SITE VISIT APPLICATIONS Application No: CH/06/0721 Received: 31-Oct-2006 Location: Ultra Electronics, Armitage Road and Main Road, Brereton Description: Residential development (Outline including access) Application Type:Outline Planning APP RECOMMENDATION S 106,Then Approval with Conditions Reasons for the Grant of Permission The proposed development complies in all material respects with the relevant policies in the Development Plan (DP) and (where applicable) Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) comprising:- DPLB8: Design Principles of New Built Development DPLC15: Protecing Trees DPLC15: Protecing Trees DPLH2: Types of Demand DPLH3: Design DPLH4:New Housing -Open Space. DPLT3: Traffic Impact Assessment DPLT6: Car Parking-General DPSD1: Sustainable Forms of Development DPSD8: Providing Implementatio//Services/Mitigation DPSE8:Loss of Employment Land and Buildings DPSH2: Location Phasing and Density of Housing Development DPSH8: Affordable Housing SPD1: Car parking standards. 1. A1 Time Limit -Outline Permission 2. A2 General Outline Condition 3. A11 Illustrative Layout 4. Prior to the commencement of development a scheme of mitigation for the impact of construction works on the surrounding area in relation to noise, dust and debris on the highways shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority.The scheme shall be implemented in accordance with the approval for the duration of the construction works. Reason To minimise the adverse impact of construction work on nearby residents, allotment holders and highway users. 5.Development shall not begin until drainage details, incorporating sustainable drainage principles and an assessment of the hydrological and hydrogeological context of development, have been submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority, and the scheme shall subsequently be implemented in accordance with the approved details before the development is completed/occupied. Reason To ensure that the development is provided with a satisfactory means of drainage as well as to reduce the risk of creating or exacerbating a flooding problem and to minimise the risk of pollution in accordance with policies PEP1 & PEP3 of the Cannock Chase Local Plan 1997. 6.No development approved by this permission shall be commenced until the application site has been subjected to a detailed scheme for the investigation and

recording of contamination and a report has been submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. Reason To prevent pollution of the water environment in accordance with policies PEP1 & PEP2 of the Cannock chase Local plan 1997. 7.If contamination is identified within the soils/groundwaters during the Site Investigation works, a Quantative Risk Assessment shall be undertaken based on a conceptual understanding of the site conditions to derive Site Specific Remedial Targets for soil/groundwaters. The Quantative Risk Assessments and Site Specific Remedial Targets shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by the Local planning Authority in consultation with the Environment Agency prior to the commencement of on-site remediation works. Reason To prevent pollution of the water environment in accordance with policies PEP1 & PEP2 of the Cannock Chase Local Plan 1997. 8.If remediation works are required a Remediation Method Statement shall be prepared detailing the remediation objectives, how the remediation works will be undertaken, and the validation procedures. The Remediation Method Statement shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority in consultation with the Environment Agency prior to the commencement of on-site remediation works. Reason To ensure the satisfactory remediation of land impacted by contamination in accordance with policy PEP2 of the Cannock Chase Local Plan 1997. EXTERNAL CONSULTATIONS Brereton & Ravenhill Parish Council: Point out inaccuracies in the supporting statement relating to the regional policy context, the transport assessment and conservation issues. They wish to see a S106 Agreement to cover improvements to Ravenhill Park and the Parish Hall towpath improvements, revenue support for public transport rather than funding for the Eastern Bypass and a travel plan. Conditions relating to archaeological assessment, height limitations and BRE excellent rating for dwellings are recommended. Staffordshire County Council – Travel Management & Safety: No objection subject to conditions and Section 106 contributions to Rugeley Eastern Bypass. Staffordshire County Council – Education There are sufficient primary and secondary school places in the catchment. Environment Agency: No objection subject to conditions dealing with flooding and contamination issues. Severn Trent Water: No objection subject to condition to deal with foul drainage.

Police Architectural Liaison: Concern about some aspects of the illustrative layout in relation to lack of natural surveillance in some areas and poorly secured rear accesses. INTERNAL COMMENTS: Environmental Health: No adverse comments in principle, further assessment of remediation requirements needed as recommended in the Environmental Evaluation report. Appropriate controls needed over demolition works. Strategic Housing: 25% affordable units required – mix and tenure to be agreed. Landscape: Additional information on trees and hedgerows levels if layout is to be considered at this stage, no objection in principle. RESPONSE TO PUBLICITY: The application has been advertised, site notices displayed and nearby occupiers notified, resulting in 6 letters of objection raising the following points:- (i) Inadequate recreation, education, health facilities to support this development. (ii) Potential for loss of privacy and light. (iii) Potential for damage to and or loss of trees and wildlife. (iv) Concern about possible soil slippage. (v) Development too dense compared with Thorn Close. (vi) Potential problem with surface water run-off and possible contamination. Brereton Gardeners Association request a new solid timber fence, a minimum of 2m high be provided along the boundary and that if access to the allotment site is needed, advance notice should be given. OBSERVATIONS: Description of site and Proposals The application site has an area of 3.6 ha and consists of the factory, offices, ancillary buildings, parking and serving area of Ultra Electronics together with the site of the former company sports and social club. The site has two vehicular accesses to Armitage Road A513 and one to Main Road A51. The land rises relatively steeply from Armitage Road and there is a 13m difference in levels between the two frontages. In addition to the buildings and hard surfaces there is a large lawned area on the Armitage Road frontage and some groups of trees mainly around the boundary but one specific group situated across the site between the office and factory buildings. Permission is sought in outline for residential development with means of access only specified at this stage. The main vehicular access is proposed from Armitage Road in the location of the existing northernmost access, with the Main Road access being retained in modified form as an emergency access.

An illustrative layout shows a development of 120 dwellings comprising 3 x 5 bed, 21 x 4 bed, 27 x 3 bed, 34 x 2 bed dwellings, 23 x 2 bed flats and 12 x 1 bed flats. The density would be 33 dwellings per hectare. In addition, 0.24 ha (0.5 acres) of open space is proposed as an addition to Ravenhill Park using the area of the site formerly occupied by the sport and social club. The illustrative layout shows a road pattern that can achieve the maximum gradients permitted by the County Council residential roads design guide. Policy Issues relating to the Principle of Residential Development The site is well within the urban area of Brereton comprising previously developed (brownfield) land. It is accessible to local services including shops, primary school and doctor’s surgery on foot, is served by a half hourly bus service from Lichfield to Stafford via Rugeley and is within half a mile of Rugeley Town railway station. It adjoins the main area of public open space in the Parish. Rugeley and Brereton’s housing needs as set out in the emerging Local Development Framework Core Strategy and Site Allocations indicate a requirement of between 160 560 dwellings on sites in addition to identified urban capacity to be found for the period 2007 to 2026. Priority in policy terms would be given to brownfield land within the urban area and this site meets the policy requirements in this respect. Redevelopment for residential purposes involves the loss of an existing employment site but it has no specific policy protection as an employment site in the Cannock Chase Local Plan 1997 and was identified as having potential for redevelopment for residential purposes in the Council’s 2005 Urban Capacity Study. Nevertheless, retention of employment in Rugeley/Brereton is an important policy objective taking into account the local regeneration area status of the town. Ultra has committed to relocate their business from this site to one of the last remaining plots at Towers Business Park in purpose-built premises to suit their current business requirements. This will secure the retention of employment in the area. A small part of the site is within the Green Space Network (GSN) identified in the Local Plan. This part of the area proposed to be laid out as public open space on the site of the former sports and social club. Laying this area out and making it accessible to the public will enhance this particular part of the GSN. The need to leave 25% of the units as affordable housing is acknowledged in the application. Site Specific Issues Design and Access The applicant argues that the proposed mix, provision of 2 and 3 storey units and a road layout that minimises traffic speeds by providing sharp right angle bends and junctions, including some development around squares, is an appropriate layout in relation to the context of the site and current design thinking. Your officers have some issues with the layout in relation to the highway frontage design concepts, the relationship with existing trees and the concern of the Police Architectural Liaison Officer. However, the overall density proposed is considered to be reasonable. It is inevitably denser than the adjoining Thorn Close which

comprises predominantly 4 bed detached dwellings, in order to provide an appropriate mix to meet local needs. Overall therefore your Officers consider that a total of 120 dwellings with the mix proposed is achievable on the site. The access proposals with the main vehicular access and secondary pedestrian/footpath access to Armitage Road together with emergency vehicular access along the pedestrian/footpath access to Main Road are acceptable to the Highway Authority. It is accepted by the Highway Authority that no off-site highway improvements are necessary. Flood Risk The Environment Agency is satisfied with the flood risk assessment (FRA) and is recommending a condition to ensure that surface water is dealt with in the manner proposed in the FRA. Contamination Further work needs to be done to areas with the potential for contamination as a result of past industrial activity and this is acknowledged by the applicant. Conditions recommended by the Environment Agency deal with this point. Planning Obligations The issues to be covered by a Section 106 Agreement are:- 1. The provision of an appropriate mix of affordable housing units comprising 25% of the total number of dwellings. 2. The laying out and further maintenance of the 0.24 ha of open space together with a financial contribution to improvements to Ravenhill Park. 3. A financial contribution towards the construction of the Rugeley Eastern By-pass. The other Section 106 issues raised in the Parish Council’s response are being dealt with by other means. Improvements to the canal tow path alongside the Towers Business Park plus a new pedestrian/cycle link into the business park is being dealt with in connection with development proposals on that site. Revenue support towards additional evening rail services from Rugeley Town to Birmingham New Street is being proposed via a Section 106 Agreement currently being negotiated for town centre retail and leisure development in Cannock. Responses to Objections Not Covered Above It is acknowledged that there are some inaccuracies in the supporting information as pointed out by the Parish. However, none of these have a material affect on the merits of the proposal. The site is not close enough to the Trent and Mersey Canal or Brereton Village conservation areas to have any material impact. The suitability of the site in principle for residential development is dealt with above. As noted above, appropriate recreation, education and health facilities are in place to support this scale of development. The other comments from neighbours are issues to be addressed at reserved matters stage as is the comment from Brereton Gardeners regarding fencing. No access will be needed to the allotments.

HUMAN RIGHTS ACT IMPLICATIONS The proposals set out in this report are considered to be compatible with the Human Rights Act 1998. The proposals could potentially interfere with an individual’s rights to the peaceful enjoyment of his or her property as specified in Article 8 and Article 1 of the First Protocol, however, the issues arising have been considered in detail in the report and it is considered that, on balance, the proposals comply with Local Plan Policy and are appropriate. CONCLUSION The site is a sustainable location for residential development and can meet an identified local need for housing including affordable housing. The commitment of Ultra to retain jobs in Brereton deals with the employment policy issue in a satisfactory way. The proposed conditions and matters to be dealt with under Section 106 are considered to satisfactorily deal with issues of environmental and infrastructure impact. Application No: CH/06/0683 Received: 09-Oct-2006 Location: 78, Wolseley Road, Rugeley. Description: Two storey dormer dwelling, new access & parking for 78 Wolseley Road and alteration to existing private access road Application Type: Full Planning Application RECOMMENDATION Approve subject to Conditions Reasons for the Grant of Permission The proposed development complies in all material respects with the relevant policies in the Development Plan (DP) and (where applicable) Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) comprising:- DPLB8: Design Principles of New Built Development DPLDCP6: Space about Dwellings DPLH3: Design DPLH5: Infill Development SPD1: Car parking standards. SPG2: Staffordshire Residential Design Guide 1. B2 Standard Time Limit 2. D1 Materials - Details Required 3. I2 Exclusion of Extensions 4. I3 Additional Fenestration 5. No trees or hedges as shown as retained on Drawings approved, shall be cut down, topped, lopped, uprooted or removed without the prior written permission of the Local Planning Authority nor shall they be wilfully damaged or destroyed. Any trees or hedges which, within a period of 5 years from completion of the development are cut down, topped, lopped or uprooted without permission of the Local Planning Authority or become seriously damaged or diseased or die shall be replaced in the next planting season with similar size and species unless the Local Planning Authority gives written consent to any variation. Reason

The existing vegetation makes an important contribution to the visual amenity of the area. In accordance with Local Plan Policies B8, C8 and C15. 6. No part of the development hereby approved shall commence or any actions likely to interfere with the biological function of the retained trees and hedges shall take place, until details for tree and hedge protection have been submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. Details shall include the position and construction of all fencing. Reason The existing vegetation makes an important contribution to the visual amenity of the area. In accordance with Local Plan Policies B8, C8 and C15. 7. Prior to the commencement of any construction or site preparation works including any actions likely to interfere with the biological function of the retained trees and hedges, approved protective fencing shall be erected in the positions shown on the approved Tree & Hedge Protection layout drawing submitted pursuant to condition 6. Within the enclosed area known as the Tree Protection Zone, no work will be permitted without the written consent of the Local Planning Authority. No storage of material, equipment or vehicles will be permitted within this zone. Service routes will not be permitted to cross the Tree Protection Zones unless written consent of the Local Planning Authority is obtained. The Tree Protection Zone will be maintained intact until the cessation of all construction works or until the Local Planning Authority gives written consent for variation. Reason The existing vegetation makes an important contribution to the visual amenity of the area. In accordance with Local Plan Policies B8, C8 and C15. 8. No part of the development shall commence until details of all arboricultural work have been submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. Details shall include a method statement and schedule of works. Reason The existing vegetation makes an important contribution to the visual amenity of the area. In accordance with Local Plan Policies B8, C8 and C15. 9. No development shall take place until a scheme has been submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority for: (a) parking of vehicles of site personnel, operatives and visitors; (b) loading and unloading of plant and materials; (c) storage area of plant and materials used in constructing the development, marked on a plan. Each of the facilities shall be maintained throughout the course of construction of the development free from any impediment to its designated use. Reason To avoid congestion in the surrounding area and to protect the amenities of the area. 10. Any trees or plants which within a period of five years from the date of planting die, are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased, shall be replaced in the following planting season with others of similar size and species unless the Local Planning Authority gives written consent to any variation.

Reason In the interests of visual amenity of the area. In accordance with Local Plan Policies B8, C8 and C15. 11. Before the proposed development commences, the access to no.78 shall be completed. Reason In the interest of highway safety and to comply with S.C.C. requirements for access 12. C13 Provision of parking and access 13. The access shall have a minimum width of 6.2m rear of the highway boundary. Reason In the interest of highway safety and to comply with S.C.C. requirements for access 14. Any gates shall be located a minimum of 8.0m rear of the carriageway edge and shall open away from the highway. Reason In the interest of highway safety and to comply with S.C.C. requirements for access 15. C16 Parking Spaces at Dwellings 16. 1.5m x 45 degree visibility splays shall be provided each side of the access with nothing placed or allowed to remain forward of the splays that exceeds 600mm in height above the adjacent carriageway. Reason In the interest of Highway safety 17. The development shall be carried out strictly in accordance with the amended deposited plans and drawings with any minor changes being agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to their implementation. Reason For the avoidance of doubt and to ensure that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans and details and in compliance with the requirements of Policy B8 of the Adopted Local Plan. EXTERNAL CONSULTATIONS Rugeley Town Council - Objection. This is over intensification of the area. The area is becoming too congested and the development appears to be a backfill development. Travel Management & Safety – No objection subject to conditions S. C. C. RESPONSE TO PUBLICITY Near neighbours notified and site notice posted with three letters of objection received, objecting on the following grounds:

1. The land to the rear of 78 Wolseley Road has already been developed on for two three bedroom bungalows and a five bedroom house all served off a private access road. Further development would result in a loss of privacy to neighbouring properties and cause a major access problem for those living in Little Orchard Gardens. 2. The single track drive already services the three properties in Little Orchard Gardens and the existing property of 78 Wolseley Road. The existing traffic (both motor and pedestrian) using the drive already results in frequent access problems. A further three bedroom development can only exacerbate this problem, both in the short term during construction, and ongoing thereafter. 3. It should be noted that the entrance and exit to Little Orchard Gardens has been made considerably more difficult and dangerous by a major building development on the Wolseley Road, which is serviced by a single access road (Eaton Drive) exactly opposite. 4. Building development at 76 Wolseley Road with increased occupancy and traffic also already had a further impact on the access to Little Orchard Gardens as the track leading to 76 Wolseley Road is sited adjacent the access road. 5. The development will reduce natural light to the dining room and kitchen of no.1 Little Orchard due to the development sited close to the rear boundary. One additional letter was received requesting further information in respect to the new access proposed for no.78 off the Wolseley Road. OBSERVATIONS 1.1 The application seeks consent for the residential development of a two storey dormer dwelling, new access and parking for 78 Wolseley Road and alteration to existing private access road at 78 Wolseley Road, Rugeley. The application site for the new dwelling is currently garden land for no. 78. It is proposed for the access to this dwelling to be off the private access road (Little Orchard Gardens). 1.2 The new dwelling would be a dormer bungalow having three bedrooms. It would be 9.8m wide, 9m in length, and the garage linked to the dormer bungalow would be 3m wide, 5.45m in length and 2.5m high. The dormer bungalow would be 6.1m high with dormer windows on the southeast elevation overlooking the private drive. 1.3 The applicant amended the plans from those originally submitted removing the dormer windows on the northwest elevation facing the neighbouring properties on Old Eaton Road. The site access has been widened in order to achieve a clear 4.20m between kerb lines, in order that traffic can pass side by side within the shared access. A turning area has been depicted to show that a car can turn round to enter and leave the access drive in forward gear. 1.4 Policy H5 of the Local Plan states that there will be opportunity for infilling and minor consolidation will be acceptable within existing residential areas subject to the amenity of neighbouring residents and the character of the area not being adversely affected. Policy B8 of the Local Plan requires new built development to be well related within the development and to existing buildings and their surroundings in terms of design, scale and materials and avoid any adverse effects of loss of amenity to adjacent properties. 1.5 The existing private drive (Little Orchard) serves four properties, the existing property of 76 Wolseley Road and nos. 1 to 3 Little Orchard. The existing private drive is to be widened to accommodate the new property and a new vehicular access

is proposed off Wolseley Road for no. 76. Staffordshire County Council Highway Department has no objections to the proposal. 1.6 The proposed dormer bungalow meets space about dwelling standards and design guidance. It is considered that the proposal will not be out of character with the surrounding area, located in a residential area and the proposal meets parking standards. 1.7 Human Rights Act The proposals set out in this report are considered to be compatible with the Human Rights Act 1998. The proposals could potentially interfere with an individual’s rights to the peaceful enjoyment of his or her property as specified in Article 8 and Article 1 of the First Protocol, however, the issues arising have been considered in detail in the report and it is considered that, on balance, the proposals comply with Local Plan Policy and are proportionate. 1.8 Conclusion In conclusion, it is considered that the site can be developed without adversely affecting the neighbouring properties or the character of the area and as such, is acceptable. Application No: CH/06/0814 Received: 28-Dec-2006 Location: The Woodlands, Slitting Mill Road, Slitting Mill Description: Two storey side extension and conservatory to rear Application Type: Full Planning Application RECOMMENDATION Refuse for the following reason:- 1. The Local Planning Authority considers that the proposal would by virtue of its design, siting and massing result in a form of development that would have a detrimental effect on the amenity and privacy of the occupants of neighbouring properties, additionally the proposal would be out of keeping and character with the existing street scene. The proposal is therefore contrary to policy B8 of the adopted Cannock Chase Local Plan 1997. EXTERNAL CONSULTATIONS Rugeley Town Council – No objections INTERNAL CONSULTATIONS None RESPONSE TO PUBLICITY Near neighbours notified:- Two letters of objection received regarding loss of visual amenity, overlooking, increased traffic issues and the proposal being out of character with the existing street scene Two letters of support received stating the extension would benefit the property and be in keeping with the locality. OBSERVATIONS

1.1 The applicant seeks consent for the construction of a two storey side extension and conservatory to the rear of The Woodlands, Slitting Mill Road, Slitting Mill. The property is a detached dwelling constructed in red brick lying on a corner plot bounded by The Pingle and Slitting Mill Lane; no uniformity in building design exists in the area. The site rises in a westerly direction, adjacent bungalow No 48 lies approximately1.5-2 metres higher than the property in question. 1.2 The proposed two storey side extension will be for the creation of a utility, cloak room, study and sitting room extension to the ground floor and two en-suite bedrooms and walk in closet to the first floor. The measurements of the proposal will be 3.25 metres in width and 10.3m in length, being level with the existing front elevation of the property and protruding 2.4m beyond the rear elevation. The height will be to match the existing for the first 7.5m from front elevation then dropping to 6m for the remainder. 1.3 The conservatory will be situated along the southern boundary adjacent to neighbour number 48 (Jayson), measuring 5.2 metres in depth, 4.1m in width and 3.3m in height to ridge, 2.4m to eaves. The proposal breaks council guidance due to the conservatory being over 4 metres in length along the southern boundary, however due to the neighbouring property being on a higher level daylight standards are met. 1.4 The existing boundaries to the rear consist of part 3m high wall part 1.8m high fencing to the southern edge, 1.8m high fencing to the Western edge and 2m high fencing to northern edge, the split level rear garden area consists of hardstanding patio area and grassed area. A detached garage exists where the proposed two storey extension will be constructed, to the front lies a landscaped garden and parking area for 4-5 vehicles. The length of the two storey side extension with its proximity to the highway is considered to be unacceptable, having an adverse affect on the character of the cul de sac notwithstanding the vicinity of design of existing dwellings. 1.5 Amendments to the original plans have been requested to reduce the length of the proposed first storey by 2.4m to be in line with the existing rear elevation of the dwelling, therefore reducing the impact the proposal will have on the visual amenity of the area. However, the applicant does not wish to amend the plans, therefore refusal is recommended. HUMAN RIGHTS The proposals set out in this report are considered to be compatible with the Human Rights Act 1998. The recommendation to refuse accords with the policies of the adopted local plan and the applicant has the right of appeal against the decision. CONCLUSION The development proposed is considered inappropriate development, which will have a detrimental impact on the visual amenity of neighbouring properties and be out of keeping with the character and appearance of the existing street scene. Therefore refusal is recommended.

Application No: CH/07/0072 Received: 31-Jan-2007 Location: 119a, Mount Street, Hednesford Description: Two storey side and single storey rear extensions Application Type: Full Planning Application RECOMMENDATION Approve subject to Conditions Reasons for the Grant of Permission The proposed development complies in all material respects with the relevant policies in the Development Plan (DP) and (where applicable) Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) comprising:- DPLB8: Design Principles of New Built Development DPLDCP6: Space about Dwellings DPLH3: Design SPG1: Residential Extensions Design Guide SPG2: Staffordshire Residential Design Guide 1. B2 Standard Time Limit 2. D1 Materials - Details Required 3. The development shall be carried out strictly in accordance with the deposited plans and drawings (2007:202/01) with any minor changes being agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to their implementation. Reason For the avoidance of doubt and to ensure that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans and details. EXTERNAL CONSULTATIONS HEDNESFORD TOWN COUNCIL No objection INTERNAL COMMENTS LANDSCAPE: Further information requested – update at committee RESPONSE TO PUBLICITY Adjacent occupiers notified – No objections raised OBSERVATIONS 1.1 The application seeks to construct a two storey side extension with a hipped roof and a single storey rear extension. The ground floor extensions will entail a garage, study, toilet and playroom/sitting room, whilst the first floor extensions include an extension to the bathroom, a bedroom, wardrobe and en-suite. The two storey side extension is proposed to extend by 4.4m towards the boundary of No.2 Mount Avenue. The single storey extension will extend to the side of the existing single storey structure to the rear of the property. 1.2 The application site is located along a residential area which comprises a mixture of detached, semi-detached and terraced properties. The application dwelling is a detached property and is the end plot of row of semi-detached dwellings.

Surrounding properties are two-storey in character and comprise hipped roofs. A hedge defines the boundary between the application site and No.2 Mount Avenue. 1.3 Policy B8 states that new development should be well related to its surroundings in terms of design, scale and materials. A two storey side extension is proposed with a hipped roof, it is considered that this is in character with the existing and surrounding. It is proposed that the walls will be rendered and that the roof tiles will match the existing which can be controlled by a condition. It is not considered that the application will have a detrimental impact on the street scene. 1.4 Supplementary Planning Guidance states that side extensions should not exceed 75% of the original dwelling without being set back. The original dwelling is 6.1m wide whilst the side extension will be 4.4m wide, which amounts a 72% increase. The footprint of the dwelling will be similar to that of the semidetached units along Mount Street. The side extension will be set back by 0.2m. No new principal windows are proposed to the rear elevation and therefore there are no issues of overlooking or impact on residential amenity. The side elevation of No.2 Mount Avenue consists of a small window, the boundary is heavily vegetated and views into the application site are very restricted. It is not considered that the proposals will have 1.5 Human Rights Act The proposals set out in this report are considered to be compatible with the Human Rights Act 1998. the proposals could potentially interfere with an individual’s rights to the peaceful enjoyment of his or her property as specified in Article 8 and Article 1 of the First Protocol, however, the issues arising have been considered in detail in the report and it is considered that, on balance, the proposals comply with Local Plan Policy and are proportionate. 1.6 Conclusion In conclusion, it is considered that the design and extent of the proposals are appropriate and in accordance with the policies contained within the Local Plan. Application No: CH/07/0051 Received: 22-Jan-2007 Location: Land rear of, 24, Blewitt Street, Hednesford Description: Residential development - One detached bungalow with access from Mavis Road Application Type: Full Planning Application RECOMMENDATION Approve subject to Conditions Reasons for the Grant of Permission The proposed development complies in all material respects with the relevant policies in the Development Plan (DP) and (where applicable) Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) comprising:- DPLB8: Design Principles of New Built Development DPLDCP6: Space about Dwellings SPD1: Car parking standards. SPG1: Residential Extensions Design Guide SPG2: Staffordshire Residential Design Guide 1. B2 Standard Time Limit

2. The development shall be carried out strictly in accordance with the deposited plans and drawings with any minor changes being agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to their implementation. Reason For the avoidance of doubt and to ensure that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans and details in accordance with the approved plans and details in accordance with Local Plan Policy B8. 3. D1 Materials - Details Required 4. Prior to commencement of the development 2 car parking spaces shall be provided to serve the existing dwelling at 24 Blewitt Street as shown on the approve plan. The spaces shall be retained throughout the life of the development. Reason In the interests of highway safety in accordance with Structure Plan Policy T18A. 5. The use of the dwelling hereby approved shall not commence until the parking area to serve it has been completed and surfaced in bound materials. The parking area and garage shall be retained for the parking of vehicles throughout the life of the development and the access shall be ungated. Reason In the interests of highway safety in accordance with Structure Plan Policy T18A. 6. The approved landscape works shall be carried out in the first planting and seeding season following the occupation of any buildings or the completion of the development , whichever is the sooner. Reason In the interests of the visual amenity of the area in accordance with Local Plan Policy B8. 7. Any trees or plants which within a period of 5 years from the date of planting die, are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased shall be replaced in the following planting season with others of similar size and species unless the Local Planning Authority gives written consent to any variation. Reason In the interests of the visual amenity of the area in accordance with Local Plan Policy B8. EXTERNAL CONSULTATIONS HEDNESFORD TOWN COUNCIL: Objects because, in view of the narrowness of Mavis Road and the difficulty of access for emergency vehicles, it does not wish to see any further access onto Mavis Road. STAFFS. COUNTY COUNCIL (HIGHWAYS): No objections subject to conditions. INTERNAL COMMENTS

PROPERTY SERVICES MANAGER: The owner will need to prove a right of access to cross Council land. RESPONSE TO PUBLICITY Site notice posted and adjacent occupiers notified. Letters received from the occupiers of 3 dwellings opposite the site on Mavis Road confirming that they raise no objections to the proposal. OBSERVATIONS 1.1 The application seeks full planning permission for a detached 2-bedroom bungalow with an attached single garage and a driveway off Mavis Road. 1.2 The site comprises part of the rear garden of 24 Blewitt Street which has an existing vehicular access off Mavis Road to the rear over a Council-owned grass verge. There are existing garden buildings in the rear garden, and also in the neighbouring rear gardens, several of which also have a rear vehicular access onto Mavis Road. The owner of No. 24 requires the proposed bungalow for his sister and husband who are currently caring for him on a daily basis since being signed off from working again due to ill health. 1.3 The proposed bungalow would include a hipped roof at the front to reflect the hipped-roof design of surrounding properties. Two car parking spaces could be accommodated in the garage and on the driveway. Spatial separation between proposed and existing buildings meets Council guidelines. The owner’s solicitor has confirmed that the property was purchased from the Council over 20 years ago with unrestricted access off Mavis Road. The proposal comprises a bungalow of modest size and no adverse visual impact is anticipated. 1.4 The proposal includes provision for 2 car parking spaces at the front of 24 Blewitt Street, on the driveway. At present there is one space but sufficient space is available to create another. 1.5 Occupiers of adjacent properties have been notified and no objections received. Three letters stating no objection have been provided by occupiers of the 3 bungalows opposite on Mavis Road. The Town Council has concerns at an additional access onto Mavis Road, due to its narrow width. A vehicular access already exists to this property and no objections are raised by the Highways Officer. 1.6 Human Rights Act Implications The proposals set out in this report are considered to be compatible with the Human Rights Act 1998. The proposals could potentially interfere with an individual’s right to the peaceful enjoyment of his or her property as specified in Article 8 and Article 1 of the First Protocol, however, the issues arising have been considered in detail in the report and it is considered that, on balance, the proposals comply with Local Plan Policy and are proportionate. 1.7 Conclusion The proposal accords with Council policies being well related to surrounding dwellings and with an adequate means of access. Approval is recommended.

Applications Recommended for Approval Application No: CH/07/0037 Received: 16-Jan-2007 Location: 17, Sandy Lane, Cannock. Description: Formation of new access Application Type: Full Planning Application RECOMMENDATION Approve subject to Conditions Reasons for the Grant of Permission The proposed development complies in all material respects with the relevant policies in the Development Plan (DP) and (where applicable) Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) comprising:- DPLB8: Design Principles of New Built Development 1. B2 Standard Time Limit 2. The development hereby approved shall be constructed to the driveway specification based on the Rodney Helliwell report dated August 2006 and as shown on approved drawing no.2465/22 unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason The existing vegetation makes an important contribution to the visual amenity of the area. In accordance with Local Plan Policies B8, C8 and C15. 3. Before the proposed development is brought into use, the access shall be completed and surfaced in a bound material for a minimum distance of 5m rear of the highway boundary and thereafter be retained for the life of the development. Reason To comply with Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent Structure Plan (1996-2011) Policy T13, in the interests of highway safety and to comply with SCC requirements for access. 4. No part of the development hereby permitted shall be commenced until details relating to edging of the drive including a section through plan of the driveway have been submitted and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Any edging on the lower side of the proposed access shall be laid flush to the existing ground to allow surface water to flow off the access onto the grass verge. The approved driveway shall be implemented in accordance with these approved details. Reason To comply with Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent Structure Plan (1996-2011) Policy T13, in the interests of highway safety and to comply with SCC requirements for access and the existing vegetation makes an important contribution to the visual amenity of the area. In accordance with Local Plan Policies B8, C8 and C15. 5. No trees or hedges shown as retained on the approved drawings shall be cut down, topped, lopped, uprooted or removed without the prior written permission of the Local Planning Authority nor shall they be wilfully damaged or destroyed. Any trees or hedges which, within a period of 5 years from completion of the development are cut down, topped, lopped or uprooted without permission of the Local Planning Authority or become seriously damaged or diseased or die shall be replaced in the next planting season with similar size and species unless the Local Planning Authority gives written consent to any variation.

Reason The existing vegetation makes an important contribution to the visual amenity of the area. In accordance with Local Plan Policies B8, C8 and C15. 6. No part of the development hereby approved shall commence or any actions likely to interfere with the biological function of the retained trees and hedges shall take place, until details for tree and hedge protection have been submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. Details shall include the position and construction of all fencing and the care & maintenance of the trees & hedges within. Reason The existing vegetation makes an important contribution to the visual amenity of the area. In accordance with Local Plan Policies B8, C8 and C15. 7. Prior to the commencement of any construction or site preparation works including any actions likely to interfere with the biological function of the retained trees and hedges, approved protective fencing shall be erected in the positions shown on the approved Tree & Hedge Protection layout drawing received pursuant to condition 6. Within the enclosed area known as the Tree Protection Zone, no work will be permitted without the written consent of the Local Planning Authority. No storage of material, equipment or vehicles will be permitted within this zone. Service routes will not be permitted to cross the Tree Protection Zones unless written consent of the Local Planning Authority is obtained. The Tree Protection Zone will be maintained intact and the vegetation within maintained until the cessation of all construction works or until the Local Planning Authority gives written consent for variation. Reason The existing vegetation makes an important contribution to the visual amenity of the area. In accordance with Local Plan Policies B8, C8 and C15. 8. The development shall be carried out strictly in accordance with the deposited plans and drawings with any minor changes being agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to their implementation. Reason For the avoidance of doubt and to ensure that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans and details and in compliance with the requirements of Policy B8 of the Adopted Local Plan. EXTERNAL CONSULTATIONS Travel Management and Safety – No objection subject to conditions S.C.C. INTERNAL COMMENTS Environment Services – No objection to the proposed new access but the following information is required: 1. Type of edge treatment to the drive required. 2. Tree protection to T7 and T2 to be shown protecting trees either side of the drive RESPONSE TO PUBLICITY

Adjacent occupiers notified with one letter received from neighbours stating they objected to the proposal on the following grounds: 1. Concerned with regard to the potential impact this new access will have on trees which are subject to Tree Preservation Orders, of which there are a number very close to this proposed access to the frontage of the property. 2. The property which is currently under construction already has access which would appear to be more than sufficient given that the construction is now close to first floor level, so the requirement for additional access which could potentially damage protected trees, and will almost certainly be over their roots would seem unnecessary. The gradient of the land under development is no greater than that of the adjoining highway, and it is apparent that construction vehicles have already accessed the lower land to the south of the site. There is also ample space for the temporary storage of construction material away from protected trees on the current driveway area accessed from the existing driveway. 3. An additional access can only facilitate increased traffic to the site, and likewise the potential nuisance to neighbours. Further the proposed access is opposite an access to a multi dwelling property, and commercial vehicle storage site. 4. Should more hard standing be created as a result of this access, and garden area lost then it would be out of character with the street scene in this semi rural location. 5. It is felt that this access is being created for reasons other than access for construction purposes, and temporary storage of material, and hope that no further developments on the site are being considered. It is further hoped that it is not the intention of the occupier to utilise the site for commercial use. PLANNING HISTORY CH/06/0017 Replacement of existing garage with 2 storey side extension, conservatory to rear, porch and dormers to front. Withdrawn 03/03/2006 CH/06/0269 Residential development - One detached dwelling (demolish existing house) Refused at Planning Committee on 21/06/2006 CH/06/0620 Residential development - One detached dwelling (demolish existing house) (Resubmission of planning application CH/06/0269) Approved under delegated powers on 13/10/2006 OBSERVATIONS 1.1 This application is for the formation of a new access at 17 Sandy Lane, Cannock. Planning consent was approved for one dwelling to replace the existing property on 13 October 2006 and this development is currently under construction. The site already has one access into the site which is to remain but the applicant wished to construct a new access lower down the site for a builder’s access in order to store materials away from the protected trees and to construct a retaining wall between the northern and southern areas of the site. 1.2 The ground level falls from north west to south east along the road so the level of land where the new drive is proposed is sited lower down. The applicant has stated that it is proposed at sometime in the future to apply for planning permission for a single dwelling on the southern part of the site and therefore want to seek consent for this access to be permanent. Also it is not possible to link the existing to the new

driveway because of the levels and want the driveway to be permanent because of the cost of providing the access over the protected tree area. 1.3 The new driveway is proposed close to protected trees so the specification for the construction of a driveway over roots would entail preparing a smooth surface using angular gravel of uniform size, the gravel being placed without driving over the ground with heavy machinery, laying a mesh of ‘geogrid’ or similar, placing a layer of geoweb 150 or 200mm deep and filling with suitable gravel then placing a wearing surface over this. This surface may be either porous tarmac, gravel with no fines, or block paving of a type with adequate space between the blocks to allow air and moisture to penetrate easily. 1.4 Landscape officers have commented that they have no objection to the proposed new access but require details of edge treatment to the drive. The proposed drive is shown to be finished 200mm higher than the existing ground level but there is also a drop of 0.5 metres from the top of the bank to the highway grass verge which means the edges are exposed. Concerns are raised that grading will increase the soil level over the roots of the existing two trees which could have a detrimental effect on the trees. If a retaining wall is proposed the foundation depth will need to be supplied and hand digging beneath the canopy of the two nearest trees will be required. Tree protection will be required to be shown on plans protecting trees either side of the drive. 1.5 A condition has been recommended requiring details of edging of the drive so that it slopes to the sides back down to the ground level to allow water to run off into the grass verge instead of straight into the road. 1.6 In regard to the objections received, the application is for an additional vehicular access to the lower part of the site and landscape officers have confirmed that it can be constructed between the protected trees provided a specially constructed surface is used. Highway officers have no objections to the proposal subject to the edging of the drive finishing at the height of the existing ground level of the grass verge and that it is made of a bound material. 1.7 Planning permission is not required to change an area of lawn into an area of hard standing at a residential property and potential future uses of a site can not be considered as any future development on the site would be subject to a new planning application and would have to go through the planning process where neighbours would be consulted. It is therefore considered that the proposal is acceptable. 1.8 Human Rights Act The proposals set out in this report are considered to be compatible with the Human Rights Act 1998. The proposals could potentially interfere with an individual’s rights to the peaceful enjoyment of his or her property as specified in Article 8 and Article 1 of the First Protocol, however, the issues arising have been considered in detail in the report and it is considered that, on balance, the proposals comply with Local Plan Policy and are proportionate. 1.9 Conclusion In conclusion, it is considered that the access can be constructed without adversely affecting the surrounded trees and the amenity to neighbouring properties and as such, is acceptable.

Application No: CH/06/0810 Received: 22-Dec-2006 Location: 92a, Cannock Road, Blackfords Description: Residential development - 12 flats comprising one block of 3 storey with 3rd floor in roof space and one block of 2 storey with 2nd floor in roof space (demolish existing industrial building) (resubmission of planning application CH/06/0615) Application Type: Full Planning Application RECOMMENDATION S 106, Then Approval with Conditions Reasons for the Grant of Permission The proposed development complies in all material respects with the relevant policies in the Development Plan (DP) and (where applicable) Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) comprising:- DPLB8: Design Principles of New Built Development DPLH3: Design DPLH4:New Housing -Open Space. DPLH5: Infill Development SPD1: Car parking standards. SPG2: Staffordshire Residential Design Guide 1. B2 Standard Time Limit 2. D1 Materials - Details Required 3. C3 Visibility Splay (Carriageway) 4. C9 Surfacing of Access Drive 5. C13 Provision of parking and access 6. K2 Site Investigation Required 7. The development hereby approved shall not commence until drainage details, incorporating sustainable drainage principles, and an assessment of the hydrological and hydro-geological context of the developemnt has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority, and the scheme shall subsequently be implemented in accordance with the approved details before the development is occupied. Reason To ensure that the development is provided with a satisfactory means of drainage as well as to reduce the risk of creating or exacerbating a flooding problem and to minimise the the risk of pollution, in accordance withpolicy PEP1 of the adopted Local Plan. 8. The development shall be carried out strictly in accordance with the approved plans and drawings unless the Local Planning Authority gives written consent to any minor variation. Reason For the avoidance of doubt and to ensure that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans and details and in compliance with policy B8 of the adopted Local Plan. EXTERNAL CONSULTATIONS SCC HIGHWAYS: Comments on revised plans to be reported verbally to Committee. SCC POLICY: No objections.

SCC PROPERTY SERVICES:No objections. SCC ARCHAEOLOGY: No objections. SEVERN TRENT: No objections subject to conditions. ENVIRONMENT AGENCY: No objections subject to conditions. SCC POLICE: No comments. INTERNAL COMMENTS LANDSCAPE: Revised conditions to be reported verbally. ENV. HEALTH: No comments. LEISURE SERVICES: No comments. RESPONSES TO PUBLICITY The application was advertised on site, in the local press and neighbouring properties consulted by letter. Six letters were received objecting to the proposal on the following grounds:- • Loss of light to existing properties. • Loss of cinema fixtures and fittings. • Highway safety. • Loss of privacy. • Noise. • Difficulty with refuse collection. • Will look unsightly. HISTORY CH/06/0615 - One three storey block of 9 flats and - Withdrawn one pair of semi detached bungalows 12/10/06 OBSERVATIONS 1.1 The application site comprises approximately 1250 sq. m. of land on the eastern side of Cannock Road opposite the local Co-op store and between older terraced properties to the north and a more modern detached dwelling to the south. The site is “L” shaped and falls away from Cannock Road to the rear of the site. Within the site is a building which is now vacant, but which was a tile and kitchen business including retail and industrial use. The premises was once a cinema, however, very little evidence remains of this former use. 1.2 The application seeks consent to demolish the building within the site and redevelop the whole of the site for housing comprising 8 two bedroomed flats and 1 one bedroomed apartment in a three storey building fronting onto Cannock Road adjacent to No. 92 Cannock Road. The third floor is accommodated in the roof space which has a relatively steep pitch similar to the adjacent older properties. To the rear of the site behind the rear boundary of No. 90A Cannock Road, a single storey block of 3, two bedroomed apartments is proposed. 18 car parking spaces

are included within the rear portion of the site. The main block of flats is stepped down as it goes into the site to reflect the sloping nature of the site. There is no vegetation within the site, however, a mature tree stands on the northern boundary. The development will not affect the tree. The existing boundary wall is to be retained and repainted, existing fences are to be retained and new ones provided along a small section of the northern boundary. 1.3 With regard to the objections raised, some loss of light will occur to No. 92 Cannock Road, as the proposed main block of flats extends beyond the rear boundary of the property. The flats would have a depth of 21 m, the existing building is in fact 28 m in depth, although it is less in height than what is proposed. In considering these two issues it is considered that the status quo is maintained and that there will be no worsening of the current situation and that the occupiers of the property will not have a loss of amenity as a result of the development. The proposed flats are set back off the boundary with the garden of No. 92, as is the existing building. With regard to the single storey flats, spatial guidelines are met and it is considered that no loss of amenity or privacy will result. 1.4 The applicant has resolved original highway concerns and is able to provide an adequate visibility splay and appropriate pedestrian footways. With regards to car parking, the number of spaces provided is in accordance with Supplementary Planning Guidance. Additionally, the site is in close proximity to local facilities and public transport. Highways are further satisfied that refuse collection vehicles can satisfactorily service the site. It is not considered that noise generated by a residential use on the site would be more intrusive than an industrial and retail use. In addition commercial vehicles would not be visiting the site. The design of the development is in keeping with nearby properties, where many are of an older style with higher pitched roofs. The inclusion of older style fenestration will lessen any impact of the new development and other design details are in keeping with the locality. 1.5 Policy requires development of this sale to make a financial contribution to local open space and play facilities and to this end the applicant has agreed to enter into a Section 106 Agreement to contribute the sum of £9,115.38 plus any additional amounts based on the 2007 Retail Price Index (which is due to be announced shortly) towards the maintenance of Old Fallow Road open space. 1.6 Human Rights Implications The proposals set out in this report are considered to be compatible with the Human Rights Act 1998. The proposals could potentially interfere with an individual’s right to the peaceful enjoyment of his or her property as specified in Article 8 and Article 1 of the First Protocol, however the issues arising have been considered in detail in the report and it is considered that, on balance, the proposals comply with Local Plan Policy and are proportionate. Application No: CH/07/0068 Received: 29-Jan-2007 Location: Land fronting, Upper Keys Business Park, Keys Park Road, Hednesford Description: Proposed H3G Base Station consisting of 15 metre slimline monopole with three antennas housed within a glass reinforced shroud, and associated equipment cabinets. (Application for prior approval for siting and appearance) Application Type: Telecom Prior Notification APP

RECOMMENDATION Prior Approval Not Required Reasons for the Grant of Permission The proposed development complies in all material respects with the relevant policies in the Development Plan (DP) and (where applicable) Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) comprising:- DPLB7: Telecommunications EXTERNAL CONSULTATIONS:- Parish Council - Object on the grounds that the height of the proposed structure will have a detrimental effect on the whole area. INTERNAL CONSULTATIONS:- Env. Health - No objections RESPONSES TO PUBLICITY:- The application was advertised in the press, a site notice was posted and all properties within 100m of the site, both residential and commercial were notified by letter. One letter of objection was received objecting on the following grounds: Health and safety implications are not yet fully understood; no need for a new mast as mobile calls can already be made in the area, the mast would be unsightly and reduce the saleability of local houses. HISTORY:- Whilst there is no history for the exact site, there have been 2 previous applications for telecommunications equipment in the vicinity, one, a 12m monopole in Keys Park Road (CH/05/0575 refers) and one, a 15m monopole, in Brickworks Road (CH/05/0600 refers). Both were refused on the grounds of their being intrusive in the street scene and detrimental to the visual amenity of the area. In both cases, the decisions were appealed and both appeals allowed. In both instances, the (different) Inspectors concluded that in consideration of the overall context of the area with large industrial buildings, the football ground and its floodlights and the street lighting as a general background, the monopoles would not be detrimental to the amenity of the area, and furthermore stated that as both installations met ICNIRP guidelines they met government policy and therefore health considerations could not be considered. Both Inspectors also confirmed that property values were not a material consideration. OBSERVATIONS:- 1.1 The application seeks prior approval to erect a 15m high slim-line telecommunications monopole and associated equipment cabins on the highway verge on Keys Park Road, adjacent to Laser Processes. The site is within an industrial and commercial area and the slim-line pole is similar in appearance to the existing lighting columns along each side of the road. 1.2 In support of the application, the operator, who is different to the previous applicant referred to in the history, have stated in support of their application that as part of their license requirements, 3G coverage must reach an area where at least 80% of the population live. They have further explained that in terms of 3G technology, the technical constraints require base stations to be closer together. The

applicant has further considered several other sites and demonstrated that these do not meet the technical requirements to provide satisfactory coverage. 1.3 With regard to the objections raised, members are referred to the planning history above relating to 2 other sites in the vicinity, and the decision of the planning inspectors and the reasoning for those decisions. In this instance it is considered that the monopole would not be visually intrusive given the existence of industrial and commercial buildings and other fixtures in the area, for example the street lighting and the floodlighting to the football club. The applicant has certified that the proposed equipment complies with ICNIRP guidelines and the value and saleability of properties is not a planning consideration. On this basis, the proposal is considered appropriate, meeting both national and local planning guidance on the matter and approval recommended. 1.4 Human Rights Implications The proposals contained in the report are considered to be compatible with the Human Rights Act 1998. The recommendation to approve the application accords with the adopted policies in the Development Plan which aims to secure the proper planning of the area in the public interest. Application No: CH/07/0079 Received: 05-Feb-2007 Location: Hire Station 180, Walsall Road, Bridgtown Description: Retention of storage container adjacent to main building Application Type: Full Planning Application RECOMMENDATION Approve subject to Conditions Reasons for the Grant of Permission The proposed development complies in all material respects with the relevant policies in the Development Plan (DP) and (where applicable) Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) comprising:- DPLB8: Design Principles of New Built Development DPLE6:Planning Conditions 1. G1 Limited Permission - Buildings 2. Subject to the expiration of condition 1, if and when the use to which the storage container is ancillary has ceased, that is of a Power Tools and Safety Equipment specialist hire company, the container shall be removed immediately. Reason In the interests of the amenity of surrounding uses 3. The proposed storage container shall be used solely for storage of machinery related to the operation of the premises and strictly for no other purpose Reason In the interests of the amenity of surrounding uses 4. The storage container shall not be used outside the hours of 7:30am and 5:00pm Monday to Friday and 08:00am to 12:00noon on Saturday Reason

To ensure that the proposed development does not prejudice the enjoyment by neighbouring occupiers of their properties. EXTERNAL CONSULTATIONS BRIDGTOWN PARISH COUNCIL: Request a site visit.Express concerns regarding detriment to street scene. INTERNAL COMMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH:No objection RESPONSE TO PUBLICITY Adjacent occupiers notified – One letter of objection received, objecting on the following grounds: 1. The submitted drawings are incorrect, the storage container is actually 2.9m high rather than 2.4m as indicated, 2. Storage container is an eyesore and visible from kitchen and garden of their property 3. Negative impact on the value of house 4. Placement could have been more thoughtful 5. Being used as a workshop OBSERVATIONS 1.14 The application seeks planning permission for the continued siting of a storage container (6.1m x 2.9m x 2.4m). The container is used to store plant machinery and other pieces of equipment that are essential to the needs of running the business. The container is only accessible to workers of Hire Station. Its location helps to keep it away from the customer entrance or main vantage points. 1.15 Hire Station are Power Tools and safety equipment specialist hire company and are located off the A34 Walsall Road, the site is accessed via North Street. To the south of the site is a public house and its associated car park, a residential dwelling is located to the west. In front of the unit is a parking and turning area for users of the premises. The container that is the subject of this container is locater within a secure area to the west of the site. 1.16 It is understood that the storage container was brought onto the site for the secure storage of expensive machinery following a theft from the site. It has been submitted that the storage container is necessary to avoid exposure to theft. 1.17 The main issue is whether the siting of the storage container will have an adverse impact on neighbouring properties and the surrounding area in general. The container is slightly visible from a number of vantage points on North Street. Between the application site and the residential property of 100a North Street is a high brick wall, the storage container is visible above this wall from the residential curtilage. The previous outlook was towards the wall of the Hire Station building which is much higher than the storage container, in front of which was a wall topped by razor wire. It

is considered that the implementation of appropriate conditions, that is with regard to its usage and hours of operation would contribute to mitigating the any negative impact that the proposed container has. A temporary condition could allow the use to be monitored. 1.18 In response to the objections raised, the height of the container as originally indicated was indeed incorrect, the drawings have been amended to show the container at the height of 2.9m. The previous outlook was towards a wall topped with razor wire and a western elevation of the Hire Station wall which is much higher than the height of the storage container and 4m further away. The effect on property values is not a planning consideration. The storage container is necessary for the security of the businesses operation and it is considered that its location within its secured yard is most appropriate. A condition can limit the use of the storage container for the purpose of storage only. 1.19 Human Rights Act The proposals set out in this report are considered to be compatible with the Human Rights Act 1998. the proposals could potentially interfere with an individual’s rights to the peaceful enjoyment of his or her property as specified in Article 8 and Article 1 of the First Protocol, however, the issues arising have been considered in detail in the report and it is considered that, on balance, the proposals comply with Local Plan Policy and are proportionate. 1.20 Conclusion The storage container is necessary for the security of expensive equipment and machinery at the application site. On balance it is considered that appropriate conditions can mitigate the impact of the storage container upon neighbouring properties. A temporary condition will allow the impact to be reviewed. Application No: CH/07/0083 Received: 05-Feb-2007 Location: Unit 13, Jerome Road Industrial Estate, Jerome Road, Norton Canes Description: Change of use from industrial (B2) to non residential delivering educational / training / recreational services (D1) Application Type: Full Planning Application RECOMMENDATION Approve subject to Conditions Reasons for the Grant of Permission The proposed development complies in all material respects with the relevant policies in the Development Plan (DP) and (where applicable) Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) comprising:- DPLTR5: Recreation and Access 1. B2 Standard Time Limit 2. The development hereby approved shall be for a educational/training/recreational use only and for no other use within the Class D2 of the Town and Country Planning Use Classes Order 1987 (as amended) Reason To enable any further uses within Use Class D2 to be properly assessed in relation to the industrial nature of the area and to secure compliance with Policy TR5: Recreation and Access, of the adopted Local Plan

3. The use hereby permitted shall not commence until: (a) drawings have been submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority showing the form of construction, layout, drainage and lighting of parking, turning, loading and unloading facilities; (b) the approved facilities have been constructed in accordance with the approved details including lining out of parking spaces and lighting Thereafter the facilities shall be available for their designated use at all times when the use is being carried out. Reason In the interests of highway safety 4. The storage container shall not be used outside the hours of 08:00 am and 22:00pm Monday to Saturday and 08:00am to 21:00pm on Sunday Reason To ensure that the proposed development does not prejudice the enjoyment by neighbouring occupiers of their properties. EXTERNAL CONSULTATIONS NORTON CANES PARISH COUNCIL: No objection STAFFORDSHIRE POLICE: No response INTERNAL COMMENTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: No objection ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH: No objection RESPONSE TO PUBLICITY Adjacent occupiers notified, site notice posted – Three letters of objection received, objecting on the following grounds: Change of use could increase the amount of pedestrians, access not suitable for that volume of pedestrian movement Significant increase in the number of vehicles, not enough parking spaces, will result in parking on the road contributing to congestion Use not in keeping with other businesses in the area, totally inappropriate for the area which is predominantly industrial Shared entrance potentially dangerous Will increase noise in the area which is surrounded by residential properties Increase of litter in the area Change of use will have a detrimental affect to the local economy, other businesses will be discouraged from moving to the area

Adjacent unit used for car park for loading and unloading lorries with forklift trucks. This unit and end unit share the entrance Increase in loitering causing nuisance to businesses and occupants of the residential bungalows Community centre in Norton Canes does not get much use, which may be a better option OBSERVATIONS 1.21 The application seeks the change of use of a unit within the Jerome Road Industrial Estate from its current use which is tied to Industrial (B2) to a non residential use delivering educational / training / recreational services (D1). The application proposes the provision parking spaces, it is indicated that two members of staff will be on the site. The opening hours of the proposed use will be from 08:00am to 10:00pm from Monday to Saturday and 08:00am to 09:00pm on Sundays. 1.22 The application site is located within an industrial estate. The application unit itself is currently vacant and was last used as an industrial use in 2005. The adjacent end unit is used an Indoor Play centre know as The Play Booth, this received planning consent in 2005. The adjacent unit to the south is a storage depot, lorries occasionally visit the site. The end unit to the south is a car bodywork repair centre, specialising in BMW’s. Opposite the site is Durapipe which manufacture thermoplastic pipework. Traffic movements are relatively in the area. Between the indoor play centre and the application site is security fencing. 1.23 The proposal will provide a centre within Norton Canes as a base to organise activities aimed primarily for elder children and teenagers run by voluntary organisations for the local community of Norton Canes. Funding has been applied for and the unit will have a sports floor, computers and a meeting room. This facility is not currently available to the locality. 1.24 The application site is within close walking distance of the community of Norton Canes. A similar use, as identified within the Use Classes Order is adjacent to the property, the area has been identified as an appropriate location for such uses in the past. It has been calculated that 12 parking spaces can easily be accommodated on the site, a condition to show these on the ground can be implemented to control the location of parking. 1.25 In response to the objections raised, concern has been raised that there will be an increase in pedestrian movement to the site which is inappropriate. A footpath links Jerome Road to the entrance of the block of units that the application site is located within, pedestrian movement should be encouraged as sustainable movement patterns. It is considered that there is adequate parking on the site for the proposed use, it is also considered that the access to the site can cope with the levels of traffic movement. The use is in keeping with the Play Booth use adjacent. The use is located within an mixed use area with residential properties located along Jerome Road, it is not considered that a change of use will cause any further harm by virtue of noise on these properties than the current uses. It is not considered that the use will discourage business coming to this area. The application unit has been vacant since 2005, the occupancy of the unit will have a positive effect. It is not considered that the use will be impacted by adjacent premises. No response has been received from Staffordshire Police, however it is not thought that the use will cause disturbance to residential properties.

1.26 Human Rights Act The proposals set out in this report are considered to be compatible with the Human Rights Act 1998. the proposals could potentially interfere with an individual’s rights to the peaceful enjoyment of his or her property as specified in Article 8 and Article 1 of the First Protocol, however, the issues arising have been considered in detail in the report and it is considered that, on balance, the proposals comply with Local Plan Policy and are proportionate. 1.27 Conclusion In conclusion, the proposal will provide a facility that is not currently available in the locality and which would be accessible on foot by a considerable number of people. It is considered that the proposed use is appropriate in this area without causing demonstrable harm to adjacent uses or residential properties. Application No: CH/07/0089 Received: 06-Feb-2007 Location: 14, Farm Close, Etchinghill. Description: Two storey rear extension Application Type: Full Planning Application RECOMMENDATION Approve subject to Conditions Reasons for the Grant of Permission The proposed development complies in all material respects with the relevant policies in the Development Plan (DP) and (where applicable) Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) comprising:- DPLB8: Design Principles of New Built Development DPLDCP6: Space about Dwellings SPG1: Residential Extensions Design Guide 1.B2 Standard Time Limit 2.D3 Materials to match 3.The development shall be carried out strictly in accordance with the deposited plans and drawings (Job No. U25 Sheets 1 and 2 dated 22-02-2007) with any minor changes being agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to their implementation. Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and to ensure that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans and details. EXTERNAL CONSULTATIONS RUGELEY TOWN COUNCIL: No objection, provided there is not a significant loss of light to No.12 RESPONSE TO PUBLICITY Adjacent occupiers notified – One letter of objection from neighbouring property, on the following grounds:

1.There will be a reduction in daylight 2. The proposed development is not in keeping with the surrounding residences 3. The above impacts will impact the saleability of their property 4. Lack of privacy in lounge when using dividing entry OBSERVATIONS 1.7 The application seeks to construct a two storey rear extension with a shallow sloping roof away from the ridge. The proposed extension will provide an extension to the lounge on the ground floor, and bedroom, dressing room WC and two en-suites on the first floor. 1.8 The application site is located within a residential area that consists of detached residential properties. The design of the existing properties consists of high pitched roofs with front and rear dormer windows to accommodate first floor accommodation. A single storey ground floor extension currently exists at the rear of the application site. The adjacent property, No.16 Farm Close is on slightly lower ground than the application site. To the rear of the properties on Farm Close is an access road. 1.9 Policy B8 states that new development should be well related to its surroundings in terms of design, scale and materials. The rear extension is proposes ground floor and first floor extensions that retains the characteristics of the dwellings in this area. A materials to match condition will ensure that the materials used will contribute to retaining style and character. 1.10 The main issue is whether the application will impact the adjacent residential properties. Applying the 45° Daylight Standard the proposed extension will not impact on No.12 Farm Close and the first floor window which would be impacted is that of a bathroom and therefore not principal. The adjacent dwelling of No.16 Farm Close is located on slightly lower ground than the application site. Originally the proposed extension was in breach of Space About Dwelling guidelines however the submitted amended drawings, with a steeper pitched roof on that elevation adjacent to this property now satisfy the 45° Daylight Standard. 1.11 In response to the objection received, the proposed development satisfies the guidance regarding loss of daylight. It is considered that the proposed extension retains the characteristics of the existing dwelling and is in keeping with the area. The saleability of a property is not a planning consideration. There will be no reduction in privacy resulting from the outlook of the extension. 1.12 Human Rights Act The proposals set out in this report are considered to be compatible with the Human Rights Act 1998. the proposals could potentially interfere with an individual’s rights to the peaceful enjoyment of his or her property as specified in Article 8 and Article 1 of the First Protocol, however, the issues arising have been considered in detail in the report and it is considered that, on balance, the proposals comply with Local Plan Policy and are proportionate. 1.13 Conclusion In conclusion, it is considered that the design and extent of the proposals are appropriate and in accordance with the policies contained within the Local Plan and Supplementary Planning Guidance.

Tree Preservation Orders TPO/24/2006 23 Langdale Drive Cannock TPO/25/2006 Land adj to 123 Cannock Road Heath Hayes