sung-won lee 1 study of jets production association with a z boson in pp collision at 7 and 8 tev...
TRANSCRIPT
Sung-Won Lee 1
Study of Jets Production Association with a Z boson in pp Collision
at 7 and 8 TeV with the CMS Detector
Kittikul Kovitanggoon
Ph. D. Thesis DefenseMarch, 24 2014
2
Outline
Motivation.
Large Hadron Collier (LHC) and Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS).
Overview of Standard Model (SM).
Measurements of Angular Distributions for Z+jet events at 7 TeV. Theory. Data Samples and Event Reconstructions. Unfolded Results with Uncertainties.
Differential Cross Section of Jets Associated to Z boson at 8 TeV. Theory. Data Samples and Event Reconstructions. Unfolded Results with Uncertainties.
Conclusions.
3
Motivation
For Z boson decays into μ+μ- , the trigger system is very efficient and nearly background free.
Provide good feedback to the theoretical physics community to improve the precision of perturbative QCD and to event generator experts.
Measurements of the rapidity distributions and differential cross sections are one of the crucial test of the SM prediction.
Major background processes for various new physics searches such as Higgs and Supersymmetry (SUSY).
4
Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
A 27 km in circumference.
To collide rotating beams of protons or heavy ions.
Maximum energy of proton-proton collisions at = 14 TeVand 4 x 10-34 cm-2s-1.
√s
In 2011, collision at = 14 TeV and 4 x 10-33 cm-2s-1
√s
In 2012, collision at = 8 TeV and 7.7 x 10-33 cm-2s-1
√s
5
Compact Muon Solenoid CMS
6
Compact Muon Solinoid CMS
7
Standard Model (SM)
8
Z + Jet Angular Distribution
9
Z+jet ''Z+jet'' events are predominantly produced by quark exchange processes (i.e. qqA → Z 0 g and qg → Z 0 q)
10
What Do We Measure? Rapidity distributions of Z boson: |y
z|
Rapidity distributions of leading jet: |yjet
|
Rapidity difference: ydiff
= 0.5|yz-y
jet|
Related to the scattering angle at the center of momentum frame: tanh(y
diff) = β*cosθ*
Rapidity average: ysum
= 0.5|yz+y
jet|
Rapidity boost from the center of momentum frame to the lab frame
Rapidity is defined by y=12
ln ( E+pzE− pz )
11
Analysis Procedure(1) Selects events containing a Z(→μμ) and a jet that satisfy kinematic and ID selections.(2) Derive efficiency from MC and correct it with data-to-MC scale factors via tag and probe method. (3) Unfold the distribution of y
jet
Other variable have unfolding correction consistent with one.
(4) Evaluate Systematic uncertainties.
(5) Compare shapes with MCFM, MADGRAPH, and SHERPA MC simulations.
MCFMMatrix element at NLO,without parton showering or hadronizationScale set to the dilepton massCTEQ 6.1 m (NLO PDFs)
MADGRAPH+PYTHIA Matrix element at LO with MLM matching Scale set to the square root sum of dilepton mass and p
T(jet)
CTEQ 6L1 m (LO PDFs)
SHERPA Matrix element at LO with CKKW matching Scale set to the dilepton mass CTEQ 6.6M (NLO PDFs)
12
Dataset and HLT CMS data collected in 2011 for 5.1 ± 0.1 fb-1
Monte Carlo Simulations
JSON: Cert_160404-180252_7TeV_ReRecoNov08_Collisions11_JSON.txt
High Level Trigger
13
Basic Kinematic Selections
14
Basic Kinematic Properties
15
Basic Kinematic Properties
16
Basic Kinematic Properties
17
Muon ID Scale Factors
ID scale factors from Particle Object Group
Use Tag & Probe with Data & MC
Select a pair of muons: one passing tight selections (tag) and the other passing or failing loose selections (probe)
The scale is computed from the ratio of tag+passing probe and tag+failing probe
Use Muon Particle Object Group recommendations
Obtain the data-to-MC ID efficiency scale factors in bins of p
T and η
Re-weight the MC events that pass IDselections with the scale factors
Obtain efficiency as a function of the four rapidity variables
18
Muon ID Efficiency
19
Unfolding
Unfolding methods 1. Bayesian 2. Bin-by-Bin 3. Singular Value Decomposition:
Criteria: if unfolding correction is consistent with zero within MC statistical uncertainty, do not unfold Only Yjet of Z analysis needs to be unfolded
In order to compare experimental result with theoretical prediction, the experimental need to be corrected due to the detector effects.==> The method is called unfolding.
Response matrices of rapidity: the comparison shows mostly
diagonal elements
20
Unfolding Correction on Data
Unfolding is consistent at one for all but yjet
distribution. Thus, we will unfold y
jet.
21
Systematic Uncertainties
JES
JER
22
Systematic Uncertainties
23
Systematic Uncertainties
24
Systematic Uncertainties
Summary
25
Comparison to Theories Shape comparisons of CMS data, MADGRAPH, and SHERPA to MCFM are shown.
26
Comparison to Theories
27
Combined Results
28
Combined Results
29
Conclusions CMS detector was used to measure the angular distributions of
the products from Z+1jet events
• Madgraph+Pythia, Sherpa, and MCFM have similar agreement with data for y
z and y
jet .
• For Z + 1jet, Sherpa agrees better with data for ydiff
and ysum
.
Parton showering and matching scheme give the difference.
Provide feedback to theory community for improving theoretical predictions.
30
Z + Jets Differential Cross Sections
31
Z+jets
32
What Do We Measure?
In this analysis, we measured the Z+jets differential cross sections ofup to two jets associated with Z → μ+μ- .
The Z+jets production cross section as a function of the jet multiplicity : dσ/ dN
J
The Z+jets cross section as a function of the jet pT : dσ/ dpT
The Z+jets cross section as a function of the jet η : dσ/ dη
33
Dataset CMS data collected in 2012 for 19.8 ± 0.1 fb-1
Monte Carlo Simulations
JSON: Cert_190456-208686_8TeV_22Jan2013ReReco_Collisions12_JSON.txt
High Level Trigger → HLT_Mu17_Mu8_v* with L1_DoubleMu3p5 seed
34
Basic Muon Selections
35
PU Reweighting
36
The First Muon Candidate
37
The Second Muon Candidate
38
Efficiency Scale Factor
39
Z Reconstruction
40
Z Reconstruction
41
Basic Jet Selections
42
Z+Jets Control Plots
43
Measured Observables
44
Measured Observables
45
Measured Observables
46
Unfolding
47
Unfolding
48
Unfolding
49
Systematic Uncertainties
JES
JER
50
Systematic Uncertainties
51
Systematic Uncertainties
52
Systematic Uncertainties
Summary
53
Results
54
Results
55
Z+Jets Summary
56
Conclusions
57
Back Up
58
Background Systematic Uncertainty for Z + Jet Angular
59
PU Systematic Uncertainty for Z + Jet Angular
60
Combination of Electron and Muon Best Linear Unbiased Esttimator
Andrea Valassi, NIM, A500, 391 Louis Lyons, Duncan Gibaut, and Peter Clifford, NIM, A207, 110
JES and PU uncertainties are 100% correlated between electron and muon channel
The covariance matrix has 2N dimension N is the number of bins with non-zero contents For each channel of y
jet, the bin-by-bin correlation is obtained
from the covariance matrix of RooUnfold after unfolding
For every bin of the observable, the uncorrelated uncertainty is at least 3 times of the correlated uncertainty
61
Breakdown Differential Cross Section
62
Breakdown Differential Cross Section