ssc report to cfmc

23
SSC Report to CFMC 148 th CFMC Meeting held December 11-12, 2013 SSC Meeting held November 12-14, 2013

Upload: dennis

Post on 23-Feb-2016

59 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

SSC Report to CFMC. 148 th CFMC Meeting held December 11-12, 2013 SSC Meeting held November 12-14, 2013. Data Review. Assessment of ACL Overages PR - Snapper Unit 2 Conch Wrasses STT- Angelfish, Squirrelfish, Wrasses STX -Conch Angelfish, Squirrelfish, Wrasses. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SSC Report to CFMC

SSC Report to CFMC

148th CFMC Meeting held December 11-12, 2013

SSC Meeting held November 12-14, 2013

Page 2: SSC Report to CFMC

Data Review

Assessment of ACL Overages

PR - Snapper Unit 2ConchWrasses

STT- Angelfish, Squirrelfish, Wrasses

STX - ConchAngelfish, Squirrelfish, Wrasses

Page 3: SSC Report to CFMC

Combined state and federal commercial average annual landings for Caribbean species or species groups that exceeded their ACLs. The years used for averaging annual landings depend on when amendments defined the ACLs for the specific species or species group. The amount of landings that exceeded each ACL is provided. PR = Puerto Rico, STT/STJ = St. Thomas/St. John, and STX =

St. Croix.

Species or Species GroupAverage Annual Landings (lbs) Years Used Annual Catch

Limit Overage (lbs)

2010 ACL Species or Species Group

PR Snapper Unit 2* 301,866 2010-2011 145,916 155,950

PR Queen Conch* 254,609 2010-2011 0 254,609

STX Queen Conch 57,299 2010-2012 50,000 7,299

STT/STJ Queen Conch 1,366 2010-2012 0 1,366

2011 ACL Species or Species Group

STX Angelfish 11,382 2011-2012 305 11,077

STX Squirrelfish 3,301 2011-2012 121 3,180

STX Wrasse 37 2011-2012 7 30

STT/STJ Angelfish 17,192 2011-2012 7,897 9,295

STT/STJ Squirrelfish 8,158 2011-2012 4,241 3,917

STT/STJ Wrasse 1,891 2011-2012 585 1,306

Page 4: SSC Report to CFMC
Page 5: SSC Report to CFMC

Conch & Non-Target Fishes

Conch ACLs were exceeded, but catch comes from territorial waters.

ACLs for non-target fishes in the USVI were exceeded because the species had not been on the catch report forms when ACLs were determined. Thus, all the ACL overages for the USVI were a reporting artifact.

Page 6: SSC Report to CFMC

Snapper Unit 2 – Puerto Rico

• Overage• Catch is variable but shows increasing trend

• Reasons• Maybe potential data problems

• Recommendations

Page 7: SSC Report to CFMC

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 7

Page 8: SSC Report to CFMC

8

Recommendation

According to the November 1, 2013 Update Report of ACL Landings for Caribbean Reef Fishes by NOAA Fisheries Service (SERO-LAPP-2013-01), only the commercial landings for Puerto Rico snapper unit 2 and STX queen conch had the landings exceed their ACLs, and these results were not due to changes in data reporting

Page 9: SSC Report to CFMC

9

RecommendationHowever, in our SSC meeting discussion in November 12, 2013, the SSC determined that it is necessary to carefully examine (via PRDNER) the origin of the snapper unit 2 overage. Discussion among SSC meeting attendees included a number of hypotheses as to why the SU2 ACL was exceeded. These explanations were focused on a limited number of individuals who have allegedly entered the fishery on a one year commercial ‘test’/new license and have been reporting landings that are an order of magnitude greater than what has been reported previously. The SSC noted that reliability of reported landings data is a broader issue and not limited to Snapper Unit 2, and that ultimately the determination of the validity of data falls on the shoulders of DNER.

Page 10: SSC Report to CFMC

Economic Model for Recommending Dates for ACL Closures

Dr. Kate Quigley

• Currently, closures for species units exceeding their ACL occur at the end of the calendar year

• This is start of peak tourist season when demand is high• New model to provide information to the Ad Hoc

Committee (combined SSC and Advisory Panel) on recommended dates for fisheries closures when ACLs are exceeded.

Page 11: SSC Report to CFMC

SSC approved of effort and made suggestions:

• Enhance visualization of results – graphs of closures by week or month

• Address trade off of Days vs Profit• Examine multispecies effects for more than

one closure• Look also at biological significant periods

(spawning times, CPUE,) when available

Page 12: SSC Report to CFMC

Review of Studies by STFA

• Red hind• Lobster

Page 13: SSC Report to CFMC

Red Hind ACL Adjustment

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140

5

10

15

20

25

30Red Hind/ 100 M2

# Transects

#/100 M2)

Max

Red

Hin

d/10

0 M

2

5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.0040,000

45,000

50,000

55,000

60,000

65,000

70,000

75,000

80,000

f(x) = 792.510903395033 x + 46485.5497383909R² = 0.460125608111071

Hinds/100 sq. m.

Grou

per L

andi

ngs (

lbs)

Red Hind abundance on the Red Hind Bank MCD from Nemeth (2005) and pers. comm. Blue circles represent number of transects.

Correlation between Hind Bank census results and annual St. Thomas grouper landings

D.A. Olsen, R. Nemeth, J. Nowlis. 2013. Managing St. Thomas Grouper Resources.

Page 14: SSC Report to CFMC

Possible use of monitoring data to annually varying ACLs

20002001

20022003

20042005

20062007

20082009

20102011

2012

40,000

45,000

50,000

55,000

60,000

65,000

70,000

75,000

Impact of Survey Based St. Thomas Grouper OFL/ACL

Survey Based OFL Survey Based ACL

Reported Grouper Landings Current OFL

Current ACL

Gro

uper

Land

ings

(lbs

)

D.A. Olsen, R. Nemeth, J. Nowlis. 2013. Managing St. Thomas Grouper Resources.

Page 15: SSC Report to CFMC

RECCOMENDATION

David Olsen and Josh Nowlis, representing the STFA, gave a presentation to the SSC regarding a proposal for management revision. Specifically, the proposal calls for more ‘real time’ management of the red hind fishery in St. Thomas; in particular an annual setting of OFL/ACL which is allowed to vary by year based on an index of red hind population as determined by the annual survey of the red hind spawning aggregation at the Hind Bank MCD in January/February. The SSC recommends that the concept presented be further evaluated during the upcoming SEDAR 35 red hind, and Dr. Nowlis is encouraged to attend.

Page 16: SSC Report to CFMC

A Collaborative Assessmentof the Virgin Islands Spiny Lobster Fishery

Olsen et al. 2013

• Noted that assessment was preliminary• New data were presented

– Tagging– Actual trap hauls – Size frequency data (STX)

• Noted lobster is scheduled for up coming SEDAR– New data should be incorporated (with QA/QC)– Further assessment of model

• Sensitivity analysis• Expanded analysis of tagging data• More rigorous presentation of data and assumptions

• Potentially informative

Page 17: SSC Report to CFMC

SSC Peer Review Process

• There is a need to establish guidelines for the preparation and review of “Third Party Assessments”

• SAFMC established guidelines as model• SSC did not reach consensus• Differences revolve around degree of “assessment”

relative to ACLs and need for management advice• Recognize need for flexibility in data poor situations• Request that SEFSC provide guidance

Page 18: SSC Report to CFMC

Species without ACLs

• Species reported on catch reports/trip tickets, which do not have an ACL– PR: 20-40% of Commercial; 80% Recreational– USVI: 15-20% of Commercial– Review of the catch data available by the SEFSC

Tunas, Billfishes, SharksMackerels, Dolphinfish, Wahoo, Snook, Octopus, Barracuda, JacksBaitfishes

Page 19: SSC Report to CFMC

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 19

Puerto Rico

Page 20: SSC Report to CFMC

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 20

St. Croix

Page 21: SSC Report to CFMC

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 21

STT/STJ

Page 22: SSC Report to CFMC

SSC - Provide Criteria for adding and eliminating species

• Potential Criteria– Landings Cultural Importance– Data Availability Ecological Importance– Past Importance Economic Importance– Distribution (EEZ, Terr.) Alt. Management Forums

• To be addressed in next SSC meeting– SSC requests that SEFSC be asked for guidance

Page 23: SSC Report to CFMC

Recognition

The SSC expresses its appreciation to out-going Chair, Dr. Barbara Kojis, for her many years of dedicated service to the SSC, the CFMC, and marine resource management in the USVI and US Caribbean and wishes her the best in all future endeavors.