site selection and gis

35
Using GIS to Assess Parcel Suitability for Potential Park Locations Matthew Mullenax, GISP Berkeley County Planning Commission

Upload: phungnguyet

Post on 14-Feb-2017

231 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Site Selection and GIS

Using GIS to Assess Parcel Suitability for

Potential Park Locations

Matthew Mullenax, GISPBerkeley County Planning Commission

Page 2: Site Selection and GIS

Study Background: 2006 Census estimates list Berkeley County as

one of 100 fastest growing counties in U.S. Growth has had impact on variety of public

services, notably parks and recreation. Berkeley County looking to develop long-range

strategy for park land acquisition. GIS can be used to help locate potential park

sites via suitability modeling. Pilot project performed on Martinsburg, WV.

Page 3: Site Selection and GIS
Page 4: Site Selection and GIS

Suitability Modeling

A measure of the relative usefulness of a land unit for some given purpose.

Typically used to locate something. If designed properly, the model results in

potential locations being identified and assigned a relative suitability score for the activity.

Breaks a big problem down into smaller, easily-solved goals which are combined for a measure of suitability.

Page 5: Site Selection and GIS

Suitability Modeling and GIS

Page 6: Site Selection and GIS

Suitability Modeling and GIS

Weighted combination is one method of suitability modeling.

Page 7: Site Selection and GIS

Suitability Modeling and GIS

Weighted combination is one method of suitability modeling.

Weighted Sum Tool available with ESRI ArcGIS 9.2 Spatial Analyst extension license.

Page 8: Site Selection and GIS

Suitability Modeling and GIS

Weighted combination is one method of suitability modeling.

Weighted Sum Tool available with ESRI ArcGIS 9.2 Spatial Analyst extension license.

Three major steps must be completed before running the tool:

1. Select evaluation or utility scale.2. Set scale or suitability values for

inputs.3. Assign weights to inputs.

Page 9: Site Selection and GIS

Building the model

Appropriate evaluation criteria:

1. Population2. Existing parks3. Roads

Page 10: Site Selection and GIS

Determine suitability of each input

1. Population – high population is preferred2. Existing parks – areas distant from existing

parks preferred3. Roads – close proximity to major roads is

preferred

Page 11: Site Selection and GIS

1. Select evaluation or utility scale

Evaluation or utility scale works to normalize all input raster datasets.

A linear scale of 1 to 9 by 1 has proven to be workable.

>9 values difficult to visually comprehend; <9 values can decrease sensitivity

Page 12: Site Selection and GIS

1 = lowest suitability2 = very low suitability3 = low suitability4 = moderately low suitability5 = moderate suitability6 = moderately high suitability7 = high suitability8 = very high suitability9 = highest suitability

Range of Suitability Values on Utility Scale:

Page 13: Site Selection and GIS

2. Set scale or suitability values for inputs. The cells of each input raster in the analysis are

assigned suitability values from the utility scale. The assignment of suitability values for a single

layer is called Single Utility Assignment (SUA).

Page 14: Site Selection and GIS

Population input

Central Dispatch address locations Perform Density calculation Use Reclassify tool to assign suitability values

on utility scale (1 to 9 by 1)

Page 15: Site Selection and GIS

Set scale values for Population input

Reclassify

9 – 11 – 158 – 7.9 – 107 – 6.2 – 7.8 6 – 4.8 – 6.15 – 3.6 – 4.74 – 2.5 – 3.53 – 1.6 – 2.42 – 0.52 – 1.51 – 0 – 0.51

Page 16: Site Selection and GIS

Existing Parks input

Existing Martinsburg parks (9) Perform Distance calculation Use Reclassify tool to assign suitability values on

utility scale (1 to 9 by 1)

Page 17: Site Selection and GIS

Set scale values for Parks input

9 – > 5280 feet8 – 4621 - 52807 – 3961 - 46206 – 3301 - 39605 – 2641 - 33004 – 1981 - 26403 – 1321 - 19802 – 661 - 13201 – 0 – 660

Reclassify

Page 18: Site Selection and GIS

Roads input

Major roads (Routes 9, 11, and 45, King and Queen Streets, Edwin Miller Boulevard, Tavern Road)

Perform Distance calculation Use Reclassify tool to assign suitability values on

utility scale (1 to 9 by 1)

Page 19: Site Selection and GIS

Set scale values for Roads input

9 – 0 – 660 feet8 – 661 – 13207 – 1321 – 19806 – 1981 – 26405 – 2641 – 33004 – 3301 – 39603 – 3961 – 46202 – 4621 – 52801 – > 5280

Reclassify

Page 20: Site Selection and GIS

3. Assign weights to inputs Each input is weighted,

or assigned a percentage influence, based on its importance.

The total influence for all inputs must equal 100 percent.

Total Suitability = (criteria1 * weight1) + (criteria2 * weight2) + ... + (criterian * weightn)

Page 21: Site Selection and GIS

3. Assign weights to inputs Each input is weighted,

or assigned a percentage influence, based on its importance.

The total influence for all inputs must equal 100 percent.

Total Suitability = (criteria1 * weight1) + (criteria2 * weight2) + ... + (criterian * weightn)

Page 22: Site Selection and GIS

(10%)

(45%)

SUAs combined to create Multiple Utility Assignment (MUA)

(45%)

Page 23: Site Selection and GIS

Results in Suitability Map

Page 24: Site Selection and GIS

Implementing the Suitability Map by Parcel Assessment

Page 25: Site Selection and GIS

Implementing the Suitability Map by Parcel Assessment Parcel assessment

conducted using Zonal Statistics as Table Tool.

Page 26: Site Selection and GIS

Implementing the Suitability Map by Parcel Assessment Parcel assessment

conducted using Zonal Statistics as Table Tool.

Tool calculates a variety of statistics on values of a raster within the “zones” of another dataset.

Page 27: Site Selection and GIS

Using Zonal Statistics as Table Tool

Zone Layer is Parcel data.

Value Raster is MUA. Creates table of

statistics joined to Parcel data by unique PIN#.

Page 28: Site Selection and GIS

Parcel Assessment

Parcels mapped by MAX suitability value.

Use of MEAN causes smaller parcels to have higher values overall than larger parcels.

Page 29: Site Selection and GIS

Parcel Assessment (cont’d)

Select all parcels with score > 6.75. Five areas identified. First area apartment complex adjacent to school

playground & church ball field (Martin’s Landing). Second area apartment complex in commercial

area (Courthouse Apartments). Third area in large, phased subdivision in recently

annexed West Side area (The Gallery). Fourth area apartment complex with playground

(Fountainhead Apartments). Fifth area Downtown.

Page 30: Site Selection and GIS
Page 31: Site Selection and GIS

Parcel Assessment (cont’d)

Inspect selected parcels ownership information, current use, etc. and determine feasibility.

If parcels unfeasible, run new query using next highest suitability values and re-perform inspection on newly selected parcels.

Page 32: Site Selection and GIS
Page 33: Site Selection and GIS

Study Limitations/Future Considerations Spatial accuracy of Roads and Address inputs in

few small areas. Lack of separation between residential vs. non-

residential addresses. Parks layer does not include school, church, and/or

subdivision improved open spaces. County inholdings, right-of-ways, municipal

boundary shape have potential to influence results. Method of weight determination not overly rigorous. Consider creating distance grid from all roads vs.

only major roads.

Page 34: Site Selection and GIS

Acknowledgements:

Steve CatlettMartinsburg-Berkeley County Parks & Recreation

Page 35: Site Selection and GIS

Questions?

Matthew Mullenax, GISP GIS Coordinator Berkeley County Planning Commission 400 West Stephen Street, Suite 203 Martinsburg, WV 25401 PH - (304) 267-5107 FX - (304) 262-3127 [email protected]