stimulating local and regional economic development: issues in managing the local development...
DESCRIPTION
Main messages regarding process management Don’t spend too much time planning without implementation Start early with projects –which are easy to implement and face little risk of failure –with a visible impact = motivate everybody to continue Don’t think that the process is a sequence! –It’s iterative: planning, action, evaluation / feedback, more planning, more action, etc. –It’s never finished! Don’t be surprised if people drop out of the process - it’s normal Include those people who run the projects Expect to deal with a number of dilemmasTRANSCRIPT
Stimulating Local and Regional Stimulating Local and Regional Economic Development: Economic Development: Issues in Issues in managing the local development managing the local development processprocess
Jörg Meyer-Stamer
Typical life-lines of local Typical life-lines of local development processesdevelopment processes
time
Start-upStrategy +planning
Imple-mentation
Consolidation
Main messages regarding process Main messages regarding process managementmanagement Don’t spend too much time planning without implementation Start early with projects
– which are easy to implement and face little risk of failure– with a visible impact = motivate everybody to continue
Don’t think that the process is a sequence! – It’s iterative: planning, action, evaluation / feedback, more
planning, more action, etc. – It’s never finished!
Don’t be surprised if people drop out of the process - it’s normal Include those people who run the projects Expect to deal with a number of dilemmas
The main dilemmas in network The main dilemmas in network managementmanagement
The ownership dilemmaThe self-organisation dilemmaThe collective conservatism dilemmaThe communication dilemmaThe power dilemmaThe legitimacy dilemma
The ownership dilemmaThe ownership dilemma
Tasks have to be taken care of Some people have to take
responsibility They become promoters Project promoters “own” their
project Barriers emerge between
promoters and other people involved
Isolated core group, frustrated periphery
> Observe the emergence of the dilemma
> Reflect about opportunities for action
> Keep areas of responsibility flexible
> Redistribute responsibilities, especially if individuals become overburdened
The self-organisation dilemmaThe self-organisation dilemma
As a network of actors emerges, uncoordinated work processes evolve
Increasing necessity of communication and coordination
Crisis of complexity Centralisation of steering Trade-off between centralisation
and flexibility / responsiveness
> Define responsibilities (temporary order)
> Create a platform for management (permanent order)
> Balance order and disorder
The collective conservatism The collective conservatism dilemmadilemma
Shared problem-definition within sub-group
Lack of understanding between in-group and out-group
Diverging perceptions between sub-group and environment
Trade-off between effective organisation of work and loss of opportunities for external cooperation
> Make implicit routines explicit
> Reflect on and question routines
> Seek communication with environment
The communication dilemmaThe communication dilemma
Petty conflicts make cooperation difficult
Underlying personal conflicts escalate
Ignore conflicts: – Tension calms down -
or process calms down Deal with conflicts:
– Conflict is solved - or escalates
> Analyse conflicts> Ignore conflicts> Mediate conflicts> “Generate” conflict
The power dilemmaThe power dilemma
Initially, differences in power are ignored
As work proceeds, imbalances in the distribution of resources (power, money, information, knowledge) become relevant
Chicken-pig-problem Overall development goals
cannot be achieved if weak actors are marginalised
> Be aware of power differences
> Make particular interests explicit
> Empower the less powerful
> Define rules and procedures
The legitimacy dilemmaThe legitimacy dilemma
Persons from different organisations meet at the stakeholders’ forum
Organisations do not necessarily have clear internal decision-making procedures, mandate of representative may be unclear
Forum’s decisions are relevant to the respective organisations
Problems arise if organisation’s members disagree with forum’s decision
Decision-making impasse, or members quit participating
> Clarify role of members: as “representatives” or as “person”
> Clarify organisations’ interests and goals
ConclusionConclusion
Local and regional development isLocal and regional development is
an iterative process of diagnostic, learning, implementing, learning, and evaluating
a process which should be based on partnerships between key stakeholders
a process which should be based on feasible projects, specific objectives, and milestones
based on a combination of knowledge of concepts and methodologies, international experiences, and the local realities, potentials and obstacles
a process which never ends! Except if there are no quick results, in which
case it tends to fizzle out!!!
Thank you for your attention!Thank you for your attention!
Homepage: www.paca-online.deHomepage: www.paca-online.deE-Mail: [email protected]: [email protected]