solubility of k 2 so 4 in co 2 loaded mea/pz solution jan 10th, 2008 qing xu rochelle group...
TRANSCRIPT
Solubility of K2SO4 in CO2 Loaded MEA/PZ Solution
Jan 10th, 2008Qing Xu
Rochelle groupDepartment of Chemical Engineering
University of Texas at Austin
Outline Reclaiming process
Why reclaimingReclaiming processes
Experiment Conductivity for K2SO4 solutionRanges of the experimentsApparent Ksp dependence on T, amine and I
Regression Analysis – Electrolyte-NRTL (in Aspen Plus 2006.5) Interaction parameters regressionFlash simulation test for regression results
Conclusion Future work
Why reclaiming? What to reclaim:
SO2, HCl, NOx SO4-2, Cl-, NO3
-…
Organic acids, amine polymers Why reclaiming?
To remove heat stable salts and degradation products, which may cause corrosion, foaming, and will affect the capacity of amine solution.
Chemical reactions:
MEACOOMEAHCO2MEA
)(SO)(MEAHOH
O2
1SO2MEA
2
242
222
Reclaiming Processes:
Thermal reclaiming with addition of NaOH Na2SO4(s)
MEA degradation products Sodium formate
Electrodialysis Ion exchange Sulfate precipitation
Fertilizer
MEASOK)SO(MEAHKOH 4224
ABSORBER
STRIPPER
SCRUBBER
FLUEGAS
CACO3
CASO3
PUREGAS
RICH-L
RICH-H
CO2
LEAN-H
LEAN-L
CO2 Capture ProcessHigh T
Low T
CaSO4
CaCO3
FLASH2
HEATER
CRYSTALLIZER FILTER
COMPR
Precipitation Reclaiming for Hot Lean Solvent
3×
Hot Lean
Cool Lean
CO2
H2O
K2SO4(s)KOH
Solubility of K2SO4 in CO2 Loaded Amine can Determine:
Solvent flow rate for reclaiming.
Operating condition to avoid scaling.
Energy and equipment cost.
Apparatus and Method - 1
Stirrer
K2SO4
Conductivity meter
Water Bath
Apparatus and Method - 2
BottleTop
Water Bath
ConductivityMeter
Water Bath
y = 99.4
y = 36.584x + 81.254
95
95.5
96
96.5
97
97.5
98
98.5
99
99.5
100
0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60
[K2SO4](m)
co
nd
(mS
/cm
)
11m MEA, [CO2]t=0.4 mol/mol MEA, 80oC
Conductivity~[K2SO4]
Start with K2SO4 slurry
End, clear solution
Ranges of the Experiments
T: 25 , 40 , 80 ℃ ℃ ℃ Amine: 7m MEA, 11m MEA, 4m PZ, 7m MEA/2m
PZ, 8m PZ, 10m PZ, etc. CO2 loading:
Loading
Extra K+: 0, 0.35m Extra SO4
=: 0, 0.15m
0.5 0.4, 0.2, 0.1, 0.05, 0,α PZ of moles*2MEA) of (moles
loaded CO of molesα 2
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4I0.17
Ksp
3.75-T
1966.4ine]0.36[eq.amI9.15lnKsp 0.17
)m],SO([)m],K([Ksp 24
2
n
1i
2iizc
2
1I
Ksp dependence on T, amine concentration, and ionic strength
7m
11m
80C40C
Regression Analysis - Ksp
Ksp of K2SO4: Property method: elecNRTL in Aspen Plus 2006.5 Based on solubility data of K2SO4 in water by Söh
nel, 1985, regress A, B, and C in Ksp(T):
Parameter Value (SI units) σ
A 235.0 2.5
B -13227 118
C -36.2 0.4
ln(T)*CB/TA(T) Kspln
)γ(SO)x(SO)(Kγ)(KxKsp 24
24
22
Originally by Chen et al., for aqueous electrolyte systems. Later extended to mixed solvent electrolyte systems (Mock et al., 1984, 1986).
A versatile model for the calculation of activity coefficients.
Adjustable ENRTL interaction parameters: Molecule-molecule Molecule-electrolyte Electrolyte-electrolyte Each interaction consists of both the nonrandomness
factor and energy parameters .
Regression Analysis – Electrolyte NRTL Model
Regression Analysis – Interaction parameters
Framework Data Regression System in Aspen Plus Electrolyte-NRTL model
Chemistry: Ksp(T) from previous regression.
]T
Tln
T
TT[E
T
DC
ref
ref
B,caB,ca
B,caB,ca
298.15KT
a andc pair eelectrolyt—ca
molecule solvent—B
ref
]T
Tln
T
TT[E
T
DC
ref
ref
ca B,ca B,
ca B,ca,B
} T
DC
Existing parameters Electrolyte-NRTL default values in Aspen Plus Hilliard, 2005 (10 C, D & E for MEA-H2O-CO2 system and parameters f
or pure/binary components)
Objective Parameters (C) and (D) related to K+ and SO4
=
Solubility data used Water data by Söhnel, 1985; MEA data by Xu, 2006~2007.
Method Select parameters with small correlation coefficients. Small residual root mean square error. Small AARD (average absolute relative deviations) in flash simulation t
est
Regression Analysis – Interaction parameters
Regression Analysis - Results
Component i Component j C DH2O (K+,MEACOO-) x x
(K+,MEACOO-) MEA x x(MEA+,SO4
-2) H2O x x(MEA+, SO4
-2) MEA xMEA (MEA+,SO4
-2) x(K+, SO4
-2) MEA x x(K+, HCO3
-) MEA x x
A series of flash simulation Using the regressed interaction parameter set Simulate under each experimental condition Get activity coefficient and mole fraction for each
case, calculate Ksp and the error from Ksp(T).
AARD: 45.6%
Regression Analysis – Test
)T(Ksp
)SO()K(
)T(Ksp
)SO()SO(x)K()K(x
SALT)-K Ksp(from
t)coefficienactivity andfraction Ksp(from
)T(Ksp
)meas(Ksp
-24
224
24
22
)SO()x(SO)K()K(xKsp 24
24
22
Dependence of Ksp(meas)/Ksp(T) on [CO2]
0.1
1
10
0 2 4 6
[CO2](m)
Ksp
(me
as)
/Ksp
(T)
Dependence of Ksp(meas)/Ksp(T) on [MEA]
0.1
1
10
0 5 10[MEA](m)
Ks
p(m
ea
s)/
Ks
p(T
)
Dependence of Ksp(meas)/Ksp(T) on T
0.1
1
10
20 40 60 80
Temperature(C)
Ksp
(me
as)
/Ksp
(T)
Conclusions Ksp dependence on T, equivalent amine concentr
ation, and ionic strength:
A parameter set in Electrolyte-NRTL model for the CO2-MEA-H2O-K+-SO4
= system was developed. Still need modification.
Ksp(meas)/Ksp(T) is dependent on MEA concentration and CO2 loading, independent on temperature.
3.75-1966.4
]eq.amine[63.09.15ln 17.0
TIKsp
Future work Modify the regression; get more accurate
C/D/E parameter set for the . Conduct experiments of K2SO4 crystallization
Slurry characteristics: settling rates, filterability, drying rates and final moisture contents.
Crystal characteristics: composition, form, habit, shape factors, and solid density.
Crystallization kinetics: crystal nucleation, growth.
Modify Aspen reclaiming process model with regressed parameters, optimize conditions, add crystallization data into the model.