site visit report · 2017-12-12 · hcl impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95%...

Site Visit Report

The site visit process is a sample on a particular day of an installation's compliance with some of its licence conditions. Where non-compliance against a particular condition has not been reported, this should not be construed to mean that there is full compliance with that condition of the licence.

Instructions and actions arising from the visit shall be addressed, or where applicable noted, by the licensee in order to ensure compliance, to improve the environmental performance of the installation and to provide clarification on certain issues.

The licensee shall take the actions specified to close out the non-compliances and observations raised in this Site Visit Report.

Licensee

Name of Installation Sperrin Galvanisers (Ireland) Limited

Licensee Sperrin Galvanisers (Ireland) Limited

Licence Register No. P0658-01

CRO Number 319411

Site Address Derryfrench, Tynagh, Galway

Site Visit Reference No. SV10472

Report Detail

Issue Date 12/10/2017

Prepared By Ken Murphy

Site Visit Detail

Date Of Inspection 26/07/2017 Announced No

Time In 09:00 Time Out 17:00

Visited by on behalf of the EPA Fitz Scientific Ltd

Licensee Personnel and Role See report

Photo Taken No Samples Taken Yes Video Taken No

Odour Assessment No

Site Visit Report - SV10472 - Sperrin Galvanisers (Ireland) Limited of 37

Scope

This is a report on monitoring of emissions to air at this site. Please find the detailed technical report attached.

Media

Air

Site Areas Inspected

See Report

Documents Inspected

See Report


Sperrin Galvanizers LimitedDerryfrench, Tynagh, Co Galway

P0658-01CAR17-01

Emissions to AtmosphereReport No:

Report Date:

Fitz Scientific

Unit 35, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co Louth

Phone: +353 41 98 45440

17/08/2017

Environmental Protection Agency

Industrial Emissions Licence: P0658-01

1 of 33Site Visit Report - SV10472 - Sperrin Galvanisers (Ireland) Limited of 37

Fitz Scientific

Derryfrench, Tynagh, Co Galway

Sperrin Galvanizers Limited

Visit No: 1Year: 2017

Report for the Periodic Monitoring of Emissions to Air

Executive Summary

Licence / Permit Number:

Job Quote Number:

P0658-01

EPA17060

Operator Name:

Installation:

Phone:

Contact Name:



0909745804

John Moore O’Connor

Monitoring Dates:

Monitoring Organisation: Fitz Scientific

Unit 35, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland

Phone: +353 41 98 45440 / Fax: +353 41 98 46171

email: [email protected]

UKAS Registration number 2802

Report Date: 17/08/2017

Signed: ____________________________ Signed: ____________________________

-1

P0658-01Industrial Emissions Licence

Report created using QRSys version

P0658-01CAR17-01

26/07/2017

Jason McGuirk

MM14 1320

Level 2

Technician

TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4

Written By:

MCERTS Reg:

Competency:

Function:

Endorsements:

Aadil Khan

MM11 1120

Level 2

Field Services Manager

TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4

Approved By:

MCERTS Reg:

Competency:

Function:

Endorsements:

3.7 April 2017


Contents

1.- Part 1

1.1.- Monitoring Objectives

1.2.- Special Monitoring Requirements

1.3.- Monitoring Results

1.4.- Operational Information

1.5.- Monitoring Deviations

1.6.- Monitoring Procedures and Deviations

2.- Part 2

Appendix 1: General Information

Appendix 2: Monitoring Information

Fitz Scientific




P0658-01Industrial Emissions LicenceP0658-01CAR17-01


Fitz Scientific





1.- Part 1

1.1.- Monitoring Objectives

1.2.- Special Monitoring Remarks

All the sampling points were obtainable Yes

All parameters were sampled Yes

Opinions and interpretations expressed in this report are outside the scope of any claimed UKAS accreditation.EPA requirements AG1 (Safety) and AG2 (Monitoring Guidance Note) were applied during the monitoring.

Additional information

The monitoring was carried out at this installation as part of compliance monitoring of an Industrial Emissions Licence requirement. This Air Emissions Monitoring has been carried out by Fitz Scientific on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency. The substances monitored at the emission points are listed below.

A1

Parameter Result

Cadmium - Cd 0.00083 mg/m3

Hydrogen Chloride <0.3 mg/m3

Lead - Pb 0.00493 mg/m3

Volumetric flow 11540.2 m3/h

Zinc - Zn 0.11558 mg/m3


Fitz Scientific





1.3.- Monitoring Results

Analysis information

Emission Point

ReferenceSubstance to be Monitored ELV Result

Uncert (+/-) Units

Date of sampling

Start - End

Times Reference Method Accr.velocity

(m/s)LOD

A1 Cadmium - Cd 0.00083 n/a 26/07/2017 11:20-12:20

BS EN 14385:2004 MCERTS5.540.00040 mg/m30.05 mg/m3

A1 Hydrogen Chloride <0.3 0.1 26/07/2017 10:25-10:55

BS EN 1911:2010 MCERTS5.540.3 mg/m310 mg/m3

A1 Lead - Pb 0.00493 n/a 26/07/2017 11:20-12:20


A1 Volumetric flow 11540.2 457.2 26/07/2017 11:10-11:15

BS EN 16911-1:2013 MCERTS5.54n/a m3/h15500 m3/h

A1 Zinc - Zn 0.11558 n/a 26/07/2017 11:20-12:20


Cadmium - Cd RPS - Salford

Hydrogen Chloride Fitz Scientific

Lead - Pb RPS - Salford

Volumetric flow Fitz Scientific

Zinc - Zn RPS - Salford

Cadmium - Cd-blank

0.01432 n/a 26/07/2017 11:06-11:08

BS EN 14385:2004 MCERTS0.00040 mg/m3A1

Hydrogen Chloride-blank

<0.2 0.1 26/07/2017 10:10-10:12

BS EN 1911:2010 MCERTS0.3 mg/m3A1

Lead - Pb-blank 0.00061 n/a 26/07/2017 11:06-11:08

BS EN 14385:2004 MCERTS0.00060 mg/m3A1

Zinc - Zn-blank 0.01453 n/a 26/07/2017 11:06-11:08

BS EN 14385:2004 MCERTS0.10937 mg/m3A1

Sampling stage carried out as per MCERTS requirementsNo*:


Fitz Scientific





Additional information

* The reported uncertainty is based on a standard uncertainty multiplied by a coverage factor k=2, providing a level of confidence of approximately 95%

** Results reported at following Reference Conditions

Reference Conditions

Abatement system and process load

Emission Point Reference Temperature (K) Pressure (KPa) Moisture (%) Oxygen (%)

Monitoring Result Reference Conditions

A1 273 101.3 no correctionno correction

Abatement system In Operation Fuel type and LoadLocation

Bag Filter Yes As NormalA1 None


Fitz Scientific





1.4.- Operating Information

Emission Point Reference Date Process Type

ProcessDuration Substance CEMS PR Units

A1 26/07/2017 n/a 0.00083Cadmium - CdAir Extraction Continuous mg/m3

A1 26/07/2017 n/a <0.3Hydrogen ChlorideAir Extraction Continuous mg/m3

A1 26/07/2017 n/a 0.00493Lead - PbAir Extraction Continuous mg/m3

A1 26/07/2017 n/a 11540.2Volumetric flowAir Extraction Continuous m3/h

A1 26/07/2017 n/a 0.11558Zinc - ZnAir Extraction Continuous mg/m3

* CEMS: Continuous Emission Monitoring System Results

* PR: Periodic Monitoring Results


Fitz Scientific





1.5.- Monitoring Deviations

Monitoring carried out as per Standard Methods. No deviations were recorded

Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.

Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.

Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).

The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)

The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)

Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).

The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).

The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.

Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)

Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).

Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).

SO2 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)

NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (TGN M22 Section 6)

The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)

A1Emission Point Cadmium - CdParameter

NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017

CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.

O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017

CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (TGN M22 Section 6)

O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.2.3)

TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)

HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)

HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).

Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form

The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)


Fitz Scientific





Low HCl levels detected. Impinger efficiency NOT relevent















A1Emission Point Hydrogen ChlorideParameter












Fitz Scientific




















A1Emission Point Lead - PbParameter












Fitz Scientific



















A1Emission Point Volumetric flowParameter












Fitz Scientific




















A1Emission Point Zinc - ZnParameter












Fitz Scientific





Licence / Permit Number:

Job Quote Number:

P0658-01

EPA17060

Operator Name:

Installation:

Phone:

Contact Name:



John Moore O’Connor

0909745804

Monitoring Dates:

Monitoring Organisation: Fitz Scientific


Phone: +353 41 98 45440 / Fax: +353 41 98 46171

email: [email protected]

2.- Part 2

Supporting information

26/07/2017

Laboratory details

Cadmium - Cd

Address Contact email Phone Acc. Number

Unit 12, Waters Edge Business Park, Modwen Road, Salford, M5 3EZ, UK

Paul Chesney

[email protected]

+44 (0)161 877 3959

UKAS 0605RPS - Salford

Hydrogen Chloride



Geoff Fitzpatrick

[email protected] +353 41 98 45440 - ext 2

UKAS 2802Fitz Scientific

Lead - Pb



Paul Chesney

[email protected]

+44 (0)161 877 3959


Volumetric flow



Fitz Scientific






Geoff Fitzpatrick

[email protected] +353 41 98 45440 - ext 2

UKAS 2802Fitz Scientific

Zinc - Zn



Paul Chesney

[email protected]

+44 (0)161 877 3959



Fitz Scientific





Appendix 1:

Sampling personnel used

Substances Monitored

Equipment Checklist References

As an accredited organisation Fitz scientific have implemented procedures to ensure that the requirements of TPS 63 (UKAS Policy on Deviating Samples) are met with regard to samples taken and tested for chemical analysis. As such all samples, when applicable, have been transported in containers, and in an environment, that meet the relevant standard requirements where applicable

Substance Fitz SOPMethod used for Monitoring

Cadmium - Cd BS EN 14385:2004 113

Hydrogen Chloride BS EN 1911:2010 148

Lead - Pb BS EN 14385:2004 113

Volumetric flow BS EN 16911-1:2013 122

Zinc - Zn BS EN 14385:2004 113

Stack: A1

EM402

Set1

Set C

Probe1

EM372

EM201 (a

EM389 EM3273/EM3277

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a n/a

n/a

n/a

TCR

Nozzles

Impingers

Probe

Pitot tube

Weights

Caliper Filters

Horiba

FID

FTIR

Testo Gases

Handheld pumps

Tubes

Zinc - ZnParameter:

EM402

n/a

n/a

Probe1

EM372

n/a

n/a n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a n/a

n/a

n/a

TCR

Nozzles

Impingers

Probe

Pitot tube

Weights

Caliper Filters

Horiba

FID

FTIR

Testo Gases

Handheld pumps

Tubes

Volumetric flowParameter:

EM402

Set1

Set C

Probe1

EM372

EM201 (a

EM389 EM3273/EM3277

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a n/a

n/a

n/a

TCR

Nozzles

Impingers

Probe

Pitot tube

Weights

Caliper Filters

Horiba

FID

FTIR

Testo Gases

Handheld pumps

Tubes

Lead - PbParameter:

26/07/2017 Technician Name Position Qualification TEs MCERTS no

Aadil Khan Team Leader Level 2 TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4

Jason McGuirk Team Leader Level 2 TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4

MM11 1120

MM14 1320


Fitz Scientific





EM402

n/a

Set A

Probe1

n/a

EM201 (a

n/a n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a n/a

n/a

n/a

TCR

Nozzles

Impingers

Probe

Pitot tube

Weights

Caliper Filters

Horiba

FID

FTIR

Testo Gases

Handheld pumps

Tubes

Hydrogen ChlorideParameter:

EM402

Set1

Set C

Probe1

EM372

EM201 (a

EM389 EM3273/EM3277

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a n/a

n/a

n/a

TCR

Nozzles

Impingers

Probe

Pitot tube

Weights

Caliper Filters

Horiba

FID

FTIR

Testo Gases

Handheld pumps

Tubes

Cadmium - CdParameter:


Fitz Scientific





Appendix 2:

Monitoring Information

2

4

5.54

99.462

34.68

0.92

13246.5

11540.2

11540.2

273

101.3

n/a

n/a

n/a

Number of Ports

Number of Points

Average Velocity v'a (m/s)

Average Pressure (KPa)

Average Temperature (ºC)

Stack Diameter (m)

Actual Moisture Flow rate (m3/h)

Moisture Flow rate at STP (m3/h)

Dry Flow rate at STP, Ref O2 (m3/h)

T reference (Deg K)

P reference (KPa)

Isokinetic condition (%)

Oxygen measured (%)

Water vapor (%)

Wet Stack (yes/no) No

Probe Temperature (°C) n/a

Impinger efficiency (%) HCl(42.75)

Size of Nozzle 7

A1Stack Parameter: Volumetric Flow, HCl, Cd, Pb, Zn

Max Flow Rate in Licence (m3/h): 15500


Fitz Scientific





Diagram of Sampling Location (not to scale)

X

X

X

X X X

X

X

A

B

A1Circular

2

4

ports

points

Point % of Diameter Location (cm) Velocity (m/s) Temperature (ºC)

Traverse Length 0.92 m

Line

1 6.70 6.2 8.43 33.951

2 25.00 23 8.54 34.451

3 75.00 69 8.495 34.81

4 93.40 85.9 8.47 34.981

1 6.70 6.2 8.795 35.1292

2 25.00 23 8.59 35.262

3 75.00 69 8.42 35.2152

4 93.40 85.9 8.05 34.682


Fitz Scientific





Monitoring result calculations and uncertainty calculations


Fitz ScientificP0658-01CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Sperrin Galvanizers LimitedIndustrial Emissions Licence P0658-01

Volumetric Flowrate Correction Template BS EN 16911-1:2013Company Sperrin Galvanizers Limited Date of Test 26/07/2017Site Derryfrench, Tynagh, Co Galway Reference No P0658-01Plant Identification A1 Operator Id MM11 1120Test carried out by Aadil Khan TE's TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4

P0658-01CAR17-01

Stack information:

Stack dimensions

m Stack Area m2 No ports / No pointsSuitable ports

(Y/N)?

Comply with 5 Up / 2 Down?

(Y/N) Pressure kPa Temperature K Moisture % Oxygen %

Circular Stack 0.92 0.664761005 2 Yes NoReference Condition 101.3 273 0 20.9

Rectangular stack 0.00 0.00 0.00 4Stack Conditions 99.5 307.7 0.0 20.90

Actual Value: 0.664761005

PointVelocity m/s (v'a)

Temp degC (ta) Temp K Presssure kPa (Pa)

Flow Rate m3/sec:

Actual Flow rate m3/hr

Moisture Flow rate at STP m3/hr Moisture

Flow rate at STP, Dry m3/hr O2 %

Flow Rate at STP, Dry, Ref O2 m3/hr

1 5.54 34.6775 307.6775 99 3.7 13246.5 11540.2 0.0 11540.2 20.90 11540.2Volumetric flow 5.54 34.68 307.68 99.462 3.7 13246.5 11540.2 0.0 11540.2 20.90 11540.2Uncertainty 34.68 307.68 99.462 524.8 457.2 0.0 457.2 20.90 457.2

Maximum volumetric flow as per Licence 15500.0 m3/h

Report Number :

Calculation spreadsheet v.48 20 of 33


Fitz ScientificP0658-01CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


v1.4 Oct-16Enter data in orange cells onlyConstantsGas constant 8.314 J/(K.mol)

1990 Pa0.01 Pa

2 % of value0.2 % of range between calibrations

PITOT 0.04 % of rangeSampling probe: Probe1 0.46 Pa

Pitot EM372 Water vapour me 0.00 % relativePitot coefficient, K 0.847 0.61 °C CO content meas 0.00 % relativeExpanded uncertainty (95%, k=2) 0.02 997.5 Pa CO2 content mea 0.00 % relative

0.50 % O2 content measu 0.00 % relative

Duct dimensions Circular RectangularDiameter 0.92 m a mArea 0.7 m2 b m

Area 0.00 m2Uncertainty (%) 0.501086957 Uncertainty (%) 0.00116889

All Pressures should be entered in Pascals, Pa

Measurement Point Atmospheric Pressure, PaStack Pressure, Pa Static Pressure, Pa meas1, Pa meas2, Pa meas3, Pa meas4, Pa meas5, Pa Delta P, Pa Stack Temperature, C

Water Vapour Content, % CO, ppm CO2, % N2, % O2, % dry molecular wt, g/mol stack molecular wt, g/mol

1 99450 99467 39.120 39.12 34.28 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.842 99450 99456 12.47 12.47 35.07 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.843 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.844 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.845 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.846 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.847 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.848 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.849 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.84

10 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8411 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8412 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8413 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8414 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8415 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8416 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8417 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8418 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8419 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8420 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.84

Mean 99450 99462 #DIV/0! 25.80 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 25.80 34.68 0.00 0.0 0.0 79.1 20.9 28.84 28.84

Circular duct Rectangular ductMean velocity 5.54 m/sec Flow rate (stack conditions) 13246 m3/hour 0 m3/hour

Standard uncerta 0.10 m/sec 1.9 % of value Vol. flow rate expanded uncertain 525 m3/hour #DIV/0! m3/hour

Mean density 1.121 kg/m3 Expanded uncert 0.21 m/sec 3.8 % of value Vol. flow rate expanded uncertain 4.0 % of value #DIV/0! % of value

Developed for the STA by David Butterfield & Chris Dimopoulos, NPL

Uncertainty in duct area measurement

Dry gas basis

Uncertainty in stack gas compositionUncertainty in Delta P transducer Enter uncertainties as (95%,k=2) where relevant

Uncertainty in temperature readout systemUncertainty in atmospheric pressure transducer

Enter uncertainties as (95%,k=2) where relevant

Repeatability of Delta P transducerDrift of Delta P transducerLack of fit of measurement system

Uncertainty calculation for Velocity and Volume Flow Rate Measurement by Pitot tube EN ISO 16911‐1

Characteristics of pressure sensor used for Delta PEnter uncertainties as (95%,k=2) where relevant

Range of Delta P transducerResolution of Delta P transducer

Calculation spreadsheet v.48

21 of 33


Fitz ScientificP0658-01CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Velocity associated uncertainties

Pitot Tube CoefficientExpanded uncertainty (95%, k=2) 0.02Standard uncertainty (Dimensionless) 0.01

Table 1

Delta P Standard uncertanites^2 Measurement Point SD of the mean of the DP measurements (Standard uncertainty Delta P)^2 u2(Dpi)Velocity (m/s) Standard uncertainty velocity m/s

Sigma DP See Table 1 1 0.8 2.5 0.001 7.1 0.24Resolution uncertainty 0.00 2 0.2 2.4 0.009 4.0 0.38Calibration uncertainty 0.05 3Lack of fit 0.21 4Drift 5.28 5

67

Molar Mass 8u(H2O) 0 9(O2)wet 20.9 10u(O2)wet 0.00 11(CO2)wet 0.0 12u(CO2)wet 0.00 13(CO)wet 0.0 14u(CO)wet 0.00 15Oxygen sensitivity 4.00E‐05 16Water sensitivity 1.00E‐04 17CO2 sensitivity 1.60E‐04 18CO sensitivity 4.00E‐08 19

20standard uncertainty 0.000000 kg/mol 0.00 % of value Average 0.52 2.42440547 0.005 5.54 0.312370625

Temperaturestandard uncertainty 0.31 K 0.10 % of value

Stack static pressurestandard uncertainty 0.0 Pa #DIV/0! % of value

Stack pressurestandard uncertainty 997.5 Pa 1.00 % of value

Stack gas densitystandard uncertainty 0.0113 kg/m3 1.01 % of value

Standard uncertainty of velocity 0.10 m/sec 1.9 % of value

Expanded uncertainty in velocity 0.21 m/sec 3.8 % of value

Calculation spreadsheet v.48

22 of 33




Volume flow rate associated uncertainties

Circular duct Rectangular ductArea uncertainty 0.01 m2 #DIV/0! m2

Flow rate standard uncertainty 262 m3/h #DIV/0! m3/h

Volume flow rate expanded uncertainty 525 m3/h #DIV/0! m3/h

Volume flow rate expanded uncertainty 4.0 % of value #DIV/0! % of value

Calculation spreadsheet v.4823 of 33




Lookup tables

Factor Loading Function

Number of measurments dn2 0.8853 0.5914 0.4865 0.436 0.3957 0.378 0.3519 0.337

10 0.32511 0.31512 0.30715 0.28820 0.26825 0.25430 0.24540 0.22750 0.22260 0.21680 0.206

100 0.199





Swirl Test Record BS EN 16911-1:2013Company Sperrin Galvanizers Limited Date of Test 26/07/2017Site Derryfrench, Tynagh, Co Galway Reference No P0658-01Plant Identification A1 Operator Id MM11 1120Test carried out by Aadil Khan TE's TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4

Sampling Line APoint Distance to duct (cm) Diff. Pressure (Pa) Temp oC Velocity (m/s) Angle of Swirl

1 6.2 55.84 33.95 8.43 02 23 57.23 34.45 8.54 03 69 56.44 34.80 8.50 04 85.9 56.11 34.98 8.47 056789

101112

Average 56.40 34.55 8.48 0Min 55.84 33.95 8.43 0Max 57.23 34.98 8.54 0

Sampling Line BPoint Distance to duct (m) Diff. Pressure (Pa) Temp oC Velocity (m/s) Angle of Swirl

1 6.2 60.45 35.13 8.802 23 57.64 35.26 8.593 69 55.50 25.22 8.424 85.9 50.84 34.68 8.0556789

101112

Average 56.11 32.57 8.47 #DIV/0!Min 50.84 25.22 8.05 0Max 60.45 35.26 8.80 0





HCl BS EN 1911:2010Company Sperrin Galvanizers Limited Date of TestSite Derryfrench, Tynagh, Co Galway Reference NoPlant Identification A1 Operator IdTest carried out by Aadil Khan TE's

Report Number : P0658-01CAR17-01

Run Laboratory Results mgHCl/L Cert Number: Laboratory Accredtation Analytical Method Date of AnalysisLOD 0.069 Fitz Scientific MCERTS IC 03/08/2017Impinger 1 0.069 5790/623/11 Fitz Scientific MCERTSImpinger 2 0.069 5790/623/13 Fitz Scientific MCERTS

BlankImpinger 1 0.069 5790/623/12 Fitz Scientific MCERTSImpinger 2 0.069 5790/623/14 Fitz Scientific MCERTS

Run BlankSample Volumes

ml L ml L166.6 0.1666 140.4 0.1404124.4 0.1244 124.0 0.124

0.077373314 Nm3

HCl mg mgHCl/m3 at STP,DrymgCl/m3 at

STP

mgHCl/m3 at Refernce

ConditionsUncertainty mgHCl/mg HCl kg/hr

Uncertainty HCl kg/hr

LOD 0.02 0.3 0.3 0.3 n/a 0.0030 n/aRun 0.02 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0030 0.00064Blank 0.02 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0027 0.00058

Reference oxygen: 20.9 %Measured oxygen: 20.9 %

Flow Rate at reference conditions 11540.20 m3/hr

DeviationAbsorption efficiency(Impinger 1 should absorb 95% of total HCl): 42.7 % Low HCl levels dete TRUEor result in second absorber should be <LOD

Sampled Volume corrected to reference conditionsSTP, Dry

TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4

26/07/2017P0658-01

MM11 1120





Uncertainty calculation for Determination of mass concentration of HCl, Reference method (taken from SO2 uncertainty STA website) v2Run Measurement EquationLimit value (ELV) 10 mg.m-3 Reference oxygen 20.9 % by volumeMeasured concen 0.3 mg.m-3 (at reference conditions)

Measured Quantit Symbol Value Standard uncertainty Units Uncertainty as pe Uncertainty at lv Requirement of stdSampled Volume Vm 0.077373314 uVm 0.001 m3 1.29 <=2%Sampled gas Tem Tm 307.6775 uTm 2 k 2.00 <2.5 kSampled gas Pres ρm 99.4615 uρm 1 kPa 1.01 <=1%Sampled gas Hum Hm 0 uHm 1 % by volume 1.00 <=1%Oxygen content O2,m 20.9 uO2,m 0.1 % by volume 0.48 <=5%Concentration in C 0.1380 uC 0.00414 mg/l 3.00 <5%Impinger solution VS 0.291 uVS 0.001 l 0.34 <1%Mass HCl m 0.0 um 0.00 mg 3.02 0.08 <5% of limit valueNote - Sampled gas humidity, temperature and pressure are values at the gas meteLeak L 2 % 2.00 <=2%

Intermediate calculationsFactor for std con fs 0.87uncertainty comp symbol sensitivity coeff u (in units of fs)

ρm 0.009 0.009Hm 0.009 0.009Tm 0.003 0.006ufs 0.014 1.56

Corrected volume V 0.07 uV 0.001 m3 2.15

Factor for O2 cor fc 1.00uncertainty comp symbol sensitivity coeff u

O2,m 1.00 0.100Factor for O2 Cor ufc 1.00 0.100 10.00

Parameter Value Units Sensitivity coe Uncertainty contribution Uncertainty as %Corrected Volume V 0.07 m3 3.85 0.01 mg.m-3 2.15 %Mass m 0.02 mg 12.92 0.01 mg.m-3 3.02 %Factor for O2 Corre fc 1.00 0.26 0.03 mg.m-3 10.00 %Leak L 0.00 mg.m-3 1.00 0.00 mg.m-3 1.15 %

Combined uncertainty 0.03 mg.m-3

Expanded uncertainty as percentage of measured val 21.46 % measured of value expressed with a level of confidence of 95%(Using a coverage factor k=2)

Expanded uncertainty in units of measurement 0.06 mg.m-3

Expanded uncertainty as percentqge of limit value 0.6 % ELV

Requirement in standard is for uncertainty to be < 20% at ELV at standard conditions





Uncertainty calculation for Determination of mass concentration of HCl, Reference method (taken from SO2 uncertainty STA website) Blank

Limit value (ELV) 1 mg.m-3 Reference oxygen 20.9 % by volumeMeasured concen 0.2 mg.m-3 (at reference conditions)

Measured Quantit Symbol Value Standard uncertainty Units Uncertainty as pe Uncertainty at lv Requirement of stdSampled Volume Vm 0.077373314 uVm 0.001 m3 1.29 <=2%Sampled gas Tem Tm 307.6775 uTm 2 k 2.00 <2.5 kSampled gas Pres ρm 99.4615 uρm 1 kPa 1.01 <=1%Sampled gas Hum Hm 0 uHm 1 % by volume 1.00 <=1%Oxygen content O2,m 20.9 uO2,m 0.1 % by volume 0.48 <=5%Concentration in C 0.1380 uC 0.00414 mg/l 3.00 <5%Impinger solution VS 0.3 uVS 0.001 l 0.38 <1%Mass NH3 m 0.0 um 0.00 mg 3.02 0.71 <5% of limit valueNote - Sampled gas humidity, temperature and pressure are values at the gas meteLeak L 2 % 2.00 <=2%

Intermediate calculationsFactor for std con fs 0.87uncertainty comp symbol sensitivity coeff u (in units of fs)

ρm 0.009 0.009Hm 0.009 0.009Tm 0.003 0.006ufs 0.014 1.56

Corrected volume V 0.07 uV 0.001 m3 2.15

Factor for O2 cor fc 1.00uncertainty comp symbol sensitivity coeff u

O2,m 1.00 0.100Factor for O2 Cor ufc 1.00 0.100 10.00

Parameter Value Units Sensitivity coe Uncertainty contribution Uncertainty as %Corrected Volume V 0.07 m3 3.50 0.01 mg.m-3 2.15 %Mass m 0.02 mg 12.92 0.01 mg.m-3 3.02 %Factor for O2 Corre fc 1.00 0.24 0.02 mg.m-3 10.00 %Leak L 0.00 mg.m-3 1.00 0.00 mg.m-3 1.15 %

Combined uncertainty 0.03 mg.m-3

Expanded uncertainty as percentage of measured val 21.46 % measured of value expressed with a level of confidence of 95%(Using a coverage factor k=2)

Expanded uncertainty in units of measurement 0.05 mg.m-3

Expanded uncertainty as percentqge of limit value 5.1 % ELV





Company Sperrin Galvanizers Limited 42942.000Site Derryfrench, Tynagh, Co Galway P0658-01Plant Identification A1 MM11 1120Test carried out by Aadil Khan E1, TE2, TE3, TE4

Pres kPa Temp K Moisture % Oxygen % Run Cert Number Blank Cert Number Laboratory Accreditation

Ref Cond 101.3 273 0 20.90 Nozzle Wash 5790/623/09 Nozzle Wash 5790/623/10 RPS Salford MCERTS Run (ml) Blank (ml)

Stack Cond 99.4615 307.68 0.00 20.90 Line Wash Line Wash Analytical Me Date of Analysis Nozzle Wash 23.90 35.60

Filter 5790/623/07 Filter 5790/623/08 ICPMS 08/08/2017 Line WashStack Flow Rate at Reference Conditions 11540.20 m3/hr Impinger 1 5790/623/01 Impinger 1 5790/623/02 Impinger 1 107.30 127.10

Impinger 2 5790/623/03 Impinger 2 5790/623/04 Impinger 2 131.30 120.80Sampled Air Volume (STP, Dry) Impinger 3 5790/623/05 Impinger 3 5790/623/06 Impinger 3 146.60 115.80

Impinger 5 Impinger 5 Impinger 5 Impinger 6 Impinger 6 Impinger 6

Dry at Gas Meter: (Vg) 0.78 m3Gas Meter Temperature: (tg) 20.45 293.45 KAmbient Pressure Measured:(Pa) 99.45 KPaGas Volume STP (Vgn) 0.717 m3Gas Volume Factor Correction: 0.98Corrected Volume STP 0.704164592 m3

Lab Results Combined Combined LOD Results Results Mass Emission ELV Result as Absorption Result as a % LOD Filter Nozzle Line Impinger 1 Impinger 2 Impinger 3 LOD Sample LOD Results (STP) Adjusted for % of efficiency of total mass

Run 1 Results Wash Wash & Line Wash & Rinse & Rinse Result Results Result Corrected STP, Dry ref O2 ELV Run Impinger 3 metal collectedug ug/filter ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug to ref O2 mg/Nm3 mg/Nm3 kg/hr mg/m3 % %

Cadmium - Cd 0.20 0.50 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.28 0.58 0.00040 #DIV/0! 0.00083 0.00083 0.00001 0.05 1.66 5.0 0.68377711Lead - Pb 0.30 0.30 0.50 20.00 1.00 6.00 0.42 3.47 0.00060 #DIV/0! 0.00493 0.00493 0.00006 0.10 4.93 25.4 4.06004729Zinc - Zn 1.00 16.00 20.00 576.00 8.00 14.00 77.01 81.39 0.10937 #DIV/0! 0.11558 0.11558 0.00133 0.20 57.79 2.5 95.2561756

Total Metals 0.11037 #DIV/0! 0.12133 0.12133 0.00140

Total for Cadmium – Cd and Thallim - Tl #REF! #DIV/0! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Total for Antimony- Sb, Arsenic – As, Lead – Pb, Chromium – Cr, Cobalt – Co, Cooper – Cu, Manganese – Mn, Nickel – Ni, Vanadium – V #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Samples Volumes

Determination of Total Concentration of Metals (BS EN 14385:2004 excluding mercury, BS EN 13211:2001 Mercury)

Date of TestReference NoOperator Id

TE's





Lab Results Combined Mass Blank Filter Nozzle Line Impinger 1 Impinger 2 Impinger 3 Sample (STP) Adjusted Emission

Results Wash Wash & Line Wash & Rinse & Rinse Results for ref O2ug/filter ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug mg/Nm3 mg/Nm3 kg/hr

Cadmium - Cd 10.00 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.20 10.08 0.01432 0.01432 0.00017Lead - Pb 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.60 0.43 0.00061 0.00061 0.00001Zinc - Zn 0.90 3.00 6.00 2.00 71.00 10.23 0.01453 0.01453 0.00017

Total Metals 0.029 0.029 0.00034

Total for Cadmium – Cd and Thallim - Tl #REF! #REF! #REF!

Total for Antimony- Sb, Arsenic – As, Lead – Pb, Chromium – Cr, Cobalt – Co, Cooper – Cu, Manganese – Mn, Nickel – Ni, Vanadium – V #REF! #REF! #REF!

0Notes: Calculated absorbtion efficiency

Absorption efficiency-Impinger 3 should absorb ≤10 % of total concentration:If one of the metals elements in the last impinger is > 10 % of total metal result result shall be rejected, unless the total result is < 30% of ELVor if the metal element is the <1% of total mass of metals collectedFor example ELVs for metals may be:• Cd and Tl combined – 0.05 mg/m3• Sb, As, Pb, Cr, Co, Cu, Mn, Ni, V combined – 0.5 mg/m3• mercury – 0.05 mg/m3For Cd and Tl combined it would not be necessary to comply with the less than 10% in the last impingercriteria, provided the overall combined Cd and Tl result for the sample train was below 0.015 mg/m3.For combined metals (Sb, As, Pb, Cr, Co, Cu, Mn, Ni, V) it would not be necessary for each individualelement to comply with the less than 10% in the last impinger criteria, provided that the overall combinedresult for the sample train was below 0.15 mg/m3.For mercury it would not be necessary to comply with the less than 10% in the last impinger criteria,provided the overall mercury result for the sample train was below 0.015 mg/m3.

Report Results

BOLD type indicates concentration of analyte at or below the limit of detection and the concemtration shown as calculated from the limit of detection for this sample



Test Certificate Date 07/08/2017

Fitz Scientific

Unit 35 Boyne Business Park

Drogheda

County Louth

Ireland

Client Order No. FS534

WK17-5390Certificate No.

Issue No. 1

Contact 31/07/2017Date ReceivedKatherine McQuillan

Description 10 samples for metals Technique ICP Stack

Analysis Method Accreditation Method LOD UncertaintyParameter

M31-BSEN14385 F-0.2ug :W-0.3ug :S-0.2ug/l 15.00%Cadmium UKAS

M31-BSEN14385 F-0.2ug :W-0.3ug :S-0.2ug/l 15.00%Cadmium UKAS

M31-BSEN14385 F-0.3ug :W-0.2ug :S-0.2ug/l 13.00%Lead UKAS

M31-BSEN14385 F-1.0ug :W-1.0ug :S-2.0ug/l 11.00%Zinc UKAS

Sample No. 947332 5790/623/01 Method

M31-BSEN14385(U)Cadmium <0.2 ug/l 98 mls

M31-BSEN14385(U)Lead 20 ug/l

M31-BSEN14385(U)Zinc 576 ug/l

Sample No. 947333 5790/623/02 Method


M31-BSEN14385(U)Lead <0.2 ug/l


Sample No. 947334 5790/623/03 Method




Sample No. 947335 5790/623/04 Method


M31-BSEN14385(U)Lead <0.2 ug/l

M31-BSEN14385(U)Zinc <2 ug/l

RPS Laboratories Ltd. Unit 12. Waters Edge Business Park. Modwen Road. Salford. M5 3EZ

Tel: (0161) 872 2443 Fax: (0161) 877 3959

Page 1 of 3


Date 07/08/2017Test Certificate


1Issue No.

Client Fitz Scientific

Sample No. 947336 5790/623/05 Method




Sample No. 947337 5790/623/06 Method


M31-BSEN14385(U)Lead 0.6 ug/l


Sample No. 947338 5790/623/07 Method

M31-BSEN14385(U)Cadmium 0.5 ug

M31-BSEN14385(U)Lead <0.3 ug

M31-BSEN14385(U)Zinc 16 ug

Sample No. 947339 5790/623/08 Method

M31-BSEN14385(U)Cadmium 10 ug


M31-BSEN14385(U)Zinc 0.9 ug

Sample No. 947340 5790/623/09 Method

M31-BSEN14385(U)Cadmium <0.3 ug 21 mls

M31-BSEN14385(U)Lead 0.5 ug


Sample No. 947341 5790/623/10 Method

M31-BSEN14385(U)Cadmium <0.3 ug 32 mls




Tel: (0161) 872 2443 Fax: (0161) 877 3959

Page 2 of 3


Date 07/08/2017Test Certificate


1Issue No.

Client Fitz Scientific

Approved By Date

Calum GreenTested By 03/08/2017Date

For and on authority of RPS Laboratories Ltd.

Method Symbols (U) Analysis is UKAS Accredited

(N) Analysis is not UKAS Accredited

Concentration values (mg/m3 and ppm) are calculated on the basis of information provided by the customer.

Results stated as ml are refering to the sample volume.

Analysis carried out on samples 'as received'

This document may not be reproduced other than in full, except with the written approval of the issuing laboratory.

RPS Laboratories terms and conditions apply - a copy is available on request.

07/08/2017

Joanne Dewhurst

Operational Manager


Tel: (0161) 872 2443 Fax: (0161) 877 3959

Page 3 of 3


Summary

FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS

You are required to complete the instructions and actions, as outlined in this report, within the specified timeframe. Where required, you shall respond to actions specified in Compliance Investigations within the required timeframe.The licensee shall maintain documentary evidence, for review by the EPA, that the prescribed corrective actions were completed within the required timeframe.

(i) Compliance Investigations

You are not required to respond directly to items contained in this EPA site visit report; where an issue requires a direct response, the EPA will generate a Compliance Investigation through the EDEN system. You will receive notification when a Compliance Investigation instruction or action is generated.

(ii) Publication of reports and licensee response.

Please note that this Site Visit Report will be made available for public viewing via the EPA’s Licence Enforcement Access Portal within one day of the issue date and will be published on the Licence Details Page of the EPA’s website, www.epa.ie, that relates to your licence 60 calendar days after the issue date.

You may if you choose submit, within 45 calendar days of the issue date of this Site Visit Report, a Licensee Public Response that will be published alongside the Site Visit Report. This Response, should you wish to avail of it, provides you with an opportunity to inform the public about how you are implementing the actions set out in the report, activities underway, timescales and target completion dates. Please be aware that the content of your Licensee Public Response must be factual and should not breach the EPAs stated online publication standards.

If you wish to submit a Licensee Public Response to an EPA Site Visit Report, you should do this by clicking on the ‘Make a Response’ link on the Site Visits page in EDEN. A .pdf document containing your response can be attached and submitted from here.

(iii) Response to Site visit report

Where you do wish to respond directly to a site visit report, you should do this by generating a ‘Licensee Return’ of the type ‘Site Updates/Notifications’ and the sub-type ‘Response to EPA Report’ in EDEN.

Please note that you are required to comply with the conditions of your licence at all times, and where noncompliance occurs you must restore compliance within the shortest possible time. These actions will be verified during subsequent EPA visits.

Please quote the above Inspection Reference Number in any future correspondence in relation to this Report.


http://www.epa.ie/