stancog transit peer comparison€¦ · king ci ty 1,828 64.50% -0.42 king ci ty 21,274 67.32%...

StanCOG

Transit PeerComparison

Transit Peer Comparison

✔ Each Operator has something in commonwith some other operator.

✔ Each Operator wants to optimize theirservice within their circumstances.

✔ Seeing who is like us can help us get ideasfor improvement.


✔ TDA Requires seven sizestatistics for each publicoperator.

✔ TDA Requires six efficiencymeasures, using thosestatistics.


✔ Fare Revenue✔ Vehicles✔ Employees

✔ Passengers✔ Hours✔ Miles✔ Operating Costs

Required Annual Statistics


✔ Farebox Ratio✔ Cost/Passenger✔ Cost/Hour

✔ Passengers/Hour✔ Passengers/Mile✔ Hours/Employee

Required TransitEfficiencies


✔ Primary challenge about this approach:

✔ No two operations areidentical!!!

✔ This is correct, but this does not invalidatecomparisons, especially when severalsimilarities are required to be included in apeer group.


✔ Fixed or DAR?✔ Local or Regional?✔ How Many Passengers?✔ Public or ADA?

Criteria for Comparisonamong Peers

I have Six Resulting Spreadsheets


✔ Local Fixed, 1 to 8 million passengers.✔ Local Fixed, 50 to 500 thousand passengers.✔ Local ADA, 50 to 150 thousand passengers.✔ Local DAR, 0 to 25 thousand passengers.✔ Local DAR, 25 to 70 thousand passengers.✔ Local DAR, over 70,000 passengers.


✔ Please note that the data is generallyobtained from the State Controller’s Report.

✔ When I compiled the followingspreadsheets the most recent available datawas for 1999-2000. These Spreadsheetsreflect that data. 2000-01 is now available.


✔ Lets look firstat small, local,General PublicDial-A-Rides.

✔ The firststatistic usedfor review ispassengers.

✔ This onlyaddresses size.

S m a ll D ia l-A -R id e s P assengers % 0 f M e a n S ta n D e v1999-2000

S o lva n g 23,659 1 7 1 .7 2 % 1 .3 9T e h a c h a p i 22,454 1 6 2 .9 8 % 1 .2 2M c F a rla n d 21,510 1 5 6 .1 3 % 1 .0 8P alo V erde V alley 20,798 1 5 0 .9 6 % 0 .9 8G re e n fie ld 18,307 1 3 2 .8 8 % 0 .6 3Im p e ria l 13,108 9 5 .1 4 % -0 .0 9S o le d a d 11,575 8 4 .0 1 % -0 .3 1K in g C ity 9,720 7 0 .5 5 % -0 .5 7W a te rfo rd 9,008 6 5 .3 8 % -0 .6 7P a tte rs o n 8,282 6 0 .1 1 % -0 .7 7C lo ve rd a le 6,649 4 8 .2 6 % -1 .0 0R ip o n 259 1 .8 8 % -1 .8 9

M e a n 1 3 ,7 7 7S ta n d a rd D e via tio n 7 ,1 3 4M e d ia n 12,342


✔ Mean✔ Standard Deviation✔ Median✔ Standard Deviation from Mean for each

Operator✔ Percent of Mean for each Operator

In Each Analysis Measure ICalculate the Following:

Comparison of Hours and MilesS m a ll D ia l-A -R id e s H ours % 0 f M e a n S ta n D e v S m a ll D ia l-A -R id e s M iles % 0 f M e a n S ta n D e v1999-2000 1999-2000P alo V erde V alley 8,051 2 8 4 .0 9 % 2 .1 9 S o lva n g 107,852 3 4 1 .2 9 % 2 .7 5S o lva n g 7,472 2 6 3 .6 6 % 1 .9 5 P alo V erde V alley 62,249 1 9 6 .9 8 % 1 .1 0T e h a c h a p i 4,138 1 4 6 .0 2 % 0 .5 5 Im p e ria l 45,959 1 4 5 .4 4 % 0 .5 2Im p e ria l 2,806 9 9 .0 1 % -0 .0 1 T e h a c h a p i 34,803 1 1 0 .1 3 % 0 .1 2P a tte rs o n 1,967 6 9 .4 1 % -0 .3 6 C lo ve rd a le 21,999 6 9 .6 1 % -0 .3 5K in g C ity 1,828 6 4 .5 0 % -0 .4 2 K in g C ity 21,274 6 7 .3 2 % -0 .3 7C lo ve rd a le 1,666 5 8 .7 9 % -0 .4 9 W a te rfo rd 19,925 6 3 .0 5 % -0 .4 2W a te rfo rd 1,637 5 7 .7 6 % -0 .5 0 G re e n fie ld 18,978 6 0 .0 6 % -0 .4 5G re e n fie ld 1,591 5 6 .1 4 % -0 .5 2 M c F a rla n d 18,346 5 8 .0 6 % -0 .4 8M c F a rla n d 1,528 5 3 .9 2 % -0 .5 5 S o le d a d 16,360 5 1 .7 7 % -0 .5 5S o le d a d 1,180 4 1 .6 4 % -0 .6 9 P a tte rs o n 9,370 2 9 .6 5 % -0 .8 0R ip o n 143 5 .0 5 % -1 .1 3 R ip o n 2,097 6 .6 4 % -1 .0 6

M e a n 2 ,8 3 4 M e a n 3 1 ,6 0 1S ta n d a rd D e via tio n 2 ,3 8 4 S ta n d a rd D e via tio n 2 7 ,7 4 5M e d ia n 1,747 M e d ia n 20,600

Comparison of Costs & RevenueS m a ll D ia l-A -R id e s O per C ost % 0 f M e a n S ta n D e v S m a ll D ia l-A -R id e s F are R evenue % 0 f M e a n S ta n D e v1999-2000 1999-2000S o lva n g $243,746 3 2 7 .7 0 % 2 .6 0 S o lva n g $27,395 2 5 2 .1 0 % 2 .1 2P alo V erde V alley $168,779 2 2 6 .9 1 % 1 .4 5 P alo V erde V alley $25,010 2 3 0 .1 5 % 1 .8 1T e h a c h a p i $92,037 1 2 3 .7 4 % 0 .2 7 Im p e ria l $15,706 1 4 4 .5 3 % 0 .6 2Im p e ria l $73,753 9 9 .1 6 % -0 .0 1 M c F a rla n d $12,001 1 1 0 .4 4 % 0 .1 5S o le d a d $62,597 8 4 .1 6 % -0 .1 8 G re e n fie ld $9,220 8 4 .8 5 % -0 .2 1G re e n fie ld $56,348 7 5 .7 6 % -0 .2 8 T e h a c h a p i $9,177 8 4 .4 5 % -0 .2 2K in g C ity $54,919 7 3 .8 3 % -0 .3 0 S o le d a d $8,406 7 7 .3 6 % -0 .3 2C lo ve rd a le $52,163 7 0 .1 3 % -0 .3 4 K in g C ity $8,293 7 6 .3 2 % -0 .3 3M c F a rla n d $34,034 4 5 .7 6 % -0 .6 2 P a tte rs o n $5,223 4 8 .0 6 % -0 .7 2W a te rfo rd $30,342 4 0 .7 9 % -0 .6 8 C lo ve rd a le $4,790 4 4 .0 8 % -0 .7 8P a tte rs o n $20,531 2 7 .6 0 % -0 .8 3 W a te rfo rd $4,616 4 2 .4 8 % -0 .8 0R ip o n $3,322 4 .4 7 % -1 .0 9 R ip o n $564 5 .1 9 % -1 .3 2

M e a n $ 7 4 ,3 8 1 M e a n $ 1 0 ,8 6 7S ta n d a rd D e via tio n $ 6 5 ,0 3 9 S ta n d a rd D e via tio n $ 7 ,8 0 0M e d ia n $55,634 M e d ia n $8,792


✔ Efficiency measures show a very differentpicture from the size.

✔ The following three slides showcomparisons of the six required efficiencymeasures.

✔ Where a lower number is more efficient ithas a higher standard deviation.

Farebox Ratio andCost/Passenger

S m a ll D ia l-A -R id e s F a re /R a te % 0 f M e a n S ta n D e v S m a ll D ia l-A -R id e s $/P ass % 0 f M e a n S ta n D e v1999-2000 H 1999-2000 LM c F a rla n d 3 5 .3 % 2 0 7 .1 3 % 2 .6 0 M c F a rla n d $1.58 2 6 .9 8 % 1 .3 3P a tte rs o n 2 5 .4 % 1 4 9 .4 3 % 1 .2 0 P a tte rs o n $2.48 4 2 .2 7 % 1 .0 5Im p e ria l 2 1 .3 % 1 2 5 .0 9 % 0 .6 1 G re e n fie ld $3.08 5 2 .4 8 % 0 .8 7R ip o n 1 7 .0 % 9 9 .7 3 % -0 .0 1 W a te rfo rd $3.37 5 7 .4 3 % 0 .7 8G re e n fie ld 1 6 .4 % 9 6 .1 1 % -0 .0 9 T e h a c h a p i $4.10 6 9 .8 9 % 0 .5 5W a te rfo rd 1 5 .2 % 8 9 .3 6 % -0 .2 6 S o le d a d $5.41 9 2 .2 1 % 0 .1 4K in g C ity 1 5 .1 % 8 8 .7 0 % -0 .2 7 Im p e ria l $5.63 9 5 .9 3 % 0 .0 7P a lo V e rd e V a lle y 1 4 .8 % 8 7 .0 4 % -0 .3 1 K in g C ity $5.65 9 6 .3 4 % 0 .0 7S o le d a d 1 3 .4 % 7 8 .8 8 % -0 .5 1 C lo ve rd a le $7.85 1 3 3 .7 6 % -0 .6 2S o lva n g 1 1 .2 % 6 6 .0 2 % -0 .8 2 P alo V erde V alley $8.12 1 3 8 .3 7 % -0 .7 0T e h a c h a p i 1 0 .0 % 5 8 .5 7 % -1 .0 0 S o lva n g $10.30 1 7 5 .6 6 % -1 .3 8C lo ve rd a le 9 .2 % 5 3 .9 4 % -1 .1 2 R ip o n $12.83 2 1 8 .6 9 % -2 .1 6

M e a n 1 7 .0 % M e a n $ 5 .8 7S ta n d a rd D e via tio n 7 .0 2 % S ta n d a rd D e via tio n $ 3 .2 2M e d ia n 15.2% M e d ia n $5.52

Cost/Hour & Passengers/HourS m a ll D ia l-A -R id e s $/H our % 0 f M e a n S ta n D e v S m a ll D ia l-A -R id e s P ass/H our % 0 f M e a n S ta n D e v1999-2000 L 1999-2000 HP a tte rs o n $10.44 3 8 .3 7 % 1 .6 4 M c F a rla n d 14.08 2 3 4 .3 8 % 2 .2 3W a te rfo rd $18.54 6 8 .1 4 % 0 .8 5 G re e n fie ld 11.51 1 9 1 .5 8 % 1 .5 2P alo V erde V alley $20.96 7 7 .0 7 % 0 .6 1 S o le d a d 9.81 1 6 3 .3 2 % 1 .0 5T e h a c h a p i $22.24 8 1 .7 7 % 0 .4 9 W a te rfo rd 5.50 9 1 .6 2 % -0 .1 4M c F a rla n d $22.27 8 1 .8 9 % 0 .4 8 T e h a c h a p i 5.43 9 0 .3 5 % -0 .1 6R ip o n $23.23 8 5 .4 1 % 0 .3 9 K in g C ity 5.32 8 8 .5 3 % -0 .1 9Im p e ria l $26.28 9 6 .6 3 % 0 .0 9 Im p e ria l 4.67 7 7 .7 8 % -0 .3 7K in g C ity $30.04 1 1 0 .4 5 % -0 .2 8 P a tte rs o n 4.21 7 0 .1 0 % -0 .5 0C lo ve rd a le $31.31 1 1 5 .1 1 % -0 .4 0 C lo ve rd a le 3.99 6 6 .4 5 % -0 .5 6S o lva n g $32.62 1 1 9 .9 3 % -0 .5 3 S o lva n g 3.17 5 2 .7 2 % -0 .7 8G re e n fie ld $35.42 1 3 0 .2 1 % -0 .8 0 P alo V erde V alley 2.58 4 3 .0 1 % -0 .9 5S o le d a d $53.05 1 9 5 .0 3 % -2 .5 3 R ip o n 1.81 3 0 .1 6 % -1 .1 6

M e a n $ 2 7 .2 0 M e a n 6 .0 1S ta n d a rd D e via tio n $ 1 0 .2 1 S ta n d a rd D e via tio n 3 .6 2M e d ia n $24.76 M e d ia n 4.99

Pass/Mile & Hours/EmployeeS m a ll D ia l-A -R id e s P ass/M ile % 0 f M e a n S ta n D e v S m a ll D ia l-A -R id e s H our/E m p % 0 f M e a n S ta n D e v1999-2000 H 1999-2000M c F a rla n d 1.17 2 1 4 .9 0 % 1 .9 9 T e h a c h a p i 2,069 1 4 6 .0 4 % 1 .1 4G re e n fie ld 0.96 1 7 6 .8 1 % 1 .3 3 P alo V erde V alley 2,013 1 4 2 .0 7 % 1 .0 4P a tte rs o n 0.88 1 6 2 .0 0 % 1 .0 7 P a tte rs o n 1,967 1 3 8 .8 4 % 0 .9 6S o le d a d 0.71 1 2 9 .6 8 % 0 .5 1 K in g C ity 1,828 1 2 9 .0 3 % 0 .7 2T e h a c h a p i 0.65 1 1 8 .2 5 % 0 .3 2 C lo ve rd a le 1,666 1 1 7 .5 9 % 0 .4 4K in g C ity 0.46 8 3 .7 4 % -0 .2 8 G re e n fie ld 1,591 1 1 2 .3 0 % 0 .3 1W a te rfo rd 0.45 8 2 .8 6 % -0 .3 0 M c F a rla n d 1,528 1 0 7 .8 5 % 0 .1 9P alo V erde V alley 0.33 6 1 .2 4 % -0 .6 7 Im p e ria l 1,403 9 9 .0 3 % -0 .0 2C lo ve rd a le 0.30 5 5 .4 0 % -0 .7 7 S o le d a d 1,180 8 3 .2 9 % -0 .4 1Im p e ria l 0.29 5 2 .2 8 % -0 .8 3 S o lva n g 1,067 7 5 .3 4 % -0 .6 1S o lva n g 0.22 4 0 .2 1 % -1 .0 4 W a te rfo rd 546 3 8 .5 2 % -1 .5 2R ip o n 0.12 2 2 .6 4 % -1 .3 4 R ip o n 143 1 0 .0 9 % -2 .2 3

M e a n 0 .5 5 M e a n 1 ,4 1 7S ta n d a rd D e via tio n 0 .3 2 S ta n d a rd D e via tio n 5 7 1M e d ia n 0.45 M e d ia n 1,560

Additional Useful Measures

✔ Cost/Mile✔ Miles/Pass

(communicates betterfor DAR operations)

✔ Average Fare✔ Miles/Hour✔ Fare/Hour✔ Fare/Mile

✔ Subsidy in Dollars✔ Subsidy/Passenger✔ Subsidy/Hour✔ Subsidy/Mile✔ Minutes/Passengers

(an inverse ofPass/Hour)

✔ Passengers/Vehicle

Statistics for ADA OperatorsS ystem P assengers P ercent S tan/D ev S ystem H ours P ercent S tan/D ev

E lderly/H andicapped E lderly/H andicapped

1999-2000 1999-2000

R iversid e 145,113 159.09% 1.87 S an D iego C ounty 63,855 191.11% 1.96

S an D iego C ounty 139,274 152.69% 1.66 C entral C ontra C osta 60,882 182.21% 1.77

S an Jaoquin T ransit 135,265 148.30% 1.52 S an Jaoquin T ransit 57,916 173.33% 1.58

C entral C ontra C osta 121,736 133.46% 1.06 S a n ta C ru z 55,536 166.21% 1.42

P om ona V alley 120,904 132.55% 1.03 F resn o 44,891 134.35% 0.74

M onterey-S alinas 110,275 120.90% 0.66 N o rth S a n D ieg o 41,026 122.79% 0.49

S a n ta C ru z 103,074 113.00% 0.41 M a rin C o u n ty 37,975 113.65% 0.29

M odesto 101,320 111.08% 0.35 M onterey-S alinas 34,590 103.52% 0.08

E astern C ontra C osta 96,686 106.00% 0.19 M odesto 34,251 102.51% 0.05

F resn o 95,603 104.81% 0.15 R iversid e 33,542 100.39% 0.01

T orrance 92,000 100.86% 0.03 B akersfield (G E T ) 30,731 91.97% -0.17

N o rth S a n D ieg o 84,367 92.49% -0.24 E astern C ontra C osta 29,875 89.41% -0.23

L ong B each 80,197 87.92% -0.38 P om ona V alley 29,603 88.60% -0.24

B akersfield (G E T ) 74,826 82.03% -0.57 S anta C larita 28,011 83.83% -0.35

S anta C larita 67,498 74.00% -0.82 L ong B each 22,292 66.72% -0.71

T housand O aks 65,495 71.80% -0.89 T orrance 19,900 59.56% -0.87

M a rin C o u n ty 64,631 70.86% -0.92 R edding 19,532 58.46% -0.89

C hico 62,262 68.26% -1.00 C hico 19,144 57.30% -0.92

P aradise 54,200 59.42% -1.28 T housand O aks 17,990 53.84% -0.99

R edding 50,611 55.49% -1.41 P aradise 11,175 33.45% -1.43

M erced 50,144 54.97% -1.42 M erced 8,951 26.79% -1.57

M ean 91,213 M ean 33,413

S tandard D eviation 28,897 S tandard D eviation 15,554

1999-2000 M edian 92,000 1999-2000 M edian 30,731

Efficiencies for ADA OperatorsS ystem F are/R ate P ercent S tan D ev S ystem C ost/P ass P ercent S tan D ev1999-2000 H 1999-2000 LR iverside 15.71% 180.78% 1.79 R iverside $5.38 35.12% 1 .5 1

M erced 15.20% 174.88% 1.65 B akersfield (G E T ) $6.84 44.66% 1 .2 9

P aradise 12.73% 146.47% 1.03 M erced $7.81 51.00% 1 .1 4

C hico 12.63% 145.30% 1.00 T housand O aks $9.26 60.49% 0 .9 2

C entral C ontra C osta 11.95% 137.51% 0.83 P aradise $9.97 65.11% 0 .8 1

S an D iego C ounty 11.80% 135.79% 0.79 T orrance $10.99 71.75% 0 .6 6

N orth S an D iego 10.94% 125.89% 0.57 C hico $11.26 73.51% 0 .6 2

M odesto 10.72% 123.31% 0.52 L ong B each $11.87 77.48% 0 .5 2

M onterey-S alinas 9.19% 105.71% 0.13 M onterey-S alinas $13.04 85.16% 0 .3 5

S anta C ruz 9.11% 104.90% 0.11 M odesto $13.17 86.00% 0 .3 3

T housand O aks 8.95% 103.01% 0.07 P om ona V alley $13.58 88.65% 0 .2 6

S an Jaoquin T ransit 8.88% 102.24% 0.05 E astern C ontra C osta $14.29 93.32% 0 .1 6

L ong B each 7.93% 91.25% -0.19 R edding $16.91 110.38% -0 .2 4

R edding 7.81% 89.88% -0.22 S an D iego C ounty $18.95 123.74% -0 .5 5

T orrance 7.24% 83.28% -0.37 N orth S an D iego $19.19 125.33% -0 .5 9

M arin C ounty 5.51% 63.46% -0.81 S an Jaoquin T ransit $19.58 127.84% -0 .6 5

P om ona V alley 5.00% 57.57% -0.94 C entral C ontra C osta $19.69 128.59% -0 .6 7

E astern C ontra C osta 4.48% 51.56% -1.07 F resno $20.26 132.28% -0 .7 5

B akersfield (G E T ) 3.20% 36.82% -1.40 S anta C ruz $21.94 143.27% -1 .0 1

S anta C larita 1.97% 22.62% -1.71 S anta C larita $23.56 153.83% -1 .2 5

F resno 1.55% 17.78% -1.82 M arin C ounty $34.08 222.49% -2 .8 5

M ean 8.69% M ean $15.32S tandard D eviation 3.93% S tandard D eviation $6.58M edian 8.95% M edian $13.58

Efficiencies for ADA OperatorsS ystem C ost/H our P ercent S tnd D ev S ystem P ass/H our P ercent S tnd D ev1999-2000 L 1999-2000 HB akersfield (G E T ) $16.65 39.45% 2.67 M erced 5.60 180.84% 2.34R iverside $23.27 55.13% 1.98 P aradise 4.85 156.56% 1.64T housand O aks $33.73 79.89% 0.89 T orrance 4.62 149.24% 1.42C hico $36.61 86.74% 0.58 R iverside 4.33 139.66% 1.15M odesto $38.96 92.29% 0.34 P om ona V alley 4.08 131.84% 0.92C entral C ontra C osta $39.38 93.29% 0.30 T housand O aks 3.64 117.52% 0.51N orth S an D iego $39.47 93.51% 0.29 L ong B each 3.60 116.13% 0.47S anta C ruz $40.73 96.48% 0.16 C hico 3.25 104.99% 0.14S an D iego C ounty $41.33 97.92% 0.09 E astern C ontra C osta 3.24 104.47% 0.13M onterey-S alinas $41.58 98.50% 0.07 M onterey-S alinas 3.19 102.91% 0.08L ong B each $42.69 101.13% -0.05 M odesto 2.96 95.49% -0.13F resno $43.15 102.21% -0.10 R edding 2.59 83.64% -0.47M erced $43.76 103.66% -0.16 B akersfield (G E T ) 2.43 78.60% -0.62R edding $43.80 103.77% -0.17 S anta C larita 2.41 77.79% -0.64S an Jaoquin T ransit $45.73 108.32% -0.37 S an Jaoquin T ransit 2.34 75.39% -0.71E astern C ontra C osta $46.26 109.58% -0.42 S an D iego C ounty 2.18 70.41% -0.86P aradise $48.36 114.57% -0.64 F resno 2.13 68.75% -0.90T orrance $50.80 120.35% -0.90 N orth S an D iego 2.06 66.38% -0.97P om ona V alley $55.45 131.36% -1.38 C entral C ontra C osta 2.00 64.55% -1.03S anta C larita $56.77 134.49% -1.52 S anta C ruz 1.86 59.91% -1.16M arin C ounty $57.99 137.38% -1.65 M arin C ounty 1.70 54.94% -1.30

M ean $42.21 M ean 3.10S tandard D eviation $9.58 S tandard D eviation 1.07M edian $42.69 M edian 2.96

Other Efficiencies for ADA Operators

S ystem M ile/P ass P ercent S tanD ev S ystem A ve/F are P ercent S tanD ev1999-2000 L 1999-2000P aradise 2.77 51.15% 1.41 C entral C ontra C osta $2.35 191.25% 1.81M erced 2.99 55.24% 1.29 S an D iego C ounty $2.24 181.73% 1.62T housand O aks 3.11 57.54% 1.22 N orth San D iego $2.10 170.64% 1.40T orrance 3.45 63.84% 1.04 Santa C ruz $2.00 162.55% 1.24P om ona V alley 3.56 65.78% 0.98 M arin C ounty $1.88 152.71% 1.05R iverside 3.93 72.64% 0.79 S an Jaoquin T ransit $1.74 141.36% 0.82C hico 4.24 78.34% 0.62 C hico $1.42 115.52% 0.31L ong B each 4.31 79.67% 0.58 M odesto $1.41 114.69% 0.29S an Jaoquin T ransit 4.60 85.05% 0.43 R edding $1.32 107.30% 0.14M odesto 5.04 93.11% 0.20 P aradise $1.27 103.14% 0.06S anta C larita 5.30 98.03% 0.06 M onterey-S alinas $1.20 97.37% -0.05B akersfield (G E T ) 5.31 98.12% 0.05 M erced $1.19 96.47% -0.07E astern C ontra C osta 5.43 100.36% -0.01 L ong B each $0.94 76.47% -0.47S anta C ruz 6.19 114.41% -0.41 R iverside $0.84 68.67% -0.62R edding 6.33 117.01% -0.49 T housand O aks $0.83 67.39% -0.65S an D iego C ounty 6.47 119.51% -0.56 T orrance $0.80 64.63% -0.70F resno 7.03 129.91% -0.86 P om ona V alley $0.68 55.20% -0.89M onterey-S alinas 7.04 130.10% -0.87 E astern C ontra C osta $0.64 52.04% -0.95M arin C ounty 8.67 160.32% -1.74 S anta C larita $0.46 37.64% -1.24C entral C ontra C osta 8.69 160.59% -1.74 F resno $0.31 25.44% -1.48N orth S an D iego 9.16 169.27% -1.99 B akersfield (G E T ) $0.22 17.79% -1.63

M ean 5.41 M ean $1.23S tandard D eviation 1.88 S tandard D eviation $0.62M edian 5.30 M edian $1.20

Small Urban Fixed StatisticsF ixed R oute S ystem s P assengers P ercent S tan D ev F ixed R oute S ystem s O per C ost P ercent S tan D ev1999-2000 1999-2000T ulare 438,384 212.64% 2.07 S im i V alley $2,140,127 291.73% 3.25S im i V alley 395,651 191.91% 1.69 M erced $1,318,202 179.69% 1.35P orterville 373,681 181.25% 1.50 V acaville $1,040,512 141.84% 0.71M erced 352,500 170.98% 1.31 T ulare $1,031,630 140.63% 0.69E ureka 316,005 153.28% 0.98 D ow ney $968,246 131.99% 0.54D ow ney 306,308 148.58% 0.89 D elano $824,170 112.35% 0.21B anning 227,268 110.24% 0.19 T housand O aks $806,691 109.96% 0.17D elano 192,000 93.13% -0.13 E ureka $801,410 109.24% 0.16P etalum a 190,996 92.64% -0.14 P etalum a $790,776 107.79% 0.13A rcata 175,302 85.03% -0.28 L om poc $777,089 105.93% 0.10V acaville 155,228 75.29% -0.45 B arstow $594,726 81.07% -0.32M adera 143,081 69.40% -0.56 C lovis $565,363 77.07% -0.39B enicia 139,388 67.61% -0.60 B enicia $535,458 72.99% -0.46T housand O aks 122,100 59.22% -0.75 T urlock $508,526 69.32% -0.52S outh C ounty 121,394 58.88% -0.76 B anning $478,649 65.25% -0.59L om poc 105,059 50.96% -0.90 A rcata $388,235 52.92% -0.80B arstow 100,068 48.54% -0.95 P orterville $335,034 45.67% -0.92T urlock 92,682 44.96% -1.01 O jai $294,075 40.09% -1.02C lovis 91,598 44.43% -1.02 S outh C ounty $249,037 33.95% -1.12O jai 84,580 41.03% -1.09 M adera $224,000 30.53% -1.18

M ean 206,164 M ean $733,598S tandard D eviation 111,978 S tandard D eviation $433,000M edian 165,265 M edian $685,908

Small Urban Fixed EfficienciesF ixed R oute S ystem s F are/R ate P ercent S tan D ev F ixed R oute S ystem s $/P ass P ercent S tan D ev1999-2000 H 1999-2000 LM adera 40.63% 235.17% 2.46 P orterville $0.90 22.39% 1.66P orterville 35.75% 206.95% 1.95 M adera $1.57 39.09% 1.30B enicia 30.79% 178.25% 1.43 S outh C ounty $2.05 51.23% 1.04S outh C ounty 25.80% 149.34% 0.90 B anning $2.11 52.59% 1.01M erced 22.09% 127.85% 0.51 A rcata $2.21 55.30% 0.95B anning 21.96% 127.10% 0.49 T ulare $2.35 58.76% 0.88A rcata 18.91% 109.46% 0.17 E ureka $2.54 63.33% 0.78E ureka 17.68% 102.34% 0.04 D ow ney $3.16 78.93% 0.45T ulare 16.29% 94.28% -0.10 O jai $3.48 86.82% 0.28S im i V alley 15.54% 89.94% -0.18 M erced $3.74 93.38% 0.14P etalum a 13.98% 80.91% -0.35 B enicia $3.84 95.93% 0.09V acaville 12.98% 75.15% -0.45 P etalum a $4.14 103.39% -0.07T housand O aks 11.97% 69.27% -0.56 D elano $4.29 107.19% -0.15D elano 11.95% 69.15% -0.56 S im i V alley $5.41 135.07% -0.75T urlock 11.48% 66.48% -0.61 T urlock $5.49 137.01% -0.79B arstow 9.41% 54.50% -0.83 B arstow $5.94 148.41% -1.03C lovis 8.86% 51.26% -0.89 C lovis $6.17 154.13% -1.15L om poc 6.99% 40.47% -1.09 T housand O aks $6.61 164.98% -1.39O jai 6.43% 37.23% -1.14 V acaville $6.70 167.38% -1.44D ow ney 6.03% 34.91% -1.19 L om poc $7.40 184.70% -1.81

M ean 17.27% M ean $4.00S tandard D eviation 9.48% S tandard D eviation $1.88M edian 14.76% M edian $3.79

Small Urban Fixed EfficienciesF ixed R oute S ystem s $/H our P ercent S tan D ev F ixed R oute S ystem s P ass/H our P ercent S tan D ev1999-2000 L 1999-2000 HM adera $22.76 42.81% 1.90 P orterville 27.42 173.84% 1.83P orterville $24.59 46.25% 1.79 A rcata 24.57 155.76% 1.38L om poc $42.13 79.24% 0.69 O jai 24.16 153.15% 1.32B enicia $43.16 81.19% 0.63 D ow ney 22.88 145.02% 1.11C lovis $43.25 81.36% 0.62 B anning 21.87 138.67% 0.96S outh C ounty $43.78 82.36% 0.59 S outh C ounty 21.34 135.30% 0.87B anning $46.07 86.66% 0.44 T ulare 20.75 131.53% 0.78T ulare $48.83 91.84% 0.27 E ureka 20.00 126.76% 0.66D elano $50.43 94.86% 0.17 S im i V alley 15.21 96.44% -0.09T urlock $50.50 95.00% 0.17 M erced 14.72 93.32% -0.17E ureka $50.71 95.39% 0.15 M adera 14.54 92.15% -0.19P etalum a $51.46 96.80% 0.11 P etalum a 12.43 78.80% -0.52A rcata $54.41 102.35% -0.08 D elano 11.75 74.48% -0.63M erced $55.05 103.55% -0.12 T housand O aks 11.69 74.11% -0.64B arstow $56.46 106.21% -0.21 B enicia 11.24 71.23% -0.71V acaville $63.80 120.02% -0.67 V acaville 9.52 60.34% -0.98D ow ney $72.31 136.02% -1.20 B arstow 9.50 60.23% -0.98T housand O aks $77.24 145.29% -1.51 T urlock 9.20 58.35% -1.03S im i V alley $82.29 154.79% -1.82 C lovis 7.01 44.42% -1.38O jai $84.00 158.00% -1.93 L om poc 5.70 36.10% -1.58

M ean $53.16 M ean 15.77S tandard D eviation $15.99 S tandard D eviation 6.37M edian $50.61 M edian 14.63

Other Small Fixed EfficienciesF ixed R oute S ystem s A ve/F are P ercent S tan D ev F ixed R oute S ystem s F are/H our P ercent S tan D ev1999-2000 1999-2000B enicia $1.18 206.30% 2.62 B enicia $13.29 162.79% 1.75V acaville $0.87 151.76% 1.28 S im i V alley $12.79 156.60% 1.57S im i V alley $0.84 146.57% 1.15 M erced $12.16 148.92% 1.36M erced $0.83 144.04% 1.09 S outh C ounty $11.30 138.35% 1.07T housand O aks $0.79 137.88% 0.93 A rcata $10.29 126.03% 0.72M adera $0.64 110.92% 0.27 B anning $10.12 123.90% 0.66T urlock $0.63 109.89% 0.24 M adera $9.25 113.24% 0.37P etalum a $0.58 100.92% 0.02 T housand O aks $9.24 113.21% 0.37B arstow $0.56 97.59% -0.06 E ureka $8.97 109.81% 0.27C lovis $0.55 95.32% -0.12 P orterville $8.79 107.66% 0.21S outh C ounty $0.53 92.30% -0.19 V acaville $8.28 101.45% 0.04L om poc $0.52 90.19% -0.24 T ulare $7.95 97.41% -0.07D elano $0.51 89.43% -0.26 P etalum a $7.19 88.10% -0.33B anning $0.46 80.65% -0.48 D elano $6.02 73.79% -0.73E ureka $0.45 78.20% -0.54 T urlock $5.80 71.04% -0.81A rcata $0.42 73.04% -0.67 O jai $5.40 66.17% -0.94T ulare $0.38 66.85% -0.82 B arstow $5.32 65.11% -0.97P orterville $0.32 55.90% -1.09 D ow ney $4.36 53.41% -1.30O jai $0.22 39.00% -1.51 C lovis $3.83 46.91% -1.48D ow ney $0.19 33.25% -1.65 L om poc $2.95 36.07% -1.78

M ean $0.57 M ean $8.16S tandard D eviation $0.23 S tandard D eviation $2.94M edian $0.54 M edian $8.54

Other Small Fixed Efficiencies(Please, Don’t throw darts at me!)

F ixed R oute S ystem s M iles/H our P ercent S tan D ev F ixed R oute S ystem s S ub/P ass P ercent S tan D ev1999-2000 1999-2000B enicia 30.57 196.15% 3.25 P orterville $0.58 15.95% 1.69T ulare 18.68 119.87% 0.67 M adera $0.93 25.74% 1.49B arstow 18.01 115.56% 0.53 S outh C ounty $1.52 42.15% 1.16P orterville 17.84 114.43% 0.49 B anning $1.64 45.51% 1.10B anning 16.30 104.59% 0.16 A rcata $1.80 49.72% 1.01S outh C ounty 16.28 104.47% 0.15 T ulare $1.97 54.54% 0.91T housand O aks 16.26 104.33% 0.15 E ureka $2.09 57.80% 0.85S im i V alley 15.67 100.51% 0.02 B enicia $2.66 73.61% 0.53M erced 14.43 92.57% -0.25 M erced $2.91 80.67% 0.39C lovis 14.22 91.23% -0.30 D ow ney $2.97 82.24% 0.36V acaville 13.85 88.83% -0.38 O jai $3.25 90.07% 0.20L om poc 13.79 88.44% -0.39 P etalum a $3.56 98.61% 0.03D ow ney 13.53 86.81% -0.45 D elano $3.78 104.65% -0.09T urlock 12.62 80.94% -0.64 S im i V alley $4.57 126.49% -0.53E ureka 12.19 78.17% -0.74 T urlock $4.86 134.46% -0.69M adera 11.88 76.22% -0.80 B arstow $5.38 149.05% -0.99A rcata 11.62 74.57% -0.86 C lovis $5.63 155.75% -1.12P etalum a 11.53 73.99% -0.88 T housand O aks $5.82 161.03% -1.23O jai 10.40 66.72% -1.13 V acaville $5.83 161.49% -1.24D elano 6.49 41.61% -1.98 L om poc $6.88 190.47% -1.82

M ean 15.59 M ean $3.61S tandard D eviation 4.61 S tandard D eviation $1.79M edian 14.03 M edian $3.11


✔ Contact me for comparative data regardingoperators in any of the six groups identifiedearlier.

✔ Do you have any other measure you wouldlike compared?

✔ If you desire the basic spreadsheet I’veused, contact me.

Do you want to know more?

stancog transit peer comparison€¦ · king ci ty 1,828 64.50% -0.42 king ci ty 21,274 67.32%...

Documents