submission cover sheet · nsw (509.6). (see page b-7 of the november 2009 submission) 6. my...

L E G I S L A T I V E A S S E M B L Y F O R T H E A U S T R A L I A N C A P I T A L T E R R I T O R Y

STANDING COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION, EMPLOYMENT AND YOUTH AFFAIRSMr Michael Pettersson MLA (Chair), Mrs Elizabeth Kikkert MLA (Deputy Chair)Mr Chris Steel MLA, Mr Andrew Wall MLA

Submission Cover Sheet

Inquiry into Standardised Testing in ACT Schools

Submission Number: 9

Date Authorised for Publication: 4 September 2018

1

Submission to the Standing Committee on Education, Employment and Youth Affairs

invites submissions to its Inquiry into Standardised Testing in ACT Schools

by Dr Mark Drummond, August 2018

Abstract

Comparative analyses based on the best available data indicates that over the history of

NAPLAN's operation from 2008, the ACT performed best in NAPLAN, relative to other

parts of Australia, from about 2010 till about 2014. Throughout the years from 2008 onward,

the ACT has performed best in the Reading component of NAPLAN, followed by

Punctuation and Grammar, then Numeracy, Writing and Spelling, or something very close to

this. Of the eight States and Territories, NSW has almost certainly been the strongest

performer in NAPLAN overall throughout NAPLAN's history, though there is abundant

evidence that Victoria has performed close to NSW levels. All school systems can benefit by

examining the strengths of other systems, but it appears as though ACT can especially benefit

from the approaches to teaching and learning that seem to be working so well in the NSW

school system. The NAPLAN performances of Victoria, Tasmania and other parts of

Australia indicate that a best possible Australian school system, with potentially immense

benefits for the ACT and beyond, and for precious children above all, is there for the taking if

stakeholders are willing to take matters seriously enough.

Introduction

1. This submission principally addresses the national comparison part of item 2(a) of the

terms of reference – namely: "The level of achievement of ACT schools compared to similar

counterparts nationally". The submission is based largely on the NAPLAN results data and

comparative analyses presented in the four Appendices A to D at the end of this submission,

beginning on page 9 below, and I'm happy for the Standing Committee on Education,

Employment and Youth Affairs to use my data any sound way it wishes to, and I'm also

happy to pass on the Microsoft Excel spreadsheets used to compile the data tabulations

shown in the appendices here.

2. I applaud the Committee on its broad terms of reference, with item 4 on "Any other

relevant matter" obviously being especially welcoming and empowering to people hoping to

make submissions to this inquiry, so really well done on that, and thank you!

3. With more time I'd have liked to have been able to make another submission here akin

to one I wrote in November 2009 for an Assembly Committee's Inquiry into the Educational

Achievement Gap in the ACT, as at

https://www.parliament.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/372704/09_Drummond.pdf,

2

but for this current Inquiry I'm able to provide an update on some State and Territory

NAPLAN performance comparisons I began in 2009 based on the NAPLAN results for

NAPLAN's first year of operation, in 2008.

4. My November 2009 submission referred to above noted that for 2008 NAPLAN

results:

Of the 20 sets of NAPLAN results generated across the four years and five

components tested, the ACT achieved the highest mean average scores, and hence a

ranking of 1, in 9 of these 20 components, compared to 4 for NSW and 7 for VIC, as

shown in the table below which compares just the ACT, NSW and VIC. (see page B-8

of the November 2009 submission)

5. My November 2009 submission also noted that when comparisons were made of

metropolitan areas only, the ACT achieved the highest mean average scores, and hence a

ranking of 1, in 5 of the 20 NAPLAN components, compared to 8 for NSW and 7 for VIC

(see table on page B-9), and it stated that:

... the 2008 NAPLAN results of VIC metro and NSW metro were superior to those of

the ACT overall, and hence provides extremely strong evidence, again, that (1) the

ACT's average overall 2008 NAPLAN results would have been well below the

corresponding results for the parts of Sydney and Melbourne with socioeconomic

status matching that of the ACT, and (2) the NSW and VIC education systems are

probably superior to the ACT system overall. (see just below the table on page B-9 of

the November 2009 submission)

and

In four year average (4YA) terms [taking mean averages of results for Years 3, 5, 7

and 9], the overall ACT mean (512.0) was below that of VIC metro (516.2) and NSW

metro (515.0), very slightly below that of VIC (512.3), and slightly above that of

NSW (509.6). (see page B-7 of the November 2009 submission)

6. My submission here is based on comparative analyses I've carried out using mean

NAPLAN and participation rates scores reported in the ten annual NAPLAN reports for

NAPLAN's first decade of operation, for the years 2008 till 2017, for which complete

finalised data is now available online via https://www.nap.edu.au/results-and-reports. The

mean NAPLAN score comparative analyses reported herein are for: (1) the eight States and

Territories and Australia overall; (2) the four NAPLAN years of Years 3, 5, 7 and 9; (3) the

five NAPLAN components of Reading, Writing, Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation, and

Numeracy; and (4) three different student cohorts I have selected as most meaningful to

analyse. The three student cohorts I have analysed are:

(1) the full State and Territory student cohorts – providing data for comparisons

referred to herein as STU (State-Territory unit) level comparisons ... which have some

face value significance, but limited scientific value as they don't provide valid like-

3

with-like comparisons owing to the fact that the ACT's socio-economic status is

significantly higher than that of the six States and Northern Territory;

(2) cohorts of students living in the metropolitan areas or major cities, or closest

approach thereto, of the eight States and Territories, providing data for comparisons

referred to in this submission as STU Metro comparisons ... which again have some

face value significance, but still limited scientific value as they still don't provide

valid like-with-like comparisons owing to the ACT's socio-economic status being

much higher than not only all of the States and Northern Territory as wholes, but also

much higher than that of Sydney, Melbourne and all other Australian cities; and

(3) the cohorts of students with at least one parent who possesses a Bachelor degree or

higher qualification – providing data for comparisons referred to herein as STU

Degree Educated Parents comparisons, for years 2010 to 2017, after such data first

became available in 2010 ... a data set likely to provide a very sound – and probably

the best available – basis for scientifically valid like-with-like comparisons of the

performances of the eight States and Territories in NAPLAN.

7. The systems that have been used to subdivide and classify metropolitan areas, major

and minor cities, regional or provincial localities, and so on, within the eight States and

Territories, have varied throughout NAPLAN's 11 year history, such that Tasmania and the

Northern Territory have in some years not included any metropolitan area component or

major cities. So for Tasmania and the Northern Territory their most urban or populous

settlement categories have been used in the STU Metro comparisons in such years. In 2016

and 2017, for example, the "inner regional" and "outer regional" data have been the closest

approaches to major city or metropolitan area data available for TAS and NT respectively,

and as such have been used as the "STU Metro" data for TAS and NT in Appendix B below.

8. References to the ACT's performance in NAPLAN refer to the mean scores achieved

across the whole ACT school system relative to the corresponding mean scores of NSW,

Victoria, the other States, the Northern Territory, and Australia overall, as provided in the

annual national NAPLAN reports available online via https://www.nap.edu.au/results-and-

reports. No results described herein refer to any specific school or school sector. Mean

scores are for all schools, government and non-government alike. So my submission

compares the school systems just at whole of State and Territory levels, in line with the data

available via https://www.nap.edu.au/results-and-reports.

9. My submission now proceeds in a kind of Socratic dialogue format, with questions

followed by responses highlighting relevant evidence from the data presented in the

appendices provided at the end of this submission and referred to often below.

4

Some Important Questions and Attempts to Answer Them Based on the Annual

NAPLAN Data Evidence Compiled in the Appendices at the End of This Submission

Question 1: Whereas the ACT achieved the highest mean scores in seven of 20 NAPLAN

components in 2008 (20 being 5 x 4, for the five components of Reading, Writing, Spelling,

Grammar and Punctuation, and Numeracy, and for the four testing Years 3, 5, 7 and 9), based

on full STU level comparisons, as in paragraph 4 above (on page 2), how many highest mean

scores – or Number 1 rankings in other words – have the ACT and other STUs achieved over

all 10 years 2008 through to 2017, in comparisons based on STU level mean NAPLAN score

data?

Response to Question 1: As Table 1 (which is the same as Table AT1 in Appendix A on

page 36 below, and a summary of results shown in other tables in Appendix A) below shows,

for STU level comparisons the ACT has achieved between seven and 14 Number 1 ranks, out

of 20, in all of the first 10 years of NAPLAN's operation, with the highest number of Number

1 ranks being 14 – as achieved in 2011, 2013 and 2014, and the lowest number being the

seven achieved in 2017. Table 1 indicates that the ACT's best NAPLAN performances

occurred over the half decade period from 2010 to 2014.

Table 1: State and Territory NAPLAN Performance Summary – Numbers

of #1 Ranks Based on Comparisons Using STU Data

Year NSW VIC QLD WA SA TAS ACT NT

2008 4 7 0 0 0 0 9 0

2009 5 5 0 0 0 0 10 0

2010 5 3 0 0 0 0 12 0

2011 5 1 0 0 0 0 14 0

2012 4 4 0 0 0 0 12 0

2013 4 2 0 0 0 0 14 0

2014 3 3 0 1 0 0 14 0

2015 3 7 0 0 0 0 10 0

2016 3 8 0 0 0 0 9 0

2017 5 8 0 0 0 0 7 0

Total 41 48 0 1 0 0 111 0

Question 2: Whereas the ACT achieved the highest mean scores in five of 20 NAPLAN

components in 2008, based on STU Metro level comparisons, as in paragraph 5 above (on

page 2 again), how many highest mean scores, or Number 1 Rankings, have the ACT and

other STUs achieved over all 10 years 2008 through to 2017, in comparisons based on STU

Metro level mean NAPLAN score data?

Response to Question 2: As Table 2 (which is the same as Table BT1 in Appendix B on

page 64 below, and a summary of results shown in other tables in Appendix B) on the next

page shows, for STU Metro level comparisons the ACT has achieved between three and eight

5

Number 1 ranks, out of 20, in all of the first 10 years of NAPLAN's operation, with the

highest numbers of Number 1 ranks being 8 – as achieved in 2012, and the lowest number

being the three achieved in 2017. Table 2 again indicates that the ACT's best NAPLAN

performances occurred over the half decade period from 2010 to 2014. NSW and Victoria

have both slightly outdone the ACT in these comparisons, especially in the years of 2008,

2009 and 2015 to 2017.

Table 2: State and Territory NAPLAN Performance Summary – Numbers

of #1 Ranks Based on Comparisons Using STU Metro Data


2008 8 7 0 0 0 0 5 0

2009 8 7 0 0 0 0 5 0

2010 7 7 0 0 0 0 7 0

2011 9 4 0 0 0 0 7 0

2012 7 6 0 0 0 0 8 0

2013 7 6 0 0 0 0 7 0

2014 8 5 0 1 0 0 6 0

2015 7 8 0 0 0 0 5 0

2016 5 10 0 1 0 0 4 0

2017 9 8 0 0 0 0 3 0

Total 75 68 0 2 0 0 57 0

Question 3: How many highest mean scores, or Number 1 rankings, have the ACT and other

STUs achieved over the eight years 2010 through to 2017, in comparisons based on STU

Degree Educated Parent level mean NAPLAN score data?

Answer to Question 3: As Table 3 (which is the same as Table CT1 in Appendix C on page

92 below, and a summary of results shown in other tables in Appendix C) below shows, for

STU Degree Educated Parents level comparisons the ACT has achieved between zero and

three Number 1 ranks, out of 20, in all of the eight years 2010 to 2017 in which this data has

been available for comparison, with the highest numbers of Number 1 ranks being three – as

achieved in 2010 and 2011, and the lowest number being the zero achieved in 2017. The

outstanding feature of Table 3 is its extremely strong evidence that NSW has the best school

system in Australia – which raises two obvious questions: (1) have ACT school children and

the ACT community as a whole benefited or been harmed by its decision decades ago to

break away from the NSW school system, or would the ACT community have been better off

if ACT schools remained within the NSW school system; and (2) moving forward, should the

ACT return its schools to the NSW system? The results in Table 3 here indicate that these

questions shouldn't be avoided, swept under the carpet or dismissed lightly at all – to say the

least! The participation rate data shown in Appendix D (pages 93-100 below, with non-

partipation data defined as 100 per cent minus the participation rate percentage) further

highlights the conspicuously strong performance of the NSW school system. I'm not a

supporter of selective schools, which are numerous in Sydney, and more numerous in NSW

6

than any other part of Australia, but there's little likelihood or evidence that NSW's strong

NAPLAN performance is due to the fact that it has large numbers of selective schools. For

many decades NSW and Victoria have clearly had world class school, and it has always been

difficult for schools in the ACT – with school based curriculum development going back

decades, and broader school based management going back several years, to match the might

of the obviously world class NSW and Victorian systems with their formidable structural

integrity – in expertise, discipline (including resistance to excessive experimentation – with

innovations able to be rolled out on firmer foundations, to better effect), human capital, and

corporate memory and knowledge generally.

Table 3: State and Territory NAPLAN Performance Summary – Numbers of

#1 Ranks Based on Comparisons Using STU Degree Educated Parents Data


2010 13 2 0 0 1 1 3 0

2011 14 1 1 0 0 1 3 0

2012 15 1 0 0 0 2 2 0

2013 14 1 0 1 0 2 2 0

2014 14 0 0 2 0 2 2 0

2015 12 5 0 0 0 1 2 0

2016 9 6 0 1 0 2 2 0

2017 16 4 0 0 0 1 0 0

Total 107 20 1 4 1 12 16 0

Question 4: Of the five NAPLAN testing components of Reading, Writing, Spelling,

Grammar and Punctuation, and Numeracy, which has been the ACT's best area, second best,

worst, and so on, over the first decade of NAPLAN's operation, from 2008 to 2017, relative

to Australia as a whole at least?

Response to Question 4: Reading has been by far the ACT's strongest NAPLAN

performance area, followed by Grammar and Punctuation. Spelling has been by far the

ACT's weakest NAPLAN performance area, Writing has probably bene the ACT's second

weakest area, and Numeracy has most been the ACT's third best area of performance. These

observations are strongly supported by abundant evidence in the comparative tables in

Appendices A to C and other comparative analyses I've carried out in Microsoft Excel

spreadsheets which I can provide to the Committee, but haven't had time to transfer over into

further Appendices for this submission.

Question 5: Which of the eight States and Territories have done the best in the Reading

component of NAPLAN over the first decade of NAPLAN's operation, from 2008 to 2017?

Response to Question 5: Tables CR1 to CR12 on pages 65-68 of Appendix C below –

especially Tables CR11 and CR12 – provide strong evidence that the ACT and Tasmania

7

have performed the best in the Reading component of NAPLAN, at least from 2010 till 2017

when degree educated parent data has been available to enable sound like-with-like

comparisons. It's important to keep in mind, however, that throughout most of NAPLAN's

history, students sitting NAPLAN in the ACT, Victoria, Tasmania, NSW and SA have been a

quarter to half a year or so older than their counterparts in the other four STUs on average –

with the WA and QLD students being by far the youngest. Students in the ACT, NSW, VIC,

TAS and SA have been of very similar ages throughout NAPLAN's history, so it's probably

the case that the best like-with-like NAPLAN performance comparisons possible are among

these five STUs using the Degree Educated Parent data presented in Appendix C, and also

taking into account the participation data in Appendix D here to further support sound

interpretation and conclusion forming.

Question 6: Which of the eight States and Territories have done the best in the Writing


Response to Question 6: Tables CW1 to CW12 on pages 69-72 of Appendix C below –

especially Tables CW11 and CW12 – provide strong evidence that NSW and VIC have

performed best in the Writing component of NAPLAN, at least from 2010 till 2017 again.

Question 7: Which of the eight States and Territories have done the best in the Spelling


Response to Question 7: Tables CS1 to CS12 on pages 73-76 of Appendix C below –

especially Tables CS11 and CS12 – provide very strong evidence that NSW has been by far

the best performing STU in the Spelling component of NAPLAN, at least from 2010 till 2017

again, with corresponding data in Appendices A and B indicating that NSW was also the best

in 2008 and 2009, so apparently the best, by far, throughout the period 2008 to 2017. It

should be noted that because the socioeconomic profiles of the six States are all quite similar,

in terms of educationally significant factors such as parental education levels, the data shown

in Appendices A and B can provide quite sound like-with-like comparisons for the States of

NSW, VIC, TAS and SA.

Question 8: Which of the eight States and Territories have done the best in the Grammar

and Punctuation component of NAPLAN over the first decade of NAPLAN's operation, from

2008 to 2017?

Response to Question 8: Tables CG1 to CG12 on pages 77-80 of Appendix C below –

especially Tables CG11 and CG12 – provide very strong evidence that NSW has been the

best performing STU in the Grammar and Punctuation component of NAPLAN, at least from

2010 till 2017 again, with corresponding data in Appendices A and B indicating that VIC has

been close to the NSW level.

8

Question 9: Which of the eight States and Territories have done the best in the Numeracy


Response to Question 9: Tables CN1 to CN12 on pages 81-84 of Appendix C below –

especially Tables CN11 and CN12 – provide strong evidence that NSW has been the best

performing STU in the Numeracy component of NAPLAN, at least from 2010 till 2017

again, with corresponding data in Appendices A and B again indicating that VIC has been

close to the NSW level throughout the period 2008 to 2017.

Question 10: Which of the eight States and Territories have done the best in NAPLAN

overall, over the first decade of NAPLAN's operation from 2008 to 2017, based on equally

weighted averages of mean scores across the five NAPLAN components of Reading, Writing,

Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation, and Numeracy?

Response to Question 10: Tables CM1 to CM12 on pages 85-88 of Appendix C below –

especially Tables CM11 and CM12 – provide strong evidence that NSW has been the best

performing STU in NAPLAN overall, at least from 2010 till 2017 again, with corresponding

data in Appendices A and B again indicating that VIC has been close to the NSW level

throughout the period 2008 to 2017.

Question 11: Which of the eight States and Territories have done the best in NAPLAN

overall, over the first decade of NAPLAN's operation from 2008 to 2017, based on weighted

averages of mean NAPLAN scores with weightings of 12.5% for each of Reading, Writing,

Spelling, and Grammar and Punctuation, and a 50% weighting for Numeracy?

Response to Question 11: Tables CE1 to CE12 on pages 89-92 of Appendix C below –

especially Tables CE11 and CE12 – provide further strong evidence that NSW has been the

best performing STU in NAPLAN overall, from 2010 till 2017, with corresponding data in

Appendices A and B again indicating that VIC has been close to the NSW level throughout

the period 2008 to 2017.

Thank you again for providing the opportunity to provide submissions to your Inquiry, and

all the best with it!

Yours sincerely,

Mark Drummond

The Appendices follow on the next page.

9

Appendix A – State-Territory Unit (STU) Mean NAPLAN Data 2008 to 2017

Table AR1: STU Year 3 NAPLAN Reading Summary – Mean Scores

Year NSW VIC QLD WA SA TAS ACT NT AUS NSW-VIC*

2008 412.3 419.9 371.1 386.7 400.5 401.2 421.0 306.6 400.5 416.1

2009 422.3 430.4 385.9 395.5 399.0 404.7 433.6 322.2 410.8 426.4

2010 421.7 430.6 393.0 398.7 401.6 414.0 439.1 328.7 414.3 426.2

2011 423.1 433.5 399.9 400.3 402.2 410.1 443.0 322.6 415.7 428.3

2012 426.0 432.0 408.5 407.6 408.9 419.1 443.8 332.2 419.6 429.0

2013 424.0 434.1 407.7 406.1 409.6 414.9 441.9 339.1 419.1 429.1

2014 422.9 431.7 409.4 406.3 407.3 415.7 438.7 332.0 418.3 427.3

2015 429.5 439.3 418.4 412.5 414.8 418.5 442.7 336.6 425.5 434.4

2016 428.8 437.7 419.8 415.9 414.1 414.5 440.8 346.2 425.6 433.3

2017 435.4 444.5 424.9 419.8 416.7 424.1 443.7 342.5 431.3 440.0

mean 424.6 433.4 403.9 404.9 407.5 413.7 438.8 330.9 418.1 429.0

median 423.6 432.8 408.1 406.2 408.1 414.7 441.4 332.1 418.7 428.7

[* NSW-VIC = mean of NSW and VIC scores]

Table AR2: STU Year 3 NAPLAN Reading Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2009 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2010 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2011 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2012 3 2 6 7 5 4 1 8

2013 3 2 6 7 5 4 1 8

2014 3 2 5 7 6 4 1 8

2015 3 2 5 7 6 4 1 8

2016 3 2 4 5 7 6 1 8

2017 3 1 4 6 7 5 2 8

mean 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

median 3 2 5 7 5 4 1 8



2008 494.7 496.7 466.1 473.6 477.9 476.4 503.3 405.1 484.4 495.7

2009 503.4 506.3 477.8 482.2 484.3 487.2 512.7 420.6 493.9 504.9

2010 496.2 502.2 468.7 477.5 476.5 484.6 508.6 412.1 487.4 499.2

2011 495.4 503.7 469.4 480.2 478.0 485.9 516.3 403.3 488.1 499.6

2012 499.8 504.1 480.3 482.6 483.9 491.7 519.0 404.8 493.6 502.0

2013 506.4 510.1 497.0 495.4 491.9 496.1 519.2 437.4 502.3 508.3

2014 504.0 509.8 496.1 491.7 489.6 497.9 522.0 425.5 500.6 506.9

2015 501.0 508.3 494.5 488.9 487.9 493.6 520.8 426.3 498.5 504.7

2016 502.7 511.1 500.1 493.7 490.6 495.5 514.0 421.5 501.5 506.9

2017 508.0 514.6 502.8 498.9 494.3 499.1 520.0 429.9 505.7 511.3

mean 501.2 506.7 485.3 486.5 485.5 490.8 515.6 418.7 495.6 503.9

median 501.9 507.3 487.4 485.8 486.1 492.7 517.7 421.1 496.2 504.8


10



2008 3 2 7 6 4 5 1 8

2009 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2010 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

2011 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

2012 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2013 3 2 4 6 7 5 1 8

2014 3 2 5 6 7 4 1 8

2015 3 2 4 6 7 5 1 8

2016 3 2 4 6 7 5 1 8

2017 3 2 4 6 7 5 1 8

mean 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

median 3 2 5 7 6 4 1 8



2008 542.5 543.0 528.1 527.0 533.5 534.2 558.2 468.4 536.5 542.8

2009 545.9 547.1 532.8 534.6 536.8 534.3 558.3 483.0 541.1 546.5

2010 548.6 553.3 537.5 544.5 543.2 541.8 567.3 487.7 546.0 551.0

2011 543.5 544.8 533.5 541.3 533.8 534.5 561.8 480.2 540.2 544.2

2012 546.1 548.3 532.7 537.8 537.0 540.6 558.6 474.3 541.5 547.2

2013 544.1 546.9 533.5 538.4 535.9 536.3 560.6 468.6 540.6 545.5

2014 548.3 550.3 541.6 544.1 541.1 542.9 567.3 478.5 546.1 549.3

2015 548.2 551.1 543.0 541.2 541.2 540.4 566.1 483.4 546.0 549.7

2016 542.1 545.6 538.5 537.6 537.8 538.0 557.9 472.9 540.8 543.9

2017 547.6 550.7 540.2 538.6 542.1 540.7 561.7 472.9 544.7 549.2

mean 545.7 548.1 536.1 538.5 538.2 538.4 561.8 477.0 542.4 546.9

median 546.0 547.7 535.5 538.5 537.4 539.2 561.2 476.4 541.3 546.9




2008 3 2 6 7 5 4 1 8

2009 3 2 7 5 4 6 1 8

2010 3 2 7 4 5 6 1 8

2011 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

2012 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

2013 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

2014 3 2 6 4 7 5 1 8

2015 3 2 4 5 5 7 1 8

2016 3 2 4 7 6 5 1 8

2017 3 2 6 7 4 5 1 8

mean 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

median 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

11



2008 583.1 584.6 568.2 569.8 574.9 578.8 601.9 524.2 578.0 583.9

2009 585.4 588.0 570.4 573.1 577.4 577.7 598.9 526.3 580.5 586.7

2010 578.2 582.1 564.9 565.7 567.1 569.9 594.8 523.6 573.7 580.2

2011 583.0 585.0 572.4 577.3 572.9 574.1 597.9 525.8 579.5 584.0

2012 577.9 581.6 566.8 572.2 570.1 570.6 597.0 516.0 574.8 579.8

2013 584.0 584.6 572.4 579.7 576.6 575.8 599.5 528.2 580.2 584.3

2014 584.3 585.5 571.6 584.4 573.0 573.4 597.3 521.7 580.4 584.9

2015 582.1 586.2 572.2 585.1 574.0 573.6 598.7 519.6 580.2 584.2

2016 581.7 583.9 575.8 584.9 575.2 578.6 600.8 520.5 580.8 582.8

2017 587.5 582.4 574.9 582.5 570.9 570.4 595.9 515.2 580.9 585.0

mean 582.7 584.4 571.0 577.5 573.2 574.3 598.3 522.1 578.9 583.6

median 583.1 584.6 571.9 578.5 573.5 573.9 598.3 522.7 580.2 584.1




2008 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2009 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2010 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2011 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

2012 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

2013 3 2 7 4 5 6 1 8

2014 4 2 7 3 6 5 1 8

2015 4 2 7 3 5 6 1 8

2016 4 3 6 2 7 5 1 8

2017 2 4 5 3 6 7 1 8

mean 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

median 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

Table AR9: STU 4YA NAPLAN Reading Summary – Mean Scores


2008 508.2 511.1 483.4 489.3 496.7 497.7 521.1 426.1 499.9 509.6

2009 514.3 518.0 491.7 496.4 499.4 501.0 525.9 438.0 506.6 516.1

2010 511.2 517.1 491.0 496.6 497.1 502.6 527.5 438.0 505.4 514.1

2011 511.3 516.8 493.8 499.8 496.7 501.2 529.8 433.0 505.9 514.0

2012 512.5 516.5 497.1 500.1 500.0 505.5 529.6 431.8 507.4 514.5

2013 514.6 518.9 502.7 504.9 503.5 505.8 530.3 443.3 510.6 516.8

2014 514.9 519.3 504.7 506.6 502.8 507.5 531.3 439.4 511.4 517.1

2015 515.2 521.2 507.0 506.9 504.5 506.5 532.1 441.5 512.6 518.2

2016 513.8 519.6 508.6 508.0 504.4 506.7 528.4 440.3 512.2 516.7

2017 519.6 523.1 510.7 510.0 506.0 508.6 530.3 440.1 515.7 521.3

mean 513.5 518.1 499.1 501.8 501.1 504.3 528.6 437.2 508.7 515.8

median 514.0 518.4 499.9 502.5 501.4 505.6 529.7 438.7 509.0 516.4


12

Table AR10: STU 4YA NAPLAN Reading Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2009 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2010 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2011 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

2012 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

2013 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

2014 3 2 6 5 7 4 1 8

2015 3 2 4 5 7 6 1 8

2016 3 2 4 5 7 6 1 8

2017 3 2 4 5 7 6 1 8

mean 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

median 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

Table AR11: STU NAPLAN Reading Summary – Total Number of #1 Ranks


2008 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2009 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2010 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2011 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2013 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2014 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2015 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2017 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0

Total 0 1 0 0 0 0 39 0

[40 in total for Years 3, 5, 7 and 9 across the 10 years from 2008 till 2017, unless two STUs are equal #1]

Table AR12: STU NAPLAN Reading Summary – Total of All Ranks

Ranks NSW VIC QLD WA SA TAS ACT NT

# 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 39 0

# 2 1 37 0 1 0 0 1 0

# 3 36 1 0 3 0 0 0 0

# 4 3 1 8 7 3 18 0 0

# 5 0 0 4 6 16 15 0 0

# 6 0 0 6 16 12 5 0 0

# 7 0 0 22 7 9 2 0 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40

[40 in total for Years 3, 5, 7 and 9 across the 10 years from 2008 till 2017, unless two STUs are equal]

13

Table AW1: STU Year 3 NAPLAN Writing Summary – Mean Scores


2008 427.6 425.8 391.8 398.1 415.1 415.7 423.2 337.4 414.2 426.7

2009 424.5 427.5 395.8 402.4 411.2 406.8 421.6 337.7 414.5 426.0

2010 429.0 428.7 402.4 400.2 410.7 413.5 434.0 330.7 418.6 428.9

2011 429.2 423.6 404.1 403.9 400.1 400.7 419.7 330.0 415.9 426.4

2012 424.3 428.1 403.3 406.8 403.3 411.6 416.0 322.9 415.8 426.2

2013 422.2 429.7 406.2 405.3 401.2 402.9 421.0 319.8 415.6 426.0

2014 408.6 416.3 390.4 397.4 384.6 394.7 403.5 317.5 402.2 412.5

2015 422.5 431.0 405.8 408.1 398.9 407.6 419.7 327.5 416.3 426.8

2016 423.8 435.7 409.8 414.7 412.2 413.4 419.9 345.0 420.7 429.8

2017 420.8 426.9 402.4 409.4 391.3 404.6 414.9 324.5 413.6 423.9

mean 423.3 427.3 401.2 404.6 402.9 407.2 419.4 329.3 414.7 425.3

median 424.1 427.8 402.9 404.6 402.3 407.2 419.8 328.8 415.7 426.3


Table AW2: STU Year 3 NAPLAN Writing Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 1 2 7 6 5 4 3 8

2009 2 1 7 6 4 5 3 8

2010 2 3 6 7 5 4 1 8

2011 1 2 4 5 7 6 3 8

2012 2 1 6 5 6 4 3 8

2013 2 1 4 5 7 6 3 8

2014 2 1 6 4 7 5 3 8

2015 2 1 6 4 7 5 3 8

2016 2 1 7 4 6 5 3 8

2017 2 1 6 4 7 5 3 8

mean 2 1 7 5 6 4 3 8

median 2 1 6 5 7 4 3 8



2008 495.4 502.4 468.9 471.7 480.8 477.3 490.7 410.9 486.5 498.9

2009 492.7 497.5 467.0 478.6 482.1 473.5 489.5 409.4 484.7 495.1

2010 494.6 496.4 471.6 473.0 479.5 474.8 494.7 399.8 485.2 495.5

2011 492.6 492.8 470.9 472.2 469.7 465.2 495.0 396.5 482.6 492.7

2012 485.6 488.7 457.7 469.9 463.2 471.5 485.2 390.9 477.0 487.2

2013 483.7 489.7 469.8 470.4 464.6 464.9 486.1 385.9 477.9 486.7

2014 473.7 480.8 457.3 464.4 455.4 461.0 473.0 379.5 468.3 477.3

2015 483.0 490.7 470.2 471.1 463.2 468.5 485.5 386.2 478.1 486.9

2016 477.3 490.7 466.3 470.3 467.0 471.7 474.3 400.7 475.6 484.0

2017 477.6 485.6 461.5 468.6 455.5 465.2 479.4 395.4 472.5 481.6

mean 485.6 491.5 466.1 471.0 468.1 469.4 485.3 395.5 478.8 488.6

median 484.7 490.7 468.0 470.8 465.8 470.0 485.8 396.0 478.0 487.0


14



2008 2 1 7 6 4 5 3 8

2009 2 1 7 5 4 6 3 8

2010 3 1 7 6 4 5 2 8

2011 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2012 2 1 7 5 6 4 3 8

2013 3 1 5 4 7 6 2 8

2014 2 1 6 4 7 5 3 8

2015 3 1 5 4 7 6 2 8

2016 2 1 7 5 6 4 3 8

2017 3 1 6 4 7 5 2 8

mean 2 1 7 4 6 5 3 8

median 3 1 6 4 7 5 2 8



2008 535.3 549.7 522.7 522.5 538.1 520.6 534.3 455.0 533.7 542.5

2009 532.7 541.2 526.0 531.1 536.4 516.7 538.7 458.7 532.4 537.0

2010 533.0 540.8 531.2 532.2 537.1 515.7 541.4 449.2 533.5 536.9

2011 527.5 533.3 532.9 529.5 528.8 507.5 535.7 446.3 529.1 530.4

2012 520.3 525.5 511.7 520.9 516.5 508.3 519.5 434.8 518.3 522.9

2013 516.6 524.4 514.9 517.6 517.1 505.6 526.7 418.4 517.0 520.5

2014 512.4 518.4 505.4 514.1 509.2 502.8 523.1 415.5 511.6 515.4

2015 511.1 522.5 504.6 506.0 509.5 501.7 521.9 409.1 510.6 516.8

2016 515.2 530.0 502.9 512.3 516.3 513.6 519.4 428.2 515.0 522.6

2017 516.8 524.0 502.4 508.2 510.1 505.7 522.3 420.8 512.9 520.4

mean 522.1 531.0 515.5 519.4 521.9 509.8 528.3 433.6 521.4 526.5

median 518.6 527.8 513.3 519.3 516.8 507.9 524.9 431.5 517.7 522.8




2008 3 1 5 6 2 7 4 8

2009 4 1 6 5 3 7 2 8

2010 4 2 6 5 3 7 1 8

2011 6 2 3 4 5 7 1 8

2012 3 1 6 2 5 7 4 8

2013 5 2 6 3 4 7 1 8

2014 4 2 6 3 5 7 1 8

2015 3 1 6 5 4 7 2 8

2016 4 1 7 6 3 5 2 8

2017 3 1 7 5 4 6 2 8

mean 3 1 6 5 4 7 2 8

median 4 1 6 3 5 7 2 8

15



2008 569.4 588.9 555.3 560.8 571.2 557.2 571.0 506.9 569.4 579.2

2009 568.3 581.9 559.0 565.8 571.4 559.2 578.0 505.0 568.9 575.1

2010 566.1 579.5 564.7 562.5 566.3 554.1 575.9 489.4 567.7 572.8

2011 562.8 578.5 564.4 561.8 560.3 545.8 574.9 491.9 565.9 570.7

2012 556.4 566.3 539.4 557.5 549.7 543.7 561.9 472.2 553.7 561.4

2013 553.7 564.0 548.6 554.4 551.0 541.2 569.9 470.1 554.1 558.9

2014 548.1 559.8 543.8 560.6 545.3 539.4 558.7 463.1 550.3 554.0

2015 544.5 560.2 537.6 553.0 541.0 537.6 559.0 439.8 546.5 552.4

2016 546.5 563.3 534.9 554.4 545.5 548.0 556.9 461.9 549.1 554.9

2017 558.6 561.0 538.8 555.3 540.4 536.8 564.7 458.2 552.0 559.8

mean 557.4 570.3 548.7 558.6 554.2 546.3 567.1 475.9 557.8 563.9

median 557.5 565.2 546.2 559.1 550.4 544.8 567.3 471.2 553.9 560.6




2008 4 1 7 5 2 6 3 8

2009 4 1 7 5 3 6 2 8

2010 4 1 5 6 3 7 2 8

2011 4 1 3 5 6 7 2 8

2012 4 1 7 3 5 6 2 8

2013 4 2 6 3 5 7 1 8

2014 4 2 6 1 5 7 3 8

2015 4 1 6 3 5 6 2 8

2016 5 1 7 3 6 4 2 8

2017 3 2 6 4 5 7 1 8

mean 4 1 6 3 5 7 2 8

median 4 2 6 3 5 7 1 8

Table AW9: STU 4YA NAPLAN Writing Summary – Mean Scores


2008 506.9 516.7 484.7 488.3 501.3 492.7 504.8 427.6 501.0 511.8

2009 504.6 512.0 487.0 494.5 500.3 489.1 507.0 427.7 500.1 508.3

2010 505.7 511.4 492.5 492.0 498.4 489.5 511.5 417.3 501.3 508.5

2011 503.0 507.1 493.1 491.9 489.7 479.8 506.3 416.2 498.4 505.0

2012 496.7 502.2 478.0 488.8 483.2 483.8 495.7 405.2 491.2 499.4

2013 494.1 502.0 484.9 486.9 483.5 478.7 500.9 398.6 491.2 498.0

2014 485.7 493.8 474.2 484.1 473.6 474.5 489.6 393.9 483.1 489.8

2015 490.3 501.1 479.6 484.6 478.2 478.9 496.5 390.7 487.9 495.7

2016 490.7 504.9 478.5 487.9 485.3 486.7 492.6 409.0 490.1 497.8

2017 493.5 499.4 476.3 485.4 474.3 478.1 495.3 399.7 487.8 496.4

mean 497.1 505.0 482.9 488.4 486.8 483.2 500.0 408.6 493.2 501.1

median 495.4 503.5 482.1 488.1 484.4 481.8 498.7 407.1 491.2 498.7


16

Table AW10: STU 4YA NAPLAN Writing Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 2 1 7 6 4 5 3 8

2009 3 1 7 5 4 6 2 8

2010 3 2 5 6 4 7 1 8

2011 3 1 4 5 6 7 2 8

2012 2 1 7 4 6 5 3 8

2013 3 1 5 4 6 7 2 8

2014 3 1 6 4 7 5 2 8

2015 3 1 5 4 7 6 2 8

2016 3 1 7 4 6 5 2 8

2017 3 1 6 4 7 5 2 8

mean 3 1 7 4 5 6 2 8

median 3 1 6 4 5 7 2 8

Table AW11: STU NAPLAN Writing Summary – Total Number of #1 Ranks


2008 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

2009 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

2010 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0

2011 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0

2012 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

2013 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0

2014 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0

2015 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

2016 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

2017 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0

Total 2 29 0 1 0 0 8 0


Table AW12: STU NAPLAN Writing Summary – Total of All Ranks


# 1 2 29 0 1 0 0 8 0

# 2 13 10 0 1 2 0 14 0

# 3 10 1 2 6 5 0 16 0

# 4 12 0 2 11 7 6 2 0

# 5 2 0 5 13 10 10 0 0

# 6 1 0 17 7 7 10 0 0

# 7 0 0 14 1 9 14 0 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40


17

Table AS1: STU Year 3 NAPLAN Spelling Summary – Mean Scores


2008 419.2 415.3 366.7 381.8 396.7 394.9 406.9 299.8 399.5 417.3

2009 423.6 419.5 376.0 389.7 394.8 393.5 411.2 305.2 404.8 421.6

2010 413.6 412.7 371.5 381.5 388.0 390.7 409.4 300.3 399.2 413.2

2011 420.4 416.7 387.7 395.0 392.0 394.2 414.9 303.4 405.9 418.6

2012 428.3 423.3 398.3 401.4 402.6 402.0 419.0 336.6 414.3 425.8

2013 423.4 419.7 396.3 399.6 403.7 393.4 415.7 327.3 410.8 421.6

2014 423.9 418.9 400.5 402.8 401.0 395.3 411.6 327.1 411.8 421.4

2015 418.2 419.1 395.7 400.5 401.7 392.8 409.5 324.7 408.8 418.7

2016 429.5 427.1 410.3 412.2 410.4 400.5 420.7 338.4 419.8 428.3

2017 426.2 422.4 408.8 408.4 404.2 395.7 412.7 328.6 416.1 424.3

mean 422.6 419.5 391.2 397.3 399.5 395.3 413.2 319.1 409.1 421.1

median 423.5 419.3 396.0 400.1 401.4 394.6 412.2 325.9 409.8 421.5


Table AS2: STU Year 3 NAPLAN Spelling Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 1 2 7 6 4 5 3 8

2009 1 2 7 6 4 5 3 8

2010 1 2 7 6 5 4 3 8

2011 1 2 7 4 6 5 3 8

2012 1 2 7 6 4 5 3 8

2013 1 2 6 5 4 7 3 8

2014 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

2015 2 1 6 5 4 7 3 8

2016 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

2017 1 2 4 5 6 7 3 8

mean 1 2 7 5 4 6 3 8

median 1 2 6 5 4 7 3 8



2008 499.4 493.5 462.0 471.3 479.5 471.7 487.8 399.1 483.8 496.5

2009 503.2 495.8 466.3 476.3 478.9 476.5 488.5 410.8 487.2 499.5

2010 502.8 494.7 467.9 476.7 479.2 477.3 489.2 408.5 487.1 498.8

2011 499.0 492.2 465.6 475.5 474.1 470.7 491.2 393.4 484.1 495.6

2012 508.9 498.6 479.0 486.4 482.4 480.8 499.6 413.4 494.9 503.8

2013 505.4 499.4 485.6 487.2 481.7 477.0 496.8 412.5 494.2 502.4

2014 507.6 500.9 489.5 492.2 488.4 485.2 502.0 421.8 497.6 504.3

2015 507.0 504.4 489.2 492.5 489.5 482.8 500.3 417.6 498.1 505.7

2016 501.1 498.3 485.8 488.4 483.3 479.1 490.0 414.8 492.9 499.7

2017 508.5 503.5 496.3 498.2 490.6 483.4 498.5 431.2 500.8 506.0

mean 504.3 498.1 478.7 484.5 482.8 478.5 494.4 412.3 492.1 501.2

median 504.3 498.5 482.3 486.8 482.1 478.2 494.0 413.0 493.6 501.1


18



2008 1 2 7 6 4 5 3 8

2009 1 2 7 6 4 5 3 8

2010 1 2 7 6 4 5 3 8

2011 1 2 7 4 5 6 3 8

2012 1 3 7 4 5 6 2 8

2013 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

2014 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

2015 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

2016 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

2017 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

mean 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

median 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8



2008 550.1 542.3 528.0 527.4 539.7 527.4 544.3 456.8 538.7 546.2

2009 551.1 540.3 532.9 529.1 536.5 523.5 539.8 465.7 540.0 545.7

2010 555.4 546.8 535.5 540.3 539.4 529.1 547.6 469.3 544.7 551.1

2011 547.5 539.5 528.6 535.6 533.2 525.8 542.4 462.1 537.7 543.5

2012 555.5 544.6 533.9 539.6 536.8 527.8 544.1 464.4 543.4 550.1

2013 559.7 550.2 542.5 545.6 543.1 533.7 554.9 466.6 549.3 555.0

2014 552.9 547.1 536.6 543.1 539.6 533.4 553.7 461.5 545.1 550.0

2015 555.4 546.6 544.3 542.0 540.6 531.3 548.5 462.1 546.7 551.0

2016 550.1 543.7 539.4 540.3 537.3 529.7 546.0 466.0 542.9 546.9

2017 558.4 548.7 545.9 546.9 544.5 533.0 549.6 471.1 549.5 553.6

mean 553.6 545.0 536.8 539.0 539.1 529.5 547.1 464.6 543.8 549.3

median 554.2 545.6 536.1 540.3 539.5 529.4 546.8 465.1 544.1 550.0




2008 1 3 5 6 4 6 2 8

2009 1 2 5 6 4 7 3 8

2010 1 3 6 4 5 7 2 8

2011 1 3 6 4 5 7 2 8

2012 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

2013 1 3 6 4 5 7 2 8

2014 2 3 6 4 5 7 1 8

2015 1 3 4 5 6 7 2 8

2016 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

2017 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

mean 1 3 6 5 4 7 2 8

median 1 3 6 4 5 7 2 8

19



2008 586.6 580.3 567.8 566.5 575.4 566.6 586.7 510.0 576.9 583.5

2009 585.6 579.3 569.3 566.4 572.0 562.8 584.7 508.7 576.3 582.5

2010 587.2 580.5 573.5 570.3 572.3 565.7 584.4 513.5 578.5 583.9

2011 588.9 584.5 575.1 574.8 575.1 565.6 584.4 515.5 581.3 586.7

2012 585.7 578.0 571.4 574.6 569.6 559.6 582.9 505.9 577.0 581.9

2013 591.4 582.5 578.0 579.1 577.3 565.0 589.0 518.8 582.7 587.0

2014 589.8 584.0 575.6 581.8 575.2 564.5 588.7 508.9 582.0 586.9

2015 590.9 582.9 579.5 583.9 574.7 567.4 588.8 508.3 583.2 586.9

2016 586.0 581.3 574.3 582.7 572.8 564.9 590.2 510.3 580.3 583.7

2017 590.5 579.5 576.8 583.6 572.9 561.6 586.2 507.1 581.4 585.0

mean 588.3 581.3 574.1 576.4 573.7 564.4 586.6 510.7 580.0 584.8

median 588.1 580.9 574.7 577.0 573.8 565.0 586.5 509.5 580.8 584.4




2008 2 3 5 7 4 6 1 8

2009 1 3 5 6 4 7 2 8

2010 1 3 4 6 5 7 2 8

2011 1 2 4 6 4 7 3 8

2012 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

2013 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

2014 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

2015 1 4 5 3 6 7 2 8

2016 2 4 5 3 6 7 1 8

2017 1 4 5 3 6 7 2 8

mean 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

median 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

Table AS9: STU 4YA NAPLAN Spelling Summary – Mean Scores


2008 513.8 507.9 481.1 486.8 497.8 490.2 506.4 416.4 499.7 510.8

2009 515.9 508.7 486.1 490.4 495.6 489.1 506.1 422.6 502.1 512.3

2010 514.8 508.7 487.1 492.2 494.7 490.7 507.7 422.9 502.4 511.7

2011 514.0 508.2 489.3 495.2 493.6 489.1 508.2 418.6 502.3 511.1

2012 519.6 511.1 495.7 500.5 497.9 492.6 511.4 430.1 507.4 515.4

2013 520.0 513.0 500.6 502.9 501.5 492.3 514.1 431.3 509.3 516.5

2014 518.6 512.7 500.6 505.0 501.1 494.6 514.0 429.8 509.1 515.6

2015 517.9 513.3 502.2 504.7 501.6 493.6 511.8 428.2 509.2 515.6

2016 516.7 512.6 502.5 505.9 501.0 493.6 511.7 432.4 509.0 514.6

2017 520.9 513.5 507.0 509.3 503.1 493.4 511.8 434.5 512.0 517.2

mean 517.2 511.0 495.2 499.3 498.8 491.9 510.3 426.7 506.2 514.1

median 517.3 511.9 498.1 501.7 499.4 492.4 511.6 429.0 508.2 515.0


20

Table AS10: STU 4YA NAPLAN Spelling Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 1 2 7 6 4 5 3 8

2009 1 2 7 5 4 6 3 8

2010 1 2 7 5 4 6 3 8

2011 1 2 6 4 5 7 2 8

2012 1 3 6 4 5 7 2 8

2013 1 3 6 4 5 7 2 8

2014 1 3 6 4 5 7 2 8

2015 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

2016 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

2017 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

mean 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

median 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

Table AS11: STU NAPLAN Spelling Summary – Total Number of #1 Ranks


2008 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

2009 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2010 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2011 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2012 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2013 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2014 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

2015 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2016 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

2017 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 36 1 0 0 0 0 3 0


Table AS12: STU NAPLAN Spelling Summary – Total of All Ranks


# 1 36 1 0 0 0 0 3 0

# 2 4 20 0 0 0 0 16 0

# 3 0 16 0 3 0 0 21 0

# 4 0 3 4 20 13 1 0 0

# 5 0 0 16 4 12 7 0 0

# 6 0 0 10 12 15 4 0 0

# 7 0 0 10 1 0 28 0 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40


21

Table AG1: STU Year 3 NAPLAN Grammar and Punctuation Summary – Mean Scores


2008 417.2 428.4 370.4 383.2 396.7 402.7 419.6 291.0 403.2 422.8

2009 431.9 440.1 394.4 403.6 408.5 412.9 440.6 315.8 419.7 436.0

2010 425.6 434.5 398.2 399.0 399.1 408.0 435.8 311.2 416.9 430.1

2011 431.9 435.6 406.8 407.8 403.6 410.5 438.1 313.2 421.2 433.8

2012 434.9 437.7 411.3 408.3 405.8 412.3 439.7 315.4 423.9 436.3

2013 436.7 439.4 419.4 414.9 414.2 415.5 444.0 337.8 428.2 438.1

2014 435.3 435.2 421.2 413.0 407.3 405.4 439.7 326.2 426.0 435.3

2015 438.8 442.7 430.5 424.1 416.6 414.2 441.3 334.9 433.2 440.8

2016 440.6 446.1 433.1 425.2 420.2 418.0 442.3 348.8 435.8 443.4

2017 444.8 449.7 436.8 428.3 420.3 425.9 445.6 328.6 439.2 447.3

mean 433.8 438.9 412.2 410.7 409.2 412.5 438.7 322.3 424.7 436.4

median 435.1 438.6 415.4 410.7 407.9 412.6 440.2 321.0 425.0 436.2


Table AG2: STU Year 3 NAPLAN Grammar and Punctuation Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 3 1 7 6 5 4 2 8

2009 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2010 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2011 3 2 6 5 7 4 1 8

2012 3 2 5 6 7 4 1 8

2013 3 2 4 6 7 5 1 8

2014 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 8

2015 3 1 4 5 6 7 2 8

2016 3 1 4 5 6 7 2 8

2017 3 1 4 5 7 6 2 8

mean 3 1 5 6 7 4 2 8

median 3 2 4 6 7 5 1 8



2008 504.9 513.4 476.6 483.2 488.3 493.4 513.2 400.0 496.2 509.2

2009 510.7 510.2 485.5 486.4 489.8 488.6 516.3 415.0 499.7 510.5

2010 512.6 512.2 483.3 486.0 487.0 489.3 511.5 396.6 499.7 512.4

2011 509.3 509.4 485.0 491.0 485.4 489.2 521.7 400.4 499.1 509.4

2012 502.6 497.8 477.5 479.9 475.6 479.3 511.1 394.4 491.0 500.2

2013 508.0 506.5 494.8 495.1 487.7 484.6 516.1 423.1 500.6 507.3

2014 512.0 508.2 500.2 495.1 490.2 488.7 518.6 418.9 503.8 510.1

2015 508.6 510.0 499.8 496.1 490.7 489.2 515.8 416.3 503.1 509.3

2016 510.9 508.0 505.2 497.8 491.7 494.0 511.1 423.7 504.9 509.5

2017 505.7 504.7 495.8 492.5 487.2 488.3 507.0 415.2 499.3 505.2

mean 508.5 508.0 490.4 490.3 487.4 488.5 514.2 410.4 499.7 508.3

median 509.0 508.8 490.2 491.8 488.0 489.0 514.5 415.1 499.7 509.3


22



2008 3 1 7 6 5 4 2 8

2009 2 3 7 6 4 5 1 8

2010 1 2 7 6 5 4 3 8

2011 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

2012 2 3 6 4 7 5 1 8

2013 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2014 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 8

2015 3 2 4 5 6 7 1 8

2016 2 3 4 5 7 6 1 8

2017 2 3 4 5 7 6 1 8

mean 2 3 4 5 7 6 1 8

median 2 3 5 4 7 6 1 8



2008 536.6 537.7 518.0 514.9 528.8 527.1 546.6 444.5 529.0 537.2

2009 543.2 544.7 534.1 531.4 536.7 533.2 556.9 464.9 539.5 544.0

2010 539.4 540.3 529.4 530.5 532.3 527.3 553.2 459.9 535.1 539.9

2011 537.6 538.5 524.4 528.2 528.4 522.8 551.4 457.2 532.4 538.1

2012 551.2 550.2 539.8 544.9 541.8 537.2 558.5 476.4 546.2 550.7

2013 541.0 538.2 531.5 533.0 528.4 520.9 551.7 441.9 535.1 539.6

2014 548.9 542.5 540.6 541.5 536.7 533.8 563.9 465.2 543.1 545.7

2015 545.7 546.1 539.1 536.6 534.8 526.9 554.2 455.3 541.3 545.9

2016 543.5 543.2 537.6 536.8 536.7 531.6 551.5 465.4 540.0 543.4

2017 545.3 545.9 537.9 537.2 539.0 532.4 552.7 459.4 541.5 545.6

mean 543.2 542.7 533.2 533.5 534.4 529.3 554.1 459.0 538.3 543.0

median 543.4 542.9 535.9 534.8 535.8 529.5 553.0 459.7 539.8 543.7




2008 3 2 6 7 4 5 1 8

2009 3 2 5 7 4 6 1 8

2010 3 2 6 5 4 7 1 8

2011 3 2 6 5 4 7 1 8

2012 2 3 6 4 5 7 1 8

2013 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2014 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2015 3 2 4 5 6 7 1 8

2016 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 8

2017 3 2 5 6 4 7 1 8

mean 2 3 6 5 4 7 1 8

median 2 3 4 6 5 7 1 8

23



2008 576.1 574.7 563.2 555.9 564.7 557.2 588.7 499.6 569.1 575.4

2009 576.1 580.4 569.0 564.7 571.5 566.7 592.3 512.5 573.5 578.3

2010 583.0 585.3 574.1 570.6 573.8 570.5 594.5 512.8 578.9 584.2

2011 575.3 578.8 566.8 566.3 567.0 561.6 587.4 506.9 572.3 577.1

2012 576.6 577.5 569.6 570.1 567.8 562.9 587.9 514.7 573.2 577.1

2013 577.3 577.2 568.5 570.3 568.6 560.5 593.7 497.5 573.1 577.3

2014 576.6 578.6 567.4 574.9 567.6 564.0 588.3 507.2 573.5 577.6

2015 569.8 570.9 565.9 571.0 561.1 558.3 581.1 491.7 567.9 570.4

2016 569.7 571.8 566.9 572.2 565.1 566.9 588.2 504.8 569.3 570.8

2017 581.2 571.8 573.2 571.4 564.1 556.3 584.9 495.6 573.6 576.5

mean 576.2 576.7 568.5 568.7 567.1 562.5 588.7 504.3 572.4 576.4

median 576.4 577.4 568.0 570.5 567.3 562.3 588.3 505.9 573.2 577.1




2008 2 3 5 7 4 6 1 8

2009 3 2 5 7 4 6 1 8

2010 3 2 4 6 5 7 1 8

2011 3 2 5 6 4 7 1 8

2012 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2013 2 3 6 4 5 7 1 8

2014 3 2 6 4 5 7 1 8

2015 4 3 5 2 6 7 1 8

2016 4 3 5 2 7 5 1 8

2017 2 4 3 5 6 7 1 8

mean 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

median 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

Table AG9: STU 4YA NAPLAN Grammar and Punctuation Summary – Mean Scores


2008 508.7 513.6 482.1 484.3 494.6 495.1 517.0 408.8 499.4 511.1

2009 515.5 518.9 495.8 496.5 501.6 500.4 526.5 427.1 508.1 517.2

2010 515.2 518.1 496.3 496.5 498.1 498.8 523.8 420.1 507.7 516.6

2011 513.5 515.6 495.8 498.3 496.1 496.0 524.7 419.4 506.3 514.6

2012 516.3 515.8 499.6 500.8 497.8 497.9 524.3 425.2 508.6 516.1

2013 515.8 515.3 503.6 503.3 499.7 495.4 526.4 425.1 509.3 515.5

2014 518.2 516.1 507.4 506.1 500.5 498.0 527.6 429.4 511.6 517.2

2015 515.7 517.4 508.8 507.0 500.8 497.2 523.1 424.6 511.4 516.6

2016 516.2 517.3 510.7 508.0 503.4 502.6 523.3 435.7 512.5 516.7

2017 519.3 518.0 510.9 507.4 502.7 500.7 522.6 424.7 513.4 518.6

mean 515.4 516.6 501.1 500.8 499.5 498.2 523.9 424.0 508.8 516.0

median 515.7 516.7 501.6 502.1 500.1 498.0 524.0 424.9 508.9 516.6


24

Table AG10: STU 4YA NAPLAN Grammar and Punctuation Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2009 3 2 7 6 4 5 1 8

2010 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2011 3 2 7 4 5 6 1 8

2012 2 3 5 4 7 6 1 8

2013 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 8

2014 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 8

2015 3 2 4 5 6 7 1 8

2016 3 2 4 5 6 7 1 8

2017 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 8

mean 3 2 4 5 6 7 1 8

median 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

Table AG11: STU NAPLAN Grammar and Punctuation Summary – Total Number of #1 Ranks


2008 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0

2009 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2010 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0

2011 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2013 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2014 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2015 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0

2016 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0

2017 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0

Total 1 5 0 0 0 0 34 0


Table AG12: STU NAPLAN Grammar and Punctuation Summary – Total of All Ranks


# 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 34 0

# 2 14 19 0 2 0 0 5 0

# 3 23 15 1 0 0 0 1 0

# 4 2 1 12 9 9 7 0 0

# 5 0 0 12 14 9 6 0 0

# 6 0 0 8 11 14 6 0 0

# 7 0 0 7 4 8 21 0 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40


25

Table AN1: STU Year 3 Numeracy Summary – Mean Scores


2008 408.9 416.9 367.9 381.9 388.8 399.9 411.5 338.4 396.9 412.9

2009 405.3 410.8 372.4 379.7 379.2 390.0 408.0 322.4 393.9 408.1

2010 401.0 410.5 378.5 382.8 379.9 393.4 412.6 329.4 395.4 405.8

2011 405.5 412.8 384.6 386.6 379.4 392.3 414.4 337.8 398.1 409.2

2012 405.0 408.9 380.9 383.9 377.4 391.5 410.1 323.2 395.5 407.0

2013 403.6 409.4 386.2 387.3 379.9 390.2 413.2 332.0 396.9 406.5

2014 407.3 413.9 393.4 392.5 385.4 396.3 413.9 338.1 401.8 410.6

2015 401.3 409.7 392.2 388.6 382.1 391.3 410.0 332.0 397.8 405.5

2016 405.2 413.6 396.3 395.0 385.2 394.6 411.9 341.2 402.0 409.4

2017 414.9 420.1 402.2 402.3 390.7 401.8 418.1 341.3 409.4 417.5

mean 405.8 412.7 385.5 388.1 382.8 394.1 412.4 333.6 398.8 409.2

median 405.3 411.8 385.4 387.0 381.0 392.9 412.3 334.9 397.4 408.6


Table AN2: STU Year 3 Numeracy Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 3 1 7 6 5 4 2 8

2009 3 1 7 5 6 4 2 8

2010 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

2011 3 2 6 5 7 4 1 8

2012 3 2 6 5 7 4 1 8

2013 3 2 6 5 7 4 1 8

2014 3 1 5 6 7 4 1 8

2015 3 2 4 6 7 5 1 8

2016 3 1 4 5 7 6 2 8

2017 3 1 5 4 7 6 2 8

mean 3 1 6 5 7 4 2 8

median 3 2 6 5 7 4 1 8



2008 487.8 489.7 458.2 460.7 460.4 464.6 483.8 416.3 475.9 488.8

2009 501.3 496.1 470.4 472.9 470.4 472.8 495.8 429.6 486.8 498.7

2010 498.4 502.7 474.1 476.8 472.6 479.4 498.7 421.5 488.8 500.6

2011 499.3 499.2 470.3 479.2 470.9 478.2 502.0 423.6 487.8 499.3

2012 497.7 497.6 476.1 477.5 471.9 480.4 504.4 417.6 488.7 497.7

2013 493.1 493.0 481.1 477.6 467.4 471.0 497.9 421.9 485.8 493.1

2014 493.4 496.6 481.7 480.6 470.9 477.3 497.4 422.7 487.6 495.0

2015 497.2 502.9 486.0 484.7 477.9 483.1 501.8 429.3 492.5 500.1

2016 497.8 502.5 488.3 486.2 476.3 481.3 497.2 435.5 493.1 500.2

2017 498.3 501.7 490.4 488.6 477.0 481.3 497.5 432.1 493.8 500.0

mean 496.4 498.2 477.7 478.5 471.6 476.9 497.7 425.0 488.1 497.3

median 497.8 498.4 478.6 478.4 471.4 478.8 497.7 423.2 488.3 499.0


26



2008 2 1 7 5 6 4 3 8

2009 1 2 6 4 6 5 3 8

2010 3 1 6 5 7 4 2 8

2011 2 3 7 4 6 5 1 8

2012 2 3 6 5 7 4 1 8

2013 2 3 4 5 7 6 1 8

2014 3 2 4 5 7 6 1 8

2015 3 1 4 5 7 6 2 8

2016 2 1 4 5 7 6 3 8

2017 2 1 4 5 7 6 3 8

mean 3 1 5 4 7 6 2 8

median 2 1 5 6 7 4 3 8



2008 551.3 552.3 539.0 533.7 536.2 533.8 556.2 488.1 545.0 551.8

2009 549.1 549.2 539.7 536.3 532.0 525.1 549.4 485.2 543.6 549.2

2010 550.1 553.6 546.2 545.8 538.5 530.6 556.2 486.6 547.8 551.9

2011 548.6 550.9 538.7 544.6 534.9 532.2 555.5 481.3 544.6 549.8

2012 543.4 544.3 532.0 534.9 529.1 526.0 545.9 474.7 538.1 543.9

2013 547.5 545.7 538.5 541.7 530.8 527.7 549.7 476.5 542.1 546.6

2014 550.3 548.6 543.6 545.5 533.9 533.1 556.6 484.4 545.9 549.5

2015 546.7 548.4 538.9 538.3 532.7 528.8 549.4 484.7 542.5 547.6

2016 552.0 555.9 545.9 548.1 542.6 539.5 555.6 486.2 549.7 554.0

2017 558.4 559.7 549.3 551.3 544.0 538.9 558.5 489.0 553.9 559.1

mean 549.7 550.9 541.2 542.0 535.5 531.6 553.3 483.7 545.3 550.3

median 549.6 550.1 539.4 543.2 534.4 531.4 555.6 485.0 544.8 549.6




2008 3 2 4 7 5 6 1 8

2009 3 2 4 5 6 7 1 8

2010 3 2 4 5 6 7 1 8

2011 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2012 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2013 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2014 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2015 3 2 4 5 6 7 1 8

2016 3 1 5 4 6 7 2 8

2017 3 1 5 4 6 7 2 8

mean 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

median 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

27



2008 591.4 590.7 570.7 570.7 571.1 568.0 594.9 532.6 582.2 591.1

2009 596.6 596.8 579.6 581.5 578.7 572.9 600.4 539.7 589.1 596.7

2010 591.5 592.8 577.4 577.9 573.1 571.4 597.2 529.9 585.1 592.2

2011 589.5 590.0 574.4 582.2 572.0 567.1 593.0 528.8 583.4 589.8

2012 591.1 590.7 574.6 582.0 573.3 567.5 596.5 532.1 584.2 590.9

2013 591.9 588.4 573.2 584.4 571.7 565.5 596.9 523.3 583.6 590.2

2014 594.3 592.3 579.8 591.1 573.6 572.8 594.4 532.0 587.8 593.3

2015 596.0 597.0 584.7 596.0 578.9 577.3 599.6 538.2 591.7 596.5

2016 591.9 592.9 581.9 594.9 577.2 576.5 597.3 531.9 588.9 592.4

2017 600.0 593.3 585.0 595.3 578.2 573.2 595.9 541.5 591.9 596.7

mean 593.4 592.5 578.1 585.6 574.8 571.2 596.6 533.0 586.8 593.0

median 591.9 592.6 578.5 583.3 573.5 572.1 596.7 532.1 586.5 592.3




2008 2 3 5 5 4 7 1 8

2009 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2010 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2011 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2012 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2013 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2014 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2015 3 2 5 3 6 7 1 8

2016 4 3 5 2 6 7 1 8

2017 1 4 5 3 6 7 2 8

mean 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

median 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

Table AN9: STU 4YA NAPLAN Spelling Summary – Mean Scores


2008 509.9 512.4 484.0 486.8 489.1 491.6 511.6 443.9 500.0 511.1

2009 513.1 513.2 490.5 492.6 490.1 490.2 513.4 444.2 503.4 513.2

2010 510.3 514.9 494.1 495.8 491.0 493.7 516.2 441.9 504.3 512.6

2011 510.7 513.2 492.0 498.2 489.3 492.5 516.2 442.9 503.5 512.0

2012 509.3 510.4 490.9 494.6 487.9 491.4 514.2 436.9 501.6 509.8

2013 509.0 509.1 494.8 497.8 487.5 488.6 514.4 438.4 502.1 509.1

2014 511.3 512.9 499.6 502.4 491.0 494.9 515.6 444.3 505.8 512.1

2015 510.3 514.5 500.5 501.9 492.9 495.1 515.2 446.1 506.1 512.4

2016 511.7 516.2 503.1 506.1 495.3 498.0 515.5 448.7 508.4 514.0

2017 517.9 518.7 506.7 509.4 497.5 498.8 517.5 451.0 512.3 518.3

mean 511.3 513.6 495.6 498.5 491.2 493.5 515.0 443.8 504.7 512.5

median 510.5 513.2 494.4 498.0 490.5 493.1 515.4 444.0 503.9 512.2


28

Table AN10: STU 4YA NAPLAN Spelling Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 3 1 7 6 5 4 2 8

2009 3 2 5 4 7 6 1 8

2010 3 2 5 4 7 6 1 8

2011 3 2 6 4 7 5 1 8

2012 3 2 6 4 7 5 1 8

2013 3 2 5 4 7 6 1 8

2014 3 2 5 4 7 6 1 8

2015 3 2 5 4 7 6 1 8

2016 3 1 5 4 7 6 2 8

2017 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

mean 3 2 5 4 7 6 1 8

median 3 2 5 4 7 6 1 8

Table AN11: STU NAPLAN Numeracy Summary – Total Number of #1 Ranks


2008 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0

2009 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0

2010 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0

2011 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2013 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2014 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0

2015 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0

2016 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0

2017 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 2 12 0 0 0 0 27 0


Table AN12: STU NAPLAN Numeracy Summary – Total of All Ranks


# 1 2 12 0 0 0 0 27 0

# 2 12 17 0 1 0 0 9 0

# 3 25 10 0 2 0 0 4 0

# 4 1 1 11 15 1 10 0 0

# 5 0 0 18 18 2 3 0 0

# 6 0 0 6 3 23 8 0 0

# 7 0 0 5 1 14 19 0 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40


29

Table AM1: STU Year 3 Equal Weighted Mean Summary – Mean Scores


2008 417.0 421.3 373.6 386.3 399.6 402.9 416.4 314.6 402.9 419.2

2009 421.5 425.7 384.9 394.2 398.5 401.6 423.0 320.7 408.7 423.6

2010 418.2 423.4 388.7 392.4 395.9 403.9 426.2 320.1 408.9 420.8

2011 422.0 424.4 396.6 398.7 395.5 401.6 426.0 321.4 411.4 423.2

2012 423.7 426.0 400.5 401.6 399.6 407.3 425.7 326.1 413.8 424.9

2013 422.0 426.5 403.2 402.6 401.7 403.4 427.2 331.2 414.1 424.2

2014 419.6 423.2 403.0 402.4 397.1 401.5 421.5 328.2 412.0 421.4

2015 422.1 428.4 408.5 406.8 402.8 404.9 424.6 331.1 416.3 425.2

2016 425.6 432.0 413.9 412.6 408.4 408.2 427.1 343.9 420.8 428.8

2017 428.4 432.7 415.0 413.6 404.6 410.4 427.0 333.1 421.9 430.6

mean 422.0 426.4 398.8 401.1 400.4 404.6 424.5 327.0 413.1 424.2

median 422.0 425.8 401.7 402.0 399.6 403.7 425.9 327.1 412.9 423.9


Table AM2: STU Year 3 Equal Weighed Mean Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 2 1 7 6 5 4 3 8

2009 3 1 7 6 5 4 2 8

2010 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2011 3 2 6 5 7 4 1 8

2012 3 1 6 5 7 4 2 8

2013 3 2 5 6 7 4 1 8

2014 3 1 4 5 7 6 2 8

2015 3 1 4 5 7 6 2 8

2016 3 1 4 5 6 7 2 8

2017 2 1 4 5 7 6 3 8

mean 3 1 7 5 6 4 2 8

median 3 2 6 5 7 4 1 8



2008 496.4 499.1 466.4 472.1 477.4 476.7 495.8 406.3 485.4 497.8

2009 502.3 501.2 473.4 479.3 481.1 479.7 500.6 417.1 490.5 501.7

2010 500.9 501.6 473.1 478.0 479.0 481.1 500.5 407.7 489.6 501.3

2011 499.1 499.5 472.2 479.6 475.6 477.8 505.2 403.4 488.3 499.3

2012 498.9 497.4 474.1 479.3 475.4 480.7 503.9 404.2 489.0 498.1

2013 499.3 499.7 485.7 485.1 478.7 478.7 503.2 416.2 492.2 499.5

2014 498.1 499.3 485.0 484.8 478.9 482.0 502.6 413.7 491.6 498.7

2015 499.4 503.3 487.9 486.7 481.8 483.4 504.8 415.1 494.1 501.3

2016 498.0 502.1 489.1 487.3 481.8 484.3 497.3 419.2 493.6 500.0

2017 499.6 502.0 489.4 489.4 480.9 483.5 500.5 420.8 494.4 500.8

mean 499.2 500.5 479.6 482.2 479.1 480.8 501.4 412.4 490.9 499.9

median 499.2 500.5 479.5 482.2 478.9 480.9 501.6 414.4 491.0 499.8


30



2008 2 1 7 6 4 5 3 8

2009 1 2 7 6 4 5 3 8

2010 2 1 7 6 5 4 3 8

2011 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

2012 2 3 7 5 6 4 1 8

2013 3 2 4 5 7 6 1 8

2014 3 2 4 5 7 6 1 8

2015 3 2 4 5 7 6 1 8

2016 2 1 4 5 7 6 3 8

2017 3 1 5 4 7 6 2 8

mean 3 2 6 4 7 5 1 8

median 3 2 6 4 7 5 1 8



2008 543.2 545.0 527.2 525.1 535.3 528.6 547.9 462.6 536.6 544.1

2009 544.4 544.5 533.1 532.5 535.7 526.6 548.6 471.5 539.3 544.5

2010 545.3 547.0 536.0 538.7 538.1 528.9 553.1 470.5 541.4 546.1

2011 540.9 541.4 531.6 535.8 531.8 524.6 549.4 465.4 536.8 541.2

2012 543.3 542.6 530.0 535.6 532.2 528.0 545.3 464.9 537.5 542.9

2013 541.8 541.1 532.2 535.3 531.1 524.8 548.7 454.4 536.8 541.4

2014 542.6 541.4 533.6 537.7 532.1 529.2 552.9 461.0 538.4 542.0

2015 541.4 542.9 534.0 532.8 531.8 525.8 548.0 458.9 537.4 542.2

2016 540.6 543.7 532.9 535.0 534.1 530.5 546.1 463.7 537.7 542.1

2017 545.3 545.8 535.1 536.4 535.9 530.1 549.0 462.6 540.5 545.6

mean 542.9 543.5 532.6 534.5 533.8 527.7 548.9 463.6 538.2 543.2

median 542.9 543.3 533.0 535.4 533.2 528.3 548.7 463.2 537.6 542.6




2008 3 2 6 7 4 5 1 8

2009 3 2 5 6 4 7 1 8

2010 3 2 6 4 5 7 1 8

2011 3 2 6 4 5 7 1 8

2012 2 3 6 4 5 7 1 8

2013 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2014 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2015 3 2 4 5 6 7 1 8

2016 3 2 6 4 5 7 1 8

2017 3 2 6 4 5 7 1 8

mean 3 2 6 4 5 7 1 8

median 3 2 6 4 5 7 1 8

31



2008 581.3 583.8 565.0 564.7 571.5 565.6 588.6 514.7 575.1 582.6

2009 582.4 585.3 569.5 570.3 574.2 567.9 590.9 518.4 577.7 583.8

2010 581.2 584.0 570.9 569.4 570.5 566.3 589.4 513.8 576.8 582.6

2011 579.9 583.4 570.6 572.5 569.5 562.8 587.5 513.8 576.5 581.6

2012 577.5 578.8 564.4 571.3 566.1 560.9 585.2 508.2 572.6 578.2

2013 579.7 579.3 568.1 573.6 569.0 561.6 589.8 507.6 574.7 579.5

2014 578.6 580.0 567.6 578.6 566.9 562.8 585.5 506.6 574.8 579.3

2015 576.7 579.4 568.0 577.8 565.9 562.8 585.4 499.5 573.9 578.1

2016 575.2 578.6 566.8 577.8 567.2 567.0 586.7 505.9 573.7 576.9

2017 583.6 577.6 569.7 577.6 565.3 559.7 585.5 503.5 576.0 580.6

mean 579.6 581.0 568.1 573.4 568.6 563.7 587.5 509.2 575.2 580.3

median 579.8 579.7 568.1 573.0 568.1 562.8 587.1 507.9 575.0 580.0




2008 3 2 6 7 4 5 1 8

2009 3 2 6 5 4 7 1 8

2010 3 2 4 6 5 7 1 8

2011 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2012 3 2 6 4 5 7 1 8

2013 2 3 6 4 5 7 1 8

2014 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2015 4 2 5 3 6 7 1 8

2016 4 2 7 3 5 6 1 8

2017 2 4 5 3 6 7 1 8

mean 3 2 6 4 5 7 1 8

median 2 3 6 4 5 7 1 8

Table AM9: STU 4YA Equal Weighted Mean Summary – Mean Scores


2008 509.5 512.3 483.0 487.1 495.9 493.4 512.2 424.5 500.0 510.9

2009 512.6 514.2 490.2 494.1 497.4 493.9 515.8 431.9 504.0 513.4

2010 511.4 514.0 492.2 494.6 495.9 495.1 517.3 428.0 504.2 512.7

2011 510.5 512.2 492.8 496.7 493.1 491.7 517.0 426.0 503.2 511.3

2012 510.9 511.2 492.2 496.9 493.3 494.2 515.0 425.8 503.2 511.0

2013 510.7 511.7 497.3 499.2 495.1 492.1 517.2 427.3 504.5 511.2

2014 509.7 511.0 497.3 500.9 493.8 493.9 515.6 427.4 504.2 510.4

2015 509.9 513.5 499.6 501.0 495.6 494.2 515.7 426.2 505.4 511.7

2016 509.8 514.1 500.7 503.2 497.9 497.5 514.3 433.2 506.4 512.0

2017 514.2 514.5 502.3 504.3 496.7 495.9 515.5 430.0 508.2 514.4

mean 510.9 512.9 494.8 497.8 495.5 494.2 515.6 428.0 504.3 511.9

median 510.6 512.9 495.0 498.0 495.7 494.1 515.7 427.4 504.2 511.5


32

Table AM10: STU 4YA Equal Weighed Mean Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 3 1 7 6 4 5 2 8

2009 3 2 7 5 4 6 1 8

2010 3 2 7 6 4 5 1 8

2011 3 2 6 4 5 7 1 8

2012 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

2013 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2014 3 2 5 4 7 6 1 8

2015 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2016 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2017 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

mean 3 2 6 4 5 7 1 8

median 3 2 6 4 5 7 1 8

Table AM11: STU NAPLAN Equal Weighted Means Summary – Total of All Ranks


# 1 1 11 0 0 0 0 28 0

# 2 11 23 0 0 0 0 6 0

# 3 26 5 0 3 0 0 6 0

# 4 2 1 10 13 6 8 0 0

# 5 0 0 9 13 13 5 0 0

# 6 0 0 12 9 10 9 0 0

# 7 0 0 9 2 11 18 0 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40


33

Table AE1: STU Year 3 NAPLAN Summary of Weighted Means

Using Literacy and Numeracy 50% each – Mean Scores


2008 414.0 419.6 371.5 384.7 395.5 401.8 414.6 323.6 400.6 416.8

2009 415.4 420.1 380.2 388.8 391.3 397.2 417.4 321.3 403.2 417.8

2010 411.7 418.6 384.9 388.8 389.9 400.0 421.1 323.6 403.8 415.2

2011 415.8 420.1 392.1 394.2 389.4 398.1 421.7 327.6 406.4 418.0

2012 416.7 419.6 393.1 395.0 391.3 401.4 419.9 325.0 407.0 418.1

2013 415.1 420.1 396.8 396.9 393.5 398.4 421.9 331.5 407.7 417.6

2014 415.0 419.7 399.4 398.7 392.7 399.5 418.6 331.9 408.2 417.4

2015 414.3 421.4 402.4 400.0 395.1 399.8 419.2 331.5 409.4 417.8

2016 417.9 425.1 407.3 406.0 399.7 403.1 421.4 342.9 413.7 421.5

2017 423.4 428.0 410.2 409.4 399.4 407.2 423.7 336.2 417.2 425.7

mean 415.9 421.2 393.8 396.2 393.8 400.6 419.9 329.5 407.7 418.6

median 415.3 420.1 395.0 395.9 393.1 399.9 420.5 329.5 407.3 417.8


[weightings are: Reading 12.5%, Writing 12.5%, Spelling 12.5%, Grammar and Punctuation 12.5%, Numeracy 50%]


Using Literacy and Numeracy 50% each – Ranks


2008 3 1 7 6 5 4 2 8

2009 3 1 7 6 5 4 2 8

2010 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2011 3 2 6 5 7 4 1 8

2012 3 2 6 5 7 4 1 8

2013 3 2 6 5 7 4 1 8

2014 3 1 5 6 7 4 2 8

2015 3 1 4 5 7 6 2 8

2016 3 1 4 5 7 6 2 8

2017 3 1 4 5 7 6 2 8

mean 3 1 6 5 7 4 2 8

median 3 2 6 5 7 4 1 8




2008 493.2 495.6 463.3 467.8 471.0 472.2 491.3 410.0 481.8 494.4

2009 501.9 499.3 472.3 476.9 477.1 477.1 498.8 421.8 489.1 500.6

2010 500.0 502.0 473.5 477.6 476.6 480.5 499.9 412.9 489.3 501.0

2011 499.2 499.4 471.5 479.5 473.9 478.0 504.0 411.0 488.1 499.3

2012 498.5 497.5 474.9 478.6 474.1 480.6 504.1 409.2 488.9 498.0

2013 497.0 497.2 484.0 482.3 474.4 475.8 501.2 418.3 489.8 497.1

2014 496.4 498.3 483.7 483.2 475.9 480.3 500.7 417.1 490.1 497.3

2015 498.6 503.1 487.2 485.9 480.4 483.3 503.7 420.5 493.5 500.8

2016 497.9 502.3 488.8 486.9 479.7 483.2 497.3 425.3 493.4 500.1

2017 499.1 501.9 489.8 489.1 479.5 482.7 499.4 425.0 494.2 500.5

mean 498.2 499.6 478.9 480.8 476.2 479.4 500.0 417.1 489.8 498.9

median 498.5 499.3 479.3 480.9 476.2 480.4 500.3 417.7 489.6 499.7



34




2008 2 1 7 6 5 4 3 8

2009 1 2 7 6 5 4 3 8

2010 2 1 7 5 6 4 3 8

2011 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

2012 2 3 6 5 7 4 1 8

2013 3 2 4 5 7 6 1 8

2014 3 2 4 5 7 6 1 8

2015 3 2 4 5 7 6 1 8

2016 2 1 4 5 7 6 3 8

2017 3 1 4 5 7 6 2 8

mean 3 2 6 4 7 5 1 8

median 3 2 6 4 7 5 1 8




2008 546.2 547.7 531.6 528.3 535.6 530.6 551.0 472.1 539.7 547.0

2009 546.2 546.3 535.6 533.9 534.3 526.0 548.9 476.6 540.9 546.2

2010 547.1 549.5 539.8 541.3 538.3 529.5 554.3 476.6 543.8 548.3

2011 543.8 545.0 534.3 539.1 533.0 527.4 551.7 471.4 539.7 544.4

2012 543.3 543.2 530.8 535.4 531.1 527.2 545.5 468.6 537.7 543.3

2013 543.9 542.8 534.6 537.7 531.0 525.9 549.1 462.7 538.8 543.4

2014 545.5 544.1 537.3 540.6 532.8 530.7 554.3 469.8 541.2 544.8

2015 543.4 545.0 535.8 534.9 532.1 526.9 548.5 468.6 539.3 544.2

2016 544.9 548.3 537.8 539.9 537.3 533.9 549.7 472.2 542.2 546.6

2017 550.2 551.0 540.5 542.0 539.0 533.4 552.5 472.5 545.5 550.6

mean 545.4 546.3 535.8 537.3 534.4 529.2 550.6 471.1 540.9 545.9

median 545.2 545.6 535.7 538.4 533.6 528.5 550.3 471.8 540.3 545.5






2008 3 2 5 7 4 6 1 8

2009 3 2 4 6 5 7 1 8

2010 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2011 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2012 2 3 6 4 5 7 1 8

2013 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2014 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2015 3 2 4 5 6 7 1 8

2016 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2017 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

mean 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

median 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

35




2008 585.1 586.4 567.2 567.0 571.3 566.5 591.0 521.4 577.8 585.8

2009 587.7 589.6 573.3 574.5 575.9 569.8 594.4 526.4 582.0 588.7

2010 585.1 587.3 573.4 572.6 571.5 568.2 592.3 519.9 579.9 586.2

2011 583.5 585.9 572.0 576.1 570.4 564.4 589.6 519.4 579.1 584.7

2012 582.6 583.3 568.2 575.3 568.8 563.4 589.5 517.2 576.9 583.0

2013 584.3 582.7 570.0 577.6 570.0 563.1 592.5 513.5 578.1 583.5

2014 584.5 584.6 572.2 583.3 569.4 566.6 588.8 516.1 579.7 584.6

2015 583.9 586.0 574.3 584.6 570.8 568.3 590.8 514.0 580.6 585.0

2016 581.4 584.0 572.4 584.2 570.9 570.6 590.7 515.6 579.4 582.7

2017 589.7 583.5 575.5 584.3 570.1 564.7 589.4 517.8 581.9 586.6

mean 584.8 585.3 571.8 577.9 570.9 566.5 590.9 518.1 579.5 585.1

median 584.4 585.2 572.3 576.9 570.6 566.5 590.7 517.5 579.5 584.8






2008 3 2 5 6 4 7 1 8

2009 3 2 6 5 4 7 1 8

2010 3 2 4 5 6 7 1 8

2011 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2012 3 2 6 4 5 7 1 8

2013 2 3 5 4 5 7 1 8

2014 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2015 4 2 5 3 6 7 1 8

2016 4 3 5 2 6 7 1 8

2017 1 4 5 3 6 7 2 8

mean 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

median 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

Table AE9: STU 4YA NAPLAN Summary of Weighted Means



2008 509.6 512.3 483.4 487.0 493.4 492.7 512.0 431.8 500.0 511.0

2009 512.8 513.8 490.3 493.5 494.6 492.5 514.9 436.5 503.8 513.3

2010 511.0 514.3 492.9 495.1 494.0 494.5 516.9 433.2 504.2 512.7

2011 510.6 512.6 492.5 497.2 491.7 492.0 516.7 432.3 503.3 511.6

2012 510.3 510.9 491.7 496.1 491.3 493.1 514.7 430.0 502.6 510.6

2013 510.1 510.7 496.3 498.6 492.2 490.8 516.2 431.5 503.6 510.4

2014 510.3 511.7 498.2 501.4 492.7 494.3 515.6 433.7 504.8 511.0

2015 510.0 513.9 499.9 501.3 494.6 494.6 515.5 433.6 505.7 512.0

2016 510.5 514.9 501.6 504.3 496.9 497.7 514.8 439.0 507.2 512.7

2017 515.6 516.1 504.0 506.2 497.0 497.0 516.2 437.9 509.7 515.9

mean 511.1 513.1 495.1 498.1 493.8 493.9 515.3 434.0 504.5 512.1

median 510.4 513.2 494.6 497.9 493.7 493.7 515.6 433.4 504.0 511.8



36

Table AE10: STU 4YA NAPLAN Summary of Weighted Means



2008 3 1 7 6 4 5 2 8

2009 3 2 7 5 4 6 1 8

2010 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

2011 3 2 5 4 7 6 1 8

2012 3 2 6 4 7 5 1 8

2013 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2014 3 2 5 4 7 6 1 8

2015 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2016 3 1 5 4 7 6 2 8

2017 3 2 5 4 7 6 1 8

mean 3 2 5 4 7 6 1 8

median 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8


Table AE11: STU NAPLAN Summary of Weighted Means Using

Literacy and Numeracy 50% Each – Total of All Ranks


# 1 2 10 0 0 0 0 28 0

# 2 8 23 0 1 0 0 8 0

# 3 28 6 0 2 0 0 4 0

# 4 2 1 11 12 3 11 0 0

# 5 0 0 15 16 9 1 0 0

# 6 0 0 7 8 15 9 0 0

# 7 0 0 7 1 13 19 0 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40



Table AT1: STU NAPLAN Summary – Total Number of #1 Ranks


2008 4 7 0 0 0 0 9 0

2009 5 5 0 0 0 0 10 0

2010 5 3 0 0 0 0 12 0

2011 5 1 0 0 0 0 14 0

2012 4 4 0 0 0 0 12 0

2013 4 2 0 0 0 0 14 0

2014 3 3 0 1 0 0 14 0

2015 3 7 0 0 0 0 10 0

2016 3 8 0 0 0 0 9 0

2017 5 8 0 0 0 0 7 0

Total 41 48 0 1 0 0 111 0

[200 in total for Years 3, 5, 7 and 9, across the five components of Reading, Writing, Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation,

and Numeracy, across the 10 years from 2008 till 2017, but actually 201 because two STUs were equal on one occasion]

37

Appendix B – State-Territory Unit (STU) Metro NAPLAN Data 2008 to 2017

Table BR1: STU Metro Year 3 NAPLAN Reading Summary – Mean Scores


2009 417.0 423.2 378.4 396.5 406.2 411.6 421.2 366.5 408.0 420.1

2009 427.8 433.9 391.2 405.3 405.1 410.0 433.8 367.5 418.1 430.9

2010 427.1 434.9 399.5 408.6 407.4 417.8 439.2 378.4 421.8 431.0

2011 429.0 437.7 407.2 408.7 408.5 415.3 443.2 374.8 423.6 433.4

2012 432.4 436.2 415.7 418.0 414.3 423.9 443.9 385.9 427.4 434.3

2013 429.3 438.5 413.8 415.2 416.2 420.2 442.0 383.6 426.2 433.9

2014 428.8 436.3 415.6 417.4 413.2 422.6 438.9 390.0 425.8 432.6

2015 436.5 444.2 425.1 422.6 421.0 424.7 442.9 392.4 433.5 440.4

2016 436.4 442.1 428.5 425.8 420.5 421.6 441.0 395.8 434.2 439.3

2017 443.2 450.1 434.1 429.5 423.0 430.1 443.7 396.9 440.3 446.7

mean 430.8 437.7 410.9 414.8 413.5 419.8 439.0 383.2 425.9 434.2

median 429.2 437.0 414.7 416.3 413.8 420.9 441.5 384.8 426.0 433.6


Table BR2: STU Metro Year 3 NAPLAN Reading Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 3 1 7 6 5 4 2 8

2009 3 1 7 5 6 4 2 8

2010 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

2011 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

2012 3 2 6 5 7 4 1 8

2013 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2014 3 2 6 5 7 4 1 8

2015 3 1 4 6 7 5 2 8

2016 3 1 4 5 7 6 2 8

2017 3 1 4 6 7 5 2 8

mean 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

median 3 2 6 5 7 4 1 8



2008 498.3 499.0 471.6 481.1 482.7 484.0 503.4 458.2 490.2 498.7

2009 507.7 508.6 482.3 490.2 488.5 494.6 512.8 469.2 499.6 508.2

2010 501.0 505.7 474.0 486.3 481.7 491.2 508.7 463.0 493.9 503.4

2011 499.8 506.8 475.7 489.2 483.7 491.3 516.5 459.6 494.8 503.3

2012 504.7 507.6 486.6 491.4 489.4 494.8 519.1 464.3 500.3 506.2

2013 511.1 513.1 502.0 502.3 496.3 501.9 519.4 479.4 507.9 512.1

2014 508.9 512.7 501.6 500.7 494.4 504.4 522.1 478.5 506.7 510.8

2015 507.0 512.9 500.3 496.5 494.4 500.7 520.8 475.1 505.3 510.0

2016 509.3 515.2 507.8 502.8 496.3 502.1 514.1 482.8 509.0 512.3

2017 514.7 518.6 510.6 507.6 500.0 504.9 520.1 483.8 513.2 516.7

mean 506.3 510.0 491.3 494.8 490.7 497.0 515.7 471.4 502.1 508.1

median 507.4 510.7 493.5 494.0 491.9 497.8 517.8 472.2 502.8 509.1


38



2008 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2009 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

2010 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

2011 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

2012 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

2013 3 2 5 4 7 6 1 8

2014 3 2 5 6 7 4 1 8

2015 3 2 5 6 7 4 1 8

2016 3 1 4 5 7 6 2 8

2017 3 2 4 5 7 6 1 8

mean 3 2 6 5 7 4 1 8

median 3 2 6 5 7 4 1 8



2008 545.8 545.9 532.5 533.7 538.5 541.6 558.2 517.4 541.7 545.9

2009 550.0 550.9 537.4 541.7 542.0 541.9 558.3 517.3 546.6 550.5

2010 552.3 556.5 541.2 550.7 547.1 548.9 567.3 526.5 550.9 554.4

2011 547.8 548.2 538.1 547.3 537.6 539.3 561.8 521.5 545.4 548.0

2012 550.3 551.5 537.4 544.3 541.0 547.6 558.6 519.0 546.8 550.9

2013 548.9 550.4 538.2 545.3 540.0 540.9 560.6 515.4 546.3 549.7

2014 553.2 553.9 546.8 551.6 545.5 548.0 567.3 522.0 551.9 553.6

2015 553.1 555.0 548.3 547.2 546.2 546.2 566.1 524.6 551.7 554.1

2016 547.4 549.0 546.0 544.7 542.4 544.8 557.9 520.2 547.2 548.2

2017 553.6 555.0 549.1 545.8 547.8 547.2 561.7 519.9 552.0 554.3

mean 550.2 551.6 541.5 545.2 542.8 544.6 561.8 520.4 548.1 550.9

median 550.2 551.2 539.7 545.6 542.2 545.5 561.2 520.1 547.0 550.7




2008 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2009 3 2 7 6 4 5 1 8

2010 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

2011 3 2 6 4 7 5 1 8

2012 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

2013 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

2014 3 2 6 4 7 5 1 8

2015 3 2 4 5 6 6 1 8

2016 3 2 4 6 7 5 1 8

2017 3 2 4 7 5 6 1 8

mean 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

median 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

39



2008 585.6 587.0 572.3 575.7 579.5 585.2 601.9 559.8 582.1 586.3

2009 588.1 590.2 574.4 579.3 581.6 583.4 598.9 556.7 584.6 589.2

2010 581.6 585.0 569.2 571.2 571.3 576.1 594.8 556.4 578.3 583.3

2011 586.4 587.4 576.7 583.1 576.5 579.4 597.9 555.2 583.8 586.9

2012 581.7 584.6 570.9 577.6 573.9 577.5 597.0 547.9 579.5 583.2

2013 588.5 587.6 577.1 585.2 580.2 580.1 599.5 561.5 585.1 588.1

2014 589.7 589.3 576.3 591.9 577.6 579.3 597.3 563.5 586.3 589.5

2015 587.3 590.0 577.5 591.4 578.6 579.4 598.7 555.6 586.0 588.7

2016 586.5 586.8 583.6 591.3 578.7 584.0 600.8 556.8 586.5 586.7

2017 592.7 586.0 583.5 588.9 576.8 576.1 596.0 558.6 587.8 589.4

mean 586.8 587.4 576.2 583.6 577.5 580.1 598.3 557.2 584.0 587.1

median 586.9 587.2 576.5 584.2 578.1 579.4 598.3 556.8 584.9 587.5




2008 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2009 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2010 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2011 3 2 6 4 7 5 1 8

2012 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

2013 2 3 7 4 5 6 1 8

2014 3 4 7 2 6 5 1 8

2015 4 3 7 2 6 5 1 8

2016 4 3 6 2 7 5 1 8

2017 2 4 5 3 6 7 1 8

mean 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

median 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

Table BR9: STU Metro 4YA NAPLAN Reading Summary – Mean Scores


2008 511.7 513.8 488.7 496.8 501.7 505.6 521.2 475.5 505.5 512.7

2009 518.4 520.9 496.3 504.1 504.3 507.5 526.0 477.7 512.2 519.7

2010 515.5 520.5 496.0 504.2 501.9 508.5 527.5 481.1 511.2 518.0

2011 515.8 520.0 499.4 507.1 501.6 506.3 529.9 477.8 511.9 517.9

2012 517.3 520.0 502.7 507.8 504.7 511.0 529.7 479.3 513.5 518.6

2013 519.5 522.4 507.8 512.0 508.2 510.8 530.4 485.0 516.4 520.9

2014 520.2 523.1 510.1 515.4 507.7 513.6 531.4 488.5 517.7 521.6

2015 521.0 525.5 512.8 514.4 510.1 512.8 532.1 486.9 519.1 523.3

2016 519.9 523.3 516.5 516.2 509.5 513.1 528.5 488.9 519.2 521.6

2017 526.1 527.4 519.3 518.0 511.9 514.6 530.4 489.8 523.3 526.7

mean 518.5 521.7 505.0 509.6 506.1 510.4 528.7 483.0 515.0 520.1

median 518.9 521.7 505.2 509.9 506.2 510.9 529.8 483.0 514.9 520.3


40

Table BR10: STU Metro 4YA NAPLAN Reading Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2009 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2010 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

2011 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

2012 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

2013 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

2014 3 2 6 4 7 5 1 8

2015 3 2 5 4 7 6 1 8

2016 3 2 4 5 7 6 1 8

2017 3 2 4 5 7 6 1 8

mean 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

median 3 2 7 5 6 4 1 8

Table BR11: Total Number of #1 Ranks


2008 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0

2009 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0

2010 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2011 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2013 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2014 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

2015 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0

2016 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0

2017 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0

Total 0 6 0 0 0 0 34 0


Table BR12: Total of All Ranks


# 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 34 0

# 2 2 29 0 3 0 0 6 0

# 3 36 3 0 1 0 0 0 0

# 4 2 2 8 8 1 19 0 0

# 5 0 0 4 14 9 13 0 0

# 6 0 0 6 13 15 7 0 0

# 7 0 0 22 1 15 1 0 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40

mean 3 2 3 3 3 3 1 3

median 3 2 3 3 3 3 1 3


41

Table BW1: STU Metro Year 3 NAPLAN Writing Summary – Mean Scores


2008 432.9 429.0 397.6 405.9 420.1 420.9 423.3 387.3 420.9 431.0

2009 430.0 431.1 401.2 410.5 416.6 412.1 421.7 389.2 421.2 430.6

2010 434.1 432.8 408.1 409.3 416.1 414.8 434.1 381.1 425.6 433.5

2011 435.6 428.3 410.4 411.6 405.0 405.3 419.8 381.9 423.5 432.0

2012 431.4 432.6 410.0 415.0 407.4 414.5 416.1 383.5 423.4 432.0

2013 429.4 434.5 412.1 414.1 407.0 406.3 421.0 377.3 423.5 432.0

2014 415.3 420.9 395.2 407.8 390.4 396.9 403.5 371.9 409.6 418.1

2015 429.2 435.6 411.1 417.0 404.1 410.3 419.8 381.6 423.6 432.4

2016 429.7 439.1 415.4 422.6 417.4 418.6 419.9 395.1 427.5 434.4

2017 427.8 431.8 409.8 418.2 396.9 410.5 415.0 374.7 421.8 429.8

mean 429.5 431.6 407.1 413.2 408.1 411.0 419.4 382.4 422.1 430.6

median 429.9 432.2 409.9 412.9 407.2 411.3 419.9 381.8 423.5 432.0


Table BW2: STU Metro Year 3 NAPLAN Writing Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 1 2 7 6 5 4 3 8

2009 2 1 7 6 4 5 3 8

2010 1 3 7 6 4 5 1 8

2011 1 2 5 4 7 6 3 8

2012 2 1 6 4 7 5 3 8

2013 2 1 5 4 6 7 3 8

2014 2 1 6 3 7 5 4 8

2015 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2016 2 1 7 3 6 5 4 8

2017 2 1 6 3 7 5 4 8

mean 2 1 7 4 6 5 3 8

median 2 1 6 4 7 5 3 8



2008 501.4 506.9 474.4 479.1 486.4 481.3 490.8 456.9 493.5 504.2

2009 498.8 502.3 472.1 486.6 488.4 480.5 489.6 462.6 491.8 500.6

2010 499.9 501.5 477.2 481.9 485.4 480.3 494.8 456.6 492.4 500.7

2011 499.4 498.6 477.8 481.9 476.4 470.9 495.2 454.2 491.0 499.0

2012 493.1 493.9 464.1 478.6 468.5 474.1 485.3 450.3 485.1 493.5

2013 491.0 494.7 476.0 478.9 471.3 469.1 486.3 447.1 485.9 492.9

2014 480.6 485.5 463.4 474.2 461.8 464.9 473.0 442.9 476.0 483.1

2015 489.7 495.5 475.8 479.1 469.6 473.4 485.6 444.1 485.5 492.6

2016 483.7 495.2 472.1 477.9 471.8 477.3 474.3 456.6 482.7 489.5

2017 485.2 490.9 469.0 477.6 461.3 469.8 479.4 446.9 480.9 488.1

mean 492.3 496.5 472.2 479.6 474.1 474.2 485.4 451.8 486.5 494.4

median 492.1 495.4 473.3 479.0 471.6 473.8 486.0 452.3 485.7 493.2


42



2008 2 1 7 6 4 5 3 8

2009 2 1 7 5 4 6 3 8

2010 2 1 7 5 4 6 3 8

2011 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

2012 2 1 7 4 6 5 3 8

2013 2 1 5 4 6 7 3 8

2014 2 1 6 3 7 5 4 8

2015 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2016 2 1 6 3 7 4 5 8

2017 2 1 6 4 7 5 3 8

mean 2 1 7 4 6 5 3 8

median 2 1 6 4 7 5 3 8



2008 541.0 555.8 527.4 530.4 545.3 529.1 534.3 510.6 540.9 548.4

2009 538.7 546.8 531.3 538.7 543.5 526.4 538.7 504.3 539.5 542.8

2010 538.9 547.2 536.6 539.6 543.1 521.5 541.4 500.9 540.7 543.1

2011 535.4 540.8 539.8 537.3 536.1 514.3 535.7 509.3 537.6 538.1

2012 528.0 532.2 517.9 528.6 522.9 516.6 519.5 499.5 526.3 530.1

2013 525.0 530.7 521.2 526.4 523.1 509.5 526.7 484.7 525.5 527.9

2014 520.3 524.7 512.5 523.7 515.7 505.2 523.1 484.7 520.2 522.5

2015 519.1 528.4 511.6 514.1 517.2 507.5 521.9 471.8 519.2 523.8

2016 522.1 534.6 511.4 520.5 522.1 519.8 519.4 491.1 523.1 528.4

2017 525.3 530.8 511.9 517.5 518.0 511.3 522.3 482.9 522.7 528.1

mean 529.4 537.2 522.2 527.7 528.7 516.1 528.3 494.0 529.6 533.3

median 526.7 533.4 519.6 527.5 523.0 515.5 524.9 495.3 525.9 529.2




2008 3 1 7 5 2 6 4 8

2009 3 1 6 3 2 7 3 8

2010 5 1 6 4 2 7 3 8

2011 6 1 2 3 4 7 5 8

2012 3 1 6 2 4 7 5 8

2013 4 1 6 3 5 7 2 8

2014 4 1 6 2 5 7 3 8

2015 3 1 6 5 4 7 2 8

2016 2 1 7 4 2 5 6 8

2017 2 1 6 5 4 7 3 8

mean 2 1 6 5 3 7 4 8

median 3 1 6 2 5 7 4 8

43



2008 574.0 594.5 561.8 569.6 578.5 563.9 571.0 546.6 576.2 584.3

2009 573.9 587.1 564.6 574.3 579.1 566.0 578.0 543.8 575.7 580.5

2010 572.1 585.7 570.4 570.9 572.5 560.1 575.9 539.5 574.9 578.9

2011 571.5 587.0 572.5 571.2 568.0 554.9 574.9 538.2 575.3 579.3

2012 565.1 573.4 545.6 565.9 556.8 548.1 561.9 520.6 562.3 569.3

2013 563.1 571.0 556.3 563.3 559.1 547.4 569.9 522.8 563.3 567.1

2014 557.3 566.3 550.6 570.5 553.8 543.8 558.7 522.6 559.2 561.8

2015 553.4 566.5 545.3 561.9 549.0 541.8 559.0 495.1 555.6 560.0

2016 553.9 568.1 544.1 563.1 551.4 553.5 556.9 515.6 557.4 561.0

2017 568.0 568.5 549.8 564.2 548.9 543.3 564.8 521.2 562.9 568.3

mean 565.2 576.8 556.1 567.5 561.7 552.3 567.1 526.6 566.3 571.0

median 566.6 572.2 553.5 567.8 558.0 550.8 567.4 522.7 563.1 568.8




2008 3 1 7 5 2 6 4 8

2009 5 1 7 4 2 6 3 8

2010 4 1 6 5 3 7 2 8

2011 4 1 3 5 6 7 2 8

2012 3 1 7 2 5 6 4 8

2013 4 1 6 3 5 7 2 8

2014 4 2 6 1 5 7 3 8

2015 4 1 6 2 5 7 3 8

2016 4 1 7 2 6 5 3 8

2017 2 1 5 4 6 7 3 8

mean 4 1 6 2 5 7 3 8

median 4 1 6 2 5 7 3 8

Table BW9: STU Metro 4YA NAPLAN Writing Summary – Mean Scores


2008 512.3 521.6 490.3 496.3 507.6 498.8 504.9 475.4 507.9 516.9

2009 510.4 516.8 492.3 502.5 506.9 496.3 507.0 475.0 507.1 513.6

2010 511.3 516.8 498.1 500.4 504.3 494.2 511.6 469.5 508.4 514.0

2011 510.5 513.7 500.1 500.5 496.4 486.4 506.4 470.9 506.9 512.1

2012 504.4 508.0 484.4 497.0 488.9 488.3 495.7 463.5 499.3 506.2

2013 502.1 507.7 491.4 495.7 490.1 483.1 501.0 458.0 499.6 504.9

2014 493.4 499.4 480.4 494.1 480.4 477.7 489.6 455.5 491.3 496.4

2015 497.9 506.5 486.0 493.0 485.0 483.3 496.6 448.2 496.0 502.2

2016 497.4 509.3 485.8 496.0 490.7 492.3 492.6 464.6 497.7 503.3

2017 501.6 505.5 485.1 494.4 481.3 483.7 495.4 456.4 497.1 503.5

mean 504.1 510.5 489.4 497.0 493.2 488.4 500.1 463.7 501.1 507.3

median 503.3 508.6 488.1 496.1 490.4 487.3 498.8 464.0 499.4 505.6


44

Table BW10: STU Metro 4YA NAPLAN Writing Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 2 1 7 6 3 5 4 8

2009 2 1 7 5 4 6 3 8

2010 3 1 6 5 4 7 2 8

2011 2 1 5 4 6 7 3 8

2012 2 1 7 3 5 6 4 8

2013 2 1 5 4 6 7 3 8

2014 3 1 6 2 5 7 4 8

2015 2 1 5 4 6 7 3 8

2016 2 1 7 3 6 5 4 8

2017 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

mean 2 1 6 4 5 7 3 8

median 2 1 6 4 5 7 3 8

Table BW11: Total Number of #1 Ranks


2008 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

2009 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

2010 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0

2011 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

2012 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

2013 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

2014 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0

2015 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

2016 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

2017 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 4 35 0 1 0 0 1 0


Table BW12: Total of All Ranks


# 1 4 35 0 1 0 0 1 0

# 2 19 4 1 5 6 0 5 0

# 3 6 1 1 9 1 0 23 0

# 4 8 0 0 13 9 2 7 0

# 5 2 0 7 8 7 12 3 0

# 6 1 0 17 4 8 9 1 0

# 7 0 0 14 0 9 17 0 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40


45

Table BS1: STU Metro Year 3 NAPLAN Spelling Summary – Mean Scores


2008 426.7 421.0 373.1 392.3 402.9 401.3 407.0 356.8 408.7 423.9

2009 432.3 425.4 381.3 399.9 401.4 396.9 411.3 357.8 414.1 428.9

2010 422.0 418.8 378.9 392.5 395.1 395.6 409.4 356.4 409.0 420.4

2011 428.6 422.7 394.8 404.2 398.4 399.6 415.1 366.8 415.2 425.7

2012 437.4 429.8 405.7 411.9 408.7 404.9 419.1 382.8 423.5 433.6

2013 431.9 426.5 403.0 409.7 410.6 400.1 415.8 374.3 420.0 429.2

2014 433.3 426.2 407.1 415.0 407.7 399.7 411.7 378.8 421.5 429.8

2015 427.3 425.9 402.2 411.2 407.8 396.8 409.6 380.8 417.9 426.6

2016 440.1 433.9 418.6 423.1 417.2 407.8 420.8 391.9 430.4 437.0

2017 437.1 430.1 417.1 419.4 410.8 400.6 412.7 383.0 426.9 433.6

mean 431.7 426.0 398.2 407.9 406.1 400.3 413.3 372.9 418.7 428.9

median 432.1 426.1 402.6 410.5 407.8 399.9 412.2 376.6 419.0 429.0


Table BS2: STU Metro Year 3 NAPLAN Spelling Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 1 2 7 6 4 5 3 8

2009 1 2 7 5 4 6 3 8

2010 1 2 7 6 5 4 3 8

2011 1 2 7 4 6 5 3 8

2012 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

2013 1 2 6 5 4 7 3 8

2014 1 2 6 3 5 7 4 8

2015 1 2 6 3 5 7 4 8

2016 1 2 5 3 6 7 4 8

2017 1 2 4 3 6 7 5 8

mean 1 2 7 4 5 6 3 8

median 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8



2008 506.9 499.0 467.6 479.7 485.5 476.7 488.1 445.4 492.0 503.0

2009 511.5 501.5 470.9 484.8 484.9 483.2 488.6 455.9 495.3 506.5

2010 510.2 500.0 473.0 486.1 485.0 480.0 489.4 456.7 495.0 505.1

2011 507.0 498.1 471.6 485.0 480.4 473.9 491.3 452.4 492.8 502.6

2012 517.2 504.6 485.4 495.9 488.7 482.6 499.7 464.5 503.7 510.9

2013 513.7 505.5 491.7 495.8 488.4 482.6 496.9 467.5 502.8 509.6

2014 515.3 506.3 495.3 502.4 493.6 487.2 502.0 475.0 505.4 510.8

2015 515.0 510.2 495.0 500.9 495.5 486.9 500.4 469.8 506.1 512.6

2016 510.2 504.3 492.9 497.5 488.8 485.2 490.1 471.4 501.9 507.3

2017 517.3 509.0 502.8 507.4 496.0 488.0 498.5 478.1 509.3 513.2

mean 512.4 503.9 484.6 493.6 488.7 482.6 494.5 463.7 500.4 508.1

median 512.6 504.5 488.6 495.9 488.6 482.9 494.1 466.0 502.4 508.4


46



2008 1 2 7 5 4 6 3 8

2009 1 2 7 5 4 6 3 8

2010 1 2 7 4 5 6 3 8

2011 1 2 7 4 5 6 3 8

2012 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

2013 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

2014 1 2 5 3 6 7 4 8

2015 1 2 6 3 5 7 4 8

2016 1 2 4 3 6 7 5 8

2017 1 2 4 3 6 7 5 8

mean 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

median 1 2 5 3 5 7 4 8



2008 557.2 548.0 533.3 535.9 546.0 532.1 544.3 505.9 546.5 552.6

2009 558.8 546.5 537.3 537.5 541.9 531.1 539.8 504.0 547.6 552.7

2010 562.8 552.7 540.3 548.0 545.0 532.8 547.6 510.5 552.1 557.8

2011 554.9 545.2 533.6 542.8 538.4 529.4 542.4 511.4 545.0 550.1

2012 562.8 550.5 539.3 547.9 542.2 533.1 544.1 515.6 551.1 556.7

2013 567.3 555.8 547.9 554.1 548.0 535.5 554.9 520.7 557.0 561.6

2014 560.3 552.2 542.6 551.8 544.8 536.6 553.7 517.7 552.8 556.3

2015 563.4 551.9 550.2 549.2 546.8 535.5 548.5 521.9 554.4 557.7

2016 558.4 548.8 547.1 548.8 542.3 535.7 546.0 520.7 551.1 553.6

2017 566.8 554.4 553.5 555.2 550.7 538.6 549.6 525.7 558.1 560.6

mean 561.3 550.6 542.5 547.1 544.6 534.0 547.1 515.4 551.6 555.9

median 561.6 551.2 541.5 548.4 544.9 534.3 546.8 516.7 551.6 556.5




2008 1 2 6 5 3 7 4 8

2009 1 2 6 5 3 7 4 8

2010 1 2 6 3 5 7 4 8

2011 1 2 6 3 5 7 4 8

2012 1 2 6 3 5 7 4 8

2013 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

2014 1 3 6 4 5 7 2 8

2015 1 2 3 4 6 7 5 8

2016 1 2 4 2 6 7 5 8

2017 1 3 4 2 5 7 6 8

mean 1 2 6 3 5 7 4 8

median 1 2 6 3 5 7 4 8

47



2008 592.7 585.7 572.8 574.3 581.5 569.3 586.7 549.1 583.7 589.2

2009 592.4 584.8 573.9 574.3 578.1 568.3 584.7 542.2 583.2 588.6

2010 594.7 586.5 578.5 577.5 577.7 570.7 584.4 549.1 585.7 590.6

2011 596.7 590.9 580.2 582.0 580.8 573.0 584.4 551.9 588.9 593.8

2012 593.1 583.7 575.5 581.0 574.4 564.6 582.9 539.7 583.9 588.4

2013 598.1 587.8 582.9 585.6 582.2 568.1 589.0 556.3 589.3 593.0

2014 597.6 590.0 580.9 590.5 581.0 569.6 588.7 559.5 589.7 593.8

2015 598.6 588.5 584.8 590.9 579.7 568.8 588.8 552.7 590.5 593.6

2016 594.3 587.3 582.6 590.8 578.2 570.6 590.2 553.5 589.0 590.8

2017 598.5 585.0 584.5 590.4 579.2 566.0 586.3 557.3 589.7 591.8

mean 595.7 587.0 579.7 583.7 579.3 568.9 586.6 551.1 587.4 591.3

median 595.7 586.9 580.6 583.8 579.5 569.1 586.5 552.3 589.0 591.3




2008 1 3 6 5 4 7 2 8

2009 1 2 6 5 4 7 3 8

2010 1 2 4 6 5 7 3 8

2011 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

2012 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

2013 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

2014 1 3 6 2 5 7 4 8

2015 1 4 5 2 6 7 3 8

2016 1 4 5 2 6 7 3 8

2017 1 4 5 2 6 7 3 8

mean 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

median 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

Table BS9: STU Metro 4YA NAPLAN Spelling Summary – Mean Scores


2008 520.9 513.4 486.7 495.6 504.0 494.9 506.5 464.3 507.7 517.2

2009 523.8 514.6 490.9 499.1 501.6 494.9 506.1 465.0 510.1 519.2

2010 522.4 514.5 492.7 501.0 500.7 494.8 507.7 468.2 510.5 518.5

2011 521.8 514.2 495.1 503.5 499.5 494.0 508.3 470.6 510.5 518.0

2012 527.6 517.2 501.5 509.2 503.5 496.3 511.5 475.7 515.6 522.4

2013 527.8 518.9 506.4 511.3 507.3 496.6 514.2 479.7 517.3 523.3

2014 526.6 518.7 506.5 514.9 506.8 498.3 514.0 482.8 517.4 522.7

2015 526.1 519.1 508.1 513.1 507.5 497.0 511.8 481.3 517.2 522.6

2016 525.8 518.6 510.3 515.1 506.6 499.8 511.8 484.4 518.1 522.2

2017 529.9 519.6 514.5 518.1 509.2 498.3 511.8 486.0 521.0 524.8

mean 525.3 516.9 501.2 508.1 504.7 496.5 510.4 475.8 514.5 521.1

median 525.9 517.9 503.9 510.2 505.3 496.4 511.6 477.7 516.4 522.3


48

Table BS10: STU Metro 4YA NAPLAN Spelling Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 1 2 7 5 4 6 3 8

2009 1 2 7 5 4 6 3 8

2010 1 2 7 4 5 6 3 8

2011 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

2012 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

2013 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

2014 1 2 6 3 5 7 4 8

2015 1 2 5 3 6 7 4 8

2016 1 2 5 3 6 7 4 8

2017 1 2 4 3 6 7 5 8

mean 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

median 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

Table BS11: STU Metro NAPLAN Spelling – Total Number of #1 Ranks


2008 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2009 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2010 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2011 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2012 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2013 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2014 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2015 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2016 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2017 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Table BS12: Total of All Ranks


# 1 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

# 2 0 32 0 6 0 0 3 0

# 3 0 5 1 11 2 0 20 0

# 4 0 3 6 12 7 1 11 0

# 5 0 0 8 8 17 2 5 0

# 6 0 0 17 3 14 5 1 0

# 7 0 0 8 0 0 32 0 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40


49

Table BG1: STU Metro Year 3 NAPLAN Grammar and Punctuation Summary – Mean Scores


2008 422.6 431.4 377.6 393.7 402.2 412.4 419.8 361.5 411.2 427.0

2009 438.4 444.2 401.2 415.6 414.6 415.2 440.7 370.2 428.2 441.3

2010 432.8 440.1 405.6 410.8 405.7 409.7 435.8 365.8 426.1 436.5

2011 439.3 440.9 414.5 418.2 410.4 415.2 438.3 375.3 430.3 440.1

2012 443.2 443.2 419.5 420.3 411.9 416.6 439.8 381.6 433.4 443.2

2013 443.7 444.1 425.7 425.1 420.8 420.1 444.0 389.6 436.3 443.9

2014 443.8 441.7 428.0 426.6 414.2 410.5 439.8 390.9 435.6 442.8

2015 447.5 448.5 436.9 435.4 422.1 419.3 441.3 392.0 442.0 448.0

2016 449.7 450.9 441.0 436.3 427.2 425.2 442.4 399.5 445.1 450.3

2017 443.2 450.1 434.1 429.5 423.0 430.1 443.7 396.9 440.3 446.7

mean 440.4 443.5 418.4 421.2 415.2 417.4 438.6 382.3 432.9 442.0

median 443.2 443.7 422.6 422.7 414.4 415.9 440.3 385.6 434.5 443.0


Table BG2: STU Metro Year 3 NAPLAN Grammar and Punctuation Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 2 1 7 6 5 4 3 8

2009 3 1 7 4 6 5 2 8

2010 3 1 7 4 6 5 2 8

2011 2 1 6 4 7 5 3 8

2012 1 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2013 3 1 4 5 6 7 2 8

2014 1 2 4 5 6 7 3 8

2015 2 1 4 5 6 7 3 8

2016 2 1 4 5 6 7 3 8

2017 3 1 4 6 7 5 2 8

mean 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

median 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8



2008 509.6 516.7 482.0 492.0 493.2 499.8 513.4 460.2 502.9 513.2

2009 516.9 514.5 490.9 495.6 495.6 496.8 516.5 473.6 507.0 515.7

2010 519.4 517.2 488.8 496.5 493.6 494.7 511.8 460.2 508.0 518.3

2011 516.3 513.9 491.9 502.3 492.4 492.2 521.9 467.4 507.5 515.1

2012 510.1 503.1 484.7 491.6 481.0 481.9 511.2 455.5 499.8 506.6

2013 514.9 511.6 501.2 504.0 493.8 490.8 516.3 473.3 508.5 513.3

2014 519.9 513.5 506.4 506.1 496.4 494.4 518.8 476.1 512.1 516.7

2015 516.5 515.6 505.4 505.6 497.2 494.5 515.9 472.4 511.2 516.1

2016 518.6 512.8 511.9 506.9 496.4 500.7 511.3 481.2 512.7 515.7

2017 515.3 510.3 503.8 502.9 493.6 494.8 507.0 471.7 508.6 512.8

mean 515.8 512.9 496.7 500.4 493.3 494.1 514.4 469.2 507.8 514.3

median 516.4 513.7 496.6 502.6 493.7 494.6 514.7 472.1 508.3 515.4


50



2008 3 1 7 6 5 4 2 8

2009 1 3 7 5 5 4 2 8

2010 1 2 7 4 6 5 3 8

2011 2 3 7 4 5 6 1 8

2012 2 3 5 4 7 6 1 8

2013 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2014 1 3 4 5 6 7 2 8

2015 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

2016 1 2 3 5 7 6 4 8

2017 1 2 4 5 7 6 3 8

mean 1 3 5 4 7 6 2 8

median 1 3 5 4 7 6 2 8



2008 541.6 542.8 522.7 523.5 535.2 535.8 546.6 505.0 535.9 542.2

2009 548.4 549.0 538.5 539.7 542.1 541.3 556.9 508.8 545.6 548.7

2010 544.8 544.9 533.3 538.6 537.5 534.5 553.2 509.2 541.4 544.9

2011 543.1 543.1 529.4 535.3 533.3 527.9 551.4 506.8 538.8 543.1

2012 556.9 554.5 544.7 552.2 546.1 544.1 558.5 523.3 552.4 555.7

2013 548.3 543.7 537.0 542.3 533.8 524.3 551.7 502.3 543.0 546.0

2014 555.5 547.5 546.2 550.3 541.2 537.9 563.9 516.6 550.3 551.5

2015 553.4 551.6 545.5 544.7 541.4 531.7 554.2 515.1 549.3 552.5

2016 551.1 548.5 545.9 545.2 542.1 539.1 551.5 514.6 548.1 549.8

2017 553.6 551.3 546.5 545.2 546.2 539.2 552.7 510.1 550.1 552.5

mean 549.7 547.7 539.0 541.7 539.9 535.6 554.1 511.2 545.5 548.7

median 549.8 548.0 541.6 543.5 541.3 536.9 553.0 509.7 546.9 549.3




2008 3 2 7 6 5 4 1 8

2009 3 2 7 6 4 5 1 8

2010 3 2 7 4 5 6 1 8

2011 2 2 6 4 5 7 1 8

2012 2 3 6 4 5 7 1 8

2013 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2014 2 4 5 3 6 7 1 8

2015 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 8

2016 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 8

2017 1 3 4 6 5 7 2 8

mean 2 3 6 4 5 7 1 8

median 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

51



2008 581.4 579.9 568.3 564.0 571.3 565.2 588.7 539.6 575.8 580.7

2009 580.0 583.9 573.3 571.4 576.7 572.2 592.3 541.4 578.6 582.0

2010 588.6 590.3 579.1 577.9 579.5 577.5 594.5 556.8 585.3 589.5

2011 580.9 583.7 572.1 573.9 572.1 568.6 587.4 541.6 578.6 582.3

2012 582.3 582.2 573.8 576.2 572.5 568.6 587.9 542.1 579.1 582.3

2013 584.1 582.3 574.4 578.2 574.5 567.6 593.7 542.7 580.3 583.2

2014 583.2 584.6 572.6 583.5 573.4 569.3 588.3 551.4 580.6 583.9

2015 576.2 575.3 571.0 578.1 566.0 561.1 581.1 538.4 574.4 575.8

2016 575.2 576.1 574.5 579.1 569.5 571.5 588.2 543.3 575.7 575.7

2017 589.2 576.6 582.3 578.3 570.7 561.4 585.0 544.1 581.9 582.9

mean 582.1 581.5 574.1 576.1 572.6 568.3 588.7 544.1 579.0 581.8

median 581.9 582.3 573.6 578.0 572.3 568.6 588.3 542.4 578.9 582.3




2008 2 3 5 7 4 6 1 8

2009 3 2 5 7 4 6 1 8

2010 3 2 5 6 4 7 1 8

2011 3 2 5 4 5 7 1 8

2012 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2013 2 3 6 4 5 7 1 8

2014 4 2 6 3 5 7 1 8

2015 3 4 5 2 6 7 1 8

2016 4 3 5 2 7 6 1 8

2017 1 5 3 4 6 7 2 8

mean 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

median 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

Table BG9: STU Metro 4YA NAPLAN Grammar and Punctuation Summary – Mean Scores


2008 513.8 517.7 487.7 493.3 500.5 503.3 517.1 466.6 506.5 515.8

2009 520.9 522.9 501.0 505.6 507.3 506.4 526.6 473.5 514.9 521.9

2010 521.4 523.1 501.7 506.0 504.1 504.1 523.8 473.0 515.2 522.3

2011 519.9 520.4 502.0 507.4 502.1 501.0 524.8 472.8 513.8 520.2

2012 523.1 520.8 505.7 510.1 502.9 502.8 524.4 475.6 516.2 521.9

2013 522.8 520.4 509.6 512.4 505.7 500.7 526.4 477.0 517.0 521.6

2014 525.6 521.8 513.3 516.6 506.3 503.0 527.7 483.8 519.7 523.7

2015 523.4 522.8 514.7 516.0 506.7 501.7 523.1 479.5 519.2 523.1

2016 523.7 522.1 518.3 516.9 508.8 509.1 523.4 484.7 520.4 522.9

2017 525.3 522.1 516.7 514.0 508.4 506.4 522.1 480.7 520.2 523.7

mean 522.0 521.4 507.1 509.8 505.3 503.8 523.9 476.7 516.3 521.7

median 522.9 522.0 507.6 511.2 506.0 503.2 524.1 476.3 516.6 522.1


52

Table BG10: STU Metro 4YA NAPLAN Grammar and Punctuation Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 3 1 7 6 5 4 2 8

2009 3 2 7 6 4 5 1 8

2010 3 2 7 4 6 5 1 8

2011 3 2 6 4 5 7 1 8

2012 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2013 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2014 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2015 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

2016 1 3 4 5 7 6 2 8

2017 1 3 4 5 6 7 2 8

mean 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

median 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

Table BG11: STU Metro NAPLAN Summary – Total Number of #1 Ranks


2008 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0

2009 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0

2010 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0

2011 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0

2012 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 0

2013 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0

2014 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0

2015 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0

2016 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0

2017 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 10 10 0 0 0 0 21 0


Table BG12: STU Metro NAPLAN Summary – Total of All Ranks


# 1 10 10 0 0 0 0 21 0

# 2 16 12 0 2 0 0 10 0

# 3 12 15 2 2 0 0 8 0

# 4 2 2 10 17 4 4 1 0

# 5 0 1 13 10 12 6 0 0

# 6 0 0 5 7 17 9 0 0

# 7 0 0 10 2 7 21 0 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40


53

Table BN1: STU Metro Year 3 Numeracy Summary – Mean Scores


2008 413.0 418.8 373.2 389.1 392.9 407.0 411.7 375.1 402.6 415.9

2009 410.5 413.5 377.1 387.3 383.4 393.5 408.2 363.6 400.1 412.0

2010 405.9 414.0 383.3 390.4 383.8 394.2 412.7 367.5 401.4 410.0

2011 410.6 416.4 389.9 393.8 383.9 396.4 414.5 370.9 404.3 413.5

2012 411.4 412.8 387.3 392.4 382.2 394.2 410.2 365.2 402.6 412.1

2013 409.2 413.6 391.3 395.1 384.6 395.1 413.3 369.0 403.4 411.4

2014 413.0 417.5 398.2 401.6 390.1 400.0 414.0 379.7 408.2 415.3

2015 407.3 414.0 397.3 396.8 386.7 392.3 410.1 369.3 404.2 410.7

2016 411.8 417.4 403.7 402.7 389.2 399.8 412.0 377.8 409.1 414.6

2017 422.0 424.5 409.9 410.8 395.0 405.8 418.1 379.0 417.1 423.3

mean 411.5 416.3 391.1 396.0 387.2 397.8 412.5 371.7 405.3 413.9

median 411.0 415.2 390.6 394.5 385.7 395.8 412.4 370.1 403.8 412.8


Table BN2: STU Metro Year 3 Numeracy Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 2 1 8 6 5 4 3 7

2009 2 1 7 5 6 4 3 8

2010 3 1 7 5 6 4 2 8

2011 3 1 6 5 7 4 2 8

2012 2 1 6 5 7 4 3 8

2013 3 1 6 4 7 4 2 8

2014 3 1 6 4 7 5 2 8

2015 3 1 4 5 7 6 2 8

2016 3 1 4 5 7 6 2 8

2017 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

mean 3 1 6 5 7 4 2 8

median 3 1 6 5 7 4 2 8



2008 493.5 492.9 462.3 468.1 464.8 470.4 483.9 448.3 482.0 493.2

2009 507.8 499.3 474.7 480.4 474.1 477.9 496.0 463.4 493.1 503.6

2010 504.4 506.9 478.9 485.3 477.8 483.3 498.8 463.5 495.6 505.7

2011 505.8 503.1 475.8 487.7 475.1 481.8 502.1 459.7 494.7 504.5

2012 504.1 501.6 482.0 486.2 476.0 481.8 504.5 459.0 495.7 502.9

2013 500.0 497.3 486.8 486.4 472.0 475.6 498.1 459.6 493.0 498.7

2014 499.5 500.3 487.2 489.2 475.2 480.1 497.5 463.1 494.1 499.9

2015 503.8 507.3 491.4 491.8 483.0 487.4 501.9 466.5 499.1 505.6

2016 505.8 507.0 495.7 494.4 480.8 486.3 497.3 472.7 500.9 506.4

2017 505.8 506.2 497.6 496.9 481.3 485.4 497.7 467.4 501.4 506.0

mean 503.1 502.2 483.2 486.6 476.0 481.0 497.8 462.3 495.0 502.6

median 504.3 502.4 484.4 487.1 475.6 481.8 497.9 463.3 495.2 504.0


54



2008 1 2 7 5 6 4 3 8

2009 1 2 6 4 7 5 3 8

2010 2 1 6 4 7 5 3 8

2011 1 2 6 4 7 5 3 8

2012 2 3 5 4 7 6 1 8

2013 1 3 4 5 7 6 2 8

2014 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2015 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2016 2 1 4 5 7 6 3 8

2017 2 1 4 5 7 6 3 8

mean 1 2 5 4 7 6 3 8

median 1 2 5 4 7 6 3 8



2008 557.7 556.5 543.6 540.9 540.9 539.5 556.2 523.8 551.4 557.1

2009 556.1 554.1 544.1 544.5 536.3 530.1 549.4 512.1 550.3 555.1

2010 556.8 558.5 550.1 553.1 542.9 535.3 556.2 523.7 554.2 557.7

2011 555.6 555.5 543.7 551.8 538.8 534.7 555.5 518.9 551.3 555.6

2012 550.6 549.3 537.0 542.4 533.4 529.7 545.9 510.0 545.0 550.0

2013 554.7 550.4 543.9 550.1 534.9 529.5 549.7 510.0 549.1 552.6

2014 557.7 553.7 549.3 554.0 538.0 535.4 556.6 518.6 553.1 555.7

2015 554.1 553.4 544.8 544.6 537.2 532.2 549.4 517.9 549.5 553.8

2016 559.8 560.8 554.7 556.0 547.5 545.0 555.6 525.9 557.7 560.3

2017 566.7 565.3 558.6 559.1 550.1 544.6 558.5 526.3 562.5 566.0

mean 557.0 555.8 547.0 549.7 540.0 535.6 553.3 518.7 552.4 556.4

median 556.5 554.8 544.5 551.0 538.4 535.0 555.6 518.8 551.4 555.6




2008 1 2 4 5 5 7 3 8

2009 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

2010 2 1 5 4 6 7 3 8

2011 1 2 5 4 6 7 2 8

2012 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

2013 1 2 5 3 6 7 4 8

2014 1 4 5 3 6 7 2 8

2015 1 2 4 5 6 7 3 8

2016 2 1 5 3 6 7 4 8

2017 1 2 4 3 6 7 5 8

mean 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

median 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

55



2008 597.2 594.9 575.6 578.0 576.6 570.4 594.9 558.2 588.3 596.1

2009 602.8 600.8 583.9 588.6 584.0 575.9 600.4 561.5 595.1 601.8

2010 598.4 597.3 582.3 584.6 577.6 575.9 597.2 559.9 591.5 597.9

2011 596.4 594.3 579.4 589.3 576.8 570.0 593.0 553.8 589.8 595.4

2012 598.6 595.4 578.9 588.8 577.9 570.5 596.5 552.3 590.7 597.0

2013 601.0 593.0 578.9 592.7 576.0 569.1 596.9 554.5 591.2 597.0

2014 601.5 597.0 584.4 598.9 578.0 576.4 594.4 561.5 594.4 599.3

2015 603.3 601.7 589.8 602.2 583.6 580.2 599.6 564.0 598.3 602.5

2016 599.9 598.3 590.2 602.3 581.5 581.2 597.3 561.5 596.9 599.1

2017 607.9 598.2 592.8 601.6 583.7 577.2 595.9 566.3 599.8 603.1

mean 600.7 597.1 583.6 592.7 579.6 574.7 596.6 559.4 593.6 598.9

median 600.5 597.2 583.1 591.0 578.0 575.9 596.7 560.7 593.0 598.5




2008 1 2 6 4 5 7 2 8

2009 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

2010 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

2011 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

2012 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

2013 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

2014 1 3 5 2 6 7 4 8

2015 1 3 5 2 6 7 4 8

2016 2 3 5 1 6 7 4 8

2017 1 3 5 2 6 7 4 8

mean 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

median 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

Table BN9: STU Metro 4YA Numeracy Summary – Mean Scores


2008 515.4 515.8 488.7 494.0 493.8 496.8 511.7 476.4 506.1 515.6

2009 519.3 516.9 495.0 500.2 494.5 494.4 513.5 475.2 509.7 518.1

2010 516.4 519.2 498.7 503.4 495.5 497.2 516.2 478.7 510.7 517.8

2011 517.1 517.3 497.2 505.7 493.7 495.7 516.3 475.8 510.0 517.2

2012 516.2 514.8 496.3 502.5 492.4 494.1 514.3 471.6 508.5 515.5

2013 516.2 513.6 500.2 506.1 491.9 492.3 514.5 473.3 509.2 514.9

2014 517.9 517.1 504.8 510.9 495.3 498.0 515.6 480.7 512.5 517.5

2015 517.1 519.1 505.8 508.9 497.6 498.0 515.3 479.4 512.8 518.1

2016 519.3 520.9 511.1 513.9 499.8 503.1 515.6 484.5 516.2 520.1

2017 525.6 523.6 514.7 517.1 502.5 503.3 517.6 484.8 520.2 524.6

mean 518.1 517.8 501.2 506.2 495.7 497.3 515.0 478.0 511.6 517.9

median 517.1 517.2 499.4 505.9 494.9 497.0 515.4 477.5 510.4 517.7


56

Table BN10: STU Metro 4YA Numeracy Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2008 2 1 7 5 6 4 3 8

2009 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

2010 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2011 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2012 1 2 5 4 7 6 3 8

2013 1 3 5 4 7 6 2 8

2014 1 2 5 4 7 6 3 8

2015 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2016 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2017 1 2 5 4 7 6 3 8

mean 1 2 5 4 7 6 3 8

median 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

Table BN11: STU Metro NAPLAN Numeracy Summary – Total Number of #1 Ranks


2008 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2009 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2010 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

2011 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2012 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0

2013 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2014 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

2015 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

2016 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0

2017 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 21 17 0 1 0 0 1 0


Table BN12: STU Metro NAPLAN Numeracy – Total of All Ranks


# 1 21 17 0 1 0 0 1 0

# 2 13 14 0 3 0 0 12 0

# 3 6 8 0 4 0 0 20 0

# 4 0 1 8 19 0 7 6 0

# 5 0 0 19 12 4 4 1 0

# 6 0 0 9 1 20 9 0 0

# 7 0 0 3 0 16 20 0 1

# 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 39


57

Table BM1: STU Metro Year 3 Equal Weighted Mean Summary – Mean Scores


2008 422.4 424.7 380.0 395.5 404.9 410.6 416.6 369.4 410.3 423.6

2009 427.8 429.6 390.4 403.7 404.2 405.5 423.1 369.7 416.3 428.7

2010 424.4 428.1 395.1 402.3 401.6 406.4 426.2 369.8 416.8 426.3

2011 428.6 429.2 403.4 407.3 401.2 406.4 426.2 373.9 419.4 428.9

2012 431.2 430.9 407.6 411.5 404.9 410.8 425.8 379.8 422.1 431.0

2013 428.7 431.4 409.2 411.8 407.8 408.4 427.2 378.8 421.9 430.1

2014 426.8 428.5 408.8 413.7 403.1 405.9 421.6 382.3 420.1 427.7

2015 429.6 433.6 414.5 416.6 408.3 408.7 424.7 383.2 424.2 431.6

2016 433.5 436.7 421.4 422.1 414.3 414.6 427.2 392.0 429.3 435.1

2017 434.7 437.3 421.0 421.5 409.7 415.4 426.6 386.1 429.3 436.0

mean 428.8 431.0 405.1 410.6 406.0 409.3 424.5 378.5 421.0 429.9

median 428.7 430.3 408.2 411.7 404.9 408.5 426.0 379.3 421.0 429.5


Table BM2: STU Metro Year 3 Equal Weighed Mean Summary – Ranks


2008 2 1 7 6 5 4 3 8

2009 2 1 7 6 5 4 3 8

2010 3 1 7 5 6 4 2 8

2011 2 1 6 4 7 5 3 8

2012 1 2 6 4 7 5 3 8

2013 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2014 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2015 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2016 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2017 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

mean 2 1 7 4 6 5 3 8

median 2 1 6 4 7 5 3 8



2008 501.9 502.9 471.6 480.0 482.5 482.4 495.9 453.8 492.1 502.4

2009 508.5 505.2 478.2 487.5 486.3 486.6 500.7 464.9 497.4 506.9

2010 507.0 506.3 478.4 487.2 484.7 485.9 500.7 460.0 497.0 506.6

2011 505.7 504.1 478.6 489.2 481.6 482.0 505.4 458.7 496.2 504.9

2012 505.8 502.2 480.6 488.7 480.7 483.0 504.0 458.7 496.9 504.0

2013 506.1 504.4 491.5 493.5 484.4 484.0 503.4 465.4 499.6 505.3

2014 504.8 503.7 490.8 494.5 484.3 486.2 502.7 467.1 498.9 504.3

2015 506.4 508.3 493.6 494.8 487.9 488.6 504.9 465.6 501.4 507.4

2016 505.5 506.9 496.1 495.9 486.8 490.3 497.4 472.9 501.4 506.2

2017 507.7 507.0 496.8 498.5 486.4 488.6 500.5 469.6 502.7 507.3

mean 506.0 505.1 485.6 491.0 484.6 485.8 501.6 463.7 498.4 505.5

median 506.0 504.8 485.7 491.4 484.5 486.1 501.7 465.2 498.1 505.8


58



2008 2 1 7 6 4 5 3 8

2009 1 2 7 4 6 5 3 8

2010 1 2 7 4 6 5 3 8

2011 1 3 7 4 6 5 2 8

2012 1 3 7 4 6 5 2 8

2013 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

2014 1 2 5 4 7 6 3 8

2015 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2016 2 1 4 5 7 6 3 8

2017 1 2 5 4 7 6 3 8

mean 1 2 6 4 7 5 3 8

median 1 2 6 4 7 5 3 8



2008 548.7 549.8 531.9 532.9 541.2 535.6 547.9 512.5 543.3 549.2

2009 550.4 549.5 537.7 540.4 541.2 534.2 548.6 509.3 545.9 549.9

2010 551.1 552.0 540.3 546.0 543.1 534.6 553.1 514.2 547.9 551.5

2011 547.4 546.6 536.9 542.9 536.8 529.1 549.4 513.6 543.6 547.0

2012 549.7 547.6 535.3 543.1 537.1 534.2 545.3 513.5 544.3 548.7

2013 548.8 546.2 537.6 543.6 536.0 527.9 548.7 506.6 544.2 547.5

2014 549.4 546.4 539.5 546.3 537.0 532.6 552.9 511.9 545.7 547.9

2015 548.6 548.1 540.1 540.0 537.8 530.6 548.0 510.3 544.8 548.3

2016 547.8 548.3 541.0 543.0 539.3 536.9 546.1 514.5 545.4 548.1

2017 553.2 551.4 543.9 544.6 542.6 536.2 549.0 513.0 549.1 552.3

mean 549.5 548.6 538.4 542.3 539.2 533.2 548.9 511.9 545.4 549.0

median 549.1 548.2 538.6 543.1 538.5 534.2 548.7 512.8 545.1 548.5




2008 2 1 7 6 4 5 3 8

2009 1 2 6 5 4 7 3 8

2010 3 2 6 4 5 7 1 8

2011 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2012 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

2013 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

2014 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2015 1 2 4 5 6 7 3 8

2016 2 1 5 4 6 7 3 8

2017 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

mean 1 3 6 4 5 7 2 8

median 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

59



2008 586.2 588.4 570.2 572.3 577.5 570.8 588.6 550.7 581.2 587.3

2009 587.4 589.4 574.0 577.6 579.9 573.2 590.9 549.1 583.4 588.4

2010 587.1 589.0 575.9 576.4 575.7 572.1 589.4 552.3 583.1 588.0

2011 586.4 588.7 576.2 579.9 574.8 569.2 587.5 548.1 583.3 587.5

2012 584.2 583.9 568.9 577.9 571.1 565.9 585.2 540.5 579.1 584.0

2013 587.0 584.3 573.9 581.0 574.4 566.5 589.8 547.6 581.8 585.7

2014 585.9 585.4 573.0 587.1 572.8 567.7 585.5 551.7 582.0 585.7

2015 583.8 584.4 573.7 584.9 571.4 566.3 585.4 541.2 581.0 584.1

2016 582.0 583.3 575.0 585.3 571.9 572.2 586.7 546.1 581.1 582.6

2017 591.3 582.9 578.6 584.7 571.9 564.8 585.6 549.5 584.4 587.1

mean 586.1 586.0 573.9 580.7 574.1 568.8 587.5 547.7 582.1 586.0

median 586.3 584.9 574.0 580.5 573.6 568.4 587.1 548.6 581.9 586.4




2008 3 2 7 5 4 6 1 8

2009 3 2 6 5 4 7 1 8

2010 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2011 3 1 5 4 6 7 2 8

2012 2 3 6 4 5 7 1 8

2013 2 3 6 4 5 7 1 8

2014 2 4 5 1 6 7 3 8

2015 4 3 5 2 6 7 1 8

2016 4 3 5 2 7 6 1 8

2017 1 4 5 3 6 7 2 8

mean 2 3 6 4 5 7 1 8

median 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

Table BM9: STU Metro 4YA Equal Weighted Mean Summary – Mean Scores


2008 514.8 516.4 488.4 495.2 501.5 499.9 512.3 471.6 506.7 515.6

2009 518.5 518.4 495.1 502.3 502.9 499.9 515.8 473.3 510.8 518.5

2010 517.4 518.8 497.4 503.0 501.3 499.7 517.4 474.1 511.2 518.1

2011 517.0 517.1 498.8 504.8 498.6 496.7 517.1 473.6 510.6 517.1

2012 517.7 516.1 498.1 505.3 498.5 498.5 515.1 473.1 510.6 516.9

2013 517.7 516.6 503.1 507.5 500.6 496.7 517.3 474.6 511.9 517.1

2014 516.7 516.0 503.0 510.4 499.3 498.1 515.7 478.3 511.7 516.4

2015 517.1 518.6 505.5 509.1 501.4 498.5 515.8 475.1 512.9 517.8

2016 517.2 518.8 508.4 511.6 503.1 503.5 514.4 481.4 514.3 518.0

2017 521.7 519.6 510.1 512.3 502.7 501.2 515.4 479.5 516.4 520.7

mean 517.6 517.7 500.8 506.1 501.0 499.3 515.6 475.4 511.7 517.6

median 517.3 517.8 500.9 506.4 501.3 499.1 515.7 474.3 511.4 517.5


60

Table BM10: STU Metro 4YA Equal Weighed Mean Summary – Ranks


2008 2 1 7 6 4 5 3 8

2009 1 2 7 5 4 6 3 8

2010 2 1 7 4 5 6 3 8

2011 3 1 5 4 6 7 2 8

2012 1 2 7 4 6 5 3 8

2013 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

2014 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

2015 2 1 5 4 6 7 3 8

2016 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2017 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

mean 2 1 6 4 5 7 3 8

median 2 1 6 4 5 7 3 8

Table BM11: Total of All Ranks


# 1 14 15 0 1 0 0 10 0

# 2 18 14 0 2 0 0 6 0

# 3 6 9 0 1 0 0 24 0

# 4 2 2 2 26 5 3 0 0

# 5 0 0 20 6 6 8 0 0

# 6 0 0 8 4 17 11 0 0

# 7 0 0 10 0 12 18 0 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40


61

Table BE1: STU Metro Year 3 NAPLAN Summary of Weighted Means



2008 418.9 422.5 377.4 393.1 400.4 409.3 414.8 371.6 407.4 420.7

2009 421.3 423.6 385.4 397.6 396.4 401.0 417.5 367.4 410.3 422.4

2010 417.5 422.8 390.7 397.9 394.9 401.8 421.2 369.0 411.0 420.1

2011 421.9 424.4 398.3 402.2 394.7 402.6 421.8 372.8 413.7 423.1

2012 423.8 424.1 400.0 404.4 396.4 404.6 420.0 374.3 414.8 423.9

2013 421.4 424.8 402.5 405.6 399.1 403.4 422.0 375.1 415.0 423.1

2014 421.7 424.4 404.8 409.2 398.2 403.7 418.7 381.3 415.7 423.0

2015 421.2 426.3 408.1 409.2 400.2 402.5 419.3 378.0 416.7 423.7

2016 425.4 429.5 414.8 414.8 404.9 409.1 421.5 386.7 421.7 427.4

2017 429.9 432.5 416.8 417.5 404.2 411.8 423.4 383.4 424.7 431.2

mean 422.3 425.5 399.9 405.1 399.0 405.0 420.0 376.0 415.1 423.9

median 421.5 424.4 401.2 405.0 398.7 403.6 420.6 374.7 414.9 423.1






2008 2 1 7 6 5 4 3 8

2009 2 1 7 5 6 4 3 8

2010 3 1 7 5 6 4 2 8

2011 2 1 6 5 7 4 3 8

2012 2 1 6 5 7 4 3 8

2013 3 1 6 4 7 5 2 8

2014 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2015 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2016 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2017 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

mean 2 1 6 4 7 5 3 8

median 2 1 6 4 7 5 3 8




2008 498.8 499.2 468.1 475.5 475.9 477.9 491.4 451.7 488.3 499.0

2009 508.3 503.0 476.9 484.9 481.7 483.3 498.9 464.4 495.8 505.6

2010 506.0 506.5 478.6 486.5 482.1 484.9 500.0 461.3 496.5 506.3

2011 505.7 503.7 477.5 488.7 479.2 481.9 504.2 459.1 495.6 504.7

2012 505.2 502.0 481.1 487.8 479.0 482.6 504.2 458.8 496.5 503.6

2013 503.8 501.8 489.8 490.8 479.7 480.9 501.4 463.2 497.1 502.8

2014 502.8 502.4 489.4 492.5 480.9 483.9 500.7 465.6 497.1 502.6

2015 505.4 507.9 492.8 493.7 486.1 488.1 503.8 465.9 500.6 506.7

2016 505.6 506.9 495.9 495.3 484.6 488.8 497.4 472.9 501.2 506.3

2017 507.0 506.7 497.1 497.9 484.5 487.4 499.5 468.8 502.2 506.8

mean 504.9 504.0 484.7 489.4 481.4 484.0 500.1 463.2 497.1 504.4

median 505.5 503.4 485.3 489.7 481.3 483.6 500.4 463.8 496.8 505.2



62




2008 2 1 7 6 5 4 3 8

2009 1 2 7 4 6 5 3 8

2010 2 1 7 4 6 5 3 8

2011 1 3 7 4 6 5 2 8

2012 1 3 6 4 7 5 2 8

2013 1 2 5 4 7 6 3 8

2014 1 2 5 4 7 6 3 8

2015 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2016 2 1 4 5 7 6 3 8

2017 1 2 5 4 7 6 3 8

mean 1 2 5 4 7 6 3 8

median 1 2 5 4 7 6 3 8




2008 552.1 552.3 536.3 535.9 541.1 537.1 551.0 516.8 546.3 552.2

2009 552.5 551.2 540.1 542.0 539.3 532.6 548.9 510.4 547.6 551.9

2010 553.3 554.4 544.0 548.7 543.0 534.9 554.3 517.7 550.2 553.8

2011 550.5 549.9 539.5 546.2 537.6 531.2 551.7 515.6 546.5 550.2

2012 550.1 548.2 535.9 542.8 535.7 532.5 545.5 512.2 544.6 549.1

2013 551.0 547.8 540.0 546.1 535.6 528.5 549.1 507.9 546.0 549.4

2014 552.5 549.1 543.2 549.2 537.4 533.7 554.3 514.4 548.5 550.8

2015 550.7 550.1 541.9 541.7 537.6 531.2 548.5 513.1 546.6 550.4

2016 552.3 553.0 546.2 547.9 542.4 539.9 549.7 518.8 550.0 552.6

2017 558.3 556.6 549.4 550.0 545.4 539.3 552.5 518.0 554.1 557.4

mean 552.3 551.3 541.6 545.0 539.5 534.1 550.6 514.5 548.0 551.8

median 552.2 550.6 541.0 546.2 538.5 533.2 550.3 515.0 547.1 551.3






2008 2 1 6 7 4 5 3 8

2009 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

2010 3 1 5 4 6 7 2 8

2011 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2012 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

2013 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

2014 2 4 5 3 6 7 1 8

2015 1 2 4 5 6 7 3 8

2016 2 1 5 4 6 7 3 8

2017 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

mean 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

median 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

63




2008 590.3 590.8 572.2 574.5 577.2 570.7 591.0 553.5 583.9 590.6

2009 593.2 593.7 577.7 581.7 581.4 574.2 594.4 553.8 587.8 593.4

2010 591.3 592.1 578.3 579.5 576.4 573.5 592.3 555.2 586.3 591.7

2011 590.1 590.8 577.4 583.4 575.6 569.5 589.6 550.3 585.7 590.5

2012 589.6 588.2 572.7 582.0 573.7 567.6 589.5 544.9 583.5 588.9

2013 592.2 587.6 575.8 585.4 575.0 567.5 592.5 550.2 585.4 589.9

2014 591.7 589.8 577.3 591.5 574.7 571.0 588.8 555.4 586.7 590.8

2015 591.1 590.9 579.7 591.4 576.0 571.5 590.8 549.7 587.5 591.0

2016 588.7 588.9 580.7 591.7 575.5 575.6 590.7 551.9 587.0 588.8

2017 597.5 588.6 583.9 591.0 576.3 569.5 589.5 555.8 590.2 593.1

mean 591.6 590.1 577.6 585.2 576.2 571.0 590.9 552.1 586.4 590.9

median 591.2 590.3 577.6 584.4 575.8 570.8 590.7 552.7 586.5 590.7






2008 3 2 6 5 4 7 1 8

2009 3 2 6 4 5 7 1 8

2010 3 2 5 4 6 7 1 8

2011 2 1 5 4 6 7 3 8

2012 1 3 6 4 5 7 2 8

2013 2 3 5 4 6 7 1 8

2014 1 3 5 2 6 7 4 8

2015 2 3 5 1 6 7 4 8

2016 4 3 5 1 7 6 2 8

2017 1 4 5 2 6 7 3 8

mean 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

median 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

Table BE9: STU Metro 4YA NAPLAN Summary of Weighted Means



2008 515.0 516.2 488.5 494.7 498.6 498.7 512.0 473.4 506.5 515.6

2009 518.8 517.9 495.0 501.5 499.7 497.8 515.0 474.0 510.3 518.3

2010 517.0 519.0 497.9 503.1 499.1 498.8 516.9 475.8 511.0 518.0

2011 517.0 517.2 498.2 505.1 496.8 496.3 516.8 474.4 510.4 517.1

2012 517.1 515.6 497.4 504.2 496.2 496.8 514.8 472.6 509.8 516.4

2013 517.1 515.5 502.0 507.0 497.4 495.1 516.2 474.1 510.9 516.3

2014 517.2 516.4 503.7 510.6 497.8 498.1 515.7 479.2 512.0 516.8

2015 517.1 518.8 505.6 509.0 500.0 498.3 515.6 476.7 512.8 517.9

2016 518.0 519.6 509.4 512.4 501.8 503.3 514.8 482.6 515.0 518.8

2017 523.2 521.1 511.8 514.1 502.6 502.0 516.2 481.5 517.8 522.1

mean 517.8 517.7 500.9 506.2 499.0 498.5 515.4 476.4 511.6 517.7

median 517.1 517.5 500.1 506.0 498.9 498.2 515.6 475.1 510.9 517.5



64

Table BE10: STU Metro 4YA NAPLAN Summary of Weighted Means



2008 2 1 7 6 5 4 3 8

2009 1 2 7 4 5 6 3 8

2010 2 1 7 4 5 6 3 8

2011 2 1 5 4 6 7 3 8

2012 1 2 5 4 7 6 3 8

2013 1 3 5 4 6 7 2 8

2014 1 2 5 4 7 6 3 8

2015 2 1 5 4 6 7 3 8

2016 2 1 5 4 7 6 3 8

2017 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

mean 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

median 2 1 5 4 6 7 3 8

Table BE11: STU Metro NAPLAN Summary of Weighted Means

Using Literacy and Numeracy 50% Each – Total of All Ranks


# 1 14 18 0 2 0 0 6 0

# 2 19 11 0 2 0 0 8 0

# 3 6 9 0 1 0 0 24 0

# 4 1 2 2 25 2 6 2 0

# 5 0 0 23 7 4 6 0 0

# 6 0 0 8 2 20 10 0 0

# 7 0 0 7 1 14 18 0 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40


Table BT1: STU Metro NAPLAN Summary – Total Number of #1 Ranks


2008 8 7 0 0 0 0 5 0

2009 8 7 0 0 0 0 5 0

2010 7 7 0 0 0 0 7 0

2011 9 4 0 0 0 0 7 0

2012 7 6 0 0 0 0 8 0

2013 7 6 0 0 0 0 7 0

2014 8 5 0 1 0 0 6 0

2015 7 8 0 0 0 0 5 0

2016 5 10 0 1 0 0 4 0

2017 9 8 0 0 0 0 3 0

Total 75 68 0 2 0 0 57 0


and Numeracy, across the 10 years from 2008 till 2017, but actually 202 because two STUs were equal on two occasions]

65

Appendix C – STU Degree Educated Parents NAPLAN Data 2010 to 2017

Table CR1: STU Degree Educated Parents Year 3 NAPLAN Reading Summary – Mean Scores


2010 463.4 464.6 433.8 445.0 442.4 465.7 468.5 430.8 456.6 464.0

2011 465.8 468.2 442.8 445.0 446.1 465.9 470.9 422.8 459.1 467.0

2012 467.6 464.9 451.1 453.0 453.3 473.8 470.5 432.6 461.7 466.3

2013 461.1 464.2 447.9 445.7 449.4 468.4 464.5 422.5 457.2 462.7

2014 462.5 463.2 451.0 449.9 449.1 472.8 463.4 432.6 458.5 462.9

2015 470.1 471.1 459.7 455.4 453.6 468.8 467.5 424.6 465.6 470.6

2016 467.0 467.8 460.1 456.1 452.1 465.6 459.6 429.7 463.5 467.4

2017 473.3 474.4 465.3 460.2 454.3 471.4 465.3 427.0 469.2 473.9

mean 466.4 467.3 451.5 451.3 450.0 469.1 466.3 427.8 461.4 466.8

median 466.4 466.4 451.1 451.5 450.8 468.6 466.4 428.4 460.4 466.4


Table CR2: STU Degree Educated Parents Year 3 NAPLAN Reading Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2010 4 3 7 5 6 2 1 8

2011 4 2 7 6 5 3 1 8

2012 3 4 7 6 5 1 2 8

2013 4 3 6 7 5 1 2 8

2014 4 3 5 6 7 1 2 8

2015 2 1 5 6 7 3 4 8

2016 2 1 4 6 7 3 5 8

2017 2 1 4 6 7 3 4 8

mean 3 2 5 6 7 1 4 8

median 2 4 6 5 7 1 2 8



2010 538.1 534.9 508.6 522.8 517.7 538.8 537.2 500.6 528.6 536.5

2011 537.1 536.2 509.2 523.0 518.0 541.9 541.0 503.9 529.2 536.7

2012 538.3 535.3 519.1 524.5 525.0 541.2 543.3 509.0 532.7 536.8

2013 539.5 536.3 529.8 529.6 522.1 540.5 538.5 513.2 534.7 537.9

2014 543.7 540.6 534.5 532.9 527.1 550.6 547.0 513.9 539.1 542.2

2015 540.8 539.7 533.8 528.3 527.3 547.2 544.9 511.4 537.2 540.3

2016 539.6 538.9 536.3 531.6 525.2 546.7 534.2 511.1 536.9 539.3

2017 546.2 542.8 539.7 537.6 529.7 545.0 541.1 511.7 541.8 544.5

mean 540.4 538.1 526.4 528.8 524.0 544.0 540.9 509.4 535.0 539.3

median 539.6 537.6 531.8 529.0 525.1 543.5 541.1 511.3 535.8 538.6


66



2010 2 4 7 5 6 1 3 8

2011 3 4 7 5 6 1 2 8

2012 3 4 7 6 5 2 1 8

2013 2 4 5 6 7 1 3 8

2014 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 8

2015 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 8

2016 2 3 4 6 7 1 5 8

2017 1 3 5 6 7 2 4 8

mean 3 4 6 5 7 1 2 8

median 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 8



2010 590.6 587.5 574.2 584.5 581.3 590.7 595.8 558.1 585.7 589.1

2011 583.9 576.4 571.6 579.5 570.1 585.2 585.8 561.8 578.5 580.2

2012 583.7 578.6 568.4 573.9 574.6 589.2 583.2 553.3 578.0 581.2

2013 581.0 575.5 569.1 574.3 569.6 582.3 583.9 550.4 575.9 578.3

2014 585.3 580.0 577.1 581.2 575.9 586.9 590.3 562.6 581.7 582.7

2015 583.3 579.5 577.2 575.4 574.4 584.0 587.2 556.4 579.8 581.4

2016 576.1 572.7 572.4 571.6 569.9 581.3 579.0 548.9 573.6 574.4

2017 582.5 578.1 575.2 572.9 575.7 585.7 581.4 548.0 578.3 580.3

mean 583.3 578.5 573.2 576.7 573.9 585.7 585.8 554.9 578.9 580.9

median 583.5 578.4 573.3 574.9 574.5 585.5 584.9 554.9 578.4 580.9




2010 3 4 7 5 6 2 1 8

2011 3 5 6 4 7 2 1 8

2012 2 4 7 6 5 1 3 8

2013 3 4 7 5 6 2 1 8

2014 3 5 6 4 7 2 1 8

2015 3 4 5 6 7 2 1 8

2016 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 8

2017 2 4 6 7 5 1 3 8

mean 3 4 7 5 6 2 1 8

median 3 4 7 5 6 1 2 8

67



2010 619.0 615.3 602.2 604.3 607.6 615.3 625.3 588.9 613.0 617.2

2011 622.3 618.1 608.7 614.4 608.6 618.0 628.0 601.3 617.2 620.2

2012 617.2 615.6 603.7 608.1 610.1 619.2 622.9 594.5 613.0 616.4

2013 620.0 614.4 607.9 615.2 609.8 621.3 623.2 594.7 615.1 617.2

2014 622.5 617.0 606.3 620.4 607.6 621.8 623.1 597.9 616.7 619.8

2015 620.1 616.7 607.8 620.4 607.2 621.6 623.6 587.1 616.1 618.4

2016 616.8 613.1 610.3 618.8 606.2 621.6 623.1 597.7 614.5 615.0

2017 620.8 610.1 609.2 615.2 602.9 615.1 613.8 589.0 613.7 615.5

mean 619.8 615.0 607.0 614.6 607.5 619.2 622.9 593.9 614.9 617.4

median 620.1 615.5 607.9 615.2 607.6 620.3 623.2 594.6 614.8 617.8




2010 2 3 7 6 5 3 1 8

2011 2 3 6 5 7 4 1 8

2012 3 4 7 6 5 2 1 8

2013 3 5 7 4 6 2 1 8

2014 2 5 7 4 6 3 1 8

2015 4 5 6 3 7 2 1 8

2016 4 5 6 3 7 2 1 8

2017 1 5 6 2 7 3 4 8

mean 2 4 7 5 6 3 1 8

median 3 4 6 5 7 2 1 8

Table CR9: STU Degree Educated Parents 4YA NAPLAN Reading Summary – Mean Scores


2010 552.8 550.6 529.7 539.2 537.3 552.6 556.7 519.6 546.0 551.7

2011 552.3 549.7 533.1 540.5 535.7 552.8 556.4 522.5 546.0 551.0

2012 551.7 548.6 535.6 539.9 540.8 555.9 555.0 522.4 546.4 550.2

2013 550.4 547.6 538.7 541.2 537.7 553.1 552.5 520.2 545.7 549.0

2014 553.5 550.2 542.2 546.1 539.9 558.0 556.0 526.8 549.0 551.9

2015 553.6 551.8 544.6 544.9 540.6 555.4 555.8 519.9 549.7 552.7

2016 549.9 548.1 544.8 544.5 538.4 553.8 549.0 521.9 547.1 549.0

2017 555.7 551.4 547.4 546.5 540.7 554.3 550.4 518.9 550.8 553.5

mean 552.5 549.7 539.5 542.8 538.9 554.5 554.0 521.5 547.6 551.1

median 552.5 550.0 540.5 542.9 539.1 554.1 555.4 521.0 546.7 551.2


68

Table CR10: STU Degree Educated Parents 4YA NAPLAN Reading Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2010 2 4 7 5 6 3 1 8

2011 3 4 7 5 6 2 1 8

2012 3 4 7 6 5 1 2 8

2013 3 4 6 5 7 1 2 8

2014 3 4 6 5 7 1 2 8

2015 3 4 6 5 7 2 1 8

2016 2 4 5 6 7 1 3 8

2017 1 3 5 6 7 2 4 8

mean 3 4 6 5 7 1 2 8

median 3 4 6 5 7 2 1 8

Table CR11: STU Degree Educated Parents NAPLAN Reading Summary – Total Number of #1 Ranks


2010 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0

2011 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0

2012 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0

2013 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0

2014 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0

2015 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0

2016 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0

2017 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

Total 2 3 0 0 0 12 15 0

[32 in total for Years 3, 5, 7 and 9 across the 10 years from 2008 till 2017 in which data available, unless two STUs are equal

#1]

Table CR12: STU Degree Educated Parents NAPLAN Reading Summary – Total of All Ranks


# 1 2 3 0 0 0 12 15 0

# 2 11 1 0 1 0 12 7 0

# 3 13 7 0 2 0 7 4 0

# 4 6 14 3 4 0 1 4 0

# 5 0 7 8 6 8 0 2 0

# 6 0 0 8 17 7 0 0 0

# 7 0 0 13 2 17 0 0 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32

[32 in total for Years 3, 5, 7 and 9 across the 10 years from 2008 till 2017 in which data available, unless two STUs are

equal]

69

Table CW1: STU Degree Educated Parents Year 3 NAPLAN Writing Summary – Mean Scores


2010 455.0 448.2 430.4 431.6 437.6 444.4 450.1 412.2 445.8 451.6

2011 453.8 442.1 432.8 431.2 426.5 433.0 436.6 414.3 442.1 448.0

2012 449.1 445.0 430.2 433.8 429.1 443.1 431.1 415.8 441.3 447.1

2013 447.4 447.0 436.1 433.5 429.6 435.3 435.6 402.5 442.0 447.2

2014 435.1 434.1 419.2 427.1 413.2 424.6 415.8 402.3 428.9 434.6

2015 446.9 448.4 435.0 437.7 426.4 435.7 433.0 406.7 442.2 447.7

2016 445.7 452.3 434.4 439.7 435.5 443.6 430.3 412.2 443.6 449.0

2017 443.5 443.5 429.5 437.0 418.6 433.3 425.7 393.9 437.9 443.5

mean 447.1 445.1 431.0 434.0 427.1 436.6 432.3 407.5 440.5 446.1

median 447.2 446.0 431.6 433.7 427.8 435.5 432.1 409.5 442.1 446.6


Table CW2: STU Degree Educated Parents Year 3 NAPLAN Writing Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2010 1 3 7 6 5 4 2 8

2011 1 2 5 6 7 4 3 8

2012 1 2 6 4 7 3 5 8

2013 1 2 3 6 7 5 4 8

2014 1 2 5 3 7 4 6 8

2015 2 1 5 3 7 4 6 8

2016 2 1 6 4 5 3 7 8

2017 1 1 5 3 7 4 6 8

mean 1 2 6 4 7 3 5 8

median 1 2 6 4 7 3 5 8



2010 523.8 519.2 502.2 507.0 510.1 509.9 514.6 483.2 515.2 521.5

2011 520.6 515.6 501.4 505.8 501.4 502.5 513.4 488.1 512.5 518.1

2012 513.4 509.3 486.1 499.8 491.1 504.4 502.5 483.2 505.3 511.4

2013 511.5 509.6 499.8 500.7 495.2 498.6 502.4 476.5 506.2 510.6

2014 501.1 499.7 486.8 495.2 484.0 493.9 488.8 470.5 495.8 500.4

2015 508.3 508.8 499.7 499.9 491.5 503.2 501.0 473.2 504.5 508.6

2016 501.1 509.3 491.5 495.4 490.8 504.4 486.2 473.7 499.8 505.2

2017 502.0 503.4 488.7 496.0 481.7 496.0 492.3 473.7 497.6 502.7

mean 510.2 509.4 494.5 500.0 493.2 501.6 500.2 477.8 504.6 509.8

median 509.9 509.3 495.6 499.9 491.3 502.9 501.7 475.1 504.9 509.6


70



2010 1 2 7 6 4 5 3 8

2011 1 2 6 4 6 5 3 8

2012 1 2 7 5 6 3 4 8

2013 1 2 5 4 7 6 3 8

2014 1 2 6 3 7 4 5 8

2015 2 1 6 5 7 3 4 8

2016 3 1 5 4 6 2 7 8

2017 2 1 6 3 7 3 5 8

mean 1 2 6 5 7 3 4 8

median 1 2 6 5 7 3 4 8



2010 566.7 569.9 562.9 565.7 570.2 554.9 563.3 535.0 566.5 568.3

2011 563.2 563.2 567.5 564.6 565.1 556.5 557.4 543.6 563.8 563.2

2012 554.8 553.6 543.0 553.3 548.6 550.7 539.9 530.2 551.2 554.2

2013 550.3 550.1 548.0 550.4 549.3 545.5 546.6 520.6 549.4 550.2

2014 544.6 543.2 538.1 546.6 540.6 538.7 542.6 514.3 542.9 543.9

2015 543.0 547.2 538.6 539.7 542.5 542.5 540.1 502.6 542.6 545.1

2016 543.2 552.6 531.6 542.5 543.4 551.6 535.6 514.7 543.1 547.9

2017 547.2 548.9 535.0 542.1 543.0 547.4 540.1 512.7 544.1 548.1

mean 551.6 553.6 545.6 550.6 550.3 548.5 545.7 521.7 550.5 552.6

median 548.8 551.4 540.8 548.5 546.0 549.1 541.4 517.7 546.8 550.1




2010 3 2 6 4 1 7 5 8

2011 4 4 1 3 2 7 6 8

2012 1 2 6 3 5 4 7 8

2013 2 3 5 1 4 7 6 8

2014 2 3 7 1 5 6 4 8

2015 2 1 7 6 3 3 5 8

2016 4 1 7 5 3 2 6 8

2017 3 1 7 5 4 2 6 8

mean 2 1 7 3 4 5 6 8

median 3 1 7 4 5 2 6 8

71



2010 606.5 613.8 599.9 601.6 605.2 597.5 602.9 570.5 606.3 610.2

2011 607.7 617.6 604.8 604.8 605.6 601.7 607.6 594.1 609.4 612.7

2012 601.3 602.2 577.5 598.6 591.9 592.1 589.7 568.1 595.7 601.8

2013 597.7 598.0 588.0 593.6 591.4 591.4 595.9 560.0 594.8 597.9

2014 589.7 591.1 580.3 597.6 583.6 585.2 584.2 559.6 588.3 590.4

2015 584.5 591.0 576.4 590.8 578.8 582.9 584.4 537.8 584.7 587.8

2016 579.4 590.6 566.5 587.4 575.5 586.8 576.7 554.4 581.1 585.0

2017 595.9 592.3 576.2 593.6 579.9 585.9 585.8 567.7 589.5 594.1

mean 595.3 599.6 583.7 596.0 589.0 590.4 590.9 564.0 593.7 597.5

median 596.8 595.2 578.9 595.6 587.5 589.1 587.8 563.9 592.2 596.0




2010 2 1 6 5 3 7 4 8

2011 2 1 5 5 4 7 3 8

2012 2 1 7 3 5 4 6 8

2013 2 1 7 4 5 5 3 8

2014 3 2 7 1 6 4 5 8

2015 3 1 7 2 6 5 4 8

2016 4 1 7 2 6 3 5 8

2017 1 3 7 2 6 4 5 8

mean 3 1 7 2 6 5 4 8

median 1 3 7 2 6 4 5 8

Table CW9: STU Degree Educated Parents 4YA NAPLAN Writing Summary – Mean Scores


2010 538.0 537.8 523.9 526.5 530.8 526.7 532.7 500.2 533.5 537.9

2011 536.3 534.6 526.6 526.6 524.7 523.4 528.8 510.0 532.0 535.5

2012 529.7 527.5 509.2 521.4 515.2 522.6 515.8 499.3 523.4 528.6

2013 526.7 526.2 518.0 519.6 516.4 517.7 520.1 489.9 523.1 526.5

2014 517.6 517.0 506.1 516.6 505.4 510.6 507.9 486.7 514.0 517.3

2015 520.7 523.9 512.4 517.0 509.8 516.1 514.6 480.1 518.5 522.3

2016 517.4 526.2 506.0 516.3 511.3 521.6 507.2 488.8 516.9 521.8

2017 522.2 522.0 507.4 517.2 505.8 515.7 511.0 487.0 517.3 522.1

mean 526.1 526.9 513.7 520.1 514.9 519.3 517.3 492.7 522.3 526.5

median 524.4 526.2 510.8 518.4 513.2 519.7 515.2 489.3 520.8 525.3


72

Table CW10: STU Degree Educated Parents 4YA NAPLAN Writing Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2010 1 2 7 6 4 5 3 8

2011 1 2 4 5 6 7 3 8

2012 1 2 7 4 6 3 5 8

2013 1 2 5 4 7 6 3 8

2014 1 2 6 3 7 4 5 8

2015 2 1 6 3 7 4 5 8

2016 3 1 7 4 5 2 6 8

2017 1 2 6 3 7 4 5 8

mean 2 1 7 3 6 4 5 8

median 2 1 7 4 6 3 5 8

Table CW11: STU Degree Educated Parents NAPLAN Writing Summary – Total Number of #1 Ranks


2010 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0

2011 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

2012 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2013 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0

2014 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

2015 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

2016 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

2017 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 13 15 1 3 1 0 0 0


#1]

Table CW12: STU Degree Educated Parents NAPLAN Writing Summary – Total of All Ranks


# 1 13 15 1 3 1 0 0 0

# 2 11 12 0 3 1 3 1 0

# 3 5 4 1 8 3 7 6 0

# 4 3 1 0 7 4 10 6 0

# 5 0 0 8 6 6 5 8 0

# 6 0 0 9 5 7 2 8 0

# 7 0 0 13 0 10 5 3 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32


equal]

73

Table CS1: STU Degree Educated Parents Year 3 NAPLAN Spelling Summary – Mean Scores


2010 446.3 436.3 403.8 418.0 419.5 427.2 431.2 392.9 432.3 441.3

2011 454.3 441.0 420.6 429.2 425.7 432.2 434.8 400.9 439.5 447.7

2012 462.3 448.0 430.1 436.9 437.0 436.9 437.3 418.3 447.4 455.2

2013 453.9 442.6 427.2 432.5 435.8 430.4 432.7 404.8 441.6 448.3

2014 457.7 443.1 431.7 438.8 434.2 434.3 428.7 413.6 444.3 450.4

2015 452.3 443.2 426.6 434.9 433.7 429.5 428.8 409.3 441.1 447.8

2016 463.8 452.1 441.9 446.6 442.9 440.9 438.1 414.9 452.3 458.0

2017 458.9 446.0 438.9 441.0 434.6 430.5 428.6 404.5 447.0 452.5

mean 456.2 444.0 427.6 434.7 432.9 432.7 432.5 407.4 443.2 450.1

median 456.0 443.2 428.7 435.9 434.4 431.4 432.0 407.1 443.0 449.6


Table CS2: STU Degree Educated Parents Year 3 NAPLAN Spelling Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2010 1 2 7 6 5 4 3 8

2011 1 2 7 5 6 4 3 8

2012 1 2 7 5 4 5 3 8

2013 1 2 7 5 3 6 4 8

2014 1 2 6 3 5 4 7 8

2015 1 2 7 3 4 5 6 8

2016 1 2 5 3 4 6 7 8

2017 1 2 4 3 5 6 7 8

mean 1 2 7 3 4 5 6 8

median 1 2 7 3 4 6 5 8



2010 532.2 516.1 495.2 508.2 508.4 508.0 510.0 481.5 515.7 524.2

2011 530.5 515.6 494.9 508.0 504.3 504.8 508.3 489.3 515.0 523.1

2012 540.3 520.8 507.2 518.9 512.8 513.8 518.1 498.1 525.1 530.6

2013 536.6 521.5 513.5 517.7 511.2 512.0 515.5 499.0 523.8 529.1

2014 537.8 523.2 516.6 524.0 516.1 516.2 520.2 503.5 526.3 530.5

2015 536.4 525.4 517.0 521.8 518.3 516.4 516.6 496.4 526.3 530.9

2016 532.1 520.5 512.5 518.3 510.4 513.2 505.6 492.8 521.4 526.3

2017 537.5 523.5 521.9 527.6 516.6 514.8 514.2 499.8 527.4 530.5

mean 535.4 520.8 509.9 518.1 512.3 512.4 513.6 495.1 522.6 528.1

median 536.5 521.2 513.0 518.6 512.0 513.5 514.9 497.3 524.5 528.8


74



2010 1 2 7 5 4 6 3 8

2011 1 2 7 4 6 5 3 8

2012 1 2 7 3 6 5 4 8

2013 1 2 5 3 7 6 4 8

2014 1 3 5 2 7 6 4 8

2015 1 2 5 3 4 7 6 8

2016 1 2 5 3 6 4 7 8

2017 1 3 4 2 5 6 7 8

mean 1 2 7 3 6 5 4 8

median 1 2 6 3 7 5 4 8



2010 587.4 572.0 563.4 570.7 568.0 562.7 566.7 541.7 575.2 579.7

2011 579.0 563.6 558.3 565.8 562.6 557.4 559.4 546.3 567.9 571.3

2012 585.2 568.9 562.1 569.5 568.4 561.7 563.7 545.0 572.9 577.1

2013 590.6 574.0 570.9 575.8 572.2 564.8 571.9 549.9 578.8 582.3

2014 583.3 569.8 564.1 574.1 568.2 568.2 570.8 549.2 574.1 576.6

2015 585.2 568.6 570.5 571.0 569.0 564.6 564.7 548.4 574.6 576.9

2016 579.2 566.5 565.6 569.6 563.8 561.7 562.4 543.9 570.4 572.9

2017 587.9 570.9 572.5 577.4 572.7 566.7 565.0 551.4 577.3 579.4

mean 584.7 569.3 565.9 571.7 568.1 563.5 565.6 547.0 573.9 577.0

median 585.2 569.4 564.9 570.9 568.3 563.7 564.9 547.4 574.4 577.3




2010 1 2 6 3 4 7 5 8

2011 1 3 6 2 4 7 5 8

2012 1 3 6 2 4 7 5 8

2013 1 3 6 2 4 7 5 8

2014 1 4 7 2 5 5 3 8

2015 1 5 3 2 4 7 6 8

2016 1 3 4 2 5 7 6 8

2017 1 5 4 2 3 6 7 8

mean 1 3 5 2 4 7 6 8

median 1 3 5 2 4 7 5 8

75



2010 624.4 611.4 604.6 602.8 606.0 600.1 609.1 582.4 613.4 617.9

2011 623.2 612.9 602.7 605.6 604.8 599.9 608.1 588.0 613.2 618.1

2012 620.4 606.4 599.7 603.3 602.3 593.5 601.7 583.9 609.0 613.4

2013 621.4 606.9 604.3 607.4 604.7 597.8 608.2 584.3 611.0 614.2

2014 623.0 610.5 603.2 612.3 604.9 598.8 611.0 588.6 612.8 616.8

2015 624.2 609.9 607.9 615.2 604.1 604.2 610.6 585.4 614.3 617.1

2016 618.1 607.6 602.8 614.6 601.6 601.7 609.8 592.4 610.8 612.9

2017 621.3 603.5 602.8 614.0 602.1 598.6 603.3 588.9 610.2 612.4

mean 622.0 608.6 603.5 609.4 603.8 599.3 607.7 586.7 611.8 615.3

median 622.2 608.8 603.0 609.9 604.4 599.4 608.7 586.7 611.9 615.5




2010 1 2 5 6 4 7 3 8

2011 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

2012 1 2 6 3 4 7 5 8

2013 1 4 6 3 5 7 2 8

2014 1 4 6 2 5 7 3 8

2015 1 4 5 2 7 6 3 8

2016 1 4 5 2 7 6 3 8

2017 1 3 5 2 6 7 4 8

mean 1 3 6 2 5 7 4 8

median 1 3 6 2 5 7 4 8

Table CS9: STU Degree Educated Parents 4YA NAPLAN Spelling Summary – Mean Scores


2010 547.6 534.0 516.8 524.9 525.5 524.5 529.3 499.6 534.2 540.8

2011 546.8 533.3 519.1 527.2 524.4 523.6 527.7 506.1 533.9 540.0

2012 552.1 536.0 524.8 532.2 530.1 526.5 530.2 511.3 538.6 544.0

2013 550.6 536.3 529.0 533.4 531.0 526.3 532.1 509.5 538.8 543.4

2014 550.5 536.7 528.9 537.3 530.9 529.4 532.7 513.7 539.4 543.6

2015 549.5 536.8 530.5 535.7 531.3 528.7 530.2 509.9 539.1 543.2

2016 548.3 536.7 530.7 537.3 529.7 529.4 529.0 511.0 538.7 542.5

2017 551.4 536.0 534.0 540.0 531.5 527.7 527.8 511.2 540.5 543.7

mean 549.6 535.7 526.7 533.5 529.3 527.0 529.8 509.0 537.9 542.6

median 550.0 536.1 528.9 534.5 530.5 527.1 529.7 510.4 538.8 543.1


76

Table CS10: STU Degree Educated Parents 4YA NAPLAN Spelling Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2010 1 2 7 5 4 6 3 8

2011 1 2 7 4 5 6 3 8

2012 1 2 7 3 5 6 4 8

2013 1 2 6 3 5 7 4 8

2014 1 3 7 2 5 6 4 8

2015 1 2 5 3 4 7 6 8

2016 1 3 4 2 5 6 7 8

2017 1 3 4 2 5 7 6 8

mean 1 2 7 3 5 6 4 8

median 1 2 6 3 4 7 5 8

Table CS11: STU Degree Educated Parents NAPLAN Spelling Summary – Total Number of #1 Ranks


2010 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2011 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2012 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2013 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2014 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2015 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2016 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2017 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


#1]

Table CS12: STU Degree Educated Parents NAPLAN Spelling Summary – Total of All Ranks


# 1 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

# 2 0 18 0 13 0 0 1 0

# 3 0 7 1 11 2 0 11 0

# 4 0 5 4 2 12 4 5 0

# 5 0 2 9 4 9 5 5 0

# 6 0 0 9 2 5 10 4 0

# 7 0 0 9 0 4 13 6 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32


equal]

77

Table CG1: STU Degree Educated Parents Year 3 NAPLAN Grammar and Punctuation Summary – Mean

Scores


2010 470.6 468.2 440.9 448.8 442.2 460.3 463.1 419.9 461.3 469.4

2011 477.1 470.4 452.0 455.4 448.1 462.8 466.2 424.5 466.2 473.8

2012 478.6 469.9 455.9 456.5 450.2 465.4 464.9 434.2 467.7 474.3

2013 474.3 468.7 459.3 456.2 454.5 463.7 466.1 427.6 466.4 471.5

2014 479.1 467.7 465.2 460.4 451.0 461.9 463.3 433.3 468.9 473.4

2015 482.9 475.1 474.3 470.0 458.8 460.8 465.4 427.7 475.4 479.0

2016 481.9 477.3 474.1 466.5 460.9 468.3 462.1 431.5 475.3 479.6

2017 486.2 481.0 479.4 472.8 461.2 475.6 467.0 423.9 479.7 483.6

mean 478.8 472.3 462.6 460.8 453.4 464.9 464.8 427.8 470.1 475.6

median 478.9 470.2 462.3 458.5 452.8 463.3 465.2 427.7 468.3 474.5


Table CG2: STU Degree Educated Parents Year 3 NAPLAN Grammar and Punctuation Summary – Ranks of

Mean Scores


2010 1 2 7 5 6 4 3 8

2011 1 2 6 5 7 4 3 8

2012 1 2 6 5 7 3 4 8

2013 1 2 5 6 7 4 3 8

2014 1 2 3 6 7 5 4 8

2015 1 2 3 4 7 6 5 8

2016 1 2 3 5 7 4 6 8

2017 1 2 3 5 7 4 6 8

mean 1 2 5 6 7 3 4 8

median 1 2 5 6 7 4 3 8


Scores


2010 555.7 543.6 524.0 532.3 531.1 542.4 540.7 491.6 541.6 549.7

2011 554.0 542.1 527.3 537.4 526.6 540.5 547.7 513.4 542.1 548.1

2012 547.3 531.3 520.6 526.3 518.5 528.9 538.1 503.9 534.5 539.3

2013 545.5 534.9 531.9 534.0 522.9 531.1 539.5 508.8 537.1 540.2

2014 554.5 539.4 540.5 537.9 528.8 540.9 542.9 515.4 543.9 547.0

2015 551.3 541.9 541.6 539.1 532.0 539.7 540.7 509.0 543.9 546.6

2016 550.7 537.5 543.8 535.5 526.3 543.5 532.0 508.5 542.0 544.1

2017 546.3 533.8 534.9 533.8 524.4 532.7 527.5 503.6 537.3 540.1

mean 550.7 538.1 533.1 534.5 526.3 537.5 538.6 506.8 540.3 544.4

median 551.0 538.5 533.4 534.8 526.5 540.1 540.1 508.7 541.8 544.7


78


Mean Scores


2010 1 2 7 5 6 3 4 8

2011 1 3 6 5 7 4 2 8

2012 1 3 6 5 7 4 2 8

2013 1 3 5 4 7 6 2 8

2014 1 5 4 6 7 3 2 8

2015 1 2 3 6 7 5 4 8

2016 1 4 2 5 7 3 6 8

2017 1 3 2 3 7 5 6 8

mean 1 3 6 5 7 4 2 8

median 1 4 6 5 7 2 2 8


Scores


2010 582.1 574.9 569.4 572.6 569.8 576.1 580.5 548.7 576.0 578.5

2011 578.3 571.3 562.6 566.9 566.3 574.2 576.1 550.6 571.6 574.8

2012 589.6 580.5 577.1 582.1 581.1 582.2 581.7 556.9 583.2 585.1

2013 583.9 570.5 572.8 574.7 566.8 570.6 576.7 536.5 575.7 577.2

2014 590.5 575.0 581.5 582.7 573.2 584.1 589.3 559.4 582.7 582.8

2015 585.5 576.9 577.9 574.9 573.2 572.2 577.1 547.8 579.3 581.2

2016 581.5 573.2 574.2 573.7 571.3 577.4 573.3 541.1 575.9 577.4

2017 582.6 574.8 575.7 574.1 576.7 579.1 573.7 539.6 577.4 578.7

mean 584.3 574.6 573.9 575.2 572.3 577.0 578.6 547.6 577.7 579.4

median 583.3 574.9 575.0 574.4 572.3 576.8 576.9 548.3 576.7 579.1



Mean Scores


2010 1 4 7 5 6 3 2 8

2011 1 4 7 5 6 3 2 8

2012 1 6 7 3 5 2 4 8

2013 1 6 4 3 7 5 2 8

2014 1 6 5 4 7 3 2 8

2015 1 4 2 5 6 7 3 8

2016 1 6 3 4 7 2 5 8

2017 1 5 4 6 3 2 7 8

mean 1 5 6 4 7 3 2 8

median 1 5 4 6 7 3 2 8

79


Mean Scores


2010 1 4 7 5 6 3 2 8

2011 1 4 7 5 6 3 2 8

2012 1 6 7 3 5 2 4 8

2013 1 6 4 3 7 5 2 8

2014 1 6 5 4 7 3 2 8

2015 1 4 2 5 6 7 3 8

2016 1 6 3 4 7 2 5 8

2017 1 5 4 6 3 2 7 8

mean 1 5 6 4 7 3 2 8

median 1 5 4 6 7 3 2 8


Mean Scores


2010 1 3 6 7 5 4 2 8

2011 1 3 6 7 5 4 2 8

2012 1 2 4 7 5 6 3 8

2013 1 4 5 6 7 3 2 8

2014 1 4 6 3 7 5 2 8

2015 1 6 4 2 7 3 4 8

2016 4 6 5 3 7 2 1 8

2017 1 6 2 3 5 7 4 8

mean 1 3 6 5 7 4 2 8

median 1 3 5 6 7 4 2 8

Table CG9: STU Degree Educated Parents 4YA Grammar and Punctuation Summary – Mean Scores


2010 558.3 551.9 536.9 540.9 539.4 549.0 552.0 513.2 549.6 555.1

2011 557.2 550.0 537.1 541.2 537.1 546.7 552.0 519.9 548.5 553.6

2012 558.6 548.8 540.6 542.8 539.6 546.2 549.4 520.4 549.6 553.7

2013 557.1 547.2 544.4 544.4 539.0 545.1 551.6 514.8 549.2 552.1

2014 560.6 548.9 548.3 548.8 539.7 549.5 552.7 523.9 552.1 554.7

2015 557.0 548.7 549.4 547.7 539.6 544.3 546.8 513.3 550.7 552.8

2016 554.8 547.6 548.7 545.9 538.9 549.5 544.4 516.3 549.3 551.2

2017 558.4 547.3 549.9 546.6 540.6 546.3 543.1 511.4 550.7 552.8

mean 557.7 548.8 544.4 544.8 539.2 547.1 549.0 516.7 550.0 553.3

median 557.7 548.7 546.3 545.1 539.5 546.5 550.5 515.6 549.6 553.2


80

Table CG10: STU Degree Educated Parents 4YA Grammar and Punctuation Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2010 1 3 7 5 6 4 2 8

2011 1 3 6 5 6 4 2 8

2012 1 3 6 5 7 4 2 8

2013 1 3 6 5 7 4 2 8

2014 1 4 6 5 7 3 2 8

2015 1 3 2 4 7 6 5 8

2016 1 4 3 5 7 2 6 8

2017 1 3 2 4 7 5 6 8

mean 1 3 6 5 7 4 2 8

median 1 3 5 6 7 4 2 8

Table CG11: STU Degree Educated Parents NAPLAN Grammar and Punctuation Summary – Total Number of

#1 Ranks


2010 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2011 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2012 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2013 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2014 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2015 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2016 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

2017 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 31 0 0 0 0 0 1 0


#1]

Table CG12: STU Degree Educated Parents NAPLAN Grammar and Punctuation Summary – Total of All Ranks


# 1 31 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

# 2 0 11 4 1 0 4 12 0

# 3 0 6 6 6 1 9 5 0

# 4 1 6 5 4 0 9 7 0

# 5 0 2 5 12 5 5 2 0

# 6 0 7 7 6 5 3 4 0

# 7 0 0 5 3 21 2 1 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32


equal]

81

Table CN1: STU Degree Educated Parents Year 3 Numeracy Summary – Mean Scores


2010 438.3 438.5 410.8 419.9 412.7 435.0 435.9 406.0 431.0 438.4

2011 440.8 440.3 418.7 421.8 414.1 435.2 435.7 406.0 433.0 440.6

2012 440.8 435.8 415.9 420.6 414.0 434.1 430.3 398.5 430.9 438.3

2013 437.3 434.3 419.3 421.2 413.0 434.0 433.5 398.3 429.8 435.8

2014 442.2 440.1 428.4 428.9 418.8 440.6 433.8 409.8 435.9 441.2

2015 437.4 436.7 426.9 424.8 415.2 428.0 428.4 391.8 432.1 437.1

2016 440.9 441.2 431.6 429.0 417.0 436.5 428.8 399.9 436.0 441.1

2017 449.1 446.4 437.2 436.5 423.8 439.8 436.1 401.1 442.7 447.8

mean 440.9 439.2 423.6 425.3 416.1 435.4 432.8 401.4 433.9 440.0

median 440.8 439.3 423.1 423.3 414.7 435.1 433.7 400.5 432.6 440.1


Table CN2: STU Degree Educated Parents Year 3 Numeracy Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2010 2 1 7 5 6 4 3 8

2011 1 2 6 5 7 4 3 8

2012 1 2 6 5 7 3 4 8

2013 1 2 6 5 7 3 4 8

2014 1 3 6 5 7 2 4 8

2015 1 2 5 6 7 4 3 8

2016 2 1 4 5 7 3 6 8

2017 1 2 4 5 7 3 6 8

mean 1 2 6 5 7 3 4 8

median 1 2 6 5 7 3 4 8



2010 538.2 532.4 508.0 515.9 509.2 521.8 523.6 494.4 526.0 535.3

2011 539.9 528.3 503.8 517.5 504.9 520.6 524.4 490.7 525.0 534.1

2012 537.1 525.9 512.0 516.8 508.9 523.3 526.6 493.7 526.1 531.5

2013 532.9 521.9 516.4 515.9 502.8 514.3 521.9 489.9 522.6 527.4

2014 529.7 522.9 515.4 516.6 502.3 520.3 517.3 491.5 521.5 526.3

2015 533.3 529.3 518.9 518.8 510.5 523.9 522.0 493.9 526.1 531.3

2016 535.3 530.2 522.1 520.9 506.6 521.8 516.8 496.9 527.4 532.8

2017 532.0 526.3 521.9 521.9 506.8 514.5 515.5 491.2 525.1 529.2

mean 534.8 527.2 514.8 518.0 506.5 520.1 521.0 492.8 525.0 531.0

median 534.3 527.3 515.9 517.2 506.7 521.2 522.0 492.6 525.6 530.8


82



2010 1 2 7 5 6 4 3 8

2011 1 2 7 5 6 4 3 8

2012 1 3 6 5 7 4 2 8

2013 1 2 4 5 7 6 2 8

2014 1 2 6 5 7 3 4 8

2015 1 2 5 6 7 3 4 8

2016 1 2 3 5 7 4 6 8

2017 1 2 3 3 7 6 5 8

mean 1 2 6 5 7 4 3 8

median 1 2 6 5 7 4 3 8



2010 596.4 588.6 583.5 585.4 577.6 577.5 585.0 552.2 589.0 592.5

2011 594.9 585.5 577.4 584.2 574.9 581.7 582.0 558.6 586.4 590.2

2012 587.6 578.1 568.8 573.8 570.3 570.3 570.8 541.0 578.3 582.9

2013 590.2 576.1 575.1 580.6 567.4 570.4 572.9 539.7 580.3 583.2

2014 593.0 579.8 580.7 585.0 569.6 576.2 579.3 549.3 584.3 586.4

2015 585.4 577.3 572.6 572.6 566.6 567.4 570.3 541.8 577.5 581.4

2016 590.4 585.3 580.7 584.6 575.5 580.3 576.9 551.8 584.9 587.9

2017 597.0 588.8 585.0 588.2 577.9 578.3 578.6 555.1 589.5 592.9

mean 591.9 582.4 578.0 581.8 572.5 575.3 577.0 548.7 583.8 587.2

median 591.7 582.6 579.1 584.4 572.6 576.9 577.8 550.6 584.6 587.1




2010 1 2 5 3 6 7 4 8

2011 1 2 6 3 7 5 4 8

2012 1 2 7 3 5 5 4 8

2013 1 3 4 2 7 6 5 8

2014 1 4 3 2 7 6 5 8

2015 1 2 3 3 7 6 5 8

2016 1 2 4 3 7 5 6 8

2017 1 2 4 3 7 6 5 8

mean 1 2 4 3 7 6 5 8

median 1 3 4 2 7 6 5 8

83

Table CN7: STU Degree Educated Parents Year 9 NAPLAN Numeracy Summary – Mean Scores


2010 639.4 628.9 612.4 616.6 614.9 613.6 629.7 592.4 627.4 634.2

2011 637.1 626.7 612.1 621.2 610.5 609.0 624.0 596.3 625.7 631.9

2012 638.6 626.5 611.1 621.9 615.3 610.3 623.5 595.9 626.3 632.6

2013 645.5 627.4 614.8 629.1 614.1 615.6 629.3 591.7 630.2 636.5

2014 638.2 626.2 614.9 629.8 608.6 614.7 621.0 590.5 626.8 632.2

2015 637.9 629.3 618.2 633.0 612.2 619.8 624.2 586.6 629.0 633.6

2016 631.3 623.7 615.3 631.8 608.2 612.9 618.9 592.2 624.5 627.5

2017 636.5 620.9 616.7 628.7 608.7 608.2 613.9 591.4 624.9 628.7

mean 638.1 626.2 614.4 626.5 611.6 613.0 623.1 592.1 626.9 632.1

median 638.1 626.6 614.9 628.9 611.4 613.3 623.8 592.0 626.6 632.3


Table CN8: STU Degree Educated Parents Year 9 NAPLAN Numeracy Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2010 1 3 7 4 5 6 2 8

2011 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

2012 1 2 6 4 5 7 3 8

2013 1 4 6 3 7 5 2 8

2014 1 3 5 2 7 6 4 8

2015 1 3 6 2 7 5 4 8

2016 2 3 5 1 7 6 4 8

2017 1 3 4 2 6 7 5 8

mean 1 3 5 2 7 6 4 8

median 1 3 5 2 7 6 4 8

Table CN9: STU Degree Educated Parents 4YA NAPLAN Numeracy Summary – Mean Scores


2010 553.1 547.1 528.7 534.5 528.6 537.0 543.6 511.3 543.4 550.1

2011 553.2 545.2 528.0 536.2 526.1 536.6 541.5 512.9 542.5 549.2

2012 551.0 541.6 527.0 533.3 527.1 534.5 537.8 507.3 540.4 546.3

2013 551.5 539.9 531.4 536.7 524.3 533.6 539.4 504.9 540.7 545.7

2014 550.8 542.3 534.9 540.1 524.8 538.0 537.9 510.3 542.1 546.5

2015 548.5 543.2 534.2 537.3 526.1 534.8 536.2 503.5 541.2 545.8

2016 549.5 545.1 537.4 541.6 526.8 537.9 535.4 510.2 543.2 547.3

2017 553.7 545.6 540.2 543.8 529.3 535.2 536.0 509.7 545.6 549.6

mean 551.4 543.7 532.7 537.9 526.7 535.9 538.5 508.8 542.4 547.6

median 551.3 544.1 532.8 537.0 526.5 535.9 537.8 510.0 542.3 547.7


84

Table CN10: STU Degree Educated Parents 4YA NAPLAN Numeracy Summary – Ranks of Mean Scores


2010 1 2 6 5 7 4 3 8

2011 1 2 6 5 7 4 3 8

2012 1 2 7 5 6 4 3 8

2013 1 2 6 4 7 5 3 8

2014 1 2 6 3 7 4 5 8

2015 1 2 6 3 7 5 4 8

2016 1 2 5 3 7 4 6 8

2017 1 2 4 3 7 6 5 8

mean 1 2 6 4 7 5 3 8

median 1 2 6 4 7 5 3 8

Table CN11: STU Degree Educated Parents NAPLAN Numeracy Summary – Total Number of #1 Ranks


2010 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2011 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2012 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2013 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2014 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2015 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2016 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0

2017 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 29 2 0 1 0 0 0 0


#1]

Table CN12: STU Degree Educated Parents NAPLAN Numeracy Summary – Total of All Ranks


# 1 29 2 0 1 0 0 0 0

# 2 3 20 0 5 0 1 4 0

# 3 0 8 4 8 0 6 7 0

# 4 0 2 7 3 0 7 11 0

# 5 0 0 6 13 3 5 6 0

# 6 0 0 10 2 6 9 4 0

# 7 0 0 5 0 23 4 0 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32


equal]

85

Table CM1: STU Degree Educated Parents Year 3 Equal Weighted Mean Summary – Mean Scores


2010 454.7 451.2 423.9 432.7 430.9 446.5 449.8 412.4 445.4 452.9

2011 458.4 452.4 433.4 436.5 432.1 445.8 448.8 413.7 448.0 455.4

2012 459.7 452.7 436.6 440.2 436.7 450.7 446.8 419.9 449.8 456.2

2013 454.8 451.4 438.0 437.8 436.5 446.4 446.5 411.1 447.4 453.1

2014 455.3 449.6 439.1 441.0 433.3 446.8 441.0 418.3 447.3 452.5

2015 457.9 454.9 444.5 444.6 437.5 444.6 444.6 412.0 451.3 456.4

2016 459.9 458.1 448.4 447.6 441.7 451.0 443.8 417.6 454.1 459.0

2017 462.2 458.3 450.1 449.5 438.5 450.1 444.5 410.1 455.3 460.2

mean 457.9 453.6 439.3 441.2 435.9 447.7 445.7 414.4 449.8 455.7

median 458.1 452.6 438.5 440.6 436.6 446.7 445.6 413.0 448.9 455.4


Table CM2: STU Degree Educated Parents Year 3 Equal Weighed Mean Summary – Ranks


2010 1 2 7 5 6 4 3 8

2011 1 2 6 5 7 4 3 8

2012 1 2 7 5 6 3 4 8

2013 1 2 5 6 7 4 3 8

2014 1 2 6 4 7 3 5 8

2015 1 2 6 4 7 4 3 8

2016 1 2 4 5 7 3 6 8

2017 1 2 4 5 7 3 6 8

mean 1 2 6 5 7 3 4 8

median 1 2 6 5 7 3 4 8



2010 537.6 529.2 507.6 517.2 515.3 524.2 525.2 490.3 525.4 533.4

2011 536.4 527.6 507.3 518.3 511.0 522.1 527.0 497.1 524.8 532.0

2012 535.3 524.5 509.0 517.3 511.3 522.3 525.7 497.6 524.7 529.9

2013 533.2 524.8 518.3 519.6 510.8 519.3 523.6 497.5 524.9 529.0

2014 533.4 525.2 518.8 521.3 511.7 524.4 523.2 499.0 525.3 529.3

2015 534.0 529.0 522.2 521.6 515.9 526.1 525.0 496.8 527.6 531.5

2016 531.8 527.3 521.2 520.3 511.9 525.9 515.0 496.6 525.5 529.5

2017 532.8 526.0 521.4 523.4 511.8 520.6 518.1 496.0 525.8 529.4

mean 534.3 526.7 515.7 519.9 512.5 523.1 522.9 496.3 525.5 530.5

median 533.7 526.6 518.5 520.0 511.8 523.3 524.3 496.9 525.4 530.2


86



2010 1 2 7 5 6 4 3 8

2011 1 2 7 5 6 4 3 8

2012 1 3 7 5 6 4 2 8

2013 1 2 6 4 7 5 3 8

2014 1 2 6 5 7 3 4 8

2015 1 2 5 6 7 3 4 8

2016 1 2 4 5 7 3 6 8

2017 1 2 4 3 7 5 6 8

mean 1 2 6 5 7 3 4 8

median 1 2 6 5 7 4 3 8



2010 584.6 578.6 570.7 575.8 573.4 572.4 578.3 547.1 578.5 581.6

2011 579.9 572.0 567.5 572.2 567.8 571.0 572.1 552.2 573.6 575.9

2012 580.2 571.9 563.9 570.5 568.6 570.8 567.9 545.3 572.7 576.1

2013 579.2 569.2 567.2 571.2 565.1 566.7 570.4 539.4 572.0 574.2

2014 579.3 569.6 568.3 573.9 565.5 570.8 574.5 547.0 573.1 574.5

2015 576.5 569.9 567.4 566.7 565.1 566.1 567.9 539.4 570.8 573.2

2016 574.1 570.1 564.9 568.4 564.8 570.5 565.4 540.1 569.6 572.1

2017 579.4 572.3 568.7 570.9 569.2 571.4 567.8 541.4 573.3 575.9

mean 579.2 571.7 567.3 571.2 567.4 570.0 570.5 544.0 573.0 575.4

median 579.4 571.0 567.4 571.1 566.7 570.8 569.1 543.3 572.9 575.2




2010 1 2 7 4 5 6 3 8

2011 1 4 7 2 6 5 3 8

2012 1 2 7 4 5 3 6 8

2013 1 4 5 2 7 6 3 8

2014 1 5 6 3 7 4 2 8

2015 1 2 4 5 7 6 3 8

2016 1 3 6 4 7 2 5 8

2017 1 2 6 4 5 3 7 8

mean 1 2 7 3 6 5 4 8

median 1 3 6 2 7 4 5 8

87

Table CM7: STU Year 9 Equal Weighted Mean Summary – Mean Scores


2010 622.8 618.0 606.5 607.0 609.7 608.8 618.1 585.3 615.9 620.4

2011 621.9 618.3 607.0 610.2 607.4 607.6 617.1 594.1 615.9 620.1

2012 619.2 612.8 600.1 607.6 605.6 604.7 610.2 585.8 611.4 616.0

2013 621.8 612.3 605.7 611.6 606.4 608.2 616.1 583.4 613.7 617.1

2014 618.3 611.7 602.1 614.8 602.1 606.3 610.9 584.8 611.5 615.0

2015 615.0 609.5 602.8 613.3 599.4 606.6 609.3 573.1 609.6 612.3

2016 610.2 607.5 599.5 612.1 597.7 606.4 607.7 584.2 607.0 608.8

2017 618.6 605.3 602.9 611.5 598.7 601.1 604.2 583.1 609.3 611.9

mean 618.5 611.9 603.3 611.0 603.4 606.2 611.7 584.2 611.8 615.2

median 618.9 612.0 602.9 611.5 603.9 606.5 610.5 584.5 611.5 615.4




2010 1 3 7 6 4 5 2 8

2011 1 2 7 4 6 5 3 8

2012 1 2 7 4 5 6 3 8

2013 1 3 7 4 6 5 2 8

2014 1 3 6 2 7 5 4 8

2015 1 3 6 2 7 5 4 8

2016 2 4 6 1 7 5 3 8

2017 1 3 5 2 7 6 4 8

mean 1 2 7 4 6 5 3 8

median 1 2 7 3 6 5 4 8

Table CM9: STU Degree Educated Parents 4YA Equal Weighted Mean Summary – Mean Scores


2010 549.9 544.3 527.2 533.2 532.3 538.0 542.8 508.8 541.3 547.1

2011 549.1 542.6 528.8 534.3 529.6 536.6 541.3 514.3 540.6 545.8

2012 548.6 540.5 527.4 533.9 530.6 537.1 537.6 512.1 539.7 544.6

2013 547.3 539.4 532.3 535.0 529.7 535.1 539.1 507.9 539.5 543.3

2014 546.6 539.0 532.1 537.8 528.1 537.1 537.4 512.3 539.3 542.8

2015 545.8 540.8 534.2 536.5 529.5 535.8 536.7 505.3 539.8 543.3

2016 544.0 540.7 533.5 537.1 529.0 538.4 533.0 509.6 539.0 542.4

2017 548.3 540.5 535.8 538.8 529.6 535.8 533.7 507.6 541.0 544.4

mean 547.4 541.0 531.4 535.8 529.8 536.8 537.7 509.7 540.0 544.2

median 547.8 540.6 532.2 535.8 529.6 536.9 537.5 509.2 539.7 544.2


88

Table CM10: STU Degree Educated Parents 4YA Equal Weighed Mean Summary – Ranks


2010 1 2 7 5 6 4 3 8

2011 1 2 7 5 6 4 3 8

2012 1 2 7 5 6 4 3 8

2013 1 2 6 5 7 4 3 8

2014 1 2 6 3 7 5 4 8

2015 1 2 6 4 7 5 3 8

2016 1 2 5 4 7 3 6 8

2017 1 2 5 3 7 4 6 8

mean 1 2 6 5 7 4 3 8

median 1 2 6 5 7 4 3 8

Table CM11: STU Degree Educated Parents Equal Weighed Mean Summary – Total of All Ranks


# 1 31 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

# 2 1 21 0 5 0 1 4 0

# 3 0 7 0 2 0 9 14 0

# 4 0 3 5 10 1 8 6 0

# 5 0 1 4 11 4 9 2 0

# 6 0 0 11 3 8 5 5 0

# 7 0 0 12 0 19 0 1 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32


equal]

89

Table CE1: STU Degree Educated Parents Year 3 NAPLAN Summary of Weighted Means Using Literacy and

Numeracy 50% each – Mean Scores


2010 448.6 446.4 419.0 427.9 424.1 442.2 444.6 410.0 440.0 447.5

2011 451.8 447.9 427.9 431.0 425.4 441.8 443.9 410.8 442.4 449.8

2012 452.6 446.4 428.9 432.8 428.2 444.5 440.6 411.9 442.7 449.5

2013 448.2 445.0 431.0 431.6 427.7 441.7 441.6 406.3 440.8 446.6

2014 450.4 446.1 435.1 436.5 427.8 444.5 438.3 415.1 443.0 448.2

2015 450.2 448.1 437.9 437.2 429.2 438.4 438.5 404.4 444.1 449.2

2016 452.8 451.8 442.1 440.6 432.4 445.6 438.2 411.0 447.3 452.3

2017 457.3 453.8 445.2 444.6 433.0 446.3 441.4 406.7 450.6 455.6

mean 451.5 448.2 433.4 435.3 428.5 443.1 440.9 409.5 443.9 449.8

median 451.1 447.1 433.0 434.7 428.0 443.3 441.0 410.4 442.9 449.1




Numeracy 50% each – Ranks


2010 1 2 7 5 6 4 3 8

2011 1 2 6 5 7 4 3 8

2012 1 2 6 5 7 3 4 8

2013 1 2 6 5 7 3 4 8

2014 1 2 6 5 7 3 4 8

2015 1 2 5 6 7 4 3 8

2016 1 2 4 5 7 3 6 8

2017 1 2 4 5 7 3 6 8

mean 1 2 6 5 7 3 4 8

median 1 2 6 5 7 3 4 8





2010 537.8 530.4 507.8 516.7 513.0 523.3 524.6 491.8 525.6 534.1

2011 537.7 527.8 506.0 518.0 508.7 521.5 526.0 494.7 524.9 532.8

2012 536.0 525.0 510.1 517.1 510.4 522.7 526.1 496.1 525.3 530.5

2013 533.1 523.7 517.6 518.2 507.8 517.4 522.9 494.6 524.0 528.4

2014 532.0 524.3 517.5 519.6 508.2 522.9 521.0 496.2 523.9 528.2

2015 533.8 529.1 521.0 520.5 513.9 525.3 523.9 495.7 527.0 531.4

2016 533.1 528.4 521.6 520.6 509.9 524.4 515.7 496.7 526.2 530.7

2017 532.5 526.1 521.6 522.8 510.0 518.3 517.1 494.2 525.6 529.3

mean 534.5 526.9 515.4 519.2 510.2 522.0 522.2 495.0 525.3 530.7

median 533.4 527.0 517.5 518.9 509.9 522.8 523.4 495.2 525.4 530.2


90




2010 1 2 7 5 6 4 3 8

2011 1 2 7 5 6 4 3 8

2012 1 3 7 5 6 4 2 8

2013 1 2 5 4 7 6 3 8

2014 1 2 6 5 7 3 4 8

2015 1 2 5 6 7 3 4 8

2016 1 2 4 5 7 3 6 8

2017 1 2 4 3 7 5 6 8

mean 1 2 6 5 7 4 3 8

median 1 2 6 5 7 4 3 8





2010 589.1 582.3 575.5 579.4 575.0 574.3 580.8 549.0 582.4 585.7

2011 585.5 577.1 571.2 576.7 570.5 575.0 575.8 554.6 578.4 581.3

2012 583.0 574.3 565.7 571.8 569.2 570.6 569.0 543.7 574.8 578.6

2013 583.3 571.8 570.2 574.7 565.9 568.1 571.3 539.5 575.1 577.6

2014 584.5 573.4 573.0 578.1 567.0 572.8 576.3 547.8 577.3 578.9

2015 579.8 572.7 569.3 568.9 565.7 566.6 568.8 540.3 573.3 576.3

2016 580.2 575.8 570.8 574.5 568.8 574.2 569.7 544.5 575.3 578.0

2017 586.0 578.5 574.8 577.4 572.5 574.0 571.8 546.5 579.4 582.3

mean 583.9 575.7 571.3 575.2 569.3 572.0 572.9 545.7 577.0 579.8

median 583.9 575.0 571.0 575.7 569.0 573.4 571.6 545.5 576.3 579.5






2010 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

2011 1 2 6 3 7 5 4 8

2012 1 2 7 3 5 4 6 8

2013 1 3 5 2 7 6 4 8

2014 1 4 5 2 7 6 3 8

2015 1 2 3 4 7 6 5 8

2016 1 2 5 3 7 4 6 8

2017 1 2 4 3 6 5 7 8

mean 1 2 6 3 7 5 4 8

median 1 3 6 2 7 4 5 8


91




2010 629.0 622.1 608.7 610.6 611.6 610.6 622.5 588.0 620.2 625.6

2011 627.6 621.4 608.9 614.3 608.6 608.1 619.7 594.9 619.6 624.5

2012 626.5 618.0 604.3 613.0 609.3 606.8 615.2 589.6 617.0 622.2

2013 630.7 618.0 609.1 618.2 609.3 611.0 621.1 586.5 619.9 624.3

2014 625.8 617.1 606.9 620.4 604.5 609.5 614.7 587.0 617.3 621.4

2015 623.6 617.0 608.6 620.7 604.2 611.6 614.9 578.2 616.9 620.3

2016 618.1 613.6 605.5 619.5 601.7 608.8 611.9 587.2 613.5 615.8

2017 625.3 611.2 608.1 617.9 602.5 603.8 607.9 586.2 615.2 618.2

mean 625.8 617.3 607.5 616.8 606.4 608.8 616.0 587.2 617.4 621.5

median 626.1 617.5 608.3 618.1 606.5 609.1 615.0 587.1 617.1 621.8






2010 1 3 7 5 4 6 2 8

2011 1 2 5 4 6 7 3 8

2012 1 2 7 4 5 6 3 8

2013 1 4 7 3 6 5 2 8

2014 1 3 6 2 7 5 4 8

2015 1 3 6 2 7 5 4 8

2016 2 3 6 1 7 5 4 8

2017 1 3 4 2 7 6 5 8

mean 1 2 6 3 7 5 4 8

median 1 3 6 2 7 5 4 8


Table CE9: STU 4YA NAPLAN Summary of Weighted Means Using Literacy and Numeracy 50% each – Mean

Scores


2010 551.1 545.3 527.7 533.7 530.9 537.6 543.1 509.7 542.1 548.2

2011 550.7 543.5 528.5 535.0 528.3 536.6 541.4 513.8 541.3 547.1

2012 549.5 540.9 527.2 533.7 529.3 536.1 537.7 510.3 539.9 545.2

2013 548.8 539.6 532.0 535.7 527.7 534.6 539.2 506.8 540.0 544.2

2014 548.2 540.2 533.1 538.6 526.9 537.4 537.6 511.5 540.4 544.2

2015 546.8 541.7 534.2 536.8 528.2 535.4 536.5 504.7 540.3 544.3

2016 546.0 542.4 535.0 538.8 528.2 538.2 533.9 509.8 540.6 544.2

2017 550.3 542.4 537.4 540.7 529.5 535.6 534.5 508.4 542.7 546.3

mean 548.9 542.0 531.9 536.6 528.6 536.4 538.0 509.4 540.9 545.5

median 549.2 542.0 532.5 536.2 528.3 536.4 537.6 509.8 540.5 545.6



92

Table CE10: STU 4YA NAPLAN Summary of Weighted Means Using Literacy and Numeracy 50% each – Ranks


2010 1 2 7 5 6 4 3 8

2011 1 2 6 5 7 4 3 8

2012 1 2 7 5 6 4 3 8

2013 1 2 6 4 7 5 3 8

2014 1 2 6 3 7 5 4 8

2015 1 2 6 3 7 5 4 8

2016 1 2 5 3 7 4 6 8

2017 1 2 4 3 7 5 6 8

mean 1 2 6 4 7 5 3 8

median 1 2 6 5 7 4 3 8


Table CE11: STU Degree Educated Parents NAPLAN Summary of Weighted

Means Using Literacy and Numeracy 50% Each – Total of All Ranks


# 1 31 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

# 2 1 23 0 5 0 0 3 0

# 3 0 7 1 6 0 8 10 0

# 4 0 2 6 5 1 8 10 0

# 5 0 0 8 13 2 7 2 0

# 6 0 0 9 2 8 7 6 0

# 7 0 0 8 0 21 2 1 0

# 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32


equal]


Table CT1: STU Degree Educated Parents NAPLAN Summary – Total Number of #1 Ranks


2010 13 2 0 0 1 1 3 0

2011 14 1 1 0 0 1 3 0

2012 15 1 0 0 0 2 2 0

2013 14 1 0 1 0 2 2 0

2014 14 0 0 2 0 2 2 0

2015 12 5 0 0 0 1 2 0

2016 9 6 0 1 0 2 2 0

2017 16 4 0 0 0 1 0 0

Total 107 20 1 4 1 12 16 0


and Numeracy, across the eight years from 2010 till 2017, but actually 161 because two STUs were equal on one occasion]

93

Appendix D – STU NAPLAN Participation Rate Data 2008 to 2017

Table DP1: STU Year 3 NAPLAN Participation Rate Summary – Means of the Five Components

Year NSW VIC QLD WA SA TAS ACT NT AUS

2008 97.2 96.0 97.6 95.2 96.9 96.8 95.6 82.7 96.6

2009 97.4 95.0 97.1 96.3 94.8 97.6 95.4 93.5 96.4

2010 97.2 93.8 96.1 95.5 93.7 96.0 94.9 88.0 95.5

2011 97.3 94.6 96.0 95.4 93.5 96.5 93.2 88.1 95.7

2012 97.0 94.7 94.8 95.1 93.7 95.2 93.4 87.6 95.3

2013 97.2 94.4 94.2 95.1 93.3 95.8 93.1 86.6 95.2

2014 97.1 94.4 93.3 95.0 92.8 95.5 93.0 88.4 94.9

2015 97.0 94.5 93.2 95.3 92.8 94.9 93.2 87.6 94.9

2016 97.0 94.6 93.2 95.3 93.3 94.5 93.1 89.8 95.0

2017 96.8 94.7 92.8 95.3 93.1 94.7 93.7 88.4 94.8

mean 97.1 94.7 94.8 95.4 93.8 95.8 93.9 88.1 95.4

median 97.2 94.6 94.5 95.3 93.4 95.7 93.3 88.1 95.3

Table DP2: STU Year 3 NAPLAN Participation Rate Summary – Ranks of Five Component Means


2008 2 5 1 7 3 4 6 8

2009 2 6 3 4 7 1 5 8

2010 1 6 2 4 7 3 5 8

2011 1 5 3 4 6 2 7 8

2012 1 5 4 3 6 2 7 8

2013 1 4 5 3 6 2 7 8

2014 1 4 5 3 7 2 6 8

2015 1 4 5 2 7 3 5 8

2016 1 3 6 2 5 4 7 8

2017 1 3 7 2 6 3 5 8

mean 1 5 4 3 7 2 6 8

median 1 4 5 3 6 2 7 8



2008 97.5 96.3 97.8 95.6 97.1 96.8 96.4 84.9 96.8

2009 97.7 95.3 97.4 97.1 95.8 97.4 96.6 95.7 96.8

2010 97.7 94.6 96.6 96.3 94.8 96.5 95.4 89.7 96.2

2011 97.7 95.2 96.2 96.1 94.9 96.5 95.6 88.5 96.2

2012 97.4 95.1 94.9 95.8 94.8 96.2 95.5 88.7 95.9

2013 97.6 95.2 94.9 95.5 94.0 96.4 94.7 87.3 95.8

2014 97.5 95.2 94.0 95.8 94.1 95.6 93.7 89.6 95.6

2015 97.4 95.2 93.8 95.8 93.8 95.7 94.8 86.8 95.5

2016 97.2 95.3 93.3 95.8 93.9 95.4 94.2 89.6 95.4

2017 97.3 95.4 93.2 95.9 93.9 94.7 94.4 88.6 95.4

mean 97.5 95.3 95.2 96.0 94.7 96.1 95.1 88.9 96.0

median 97.5 95.2 94.9 95.8 94.5 96.3 95.1 88.7 95.9

94



2008 2 6 1 7 3 4 5 8

2009 1 8 2 4 6 2 5 7

2010 1 7 2 4 6 3 5 8

2011 1 6 3 4 7 2 5 8

2012 1 5 6 3 7 2 4 8

2013 1 4 5 3 7 2 6 8

2014 1 4 6 2 5 3 7 8

2015 1 4 6 2 6 3 5 8

2016 1 4 7 2 6 3 5 8

2017 1 3 7 2 6 4 5 8

mean 1 4 5 3 7 2 6 8

median 1 4 6 3 7 2 5 8



2008 96.6 95.7 97.7 95.7 96.8 95.6 95.0 79.5 96.3

2009 97.2 94.9 97.2 96.6 96.0 95.3 95.0 93.0 96.3

2010 97.3 94.6 96.7 96.3 94.9 95.1 95.6 89.1 96.1

2011 97.1 95.0 96.5 95.9 95.4 94.9 95.4 87.4 96.0

2012 96.4 94.9 95.4 95.7 94.8 94.4 94.5 87.0 95.5

2013 97.1 95.0 95.0 95.6 94.2 95.0 93.9 85.2 95.5

2014 96.7 94.9 93.1 95.6 93.8 95.1 94.5 88.4 95.1

2015 96.5 94.6 91.9 95.5 93.5 94.2 94.7 84.3 94.5

2016 96.6 94.7 91.4 95.5 94.0 94.2 94.0 87.0 94.5

2017 96.8 94.7 91.0 95.4 93.8 93.9 95.3 84.7 94.5

mean 96.8 94.9 94.6 95.8 94.7 94.8 94.8 86.6 95.4

median 96.8 94.9 95.2 95.7 94.5 95.0 94.9 87.0 95.5



2008 3 4 1 4 2 6 7 8

2009 1 7 1 3 4 5 6 8

2010 1 7 2 3 6 5 4 8

2011 1 6 2 3 4 7 4 8

2012 1 4 3 2 5 7 6 8

2013 1 3 3 2 6 3 7 8

2014 1 4 7 2 6 3 5 8

2015 1 4 7 2 6 5 3 8

2016 1 3 7 2 5 4 5 8

2017 1 4 7 2 6 5 3 8

mean 1 3 7 2 6 5 4 8

median 1 5 3 2 7 4 6 8

95



2008 94.2 92.2 94.9 93.1 93.6 91.1 92.4 79.9 93.5

2009 95.1 91.7 94.8 94.7 92.0 91.9 91.6 87.6 93.7

2010 95.0 90.7 93.6 93.7 90.4 91.1 91.8 84.3 92.9

2011 94.8 91.2 92.9 93.8 90.8 90.6 91.9 85.5 92.9

2012 93.8 91.3 91.4 92.7 89.9 90.0 92.2 84.4 92.1

2013 94.3 91.2 90.8 92.5 90.2 91.4 90.5 80.5 92.1

2014 93.9 91.1 89.1 93.7 89.8 91.9 89.4 84.6 91.7

2015 93.8 90.7 88.8 94.1 89.1 90.9 89.8 76.6 91.4

2016 93.5 90.6 87.2 93.7 89.5 90.5 90.9 80.6 91.2

2017 95.2 90.4 86.8 94.1 89.1 90.1 89.9 78.0 91.3

mean 94.4 91.1 91.0 93.6 90.4 91.0 91.0 82.2 92.3

median 94.3 91.2 91.1 93.7 90.1 91.0 91.3 82.5 92.1



2008 2 6 1 4 3 7 5 8

2009 1 6 2 3 4 5 7 8

2010 1 6 3 2 7 5 4 8

2011 1 5 3 2 6 7 4 8

2012 1 5 4 2 7 6 3 8

2013 1 4 5 2 7 3 6 8

2014 1 4 7 2 5 3 6 8

2015 2 4 7 1 6 3 5 8

2016 2 4 7 1 6 5 3 8

2017 1 3 7 2 6 4 5 8

mean 1 3 5 2 7 6 4 8

median 1 4 5 2 7 6 3 8

Table DP9: STU 4YA NAPLAN Participation Rates – Means of the Five Components


2008 96.4 95.1 97.0 94.9 96.1 95.1 94.9 81.8 95.8

2009 96.9 94.2 96.6 96.2 94.7 95.6 94.7 92.5 95.8

2010 96.8 93.4 95.8 95.5 93.5 94.7 94.4 87.8 95.2

2011 96.7 94.0 95.4 95.3 93.7 94.6 94.0 87.4 95.2

2012 96.2 94.0 94.1 94.8 93.3 94.0 93.9 86.9 94.7

2013 96.6 94.0 93.7 94.7 92.9 94.7 93.1 84.9 94.7

2014 96.3 93.9 92.4 95.0 92.6 94.5 92.7 87.8 94.3

2015 96.2 93.8 91.9 95.2 92.3 93.9 93.1 83.8 94.1

2016 96.1 93.8 91.3 95.1 92.7 93.7 93.1 86.8 94.0

2017 96.5 93.8 91.0 95.2 92.5 93.4 93.3 84.9 94.0

mean 96.5 94.0 93.9 95.2 93.4 94.4 93.7 86.4 94.8

median 96.5 93.9 93.9 95.1 93.1 94.6 93.6 86.8 94.7

96

Table DP10: STU 4YA NAPLAN Participation Rates – Ranks of Five Component Means


2008 2 5 1 6 3 4 7 8

2009 1 7 2 3 5 4 5 8

2010 1 7 2 3 6 4 5 8

2011 1 6 2 3 7 4 5 8

2012 1 4 3 2 7 5 6 8

2013 1 4 5 2 7 3 6 8

2014 1 4 7 2 6 3 5 8

2015 1 4 7 2 6 3 5 8

2016 1 3 7 2 6 4 5 8

2017 1 3 7 2 6 4 5 8

mean 1 4 5 2 7 3 6 8

median 1 4 4 2 7 3 6 8

Table DP11: STU NAPLAN Participation Rates – Total Number of #1 Ranks


2008 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0

2009 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0

2010 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2011 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2012 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2013 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2014 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2015 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

2016 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

2017 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 33 0 5 2 0 1 0 0


Table DP12: STU NAPLAN Participation Rates – Total of All Ranks


# 1 33 0 5 2 0 1 0 0

# 2 6 0 6 19 1 8 0 0

# 3 1 6 7 9 3 12 4 0

# 4 0 16 2 8 3 6 5 0

# 5 0 6 5 0 5 7 16 0

# 6 0 8 4 0 18 2 7 0

# 7 0 3 11 2 10 4 8 1

# 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 39


97

Table DN1: STU Year 3 NAPLAN Non-Participation Rate Summary – Means of the Five Components


2008 2.8 4.0 2.4 4.8 3.1 3.2 4.4 17.3 3.4

2009 2.6 5.0 2.9 3.7 5.2 2.4 4.6 6.5 3.6

2010 2.8 6.2 3.9 4.5 6.3 4.0 5.1 12.0 4.5

2011 2.7 5.4 4.0 4.6 6.5 3.5 6.8 11.9 4.3

2012 3.0 5.3 5.2 4.9 6.3 4.8 6.6 12.4 4.7

2013 2.8 5.6 5.8 4.9 6.7 4.2 6.9 13.4 4.8

2014 2.9 5.6 6.7 5.0 7.2 4.5 7.0 11.6 5.1

2015 3.0 5.5 6.8 4.7 7.2 5.1 6.8 12.4 5.1

2016 3.0 5.4 6.8 4.7 6.7 5.5 6.9 10.2 5.0

2017 3.2 5.3 7.2 4.7 6.9 5.3 6.3 11.6 5.2

mean 2.9 5.3 5.2 4.7 6.2 4.3 6.1 11.9 4.6

median 2.9 5.4 5.5 4.7 6.6 4.4 6.7 12.0 4.8

Table DN2: STU Year 3 NAPLAN Non-Participation Rate Summary – Ranks of Five Component Means


2008 7 4 8 2 6 5 3 1

2009 7 3 6 5 2 8 4 1

2010 8 3 7 5 2 6 4 1

2011 8 4 6 5 3 7 2 1

2012 8 4 5 6 3 7 2 1

2013 8 5 4 6 3 7 2 1

2014 8 5 4 6 2 7 3 1

2015 8 5 3 7 2 6 3 1

2016 8 6 3 7 4 5 2 1

2017 8 5 2 7 3 5 4 1

mean 8 4 5 6 2 7 3 1

median 8 5 4 6 3 7 2 1



2008 2.5 3.7 2.2 4.4 2.9 3.2 3.6 15.1 3.2

2009 2.3 4.7 2.6 2.9 4.2 2.6 3.4 4.3 3.2

2010 2.3 5.4 3.4 3.7 5.2 3.5 4.6 10.3 3.8

2011 2.3 4.8 3.8 3.9 5.1 3.5 4.4 11.5 3.8

2012 2.6 4.9 5.1 4.2 5.2 3.8 4.5 11.3 4.1

2013 2.4 4.8 5.1 4.5 6.0 3.6 5.3 12.7 4.2

2014 2.5 4.8 6.0 4.2 5.9 4.4 6.3 10.4 4.4

2015 2.6 4.8 6.2 4.2 6.2 4.3 5.2 13.2 4.5

2016 2.8 4.7 6.7 4.2 6.1 4.6 5.8 10.4 4.6

2017 2.7 4.6 6.8 4.1 6.1 5.3 5.6 11.4 4.6

mean 2.5 4.7 4.8 4.0 5.3 3.9 4.9 11.1 4.0

median 2.5 4.8 5.1 4.2 5.6 3.7 4.9 11.4 4.2

98



2008 7 3 8 2 6 5 4 1

2009 8 1 6 5 3 6 4 2

2010 8 2 7 5 3 6 4 1

2011 8 3 6 5 2 7 4 1

2012 8 4 3 6 2 7 5 1

2013 8 5 4 6 2 7 3 1

2014 8 5 3 7 4 6 2 1

2015 8 5 2 7 2 6 4 1

2016 8 5 2 7 3 6 4 1

2017 8 6 2 7 3 5 4 1

mean 8 5 4 6 2 7 3 1

median 8 5 3 6 2 7 4 1



2008 3.4 4.3 2.3 4.3 3.2 4.4 5.0 20.5 3.7

2009 2.8 5.1 2.8 3.4 4.0 4.7 5.0 7.0 3.7

2010 2.7 5.4 3.3 3.7 5.1 4.9 4.4 10.9 3.9

2011 2.9 5.0 3.5 4.1 4.6 5.1 4.6 12.6 4.0

2012 3.6 5.1 4.6 4.3 5.2 5.6 5.5 13.0 4.5

2013 2.9 5.0 5.0 4.4 5.8 5.0 6.1 14.8 4.5

2014 3.3 5.1 6.9 4.4 6.2 4.9 5.5 11.6 4.9

2015 3.5 5.4 8.1 4.5 6.5 5.8 5.3 15.7 5.5

2016 3.4 5.3 8.6 4.5 6.0 5.8 6.0 13.0 5.5

2017 3.2 5.3 9.0 4.6 6.2 6.1 4.7 15.3 5.5

mean 3.2 5.1 5.4 4.2 5.3 5.2 5.2 13.4 4.6

median 3.3 5.1 4.8 4.4 5.5 5.1 5.2 13.0 4.5



2008 6 4 8 4 7 3 2 1

2009 7 2 7 6 5 4 3 1

2010 8 2 7 6 3 4 5 1

2011 8 3 7 6 4 2 4 1

2012 8 5 6 7 4 2 3 1

2013 8 4 4 7 3 4 2 1

2014 8 5 2 7 3 6 4 1

2015 8 5 2 7 3 4 6 1

2016 8 6 2 7 3 5 3 1

2017 8 5 2 7 3 4 6 1

mean 8 6 2 7 3 4 5 1

median 8 4 6 7 2 5 3 1

99



2008 5.8 7.8 5.1 6.9 6.4 8.9 7.6 20.1 6.5

2009 4.9 8.3 5.2 5.3 8.0 8.1 8.4 12.4 6.3

2010 5.0 9.3 6.4 6.3 9.6 8.9 8.2 15.7 7.1

2011 5.2 8.8 7.1 6.2 9.2 9.4 8.1 14.5 7.1

2012 6.2 8.7 8.6 7.3 10.1 10.0 7.8 15.6 7.9

2013 5.7 8.8 9.2 7.5 9.8 8.6 9.5 19.5 7.9

2014 6.1 8.9 10.9 6.3 10.2 8.1 10.6 15.4 8.3

2015 6.2 9.3 11.2 5.9 10.9 9.1 10.2 23.4 8.6

2016 6.5 9.4 12.8 6.3 10.5 9.5 9.1 19.4 8.8

2017 4.8 9.6 13.2 5.9 10.9 9.9 10.1 22.0 8.7

mean 5.6 8.9 9.0 6.4 9.6 9.1 9.0 17.8 7.7

median 5.8 8.9 8.9 6.3 10.0 9.0 8.8 17.6 7.9



2008 7 3 8 5 6 2 4 1

2009 8 3 7 6 5 4 2 1

2010 8 3 6 7 2 4 5 1

2011 8 4 6 7 3 2 5 1

2012 8 4 5 7 2 3 6 1

2013 8 5 4 7 2 6 3 1

2014 8 5 2 7 4 6 3 1

2015 7 5 2 8 3 6 4 1

2016 7 5 2 8 3 4 6 1

2017 8 6 2 7 3 5 4 1

mean 8 6 4 7 2 3 5 1

median 8 5 4 7 2 3 6 1

Table DN9: STU 4YA NAPLAN Non-Participation Rates – Means of the Five Components


2008 3.6 5.0 3.0 5.1 3.9 4.9 5.2 18.3 4.2

2009 3.2 5.8 3.4 3.8 5.3 4.4 5.3 7.6 4.2

2010 3.2 6.6 4.3 4.6 6.6 5.3 5.6 12.2 4.8

2011 3.3 6.0 4.6 4.7 6.3 5.4 6.0 12.6 4.8

2012 3.8 6.0 5.9 5.2 6.7 6.1 6.1 13.1 5.3

2013 3.5 6.1 6.3 5.3 7.1 5.3 6.9 15.1 5.3

2014 3.7 6.1 7.6 5.0 7.4 5.5 7.3 12.3 5.7

2015 3.8 6.3 8.1 4.8 7.7 6.1 6.9 16.2 5.9

2016 3.9 6.2 8.7 4.9 7.3 6.3 6.9 13.3 6.0

2017 3.5 6.2 9.1 4.8 7.5 6.7 6.7 15.1 6.0

mean 3.5 6.0 6.1 4.8 6.6 5.6 6.3 13.6 5.2

median 3.6 6.1 6.1 4.9 6.9 5.4 6.4 13.2 5.3

100

Table DN10: STU 4YA Non-Participation Rates – Ranks of Five Component Means


2008 7 4 8 3 6 5 2 1

2009 8 2 7 6 3 5 3 1

2010 8 2 7 6 3 5 4 1

2011 8 3 7 6 2 5 4 1

2012 8 5 6 7 2 4 3 1

2013 8 5 4 7 2 6 3 1

2014 8 5 2 7 3 6 4 1

2015 8 5 2 7 3 6 4 1

2016 8 6 2 7 3 5 4 1

2017 8 6 2 7 3 5 4 1

mean 8 5 4 7 2 6 3 1

median 8 4 4 7 2 6 3 1

Table DN11: STU 4YA Non-Participation Rates – Total Number of #1 Ranks


2008 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

2009 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3

2010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

2011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

2013 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

2014 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

2015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

Total 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 39


Table DN12: STU 4YA Non-Participation Rates – Total of All Ranks


# 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 39

# 2 0 3 12 2 11 4 8 1

# 3 0 8 4 0 18 2 9 0

# 4 0 8 5 1 5 8 15 0

# 5 0 16 2 7 2 7 4 0

# 6 1 4 7 9 3 11 4 0

# 7 7 0 6 19 1 7 0 0

# 8 32 0 4 2 0 1 0 0


submission cover sheet · nsw (509.6). (see page b-7 of the november 2009 submission) 6. my...

Documents