speed reading,crt think mapping
DESCRIPTION
mappingTRANSCRIPT
SPEED READING
CRITICAL THINKING
CONCEPT of MAPPING
BELAJAR
Belajar / Proses belajarBelajar / Proses belajar
Belajar Sepanjang HidupBelajar Sepanjang Hidup
( Lifelong learning Adult learning Active Learning )( Lifelong learning Adult learning Active Learning )
BelajarBelajar KeputusanKeputusanMembacaMembaca
( Mengetahui Memahami )( Mengetahui Memahami )
Reading
Lec
ture
s in
mo
du
le
Days Months Years
Imagine ………
How ???
Reading / Membaca
Teks
- Observasi ( teliti )
- Interpretasi data
Isu Teks / opini
Berpikir
Kreatif Kritis
Tantangan
Analisa
Keputusan
Slow reading ?-Individual variables : Kecerdasan, motivasi faktor fisiologik dan psikologik
-Kurangnya vocabulary dan tingkat pemahaman -Kurangnya konsentrasi
?
Comprehension
TimeSpeed Reading
SPEED READING
Tujuan :
-Meningkatkan kecepatan kemampuan membaca
-Meningkatkan konsentrasi dan memori
-Mempersingkat waktu untuk membaca
-Mengatur waktu
?Membaca efektif
Membaca Membutuhkan tahapan / pola pikir
kebiasaan pikiran
Critical Reading Critical Thinking
Critical Reading
Teknik untuk mengetahui informasi dan ide dalam teks
Critical Thinking
Teknik untuk evaluasi informasi dan ide untuk
menentukan apa yang dapat diterima dan dipercaya
( Membaca kritis )
( Berpikir kritis )
In pratice critical reading and critical thinking are in harmony
( Membaca kritis )
Sistem membaca :
-Tentukan tujuan membaca dari materi yang dibutuhkan
-Baca Introduction dan summary
-Gunakan teknik Skimming dan Scanning
-Gunakan Teknik Mapping untuk Summarize
-Terapkan sistem “ read check read “
-Kurangi reading fatigue dan tingkatkan konsentrasi
-Tanggulangi hambatan
-Gunakan hasil membaca dengan cara berlatih (practice)
Critical Reading
Langkah membaca kritis
• Teks: amati, baca sekilas sebelum baca
seluruh
• Isi dan konteks : hubungkan
• Buat pertanyaan tentang kandungan teks
• Refleksikan kandungan teks yang
berhubungan dengan pendapat saudara
• Buat rangkaian kandungan teks dengan kata-
kata saudara sendiri
When U have 2 know what When U have 2 know what U r U r
reading aboutreading about............
Learn speed reading, Learn speed reading, comprehend,comprehend,
use Ur memory betteruse Ur memory better............
Critical Thinking
• Berpikir berdasar alasan ketrampilan :
- membedakan antara relevan & tidak
Definition of Critical Thinking
Critical thinking means correct thinking in
the pursuit of relevant and reliable
knowledge about the world. Another way to
describe it is reasonable, reflective,
responsible, and skillful thinking that is
focused on deciding what to believe or do.
Critical Thinking( Berpikir kritis )
Terdiri dari kombinasi beberapa kemampuan
Rationality - Berdasar alasan dari emosi- Membutuhkan fakta
Self-awareness - Mempertimbangkan alasan berdasar pengaruh bias, prasangkaHonesty
- Dorongan emosi, egois, tujuan jahat Discipline
- Tepat, teliti, menyeluruh dan lengkapJudgment
- Mempertimbangkan relevansi antara asumsi dan kenyataan Open-mindedness
- Evaluasi dan mempertimbangkan semua pendapat yang layak- Tetap terbuka untuk menerima interpretasi alternatif- Menerima penjelasan, Model, Paradigma baru karena disertai pembuktian
Apakah Saya Berpikir Kritis
?1. Apakah saya menguatkan pendapat saya dengan bukti ?2. Apakah saya berusaha memahami ?3. Apakah saya mendengar dengan pikiran terbuka ?4. Apakah saya berani berbicara ?5. Apakah saya bersikap sopan santun ?6. Apakah saya minta klarifikasi dan elaborasi ?7. Apakah saya menerima informasi secara membabi buta ?8. Apakah saya terikat pada satu pendapat ?9. Apakah saya mengembangkan informasi yang diberikan /
disampaikan ?
A person who thinks critically can ask
appropriate questions, gather relevant
information, efficiently and creatively sort
through this information, reason logically
from this information, and come to reliable
and trustworthy conclusions about the world
that enable one to live and act successfully in
it.
Critical thinking is not being able to
process information well enough to know
to stop for red lights or whether you
received the correct change at the
supermarket. Such low-order thinking,
critical and useful though it may be, is
sufficient only for personal survival; most
individuals master this.
True critical thinking is higher-order
thinking, enabling a person to, for example,
responsibly judge between political
candidates, serve on a murder trial jury,
evaluate society's need for nuclear power
plants, and assess the consequences of
global warming.
Critical thinking enables an individual
to be a responsible citizen who
contributes to society, and not be
merely a consumer of society's
distractions.
Critical thinking can be described as the
scientific method applied by ordinary people
to the ordinary world.
This is true because critical thinking mimics
the well-known method of scientific
investigation:
a question is identified, an hypothesis
formulated, relevant data sought and
gathered, the hypothesis is logically tested
and evaluated, and reliable conclusions are
drawn from the result.
Critical thinking is the ability to think
for one's self and reliably and
responsibly make those decisions that
affect one's life.
Critical thinking is also critical inquiry,
so such critical thinkers investigate
problems, ask questions, pose new answers
that challenge the status quo, discover new
information that can be used for good or ill,
question authorities and traditional beliefs,
challenge received dogmas and doctrines,
and often end up possessing power in
society greater than their numbers.
Critical thinking is scientific thinking.
All of the skills of scientific investigation are
matched by critical thinking, which is
therefore nothing more than scientific
method used in everyday life rather than in
specifically scientific disciplines or
endeavors.
Raymond S. Nickerson (1987), an authority on critical thinking,
characterizes a good critical thinker in
terms of knowledge, abilities, attitudes,
and habitual ways of behaving.
The characteristics of such a thinker:
Uses evidence skillfully and impartially Organizes thoughts and articulates them concisely and coherently Distinguishers between logically valid and invalid
inferences Suspends judgment in the absence of sufficient
evidence to support a decision Understands the difference between reasoning
and rationalizing Attempts to anticipate the probable consequences of alternative actions
Understands the idea of degrees of belief Sees similarities and analogies that are not superficially apparent Can learn independently and has an abiding interest in doing so Applies problem-solving techniques in domains
other than those in which learned Can structure informally represented problems in
such a way that formal techniques, such as mathematics, can be used to solve them
Can strip a verbal argument of irrelevancies and phrase it in its essential terms
Habitually questions one's own views and attempts to understand both the assumptions that are critical to those views and the implications of the views Is sensitive to the difference between the validity of a belief and the intensity with which it is held Is aware of the fact that one's understanding is always limited, often much more so than would be apparent to one with a noninquiring attitude Recognizes the fallibility of one's own opinions, the probability of bias in those opinions, and the danger of weighting evidence according to personal preferences
Concept Concept MappingMapping
Thalca Hamid Agusni, drg., Thalca Hamid Agusni, drg., Sp.Ort., MHPEd., PhDSp.Ort., MHPEd., PhD
What is it?What is it?
a graphical way of organizing a graphical way of organizing your thoughts and showing how your thoughts and showing how
concepts are related or concepts are related or differentiated (looking at differentiated (looking at
completed concept maps might completed concept maps might be the best way to understand be the best way to understand
what they are)what they are)
A diagrammed series of "nodes“A diagrammed series of "nodes“,,
consisting of linked topics (core consisting of linked topics (core
concepts) and subtopics (which include concepts) and subtopics (which include
examples and evidence for the topics) examples and evidence for the topics)
Connections are labelled by Connections are labelled by
cause/effect, relationships and inter-cause/effect, relationships and inter-
relationships, differences, or hierarchiesrelationships, differences, or hierarchies..
Reading / Membaca
Teks
- Observasi ( teliti )
- Interpretasi data
Isu Teks / opini
Berpikir
Kreatif Kritis
Tantangan
Analisa
Keputusan
Why use it?Why use it?
Mapping is an active learning strategy Mapping is an active learning strategy that moves you beyond rote that moves you beyond rote
memorization to critical thinkingmemorization to critical thinking
Mapping helps you to learn about how Mapping helps you to learn about how you learn you learn
It provides an explicit, encapsulated It provides an explicit, encapsulated representation of important ideas on one representation of important ideas on one
page which is great for reviewpage which is great for review
Mapping promotes a richer construction of Mapping promotes a richer construction of
knowledge because you must organize, knowledge because you must organize,
select, relate and interpret data select, relate and interpret data
Mapping requires that you break down Mapping requires that you break down
component parts to see how things are put component parts to see how things are put
togethertogether
it helps you to see gaps in knowledge and it helps you to see gaps in knowledge and
areas of oversimplification, contradiction or areas of oversimplification, contradiction or
misinterpretationmisinterpretation
What can it be used for?What can it be used for? reviewing for exams reviewing for exams conceptualizing processes,conceptualizing processes, systems systems and relationships and relationships brainstorming, organizing concepts and brainstorming, organizing concepts and principles principles identifying mistakes and areas of identifying mistakes and areas of confusion confusion assessing prior knowledge, generating assessing prior knowledge, generating questions and answers from aquestions and answers from a r reading or eading or writing assignment and organizing writing assignment and organizing
argumentsarguments
Who can use it?Who can use it?
Anyone! Anyone!
Concept mapping is an effective Concept mapping is an effective
learning tool across disciplines learning tool across disciplines and and
year levels year levels
Concept maps can be done Concept maps can be done
independently or collaborativelyindependently or collaboratively
How is it done?How is it done?
1.1. Identify the main topic or core concept Identify the main topic or core concept
2.2. Brainstorm for everything known about the Brainstorm for everything known about the
topic topic
3.3. Organize the information according to Organize the information according to
major points major points
4.4. Place information on a map - working from Place information on a map - working from
the core concept, to major points, to the core concept, to major points, to
significant details significant details
5.5. Review relevant course materials and discipline-Review relevant course materials and discipline-
specific vocabulary to make sure that you have specific vocabulary to make sure that you have
everything, and everything, and then label connecting strands then label connecting strands
with words or phrases that indicate the nature with words or phrases that indicate the nature
of the relationshipsof the relationships
6.6. Use branches, arrows, and other symbols like Use branches, arrows, and other symbols like
stop signsstop signs or yield signs to indicate the nature or yield signs to indicate the nature
of the relationships between ideas of the relationships between ideas
7.7. Use different colours, fonts or lines to group and Use different colours, fonts or lines to group and
distinguish concepts distinguish concepts
8.8. Include detailed explanations, definitions, rules, Include detailed explanations, definitions, rules,
formulae or equationsformulae or equations
9.9. Analyze the resulting map by asking the Analyze the resulting map by asking the following questions: following questions:
. Is the core concept accurately defined and positioned? . How do the ideas fit together? . Have I considered all of the related information gathered from lectures, texts, labs? . Have I noted all relevant relationships, exceptions,
and conditions? . Does the map have adequate validity, logic, complexity and detail? . What is the muddiest point and what can be done to
clarify it?
10.10. Revise the map as your understanding of the Revise the map as your understanding of the material improves. material improves.
Things to watch for...Things to watch for...
Using other students' maps as study tools will not be as
beneficial or productive as creating your own.
The value of concept mapping is found in the process more
than in the product.
You will need time and practice to develop your concept
mapping skills.
Start small - for example, try to create a concept map from a
single lecture or chapter.
Your early attempts will likely be simple and chaotic.
Don't let yourself get frustrated by this!
Your initial, rudimentary maps are crucial in the development
of more sophisticated maps.