sudbury contact mines ltd. by

31M12SW2004 2 .18296 LUNDY

SUMMARY REPORT

ON THE

FEBRUARY - APRIL 1996

DIAMOND DRILL INVESTIGATION

OF

KIMBERLITE PIPE 95-1

MONTREAL RIVER "A" PROPERTY

LUNDY TOWNSHIP

LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION

NORTHEASTERN ONTARIO

**************************

PREPARED FOR

SUDBURY CONTACT MINES LTD.

BY

W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.365 Bay Street, Suite 807

Toronto, OntarioM5H 2V1

010

NTS 31-M/12 SW

MARCH 16,1998

PN: 216-9 File:216951dd.wpd

RAYMOND J. KNOWLES, B.Sc.

31M12SW2004 2.18296 LUNDY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

010C

SUMMARY

LOCATION MAPS (1)(2)

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS

APPENDIX A: PLAN MAP A SECTIONS

(1) DRILL HOLE PLAN MAP

(2) SECTION RC #1 AND DDK #2

(3) SECTION DDK #3

(4) SECTION DDK #1

APPENDIX B:

APPENDIX C:

1:20,000 1:5,000

1:2,500

1:1,000

1:1,000

1:1,000

DDK LOGS; MS LOG: HOLES l - 3

LAKEFDELD RESEARCH ANALYSIS REPORT

W. A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.

SUMMARY

Kimberlite Pipe 95-1 was discovered on Claim 1202721 in one of three holes drilled into a magnetic low target by a Reverse Circulation Drill in March of 1995. No macro or micro diamonds were recovered from 80.0 kg of material. Indicator results totaled 25 chromite, 38 picroilmenite, 2 clinopyroxene and 17 pyrope garnet grains. Based on these results, three angled holes were diamond drilled (NQ) into the pipe to delineate the dimensions and describe the geology of the pipe, and to gain a bulk sample for diamond and indicator analysis.

Diamond drilling was conducted between February 24 and March 6, 1996. Logging and sampling were conducted March 25 to April 5, 1996 on Holes MRB-96-1, 2 and 3.

Analysis of the DD core (sent April 5, 1996) was performed by Lakefield Research Limited, Lakefield, Ontario. A total of 313.6 kg on 7 samples representing a split half portion of kimberlite core was sent for caustic dissolution. No diamonds were recovered. A total of 64 kg in four samples representing 25 cm of every 1m of split half portion of kimberlite core was sent for attrition milling in order to recover indicator minerals. An extensive suite was selected.

Diamond drilling intersected kimberlite in all three holes even where vertical RC holes above the drill hole trace failed to intersect kimberlite. The drilling results to date indicate an initial heterolithic volcanoclastic kimberlitic diatreme breccia, subsequently cut by at least two if not three hypabyssal dikes comprising up to 30"^ of the kimberlite body. Indicator minerals recovered include 62 pyrope, 147 possibly eclogitic almandine-pyrope, 67 chrome diopside and 14 picrochromite/ picroilmenite. No probe work was conducted at this time.

Further testing of Pipe 95-1 will be assessed after all kimberlite targets have been drilled.

The coordination and implementation of the various technical tasks was conducted by W.A. Hubacheck Consultants Ltd, under the supervision of D. Christie and R. Knowles.

Tl i5i*rSN; ! o ,ao /\

7 2 3H^

946: - '}P? 11 it r f 'rv'-v;////M-' x

V /CWf

20

95-1 PIPE DRILL HOLE LOCATION MAP SUDBURY CONTACT MINES LTD.

^^y^*;J - :,-.v

MRB96-11

MRB96-3

100 200m

r

95-1 PIPE DRILL HOLE PLAN MAP SUDBURY CONTACT MINES LTD.

Scale: 1:5000

-J, Dwg. By: RJK Date: 03/16/98

O

Certificate of Qualifications

I, Raymond J. Knowles, of the City of Etobicoke, in the Province of Ontario, Canada, do hereby certify that:

1) I am an Exploration Geologist, residing at 79 Thirteenth Street, Etobicoke, Ontario, M8V 3H5, under contract to W. A. Hubacheck Consultants Ltd., 365 Bay St., Suite 807, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 2V1.

2) I am a graduate of the University of Toronto where I received my Bachelor of Science degree in Geology in 1985, and have been practising my profession as an Exploration Geologist continuously since graduation.

3) I am a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada, a member of the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada.

4) This report is based on personal examination of the property in 1995 and 1996.

5) I have no direct interest hi the properties or securities of Sudbury Contact Mines Ltd..

Dated at Toronto, OntarioMarch 16, 1998 Raymond J. Knowles, B.Se.


APPENDIX A:

PLAN MAP A SECTIONS

\V. A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.

4^ /frifr"

r-~/ t ' '' s t\l 'it /V/ X Ph f rf /.^ U kc. .-" J } L//^.

(00 A/

—2005

N

LEGEND

3c Huronian Conglomerate ?.?~- out crop outline

glacial striation directionOut line of total field ground magnetic anomalystrike, dipalder

95-1 PIPE DRILL HOLE PLAN MAP SUDBURY CONTACT MINES LTD.

Scale: 1:2500

100 200m

Dwg. By: RJK Date: 03/16/98

HR6U-01 ,-ss*(2

KV.crp

O o

35IZ.I O O

O O

1H.O*GP GA DC

350^0 45 Z 3 J*.

158.0-

3SOSI

U1.1-

LEGEND

Km - Kimberlite Diatreem

Kml - Heterolithic Volcanoclastic Kimberlite Breccia

Huronian

l Ob - Firstbrook Member siltstone

bx - breccia

GP - pyrope garnet

GA - possible eclogitic almandine-pyrope

DC - chrome diopside

Il/chr - picroilmenite + picrochromite

O 10 20 30 40m

Scale l : 1000

core storage -Cobalt Ont,Agnico Eagle property Block House

SUDBURY CONTACT MINES LTD.PIPE 95 - l

DRILL HOLE SECTION MRB96 -1

LOOKING EAST DWG. by: RJK

CL# 1202721 Date: 16/03/1998

M R B16- o?./

I0b

LEGEND


Km l - Heterolithic Volcanoclastic Kimberlite Breccia

Huronian


bx - breccia

GP - pyrope garnet



Il/chr - picroilmenite + picrochromite

O 10 20 30 40m

Scale l : 1000

core storage - Cobalt Ont.,Agnico Eagle property Block House


DRILL HOLE SECTION MRB96 - 2


CL# 1202721 Date: 16/03/1998

hRB ^ 6-0-3^-55*^ t

L 3 too E X 1 + 3-2-A/C f O "1 O i^TX.

1 cA- o r -b

SP &A DC

8560

167.Z-

LEGEND


Km l - Heterolithic Volcanoclastic Kimberlite Breccia

Huronian


bx - breccia

GP - pyrope garnet



Il/chr - picroilmenite 4- picrochromite

O 10 20 30 40m

Scale l : 1000

core storage - Cobalt Ont.,Agnico Eagle property Block House


DRILL HOLE SECTION MRB96 - 3


CL# 1202721 Date: 16/03/1998

APPENDIX B:

DDH LOGS,

AND

MS LOG

HOLES MRB-96-1 to 3


DIAMOND DRILL LOGSee Survey Sheet

W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA

COMPANY

PROPERTY

COMMENCED

COMPLETED

OBJECTIVE

Sudbury Contact Mines

Lundy 216

Feb. 24, 1996

Feb. 28, 1996

Tea nag. Tarzct/Kimberlite

NTS

DISTRICT

31 M/12, SW

Larder Lake

TWnUTJUHa tmti T*n 1-1/1 \M IKm IV

CLAIM

CO-ORD.

1202721

Grid 95-1 L4+OOE/

CORE SIZE

CONTRACTOR

DATE LOGGED

LOGGED BY

DDK COMMENTS

NQ

Bout LonfYeir

March 25, 26, 29/96

Raymond I. Knowles

^7

SURVEY DEPTH DIP AZIMUTH HOLE NO. MRB-9641

COLLAR AZIMUTH

COLLAR DIP

ELEVATION

LENGTH

PAGE 1/10

150- Ai

-55

295m

202.0m

2+OON UTM 5809QZE/52654.10N

INTERVAL MD FtD

ntOM

0

3.18

TO

3.18

88.0

sREG

S ROD LITHOTYPE

OB

10B

f ^

DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY: (colour, grain size, texture, minerals, alteration, etc)

Overburden.

Huronian Firstbrook Formation Siltstone

Finely bedded with 10-20cm buff grey lo dark grey fine grained siltstone, rust

brown 2-3mm lamenae and 10-20mm beds of arkosic greywacke also buff coloured.

Bedding a at 68-75* to CA. For the most part compitent, most fracture plains

coated with limonite. Fractures at 5-10* to CA and 40-50* to CA.

M.S. values throughout average 0.23.

77.5-88.0 Moderate to severe fracturing with most fracture planes coated with

limonite and calcite. Core is in some cases badly broken up and blocky.

82.3-83.0 Breccia zone with fragments dissoriented and leaving lQ-15% void

space <2mm-20mm in size, which have wall coatings of yellow calcite with

drusey clear glassy very fined quartz (7) needles.

85.0-85.2 Breccia zone as previously described.

85.2-87.2 Badly ground core represented by 1m of mostly gravel size bits.

87.3-87.4 Breccia zone as described above except 5* void space and no quartz.

J SAMPLE

SAMFLE NO.

raoM TO LENGTHS

SUL

ASSAYS

A. H*

DIAMOND DRILL LOG

COMPANY NTS CORE SIZE

PROPERTY DISTRICT CONTRACTOR

COMMENCED TWP/LAT.LONO. DATE LOGGED

COMPLETED CLAIM LOGGED BY

OBJECTIVE COORDINATES DDH COMMENTS

SURVEY DEPTH DIP AZIMUTH


HOLE NO. MRB-M-01________PAGE 2/10

COLLAR AZIMUTH^^^^^^^^^^^

COLLAR PIP_____________________

ELEVATION-—^————^-———.——————

LENGTH

INTERVALM D Ft D

ntOM

88.0

94.0

TO

94.0

101.0

%IK

I KQD LITHOTYPE

10B (bx)

Kral

DESCRIPTIONGEOLOGY: (colour, (nin size, texture, mineral!, alteration, etc)

Huronian Firstbrook Formation Breccia. Siltstone as previously described butmoderately to severely brecciated. Bedding demonstrated that me fragments are

orientated to core axis. No millir^has occured. Fragments are angular and range

from ^mm up to 350mm but average < 100mm.88.0-94.0 Breccia is clast supported more or less tight with limonite healing joins

and 5* void space. M.S. is 0.15 to 0.2. A yellow colouration exists throughout

88.0-88.2S, 88.6-88.8 Ground sections leaving gravel.-

Monolithic Oxidized Kimberlite Breccia. Breccia fragments ^5mm) are separated

by matrix comprised of siltstone fragments ^mm and minor calcite phis possiblekimberlite (fine grained now serpentine?). Rock is not very competent and has

up badly along matrix, however, matrix is estimated to be about 10-20* of rockthrough this section. M.S. values are variable with matrix rarely achieving ^4.

The siltstone breccia fragments however increase in magnetic susceptabuity from 0.3

through lo 2.7 by 98.5 and finally after 98.5 lo 101. The M.S. values range from

2.1 to 8.3, averaging 4.5.

SAMPLE

SAMPLE NO. now TO LENGTH I

SUL

ASSAYS

AiH*

DIAMOND DRILL LOG



COMMENCED TWP/LAT.LONG. DATE LOGGED


OBJECTIVE CO-ORDINATES DDK COMMENTS



HOLE NO. MRB-?fr01________PAGE 3/10

COLLAR AZIMUTH-—^^^-——-^———-

COLLAR DIP^-—^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ELEVATION^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

LENGTH

INTERVAL MD Ft D

PXOM

101.0

106.0

TO

106.0

169.9

iREC

I ROD LITHOTYPE

Kml

Kml

DESCRIPTION . GEOLOGY: (colour, grain me, texture, minerals, alteration, etc)

Monolithic Kimberlite Breccia. 70 X siltstone as described before as randomlyoriented blocks 100 to 550mm in length separated by 15 X randomly oriented siltstone

fragments ^mm to 30mm in size which inturn is separated by 5* white calcite, and

10* fine grained kimberlite of a medium grey green colouration except 105.2-106where the kimberlite becomes more cyrstaline with calcite intermixed and takes onan indian red colouration. Possible later hypabyssal/diatreme phase. Where matrix

obtains a thickness of <20mm ie. at 105.55 the kimberlite is a medium grey with

about 20* fine olivine crystals. At 106.0 ^-4mm calcite clear crystals. Overall

matrix supported with clast either separated by kimberlite or fracture thin calcite.

M.S. leadings of the matrix rich areas average 1.4 whereas the 5* 100mm siltstone

blocks range from 2.1 to 6.9. The siltstone blocks with more abundant brownlaminae have higher M.S. values possibly indicating a magnhration of the iron

rich bands??

Lower contact sharp at 20* to CA.Upper contact oxidization boundary by groundwater is sharp, over 20mm.

Heterolithic Volcaniclastic Kimberlite Breccia. Diatreme facies volcaniclastic

kimberlite breccia containing primarily country rock clasts. More or less one massive

SAMPLE

SAMPLE NO. FROM TO LENGTH I

sin.

ASSAYS

A.H*

DIAMOND DRILL LOG



COMMENCED TWP/LAT.LONQ. DATE LOGGED





HOLE NO. MRB-M-01________PAGE 4/10


COLLAR DIP^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ELEVATION______________________

LENGTH

INTERVALM D Ft D

FKOM TD

Xuc

xMJD LITHOTYPE DESCRIPTION

GEOLOGY: (colour, grain size, texture, minenb, alteration, etc)

diatreme ohase of a t rev hue cross-cut bv later ereen hypabyssal dvkes (5*) andpossibly subsequently by rusty speckled diatreme dykes (5%). The massive diatreme

is matrix supported with up to 30 X clasts of country rock.

Clasts - overall 2056 limestone and 1056 Huronian siltstone. The limestone is angularto sub-angular, ^-240mm but average 30-40mm. The siltstone is both grey, dark

green and brown, b angular to sub-angular and ranges in size from O-60mm.Possible trace eccurance of gneiss. Also possible trace mantle fragments, however.

these are always badly weathered, serpentinized, so their true nature can not be

determined. Possible trace autolith*?

Matrix - generally fine grained, grey kimberlite at >40*> white speckled calciteafter olivine at 10-20* and ^mm country rock fragments at 10-20X.

No indicator minerals can be seen in either the main diatreme facies or Ibe subsequent

hypabyssal and diatreme dykes. There are no pelletab present throughout.Matrix is generally very reactive to acid in main diatreme as well as the dykes.

Dykes: Green hypabyssal - generally olive green hue, medium to fine grainedgranular, 5 % < 1mm size white specks of calcite. Has the texture of a medium tofine grained sandstone. Granuals could possibly be pelletab or olivine pseudo-

morphed to serpentine and the kimberlite matrix b also altered to serpentine and

SAMPLE

SAMFLE NO. FXOM TO UNOTH X

SUL

ASSAYS

A. FI*

DIAMOND DRILL LOG





OBJECTIVE COORDINATES DDK COMMENTS

SURVEY DEPTH ' DIP AZIMUTH


HOLE NO. MRB-M41________PAGE 5/10


COLLAR DP?——-^^^^—^^^^———

ELEVATION^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

LENOTH

INTERVAL MD FID

ntOM TO

I uc

I ago LITHOTYPE DESCRIPTION

GEOLOGY: (colour, grain size, textile, mineral!, iteration, etc)

calcite.Rust bdian Red Diatreme - generally ID-15% clasts of limestone and siltstone.

sub-angular <2mm up to 30mm set hi a medium (rained granular oxidized matrixcomprised of up to 2D% calcite pseudomorph! of olivine -CI .3mm matrix supported.

but up to 5 X fine pUogophHe (mica). Trace autolims can be seen. Some patchesof less to unaltered can be seen infrequently as grey and/or medium green.

M.S. - generally die main diatreme facies. Ranges 14.0-30 but averages 20.

The green hyabyssal dykes range from .06-1.07 and average 0.7.The red diatreme dykes range 0.7-3.9 and average 2.0 in the olivine rich (nowcalcite) sections and 4.8 in the more kimberlite rich. In both cases dwre is a halo

effect on both sides of die dykes anywhere from 10cm to 1m where rock is clayaltered and M.S. values are depressed.The larger limestone blocks have readings as high as 1.7 but average 0-0.2.Generally all diatreme kimberlite shows a strong magnetic attraction.

of 20* to CA and a lower contact of 32* to CA.

106.25-108.15 M.S. values 1.2-11.0, possibly due lo clay alteration, core a very

soft with up to 20% calcite crysfaline filled vuggy patches and zones and up to XX

SAMPLE

SAMTLI NO.

DtooM

35120

motu

94.0

TO

(entire)

106

LENOTH

12.0

S SUL

(wt

31.7

ASSAYS

MB*

Diamond

Micro

0

Macro0

DIAMOND DRILL LOG

COMPANY

PROPERTY

COMMENCED

COMPLETED

OBJECTIVE

NTS

DISTRICT

TWP/LAT.LONO.

CLAIM

COORDINATES


CORE SIZE

CONTRACTOR

DATE LOGGED

LOGGED BY

DDK COMMENTS

SURVEY DEPTH DIP AZIMUTH BOLE NO. MRB-9C-01 PAGE 6/10

COLLAR AZIMUTH

COLLAR DIP

ELEVATION

LENGTH

INTERVALM D Ft D

paOH TO

s x*QO LITHOTYPE DESCRIPTION

GEOLOGY: (colour, pita size, texture, minerals, iteration, etc)

clasts inhiiltv and men nadint bv 107.5 down to 20-30*.108.15-109.0 Green hypabyssal dyke. Upper contact at 30* to CA, lower contactis (round. Very crumbky soft weathered serpentine and fine calcite.

109.0-109.6 Main diatreme facies.

109.6-110.25 Green hypabyssal dyke. Upper contact at 20* to CA, tower contact

at 18* to CA. Early fine wormy fractures healed with olive green (serpentine)

(5-10*) later fractures and wormy patches oxidized ^H, 2-5mm rusty altered

contact rind at bom contacts.110.95 10mm green dyke at 45* to CA, and oxidized discolouration crosscutting at

20* to CA.

1 1 1 .05-1 1 1 .8 Green hypabyssal dyke. Upper contact at 30* to CA, lower contact

at 32* to CA.

111.3-111.35 Oxidized section sharp contacts at 40* to CA.

117.25-118.75 Broken up section with M.S. readings around 10, possibly due toclay alteration.

120.3-121.0 Same as above.121.4-121.6 Green hypabyssal dyke. Upper contact irregular but near 90* to CA.

Lower contact broken up.

SAMPLE

SAMFUNO.

DteokKiMi

35121

noM

Solh106.0

TO

130.0

LENGTH

24.0

sSUL

(wikz)

42.62

Indicator first 25cm every 1m split

35060 94 138 22 14.51

ASSAYS

AiB*

Micro0

GP

20

Macro0

GA

45

DC

23

n/Ai12

t

DIAMOND DRILL LOG



COMMENCED TWP/LAT.LONO. DATE LODGED





HOLE NO. MRB^frOl________PAGE 7/10


COLLAR DIP^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ELEVATION^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

LENGTH

INTERVALMD FtD

nw TO

x uc

%(QO LITHOTYPE DESCRIPTION

GEOLOGY: (colour, (nin the, texture, mineral!, iteration, de)

121.6-122.4 Moderate to badlv broken uo core.123.2-123 J Moderate lo badly broken core. In both the above cases.

M.S. values drop to a range of 5.6-12.123.5-123.85 Green hypabyssal dyke. Upper contact obscured, lower contact

at 35* to CA. Possible fine autolith*.

123.85-124.7, 124.9-126.0, 126.6-127.2, 127.3-127.35, clay attention, lowered

M.S. 9-11.

127.35-127 J Green hypayssal dyke. Contacts obscured.

127.5-128.0. 128.2-128.5, 128.55-128.75 Clay altered, lower M.S. as before.

128.75-129.2 Green hypabyssal dyke. Upper contact mushed, lower contact sharp

at 40* to CA.

129.2-130.45 Lowered M.S., clay altered, core somewhat crumbtey.

130.45-130.75 Rusty red diatreme dyke. Upper contact at 50* to CA, lower

contact at + I- 75* to CA.130.75-131.85 Lowered M.S., clay altered, core easily broken.

132.73-132.76 Green hypabyssal dyke. Upper contact at 50*, lower contact 60*.137.4-137.6 M.S. drops, core crumbles easily, attention effect due lo the

following dyke.

SAMPLE

SAMTU NO.

Dbwtadn

35122

PXOM

(split)

130.0

TO

155.0

LENGTH

25.0

f SUL

(oLkf)

50.56

ASSAYS

Al B*

DiamondMicro

0Macro

0

DIAMOND DRILL LOG W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA





OBJECTIVE CO-ORDINATES DDH COMMENTS

SURVEY DEPTH DIP AZIMUTH BOLE NO. MRB-94-01 PAGE 8/10

COLLAR AZIMUTH

COLLAR DIP

ELEVATION

LENGTH

INTERVALM D Ft D

FROM TO

X (EC

I RQO LITHOTYPE DESCRIPTION

GEOLOGY: (colour, grain tize, texture, minerals, altenttkm. etc)

137.6-140.74 Rusty red diatreme dyke. Uooer contact at 50* to CA. lower contactat 38* to CA.

137.6-139.05 Calcite pseudomorph of olivine rich, averaging M.S. readings of 2.0.

139.05-140.74 Average M.S. readings of 5.0. Overall trace autolith*.

139.35 5mm clay seam.

140.74-140.76 Green hypabyssal dyke. Running up the contact

148.3-148.45 Clay alteration.

151.0-151.4 Clay alteration, possible diatreme dyke.

153.05-153.45 Diatreme dyke, grey 10-30* clast including autoliths. Upper

contact 40* to CA with a 10-15mm layer of green hypabyssal like dyke.

153.45-153.65 Low angle crystal rich green hypabyssal dyke with upper contact

at 35* to CA and lower contact at 15* lo CA. Crystals are now calcite pseudo-

morphs of olivine? serpentinized.

154.45-154.55 Rusty red calcite speckled dyke where calcite pseudomorphs ofolivine are 10-15*. Upper contact at 40* to CA, lower contact at 35* to CA.

154.9-155.05 Rusty red calcite speckled dyke as described above. Bom upper and

tower contacts at 35* to CA.

158.2-158.35 Chalk white clay? alteration. Contacts sharp at 54* to CA.

SAMPLE

SAMTLEHO.

Mnotadoa

35123

FROM

(split)

155.0

TO

169.9

LENGTH

14.9

11 SUL

(wLkf)

33.33

Indicator First 25cm every 1m (split)

35061 138.0 169.9 31.0 15.99

ASSAYS

AlPP*

Diamond

Micro

0

OP

19

Macro0

GA

47

DC

30

n/ck

2

DIAMOND DRILL LOG







W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.TORONTO, ONTARIO. CANADA

HOLE NO. MRB-X-01^^^^^PAGE 9/10

COLLAR AZIMUTH^^——————^^———

COLLAR DIP————————^^^^——

ELEVATION^——————^^^^—^^^

LENGTH

INTERVAL MD FtD

ROM

169.9

TO

202.0

%KEC

X KQD LITHOTYPE

10B

DESCRIPTIONGEOLOGY: (colour, t nin tize, texture, minenu. iteration, etc)

166.7-166.8 Lineation of fine ^mm rankles at 45* to CA.167.75 5-20mm wide green hypabyssal dyke at 25* to CA.

168.55 Alignment contact at 50* to CA where M.S. values drop from 15 to 1.6.

168.55-168.9 Paler or bleach section (clay alteration?)

168.9-169.9 Breeciazone. SO-60% clasts of 90?4 brown laminated siltstone.

Clasts are rounded to sub-rounded demonstrating milling and are > 15 to 40mm in

size. Matrix is for the most part a fine grained green (serpentinized) with fine

calcite bhs unlike the main diatreme body. This probably is representative of the laterhypabyssal dyke which has come up along the contact of the main diatreme with

the siltstone and further brecciated and transported siltstone blocks and fragments.

Or, s simply more quickly chilled kimberlite. There are similarities with thekimberlite matrix of the upper contact breccia.

169.7-169.8 Rusty red calcite spotted dyke with upper ft lower contacts at 50* lo CA.

169.9 Lower contact at 60* to CA.

laminated grey siltstone. In this case, however, there fa DO extensive brecciation

(169.9-170.6) and fine grained wacke sets are very thin to non-existant and brown

SAMPLE

SAMFU NO. FKOM TO LENGTH S

SOL

ASSAYS

KmH*

DIAMOND DRILL LOG








HOLE NO. MRB-X-01_______PAGE 10/10

COLLAR AZIMUTH-^^^—————^^^——

COLLAR DIP^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ELEVATION^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

LENGTH

INTERVALMD FtD

PXOM

202.0

TO

202.0

xKEC

li KQD LITHOTYPE

E.O.H.

DESCRIPTIONGEOLOGY: (colour, train size, texture, minerals, iltentwn, etc)

laminations traditionally tive way to erev after 181.0.M.S. values gradatkmilly decrease from 9.9 to 0.22 by 170.6 and then average 0.22.

End of Hole.

SAMPLE

SAMTLB NO. FItOM TO LEMjnf (

SUL

ASSAYS

Al W*

c 8 C-:DOWNHOLE SURVEYING

HOLE NUMBER: H K ft-^ k -O l

Le premier test commence a du casing apres dix metres: : Sperry-SunID

Metres ;Test Azimuth Dip

75m i Acid test o .

perry-Sun469m i g"^ iSperry-Sun j j 14 q-

S Acid test200m : Sperry-Sun250m jSperry-Sun275m 'Acid test300m ;Sperry-Sun350m : Sperry-Sun375m i Acid test400m 'Sperry-Sun450m !Sperry-Sun475m 'Acid test500m 'Sperry-Sun550m Sperry-Sun575m Acid test600m i Sperry-Sun650m 'Sperry-Sun675m ! Acid test700m .Sperry-Sun750m : Sperry-Sun775m 'Acid test800m .Sperry-Sun850m Sperry-Sun

975rri - 1000m

'Acid test900m __- Sperry-Sun

; Sperry-Sun 'Acid test'Soerry-Sun

Soerr/'Sun a la fin du trou

MS Readings MRB-96-01 51

From

0

3.18

94

101

106

109

109.6

11025

110.95

111.8

120.4

1210

121.4

121.6

123.5

123.85

126

127.3

127.3

127.5

128

128.3

128.75

To

3.18

94

101

106

108.15

109.6

11025

110.95

111.8

120.4

121

'121.4

121.6

123.5

123.85

126

127.3

127.35

127.5

128

128.3

128.75

129.2

Range

-

023

.32 - 8.3

1.8-6.6

12-13.0

13.4-18

.56-0.18

14.7-16.5

0.3 - .70

10.0-28.7

10.0-14

13.0-34.7

6.89

5.6-14.8

.96-1.09

8.6-12.7

12.2-20.3

7.3-10.1

11 -13.4

.06 - 22 '

Average

-

023

4.5

4

10

16

0.18

15.5

0.5

19

12

25

6.89

10

1

10

16

9.3

0.8

9

14.8

12

0.16

Comments

overburden

siltstone

oxydbced kimerlite monolithic breccia

unoxydixed kimerlite monolttic breccia

hypabyssal dyke

hypabyssal dyke

hypabyssal dyke

minor clay alteration zones withms

clay alteration zones

less altered

dyke

some bracken core alteration zones

dyke hypabyssal

clay alteration broken core

alteration zone

dyke

alteration

altered

hypabyssal dyke

129.2

130.45

130.75

131.85

137.4

137.6

139.05

140.74

153.05

153.45

153.65

167.75

168.55

168.9

169.9

170.6

Eo H

130.45

130.75

131.85

137.4

137.6

139.05

140.74

153.05

15345

153.65

167.75

168.55

168.9

169.9

170.6

202

EOH

3.6-13.5 '

4.8-1.2

7.3 - 14.7

13.0-34.0

6.15-9.5

.23 - 2.7

4.6 - 5.9

10-23

.71-1.51

17.0-36.0

10.8-16.6

1.6-6.6

4.6-8.3

0.85 - 9.9

0.22

0.9

0.9

11

19

7

1.8

5

20

1

5.6

21

14

5

6.5

1.5

0.22

altered

red diatreme

altered

alteration halo

red diatreme divine bids

red diatreme divine poor

minor clay alteration

hypabyssal dyke

coarse dyke

monolithic kim. breccia

magnetized siltstone

siltstone

DIAMOND DRILL LOGSee Survey Sheet


COMPANY

PROPERTY

COMMENCED

COMPLETED

OBJECTIVE

Sudbury Contact Mines Li*.

Lundy 216

Feb. 28, 1996

Much 3, 1996

Test Mag. Tarfet/Kimberlte

NTS

DISTRICT

TWM-^L-,

CLAIM

31M/12, SW

UnferUke

rt* I.UIIJI*CM lv

1202721

CO-ORDINATESMd 95-1 2+65E/

CORE SIZE

CONTRACTOR

DATE LOGGED

LOGGED BY

DDK COMMENTS

NQ

Boart Longyear

Match 30/April 1/96

Riynood J. Knowles

^

SURVEY DEPTH DIP AZIMUTH HOLE NO. MRB-M4Z

COLLAR AZIMUTH

COLLAR DIP

ELEVATION

LENGTH

PAGE 1/9

142* AZ

•35

285m

241

INTERVALMD FtD

ROM

0

2

TO

2

45.8

iRBC

I KQD LITHOTYPE

OVER

10B

V

DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY: (colour, f nun size, texture, minerals, alteration, etc)

Overburden.

Huronian Firstbrook Formation Siltstone. Red brown l-2mm laminae, 3-80mm fine

greywacke and 2-4mm grey buff siltstone all alternating (rythymites?).Bedding at 64 lo 74* lo CA, average 70* to CA for the most part, massive

competent M.S. average 0.2.34.75-36.5 Soft sediment deformation. Sharp .upper contact at 70* lo CA.

First 0.5m is quite disturbed. Remainder a well bedded but anywhere from 0-40*

W CA.37.45-38.05 Red stained alteration. Gradational upper and tower boundaries

over 5-10cm. A red brown hue discolours the siltstone. Fractures are filled withcalcite at 50* and at 20* to CA.37.8 100mm wide fault gouge or kimberlite buff grey carbonate rich.

38.5-42.0 Increased fracturing filled with limonitic calcite.42.0-42.6 Breccia zone with partings up lo 30mm. Matrix is up to 30* and

comprised of fine grained buff brownish to buff yellow stained calcite.at 42.05-42.08 and 42.25-42.3 probable kimberlite component Siltstone is stained

SAMPLE

SAMPLE HO.

ntou TO LENGTH S SUL

ASSAYS

A*PI*

DIAMOND DRILL LOG







W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.TORONTO, ONTARIO. CANADA

HOLE NO. MRB-M-02_________PAGE 2/9


COLLAR DIP——^———^^^^^^————

ELEVATION^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

LENGTH

INTERVALMD Ft D

FROM

45.8

TO

63.4

*(EC

* *Qp LITHOTYPE

lOB, bx

DESCRIPTIONGEOLOGY: (colour, grain size, texture, minerals, alteration, etc)

dark brown red as in the earlier discribed alteration zone.42.9-43.8 5* calcite filled fractures.44.9-45.5 Heterolithic volcaniclastic diatreme breccia dyke. Upper contact at44* to CA, lower contact at 50 to CA.

30-40* clasts, matrix supported. Matrix medium to light grey with 20* ^mmcountry rock chips and 40* fine grained massive kimberlite (clay altered?).

Clasts are primartty limestone and siltstone at equal proportions ranging in size from

O-50mm. Siltstone is half grey half brown laminae. Kimberlite is filling anopened irregular fracture with minor calcite filled fracture extending outwards at

30* to CA for 5cm beyond contacts into the wall rock. No indicators observed.

M.S. ranges 3-5.4, averaging 4.4.45 .5-45.8 Rapid decrease in brown lamininae bedding still at 70* to CA.

Brecciated Huronian Ftrstfarook Formation Grey Siltstone. ̂ —^———^—-Massive finely laminated grey siltstone, 70-80* brecciated of which 60* is severely

brecciated and 5-10* kimberlite diatreme dykes.Bedding lamenae is for the most pan oriented or intact through me brecciation

at 60-64* to C A except in the major brecccia sections where random attitudes to

SAMPLE

SAMPLENO. noM TO LENGTH S

SUL

ASSAYS

Al PI*

DIAMOND DRILL LOG








HOLE NO. MRB-9642_________PAGE 3/9

COLLAR AZIMUTH^^^^^^^^^^^^^

COLLAR DIP^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ELEVATION^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

LENGTH

INTERVALM D Ft D

FKOM TO

1 REC

X HQO LITHOTYPE DESCRIPTION

GEOLOGY: (colour, grain size, ttxtiirc, minerals, ilttration, etc)

CA indicate maior movement of breccia fragments.M.S. ranges 0.02-0.2.

45.8-47.1 Minor brecciation. Mostly fracture separation and infilling with whitecalcite ^2-3 mm).

47.1-47.4 Strong brecciation with ID-15% infilling of white and grey calcite, minor

Kimberlite.47 .4-47 .55 Moderate to minor brecciation.47.55-47.6 Cilcite/ktmberlhe dyke white to buff grey like die kimberlite matrix

to the previously described diatreme dyke.

47.6-48.60 Moderate to strong brecciation with up to 20* white calcite and 10*buff grey kimberlite.48.6-49.1 Minor brecciation, calcite filled fracture partings.49.1-54.9 Moderate to severe brecciation whh possible kimberlite monolithic

volcaniclastic breccia dyking from 49.9-54.9. Note no significant M.S. change

0.1-0.17.49.1-49.5 20* matrix and void space where matrix is 5* white calcite and 15X

buff grey kimberlite?49.9-54.9 Possible monolithic volcaniclastic kimberlite breccia dyke with up to 50X

SAMPLE

SAMPLE NO. FHOH TO LENGTH X

SOL

ASSAYS

A. B*

DIAMOND DRILL LOG






SURVEY DEPTH or? AZIMUTH


HOLE NO. MRB-**42_________PACE 4/9

COLLAR AZIMUTH——^^—————————

COLLAR DIP-^—^————————^-^—-

ELEVATION^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

LENGTH

INTERVALMD Ft D

noM TO

-

(KBC

% *QO LITHOTYPE DESCRIPTION

GEOLOGY: (colour, train size, texture, minerals, tlteratxm, etc)

calcite rich kimberlite matrix fine grained buff crev with a oale treen mottled timeand an overall yellowing. Clasts Omm-200mm 10X of which are red brownsiltstone and 40*4 are grey siltstone. Clasts are randomly oriented with respectto CA. No limestone or indicators were observed. Late calcite infilling voids and

partially coating clasts and late fractures.53.0-53.8J Low angle 10-20* to CA. late brecciation and infilling with 20-30*

yellowed calcite (limonhic) no kimberlite.

54.9-56.23 More or less massive grey siltstone with oriented lamination at 55*

to CA. Trace fracturing zones. M.S. values range 0.04-0.13.56.23-56.9 Heterolithic volcaniclastic kimberlite breccia dyke. Medium to dark

grey purple matrix (60S), fine to medium grained with 20X <2mm country rock.Clasts at 30-40*4 are ^-30mm grey to brown siltstone and fine limestone.First 10cm and last 10cm appear to be monolithic and clasH are rounded in a

hypabyssal type kimberlite matrix, possibly indicating a 2 phase dyking. Abo a30-40mm band at 56.6 is possibly indicative of a third and last dyking of hypabyssalmaterial with no clasn like the narrow dyke seen at 59.940.0, and 59.65-59.7.Overran M.S. average 2.2.56.9-63.0 More or less massive grey finely laminated siltstone with lamenae at

SAMPLE

sum*NO. FROM TO LENGTH *

SOL

ASSAYS

K*n*

DIAMOND DRILL LOG








HOU NO. MRB-M-02_________PAGE 519

COLLAR AZIMUTH—^————^^^^^—

COLLAR DIP^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ELEVATION-————^-———-^^^———

LENGTH

INTERVAL MD RD

noH

63.4

TO

85.2

s ne

xKQD LITHOTYPE

Kml

DESCRIPTIONGEOLOGY: (colour, grain size, texture, mineral!, iteration, ac)

50-60* to CA. M.S. readinzs rance from 0-0.17.5-10* breccia zones healed with calcite sometimes slightly limonitic.

58.9-59.4 Breccia zone with 10* infilling of buff grey fine grained possiblyhypabyssal kimberlite material.

59.65-59.7 Narrow hypabyssal dyke with calcite.

M.S. reading is 5.25. Contacts at 60* to CA.

59.9-60.0 Hypabyssal kimberlite dyke fine grained massive calcite rich dark grey.

Upper contact at 70* lo CA, lower contact at 50* to CA.

M.S. reading is 10.1.60.1-60.35 Breccia zone with 1096 buff grey kimberlite (hypabyssal) fining.

63.0-63.4 Dark grey to purple siltstone. Alteration?

Massive to fractured, tight M.S. 1.48-2.11.

Heterolithic Volcaniclastic Kimberlite Diatreme Breccia

Medium to dark grey matrix supported.Clasts: 4*50* angular to sub-angular. 20* limestone, ^-ItQaua. Many smallerare clay altered. 30* siltstone (15 red brown, 5 grey). ^-350mm. Trace lutolhfas.

Some limestone clasts have a thin kimberlite rim or rind.

SAMPLE

JAM7LHHO. FROM TO UNOTH (

SUL

ASSAYS

A*R*







SURVEY DEPTH DIP AZIMUTH HOLE NO. MRB-M4Z PAGE 6/9

COLLAR AZIMUTH

COLLAR DIP

ELEVATION

LENGTH

INTERVAL MD FtD

ntoM

85.2

TO

95.5

xUK

X KQO LITHOTYPE

10B bx/kml/kd

DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY: (colour, (tain tile, texture, minerals, alteration, etc)

70.0-70.13 Lane buff ereen crev autolith.Matrix - fine grained granular, calcite rich, with 10-15* ^mm country rockfragments. Medhim buff grey colouration consistant throughout Minor to moderate

clay alteration seen also with depressed M.S. readings.

Indicators were not observed. Non-pelletals.

Unit appears to be a single phase with no observed internal structure.M.S. value average 16.5 (with a range of 13-18.5) with clay alteration sections

ranging from 8.4-11.5, averaging 9 J.81.2-83.3 clay altered section with depressed M.S. and reduced clast content and

size. Possible secondary, phase although contact not obvious.

Tizhtrv Brecciated Huronian Firstbrook Siltstone.Grey, purple to red brown. Laminated at 60-70* to CA.50-60* brecciated. 30* of which is a tight, clast supported, where clam are <2m^^-

30mm bound by a thin (Omm) matrix composed of 60* kimberlite and 40*calcite.

The other 30* breccia is a matrix supported for the most part monolithicvolcaniclastic kimberlite diatreme to hypabyssal breccia. Matrix is commonly

SAMPLE

SAMFLBHO.

Dfeohtion

35124

FltOM

Split63.4

TO

85.2

LENGTH

21.8

sSUL

(wt-kl)

44.9Indicator Split first 25cm every 1m

35062 63.4 85.2 21.8 9.75

ASSAYS

At fi*

DiamondMicro

0OP14

Macro0

GA44

DC12

n/di0

DIAMOND DRILL LOG







W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.TORONTO. ONTARIO. CANADA

HOLE NO. MMHt-ta_________PAGE 7/9


COLLAR DIP^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ELEVATION^^^——^———————^^^—

LENGTH

INTERVAL MD RD

ROM TO

Xac

sROD LITHOTYPE DESCRIPTION

GEOLOGY: (colour, train size, texture, minerals, iteration, etc)

20-50* with massive hypabyssal sections cutting at 52-65* to CA,Where host rock is in place the laminations are at 65-70* lo CA.

The tight breccia appears to be later than the diatreme breccia but before thehypabyssal dyking.

85.2-86.7 Tight breccia zone. M.S. 2.6-10.2. average 3.0.

86.7-88.35 Purple siltstone, very blocky, broken up by drilling.

M.S. 1.5M.75.

88.35-88.4 Hypabyssal dyke contacts broken. M.S. 11.0.88.4-90.5 40* tight breccia. Where breccia, M.S. average 2.4 and siltstone is

0.06-1.4.

90341 3 90* Tight breccia. M.S. 2.8-9 2 , average 4.0.91.3-91.32 Hypabyssal dyke? M.S. 10.7.91.32-91.7 Purple siltstone OX fractures filled whh calcite and kimberlite <2mm

thick.91.7-95.4 Complex combination of monolithic volcaniclastic kimberlite diatreme

with trace limestone and 60* rounded ID sub-angular siltstone, kimberlite

hypabyssal dykes and olcite/ktmberlite healed tight breccia.91.7-92.42 Diatreme. M.S. 10-21.6. pure matrix at 24.0.

SAMPLE

SAMU NO, FROM TO LENGTH X

SUL

ASSAYS

M B*

DIAMOND DRILL LOG

COMPANY NTS CORE SEE







HOLE NO. MRB-X-M^^^^^^PAGE g/9


COLLAR DIP———^^————^^^^^^—

ELEVATION^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

LENGTH

INTERVALM D Ft D

FKOM

95.5

TO

102.0

%(BC

X KQO LITHOTYPE

10B. bx

DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY: (colour, f rain tize. texture, minerals, attention, etc)

92.42-92.8 Hvoabvssal dyke contact at 65* to CA. Rto uo pieces of diatreme.M.S. 22.1-22.8.

92.8-92.95 Tight breccia. M.S. 10.1.

92.95-93.0 Hypabyssal dyke. M.S. 17.2.

93.0-93.25 Tight breccia. M.S. 6.5-8.1.

93.25-93.4 Diatreme. M.S. 9.3.

93.4-93.6 Hypabyssal dyke at 52* to CA. M.S. 33.1.

93.6-94.3 7051 diatreme. 30* tight breccia. M.S. 8.16-11.0.

94.3-94.53 Siltstone. M.S. 1.8.

94.53-95.5 70* diatreme, 30* tight breccia. M.S. 0.52-2.5.

Huronian Firstbrook Formation Siltstone.

M.S. 0-0.2. Transition zone.

95.5-93.3 Ground core. No recovery.93.3-98.0 Purple to red brown siltstone.

98.0-100 As above but ground, only recovered 0.75m of coarse gravel size core.

100.0-100 J Purple siltstone.

100.5-100.8 Red brown laminated siltstone.

100.8-102.0 As above but ground, only recovered 0.5m of coarse gravel size core.

SAMPLE

SAMTU NO. FKOM TO LENGTH I

SUL

ASSAYS

A. PI*

DIAMOND DRILL LOG








HOU NO. MRB-X^B_________PAGE 919


COLLAR DIP^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ELEVATION^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

LENGTH

INTERVALM D FtD

noM

102.0

145.0

241

TO

14S.O

241

241

s uc

xHOD LITHOTYPE

10B. bx/kd

10B

EOH

DESCRIPTIONGEOLOGY: (colour, grain size, texture, mineral*, attention, etc)

Brecciated Huronian Firstbrook Formation SiltstoneRed brown finely laminated at 73-75* to CA. Tight breccia zone. Matrix at 15-20*fine grained kimberlite clay altered. M.S. 0.85-1.16.

Note: Suspect 95.5-93.2, 96.0-100. 100.8-102.0 and 102.6-103.6 could be of the

same breccia and the clay altered kimberlite matrix has washed out and causedblocking and grinding of core. Pieces of clay kimberlite are seen along the ground

section.

Huronian Firstbrook Formation SiltstoneBeige grey, finely laminated siltstone to medium lo dark grey, finely laminate*!

siltstone. Laminations at 70-75* to CA. Massive.

155.3-155.5 Kimberlite hypabyssal dyke, fine grained massive with l-2cm rim of20* <2mm country rock medium to dark grey black. 3cm wan rock alteration.

red staining. Contact angle at 50* to CA. M.S. 4.5-4.7.

End of Hole.Note: Second surface geophysical magnetic target was not intersected.

SAMPLE

SMiruNO. FROM TO LENGTH %

SUL

ASSAYS

Aln*

: DOWNHOLE SURVEYING

HOLE NUMBER:l

Le premier test commence a du casing acres dix metres: Spcrry-Gun-

Metres i Test Azimuth Dip

\375m lAcid test100m !Sperry-Sun150m IT) i Sperry-Sun175m LAcid test 56200m ;Sperry-Sun250m Zf\ j iSperry-Sun275m i Acid test300m iSperry-Sun350m ! Sperry-Sun375m -Acid test400m ISperry-Sun450m !Sperry-Sun475m jAcid test500m i Sperry-Sun550m Sperry-Sun575m : Acid test600m i Sperry-Sun650m 'Sperry-Sun675m 'Acid test700m l Sperry-Sun750m i Sperry-Sun775m 'Acid test800m ;Sperry-Sun850m Sperry-Sun875rn. 900'm

'Acid test'Sperry-Sun

950m __jSperry-Sun 975m i Acid test1000m 'Sperry-Sun

Soerrv-Sun a la fin du trou

-Jk

LWLAJYH

COMPANY

PROPERTY

COMMENCED

COMPLETED

OBIECnVB

JJMJLI UKULJL

Sudbury Contact Mine* Lid.

Lundy 216

Match 4, 1996

Match 6, 1996

Test M*f. /Kimberlite

lAJl^

NTS 3M/12. SW

DISTRICT LuderUke

TW^T.,-*. U-,T*MaL..C-,V

CLAIM 1202721

CO-ORD. Grid 95-11 L3+OOE/

CORE SIZE

CONTRACTOR

DATE LOGGED

LOGGED BY

DDK COMMENTS

NQ

Bout Longycar

April 1,2/96

Raymond J. Knowles

^

W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LISee Survey Sheet TORONTO. ONTARIO, CAN/

SURVEY DEPTH DIP AZIMUTH HOLE NO. MRB-M-03 PAGE in

COLLAR AZIMUTH 142*

COLLAR DIP -55*

ELEVATION 295m

LENGTH 181m

1+32N UTM 5S08PZE/5265HIN

INTERVALMD Ft D

nou

0

2.35

TO

2.35

103.5

*KEC

S ROD LITHOTYPE

OVER

10B

f J ^—•••1

DESCRIPTIONGEOLOGY: (colour, train size, texture, minerals, altennon. etc)

Overburden.

Huronian Firstbrook Formation Siltstone

Massive finely laminated with red brown fine grained laminae (l-2mm), brown grey

fine grained laminae (2-5mm) and grey black medium to fine grained greywacke bedsCA.(2-5mm). Overall bedding 70-76* to CA.M.S. values range 0.2-0.27 average 0.24.

95.95-96.05 Kimberlite dyke hypabyssal medium to light grey banded (flow).Contacts and banding it 60* to CA.

M.S. 7.7-8.8. No acid reaction.97.55 3mm kimberlite dyke as above.Contact at 50* lo CA.

98.0-99.0 2-5** increased fracturing ruled with calcite.99.0-101.3 Monolithic to heterolithic volcaniclastic kimberlite breccia and multiple

narrow hypabyssal dyking.

Much of the 2.3m (60*) is broken up badly, however, the kimberlite component isabout 50* of the total.

—— —— ̂ SAMPLE

SAMPU NO. FROM TO LENGTH X

SUL

ASSAYS

A* M*

DIAMOND DRILL LOG








HOLE NO. MRB-X-03_________PAGE 2/7


COLLAR DIP^_^_i___^__^^_^^_

ELEVATION—————^———^^^^^—

LENGTH

INTERVALM D Ft D

nou

103.5

TO

111.0

Xuc

IROD LITHOTYPE

10B, bx, kd

DESCRIPTIONGEOLOGY: (colour, grain size, texture, minerals, iltcnaon, etc)

M S values for the kimberlite matrix of the diatreme and hvoabvssal ranee from.59 - 10.4. Contact angles are mostly broken but some are 60-76* to CA.Some of the clasts within me diatreme portion are beat altered lo deep red brown andpurple and have M.S. values of .35 up to 4.32.

The kimberlite a very similar to the above hypabyssal dykes. Hypabyssal componenthas no acid reaction as well. There is 5* calcite infilling associated fractures within

the siltstone and surrounding some clasts within the breccia. Calcite is post kimberlite.101.65-101.95 Further brecciation with 10* kimberlite and 3* calcite and a 20mm

dyke at 54* to CA.102.5-103.5 Badly fractured, 1* fine pyrite crystals, 5-10X kimberlite hypabyssal

dyking as above but much has been disohrcd and washed during drilling.M J. 0.18 - .26 average 0.2.

Huronian firstbrook Formation Siltstone

Medium grey green finely laminated and 20X dark grey black greywacke l-5mm

beds.M.S. 0.22 - 0.27. average 0.24.

JO-40% fractured lo badly fractured whh kimberlite dyking which is clay alteredand generally poor recovered and not enough present for an M.S. reading.

SAMPLE

SAMPLE NO. F10M TO LENGTH I

SOL

ASSAYS

Aln*



PROPERTY

COMMENCED

COMPLETED

OBJECTIVE

DISTRICT

TWP/LAT.LONG.

CLAIM

COORDINATES

CONTRACTOR

DATE LOGGED

LOGGED BY

DDK COMMENTS

SURVEY DEPTH DIP AZIMUTH HOLE NO. MRB-X-03 PAGE 3/7

COLLAR AZIMUTH

COLLAR DIP

ELEVATION

LENGTH

INTERVALMD RD

piton

111.0

TO

167.2

x(BC

S *QP LITHOTYPE

Kral

DESCRIPTIONGEOLOGY: (colour, f rain axe, texture, minenh, iteration, etc)

110.0-0-111.0 Increased M.S. 0.58 - 1.16. Tieht microfractures throuzhout.Minor kimberlite filling.

Heterolithic Volcaniclastic Kimberlite Diatreme Breccia. Contact at 60* lo CA.

Medium grey fine grained granular matrix with generally A0% but up to 605S clastsof red brown laminated and grey siltstone and limestone. Clast content variation isgradational in nature and probably not indicative of separate diatreme phases.Only minor hypabyssal kimberlite dyking is observed as green fine grained granular

material. Several narrow oxidized red dykes and/or fracture related alteration is

seen occasionally throughout Also narrow medium to dark grey hypabyssalkimberlite dykes are seen in two instances trending at low angle to core axis.

Flow fabrics or orientation of clasts is rarely seen.No indicators minerals were observed, trace possible autolith! and mantle clast maybe present. Some clasts appear to be clay altered after serpentine and could be relic

mantle clasts.Matrix is comprised of 10-15* fine ^2mm) country rock fragments and 5-10* veryfine calcite dots, probably after olivine, all bound in fine grained medium greykimberlite.

SAMPLE

MUM NO.

Dinobtion

35125

35126

FROM

(split)

111.0

139.0

TO

139.0167.2

LENOTH

28.0

28.2

iSUL

(M. kx)

56.23

60.32Indicator split first 25cm every 1m

35063 111.0 167.2 56.2 26.76

ASSAYS

A*B*

Diamond00

GF8

00

OA5

DC

6

D/ch0

DIAMOND DRILL LOG








HOU NO. MRB-M-03_________PAGE 4/7

COLLAR AZIMUTH^^———^-—-^—^—

COLLAR DIP^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ELEVATION^—-^—^^-———^^^

LENGTH

INTERVALMD RD

net* TO

(IBC

S (QD LITHOTYPE DESCRIPTION

GEOLOGY: (colour, (rain size, texture, mmerah, iltendon, etc)

Clasts is stated virv in zones from 40-6096 ire dominantlv siltstone 70% ind 3096limestone and angular to sub-angular ranging from <2mm up to 250 mm for

limestone and 200mm for siltstone. Trace clasts mostly limestone <40mm show

presence of a 2mm nm of different coloured matrix and could represent different

matrix coatings and rebrecciation of an cartier phase or rather a preservation halo.The diatreme is clay altered lo varying degrees reflected by easily crumbled core.

packed or pitted core and weathered limestone (mantle) clasts to clay and also

reduced M.S. values.

Features of interest?

111.0-111.25 Reddish tinge medium grained granular. 40-5051 clasts all OOmm,

trace liiiiciiloue.

M.S. 4.3-2.3.

111.25-117.35 Medium grey matrix. 30-4096 clists.

M.S. 14.2-22.7, average 17.5.

115.6 Oxidized calcite healed fracture at 20* to CA with up to 20mm reddish halo.

116.65 Oriented clasts at 35* to CA.117.35-119.85 60-7056 clasts in a reddish brown lo medium grey grainular matrix.

Upper contact broken, lower contact 70* to CA. 0.5* 1 -2mm calcite crystals.

SAMPLE

SAMTLINO. ntOM TO UNDTH S

SUL

ASSAYS

A*W*

DIAMOND DRILL LOG







W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.TORONTO. ONTARIO, CANADA

HOLE NO. MRB-X-03-^——-^--PAGE 5/7

COLLAR AZIMUTH^^^^^—^^^————

COLLAR DIP————^^——^^^^^^—

ELEVATION^^———————————^^

LENGTH

INTERVAL MD Ft D

noM TO

-

s uc

%ROD LITHOTYPE DESCRIPTION

GEOLOGY: (colour, (tain she. texture, minerals, iteration, etc)

M S values 4 55 - 9 2 fdue to abundance of clasts?)119.85-130.5 40-50* clasts in a medium grey matrix.

M.S. values range from 12 lo 23 but average 17 - 19 in less altered matrix.

120.7 Oxidized reddish with washout green clast (possible mantle).123.5, 123.8 and 124.15 1mm calcite filled fractured with 10-20mm reddish brown

alteration halo. The 124.15 fracture has a 100cm halo with reduced M.S. lo 8.1.

Angles are 50* to CA.124.7 30mm 3.6 M.S. dyke? at 50' and 60* to CA.

125.0-125.1 Large autolith. M.S. 20.9.

127 J Qilche filled fracture with reddish halo it 50' to CA.128.1-128.5 Alignment at 23* lo CA.

129.2 20* calcite fracture. 10mm halo.130.5-131.0 70* clasts, partially oxidized matrix. No preserved contacts.M.S. 11.3, one suspect mantle clast, clay altered pale greenish hue.131.0-146.7 30-40* clasts in a medium grey fine grained matrix.

M.S. average 19.131.25-131.75 Green hypabyssal dyke. Upper contact 18* lo CA. Lower at 42*to CA. Fine grained granular, strong acid reaction fine calcite after otvine?

SAMPLE

SAMTU NO. raoM TO UNora s

an.

ASSAYS

A* H*

DIAMOND DRILL LOG








HOLE NO. MXS-9643_________PAGE 6/7


COLLAR DIP^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ELEVATION^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

LENGTH

INTERVALMD FtO

ROM TO

(KBC

( tQO LITHOTYPE DESCRIPTION

GEOLOGY: (cokmr, train size, texture, minerals, iteration, ac)

M.S. 1.5.132.9-133.25 18* 10-20mm hypabyssal dyke, medhun to dark grey, M.S. 20.

133.75-133.8 Granular dark grey dyke? at 56* to CA. M.S. 24.6.134.4-134.6, 134.95-135.05 Coarse lo medium granular diatreme matrix (calcite

after olivine?).

M.S. 19.9 - 30.1. lower contact 0 36* to CA.

139.2 Red brown staining, 30mm.

141.0 40* red brown oxidation? zone (15mm).141.55 50*, 10mm red brown zone with .5mm calcite centre.

141.57, 141.8 2 possible mantle clasts.146.7-152.05 60-70* clasts in a medium grey fine grained kimberlite as before. Norcil slurp contacts just sudden increase in clist content.M.S. average 12-13.

150.15 45mm possible altered mantle clast with oxidized rind.152.05-162.75 30-40* clasts in a fine grained medium grey matrix as before.153.9-154.0 Large possible altered mande or autolith.157.4-158 Low angle 15*. 10-15mm wavey hypabyssal dyke.

M.S. is 22-23 compared to 17-20 wall rocks.

SAMPLE

SAMU NO. racH TO Lenan %

sin.

ASSAYS

Urnn*

DIAMOND DRILL LOG



COMMENCED TWP/LAT.LONG. D ATE LOGGED

COMPLETED CLAIM LODGED BY




HOLENO. MRB-H-M_________PAOB 7/7


COLLAR DIP—————————^^—————

ELEVATION^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

LENGTH

INTERVAL M D RD

HUM

167.2

181.0

TO

181.0

181.0

f uc

*KQD LITHOTYPE

10B

EOH

DESCRIPTIONGEOLOGY: (colour, irata size, tonne, mineral!, alteration, etc)

162.75 Lower contact sharo M 50* to CA.162.75-162.95 Red diatreme buff brown medium to coarse (rained, 20-30?t clasts.

M.S. 7.3. Lower contact at 40* to CA.

162.95-167.2 40-60* clasts in a fine grained medium grey matrix.

M.S. values average 12. Last 30cm averages 2.4.

huronian FnyfrwK formation SiltstoneRed brown laminated like at the beginning of the hole.M.S. average 0.27.167.2-168.5 Core fractured and ground.170.0-181.0 Massive competent.

End of Hole.

SAMPLE

SAMItl HO. FKOM TO LENGTH %

SOL

ASSAYS

At PI*

i ; : DOWNHOLE SURVEYING1 1 ' : l

HOLE NUMBER: FlîÂ ~O "^ '- '- '1 EO*V 161: 'W^ln

Le premier test commence a du casing apres dix metres: 'Sperry. i 1 . ;

Metres .Test : Azimuth Dipj ! : - i

f : f '

l"bf~ jwAw*-^ i \ i\7_ 6 \ — r'T0 i ;75m 7^ iAcid test 1 ; -~5"3* - :100m 'Sperry-Sun J i *43 0 ~^4? 0 ' '150m jS~H ; Sperry-Sun . t \ 35 i *-5 ^ ! !175m H^ l Acid test i ̂ ^ ; i200m :Sperry-Sun |250rh l Sperry-Sun j :. , ;275m iAcid test i : : '300m i Sperry-Sun : ; - '350m ^Sperry-Sun ' '375m iAcid test ' i400m 'Spejry-Sun i : '450m ! Sperry-Sun ' ' '475m 'Acid test i ;500m 'Sperry-Sun i . :550m Sperry-Sun :575m Acid test600m l Sperry-Sun650m ; Sperry-Sun ., ' ' '675m -Acid test . - .700m .Sperry-Sun750m : Sperry-Sun :775m Âcidtest ! i800m : Sperry-Sun850m ^perry-Sun875m 'Acid test :SOOm Sperry-Sun :950m ;Sperry-Sun l ;975m i Acid test : : . - i1000m : Sperry-Sun ' ' ' '

Soerrv-Sun a la fin du trou

i

i1

*LO '•San

i.i:

i!

1

l

i1

!

1

.

1

1

ii

:l!

i1

!

'

i

i

l

MS Readings MRB-96-03 si

From

0

99.0

99.8

101.2

110.0

111.0

11125

117.5

119.7

123.0

130.4

131.2

131.7

135.4

147.4

151.5

162.7

167.2

181.0

To

99.0

99.8

101.2

110.0

111.0

11125

117.5

119.7

123.0

128.3

1312

131.7

/135.4

147.4

151.5

162.7

167.2

181.0

EOH

Range

02 - 028

0.5-10.4

0.35 - 0.59

02 - 0.24

0.58-1.16

2.32-4.31

13.4-20.0

2.9 - 92

925-15.5

9.7-16.8

11.3-17.8

12-1.68

12.6-21.9

12.7-20.0

2.4-14.9

12.8-23.5

2.2-15.8

.2 - 0.27

Average

025

5.0

0.4

0.22

0.8

3.0

17.0

8.0

14.0

13

17

1.5

19.0

17.5

12.5

18.5

10.0

0.25

Comments

siltstone

kim. breccia

kim dykes 3.5

siltstone bx (200y6)

siltstone contact alt.

kms 4007o clasts

kms 400Xo clasts

kms more abundant clasts 70%

km1

kms clay?

km1

green dyke

km1 some dykes up to 30.1

km1

km1 50"X. clasts?

km1

km1 6007o clasts

siltstone

APPENDIX C:

LAKEFIELD RESEARCH ANALYSIS REPORT


185 concession Street, Postal Bag 4300 Lakefield, Ontario. Canada KOL 2HO

LDVOTED Tel: (705) 652-2000 Fax: (705) 652-6365

WA Hubacheck Consultants Ltd. July 2,1996 Suite 1401,141 Adelaide Street W Toronto, Ontario CANADA M5H3L5

Attention: Dave Christie

Re: Lakefield Research Project No. 8900-981 (Apr3020.R96)

Dear Dave:

Lakefield Research has completed the caustic dissolution treatment of the seven samples identified as follows:

* 35120 94-106m* 35121 106-130m* 35122 130-155m* 35123 155-169.9m* 35124 63.4-85.2m* 35125 lll-134m* and 35126 139-167.2m

and the attrition milling treatment and indicator mineral identification from the following four samples:

* 35060 106-138m* 35061 138-169.9m . 35062 63.4-85.2m* 35063 lll-167.2m

No diamonds were recovered from either the caustic dissolution residues or the nonmagnetic fractions of the attrition milling residues. A suite of potential indicator minerals was selected from the attrition mill residues; pyrope garnet, chrome diopside, and orange garnet (possibly eclogitic almandine-pyrope) were identified. Few grains of chromite and ilmenite were selected from the 0.4Amp nonmagnetic fractions; this fraction typically contains the magnesian varieties of the oxide minerals (picrochromite, picroilmenite).

Twenty-five synthetic diamonds were recovered from both the attrition milling and caustic dissolution residues.

The summary data sheets are attached. ;

LAKEFIELD RESEARCH CHILE SA., Los Ebanistas 8585, Parque Industrial La Reina, Santiago, ChileFbno 56-2-273-0487 Facsimil 56-2-273-0250

Hubachedt 8900-9S1 LakefieU Research Mineralogy - Diamonds

Procedures

Attrition Milling

The four samples were crushed to pass a nominal 5mm and were submitted for gentle attrition milling using the polyurethane cement mixers. The mixers were charged with a package of ceramic balls (3/4", l", and l 1/2" diameter in equal proportions). A high solids percentage was maintained to minimize impact of the ceramic charge. The attrition milling was allowed to continue for a period of four to eight hours after which the mill was emptied onto the 20 mesh Kason 24 inch diameter vibratory screens. The milling and screening operation was carried out in short stages to optimize fines removal and to minimize overall milling residence time. Milling durations of fourteen to forty-two hours were required.

The milling typically is continued until the development of a fines fraction was at a minimum (oversize fraction typically 5-10wt34 of original sample weight). The attrition milling residue was screened at 20 and 100 mesh, dried and weighed. The -20+100 mesh fraction was submitted for heavy liquid separation at SG 3.1 using a medium of acetone tuned methylene iodide.

The -20+100 mesh heavy liquid concentrate and the +20 mesh oversize fractions are submitted for microscopy to identify the presence of indicator minerals (pyrope, almandine-pyrope, chrome diopside, picroilmenite, picrochromite, olivine) and to select a representative suite of the indicator minerals. Microscopy is carried out on several magnetic, paramagnetic and nonmagnetic fractions of the HLS concentrate.

Diamonds may be observed in the nonmagnetic portion of the HLS concentrate; however, the diamonds may exhibit evidence of breakage during the milling procedure. In-house tests have indicated a shift in the frequency and size distribution of the contained diamonds as compared to parallel caustic dissolution tests.

Caustic Dissolution

The caustic dissolution treatment, directly uses diamond's property of high resistance to chemical attack. The procedure was developed, and refined to improve and streamline the process for routine diamond exploration samples, in response to the microdiamond losses attributed to standard attrition milling and also to reduce the weight of final concentrate.

The major advantage of the caustic dissolution process is the ability to recover, without breakage, all of the diamonds contained within the sample regardless of their particle size (+100 mesh), liberation size, quality or origin. The latter may account for actual diamond xenocrysts from the Tamberlitic' material, and l or quality control stones added by Lakefield Research or by the client, and l or diamonds attributed to the exploratory core drilling equipment.

Diamond losses and modifications to the size distribution profile due to stone breakage are eliminated. A comparison of the efficiency of the caustic dissolution treatment and attrition milling flowsheets was undertaken using 'seeded1 kimberlite samples. The results clearly indicated breakage and losses of microdiamonds from the milled samples; the normalized stone frequency (SPFK) and octacarat weights (OCPFK) typically were reduced by a factor of two to ten times.

Hubadtedf g900-981 Lakefldd Research Mineralogy - Diamonds

Anomalously high stone frequency data indicating breakage was reported; corresponding stone weights and microdiamond grades were invariably low.

Routine quality control tests are utilized to evaluate the efficiency of the caustic dissolution technique. As such, the samples are blind spiked, prior to the fusion step, with green diamonds typically measuring from 10 to 80 mesh; these stones have been neutron irradiated to produce the distinctive coloration.

Lakefield Research is not responsible for determination of the origin, quality or valuation of any diamonds recovered.

Flowsheet l outlines the typical program for microdiamond recovery from exploration samples. The caustic dissolution followed by water and acid leaching, and magnetic separations will produce several fractions commonly containing relict indicator minerals and a non-magnetic fraction possibly containing microdiamonds.

The Lakefield Research facility has sixteen pottery kilns which can treat up to 8 kg each (using uncrushed drill core) and are mn in a 24 hour cycle. The use of smaller sample charges may be dictated by the abundance of carbonate minerals. Prior to the dissolution stage, a cursory mineralogical examination, by XRD and l or acid leach test (note effervescence), is carried out to identify any potentially deleterious phases. The carbonates, in particular, may exhibit a vigorous reaction to the hot caustic soda. Therefore, 1) the sample charge must be reduced to accommodate the relative volume increase or 2) the sample may be subjected to an acid digestion step. The former is recommended as the latter requires a similar time frame and additional material handling (leaching, filtering, rinsing, drying, weighing, etc.) which could contribute to potential losses of microdiamonds.

At the appropriate sodium hydroxide to sample ratio and optimum temperatures, the reaction is allowed to continue overnight As depicted in the flowsheet, the process consists of dissolving the entire sample in a molten sodium hydroxide bath and typically recovering the H-100 mesh residue.

An important feature of the recovery system is the pouring of the melt through a large diameter, stainless steel screen to collect the residue. The screening procedure significantly reduces the material handling and simplifies the subsequent leaching process. The screen and pot are leached sequentially with water and then acid to dissolve the residual sodium hydroxide. Collection of the final dissolution residue from the leaching tub is also made on a stainless steel screen. Of note, all screens are dedicated to only the diamond programs; each of the screens is examined thoroughly before and after usage. Any flaws require immediate replacement of the screen.

The spent caustic is allowed to cool for 24 hours, is removed from the recovery vessel and drummed for recycling for outside industrial applications.

After drying, the dissolution residue is split into three magnetic and non-magnetic fractions using the permanent magnet followed by the Frantz Isodynamic Separator. Extreme care is required as the non-magnetic, diamondiferous, portion of the residue commonly amounts to no more than a few milligrams. The concentrate products are then submitted for microscopy.

Hubaduck 8900-981 Lakefield Research Mineralogy - Diamonds

Very few minerals survive the harsh attack; therefore weight reductions commonly exceed 999*6 of the initial sample weight The high weight loss with optimum stone recovery is another major advantage of the caustic dissolution technique.

Only highly resistant minerals such as diamond, graphite, moissanite, zircon, chromite, kyanite, etc. survive the caustic attack. Of note, partially dissolved indicator minerals including colorless to opaque spinel, garnet, and ilmenite, as rounded relicts of original coarse grains, may occur in the dissolution residue.

The selected diamonds are measured using the petrographic microscope and the data are transferred to octacarat weights using an in-house software package. Diamonds may be weighed individually or in groups using the Sartorius balance to O.xxx mg. Graphic representation of the diamond size and frequence distribution may be provided upon request.

HubachfckS900-9Sl Lakefidd Research Mineralogy - Diamonds

Resnhs

Attrition Moling

The sample weights for the attrition milling testwork are summarized as follows:* 35060 106-138m 13.1kg* 35061 138-169.9m 15.3kg* 35062 63.4-8S.2m 9.2kg* 35063 lll-167.2m 26.4kg

The attrition milling and heavy liquid product weights are summarized below:* 35060 ' 1 06-138m +20 Mesh 480g

-20+100 Mesh Float 617g-20+100 Mesh Sink 16.5g

* 35061 138-169.9m +20Mesh 246g-20+100 Mesh Float 866g-20+100 Mesh Sink 52.0g

* 35062 63.4-85.2m +20Mesh 435g-20+100 Mesh Float 487g-20+100 Mesh Sink 0.4g

* 35063 lll-167.2m +20Mesh 685g-20+100 Mesh Float 1589g-20+100 Mesh Sink 0.6g

A suite of potential indicator minerals was selected from the attrition mill residues; pyrope garnet, chrome diopside, and orange garnet (possibly eclogitic almandine-pyrope) were identified. Few grains of chromite and ilmenite were selected from the 0.4Amp nonmagnetic fractions; this fraction typically contains the magnesian varieties of the oxide minerals (picrochromite, picroilmenite).

The indicator minerals recovered from the attrition milling residues are tabulated below.

Py Alm-Py(?) CrCpx CrChr/CrDm

* 35060 20 50 23 12* 35061 20 47 35 2* 35062 14 44 13 O* 35063 856 O

The concentrates contained abundant pyrite, exotic rock fragments (typically metasedimentary lithologies) and ferromagnetic to strongly paramagnetic oxide minerals.

The indicator minerals are in storage and may be mounted for electron microprobe analysis at your convenience.

Hubaduck 8900-981 Lakefteld Research Mineralogy - Diamonds

Synthetic diamonds were recovered from two of the attrition mill concentrates as follows:* 35062 6 synthetic diamonds* 35063 IS synthetic diamonds

Caustic Dissolution

The sample weights for the caustic dissolution testwork are summarized as follows:* 35120* 35121* 35122* 35123* 35124* 35125. and 35126

94-106m106-130m130-1 55m155-169.9m63.4-85.2mlll-134m139-167.2m

30.3kg41.0kg48.2kg33.4kg44.4kg56.2kg60.1kg

No natural diamonds were recovered from either the caustic dissolution residues or the nonmagnetic fractions of the attrition milling residues.

Four synthetic diamonds were recovered.

The caustic dissolution data sheets are attached.

The invoice was forwarded under separate cover.

The selected indicator minerals, attrition mill products and caustic dissolution residues will be stored at Lakefield Research. Please advise when shipment is required

If there are any questions regarding the results, please do not hesitate to call me.

Best regards, LAKEFIELD RESEARCH

J.G. Davison, M.Sc. Senior Mineralogist PH# 705-652-2019

CAUSTIC DISSOLUTION

Primary Crush

Caustic Dissolution

H2O Leach

Caustic Disposal

Acid Leach

Screen

Magnetic Separation

Ferromagnetics

Microscopy Nonmagnetics

Microscopy Paramagnetics

7 A TTRITION MILL FLOWSHEET 7 "7

Primary Crush

H A ttrition Mill

Screen 20mesh

Screen 60/IOOmesh

Fines

Heavy Media Separation

Floats

Magnetic Separation

Ferromagnetics

Microscopy Nonmagnetics

Microscopy Paramagnetics

LAKEFIELD RESEARCH LIMITEDP.O. Box 4300, 185 Concession St., Lakefield, Ontario, KOL 2HOPhone : 705-652-2038 - FAX : 705-652-6441

Hubacheck W. A. Consultants 141 Adelaide St. W. Suite 1401 Toronto, Ontario, M5H 3L5

Attn : Dave Christie Fax : 416364-5384

Lakefield, July 9, 1996

Date Ree. LR. Ref. Reference Proj ect

: April 30, 1996 : APR3020.R96 : LR9601797 : 8900-981

SUMMARY INFORMATION

No. Sample ID Sample wt Indicator leg Minerals

1 35060/106-13801 13.12 35061/138-169.9m 15.33 35062/63.4-85.2m 9.24 35063/111-167.2m 26.4

1051047919

Greg Davison

LAKEFIELD RESEARCH LIMITEDP.O. Box 4300. 185 Concession St.. Lakefield, Ontario. KOL 2HOPhone : 705-652-2038 - FAX : 705-652-6441

Hubacheck W. A. Consultants 141 Adelaide St. W. Suite 1401 Toronto, Ontario, M5H 3L5

Attn : Dave Christie Fax : 416364-5384

Lakefield, July 9, 1996

Date Ree. LR. Ref. Reference Project

April 30, 1996 APR3020.R96 LR9601797 8900-981

SUMMARY INFORMATION

No.

56189

1011

Sample ID

35120/94-loem3512lXl06-130m35122/130-15511135123/155-169. 9m35124/63. 4-85. 2m35125/111-13411135126/139-167. 2m

Wtkg

30.341.048.233.444.456.260.1

# Fours

68968

1112

^Diamonds

0000000

Greg Davison

LAKEFIELD RESEARCH LTD.P.O. Bag 4300,185 Concession Street, LakefieW, Ontario, KOL 2HO Phone: 705-652-2000 FAX: 705-652-6365

DIAMOND RECOVERY BY CAUSTIC DISSOLUTION

Project: 8900-981 Sample*: 35120 Batch # : Apr3020 Client: W.A. Hubacheck- 94-106m Weight: 30.3

Stone Dimension, mmX Tf Z

Weight(octacarats)

Stone Descriptioncolour Clarity Morphology

Caustic Residue:

Mesh+ 20

-20+ 100

-20 + 100

FractionOversize

Magnetic

Non-Magnetic

DescriptionRock fragments.

Oxides, with minor silicates.

Silicates (clear, white, brown).

Total Weight (octacarats):

Number of Diamonds:

CPHT (Total sample Grade):

SPFK(* 100 mesh):

OCPFK(-HOOmesh):

O

O

O

O

O

Number of Syndites:

Authorizing Signature

Notes: 1 carat s 10 octacarats.Lakefield Research is not responsible for the determination of the origin, quality or valuation of any diamonds recovered.

Page 1 Thursday, June 06,1996

LAKEFIELD RESEARCH LTD.P.O. Bag 4300,185 Concession Street, LakefieU, Ontario, KOL 2HO Phone: 705-652-2000 FAX: 705-652-6365


Project; 8900-981 Sample # : 35121 Batch # : Apr3020 Client: W.A. Hubacheck- 106-1 30m Weight: 41.0

Stone Dimension, mmX Y Z

Weight(octacarats)

Stone DescriptionColour Clarity Morphology

Caustic Residue:

Mesh+ 20

-20+ 100

-20+ 100

FractionOversize

Magnetic

Non-Magnetic

DescriptionRock fragments, with minor oxides.

Oxides, with trace rock fragments.

Silicates (clear, white, brown), with trace oxides and moissanite.


Number of Diamonds:


SPFM+ 100 mesh):

OCPFK(* 100 mesh):

O

O

O

O

O

Number of Syndites:

-Authorizing Signature

8Notes: 1 carat s 10 octacarats.

Lakefield Research is not responsible for the determination of the origin, quality or valuation of any diamonds recovered.

Pagel Thursday, June 06,1996

LAKEFIELD RESEARCH LTD.P.O. Bag 4300.185 Concession Street, Lakefield. Ontario, KOL 2HO Phone: 705-652-2000 FAX: 705-652-6365


Project: 8900-981 Sample # : 35122 Batch #: Apr3020 Client: W.A. Hubacheck- 130-1 55m Weight: 48.2


Weight(octacarats)


Caustic Residue;

Mesh+ 20

-20 + 100

-20+ 100

FractionOversize

Magnetic

Non-Magnetic

DescriptionRock fragments and oxides.

Oxides, with trace rock fragments.

Silicates (clear, white, brown), with trace oxides.


Slumber of Diamonds:


3PFK(* 100 mesh):

OCPFK(-MOO mesh):

O

O

O

O

O

Number of Syndites:


s -Notes: 1 carat z 10 octacarats.


3age1 Thursday, June 06,1996

LAKEFIELD RESEARCH LTD.P.O. Bag 4300,185 Concession Street, LakefiekJ, Ontario, KOL 2HO Phone: 705-652-2000 FAX: 705-652-6365


Project: 8900-981 Sample*: 35123 Batch*: Apr3020 Client: W.A. Hubacheck- 155-169.9m Weight: 33.4

stone Dimension, mmX Y Z

Weight(octacarats)


Caustic Residue:

l Mesh+ 20

-20+ 100

- 20 * 1 00

FractionOversize

Magnetic

Non-Magnetic

DescriptionRock fragments and oxides.

Oxides, with minor rock fragments.

Silicates (clear, white, brown), with minor oxides.


dumber of Diamonds:


3PFK(* 100 mesh):

"DCPFK(* 100 mesh):

O

O

O

O

O

Number of Syndites:


8Jslotes: 1 carat s 10 octacarats.


}age1 Thursday, June 06,1996

LAKEFIELD RESEARCH LTD.P.O. Bag 4300,185 Concession Street, Lakefield, Ontario, KOL 2HO Phone: 705-652-2000 FAX: 705-652-6365


Project: 8900-981 Sample*: 35124 Batch # : Apr3020 Client : W.A. Hubacheck - 63.4-85.2m Weight : 44.4


Weight(octacarats)

Stone DescriptionColour Clarity Morpnoiogy

Caustic Residue:

MeshH- 20

-20 + 100

-20 + 100

FractionOversize

Magnetic

Non-Magnetic

DescriptionRcok fragments, with trace oxides.

Rock fragments, with minor oxides.

Silicates (clear, white, brown), with trace rock fragments and oxides.


Number of Diamonds:


SPFK (* 100 mesh):

OCPFK(* 100 mesh):

O

O

O

O

O

Number of Syndites:


8Notes: 1 carat s 10 octacarats.



LAKEFIELD RESEARCH LTD.P.O. Bag 4300.185 Concession Street, Lakefield, Ontario, KOL 2HO Phone: 705-652-2000 FAX: 705-652-6365


Project: 8900-981 Sample*: 35125 Batch # : Apr3020 Client: W.A. Hubacheck- 111-134m Weight: 56.2


Weight(octacarats)


Caustic Residue:

Mesh+ 20

-20 + 100

-20 + 100

FractionOversize

Magnetic

Non-Magnetic

DescriptionRocK fragments, with trace oxides and garnets.

Rock fragments, with minor oxides.

Silicates (clear, white, brown), minor rock fragments, with trace sulphides.


Number of Diamonds:


SPFK(* 100 mesh):

OCPFK(* 100 mesh):

O

O

O

O

O

Number of Syndites:


s Notes: 1 carat s 10 octacarats.


Pagel Thursday, June 06,1996

LAKEFIELD RESEARCH LTD.P.O. Bag 4300,185 Concession Street, Lakefield. Ontario. KOL 2HO Phone: 705^52-2000 FAX: 705-652-6365


Project: 8900-981 Sample*: 35126 Batch*: Apr3020 Client: W.A. Hubacheck- 129-167.7m Weight: 60.1


Weight(octacarats)


Caustic Residue:

Mesh+ 20

-20 + 100

-20 + 100

FractionOversize

Magnetic

Non-Magnetic

DescriptionRock fragments, with trace oxides.

Oxides and rock fragments.

Silicates (clear, white, brown), with minor oxides.


Number of Diamonds:


SPFK(* 100 mesh):

OCPFK(* 100 mesh):

O

O

O

O

O

Number of Syndttes:


s Notes: 1 carat s 10 octacarats.



SS&****** Declaration of Assessment Work and Mines Performed on Mining Land

Mining Act, Subsection 68(2) ami 66(3), R.S.O. 1000

Transaction Number (office use)

41Imaging

Ity of subsections 65(2) and 66(3) of the Mining Ad. Under aectlon 8 of the l to review the assessment work and correspond with the mining land holder. Ing Recorder, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 6th Floor,

31M12SW2004 2.18296 LUNDY 900Instructions: - For work performed on Crown Lands before recording a claim, use form 0240.

- Please type or print in ink.

1. Recorded holder(s) (Attach a list if necessary)2. l 8296

Name *SudLbu.*-v)

Client Numbericy O /

Telephone Numbercc -u-4-. Ma..

Name Client Number

Address Telephone Number

Fax Number

2. Type of work performed: Check ( ^ ) and report on only ONE of the following groups for this declaration.

D Geotechnical: prospecting, surveys, assays and work under section 18 (regs)

Physical: drilling, stripping, trenching and associated assays Rehabilitation

Work Type

rvA

Office Use

Commodity

Total S Value of Work Claimed

Oates Work PfjrtorffttQ

. From T0 NTS ReferenceGlobal Positioning System Data (If available) TownahiptttsK

Mining DivisionM or Q-Plan umber Resident Geologist

District

Please remember to: - obtain a work permit from the Ministry of Natural Resources as required;- provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;- complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212;- provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked for assigning work;- include two copies of your technical report.

3. Person or companies who prepared the technical report (Attach a list if necessary)Telephone Number

10. A MdLAddress Fax

*Name Telephone Number

Address Fax Number

Name

Addrasa

Telephone Number

Fax Number

4. Certification by Recorded Holder or Agent

MAR 2^ 1998GEOSCIENCASSESSMENT

OK ^^ , do hereby certify that l have personal of'(Print Nanw)

forth in this Declaration of Assessment Work having caused the work to be performed or witnessed the same during or after its completion and, to the best of my knowledge, the annexed report Is true.

Slgneturs of Recorded Holder or Agent S^C/ /~"X i ^ M ~ " T Date

AgenrsAddress [^./\, ^ 4o \LS -RAXI SJL'TE

UW-JiTi I^SH

Telephone Number Fax Number

~6. Work to be recorded and distributed. Wthe mining land where work was pdrtormetf.WmiMtt GGomnanv thla form. - '' i.-'

fJerfomied.must accompany mi* rorm. ....'.1.4 * ^uum rw ^^. ri vWafa *\*.,At ^W

U/HlraO' C/Oflr ^Mining Claim Number. Or If work was done on other eligible mining land, show In this column the location number Indicated on the claim map.

*9

eg

g

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

TB 7827

1234567

1234568

lizos^^i

Number of Claim Units. For other mining land, list hectares.

16 ha

12

2

llo ""Vfd

Column Totals

I.. '-'1 i j,"*? f**" *Value of work ywi i vMia^nf vii uitBf

dalm or,othef mining land.

126,826

0

S 8, 892

••sff^^q

13 7^9

Value of work applied to this claim.

2 .N/A

S24,000

S 4,000

0

n

Value of work assigned to other mining claims.

1 8 2 'S24.000

0

0

D

-

. . .

^9

Bank. Value of work to be distributed at ajuture date.

) frS2.825

0

14,892

" 39 7^*?y '

397/^7l, t do hereby certify that the above work credits are eligible under

(Print FuN Name)subsection 7 (1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96 for assignment to contiguous claims or for application to

the claim where the work was done.Signature Holdacw Agent Authorized in Writing Date

6. Instructions for cutting back credits that are not approved.

Some of the credits claimed in this declaration may be cut back. Please check (** ) in the boxes below to show how

you wish to prioritize the deletion of credits:

53 1. Credits are to be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option 2 or 3 or 4 as indicated.

D 2. Credits are to be cut back starting with the claims listed last, working backwards; or

D 3. Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims listed in this declaration; or

D 4. Credits are to be cut back as prioritized on the attached appendix or as follows (describe):

Note: If you have not indicated how your credits are to be deleted, credits will be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option number 2 if necessary. ;

For Office Use OnlyReceived Stamp

0241 (02/MI

RECEIVED

MAR 2 4 1993 ftTW

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT

Deemed Approved Date

Date Approved

Approved for Recording by

Date Notification Sent

Total Value el Credit Approved

Mining Recorder (Signature)

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Development nd Mine*

Mlnlstere du Developpement du Nord t dee mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit

Irtat des coOts sux fins du credit devaluation

Mining Act/Lol sur les mines

Transaction NO./N* de transaction

. 00/31

2. l 8296Personal information collected on this form la obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining dalm(s). Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 4th Floor, 1S9 Cedar Street, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7204.

Las renseignements personnels contenus dans la presents formule sont recueilHs en vertu de la U) sur les mines et sen/front a tenlr a Jour un registre des concessions minleres. Adresser touts question sur la collece de cos renseignements au chef provincial des terrains mlnlers, ministers du Developpement du Nord et des Mines, 159. rue Cedar, 4* stage, Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 8A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.

1. Direct Costs/CoOts directs

TypeWages Salalrea

Contractor'1and Consultant'sFeesDroltade('entrepreneuret d* ('expert-coneell

Supplies UsedFoumltureeutlllaees

Equipment Rental Location de mattriel

Description

Labour Main-d'oeuvreField Supervision Supervision sur le terrain

Type

Type

Amount Montant

Total Direct Costs Total des coOts directs

Totals Total global

2. Indirect Costs/CoQts Indlrects* * Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not

allowable aa assessmeni work. Pour le remboursement des travaux de rehabilitation, lea coOta Indlrects ne sont pas admissible* en tanl que iravaux devaluation.

Type

Transportation Transport

Food and Lodging Nourriture et h4bergementMobilization and Demobilization Mobilisation etDemobilisation

Description

Type

^Trv^k

i^AOtOJ'VA^bi It

T^u^l

Amount Montan!

1 1 te.ar

TC& -90

3tfD.3tl

4&.20

Sub Total of Indirect Costs Total partial des coOts Indlrects

Amount AHowable (not greater than 20H of Direct Costs) Montant admissible (n'exc4dant pae 20 H dee coOta directs)Total Value of Assessment Credit Valeur totale du credit (Total of Direct and Allowable devaluationIndirect eactal flottl dM eaOtt dined

Totals Total global

3W**-Jty

4&.JO

^

:2fe//.^

\Mo4.y\ttf&.tZ

*t Indirect* (dmlulbla*

Note: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.

Note : Le titulaire enregistr* sera tenu de verifier les defenses demandees dans le present etat des coOts dans les 30 jours suivant une demande a cet effet. SI la verification n'esl pas effectuee, le ministre peut rejeter tout ou une partie des travaux devaluation pr6sent6s.

Filing Discounts Remises pour dtfpdt

1. Work filed within two years of completion Is claimed at 10OTfe of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.

1. Les travaux d6po*6s dans les deux ana suivant leur achievement sont . rembourses a 100 M de la valeur totale susmentlonn*e du credit devaluation.

2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at 504* of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:

Total Value of Assessment Credit Total Assessment Claimed

ft*- - S 8

2. Les travaux deposes trols, quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achievement sont rembourses a 50 W de la valeur totale du credit devaluation susmentlonne. Volr les calculs d-dessous.

Valeur totale du credit devaluationx 0,50 -

Evaluation totale demand**

Certification Verifying Statement of Costs

l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were Incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.

that as(Racord*4Jloldar. Agent, Position In Company)

to make this certlficatlc i P3 FO E l V (E D!

Attestation de I'ttat des coOts

J'atteste par la presents :quo les montants Indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces defenses ont M engagers pour effectuer les travaux devaluation Sur les terrains Indiquls dans la formule de rapport de travail ci-joint.

l am authorized Et qu'a litre de je suis autorlse(Mulalre enraglstrt. repr4tantanl. pout occup* din* la compagnla)

a falre cette attestation.

P

0212 (04*1)

MAR 2 4 19S8

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT t, lorsJju'Dans cane formula, loraJju'll designs des personnas, la masculln ast utlllsa au sans neuira

W*** m ' M inistry of'OntariO Northern Oevetopmentxxi i*.w*i INX and M|n9g

Declaration of Assessment Work Performed on Mining LandMining Act, Subeectlon M(2} and 66(9)', R.8.0.1MO

Numbtr (offlot UM)

^flftO .001^2.amem FUes ResearchAssesamem Imaging

Personal information collected on this form Is obtained under the authority of subsections 65(2) and 66(3) of the Mining Act. Under section a of the Mining Act. the information is a public record. This Information will be used to review the assessment work and correspond with the mining land holder. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Chief Mining Recorder, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 6th Floor, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 6BS.

Instructions: - For work performed on Crown Lands before recording a claim, use form 0240. - Please type or print in ink.

1. Recorded holder(s) (Attach a list if necessary)Name

2. l 8296Client Number

BvM

Telephone Number

Fax Number

l C 'i-^n. HName

Address

Client Number

Telephone Number

Fax Number

2. Type of work performed: Check ( s ) and report on only ONE of the following groups for this declaration.

D Geotechnical: prospecting, surveys, r r Physical: drilling, stripping, f i Rehabilitation assays and work under section 18 (regs) LO trenching and associated assays L-1

Work Type t* r ill Core. *3*cxv

X^rtU C^cnre. .^Q.*wp\C. r

Dates Work e , . Performed From 0^- , O*f , \*ft

Day l Month | YMTGlobal Positioning System Data (if available)

wS^

fc To ps"i OH i n^g?Day 1 Monm | Ytw

Township/Area

^U.K\f?vC\M or G-Plan Nujpber

Office Use

Commodity

Total S Value of Work Claimed 2,1 , ^jCf*

NTS Reference

Mining Division J[ i P 1

Resident Geologist A

Please remember to: - obtain a work permit from the Ministry of Natural Resources as required;- provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;- complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212;- provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked for assigning work;- include two copies of your technical report.

3. Person or companies who prepared the technical report (Attach a list if necessary)

N^^lCI^rJ^(^^^V-^ MJ.Address __ l /*\ i ' ^^D^ ~ 3L3& t^L-sJ o\ . 1 erCCnr^-C fVuvray) o rv^H 3-VlName 7 ' ' '

Address

Name

Address U\

4. Certification by Recorded Holder or Age

HECETVtL^ MAR 2 ^ 1998

Telephone Number iJjl ^io*-/ * SS^^-N"

Fax Number ^^.

Telephone Number

Fax Number

Te ephone Number

Fax Number

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICF

ill

*T") . j ~~r~ \ * i1, KccVJ kW/wvx ~^' ICwriiX^^.S ,, , do he^by certify that 1 have personal knowledge of the facts Set

(Print Name)

forth in this Declaration of Assessment Work having caused the work to be performed or witnessed the same during or after its completion and, to the best of my knowledge, the annexed report is true.

Signature of Recorded Holder or Agent

fc Work to be recorded and distributed. Work canonlv b. assigned to dalm* that are cpntifluou. (adjoining) the mining land where work was performed, at tfie'time worf! was performed. A map ahcwfoglne ooottguou* link must accompany this form. . .,-f--. i-t-t-* ';.-.* !-v . ,- . .^ . r- "-^ *" \

t .

Mining Claim Number. Or If work waa done on other eligible mining land, *how In thle column the location number Indicated on the claim map.

eg

eg

eg

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

g10

11

12

13

14

15

TB7827

1234567

1234568

l Ô 23-ZL l

Number of Claim Unit*. For other mining land, IM hectare*.

16 ha

12

2

/fo unrrS

Column Totals

WHftftft 00Value of wont performed on thte claim or. other mining land. ,.., ,

S26, 825

- , ;-r^ o-î.

S 8, 892

^.k925.

1 "^ - i.- le

.i 'V""1 ' 4

: .' ': i '0.n -' -.

t - .'

31. 3^7-VCôlOl^S . do hereb

^ ) (Print Fun Nairn) ' .

Value of work applied to tMadalm.

2 .N/A

*24,000 '

S 4,000

O

ftt

0

Value of work aaalgned to other mlnlngclalrju. . ~**

1 Q S, :9- V l.' ' '.'.. 'HI-

124,000

i-.*i-.-..*;: Q" :

0

' •--•fi ' *" '

. .. .-

..v, m^~

v in'V-a?r-n' . :!.'""'"'." x

-1

(9

Hfj \Bank. Value of w\ to be dlatrlbuted V M future date. \

o \S2,825 ^

0

S4.892

lo'cP/ i5?P9-'

t

fi* V i - , . - ' -

i*;': r. - /r-, r

^2Z. SP?.J— — —

y certify that the above work credits are eligible under

tf^' s

subsection 7 (1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96 for assignment to contiguous clalrrts or for application to

the claim where the work was done.Signature of Recorded Holder or Agent Authorized In Oat*

6. Instructions for cutting back credits that are not approved.

Some of the credits claimed in this declaration may be cut back. Please check (** ) In the boxes below to show how

you wish to prioritize the deletion of credits:

0 1. Credits are to be cut back from th'e Bank first, followed by option 2 or 3 o'rTas Indicated.

D 2. Credits are to be cut back starting with the claims listed last, working backwards; or

D 3. Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims listed in this declaration; or

D 4. Credits are to be cut back as prioritized on the attached appendix or as follows (describe):

Note: If you have not indicated followed by option number

ASSESSMENT! - -leted, credits will be cut back from the Bank first,

For Office Use OnlyRictlvtd Stamp

MlfOtM)

Dearmd Approved Daw

Dan Approved

Data Notification sent

Total Value of Credit Approvea

Approved for Recording by Mining Recorder (Slg iatajreT

rtario Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit

iMl

Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of subsection 6(1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96. Under action 8 of the Mining Act, the information is a public record. This Information will be used to review the assessment work and correspond with the mining land holder. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Chief Mining Recorder. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. 6th Floor, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 686.

Work Type

1VM\ G-eoUms4-v^ * * O

1 @ r- y\ *\ l C. \ OjT\

âi^pi^T^CC^ê.two* ( L~~~-s

Units of WorkDepending on the type of work, list the number of hours/days worked, metres of drilling, kilo metre* of grid line, number of samples, etc.

a\Cj?kr\(k l^têCMrcO*r

Associated Costs (e.g. supplies, mobilization and demobilization).

Transportation Costs

Food and Lodging Costs

^FCEIVED

AV * l tr-7*-

Cost Per Unit of work

Tola Value of Assessment WorkMAR 2 i\ 1998 If ^[bO-^

Calculations of Filing Discount ^SCIENCE ASSESSMENT

T tr* Vrf

Total Cost

c? if. CO

3?A.cm

^21,33(1. ro

* ^/,3^7 C O

1. Work filed within two years of performance is claimed at 100*^ of the above Total Value of Assessment Work.2. If work is filed after two years and up to five years after performance, it can only be claimed at SO0/*) of the Total

Value of Assessment Work. If this situation applies to your claims, use the calculation below:

TOTAL VALUE OF ASSESSMENT WORK x 0.50 Total S value of worked claimed.

Note:- Work older than S years is not eligible for credit.- A recorded holder may be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 45 days of a request fer verification and/or correction/clarification. If verification and/or correction/clarification is not made, the Minister may reject all or part of the assessment work submitted.

Certification verifying costs:

____ , do hereby certify, that the amounts shown are as accurate as may (pi**** prim full mm*)

reasonably be determined and the costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands indicated on

the accompanying Declaration of Work form as

to make this certification.(recorded hold*r,a9em, or *tcMJomp*ny position with slgtdng authority)

l am authorized

Ministry ofNorthern Development nd Mines

Minister* du Developpement du Nord et des Mines Ontario

June 12,1998

Raymond J. KnowlesSUDBURY CONTACT MINES LIMITEDc/o W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.807-365 BAY STREETTORONTO. ONTARIOM5H-2V1

Dear Sir or Madam:

Subject: Transaction Number(s):

Geoscience Assessment Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5

Telephone: (888) 415-9846 Fax: (70S) 670-5881

Visit our websKe at: www.gov.on.ca/MNDM/MINES/LANDS/mlsmnpge.htm

Submission Number: 2.18296

StatusW9880.00191 Approval W9880.00192 Approval

We have reviewed your Assessment Work submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached summary page(s) indicate the results of the review. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ THIS SUMMARY FOR THE DETAILS PERTAINING TO YOUR ASSESSMENT WORK.

If the status for a transaction is a 45 Day Notice, the summary will outline the reasons for the notice, and any steps you can take to remedy deficiencies. The 90-day deemed approval provision, subsection 6(7) of the Assessment Work Regulation, will no longer be in effect for assessment work which has received a 45 Day Notice. Allowable changes to your credit distribution can be made by contacting the Geoscience Assessment Office within this 45 Day period, otherwise assessment credit will be cut back and distributed as outlined in Section #6 of the Declaration of Assessment work form.

Please note any revisions must be submitted in DUPLICATE to the Geoscience Assessment Office, by the response date on the summary.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Steve Beneteau by e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at (705) 670-5855.

Yours sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BYBlair KiteSupervisor, Geoscience Assessment OfficeMining Lands Section

Correspondence ID: 12411

Copy for: Assessment Library

Work Report Assessment Results

Submission Number: 2 .18296

Date Correspondence Sent: June 12,1998 AssessonSteve Beneteau

Transaction Number

W9880.00191

Section:16 Drilling PDRILL

First Claim Number

1202721

Township(s) l Area(s)

LUNDY

Status

Approval

Approval Date

June 11,1998

Transaction Number

W9880.00192

Section:17 Assays ASSAY

First Claim Number

1202721

Township(s) l Area(s)

LUNDY

Status

Approval

Approval Date

June 11,1998

Correspondence to:Resident Geologist Kirkland Lake, ON

Assessment Files Library Sudbury, ON

Recorded Holder(s) and/or Agent(s):Raymond J. KnowlesSUDBURY CONTACT MINES LIMITEDTORONTO, ONTARIO

SUDBURY CONTACT MINES LIMITED TORONTO, ONTARIO

Page: 1Correspondence ID: 12411

l j

;l

I2bl6946i s -'

i i

1212048- i

l- --, -. "''

120594^' . . . ,' ; li.- V- l * - u-\

7*700r-x i 767004' vko -^ y) /"! ] - - '' feo

F/'/f-^fifn /^

o! I4atui3l Ree t irces

ofNorthern ao^*

Ontariogeology rcfcrence-CQBALT

RESIDENT GEO.

LAK0 DISPOSITI

PUN

3-3439TOWNSHIP

TEMAGAMI

LUNDYLARDER LAKE LAM Ttrus/*. BOTHY m WM

TIMISr

Sc*to1:20MM

1000

1000 MTJ 300) MCt If*"

Contour Interval 10 Mvtrwft

SYMBOLSBoundary

Towr'hip, Meridian, F acline ....

Poad allowance; surveyed........

shore 1 ,)*.

Lot/Concession; surveyed. . .

unsurveyftd

Parcel; surveyed . . . . . . . . . , .

Right- of- WF y; rattfrailway

utility.

Reservation . . . . . . . . . . . .

Cliff, Pi', Pile . . . . . . . .

Contour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Interpc lated . . . . .

/^proximate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . .

Depression. . .

Contn point (he izontai^

Food j land . . . .

Mine iaad fram * . . . . . . . .

Pipe rie (above grrund) .

Ra way; dingle trac*.

double track

i-,' antic.. -w. . .

Road; 'lighway, county, township

access . . . . . . . . . .

trail, bush

Shoreline (orienal). . . . . . . .

Transmission lint, . . . . . . . . . .

Wooded area . . . . . . . . . . .

WSPf SIYiGN OF CROWN LANDSPatent

bui race S Mining Rights

Surface Right;; Only

Mining Right? Only

Lease

Suridce '* Mining Rights , . .

Surfara Rights Only . . , . . . . .

Min'rtg Rights Only ..... .

Lie' neb of Occupation

Jrder-in Council.

Canci '!ad . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.r e

..V

..B

.Vf.

.0-

sand

NOTICE OF FORESTRY ACTIVITYTHIS TOWNSHIP l AREA FALLS WITHIN THE .m

AND MAY BETHE MNR UNIT FORESTER FOR THIS AREA CAN BECONTACTED AT : P.O. BOX 38

LAKESHORE DRIVETEMAGAMI, ONT.POH 2HO705-569-3622

Map ba^o and land disposition draf ing Dy Surveys ind Mapping Branch, Ministry of Nature, hot 'jrr,es.

AHFAS W THDfl/'VN FRO ft 5 DISPx^ SITION

Mf, C - Mining Right* Only

SHO Surtac* Rights Only

M * S - MJntr-j PTX! Si 1 -r^w Right

n*(S|) S IC. 36/80 W.2/83 25/ZA

SEC. 36/80 W.II/85

OhD-R NO.O-L-I8/9G NER OPENS W-l 1/85 NER

THIS TOWNSHIP FALLS WITHIN THE TEMAGAMI COMPREHENSIVE PLANING AREA. SPECIAL WORKING CONDITIONS MAY APPLY TO EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES. FOR MORE DETAILS PLEASE CONTACT:

DISTRICT MANAGER. NORTH BAY DISTRICT MINISTRY, NATURAL RESOURCES

THE INFORMATION THAT APPEARS ON THIS MAP HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES. AND ACCURACY IS NOT GUARANTEED THOSE WISHING TO STAKE MIN ING CLAIMS SHOULD CON SULT WITH THE MINING RECORDER, MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOP MENT AND MINES, FOR AH- DITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON.

CIRCULATED APRIL 19/88 ARCHIVED APRIL 3, 1993

ARCHIVED APRIL 18, 1997

The disposition of land, location of !o', fab-' -,id parcel bounds i,*,, this index was compi't * .; administrative p, irposea only

(D

r ci

:^

M

j CO

sudbury contact mines ltd. by

Documents