subject of detection, subject to inspection part ii subject to inspection serhat uyurkulak
TRANSCRIPT
Subject of Detection, Subject to Inspection
Part II
Subject to InspectionSerhat Uyurkulak
How to identify/read the criminal?
How to visualizeor representthem?
Are there any innate signsrevealing the criminal orcriminal impulses?
How to keep them under surveillance?
Making the Criminal Visible
Mechanism of Observation and Inspection: Panopticon
Gr. Pan: all + opticon: see = Seeing all, everything
Or, the Inspection-House:
Morals reformed – health preserved – industry invigorated – instruction diffused – public burthens lightened – Economy seated, as it were, upon a rock – the gordian knot of the Poor-Laws not cut, but untied – all by a simple idea in architecture!
Jeremy Bentham, Panopticon (1787)
Panopticon and the “Utilitarian” Principle of Surveillance
“[This idea] will be found applicable (…)to all establishments whatsoever, in which (…) a number of persons are meant to bekept under inspection. No matter howdifferent, or even opposite the purpose:whether it be that of punishing the incorrigible, guarding the insane, reforming the vicious, confining the suspected, employing the idle, maintaining the helpless, curing the sick, instructing thewilling in any branch of industry, or training the rising race in the path of education (…).”
J. Bentham, Panopticon
The condition of the inmate, subject to continual inspection
Essential Points of The Panoptic Plan: Perfection of Discipline
“the centrality of the inspector’s situation, combined with the well-knownand most effectual contrivances forseeing without being seen.”
“the persons to be inspected should always feel themselves as if under inspection (…) the greater chance there is, of a given person’s being at a given time actually under inspection, the more strong will be the persuasion – the more intense (…) the feeling, he has of his being so.” (Bentham)
Real or imagined omnipresence and omniscience of the inspector Internalization of discipline, self-disciplining
One of the “realized” panoptic structures
“The Panopticon (…) must be understood as a generalizable model of functioning; a way of defining power relations in terms of the everyday life of men.
The fact that it should have given rise, even in our own time, to so many variations, projected or realized, is evidence of the imaginary intensity that it has possessed for almost two hundred years. But the Panopticon must not be understood as a dream building: it is the diagram of a mechanism of power reduced to its ideal form; its functioning, abstracted from any obstacle, resistance or friction, must be represented as a pure architectural and optical system: it is in fact a figure of political technology that may and must be detached from any specific use.”
From Discipline and Punish, Michel Foucault (1975)
Making individuals (physical bodies) visible, observable, confinable, accesible, retrievable, available…at all times
Panopticism: Ideal of Disciplining Modern Subjects
Hobbes and Bentham: Panoptic Similarity
Imagining to be under continual surveillance, inspection (or “knowing” that). Sovereign is seen in Hobbes, observation-tower is seen in Bentham.
Holmes’ “panoptic” techniques: Seeing-all
Deceit, according to him, was an impossibility in the case of one trained to observation and analysis. His conclusions were as infallible as so many propositions of Euclid.
From The Sign of Four
[T]he Science of Deduction and Analysis is one which can only be acquired by long and patient study (…) on meeting a fellow-mortal, learn at a glance to distinguish the history of the man, and the trade or profession to which he belongs. Puerile as such an exercise may seem, it sharpens the faculties of observation, and teaches one where to look and what to look for. Making the objects BUT more importantly, bodies, body parts readable texts, files, cases
Holmes’ “panoptic” techniques: Seeing-all without being seen
“It was close upon four beforethe door opened, and a drunken-looking groom, ill-kempt and side-whiskered, with an inflamed face and disreputable clothes, walked into the room. Accustomed as I was to my friend's amazing powers in the use of disguises, I had to look three times before I was certain that it was indeed he. With a nod he vanished into the bedroom, whence he emerged in five minutes tweed-suited and respectable, as of old.”
From “A Scandal in Bohemia”
Amiable Nonconformist clergymanNot “seen” in his true identity, undercover
Holmes’ “Panoptic” Technologies “Some five years ago, during a lengthy visit to Warsaw, I made the acquaintance of the well-known adventuress, Irene Adler. The name is no doubt familiar to you.”
"Kindly look her up in my index, Doctor," murmured Holmes without opening his eyes. For many years he had adopted a system of docketing all paragraphs concerning men and things, so that it was difficult to name a subject or a person on which he could not at once furnish information. In this case I found her biography sandwiched in between that of a Hebrew rabbi and that of a staff-commander who had written a monograph upon the deep-sea fishes.From “A Scandal in Bohemia”
Turning qualities of things and individualsto observable, recordable, measurable data (common aspect, mere alphabetical order)Holmes is a great indexer and filer (if nota profiler), can retrieve information (makes present) on almost anything anytime he wants Network of TRAINS, TELEGRAMS, LETTERS...
19th C. Technology of Recording: Photography
"Then I fail to follow your Majesty. If this young person should produce her letters for blackmailing or other purposes, how is she to prove their authenticity?”(…)“We were both in the photograph.”"Oh, dear! That is very bad! Your Majesty has indeed committed an indiscretion.”From “A Scandal in Bohemia”
Photography is unequalled in recording things, and people as they are The information it gives or knowledge it produces (re-presents) is more authoritative It is indexical – helps attach identities or meanings to objects or persons
Making the Criminal Visible or Criminalizing the Visible?
“Scientific” ideal of modernity (or positivism): Pull, discipline, and file bodies in the field of total visibility, observation, inspection, examination, calculation, and measurement
Anthropometry and Criminal Anthropology:
Cesare Lombroso, L’uomo delinquente (1876)
Francis Galton, Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development (1883)
Alphonse Bertillon (invented a system of filing people, perfected 1850-1880)
One of Sherlock Holmes’ clients calls him the second best expert of crime inEurope (Bertillon being the best)
Visually “Fixing” the Immoral and the Criminal
Re-presenting the Criminal and Dangerous Classes
Anthropometric face-masks made by Cesare Lombroso
Robberandmurderer
Rapist
Thief and forger
Corruptor
Images / indices of Inferiority and Lesser Humanness:
Stereotyping or Typecasting
Fig. 20:Inferior race – habitual thief
Fig. 23: Common type thief – habitual
Fig. 24:Common type thief – degenerate
Modern Obsession with Calculation and Measurement
Anthropometry
“Skulls of Criminals”
“Tattoos of Delinquents”
Bodies become surfaces bearing texts and signs of immorality and criminality
Composite Pictures: Reaching the Ultimate, Definitive Image of the Criminal
Francis Galton’s invention
Reaching the Ultimate, Definitive Image of the Sick
Tuberculosis with swellingsPulmonary tuberculosis (and syphilis?)
Filing-Recording the Criminal
Personal Identification “Fiche” and Profiling
Bertillon’s method