style of case 10
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Style of Case 10
1/2
{STYLE OF CASE-FORM1B:2}
{PARTY}S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
{Party} asks the court to grant a new trial in the interest of justice and fairness. { See OConnors Texas
Rules, MNT After Nonjury Trial, ch. 10-B, 10, p. 648.}
A.
Introduction
1.
Plaintiff is {name}; defendant is {name}.
2.
Plaintiff sued defendant for {state basis of suit}.
B.
Facts
3.
After a trial to the court, the court signed a judgment for{ advise party} on {date}.
4.
{State other facts relevant to the motion.}
5.
{Party} attaches affidavits to this motion to establish facts not apparent from the record and
incorporates them by reference.
C.
Challenge the Findings and Conclusions
6.
The court should grant a new trial because it erred in making the following rulings.
{CHOOSE APPROPIATE PARAGRAPHS 7-13}
7.
The court erred when it refused to file findings of fact and conclusions of law because
{party} cannot ascertain the facts and grounds for {recovery/defense} on which the court
based its judgment. When a party timely requests findings of fact and conclusions of law,
and the court does not file them, on appeal the failure is presumed harmful unless the
record affirmatively shows{party} suffered no injury. Tenery v. Tenery, 932 S.W.2d 29, 30
(Tex. 1996). In this case, {party} can show injury because {explain}. { se OConnors Texas
Rules, When findings requested but not filed, ch. 10-E, 6.2.7, p.673.}
{To challenge findings on which movant had burden of proof}
8.
The court erred when it found {state the finding} because that finding is against the great
weight and preponderance of the evidence and is manifestly unjust. {Elaborate.} {See
OConnors Texas Rules, Standard challenges, ch. 10-B, 9.1.4.p. 648.}
9.
The court erred when it found {state the finding} because the evidence proves conclusively,
as a matter of law, that {state what the evidence proves}.{Elaborate.} {See OConnors Texas
Rules, Standard challenges, ch. 10-B, 9.1.4.p. 648.}
{To challenge findings on which movant did not have burden of proof}
10.
The court erred when it found {state the finding} because the evidence is insufficient to
support the finding.{Elaborate.} {See OConnors Texas Rules, Standard challenges, ch. 10-
B, 9.1.4.p. 648.}
11.
The court erred when it found {state the finding} because there is no evidence to support
the finding.{Elaborate.} {See OConnors Texas Rules, Standard challenges, ch. 10-B,
9.1.4.p. 648.}
{To challenge implicit findings}
12.
Even though the court did not make an express finding, the court erred when it implicitly
found {identify implicit findings} because there is no evidence or, in the alternative,
insufficient evidence to support that finding on the issue of {identify issue}. {Elaborate.}
-
8/10/2019 Style of Case 10
2/2
{To challenge conclusions of law}
13.
The court erred when it concluded {state specific legal conclusion}. {Elaborate, starting
specific error.}
D.
Other Grounds
14.
{State other appropriate grounds. See FORM 10B:1, G-N, for various challenges that can be
asserted.}
E.
Conclusion
15.
{Briefly summarize the motion.}
F.
Prayer
16.
For these reasons, and in the interest of justice and fairness {party} asks the court to grant a
new trial.