stem cell journal
TRANSCRIPT
DEXTER C. CORRALES, RN, RM
September 9, 2013
Stem Cell Treatments Overtake ScienceBy LAURA BEIL
TIJUANA, Mexico — Maggie Alejos arrived here in June
from St. Anne, Ill., with her husband, her daughter and a
cashier’s check for $13,500, payable to the Regenerative
Medicine Institute.
Rail-thin, with an oxygen tube anchored above her upper
lip, Ms. Alejos, a retired Army nurse, has coped
with emphysema for a dozen of her 65 years. Once she
came close enough to a lung transplant that doctors
prepared her for surgery, only to discover that the donor
lung was unfit.
At a hospital here, doctors affiliated with the institute
extracted about seven ounces of fat from her thighs,
hoping to harvest about 130 million stem cells and implant
them in her failing lungs.
Across the Internet — where Ms. Alejos learned about the
Tijuana institute — adult stem cells are promoted as a cure
for everything from sagging skin to severed spinal cords.
On the surface, the claim is plausible. Scientists have
discovered that fat, bone marrow and other parts of the
body contain stem cells, immature cells that can rejuvenate
themselves, at least in the tissue they are naturally found.
But it has yet to be proved that these cells can regenerate
no matter where they are placed, or under what conditions
this might occur. Moreover, questions about safety remain
unanswered.
These sober realities do not appear to have slowed the rise
of an international industry catering to customers who may
pay tens of thousands of dollars in cash for their shot at a
personal miracle. (Some foreign operators offer creative
variations on the theme, like cells from sharks and sheep.)
Domestic providers, too, can push the limits. In July, for
example, a former pathologist at the Medical University of
South Carolina pleaded guilty to illegally processing and
shipping stem cells for treatment without approval from the
university or the Food and Drug Administration.
The number of clinics and products has reached the point
that scientists fear repercussions for their own work. Dr.
Hesham Sadek of the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center in Dallas, who is studying heart muscle
regeneration, worries that the marketing deluge now makes
it hard for patients to tell science from swindle, and all that
lies on the spectrum in between.
“It really has the potential to undermine the legitimacy of
the whole field,” he said.
Trial or Treatment?
Even though Tijuana has perhaps 20 clinics offering adult
stem cell therapy, Dr. Javier Lopez, founder of
the Regenerative Medicine Institute, says it is his that has
become “the poster company to knock down.”
Born and educated in Tijuana, he has lived and worked
across the border, in San Diego, for more than 30 years,
mainly as a health care administrator. He became inspired
by stem cells after accompanying a physician friend to a
conference in Palm Springs, Calif., in 2008.
“It was eye-opening,” he said. “I immediately thought, ‘This
is the future of medicine, and I want to be a part of it.’ ”
He says he runs the institute within the accepted
framework of clinical trials: Patients sign consent forms
acknowledging that the treatment is experimental. Studies
are registered with the National Library of Medicine in the
United States.
Being accepted for treatment requires more than cash.
Protocols and procedures are approved by the institutional
review board, or I.R.B., at Hospital Angeles Tijuana, and
are administered by physicians at the hospital. “The focus
of our trial, from Day 1, has been safety,” Dr. Lopez said.
Still, skeptics in the United States are not convinced. Leigh
Turner, a bioethicist at the University of Minnesota, says
the Regenerative Medicine Institute blurs the boundary
between trial and treatment.
The institute’s patient consent form “would not pass muster
with a competent American I.R.B.,” Dr. Turner said, and the
testimonials on its Web site place the emphasis squarely
on results.
Moreover, studying patients who pay undermines the trials’
scientific validity, Dr. Turner said. The patient sample is
skewed toward those with the means to travel, and their
financial investment may amplify an already strong placebo
effect.
Dr. Lopez says that scientists in Mexico lack the
government research support available in the United
States, leaving establishments like his no choice but to
charge patients.
He agrees that many stem cell providers are dubious, and
says he works with the Mexican authorities to try to
establish uniform standards. As for his own institute, he
said, “I’m very proud of what we are doing,” and added, “I
get upset when people start talking trash about what is
done south of the border.”
A Gray Area
In the United States, too, it is easy to conduct business
outside government oversight, said Dr. George Q. Daley,
who studies stem cells for blood diseases at Harvard
Medical School. Close down one shady operation, he went
on, and more seem to randomly pop up.
Even questionable publicity does not necessarily hurt
business. Regnocyte, a company in Florida, posted an
unflattering CNN report about iton its Web site under the
heading “special coverage.”
If the stem cell business continues to flourish without
proper scrutiny, Dr. Daley and others fear research
progress will suffer. Clinical trials depend on patients who
are willing to sign on even though they know they might be
given a placebo, while competing clinics are offering what
seems to be a sure thing. In addition, patients who have
already had stem cell therapy could be ineligible for trials.
And if too many patients try stem cells unsuccessfully, the
public may come to see the entire field as a failure, said Dr.
Sadek, the heart cell scientist in Dallas. Many comments
on articles about his last paper, published in the journal
Nature, “were skeptical and jaded,” he continued. “One
said, ‘I’ve gotten stem cell therapy and nothing happened.’
If the public loses faith in regenerative medicine in general,
funding can be affected.”
A Lack of Data
Beyond the online testimonials, there is little evidence to
indicate whether adult stem cell treatments on offer are
working. Paul Knoepfler, a stem cell researcher at the
University of California, Davis, says the lack of data is
vexing.
“There is absolutely no legitimate reason for such clinics to
be not publishing their data,” he wrote on his stem cell
blog this year. “Yet they almost never do it.”Stem cell
businesses say they have other priorities. “I’m not that
interested in doing a lot of research for publication
purposes only,” said Maynard A. Howe, the chief executive
of Stemedica Cell Technologies in San Diego, which is
developing a drug made from donated stem cells. Dr.
Howe and his brother Roger started the company in 2005
after a sister-in-law received stem cells in Russia for
a spinal cord injury.
Dr. Howe says that his company publishes just enough
data to meet F.D.A. requirements, but that he would rather
his scientists spend their time getting a product to market.
He also defends the practice of foreign trials largely on
economic grounds. Outside the United States, he said, “I
can do a PET scan for $500,” a fraction of the typical
American rate. “Why wouldn’t I do my clinical trial
overseas?”
For his part, Dr. Lopez says he is trying to publish data
from the 125 patients he has treated so far, but he faces a
struggle. “Nobody wants to talk to us because we are from
Tijuana,” he said of medical journals. He has managed to
get just a case description accepted for publication.
So for now, he does not have much to show in the way of
science. He believes in stem cells — and in that, he and
his critics share common ground. The challenge for
scientists is to promote the promise of stem cells with both
excitement and restraint. It can be a hard line to walk.
“I understand how difficult it is — how many years and
sometimes decades it takes before you discover a new
therapy,” said Dr. Daley, of Harvard. “We have a
tremendous enthusiasm about the potential of stem cell
therapy.
“That said, these aren’t magical agents that run around
your body and fix things. It’s frustrating to watch other
people who, even well intentioned, aren’t acting in their
patients’ best interest.”
This week, the International Society for Stem Cell
Research is to release a statement declaring the use of
stem cells outside scientific settings to be “a threat to
patient welfare, patient autonomy and to the scientific
process,” according to its public policy chairman, Jonathan
Kimmelman, a bioethicist at McGill.
This is the same group that once tried to offer an online
guide to stem cell clinics, but the journal Nature
reported that the effort was abruptly abandoned under
threat of lawsuits.
Acute Pancreatitis Overview
Acute pancreatitis is sudden swelling and inflammation of the pancreas.
CAUSES
The pancreas is an organ located behind the stomach that produces chemicals called enzymes, as well as the hormones insulin and glucagon. Most of the time, the enzymes are only active after they reach the small intestine, where they are needed to digest food.
When these enzymes somehow become active inside the pancreas, they eat (and digest) the tissue of the pancreas. This causes swelling, bleeding (hemorrhage), and damage to the pancreas and its blood vessels.
Acute pancreatitis affects men more often than women. Certain diseases, surgeries, and habits make you more likely to develop this condition.
The condition is most often caused by alcoholism and alcohol abuse (70% of cases in the United States). Genetics may be a factor in some cases. Sometimes the cause is not known, however.
Other conditions that have been linked to pancreatitis are:
Autoimmune problems (when the immune system attacks the body)
Blockage of the pancreatic duct or common bile duct, the tubes that drain enzymes from the pancreas
Damage to the ducts or pancreas during surgery High blood levels of a fat called triglycerides
(hypertriglyceridemia) Injury to the pancreas from an accident
Other causes include:
Complications of cystic fibrosis Hemolytic uremic syndrome Hyperparathyroidism Kawasaki disease Reye syndrome Use of certain medications (especially estrogens,
corticosteroids, thiazide diuretics, and azathioprine) Viral infections, including mumps, coxsackie
B, mycoplasma pneumonia, and campylobacter
SYMPTOMS
The main symptom of pancreatitis is abdominal pain felt in the upper left side or middle of the abdomen.
The pain:
May be worse within minutes after eating or drinking at first, especially if foods have a high fat content
Becomes constant and more severe, lasting for several days
May be worse when lying flat on the back May spread (radiate) to the back or below the left shoulder
blade
People with acute pancreatitis often look ill and have a fever, nausea, vomiting, and sweating.
Other symptoms that may occur with this disease include:
Clay-colored stools Gaseous abdominal fullness Hiccups Indigestion Mild yellowing of the skin and whites of the eyes (jaundice) Skin rash or sore (lesion) Swollen abdomen
EXAMS AND TESTS
The doctor will perform a physical exam, which may show that you have:
Abdominal tenderness or lump (mass) Fever Low blood pressure Rapid heart rate Rapid breathing (respiratory) rate
Laboratory tests will be done. Tests that show the release of pancreatic enzymes include:
Increased blood amylase level Increased serum blood lipase level Increase urine amylase level
Other blood tests that can help diagnose pancreatitis or its complications include:
Complete blood count (CBC) Comprehensive metabolic panel
Imaging tests that can show inflammation of the pancreas include:
Abdominal CT scan Abdominal MRI Abdominal ultrasound
TREATMENT
Treatment often requires a stay in the hospital and may involve:
Pain medicines Fluids given through a vein (IV) Stopping food or fluid by mouth to limit the activity of the
pancreas
Occasionally a tube will be inserted through the nose or mouth to remove the contents of the stomach (nasogastric suctioning). This may be done if vomiting or severe pain do not improve, or if a paralyzed bowel (paralytic ileus) develops. The tube will stay in for 1 - 2 days to 1 - 2 weeks.
Treating the condition that caused the problem can prevent repeated attacks.
In some cases, therapy is needed to:
Drain fluid that has collected in or around the pancreas Remove gallstones Relieve blockages of the pancreatic duct
In the most severe cases, surgery is needed to remove dead or infected pancreatic tissue.
Avoid smoking, alcoholic drinks, and fatty foods after the attack has improved.
OUTLOOK (PROGNOSIS)
Most cases go away in a week. However, some cases develop into a life-threatening illness.
The death rate is high with:
Hemorrhagic pancreatitis Liver, heart, or kidney impairment Necrotizing pancreatitis
Pancreatitis can return. The likelihood of it returning depends on the cause, and how successfully it can be treated.
POSSIBLE COMPLICATIONS Acute kidney failure Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) Buildup of fluid in the abdomen (ascites) Cysts or abscesses in the pancreas Heart failure Low blood pressure
Repeat episodes of acute pancreatitis can lead to chronic pancreatitis.
WHEN TO CONTACT A MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL
Call your health care provider if:
You have intense, constant abdominal pain You develop other symptoms of acute pancreatitis
PREVENTION
You may lower your risk of new or repeat episodes of pancreatitis by taking steps to prevent the medical conditions that can lead to the disease:
Avoid aspirin when treating a fever in children, especially if they may have a viral illness, to reduce the risk of Reye syndrome.
Do NOT drink too much alcohol. Make sure children receive vaccines to protect them
against mumps and other childhood illnesses (see: Immunizations - general overview).
REFERENCES
Banks PA, Freeman ML; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol . 2006;101:2379-2400.
Frossard JL, Steer ML, Pastor CM. Acute pancreatitis. Lancet . 2008;371:143-152.
Owyang C. Pancreatitis. In: Goldman L, Ausiello D, eds. Cecil Medicine . 23rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders Elsevier; 2007:chap 147.