ssc2011_russ adams ppt

68
Transportation Equity Alliance for Metropolitan Stability 612-332-4471 [email protected] www.metrostability.org

Upload: national-housing-conference-the-center-for-housing-policy

Post on 16-Apr-2017

904 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Transportation Equity

Alliance for Metropolitan Stability612-332-4471russ@metrostability.orgwww.metrostability.org

Page 2: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

• We are a coalition of advocacy organizations that work

together to advance racial, economic and environmental

justice in the way growth and development happens in

our region.

• We support grassroots organizing campaigns that

demonstrate how the people, places and issues of the

Twin Cities are interconnected – and interdependent.

Alliance for Metropolitan Stability

Page 3: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

HUD Sustainable Communities Grant: Community Engagement Team

Page 4: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Corridors of Opportunity

Bottineau

Transitway

Approx $900 M

South West LRT

Approx $1.2 BCedar Ave. BRTApprox $256 M

Hiawatha LRT

$715 M

Northstar Commuter Rail$317 M ( + additional stations)

Central Corridor LRTApprox $957 M

Gateway CorridorApprox $750 M

Page 5: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Communities will be grappling with how to optimize the benefits of transitway corridor development for the next 10 – 25+ years

Who Decides & Who Benefits from these publicly subsidized projects?

Page 6: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

COORDINATING COMMITTEEalso includes other partner organizations

Metropolitan Council (co-chair)The McKnight Foundation (co-chair)

Central Corridor Funders CollaborativeCity of Minneapolis

City of Saint PaulCommunity Engagement Team

Counties Transit Improvement BoardEvaluation Team (non-voting)

Family Housing FundHennepin County

SENIORSTAFF

Corridors of Opportunity Initiative

POLICY BOARD

Community Engagement Team:Alliance for Metropolitan Stability

Minnesota Center for Neighborhood OrganizingNexus Community Partners

Evaluation Team:CTS / CURA (U of M)

Met CouncilWilder Research

The Itasca ProjectLocal Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC)

Metro Consortium of Community DevelopersMinnesota Housing

Neighborhood Development CenterRamsey County

Regional Council of MayorsSaint Paul Foundation

Twin Cities Community Land BankUrban Land Institute -- Minnesota

Neighborhood-based and Community Organizations

Related Evaluation Efforts

Living CitiesCorridors of Opportunity Sustainable Communities

COLOR LEGEND

Policy / Partner Collaboration Team

Collaborating Partners

Housing / TOD

Small Business

Southwest LRT

Central Corridor

Living CitiesImplementation Teams

TEAM LEADS

Sustainable Communities Corridor Development

Projects

Bottineau

Cedar Avenue BRT

Central Corridor LRT

Gateway Corridor

Northstar Commuter Rail

Southwest LRT

PROJECT MANAGERS

Page 7: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Equitable Community Engagement:

Bring people and community groups in early for authentic participation in the transitway planning & decision making process to solve problems.

Page 8: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Community Engagement Team:www.engagetc.org

Page 9: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

CASE STUDIES: Twin Cities Transportation Equity

Page 10: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT
Page 11: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

KEY QUESTION:

How can Transitway planning, station area designs, and related development be done in a way that is INCLUSIVE OF & EQUITABLE TOWARDS everyone, including members of nearby Environmental Justice communities?

Page 12: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

CASE STUDY #1: CENTRAL CORRIDOR LRT

The Stops For Us Campaign

Page 13: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

University Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota

Page 14: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Coalition Partners included:• Alliance for Metropolitan

Stability• Aurora/St. Anthony

Community Development Corporation (ASANDC)

• Community Stabilization Project

• District Councils Collaborative of Saint Paul and Minneapolis

• Hmong Organizing Program, TakeActionMN

• ISAIAH• Jewish Community Action• Minnesota Center for

Environmental Advocacy• Transit for Livable

Communities• Housing Preservation

Project (HPP)• University United

Page 15: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

HISTORY MATTERS

Page 16: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Planners can start by asking the right questions

Page 17: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Maps Matter …

Page 18: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Title VI – Civil Rights Act

"No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance."

- Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Retrieved from http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/ej2.htm

Page 19: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Environmental Justice

"Each Federal agency shall make achieving environmental justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations.“ – Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in

Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 1994

“Safety and mobility are two of the U.S. Department of Transportation's (DOT's) top priorities. Achieving environmental

justice is another undeniable mission of the agency.”Retrieved from http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/ej2.htm

Page 20: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

What is Environmental Justice?There are 3 fundamental environmental justice principles:

1. To avoid, minimize, or mitigate disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental effects, including social and economic effects, on minority populations and low-income populations.

2. To ensure the full and fair participation by all potentially affected communities in the transportation decision-making process.

3. To prevent the denial of, reduction in, or significant delay in the receipt of benefits by minority and low-income populations.

[ from FHWA FTA Environmental Justice http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/ej2000.htm ]

Environmental Justice Communities Exist, and we must prevent “disproportionate impacts” to them, including social & economic effects.

Who Decides? Community Engagement process must include affected communities

Who Benefits? The managing agency must protect the rights of minority and low-income communities to equally benefit from the project.

Page 21: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

The Community Argued: There were distinct environmental justice populations within

the Central section that were not properly identified within the EIS

City of St. Paul, Ramsey County & other public officials and their Planning Staff worked with Community Groups to resolve this issue.

Page 22: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Find Allies in High Places.

FTA Administrator Peter Rogoff

Grassroots groups ranging from Asian shopkeepers to disabled residents clamored for the extra stops, and found a friend in Rogoff. He took it up as a matter of civil rights because of the low-income and minority communities who live along the line.

… while attending a transit conference last fall in Boston. He said he was cornered by a handful of Twin Cities advocates who spotted him while he was ordering coffee. "Those were the people who found in me in line in Starbucks," he said.

Minnesota Public Radio March 12, 2010

- Laura Yuen

Page 23: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

New Federal Performance Measures

FTA has revised the New Starts evaluation criteria, by balancing the Cost Effectiveness Index (CEI) with other social, economic and environmental factors:

• Cost Effectiveness Index - 20%• Land Use - 20%• Economic Development - 20%• Mobility - 20%• Environmental Benefits - 10%• Operating Efficiencies - 10%

Rogoff: the Central Corridor project became the poster child of why the [CEI] policy needed to be changed.

Page 24: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Central Corridor Final Map

Page 25: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Don’t Let Them Tell You It’s Impossible

Page 26: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Community Summit Vision

To be successful, the light rail line must not only improve mobility, but must also serve as a catalyst to strengthen and enhance existing and future neighborhoods, workforces and businesses along the line. - Saint Paul & Minneapolis Community Summit, March, 2009

Page 27: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

HIRE Minnesotawww.hiremn.org

HIRE Minnesota Video (Emmy-nominated production by MBTV)

http://blackmusicamerica.com/ummg/about_us.htm

CASE STUDY

#2:

Page 28: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

The purpose of the HIRE Minnesota campaign is to seek equitable investments in infrastructure development.

Page 29: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

In 2009, the Minnesota Department of Transportation only hired 3.4 percent women, &only hired 6.0 percent people of color in the Twin Cities metro area

compared to a goal of 6 percent women

compared to a goal of 11 percent people of color

Page 30: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Our allies also wanted MnDOT to allocate the maximum amount allowed by federal law to job training programs for women and people of color (one-half of 1 percent).    

Page 31: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

For 18 Straight Years, MnDOT had failed to meet its hiring goals.

Page 32: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Infrastructure: Improve reporting on workforce demographics, increase transparency in how contracts are awarded and contractors’ workforce goals are enforced, and accountability for firms that do not meet workforce goals.

Green Jobs: Maximize jobs that are accessible to and inclusive of low-income people and people of color, that improve our energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions, and that create long-term and family-sustaining career paths.

Page 33: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Minnesota’s alarmingly high unemployment rate

Page 34: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

 Top 25 largest

metropolitan areas (1=Best)

2006-2008

1 Tampa, FL 4.6%2 Atlanta, GA 6.4%

3 Washington, DC-VA-MD-WV 6.6%

4 San Bernardino, CA 7.1%5 San Diego, CA 7.6%6 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 8.2%7 Seattle, WA 8.3%8 Houston, TX 8.5%9 Phoenix, AZ 8.7%10 Denver, CO 9.0%11 Dallas, TX 9.1%12 Miami, FL 9.7%13 Baltimore, MD 10.1%14 Los Angeles, CA 10.3%15 Sacramento, CA 10.9%

 Top 25 largest

metropolitan areas (1=Best)

2006-2008

16 Portland, OR-WA 12.3%17 St. Louis, MO-IL 13.8%18 Pittsburgh, PA 14.0%19 New York, NY-NJ-PA 14.1%20 Boston, MA-NH 15.2%21 San Francisco, CA 15.6%

22 Philadelphia, PA-NJ-DE-MD 15.9%

23 Detroit, MI 16.8%24 Chicago, IL-IN-WI 16.9%

25 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI (13-county) 20.6%

Employment gap (White-U.S.-born Black)Source: Integrated Public Use Microdata Series from U.S. Census Bureau data.Minnesota Compass graphhttp://www.mncompass.org/economyworkforce/key-measures.php?km=Proportionadultsworking#7-3732-g

Page 35: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

We started making our case at the State Legislature …

Page 36: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

… we filled legislative hearing rooms …

Page 37: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

… marching to MnDOT Headquarters …

Page 38: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

… and demonstrated at MnDOT Contractor Work Sites.

Page 39: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

We caught the attention of local officials and candidates for high office.

Mark Dayton

Page 40: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Young People Became Involved, Top Local Music Talent Performed at Our Rallies – Advocacy Was Fun Again!

Page 41: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

So What Have We Accomplished?

Page 42: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

A 45% Increase in women and workers of color during the 2010 construction season

MnDOT Hiring Goals:

Page 43: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

• Only one of the top fourteen projects is meeting or exceeding the goals for both women and minorities.

• No other project is meeting the goal for women.

• Seven of the remaining projects are meeting the goals for people of color, meaning that six projects are below the goals for both groups.

MnDOT Hiring Goals 2011 Update:

Page 44: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

MnDOT committed to fully fund the federal highway job training program to identify, hire and train women and people of color for construction jobs - an investment of $6.2 million over 5 years.  

MnDOT Job Training Goals:

Page 45: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Met Council sets goal to hire 18 percent people of color and 6 percent women to help build out of the Central Corridor Light Rail Project

Met Council Hiring Goals:

Page 46: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

• Both main contractors on CCLRT construction are at or above 17% for minority participation, while the goal is 18%

• Both main contractors are above the 6% goal for women

• Both contractors submitted projections at the beginning of the project indicating they would be above goal at this point

• We cannot rely on the federal government because the hiring goals from a federal level are an incredulously low 2.9% (according to the Office of Federal Contract Compliance – OFCCP)

Met Council Hiring Goals 2011 Update:

That number has been the same for more than 30 years

Page 47: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

CASE STUDY #3: VAN WHITE STATION

SW LRT

This is about Access vs. Isolation

Page 48: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Harrison Neighborhood

2010 Census:• African American 40%• S.E. Asian 17%• European American 28%• Latino 9%

37% of Harrison’s population is under the age of 18 & of those, 63% live in poverty.

Retrieved from City of Minneapolis Neighborhood Profiles: http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/neighborhoods/harrison_population.asp#TopOfPage

Page 49: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Employment Rate:• Harrison overall 20.5%• African Americans 32%• City of Minneapolis 6.5% (1st Quarter, 2011)

Due to foreclosures, Harrison has lost 23% of the neighborhood while north Minneapolis in general has lost over 7000 persons.

Retrieved from City of Minneapolis Neighborhood Profiles: http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/neighborhoods/harrison_population.asp#TopOfPage

Harrison Neighborhood

Page 50: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

HISTORY MATTERS: 1935 Planning Map

Page 51: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT
Page 52: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Bassett Creek Valley Master PlanFor over 10 years, Harrison Neighborhood Association

and Northside residents have been planning for the redevelopment of Bassett Creek Valley to provide quality affordable housing, living wage jobs, avoid displacement, and build community assets that will directly benefit the current residents.

• Over 650 residents and otherstakeholders participated in theplanning process.

Page 54: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT
Page 55: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Bassett Creek Valley Master Plan

EXPECTED REDEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES:• 3,000+ housing units• 2.5 M sq ft commercial space (office and retail)• 5000 - 6000 jobs• 40 ac. new green space• After TIF repayment, future projected tax revenue of $82 - $128 M

Page 56: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT
Page 57: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

The Interchange is proposed to be the terminus station for these commuter rail lines:

Midwest High Speed Rail Assoc.

Image Concept by HDR prepared for Hennepin County Intermodal Facility Report, Minneapolis, MN January 2009

Page 58: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Bassett Creek Valley Master Plan

Can we fully develop Linden Yards East if there are 14 - 18 Commuter trains parked there, storing between 80 - 100 rail cars per work day on this site?

Page 59: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Bassett Creek Valley Master Plan

• 2800 Jobs [cut by 1/3rd]

• 500 New Mixed-Income

Housing Units; & 1000

new residents [all cut]

• Millions of dollars in

new tax base [cut ?]

Humphrey Institute, Opportunity Cost Study, December, 2009

Page 60: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Bassett Creek Valley Master Plan

What are the Environmental Impacts of having a diesel locomotive storage and maintenance yard on the neighborhood? How would air quality be impacted?

Page 61: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT
Page 62: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT
Page 63: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

HOW DOES ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IMPROVE TRANSPORTATION DECISION MAKING?

• Make better transportation decisions that meet the needs of all people. • Design transportation facilities that fit more harmoniously into communities. • Enhance the public-involvement process, strengthen community-based partnerships, and provide minority and low-income populations with opportunities to learn about and improve the quality and usefulness of transportation in their lives. • Improve data collection, monitoring, and analysis tools that assess the needs of, and analyze the potential impacts on minority and low-income

populations.• Partner with other public and private programs to leverage transportation-agency resources to achieve a common vision for communities. • Avoid disproportionately high and adverse impacts on minority and low-income populations. • Minimize and/ or mitigate unavoidable impacts by identifying concerns early in the planning phase and providing offsetting initiatives and enhancement measures to benefit affected communities and neighborhoods.

Environmental justice is more than a set of legal and regulatory obligations. Properly implemented, environmental justice principles and procedures improve all levels of transportation decision making.

This approach will:

Page 64: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Allied Partners and Advocacy Organizations

Page 65: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Regional Transitways participant groups

• 1000 Friends of Minnesota• African Development Center • Alliance for Metropolitan Stability• Council on Black Minnesotans• CURA Community Growth Options• District Councils Collaborative of Saint

Paul & Minneapolis• Family & Children’s Service• Fresh Energy• Growth & Justice• Harrison Neighborhood Association• Housing Preservation Project• ISAIAH

• Metropolitan Consortium of Community Developers

• MICAH• Midtown Community Works

Partnership• Midtown Greenway Coalition• Minneapolis Urban League• MN Center for Environmental

Advocacy• Native American Community

Development Institute• Smart Growth America• Somali Action Alliance• Twin Cities Local Initiative Support

Corporation• Transit for Livable Communities

Co-convened by AMS & the Housing Preservation Project

Page 66: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT

Regional Transitways table: Equity Statement

“To ensure fair and equitable access to transit, jobs, and affordable housing for low-income communities and communities of color by

promoting an inclusive public input process and influencing future corridor alignment,

stops locations, land use plans, and development opportunities along regional

transitways.”

Page 67: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT
Page 68: SSC2011_Russ Adams PPT