social interaction social groups. types of interaction category – shared social characteristics...
TRANSCRIPT
SOCIAL INTERACTION
Social Groups
Types of Interaction
Category – shared social characteristics
Aggregates – shared spaceBoth can become social groups Social Groups
Identification – belongingness Awareness Shared expectations
Types of Groups
Primary Secondary Small Larger Intimate, intense Impersonal, distant Informal, direct Formal, indirect relationship Goal orientation
orientation Holistic Compartmentalized,
specific,ltd Enduring Temporary, short durationIrreplaceable replaceableProcess Product
Divisions
Ingroups Outgroups We They Loyalty/identity Competition
PowerUnityEthnocentrismSocial Distance - Bogardus
Research - SherifsCompetition & limited social
interaction Intolerance; lack of acceptance &
understanding; distain; emphasis of differences
Cooperation & opportunity for social interaction Tolerance; acceptance; understanding;
emphasis on commonalities Thus degree of tolerance and
understanding can be changed or manipulated
Building Blocks
Dyad -2 Triad -3Mortality ImmortalityConsensus Conflict/tension/dynamicIntense CoalitionsFragile/unstable Stable
Factors that impact groups
Size
Intimacy Organization
Axiom of Social Groups
The more members of a social group interact within the group, the more they are influenced norms & values, the more similar they become –
GROUP = AN ENTITY – functions as a whole – not just individual members
Transcends the individuals
Reference Groups
EvaluationDecision makingMay or may not be ingroup
Blau – Social Diversity
“hooking” and “herding” Large groups turn in- herdingDiverse, heterogeneous groups turn
out- hooking Social parity/equality increases
contact, relationshipsPhysical proximity/boundaries ---
social connections or separation
Networks
Indirect and weak connections---butSignificant resourceDensity & extensiveness variesSocial capital – SES, gender, race,
ethnicity, religion, associations may create the network
Group Leadership: Key Roles
Instrumental Expressive product process
outward inward action/structure emotional
organization connections “prods/engages” “glues” respected liked, affection admired remembered
Leadership Styles
Authoritarian - instrumental
Laissez Faire - expressive
Democratic – both possible
Simmel – Group Dynamics
Leadership atmosphere/style I E roles/coordination(status)
Communication cohesion control commitment
satisfaction/productivity creativity history/formation
IPA Blau factors Evolution
Moreno - Sociogram
Group Conformity
Asch - conformity
Milgram – compliance & obedience
Janis – Group Think & Risky Shift
Asch
Milgram
Janis
Society as Group
Key question – what connects and glues a society?
Durkheim Mechanical Solidarity Organic
Solidarity Likeness, homogeneity differences,
interdependence
Durkheim’s Dilemma – increase individual freedom but increased anomie and separateness
Tonnies Gemeinschaft Gesellschaft
primary group ties secondary group ties
Formal Organizations
Secondary groups Organized – goal directed Main function = EFFICIENCY
Not necessarily best or most effective
Types -Etzioni
Normative PTA, Scouts
Utilitarian USD 512 for me
Coercive Prison
Weber
Rationality – spontaneous and traditional replaced by “systems” market place ----mall Exchange ----barter --- money & price tags Tutor/scholar ----high school Anomie ------ Alienation
Weber: Ideal type –Bureaucracy - characteristics
Specialization Hierarchy Formal rules and regulationsImpersonality Formal, written communications Technical competence/qualification
Dysfunctions - dehumanizes
Bureaucratic inefficiency – the unique
Peters Principle; Peters CorollaryParkinson’s LawBureaucratic ritualism – red tape; ltd
creativityBureaucratic personality Bureaucratic inertia ---- Bloat Bureaucratic alienation Status conflicts Oligarchy
Informal System
Humanizes Personalizes Bends and shapesMakes flexible; more creative; more
responsive
Examples
“holes in the system”Personalized space Primary groups Influence leadersGroup norms Grapevine (emails, gossip)
Other factors
Organizational environment – factors that impact nature of Bureaucracy
context
Kanter
Hidden corporate cultures – self fulfilling prophecies – encourage those like me – “patterns of privilege”
Humanizing Bureaucracy Issues of gender and race - diversity Opening up – decrease in/out groups Frequent promotions
Tannen and Helgesenmale/female management stylesMaleImage focus –
impact of ? on rep.Hold more info –
powerMore hierarchy of
decision-making – more supervision or direction
Focus on own division- competitive
FemaleInformation focus –
ask ? To understand
Share info more Value communication
More flexible – more autonomy
Interconnectedness of all aspects of the organization –cooperative
21c – female adv.?
Japan: Ouchi – Theory Z
Bureaucracy shaped by values/normsJapan
Group hiring and promotion Lifetime employment Holistic involvement Broad, non-specialized training Collective decision-making
Work and Work Style
Creative autonomy Self managed teams Flattened organization Less rigid, more flexible