strategy of organizing staff mobility. case of the intra ......scoring criteria by the host...

13
7 th -8 th February Pr. Hamma YACOUBA Research Director/2iE Strategy of organizing staff mobility. Case of the Intra-African Partnership Project for Francophone Mobility on the Environment (PIMASO)

Upload: others

Post on 24-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Strategy of organizing staff mobility. Case of the Intra ......Scoring criteria by the host university: relevance of the personal project (20 marks); Adequacy of reception (10 marks);

7th-8th February

Pr. Hamma YACOUBA

Research Director/2iE

Strategy of organizing staff mobility.

Case of the Intra-African Partnership Project for

Francophone Mobility on the Environment (PIMASO)

Page 2: Strategy of organizing staff mobility. Case of the Intra ......Scoring criteria by the host university: relevance of the personal project (20 marks); Adequacy of reception (10 marks);

An intra-ACP mobility program

Strategy at the institutional level

During the project launch meeting, the coordination of PIMASO and the consortium

members agreed on how to welcome the staff and following decisions were taken:

The home university was invited to ease the availability of administrative staff for the

mobility;

Each host Institute was committed to ensure a good reception and working environment

for staff in mobility: reception units are functional with available people;

Given the short duration of the stay (2 months), the host University must ensure the

availability of accommodation, welcome the staff at the airport and facilitate the

formalities of entry in the host country;

The project must ensure a rapid implementation of the insurance and pay the scholarship

at one time if possible in the first week following the arrival of the staff.

7th-8th February

Page 3: Strategy of organizing staff mobility. Case of the Intra ......Scoring criteria by the host university: relevance of the personal project (20 marks); Adequacy of reception (10 marks);

ELIGIBILITY : All Consortium Members

7th-8th February

Page 4: Strategy of organizing staff mobility. Case of the Intra ......Scoring criteria by the host university: relevance of the personal project (20 marks); Adequacy of reception (10 marks);

Conditions for mobility

For the staff

Laboratory or unit of the

home University

Laboratory or Unit of the Host

University

• Authorization certificates from the home university 1.

• Acceptance certificate of the host university

2.

• Relevance of the Professional project

3.

7th-8th February

Page 5: Strategy of organizing staff mobility. Case of the Intra ......Scoring criteria by the host university: relevance of the personal project (20 marks); Adequacy of reception (10 marks);

Steps for candidates selection (1/2)

To ensure equity and transparency for all candidates, the selection procedure

was as follows:

Scoring criteria by the home university: relevance of the professional Project (10

marks); Motivations (10 marks);

Scoring criteria by the host university: relevance of the personal project (20

marks); Adequacy of reception (10 marks);

At the end of registrations, universities consensually graded outgoing and

incoming candidates according to the agreed criteria above;

The scoring results was transmitted by different universities to the project

coordination;

7th-8th February

The staff

Page 6: Strategy of organizing staff mobility. Case of the Intra ......Scoring criteria by the host university: relevance of the personal project (20 marks); Adequacy of reception (10 marks);

Steps for candidates selection (2/2)

The results were then analyzed during the Selection Committee meetings which

generates the main and waiting lists;

The lists were published on the PIMASO website and PIMASO partners have

been informed of the final scholarship awards after the written confirmation of

selected candidates;

NB: The disclaimers were directly replaced by the waiting list

The arrival of the candidates to the host institution/university is confirmed by the

local coordinator who ensures the administrative follow-up of his stay;

At the end of the mobility a report is requested.

7th-8th February

The staff

Page 7: Strategy of organizing staff mobility. Case of the Intra ......Scoring criteria by the host university: relevance of the personal project (20 marks); Adequacy of reception (10 marks);

RESULTS

67

41

20

11 15

9

Master Doctorat Enseignants Personneladministratif

Groupe 1

Type of

mobility Traget1 Target2 Total

Master 67 15 82

Ph.D student 41 9 50

Teachers 20 20

Administrati

ve Staff 11 11

Total 139 24 163

7th-8th February

Page 8: Strategy of organizing staff mobility. Case of the Intra ......Scoring criteria by the host university: relevance of the personal project (20 marks); Adequacy of reception (10 marks);

Observations

To get more applicants, the following strategy have been adopted :

Local coordinators have been used to directly request their colleagues to apply

by website;

Target laboratories with similar thematic to guide teacher applications;

Target teachers with records for their professional career that would allow them

to publish scientific articles;

It should also be noted that most of the administrative staff came from a single

pay: imbalance

7th-8th February

The staff

Page 9: Strategy of organizing staff mobility. Case of the Intra ......Scoring criteria by the host university: relevance of the personal project (20 marks); Adequacy of reception (10 marks);

Results of information system of candidates

through survey

Most candidates (57.7%) were referred to the project's web

site to inquire and apply. 7th-8th February

Page 10: Strategy of organizing staff mobility. Case of the Intra ......Scoring criteria by the host university: relevance of the personal project (20 marks); Adequacy of reception (10 marks);

Appreciation of home university before departure

15.03.18

The role of local coordinator was highly appreciated by mobility candidates

7th-8th February

Page 11: Strategy of organizing staff mobility. Case of the Intra ......Scoring criteria by the host university: relevance of the personal project (20 marks); Adequacy of reception (10 marks);

Rate of Satisfaction as compared to scholarship

Scholarship level was moderately appreciated: In addition, the candidates were still receiving their salary

7th-8th February

Hence, the low flux of applications, especially from teachers

Page 12: Strategy of organizing staff mobility. Case of the Intra ......Scoring criteria by the host university: relevance of the personal project (20 marks); Adequacy of reception (10 marks);

Satisfaction after mobility

For administrative staff: Skills acquisition to better serve their unit

of origin: improving service quality;

For teachers: co-supervision of thesis, production of scientific

articles.

7th-8th February

Page 13: Strategy of organizing staff mobility. Case of the Intra ......Scoring criteria by the host university: relevance of the personal project (20 marks); Adequacy of reception (10 marks);

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

www.2ie-edu.org