style of case 10

Upload: adrian-booker

Post on 02-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Style of Case 10

    1/2

    {STYLE OF CASE-FORM1B:2}

    {PARTY}S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL

    {Party} asks the court to grant a new trial in the interest of justice and fairness. { See OConnors Texas

    Rules, MNT After Nonjury Trial, ch. 10-B, 10, p. 648.}

    A.

    Introduction

    1.

    Plaintiff is {name}; defendant is {name}.

    2.

    Plaintiff sued defendant for {state basis of suit}.

    B.

    Facts

    3.

    After a trial to the court, the court signed a judgment for{ advise party} on {date}.

    4.

    {State other facts relevant to the motion.}

    5.

    {Party} attaches affidavits to this motion to establish facts not apparent from the record and

    incorporates them by reference.

    C.

    Challenge the Findings and Conclusions

    6.

    The court should grant a new trial because it erred in making the following rulings.

    {CHOOSE APPROPIATE PARAGRAPHS 7-13}

    7.

    The court erred when it refused to file findings of fact and conclusions of law because

    {party} cannot ascertain the facts and grounds for {recovery/defense} on which the court

    based its judgment. When a party timely requests findings of fact and conclusions of law,

    and the court does not file them, on appeal the failure is presumed harmful unless the

    record affirmatively shows{party} suffered no injury. Tenery v. Tenery, 932 S.W.2d 29, 30

    (Tex. 1996). In this case, {party} can show injury because {explain}. { se OConnors Texas

    Rules, When findings requested but not filed, ch. 10-E, 6.2.7, p.673.}

    {To challenge findings on which movant had burden of proof}

    8.

    The court erred when it found {state the finding} because that finding is against the great

    weight and preponderance of the evidence and is manifestly unjust. {Elaborate.} {See

    OConnors Texas Rules, Standard challenges, ch. 10-B, 9.1.4.p. 648.}

    9.

    The court erred when it found {state the finding} because the evidence proves conclusively,

    as a matter of law, that {state what the evidence proves}.{Elaborate.} {See OConnors Texas

    Rules, Standard challenges, ch. 10-B, 9.1.4.p. 648.}

    {To challenge findings on which movant did not have burden of proof}

    10.

    The court erred when it found {state the finding} because the evidence is insufficient to

    support the finding.{Elaborate.} {See OConnors Texas Rules, Standard challenges, ch. 10-

    B, 9.1.4.p. 648.}

    11.

    The court erred when it found {state the finding} because there is no evidence to support

    the finding.{Elaborate.} {See OConnors Texas Rules, Standard challenges, ch. 10-B,

    9.1.4.p. 648.}

    {To challenge implicit findings}

    12.

    Even though the court did not make an express finding, the court erred when it implicitly

    found {identify implicit findings} because there is no evidence or, in the alternative,

    insufficient evidence to support that finding on the issue of {identify issue}. {Elaborate.}

  • 8/10/2019 Style of Case 10

    2/2

    {To challenge conclusions of law}

    13.

    The court erred when it concluded {state specific legal conclusion}. {Elaborate, starting

    specific error.}

    D.

    Other Grounds

    14.

    {State other appropriate grounds. See FORM 10B:1, G-N, for various challenges that can be

    asserted.}

    E.

    Conclusion

    15.

    {Briefly summarize the motion.}

    F.

    Prayer

    16.

    For these reasons, and in the interest of justice and fairness {party} asks the court to grant a

    new trial.