smart eda...mackay isaac whitsunday regional office level 4, 44 nelson street po box 710 mackay qld...

62
294 MIA MIA CONNECTION RD, MIA MIA 5 matters requiring further investigation. State Assessment and Referral Agency State Assessment and Referral Agency 294 MIA MIA CONNECTION RD, MIA MIA 3 matters requiring further investigation. State Assessment and Referral Agency State Assessment and Referral Agency 294 MIA MIA CONNECTION RD, MIA MIA 2 matters requiring further investigation. State Assessment and Referral Agency State Assessment and Referral Agency Smart eDA Smart eDA ID: 1431399882458 State assessments Economic Growth Water resource planning area boundaries Yes Environment and Heritage Category A and B extract from the regulated vegetation management map Yes Qld waterways for waterway barrier works Yes Transport Area within 25m of a State controlled road Yes State controlled roads Yes Economic Growth Water resource planning area boundaries Yes Environment and Heritage Category A and B extract from the regulated vegetation management map Yes Qld waterways for waterway barrier works Yes Economic Growth Water resource planning area boundaries Yes Environment and Heritage Category A and B extract from the regulated vegetation

Upload: others

Post on 31-Aug-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

294 MIA MIA CONNECTION RD MIA MIA5 matters requiring further investigation

State Assessment and Referral Agency

State Assessment and Referral Agency

294 MIA MIA CONNECTION RD MIA MIA3 matters requiring further investigation

State Assessment and Referral Agency

State Assessment and Referral Agency

294 MIA MIA CONNECTION RD MIA MIA2 matters requiring further investigation

State Assessment and Referral Agency

State Assessment and Referral Agency

Smart eDA

Smart eDA ID 1431399882458

State assessments

Economic GrowthWater resource planning area boundaries YesEnvironment and HeritageCategory A and B extract from the regulated vegetationmanagement map

Yes

Qld waterways for waterway barrier works YesTransportArea within 25m of a State controlled road YesState controlled roads Yes

Economic GrowthWater resource planning area boundaries YesEnvironment and HeritageCategory A and B extract from the regulated vegetationmanagement map

Yes

Qld waterways for waterway barrier works Yes

Economic GrowthWater resource planning area boundaries YesEnvironment and HeritageCategory A and B extract from the regulated vegetation

tracyh
Received (Auto Date)

Smart eDA (httpwwwsmartedaqldgovau) Page of 2 2 May 12 2015 1200 PM

management map Yes

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037722Search Date 29042013 1611 Title Reference 50221575 Date Created 03061998 Previous Title 20605139 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 4 SURVEY PLAN 104775 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20096178 (POR 1564) 2 LEASE No 702711887 03061998 at 1455 NORTH ETON CENTRAL SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED TO IDENTIFY WITH LEASE NON81172 PROD6 MAY 1919 REG22 AUG 1919 OMITTED AT DATA TAKEON 3 TRANSFER No 702712128 03061998 at 1533 LEASE 702711887 THE TREASURER OF QUEENSLAND TO IDENTIFY WITH TRANSFER OF LEASE NON83371 PROD27 OCT 1919 REG6 DEC 1919 OMITTED AT DATA TAKEON 4 TRANSFER No 702712204 03061998 at 1549 LEASE 702711887 THE NORTH ETON CO-OPERATIVE SUGAR MILLING ASSOCIATION TO IDENTIFY WITH TRANSFER OF LEASE NON256839 PROD20 SEP 1946 REG3 JAN 1947OMITTED AT DATA TAKEON 5 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status709575684 ACCESS RIGHT 09052006 1112 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999 Page 12

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037722Search Date 29042013 1611 Title Reference 50221575 Date Created 03061998UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 22

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16040823Search Date 30042013 0949 Title Reference 20511062 Date Created 14061955 Previous Title 20278134 20278135 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 130 CROWN PLAN CI308 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20278134 (POR 130) Deed of Grant No 20278135 (POR 130) 2 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 11

LAND TITLE ACT 1994

REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION STATEMENT DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Title Reference 50966666 This is the current status of the title as at 1654 on 20102014 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 716068660 10102014 MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 113 CROWN PLAN CI189 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY For exclusions reservations for public purposes refer to Plan CP CI189 EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20250015 (POR 113) 2 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICES Dealing Type Lodgement Date Status 709660172 ACCESS RIGHT 07062006 0831 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999 710100853 ACCESS RIGHT 15112006 1339 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999 714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999 UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority End of Confirmation Statement EV Dann Registrar of Titles and Registrar of Water Allocations Lodgement No 3520849 Office MACKAY Email titlesmacamietcomau MACROSSAN amp AMIET PO BOX 76 MACKAY QLD CONTACT GENE PATERSON 4740 Page 11

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16040823Search Date 30042013 0949 Title Reference 20511062 Date Created 14061955 Previous Title 20278134 20278135 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 130 CROWN PLAN CI308 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20278134 (POR 130) Deed of Grant No 20278135 (POR 130) 2 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 11

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037843Search Date 29042013 1619 Title Reference 20531186 Date Created 08101956 Previous Title 20499060 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 1 REGISTERED PLAN 710290 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY LOT 2 REGISTERED PLAN 714773 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20114051 (POR 1563) Deed of Grant No 20135231 (POR 15V) Deed of Grant No 20172015 (POR 82V) 2 LEASE No 602296293 (N82195) 05081919 OF PART OF SUB 2 OF RESUB 1 OF SUB 2 OF POR 1563 TO THE TREASURER OF QUEENSLAND ORIGINAL TERM FOR 99 YEARS COMMENCING 01 JAN 1919 OR OPTIONS AS MAY BE STATED 3 TRANSFER No 601014654 (N256839) 26091946 IN LEASE NOS N82195 AND N87826 TO THE NORTH ETON CO-OPERATIVE SUGAR MILLING ASSOCIATION LIMITED 4 VESTING No 700772647 26071995 at 1113 of LEASE 602296293 (N82195 ) to MACKAY SUGAR CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LIMITED 5 LEASE No 602296294 (N87826) 06091920 OF PART OF SUB 1 OF POR 15V TO THE TREASURER OF QUEENSLAND ORIGINAL TERM FOR 99 YEARS COMMENCING 01 JAN 1920 OR OPTIONS AS MAY BE STATED Page 12

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037843Search Date 29042013 1619 Title Reference 20531186 Date Created 08101956 EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 6 VESTING No 700772912 26071995 at 1203 of LEASE 602296294 (N87826 ) to MACKAY SUGAR CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LIMITED 7 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status709606017 ACCESS RIGHT 18052006 1439 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999709606038 ACCESS RIGHT 18052006 1440 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 22

Page 1Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Level 4 44 Nelson StreetPO Box 710

Mackay QLD 4740

Our reference SPL-0714-012469Your reference 233412

14 August 2014

Mark and Linda Deguarac- Aurecon PO Box 1060Mackay QLD 4740

Attention Thomas Withers

Dear Mr Withers

Pre-lodgement meeting recordmdashproposed Reconfiguration of a Lot (Boundary Realignment) over Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775 at Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

This pre-lodgement record provides a summary of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting This record provides initial advice regarding the likely major issues relevant to the development proposal to assist in the timely processing of a development application While this pre-lodgement advice is provided in good faith if the proposal is changed to that which was discussed with the department during the pre-lodgement meeting this advice is not binding

Reference information

Departmental role Concurrence agency

Jurisdiction Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 4 ndash Clearing vegetation

Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 2 ndash State controlled roads

Meeting date 29 July 2014

Meeting attendees

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 2

Name Position Organisation

Thomas Withers Urban and Environmental Planner

Aurecon

Grant Paterson Senior Environmental Scientist

Aurecon

Tom Kasauskas Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Phillip Fishburn Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Tanya Whalley Senior Land Office - State Land Asset Management

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Ross Young Principal Designer Department of Transport and Main Roads

Matthew Stirling Senior Designer (Civil) Department of Transport and Main Roads

Dylan Brown Town Planner Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Site details

Street address Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

Real property description Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775

Local government area Mackay Regional Council

Local government zone Rural

Existing use Agricultural activities

Proposed development details

Development type Reconfiguring a lot

Development description Boundary Realignment ndash 11 Lots into 11 Lots

Supporting information

Plan Report title Author Reference no Version and date

Figure 1 Proposed Aurecon 233412 4 17072014

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 3

Boundary Realignment

Figure Proposed PMAV Aurecon 233412 1 17072014

Certificates of Title NA NA NA

Vegetation management is triggered as one of the 11 proposed lots is less than 25ha As discussed if proposed Lot B was increased to greater than 25ha then the proposal would not be triggered for vegetation management referral and the following vegetation management advice would not apply

The following information is provided as a record of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting

Item Further adviceVegetation Management1 The applicant will be required to complete IDAS forms 1 and 11 The applicant will

need to

address Module 8 of the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) Version 14

provide information on the total extent of the clearing footprint within mapped remnant vegetation including any proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure and

provide information on tree heights within mapped remnant vegetation immediately adjacent to proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure to determine the applicable firebreak requirements

2 As part of the assessment against SDAP it is necessary to determine ldquoclearing as a result of reconfiguring a lotrdquo as defined in Module 8 section 84 Glossary of terms

The following considerations are particularly relevant to this application

(1) clearing for boundary fence lines for each proposed allotment(2) clearing to construct built infrastructure(3) clearing for a single residence and reasonably associated buildings and

structures for each new allotment(4) all built infrastructure other than underground services roads and fences

will be assessed as requiring clearing for firebreaks and safety buffers with a width of 20 metres or 15 times the height of the tallest adjacent tree to the infrastructure whichever is the greater

(5) clearing for fire management lines with a width of 10 metres constructed on either side of the allotment boundary

3 A statement addressing how the proposal meets either the performance outcome (PO) or acceptable outcome (AO) for Table 813 PO1-PO2 and Table 814 PO2-PO10 will be required as part of the application

4 Table 813 General

PO1 Clearing to avoid and minimise impacts

Information to demonstrate that the development has first avoided and then minimised the impacts of development will be required as part of an application

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 4

Item Further advicePositioning building envelopes within Category X areas and outside the required buffers for firebreaks would assist in minimising impacts

5 Table 814 Relevant infrastructure

PO3 Watercourses

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 31 or AO 32 as the proposed allotment boundaries will intersect stream order 1 and 2 watercourses containing remnant vegetation where 10 metre clearing on either side of the allotment boundary is assessed

AO 33 states lsquowhere it can be demonstrated that clearing cannot be avoided and the extent of clearing has been minimised an environmental offset is provided for any significant residual impact from clearing of vegetation associated with any watercoursersquo

The performance outcome PO3 requirement is to maintain the current extent of vegetation associated with any watercourse to protect

1 bank stability by protecting against bank erosion2 water quality by filtering sediments nutrients and other pollutants3 aquatic habitat4 terrestrial habitat

As defined in Module 8 Section 84 Glossary of terms to lsquomaintain the current extentrsquo means to

(1) avoid clearing the regional ecosystems or(2) ensure the structure and function of the regional ecosystem is maintained

(minimise the clearing) or(3) provide an environmental offset

If the applicant cannot provided sufficient evidence demonstrating that the structure and function of the impacted regional ecosystems are maintained then both under AO 33 and PO3 they would be required to provide an environmental offset The department highly recommends further discussion with DNRM officers in regard to these matters

6 PO4 Connectivity

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 41 as clearing will occur in areas of vegetation less than 100 metres wide in a coastal bioregion

The performance outcome PO4 requires the vegetation retained

1 is of sufficient size and configured in a way that maintains ecosystem functioning and

2 remains in the landscape despite threatening processes

This may be further affected depending on the proposed building envelopes The clearing footprint will result in highly modifying and disjointing the lsquoof concernrsquo remnant polygons The impact of the proposal on connectivity needs to be addressed to demonstrate how clearing will achieve performance outcome PO4

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 5

Item Further advice7 PO8 Conserving endangered and of concern regional ecosystems

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 81 as clearing will occur within lsquoof concernrsquo RE 835 for the purpose of establishing new allotment boundaries

From preliminary assessment under the proposed plan the application will meet AO 82 as clearing within the lsquoof concernrsquo RE whose structure category is sparse is below the limit stated in Module 8 813 Reference Tables Table 1 (2 ha) but this may not be the case depending on the size and location of the proposed building envelopes which need to be provided

If AO 82 cannot be met the application will be required to meet either AO 83 or PO8 which both stipulate offset provisions It is important to note that if an environmental offset is triggered for a significant residual impact from clearing of an lsquoof concernrsquo RE then the offset will need be achieved in accordance with the Queensland Environmental Offset Framework including the Environmental Offsets Act 2014 Environmental Offsets Regulation 2014 and the Queensland Environmental Offset Policy Further discussion with departmental officers with regard to these matters is highly recommended

8 PMAV

If the applicant believes the regional ecosystem mapping is incorrect they can lodge an application for a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) to dispute it It is highly recommend that if the applicant applies for a PMAV change that they do it prior to lodging the development application for RaL The PMAV application must contain sufficient detailed information for the department to make the PMAV

The proponent is advised that there is no statutory timeframe for the assessment of PMAV applications Please be advised that depending on the final approved PMAV and the submission information provided with the Reconfiguring a Lot application the application may still trigger Vegetation Management assessment under Sustainable Planning Act 2009

State Land Asset Management (SLAM)9 Road Closure and Opening

As the proposed road is being opened out of Freehold Land this can be done by way of registering a survey plan with the consent of Mackay Regional Council DNRM State Land Asset Management does not need to play a part in the road opening

With regards to the road closure the proponent will be required to lodge an Application for Permanent Road Closure The form and associated materials are available at the following website httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstateroadsclosure

The current fee for a Permanent Road Closure is $24440

Assessment must be undertaken to determine if the application may proceed including a Native Title Assessment

There will be consideration payable for the permanent road closure and offsetting

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 6

Item Further advicewill not apply

The road will have to be certified as being acceptable by the road manager prior to the current road being closed SLAM will work with the applicant in order to minimise the survey requirements and this particular dealing may be able to proceed by way of simultaneous opening closure

SLAM will investigate whether advertising can be dispensed with

Assuming that there are no objections to the closure and Native Title has been extinguished it is estimated that an offer will be made to the applicant for the closure within 4 months

10 Reservations

Lot 113 on CI189 and Lot 5 on RP705451 Title Reference 21303024 are subject to road reservations as detailed on CI189 and RP705451

Further investigation will need to be undertaken with regards to the extent of the reservations

The reservations will have to be purchased (unless still required for that purpose) prior to the subdivisionreconfiguration

Application information is available via the following link httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstatepurchase-exchangeallocating The current application fee is $24440

Should the applicant have any further enquiries regarding reservations or road closure and opening they may contact Tanya Whalley Senior Land Officer State Land Asset Management on (07) 4999 6959

Access11 The existing access at Chainage 2910 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is

to remain for existing use only The access shall be maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 (attached)

12 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot

13 The existing access at Chainage 3494 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to provide access for 4 lots only (proposed Lots A B C and J)

Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry It is desirable for the applicant to achieve longer sight distances if possible

The access shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083

14 The remainder of the proposed lots will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road DTMR has no requirements for intersection works on this route

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 7

If you require any further information please contact Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office on (07) 4898 6814 or via email felicitylaubdsdipqldgovau who will be pleased to assist

Yours sincerely

Jamie ThorleyManager (Planning) ndash Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Encl DTMR Standard conditions for construction of minor accesses onto State controlled roadsAccess LocationsDTMR Plan showing minimum access requirements

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 1 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

1 GRANTING of APPROVAL

The Department of Transport and Main Roads grants approvals to construct property accesses within the boundaries of a state controlled road as follows -

bull Limited Access Road _ Sections 54 and 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

bull Other State Controlled Roads _ Section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

The applicant shall construct the access at the location approved by the Regional Director (Mackay) or his representative and in accordance with these Standard Conditions and any special conditions applied by the issuing office

2 SPECIFICATIONS amp DRAWINGS

21 Rural

Access construction must conform to the General Layout Grading and Cross Sectional requirements shown on DWG No 579912 (14022012) attached vertical grading diagrams (Type A ndash Type E) or other drawings approved by the department Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix B The applicant shall also submit engineering drawings (of the proposed access) to the department for approval when requested to do so A registered professional civil engineer must prepare such drawings at no cost to the Department of Transport and Main Roads

22 Urban

The owner shall install a ramped kerb crossing of the existing kerb and channel in accordance with Local Government specifications Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix A The owner shall negotiate with the Local Government about changes to existing kerbside parking to accommodate the sight distance requirements and comply with any requirements council might impose

3 ENVIRONMENT

All works shall comply with the requirements of the regionrsquos current Environment Management Conditions for Minor Works within State Controlled Road Boundaries

4 CONSTRUCTION amp MAINTENANCE

41 Specifications

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or on any attached drawings Department of Transport amp Main Roads Standard Specifications for each class of work involved will apply

42 Traffic Management

Construction of the access shall proceed without unreasonable interruption to traffic The owner shall take all steps necessary to protect the public during construction This shall

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 2 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

include the provision of adequate signage barriers or other specified protection in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1995) Part 3 - Work on Roads

43 Clearing amp Grubbing

Any declared weeds identified at the site shall be treated before clearing work starts The Department of Natural Resources amp Water or the local government can advise on appropriate identification and treatment

Clearing and grubbing (for the proposed works) shall be the minimum needed for the installation of the works either adjacent to the property or on the approved alignment

Materials cleared and grubbed shall be disposed of as approved by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative in the following manner -

(a) Millable timber or other materials that have a commercial use shall be separated and treated to permit its sale or re-use The constructing authority shall liaise with the Department of Primary Industry and Forestry with respect to royalties and sale

(b) All trees and vegetable material up to 100mm diameter shall be mulched for re-use on site along the disturbed area as an aid to revegetation and to assist in stabilisation of the site

(c) Material not mulched or of commercial value shall be stockpiled at approved sites along the road reserve to provide habitat for local fauna No stockpiles are permitted adjacent to the property boundary (as this may create a fire hazard) or in drainage lines All stockpiles shall be outside of the clear zone ndash refer Section 8 of the Departments Road Planning amp Design Manual

(d) The department may order all cleared and grubbed material to be burnt if the options above are impracticable

(e) Grub holes are to be backfilled and the whole of the disturbed area graded to maintain the shape of the existing terrain

(f) The Department may require all non-usable materials to be removed from the road reserve and disposed of at a site approved by Transport amp Main Roads

Such work is to be to the satisfaction of the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative

44 Services

The owner shall verify the existence and location of any underground or overhead public utility services that construction of the proposed access may affect If such services do exist the owner is to liaise with the relevant Authority to prevent any damage to such service The owner shall also maintain the minimum horizontal and or vertical clearance (as stipulated by the service authority) from any underground or overhead services Any relocation or protection of underground or overhead services shall be carried out at no cost to the Department of Transport amp Main Roads

45 Drainage

A reinforced concrete pipe or reinforced concrete box culvert shall be laid in the table drain under the access unless otherwise approved (in writing) by the Department of Transport amp

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 3 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

Main Roads An Engineering assessment (by a registered professional civil engineer) must be made to determine the size of culvert necessary at each access to ensure that the access does not interfere with drainage flow in the area The minimum diameter of pipe shall be 375 mm RCP or a reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) of equivalent waterway area The minimum length of culvert shall be in accordance with drawings DWG MS 4-5 (18042000) or DWG MS 4-6 (18042000)

46 Roadway Repairs

The owner will be required to repair or cause to be repaired at his own expense any damage to the roadway due to the existence of the access

47 Supervision

All work within the road reserve is to be carried out under the supervision of the Departments area engineer or works inspector for the local government area within which the work lies In this regard it will be necessary for you to contact the Transport amp Main Roads Regional office before commencing any work within the road reserve Alternatively the supervision may be carried out by a registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)

48 Certification

The applicant is to provide written certification that all works have been constructed in accordance with these conditions standard drawings and or any other standard or job specific conditions specified at the time of approval for the works to be constructed

The certification may be from either the Departments area engineer or works inspector or the registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) whoever supervises the works

49 Maintenance of Access

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out at their expense any maintenance work required on the access They may be directed to do so in writing by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative at any time and such work shall be carried out without delay to his satisfaction Failure to do so within the specified time may result in the Department of Transport amp Main Roads carrying out the required works or having it done by a private contractor and recouping the costs from the property owner

5 FUTURE WORKS

51 By Property Owner

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out any upgrading of an access necessary due to additional traffic generation or change in vehicle type using the access

52 By Transport amp Main Roads

The Department of Transport amp Main Roads will reinstate existing accesses to pre-existing standards during any future road reconstruction

All reasonable care will be taken during future roadwork construction however the construction of an access must in no way interfere with the work of maintenance personnel The Director

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 2: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Smart eDA (httpwwwsmartedaqldgovau) Page of 2 2 May 12 2015 1200 PM

management map Yes

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037722Search Date 29042013 1611 Title Reference 50221575 Date Created 03061998 Previous Title 20605139 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 4 SURVEY PLAN 104775 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20096178 (POR 1564) 2 LEASE No 702711887 03061998 at 1455 NORTH ETON CENTRAL SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED TO IDENTIFY WITH LEASE NON81172 PROD6 MAY 1919 REG22 AUG 1919 OMITTED AT DATA TAKEON 3 TRANSFER No 702712128 03061998 at 1533 LEASE 702711887 THE TREASURER OF QUEENSLAND TO IDENTIFY WITH TRANSFER OF LEASE NON83371 PROD27 OCT 1919 REG6 DEC 1919 OMITTED AT DATA TAKEON 4 TRANSFER No 702712204 03061998 at 1549 LEASE 702711887 THE NORTH ETON CO-OPERATIVE SUGAR MILLING ASSOCIATION TO IDENTIFY WITH TRANSFER OF LEASE NON256839 PROD20 SEP 1946 REG3 JAN 1947OMITTED AT DATA TAKEON 5 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status709575684 ACCESS RIGHT 09052006 1112 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999 Page 12

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037722Search Date 29042013 1611 Title Reference 50221575 Date Created 03061998UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 22

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16040823Search Date 30042013 0949 Title Reference 20511062 Date Created 14061955 Previous Title 20278134 20278135 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 130 CROWN PLAN CI308 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20278134 (POR 130) Deed of Grant No 20278135 (POR 130) 2 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 11

LAND TITLE ACT 1994

REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION STATEMENT DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Title Reference 50966666 This is the current status of the title as at 1654 on 20102014 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 716068660 10102014 MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 113 CROWN PLAN CI189 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY For exclusions reservations for public purposes refer to Plan CP CI189 EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20250015 (POR 113) 2 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICES Dealing Type Lodgement Date Status 709660172 ACCESS RIGHT 07062006 0831 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999 710100853 ACCESS RIGHT 15112006 1339 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999 714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999 UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority End of Confirmation Statement EV Dann Registrar of Titles and Registrar of Water Allocations Lodgement No 3520849 Office MACKAY Email titlesmacamietcomau MACROSSAN amp AMIET PO BOX 76 MACKAY QLD CONTACT GENE PATERSON 4740 Page 11

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16040823Search Date 30042013 0949 Title Reference 20511062 Date Created 14061955 Previous Title 20278134 20278135 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 130 CROWN PLAN CI308 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20278134 (POR 130) Deed of Grant No 20278135 (POR 130) 2 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 11

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037843Search Date 29042013 1619 Title Reference 20531186 Date Created 08101956 Previous Title 20499060 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 1 REGISTERED PLAN 710290 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY LOT 2 REGISTERED PLAN 714773 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20114051 (POR 1563) Deed of Grant No 20135231 (POR 15V) Deed of Grant No 20172015 (POR 82V) 2 LEASE No 602296293 (N82195) 05081919 OF PART OF SUB 2 OF RESUB 1 OF SUB 2 OF POR 1563 TO THE TREASURER OF QUEENSLAND ORIGINAL TERM FOR 99 YEARS COMMENCING 01 JAN 1919 OR OPTIONS AS MAY BE STATED 3 TRANSFER No 601014654 (N256839) 26091946 IN LEASE NOS N82195 AND N87826 TO THE NORTH ETON CO-OPERATIVE SUGAR MILLING ASSOCIATION LIMITED 4 VESTING No 700772647 26071995 at 1113 of LEASE 602296293 (N82195 ) to MACKAY SUGAR CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LIMITED 5 LEASE No 602296294 (N87826) 06091920 OF PART OF SUB 1 OF POR 15V TO THE TREASURER OF QUEENSLAND ORIGINAL TERM FOR 99 YEARS COMMENCING 01 JAN 1920 OR OPTIONS AS MAY BE STATED Page 12

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037843Search Date 29042013 1619 Title Reference 20531186 Date Created 08101956 EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 6 VESTING No 700772912 26071995 at 1203 of LEASE 602296294 (N87826 ) to MACKAY SUGAR CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LIMITED 7 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status709606017 ACCESS RIGHT 18052006 1439 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999709606038 ACCESS RIGHT 18052006 1440 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 22

Page 1Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Level 4 44 Nelson StreetPO Box 710

Mackay QLD 4740

Our reference SPL-0714-012469Your reference 233412

14 August 2014

Mark and Linda Deguarac- Aurecon PO Box 1060Mackay QLD 4740

Attention Thomas Withers

Dear Mr Withers

Pre-lodgement meeting recordmdashproposed Reconfiguration of a Lot (Boundary Realignment) over Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775 at Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

This pre-lodgement record provides a summary of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting This record provides initial advice regarding the likely major issues relevant to the development proposal to assist in the timely processing of a development application While this pre-lodgement advice is provided in good faith if the proposal is changed to that which was discussed with the department during the pre-lodgement meeting this advice is not binding

Reference information

Departmental role Concurrence agency

Jurisdiction Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 4 ndash Clearing vegetation

Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 2 ndash State controlled roads

Meeting date 29 July 2014

Meeting attendees

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 2

Name Position Organisation

Thomas Withers Urban and Environmental Planner

Aurecon

Grant Paterson Senior Environmental Scientist

Aurecon

Tom Kasauskas Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Phillip Fishburn Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Tanya Whalley Senior Land Office - State Land Asset Management

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Ross Young Principal Designer Department of Transport and Main Roads

Matthew Stirling Senior Designer (Civil) Department of Transport and Main Roads

Dylan Brown Town Planner Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Site details

Street address Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

Real property description Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775

Local government area Mackay Regional Council

Local government zone Rural

Existing use Agricultural activities

Proposed development details

Development type Reconfiguring a lot

Development description Boundary Realignment ndash 11 Lots into 11 Lots

Supporting information

Plan Report title Author Reference no Version and date

Figure 1 Proposed Aurecon 233412 4 17072014

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 3

Boundary Realignment

Figure Proposed PMAV Aurecon 233412 1 17072014

Certificates of Title NA NA NA

Vegetation management is triggered as one of the 11 proposed lots is less than 25ha As discussed if proposed Lot B was increased to greater than 25ha then the proposal would not be triggered for vegetation management referral and the following vegetation management advice would not apply

The following information is provided as a record of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting

Item Further adviceVegetation Management1 The applicant will be required to complete IDAS forms 1 and 11 The applicant will

need to

address Module 8 of the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) Version 14

provide information on the total extent of the clearing footprint within mapped remnant vegetation including any proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure and

provide information on tree heights within mapped remnant vegetation immediately adjacent to proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure to determine the applicable firebreak requirements

2 As part of the assessment against SDAP it is necessary to determine ldquoclearing as a result of reconfiguring a lotrdquo as defined in Module 8 section 84 Glossary of terms

The following considerations are particularly relevant to this application

(1) clearing for boundary fence lines for each proposed allotment(2) clearing to construct built infrastructure(3) clearing for a single residence and reasonably associated buildings and

structures for each new allotment(4) all built infrastructure other than underground services roads and fences

will be assessed as requiring clearing for firebreaks and safety buffers with a width of 20 metres or 15 times the height of the tallest adjacent tree to the infrastructure whichever is the greater

(5) clearing for fire management lines with a width of 10 metres constructed on either side of the allotment boundary

3 A statement addressing how the proposal meets either the performance outcome (PO) or acceptable outcome (AO) for Table 813 PO1-PO2 and Table 814 PO2-PO10 will be required as part of the application

4 Table 813 General

PO1 Clearing to avoid and minimise impacts

Information to demonstrate that the development has first avoided and then minimised the impacts of development will be required as part of an application

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 4

Item Further advicePositioning building envelopes within Category X areas and outside the required buffers for firebreaks would assist in minimising impacts

5 Table 814 Relevant infrastructure

PO3 Watercourses

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 31 or AO 32 as the proposed allotment boundaries will intersect stream order 1 and 2 watercourses containing remnant vegetation where 10 metre clearing on either side of the allotment boundary is assessed

AO 33 states lsquowhere it can be demonstrated that clearing cannot be avoided and the extent of clearing has been minimised an environmental offset is provided for any significant residual impact from clearing of vegetation associated with any watercoursersquo

The performance outcome PO3 requirement is to maintain the current extent of vegetation associated with any watercourse to protect

1 bank stability by protecting against bank erosion2 water quality by filtering sediments nutrients and other pollutants3 aquatic habitat4 terrestrial habitat

As defined in Module 8 Section 84 Glossary of terms to lsquomaintain the current extentrsquo means to

(1) avoid clearing the regional ecosystems or(2) ensure the structure and function of the regional ecosystem is maintained

(minimise the clearing) or(3) provide an environmental offset

If the applicant cannot provided sufficient evidence demonstrating that the structure and function of the impacted regional ecosystems are maintained then both under AO 33 and PO3 they would be required to provide an environmental offset The department highly recommends further discussion with DNRM officers in regard to these matters

6 PO4 Connectivity

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 41 as clearing will occur in areas of vegetation less than 100 metres wide in a coastal bioregion

The performance outcome PO4 requires the vegetation retained

1 is of sufficient size and configured in a way that maintains ecosystem functioning and

2 remains in the landscape despite threatening processes

This may be further affected depending on the proposed building envelopes The clearing footprint will result in highly modifying and disjointing the lsquoof concernrsquo remnant polygons The impact of the proposal on connectivity needs to be addressed to demonstrate how clearing will achieve performance outcome PO4

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 5

Item Further advice7 PO8 Conserving endangered and of concern regional ecosystems

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 81 as clearing will occur within lsquoof concernrsquo RE 835 for the purpose of establishing new allotment boundaries

From preliminary assessment under the proposed plan the application will meet AO 82 as clearing within the lsquoof concernrsquo RE whose structure category is sparse is below the limit stated in Module 8 813 Reference Tables Table 1 (2 ha) but this may not be the case depending on the size and location of the proposed building envelopes which need to be provided

If AO 82 cannot be met the application will be required to meet either AO 83 or PO8 which both stipulate offset provisions It is important to note that if an environmental offset is triggered for a significant residual impact from clearing of an lsquoof concernrsquo RE then the offset will need be achieved in accordance with the Queensland Environmental Offset Framework including the Environmental Offsets Act 2014 Environmental Offsets Regulation 2014 and the Queensland Environmental Offset Policy Further discussion with departmental officers with regard to these matters is highly recommended

8 PMAV

If the applicant believes the regional ecosystem mapping is incorrect they can lodge an application for a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) to dispute it It is highly recommend that if the applicant applies for a PMAV change that they do it prior to lodging the development application for RaL The PMAV application must contain sufficient detailed information for the department to make the PMAV

The proponent is advised that there is no statutory timeframe for the assessment of PMAV applications Please be advised that depending on the final approved PMAV and the submission information provided with the Reconfiguring a Lot application the application may still trigger Vegetation Management assessment under Sustainable Planning Act 2009

State Land Asset Management (SLAM)9 Road Closure and Opening

As the proposed road is being opened out of Freehold Land this can be done by way of registering a survey plan with the consent of Mackay Regional Council DNRM State Land Asset Management does not need to play a part in the road opening

With regards to the road closure the proponent will be required to lodge an Application for Permanent Road Closure The form and associated materials are available at the following website httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstateroadsclosure

The current fee for a Permanent Road Closure is $24440

Assessment must be undertaken to determine if the application may proceed including a Native Title Assessment

There will be consideration payable for the permanent road closure and offsetting

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 6

Item Further advicewill not apply

The road will have to be certified as being acceptable by the road manager prior to the current road being closed SLAM will work with the applicant in order to minimise the survey requirements and this particular dealing may be able to proceed by way of simultaneous opening closure

SLAM will investigate whether advertising can be dispensed with

Assuming that there are no objections to the closure and Native Title has been extinguished it is estimated that an offer will be made to the applicant for the closure within 4 months

10 Reservations

Lot 113 on CI189 and Lot 5 on RP705451 Title Reference 21303024 are subject to road reservations as detailed on CI189 and RP705451

Further investigation will need to be undertaken with regards to the extent of the reservations

The reservations will have to be purchased (unless still required for that purpose) prior to the subdivisionreconfiguration

Application information is available via the following link httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstatepurchase-exchangeallocating The current application fee is $24440

Should the applicant have any further enquiries regarding reservations or road closure and opening they may contact Tanya Whalley Senior Land Officer State Land Asset Management on (07) 4999 6959

Access11 The existing access at Chainage 2910 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is

to remain for existing use only The access shall be maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 (attached)

12 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot

13 The existing access at Chainage 3494 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to provide access for 4 lots only (proposed Lots A B C and J)

Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry It is desirable for the applicant to achieve longer sight distances if possible

The access shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083

14 The remainder of the proposed lots will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road DTMR has no requirements for intersection works on this route

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 7

If you require any further information please contact Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office on (07) 4898 6814 or via email felicitylaubdsdipqldgovau who will be pleased to assist

Yours sincerely

Jamie ThorleyManager (Planning) ndash Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Encl DTMR Standard conditions for construction of minor accesses onto State controlled roadsAccess LocationsDTMR Plan showing minimum access requirements

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 1 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

1 GRANTING of APPROVAL

The Department of Transport and Main Roads grants approvals to construct property accesses within the boundaries of a state controlled road as follows -

bull Limited Access Road _ Sections 54 and 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

bull Other State Controlled Roads _ Section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

The applicant shall construct the access at the location approved by the Regional Director (Mackay) or his representative and in accordance with these Standard Conditions and any special conditions applied by the issuing office

2 SPECIFICATIONS amp DRAWINGS

21 Rural

Access construction must conform to the General Layout Grading and Cross Sectional requirements shown on DWG No 579912 (14022012) attached vertical grading diagrams (Type A ndash Type E) or other drawings approved by the department Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix B The applicant shall also submit engineering drawings (of the proposed access) to the department for approval when requested to do so A registered professional civil engineer must prepare such drawings at no cost to the Department of Transport and Main Roads

22 Urban

The owner shall install a ramped kerb crossing of the existing kerb and channel in accordance with Local Government specifications Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix A The owner shall negotiate with the Local Government about changes to existing kerbside parking to accommodate the sight distance requirements and comply with any requirements council might impose

3 ENVIRONMENT

All works shall comply with the requirements of the regionrsquos current Environment Management Conditions for Minor Works within State Controlled Road Boundaries

4 CONSTRUCTION amp MAINTENANCE

41 Specifications

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or on any attached drawings Department of Transport amp Main Roads Standard Specifications for each class of work involved will apply

42 Traffic Management

Construction of the access shall proceed without unreasonable interruption to traffic The owner shall take all steps necessary to protect the public during construction This shall

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 2 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

include the provision of adequate signage barriers or other specified protection in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1995) Part 3 - Work on Roads

43 Clearing amp Grubbing

Any declared weeds identified at the site shall be treated before clearing work starts The Department of Natural Resources amp Water or the local government can advise on appropriate identification and treatment

Clearing and grubbing (for the proposed works) shall be the minimum needed for the installation of the works either adjacent to the property or on the approved alignment

Materials cleared and grubbed shall be disposed of as approved by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative in the following manner -

(a) Millable timber or other materials that have a commercial use shall be separated and treated to permit its sale or re-use The constructing authority shall liaise with the Department of Primary Industry and Forestry with respect to royalties and sale

(b) All trees and vegetable material up to 100mm diameter shall be mulched for re-use on site along the disturbed area as an aid to revegetation and to assist in stabilisation of the site

(c) Material not mulched or of commercial value shall be stockpiled at approved sites along the road reserve to provide habitat for local fauna No stockpiles are permitted adjacent to the property boundary (as this may create a fire hazard) or in drainage lines All stockpiles shall be outside of the clear zone ndash refer Section 8 of the Departments Road Planning amp Design Manual

(d) The department may order all cleared and grubbed material to be burnt if the options above are impracticable

(e) Grub holes are to be backfilled and the whole of the disturbed area graded to maintain the shape of the existing terrain

(f) The Department may require all non-usable materials to be removed from the road reserve and disposed of at a site approved by Transport amp Main Roads

Such work is to be to the satisfaction of the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative

44 Services

The owner shall verify the existence and location of any underground or overhead public utility services that construction of the proposed access may affect If such services do exist the owner is to liaise with the relevant Authority to prevent any damage to such service The owner shall also maintain the minimum horizontal and or vertical clearance (as stipulated by the service authority) from any underground or overhead services Any relocation or protection of underground or overhead services shall be carried out at no cost to the Department of Transport amp Main Roads

45 Drainage

A reinforced concrete pipe or reinforced concrete box culvert shall be laid in the table drain under the access unless otherwise approved (in writing) by the Department of Transport amp

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 3 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

Main Roads An Engineering assessment (by a registered professional civil engineer) must be made to determine the size of culvert necessary at each access to ensure that the access does not interfere with drainage flow in the area The minimum diameter of pipe shall be 375 mm RCP or a reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) of equivalent waterway area The minimum length of culvert shall be in accordance with drawings DWG MS 4-5 (18042000) or DWG MS 4-6 (18042000)

46 Roadway Repairs

The owner will be required to repair or cause to be repaired at his own expense any damage to the roadway due to the existence of the access

47 Supervision

All work within the road reserve is to be carried out under the supervision of the Departments area engineer or works inspector for the local government area within which the work lies In this regard it will be necessary for you to contact the Transport amp Main Roads Regional office before commencing any work within the road reserve Alternatively the supervision may be carried out by a registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)

48 Certification

The applicant is to provide written certification that all works have been constructed in accordance with these conditions standard drawings and or any other standard or job specific conditions specified at the time of approval for the works to be constructed

The certification may be from either the Departments area engineer or works inspector or the registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) whoever supervises the works

49 Maintenance of Access

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out at their expense any maintenance work required on the access They may be directed to do so in writing by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative at any time and such work shall be carried out without delay to his satisfaction Failure to do so within the specified time may result in the Department of Transport amp Main Roads carrying out the required works or having it done by a private contractor and recouping the costs from the property owner

5 FUTURE WORKS

51 By Property Owner

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out any upgrading of an access necessary due to additional traffic generation or change in vehicle type using the access

52 By Transport amp Main Roads

The Department of Transport amp Main Roads will reinstate existing accesses to pre-existing standards during any future road reconstruction

All reasonable care will be taken during future roadwork construction however the construction of an access must in no way interfere with the work of maintenance personnel The Director

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 3: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037722Search Date 29042013 1611 Title Reference 50221575 Date Created 03061998 Previous Title 20605139 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 4 SURVEY PLAN 104775 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20096178 (POR 1564) 2 LEASE No 702711887 03061998 at 1455 NORTH ETON CENTRAL SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED TO IDENTIFY WITH LEASE NON81172 PROD6 MAY 1919 REG22 AUG 1919 OMITTED AT DATA TAKEON 3 TRANSFER No 702712128 03061998 at 1533 LEASE 702711887 THE TREASURER OF QUEENSLAND TO IDENTIFY WITH TRANSFER OF LEASE NON83371 PROD27 OCT 1919 REG6 DEC 1919 OMITTED AT DATA TAKEON 4 TRANSFER No 702712204 03061998 at 1549 LEASE 702711887 THE NORTH ETON CO-OPERATIVE SUGAR MILLING ASSOCIATION TO IDENTIFY WITH TRANSFER OF LEASE NON256839 PROD20 SEP 1946 REG3 JAN 1947OMITTED AT DATA TAKEON 5 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status709575684 ACCESS RIGHT 09052006 1112 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999 Page 12

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037722Search Date 29042013 1611 Title Reference 50221575 Date Created 03061998UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 22

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16040823Search Date 30042013 0949 Title Reference 20511062 Date Created 14061955 Previous Title 20278134 20278135 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 130 CROWN PLAN CI308 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20278134 (POR 130) Deed of Grant No 20278135 (POR 130) 2 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 11

LAND TITLE ACT 1994

REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION STATEMENT DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Title Reference 50966666 This is the current status of the title as at 1654 on 20102014 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 716068660 10102014 MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 113 CROWN PLAN CI189 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY For exclusions reservations for public purposes refer to Plan CP CI189 EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20250015 (POR 113) 2 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICES Dealing Type Lodgement Date Status 709660172 ACCESS RIGHT 07062006 0831 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999 710100853 ACCESS RIGHT 15112006 1339 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999 714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999 UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority End of Confirmation Statement EV Dann Registrar of Titles and Registrar of Water Allocations Lodgement No 3520849 Office MACKAY Email titlesmacamietcomau MACROSSAN amp AMIET PO BOX 76 MACKAY QLD CONTACT GENE PATERSON 4740 Page 11

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16040823Search Date 30042013 0949 Title Reference 20511062 Date Created 14061955 Previous Title 20278134 20278135 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 130 CROWN PLAN CI308 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20278134 (POR 130) Deed of Grant No 20278135 (POR 130) 2 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 11

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037843Search Date 29042013 1619 Title Reference 20531186 Date Created 08101956 Previous Title 20499060 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 1 REGISTERED PLAN 710290 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY LOT 2 REGISTERED PLAN 714773 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20114051 (POR 1563) Deed of Grant No 20135231 (POR 15V) Deed of Grant No 20172015 (POR 82V) 2 LEASE No 602296293 (N82195) 05081919 OF PART OF SUB 2 OF RESUB 1 OF SUB 2 OF POR 1563 TO THE TREASURER OF QUEENSLAND ORIGINAL TERM FOR 99 YEARS COMMENCING 01 JAN 1919 OR OPTIONS AS MAY BE STATED 3 TRANSFER No 601014654 (N256839) 26091946 IN LEASE NOS N82195 AND N87826 TO THE NORTH ETON CO-OPERATIVE SUGAR MILLING ASSOCIATION LIMITED 4 VESTING No 700772647 26071995 at 1113 of LEASE 602296293 (N82195 ) to MACKAY SUGAR CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LIMITED 5 LEASE No 602296294 (N87826) 06091920 OF PART OF SUB 1 OF POR 15V TO THE TREASURER OF QUEENSLAND ORIGINAL TERM FOR 99 YEARS COMMENCING 01 JAN 1920 OR OPTIONS AS MAY BE STATED Page 12

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037843Search Date 29042013 1619 Title Reference 20531186 Date Created 08101956 EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 6 VESTING No 700772912 26071995 at 1203 of LEASE 602296294 (N87826 ) to MACKAY SUGAR CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LIMITED 7 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status709606017 ACCESS RIGHT 18052006 1439 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999709606038 ACCESS RIGHT 18052006 1440 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 22

Page 1Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Level 4 44 Nelson StreetPO Box 710

Mackay QLD 4740

Our reference SPL-0714-012469Your reference 233412

14 August 2014

Mark and Linda Deguarac- Aurecon PO Box 1060Mackay QLD 4740

Attention Thomas Withers

Dear Mr Withers

Pre-lodgement meeting recordmdashproposed Reconfiguration of a Lot (Boundary Realignment) over Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775 at Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

This pre-lodgement record provides a summary of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting This record provides initial advice regarding the likely major issues relevant to the development proposal to assist in the timely processing of a development application While this pre-lodgement advice is provided in good faith if the proposal is changed to that which was discussed with the department during the pre-lodgement meeting this advice is not binding

Reference information

Departmental role Concurrence agency

Jurisdiction Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 4 ndash Clearing vegetation

Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 2 ndash State controlled roads

Meeting date 29 July 2014

Meeting attendees

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 2

Name Position Organisation

Thomas Withers Urban and Environmental Planner

Aurecon

Grant Paterson Senior Environmental Scientist

Aurecon

Tom Kasauskas Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Phillip Fishburn Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Tanya Whalley Senior Land Office - State Land Asset Management

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Ross Young Principal Designer Department of Transport and Main Roads

Matthew Stirling Senior Designer (Civil) Department of Transport and Main Roads

Dylan Brown Town Planner Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Site details

Street address Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

Real property description Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775

Local government area Mackay Regional Council

Local government zone Rural

Existing use Agricultural activities

Proposed development details

Development type Reconfiguring a lot

Development description Boundary Realignment ndash 11 Lots into 11 Lots

Supporting information

Plan Report title Author Reference no Version and date

Figure 1 Proposed Aurecon 233412 4 17072014

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 3

Boundary Realignment

Figure Proposed PMAV Aurecon 233412 1 17072014

Certificates of Title NA NA NA

Vegetation management is triggered as one of the 11 proposed lots is less than 25ha As discussed if proposed Lot B was increased to greater than 25ha then the proposal would not be triggered for vegetation management referral and the following vegetation management advice would not apply

The following information is provided as a record of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting

Item Further adviceVegetation Management1 The applicant will be required to complete IDAS forms 1 and 11 The applicant will

need to

address Module 8 of the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) Version 14

provide information on the total extent of the clearing footprint within mapped remnant vegetation including any proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure and

provide information on tree heights within mapped remnant vegetation immediately adjacent to proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure to determine the applicable firebreak requirements

2 As part of the assessment against SDAP it is necessary to determine ldquoclearing as a result of reconfiguring a lotrdquo as defined in Module 8 section 84 Glossary of terms

The following considerations are particularly relevant to this application

(1) clearing for boundary fence lines for each proposed allotment(2) clearing to construct built infrastructure(3) clearing for a single residence and reasonably associated buildings and

structures for each new allotment(4) all built infrastructure other than underground services roads and fences

will be assessed as requiring clearing for firebreaks and safety buffers with a width of 20 metres or 15 times the height of the tallest adjacent tree to the infrastructure whichever is the greater

(5) clearing for fire management lines with a width of 10 metres constructed on either side of the allotment boundary

3 A statement addressing how the proposal meets either the performance outcome (PO) or acceptable outcome (AO) for Table 813 PO1-PO2 and Table 814 PO2-PO10 will be required as part of the application

4 Table 813 General

PO1 Clearing to avoid and minimise impacts

Information to demonstrate that the development has first avoided and then minimised the impacts of development will be required as part of an application

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 4

Item Further advicePositioning building envelopes within Category X areas and outside the required buffers for firebreaks would assist in minimising impacts

5 Table 814 Relevant infrastructure

PO3 Watercourses

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 31 or AO 32 as the proposed allotment boundaries will intersect stream order 1 and 2 watercourses containing remnant vegetation where 10 metre clearing on either side of the allotment boundary is assessed

AO 33 states lsquowhere it can be demonstrated that clearing cannot be avoided and the extent of clearing has been minimised an environmental offset is provided for any significant residual impact from clearing of vegetation associated with any watercoursersquo

The performance outcome PO3 requirement is to maintain the current extent of vegetation associated with any watercourse to protect

1 bank stability by protecting against bank erosion2 water quality by filtering sediments nutrients and other pollutants3 aquatic habitat4 terrestrial habitat

As defined in Module 8 Section 84 Glossary of terms to lsquomaintain the current extentrsquo means to

(1) avoid clearing the regional ecosystems or(2) ensure the structure and function of the regional ecosystem is maintained

(minimise the clearing) or(3) provide an environmental offset

If the applicant cannot provided sufficient evidence demonstrating that the structure and function of the impacted regional ecosystems are maintained then both under AO 33 and PO3 they would be required to provide an environmental offset The department highly recommends further discussion with DNRM officers in regard to these matters

6 PO4 Connectivity

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 41 as clearing will occur in areas of vegetation less than 100 metres wide in a coastal bioregion

The performance outcome PO4 requires the vegetation retained

1 is of sufficient size and configured in a way that maintains ecosystem functioning and

2 remains in the landscape despite threatening processes

This may be further affected depending on the proposed building envelopes The clearing footprint will result in highly modifying and disjointing the lsquoof concernrsquo remnant polygons The impact of the proposal on connectivity needs to be addressed to demonstrate how clearing will achieve performance outcome PO4

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 5

Item Further advice7 PO8 Conserving endangered and of concern regional ecosystems

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 81 as clearing will occur within lsquoof concernrsquo RE 835 for the purpose of establishing new allotment boundaries

From preliminary assessment under the proposed plan the application will meet AO 82 as clearing within the lsquoof concernrsquo RE whose structure category is sparse is below the limit stated in Module 8 813 Reference Tables Table 1 (2 ha) but this may not be the case depending on the size and location of the proposed building envelopes which need to be provided

If AO 82 cannot be met the application will be required to meet either AO 83 or PO8 which both stipulate offset provisions It is important to note that if an environmental offset is triggered for a significant residual impact from clearing of an lsquoof concernrsquo RE then the offset will need be achieved in accordance with the Queensland Environmental Offset Framework including the Environmental Offsets Act 2014 Environmental Offsets Regulation 2014 and the Queensland Environmental Offset Policy Further discussion with departmental officers with regard to these matters is highly recommended

8 PMAV

If the applicant believes the regional ecosystem mapping is incorrect they can lodge an application for a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) to dispute it It is highly recommend that if the applicant applies for a PMAV change that they do it prior to lodging the development application for RaL The PMAV application must contain sufficient detailed information for the department to make the PMAV

The proponent is advised that there is no statutory timeframe for the assessment of PMAV applications Please be advised that depending on the final approved PMAV and the submission information provided with the Reconfiguring a Lot application the application may still trigger Vegetation Management assessment under Sustainable Planning Act 2009

State Land Asset Management (SLAM)9 Road Closure and Opening

As the proposed road is being opened out of Freehold Land this can be done by way of registering a survey plan with the consent of Mackay Regional Council DNRM State Land Asset Management does not need to play a part in the road opening

With regards to the road closure the proponent will be required to lodge an Application for Permanent Road Closure The form and associated materials are available at the following website httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstateroadsclosure

The current fee for a Permanent Road Closure is $24440

Assessment must be undertaken to determine if the application may proceed including a Native Title Assessment

There will be consideration payable for the permanent road closure and offsetting

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 6

Item Further advicewill not apply

The road will have to be certified as being acceptable by the road manager prior to the current road being closed SLAM will work with the applicant in order to minimise the survey requirements and this particular dealing may be able to proceed by way of simultaneous opening closure

SLAM will investigate whether advertising can be dispensed with

Assuming that there are no objections to the closure and Native Title has been extinguished it is estimated that an offer will be made to the applicant for the closure within 4 months

10 Reservations

Lot 113 on CI189 and Lot 5 on RP705451 Title Reference 21303024 are subject to road reservations as detailed on CI189 and RP705451

Further investigation will need to be undertaken with regards to the extent of the reservations

The reservations will have to be purchased (unless still required for that purpose) prior to the subdivisionreconfiguration

Application information is available via the following link httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstatepurchase-exchangeallocating The current application fee is $24440

Should the applicant have any further enquiries regarding reservations or road closure and opening they may contact Tanya Whalley Senior Land Officer State Land Asset Management on (07) 4999 6959

Access11 The existing access at Chainage 2910 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is

to remain for existing use only The access shall be maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 (attached)

12 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot

13 The existing access at Chainage 3494 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to provide access for 4 lots only (proposed Lots A B C and J)

Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry It is desirable for the applicant to achieve longer sight distances if possible

The access shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083

14 The remainder of the proposed lots will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road DTMR has no requirements for intersection works on this route

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 7

If you require any further information please contact Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office on (07) 4898 6814 or via email felicitylaubdsdipqldgovau who will be pleased to assist

Yours sincerely

Jamie ThorleyManager (Planning) ndash Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Encl DTMR Standard conditions for construction of minor accesses onto State controlled roadsAccess LocationsDTMR Plan showing minimum access requirements

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 1 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

1 GRANTING of APPROVAL

The Department of Transport and Main Roads grants approvals to construct property accesses within the boundaries of a state controlled road as follows -

bull Limited Access Road _ Sections 54 and 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

bull Other State Controlled Roads _ Section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

The applicant shall construct the access at the location approved by the Regional Director (Mackay) or his representative and in accordance with these Standard Conditions and any special conditions applied by the issuing office

2 SPECIFICATIONS amp DRAWINGS

21 Rural

Access construction must conform to the General Layout Grading and Cross Sectional requirements shown on DWG No 579912 (14022012) attached vertical grading diagrams (Type A ndash Type E) or other drawings approved by the department Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix B The applicant shall also submit engineering drawings (of the proposed access) to the department for approval when requested to do so A registered professional civil engineer must prepare such drawings at no cost to the Department of Transport and Main Roads

22 Urban

The owner shall install a ramped kerb crossing of the existing kerb and channel in accordance with Local Government specifications Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix A The owner shall negotiate with the Local Government about changes to existing kerbside parking to accommodate the sight distance requirements and comply with any requirements council might impose

3 ENVIRONMENT

All works shall comply with the requirements of the regionrsquos current Environment Management Conditions for Minor Works within State Controlled Road Boundaries

4 CONSTRUCTION amp MAINTENANCE

41 Specifications

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or on any attached drawings Department of Transport amp Main Roads Standard Specifications for each class of work involved will apply

42 Traffic Management

Construction of the access shall proceed without unreasonable interruption to traffic The owner shall take all steps necessary to protect the public during construction This shall

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 2 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

include the provision of adequate signage barriers or other specified protection in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1995) Part 3 - Work on Roads

43 Clearing amp Grubbing

Any declared weeds identified at the site shall be treated before clearing work starts The Department of Natural Resources amp Water or the local government can advise on appropriate identification and treatment

Clearing and grubbing (for the proposed works) shall be the minimum needed for the installation of the works either adjacent to the property or on the approved alignment

Materials cleared and grubbed shall be disposed of as approved by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative in the following manner -

(a) Millable timber or other materials that have a commercial use shall be separated and treated to permit its sale or re-use The constructing authority shall liaise with the Department of Primary Industry and Forestry with respect to royalties and sale

(b) All trees and vegetable material up to 100mm diameter shall be mulched for re-use on site along the disturbed area as an aid to revegetation and to assist in stabilisation of the site

(c) Material not mulched or of commercial value shall be stockpiled at approved sites along the road reserve to provide habitat for local fauna No stockpiles are permitted adjacent to the property boundary (as this may create a fire hazard) or in drainage lines All stockpiles shall be outside of the clear zone ndash refer Section 8 of the Departments Road Planning amp Design Manual

(d) The department may order all cleared and grubbed material to be burnt if the options above are impracticable

(e) Grub holes are to be backfilled and the whole of the disturbed area graded to maintain the shape of the existing terrain

(f) The Department may require all non-usable materials to be removed from the road reserve and disposed of at a site approved by Transport amp Main Roads

Such work is to be to the satisfaction of the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative

44 Services

The owner shall verify the existence and location of any underground or overhead public utility services that construction of the proposed access may affect If such services do exist the owner is to liaise with the relevant Authority to prevent any damage to such service The owner shall also maintain the minimum horizontal and or vertical clearance (as stipulated by the service authority) from any underground or overhead services Any relocation or protection of underground or overhead services shall be carried out at no cost to the Department of Transport amp Main Roads

45 Drainage

A reinforced concrete pipe or reinforced concrete box culvert shall be laid in the table drain under the access unless otherwise approved (in writing) by the Department of Transport amp

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 3 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

Main Roads An Engineering assessment (by a registered professional civil engineer) must be made to determine the size of culvert necessary at each access to ensure that the access does not interfere with drainage flow in the area The minimum diameter of pipe shall be 375 mm RCP or a reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) of equivalent waterway area The minimum length of culvert shall be in accordance with drawings DWG MS 4-5 (18042000) or DWG MS 4-6 (18042000)

46 Roadway Repairs

The owner will be required to repair or cause to be repaired at his own expense any damage to the roadway due to the existence of the access

47 Supervision

All work within the road reserve is to be carried out under the supervision of the Departments area engineer or works inspector for the local government area within which the work lies In this regard it will be necessary for you to contact the Transport amp Main Roads Regional office before commencing any work within the road reserve Alternatively the supervision may be carried out by a registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)

48 Certification

The applicant is to provide written certification that all works have been constructed in accordance with these conditions standard drawings and or any other standard or job specific conditions specified at the time of approval for the works to be constructed

The certification may be from either the Departments area engineer or works inspector or the registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) whoever supervises the works

49 Maintenance of Access

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out at their expense any maintenance work required on the access They may be directed to do so in writing by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative at any time and such work shall be carried out without delay to his satisfaction Failure to do so within the specified time may result in the Department of Transport amp Main Roads carrying out the required works or having it done by a private contractor and recouping the costs from the property owner

5 FUTURE WORKS

51 By Property Owner

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out any upgrading of an access necessary due to additional traffic generation or change in vehicle type using the access

52 By Transport amp Main Roads

The Department of Transport amp Main Roads will reinstate existing accesses to pre-existing standards during any future road reconstruction

All reasonable care will be taken during future roadwork construction however the construction of an access must in no way interfere with the work of maintenance personnel The Director

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 4: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037722Search Date 29042013 1611 Title Reference 50221575 Date Created 03061998UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 22

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16040823Search Date 30042013 0949 Title Reference 20511062 Date Created 14061955 Previous Title 20278134 20278135 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 130 CROWN PLAN CI308 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20278134 (POR 130) Deed of Grant No 20278135 (POR 130) 2 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 11

LAND TITLE ACT 1994

REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION STATEMENT DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Title Reference 50966666 This is the current status of the title as at 1654 on 20102014 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 716068660 10102014 MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 113 CROWN PLAN CI189 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY For exclusions reservations for public purposes refer to Plan CP CI189 EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20250015 (POR 113) 2 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICES Dealing Type Lodgement Date Status 709660172 ACCESS RIGHT 07062006 0831 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999 710100853 ACCESS RIGHT 15112006 1339 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999 714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999 UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority End of Confirmation Statement EV Dann Registrar of Titles and Registrar of Water Allocations Lodgement No 3520849 Office MACKAY Email titlesmacamietcomau MACROSSAN amp AMIET PO BOX 76 MACKAY QLD CONTACT GENE PATERSON 4740 Page 11

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16040823Search Date 30042013 0949 Title Reference 20511062 Date Created 14061955 Previous Title 20278134 20278135 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 130 CROWN PLAN CI308 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20278134 (POR 130) Deed of Grant No 20278135 (POR 130) 2 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 11

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037843Search Date 29042013 1619 Title Reference 20531186 Date Created 08101956 Previous Title 20499060 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 1 REGISTERED PLAN 710290 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY LOT 2 REGISTERED PLAN 714773 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20114051 (POR 1563) Deed of Grant No 20135231 (POR 15V) Deed of Grant No 20172015 (POR 82V) 2 LEASE No 602296293 (N82195) 05081919 OF PART OF SUB 2 OF RESUB 1 OF SUB 2 OF POR 1563 TO THE TREASURER OF QUEENSLAND ORIGINAL TERM FOR 99 YEARS COMMENCING 01 JAN 1919 OR OPTIONS AS MAY BE STATED 3 TRANSFER No 601014654 (N256839) 26091946 IN LEASE NOS N82195 AND N87826 TO THE NORTH ETON CO-OPERATIVE SUGAR MILLING ASSOCIATION LIMITED 4 VESTING No 700772647 26071995 at 1113 of LEASE 602296293 (N82195 ) to MACKAY SUGAR CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LIMITED 5 LEASE No 602296294 (N87826) 06091920 OF PART OF SUB 1 OF POR 15V TO THE TREASURER OF QUEENSLAND ORIGINAL TERM FOR 99 YEARS COMMENCING 01 JAN 1920 OR OPTIONS AS MAY BE STATED Page 12

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037843Search Date 29042013 1619 Title Reference 20531186 Date Created 08101956 EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 6 VESTING No 700772912 26071995 at 1203 of LEASE 602296294 (N87826 ) to MACKAY SUGAR CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LIMITED 7 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status709606017 ACCESS RIGHT 18052006 1439 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999709606038 ACCESS RIGHT 18052006 1440 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 22

Page 1Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Level 4 44 Nelson StreetPO Box 710

Mackay QLD 4740

Our reference SPL-0714-012469Your reference 233412

14 August 2014

Mark and Linda Deguarac- Aurecon PO Box 1060Mackay QLD 4740

Attention Thomas Withers

Dear Mr Withers

Pre-lodgement meeting recordmdashproposed Reconfiguration of a Lot (Boundary Realignment) over Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775 at Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

This pre-lodgement record provides a summary of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting This record provides initial advice regarding the likely major issues relevant to the development proposal to assist in the timely processing of a development application While this pre-lodgement advice is provided in good faith if the proposal is changed to that which was discussed with the department during the pre-lodgement meeting this advice is not binding

Reference information

Departmental role Concurrence agency

Jurisdiction Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 4 ndash Clearing vegetation

Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 2 ndash State controlled roads

Meeting date 29 July 2014

Meeting attendees

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 2

Name Position Organisation

Thomas Withers Urban and Environmental Planner

Aurecon

Grant Paterson Senior Environmental Scientist

Aurecon

Tom Kasauskas Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Phillip Fishburn Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Tanya Whalley Senior Land Office - State Land Asset Management

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Ross Young Principal Designer Department of Transport and Main Roads

Matthew Stirling Senior Designer (Civil) Department of Transport and Main Roads

Dylan Brown Town Planner Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Site details

Street address Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

Real property description Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775

Local government area Mackay Regional Council

Local government zone Rural

Existing use Agricultural activities

Proposed development details

Development type Reconfiguring a lot

Development description Boundary Realignment ndash 11 Lots into 11 Lots

Supporting information

Plan Report title Author Reference no Version and date

Figure 1 Proposed Aurecon 233412 4 17072014

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 3

Boundary Realignment

Figure Proposed PMAV Aurecon 233412 1 17072014

Certificates of Title NA NA NA

Vegetation management is triggered as one of the 11 proposed lots is less than 25ha As discussed if proposed Lot B was increased to greater than 25ha then the proposal would not be triggered for vegetation management referral and the following vegetation management advice would not apply

The following information is provided as a record of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting

Item Further adviceVegetation Management1 The applicant will be required to complete IDAS forms 1 and 11 The applicant will

need to

address Module 8 of the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) Version 14

provide information on the total extent of the clearing footprint within mapped remnant vegetation including any proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure and

provide information on tree heights within mapped remnant vegetation immediately adjacent to proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure to determine the applicable firebreak requirements

2 As part of the assessment against SDAP it is necessary to determine ldquoclearing as a result of reconfiguring a lotrdquo as defined in Module 8 section 84 Glossary of terms

The following considerations are particularly relevant to this application

(1) clearing for boundary fence lines for each proposed allotment(2) clearing to construct built infrastructure(3) clearing for a single residence and reasonably associated buildings and

structures for each new allotment(4) all built infrastructure other than underground services roads and fences

will be assessed as requiring clearing for firebreaks and safety buffers with a width of 20 metres or 15 times the height of the tallest adjacent tree to the infrastructure whichever is the greater

(5) clearing for fire management lines with a width of 10 metres constructed on either side of the allotment boundary

3 A statement addressing how the proposal meets either the performance outcome (PO) or acceptable outcome (AO) for Table 813 PO1-PO2 and Table 814 PO2-PO10 will be required as part of the application

4 Table 813 General

PO1 Clearing to avoid and minimise impacts

Information to demonstrate that the development has first avoided and then minimised the impacts of development will be required as part of an application

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 4

Item Further advicePositioning building envelopes within Category X areas and outside the required buffers for firebreaks would assist in minimising impacts

5 Table 814 Relevant infrastructure

PO3 Watercourses

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 31 or AO 32 as the proposed allotment boundaries will intersect stream order 1 and 2 watercourses containing remnant vegetation where 10 metre clearing on either side of the allotment boundary is assessed

AO 33 states lsquowhere it can be demonstrated that clearing cannot be avoided and the extent of clearing has been minimised an environmental offset is provided for any significant residual impact from clearing of vegetation associated with any watercoursersquo

The performance outcome PO3 requirement is to maintain the current extent of vegetation associated with any watercourse to protect

1 bank stability by protecting against bank erosion2 water quality by filtering sediments nutrients and other pollutants3 aquatic habitat4 terrestrial habitat

As defined in Module 8 Section 84 Glossary of terms to lsquomaintain the current extentrsquo means to

(1) avoid clearing the regional ecosystems or(2) ensure the structure and function of the regional ecosystem is maintained

(minimise the clearing) or(3) provide an environmental offset

If the applicant cannot provided sufficient evidence demonstrating that the structure and function of the impacted regional ecosystems are maintained then both under AO 33 and PO3 they would be required to provide an environmental offset The department highly recommends further discussion with DNRM officers in regard to these matters

6 PO4 Connectivity

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 41 as clearing will occur in areas of vegetation less than 100 metres wide in a coastal bioregion

The performance outcome PO4 requires the vegetation retained

1 is of sufficient size and configured in a way that maintains ecosystem functioning and

2 remains in the landscape despite threatening processes

This may be further affected depending on the proposed building envelopes The clearing footprint will result in highly modifying and disjointing the lsquoof concernrsquo remnant polygons The impact of the proposal on connectivity needs to be addressed to demonstrate how clearing will achieve performance outcome PO4

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 5

Item Further advice7 PO8 Conserving endangered and of concern regional ecosystems

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 81 as clearing will occur within lsquoof concernrsquo RE 835 for the purpose of establishing new allotment boundaries

From preliminary assessment under the proposed plan the application will meet AO 82 as clearing within the lsquoof concernrsquo RE whose structure category is sparse is below the limit stated in Module 8 813 Reference Tables Table 1 (2 ha) but this may not be the case depending on the size and location of the proposed building envelopes which need to be provided

If AO 82 cannot be met the application will be required to meet either AO 83 or PO8 which both stipulate offset provisions It is important to note that if an environmental offset is triggered for a significant residual impact from clearing of an lsquoof concernrsquo RE then the offset will need be achieved in accordance with the Queensland Environmental Offset Framework including the Environmental Offsets Act 2014 Environmental Offsets Regulation 2014 and the Queensland Environmental Offset Policy Further discussion with departmental officers with regard to these matters is highly recommended

8 PMAV

If the applicant believes the regional ecosystem mapping is incorrect they can lodge an application for a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) to dispute it It is highly recommend that if the applicant applies for a PMAV change that they do it prior to lodging the development application for RaL The PMAV application must contain sufficient detailed information for the department to make the PMAV

The proponent is advised that there is no statutory timeframe for the assessment of PMAV applications Please be advised that depending on the final approved PMAV and the submission information provided with the Reconfiguring a Lot application the application may still trigger Vegetation Management assessment under Sustainable Planning Act 2009

State Land Asset Management (SLAM)9 Road Closure and Opening

As the proposed road is being opened out of Freehold Land this can be done by way of registering a survey plan with the consent of Mackay Regional Council DNRM State Land Asset Management does not need to play a part in the road opening

With regards to the road closure the proponent will be required to lodge an Application for Permanent Road Closure The form and associated materials are available at the following website httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstateroadsclosure

The current fee for a Permanent Road Closure is $24440

Assessment must be undertaken to determine if the application may proceed including a Native Title Assessment

There will be consideration payable for the permanent road closure and offsetting

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 6

Item Further advicewill not apply

The road will have to be certified as being acceptable by the road manager prior to the current road being closed SLAM will work with the applicant in order to minimise the survey requirements and this particular dealing may be able to proceed by way of simultaneous opening closure

SLAM will investigate whether advertising can be dispensed with

Assuming that there are no objections to the closure and Native Title has been extinguished it is estimated that an offer will be made to the applicant for the closure within 4 months

10 Reservations

Lot 113 on CI189 and Lot 5 on RP705451 Title Reference 21303024 are subject to road reservations as detailed on CI189 and RP705451

Further investigation will need to be undertaken with regards to the extent of the reservations

The reservations will have to be purchased (unless still required for that purpose) prior to the subdivisionreconfiguration

Application information is available via the following link httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstatepurchase-exchangeallocating The current application fee is $24440

Should the applicant have any further enquiries regarding reservations or road closure and opening they may contact Tanya Whalley Senior Land Officer State Land Asset Management on (07) 4999 6959

Access11 The existing access at Chainage 2910 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is

to remain for existing use only The access shall be maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 (attached)

12 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot

13 The existing access at Chainage 3494 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to provide access for 4 lots only (proposed Lots A B C and J)

Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry It is desirable for the applicant to achieve longer sight distances if possible

The access shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083

14 The remainder of the proposed lots will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road DTMR has no requirements for intersection works on this route

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 7

If you require any further information please contact Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office on (07) 4898 6814 or via email felicitylaubdsdipqldgovau who will be pleased to assist

Yours sincerely

Jamie ThorleyManager (Planning) ndash Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Encl DTMR Standard conditions for construction of minor accesses onto State controlled roadsAccess LocationsDTMR Plan showing minimum access requirements

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 1 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

1 GRANTING of APPROVAL

The Department of Transport and Main Roads grants approvals to construct property accesses within the boundaries of a state controlled road as follows -

bull Limited Access Road _ Sections 54 and 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

bull Other State Controlled Roads _ Section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

The applicant shall construct the access at the location approved by the Regional Director (Mackay) or his representative and in accordance with these Standard Conditions and any special conditions applied by the issuing office

2 SPECIFICATIONS amp DRAWINGS

21 Rural

Access construction must conform to the General Layout Grading and Cross Sectional requirements shown on DWG No 579912 (14022012) attached vertical grading diagrams (Type A ndash Type E) or other drawings approved by the department Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix B The applicant shall also submit engineering drawings (of the proposed access) to the department for approval when requested to do so A registered professional civil engineer must prepare such drawings at no cost to the Department of Transport and Main Roads

22 Urban

The owner shall install a ramped kerb crossing of the existing kerb and channel in accordance with Local Government specifications Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix A The owner shall negotiate with the Local Government about changes to existing kerbside parking to accommodate the sight distance requirements and comply with any requirements council might impose

3 ENVIRONMENT

All works shall comply with the requirements of the regionrsquos current Environment Management Conditions for Minor Works within State Controlled Road Boundaries

4 CONSTRUCTION amp MAINTENANCE

41 Specifications

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or on any attached drawings Department of Transport amp Main Roads Standard Specifications for each class of work involved will apply

42 Traffic Management

Construction of the access shall proceed without unreasonable interruption to traffic The owner shall take all steps necessary to protect the public during construction This shall

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 2 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

include the provision of adequate signage barriers or other specified protection in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1995) Part 3 - Work on Roads

43 Clearing amp Grubbing

Any declared weeds identified at the site shall be treated before clearing work starts The Department of Natural Resources amp Water or the local government can advise on appropriate identification and treatment

Clearing and grubbing (for the proposed works) shall be the minimum needed for the installation of the works either adjacent to the property or on the approved alignment

Materials cleared and grubbed shall be disposed of as approved by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative in the following manner -

(a) Millable timber or other materials that have a commercial use shall be separated and treated to permit its sale or re-use The constructing authority shall liaise with the Department of Primary Industry and Forestry with respect to royalties and sale

(b) All trees and vegetable material up to 100mm diameter shall be mulched for re-use on site along the disturbed area as an aid to revegetation and to assist in stabilisation of the site

(c) Material not mulched or of commercial value shall be stockpiled at approved sites along the road reserve to provide habitat for local fauna No stockpiles are permitted adjacent to the property boundary (as this may create a fire hazard) or in drainage lines All stockpiles shall be outside of the clear zone ndash refer Section 8 of the Departments Road Planning amp Design Manual

(d) The department may order all cleared and grubbed material to be burnt if the options above are impracticable

(e) Grub holes are to be backfilled and the whole of the disturbed area graded to maintain the shape of the existing terrain

(f) The Department may require all non-usable materials to be removed from the road reserve and disposed of at a site approved by Transport amp Main Roads

Such work is to be to the satisfaction of the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative

44 Services

The owner shall verify the existence and location of any underground or overhead public utility services that construction of the proposed access may affect If such services do exist the owner is to liaise with the relevant Authority to prevent any damage to such service The owner shall also maintain the minimum horizontal and or vertical clearance (as stipulated by the service authority) from any underground or overhead services Any relocation or protection of underground or overhead services shall be carried out at no cost to the Department of Transport amp Main Roads

45 Drainage

A reinforced concrete pipe or reinforced concrete box culvert shall be laid in the table drain under the access unless otherwise approved (in writing) by the Department of Transport amp

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 3 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

Main Roads An Engineering assessment (by a registered professional civil engineer) must be made to determine the size of culvert necessary at each access to ensure that the access does not interfere with drainage flow in the area The minimum diameter of pipe shall be 375 mm RCP or a reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) of equivalent waterway area The minimum length of culvert shall be in accordance with drawings DWG MS 4-5 (18042000) or DWG MS 4-6 (18042000)

46 Roadway Repairs

The owner will be required to repair or cause to be repaired at his own expense any damage to the roadway due to the existence of the access

47 Supervision

All work within the road reserve is to be carried out under the supervision of the Departments area engineer or works inspector for the local government area within which the work lies In this regard it will be necessary for you to contact the Transport amp Main Roads Regional office before commencing any work within the road reserve Alternatively the supervision may be carried out by a registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)

48 Certification

The applicant is to provide written certification that all works have been constructed in accordance with these conditions standard drawings and or any other standard or job specific conditions specified at the time of approval for the works to be constructed

The certification may be from either the Departments area engineer or works inspector or the registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) whoever supervises the works

49 Maintenance of Access

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out at their expense any maintenance work required on the access They may be directed to do so in writing by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative at any time and such work shall be carried out without delay to his satisfaction Failure to do so within the specified time may result in the Department of Transport amp Main Roads carrying out the required works or having it done by a private contractor and recouping the costs from the property owner

5 FUTURE WORKS

51 By Property Owner

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out any upgrading of an access necessary due to additional traffic generation or change in vehicle type using the access

52 By Transport amp Main Roads

The Department of Transport amp Main Roads will reinstate existing accesses to pre-existing standards during any future road reconstruction

All reasonable care will be taken during future roadwork construction however the construction of an access must in no way interfere with the work of maintenance personnel The Director

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 5: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16040823Search Date 30042013 0949 Title Reference 20511062 Date Created 14061955 Previous Title 20278134 20278135 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 130 CROWN PLAN CI308 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20278134 (POR 130) Deed of Grant No 20278135 (POR 130) 2 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 11

LAND TITLE ACT 1994

REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION STATEMENT DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Title Reference 50966666 This is the current status of the title as at 1654 on 20102014 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 716068660 10102014 MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 113 CROWN PLAN CI189 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY For exclusions reservations for public purposes refer to Plan CP CI189 EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20250015 (POR 113) 2 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICES Dealing Type Lodgement Date Status 709660172 ACCESS RIGHT 07062006 0831 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999 710100853 ACCESS RIGHT 15112006 1339 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999 714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999 UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority End of Confirmation Statement EV Dann Registrar of Titles and Registrar of Water Allocations Lodgement No 3520849 Office MACKAY Email titlesmacamietcomau MACROSSAN amp AMIET PO BOX 76 MACKAY QLD CONTACT GENE PATERSON 4740 Page 11

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16040823Search Date 30042013 0949 Title Reference 20511062 Date Created 14061955 Previous Title 20278134 20278135 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 130 CROWN PLAN CI308 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20278134 (POR 130) Deed of Grant No 20278135 (POR 130) 2 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 11

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037843Search Date 29042013 1619 Title Reference 20531186 Date Created 08101956 Previous Title 20499060 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 1 REGISTERED PLAN 710290 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY LOT 2 REGISTERED PLAN 714773 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20114051 (POR 1563) Deed of Grant No 20135231 (POR 15V) Deed of Grant No 20172015 (POR 82V) 2 LEASE No 602296293 (N82195) 05081919 OF PART OF SUB 2 OF RESUB 1 OF SUB 2 OF POR 1563 TO THE TREASURER OF QUEENSLAND ORIGINAL TERM FOR 99 YEARS COMMENCING 01 JAN 1919 OR OPTIONS AS MAY BE STATED 3 TRANSFER No 601014654 (N256839) 26091946 IN LEASE NOS N82195 AND N87826 TO THE NORTH ETON CO-OPERATIVE SUGAR MILLING ASSOCIATION LIMITED 4 VESTING No 700772647 26071995 at 1113 of LEASE 602296293 (N82195 ) to MACKAY SUGAR CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LIMITED 5 LEASE No 602296294 (N87826) 06091920 OF PART OF SUB 1 OF POR 15V TO THE TREASURER OF QUEENSLAND ORIGINAL TERM FOR 99 YEARS COMMENCING 01 JAN 1920 OR OPTIONS AS MAY BE STATED Page 12

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037843Search Date 29042013 1619 Title Reference 20531186 Date Created 08101956 EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 6 VESTING No 700772912 26071995 at 1203 of LEASE 602296294 (N87826 ) to MACKAY SUGAR CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LIMITED 7 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status709606017 ACCESS RIGHT 18052006 1439 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999709606038 ACCESS RIGHT 18052006 1440 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 22

Page 1Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Level 4 44 Nelson StreetPO Box 710

Mackay QLD 4740

Our reference SPL-0714-012469Your reference 233412

14 August 2014

Mark and Linda Deguarac- Aurecon PO Box 1060Mackay QLD 4740

Attention Thomas Withers

Dear Mr Withers

Pre-lodgement meeting recordmdashproposed Reconfiguration of a Lot (Boundary Realignment) over Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775 at Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

This pre-lodgement record provides a summary of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting This record provides initial advice regarding the likely major issues relevant to the development proposal to assist in the timely processing of a development application While this pre-lodgement advice is provided in good faith if the proposal is changed to that which was discussed with the department during the pre-lodgement meeting this advice is not binding

Reference information

Departmental role Concurrence agency

Jurisdiction Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 4 ndash Clearing vegetation

Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 2 ndash State controlled roads

Meeting date 29 July 2014

Meeting attendees

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 2

Name Position Organisation

Thomas Withers Urban and Environmental Planner

Aurecon

Grant Paterson Senior Environmental Scientist

Aurecon

Tom Kasauskas Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Phillip Fishburn Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Tanya Whalley Senior Land Office - State Land Asset Management

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Ross Young Principal Designer Department of Transport and Main Roads

Matthew Stirling Senior Designer (Civil) Department of Transport and Main Roads

Dylan Brown Town Planner Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Site details

Street address Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

Real property description Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775

Local government area Mackay Regional Council

Local government zone Rural

Existing use Agricultural activities

Proposed development details

Development type Reconfiguring a lot

Development description Boundary Realignment ndash 11 Lots into 11 Lots

Supporting information

Plan Report title Author Reference no Version and date

Figure 1 Proposed Aurecon 233412 4 17072014

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 3

Boundary Realignment

Figure Proposed PMAV Aurecon 233412 1 17072014

Certificates of Title NA NA NA

Vegetation management is triggered as one of the 11 proposed lots is less than 25ha As discussed if proposed Lot B was increased to greater than 25ha then the proposal would not be triggered for vegetation management referral and the following vegetation management advice would not apply

The following information is provided as a record of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting

Item Further adviceVegetation Management1 The applicant will be required to complete IDAS forms 1 and 11 The applicant will

need to

address Module 8 of the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) Version 14

provide information on the total extent of the clearing footprint within mapped remnant vegetation including any proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure and

provide information on tree heights within mapped remnant vegetation immediately adjacent to proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure to determine the applicable firebreak requirements

2 As part of the assessment against SDAP it is necessary to determine ldquoclearing as a result of reconfiguring a lotrdquo as defined in Module 8 section 84 Glossary of terms

The following considerations are particularly relevant to this application

(1) clearing for boundary fence lines for each proposed allotment(2) clearing to construct built infrastructure(3) clearing for a single residence and reasonably associated buildings and

structures for each new allotment(4) all built infrastructure other than underground services roads and fences

will be assessed as requiring clearing for firebreaks and safety buffers with a width of 20 metres or 15 times the height of the tallest adjacent tree to the infrastructure whichever is the greater

(5) clearing for fire management lines with a width of 10 metres constructed on either side of the allotment boundary

3 A statement addressing how the proposal meets either the performance outcome (PO) or acceptable outcome (AO) for Table 813 PO1-PO2 and Table 814 PO2-PO10 will be required as part of the application

4 Table 813 General

PO1 Clearing to avoid and minimise impacts

Information to demonstrate that the development has first avoided and then minimised the impacts of development will be required as part of an application

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 4

Item Further advicePositioning building envelopes within Category X areas and outside the required buffers for firebreaks would assist in minimising impacts

5 Table 814 Relevant infrastructure

PO3 Watercourses

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 31 or AO 32 as the proposed allotment boundaries will intersect stream order 1 and 2 watercourses containing remnant vegetation where 10 metre clearing on either side of the allotment boundary is assessed

AO 33 states lsquowhere it can be demonstrated that clearing cannot be avoided and the extent of clearing has been minimised an environmental offset is provided for any significant residual impact from clearing of vegetation associated with any watercoursersquo

The performance outcome PO3 requirement is to maintain the current extent of vegetation associated with any watercourse to protect

1 bank stability by protecting against bank erosion2 water quality by filtering sediments nutrients and other pollutants3 aquatic habitat4 terrestrial habitat

As defined in Module 8 Section 84 Glossary of terms to lsquomaintain the current extentrsquo means to

(1) avoid clearing the regional ecosystems or(2) ensure the structure and function of the regional ecosystem is maintained

(minimise the clearing) or(3) provide an environmental offset

If the applicant cannot provided sufficient evidence demonstrating that the structure and function of the impacted regional ecosystems are maintained then both under AO 33 and PO3 they would be required to provide an environmental offset The department highly recommends further discussion with DNRM officers in regard to these matters

6 PO4 Connectivity

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 41 as clearing will occur in areas of vegetation less than 100 metres wide in a coastal bioregion

The performance outcome PO4 requires the vegetation retained

1 is of sufficient size and configured in a way that maintains ecosystem functioning and

2 remains in the landscape despite threatening processes

This may be further affected depending on the proposed building envelopes The clearing footprint will result in highly modifying and disjointing the lsquoof concernrsquo remnant polygons The impact of the proposal on connectivity needs to be addressed to demonstrate how clearing will achieve performance outcome PO4

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 5

Item Further advice7 PO8 Conserving endangered and of concern regional ecosystems

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 81 as clearing will occur within lsquoof concernrsquo RE 835 for the purpose of establishing new allotment boundaries

From preliminary assessment under the proposed plan the application will meet AO 82 as clearing within the lsquoof concernrsquo RE whose structure category is sparse is below the limit stated in Module 8 813 Reference Tables Table 1 (2 ha) but this may not be the case depending on the size and location of the proposed building envelopes which need to be provided

If AO 82 cannot be met the application will be required to meet either AO 83 or PO8 which both stipulate offset provisions It is important to note that if an environmental offset is triggered for a significant residual impact from clearing of an lsquoof concernrsquo RE then the offset will need be achieved in accordance with the Queensland Environmental Offset Framework including the Environmental Offsets Act 2014 Environmental Offsets Regulation 2014 and the Queensland Environmental Offset Policy Further discussion with departmental officers with regard to these matters is highly recommended

8 PMAV

If the applicant believes the regional ecosystem mapping is incorrect they can lodge an application for a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) to dispute it It is highly recommend that if the applicant applies for a PMAV change that they do it prior to lodging the development application for RaL The PMAV application must contain sufficient detailed information for the department to make the PMAV

The proponent is advised that there is no statutory timeframe for the assessment of PMAV applications Please be advised that depending on the final approved PMAV and the submission information provided with the Reconfiguring a Lot application the application may still trigger Vegetation Management assessment under Sustainable Planning Act 2009

State Land Asset Management (SLAM)9 Road Closure and Opening

As the proposed road is being opened out of Freehold Land this can be done by way of registering a survey plan with the consent of Mackay Regional Council DNRM State Land Asset Management does not need to play a part in the road opening

With regards to the road closure the proponent will be required to lodge an Application for Permanent Road Closure The form and associated materials are available at the following website httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstateroadsclosure

The current fee for a Permanent Road Closure is $24440

Assessment must be undertaken to determine if the application may proceed including a Native Title Assessment

There will be consideration payable for the permanent road closure and offsetting

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 6

Item Further advicewill not apply

The road will have to be certified as being acceptable by the road manager prior to the current road being closed SLAM will work with the applicant in order to minimise the survey requirements and this particular dealing may be able to proceed by way of simultaneous opening closure

SLAM will investigate whether advertising can be dispensed with

Assuming that there are no objections to the closure and Native Title has been extinguished it is estimated that an offer will be made to the applicant for the closure within 4 months

10 Reservations

Lot 113 on CI189 and Lot 5 on RP705451 Title Reference 21303024 are subject to road reservations as detailed on CI189 and RP705451

Further investigation will need to be undertaken with regards to the extent of the reservations

The reservations will have to be purchased (unless still required for that purpose) prior to the subdivisionreconfiguration

Application information is available via the following link httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstatepurchase-exchangeallocating The current application fee is $24440

Should the applicant have any further enquiries regarding reservations or road closure and opening they may contact Tanya Whalley Senior Land Officer State Land Asset Management on (07) 4999 6959

Access11 The existing access at Chainage 2910 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is

to remain for existing use only The access shall be maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 (attached)

12 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot

13 The existing access at Chainage 3494 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to provide access for 4 lots only (proposed Lots A B C and J)

Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry It is desirable for the applicant to achieve longer sight distances if possible

The access shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083

14 The remainder of the proposed lots will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road DTMR has no requirements for intersection works on this route

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 7

If you require any further information please contact Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office on (07) 4898 6814 or via email felicitylaubdsdipqldgovau who will be pleased to assist

Yours sincerely

Jamie ThorleyManager (Planning) ndash Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Encl DTMR Standard conditions for construction of minor accesses onto State controlled roadsAccess LocationsDTMR Plan showing minimum access requirements

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 1 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

1 GRANTING of APPROVAL

The Department of Transport and Main Roads grants approvals to construct property accesses within the boundaries of a state controlled road as follows -

bull Limited Access Road _ Sections 54 and 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

bull Other State Controlled Roads _ Section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

The applicant shall construct the access at the location approved by the Regional Director (Mackay) or his representative and in accordance with these Standard Conditions and any special conditions applied by the issuing office

2 SPECIFICATIONS amp DRAWINGS

21 Rural

Access construction must conform to the General Layout Grading and Cross Sectional requirements shown on DWG No 579912 (14022012) attached vertical grading diagrams (Type A ndash Type E) or other drawings approved by the department Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix B The applicant shall also submit engineering drawings (of the proposed access) to the department for approval when requested to do so A registered professional civil engineer must prepare such drawings at no cost to the Department of Transport and Main Roads

22 Urban

The owner shall install a ramped kerb crossing of the existing kerb and channel in accordance with Local Government specifications Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix A The owner shall negotiate with the Local Government about changes to existing kerbside parking to accommodate the sight distance requirements and comply with any requirements council might impose

3 ENVIRONMENT

All works shall comply with the requirements of the regionrsquos current Environment Management Conditions for Minor Works within State Controlled Road Boundaries

4 CONSTRUCTION amp MAINTENANCE

41 Specifications

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or on any attached drawings Department of Transport amp Main Roads Standard Specifications for each class of work involved will apply

42 Traffic Management

Construction of the access shall proceed without unreasonable interruption to traffic The owner shall take all steps necessary to protect the public during construction This shall

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 2 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

include the provision of adequate signage barriers or other specified protection in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1995) Part 3 - Work on Roads

43 Clearing amp Grubbing

Any declared weeds identified at the site shall be treated before clearing work starts The Department of Natural Resources amp Water or the local government can advise on appropriate identification and treatment

Clearing and grubbing (for the proposed works) shall be the minimum needed for the installation of the works either adjacent to the property or on the approved alignment

Materials cleared and grubbed shall be disposed of as approved by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative in the following manner -

(a) Millable timber or other materials that have a commercial use shall be separated and treated to permit its sale or re-use The constructing authority shall liaise with the Department of Primary Industry and Forestry with respect to royalties and sale

(b) All trees and vegetable material up to 100mm diameter shall be mulched for re-use on site along the disturbed area as an aid to revegetation and to assist in stabilisation of the site

(c) Material not mulched or of commercial value shall be stockpiled at approved sites along the road reserve to provide habitat for local fauna No stockpiles are permitted adjacent to the property boundary (as this may create a fire hazard) or in drainage lines All stockpiles shall be outside of the clear zone ndash refer Section 8 of the Departments Road Planning amp Design Manual

(d) The department may order all cleared and grubbed material to be burnt if the options above are impracticable

(e) Grub holes are to be backfilled and the whole of the disturbed area graded to maintain the shape of the existing terrain

(f) The Department may require all non-usable materials to be removed from the road reserve and disposed of at a site approved by Transport amp Main Roads

Such work is to be to the satisfaction of the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative

44 Services

The owner shall verify the existence and location of any underground or overhead public utility services that construction of the proposed access may affect If such services do exist the owner is to liaise with the relevant Authority to prevent any damage to such service The owner shall also maintain the minimum horizontal and or vertical clearance (as stipulated by the service authority) from any underground or overhead services Any relocation or protection of underground or overhead services shall be carried out at no cost to the Department of Transport amp Main Roads

45 Drainage

A reinforced concrete pipe or reinforced concrete box culvert shall be laid in the table drain under the access unless otherwise approved (in writing) by the Department of Transport amp

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 3 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

Main Roads An Engineering assessment (by a registered professional civil engineer) must be made to determine the size of culvert necessary at each access to ensure that the access does not interfere with drainage flow in the area The minimum diameter of pipe shall be 375 mm RCP or a reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) of equivalent waterway area The minimum length of culvert shall be in accordance with drawings DWG MS 4-5 (18042000) or DWG MS 4-6 (18042000)

46 Roadway Repairs

The owner will be required to repair or cause to be repaired at his own expense any damage to the roadway due to the existence of the access

47 Supervision

All work within the road reserve is to be carried out under the supervision of the Departments area engineer or works inspector for the local government area within which the work lies In this regard it will be necessary for you to contact the Transport amp Main Roads Regional office before commencing any work within the road reserve Alternatively the supervision may be carried out by a registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)

48 Certification

The applicant is to provide written certification that all works have been constructed in accordance with these conditions standard drawings and or any other standard or job specific conditions specified at the time of approval for the works to be constructed

The certification may be from either the Departments area engineer or works inspector or the registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) whoever supervises the works

49 Maintenance of Access

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out at their expense any maintenance work required on the access They may be directed to do so in writing by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative at any time and such work shall be carried out without delay to his satisfaction Failure to do so within the specified time may result in the Department of Transport amp Main Roads carrying out the required works or having it done by a private contractor and recouping the costs from the property owner

5 FUTURE WORKS

51 By Property Owner

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out any upgrading of an access necessary due to additional traffic generation or change in vehicle type using the access

52 By Transport amp Main Roads

The Department of Transport amp Main Roads will reinstate existing accesses to pre-existing standards during any future road reconstruction

All reasonable care will be taken during future roadwork construction however the construction of an access must in no way interfere with the work of maintenance personnel The Director

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 6: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

LAND TITLE ACT 1994

REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION STATEMENT DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Title Reference 50966666 This is the current status of the title as at 1654 on 20102014 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 716068660 10102014 MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 113 CROWN PLAN CI189 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY For exclusions reservations for public purposes refer to Plan CP CI189 EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20250015 (POR 113) 2 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICES Dealing Type Lodgement Date Status 709660172 ACCESS RIGHT 07062006 0831 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999 710100853 ACCESS RIGHT 15112006 1339 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999 714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999 UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority End of Confirmation Statement EV Dann Registrar of Titles and Registrar of Water Allocations Lodgement No 3520849 Office MACKAY Email titlesmacamietcomau MACROSSAN amp AMIET PO BOX 76 MACKAY QLD CONTACT GENE PATERSON 4740 Page 11

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16040823Search Date 30042013 0949 Title Reference 20511062 Date Created 14061955 Previous Title 20278134 20278135 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 130 CROWN PLAN CI308 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20278134 (POR 130) Deed of Grant No 20278135 (POR 130) 2 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 11

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037843Search Date 29042013 1619 Title Reference 20531186 Date Created 08101956 Previous Title 20499060 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 1 REGISTERED PLAN 710290 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY LOT 2 REGISTERED PLAN 714773 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20114051 (POR 1563) Deed of Grant No 20135231 (POR 15V) Deed of Grant No 20172015 (POR 82V) 2 LEASE No 602296293 (N82195) 05081919 OF PART OF SUB 2 OF RESUB 1 OF SUB 2 OF POR 1563 TO THE TREASURER OF QUEENSLAND ORIGINAL TERM FOR 99 YEARS COMMENCING 01 JAN 1919 OR OPTIONS AS MAY BE STATED 3 TRANSFER No 601014654 (N256839) 26091946 IN LEASE NOS N82195 AND N87826 TO THE NORTH ETON CO-OPERATIVE SUGAR MILLING ASSOCIATION LIMITED 4 VESTING No 700772647 26071995 at 1113 of LEASE 602296293 (N82195 ) to MACKAY SUGAR CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LIMITED 5 LEASE No 602296294 (N87826) 06091920 OF PART OF SUB 1 OF POR 15V TO THE TREASURER OF QUEENSLAND ORIGINAL TERM FOR 99 YEARS COMMENCING 01 JAN 1920 OR OPTIONS AS MAY BE STATED Page 12

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037843Search Date 29042013 1619 Title Reference 20531186 Date Created 08101956 EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 6 VESTING No 700772912 26071995 at 1203 of LEASE 602296294 (N87826 ) to MACKAY SUGAR CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LIMITED 7 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status709606017 ACCESS RIGHT 18052006 1439 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999709606038 ACCESS RIGHT 18052006 1440 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 22

Page 1Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Level 4 44 Nelson StreetPO Box 710

Mackay QLD 4740

Our reference SPL-0714-012469Your reference 233412

14 August 2014

Mark and Linda Deguarac- Aurecon PO Box 1060Mackay QLD 4740

Attention Thomas Withers

Dear Mr Withers

Pre-lodgement meeting recordmdashproposed Reconfiguration of a Lot (Boundary Realignment) over Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775 at Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

This pre-lodgement record provides a summary of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting This record provides initial advice regarding the likely major issues relevant to the development proposal to assist in the timely processing of a development application While this pre-lodgement advice is provided in good faith if the proposal is changed to that which was discussed with the department during the pre-lodgement meeting this advice is not binding

Reference information

Departmental role Concurrence agency

Jurisdiction Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 4 ndash Clearing vegetation

Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 2 ndash State controlled roads

Meeting date 29 July 2014

Meeting attendees

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 2

Name Position Organisation

Thomas Withers Urban and Environmental Planner

Aurecon

Grant Paterson Senior Environmental Scientist

Aurecon

Tom Kasauskas Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Phillip Fishburn Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Tanya Whalley Senior Land Office - State Land Asset Management

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Ross Young Principal Designer Department of Transport and Main Roads

Matthew Stirling Senior Designer (Civil) Department of Transport and Main Roads

Dylan Brown Town Planner Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Site details

Street address Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

Real property description Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775

Local government area Mackay Regional Council

Local government zone Rural

Existing use Agricultural activities

Proposed development details

Development type Reconfiguring a lot

Development description Boundary Realignment ndash 11 Lots into 11 Lots

Supporting information

Plan Report title Author Reference no Version and date

Figure 1 Proposed Aurecon 233412 4 17072014

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 3

Boundary Realignment

Figure Proposed PMAV Aurecon 233412 1 17072014

Certificates of Title NA NA NA

Vegetation management is triggered as one of the 11 proposed lots is less than 25ha As discussed if proposed Lot B was increased to greater than 25ha then the proposal would not be triggered for vegetation management referral and the following vegetation management advice would not apply

The following information is provided as a record of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting

Item Further adviceVegetation Management1 The applicant will be required to complete IDAS forms 1 and 11 The applicant will

need to

address Module 8 of the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) Version 14

provide information on the total extent of the clearing footprint within mapped remnant vegetation including any proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure and

provide information on tree heights within mapped remnant vegetation immediately adjacent to proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure to determine the applicable firebreak requirements

2 As part of the assessment against SDAP it is necessary to determine ldquoclearing as a result of reconfiguring a lotrdquo as defined in Module 8 section 84 Glossary of terms

The following considerations are particularly relevant to this application

(1) clearing for boundary fence lines for each proposed allotment(2) clearing to construct built infrastructure(3) clearing for a single residence and reasonably associated buildings and

structures for each new allotment(4) all built infrastructure other than underground services roads and fences

will be assessed as requiring clearing for firebreaks and safety buffers with a width of 20 metres or 15 times the height of the tallest adjacent tree to the infrastructure whichever is the greater

(5) clearing for fire management lines with a width of 10 metres constructed on either side of the allotment boundary

3 A statement addressing how the proposal meets either the performance outcome (PO) or acceptable outcome (AO) for Table 813 PO1-PO2 and Table 814 PO2-PO10 will be required as part of the application

4 Table 813 General

PO1 Clearing to avoid and minimise impacts

Information to demonstrate that the development has first avoided and then minimised the impacts of development will be required as part of an application

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 4

Item Further advicePositioning building envelopes within Category X areas and outside the required buffers for firebreaks would assist in minimising impacts

5 Table 814 Relevant infrastructure

PO3 Watercourses

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 31 or AO 32 as the proposed allotment boundaries will intersect stream order 1 and 2 watercourses containing remnant vegetation where 10 metre clearing on either side of the allotment boundary is assessed

AO 33 states lsquowhere it can be demonstrated that clearing cannot be avoided and the extent of clearing has been minimised an environmental offset is provided for any significant residual impact from clearing of vegetation associated with any watercoursersquo

The performance outcome PO3 requirement is to maintain the current extent of vegetation associated with any watercourse to protect

1 bank stability by protecting against bank erosion2 water quality by filtering sediments nutrients and other pollutants3 aquatic habitat4 terrestrial habitat

As defined in Module 8 Section 84 Glossary of terms to lsquomaintain the current extentrsquo means to

(1) avoid clearing the regional ecosystems or(2) ensure the structure and function of the regional ecosystem is maintained

(minimise the clearing) or(3) provide an environmental offset

If the applicant cannot provided sufficient evidence demonstrating that the structure and function of the impacted regional ecosystems are maintained then both under AO 33 and PO3 they would be required to provide an environmental offset The department highly recommends further discussion with DNRM officers in regard to these matters

6 PO4 Connectivity

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 41 as clearing will occur in areas of vegetation less than 100 metres wide in a coastal bioregion

The performance outcome PO4 requires the vegetation retained

1 is of sufficient size and configured in a way that maintains ecosystem functioning and

2 remains in the landscape despite threatening processes

This may be further affected depending on the proposed building envelopes The clearing footprint will result in highly modifying and disjointing the lsquoof concernrsquo remnant polygons The impact of the proposal on connectivity needs to be addressed to demonstrate how clearing will achieve performance outcome PO4

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 5

Item Further advice7 PO8 Conserving endangered and of concern regional ecosystems

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 81 as clearing will occur within lsquoof concernrsquo RE 835 for the purpose of establishing new allotment boundaries

From preliminary assessment under the proposed plan the application will meet AO 82 as clearing within the lsquoof concernrsquo RE whose structure category is sparse is below the limit stated in Module 8 813 Reference Tables Table 1 (2 ha) but this may not be the case depending on the size and location of the proposed building envelopes which need to be provided

If AO 82 cannot be met the application will be required to meet either AO 83 or PO8 which both stipulate offset provisions It is important to note that if an environmental offset is triggered for a significant residual impact from clearing of an lsquoof concernrsquo RE then the offset will need be achieved in accordance with the Queensland Environmental Offset Framework including the Environmental Offsets Act 2014 Environmental Offsets Regulation 2014 and the Queensland Environmental Offset Policy Further discussion with departmental officers with regard to these matters is highly recommended

8 PMAV

If the applicant believes the regional ecosystem mapping is incorrect they can lodge an application for a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) to dispute it It is highly recommend that if the applicant applies for a PMAV change that they do it prior to lodging the development application for RaL The PMAV application must contain sufficient detailed information for the department to make the PMAV

The proponent is advised that there is no statutory timeframe for the assessment of PMAV applications Please be advised that depending on the final approved PMAV and the submission information provided with the Reconfiguring a Lot application the application may still trigger Vegetation Management assessment under Sustainable Planning Act 2009

State Land Asset Management (SLAM)9 Road Closure and Opening

As the proposed road is being opened out of Freehold Land this can be done by way of registering a survey plan with the consent of Mackay Regional Council DNRM State Land Asset Management does not need to play a part in the road opening

With regards to the road closure the proponent will be required to lodge an Application for Permanent Road Closure The form and associated materials are available at the following website httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstateroadsclosure

The current fee for a Permanent Road Closure is $24440

Assessment must be undertaken to determine if the application may proceed including a Native Title Assessment

There will be consideration payable for the permanent road closure and offsetting

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 6

Item Further advicewill not apply

The road will have to be certified as being acceptable by the road manager prior to the current road being closed SLAM will work with the applicant in order to minimise the survey requirements and this particular dealing may be able to proceed by way of simultaneous opening closure

SLAM will investigate whether advertising can be dispensed with

Assuming that there are no objections to the closure and Native Title has been extinguished it is estimated that an offer will be made to the applicant for the closure within 4 months

10 Reservations

Lot 113 on CI189 and Lot 5 on RP705451 Title Reference 21303024 are subject to road reservations as detailed on CI189 and RP705451

Further investigation will need to be undertaken with regards to the extent of the reservations

The reservations will have to be purchased (unless still required for that purpose) prior to the subdivisionreconfiguration

Application information is available via the following link httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstatepurchase-exchangeallocating The current application fee is $24440

Should the applicant have any further enquiries regarding reservations or road closure and opening they may contact Tanya Whalley Senior Land Officer State Land Asset Management on (07) 4999 6959

Access11 The existing access at Chainage 2910 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is

to remain for existing use only The access shall be maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 (attached)

12 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot

13 The existing access at Chainage 3494 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to provide access for 4 lots only (proposed Lots A B C and J)

Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry It is desirable for the applicant to achieve longer sight distances if possible

The access shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083

14 The remainder of the proposed lots will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road DTMR has no requirements for intersection works on this route

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 7

If you require any further information please contact Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office on (07) 4898 6814 or via email felicitylaubdsdipqldgovau who will be pleased to assist

Yours sincerely

Jamie ThorleyManager (Planning) ndash Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Encl DTMR Standard conditions for construction of minor accesses onto State controlled roadsAccess LocationsDTMR Plan showing minimum access requirements

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 1 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

1 GRANTING of APPROVAL

The Department of Transport and Main Roads grants approvals to construct property accesses within the boundaries of a state controlled road as follows -

bull Limited Access Road _ Sections 54 and 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

bull Other State Controlled Roads _ Section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

The applicant shall construct the access at the location approved by the Regional Director (Mackay) or his representative and in accordance with these Standard Conditions and any special conditions applied by the issuing office

2 SPECIFICATIONS amp DRAWINGS

21 Rural

Access construction must conform to the General Layout Grading and Cross Sectional requirements shown on DWG No 579912 (14022012) attached vertical grading diagrams (Type A ndash Type E) or other drawings approved by the department Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix B The applicant shall also submit engineering drawings (of the proposed access) to the department for approval when requested to do so A registered professional civil engineer must prepare such drawings at no cost to the Department of Transport and Main Roads

22 Urban

The owner shall install a ramped kerb crossing of the existing kerb and channel in accordance with Local Government specifications Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix A The owner shall negotiate with the Local Government about changes to existing kerbside parking to accommodate the sight distance requirements and comply with any requirements council might impose

3 ENVIRONMENT

All works shall comply with the requirements of the regionrsquos current Environment Management Conditions for Minor Works within State Controlled Road Boundaries

4 CONSTRUCTION amp MAINTENANCE

41 Specifications

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or on any attached drawings Department of Transport amp Main Roads Standard Specifications for each class of work involved will apply

42 Traffic Management

Construction of the access shall proceed without unreasonable interruption to traffic The owner shall take all steps necessary to protect the public during construction This shall

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 2 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

include the provision of adequate signage barriers or other specified protection in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1995) Part 3 - Work on Roads

43 Clearing amp Grubbing

Any declared weeds identified at the site shall be treated before clearing work starts The Department of Natural Resources amp Water or the local government can advise on appropriate identification and treatment

Clearing and grubbing (for the proposed works) shall be the minimum needed for the installation of the works either adjacent to the property or on the approved alignment

Materials cleared and grubbed shall be disposed of as approved by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative in the following manner -

(a) Millable timber or other materials that have a commercial use shall be separated and treated to permit its sale or re-use The constructing authority shall liaise with the Department of Primary Industry and Forestry with respect to royalties and sale

(b) All trees and vegetable material up to 100mm diameter shall be mulched for re-use on site along the disturbed area as an aid to revegetation and to assist in stabilisation of the site

(c) Material not mulched or of commercial value shall be stockpiled at approved sites along the road reserve to provide habitat for local fauna No stockpiles are permitted adjacent to the property boundary (as this may create a fire hazard) or in drainage lines All stockpiles shall be outside of the clear zone ndash refer Section 8 of the Departments Road Planning amp Design Manual

(d) The department may order all cleared and grubbed material to be burnt if the options above are impracticable

(e) Grub holes are to be backfilled and the whole of the disturbed area graded to maintain the shape of the existing terrain

(f) The Department may require all non-usable materials to be removed from the road reserve and disposed of at a site approved by Transport amp Main Roads

Such work is to be to the satisfaction of the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative

44 Services

The owner shall verify the existence and location of any underground or overhead public utility services that construction of the proposed access may affect If such services do exist the owner is to liaise with the relevant Authority to prevent any damage to such service The owner shall also maintain the minimum horizontal and or vertical clearance (as stipulated by the service authority) from any underground or overhead services Any relocation or protection of underground or overhead services shall be carried out at no cost to the Department of Transport amp Main Roads

45 Drainage

A reinforced concrete pipe or reinforced concrete box culvert shall be laid in the table drain under the access unless otherwise approved (in writing) by the Department of Transport amp

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 3 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

Main Roads An Engineering assessment (by a registered professional civil engineer) must be made to determine the size of culvert necessary at each access to ensure that the access does not interfere with drainage flow in the area The minimum diameter of pipe shall be 375 mm RCP or a reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) of equivalent waterway area The minimum length of culvert shall be in accordance with drawings DWG MS 4-5 (18042000) or DWG MS 4-6 (18042000)

46 Roadway Repairs

The owner will be required to repair or cause to be repaired at his own expense any damage to the roadway due to the existence of the access

47 Supervision

All work within the road reserve is to be carried out under the supervision of the Departments area engineer or works inspector for the local government area within which the work lies In this regard it will be necessary for you to contact the Transport amp Main Roads Regional office before commencing any work within the road reserve Alternatively the supervision may be carried out by a registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)

48 Certification

The applicant is to provide written certification that all works have been constructed in accordance with these conditions standard drawings and or any other standard or job specific conditions specified at the time of approval for the works to be constructed

The certification may be from either the Departments area engineer or works inspector or the registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) whoever supervises the works

49 Maintenance of Access

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out at their expense any maintenance work required on the access They may be directed to do so in writing by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative at any time and such work shall be carried out without delay to his satisfaction Failure to do so within the specified time may result in the Department of Transport amp Main Roads carrying out the required works or having it done by a private contractor and recouping the costs from the property owner

5 FUTURE WORKS

51 By Property Owner

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out any upgrading of an access necessary due to additional traffic generation or change in vehicle type using the access

52 By Transport amp Main Roads

The Department of Transport amp Main Roads will reinstate existing accesses to pre-existing standards during any future road reconstruction

All reasonable care will be taken during future roadwork construction however the construction of an access must in no way interfere with the work of maintenance personnel The Director

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 7: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16040823Search Date 30042013 0949 Title Reference 20511062 Date Created 14061955 Previous Title 20278134 20278135 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 130 CROWN PLAN CI308 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20278134 (POR 130) Deed of Grant No 20278135 (POR 130) 2 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 11

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037843Search Date 29042013 1619 Title Reference 20531186 Date Created 08101956 Previous Title 20499060 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 1 REGISTERED PLAN 710290 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY LOT 2 REGISTERED PLAN 714773 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20114051 (POR 1563) Deed of Grant No 20135231 (POR 15V) Deed of Grant No 20172015 (POR 82V) 2 LEASE No 602296293 (N82195) 05081919 OF PART OF SUB 2 OF RESUB 1 OF SUB 2 OF POR 1563 TO THE TREASURER OF QUEENSLAND ORIGINAL TERM FOR 99 YEARS COMMENCING 01 JAN 1919 OR OPTIONS AS MAY BE STATED 3 TRANSFER No 601014654 (N256839) 26091946 IN LEASE NOS N82195 AND N87826 TO THE NORTH ETON CO-OPERATIVE SUGAR MILLING ASSOCIATION LIMITED 4 VESTING No 700772647 26071995 at 1113 of LEASE 602296293 (N82195 ) to MACKAY SUGAR CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LIMITED 5 LEASE No 602296294 (N87826) 06091920 OF PART OF SUB 1 OF POR 15V TO THE TREASURER OF QUEENSLAND ORIGINAL TERM FOR 99 YEARS COMMENCING 01 JAN 1920 OR OPTIONS AS MAY BE STATED Page 12

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037843Search Date 29042013 1619 Title Reference 20531186 Date Created 08101956 EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 6 VESTING No 700772912 26071995 at 1203 of LEASE 602296294 (N87826 ) to MACKAY SUGAR CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LIMITED 7 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status709606017 ACCESS RIGHT 18052006 1439 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999709606038 ACCESS RIGHT 18052006 1440 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 22

Page 1Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Level 4 44 Nelson StreetPO Box 710

Mackay QLD 4740

Our reference SPL-0714-012469Your reference 233412

14 August 2014

Mark and Linda Deguarac- Aurecon PO Box 1060Mackay QLD 4740

Attention Thomas Withers

Dear Mr Withers

Pre-lodgement meeting recordmdashproposed Reconfiguration of a Lot (Boundary Realignment) over Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775 at Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

This pre-lodgement record provides a summary of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting This record provides initial advice regarding the likely major issues relevant to the development proposal to assist in the timely processing of a development application While this pre-lodgement advice is provided in good faith if the proposal is changed to that which was discussed with the department during the pre-lodgement meeting this advice is not binding

Reference information

Departmental role Concurrence agency

Jurisdiction Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 4 ndash Clearing vegetation

Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 2 ndash State controlled roads

Meeting date 29 July 2014

Meeting attendees

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 2

Name Position Organisation

Thomas Withers Urban and Environmental Planner

Aurecon

Grant Paterson Senior Environmental Scientist

Aurecon

Tom Kasauskas Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Phillip Fishburn Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Tanya Whalley Senior Land Office - State Land Asset Management

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Ross Young Principal Designer Department of Transport and Main Roads

Matthew Stirling Senior Designer (Civil) Department of Transport and Main Roads

Dylan Brown Town Planner Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Site details

Street address Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

Real property description Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775

Local government area Mackay Regional Council

Local government zone Rural

Existing use Agricultural activities

Proposed development details

Development type Reconfiguring a lot

Development description Boundary Realignment ndash 11 Lots into 11 Lots

Supporting information

Plan Report title Author Reference no Version and date

Figure 1 Proposed Aurecon 233412 4 17072014

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 3

Boundary Realignment

Figure Proposed PMAV Aurecon 233412 1 17072014

Certificates of Title NA NA NA

Vegetation management is triggered as one of the 11 proposed lots is less than 25ha As discussed if proposed Lot B was increased to greater than 25ha then the proposal would not be triggered for vegetation management referral and the following vegetation management advice would not apply

The following information is provided as a record of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting

Item Further adviceVegetation Management1 The applicant will be required to complete IDAS forms 1 and 11 The applicant will

need to

address Module 8 of the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) Version 14

provide information on the total extent of the clearing footprint within mapped remnant vegetation including any proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure and

provide information on tree heights within mapped remnant vegetation immediately adjacent to proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure to determine the applicable firebreak requirements

2 As part of the assessment against SDAP it is necessary to determine ldquoclearing as a result of reconfiguring a lotrdquo as defined in Module 8 section 84 Glossary of terms

The following considerations are particularly relevant to this application

(1) clearing for boundary fence lines for each proposed allotment(2) clearing to construct built infrastructure(3) clearing for a single residence and reasonably associated buildings and

structures for each new allotment(4) all built infrastructure other than underground services roads and fences

will be assessed as requiring clearing for firebreaks and safety buffers with a width of 20 metres or 15 times the height of the tallest adjacent tree to the infrastructure whichever is the greater

(5) clearing for fire management lines with a width of 10 metres constructed on either side of the allotment boundary

3 A statement addressing how the proposal meets either the performance outcome (PO) or acceptable outcome (AO) for Table 813 PO1-PO2 and Table 814 PO2-PO10 will be required as part of the application

4 Table 813 General

PO1 Clearing to avoid and minimise impacts

Information to demonstrate that the development has first avoided and then minimised the impacts of development will be required as part of an application

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 4

Item Further advicePositioning building envelopes within Category X areas and outside the required buffers for firebreaks would assist in minimising impacts

5 Table 814 Relevant infrastructure

PO3 Watercourses

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 31 or AO 32 as the proposed allotment boundaries will intersect stream order 1 and 2 watercourses containing remnant vegetation where 10 metre clearing on either side of the allotment boundary is assessed

AO 33 states lsquowhere it can be demonstrated that clearing cannot be avoided and the extent of clearing has been minimised an environmental offset is provided for any significant residual impact from clearing of vegetation associated with any watercoursersquo

The performance outcome PO3 requirement is to maintain the current extent of vegetation associated with any watercourse to protect

1 bank stability by protecting against bank erosion2 water quality by filtering sediments nutrients and other pollutants3 aquatic habitat4 terrestrial habitat

As defined in Module 8 Section 84 Glossary of terms to lsquomaintain the current extentrsquo means to

(1) avoid clearing the regional ecosystems or(2) ensure the structure and function of the regional ecosystem is maintained

(minimise the clearing) or(3) provide an environmental offset

If the applicant cannot provided sufficient evidence demonstrating that the structure and function of the impacted regional ecosystems are maintained then both under AO 33 and PO3 they would be required to provide an environmental offset The department highly recommends further discussion with DNRM officers in regard to these matters

6 PO4 Connectivity

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 41 as clearing will occur in areas of vegetation less than 100 metres wide in a coastal bioregion

The performance outcome PO4 requires the vegetation retained

1 is of sufficient size and configured in a way that maintains ecosystem functioning and

2 remains in the landscape despite threatening processes

This may be further affected depending on the proposed building envelopes The clearing footprint will result in highly modifying and disjointing the lsquoof concernrsquo remnant polygons The impact of the proposal on connectivity needs to be addressed to demonstrate how clearing will achieve performance outcome PO4

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 5

Item Further advice7 PO8 Conserving endangered and of concern regional ecosystems

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 81 as clearing will occur within lsquoof concernrsquo RE 835 for the purpose of establishing new allotment boundaries

From preliminary assessment under the proposed plan the application will meet AO 82 as clearing within the lsquoof concernrsquo RE whose structure category is sparse is below the limit stated in Module 8 813 Reference Tables Table 1 (2 ha) but this may not be the case depending on the size and location of the proposed building envelopes which need to be provided

If AO 82 cannot be met the application will be required to meet either AO 83 or PO8 which both stipulate offset provisions It is important to note that if an environmental offset is triggered for a significant residual impact from clearing of an lsquoof concernrsquo RE then the offset will need be achieved in accordance with the Queensland Environmental Offset Framework including the Environmental Offsets Act 2014 Environmental Offsets Regulation 2014 and the Queensland Environmental Offset Policy Further discussion with departmental officers with regard to these matters is highly recommended

8 PMAV

If the applicant believes the regional ecosystem mapping is incorrect they can lodge an application for a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) to dispute it It is highly recommend that if the applicant applies for a PMAV change that they do it prior to lodging the development application for RaL The PMAV application must contain sufficient detailed information for the department to make the PMAV

The proponent is advised that there is no statutory timeframe for the assessment of PMAV applications Please be advised that depending on the final approved PMAV and the submission information provided with the Reconfiguring a Lot application the application may still trigger Vegetation Management assessment under Sustainable Planning Act 2009

State Land Asset Management (SLAM)9 Road Closure and Opening

As the proposed road is being opened out of Freehold Land this can be done by way of registering a survey plan with the consent of Mackay Regional Council DNRM State Land Asset Management does not need to play a part in the road opening

With regards to the road closure the proponent will be required to lodge an Application for Permanent Road Closure The form and associated materials are available at the following website httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstateroadsclosure

The current fee for a Permanent Road Closure is $24440

Assessment must be undertaken to determine if the application may proceed including a Native Title Assessment

There will be consideration payable for the permanent road closure and offsetting

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 6

Item Further advicewill not apply

The road will have to be certified as being acceptable by the road manager prior to the current road being closed SLAM will work with the applicant in order to minimise the survey requirements and this particular dealing may be able to proceed by way of simultaneous opening closure

SLAM will investigate whether advertising can be dispensed with

Assuming that there are no objections to the closure and Native Title has been extinguished it is estimated that an offer will be made to the applicant for the closure within 4 months

10 Reservations

Lot 113 on CI189 and Lot 5 on RP705451 Title Reference 21303024 are subject to road reservations as detailed on CI189 and RP705451

Further investigation will need to be undertaken with regards to the extent of the reservations

The reservations will have to be purchased (unless still required for that purpose) prior to the subdivisionreconfiguration

Application information is available via the following link httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstatepurchase-exchangeallocating The current application fee is $24440

Should the applicant have any further enquiries regarding reservations or road closure and opening they may contact Tanya Whalley Senior Land Officer State Land Asset Management on (07) 4999 6959

Access11 The existing access at Chainage 2910 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is

to remain for existing use only The access shall be maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 (attached)

12 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot

13 The existing access at Chainage 3494 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to provide access for 4 lots only (proposed Lots A B C and J)

Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry It is desirable for the applicant to achieve longer sight distances if possible

The access shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083

14 The remainder of the proposed lots will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road DTMR has no requirements for intersection works on this route

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 7

If you require any further information please contact Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office on (07) 4898 6814 or via email felicitylaubdsdipqldgovau who will be pleased to assist

Yours sincerely

Jamie ThorleyManager (Planning) ndash Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Encl DTMR Standard conditions for construction of minor accesses onto State controlled roadsAccess LocationsDTMR Plan showing minimum access requirements

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 1 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

1 GRANTING of APPROVAL

The Department of Transport and Main Roads grants approvals to construct property accesses within the boundaries of a state controlled road as follows -

bull Limited Access Road _ Sections 54 and 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

bull Other State Controlled Roads _ Section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

The applicant shall construct the access at the location approved by the Regional Director (Mackay) or his representative and in accordance with these Standard Conditions and any special conditions applied by the issuing office

2 SPECIFICATIONS amp DRAWINGS

21 Rural

Access construction must conform to the General Layout Grading and Cross Sectional requirements shown on DWG No 579912 (14022012) attached vertical grading diagrams (Type A ndash Type E) or other drawings approved by the department Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix B The applicant shall also submit engineering drawings (of the proposed access) to the department for approval when requested to do so A registered professional civil engineer must prepare such drawings at no cost to the Department of Transport and Main Roads

22 Urban

The owner shall install a ramped kerb crossing of the existing kerb and channel in accordance with Local Government specifications Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix A The owner shall negotiate with the Local Government about changes to existing kerbside parking to accommodate the sight distance requirements and comply with any requirements council might impose

3 ENVIRONMENT

All works shall comply with the requirements of the regionrsquos current Environment Management Conditions for Minor Works within State Controlled Road Boundaries

4 CONSTRUCTION amp MAINTENANCE

41 Specifications

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or on any attached drawings Department of Transport amp Main Roads Standard Specifications for each class of work involved will apply

42 Traffic Management

Construction of the access shall proceed without unreasonable interruption to traffic The owner shall take all steps necessary to protect the public during construction This shall

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 2 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

include the provision of adequate signage barriers or other specified protection in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1995) Part 3 - Work on Roads

43 Clearing amp Grubbing

Any declared weeds identified at the site shall be treated before clearing work starts The Department of Natural Resources amp Water or the local government can advise on appropriate identification and treatment

Clearing and grubbing (for the proposed works) shall be the minimum needed for the installation of the works either adjacent to the property or on the approved alignment

Materials cleared and grubbed shall be disposed of as approved by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative in the following manner -

(a) Millable timber or other materials that have a commercial use shall be separated and treated to permit its sale or re-use The constructing authority shall liaise with the Department of Primary Industry and Forestry with respect to royalties and sale

(b) All trees and vegetable material up to 100mm diameter shall be mulched for re-use on site along the disturbed area as an aid to revegetation and to assist in stabilisation of the site

(c) Material not mulched or of commercial value shall be stockpiled at approved sites along the road reserve to provide habitat for local fauna No stockpiles are permitted adjacent to the property boundary (as this may create a fire hazard) or in drainage lines All stockpiles shall be outside of the clear zone ndash refer Section 8 of the Departments Road Planning amp Design Manual

(d) The department may order all cleared and grubbed material to be burnt if the options above are impracticable

(e) Grub holes are to be backfilled and the whole of the disturbed area graded to maintain the shape of the existing terrain

(f) The Department may require all non-usable materials to be removed from the road reserve and disposed of at a site approved by Transport amp Main Roads

Such work is to be to the satisfaction of the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative

44 Services

The owner shall verify the existence and location of any underground or overhead public utility services that construction of the proposed access may affect If such services do exist the owner is to liaise with the relevant Authority to prevent any damage to such service The owner shall also maintain the minimum horizontal and or vertical clearance (as stipulated by the service authority) from any underground or overhead services Any relocation or protection of underground or overhead services shall be carried out at no cost to the Department of Transport amp Main Roads

45 Drainage

A reinforced concrete pipe or reinforced concrete box culvert shall be laid in the table drain under the access unless otherwise approved (in writing) by the Department of Transport amp

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 3 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

Main Roads An Engineering assessment (by a registered professional civil engineer) must be made to determine the size of culvert necessary at each access to ensure that the access does not interfere with drainage flow in the area The minimum diameter of pipe shall be 375 mm RCP or a reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) of equivalent waterway area The minimum length of culvert shall be in accordance with drawings DWG MS 4-5 (18042000) or DWG MS 4-6 (18042000)

46 Roadway Repairs

The owner will be required to repair or cause to be repaired at his own expense any damage to the roadway due to the existence of the access

47 Supervision

All work within the road reserve is to be carried out under the supervision of the Departments area engineer or works inspector for the local government area within which the work lies In this regard it will be necessary for you to contact the Transport amp Main Roads Regional office before commencing any work within the road reserve Alternatively the supervision may be carried out by a registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)

48 Certification

The applicant is to provide written certification that all works have been constructed in accordance with these conditions standard drawings and or any other standard or job specific conditions specified at the time of approval for the works to be constructed

The certification may be from either the Departments area engineer or works inspector or the registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) whoever supervises the works

49 Maintenance of Access

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out at their expense any maintenance work required on the access They may be directed to do so in writing by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative at any time and such work shall be carried out without delay to his satisfaction Failure to do so within the specified time may result in the Department of Transport amp Main Roads carrying out the required works or having it done by a private contractor and recouping the costs from the property owner

5 FUTURE WORKS

51 By Property Owner

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out any upgrading of an access necessary due to additional traffic generation or change in vehicle type using the access

52 By Transport amp Main Roads

The Department of Transport amp Main Roads will reinstate existing accesses to pre-existing standards during any future road reconstruction

All reasonable care will be taken during future roadwork construction however the construction of an access must in no way interfere with the work of maintenance personnel The Director

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 8: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037843Search Date 29042013 1619 Title Reference 20531186 Date Created 08101956 Previous Title 20499060 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No 713435748 30082010

MARK ANDREW DEGUARA ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 1 REGISTERED PLAN 710290 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY LOT 2 REGISTERED PLAN 714773 County of CARLISLE Parish of MIA MIA Local Government MACKAY EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1 Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No 20114051 (POR 1563) Deed of Grant No 20135231 (POR 15V) Deed of Grant No 20172015 (POR 82V) 2 LEASE No 602296293 (N82195) 05081919 OF PART OF SUB 2 OF RESUB 1 OF SUB 2 OF POR 1563 TO THE TREASURER OF QUEENSLAND ORIGINAL TERM FOR 99 YEARS COMMENCING 01 JAN 1919 OR OPTIONS AS MAY BE STATED 3 TRANSFER No 601014654 (N256839) 26091946 IN LEASE NOS N82195 AND N87826 TO THE NORTH ETON CO-OPERATIVE SUGAR MILLING ASSOCIATION LIMITED 4 VESTING No 700772647 26071995 at 1113 of LEASE 602296293 (N82195 ) to MACKAY SUGAR CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LIMITED 5 LEASE No 602296294 (N87826) 06091920 OF PART OF SUB 1 OF POR 15V TO THE TREASURER OF QUEENSLAND ORIGINAL TERM FOR 99 YEARS COMMENCING 01 JAN 1920 OR OPTIONS AS MAY BE STATED Page 12

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037843Search Date 29042013 1619 Title Reference 20531186 Date Created 08101956 EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 6 VESTING No 700772912 26071995 at 1203 of LEASE 602296294 (N87826 ) to MACKAY SUGAR CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LIMITED 7 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status709606017 ACCESS RIGHT 18052006 1439 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999709606038 ACCESS RIGHT 18052006 1440 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 22

Page 1Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Level 4 44 Nelson StreetPO Box 710

Mackay QLD 4740

Our reference SPL-0714-012469Your reference 233412

14 August 2014

Mark and Linda Deguarac- Aurecon PO Box 1060Mackay QLD 4740

Attention Thomas Withers

Dear Mr Withers

Pre-lodgement meeting recordmdashproposed Reconfiguration of a Lot (Boundary Realignment) over Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775 at Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

This pre-lodgement record provides a summary of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting This record provides initial advice regarding the likely major issues relevant to the development proposal to assist in the timely processing of a development application While this pre-lodgement advice is provided in good faith if the proposal is changed to that which was discussed with the department during the pre-lodgement meeting this advice is not binding

Reference information

Departmental role Concurrence agency

Jurisdiction Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 4 ndash Clearing vegetation

Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 2 ndash State controlled roads

Meeting date 29 July 2014

Meeting attendees

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 2

Name Position Organisation

Thomas Withers Urban and Environmental Planner

Aurecon

Grant Paterson Senior Environmental Scientist

Aurecon

Tom Kasauskas Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Phillip Fishburn Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Tanya Whalley Senior Land Office - State Land Asset Management

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Ross Young Principal Designer Department of Transport and Main Roads

Matthew Stirling Senior Designer (Civil) Department of Transport and Main Roads

Dylan Brown Town Planner Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Site details

Street address Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

Real property description Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775

Local government area Mackay Regional Council

Local government zone Rural

Existing use Agricultural activities

Proposed development details

Development type Reconfiguring a lot

Development description Boundary Realignment ndash 11 Lots into 11 Lots

Supporting information

Plan Report title Author Reference no Version and date

Figure 1 Proposed Aurecon 233412 4 17072014

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 3

Boundary Realignment

Figure Proposed PMAV Aurecon 233412 1 17072014

Certificates of Title NA NA NA

Vegetation management is triggered as one of the 11 proposed lots is less than 25ha As discussed if proposed Lot B was increased to greater than 25ha then the proposal would not be triggered for vegetation management referral and the following vegetation management advice would not apply

The following information is provided as a record of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting

Item Further adviceVegetation Management1 The applicant will be required to complete IDAS forms 1 and 11 The applicant will

need to

address Module 8 of the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) Version 14

provide information on the total extent of the clearing footprint within mapped remnant vegetation including any proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure and

provide information on tree heights within mapped remnant vegetation immediately adjacent to proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure to determine the applicable firebreak requirements

2 As part of the assessment against SDAP it is necessary to determine ldquoclearing as a result of reconfiguring a lotrdquo as defined in Module 8 section 84 Glossary of terms

The following considerations are particularly relevant to this application

(1) clearing for boundary fence lines for each proposed allotment(2) clearing to construct built infrastructure(3) clearing for a single residence and reasonably associated buildings and

structures for each new allotment(4) all built infrastructure other than underground services roads and fences

will be assessed as requiring clearing for firebreaks and safety buffers with a width of 20 metres or 15 times the height of the tallest adjacent tree to the infrastructure whichever is the greater

(5) clearing for fire management lines with a width of 10 metres constructed on either side of the allotment boundary

3 A statement addressing how the proposal meets either the performance outcome (PO) or acceptable outcome (AO) for Table 813 PO1-PO2 and Table 814 PO2-PO10 will be required as part of the application

4 Table 813 General

PO1 Clearing to avoid and minimise impacts

Information to demonstrate that the development has first avoided and then minimised the impacts of development will be required as part of an application

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 4

Item Further advicePositioning building envelopes within Category X areas and outside the required buffers for firebreaks would assist in minimising impacts

5 Table 814 Relevant infrastructure

PO3 Watercourses

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 31 or AO 32 as the proposed allotment boundaries will intersect stream order 1 and 2 watercourses containing remnant vegetation where 10 metre clearing on either side of the allotment boundary is assessed

AO 33 states lsquowhere it can be demonstrated that clearing cannot be avoided and the extent of clearing has been minimised an environmental offset is provided for any significant residual impact from clearing of vegetation associated with any watercoursersquo

The performance outcome PO3 requirement is to maintain the current extent of vegetation associated with any watercourse to protect

1 bank stability by protecting against bank erosion2 water quality by filtering sediments nutrients and other pollutants3 aquatic habitat4 terrestrial habitat

As defined in Module 8 Section 84 Glossary of terms to lsquomaintain the current extentrsquo means to

(1) avoid clearing the regional ecosystems or(2) ensure the structure and function of the regional ecosystem is maintained

(minimise the clearing) or(3) provide an environmental offset

If the applicant cannot provided sufficient evidence demonstrating that the structure and function of the impacted regional ecosystems are maintained then both under AO 33 and PO3 they would be required to provide an environmental offset The department highly recommends further discussion with DNRM officers in regard to these matters

6 PO4 Connectivity

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 41 as clearing will occur in areas of vegetation less than 100 metres wide in a coastal bioregion

The performance outcome PO4 requires the vegetation retained

1 is of sufficient size and configured in a way that maintains ecosystem functioning and

2 remains in the landscape despite threatening processes

This may be further affected depending on the proposed building envelopes The clearing footprint will result in highly modifying and disjointing the lsquoof concernrsquo remnant polygons The impact of the proposal on connectivity needs to be addressed to demonstrate how clearing will achieve performance outcome PO4

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 5

Item Further advice7 PO8 Conserving endangered and of concern regional ecosystems

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 81 as clearing will occur within lsquoof concernrsquo RE 835 for the purpose of establishing new allotment boundaries

From preliminary assessment under the proposed plan the application will meet AO 82 as clearing within the lsquoof concernrsquo RE whose structure category is sparse is below the limit stated in Module 8 813 Reference Tables Table 1 (2 ha) but this may not be the case depending on the size and location of the proposed building envelopes which need to be provided

If AO 82 cannot be met the application will be required to meet either AO 83 or PO8 which both stipulate offset provisions It is important to note that if an environmental offset is triggered for a significant residual impact from clearing of an lsquoof concernrsquo RE then the offset will need be achieved in accordance with the Queensland Environmental Offset Framework including the Environmental Offsets Act 2014 Environmental Offsets Regulation 2014 and the Queensland Environmental Offset Policy Further discussion with departmental officers with regard to these matters is highly recommended

8 PMAV

If the applicant believes the regional ecosystem mapping is incorrect they can lodge an application for a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) to dispute it It is highly recommend that if the applicant applies for a PMAV change that they do it prior to lodging the development application for RaL The PMAV application must contain sufficient detailed information for the department to make the PMAV

The proponent is advised that there is no statutory timeframe for the assessment of PMAV applications Please be advised that depending on the final approved PMAV and the submission information provided with the Reconfiguring a Lot application the application may still trigger Vegetation Management assessment under Sustainable Planning Act 2009

State Land Asset Management (SLAM)9 Road Closure and Opening

As the proposed road is being opened out of Freehold Land this can be done by way of registering a survey plan with the consent of Mackay Regional Council DNRM State Land Asset Management does not need to play a part in the road opening

With regards to the road closure the proponent will be required to lodge an Application for Permanent Road Closure The form and associated materials are available at the following website httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstateroadsclosure

The current fee for a Permanent Road Closure is $24440

Assessment must be undertaken to determine if the application may proceed including a Native Title Assessment

There will be consideration payable for the permanent road closure and offsetting

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 6

Item Further advicewill not apply

The road will have to be certified as being acceptable by the road manager prior to the current road being closed SLAM will work with the applicant in order to minimise the survey requirements and this particular dealing may be able to proceed by way of simultaneous opening closure

SLAM will investigate whether advertising can be dispensed with

Assuming that there are no objections to the closure and Native Title has been extinguished it is estimated that an offer will be made to the applicant for the closure within 4 months

10 Reservations

Lot 113 on CI189 and Lot 5 on RP705451 Title Reference 21303024 are subject to road reservations as detailed on CI189 and RP705451

Further investigation will need to be undertaken with regards to the extent of the reservations

The reservations will have to be purchased (unless still required for that purpose) prior to the subdivisionreconfiguration

Application information is available via the following link httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstatepurchase-exchangeallocating The current application fee is $24440

Should the applicant have any further enquiries regarding reservations or road closure and opening they may contact Tanya Whalley Senior Land Officer State Land Asset Management on (07) 4999 6959

Access11 The existing access at Chainage 2910 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is

to remain for existing use only The access shall be maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 (attached)

12 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot

13 The existing access at Chainage 3494 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to provide access for 4 lots only (proposed Lots A B C and J)

Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry It is desirable for the applicant to achieve longer sight distances if possible

The access shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083

14 The remainder of the proposed lots will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road DTMR has no requirements for intersection works on this route

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 7

If you require any further information please contact Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office on (07) 4898 6814 or via email felicitylaubdsdipqldgovau who will be pleased to assist

Yours sincerely

Jamie ThorleyManager (Planning) ndash Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Encl DTMR Standard conditions for construction of minor accesses onto State controlled roadsAccess LocationsDTMR Plan showing minimum access requirements

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 1 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

1 GRANTING of APPROVAL

The Department of Transport and Main Roads grants approvals to construct property accesses within the boundaries of a state controlled road as follows -

bull Limited Access Road _ Sections 54 and 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

bull Other State Controlled Roads _ Section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

The applicant shall construct the access at the location approved by the Regional Director (Mackay) or his representative and in accordance with these Standard Conditions and any special conditions applied by the issuing office

2 SPECIFICATIONS amp DRAWINGS

21 Rural

Access construction must conform to the General Layout Grading and Cross Sectional requirements shown on DWG No 579912 (14022012) attached vertical grading diagrams (Type A ndash Type E) or other drawings approved by the department Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix B The applicant shall also submit engineering drawings (of the proposed access) to the department for approval when requested to do so A registered professional civil engineer must prepare such drawings at no cost to the Department of Transport and Main Roads

22 Urban

The owner shall install a ramped kerb crossing of the existing kerb and channel in accordance with Local Government specifications Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix A The owner shall negotiate with the Local Government about changes to existing kerbside parking to accommodate the sight distance requirements and comply with any requirements council might impose

3 ENVIRONMENT

All works shall comply with the requirements of the regionrsquos current Environment Management Conditions for Minor Works within State Controlled Road Boundaries

4 CONSTRUCTION amp MAINTENANCE

41 Specifications

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or on any attached drawings Department of Transport amp Main Roads Standard Specifications for each class of work involved will apply

42 Traffic Management

Construction of the access shall proceed without unreasonable interruption to traffic The owner shall take all steps necessary to protect the public during construction This shall

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 2 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

include the provision of adequate signage barriers or other specified protection in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1995) Part 3 - Work on Roads

43 Clearing amp Grubbing

Any declared weeds identified at the site shall be treated before clearing work starts The Department of Natural Resources amp Water or the local government can advise on appropriate identification and treatment

Clearing and grubbing (for the proposed works) shall be the minimum needed for the installation of the works either adjacent to the property or on the approved alignment

Materials cleared and grubbed shall be disposed of as approved by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative in the following manner -

(a) Millable timber or other materials that have a commercial use shall be separated and treated to permit its sale or re-use The constructing authority shall liaise with the Department of Primary Industry and Forestry with respect to royalties and sale

(b) All trees and vegetable material up to 100mm diameter shall be mulched for re-use on site along the disturbed area as an aid to revegetation and to assist in stabilisation of the site

(c) Material not mulched or of commercial value shall be stockpiled at approved sites along the road reserve to provide habitat for local fauna No stockpiles are permitted adjacent to the property boundary (as this may create a fire hazard) or in drainage lines All stockpiles shall be outside of the clear zone ndash refer Section 8 of the Departments Road Planning amp Design Manual

(d) The department may order all cleared and grubbed material to be burnt if the options above are impracticable

(e) Grub holes are to be backfilled and the whole of the disturbed area graded to maintain the shape of the existing terrain

(f) The Department may require all non-usable materials to be removed from the road reserve and disposed of at a site approved by Transport amp Main Roads

Such work is to be to the satisfaction of the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative

44 Services

The owner shall verify the existence and location of any underground or overhead public utility services that construction of the proposed access may affect If such services do exist the owner is to liaise with the relevant Authority to prevent any damage to such service The owner shall also maintain the minimum horizontal and or vertical clearance (as stipulated by the service authority) from any underground or overhead services Any relocation or protection of underground or overhead services shall be carried out at no cost to the Department of Transport amp Main Roads

45 Drainage

A reinforced concrete pipe or reinforced concrete box culvert shall be laid in the table drain under the access unless otherwise approved (in writing) by the Department of Transport amp

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 3 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

Main Roads An Engineering assessment (by a registered professional civil engineer) must be made to determine the size of culvert necessary at each access to ensure that the access does not interfere with drainage flow in the area The minimum diameter of pipe shall be 375 mm RCP or a reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) of equivalent waterway area The minimum length of culvert shall be in accordance with drawings DWG MS 4-5 (18042000) or DWG MS 4-6 (18042000)

46 Roadway Repairs

The owner will be required to repair or cause to be repaired at his own expense any damage to the roadway due to the existence of the access

47 Supervision

All work within the road reserve is to be carried out under the supervision of the Departments area engineer or works inspector for the local government area within which the work lies In this regard it will be necessary for you to contact the Transport amp Main Roads Regional office before commencing any work within the road reserve Alternatively the supervision may be carried out by a registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)

48 Certification

The applicant is to provide written certification that all works have been constructed in accordance with these conditions standard drawings and or any other standard or job specific conditions specified at the time of approval for the works to be constructed

The certification may be from either the Departments area engineer or works inspector or the registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) whoever supervises the works

49 Maintenance of Access

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out at their expense any maintenance work required on the access They may be directed to do so in writing by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative at any time and such work shall be carried out without delay to his satisfaction Failure to do so within the specified time may result in the Department of Transport amp Main Roads carrying out the required works or having it done by a private contractor and recouping the costs from the property owner

5 FUTURE WORKS

51 By Property Owner

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out any upgrading of an access necessary due to additional traffic generation or change in vehicle type using the access

52 By Transport amp Main Roads

The Department of Transport amp Main Roads will reinstate existing accesses to pre-existing standards during any future road reconstruction

All reasonable care will be taken during future roadwork construction however the construction of an access must in no way interfere with the work of maintenance personnel The Director

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 9: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES QUEENSLAND Request No 16037843Search Date 29042013 1619 Title Reference 20531186 Date Created 08101956 EASEMENTS ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 6 VESTING No 700772912 26071995 at 1203 of LEASE 602296294 (N87826 ) to MACKAY SUGAR CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LIMITED 7 MORTGAGE No 713435761 30082010 at 1547 RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 001 621 129 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICESDealing Type Lodgement Date Status709606017 ACCESS RIGHT 18052006 1439 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999709606038 ACCESS RIGHT 18052006 1440 CURRENT SUGAR INDUSTRY ACT 1999711223443 WATER NOTICE 28112007 1542 CURRENT WATER ACT 2000714282320 VEG NOTICE 25012012 1530 CURRENT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT 1999UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

End of Current Title Search

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2013]Requested By D APPLICATIONS CITEC CONFIRM Page 22

Page 1Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Level 4 44 Nelson StreetPO Box 710

Mackay QLD 4740

Our reference SPL-0714-012469Your reference 233412

14 August 2014

Mark and Linda Deguarac- Aurecon PO Box 1060Mackay QLD 4740

Attention Thomas Withers

Dear Mr Withers

Pre-lodgement meeting recordmdashproposed Reconfiguration of a Lot (Boundary Realignment) over Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775 at Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

This pre-lodgement record provides a summary of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting This record provides initial advice regarding the likely major issues relevant to the development proposal to assist in the timely processing of a development application While this pre-lodgement advice is provided in good faith if the proposal is changed to that which was discussed with the department during the pre-lodgement meeting this advice is not binding

Reference information

Departmental role Concurrence agency

Jurisdiction Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 4 ndash Clearing vegetation

Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 2 ndash State controlled roads

Meeting date 29 July 2014

Meeting attendees

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 2

Name Position Organisation

Thomas Withers Urban and Environmental Planner

Aurecon

Grant Paterson Senior Environmental Scientist

Aurecon

Tom Kasauskas Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Phillip Fishburn Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Tanya Whalley Senior Land Office - State Land Asset Management

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Ross Young Principal Designer Department of Transport and Main Roads

Matthew Stirling Senior Designer (Civil) Department of Transport and Main Roads

Dylan Brown Town Planner Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Site details

Street address Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

Real property description Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775

Local government area Mackay Regional Council

Local government zone Rural

Existing use Agricultural activities

Proposed development details

Development type Reconfiguring a lot

Development description Boundary Realignment ndash 11 Lots into 11 Lots

Supporting information

Plan Report title Author Reference no Version and date

Figure 1 Proposed Aurecon 233412 4 17072014

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 3

Boundary Realignment

Figure Proposed PMAV Aurecon 233412 1 17072014

Certificates of Title NA NA NA

Vegetation management is triggered as one of the 11 proposed lots is less than 25ha As discussed if proposed Lot B was increased to greater than 25ha then the proposal would not be triggered for vegetation management referral and the following vegetation management advice would not apply

The following information is provided as a record of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting

Item Further adviceVegetation Management1 The applicant will be required to complete IDAS forms 1 and 11 The applicant will

need to

address Module 8 of the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) Version 14

provide information on the total extent of the clearing footprint within mapped remnant vegetation including any proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure and

provide information on tree heights within mapped remnant vegetation immediately adjacent to proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure to determine the applicable firebreak requirements

2 As part of the assessment against SDAP it is necessary to determine ldquoclearing as a result of reconfiguring a lotrdquo as defined in Module 8 section 84 Glossary of terms

The following considerations are particularly relevant to this application

(1) clearing for boundary fence lines for each proposed allotment(2) clearing to construct built infrastructure(3) clearing for a single residence and reasonably associated buildings and

structures for each new allotment(4) all built infrastructure other than underground services roads and fences

will be assessed as requiring clearing for firebreaks and safety buffers with a width of 20 metres or 15 times the height of the tallest adjacent tree to the infrastructure whichever is the greater

(5) clearing for fire management lines with a width of 10 metres constructed on either side of the allotment boundary

3 A statement addressing how the proposal meets either the performance outcome (PO) or acceptable outcome (AO) for Table 813 PO1-PO2 and Table 814 PO2-PO10 will be required as part of the application

4 Table 813 General

PO1 Clearing to avoid and minimise impacts

Information to demonstrate that the development has first avoided and then minimised the impacts of development will be required as part of an application

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 4

Item Further advicePositioning building envelopes within Category X areas and outside the required buffers for firebreaks would assist in minimising impacts

5 Table 814 Relevant infrastructure

PO3 Watercourses

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 31 or AO 32 as the proposed allotment boundaries will intersect stream order 1 and 2 watercourses containing remnant vegetation where 10 metre clearing on either side of the allotment boundary is assessed

AO 33 states lsquowhere it can be demonstrated that clearing cannot be avoided and the extent of clearing has been minimised an environmental offset is provided for any significant residual impact from clearing of vegetation associated with any watercoursersquo

The performance outcome PO3 requirement is to maintain the current extent of vegetation associated with any watercourse to protect

1 bank stability by protecting against bank erosion2 water quality by filtering sediments nutrients and other pollutants3 aquatic habitat4 terrestrial habitat

As defined in Module 8 Section 84 Glossary of terms to lsquomaintain the current extentrsquo means to

(1) avoid clearing the regional ecosystems or(2) ensure the structure and function of the regional ecosystem is maintained

(minimise the clearing) or(3) provide an environmental offset

If the applicant cannot provided sufficient evidence demonstrating that the structure and function of the impacted regional ecosystems are maintained then both under AO 33 and PO3 they would be required to provide an environmental offset The department highly recommends further discussion with DNRM officers in regard to these matters

6 PO4 Connectivity

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 41 as clearing will occur in areas of vegetation less than 100 metres wide in a coastal bioregion

The performance outcome PO4 requires the vegetation retained

1 is of sufficient size and configured in a way that maintains ecosystem functioning and

2 remains in the landscape despite threatening processes

This may be further affected depending on the proposed building envelopes The clearing footprint will result in highly modifying and disjointing the lsquoof concernrsquo remnant polygons The impact of the proposal on connectivity needs to be addressed to demonstrate how clearing will achieve performance outcome PO4

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 5

Item Further advice7 PO8 Conserving endangered and of concern regional ecosystems

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 81 as clearing will occur within lsquoof concernrsquo RE 835 for the purpose of establishing new allotment boundaries

From preliminary assessment under the proposed plan the application will meet AO 82 as clearing within the lsquoof concernrsquo RE whose structure category is sparse is below the limit stated in Module 8 813 Reference Tables Table 1 (2 ha) but this may not be the case depending on the size and location of the proposed building envelopes which need to be provided

If AO 82 cannot be met the application will be required to meet either AO 83 or PO8 which both stipulate offset provisions It is important to note that if an environmental offset is triggered for a significant residual impact from clearing of an lsquoof concernrsquo RE then the offset will need be achieved in accordance with the Queensland Environmental Offset Framework including the Environmental Offsets Act 2014 Environmental Offsets Regulation 2014 and the Queensland Environmental Offset Policy Further discussion with departmental officers with regard to these matters is highly recommended

8 PMAV

If the applicant believes the regional ecosystem mapping is incorrect they can lodge an application for a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) to dispute it It is highly recommend that if the applicant applies for a PMAV change that they do it prior to lodging the development application for RaL The PMAV application must contain sufficient detailed information for the department to make the PMAV

The proponent is advised that there is no statutory timeframe for the assessment of PMAV applications Please be advised that depending on the final approved PMAV and the submission information provided with the Reconfiguring a Lot application the application may still trigger Vegetation Management assessment under Sustainable Planning Act 2009

State Land Asset Management (SLAM)9 Road Closure and Opening

As the proposed road is being opened out of Freehold Land this can be done by way of registering a survey plan with the consent of Mackay Regional Council DNRM State Land Asset Management does not need to play a part in the road opening

With regards to the road closure the proponent will be required to lodge an Application for Permanent Road Closure The form and associated materials are available at the following website httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstateroadsclosure

The current fee for a Permanent Road Closure is $24440

Assessment must be undertaken to determine if the application may proceed including a Native Title Assessment

There will be consideration payable for the permanent road closure and offsetting

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 6

Item Further advicewill not apply

The road will have to be certified as being acceptable by the road manager prior to the current road being closed SLAM will work with the applicant in order to minimise the survey requirements and this particular dealing may be able to proceed by way of simultaneous opening closure

SLAM will investigate whether advertising can be dispensed with

Assuming that there are no objections to the closure and Native Title has been extinguished it is estimated that an offer will be made to the applicant for the closure within 4 months

10 Reservations

Lot 113 on CI189 and Lot 5 on RP705451 Title Reference 21303024 are subject to road reservations as detailed on CI189 and RP705451

Further investigation will need to be undertaken with regards to the extent of the reservations

The reservations will have to be purchased (unless still required for that purpose) prior to the subdivisionreconfiguration

Application information is available via the following link httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstatepurchase-exchangeallocating The current application fee is $24440

Should the applicant have any further enquiries regarding reservations or road closure and opening they may contact Tanya Whalley Senior Land Officer State Land Asset Management on (07) 4999 6959

Access11 The existing access at Chainage 2910 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is

to remain for existing use only The access shall be maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 (attached)

12 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot

13 The existing access at Chainage 3494 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to provide access for 4 lots only (proposed Lots A B C and J)

Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry It is desirable for the applicant to achieve longer sight distances if possible

The access shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083

14 The remainder of the proposed lots will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road DTMR has no requirements for intersection works on this route

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 7

If you require any further information please contact Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office on (07) 4898 6814 or via email felicitylaubdsdipqldgovau who will be pleased to assist

Yours sincerely

Jamie ThorleyManager (Planning) ndash Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Encl DTMR Standard conditions for construction of minor accesses onto State controlled roadsAccess LocationsDTMR Plan showing minimum access requirements

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 1 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

1 GRANTING of APPROVAL

The Department of Transport and Main Roads grants approvals to construct property accesses within the boundaries of a state controlled road as follows -

bull Limited Access Road _ Sections 54 and 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

bull Other State Controlled Roads _ Section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

The applicant shall construct the access at the location approved by the Regional Director (Mackay) or his representative and in accordance with these Standard Conditions and any special conditions applied by the issuing office

2 SPECIFICATIONS amp DRAWINGS

21 Rural

Access construction must conform to the General Layout Grading and Cross Sectional requirements shown on DWG No 579912 (14022012) attached vertical grading diagrams (Type A ndash Type E) or other drawings approved by the department Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix B The applicant shall also submit engineering drawings (of the proposed access) to the department for approval when requested to do so A registered professional civil engineer must prepare such drawings at no cost to the Department of Transport and Main Roads

22 Urban

The owner shall install a ramped kerb crossing of the existing kerb and channel in accordance with Local Government specifications Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix A The owner shall negotiate with the Local Government about changes to existing kerbside parking to accommodate the sight distance requirements and comply with any requirements council might impose

3 ENVIRONMENT

All works shall comply with the requirements of the regionrsquos current Environment Management Conditions for Minor Works within State Controlled Road Boundaries

4 CONSTRUCTION amp MAINTENANCE

41 Specifications

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or on any attached drawings Department of Transport amp Main Roads Standard Specifications for each class of work involved will apply

42 Traffic Management

Construction of the access shall proceed without unreasonable interruption to traffic The owner shall take all steps necessary to protect the public during construction This shall

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 2 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

include the provision of adequate signage barriers or other specified protection in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1995) Part 3 - Work on Roads

43 Clearing amp Grubbing

Any declared weeds identified at the site shall be treated before clearing work starts The Department of Natural Resources amp Water or the local government can advise on appropriate identification and treatment

Clearing and grubbing (for the proposed works) shall be the minimum needed for the installation of the works either adjacent to the property or on the approved alignment

Materials cleared and grubbed shall be disposed of as approved by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative in the following manner -

(a) Millable timber or other materials that have a commercial use shall be separated and treated to permit its sale or re-use The constructing authority shall liaise with the Department of Primary Industry and Forestry with respect to royalties and sale

(b) All trees and vegetable material up to 100mm diameter shall be mulched for re-use on site along the disturbed area as an aid to revegetation and to assist in stabilisation of the site

(c) Material not mulched or of commercial value shall be stockpiled at approved sites along the road reserve to provide habitat for local fauna No stockpiles are permitted adjacent to the property boundary (as this may create a fire hazard) or in drainage lines All stockpiles shall be outside of the clear zone ndash refer Section 8 of the Departments Road Planning amp Design Manual

(d) The department may order all cleared and grubbed material to be burnt if the options above are impracticable

(e) Grub holes are to be backfilled and the whole of the disturbed area graded to maintain the shape of the existing terrain

(f) The Department may require all non-usable materials to be removed from the road reserve and disposed of at a site approved by Transport amp Main Roads

Such work is to be to the satisfaction of the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative

44 Services

The owner shall verify the existence and location of any underground or overhead public utility services that construction of the proposed access may affect If such services do exist the owner is to liaise with the relevant Authority to prevent any damage to such service The owner shall also maintain the minimum horizontal and or vertical clearance (as stipulated by the service authority) from any underground or overhead services Any relocation or protection of underground or overhead services shall be carried out at no cost to the Department of Transport amp Main Roads

45 Drainage

A reinforced concrete pipe or reinforced concrete box culvert shall be laid in the table drain under the access unless otherwise approved (in writing) by the Department of Transport amp

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 3 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

Main Roads An Engineering assessment (by a registered professional civil engineer) must be made to determine the size of culvert necessary at each access to ensure that the access does not interfere with drainage flow in the area The minimum diameter of pipe shall be 375 mm RCP or a reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) of equivalent waterway area The minimum length of culvert shall be in accordance with drawings DWG MS 4-5 (18042000) or DWG MS 4-6 (18042000)

46 Roadway Repairs

The owner will be required to repair or cause to be repaired at his own expense any damage to the roadway due to the existence of the access

47 Supervision

All work within the road reserve is to be carried out under the supervision of the Departments area engineer or works inspector for the local government area within which the work lies In this regard it will be necessary for you to contact the Transport amp Main Roads Regional office before commencing any work within the road reserve Alternatively the supervision may be carried out by a registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)

48 Certification

The applicant is to provide written certification that all works have been constructed in accordance with these conditions standard drawings and or any other standard or job specific conditions specified at the time of approval for the works to be constructed

The certification may be from either the Departments area engineer or works inspector or the registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) whoever supervises the works

49 Maintenance of Access

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out at their expense any maintenance work required on the access They may be directed to do so in writing by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative at any time and such work shall be carried out without delay to his satisfaction Failure to do so within the specified time may result in the Department of Transport amp Main Roads carrying out the required works or having it done by a private contractor and recouping the costs from the property owner

5 FUTURE WORKS

51 By Property Owner

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out any upgrading of an access necessary due to additional traffic generation or change in vehicle type using the access

52 By Transport amp Main Roads

The Department of Transport amp Main Roads will reinstate existing accesses to pre-existing standards during any future road reconstruction

All reasonable care will be taken during future roadwork construction however the construction of an access must in no way interfere with the work of maintenance personnel The Director

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 10: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Page 1Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Level 4 44 Nelson StreetPO Box 710

Mackay QLD 4740

Our reference SPL-0714-012469Your reference 233412

14 August 2014

Mark and Linda Deguarac- Aurecon PO Box 1060Mackay QLD 4740

Attention Thomas Withers

Dear Mr Withers

Pre-lodgement meeting recordmdashproposed Reconfiguration of a Lot (Boundary Realignment) over Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775 at Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

This pre-lodgement record provides a summary of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting This record provides initial advice regarding the likely major issues relevant to the development proposal to assist in the timely processing of a development application While this pre-lodgement advice is provided in good faith if the proposal is changed to that which was discussed with the department during the pre-lodgement meeting this advice is not binding

Reference information

Departmental role Concurrence agency

Jurisdiction Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 4 ndash Clearing vegetation

Schedule 7 Table 2 Item 2 ndash State controlled roads

Meeting date 29 July 2014

Meeting attendees

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 2

Name Position Organisation

Thomas Withers Urban and Environmental Planner

Aurecon

Grant Paterson Senior Environmental Scientist

Aurecon

Tom Kasauskas Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Phillip Fishburn Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Tanya Whalley Senior Land Office - State Land Asset Management

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Ross Young Principal Designer Department of Transport and Main Roads

Matthew Stirling Senior Designer (Civil) Department of Transport and Main Roads

Dylan Brown Town Planner Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Site details

Street address Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

Real property description Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775

Local government area Mackay Regional Council

Local government zone Rural

Existing use Agricultural activities

Proposed development details

Development type Reconfiguring a lot

Development description Boundary Realignment ndash 11 Lots into 11 Lots

Supporting information

Plan Report title Author Reference no Version and date

Figure 1 Proposed Aurecon 233412 4 17072014

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 3

Boundary Realignment

Figure Proposed PMAV Aurecon 233412 1 17072014

Certificates of Title NA NA NA

Vegetation management is triggered as one of the 11 proposed lots is less than 25ha As discussed if proposed Lot B was increased to greater than 25ha then the proposal would not be triggered for vegetation management referral and the following vegetation management advice would not apply

The following information is provided as a record of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting

Item Further adviceVegetation Management1 The applicant will be required to complete IDAS forms 1 and 11 The applicant will

need to

address Module 8 of the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) Version 14

provide information on the total extent of the clearing footprint within mapped remnant vegetation including any proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure and

provide information on tree heights within mapped remnant vegetation immediately adjacent to proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure to determine the applicable firebreak requirements

2 As part of the assessment against SDAP it is necessary to determine ldquoclearing as a result of reconfiguring a lotrdquo as defined in Module 8 section 84 Glossary of terms

The following considerations are particularly relevant to this application

(1) clearing for boundary fence lines for each proposed allotment(2) clearing to construct built infrastructure(3) clearing for a single residence and reasonably associated buildings and

structures for each new allotment(4) all built infrastructure other than underground services roads and fences

will be assessed as requiring clearing for firebreaks and safety buffers with a width of 20 metres or 15 times the height of the tallest adjacent tree to the infrastructure whichever is the greater

(5) clearing for fire management lines with a width of 10 metres constructed on either side of the allotment boundary

3 A statement addressing how the proposal meets either the performance outcome (PO) or acceptable outcome (AO) for Table 813 PO1-PO2 and Table 814 PO2-PO10 will be required as part of the application

4 Table 813 General

PO1 Clearing to avoid and minimise impacts

Information to demonstrate that the development has first avoided and then minimised the impacts of development will be required as part of an application

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 4

Item Further advicePositioning building envelopes within Category X areas and outside the required buffers for firebreaks would assist in minimising impacts

5 Table 814 Relevant infrastructure

PO3 Watercourses

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 31 or AO 32 as the proposed allotment boundaries will intersect stream order 1 and 2 watercourses containing remnant vegetation where 10 metre clearing on either side of the allotment boundary is assessed

AO 33 states lsquowhere it can be demonstrated that clearing cannot be avoided and the extent of clearing has been minimised an environmental offset is provided for any significant residual impact from clearing of vegetation associated with any watercoursersquo

The performance outcome PO3 requirement is to maintain the current extent of vegetation associated with any watercourse to protect

1 bank stability by protecting against bank erosion2 water quality by filtering sediments nutrients and other pollutants3 aquatic habitat4 terrestrial habitat

As defined in Module 8 Section 84 Glossary of terms to lsquomaintain the current extentrsquo means to

(1) avoid clearing the regional ecosystems or(2) ensure the structure and function of the regional ecosystem is maintained

(minimise the clearing) or(3) provide an environmental offset

If the applicant cannot provided sufficient evidence demonstrating that the structure and function of the impacted regional ecosystems are maintained then both under AO 33 and PO3 they would be required to provide an environmental offset The department highly recommends further discussion with DNRM officers in regard to these matters

6 PO4 Connectivity

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 41 as clearing will occur in areas of vegetation less than 100 metres wide in a coastal bioregion

The performance outcome PO4 requires the vegetation retained

1 is of sufficient size and configured in a way that maintains ecosystem functioning and

2 remains in the landscape despite threatening processes

This may be further affected depending on the proposed building envelopes The clearing footprint will result in highly modifying and disjointing the lsquoof concernrsquo remnant polygons The impact of the proposal on connectivity needs to be addressed to demonstrate how clearing will achieve performance outcome PO4

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 5

Item Further advice7 PO8 Conserving endangered and of concern regional ecosystems

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 81 as clearing will occur within lsquoof concernrsquo RE 835 for the purpose of establishing new allotment boundaries

From preliminary assessment under the proposed plan the application will meet AO 82 as clearing within the lsquoof concernrsquo RE whose structure category is sparse is below the limit stated in Module 8 813 Reference Tables Table 1 (2 ha) but this may not be the case depending on the size and location of the proposed building envelopes which need to be provided

If AO 82 cannot be met the application will be required to meet either AO 83 or PO8 which both stipulate offset provisions It is important to note that if an environmental offset is triggered for a significant residual impact from clearing of an lsquoof concernrsquo RE then the offset will need be achieved in accordance with the Queensland Environmental Offset Framework including the Environmental Offsets Act 2014 Environmental Offsets Regulation 2014 and the Queensland Environmental Offset Policy Further discussion with departmental officers with regard to these matters is highly recommended

8 PMAV

If the applicant believes the regional ecosystem mapping is incorrect they can lodge an application for a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) to dispute it It is highly recommend that if the applicant applies for a PMAV change that they do it prior to lodging the development application for RaL The PMAV application must contain sufficient detailed information for the department to make the PMAV

The proponent is advised that there is no statutory timeframe for the assessment of PMAV applications Please be advised that depending on the final approved PMAV and the submission information provided with the Reconfiguring a Lot application the application may still trigger Vegetation Management assessment under Sustainable Planning Act 2009

State Land Asset Management (SLAM)9 Road Closure and Opening

As the proposed road is being opened out of Freehold Land this can be done by way of registering a survey plan with the consent of Mackay Regional Council DNRM State Land Asset Management does not need to play a part in the road opening

With regards to the road closure the proponent will be required to lodge an Application for Permanent Road Closure The form and associated materials are available at the following website httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstateroadsclosure

The current fee for a Permanent Road Closure is $24440

Assessment must be undertaken to determine if the application may proceed including a Native Title Assessment

There will be consideration payable for the permanent road closure and offsetting

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 6

Item Further advicewill not apply

The road will have to be certified as being acceptable by the road manager prior to the current road being closed SLAM will work with the applicant in order to minimise the survey requirements and this particular dealing may be able to proceed by way of simultaneous opening closure

SLAM will investigate whether advertising can be dispensed with

Assuming that there are no objections to the closure and Native Title has been extinguished it is estimated that an offer will be made to the applicant for the closure within 4 months

10 Reservations

Lot 113 on CI189 and Lot 5 on RP705451 Title Reference 21303024 are subject to road reservations as detailed on CI189 and RP705451

Further investigation will need to be undertaken with regards to the extent of the reservations

The reservations will have to be purchased (unless still required for that purpose) prior to the subdivisionreconfiguration

Application information is available via the following link httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstatepurchase-exchangeallocating The current application fee is $24440

Should the applicant have any further enquiries regarding reservations or road closure and opening they may contact Tanya Whalley Senior Land Officer State Land Asset Management on (07) 4999 6959

Access11 The existing access at Chainage 2910 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is

to remain for existing use only The access shall be maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 (attached)

12 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot

13 The existing access at Chainage 3494 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to provide access for 4 lots only (proposed Lots A B C and J)

Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry It is desirable for the applicant to achieve longer sight distances if possible

The access shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083

14 The remainder of the proposed lots will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road DTMR has no requirements for intersection works on this route

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 7

If you require any further information please contact Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office on (07) 4898 6814 or via email felicitylaubdsdipqldgovau who will be pleased to assist

Yours sincerely

Jamie ThorleyManager (Planning) ndash Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Encl DTMR Standard conditions for construction of minor accesses onto State controlled roadsAccess LocationsDTMR Plan showing minimum access requirements

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 1 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

1 GRANTING of APPROVAL

The Department of Transport and Main Roads grants approvals to construct property accesses within the boundaries of a state controlled road as follows -

bull Limited Access Road _ Sections 54 and 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

bull Other State Controlled Roads _ Section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

The applicant shall construct the access at the location approved by the Regional Director (Mackay) or his representative and in accordance with these Standard Conditions and any special conditions applied by the issuing office

2 SPECIFICATIONS amp DRAWINGS

21 Rural

Access construction must conform to the General Layout Grading and Cross Sectional requirements shown on DWG No 579912 (14022012) attached vertical grading diagrams (Type A ndash Type E) or other drawings approved by the department Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix B The applicant shall also submit engineering drawings (of the proposed access) to the department for approval when requested to do so A registered professional civil engineer must prepare such drawings at no cost to the Department of Transport and Main Roads

22 Urban

The owner shall install a ramped kerb crossing of the existing kerb and channel in accordance with Local Government specifications Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix A The owner shall negotiate with the Local Government about changes to existing kerbside parking to accommodate the sight distance requirements and comply with any requirements council might impose

3 ENVIRONMENT

All works shall comply with the requirements of the regionrsquos current Environment Management Conditions for Minor Works within State Controlled Road Boundaries

4 CONSTRUCTION amp MAINTENANCE

41 Specifications

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or on any attached drawings Department of Transport amp Main Roads Standard Specifications for each class of work involved will apply

42 Traffic Management

Construction of the access shall proceed without unreasonable interruption to traffic The owner shall take all steps necessary to protect the public during construction This shall

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 2 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

include the provision of adequate signage barriers or other specified protection in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1995) Part 3 - Work on Roads

43 Clearing amp Grubbing

Any declared weeds identified at the site shall be treated before clearing work starts The Department of Natural Resources amp Water or the local government can advise on appropriate identification and treatment

Clearing and grubbing (for the proposed works) shall be the minimum needed for the installation of the works either adjacent to the property or on the approved alignment

Materials cleared and grubbed shall be disposed of as approved by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative in the following manner -

(a) Millable timber or other materials that have a commercial use shall be separated and treated to permit its sale or re-use The constructing authority shall liaise with the Department of Primary Industry and Forestry with respect to royalties and sale

(b) All trees and vegetable material up to 100mm diameter shall be mulched for re-use on site along the disturbed area as an aid to revegetation and to assist in stabilisation of the site

(c) Material not mulched or of commercial value shall be stockpiled at approved sites along the road reserve to provide habitat for local fauna No stockpiles are permitted adjacent to the property boundary (as this may create a fire hazard) or in drainage lines All stockpiles shall be outside of the clear zone ndash refer Section 8 of the Departments Road Planning amp Design Manual

(d) The department may order all cleared and grubbed material to be burnt if the options above are impracticable

(e) Grub holes are to be backfilled and the whole of the disturbed area graded to maintain the shape of the existing terrain

(f) The Department may require all non-usable materials to be removed from the road reserve and disposed of at a site approved by Transport amp Main Roads

Such work is to be to the satisfaction of the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative

44 Services

The owner shall verify the existence and location of any underground or overhead public utility services that construction of the proposed access may affect If such services do exist the owner is to liaise with the relevant Authority to prevent any damage to such service The owner shall also maintain the minimum horizontal and or vertical clearance (as stipulated by the service authority) from any underground or overhead services Any relocation or protection of underground or overhead services shall be carried out at no cost to the Department of Transport amp Main Roads

45 Drainage

A reinforced concrete pipe or reinforced concrete box culvert shall be laid in the table drain under the access unless otherwise approved (in writing) by the Department of Transport amp

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 3 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

Main Roads An Engineering assessment (by a registered professional civil engineer) must be made to determine the size of culvert necessary at each access to ensure that the access does not interfere with drainage flow in the area The minimum diameter of pipe shall be 375 mm RCP or a reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) of equivalent waterway area The minimum length of culvert shall be in accordance with drawings DWG MS 4-5 (18042000) or DWG MS 4-6 (18042000)

46 Roadway Repairs

The owner will be required to repair or cause to be repaired at his own expense any damage to the roadway due to the existence of the access

47 Supervision

All work within the road reserve is to be carried out under the supervision of the Departments area engineer or works inspector for the local government area within which the work lies In this regard it will be necessary for you to contact the Transport amp Main Roads Regional office before commencing any work within the road reserve Alternatively the supervision may be carried out by a registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)

48 Certification

The applicant is to provide written certification that all works have been constructed in accordance with these conditions standard drawings and or any other standard or job specific conditions specified at the time of approval for the works to be constructed

The certification may be from either the Departments area engineer or works inspector or the registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) whoever supervises the works

49 Maintenance of Access

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out at their expense any maintenance work required on the access They may be directed to do so in writing by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative at any time and such work shall be carried out without delay to his satisfaction Failure to do so within the specified time may result in the Department of Transport amp Main Roads carrying out the required works or having it done by a private contractor and recouping the costs from the property owner

5 FUTURE WORKS

51 By Property Owner

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out any upgrading of an access necessary due to additional traffic generation or change in vehicle type using the access

52 By Transport amp Main Roads

The Department of Transport amp Main Roads will reinstate existing accesses to pre-existing standards during any future road reconstruction

All reasonable care will be taken during future roadwork construction however the construction of an access must in no way interfere with the work of maintenance personnel The Director

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 11: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 2

Name Position Organisation

Thomas Withers Urban and Environmental Planner

Aurecon

Grant Paterson Senior Environmental Scientist

Aurecon

Tom Kasauskas Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Phillip Fishburn Natural Resource Management Officer

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Tanya Whalley Senior Land Office - State Land Asset Management

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Ross Young Principal Designer Department of Transport and Main Roads

Matthew Stirling Senior Designer (Civil) Department of Transport and Main Roads

Dylan Brown Town Planner Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

Site details

Street address Mia Mia Connection Road Mia Mia QLD 4740

Real property description Lot 5 on RP705451 Lot 1 on RP705453 Lot 113 on CI189 Lots 1 and 2 on RP710290 Lot 130 on CI308 Lots 1 and 2 on RP714773 Lots 1 and 2 on RP715529 and Lot 4 on SP104775

Local government area Mackay Regional Council

Local government zone Rural

Existing use Agricultural activities

Proposed development details

Development type Reconfiguring a lot

Development description Boundary Realignment ndash 11 Lots into 11 Lots

Supporting information

Plan Report title Author Reference no Version and date

Figure 1 Proposed Aurecon 233412 4 17072014

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 3

Boundary Realignment

Figure Proposed PMAV Aurecon 233412 1 17072014

Certificates of Title NA NA NA

Vegetation management is triggered as one of the 11 proposed lots is less than 25ha As discussed if proposed Lot B was increased to greater than 25ha then the proposal would not be triggered for vegetation management referral and the following vegetation management advice would not apply

The following information is provided as a record of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting

Item Further adviceVegetation Management1 The applicant will be required to complete IDAS forms 1 and 11 The applicant will

need to

address Module 8 of the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) Version 14

provide information on the total extent of the clearing footprint within mapped remnant vegetation including any proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure and

provide information on tree heights within mapped remnant vegetation immediately adjacent to proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure to determine the applicable firebreak requirements

2 As part of the assessment against SDAP it is necessary to determine ldquoclearing as a result of reconfiguring a lotrdquo as defined in Module 8 section 84 Glossary of terms

The following considerations are particularly relevant to this application

(1) clearing for boundary fence lines for each proposed allotment(2) clearing to construct built infrastructure(3) clearing for a single residence and reasonably associated buildings and

structures for each new allotment(4) all built infrastructure other than underground services roads and fences

will be assessed as requiring clearing for firebreaks and safety buffers with a width of 20 metres or 15 times the height of the tallest adjacent tree to the infrastructure whichever is the greater

(5) clearing for fire management lines with a width of 10 metres constructed on either side of the allotment boundary

3 A statement addressing how the proposal meets either the performance outcome (PO) or acceptable outcome (AO) for Table 813 PO1-PO2 and Table 814 PO2-PO10 will be required as part of the application

4 Table 813 General

PO1 Clearing to avoid and minimise impacts

Information to demonstrate that the development has first avoided and then minimised the impacts of development will be required as part of an application

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 4

Item Further advicePositioning building envelopes within Category X areas and outside the required buffers for firebreaks would assist in minimising impacts

5 Table 814 Relevant infrastructure

PO3 Watercourses

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 31 or AO 32 as the proposed allotment boundaries will intersect stream order 1 and 2 watercourses containing remnant vegetation where 10 metre clearing on either side of the allotment boundary is assessed

AO 33 states lsquowhere it can be demonstrated that clearing cannot be avoided and the extent of clearing has been minimised an environmental offset is provided for any significant residual impact from clearing of vegetation associated with any watercoursersquo

The performance outcome PO3 requirement is to maintain the current extent of vegetation associated with any watercourse to protect

1 bank stability by protecting against bank erosion2 water quality by filtering sediments nutrients and other pollutants3 aquatic habitat4 terrestrial habitat

As defined in Module 8 Section 84 Glossary of terms to lsquomaintain the current extentrsquo means to

(1) avoid clearing the regional ecosystems or(2) ensure the structure and function of the regional ecosystem is maintained

(minimise the clearing) or(3) provide an environmental offset

If the applicant cannot provided sufficient evidence demonstrating that the structure and function of the impacted regional ecosystems are maintained then both under AO 33 and PO3 they would be required to provide an environmental offset The department highly recommends further discussion with DNRM officers in regard to these matters

6 PO4 Connectivity

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 41 as clearing will occur in areas of vegetation less than 100 metres wide in a coastal bioregion

The performance outcome PO4 requires the vegetation retained

1 is of sufficient size and configured in a way that maintains ecosystem functioning and

2 remains in the landscape despite threatening processes

This may be further affected depending on the proposed building envelopes The clearing footprint will result in highly modifying and disjointing the lsquoof concernrsquo remnant polygons The impact of the proposal on connectivity needs to be addressed to demonstrate how clearing will achieve performance outcome PO4

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 5

Item Further advice7 PO8 Conserving endangered and of concern regional ecosystems

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 81 as clearing will occur within lsquoof concernrsquo RE 835 for the purpose of establishing new allotment boundaries

From preliminary assessment under the proposed plan the application will meet AO 82 as clearing within the lsquoof concernrsquo RE whose structure category is sparse is below the limit stated in Module 8 813 Reference Tables Table 1 (2 ha) but this may not be the case depending on the size and location of the proposed building envelopes which need to be provided

If AO 82 cannot be met the application will be required to meet either AO 83 or PO8 which both stipulate offset provisions It is important to note that if an environmental offset is triggered for a significant residual impact from clearing of an lsquoof concernrsquo RE then the offset will need be achieved in accordance with the Queensland Environmental Offset Framework including the Environmental Offsets Act 2014 Environmental Offsets Regulation 2014 and the Queensland Environmental Offset Policy Further discussion with departmental officers with regard to these matters is highly recommended

8 PMAV

If the applicant believes the regional ecosystem mapping is incorrect they can lodge an application for a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) to dispute it It is highly recommend that if the applicant applies for a PMAV change that they do it prior to lodging the development application for RaL The PMAV application must contain sufficient detailed information for the department to make the PMAV

The proponent is advised that there is no statutory timeframe for the assessment of PMAV applications Please be advised that depending on the final approved PMAV and the submission information provided with the Reconfiguring a Lot application the application may still trigger Vegetation Management assessment under Sustainable Planning Act 2009

State Land Asset Management (SLAM)9 Road Closure and Opening

As the proposed road is being opened out of Freehold Land this can be done by way of registering a survey plan with the consent of Mackay Regional Council DNRM State Land Asset Management does not need to play a part in the road opening

With regards to the road closure the proponent will be required to lodge an Application for Permanent Road Closure The form and associated materials are available at the following website httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstateroadsclosure

The current fee for a Permanent Road Closure is $24440

Assessment must be undertaken to determine if the application may proceed including a Native Title Assessment

There will be consideration payable for the permanent road closure and offsetting

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 6

Item Further advicewill not apply

The road will have to be certified as being acceptable by the road manager prior to the current road being closed SLAM will work with the applicant in order to minimise the survey requirements and this particular dealing may be able to proceed by way of simultaneous opening closure

SLAM will investigate whether advertising can be dispensed with

Assuming that there are no objections to the closure and Native Title has been extinguished it is estimated that an offer will be made to the applicant for the closure within 4 months

10 Reservations

Lot 113 on CI189 and Lot 5 on RP705451 Title Reference 21303024 are subject to road reservations as detailed on CI189 and RP705451

Further investigation will need to be undertaken with regards to the extent of the reservations

The reservations will have to be purchased (unless still required for that purpose) prior to the subdivisionreconfiguration

Application information is available via the following link httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstatepurchase-exchangeallocating The current application fee is $24440

Should the applicant have any further enquiries regarding reservations or road closure and opening they may contact Tanya Whalley Senior Land Officer State Land Asset Management on (07) 4999 6959

Access11 The existing access at Chainage 2910 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is

to remain for existing use only The access shall be maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 (attached)

12 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot

13 The existing access at Chainage 3494 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to provide access for 4 lots only (proposed Lots A B C and J)

Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry It is desirable for the applicant to achieve longer sight distances if possible

The access shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083

14 The remainder of the proposed lots will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road DTMR has no requirements for intersection works on this route

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 7

If you require any further information please contact Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office on (07) 4898 6814 or via email felicitylaubdsdipqldgovau who will be pleased to assist

Yours sincerely

Jamie ThorleyManager (Planning) ndash Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Encl DTMR Standard conditions for construction of minor accesses onto State controlled roadsAccess LocationsDTMR Plan showing minimum access requirements

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 1 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

1 GRANTING of APPROVAL

The Department of Transport and Main Roads grants approvals to construct property accesses within the boundaries of a state controlled road as follows -

bull Limited Access Road _ Sections 54 and 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

bull Other State Controlled Roads _ Section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

The applicant shall construct the access at the location approved by the Regional Director (Mackay) or his representative and in accordance with these Standard Conditions and any special conditions applied by the issuing office

2 SPECIFICATIONS amp DRAWINGS

21 Rural

Access construction must conform to the General Layout Grading and Cross Sectional requirements shown on DWG No 579912 (14022012) attached vertical grading diagrams (Type A ndash Type E) or other drawings approved by the department Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix B The applicant shall also submit engineering drawings (of the proposed access) to the department for approval when requested to do so A registered professional civil engineer must prepare such drawings at no cost to the Department of Transport and Main Roads

22 Urban

The owner shall install a ramped kerb crossing of the existing kerb and channel in accordance with Local Government specifications Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix A The owner shall negotiate with the Local Government about changes to existing kerbside parking to accommodate the sight distance requirements and comply with any requirements council might impose

3 ENVIRONMENT

All works shall comply with the requirements of the regionrsquos current Environment Management Conditions for Minor Works within State Controlled Road Boundaries

4 CONSTRUCTION amp MAINTENANCE

41 Specifications

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or on any attached drawings Department of Transport amp Main Roads Standard Specifications for each class of work involved will apply

42 Traffic Management

Construction of the access shall proceed without unreasonable interruption to traffic The owner shall take all steps necessary to protect the public during construction This shall

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 2 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

include the provision of adequate signage barriers or other specified protection in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1995) Part 3 - Work on Roads

43 Clearing amp Grubbing

Any declared weeds identified at the site shall be treated before clearing work starts The Department of Natural Resources amp Water or the local government can advise on appropriate identification and treatment

Clearing and grubbing (for the proposed works) shall be the minimum needed for the installation of the works either adjacent to the property or on the approved alignment

Materials cleared and grubbed shall be disposed of as approved by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative in the following manner -

(a) Millable timber or other materials that have a commercial use shall be separated and treated to permit its sale or re-use The constructing authority shall liaise with the Department of Primary Industry and Forestry with respect to royalties and sale

(b) All trees and vegetable material up to 100mm diameter shall be mulched for re-use on site along the disturbed area as an aid to revegetation and to assist in stabilisation of the site

(c) Material not mulched or of commercial value shall be stockpiled at approved sites along the road reserve to provide habitat for local fauna No stockpiles are permitted adjacent to the property boundary (as this may create a fire hazard) or in drainage lines All stockpiles shall be outside of the clear zone ndash refer Section 8 of the Departments Road Planning amp Design Manual

(d) The department may order all cleared and grubbed material to be burnt if the options above are impracticable

(e) Grub holes are to be backfilled and the whole of the disturbed area graded to maintain the shape of the existing terrain

(f) The Department may require all non-usable materials to be removed from the road reserve and disposed of at a site approved by Transport amp Main Roads

Such work is to be to the satisfaction of the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative

44 Services

The owner shall verify the existence and location of any underground or overhead public utility services that construction of the proposed access may affect If such services do exist the owner is to liaise with the relevant Authority to prevent any damage to such service The owner shall also maintain the minimum horizontal and or vertical clearance (as stipulated by the service authority) from any underground or overhead services Any relocation or protection of underground or overhead services shall be carried out at no cost to the Department of Transport amp Main Roads

45 Drainage

A reinforced concrete pipe or reinforced concrete box culvert shall be laid in the table drain under the access unless otherwise approved (in writing) by the Department of Transport amp

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 3 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

Main Roads An Engineering assessment (by a registered professional civil engineer) must be made to determine the size of culvert necessary at each access to ensure that the access does not interfere with drainage flow in the area The minimum diameter of pipe shall be 375 mm RCP or a reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) of equivalent waterway area The minimum length of culvert shall be in accordance with drawings DWG MS 4-5 (18042000) or DWG MS 4-6 (18042000)

46 Roadway Repairs

The owner will be required to repair or cause to be repaired at his own expense any damage to the roadway due to the existence of the access

47 Supervision

All work within the road reserve is to be carried out under the supervision of the Departments area engineer or works inspector for the local government area within which the work lies In this regard it will be necessary for you to contact the Transport amp Main Roads Regional office before commencing any work within the road reserve Alternatively the supervision may be carried out by a registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)

48 Certification

The applicant is to provide written certification that all works have been constructed in accordance with these conditions standard drawings and or any other standard or job specific conditions specified at the time of approval for the works to be constructed

The certification may be from either the Departments area engineer or works inspector or the registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) whoever supervises the works

49 Maintenance of Access

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out at their expense any maintenance work required on the access They may be directed to do so in writing by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative at any time and such work shall be carried out without delay to his satisfaction Failure to do so within the specified time may result in the Department of Transport amp Main Roads carrying out the required works or having it done by a private contractor and recouping the costs from the property owner

5 FUTURE WORKS

51 By Property Owner

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out any upgrading of an access necessary due to additional traffic generation or change in vehicle type using the access

52 By Transport amp Main Roads

The Department of Transport amp Main Roads will reinstate existing accesses to pre-existing standards during any future road reconstruction

All reasonable care will be taken during future roadwork construction however the construction of an access must in no way interfere with the work of maintenance personnel The Director

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 12: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 3

Boundary Realignment

Figure Proposed PMAV Aurecon 233412 1 17072014

Certificates of Title NA NA NA

Vegetation management is triggered as one of the 11 proposed lots is less than 25ha As discussed if proposed Lot B was increased to greater than 25ha then the proposal would not be triggered for vegetation management referral and the following vegetation management advice would not apply

The following information is provided as a record of the matters discussed at the pre-lodgement meeting in addition to providing further advice prepared subsequent to the meeting

Item Further adviceVegetation Management1 The applicant will be required to complete IDAS forms 1 and 11 The applicant will

need to

address Module 8 of the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) Version 14

provide information on the total extent of the clearing footprint within mapped remnant vegetation including any proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure and

provide information on tree heights within mapped remnant vegetation immediately adjacent to proposed building envelopes and necessary infrastructure to determine the applicable firebreak requirements

2 As part of the assessment against SDAP it is necessary to determine ldquoclearing as a result of reconfiguring a lotrdquo as defined in Module 8 section 84 Glossary of terms

The following considerations are particularly relevant to this application

(1) clearing for boundary fence lines for each proposed allotment(2) clearing to construct built infrastructure(3) clearing for a single residence and reasonably associated buildings and

structures for each new allotment(4) all built infrastructure other than underground services roads and fences

will be assessed as requiring clearing for firebreaks and safety buffers with a width of 20 metres or 15 times the height of the tallest adjacent tree to the infrastructure whichever is the greater

(5) clearing for fire management lines with a width of 10 metres constructed on either side of the allotment boundary

3 A statement addressing how the proposal meets either the performance outcome (PO) or acceptable outcome (AO) for Table 813 PO1-PO2 and Table 814 PO2-PO10 will be required as part of the application

4 Table 813 General

PO1 Clearing to avoid and minimise impacts

Information to demonstrate that the development has first avoided and then minimised the impacts of development will be required as part of an application

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 4

Item Further advicePositioning building envelopes within Category X areas and outside the required buffers for firebreaks would assist in minimising impacts

5 Table 814 Relevant infrastructure

PO3 Watercourses

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 31 or AO 32 as the proposed allotment boundaries will intersect stream order 1 and 2 watercourses containing remnant vegetation where 10 metre clearing on either side of the allotment boundary is assessed

AO 33 states lsquowhere it can be demonstrated that clearing cannot be avoided and the extent of clearing has been minimised an environmental offset is provided for any significant residual impact from clearing of vegetation associated with any watercoursersquo

The performance outcome PO3 requirement is to maintain the current extent of vegetation associated with any watercourse to protect

1 bank stability by protecting against bank erosion2 water quality by filtering sediments nutrients and other pollutants3 aquatic habitat4 terrestrial habitat

As defined in Module 8 Section 84 Glossary of terms to lsquomaintain the current extentrsquo means to

(1) avoid clearing the regional ecosystems or(2) ensure the structure and function of the regional ecosystem is maintained

(minimise the clearing) or(3) provide an environmental offset

If the applicant cannot provided sufficient evidence demonstrating that the structure and function of the impacted regional ecosystems are maintained then both under AO 33 and PO3 they would be required to provide an environmental offset The department highly recommends further discussion with DNRM officers in regard to these matters

6 PO4 Connectivity

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 41 as clearing will occur in areas of vegetation less than 100 metres wide in a coastal bioregion

The performance outcome PO4 requires the vegetation retained

1 is of sufficient size and configured in a way that maintains ecosystem functioning and

2 remains in the landscape despite threatening processes

This may be further affected depending on the proposed building envelopes The clearing footprint will result in highly modifying and disjointing the lsquoof concernrsquo remnant polygons The impact of the proposal on connectivity needs to be addressed to demonstrate how clearing will achieve performance outcome PO4

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 5

Item Further advice7 PO8 Conserving endangered and of concern regional ecosystems

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 81 as clearing will occur within lsquoof concernrsquo RE 835 for the purpose of establishing new allotment boundaries

From preliminary assessment under the proposed plan the application will meet AO 82 as clearing within the lsquoof concernrsquo RE whose structure category is sparse is below the limit stated in Module 8 813 Reference Tables Table 1 (2 ha) but this may not be the case depending on the size and location of the proposed building envelopes which need to be provided

If AO 82 cannot be met the application will be required to meet either AO 83 or PO8 which both stipulate offset provisions It is important to note that if an environmental offset is triggered for a significant residual impact from clearing of an lsquoof concernrsquo RE then the offset will need be achieved in accordance with the Queensland Environmental Offset Framework including the Environmental Offsets Act 2014 Environmental Offsets Regulation 2014 and the Queensland Environmental Offset Policy Further discussion with departmental officers with regard to these matters is highly recommended

8 PMAV

If the applicant believes the regional ecosystem mapping is incorrect they can lodge an application for a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) to dispute it It is highly recommend that if the applicant applies for a PMAV change that they do it prior to lodging the development application for RaL The PMAV application must contain sufficient detailed information for the department to make the PMAV

The proponent is advised that there is no statutory timeframe for the assessment of PMAV applications Please be advised that depending on the final approved PMAV and the submission information provided with the Reconfiguring a Lot application the application may still trigger Vegetation Management assessment under Sustainable Planning Act 2009

State Land Asset Management (SLAM)9 Road Closure and Opening

As the proposed road is being opened out of Freehold Land this can be done by way of registering a survey plan with the consent of Mackay Regional Council DNRM State Land Asset Management does not need to play a part in the road opening

With regards to the road closure the proponent will be required to lodge an Application for Permanent Road Closure The form and associated materials are available at the following website httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstateroadsclosure

The current fee for a Permanent Road Closure is $24440

Assessment must be undertaken to determine if the application may proceed including a Native Title Assessment

There will be consideration payable for the permanent road closure and offsetting

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 6

Item Further advicewill not apply

The road will have to be certified as being acceptable by the road manager prior to the current road being closed SLAM will work with the applicant in order to minimise the survey requirements and this particular dealing may be able to proceed by way of simultaneous opening closure

SLAM will investigate whether advertising can be dispensed with

Assuming that there are no objections to the closure and Native Title has been extinguished it is estimated that an offer will be made to the applicant for the closure within 4 months

10 Reservations

Lot 113 on CI189 and Lot 5 on RP705451 Title Reference 21303024 are subject to road reservations as detailed on CI189 and RP705451

Further investigation will need to be undertaken with regards to the extent of the reservations

The reservations will have to be purchased (unless still required for that purpose) prior to the subdivisionreconfiguration

Application information is available via the following link httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstatepurchase-exchangeallocating The current application fee is $24440

Should the applicant have any further enquiries regarding reservations or road closure and opening they may contact Tanya Whalley Senior Land Officer State Land Asset Management on (07) 4999 6959

Access11 The existing access at Chainage 2910 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is

to remain for existing use only The access shall be maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 (attached)

12 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot

13 The existing access at Chainage 3494 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to provide access for 4 lots only (proposed Lots A B C and J)

Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry It is desirable for the applicant to achieve longer sight distances if possible

The access shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083

14 The remainder of the proposed lots will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road DTMR has no requirements for intersection works on this route

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 7

If you require any further information please contact Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office on (07) 4898 6814 or via email felicitylaubdsdipqldgovau who will be pleased to assist

Yours sincerely

Jamie ThorleyManager (Planning) ndash Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Encl DTMR Standard conditions for construction of minor accesses onto State controlled roadsAccess LocationsDTMR Plan showing minimum access requirements

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 1 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

1 GRANTING of APPROVAL

The Department of Transport and Main Roads grants approvals to construct property accesses within the boundaries of a state controlled road as follows -

bull Limited Access Road _ Sections 54 and 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

bull Other State Controlled Roads _ Section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

The applicant shall construct the access at the location approved by the Regional Director (Mackay) or his representative and in accordance with these Standard Conditions and any special conditions applied by the issuing office

2 SPECIFICATIONS amp DRAWINGS

21 Rural

Access construction must conform to the General Layout Grading and Cross Sectional requirements shown on DWG No 579912 (14022012) attached vertical grading diagrams (Type A ndash Type E) or other drawings approved by the department Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix B The applicant shall also submit engineering drawings (of the proposed access) to the department for approval when requested to do so A registered professional civil engineer must prepare such drawings at no cost to the Department of Transport and Main Roads

22 Urban

The owner shall install a ramped kerb crossing of the existing kerb and channel in accordance with Local Government specifications Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix A The owner shall negotiate with the Local Government about changes to existing kerbside parking to accommodate the sight distance requirements and comply with any requirements council might impose

3 ENVIRONMENT

All works shall comply with the requirements of the regionrsquos current Environment Management Conditions for Minor Works within State Controlled Road Boundaries

4 CONSTRUCTION amp MAINTENANCE

41 Specifications

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or on any attached drawings Department of Transport amp Main Roads Standard Specifications for each class of work involved will apply

42 Traffic Management

Construction of the access shall proceed without unreasonable interruption to traffic The owner shall take all steps necessary to protect the public during construction This shall

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 2 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

include the provision of adequate signage barriers or other specified protection in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1995) Part 3 - Work on Roads

43 Clearing amp Grubbing

Any declared weeds identified at the site shall be treated before clearing work starts The Department of Natural Resources amp Water or the local government can advise on appropriate identification and treatment

Clearing and grubbing (for the proposed works) shall be the minimum needed for the installation of the works either adjacent to the property or on the approved alignment

Materials cleared and grubbed shall be disposed of as approved by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative in the following manner -

(a) Millable timber or other materials that have a commercial use shall be separated and treated to permit its sale or re-use The constructing authority shall liaise with the Department of Primary Industry and Forestry with respect to royalties and sale

(b) All trees and vegetable material up to 100mm diameter shall be mulched for re-use on site along the disturbed area as an aid to revegetation and to assist in stabilisation of the site

(c) Material not mulched or of commercial value shall be stockpiled at approved sites along the road reserve to provide habitat for local fauna No stockpiles are permitted adjacent to the property boundary (as this may create a fire hazard) or in drainage lines All stockpiles shall be outside of the clear zone ndash refer Section 8 of the Departments Road Planning amp Design Manual

(d) The department may order all cleared and grubbed material to be burnt if the options above are impracticable

(e) Grub holes are to be backfilled and the whole of the disturbed area graded to maintain the shape of the existing terrain

(f) The Department may require all non-usable materials to be removed from the road reserve and disposed of at a site approved by Transport amp Main Roads

Such work is to be to the satisfaction of the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative

44 Services

The owner shall verify the existence and location of any underground or overhead public utility services that construction of the proposed access may affect If such services do exist the owner is to liaise with the relevant Authority to prevent any damage to such service The owner shall also maintain the minimum horizontal and or vertical clearance (as stipulated by the service authority) from any underground or overhead services Any relocation or protection of underground or overhead services shall be carried out at no cost to the Department of Transport amp Main Roads

45 Drainage

A reinforced concrete pipe or reinforced concrete box culvert shall be laid in the table drain under the access unless otherwise approved (in writing) by the Department of Transport amp

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 3 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

Main Roads An Engineering assessment (by a registered professional civil engineer) must be made to determine the size of culvert necessary at each access to ensure that the access does not interfere with drainage flow in the area The minimum diameter of pipe shall be 375 mm RCP or a reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) of equivalent waterway area The minimum length of culvert shall be in accordance with drawings DWG MS 4-5 (18042000) or DWG MS 4-6 (18042000)

46 Roadway Repairs

The owner will be required to repair or cause to be repaired at his own expense any damage to the roadway due to the existence of the access

47 Supervision

All work within the road reserve is to be carried out under the supervision of the Departments area engineer or works inspector for the local government area within which the work lies In this regard it will be necessary for you to contact the Transport amp Main Roads Regional office before commencing any work within the road reserve Alternatively the supervision may be carried out by a registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)

48 Certification

The applicant is to provide written certification that all works have been constructed in accordance with these conditions standard drawings and or any other standard or job specific conditions specified at the time of approval for the works to be constructed

The certification may be from either the Departments area engineer or works inspector or the registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) whoever supervises the works

49 Maintenance of Access

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out at their expense any maintenance work required on the access They may be directed to do so in writing by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative at any time and such work shall be carried out without delay to his satisfaction Failure to do so within the specified time may result in the Department of Transport amp Main Roads carrying out the required works or having it done by a private contractor and recouping the costs from the property owner

5 FUTURE WORKS

51 By Property Owner

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out any upgrading of an access necessary due to additional traffic generation or change in vehicle type using the access

52 By Transport amp Main Roads

The Department of Transport amp Main Roads will reinstate existing accesses to pre-existing standards during any future road reconstruction

All reasonable care will be taken during future roadwork construction however the construction of an access must in no way interfere with the work of maintenance personnel The Director

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 13: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 4

Item Further advicePositioning building envelopes within Category X areas and outside the required buffers for firebreaks would assist in minimising impacts

5 Table 814 Relevant infrastructure

PO3 Watercourses

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 31 or AO 32 as the proposed allotment boundaries will intersect stream order 1 and 2 watercourses containing remnant vegetation where 10 metre clearing on either side of the allotment boundary is assessed

AO 33 states lsquowhere it can be demonstrated that clearing cannot be avoided and the extent of clearing has been minimised an environmental offset is provided for any significant residual impact from clearing of vegetation associated with any watercoursersquo

The performance outcome PO3 requirement is to maintain the current extent of vegetation associated with any watercourse to protect

1 bank stability by protecting against bank erosion2 water quality by filtering sediments nutrients and other pollutants3 aquatic habitat4 terrestrial habitat

As defined in Module 8 Section 84 Glossary of terms to lsquomaintain the current extentrsquo means to

(1) avoid clearing the regional ecosystems or(2) ensure the structure and function of the regional ecosystem is maintained

(minimise the clearing) or(3) provide an environmental offset

If the applicant cannot provided sufficient evidence demonstrating that the structure and function of the impacted regional ecosystems are maintained then both under AO 33 and PO3 they would be required to provide an environmental offset The department highly recommends further discussion with DNRM officers in regard to these matters

6 PO4 Connectivity

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 41 as clearing will occur in areas of vegetation less than 100 metres wide in a coastal bioregion

The performance outcome PO4 requires the vegetation retained

1 is of sufficient size and configured in a way that maintains ecosystem functioning and

2 remains in the landscape despite threatening processes

This may be further affected depending on the proposed building envelopes The clearing footprint will result in highly modifying and disjointing the lsquoof concernrsquo remnant polygons The impact of the proposal on connectivity needs to be addressed to demonstrate how clearing will achieve performance outcome PO4

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 5

Item Further advice7 PO8 Conserving endangered and of concern regional ecosystems

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 81 as clearing will occur within lsquoof concernrsquo RE 835 for the purpose of establishing new allotment boundaries

From preliminary assessment under the proposed plan the application will meet AO 82 as clearing within the lsquoof concernrsquo RE whose structure category is sparse is below the limit stated in Module 8 813 Reference Tables Table 1 (2 ha) but this may not be the case depending on the size and location of the proposed building envelopes which need to be provided

If AO 82 cannot be met the application will be required to meet either AO 83 or PO8 which both stipulate offset provisions It is important to note that if an environmental offset is triggered for a significant residual impact from clearing of an lsquoof concernrsquo RE then the offset will need be achieved in accordance with the Queensland Environmental Offset Framework including the Environmental Offsets Act 2014 Environmental Offsets Regulation 2014 and the Queensland Environmental Offset Policy Further discussion with departmental officers with regard to these matters is highly recommended

8 PMAV

If the applicant believes the regional ecosystem mapping is incorrect they can lodge an application for a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) to dispute it It is highly recommend that if the applicant applies for a PMAV change that they do it prior to lodging the development application for RaL The PMAV application must contain sufficient detailed information for the department to make the PMAV

The proponent is advised that there is no statutory timeframe for the assessment of PMAV applications Please be advised that depending on the final approved PMAV and the submission information provided with the Reconfiguring a Lot application the application may still trigger Vegetation Management assessment under Sustainable Planning Act 2009

State Land Asset Management (SLAM)9 Road Closure and Opening

As the proposed road is being opened out of Freehold Land this can be done by way of registering a survey plan with the consent of Mackay Regional Council DNRM State Land Asset Management does not need to play a part in the road opening

With regards to the road closure the proponent will be required to lodge an Application for Permanent Road Closure The form and associated materials are available at the following website httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstateroadsclosure

The current fee for a Permanent Road Closure is $24440

Assessment must be undertaken to determine if the application may proceed including a Native Title Assessment

There will be consideration payable for the permanent road closure and offsetting

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 6

Item Further advicewill not apply

The road will have to be certified as being acceptable by the road manager prior to the current road being closed SLAM will work with the applicant in order to minimise the survey requirements and this particular dealing may be able to proceed by way of simultaneous opening closure

SLAM will investigate whether advertising can be dispensed with

Assuming that there are no objections to the closure and Native Title has been extinguished it is estimated that an offer will be made to the applicant for the closure within 4 months

10 Reservations

Lot 113 on CI189 and Lot 5 on RP705451 Title Reference 21303024 are subject to road reservations as detailed on CI189 and RP705451

Further investigation will need to be undertaken with regards to the extent of the reservations

The reservations will have to be purchased (unless still required for that purpose) prior to the subdivisionreconfiguration

Application information is available via the following link httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstatepurchase-exchangeallocating The current application fee is $24440

Should the applicant have any further enquiries regarding reservations or road closure and opening they may contact Tanya Whalley Senior Land Officer State Land Asset Management on (07) 4999 6959

Access11 The existing access at Chainage 2910 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is

to remain for existing use only The access shall be maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 (attached)

12 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot

13 The existing access at Chainage 3494 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to provide access for 4 lots only (proposed Lots A B C and J)

Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry It is desirable for the applicant to achieve longer sight distances if possible

The access shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083

14 The remainder of the proposed lots will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road DTMR has no requirements for intersection works on this route

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 7

If you require any further information please contact Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office on (07) 4898 6814 or via email felicitylaubdsdipqldgovau who will be pleased to assist

Yours sincerely

Jamie ThorleyManager (Planning) ndash Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Encl DTMR Standard conditions for construction of minor accesses onto State controlled roadsAccess LocationsDTMR Plan showing minimum access requirements

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 1 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

1 GRANTING of APPROVAL

The Department of Transport and Main Roads grants approvals to construct property accesses within the boundaries of a state controlled road as follows -

bull Limited Access Road _ Sections 54 and 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

bull Other State Controlled Roads _ Section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

The applicant shall construct the access at the location approved by the Regional Director (Mackay) or his representative and in accordance with these Standard Conditions and any special conditions applied by the issuing office

2 SPECIFICATIONS amp DRAWINGS

21 Rural

Access construction must conform to the General Layout Grading and Cross Sectional requirements shown on DWG No 579912 (14022012) attached vertical grading diagrams (Type A ndash Type E) or other drawings approved by the department Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix B The applicant shall also submit engineering drawings (of the proposed access) to the department for approval when requested to do so A registered professional civil engineer must prepare such drawings at no cost to the Department of Transport and Main Roads

22 Urban

The owner shall install a ramped kerb crossing of the existing kerb and channel in accordance with Local Government specifications Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix A The owner shall negotiate with the Local Government about changes to existing kerbside parking to accommodate the sight distance requirements and comply with any requirements council might impose

3 ENVIRONMENT

All works shall comply with the requirements of the regionrsquos current Environment Management Conditions for Minor Works within State Controlled Road Boundaries

4 CONSTRUCTION amp MAINTENANCE

41 Specifications

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or on any attached drawings Department of Transport amp Main Roads Standard Specifications for each class of work involved will apply

42 Traffic Management

Construction of the access shall proceed without unreasonable interruption to traffic The owner shall take all steps necessary to protect the public during construction This shall

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 2 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

include the provision of adequate signage barriers or other specified protection in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1995) Part 3 - Work on Roads

43 Clearing amp Grubbing

Any declared weeds identified at the site shall be treated before clearing work starts The Department of Natural Resources amp Water or the local government can advise on appropriate identification and treatment

Clearing and grubbing (for the proposed works) shall be the minimum needed for the installation of the works either adjacent to the property or on the approved alignment

Materials cleared and grubbed shall be disposed of as approved by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative in the following manner -

(a) Millable timber or other materials that have a commercial use shall be separated and treated to permit its sale or re-use The constructing authority shall liaise with the Department of Primary Industry and Forestry with respect to royalties and sale

(b) All trees and vegetable material up to 100mm diameter shall be mulched for re-use on site along the disturbed area as an aid to revegetation and to assist in stabilisation of the site

(c) Material not mulched or of commercial value shall be stockpiled at approved sites along the road reserve to provide habitat for local fauna No stockpiles are permitted adjacent to the property boundary (as this may create a fire hazard) or in drainage lines All stockpiles shall be outside of the clear zone ndash refer Section 8 of the Departments Road Planning amp Design Manual

(d) The department may order all cleared and grubbed material to be burnt if the options above are impracticable

(e) Grub holes are to be backfilled and the whole of the disturbed area graded to maintain the shape of the existing terrain

(f) The Department may require all non-usable materials to be removed from the road reserve and disposed of at a site approved by Transport amp Main Roads

Such work is to be to the satisfaction of the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative

44 Services

The owner shall verify the existence and location of any underground or overhead public utility services that construction of the proposed access may affect If such services do exist the owner is to liaise with the relevant Authority to prevent any damage to such service The owner shall also maintain the minimum horizontal and or vertical clearance (as stipulated by the service authority) from any underground or overhead services Any relocation or protection of underground or overhead services shall be carried out at no cost to the Department of Transport amp Main Roads

45 Drainage

A reinforced concrete pipe or reinforced concrete box culvert shall be laid in the table drain under the access unless otherwise approved (in writing) by the Department of Transport amp

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 3 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

Main Roads An Engineering assessment (by a registered professional civil engineer) must be made to determine the size of culvert necessary at each access to ensure that the access does not interfere with drainage flow in the area The minimum diameter of pipe shall be 375 mm RCP or a reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) of equivalent waterway area The minimum length of culvert shall be in accordance with drawings DWG MS 4-5 (18042000) or DWG MS 4-6 (18042000)

46 Roadway Repairs

The owner will be required to repair or cause to be repaired at his own expense any damage to the roadway due to the existence of the access

47 Supervision

All work within the road reserve is to be carried out under the supervision of the Departments area engineer or works inspector for the local government area within which the work lies In this regard it will be necessary for you to contact the Transport amp Main Roads Regional office before commencing any work within the road reserve Alternatively the supervision may be carried out by a registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)

48 Certification

The applicant is to provide written certification that all works have been constructed in accordance with these conditions standard drawings and or any other standard or job specific conditions specified at the time of approval for the works to be constructed

The certification may be from either the Departments area engineer or works inspector or the registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) whoever supervises the works

49 Maintenance of Access

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out at their expense any maintenance work required on the access They may be directed to do so in writing by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative at any time and such work shall be carried out without delay to his satisfaction Failure to do so within the specified time may result in the Department of Transport amp Main Roads carrying out the required works or having it done by a private contractor and recouping the costs from the property owner

5 FUTURE WORKS

51 By Property Owner

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out any upgrading of an access necessary due to additional traffic generation or change in vehicle type using the access

52 By Transport amp Main Roads

The Department of Transport amp Main Roads will reinstate existing accesses to pre-existing standards during any future road reconstruction

All reasonable care will be taken during future roadwork construction however the construction of an access must in no way interfere with the work of maintenance personnel The Director

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 14: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 5

Item Further advice7 PO8 Conserving endangered and of concern regional ecosystems

Based on the proposed plan the application will not meet AO 81 as clearing will occur within lsquoof concernrsquo RE 835 for the purpose of establishing new allotment boundaries

From preliminary assessment under the proposed plan the application will meet AO 82 as clearing within the lsquoof concernrsquo RE whose structure category is sparse is below the limit stated in Module 8 813 Reference Tables Table 1 (2 ha) but this may not be the case depending on the size and location of the proposed building envelopes which need to be provided

If AO 82 cannot be met the application will be required to meet either AO 83 or PO8 which both stipulate offset provisions It is important to note that if an environmental offset is triggered for a significant residual impact from clearing of an lsquoof concernrsquo RE then the offset will need be achieved in accordance with the Queensland Environmental Offset Framework including the Environmental Offsets Act 2014 Environmental Offsets Regulation 2014 and the Queensland Environmental Offset Policy Further discussion with departmental officers with regard to these matters is highly recommended

8 PMAV

If the applicant believes the regional ecosystem mapping is incorrect they can lodge an application for a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) to dispute it It is highly recommend that if the applicant applies for a PMAV change that they do it prior to lodging the development application for RaL The PMAV application must contain sufficient detailed information for the department to make the PMAV

The proponent is advised that there is no statutory timeframe for the assessment of PMAV applications Please be advised that depending on the final approved PMAV and the submission information provided with the Reconfiguring a Lot application the application may still trigger Vegetation Management assessment under Sustainable Planning Act 2009

State Land Asset Management (SLAM)9 Road Closure and Opening

As the proposed road is being opened out of Freehold Land this can be done by way of registering a survey plan with the consent of Mackay Regional Council DNRM State Land Asset Management does not need to play a part in the road opening

With regards to the road closure the proponent will be required to lodge an Application for Permanent Road Closure The form and associated materials are available at the following website httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstateroadsclosure

The current fee for a Permanent Road Closure is $24440

Assessment must be undertaken to determine if the application may proceed including a Native Title Assessment

There will be consideration payable for the permanent road closure and offsetting

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 6

Item Further advicewill not apply

The road will have to be certified as being acceptable by the road manager prior to the current road being closed SLAM will work with the applicant in order to minimise the survey requirements and this particular dealing may be able to proceed by way of simultaneous opening closure

SLAM will investigate whether advertising can be dispensed with

Assuming that there are no objections to the closure and Native Title has been extinguished it is estimated that an offer will be made to the applicant for the closure within 4 months

10 Reservations

Lot 113 on CI189 and Lot 5 on RP705451 Title Reference 21303024 are subject to road reservations as detailed on CI189 and RP705451

Further investigation will need to be undertaken with regards to the extent of the reservations

The reservations will have to be purchased (unless still required for that purpose) prior to the subdivisionreconfiguration

Application information is available via the following link httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstatepurchase-exchangeallocating The current application fee is $24440

Should the applicant have any further enquiries regarding reservations or road closure and opening they may contact Tanya Whalley Senior Land Officer State Land Asset Management on (07) 4999 6959

Access11 The existing access at Chainage 2910 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is

to remain for existing use only The access shall be maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 (attached)

12 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot

13 The existing access at Chainage 3494 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to provide access for 4 lots only (proposed Lots A B C and J)

Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry It is desirable for the applicant to achieve longer sight distances if possible

The access shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083

14 The remainder of the proposed lots will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road DTMR has no requirements for intersection works on this route

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 7

If you require any further information please contact Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office on (07) 4898 6814 or via email felicitylaubdsdipqldgovau who will be pleased to assist

Yours sincerely

Jamie ThorleyManager (Planning) ndash Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Encl DTMR Standard conditions for construction of minor accesses onto State controlled roadsAccess LocationsDTMR Plan showing minimum access requirements

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 1 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

1 GRANTING of APPROVAL

The Department of Transport and Main Roads grants approvals to construct property accesses within the boundaries of a state controlled road as follows -

bull Limited Access Road _ Sections 54 and 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

bull Other State Controlled Roads _ Section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

The applicant shall construct the access at the location approved by the Regional Director (Mackay) or his representative and in accordance with these Standard Conditions and any special conditions applied by the issuing office

2 SPECIFICATIONS amp DRAWINGS

21 Rural

Access construction must conform to the General Layout Grading and Cross Sectional requirements shown on DWG No 579912 (14022012) attached vertical grading diagrams (Type A ndash Type E) or other drawings approved by the department Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix B The applicant shall also submit engineering drawings (of the proposed access) to the department for approval when requested to do so A registered professional civil engineer must prepare such drawings at no cost to the Department of Transport and Main Roads

22 Urban

The owner shall install a ramped kerb crossing of the existing kerb and channel in accordance with Local Government specifications Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix A The owner shall negotiate with the Local Government about changes to existing kerbside parking to accommodate the sight distance requirements and comply with any requirements council might impose

3 ENVIRONMENT

All works shall comply with the requirements of the regionrsquos current Environment Management Conditions for Minor Works within State Controlled Road Boundaries

4 CONSTRUCTION amp MAINTENANCE

41 Specifications

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or on any attached drawings Department of Transport amp Main Roads Standard Specifications for each class of work involved will apply

42 Traffic Management

Construction of the access shall proceed without unreasonable interruption to traffic The owner shall take all steps necessary to protect the public during construction This shall

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 2 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

include the provision of adequate signage barriers or other specified protection in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1995) Part 3 - Work on Roads

43 Clearing amp Grubbing

Any declared weeds identified at the site shall be treated before clearing work starts The Department of Natural Resources amp Water or the local government can advise on appropriate identification and treatment

Clearing and grubbing (for the proposed works) shall be the minimum needed for the installation of the works either adjacent to the property or on the approved alignment

Materials cleared and grubbed shall be disposed of as approved by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative in the following manner -

(a) Millable timber or other materials that have a commercial use shall be separated and treated to permit its sale or re-use The constructing authority shall liaise with the Department of Primary Industry and Forestry with respect to royalties and sale

(b) All trees and vegetable material up to 100mm diameter shall be mulched for re-use on site along the disturbed area as an aid to revegetation and to assist in stabilisation of the site

(c) Material not mulched or of commercial value shall be stockpiled at approved sites along the road reserve to provide habitat for local fauna No stockpiles are permitted adjacent to the property boundary (as this may create a fire hazard) or in drainage lines All stockpiles shall be outside of the clear zone ndash refer Section 8 of the Departments Road Planning amp Design Manual

(d) The department may order all cleared and grubbed material to be burnt if the options above are impracticable

(e) Grub holes are to be backfilled and the whole of the disturbed area graded to maintain the shape of the existing terrain

(f) The Department may require all non-usable materials to be removed from the road reserve and disposed of at a site approved by Transport amp Main Roads

Such work is to be to the satisfaction of the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative

44 Services

The owner shall verify the existence and location of any underground or overhead public utility services that construction of the proposed access may affect If such services do exist the owner is to liaise with the relevant Authority to prevent any damage to such service The owner shall also maintain the minimum horizontal and or vertical clearance (as stipulated by the service authority) from any underground or overhead services Any relocation or protection of underground or overhead services shall be carried out at no cost to the Department of Transport amp Main Roads

45 Drainage

A reinforced concrete pipe or reinforced concrete box culvert shall be laid in the table drain under the access unless otherwise approved (in writing) by the Department of Transport amp

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 3 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

Main Roads An Engineering assessment (by a registered professional civil engineer) must be made to determine the size of culvert necessary at each access to ensure that the access does not interfere with drainage flow in the area The minimum diameter of pipe shall be 375 mm RCP or a reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) of equivalent waterway area The minimum length of culvert shall be in accordance with drawings DWG MS 4-5 (18042000) or DWG MS 4-6 (18042000)

46 Roadway Repairs

The owner will be required to repair or cause to be repaired at his own expense any damage to the roadway due to the existence of the access

47 Supervision

All work within the road reserve is to be carried out under the supervision of the Departments area engineer or works inspector for the local government area within which the work lies In this regard it will be necessary for you to contact the Transport amp Main Roads Regional office before commencing any work within the road reserve Alternatively the supervision may be carried out by a registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)

48 Certification

The applicant is to provide written certification that all works have been constructed in accordance with these conditions standard drawings and or any other standard or job specific conditions specified at the time of approval for the works to be constructed

The certification may be from either the Departments area engineer or works inspector or the registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) whoever supervises the works

49 Maintenance of Access

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out at their expense any maintenance work required on the access They may be directed to do so in writing by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative at any time and such work shall be carried out without delay to his satisfaction Failure to do so within the specified time may result in the Department of Transport amp Main Roads carrying out the required works or having it done by a private contractor and recouping the costs from the property owner

5 FUTURE WORKS

51 By Property Owner

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out any upgrading of an access necessary due to additional traffic generation or change in vehicle type using the access

52 By Transport amp Main Roads

The Department of Transport amp Main Roads will reinstate existing accesses to pre-existing standards during any future road reconstruction

All reasonable care will be taken during future roadwork construction however the construction of an access must in no way interfere with the work of maintenance personnel The Director

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 15: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 6

Item Further advicewill not apply

The road will have to be certified as being acceptable by the road manager prior to the current road being closed SLAM will work with the applicant in order to minimise the survey requirements and this particular dealing may be able to proceed by way of simultaneous opening closure

SLAM will investigate whether advertising can be dispensed with

Assuming that there are no objections to the closure and Native Title has been extinguished it is estimated that an offer will be made to the applicant for the closure within 4 months

10 Reservations

Lot 113 on CI189 and Lot 5 on RP705451 Title Reference 21303024 are subject to road reservations as detailed on CI189 and RP705451

Further investigation will need to be undertaken with regards to the extent of the reservations

The reservations will have to be purchased (unless still required for that purpose) prior to the subdivisionreconfiguration

Application information is available via the following link httpwwwqldgovauenvironmentlandstatepurchase-exchangeallocating The current application fee is $24440

Should the applicant have any further enquiries regarding reservations or road closure and opening they may contact Tanya Whalley Senior Land Officer State Land Asset Management on (07) 4999 6959

Access11 The existing access at Chainage 2910 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is

to remain for existing use only The access shall be maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 (attached)

12 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot

13 The existing access at Chainage 3494 km (refer to attached Access Locations) is to provide access for 4 lots only (proposed Lots A B C and J)

Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry It is desirable for the applicant to achieve longer sight distances if possible

The access shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083

14 The remainder of the proposed lots will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road DTMR has no requirements for intersection works on this route

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 7

If you require any further information please contact Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office on (07) 4898 6814 or via email felicitylaubdsdipqldgovau who will be pleased to assist

Yours sincerely

Jamie ThorleyManager (Planning) ndash Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Encl DTMR Standard conditions for construction of minor accesses onto State controlled roadsAccess LocationsDTMR Plan showing minimum access requirements

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 1 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

1 GRANTING of APPROVAL

The Department of Transport and Main Roads grants approvals to construct property accesses within the boundaries of a state controlled road as follows -

bull Limited Access Road _ Sections 54 and 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

bull Other State Controlled Roads _ Section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

The applicant shall construct the access at the location approved by the Regional Director (Mackay) or his representative and in accordance with these Standard Conditions and any special conditions applied by the issuing office

2 SPECIFICATIONS amp DRAWINGS

21 Rural

Access construction must conform to the General Layout Grading and Cross Sectional requirements shown on DWG No 579912 (14022012) attached vertical grading diagrams (Type A ndash Type E) or other drawings approved by the department Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix B The applicant shall also submit engineering drawings (of the proposed access) to the department for approval when requested to do so A registered professional civil engineer must prepare such drawings at no cost to the Department of Transport and Main Roads

22 Urban

The owner shall install a ramped kerb crossing of the existing kerb and channel in accordance with Local Government specifications Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix A The owner shall negotiate with the Local Government about changes to existing kerbside parking to accommodate the sight distance requirements and comply with any requirements council might impose

3 ENVIRONMENT

All works shall comply with the requirements of the regionrsquos current Environment Management Conditions for Minor Works within State Controlled Road Boundaries

4 CONSTRUCTION amp MAINTENANCE

41 Specifications

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or on any attached drawings Department of Transport amp Main Roads Standard Specifications for each class of work involved will apply

42 Traffic Management

Construction of the access shall proceed without unreasonable interruption to traffic The owner shall take all steps necessary to protect the public during construction This shall

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 2 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

include the provision of adequate signage barriers or other specified protection in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1995) Part 3 - Work on Roads

43 Clearing amp Grubbing

Any declared weeds identified at the site shall be treated before clearing work starts The Department of Natural Resources amp Water or the local government can advise on appropriate identification and treatment

Clearing and grubbing (for the proposed works) shall be the minimum needed for the installation of the works either adjacent to the property or on the approved alignment

Materials cleared and grubbed shall be disposed of as approved by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative in the following manner -

(a) Millable timber or other materials that have a commercial use shall be separated and treated to permit its sale or re-use The constructing authority shall liaise with the Department of Primary Industry and Forestry with respect to royalties and sale

(b) All trees and vegetable material up to 100mm diameter shall be mulched for re-use on site along the disturbed area as an aid to revegetation and to assist in stabilisation of the site

(c) Material not mulched or of commercial value shall be stockpiled at approved sites along the road reserve to provide habitat for local fauna No stockpiles are permitted adjacent to the property boundary (as this may create a fire hazard) or in drainage lines All stockpiles shall be outside of the clear zone ndash refer Section 8 of the Departments Road Planning amp Design Manual

(d) The department may order all cleared and grubbed material to be burnt if the options above are impracticable

(e) Grub holes are to be backfilled and the whole of the disturbed area graded to maintain the shape of the existing terrain

(f) The Department may require all non-usable materials to be removed from the road reserve and disposed of at a site approved by Transport amp Main Roads

Such work is to be to the satisfaction of the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative

44 Services

The owner shall verify the existence and location of any underground or overhead public utility services that construction of the proposed access may affect If such services do exist the owner is to liaise with the relevant Authority to prevent any damage to such service The owner shall also maintain the minimum horizontal and or vertical clearance (as stipulated by the service authority) from any underground or overhead services Any relocation or protection of underground or overhead services shall be carried out at no cost to the Department of Transport amp Main Roads

45 Drainage

A reinforced concrete pipe or reinforced concrete box culvert shall be laid in the table drain under the access unless otherwise approved (in writing) by the Department of Transport amp

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 3 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

Main Roads An Engineering assessment (by a registered professional civil engineer) must be made to determine the size of culvert necessary at each access to ensure that the access does not interfere with drainage flow in the area The minimum diameter of pipe shall be 375 mm RCP or a reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) of equivalent waterway area The minimum length of culvert shall be in accordance with drawings DWG MS 4-5 (18042000) or DWG MS 4-6 (18042000)

46 Roadway Repairs

The owner will be required to repair or cause to be repaired at his own expense any damage to the roadway due to the existence of the access

47 Supervision

All work within the road reserve is to be carried out under the supervision of the Departments area engineer or works inspector for the local government area within which the work lies In this regard it will be necessary for you to contact the Transport amp Main Roads Regional office before commencing any work within the road reserve Alternatively the supervision may be carried out by a registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)

48 Certification

The applicant is to provide written certification that all works have been constructed in accordance with these conditions standard drawings and or any other standard or job specific conditions specified at the time of approval for the works to be constructed

The certification may be from either the Departments area engineer or works inspector or the registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) whoever supervises the works

49 Maintenance of Access

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out at their expense any maintenance work required on the access They may be directed to do so in writing by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative at any time and such work shall be carried out without delay to his satisfaction Failure to do so within the specified time may result in the Department of Transport amp Main Roads carrying out the required works or having it done by a private contractor and recouping the costs from the property owner

5 FUTURE WORKS

51 By Property Owner

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out any upgrading of an access necessary due to additional traffic generation or change in vehicle type using the access

52 By Transport amp Main Roads

The Department of Transport amp Main Roads will reinstate existing accesses to pre-existing standards during any future road reconstruction

All reasonable care will be taken during future roadwork construction however the construction of an access must in no way interfere with the work of maintenance personnel The Director

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 16: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

SPL-0714-012469

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning Page 7

If you require any further information please contact Felicity Laub Senior Planning Officer Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office on (07) 4898 6814 or via email felicitylaubdsdipqldgovau who will be pleased to assist

Yours sincerely

Jamie ThorleyManager (Planning) ndash Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office

Encl DTMR Standard conditions for construction of minor accesses onto State controlled roadsAccess LocationsDTMR Plan showing minimum access requirements

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 1 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

1 GRANTING of APPROVAL

The Department of Transport and Main Roads grants approvals to construct property accesses within the boundaries of a state controlled road as follows -

bull Limited Access Road _ Sections 54 and 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

bull Other State Controlled Roads _ Section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

The applicant shall construct the access at the location approved by the Regional Director (Mackay) or his representative and in accordance with these Standard Conditions and any special conditions applied by the issuing office

2 SPECIFICATIONS amp DRAWINGS

21 Rural

Access construction must conform to the General Layout Grading and Cross Sectional requirements shown on DWG No 579912 (14022012) attached vertical grading diagrams (Type A ndash Type E) or other drawings approved by the department Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix B The applicant shall also submit engineering drawings (of the proposed access) to the department for approval when requested to do so A registered professional civil engineer must prepare such drawings at no cost to the Department of Transport and Main Roads

22 Urban

The owner shall install a ramped kerb crossing of the existing kerb and channel in accordance with Local Government specifications Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix A The owner shall negotiate with the Local Government about changes to existing kerbside parking to accommodate the sight distance requirements and comply with any requirements council might impose

3 ENVIRONMENT

All works shall comply with the requirements of the regionrsquos current Environment Management Conditions for Minor Works within State Controlled Road Boundaries

4 CONSTRUCTION amp MAINTENANCE

41 Specifications

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or on any attached drawings Department of Transport amp Main Roads Standard Specifications for each class of work involved will apply

42 Traffic Management

Construction of the access shall proceed without unreasonable interruption to traffic The owner shall take all steps necessary to protect the public during construction This shall

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 2 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

include the provision of adequate signage barriers or other specified protection in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1995) Part 3 - Work on Roads

43 Clearing amp Grubbing

Any declared weeds identified at the site shall be treated before clearing work starts The Department of Natural Resources amp Water or the local government can advise on appropriate identification and treatment

Clearing and grubbing (for the proposed works) shall be the minimum needed for the installation of the works either adjacent to the property or on the approved alignment

Materials cleared and grubbed shall be disposed of as approved by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative in the following manner -

(a) Millable timber or other materials that have a commercial use shall be separated and treated to permit its sale or re-use The constructing authority shall liaise with the Department of Primary Industry and Forestry with respect to royalties and sale

(b) All trees and vegetable material up to 100mm diameter shall be mulched for re-use on site along the disturbed area as an aid to revegetation and to assist in stabilisation of the site

(c) Material not mulched or of commercial value shall be stockpiled at approved sites along the road reserve to provide habitat for local fauna No stockpiles are permitted adjacent to the property boundary (as this may create a fire hazard) or in drainage lines All stockpiles shall be outside of the clear zone ndash refer Section 8 of the Departments Road Planning amp Design Manual

(d) The department may order all cleared and grubbed material to be burnt if the options above are impracticable

(e) Grub holes are to be backfilled and the whole of the disturbed area graded to maintain the shape of the existing terrain

(f) The Department may require all non-usable materials to be removed from the road reserve and disposed of at a site approved by Transport amp Main Roads

Such work is to be to the satisfaction of the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative

44 Services

The owner shall verify the existence and location of any underground or overhead public utility services that construction of the proposed access may affect If such services do exist the owner is to liaise with the relevant Authority to prevent any damage to such service The owner shall also maintain the minimum horizontal and or vertical clearance (as stipulated by the service authority) from any underground or overhead services Any relocation or protection of underground or overhead services shall be carried out at no cost to the Department of Transport amp Main Roads

45 Drainage

A reinforced concrete pipe or reinforced concrete box culvert shall be laid in the table drain under the access unless otherwise approved (in writing) by the Department of Transport amp

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 3 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

Main Roads An Engineering assessment (by a registered professional civil engineer) must be made to determine the size of culvert necessary at each access to ensure that the access does not interfere with drainage flow in the area The minimum diameter of pipe shall be 375 mm RCP or a reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) of equivalent waterway area The minimum length of culvert shall be in accordance with drawings DWG MS 4-5 (18042000) or DWG MS 4-6 (18042000)

46 Roadway Repairs

The owner will be required to repair or cause to be repaired at his own expense any damage to the roadway due to the existence of the access

47 Supervision

All work within the road reserve is to be carried out under the supervision of the Departments area engineer or works inspector for the local government area within which the work lies In this regard it will be necessary for you to contact the Transport amp Main Roads Regional office before commencing any work within the road reserve Alternatively the supervision may be carried out by a registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)

48 Certification

The applicant is to provide written certification that all works have been constructed in accordance with these conditions standard drawings and or any other standard or job specific conditions specified at the time of approval for the works to be constructed

The certification may be from either the Departments area engineer or works inspector or the registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) whoever supervises the works

49 Maintenance of Access

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out at their expense any maintenance work required on the access They may be directed to do so in writing by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative at any time and such work shall be carried out without delay to his satisfaction Failure to do so within the specified time may result in the Department of Transport amp Main Roads carrying out the required works or having it done by a private contractor and recouping the costs from the property owner

5 FUTURE WORKS

51 By Property Owner

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out any upgrading of an access necessary due to additional traffic generation or change in vehicle type using the access

52 By Transport amp Main Roads

The Department of Transport amp Main Roads will reinstate existing accesses to pre-existing standards during any future road reconstruction

All reasonable care will be taken during future roadwork construction however the construction of an access must in no way interfere with the work of maintenance personnel The Director

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 17: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 1 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

1 GRANTING of APPROVAL

The Department of Transport and Main Roads grants approvals to construct property accesses within the boundaries of a state controlled road as follows -

bull Limited Access Road _ Sections 54 and 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

bull Other State Controlled Roads _ Section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (as in force 1 January 2004) and any subsequent amendments

The applicant shall construct the access at the location approved by the Regional Director (Mackay) or his representative and in accordance with these Standard Conditions and any special conditions applied by the issuing office

2 SPECIFICATIONS amp DRAWINGS

21 Rural

Access construction must conform to the General Layout Grading and Cross Sectional requirements shown on DWG No 579912 (14022012) attached vertical grading diagrams (Type A ndash Type E) or other drawings approved by the department Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix B The applicant shall also submit engineering drawings (of the proposed access) to the department for approval when requested to do so A registered professional civil engineer must prepare such drawings at no cost to the Department of Transport and Main Roads

22 Urban

The owner shall install a ramped kerb crossing of the existing kerb and channel in accordance with Local Government specifications Sight distance to and from the access shall be in accordance with the sketch in Appendix A The owner shall negotiate with the Local Government about changes to existing kerbside parking to accommodate the sight distance requirements and comply with any requirements council might impose

3 ENVIRONMENT

All works shall comply with the requirements of the regionrsquos current Environment Management Conditions for Minor Works within State Controlled Road Boundaries

4 CONSTRUCTION amp MAINTENANCE

41 Specifications

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or on any attached drawings Department of Transport amp Main Roads Standard Specifications for each class of work involved will apply

42 Traffic Management

Construction of the access shall proceed without unreasonable interruption to traffic The owner shall take all steps necessary to protect the public during construction This shall

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 2 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

include the provision of adequate signage barriers or other specified protection in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1995) Part 3 - Work on Roads

43 Clearing amp Grubbing

Any declared weeds identified at the site shall be treated before clearing work starts The Department of Natural Resources amp Water or the local government can advise on appropriate identification and treatment

Clearing and grubbing (for the proposed works) shall be the minimum needed for the installation of the works either adjacent to the property or on the approved alignment

Materials cleared and grubbed shall be disposed of as approved by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative in the following manner -

(a) Millable timber or other materials that have a commercial use shall be separated and treated to permit its sale or re-use The constructing authority shall liaise with the Department of Primary Industry and Forestry with respect to royalties and sale

(b) All trees and vegetable material up to 100mm diameter shall be mulched for re-use on site along the disturbed area as an aid to revegetation and to assist in stabilisation of the site

(c) Material not mulched or of commercial value shall be stockpiled at approved sites along the road reserve to provide habitat for local fauna No stockpiles are permitted adjacent to the property boundary (as this may create a fire hazard) or in drainage lines All stockpiles shall be outside of the clear zone ndash refer Section 8 of the Departments Road Planning amp Design Manual

(d) The department may order all cleared and grubbed material to be burnt if the options above are impracticable

(e) Grub holes are to be backfilled and the whole of the disturbed area graded to maintain the shape of the existing terrain

(f) The Department may require all non-usable materials to be removed from the road reserve and disposed of at a site approved by Transport amp Main Roads

Such work is to be to the satisfaction of the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative

44 Services

The owner shall verify the existence and location of any underground or overhead public utility services that construction of the proposed access may affect If such services do exist the owner is to liaise with the relevant Authority to prevent any damage to such service The owner shall also maintain the minimum horizontal and or vertical clearance (as stipulated by the service authority) from any underground or overhead services Any relocation or protection of underground or overhead services shall be carried out at no cost to the Department of Transport amp Main Roads

45 Drainage

A reinforced concrete pipe or reinforced concrete box culvert shall be laid in the table drain under the access unless otherwise approved (in writing) by the Department of Transport amp

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 3 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

Main Roads An Engineering assessment (by a registered professional civil engineer) must be made to determine the size of culvert necessary at each access to ensure that the access does not interfere with drainage flow in the area The minimum diameter of pipe shall be 375 mm RCP or a reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) of equivalent waterway area The minimum length of culvert shall be in accordance with drawings DWG MS 4-5 (18042000) or DWG MS 4-6 (18042000)

46 Roadway Repairs

The owner will be required to repair or cause to be repaired at his own expense any damage to the roadway due to the existence of the access

47 Supervision

All work within the road reserve is to be carried out under the supervision of the Departments area engineer or works inspector for the local government area within which the work lies In this regard it will be necessary for you to contact the Transport amp Main Roads Regional office before commencing any work within the road reserve Alternatively the supervision may be carried out by a registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)

48 Certification

The applicant is to provide written certification that all works have been constructed in accordance with these conditions standard drawings and or any other standard or job specific conditions specified at the time of approval for the works to be constructed

The certification may be from either the Departments area engineer or works inspector or the registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) whoever supervises the works

49 Maintenance of Access

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out at their expense any maintenance work required on the access They may be directed to do so in writing by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative at any time and such work shall be carried out without delay to his satisfaction Failure to do so within the specified time may result in the Department of Transport amp Main Roads carrying out the required works or having it done by a private contractor and recouping the costs from the property owner

5 FUTURE WORKS

51 By Property Owner

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out any upgrading of an access necessary due to additional traffic generation or change in vehicle type using the access

52 By Transport amp Main Roads

The Department of Transport amp Main Roads will reinstate existing accesses to pre-existing standards during any future road reconstruction

All reasonable care will be taken during future roadwork construction however the construction of an access must in no way interfere with the work of maintenance personnel The Director

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 18: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 2 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

include the provision of adequate signage barriers or other specified protection in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1995) Part 3 - Work on Roads

43 Clearing amp Grubbing

Any declared weeds identified at the site shall be treated before clearing work starts The Department of Natural Resources amp Water or the local government can advise on appropriate identification and treatment

Clearing and grubbing (for the proposed works) shall be the minimum needed for the installation of the works either adjacent to the property or on the approved alignment

Materials cleared and grubbed shall be disposed of as approved by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative in the following manner -

(a) Millable timber or other materials that have a commercial use shall be separated and treated to permit its sale or re-use The constructing authority shall liaise with the Department of Primary Industry and Forestry with respect to royalties and sale

(b) All trees and vegetable material up to 100mm diameter shall be mulched for re-use on site along the disturbed area as an aid to revegetation and to assist in stabilisation of the site

(c) Material not mulched or of commercial value shall be stockpiled at approved sites along the road reserve to provide habitat for local fauna No stockpiles are permitted adjacent to the property boundary (as this may create a fire hazard) or in drainage lines All stockpiles shall be outside of the clear zone ndash refer Section 8 of the Departments Road Planning amp Design Manual

(d) The department may order all cleared and grubbed material to be burnt if the options above are impracticable

(e) Grub holes are to be backfilled and the whole of the disturbed area graded to maintain the shape of the existing terrain

(f) The Department may require all non-usable materials to be removed from the road reserve and disposed of at a site approved by Transport amp Main Roads

Such work is to be to the satisfaction of the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative

44 Services

The owner shall verify the existence and location of any underground or overhead public utility services that construction of the proposed access may affect If such services do exist the owner is to liaise with the relevant Authority to prevent any damage to such service The owner shall also maintain the minimum horizontal and or vertical clearance (as stipulated by the service authority) from any underground or overhead services Any relocation or protection of underground or overhead services shall be carried out at no cost to the Department of Transport amp Main Roads

45 Drainage

A reinforced concrete pipe or reinforced concrete box culvert shall be laid in the table drain under the access unless otherwise approved (in writing) by the Department of Transport amp

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 3 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

Main Roads An Engineering assessment (by a registered professional civil engineer) must be made to determine the size of culvert necessary at each access to ensure that the access does not interfere with drainage flow in the area The minimum diameter of pipe shall be 375 mm RCP or a reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) of equivalent waterway area The minimum length of culvert shall be in accordance with drawings DWG MS 4-5 (18042000) or DWG MS 4-6 (18042000)

46 Roadway Repairs

The owner will be required to repair or cause to be repaired at his own expense any damage to the roadway due to the existence of the access

47 Supervision

All work within the road reserve is to be carried out under the supervision of the Departments area engineer or works inspector for the local government area within which the work lies In this regard it will be necessary for you to contact the Transport amp Main Roads Regional office before commencing any work within the road reserve Alternatively the supervision may be carried out by a registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)

48 Certification

The applicant is to provide written certification that all works have been constructed in accordance with these conditions standard drawings and or any other standard or job specific conditions specified at the time of approval for the works to be constructed

The certification may be from either the Departments area engineer or works inspector or the registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) whoever supervises the works

49 Maintenance of Access

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out at their expense any maintenance work required on the access They may be directed to do so in writing by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative at any time and such work shall be carried out without delay to his satisfaction Failure to do so within the specified time may result in the Department of Transport amp Main Roads carrying out the required works or having it done by a private contractor and recouping the costs from the property owner

5 FUTURE WORKS

51 By Property Owner

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out any upgrading of an access necessary due to additional traffic generation or change in vehicle type using the access

52 By Transport amp Main Roads

The Department of Transport amp Main Roads will reinstate existing accesses to pre-existing standards during any future road reconstruction

All reasonable care will be taken during future roadwork construction however the construction of an access must in no way interfere with the work of maintenance personnel The Director

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 19: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 3 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

Main Roads An Engineering assessment (by a registered professional civil engineer) must be made to determine the size of culvert necessary at each access to ensure that the access does not interfere with drainage flow in the area The minimum diameter of pipe shall be 375 mm RCP or a reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) of equivalent waterway area The minimum length of culvert shall be in accordance with drawings DWG MS 4-5 (18042000) or DWG MS 4-6 (18042000)

46 Roadway Repairs

The owner will be required to repair or cause to be repaired at his own expense any damage to the roadway due to the existence of the access

47 Supervision

All work within the road reserve is to be carried out under the supervision of the Departments area engineer or works inspector for the local government area within which the work lies In this regard it will be necessary for you to contact the Transport amp Main Roads Regional office before commencing any work within the road reserve Alternatively the supervision may be carried out by a registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)

48 Certification

The applicant is to provide written certification that all works have been constructed in accordance with these conditions standard drawings and or any other standard or job specific conditions specified at the time of approval for the works to be constructed

The certification may be from either the Departments area engineer or works inspector or the registered professional engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) whoever supervises the works

49 Maintenance of Access

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out at their expense any maintenance work required on the access They may be directed to do so in writing by the Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads (Mackay) or his representative at any time and such work shall be carried out without delay to his satisfaction Failure to do so within the specified time may result in the Department of Transport amp Main Roads carrying out the required works or having it done by a private contractor and recouping the costs from the property owner

5 FUTURE WORKS

51 By Property Owner

It is the responsibility of the owner to carry out any upgrading of an access necessary due to additional traffic generation or change in vehicle type using the access

52 By Transport amp Main Roads

The Department of Transport amp Main Roads will reinstate existing accesses to pre-existing standards during any future road reconstruction

All reasonable care will be taken during future roadwork construction however the construction of an access must in no way interfere with the work of maintenance personnel The Director

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 20: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 4 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government accept no responsibility for damage to the access during any maintenance or reconstruction work

6 INDEMNIFICATION

The owner by accepting the above conditions indemnifies the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damage or injury which might arise during the progress of the work And shall keep indemnified the Director General Department of Transport amp Main Roads and the Local Government against any claim action or process for damages andor injury which might arise from the existence of the access The indemnification shall be supported by Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $A10000000 at the expense of the owner The insurance policy shall name the State of Queensland represented by the Department of Transport amp Main Roads as an interested party

7 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Property owners are not permitted to install objects within the road reserve that are not shown on the attached standard drawings or otherwise approved in writing by the Regional Director

Examples of prohibited objects are

bull Rock Walls bull Timber or concrete sleepers bull Fences of any type bull Trees andor landscaping bull Vehicle tyres bull Advertising signs

The list above is not comprehensive and if in doubt the property owner must seek approval from the Department of Transport amp Main Roads before carrying out any work within the road reserve

8 NATIVE TITLE

Regarding Native Title this Department makes no warrant as to the existence or non-existence of native title interests over any land within the boundaries of the state-controlled road reserve proposed to be used for the construction andor maintenance of a property access It is a requirement of this Department that the property ownerapplicant complies with Section 24JB Subsection 6 of the Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993

9 CULTURAL HERITAGE

The owners must undertake searches to determine whether there are any Cultural Heritage sites along the route of the proposed access These sites may be of significance to either indigenous or non-indigenous persons or groups All costs associated with complying with Cultural Heritage requirements shall be borne by the owners of the proposed access

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 21: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 5 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX A

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

URBAN ACCESSES

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - URBAN

Design Speed (kph) ASD (m)

40 33

50 47

60 63

70 82

80 103

ASD _ Refer Table ASD _ Refer Table

5m

Edge line

Edge line or lip of channel

Acc

ess

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

Sight line

Sight line

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic Lane

Traffic lane

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 22: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 6 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

APPENDIX B

APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE ndash VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

RURAL ACCESSES

ESD applies only if specified in writing by Transport amp Main Roads

TABLE OF SIGHT DISTANCES - RURAL

Design Speed (kph) SISD(m) ESD(m)

70 150 220

80 185 305

90 215 400

100 255 500

110 300 500

Acce

ss

5m

Road shoulder

Road shoulder

Sight line SISD or ESD SISD or ESD

Vehicles within the sight triangle are to be clearly visible to each other at all times

No permanent sight obstructions permitted in these areas

Traffic lane Traffic lane

Edge line

Edge line

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 23: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MINOR ACCESSES ONTO STATE CONTROLLED ROADS MS4-4 (14022012)

Page 7 of 7 GRoad CorridorCorridor ManagementDev AssessmentDC Standard Conditions__Current_June2011Minor AccessesConstruction of Minor Property Accesses (140212)doc

Mackay Regional Office

OWNERS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS

The owner shall by signature below acknowledge acceptance of these conditions and forward before commencement of construction to

The Regional Director Department of Transport amp Main Roads PO Box 62 MACKAY QLD 4740

Local Authority

Road

Location

Ownerrsquos Name

Ownerrsquos Signature Date

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 24: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Aurecon Australasia Pty LtdABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

T +61 7 4977 5200F +61 7 4977 5201 E mackayaurecongroupcom W aurecongroupcom

Memorandum

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 1

To Leah Harris Mackay Regional Council From Thomas Withers

Copy Reference 233412 Date 17 November 2014 Pages (including

this page) 5 Subject Prelodgement Advice ndashProposed 11 into 11 lot ROL

1 Revised Lot Layout A meeting request was made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 This request included Councilrsquos Development Services Meeting Request Form and supporting documentation

The advice given in response from Council (email date 1 August 2014) was that proposed Lots E F G and H are unsupported as they do not follow any features and are not an improvement to the current lot layout In response to this advice we wish to provide to Council a revised lot layout (lsquoProposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6 refer to Attachment A) and a detailed rational behind the proposed boundaries

Based your feedback we have made some adjustments to the proposed east-west boundaries between proposed Lots D E F and G The revised boundaries Follow contours in the Digital Elevation Model (MRC 2009) - these contours are natural

boundaries to activities

Follow cleared access tracks and fence lines ndash the boundaries follow existing cleared access tracks and fence lines which fragment activities

Avoids watercourses - boundaries run parallel to vegetated watercourses which are natural boundaries to activities

Avoids Of Concern Dominant Regional Ecosystem mapping - boundaries are located along existing cleared fence lines and access tracks (identifiable on high res imagery) and avoid important areas of vegetation

Consolidate the existing viable cane growing land - the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide large enough flat cleared areas that are contiguous to make them viable for broadscale agriculture such as growing cane All viable areas of the land for growing cane have already been utilised All existing and viable cane growing land will not be fragmented and will be consolidated in proposed Lot G

Please also note that DCDB cadastral boundaries in the revised lot layout have been adjusted to compensate for the known shift in DCDB boundaries (+- 30m) from their actual locations This has been done so that proposed boundaries can more easily be seen to follow existing features

11 Viable alternative land uses As Lot 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 do not provide any viable broadscale agricultural use in their current form a viable alternative for this land (proposed Lots D E and F) is high value horticultural purposes

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 25: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 2

The proposed east-west boundary creating proposed Lots D E F and G is based on existing topographic features (watercourses cleared access tracks and fence lines hills and vegetation) that prevent horticultural activities being undertaken contiguously across the existing configuration Due to the capital intensive nature of horticultural activities and the limited contagious areas of viable land within the existing Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 it is unlikely that the land would be considered a reliable investment by proponents looking to undertake large scale horticultural operations The land (DE F and potentially G) is therefore best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations as operations on this scale are much more financially viable to proponents with limited financial backing Small scale horticultural operations also provide a more economically and environmentally sustainable outcome as crop types are diversified and can be tailored to fit the availability of resources and the available size and topography of the land available

2 Draft Planning Scheme Council has advised that the draft planning scheme is currently being reviewed to incorporate the new State Planning Policy (SPP) (July 2014)

The advice suggested reviewing the Agricultural Land Classification ndash Class A and B in the SPP Plan Making mapping It is noted that the mapped areas are the same as the Good Quality Agricultural Land in the Mirani Shire Plan and the draft planning scheme

See below an assessment of the proposal against the SPP

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

The planning scheme is to appropriately integrate the state interest by

(1) considering the strategic economic significance of important agricultural areas by promoting and optimising agricultural development opportunities and enabling increased agricultural production in these areas and

(1) The subject land is of low strategic economic significance Natural boundaries and topographic features limit the extent of cane growing to its current form It is proposed that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for high value horticultural activities The proposed Lots D E and F provide the most viable and sustainable configuration to enable horticultural activities

(2) protecting Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Class A and Class B land for sustainable agricultural use by

(a) avoiding fragmentation of ALC Class A or Class B land into lot sizes inconsistent with the current or potential use of the land for agriculture and

(a) It is considered that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are appropriate to the current and potential use of the land for ongoing activities All lot sizes are above 25 ha and proposed boundaries follow existing natural boundaries and topographic features that confine agricultural activities

The land (proposed Lots D E F and potentially G) is best utilised by 3 ndash 4 smaller scale horticultural operations The proposed layout of Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 26: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 3

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

horticultural activities

(b) avoiding locating non-agricultural development on or adjacent to ALC Class A or Class B land and

(b) The development will not change the use of the land from agricultural purposes

(c) maintaining or enhancing land condition and the biophysical resources underpinning ALC Class A or Class B land and

(c) The development will not alter the land condition or biophysical resources

(3) protecting fisheries resources from development that compromises long-term fisheries productivity and accessibility and

NA

(4) facilitating growth in agricultural production and a strong agriculture industry by

(a) considering the value and suitability of land for current or potential agricultural uses when making land use decisions and

(a) It is considered that proposed Lots D E and F which are not economically viable for growing cane may be utilised for horticultural activities Boundaries of proposed Lots D E and F accommodate viable land within Lots 5 on RP705451 and the majority of Lot 1 on RP705453 that is suitable for horticultural purposes The proposed layout of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the potential of the land for horticultural activities

(b) considering the planning needs of hard-to-locate intensive agricultural land uses such as intensive animal industries and intensive horticulture and

(b) The land is not suitable for broadscale agricultural land uses The configuration of proposed Lots D E F and G maximises the viability of the land for horticultural uses

(c) locating new development (such as sensitive land uses or land uses that have biosecurity risks for agriculture) in areas that minimise potential for conflict with existing agricultural uses through the provision of adequate separation areas or other measures and

(c) The proposal is a ROL and does not propose new land uses

(d) considering model levels of assessment and including agriculture development codes (or similar development assessment requirements) and

(d) NA

(e) facilitating opportunities for mutually beneficial co-existence with development that is complementary to agriculture and other non-agricultural uses that do not diminish agricultural productivity and

(e) The proposal does not propose non-agricultural uses

(f) considering the infrastructure and services necessary to support a strong agriculture

(f) The proposed boundary realignment will preserve the existing cane tramline

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 27: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 4

State Interest - Agriculture Compliance

industry and associated agricultural supply chains and

infrastructure and will allow agricultural activities to be undertaken to their maximum potential without impacting on this infrastructure It is considered that horticultural uses on D E and F will best fit the capacity of existing infrastructure and road infrastructure likely to be conditioned by Council

(g) protecting the stock route network from development (both on the stock route and adjacent) that would compromise the networkrsquos primary use or capacity for stock movement and other values (conservation recreational)

(g) NA

3 Prelodgement Meeting with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

A Prelodgement meeting was held with the Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) on 29 July 2014 (Refer to Attachment B) Also providing Prelodgement advice were representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Feedback and advice in relation to the proposed Boundary Realignment was positive

31 Vegetation Management Advice from the DNRM indicated that no referral for Vegetation Management would be required if proposed Lot B was increased to be greater than 25ha Proposed Lot B has been increased to be greater than 25ha in accordance with this advice

32 Road Closure and Opening Advice from the DNRM indicated requirements for an application for simultaneous closure and opening Advice from DTMR indicated requirements and standard conditions of access to the State Controlled Road Mia Mia Connection Road for the proposed application for simultaneous closure and opening

33 Road Standards In addition to information in the meeting request made to Councilrsquos Development Services on 17 July 2014 we ask for advice on the minimum standards for rural road construction for

bull road construction for the 24 km (approximate) of road along Galeas Road to service proposed lots D E F G H amp I

bull road construction for the 900 m (approximate) of road to service Lots B C and J

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 28: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Project 233412 File Memo_Deguara ROL_Prelodgement Advice for MRCdocx 17 November 2014 Revision 0 Page 5

In light of the revised lot layout and the additional information provided we wish to proceed with a Prelodgement meeting with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering programs

Attachment A - Proposed Boundary Realignmentrsquo Version 6

Attachment B - SPL-0714-012469 Pre-lodgement meeting record

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 29: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

From Thomas WithersTo Grant Paterson Neil Proposch Kate LargeSubject Deguara - FW Prelodgement Meeting RequestDate Monday 4 August 2014 103324 AMAttachments image001jpg

image002jpgimage003pngimage004pngimage005jpg

Feedback from Leah on Deguara Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Leah Harris [mailtoLeahHarrismackayqldgovau] Sent Friday 1 August 2014 435 PMTo Thomas WithersSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Thomas sorry I havenrsquot gotten back to you it is taking a while to work out all the changes to the lots and which I think are ok and which are not Irsquoll summarise the big issues for now which is that we do not support the creation of lots DEF and G which are straight subdivisions of Lot 5 on RP705451 and Lot 1 on RP705453 (while I realise there are 11 existing titles) These lots donrsquot follow any feature ie paddocks rivers roads etc It is not an improvement of the lot layout This is an even greater issue for Council as they are essentially new lots without access to a constructed road The other boundary realignments seem quite minor and I will keep working through them to provide more specific feedback Irsquom happy to discuss them if you want to request a meeting time In your assessment of my comments and advice to your client you need to be mindfull of the RoL provisions of the planning scheme which have specific requirements around boundary realignments You also need to be aware Council is undertaking a review of RuralRural Res provisions in the draft planning scheme which is affecting our policy direction bringing it in line with the new SPP and specifically the guideline around drafting an agriculture code You may want to look at the Ag Land Class A and B SARA (plan making) mapping Kind Regards Leah Harris | Principal Planner | Development Assessment | Mackay Regional CouncilPhone 07 4961 9113 | Fax 07 4944 2411 | leahharrismackayqldgovau | mackayqldgovau

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 30: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

cidimage003jpg01CF20FC43B07940

PLEASE NOTE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE AN OFFICERS OPINION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RELEVANT CURRENT POLICY AND LEGISLATION LODGEMENT OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE MAY RAISE OTHER ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED HERE AND THEREFORE THE ABOVE ADVICE DOES NOT BIND COUNCIL IN ANY WAY WHEN CONSIDERING A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION From Thomas Withers [mailtoThomasWithersaurecongroupcom] Sent Monday 28 July 2014 145 PMTo Leah HarrisCc Grant Paterson Kate Large Neil ProposchSubject RE Prelodgement Meeting Request Hi Leah Just touching base as I have not heard from you As you indicated Friday can you please indicate in writing the details of Councilrsquos feedback on the proposalAny feedback now would make a more productive Prelodgement meeting As indicated we still wish to have a Prelodgement meeting and would like to confirm a date Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

From Thomas Withers Sent Thursday 17 July 2014 400 PMTo developmentservicesmackayqldgovauCc Grant PatersonSubject Prelodgement Meeting RequestImportance High

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 31: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Hi We wish to have a Prelodgement discussion with Councilrsquos Development Assessment and Development Engineering teams We are hoping this could occur Mon 21 July sometime between 8am-10am Thank you Kind RegardsThomas Withers________________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Withers MUrbEnvPlan BDigitalDes DipCrAEnvironmental amp Urban Planner | AureconT +61 7 4977 5223 | M +61 4 2077 3384 | F +61 7 4977 5201E thomaswithersaurecongroupcom

Level 1 9 Tennyson Street | PO Box 1060 Mackay Qld 4740wwwaurecongroupcom________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information You must not use or disclose this information other than for the purposes for which it was supplied The privilege or confidentiality attached to this email and attachments is not waived by reason of mistaken delivery to you If for whatever reason this email is received by other than the intended recipient you are requested to notify the sender promptly by telephone email or facsimile and destroy and delete all copies of the original message

Any personal information collected by Mackay Regional Council will be for lawful purposes directly related to the functions of Council Mackay Regional Council will take all reasonable precautions to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and will protect the personal information it holds from misuse unauthorised access and modification

Personal information will only be disclosed to a third party with your written authorisation or as required by law

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 32: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code Table 111 Building work and material change of use Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Residential buildings near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO1 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured

L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am le40 dB(A))

(2) le63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) facade corrected (measured L90 (8 hour) free field between 10 pm and 6 am gt40 dB(A))

AND

NA No building works or MCU as part of this application

AO12 Every private open space in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(2) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

AND

NA

AO13 Every passive recreation area in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria^ (1) 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and 6

pm) AND

NA

AO14 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours)

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 33: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Note Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

Editorrsquos note Habitable rooms of residential buildings located within a transport noise corridor must comply with the Queensland Development Code MP44 Buildings in a transport noise corridor Queensland Government 2010 Transport noise corridors are mapped on the Department of Housing and Public Works website

Accommodation buildings near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO2 Development involving an accommodation activity that is a residential building achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 All facades of a residential building exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) facade corrected (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO22 Every private open space and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

NA

AO23 Every habitable room in an accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level (railway) Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 34: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Accommodation activities or residential care facilities near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving an accommodation activity or residential care facility achieves acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO31 All facades of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le50 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour between 10 pm and 6 am) (3) le64 dB(A) Lmax facade corrected (between 10 pm and

6 am) AND

NA

AO32 Every private open space and passive recreation area in an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm)

(2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field AND

NA

AO33 Every habitable room of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24

hours) Note Noise levels from a busway or light rail are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a state-controlled road or type 1 multi modal corridor

PO4 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (1) community use or (2) educational establishment or (3) health care service or

AO41 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours)

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 35: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (4) hospital or (5) office or (6) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AND

AO42 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area for the particular development exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le63 dB(A) L10 (12 hours) free field (between 6 am

and 6 pm) AND

NA

AO43 A childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO44 A community use (except for a library) and office exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Noise levels from state-controlled roads or type 1 multi-modal corridors are to be measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Particular development near a railway (with more than 15 passing trains per day) or a type 2 multi modal corridor

PO5 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating

AO51 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le65 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) (2) le87 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) facade corrected AND

NA

AO52 Every outdoor education area and passive NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 36: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

recreation area exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (12 hour) free field (between 6 am and

6 pm) (2) le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure

level) free field AND

AO53 Sleeping areas in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO54 Other rooms in a child care centre health care service or hospital exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO55 An educational establishment library or place of worship exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le50 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level AND

NA

AO56 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) single event maximum sound pressure

level Note Noise levels from railways or type 2 multi-modal corridors are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 37: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Particular development near a busway or light rail

PO6 Development involving a (1) child care centre or (2) community use or (3) educational establishment or (4) health care service or (5) hospital or (6) office or (7) place of worship achieves acceptable noise levels for workers and patrons by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from noise generated by a busway or light rail

AO61 All facades of buildings for the particular development exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le55 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) facade corrected (maximum

hour during normal opening hours) AND

NA

AO62 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following external noise criteria^ (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

during normal opening hours) (2) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field (during normal opening

hours) AND

NA

AO63 Every childcare centre health care service hospital educational establishment library and place of worship exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) AND

NA

AO64 A community use (except library) or office exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meet the following internal noise criteria^ (1) le45 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during

opening hours) Note Areas exposed to noise from a busway or light rail are measured in accordance with AS10551ndash1997 Acoustics ndash Description and measurement of environmental noise

NA

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO7 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and

AO71 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Design of the OR

The proposed development is Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include noise barriers or earth mounds

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 38: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(6) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO72 Where adjacent to a railway or type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

AO73 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA

Vibration

PO8 Development mitigates adverse impacts on the development from vibration generated by transport operations and infrastructure

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 9

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 39: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Table 112 Reconfiguring a lot

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a state controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor

PO1 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor

AO11 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (7) le57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18

hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight le45 dB(A))

(8) le60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field (measured L90 (18 hour) free field between 6 am and 12 midnight gt45 dB(A))

NA The proposed development does not include future anticipated accommodation activity

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

PO2 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels for residents and visitors by mitigating adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO21 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations (1) le62 dB(A) Leq (24 hour) free field le84 dB(A) (single event maximum sound pressure level) free field

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

Future anticipated accommodation activity near a busway or light rail

PO3 Development involving land where a future anticipated accommodation activity is made exempt or self-assessable development under a local planning instrument is to achieve acceptable noise levels by mitigating

AO31 Land for a future anticipated accommodation activity exposed to noise from a busway or light rail meets the following external noise criteria at the building envelope or if the building envelope is unknown the deemed-to-comply setback distance for buildings stipulated by the local government planning instrument or

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 8 of 9

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 40: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

adverse impacts on the development site from noise generated by a busway or light rail

building regulations (1) le52 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 6 am and 10 pm) (2) le47 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) free field (maximum hour

between 10 pm and 6 am) le66 dB(A) Lmax free field

Noise barriers or earth mounds

PO4 Noise barriers or earth mounds erected to mitigate noise from transport operations and infrastructure are designed sited and constructed to ensure (1) adequate clearances to state

transport infrastructure to incorporate safety requirements and facilitate maintenance requirements

(2) privacy security and amenity of surrounding properties are not significantly impacted

(3) appropriate colour schemes textures and landscaping are used in barrier design

(4) design of noise barriers complements existing terrain

(5) fauna movement is maintained along appropriate corridors

(3) noise barriers are durable and fit for purpose

AO41 Where adjacent to a state-controlled road or a type 1 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with Chapter 7 Integrated Noise Barrier Design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice ndash Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 OR

NA

The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot does not include a proposal for noise barriers or earth mounds The proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot is an 4 into 4 lots boundary realignment of rural agricultural lots The proposal does not change the existing rural and agricultural land uses

AO42 Where adjacent to a railway or a type 2 multi-modal corridor noise barriers and earth mounds are designed sited and constructed in accordance with the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement mdash CIVIL-SR-014 Design of noise barriers adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 OR

NA

The proposed development is not near a railway with more than 15 passing trains per day or a type 2 multi-modal corridor

AO43 No acceptable outcome is prescribed for noise barriers and earth mounds adjacent to a busway or light rail

NA The proposed development is not near a busway or light rail

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 9 of 9

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 41: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code Table 121 Building work material change of use and reconfiguring a lot Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Air quality

PO1 Development involving sensitive development achieves acceptable levels of air quality for occupiers or users of the development by mitigating adverse impacts on the development from air emissions generated by state transport infrastructure

AO11 Every private open space and passive recreation area of an accommodation activity or residential care facility (other than a residential building) meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes AND

NA

The proposed development does not include an accommodation activity or residential care facility

AO12 Every outdoor education area and passive recreation area of an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office meet the air quality objectives in the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 for the following indicators (1) carbon monoxide (2) nitrogen dioxide (3) sulphur dioxide (4) photochemical oxidants (5) respirable particulate matter (PM10) (6) fine particulate matter (PM25) (7) lead (8) toluene (9) formaldehyde (10) xylenes

NA

The proposed development does not include an educational establishment childcare centre health care service hospital community use place of worship and office

Lighting impacts

PO2 Development involving an AO21 Buildings for an accommodation activity residential NA The proposed development does not include an

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 42: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital achieves acceptable levels of amenity for residents and patients by mitigating lighting impacts from state transport infrastructure

care facility (other than a residential building) health care service and hospital are designed sited and constructed to incorporate treatments to attenuate ingress of artificial lighting from state transport infrastructure during the hours of 10 pm ndash 6 am

accommodation activity residential care facility health care service or hospital

State development assessment provisions Module 1 mdash Community amenity 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 43: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

181 Filling excavation and structures state code Table 1811 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All development

PO1 Buildings services structures and utilities do not adversely impact on the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO11 Buildings structures services and utilities are not located in a railway or future railway land AND (1)

NA No buildings structures services or utilities proposed as part of this development

AO12 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of three metres from overhead line equipment Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances and Part B1 Setbacks of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (2)

NA

AO13 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway AND (3)

NA

AO14 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway land is to be a minimum of (1) 79 metres above the railway track where the

proposed development extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres or

(2) 90 metres above the railway track where the development extends along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres

Editorrsquos note Part A10 ndash Clearances of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (4)

NA

AO15 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained AND

NA

AO16 Pipe work services and utilities can be maintained without requiring access to the state transport corridor AND

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 44: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (5) AO17 Pipe work services and utilities are not attached to rail transport infrastructure AND (6)

NA

AO18 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres from a railway viaduct Editorrsquos note Part A14 ndash Viaducts and Part B11 Viaducts of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome AND (7)

NA

AO19 Development below or abutting a railway viaduct is to be clear of permanent structures or any other activity that may impede emergency access or works and maintenance of rail transport infrastructure (8) Editorrsquos note Temporary activities below or abutting a

railway viaduct could include for example car parking or outdoor storage

NA

PO2 Development prevents unauthorised access to (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure by people vehicles and projectiles

AO21 Fencing is provided along the property boundary with the railway Editorrsquos note Where fencing is provided it is to be in accordance with the railway managerrsquos standards AND (9)

NA

AO22 Accommodation activities with a publicly accessible area located within 10 metres from the boundary of a railway or 20 metres from the centreline of the nearest railway track (whichever is the shorter distance) include throw protection screens for the publicly accessible area as follows (1) openings of no greater than 25 mm x 25 mm (2) height of 24 metres vertically above the highest toe

hold if see-through or 2 metres if non see-through Editorrsquos note Expanded metal is considered see-through AND

NA

AO23 Development in a railway or future railway land includes throw protection screens Editorrsquos note Throw protection screens in a railway or future railway land designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Engineering Technical

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 45: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment Requirement CIVIL-SR-005 Design of buildings over or near railways Queensland Rail 2011 and the Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-008 Protection screens Queensland Rail 2011 comply with this acceptable outcome AND (10) AO24 Built to boundary walls and solid fences abutting a railway are protected by an anti-graffiti coating AND (11)

NA

AO25 Road barriers are installed along any proposed roads abutting a railway Editorrsquos note Road barriers designed in accordance with Queensland Rail Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-007 Design and selection criteria for roadrail interface barriers comply with this acceptable outcome AND (12)

NA

AO26 Proposed vehicle manoeuvring areas driveways loading areas or carparks abutting a railway include rail interface barriers Editorrsquos note A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO3 Buildings and structures in over or below a railway or future railway land are able to sustain impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an impact from a derailed train

AO31 Buildings and structures including piers or supporting elements located in over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design AS 1170 Structural design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012 Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways Queensland Rail 2011 Editorrsquos note Part A9 ndash Collision protection of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010 provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome

NA

PO4 Buildings and structures in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport tunnel have no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-controlled transport tunnel

AO41 Development in over below or within 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel ensures that the tunnel is (1) not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or

removal of lateral pressures (2) not adversely affected as a result of directly or

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 46: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment indirectly disturbing groundwater or soil

(13) Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment groundwater assessment and structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the application

PO5 Development involving dangerous goods adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not adversely impact on the safety of a railway

AO51 Development involving dangerous goods other than hazardous chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 52 of the State Planning Policy guideline State interest ndash emissions and hazardous activities Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning 2013 ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire explosion spill gas emission or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with Attachment 1 Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a railway environment Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010

NA

PO6 Any part of the development located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road minimises the potential to distract drivers and cause a safety hazard

AO61 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of but visible from a state-controlled road outlined within the Roadside advertising guide Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

NA

PO7 Filling excavation and construction does not adversely impact on or compromise the safety or operation of (1) state transport corridors (2) future state transport corridors (3) state transport infrastructure

AO71 Filling and excavation does not undermine cause subsidence of or groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for a state-controlled road it is recommended that a filling and excavation report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 Editorrsquos note If a development involves filling and excavation within a state-controlled road an approval

NA No filling and excavation works are proposed as part of this development

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 47: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required AND AO72 Development within 25 metres of a railway and involving excavation for basement levels or structural piling does not result in vibration impacts during construction which would compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared and submitted with the application Editorrsquos note Development within 25 metres of a railway may require an RPEQ certified vibration monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition of approval

NA

PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or impact on existing or future planned services or public utilities on a state-controlled road

AO81 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer Editorrsquos note An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be required

NA

PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to contain fill and excavation (1) do not encroach on a state transport

corridor (2) are capable of being constructed

and maintained without adversely impacting a state transport corridor

(3) are constructed of durable materials which maximise the life of the structure

AO91 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings rock anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future state transport corridor AND

NA

AO92 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and certified by a structural RPEQ Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure AND

NA

AO93 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than 750 millimetres from a common boundary

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 48: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment with a state-controlled road are certified by a structural RPEQ and designed to achieve a low maintenance external finish AND AO94 Retaining or reinforced soil structures adjacent to a state-controlled road and in excess of an overall height of two metres incorporate design treatments (such as terracing or planting) to reduce the overall height impact AND

NA

AO95 Construction materials of all retaining or reinforced soil structures have a design life exceeding 40 years and comply with the specifications approved by a RPEQ AND

NA

AO96 Temporary structures and batters do not encroach into a railway

NA

PO10 Filling and excavation does not cause siltation and erosion run-off from the property or wind blown dust nuisance onto a state-controlled road

AO101 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with the requirements of AS 12890 2000 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes

NA

PO11 Where the quantity of fill or excavated spoil material being imported or exported for a development exceeds 10 000 tonnes and haulage will be on a state-controlled road any impact on the infrastructure is identified and mitigation measures implemented

AO111 The impacts on the state-controlled road network are identified and measures are implemented to avoid reduce or compensate the effects on the asset life of the state-controlled road Editorrsquos note It is recommended that a pavement impact assessment report be prepared to address this acceptable outcome Guidance for preparing a pavement impact assessment is set out in Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Transport and Main Roads 2006

NA

PO12 Filling and excavation associated with providing a driveway crossover to a state-controlled road does not compromise the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure

AO121 Filling and excavation associated with the design of driveway crossovers complies with the relevant Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia Queensland (IPWEAQ) standards Editorrsquos note The construction of any crossover requires the applicant to obtain a permit to work in the state-controlled road corridor under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and a section 62 approval under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 for the siting of the access and associated works

NA

PO13 Fill material does not cause contamination from the development site onto a state-controlled road

AO131 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid sulphate content and achieves compliance with AS 12890 ndash Methods of testing soils for engineering

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 6 of 7

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 49: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment purposes and AS 41330-2005 ndash Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes

PO14 Vibration generated through fill compaction does not result in damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road

AO141 Fill compaction does not result in any vibrations beyond the site boundary and is in accordance with AS 2436ndash2010 ndash Guide to noise and vibration control on construction demolition and maintenance sites

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 181 Filling excavation and structures state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 7 of 7

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 50: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code Table 1821 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Stormwater and drainage management

PO1 Stormwater management for the development must ensure there is no worsening of and no actionable nuisance in relation to peak discharges flood levels frequency or duration of flooding flow velocities water quality ponding sedimentation and scour effects on an existing or future state transport corridor for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1 per cent annual exceedance probability

AO11 The development does not result in stormwater or drainage impacts or actionable nuisance within an existing or future state transport corridor Editorrsquos note It is recommended that basic stormwater information is to be prepared to demonstrate compliance with AO11

OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO12 A stormwater management statement certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on an existing or future state transport corridor OR

NA Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater drainage Existing uses on subject lots have sufficient stormwater drainage and lot realignment will not change catchment or run off

AO13 A stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that the development will achieve a no worsening impact or actionable nuisance on a state-controlled road OR

NA

AO14 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway a stormwater management plan certified by an RPEQ demonstrates that (1) the development will achieve a no worsening impact

or actionable nuisance on the railway (2) the development does not cause stormwater

roofwater ponding floodwater or any other drainage to be directed to increased or concentrated on the railway

(3) the development does not impede any drainage stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway

(4) stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to (a) maintain the structural integrity of the light rail

transport infrastructure

NA

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 51: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment (b) avoid scour or deposition

(5) additional railway formation drainage necessitated by the development is located within the premises where the development is carried out

(6) retaining structures for excavations abutting the railway corridor provide for drainage

Lawful point of discharge

PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts on a future or existing state transport corridor

AO21 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport corridor the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with section 143 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 and section 302 of Queensland urban drainage manual Department of Natural Resources and Mines 2013 OR

Road design will ensure compliance with stormwater run-off requirements

AO22 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 schedule 6 has been gained to verify the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway AND

NA

AO23 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor during construction or thereafter AND

NA

AO24 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the state transport corridor

NA

Sediment and erosion management

PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state transport corridor

AO31 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates erosion and sediment control measures Editorrsquos note For a state-controlled road where a development has a moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 135 of the Road drainage manual Department of Transport and Main Roads 2010 an erosion and sedimentation control plan should

Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented when undertaking Operational Works

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 3

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 52: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment be provided to support either a stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan

State development assessment provisions Module 18 mdash State transport infrastructure protection 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 3

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 53: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

191 Access to state-controlled roads state code Table 1911 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Location of the direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO1 Any road access location to the state-controlled road from adjacent land does not compromise the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO11 Any road access location to the state-controlled road complies with a decision under section 62 of the TIA OR

NA

AO12 Development does not propose a new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location to a state-controlled road OR

Road access application for simultaneous road closure amp opening submitted to DNRM The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO13 Any proposed road access location for the development is provided from a lower order road where an alternative to the state-controlled road exists OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

AO14 Any new or temporary road access location or a change to the use or operation of an existing permitted road access location demonstrates that the development

(1) does not exceed the acceptable level of service of a state-controlled road

(2) meets the sight distance requirements outlined in Volume 3 parts 3 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(3) does not exceed the acceptable operation of an intersection with a state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 54: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment including the degree of saturation delay queuing lengths and intersection layout

(4) is not located within andor adjacent to an existing or planned intersection in accordance with Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

(5) does not conflict with another propertyrsquos road access location and operation

Editorrsquos Note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended a traffic impact assessment be developed in accordance with Chapters 1 4 6 7 8 and 9 of the Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development (GARID) Department of Main Roads 2006 and the requirements of Volume 3 parts 4 4A 4B and 4C of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 SIDRA analysis or traffic modelling AND

AO15 Development does not propose a new road access location to a limited access road Editorrsquos note Limited access roads are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA Details can be accessed by contacting the appropriate DTMR regional office

NA

Number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

PO2 The number of road accesses to the state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO21 Development does not increase the number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

AND

The unnamed road provides legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 The unnamed road connects to Mia Mia Connection Road (a State-Controlled Road)

The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue

AO22 Where multiple road accesses to the premises exist access is rationalised to reduce the overall number of road accesses to the state-controlled road

Refer to attached Access Locations in Meeting Minutes ndash Appendix D of the Planning Report The existing access at Chainage 2910 km will remain for existing use only The access will be maintained in

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 55: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment AND accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard

Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 The existing access at Chainage 3024 km is to remain for existing house use only Access to other lots is to be discontinued and this access will not be used as access for this proposed reconfiguration of a lot Lot C will gain access from the north via a local government road network to Gargett ndash Mia Mia Road

AO23 Shared or combined road accesses are provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road

Editorrsquos note Shared road accesses may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacent lots If this is required then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of any lots for the shared access

See above

Design vehicle and traffic volume

PO3 The design of any road access maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO31 Any road access meets the minimum standards associated with the design vehicle Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme AND

PS Road design will comply to ensure maintained safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road No increase in traffic volume will occur as a result of this proposed development

AO32 Any road access is designed to accommodate the forecast volume of vehicle movements in the peak periods of operation or conducting the proposed use of the premises AND

AO33 Any road access is designed to accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of the final stage of development in accordance with GARID AND

AO34 Any road access in an urban location is designed in accordance with the relevant local government standards or IPWEAQ R-050 R-051 R-052 and R-053 drawings AND

AO35 Any road access not in an urban location is

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 3 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 56: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment designed in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013

Internal and external manoeuvring associated with direct vehicular access to the state-controlled road

PO4 Turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the premises via the road access maintain the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO41 The road access provides for left in and left out turning movements only

AND

PS The current location of the road reserve is occupied by farming activities and infrastructure that have encroached onto the road reserve

The proposed new road reserve location maintains the legal access to Lot 2 on RP714773 and Lot 130 on CI308 takes advantage of an existing access way and allows the farming activities and infrastructure to continue Sight distance at this access is approximately 160m in either direction This is adequate for a design speed of 70 kph This section of Mia Mia Connection Road has advisory speed signs of 60 kph because of the horizontal geometry The access will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the relevant clauses of TMRrsquos Standard Conditions for Construction of Minor Accesses MS4-4 and the attached Drawing MDO-2083 within Appendix D of the planning report

AO42 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the premises in a forward gear at all times Editorrsquos note The design vehicle to be considered is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government planning scheme

No change to internal road design

PO5 On-site circulation is suitably designed to accommodate the design vehicle associated with the proposed land use in order to ensure that there is no impact on the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO51 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space is provided to ensure the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not compromised by an overflow of traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with AS2890 ndash Parking facilities AND

NA

AO52 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that the flow of traffic on the state-controlled road is not disturbed by traffic queuing to access the site

NA

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 4 of 5

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 57: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road

PO6 Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road

AO61 The road access location to the local road is located as far as possible from where the road intersects with the state-controlled road and accommodates existing operations and planned upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road

AND

PS See above

AO62 The road access to the local road network is in accordance with Volume 3 parts 3 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 and is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period of 10 years past completion of the final stage of development

AND

AO63 Vehicular access to the local road and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 5 of 5

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 58: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Table 1921 All development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

All state transport infrastructure ndash except state-controlled roads

PO1 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state transport infrastructure or transport networks Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared A traffic impact assessment should identify any upgrade works required to mitigate impacts on the safety and operational integrity of the state transport corridor including any impact on a railway crossing An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken

No acceptable outcome is prescribed NA

PO2 Development does not compromise planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure or the development of future state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR advising that there are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or future state transport corridors that will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AO21 The layout and design of the proposed development accommodates planned upgrades to state transport infrastructure AND

NA

AO22 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

NA

State-controlled roads

PO3 Development does not compromise the safe and efficient management or operation of state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this performance outcome

No acceptable outcome is prescribed Refer SDAP Code Module 191

PO4 Development does not compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled road network or delivery of future state-

AO41 The layout and design of the development accommodates planned upgrades of the state-controlled road

Response column key Achieved PS Performance solution NA Not applicable

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 1 of 2

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 59: Smart eDA...Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Office Level 4, 44 Nelson Street PO Box 710 Mackay QLD 4740 Our reference: SPL-0714-012469 Your reference: 233412 14 August 2014 Mark and

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment controlled roads Editorrsquos note Written advice from DTMR that there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads or future state-controlled roads which will be compromised by the development will assist in addressing this performance outcome

AND

AO42 The layout and design of the development accommodates the delivery of future state-controlled roads Editorrsquos note To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be prepared

PO5 Upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are undertaken in accordance with applicable standards

AO51 Upgrade works for the development are consistent with the requirements of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition Department of Transport and Main Roads 2013 AND

AO52 The design and staging of upgrade works on or associated with the state-controlled road network are consistent with planned upgrades

PO6 Development does not impose traffic loadings on the state-controlled road network which could be accommodated on the local road network

AO61 New lower order roads do not connect directly to a state-controlled road AND

AO62 The layout and design of the development directs traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads

State development assessment provisions Module 19 mdash State transport network functionality 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code 20 June 2014 V14 Page 2 of 2

  • State Assessments
  • Appendix B - Owners Consent-
  • Appendix C - Titles-
  • Appendix D - Communications and meeting minutes-
  • Appendix E - SDAP Codes -
    • Module 11 Noise amp Vibration Impacts from Transport Corridor
      • 11 Managing noise and vibration impacts from transport corridors state code
        • Module 12 Air amp Light Impacts from Transport Corridor
          • 12 Managing air and lighting impacts from transport corridors state code
            • Module 181 Filling Excavation amp Structures
              • 181 Filling excavation and structures state code
                • Module 182 Storwater amp Drainage Impacts on Transport Corridor
                  • 182 Stormwater and drainage impacts on state transport infrastructure state code
                    • Module 191 Access to State Controlled Road
                      • 191 Access to state-controlled roads state code
                        • Module 192 Transport Infrastructure amp Network Design
                          • 192 Transport infrastructure and network design state code