steph garfield-birkbeck assistant director nihr evaluation trials and studies coordinating centre,...

20
Steph Garfield-Birkbeck Assistant Director NIHR Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, University of Southampton

Upload: myles-walton

Post on 30-Dec-2015

279 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Steph Garfield-BirkbeckAssistant Director

NIHR Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, University of Southampton

The NIHR Health Research System

www.nihr.ac.uk

• Research with the capacity to improve patient outcomes and NHS services

• Clinical research (not only trials)

• Not– Discovery science– Animal

• What is Applied Research?

www.nihr.ac.uk

NETSCC: Established: 2008

NIHR Evaluation, Trials and Studies (NETS) programmes - from 2012

Health Technology Assessment

Established: 1993

Health Services and Delivery Research

Established: January 2012

Public Health Research

Established: 2008

Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation

Funded by the MRC and NIHR, managed by NIHR

Established: 2008

Systematic Review

Established: 2012(previously known as Reviews Infrastructure)

HS&DR

SR

EME

PHRHTA

www.nihr.ac.uk

Science Added• The secretariat adds value to

the research progress through– Clinical and

methodological input– Steering prioritisation– dissemination

• Projects are funded on the basis of the needs of the health service– Not the scientific interest

of the project

Needs Led

• Programme Characteristics

www.nihr.ac.uk

Researcher Led

• Open calls for researchers to apply for funding for their own topics and questions

• Applications are prioritised in terms of NHS or other information needs

• Starts with the information needs of decision makers

• Topics are refined and prioritised by people with expertise in the field, and commissioning briefs are advertised

Commissioned

• Workstreams

All applications assesses against the same ‘needs’ and ‘quality’ standards

www.nihr.ac.uk

www.nihr.ac.uk

www.nihr.ac.uk

Research themes

Technology evaluation

Health services and

organisation

Public health

EME X X

HS&DR X X

HTA X X X

PHR X

SR X X X

www.nihr.ac.uk

Which NIHR Research Programme

• i4i – translational R&D projects aimed at cultivating new techniques or technologies into innovative interventions to address healthcare needs www.ccf.nihr.ac.uk/i4i

• EME – exploratory trials, less pragmatic, phase 2-3, efficacy, mechanisms if possible www.eme.ac.uk

• HTA – systematic reviews, large multicentre pragmatic trials or other studies (phase 3-4), effectiveness in the NHS www.hta.ac.uk

• HS&DR – organisational, patient experience and access to services, qualitative or other www.netscc.ac.uk/hsdr

• PHR - evaluates public health interventions www.phr.ac.uk

• PGfAR – a broad range of interlinking health services research projects, generating a variety of outputs. www.ccf.nihr.ac.uk/PGfAR

• RfPB – max £350k for up to three years, awards made to NHS bodies www.ccf.nihr.ac.uk/RfPB

• Fellowships – doctoral, postdoctoral and senior fellowships www.nkhrtcc.nhs.uk/nihrfellow

www.nihr.ac.uk

What makes a good research question

• Important to the NHS and its patients• Supported by current evidence• High scientific quality• Feasible• Timely, i.e. research will continue to be relevant following

completion of study• Clear and well-defined• Represents value for money

www.nihr.ac.uk

Burden of disease

Health services

Need = frequency x severity x impact of technology x evidence deficit

(Discounted for time to produce evidence)

Important question on an important topic

Evidence gap

Prioritising research

www.nihr.ac.uk

Application assessment process: Generally a two-stage process

Outline proposals:►Remit and competitiveness check (pre-panel/board)►Panel assessment primarily for need and importance to the NHS►Shortlist/Reject/Resubmit

Full proposals:►External review►Board assessment primarily for scientific quality, value for money►Fund/Fund With Changes/Reject/Resubmit

One stage straight to full proposal process - option for researcher-led evidence synthesis submissions in some programmes

www.nihr.ac.uk

Selection criteria: Importance of the Research

►Adherence to the advertised commissioning brief or call specification

►Health need

►Expressed need

►Sustained interest

►Capacity to generate new knowledge

►Actionable findings and prospects for change

www.nihr.ac.uk

Selection criteria: Research Quality

►Scientific quality

►Links with knowledge users and where appropriate, integration of knowledge users in the knowledge production process

►Service user involvement

► Make up of team and project management

► Value for money

www.nihr.ac.uk

Hints and Tips for a good application (1)

• Is the Question Important

• Is it the Right Method

• Is the Research Feasible

• The Science

• Is the proposal clear, logical and persuasive

www.nihr.ac.uk

Hints and Tips for a good application (2)

• The Team and Support

• Patient and Public Involvement

• Dissemination

• Costings

www.nihr.ac.uk

Sources of information and help

• NIHR Clinical Research Network

• Research Design Service (RDS)

• INVOLVE

• Browse NETS website for study protocols, guidance notes and FAQs

• Become a reviewer for NETS programmes

• Become a panel member