7.00 1.40 1.40 7.00 7.00 7.00 1.40 1.40

0.0004 0.0004 0.00035 0.00035 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.00035 0.00035 0.0004

4.32 4.32 4.32 1.06 1.06 4.32 4.32 4.32 1.06 1.06

1.92 1.92 1.92 0.43 0.43 1.92 1.92 1.92 0.43 0.43

30.00 30.00 30.00 15.00 15.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 15.00 15.00

0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15

9.00 9.00 9.00 1.29 1.29 9.00 9.00 9.00 1.29 1.29

2.20 2.20 2.00 0.60 0.60 7.01 7.01 6.37 1.91 1.91

0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40

0.00 0.00

10.00 10.00 8.75 0.70 0.70 10.00 10.00 8.75 1.80 1.80

0.00 0.00
























Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)

Max Daily Brine/


CALCULATED

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)


rate Flow (MGD) -

CALCULATED

0.00 0.00

0.20 0.00 0.20 0.00

10.00 10.00 8.75 1.50 1.50 10.00 10.00 8.75 1.50 1.50

0.80 0.80 0.80 0.20 0.20 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.20 0.20

0.00 0.00

5.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00

0.00 0.00

8.60 8.60 8.60 2.10 2.10 8.60 8.60 8.60 2.10 2.10

2.03 2.03 2.03 0.40 0.40 2.03 2.03 2.03 0.40 0.40

7.50 7.50 7.50 1.88 1.88 15.00 15.00 15.00 3.75 3.75

4.00 4.00 4.00 0.80 0.80 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.80 0.80

2.00 2.00 2.00 0.40 0.40

5.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00

3.00 3.00 3.00 0.60 0.60





























North Orange County




Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)


rate Flow (MGD) -

CALCULATED

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)


rate Flow (MGD) -

CALCULATED

0.00 0.00

6.00 6.00 6.00 1.00 1.30 1.30 6.00 6.00 6.00 1.00 1.30 1.30

15.33 15.33 14.67 2.20 2.30 15.33 15.33 14.67 2.20 2.30

18.00 18.00 18.00 2.70 2.70 18.00 18.00 18.00 2.70 2.70

0.00 0.00

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

1.70 1.70 1.70 0.34 0.34 1.70 1.70 1.70 0.34 0.34

0.00 0.00

3.00 3.00 2.70 0.90 0.90 3.00 3.00 2.70 0.90 0.90

5.00 5.00 4.70 2.12 2.12 5.00 5.00 4.70 2.12 2.12

4.17 4.17 4.17 1.17 1.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 1.17 1.17

0.26 0.26 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.26 0.26 0.10 0.10 0.10

15.00 15.00 15.00 1.80 1.80 15.00 15.00 15.00 1.80 1.80

0.00 0.00

3.00 3.00 3.00 0.30 0.30 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.30 0.30

7.20 7.20 7.20 0.06 0.06 7.20 7.20 7.20 0.06 0.06

5.00 5.00 3.75 1.25 1.25 5.00 5.00 3.75 1.25 1.25

1.50 1.50 1.50 0.45 0.45 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.45 0.45

1.60 1.60 1.60 0.40 0.40 1.60 1.60 1.60 0.40 0.40

1.60 1.60 1.60 0.40 0.40 1.60 1.60 1.60 0.40 0.40

15.00 15.00 15.00 4.50 4.50 15.00 15.00 15.00 4.50 4.50

3.74 3.74 3.74 0.06 0.06 3.74 3.74 3.74 0.06 0.06

7.00 7.00 7.00 0.17 0.17 7.00 7.00 7.00 0.17 0.17








South Orange County



South Orange County


South Orange County


South Orange County



South Orange County










Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)


rate Flow (MGD) -

CALCULATED

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)


rate Flow (MGD) -

CALCULATED

0.00 0.00

3.00 2.00 2.00 0.32 0.48 3.00 2.00 2.00 0.32 0.48

4.00 4.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 1.00 1.00

19.40 19.40 16.16 0.81 0.81 19.40 19.40 16.16 0.81 0.81

7.00 7.00 7.00 1.40 1.40 7.00 7.00 7.00 1.40 1.40

0.0004 0.0004 0.00035 0.00035 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.00035 0.00035 0.0004

4.32 4.32 4.32 1.06 1.06 4.32 4.32 4.32 1.06 1.06

1.92 1.92 1.92 0.43 0.43 1.92 1.92 1.92 0.43 0.43

30.00 30.00 30.00 15.00 15.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 15.00 15.00

0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15

9.00 9.00 9.00 1.29 1.29 9.00 9.00 9.00 1.29 1.29

7.01 7.01 6.37 1.91 1.91 7.01 7.01 6.37 1.91 1.91

0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40

0.00 0.00

10.00 10.00 8.75 1.80 1.80 10.00 10.00 8.75 1.80 1.80

0.00 0.00
























Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)


rate Flow (MGD) -

CALCULATED

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)


rate Flow (MGD) -

CALCULATED

0.00 0.00

0.20 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.05

10.00 10.00 8.75 1.50 1.50 10.00 10.00 8.75 1.50 1.50

0.80 0.80 0.80 0.20 0.20 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.20 0.20

0.00 0.00

5.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00

0.00 0.00

8.60 8.60 8.60 2.10 2.10 8.60 8.60 8.60 2.10 2.10

2.03 2.03 2.03 0.40 0.40 2.03 2.03 2.03 0.40 0.40

15.00 15.00 15.00 3.75 3.75 15.00 15.00 15.00 3.75 3.75

4.00 4.00 4.00 0.80 0.80 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.80 0.80

2.00 2.00 2.00 0.40 0.40 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.40 0.40

5.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00

3.00 3.00 3.00 0.60 0.60 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.60 0.60





























North Orange County




Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)


rate Flow (MGD) -

CALCULATED

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)


rate Flow (MGD) -

CALCULATED

4.30 4.30 4.30 1.08 1.08 4.30 4.30 4.30 1.08 1.08

6.00 6.00 6.00 1.00 1.30 1.30 6.00 6.00 6.00 1.00 1.30 1.30

15.33 15.33 14.67 2.20 2.30 15.33 15.33 14.67 2.20 2.30

18.00 18.00 18.00 2.70 2.70 18.00 18.00 18.00 2.70 2.70

9.50 9.50 9.50 1.43 1.43 9.50 9.50 9.50 1.43 1.43

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

1.70 1.70 1.70 0.34 0.34 1.70 1.70 1.70 0.34 0.34

15.00 15.00 15.00 3.75 3.75 15.00 15.00 15.00 3.75 3.75

3.00 3.00 2.70 0.90 0.90 3.00 3.00 2.70 0.90 0.90

5.00 5.00 4.70 2.12 2.12 5.00 5.00 4.70 2.12 2.12

6.25 6.25 6.25 1.75 1.75 6.25 6.25 6.25 1.75 1.75

0.26 0.26 0.26 0.10 0.10 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.10 0.10

15.00 15.00 15.00 1.80 1.80 15.00 15.00 15.00 1.80 1.80

12.00 12.00 12.00 3.00 3.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 3.00 3.00

3.00 3.00 3.00 0.30 0.30 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.30 0.30

7.20 7.20 7.20 0.06 0.06 7.20 7.20 7.20 0.06 0.06

5.00 5.00 3.75 1.25 1.25 5.00 5.00 3.75 1.25 1.25

1.50 1.50 1.50 0.45 0.45 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.45 0.45

1.60 1.60 1.60 0.40 0.40 1.60 1.60 1.60 0.40 0.40

1.60 1.60 1.60 0.40 0.40 1.60 1.60 1.60 0.40 0.40

15.00 15.00 15.00 4.50 4.50 15.00 15.00 15.00 4.50 4.50

3.74 3.74 3.74 0.06 0.06 3.74 3.74 3.74 0.06 0.06

7.00 7.00 7.00 0.17 0.17 7.00 7.00 7.00 0.17 0.17








South Orange County



South Orange County


South Orange County


South Orange County



South Orange County










Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)


rate Flow (MGD) -

CALCULATED

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)


rate Flow (MGD) -

CALCULATED

10.00 10.00 10.00 2.50 2.50 10.00 10.00 10.00 2.50 2.50

3.00 2.00 2.00 0.32 0.48 3.00 2.00 2.00 0.32 0.48

4.00 4.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 1.00 1.00

19.40 19.40 16.16 0.81 0.81 19.40 19.40 16.16 0.81 0.81

7.00 7.00 7.00 1.40 1.40 7.00 7.00 7.00 1.40 1.40

0.0004 0.0004 0.00035 0.00035 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.00035 0.00035 0.0004

4.32 4.32 4.32 1.06 1.06 4.32 4.32 4.32 1.06 1.06

1.92 1.92 1.92 0.43 0.43 1.92 1.92 1.92 0.43 0.43

30.00 30.00 30.00 15.00 15.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 15.00 15.00

0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15

9.00 9.00 9.00 1.29 1.29 9.00 9.00 9.00 1.29 1.29

14.30 14.30 13.00 3.90 3.90 14.30 14.30 13.00 3.90 3.90

0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40

0.00 0.00

10.00 10.00 8.75 1.80 1.80 10.00 10.00 8.75 1.80 1.80

0.00 2.68 2.68 2.68 0.67 0.67
























Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)


rate Flow (MGD) -

CALCULATED

Capacity(MGD)

MaximumDaily Flow

(MGD)

AverageDaily Flow

(MGD)


(MGD)

Average Brine/

Concentrate Flow

(MGD)


rate Flow (MGD) -

CALCULATED

0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.06 0.06

0.20 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.05

10.00 10.00 8.75 1.50 1.50 10.00 10.00 8.75 1.50 1.50

0.80 0.80 0.80 0.20 0.20 1.80 1.80 1.80 0.45 0.45

0.00 5.35 5.35 5.35 1.34 1.34

5.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00

0.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.75 0.75

8.60 8.60 8.60 2.10 2.10 8.60 8.60 8.60 2.10 2.10

2.03 2.03 2.03 0.40 0.40 2.03 2.03 2.03 0.40 0.40

15.00 15.00 15.00 3.75 3.75 15.00 15.00 15.00 3.75 3.75

4.00 4.00 4.00 0.80 0.80 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.80 0.80

2.00 2.00 2.00 0.40 0.40 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.40 0.40

5.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00

3.00 3.00 3.00 0.60 0.60 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.60 0.60
