standards document template_2017 · web viewjoseph e. kenas, bombardier peter klauser, vehicle...

22
APTA STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM RE MME E PR E CO ND D ACTIC American Public Transportation Association 1300 I Street, NW, Suite 1200 East, Washington, DC 20005 APTA PR-M-RP-002-98, Rev. 2 First Published: March 17 ,1999 First Revision: February 13, 2004 Working Group Approved: Public Comment: CEO Committee Approval: Policy & Planning Approval: PRESS Mechanical Working Group DRAFT Inspection and Maintenance of Type H-Tightlock Couplers Abstract: This recommended practice assists inspection and maintenance forces to detect and correct improper conditions involving the complete coupler, coupler parts, coupler operating mechanism, yoke, radial connection and attachments. Keywords: coupler parts, coupler operating mechanisms, H Tightlock couplers, inspection, locomotives, maintenance, passenger cars, radial connections, rail attachments, specification M-206B, yokes Summary: xx Scope and purpose: This recommended practice assists inspection and maintenance forces to detect and correct improper conditions involving This document represents a common viewpoint of those parties concerned with its provisions, namely operating/ planning agencies, manufacturers, consultants, engineers and general interest groups. The application of any standards, recommended practices or guidelines contained herein is voluntary. In some cases, federal and/or state regulations govern portions of a transit system’s operations. In those cases, the government regulations take precedence over this standard. The North American Transit Service Association and its parent organization APTA recognize that for certain applications, the standards or practices, as implemented by individual agencies, may be

Upload: dangkhue

Post on 09-May-2018

227 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Standards Document Template_2017 · Web viewJoseph E. Kenas, Bombardier Peter Klauser, Vehicle Dynamics Heinz-Peter Kotz, Siemens Scott J. Kramer, MC &T Tammy Krause, Retired Pallavi

A P T A S T A N D A R D S D E V E L O P M E N T P R O G R A M

RE MME E PR ECO ND D ACTICAmerican Public Transportation Association

1300 I Street, NW, Suite 1200 East, Washington, DC 20005

APTA PR-M-RP-002-98, Rev. 2First Published: March 17 ,1999

First Revision: February 13, 2004

Working Group Approved:

Public Comment:

CEO Committee Approval:

Policy & Planning Approval:

PRESS Mechanical Working GroupDRAFT

Inspection and Maintenance of Type H-Tightlock Couplers

Abstract: This recommended practice assists inspection and maintenance forces to detect and correct improper conditions involving the complete coupler, coupler parts, coupler operating mechanism, yoke, radial connection and attachments.

Keywords: coupler parts, coupler operating mechanisms, H Tightlock couplers, inspection, locomotives, maintenance, passenger cars, radial connections, rail attachments, specification M-206B, yokes

Summary: xx

Scope and purpose: This recommended practice assists inspection and maintenance forces to detect and correct improper conditions involving the complete coupler, coupler parts, coupler operating mechanism, yoke, radial connection and attachments. In the case of proprietary couplers, the coupler manufacturer should be consulted for proper maintenance procedures. Where secondhand couplers are involved or reconditioning procedures are required, APTA Specification M-206A should be followed.

The passenger rail industry phased this recommended practice into practice over the six-month period from July 1 to December 31, 1999. The recommended practice took effect January 1, 2000.

This document represents a common viewpoint of those parties concerned with its provisions, namely operating/ planning agencies, manufacturers, consultants, engineers and general interest groups. The application of any standards, recommended practices or guidelines contained herein is voluntary. In some cases, federal and/or state regulations govern portions of a transit system’s operations. In those cases, the government regulations take precedence over this standard. The North American Transit Service Association and its parent organization APTA recognize that for certain applications, the standards or practices, as implemented by individual agencies, may be either more or less restrictive than those given in this document.© 2017 NATSA and its parent organization. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without the prior written permission of NATSA.

Page 2: Standards Document Template_2017 · Web viewJoseph E. Kenas, Bombardier Peter Klauser, Vehicle Dynamics Heinz-Peter Kotz, Siemens Scott J. Kramer, MC &T Tammy Krause, Retired Pallavi

Table of Contents

Participants.......................................................................................................................................................... ivIntroduction......................................................................................................................................................... ivNote on alternate practices...................................................................................................................................v

1. General.......................................................................................................................................................... 11.1 Tightlock couplers..........................................................................................................................................11.2 Steam and train lines and supports.................................................................................................................11.3 Slack...............................................................................................................................................................21.4 Yoke and radial connection inspection..........................................................................................................2

2. Operation...................................................................................................................................................... 62.1 Operating rod conditions................................................................................................................................62.2 Opening..........................................................................................................................................................62.3 Dropping.........................................................................................................................................................72.4 Anti-Creep protection.....................................................................................................................................7

3. Contour inspection...................................................................................................................................... 73.1 Not meeting requirements..............................................................................................................................73.2 Correctness of contour....................................................................................................................................73.3 Distortion........................................................................................................................................................83.4 Wear...............................................................................................................................................................93.5 Contour slack..................................................................................................................................................9

4. Coupler body and parts............................................................................................................................. 104.1 Portions missing...........................................................................................................................................104.2 Shank wear plates.........................................................................................................................................104.3 Out of alignment...........................................................................................................................................104.4 Coupler body pin protector and pivot lugs...................................................................................................114.5 Locks............................................................................................................................................................11

5. Cleaning and lubrication........................................................................................................................... 115.1 Satisfactory operation...................................................................................................................................115.2 Debris...........................................................................................................................................................11

6. Maintenance gages.................................................................................................................................... 11Related APTA standards....................................................................................................................................12References..........................................................................................................................................................12Definitions..........................................................................................................................................................12Abbreviations and acronyms..............................................................................................................................12Summary of document changes.........................................................................................................................12Document history...............................................................................................................................................12

List of Figures and Tables

Figure 1: Tell Tail Slot.......................................................................................................................................1Figure 2: Tightlock Coupler and Draft Gear System....................................................................................2Figure 3: Additional Coupler Yokes................................................................................................................3Figure 4: No. 6 Operating Mechanism............................................................................................................4Figure 5: Double Operating Mechanism........................................................................................................5Figure 6: Type H Tightlock Coupler – Exploded View.................................................................................6

© 2017 American Public Transportation Association | ii

Page 3: Standards Document Template_2017 · Web viewJoseph E. Kenas, Bombardier Peter Klauser, Vehicle Dynamics Heinz-Peter Kotz, Siemens Scott J. Kramer, MC &T Tammy Krause, Retired Pallavi

Figure 7: Procedure to Determine Anticreep Protection..............................................................................7Figure 8: Contour Maintenance Gage No. 31000.........................................................................................8Figure 9: Aligning Wing Limit Gage No. 32600.............................................................................................8Figure 10: Vertical Height Aligning Wing Pocket and Guard Arm Gage No. 34101- 4...........................9Figure 11: Vertical Height Condemning Limit Aligning Wing Pocket and Guard Arm Gage No. 44250-5................................................................................................................................................................9Figure 12: Contour Inspection Limit Gage No. 34100-1............................................................................10Figure 13: Knuckle Nose Wear and Stretch Limit Gage No. 34100-2A..................................................10

© 2017 American Public Transportation Association | iii

Page 4: Standards Document Template_2017 · Web viewJoseph E. Kenas, Bombardier Peter Klauser, Vehicle Dynamics Heinz-Peter Kotz, Siemens Scott J. Kramer, MC &T Tammy Krause, Retired Pallavi

ParticipantsThe American Public Transportation Association greatly appreciates the contributions of the APTA PRESS Mechanical Working Group, which provided the primary effort in the drafting of this document.

At the time this standard was revised, the working group included the following members:

David C. Warner, SEPTA, Chair Rudy Vasquez, Amtrak, Vice Chair

Paul E. Jamieson, SNC-Lavalin, Secretary

Allen C. Bieber, ACB RailTechBrad A. Black, VirginkarStephen Bonina, WSP USAGlenn Brandimarte, ORXTony Brown, MTA of Harris CoMichael L. Burshtin, AmtrakGordon S. Campbell, CrosslinxKevin C. Carmody, STV Steve Chrismer, ENSCOJohn Condrasky, Wabtec Joshua Coran, TalgoBrendan W. Crowley, NYABRichard D. Curtis, Curtis Eng.Steven L. Dedmon, Standard SteelJoe Di Liello, VIA Rail CanadaMatthew Dick, ENSCOAdam J. Eby, AmtrakGary Fairbanks, FRARobert J. Festa, MTA LIRR Steve Finegan, SNC-LavalinGavin Fraser, CH2MJeffrey Gordon, Volpe CenterMark W. Hartong, FRAJames M. Herzog, LTK Eng.

Kenneth R. Hesser, LTK Eng.Christopher J. Holliday, STV George C. Hud, LTK Eng.John A. Janiszewski, LTK Eng.Joseph E. Kenas, BombardierPeter Klauser, Vehicle DynamicsHeinz-Peter Kotz, SiemensScott J. Kramer, MC&TTammy Krause, RetiredPallavi Lal, LTK Eng.Peter Lapre, FRANicolas Lessard, Bombardier Cameron Lonsdale, Standard SteelFrancesco Maldari, MTA LIRRBrian Marquis, Volpe CenterEloy E. Martinez, LTK Eng. Raynald Masse, AMTRobert May, LTK Eng.Ronald Mayville, SG&HRichard J. Mazur, Wabtec Bryan M. McLaughlin, NYABLuke Morscheck, LTK Eng. Joshua E. Munoz, LTK Eng.Allen Nutt, LTK Eng.

Paul O'Brien, UTAJohn B. Pearson, LTK Eng.Martin A. Petzoldt, WABCOIan B. Pirie, STVDanial Rice, WabtecSteven Roman, LTK Eng.Carol A. Rose, STVThomas M. Rusin, Rusin Cons. Mehrdad Samani, CH2M Martin P. Schroeder, CH2MRichard P. Seaton, TDG Patrick J. Sheeran, LTK Eng. Melissa Shurland, FRAMark Stewart, SNC-Lavalin Jonathan Sunde, Strato, Inc.Ali Tajaddini, FRAJeff Thompson, SEPTARonald M. Truitt, AmtrakBrian Whitten, SNC-Lavalin Todd Williams, Penn Machine Gregory L. Yovich, NICTDSteven Zuiderveen, FRA

Staff AdvisorsNarayana Sundaram, American Public Transportation AssociationNathan Leventon, American Public Transportation Association

IntroductionThis introduction is not part of APTA PR-M-RP-002-98, Rev. 2, “Inspection and Maintenance of Type H-Tightlock Couplers.”

APTA recommends the use of this document by:© 2017 American Public Transportation Association | iv

Page 5: Standards Document Template_2017 · Web viewJoseph E. Kenas, Bombardier Peter Klauser, Vehicle Dynamics Heinz-Peter Kotz, Siemens Scott J. Kramer, MC &T Tammy Krause, Retired Pallavi

individuals or organizations that operate rail transit systems; individuals or organizations that contract with others for the operation of rail transit systems; and individuals or organizations that influence how rail transit systems are operated (including but not

limited to consultants, designers and contractors).

Note on alternate practicesIndividual rail transit systems may modify the practices in this standard to accommodate their specific equipment and mode of operation. APTA recognizes that some rail transit systems may have unique operating environments that make strict compliance with every provision of this standard impossible. As a result, certain rail transit systems may need to implement the standards and practices herein in ways that are more or less restrictive than this document prescribes. A rail transit system may develop alternates to APTA standards so long as the alternates are based on a safe operating history and are described and documented in the system’s safety program plan (or another document that is referenced in the system safety program plan).

Documentation of alternate practices shall:

identify the specific APTA rail transit safety standard requirements that cannot be met; state why each of these requirements cannot be met; describe the alternate methods used; and describe and substantiate how the alternate methods do not compromise safety and provide a level of

safety equivalent to the practices in the APTA safety standard (operating histories or hazard analysis findings may be used to substantiate this claim).

© 2017 American Public Transportation Association | v

Page 6: Standards Document Template_2017 · Web viewJoseph E. Kenas, Bombardier Peter Klauser, Vehicle Dynamics Heinz-Peter Kotz, Siemens Scott J. Kramer, MC &T Tammy Krause, Retired Pallavi

APTA PR-M-RP-002-98, Rev. 2Inspection and Maintenance of Type H-Tightlock Couplers

Inspection and Maintenance of Type H-Tightlock Couplers

1. General1.1 Tightlock couplersFigure 1 depicts a typical tightlock coupler. Tightlock couplers must be maintained in a level position on the coupler carrier to insure satisfactory coupling. A simple check for levelness of the coupler may be made by suspending a weighted string against the machined front face of the coupler head when the car is on reason-ably level track.

Figure 1: Tell Tail Slot

1.2 Steam and train lines and supportsTrain lines and supports, or other attachments, must not interfere during train operations with the coupler, coupler operating parts or coupler operating mechanism.

© 2017 American Public Transportation Association 1

Page 7: Standards Document Template_2017 · Web viewJoseph E. Kenas, Bombardier Peter Klauser, Vehicle Dynamics Heinz-Peter Kotz, Siemens Scott J. Kramer, MC &T Tammy Krause, Retired Pallavi

APTA PR-M-RP-002-98, Rev. 2Inspection and Maintenance of Type H-Tightlock Couplers

1.3 SlackExcessive slack in the draft attachments should be reduced or eliminated. The amount of free slack can be de-termined by first sledging the coupler back solid and then measuring the clearance between the coupler horn and the striker face. Next, by inserting a long bar between the coupler horn and striker face, pry the coupler out as far as possible and again measure the space between the horn and the striker face. The difference be-tween these two measurements is the amount of free slack in the draft arrangement. The maximum free slack permitted is 1/2 inch (1.27 cm).

1.4 Yoke and radial connection inspectionA visual inspection should be made of the yoke and radial connection as well as the carrier plates and fasten-ers attaching the carrier plates. The shank pin retaining key and cotter key should be inspected and replaced if worn more than 25 percent. This inspection is mandatory if excessive free slack is found during inspections described in Sections 2.2 or 2.3. Any cracked or broken part uncovered by this inspection must be replaced.

Refer to tightlock coupler and draft gear system, Figure 2. An APTA C-Y65 yoke and a twin unit draft gear are shown for purposes of illustration. Additional yokes are identified in AAR Specification M-205, Coupler Yokes and Figure 3.

Figure 2: Tightlock Coupler and Draft Gear System

© 2017 American Public Transportation Association 2

Page 8: Standards Document Template_2017 · Web viewJoseph E. Kenas, Bombardier Peter Klauser, Vehicle Dynamics Heinz-Peter Kotz, Siemens Scott J. Kramer, MC &T Tammy Krause, Retired Pallavi

APTA PR-M-RP-002-98, Rev. 2Inspection and Maintenance of Type H-Tightlock Couplers

Figure 3: Additional Coupler Yokes

Also refer to the APTA tightlock coupler No. 6 operating mechanism, as shown in Figure 4. The double op-erating mechanism is as shown in Figure 5.

© 2017 American Public Transportation Association 3

Page 9: Standards Document Template_2017 · Web viewJoseph E. Kenas, Bombardier Peter Klauser, Vehicle Dynamics Heinz-Peter Kotz, Siemens Scott J. Kramer, MC &T Tammy Krause, Retired Pallavi

APTA PR-M-RP-002-98, Rev. 2Inspection and Maintenance of Type H-Tightlock Couplers

Figure 4: No. 6 Operating Mechanism

© 2017 American Public Transportation Association 4

Page 10: Standards Document Template_2017 · Web viewJoseph E. Kenas, Bombardier Peter Klauser, Vehicle Dynamics Heinz-Peter Kotz, Siemens Scott J. Kramer, MC &T Tammy Krause, Retired Pallavi

APTA PR-M-RP-002-98, Rev. 2Inspection and Maintenance of Type H-Tightlock Couplers

Figure 5: Double Operating Mechanism

An exploded view of the Type H tightlock coupler is shown in Figure 6.

© 2017 American Public Transportation Association 5

Page 11: Standards Document Template_2017 · Web viewJoseph E. Kenas, Bombardier Peter Klauser, Vehicle Dynamics Heinz-Peter Kotz, Siemens Scott J. Kramer, MC &T Tammy Krause, Retired Pallavi

APTA PR-M-RP-002-98, Rev. 2Inspection and Maintenance of Type H-Tightlock Couplers

Figure 6: Type H Tightlock Coupler – Exploded View

2. Operation2.1 Operating rod conditionsThe operating rod conditions specified in Figure 4 must be maintained. It is important that the requirements for the shape of the rod and the bracket location be provided and maintained. As illustrated in Figure 4, it is important to maintain rod eye clearance (Dimension A) when the coupler is centered on the carrier and fully locked.

2.2 OpeningThe coupler operating mechanism must open the knuckle when the handle is raised to the top position.

© 2017 American Public Transportation Association 6

Page 12: Standards Document Template_2017 · Web viewJoseph E. Kenas, Bombardier Peter Klauser, Vehicle Dynamics Heinz-Peter Kotz, Siemens Scott J. Kramer, MC &T Tammy Krause, Retired Pallavi

APTA PR-M-RP-002-98, Rev. 2Inspection and Maintenance of Type H-Tightlock Couplers

2.3 DroppingThe lock must drop freely to the locked position when the knuckle is fully closed. The coupler is fully locked when the telltale recess in the lock hole shroud is clear and unobstructed as shown in Figure 1.

2.4 Anti-Creep protectionAnti-creep protection must be assured in accordance with procedures illustrated in Figure 7.

Figure 7: Procedure to Determine Anticreep ProtectionRecommended Practice – Adopted 1959

3. Contour inspection3.1 Not meeting requirementsCouplers and/or knuckles not meeting the gaging requirements of this Section shall be removed from service.

3.2 Correctness of contourCorrectness of contour must be checked with gage No. 31000 as shown in Figure 8. If the gage does not pass, parts may be replaced or locks modified in accordance with 4.5.1 to allow passage of the gage.

© 2017 American Public Transportation Association 7

Page 13: Standards Document Template_2017 · Web viewJoseph E. Kenas, Bombardier Peter Klauser, Vehicle Dynamics Heinz-Peter Kotz, Siemens Scott J. Kramer, MC &T Tammy Krause, Retired Pallavi

APTA PR-M-RP-002-98, Rev. 2Inspection and Maintenance of Type H-Tightlock Couplers

Figure 8: Contour Maintenance Gage No. 31000

3.3 DistortionDistortion of the aligning wing pocket and guard arm must be checked by using aligning wing limit gage No. 32600 as shown in Figure 9 and vertical height aligning wing pocket and guard arm gage No. 34101- 4 as shown in Figure 10.

Figure 9: Aligning Wing Limit Gage No. 32600

© 2017 American Public Transportation Association 8

Page 14: Standards Document Template_2017 · Web viewJoseph E. Kenas, Bombardier Peter Klauser, Vehicle Dynamics Heinz-Peter Kotz, Siemens Scott J. Kramer, MC &T Tammy Krause, Retired Pallavi

APTA PR-M-RP-002-98, Rev. 2Inspection and Maintenance of Type H-Tightlock Couplers

Figure 10: Vertical Height Aligning Wing Pocket and Guard Arm Gage No. 34101- 4

3.4 WearWear of the aligning wing pocket and guard arm must be checked with the vertical height condemning limit aligning wing pocket and guard arm gage No. 44250-5 as shown in Figure 11.

Figure 11: Vertical Height Condemning Limit Aligning Wing Pocket and Guard Arm Gage No. 44250-5

3.5 Contour slack3.5.1 Free slackFree slack in the contour of a tightlock coupler develops very slowly in service when it is mated with another tightlock coupler, but when coupled with non-tightlock couplers the wear rate is somewhat accelerated. A value for the limit of contour slack due to wear has been set at 3/8" (.95 cm) as checked with gage No. 34100-1, Figure 12.

© 2017 American Public Transportation Association 9

Page 15: Standards Document Template_2017 · Web viewJoseph E. Kenas, Bombardier Peter Klauser, Vehicle Dynamics Heinz-Peter Kotz, Siemens Scott J. Kramer, MC &T Tammy Krause, Retired Pallavi

APTA PR-M-RP-002-98, Rev. 2Inspection and Maintenance of Type H-Tightlock Couplers

Figure 12: Contour Inspection Limit Gage No. 34100-1

3.5.2 Exceeding the limitWhen the coupler contour exceeds the limit of gage No. 34100-1, the knuckle should be removed and re-placed with a new knuckle. If this substitution does not bring the coupler within the limits of gage No. 34100-1, then the lock may be replaced with a new lock. If the contour is still not within the limits of gage No. 34100-1, the coupler body should be replaced.

3.5.3 Knuckle removedAny knuckle removed per 3.5.2 shall be checked with the nose wear and stretch limit gage No. 34100-2A as shown in Figure 13. If the limits of this gage are reached, indicating wear and/or stretch of l/4" (.63 cm) or more, the knuckle shall be scrapped.

Figure 13: Knuckle Nose Wear and Stretch Limit Gage No. 34100-2A

4. Coupler body and parts4.1 Portions missingCoupler body and parts, yokes, and connections, cracked, broken and/or with portions thereof missing, shall be replaced.

4.2 Shank wear platesOn couplers requiring shank wear plate, the wear plate shall be replaced if it is worn more than 3/16" deep or is missing or loose. Coupler not requiring shank wear plate shall be replaced if the shank is worn more than 3/8" (.95 cm) deep. Shank wear plates shall be repaired or replaced only in accordance with APTA RP-M-004-98, with coupler removed from car.

© 2017 American Public Transportation Association 10

Page 16: Standards Document Template_2017 · Web viewJoseph E. Kenas, Bombardier Peter Klauser, Vehicle Dynamics Heinz-Peter Kotz, Siemens Scott J. Kramer, MC &T Tammy Krause, Retired Pallavi

APTA PR-M-RP-002-98, Rev. 2Inspection and Maintenance of Type H-Tightlock Couplers

4.3 Out of alignmentCoupler shall be replaced when shank is obviously bent out of alignment with coupler head, including rip-pling of walls.4.4 Coupler body pin protector and pivot lugs4.4.1 Passenger service equipmentOn passenger service equipment, a coupler with a cracked or broken pin protector boss or pivot lug shall be removed from service.

4.5 Locks4.5.1 Closed knuckleWhen the knuckle is closed, the lock shall be seated not more than 1/8" (.32 cm) above the knuckle tail shelf, but should be preferably seated on the shelf. When adjustment is necessary, metal should be removed from the guard arm (non-tapered) side of the lock by grinding or preferably by machining. The amount of metal to be removed is one-eighth the distance the lock is to be lowered. For example, if the lock is 1/8" (.32 cm) above the shelf and it is to be seated on the shelf the amount of metal to be removed from the lock face is one-eighth of 1/8" (.32 cm) or 1/64" (.4 mm).

4.5.2 Stuck lockIn the event a lock becomes stuck, it should be released by tapping upward on the bottom of the lock leg through the lock hole shroud. No hammering should ever be done on any part of the locklift assembly as this may cause distortion and result in faulty operation of the coupler. Sticking locks can be relieved by reducing the thickness of the lock as described in Section 4.5.1.

5. Cleaning and lubrication5.1 Satisfactory operationTightlock couplers should be cleaned frequently to insure satisfactory operation. Dirt or other foreign matter should be removed with a dry air blast, or other means.

5.2 DebrisThe inside of the coupler head, the coupler operating parts, and the machined surfaces of the coupler contour shall be kept free from any lubricant or paint.

6. Maintenance gagesThe various maintenance gages referred to in these specifications may be purchased from the Standard Cou-pler manufacturers.

Purchase of drawings for the various maintenance gages referred to should be directed to:

Office of the ChairmanMechanical Committee of the Standard Coupler Manufacturers 10 S. Riverside Plaza - 10th FloorChicago, IL 60606

© 2017 American Public Transportation Association 11

Page 17: Standards Document Template_2017 · Web viewJoseph E. Kenas, Bombardier Peter Klauser, Vehicle Dynamics Heinz-Peter Kotz, Siemens Scott J. Kramer, MC &T Tammy Krause, Retired Pallavi

APTA PR-M-RP-002-98, Rev. 2Inspection and Maintenance of Type H-Tightlock Couplers

Related APTA standardsAPTA PR-M-RP-004-98, “Second Hand and Reconditioned Type H- Tightlock Couplers”

ReferencesThis standard shall be used in conjunction with the following publications. When the following standards are

superseded by an approved revision, the revision shall apply.

AAR Specification M-205, Coupler Yokes and Figure 2A

Definitionsxx

Abbreviations and acronymsxx xx xx xx xx xx

Summary of document changes Bullet points xx

Document historyDocument

VersionWorking Group

VotePublic Comment/

Technical Oversight

CEO ApprovalPolicy & Planning Approval

Publish Date

First published — — — January 22, 1998 March 17 ,1999

First revision — — — — February 13, 2004

Second revision — — — — —

© 2017 American Public Transportation Association 12