site characterization report and source removal … · sap sampling and analysis plan xrf x-ray...

$: SITE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT AND SOURCE REMOVAL … · SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan XRF x-ray fluorescence . AMEC Project No. 14161140 1 r:\16114 - adot glacier hwy\002\characterization$
SITE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT AND SOURCE REMOVAL REMEDIATION PLAN Glacier Highway Battery Investigation

Juneau, Alaska Prepared for:

Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Juneau, Alaska

Prepared by:

AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 600 University Street, Suite 600 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 342-1760

July 2014

Project No. SE14161140

R:\16114 - ADOT Glacier Hwy\002\Cert.docx

SITE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT AND SOURCE REMOVAL REMEDIATION PLAN Glacier Highway Battery Investigation Juneau, Alaska

July 1, 2014 Project SE14161140

This report was prepared by Nathan Moxley, of AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc., under the supervision of Natasya Gray, Associate Geologist, whose signatures appear here on.

Nathan Moxley is the qualified personnel who collected samples and interpreted data from the Glacier Highway Battery Dump Site, recognized in the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation File No: 1531.38.006, for this report.

Nathan Moxley, LG Technical Professional 3 Geologist

Natasya Gray, LG Associate Geologist

AMEC Project No. 14161140 i r:\16114 - adot glacier hwy\002\characterization report and workplan_sx.docx

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION ............................................................................................... 3

2.0 INVESTIGATION METHODS .................................................................................................... 5 2.1 XRF FIELD SCREENING ................................................................................................... 5 2.2 SOIL SAMPLE COLLECTION .............................................................................................. 6 2.3 LOGGING OF BORINGS ..................................................................................................... 7

3.0 INVESTIGATION RESULTS ..................................................................................................... 9 3.1 XRF FIELD SCREENING RESULTS .................................................................................... 9 3.2 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS .............................................................................. 10 3.3 DATA QUALITY EVALUATION ........................................................................................... 12

4.0 UPDATED CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL ............................................................................... 13

5.0 REMEDIAL EXCAVATION PLAN ............................................................................................ 15 5.1 EXCAVATION EXTENT ..................................................................................................... 15 5.2 FIELD SCREENING AND CONFIRMATION SOIL SAMPLING .................................................. 16 5.3 BACKFILL AND RESTORATION ......................................................................................... 16

6.0 WASTE MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................................... 17 6.1 SITE INVESTIGATION WASTE .......................................................................................... 17 6.2 EXCAVATION WASTE ...................................................................................................... 17

6.2.1 Waste Storage ................................................................................................. 18 6.2.2 Waste Transportation ....................................................................................... 18

7.0 SCHEDULE ............................................................................................................................. 19

8.0 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 21

TABLES

Table 1 XRF Field Screening Results Table 2 Soil Analytical Results Table 3 IDW Soil Analytical Results

FIGURES

Figure 1 Site Vicinity Figure 2 Soil Sample Locations Figure 3 Cross Section A Figure 4 Cross Section B

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

AMEC ii Project No. 14161140

r:\16114 - adot glacier hwy\002\characterization report and workplan_sx.docx

APPENDICES

Appendix A Comparison of XRF Results to Laboratory Analytical Results Appendix B Boring Logs Appendix C Site Photos Appendix D Laboratory Data Package and Data Quality Review Appendix E Draft Interim Action Removal Plan

AMEC Project No. 14161140 iii r:\16114 - adot glacier hwy\002\characterization report and workplan_sx.docx

ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS

ADEC Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation

ADOT&PF Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities

AMEC AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.

ARI Analytical Resources, Inc.

bgs below ground surface

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

HDPE high density polyethylene

IDW investigation derived waste

mg/kg milligrams per kilogram

NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

ppm parts per million

RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

ROW right-of-way

SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan

XRF x-ray fluorescence

AMEC Project No. 14161140 1 r:\16114 - adot glacier hwy\002\characterization report and workplan_sx.docx

SITE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT AND SOURCE REMOVAL REMEDIATION PLAN

Glacier Highway Battery Investigation Juneau, Alaska

1.0 INTRODUCTION

AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (AMEC), prepared this Site Characterization Report and

Source Removal Remediation Plan on behalf of the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public

Facilities (ADOT&PF). This report presents the findings of a site investigation and remediation plan

related to soil contamination within the Glacier Highway right-of-way (ROW) in the vicinity of 11385

Glacier Highway, in Juneau, Alaska (Figure 1). AMEC conducted the site investigation in June 2014 to

delineate areas of lead-contaminated soil to be removed and disposed of during future planned

excavation.

The site investigation was conducted in accordance with the Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP)

(AMEC, 2014), which was approved by the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation

(ADEC) on June 4, 2014 (ADEC, 2014a).

1.1 OBJECTIVES

The objective of the site investigation was to delineate the area within the Glacier Highway ROW

where lead contaminated soils are present. The soils within the ROW are impacted by metals,

primarily lead, and debris from lead acid batteries that were improperly disposed of on the site

resulting in lead concentrations above the ADEC Method 2 soil cleanup level of 400 milligrams per

kilogram (mg/kg), as defined in 18 Alaska Administrative Code 75.341.

The findings of the site investigation were used to prepare a source removal and remediation plan that

will be used for planning purposes for the construction contract for the proposed road improvement

construction project. The objective of the source removal remediation is to remove all battery debris

and associated lead- contaminated soil with lead concentrations above 400 mg/kg within the ROW.

AMEC 2 Project No. 14161140


1.2 BACKGROUND

The Glacier Highway battery dump is a dump site for batteries, battery-related components, and

general debris that originated from the Hagmeier property, which is located at 11385 Glacier Highway

in Juneau, Alaska (ADEC, 2014b; BNCI, 2009). Based on historical investigations, the battery waste

area was observed to extend across the Hagmeier property line onto two adjacent parcels (Figure 2):

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) parcel at 11309 Glacier Highway, and

The Glacier Highway ROW, owned by ADOT&PF.

The Glacier Highway ROW abuts two properties to the west of the battery dump: the Hagmeier

property at 11385 Glacier Highway and the NOAA parcel at 11305 Glacier Highway. Glacier Highway

and the Hagmeier driveway are elevated above the battery dump site to the east and north,

respectively. The battery dump site slopes down to the south and west through portions of the ROW

and Hagemier property, and onto the NOAA property. The ROW is heavily vegetated in the vicinity of

the battery dump, with shot rock present over the portions of the dump that were previously

excavated.

Battery waste was observed to be sloughing onto the NOAA property from the adjacent Hagmeier

property prior to 2003, when construction of the Auke Bay Laboratory on the NOAA parcel began

(ADEC, 2014b). NOAA reported this information to ADEC at that time.

In 2003, NOAA conducted an Interim Removal Action to remove approximately 6 cubic yards of

contaminated soil and battery debris that was the apparent source of lead contamination on the

NOAA parcel. NOAA’s contractor, CCI Inc., also removed approximately 4,000 pounds of non-battery

related debris (CCI, 2003). The 2003 interim action did not remove all of the battery waste, and

another interim action excavation was undertaken by NOAA in 2008.

In 2008, NOAA contracted with BNC International to remove another 5 to 6 cubic yards of soil

contaminated with battery waste. The 2008 excavation was halted when it became apparent that

complete removal of the battery waste was not possible without compromising the Glacier Highway

embankment. Continued excavation into the embankment may have destabilized the highway.

As part of the 2008 work, BNCI collected soil confirmation samples from soil left in place within the

embankment west of Glacier Highway, which is within the highway ROW. Paired samples were

collected at different depths to characterize the vertical extent of contamination below the soil horizon

affected by battery debris, reported to be approximately 4 feet below ground surface (bgs) and 1 foot

thick (BNCI, 2009). Lead concentrations in soil from the battery-affected soil horizon were


4,980 mg/kg and 38,900 mg/kg. The paired samples from 12–20 inches below these two samples

contained lead concentrations of 330 and 13.2 mg/kg, respectively. A third sample from the interval

12–20 inches below the battery-affected soil horizon contained lead at a concentration of 16.9 mg/kg.

All three of these samples were below the 400 mg/kg cleanup level (BNCI, 2009).

In 2014, ADOT&PF began planning for realignment of the Glacier Highway, and identified the former

battery dump as part of the environmental review process. The highway project offers a good

opportunity to remove remaining battery-related waste and contaminated soil while ADOT&PF is

completing realignment activities. ADOT&PF commissioned AMEC to evaluate the area of

lead-contaminated soil and assist in planning for removal of contaminated material as part of the

highway project.

1.3 SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION

AMEC conducted the June 2014 site investigation within the Glacier Highway ROW. Sampling did not

extend onto the privately-owned Hagmeier property or NOAA parcel. Based on previous

investigations that showed the extent of affected soil was relatively shallow and only extended slightly

below the depth of the observed battery waste material, sampling was limited to only soil. Surface

water was not sampled, and groundwater was not encountered. Although surface water was not

sampled, two soil samples were collected in proximity to the small stream flowing through a culvert

under the Glacier Highway, south of the apparent lead-affected area. The sampling results are

discussed in Sections 3.1 and 3.2.



This page intentionally left blank.


2.0 INVESTIGATION METHODS

Field work was conducted on June 9 – 11, 2014. AMEC personnel oversaw the installation of 11 soil

borings using direct push drilling, and seven borings advanced using hand augering techniques.

GeoTek Alaska, an Alaska based drilling company, performed the drilling work under direction of an

AMEC geologist.

Borings were named with the prefix “SB” for soil boring, and numbered consecutively from 1 through

18. The boring locations were spread widely across the area, and are shown on Figure 2. Samples

collected from each boring were identified by the boring name (e.g., SB-1) followed by the depth bgs

that each sample was collected from. For example, sample ‘SB-3-5.0-6.0’ was collected from boring

SB-3, from 5.0 to 6.0 feet bgs. Sample intervals from each boring were selected based primarily on

results of field screening using a portable x-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF). These samples

were analyzed by an off-site laboratory and the results were used, along with field screening, to

delineate the extent of battery-affected material in the area.

Field procedures were followed, as described in the ADEC-approved SAP. As expected, several

boring locations were advanced using hand augering techniques due to access limitations for the

drilling equipment. Borings SB-1 through SB-11 were advanced using a direct push drill rig, and

borings SB-12 through SB-18 were advanced using a hand auger. Borings advanced via hand auger

could not be advanced as deep as those using direct push drilling.

Samples were collected from at least one interval in each boring, and in most locations samples were

collected from multiple intervals. Lead concentrations in soil were screened in each boring using an

XRF across the full depth of the boring. Samples were then selected for laboratory analysis based on

the results of XRF screening and their location. In general, the interval(s) with the highest lead

concentrations, as measured with the XRF, were retained for laboratory analysis. Where possible,

additional samples were collected from shallower and deeper intervals in an attempt to better define

the vertical extent of lead-contaminated soil in each boring. If XRF screening did not indicate elevated

lead concentrations in a boring, samples were selected for laboratory analysis based on their location

in order to provide good spatial and vertical sample coverage across the area.

2.1 XRF FIELD SCREENING

The XRF instrument used for field screening was a Delta Innov-X environmental soil analyzer. This

instrument was factory calibrated, and it has an auto standardization feature every time it is powered

on. The instrument is capable of measuring lead concentrations in soil as low as 10 mg/kg. After first

powering on the instrument and running the self standardization, a manual check of the instrument

was made using a lead standard with a known concentration of 1,100 parts per million (ppm) lead.



Manual measurement of the standard yielded a lead concentration of 1,060 ppm lead +/- 24 ppm,

which is less than a 5 percent variation. Field screening proceeded once it was determined the XRF

was functioning properly.

After advancing a soil boring, soil from the boring was screened across the depth of the boring using a

portable XRF. The primary method of screening was to collect an aliquot of soil across a selected

interval, and homogenize the sample in a plastic zippered bag. Once homogenized, pieces of gravel

and rocks larger than approximately ½-inch in diameter were removed from the sample. The bagged

sample was then oriented so that a layer of soil at least ½-inch thick and 2 inches in diameter was flat

against the bottom of the plastic bag, the air was removed from the bag, and the sample was

analyzed by the XRF directly through the plastic. The XRF manufacturer recommends a minimum soil

thickness of ½ inch using this method, and notes it is acceptable to take measurements through a

plastic bag. This method was used to screen soil in all borings that were advanced using a hand

auger, as well as many of the direct-push borings. In selected direct-push soil cores, additional XRF

measurements were made directly on the soil core at discrete depths, rather than across a depth

interval.

The results of all field screening for lead are shown on Table 1 and selected results shown on Figures

3 and 4. Where time allowed, multiple XRF measurements were taken at some locations, and those

results are also included in Table 1. If multiple measurements were made at a sample location, only

the highest XRF measurement was reported for a selected location and depth on the figures. A

discussion on the comparison of portable XRF data to analytical laboratory data is included in

Appendix A.

2.2 SOIL SAMPLE COLLECTION

Soil samples were collected from each boring for laboratory analysis. Samples were selected for

analysis based on XRF screening data and field observations to provide good spatial coverage across

the area of investigation.

In direct push borings, soil samples were collected directly from disposable acetate liners, and placed

directly into laboratory-supplied sampling containers. Soil from hand auger borings was placed into a

new, dedicated plastic bag before being transferred to laboratory-supplied sampling containers. All

non-dedicated sampling equipment, including drill rods, hand augers, and sampling spoons, were

decontaminated between sample locations by washing with an Alconox soap solution and rinsing with

distilled water.

The horizontal location of each boring was measured from available landmarks. The approximate

relative elevation of each boring was recorded in reference to the Glacier Highway road surface.


The soil samples retained for analysis were shipped to Analytical Resources, Inc. (ARI), an

Alaska-certified environmental testing laboratory based in Tukwila, Washington. Standard procedures

were followed using chain-of-custody forms for all samples sent to the laboratory, as described in the

SAP. Samples were analyzed following the protocol presented in the SAP.

2.3 LOGGING OF BORINGS

All subsurface borings were logged continuously by a field geologist to the soil boring’s total depth,

following the procedures described in the SAP and outlined below. An attempt was made to visually

identify where battery-affected soils were present, though the small diameter (1.5-2 inches) of direct-

push drilling methods prevented any direct visual identification of the battery-affected soil horizon. The

same was true for hand auger locations. In addition to visual inspection for signs of battery debris, a

portable, hand-held XRF spectrometer was used in the field to record relative lead concentrations in

each soil core and to help identify whether lead-affected soil was present. The lithologic log for each

boring is based on visual observation and description of the corresponding soil samples in

accordance with ASTM D2488. Boring logs can be found in Appendix B.

Each sample lithologic description contained the following information:

Boring identifier;

Sample depth interval, in feet bgs;

Color;

Signs of weathering (e.g., rust-colored stains or coatings) where present;

Texture (particle size, angularity/roundness, and degree of sorting);

Soil type, based on the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM International D2487-98);

Estimated moisture content (qualitative);

Organic matter (e.g., plant detritus, woody or fibrous vegetative matter, shell fragments), if any; and

Noticeable odor, staining, and/or presence of foreign debris (e.g., battery components, or other waste debris associated with the battery-affected horizon), if any.


3.0 INVESTIGATION RESULTS

Results of XRF field screening are presented in Table 1 and discussed in Section 3.1. The XRF field

screening showed only four boring locations with soil containing lead concentrations above the ADEC

Method 2 cleanup level for lead of 400 mg/kg. Those borings were SB-1, SB-5, SB-15, and SB-17.

Table 2 shows the laboratory results of these samples and all other samples selected for laboratory

analysis. Laboratory results are also discussed in Section 3.2. A comparison of XRF results to

analytical results is included as Appendix A. Boring logs for all borings are presented in Appendix B.

3.1 XRF FIELD SCREENING RESULTS

Selected XRF data are shown in Figures 3 and 4. Sampling locations are shown on Figure 2.

Boring SB-1 was advanced just north of the northern end of the highway guard rail, adjacent to the

Hagmeier driveway. Lead was measured in soil from boring SB-1 at 1,243 mg/kg in the 1.25–2.5 feet

bgs depth interval. The shallower interval of 0.0–1.25 feet bgs had elevated lead concentrations, but

did not exceed 400 mg/kg, suggesting that the top approximately 1 foot of soil in this location is below

the cleanup level. The depth interval immediately below 2.5 feet bgs was not recovered during drilling,

however, the interval from 5.0–8.5 feet was recovered, and XRF screening of these intervals showed

a lead concentration of 14 mg/kg.

Boring SB-5 was advanced at the southern edge of the driveway to the Hagmeier garage, within the

Glacier Highway ROW. This boring had a shallow layer of surface soil on top of an old asphalt surface

for the driveway. XRF screening of the asphalt layer was below the instrument’s detection level for

lead of 12 mg/kg. Below the asphalt from 0.6–2.0 feet bgs, lead was measured at 733 mg/kg.

However, in the layer immediately below, from 2.0–3.0 feet bgs, lead was only measured at 12 mg/kg,

suggesting that lead contamination in this area is limited to the upper 2 feet of soil.

Boring SB-15 was advanced west of the highway guard rail, along the embankment above the 2008

NOAA excavation, approximately 4 feet east of the eastern excavation extent. This boring was only

4 feet east of soil containing partially-intact battery cases visible at the east end of the 2008

excavation (photo 1 in Appendix C). Screening of surface soil from this boring to a depth of 1.5 feet

suggested lead concentrations were below 56 mg/kg. However, soil from 1.5–2.0 feet bgs had lead

concentrations as high as 6,311 mg/kg; from 2.0–2.75 feet bgs, lead was measured as high as

2,555 mg/kg. The boring could not be advanced below 2.75 feet bgs due to refusal encountered

during hand augering.

Boring SB-17 was advanced in the approximate center of the 2008 NOAA excavation, which was

actually on the ADOT&PF ROW property. Shot rock was temporarily placed aside, and a small cut



was made through the high density polyethylene (HDPE) liner and geotextile fabric covering the

previous excavation. A shallow soil sample was collected immediately beneath the liner, extending to

a depth of 0.5 foot bgs (as measured from the soil surface beneath the shot rock). This sample had

the highest lead concentration as measured with the XRF, with a maximum value of 37,929 mg/kg.

Field screening results for lead in the remaining borings showed lead concentrations below

400 mg/kg. Borings SB-4, SB-6, and SB-11 had detections above 100 mg/kg; however, the maximum

detection was 197 mg/kg in boring SB-11 at a depth of 5.5 feet. Laboratory analysis from these

borings confirmed lead concentrations were well below the 400 mg/kg cleanup level.

In general, most XRF field screening results were comparable to laboratory results. At higher values

(greater than 1,000 mg/kg), the XRF results tended to be more variable than at lower concentrations.

For a full discussion on the comparison between XRF field screening and laboratory results, see

Appendix A. Although there were some differences between field screening results and laboratory

results, the differences were generally small, and the XRF still proved to be a valuable screening tool

for the investigation. The portable XRF detector results can be quite variable, even between different

measurements of the same soil sample. However, this is also true of laboratory samples, and reflects

the often heterogeneous nature of metals contamination in soils.

3.2 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Samples were selected for laboratory analysis based primarily on results of field screening for lead

using a portable XRF. All samples that exceeded the cleanup level in field screening were selected for

analysis, along with selected samples from all other borings except borings SB-9, SB-12, and SB-14.

Samples from these borings were not analyzed because XRF field screening data did not suggest

elevated lead concentrations, and because additional borings had already been advanced closer to

the area of suspected contamination. SB-9 was east of borings SB-2 and SB-3; SB-14 was south of

and very close to boring SB-16; and boring SB-12 was south of boring SB-13.

All samples were submitted to ARI, an ADEC-accredited laboratory located in Tukwila, Washington.

Laboratory results for samples selected for follow-up analysis confirmed what XRF field screening

suggested: that only four boring locations had lead concentrations in soil above the ADEC Method 2

cleanup level for lead of 400 mg/kg. Those borings were SB-1, SB-5, SB-15, and SB-17. Results are

shown in Table 2 and on Figures 3 and 4.

Soil in boring SB-1 exceeded the cleanup level from 1.25–2.5 feet bgs, with a concentration of

1,460 mg/kg. Shallower soil, although elevated, was below the cleanup level with a concentration of

253 mg/kg between 0 and 1.25 feet bgs. Soil between 5.0 and 6.75 feet bgs was only 5 mg/kg,

suggesting lead contaminated soil is limited to a maximum depth of 5 feet bgs in this location.


Soil in boring SB-5 exceeded the cleanup level from 0.6–2.0 feet bgs with a lead concentration of

736 mg/kg. Deeper soil from 2.0–3.0 feet bgs was below the laboratory reporting limit of 6 mg/kg. This

suggests that contaminated soil is limited to a depth of 2 feet bgs along the northern crest of the

embankment near the Hagmeier garage.

Lead concentrations in boring SB-15 were 1,360 and 1,330 mg/kg between 1.5–2.0 feet bgs, and

2.0-2.5 feet bgs, respectively. XRF field screening data suggests that soil from 2.5–2.75 feet bgs has

concentrations similar to that found from 1.5–2.5 feet bgs. XRF screening data also suggest that

shallower soil above 1.5 feet bgs is well below the cleanup level.

The lead concentration in boring SB-17 was the highest concentration measured in any of the soil

samples, at 50,400 mg/kg. This sample was collected from an area that was already excavated in

2008, suggesting that the area of previous excavation will require further excavation as part of any

future cleanup of lead-contaminated soils in the Glacier Highway ROW. Battery terminal caps were

visible directly under the HDPE liner, adjacent to the shallow boring.

Samples analyzed from the remaining borings were all below the cleanup level for lead.

Several borings were advanced outside of the area of suspected contamination in an effort to

thoroughly document conditions across the ROW. Borings SB-8 and SB-11 were advanced north of

the Hagmeier driveway to investigate the potential for battery debris to have been dumped in this

area. Both XRF field screening and laboratory analysis confirm lead concentrations in soil are well

below cleanup levels in this area.

Borings SB-12 and SB-13 were advanced south of the suspected area of contamination in an effort to

document conditions near the small stream that flows through a culvert under the Glacier Highway.

Boring SB-13 was advanced in the general vicinity of the former stream channel (BNCI, 2009 and

CCI, 2003). This stream channel was reportedly rerouted away from the area of previous excavation

in 2003, and again in 2008 after it apparently returned to its original channel. Lead concentrations in

soil from SB-13 were well below the cleanup level. During the June 2014 investigation, the stream

appeared to be flowing along a course between the former channel and the reported rerouted

channel. Sample SB-12 was collected in the approximate vicinity of the rerouted channel. XRF field

screening of soil in SB-12 suggested very low lead concentrations, and the sample was not selected

for laboratory analysis.

One additional boring was advanced further downslope along the former stream channel to

investigate the potential for lead contamination south of the 2008 excavation. Boring SB-18 was

advanced along the ROW boundary, in the approximate location of the former stream channel, and



approximately nine feet south of the southern extent of the 2008 excavation. Both XRF screening and

laboratory results indicate the presence of lead concentrations in soil; however, the

laboratory -reported concentration of 169 mg/kg is below the cleanup level of 400 mg/kg.

In addition to lead, five samples from five borings (SB-1, SB-5, SB-6, SB-15, and SB-17) were

selected for analysis of the full Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) list of eight metals

(arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver). The full list of RCRA 8

metals was analyzed because environmental risks associated with batteries can include other metals

besides lead. In addition, the RCRA 8 data will be helpful in obtaining a waste disposal

characterization profile to use during the remedial action. Samples were chosen for laboratory

analysis of RCRA 8 metals based on XRF field screening for the samples with the highest expected

lead concentrations. Excluding lead, arsenic was the only metal on the RCRA 8 metals list that was

found to exceed the relevant ADEC Method 2 soil cleanup levels. Three of the five samples analyzed

for the RCRA 8 metals exceeded the ADEC Method 2 soil cleanup level for arsenic of 3.7 mg/kg.

Those samples were SB-1-1.25-2.5, SB-6-0.9-2.0, and SB-17-0.0-0.5 with arsenic concentrations of

12 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, and 40 mg/kg, respectively. However, as noted in the ADEC Method 2 soil

cleanup levels table, arsenic needs to be evaluated as a contaminant of potential concern on a site-

specific basis. One of the primarily uses of metallic arsenic prior to the 1970s was as an additive to

lead used in lead acid batteries (Loebenstein, 1994) so it is feasible that the arsenic presence

coincides with the lead contamination. However, lead concentrations were consistently much higher

and therefore more likely to be an indicative compound to use in determining cleanup scope and

verification.

3.3 DATA QUALITY EVALUATION

The laboratory data was reviewed and evaluated, and found to be acceptable and to meet the data

quality objectives for the project. The laboratory data, data quality review memo, and laboratory data

review checklist can be found in Appendix D.


4.0 UPDATED CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL

Based on previous interim action cleanup efforts by NOAA, the battery dump site occupied portions of

three properties: the Hegmeier property, the NOAA parcel, and the Glacier Highway ROW. The

primary constituent of concern is lead; however, arsenic was also found to exceed ADEC Method 2

soil cleanup levels in at least three locations. No other RCRA 8 metals were found to exceed their

associated cleanup levels. The majority of the battery debris was removed from all three properties

during interim action excavations in 2003 and 2008. Although approximately 12 cubic yards of lead

contaminated soil was removed during these interim action excavations, recent sampling indicates

significant lead concentrations in soil still remain within the former excavation area.

Following the interim action excavation in 2008, battery debris was observed to be present near the

northern and eastern excavation extents. During the 2014 site investigation, battery debris was

confirmed to be present in soil along the eastern excavation extent (photo 1 in Appendix C). Battery

debris also was evident in the center of the former excavation, in the vicinity of boring SB-17.

At the eastern extent of the 2008 excavation, at the base of the Glacier Highway embankment (within

the ROW), the upper limit of the battery-affected soil horizon was reported to be approximately

4 feet bgs (BNCI, 2009). Battery debris was observed in this area at an approximate depth of 2.5 feet

during the 2014 Investigation. The 2009 BNCI report suggests the battery-affected soil horizon was

oriented along the former slope of the highway embankment prior to the widening of the Glacier

Highway. The highway was then widened at some point after the battery waste was dumped. Results

of the 2014 investigation are consistent with this conceptual model.

In 2008, the battery-affected soil horizon was observed to be approximately 1 foot thick near the base

of the highway embankment. Results of depth profile soil sampling suggested that the vertical extent

of soil with lead concentrations in excess of the 400 mg/kg cleanup level is limited to approximately 12

to 20 inches below the base of the battery-affected horizon. Thus, the total thickness of the

battery-contaminated soil horizon and suspected contaminated soil beneath that horizon would be

approximately 3 feet (BNCI, 2009). This is consistent with observations from borings during the 2014

investigation (e.g., SB-1 and SB-5).

As shown in Figures 3 and 4, the vertical extent of impacted soil does not extend below the

groundwater table in the Glacier Highway ROW. The lateral extent of contamination is limited to an

area approximately 30 feet long (north – south), extending south from the Hagmeier driveway at

11385 Glacier Highway, and approximately 15 feet wide, extending east from the western Glacier

highway ROW boundary. It is unknown how far lead contaminated soils extend west of the Highway

ROW on either the Hagmeier or NOAA properties.


5.0 REMEDIAL EXCAVATION PLAN

The proposed removal action is described in this section. The proposed excavation boundaries

encompass all locations identified within the ROW where concentrations above the 400 mg/kg

cleanup level were detected. Draft construction design drawings and specifications in the form of

construction notes on the drawings, are presented in Appendix E.

Based on discussions with ADOT&PF, we understand that remedial excavation will occur during the

summer of 2015, as part of the Glacier Highway realignment in this area. Therefore, it is assumed that

the excavation will proceed after the highway, guard rail, and utilities have been realigned. (e.g., a

water main and two communication lines identified during the 2014 investigation). This will allow the

excavation to proceed as an open face excavation with no restrictions on sloping or preserving

utilities. This will help reduce both the length and overall cost of the project.

5.1 EXCAVATION EXTENT

The proposed horizontal and vertical limits of excavation are shown on Figures 2 through 4. Actual

excavation depths and extent will be determined during excavation by field screening with an XRF,

and collecting confirmation samples from the bottom and sidewalls of the excavation.

The proposed excavation extent is limited to the Glacier Highway ROW and covers an area

approximately 30 feet long (north – south) by approximately 15 feet wide (east to west). Total plan

view area is estimated to be approximately 420 square feet. The proposed vertical extent of the

excavation is a minimum of 2 feet below the deepest interval with lead concentrations above the

cleanup level. This 2-foot distance is based on discrete depth sampling (, as described in Section

4.0.The proposed horizontal excavation boundaries will be marked in the field prior to the start of

excavation.

As shown on Figure 3, the deepest soil sample exceeding cleanup levels was SB-15 at a depth of

2.75 feet bgs. Therefore, total excavation depth is expected to be approximately 4.75 feet bgs in this

area. Assuming a maximum depth of 4.75 feet across the affected area of 420 square feet, an

estimated 74 cubic yards of material requires removal. If an additional 25 percent is included to

account for potential sidewall sloughing, and/or additional excavation depth or lateral extent, a

conservative estimate of approximately 94 cubic yards of material could require excavation.

Using an approximate conversion of 1.7 tons per cubic yard, the maximum expected weight of

excavated soil requiring disposal is expected to be approximately 160 tons. This volume may be

reduced by segregating overlying soil that does not exceed cleanup levels, and/or by carefully



screening soil during excavation to reduce the overall depth. In addition, larger debris such as

cobbles, boulders, or logs should be sorted during excavation to further reduce disposal costs.

During excavation, a qualified person, as defined by ADEC, will oversee the excavation to field screen

soil requiring removal, and verify that all soils in excess of cleanup levels have been removed. In

addition, laboratory confirmation samples will be collected along the excavation bottom and sidewalls,

as discussed in Section 6.2.

5.2 FIELD SCREENING AND CONFIRMATION SOIL SAMPLING

Field screening will be done by a qualified person using a portable XRF soil analyzer. Screening will

follow the procedures outlined in the SAP, and as described in Section 3.1. The qualified person

performing field screening will direct the excavation contractor on where to dig, and whether the

extent of excavation has been reached. Once XRF field screening has identified the spatial and

vertical extents of excavation, confirmation soil samples will be collected along the excavation bottom

and sidewalls. Confirmation soil samples will be collected from the bottom of the excavation

approximately every 100 square feet. Sidewall samples will be collected every 20 linear feet.

Assuming an approximate area of 420 square feet, this would require up to 5 bottom samples, and

approximately 6 sidewall samples, depending on the shape of the excavation.

5.3 BACKFILL AND RESTORATION

Final requirements for backfill will be determined by ADOT&PF. At a minimum, the excavation should

be covered with a suitable topsoil material and seeded as quickly as possible to reduce erosion and

sediment discharge.


6.0 WASTE MANAGEMENT

The final handling and disposal of the excavated material will be determined by ADOT&PF. This

section describes how waste from the 2014 investigation was handled and the plan for waste

management during the planned excavation project.

6.1 SITE INVESTIGATION WASTE

The 2014 site investigation generated one 55-gallon drum with approximately 15 gallons of combined

soil cuttings and decontamination water. A composite sample of the soil prior to mixing with

decontamination water was submitted to ARI for analysis of RCRA 8 metals. Results showed

relatively low concentrations of lead at 12 mg/kg (Table 3). Arsenic was not detected above the

laboratory reporting limit. These low results are likely based on the wide sampling area that

encompassed multiple uncontaminated locations. These results indicate the investigation-derived

waste would not require management, as hazardous waste and the material can be handled by

ADOT&PF as part of solid waste management.

6.2 EXCAVATION WASTE

ADOT&PF will properly handle, accumulate and temporarily store, transport, and dispose of project-

derived wastes in accordance with local, state, and federal requirements. Trained and experienced

personnel will be present during all cleanup activities to arrange initial waste segregation, storage,

and coordination of both on-site and off-site disposal activities. The primary waste-related project

activities include early identification and pre-planning for expected waste sources, characterization of

wastes, interim and centralized accumulation and storage, and timely transportation and disposal of

wastes. Large boulders and rocks at the surface will be placed aside for reuse and not disposed of.

The project is expected to generate a small amount of non-hazardous solid waste that will be

disposed off site in a Subtitle D landfill. This material would include sources such as contaminated soil

not designated as dangerous waste (if any), miscellaneous soil/sludge, etc. that may be generated

from various equipment operations, site cleanup equipment, and spent disposable personal protective

equipment.

The project is expected to generate approximately 160 tons of hazardous waste. Due to the elevated

concentrations of lead known to be present in the planned excavation area, ADOT&PF plans to

handle the entire volume excavated as part of the remedial action as hazardous waste and profile and

dispose of it as such. ADOT&PF will mobilize an appropriate shipping container(s) during the project

and place all soil excavated within the footprint shown in Figure 2 in the shipping container via

ADOT&PF-approved containment for hazardous waste in transit. Existing test results should be



sufficient for waste profiling. However, it is possible that the landfill may require additional analyses.

This matter will be discussed with the receiving landfill to meet their requirements.

It is anticipated that all excavated material will be disposed of at a Subtitle C landfill.

6.2.1 Waste Storage

Waste accumulation methods may include surface stockpiles, drums, or bulk storage containers

(super-sacks, totes, or bins), as appropriate for the waste. Any suspect contaminated soil

(undesignated waste) will be separately stored on plastic sheeting and covered with plastic sheeting

to protect it against erosion while awaiting analytical test results. Once the waste has been

characterized, it will be shipped off site for disposal.

ADOT&PF will properly label waste in accordance with federal regulations, and as directed by the

landfill and DOT approved transported. Waste accumulation time will be tracked for containerized

wastes in accordance with 40 CFR 262. Containerized wastes will not be stored on site for more than

90 days. Contaminated remediation wastes shall be managed in a manner that prevents releases of

contamination to the ground or air.

6.2.2 Waste Transportation

A qualified subcontractor(s) with current insurance, trained and qualified personnel (commercial

driver’s licenses and required endorsements), and an identification number (40 CFR 263) from the

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will be used for transportation of hazardous wastes. ADOT will

coordinate preparation of waste profile documents, bills of lading, manifests, land ban forms, and

other required documentation for the proper transportation of project-derived wastes.


7.0 SCHEDULE

ADOT&PF plans to proceed with highway realignment and remedial action planning over the next

several months and to mobilize for implementation in summer 2015. ADOT will keep ADEC apprised

of the actual field implementation schedule as it is developed.


8.0 REFERENCES

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC), 2014a, Workplan Approval Letter, Glacier Highway Battery Dump Site, Contaminated Sites Program Database Haz ID # 4636, 11385 Glacier Highway, Juneau, Alaska, June 4.

ADEC, 2014b, Contaminated Sites Database, Glacier Highway Battery Dump Site. http://146.63.9.103/Applications/SPAR/CCReports/Site_Report.aspx?Hazard_ID=4636, accessed May 21.

AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (AMEC), 2014, Sampling and Analysis Plan, Battery Dump Site, Glacier Highway, Juneau, Alaska, May.

BNC International, Inc. (BNCI), 2009, Lead Battery Site Removal Action Report, prepared for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and National Marine Fisheries Services, Auke Bay Laboratory, Juneau, Alaska.

CCI, Inc. (CCI), 2003, Battery Debris Removal, Auke Bay Laboratory, Juneau, Alaska, Letter Report, June 20.

Loebenstein, J. Reger, 1994, The Materials Flow of Arsenic in the United States, United States Bureau of Mines Information Circular 9382.

TABLES

TABLE 1

XRF FIELD SCREENING RESULTSGlacier Highway Battery Investigation

Juneau, Alaska

Boring IDDepth

(feet bgs)XRF

(mg/kg)Estimated Error

+/- (mg/kg)0.0 - 1.25 250 61.25 - 2.5 1,243 18

2.5 13 45.75 <LOD 14

5.0 - 6.75 14 36.75-8.5 <LOD 90.0 - 1.75 20 31.75 - 3.5 22 41.75 - 3.5 25 41.75 - 3.5 23 5

5 18 46 <LOD 11

7.5 <LOD 125.0 - 6.0 21 30.0 - 1.5 20 21.5 - 3.0 29 45.0 - 6.0 30 46.4 - 7.5 <LOD 9

3.5 14 50.3 <LOD 12

0.5 - 2.0 126 42.0 - 3.5 118 5

0.4 <LOD 120.6 - 2.0 733 142.0 - 3.0 12 40.9 - 2.0 191 60.9 - 2.0 161 72.0 - 3.0 10 3

9 <LOD 128 <LOD 127 <LOD 116 <LOD 10

5.5 17 45.0 - 7.0 14 41.0 - 2.5 12 22.5 - 4.0 13 35.0 - 6.4 15 3

7 <LOD 14

SB-7

Lead Concentrations

SB-6

SB-1

SB-2

SB-3

SB-4

SB-5

R:\16114 - ADOT Glacier Hwy\002\Table 1 - XRF results

AMECPage 1 of 3

TABLE 1


Juneau, Alaska

Boring IDDepth

(feet bgs)XRF


+/- (mg/kg)

Lead Concentrations

0.0 - 1.25 58 31.25 - 2.50 31 45.0 - 6.0 16 20.9 - 2.0 14 32.0 - 3.5 <LOD 105.0 - 6.0 <LOD 91.0 - 2.5 95 62.5 - 4.0 <LOD 125.0 - 6.1 13 3

6.5 <LOD 87.5 <LOD 12

0.0 - 1.25 115 41.25 - 2.50 33 3

5.5 197 76.5 <LOD 107.5 <LOD 9

5.0 - 6.0 46 72.0 - 3.0 20 52.0 - 3.0 31 41.0 - 2.0 44 51.0 - 2.0 57 53.0 - 4.0 24 53.0 - 4.0 24 34.0 - 4.5 33 44.0 - 4.5 35 5

SB-12 0.3 - 1.0 18 2SB-13 0.2 - 1.0 31 4

0.0 - 1.0 27 30.0 - 1.0 56 41.0 - 1.5 52 61.0 - 1.5 28 31.5 - 2.0 106 61.5 - 2.0 331 111.5 - 2.0 6,311 932.0 - 2.5 1,210 172.0 - 2.5 178 82.0 - 2.5 1,006 232.5 - 2.75 2,555 452.5 - 2.75 345 8

SB-15

SB-8

SB-9

SB-10

SB-11

SB-14


AMECPage 2 of 3

TABLE 1


Juneau, Alaska

Boring IDDepth

(feet bgs)XRF


+/- (mg/kg)

Lead Concentrations

0.0 - 1.0 22 21.0 - 2.0 32 51.0 - 2.0 11 32.0 - 2.5 24 52.0 - 2.5 26 52.0 - 2.5 17 42.5 - 3.0 19 42.5 - 3.0 60 32.5 - 3.0 26 20.0 - 0.5 29,135 3080.0 - 0.5 37,929 6530.0 - 1.0 75 50.0 - 1.0 154 7

Standard Standard 1,061 24

Abbreviationsbgs = below ground surfaceLOD = limit of detectionmg/kg = milligrams per kilogramXRF = x-ray flourescence

SB-16

SB-17

SB-18


AMECPage 3 of 3

TABLE 2

SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS 1

Glacier Highway Battery InvestigationJuneau, Alaska

Sample Location SB-3 SB-4 SB-5 SB-6Depth (feet bgs) 0 to 1.25 1.25 to 2.5 5 to 6.75 0 to 1.75 5 to 6 0 to 1.5 0.5 to 2 2 to 3.5 0.6 to 2 2 to 3 0.9 to 2 2 to 3 5 to 7

Date Sampled 6/10/2014 6/10/2014 6/10/2014 6/10/2014 6/10/2014 6/10/2014 6/10/2014 6/10/2014 6/10/2014 6/10/2014 6/10/2014 6/10/2014 6/10/2014Metals (mg/kg)

Arsenic -- 12 -- -- -- -- -- -- 5.U -- 10 -- --Barium -- 235 J -- -- -- -- -- -- 103 J -- 366 J -- --Cadmium -- 1.8 -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.4 -- 1.9 -- --Chromium -- 35.7 J -- -- -- -- -- -- 19.1 J -- 39.2 J -- --Lead 253 1,460 5 15 8 13 239 81 736 6 U 150 2 3Mercury -- 0.03 -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.03 -- 0.03 -- --Selenium -- 5.U -- -- -- -- -- -- 5.U -- 5.U -- --Silver -- 0.3 U -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.3 U -- 0.3 U -- --

SB-1 SB-2

R:\16114 - ADOT Glacier Hwy\002\Table 2 - Lab Results

AMECPage 1 of 2

TABLE 2

SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS 1


Sample LocationDepth (feet bgs)

Date SampledMetals (mg/kg)

ArsenicBariumCadmiumChromiumLeadMercurySeleniumSilver

SB-7 SB-8 SB-10 SB-11 SB-13 SB-15 SB-16 SB-17 SB-181 to 2.5 5 to 6.4 0 to 1.25 1.0 to 2.5 0 to 1.25 5 to 6 0.2 to 1 1.5 to 2 2 to 2.5 2.5 to 3 0 to 0.5 0 to 1.0

6/10/2014 6/10/2014 6/10/2014 6/10/2014 6/10/2014 6/10/2014 6/11/2014 6/11/2014 6/11/2014 6/11/2014 6/11/2014 6/11/2014

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5.U -- -- 40 ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- 190 J -- -- 126 J ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.2 J -- -- 5.2 J ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- 22 -- -- 43 --56 2 U 37 64 J 83 J 67 J 45 J 1,360 J 1,330 J 42 J 50,400 J 169 J-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.02 -- -- 0.56 ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5.U -- -- 20 U ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.3 U -- -- 1.2 --

Notes Abbreviations1. Data qualifiers are as follows: bgs = below ground surface

U = The analyte was not detected at the reporting limit indicated. mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram J = The value is an estimate. -- = not analyzed

R:\16114 - ADOT Glacier Hwy\002\Table 2 - Lab Results

AMECPage 2 of 2

TABLE 3

IDW SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS 1


Sample ID IDW-Soil-061114Date Sampled 6/11/2014

Metals (mg/kg)

Arsenic 5 UBarium 217Cadmium 0.3Chromium 29.0Lead 12Mercury 0.02 USelenium 5 USilver 0.3 U

Notes1. Data qualifiers are as follows:

U = The analyte was not detected at the reporting limit indicated.

Abbreviations IDW = investigation derived wastemg/kg = milligrams per kilogram

R:\16114 - ADOT Glacier Hwy\002\Table 3 - IDW Soil

AMECPage 1 of 1

FIGURES

Copyright: © 2013 National Geographic Society

600 University Street, Suite 600

Seattle, WA, U.S.A. 98101

AMEC

Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.

1 inch = 2,000 feet

TITLE:

PROJECT:

DWN BY:

CHK'D BY:

PROJECTION: SCALE:

REV. NO.:

DATUM: DATE:

PROJECT NO.:

FIGURE No.:

APS

NM

--

--

SITE VICINITY MAY 2014

SE141611401

1

GLACIER HIGHWAY BATTERY DEBRIS INVESTIGATION11385 GLACIER HIGHWAY, JUNEAU, AK

CLIENT:

ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION

AND PUBLIC FACILITIES

0 2,000 4,0001,000

Feet I

S:\16114\001_SAP\AukeBay-Vicinity_052914.mxd - adam.stenberg - 5/29/2014 - 1:54:52 PM

SITE LOCATION

Note: Base map from U.S.G.S. 24k

¬«7

GLA

CIE

R H

WY

APPENDIX A

XRF Comparison to Analytical Data

APPENDIX A COMPARISON OF XRF RESULTS TO

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS Glacier Highway Battery Investigation

Juneau, Alaska

INTRODUCTION

This appendix has been prepared as part of the Site Characterization Report and Source

Removal Remediation Plan for the Glacier Highway Battery investigation site in the vicinity of

11385 Glacier Highway, in Juneau, Alaska (Site) (Figure 1).

This document compares field screening results from a Delta Innov-X environmental soil

analyzer, a portable x-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF), to analytical results obtained from

laboratory analysis of the same soil sample.

XRF FIELD SCREENING METHODS

XRF screening methods are described in Section 2.1 of the Characterization Report. In

summary, soil was screened in the field using one of two methods. The first involved placing

an aliquot of soil into a plastic bag, homogenizing the soil, and taking an XRF reading directly

through the bag. Using this method, a layer of soil at least ½-inch thick was used for screening

per the manufacturers recommendations. The second method involved taking XRF readings

directly from the surface of a soil core. Both methods yielded acceptable results.

COMPARISON OF XRF SCREENING WITH ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Results of XRF field screening for lead are presented on Table 1 of the Characterization

Report. See Table A-1 for a comparison of XRF data for lead and arsenic to laboratory

analytical data. Data from all metals analyzed by the XRF are included in Table A-2. On Table

A-2, only metals that were detected above the limits of detection of the XRF in at least 1

sample are shown.

As noted in Section 3.1 of the Characterization Report, most XRF data were comparable to

laboratory results. While generally comparable, XRF results can be variable, even between

different measurements of the same sample. Figure A-1 illustrates the variation between XRF

field screening and laboratory analytical results. At lower concentrations of lead, the XRF data

was more closely aligned with analytical data. At higher concentrations the results tended to

be more variable.

Appendix A, Page 1 of 7

Figure A-1: Comparison of XRF field screening for lead (x-axis) to laboratory data for lead from the same

samples (y-axis). The black line is the linear trend line, with an R2 value of 0.9678.

y = 1.4594x ‐ 109.38R² = 0.9678

‐10000

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000

Lab Data (m

g/kg)

XRF Result (mg/kg)

XRF Pb Calibration


TABLE A-1

XRF CALIBRATION DATAGlacier Highway Battery Investigation

Juneau, Alaska

Boring ID Depth (ft bgs)

XRF (Pb)mg/kg

Lab (Pb)mg/kg

XRF (As)mg/kg

Lab (As) mg/kg

0.0 - 1.25 250 253 -- --1.25 - 2.5 1243 1460 89 12

2.5 13 -- -- --5.75 <LOD -- -- --

5.0 - 6.75 14 5 -- --6.75-8.5 <LOD -- -- --0.0 - 1.75 20 15 7 --1.75 - 3.5 22 -- 13 --1.75 - 3.5 25 -- -- --1.75 - 3.5 23 -- -- --

5 18 -- 12 --6 <LOD -- -- --

7.5 <LOD -- -- --5.0 - 6.0 21 8 -- --0.0 - 1.5 20 13 -- --1.5 - 3.0 29 -- -- --5.0 - 6.0 30 -- -- --6.4 - 7.5 <LOD -- -- --

3.5 14 -- 49 --0.3 <LOD -- -- --

0.5 - 2.0 126 239 17 --2.0 - 3.5 118 81 48 --0.6 - 2.0 733 736 -- --

0.4 <LOD -- -- --2.0 - 3.0 12 6.0 65 --0.9 - 2.0 191 150 -- 100.9 - 2.0 161 150 -- --2.0 - 3.0 10 2 -- --

9 <LOD -- -- --8 <LOD -- -- --7 <LOD -- 14 --6 <LOD -- -- --

5.5 17 -- -- --5.0 - 7.0 14 3 -- --1.0 - 2.5 12 56 -- --2.5 - 4.0 13 -- -- --5.0 - 6.4 15 2 -- --

7 <LOD -- -- --0.0 - 1.25 58 37 10 --1.25 - 2.50 31 -- -- --5.0 - 6.0 16 -- 10 --

SB-1

SB-2

SB-3

SB-4

SB-5

SB-6

SB-7

SB-8

R:\16114 - ADOT Glacier Hwy\002\App A - XRF Calib. to lab data\Tables A-1 and A-2_Sx AMECAppendix A, Page 3 of 7

TABLE A-1


Juneau, Alaska


XRF (Pb)mg/kg

Lab (Pb)mg/kg

XRF (As)mg/kg

Lab (As) mg/kg

0.9 - 2.0 14 -- -- --2.0 - 3.5 <LOD -- -- --5.0 - 6.0 <LOD -- -- --1.0 - 2.5 95 64 -- --2.5 - 4.0 <LOD -- -- --5.0 - 6.1 13 -- -- --

6.5 <LOD -- -- --7.5 <LOD -- 18 --

0.0 - 1.25 115 83 -- --1.25 - 2.50 33 -- -- --

5.5 197 -- -- --6.5 <LOD -- -- --7.5 <LOD -- 11 --

5.0 - 6.0 46 67 -- --SB-12 0.3 - 1.0 18 -- -- --SB-13 0.2 - 1.0 31 45 -- --

2.0 - 3.0 20 -- -- --2.0 - 3.0 31 -- -- --1.0 - 2.0 44 -- -- --1.0 - 2.0 57 -- -- --3.0 - 4.0 24 -- -- --3.0 - 4.0 24 -- -- --4.0 - 4.5 33 -- -- --4.0 - 4.5 35 -- -- --0.0 - 1.0 27 -- -- --0.0 - 1.0 56 -- -- --1.0 - 1.5 52 -- -- --1.0 - 1.5 28 -- -- --1.5 - 2.0 106 1,360 -- --1.5 - 2.0 331 1,360 -- --1.5 - 2.0 6311 1,360 -- --2.0 - 2.5 1210 1,330 -- --2.0 - 2.5 178 1,330 -- --2.0 - 2.5 1006 1,330 -- --2.5 - 2.75 2555 -- 135 --2.5 - 2.75 345 -- -- --

SB-9

SB-10

SB-11

SB-14

SB-15


TABLE A-1


Juneau, Alaska


XRF (Pb)mg/kg

Lab (Pb)mg/kg

XRF (As)mg/kg

Lab (As) mg/kg

0.0 - 1.0 22 -- -- --1.0 - 2.0 32 -- -- --1.0 - 2.0 11 -- -- --2.0 - 2.5 24 -- -- --2.0 - 2.5 26 -- 14 --2.0 - 2.5 17 -- -- --2.5 - 3.0 19 42 -- --2.5 - 3.0 60 42 -- --2.5 - 3.0 26 42 -- --0.0 - 0.5 29135 50,400 1874 400.0 - 0.5 37929 50,400 1318 --0.0 - 1.0 75 169 -- --0.0 - 1.0 154 169 -- --

Standard Standard 1061 -- 77 --

Abbreviations:As = Arsenicbgs = below ground surfaceft = feetLOD = Limit of Detectionmg/kg = milligrams per kilogramPb = lead

SB-16

SB-17

SB-18


TABLE A-2

XRF FIELD DATAALL ANALYTES


Boring ID Depth (ft bgs) Pb (mg/kg) Pb +/- As (mg/kg) As +/- Ti Ti +/- Cr Cr +/- Mn Mn +/- Fe Fe +/- Co Co +/- Ni Ni +/- Cu Cu +/- Zn Zn +/- Br Br +/- Rb Rb +/- Sr Sr +/- Zr Zr +/- Mo Mo +/- Cd Cd +/- Sb Sb +/- Ba Ba +/-

0.0 - 1.25 250 6 <LOD 14 2574 222 <LOD 90 544 29 28796 241 175 44 58 11 38 6 72 4 <LOD 4 14 2 373 4 59 2 <LOD 6 <LOD 30 <LOD 55 606 1531.25 - 2.5 1243 18 89 12 2987 275 <LOD 108 482 35 28829 294 <LOD 158 43 13 263 12 230 8 <LOD 7 23 2 368 5 69 3 <LOD 7 <LOD 37 <LOD 66 <LOD 554

2.5 13 4 <LOD 8 2619 315 <LOD 111 132 26 7250 126 <LOD 104 <LOD 35 <LOD 24 21 4 7 2 37 3 264 5 125 4 <LOD 9 <LOD 46 <LOD 80 <LOD 6345.75 <LOD 14 <LOD 11 4293 541 <LOD 215 778 73 75465 1074 <LOD 386 <LOD 75 125 15 78 8 <LOD 8 25 3 438 9 41 4 <LOD 11 <LOD 58 <LOD 107 1354 373

5.0 - 6.75 14 3 <LOD 6 2628 236 <LOD 89 785 35 30268 266 <LOD 140 41 11 23 6 53 4 5 1 23 2 416 5 57 2 <LOD 6 <LOD 32 <LOD 58 582 1626.75-8.5 <LOD 9 <LOD 7 1529 236 <LOD 93 201 27 12011 165 <LOD 119 <LOD 32 <LOD 21 17 4 8 2 25 2 139 3 54 3 14 3 <LOD 41 <LOD 70 <LOD 4800.0 - 1.75 20 3 7 2 3995 249 <LOD 86 468 29 30607 257 <LOD 135 <LOD 29 21 6 61 4 <LOD 4 29 2 444 5 67 2 <LOD 6 <LOD 31 <LOD 55 619 1631.75 - 3.5 22 4 13 3 3915 321 143 41 496 38 28716 316 192 57 45 14 <LOD 23 57 5 <LOD 5 35 3 473 7 136 3 <LOD 8 <LOD 40 <LOD 72 <LOD 6321.75 - 3.5 25 4 <LOD 10 3043 347 <LOD 125 461 42 25567 337 <LOD 188 <LOD 45 <LOD 26 72 6 <LOD 6 19 3 504 8 84 4 <LOD 9 <LOD 48 <LOD 84 <LOD 6921.75 - 3.5 23 5 <LOD 13 2522 447 <LOD 175 397 51 24653 403 <LOD 227 <LOD 56 <LOD 33 68 8 <LOD 8 28 4 595 11 88 5 <LOD 11 <LOD 59 <LOD 107 1352 317

5 18 4 12 3 2127 335 <LOD 140 468 45 23446 333 <LOD 192 <LOD 44 36 10 30 5 11 2 21 3 219 5 55 3 <LOD 10 <LOD 50 <LOD 87 <LOD 6916 <LOD 11 <LOD 8 2487 335 <LOD 118 192 33 14813 226 <LOD 151 <LOD 41 <LOD 27 19 5 <LOD 5 20 3 266 6 80 3 <LOD 9 <LOD 51 <LOD 90 <LOD 678

7.5 <LOD 12 <LOD 10 2585 378 <LOD 147 232 39 20391 313 <LOD 192 <LOD 48 <LOD 25 25 5 <LOD 6 32 3 261 6 92 4 11 3 <LOD 53 <LOD 94 <LOD 7785.0 - 6.0 21 3 <LOD 8 2989 299 <LOD 112 447 37 27890 312 <LOD 171 <LOD 38 23 8 50 5 <LOD 5 35 3 330 5 69 3 <LOD 8 <LOD 40 <LOD 71 <LOD 6000.0 - 1.5 20 2 <LOD 6 2658 209 <LOD 79 452 25 23610 192 <LOD 109 <LOD 26 17 5 67 4 <LOD 4 26 2 426 4 107 2 <LOD 6 <LOD 29 <LOD 52 714 1441.5 - 3.0 29 4 <LOD 9 2918 325 <LOD 121 388 36 22869 278 <LOD 162 <LOD 39 <LOD 24 64 6 <LOD 5 27 3 478 7 99 3 <LOD 8 <LOD 43 <LOD 78 961 2235.0 - 6.0 30 4 <LOD 10 2371 325 <LOD 135 562 44 32615 395 285 69 <LOD 47 <LOD 26 89 7 <LOD 6 19 3 368 6 173 4 <LOD 9 <LOD 45 <LOD 81 <LOD 6786.4 - 7.5 <LOD 9 <LOD 7 2662 319 <LOD 128 241 35 22595 293 182 58 <LOD 42 <LOD 24 63 6 <LOD 5 41 3 263 5 91 3 <LOD 9 <LOD 45 <LOD 81 <LOD 644

3.5 14 5 49 5 3108 432 248 65 431 55 37931 573 <LOD 279 <LOD 62 40 12 61 8 <LOD 7 46 4 339 8 82 4 <LOD 11 <LOD 57 <LOD 102 <LOD 8750.3 <LOD 12 <LOD 9 2235 374 <LOD 127 312 42 22458 337 <LOD 199 <LOD 43 <LOD 28 51 6 <LOD 6 22 3 440 8 56 4 <LOD 10 <LOD 53 <LOD 93 903 262

0.5 - 2.0 126 4 17 4 3115 223 89 29 426 26 22468 195 <LOD 113 48 10 25 6 84 4 7 1 27 2 327 4 66 2 <LOD 6 <LOD 31 <LOD 54 <LOD 4442.0 - 3.5 118 5 48 4 2838 253 <LOD 101 670 35 33895 303 <LOD 151 70 12 29 7 73 5 <LOD 5 24 2 470 6 66 2 <LOD 6 <LOD 33 <LOD 59 699 1740.6 - 2.0 733 14 <LOD 30 2921 304 <LOD 115 623 40 30908 331 <LOD 174 <LOD 38 126 10 84 6 <LOD 6 24 2 506 7 78 3 <LOD 8 <LOD 40 <LOD 72 866 209

0.4 <LOD 12 <LOD 10 2431 385 <LOD 147 337 44 26578 383 <LOD 215 <LOD 49 <LOD 29 74 7 <LOD 6 24 3 545 10 53 4 <LOD 10 <LOD 52 <LOD 91 982 2702.0 - 3.0 12 4 65 5 3021 382 183 56 689 55 55607 670 469 94 82 20 72 11 69 7 <LOD 6 20 3 520 8 53 3 <LOD 9 <LOD 47 <LOD 86 <LOD 7930.9 - 2.0 191 6 <LOD 15 2566 277 <LOD 107 462 34 29276 293 <LOD 155 <LOD 36 32 7 132 6 <LOD 5 35 2 422 6 88 3 <LOD 7 <LOD 37 <LOD 66 1044 1950.9 - 2.0 161 7 <LOD 17 2670 335 <LOD 126 496 41 26769 329 <LOD 181 <LOD 43 31 9 118 7 <LOD 6 42 3 428 7 105 3 <LOD 8 <LOD 44 <LOD 80 1007 2342.0 - 3.0 10 3 <LOD 7 3996 284 <LOD 98 434 31 25858 255 <LOD 141 <LOD 33 22 7 50 4 <LOD 5 21 2 581 7 153 3 <LOD 7 <LOD 36 <LOD 63 666 185

9 <LOD 12 <LOD 10 1505 379 <LOD 161 307 45 21998 359 <LOD 213 <LOD 53 <LOD 32 55 7 <LOD 7 37 4 287 7 77 4 <LOD 11 <LOD 57 <LOD 102 835 2778 <LOD 12 <LOD 10 2219 363 223 56 169 40 21767 343 <LOD 205 65 18 <LOD 31 50 7 <LOD 6 35 3 262 6 79 4 <LOD 11 <LOD 55 <LOD 99 <LOD 7457 <LOD 11 14 3 1978 343 <LOD 150 301 42 24410 356 307 70 <LOD 50 <LOD 30 43 6 <LOD 6 42 3 245 6 76 4 <LOD 10 <LOD 52 <LOD 93 <LOD 7176 <LOD 10 <LOD 8 2486 312 <LOD 121 234 34 22122 285 204 57 46 15 <LOD 25 55 6 <LOD 6 37 3 258 5 81 3 <LOD 9 <LOD 45 <LOD 80 <LOD 634

5.5 17 4 <LOD 10 3190 408 <LOD 140 298 43 24983 374 <LOD 210 <LOD 52 <LOD 30 50 7 <LOD 7 31 4 656 11 85 4 <LOD 10 <LOD 54 <LOD 97 <LOD 8245.0 - 7.0 14 4 <LOD 9 3141 347 <LOD 128 388 39 31389 370 <LOD 193 58 15 <LOD 25 72 6 <LOD 6 36 3 413 7 69 3 <LOD 8 <LOD 44 <LOD 79 1134 2401.0 - 2.5 12 2 <LOD 5 2478 207 <LOD 79 454 25 22608 185 <LOD 108 <LOD 26 <LOD 16 50 3 <LOD 4 25 2 477 5 90 2 <LOD 6 <LOD 29 <LOD 51 766 1432.5 - 4.0 13 3 <LOD 8 3151 346 141 46 522 42 36089 406 <LOD 200 <LOD 44 <LOD 24 76 6 <LOD 5 24 3 637 9 72 3 <LOD 8 <LOD 43 <LOD 77 1279 2415.0 - 6.4 15 3 <LOD 8 3495 338 <LOD 119 509 40 29204 342 <LOD 181 <LOD 41 <LOD 24 47 5 <LOD 5 15 2 563 8 45 3 <LOD 8 <LOD 43 <LOD 76 777 226

7 <LOD 14 <LOD 11 1594 417 <LOD 176 285 49 17186 340 <LOD 218 <LOD 54 <LOD 37 50 8 <LOD 7 33 4 262 7 63 4 <LOD 13 <LOD 65 <LOD 117 <LOD 8900.0 - 1.25 58 3 10 3 2420 215 <LOD 84 458 27 23819 207 <LOD 119 <LOD 29 36 6 86 5 <LOD 4 23 2 405 5 70 2 <LOD 6 <LOD 31 <LOD 55 454 1471.25 - 2.50 31 4 <LOD 9 1234 268 <LOD 116 179 30 16493 225 <LOD 148 <LOD 40 33 9 85 6 <LOD 5 20 2 368 6 59 3 <LOD 9 <LOD 44 <LOD 78 <LOD 579

5.0 - 6.0 16 2 10 2 1454 162 <LOD 68 170 18 14595 126 <LOD 85 <LOD 22 <LOD 14 76 4 <LOD 3 21 1 194 3 46 2 <LOD 5 <LOD 27 <LOD 48 <LOD 3410.9 - 2.0 14 3 <LOD 8 2923 310 151 42 521 38 28967 319 221 58 <LOD 39 <LOD 23 48 5 <LOD 5 28 2 480 7 88 3 <LOD 8 <LOD 40 <LOD 73 921 2142.0 - 3.5 <LOD 10 <LOD 8 3048 357 <LOD 128 380 40 26623 346 <LOD 191 <LOD 44 <LOD 27 52 6 <LOD 6 20 3 639 10 72 4 <LOD 9 <LOD 46 <LOD 83 810 2425.0 - 6.0 <LOD 9 <LOD 7 2433 300 306 47 365 37 30648 343 <LOD 181 69 15 <LOD 24 55 5 <LOD 5 26 2 434 6 68 3 <LOD 8 <LOD 41 <LOD 74 <LOD 6301.0 - 2.5 95 6 <LOD 16 3395 392 <LOD 140 481 47 30075 413 <LOD 219 <LOD 50 <LOD 30 87 7 <LOD 6 21 3 410 8 87 4 <LOD 10 <LOD 51 <LOD 90 <LOD 7842.5 - 4.0 <LOD 12 <LOD 9 3134 389 <LOD 157 496 49 27845 404 <LOD 219 <LOD 49 <LOD 28 50 6 <LOD 6 20 3 641 11 71 4 <LOD 10 <LOD 53 <LOD 95 <LOD 7765.0 - 6.1 13 3 <LOD 8 3953 347 <LOD 132 415 39 31544 369 208 65 <LOD 41 <LOD 23 63 6 <LOD 5 23 3 543 8 113 4 <LOD 8 <LOD 43 <LOD 77 <LOD 680

6.5 <LOD 8 <LOD 6 641 202 <LOD 89 168 24 6253 102 <LOD 86 <LOD 29 <LOD 19 12 3 5 2 21 2 122 3 62 3 11 3 <LOD 41 <LOD 70 <LOD 4447.5 <LOD 12 18 4 2574 411 <LOD 170 344 48 31505 471 <LOD 248 <LOD 56 <LOD 31 70 8 <LOD 6 43 3 298 7 91 4 <LOD 11 <LOD 55 <LOD 97 <LOD 859

0.0 - 1.25 115 4 <LOD 10 2548 205 99 28 307 23 22886 188 <LOD 110 <LOD 27 20 6 58 4 <LOD 4 23 2 577 6 69 2 <LOD 6 <LOD 29 <LOD 52 543 1401.25 - 2.50 33 3 <LOD 7 1101 174 <LOD 79 220 22 13318 137 153 32 <LOD 27 <LOD 17 52 4 4 1 15 2 185 3 49 2 9 2 <LOD 32 <LOD 55 <LOD 368

5.5 197 7 <LOD 17 907 223 <LOD 106 200 27 10105 145 <LOD 110 <LOD 33 <LOD 22 191 9 9 2 20 2 148 3 46 2 13 3 <LOD 41 <LOD 70 <LOD 4866.5 <LOD 10 <LOD 8 2048 305 169 46 348 38 23553 304 <LOD 177 50 15 <LOD 24 53 6 6 2 23 3 218 5 72 3 <LOD 9 <LOD 45 <LOD 80 <LOD 6367.5 <LOD 9 11 3 1718 286 <LOD 113 174 29 14034 197 198 46 <LOD 37 <LOD 22 29 4 <LOD 5 32 3 174 4 64 3 <LOD 9 <LOD 44 <LOD 78 <LOD 605

5.0 - 6.0 46 7 <LOD 16 1828 427 <LOD 176 255 49 18726 370 <LOD 230 <LOD 56 <LOD 34 95 10 <LOD 9 25 4 194 6 69 4 <LOD 13 <LOD 65 <LOD 114 <LOD 895

SB-12 0.3 - 1.0 18 2 <LOD 6 2554 207 <LOD 82 499 26 27795 215 181 39 36 9 26 5 73 4 <LOD 4 38 2 307 3 106 2 <LOD 5 <LOD 28 <LOD 50 773 144

SB-13 0.2 - 1.0 31 4 <LOD 9 2578 295 <LOD 113 425 36 29609 322 208 58 <LOD 39 28 8 151 7 <LOD 5 25 2 437 6 62 3 <LOD 8 <LOD 40 <LOD 71 780 2052.0 - 3.0 20 5 <LOD 11 2071 365 <LOD 130 382 44 19978 315 <LOD 192 <LOD 47 <LOD 28 47 6 <LOD 6 38 4 360 7 95 4 <LOD 11 <LOD 53 <LOD 94 <LOD 7632.0 - 3.0 31 4 <LOD 9 2061 277 <LOD 103 345 32 18822 227 <LOD 141 <LOD 36 <LOD 23 57 5 <LOD 5 22 3 412 6 103 3 <LOD 8 <LOD 41 <LOD 73 637 1931.0 - 2.0 44 5 <LOD 12 2894 364 <LOD 139 535 47 21638 319 <LOD 190 <LOD 44 <LOD 28 103 8 <LOD 6 18 3 440 8 63 4 <LOD 10 <LOD 50 <LOD 91 <LOD 7251.0 - 2.0 57 5 <LOD 13 2681 354 <LOD 132 506 44 23256 317 <LOD 187 <LOD 43 <LOD 26 106 8 <LOD 6 25 3 386 7 76 3 <LOD 9 <LOD 48 <LOD 86 799 2433.0 - 4.0 24 5 <LOD 13 1593 377 <LOD 149 327 46 18967 326 <LOD 204 <LOD 50 <LOD 29 63 7 <LOD 7 27 3 340 8 66 4 15 4 <LOD 59 <LOD 102 <LOD 8113.0 - 4.0 24 3 <LOD 6 2288 211 <LOD 79 477 26 21661 185 <LOD 110 <LOD 27 <LOD 17 50 4 <LOD 4 27 2 403 4 98 2 8 2 <LOD 29 <LOD 52 825 1484.0 - 4.5 33 4 <LOD 10 1461 300 <LOD 128 1119 55 28059 351 <LOD 193 <LOD 44 <LOD 25 75 6 <LOD 5 18 3 357 6 63 3 <LOD 9 <LOD 45 <LOD 79 <LOD 6514.0 - 4.5 35 5 <LOD 11 2062 357 <LOD 146 476 47 25228 367 <LOD 207 <LOD 46 <LOD 28 58 7 <LOD 7 24 3 483 9 91 4 12 3 <LOD 52 <LOD 92 <LOD 751

SB-1

SB-2

SB-3

SB-4

SB-5

SB-6

SB-7

SB-8

SB-9

SB-10

SB-11

SB-14

R:\16114 - ADOT Glacier Hwy\002\App A - XRF Calib. to lab data\Tables A-1 and A-2_Sx

AMEC


TABLE A-2

XRF FIELD DATAALL ANALYTES


Boring ID Depth (ft bgs) Pb (mg/kg) Pb +/- As (mg/kg) As +/- Ti Ti +/- Cr Cr +/- Mn Mn +/- Fe Fe +/- Co Co +/- Ni Ni +/- Cu Cu +/- Zn Zn +/- Br Br +/- Rb Rb +/- Sr Sr +/- Zr Zr +/- Mo Mo +/- Cd Cd +/- Sb Sb +/- Ba Ba +/-

0.0 - 1.0 27 3 <LOD 8 1747 252 <LOD 100 429 32 20028 218 <LOD 133 <LOD 32 <LOD 21 47 4 <LOD 4 26 2 404 6 75 3 <LOD 7 <LOD 37 <LOD 66 839 1810.0 - 1.0 56 4 <LOD 10 2538 288 <LOD 107 491 35 19393 228 <LOD 141 <LOD 36 <LOD 22 49 5 <LOD 5 26 2 359 6 72 3 <LOD 8 <LOD 40 <LOD 71 806 1991.0 - 1.5 52 6 <LOD 14 2539 388 <LOD 144 713 55 27500 407 <LOD 224 <LOD 49 <LOD 31 53 7 <LOD 6 27 3 443 9 75 4 <LOD 10 <LOD 54 <LOD 96 <LOD 8011.0 - 1.5 28 3 <LOD 7 2416 224 <LOD 83 441 28 17882 177 <LOD 111 <LOD 28 <LOD 18 38 4 <LOD 4 22 2 344 4 66 2 <LOD 6 <LOD 33 <LOD 59 <LOD 4531.5 - 2.0 106 6 <LOD 14 1478 308 <LOD 126 436 40 19360 268 <LOD 166 <LOD 41 <LOD 26 45 5 <LOD 6 30 3 369 7 72 3 <LOD 9 <LOD 48 <LOD 83 739 2231.5 - 2.0 331 11 <LOD 25 2105 323 <LOD 126 365 39 17801 258 <LOD 166 <LOD 42 <LOD 27 35 5 <LOD 7 20 3 380 7 76 3 <LOD 9 <LOD 49 <LOD 86 <LOD 6681.5 - 2.0 6311 93 <LOD 118 2269 358 <LOD 138 318 43 18991 306 <LOD 191 <LOD 47 <LOD 33 40 7 <LOD 17 15 4 271 6 63 4 13 4 <LOD 54 <LOD 95 <LOD 7192.0 - 2.5 1210 17 <LOD 34 1965 246 <LOD 92 522 32 20992 218 <LOD 129 <LOD 32 <LOD 20 48 4 <LOD 6 27 2 342 5 73 3 <LOD 7 <LOD 35 <LOD 63 724 1732.0 - 2.5 178 8 <LOD 19 2382 353 <LOD 132 365 39 18138 260 <LOD 165 <LOD 43 <LOD 28 33 5 <LOD 6 20 3 412 7 65 3 <LOD 9 <LOD 49 <LOD 88 1109 2482.0 - 2.5 1006 23 <LOD 48 2676 377 <LOD 139 355 43 18617 297 <LOD 186 <LOD 45 <LOD 28 41 6 <LOD 9 19 3 370 8 72 4 <LOD 10 <LOD 54 <LOD 96 <LOD 757

2.5 - 2.75 2555 45 135 26 2236 387 <LOD 151 454 49 20665 333 <LOD 203 <LOD 50 <LOD 32 48 7 <LOD 13 28 4 351 8 63 4 <LOD 11 <LOD 56 <LOD 99 <LOD 8062.5 - 2.75 345 8 <LOD 19 1676 231 <LOD 95 383 30 18666 200 <LOD 125 <LOD 32 <LOD 19 42 4 <LOD 5 30 2 403 5 73 3 <LOD 7 <LOD 36 <LOD 63 <LOD 4890.0 - 1.0 22 2 <LOD 6 2762 212 <LOD 80 423 25 18585 161 123 34 <LOD 25 17 5 51 4 <LOD 3 23 2 394 4 71 2 <LOD 6 <LOD 29 <LOD 51 709 1441.0 - 2.0 32 5 <LOD 12 2046 365 <LOD 151 456 47 24760 361 <LOD 203 <LOD 50 <LOD 28 46 6 <LOD 6 30 3 412 8 58 4 <LOD 10 <LOD 52 <LOD 92 <LOD 7761.0 - 2.0 11 3 <LOD 6 2064 220 <LOD 86 468 29 22641 211 <LOD 123 <LOD 29 <LOD 18 47 4 <LOD 4 24 2 406 5 93 2 <LOD 6 <LOD 33 <LOD 58 458 1532.0 - 2.5 24 5 <LOD 12 2340 392 <LOD 158 476 49 23469 361 <LOD 207 <LOD 50 <LOD 31 44 6 <LOD 7 35 4 488 9 91 4 <LOD 11 <LOD 54 <LOD 97 889 2762.0 - 2.5 26 5 14 4 2249 367 <LOD 151 366 44 28484 397 <LOD 216 <LOD 50 <LOD 28 55 6 <LOD 6 36 3 420 8 84 4 <LOD 10 <LOD 51 <LOD 91 794 2592.0 - 2.5 17 4 <LOD 10 2234 360 <LOD 137 363 43 21467 326 <LOD 198 <LOD 48 <LOD 29 48 6 <LOD 6 29 3 413 8 67 4 <LOD 10 <LOD 52 <LOD 93 <LOD 7432.5 - 3.0 19 4 <LOD 10 2292 316 <LOD 129 329 38 17298 251 <LOD 160 <LOD 41 <LOD 24 27 5 <LOD 6 26 3 313 6 67 3 <LOD 9 <LOD 48 <LOD 84 <LOD 6382.5 - 3.0 60 3 <LOD 8 2096 217 <LOD 82 615 30 20319 185 <LOD 112 <LOD 26 <LOD 16 106 5 <LOD 4 20 2 382 4 66 2 10 2 <LOD 31 <LOD 55 810 1532.5 - 3.0 26 2 <LOD 6 2194 188 <LOD 73 317 22 18348 152 <LOD 95 <LOD 23 <LOD 15 44 3 <LOD 3 25 2 370 4 84 2 <LOD 5 <LOD 28 <LOD 49 501 1300.0 - 0.5 29135 308 1874 72 2546 347 194 53 493 46 38612 448 <LOD 218 89 20 1513 33 614 18 <LOD 29 30 4 232 5 18 3 <LOD 9 60 15 152 27 <LOD 7400.0 - 0.5 37929 653 1318 131 2668 596 <LOD 265 447 77 43382 816 496 129 <LOD 96 2867 79 852 36 <LOD 55 <LOD 23 162 7 <LOD 16 <LOD 14 76 24 230 43 <LOD 12790.0 - 1.0 75 5 <LOD 12 1521 251 <LOD 104 209 30 14438 198 <LOD 133 <LOD 33 25 8 165 8 7 2 12 2 188 4 36 3 11 3 <LOD 42 <LOD 72 <LOD 5140.0 - 1.0 154 7 <LOD 16 1528 270 <LOD 113 294 34 20058 257 <LOD 159 <LOD 39 29 8 210 9 6 2 19 2 188 4 45 3 <LOD 8 <LOD 44 <LOD 76 <LOD 570

Standard Standard 1061 24 77 17 1993 362 <LOD 144 501 50 22631 356 <LOD 208 <LOD 47 106 13 304 14 <LOD 11 101 5 228 6 215 5 <LOD 11 59 18 <LOD 93 <LOD 750

Abbreviations:bgs = below ground surfaceft = feetLOD = limit of detectionmg/kg = miligrams per kilogram

SB-18

SB-15

SB-16

SB-17

R:\16114 - ADOT Glacier Hwy\002\App A - XRF Calib. to lab data\Tables A-1 and A-2_Sx

AMEC


APPENDIX B

Boring Logs

Soil was screened in thefield using a Delta Innov-Xportable XRF detectorS

B-0

1-0.

0-1.

25S

B-0

1-1.

25-2

.5S

B-0

1-5.

0-6.

75

POORLY-GRADED SAND with GRAVEL (SP): Brown, moist, 85%fine to medium SAND with 15% gravel

gravel content increases to 20-30% (SP)

Rust orange colored lens

wood debris (log)

SANDY SILT with GRAVEL (ML): Brown & gray, moist, 55% lowplastic fines, 30% fine to medium sand, and 15% gravel

Boring terminated at 10 feet below ground surface and backfilledwith bentonite chips

250

1250

13

ND<14

ND<9

MEASURING POINT:

DATE FINISHED:

RESPONSIBLE PROFESSIONAL:

0

REG. NO.

ELEVATION AND DATUM:

DRILLING METHOD:

DRILLING EQUIPMENT:

NAME (USCS): color, moist, % by wt., plast. density, structure,

SAMPLING METHOD:LOGGED BY:

COMPL.

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.):

Nathan Moxley

Nathan Moxley

10.0

6/10/14 6/10/14

Juneau, AK

GeoTek Alaska

Direct push

Geoprobe 6620 DT

Enviro-core sampling system [5’x 1 5/8"]

NA

BORING LOCATION:

Log of Boring No. SB-01

DROP:

DATE STARTED:

Surface Elevation:

DESCRIPTION

cementation, react. w/HCl, geo. inter.

HAMMER WEIGHT:

DEPTH TO WATER (ft.)

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

FIRST

--

Ground Surface

NA

DE

PT

H(f

eet)

SAMPLESREMARKS

Blo

ws/

Foo

t

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

No.

(ppm

)X

RF

(P

b)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Project No. 1416114 Page 1 of 1

PROJECT: Glacier Highway Battery Debris Investigation

Appendix B, Page 1 of 18


B-2

-0.

0-1.

75S

B-2

-1.

75-3

.5S

B-2

-5.

0-6.

0

POORLY-GRADED SAND (SP): Brown, moist, 90% fine tomedium SAND with 10% low plastic fines

Ashpalt


color change to gray, gravel content decreases (SP)

POORLY-GRADED GRAVEL (GP): Rust orange, wet, clean, peagravel

POORLY-GRADED SAND with SILT and GRAVEL (SP-SM): Darkgray, moist, 55% fine SAND, 30% low plastic fines, and 15% gravel


20

22/25/23

18

ND<11

ND<12

MEASURING POINT:

DATE FINISHED:


0

REG. NO.


DRILLING METHOD:

DRILLING EQUIPMENT:



COMPL.

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.):

Nathan Moxley

Nathan Moxley

10.0

6/10/14 6/10/14

Juneau, AK

GeoTek Alaska

Direct push

Geoprobe 6620 DT


NA

BORING LOCATION:


DROP:

DATE STARTED:

Surface Elevation:

DESCRIPTION


HAMMER WEIGHT:



FIRST

--

Ground Surface

NA

DE

PT

H(f

eet)

SAMPLESREMARKS

Blo

ws/

Foo

t

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

No.

(ppm

)X

RF

(P

b)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15




Soil was screened in thefield using a Delta Innov-Xportable XRF detector

Drillers report soft drillingconditions at ~ 7.0 ft

SB

-3-

0.0-

1.5

SB

-3-

1.5-

3.0

SB

-3-

5.0-

6.0


POORLY-GRADED SAND with SILT and GRAVEL (SP-SM):Brown, moist, 70% fine to medium SAND with 15% silt and 15%gravel

POORLY-GRADED GRAVEL (GP): Rust orange, wet, peaGRAVELSANDY SILT (ML): Gray, moist, 70% low plastic fines with 30%fine sand


20

29

30

ND<9

MEASURING POINT:

DATE FINISHED:


0

REG. NO.


DRILLING METHOD:

DRILLING EQUIPMENT:



COMPL.

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.):

Nathan Moxley

Nathan Moxley

10.0

6/10/14 6/10/14

Juneau, AK

GeoTek Alaska

Direct push

Geoprobe 6620 DT


NA

BORING LOCATION:


DROP:

DATE STARTED:

Surface Elevation:

DESCRIPTION


HAMMER WEIGHT:



FIRST

--

Ground Surface

NA

DE

PT

H(f

eet)

SAMPLESREMARKS

Blo

ws/

Foo

t

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

No.

(ppm

)X

RF

(P

b)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15





SB

-4-

0.5-

2.0

SB

-4-

2.0-

3.5

POORLY-GRADED SAND with SILT and GRAVEL (SP-SM): Gray,wet, 70% fine to medium SAND with 15% low plastic fines and 15%gravel

Asphalt


Boring terminated at 5 feet below ground surface and backfilled withbentonite chips

ND<12

126

118

14

MEASURING POINT:

DATE FINISHED:


0

REG. NO.


DRILLING METHOD:

DRILLING EQUIPMENT:



COMPL.

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.):

Nathan Moxley

Nathan Moxley

5.0

6/10/14 6/10/14

Juneau, AK

GeoTek Alaska

Direct push

Geoprobe 6620 DT


NA

BORING LOCATION:


DROP:

DATE STARTED:

Surface Elevation:

DESCRIPTION


HAMMER WEIGHT:



FIRST

--

Ground Surface

NA

DE

PT

H(f

eet)

SAMPLESREMARKS

Blo

ws/

Foo

t

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

No.

(ppm

)X

RF

(P

b)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15





SB

-5-

0.6-

2.0

SB

-5-

2.0-

3.0

POORLY-GRADED SAND with SILT and GRAVEL (SP-SM):Brown, moist to wet, 70% fine to medium SAND with 15% lowplastic fines, and 15% gravel

Asphalt


POORLY-GRADED SAND with SILT and GRAVEL (SP-SM):Brown, moist, 55% fine to medium SAND with 30% low plastic finesand 15% gravel

Boring terminated at 5 feet below ground surface and backfilled withbentonite chips

ND<12

733

12

MEASURING POINT:

DATE FINISHED:


0

REG. NO.


DRILLING METHOD:

DRILLING EQUIPMENT:



COMPL.

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.):

Nathan Moxley

Nathan Moxley

5.0

6/10/14 6/10/14

Juneau, AK

GeoTek Alaska

Direct push

Geoprobe 6620 DT


NA

BORING LOCATION:


DROP:

DATE STARTED:

Surface Elevation:

DESCRIPTION


HAMMER WEIGHT:



FIRST

--

Ground Surface

NA

DE

PT

H(f

eet)

SAMPLESREMARKS

Blo

ws/

Foo

t

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

No.

(ppm

)X

RF

(P

b)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15





SB

-6-

0.9-

2.0

SB

-6-

2.0-

3.0

SB

-6-

5.0-

7.0

Asphalt

POORLY-GRADED SAND with GRAVEL (SP): Light brown, moist,85% fine to medium SAND with 15% gravel

wood debris

POORLY-GRADED SAND with SILT and GRAVEL (SP-SM):Brown, moist, 55% fine SAND, 30% low plastic fines, and 15%gravel


161/189

10

17

ND<10

1.4

ND<11

ND<12

ND<12

MEASURING POINT:

DATE FINISHED:


0

REG. NO.


DRILLING METHOD:

DRILLING EQUIPMENT:



COMPL.

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.):

Nathan Moxley

Nathan Moxley

10.0

6/10/14 6/10/14

Juneau, AK

GeoTek Alaska

Direct push

Geoprobe 6620 DT


NA

BORING LOCATION:


DROP:

DATE STARTED:

Surface Elevation:

DESCRIPTION


HAMMER WEIGHT:



FIRST

--

Ground Surface

NA

DE

PT

H(f

eet)

SAMPLESREMARKS

Blo

ws/

Foo

t

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

No.

(ppm

)X

RF

(P

b)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15





SB

-7-

1.0-

2.5

SB

-7-

2.5-

4.0

SB

-7-

5.0-

6.4

Asphalt


POORLY-GRADED SAND with SILT and GRAVEL (SP-SM): Gray,moist, 55% fine SAND with 30% low plastic fines and 15% gravel


12

13

15

ND<14

MEASURING POINT:

DATE FINISHED:


0

REG. NO.


DRILLING METHOD:

DRILLING EQUIPMENT:



COMPL.

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.):

Nathan Moxley

Nathan Moxley

10.0

6/10/14 6/10/14

Juneau, AK

GeoTek Alaska

Direct push

Geoprobe 6620 DT


NA

BORING LOCATION:


DROP:

DATE STARTED:

Surface Elevation:

DESCRIPTION


HAMMER WEIGHT:



FIRST

--

Ground Surface

NA

DE

PT

H(f

eet)

SAMPLESREMARKS

Blo

ws/

Foo

t

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

No.

(ppm

)X

RF

(P

b)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15





SB

-8-

0.0-

1.25

SB

-8-

1.25

-2.5

SB

-8-

5.0-

6.0

POORLY-GRADED SAND with SILT and GRAVEL (SP-SM):Brown, moist, 55% fine to medium SAND with 30% gravel and 15%low plastic fines

wood debris

gray SILT lens (ML)gray GRAVEL lens (GP)wood debris


58

31

16

MEASURING POINT:

DATE FINISHED:


0

REG. NO.


DRILLING METHOD:

DRILLING EQUIPMENT:



COMPL.

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.):

Nathan Moxley

Nathan Moxley

10.0

6/10/14 6/10/14

Juneau, AK

GeoTek Alaska

Direct push

Geoprobe 6620 DT


NA

BORING LOCATION:


DROP:

DATE STARTED:

Surface Elevation:

DESCRIPTION


HAMMER WEIGHT:



FIRST

--

Ground Surface

NA

DE

PT

H(f

eet)

SAMPLESREMARKS

Blo

ws/

Foo

t

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

No.

(ppm

)X

RF

(P

b)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15





SB

-9-

0.9-

2.0

SB

-9-

2.0-

3.5

SB

-9-

5.0-

6.0

Asphalt


wood debris

SANDY SILT with GRAVEL (ML): Gray, moist, 55% low plasticfines, 30% fine sand, and 15% gravel


14

ND<10

ND<9

MEASURING POINT:

DATE FINISHED:


0

REG. NO.


DRILLING METHOD:

DRILLING EQUIPMENT:



COMPL.

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.):

Nathan Moxley

Nathan Moxley

10.0

6/10/14 6/10/14

Juneau, AK

GeoTek Alaska

Direct push

Geoprobe 6620 DT


NA

BORING LOCATION:


DROP:

DATE STARTED:

Surface Elevation:

DESCRIPTION


HAMMER WEIGHT:



FIRST

--

Ground Surface

NA

DE

PT

H(f

eet)

SAMPLESREMARKS

Blo

ws/

Foo

t

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

No.

(ppm

)X

RF

(P

b)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15





SB

-10-

1.0-

2.5

SB

-10-

2.5-

4.0

Asphalt


GRAVELLY SILT with SAND (ML): Brown, moist, 55% low plasticfines, 30% fine sand, and 15% gravel

color change to gray


95

ND<12

13

ND<8

ND<12

MEASURING POINT:

DATE FINISHED:


0

REG. NO.


DRILLING METHOD:

DRILLING EQUIPMENT:



COMPL.

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.):

Nathan Moxley

Nathan Moxley

10.0

6/10/14 6/10/14

Juneau, AK

GeoTek Alaska

Direct push

Geoprobe 6620 DT


NA

BORING LOCATION:


DROP:

DATE STARTED:

Surface Elevation:

DESCRIPTION


HAMMER WEIGHT:



FIRST

--

Ground Surface

NA

DE

PT

H(f

eet)

SAMPLESREMARKS

Blo

ws/

Foo

t

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

No.

(ppm

)X

RF

(P

b)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15





B-1

1-0.

0-1.

25S

B-1

1-1.

25-2

.5S

B-1

1-5.

0-6.

0

POORLY-GRADED SAND with SILT and GRAVEL (SP-SM):Brown, moist, 55% fine to medium SAND with 30% gravel and 15%low plastic fines

dark brown

wood debris

becomes wet at 8.5 feet


115

33

46-197

ND<10

ND<9

MEASURING POINT:

DATE FINISHED:


0

REG. NO.


DRILLING METHOD:

DRILLING EQUIPMENT:



COMPL.

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.):

Nathan Moxley

Nathan Moxley

10.0

6/10/14 6/10/14

Juneau, AK

GeoTek Alaska

Direct push

Geoprobe 6620 DT


NA

BORING LOCATION:


DROP:

DATE STARTED:

Surface Elevation:

DESCRIPTION


HAMMER WEIGHT:



FIRST

--

Ground Surface

NA

DE

PT

H(f

eet)

SAMPLESREMARKS

Blo

ws/

Foo

t

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

No.

(ppm

)X

RF

(P

b)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15





B-1

2-0.

3 -

1.0 organic duff

SANDY SILT with GRAVEL (ML): Gray, moist, 55% low plasticfines, 30% fine sand, and 15% gravel

Boring terminated at 1 foot below ground surface and backfilled withnative soil cuttings

18

MEASURING POINT:

DATE FINISHED:


0

REG. NO.


DRILLING METHOD:

DRILLING EQUIPMENT:



COMPL.

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.):

Nathan Moxley

Nathan Moxley

1.0

6/11/14 6/11/14

Juneau, AK

GeoTek Alaska

Hand auger

Hand auger

NA

BORING LOCATION:


DROP:

DATE STARTED:

Surface Elevation:

DESCRIPTION


HAMMER WEIGHT:



FIRST

--

Ground Surface

NA

DE

PT

H(f

eet)

SAMPLESREMARKS

Blo

ws/

Foo

t

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

No.

(ppm

)X

RF

(P

b)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15





SB

-13-

0.2

- 1.

0 organic duff

SILTY SAND with GRAVEL (SM): Brown, wet, 55% fine to mediumSAND with 30% low plastic fines and 15% gravel


31

MEASURING POINT:

DATE FINISHED:


0

REG. NO.


DRILLING METHOD:

DRILLING EQUIPMENT:



COMPL.

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.):

Nathan Moxley

Nathan Moxley

1.0

6/11/14 6/11/14

Juneau, AK

GeoTek Alaska

Hand auger

Hand auger

NA

BORING LOCATION:


DROP:

DATE STARTED:

Surface Elevation:

DESCRIPTION


HAMMER WEIGHT:



FIRST

--

Ground Surface

NA

DE

PT

H(f

eet)

SAMPLESREMARKS

Blo

ws/

Foo

t

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

No.

(ppm

)X

RF

(P

b)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15





SB

-14-

1.0

- 2.

0


Boring terminated at 4 feet below ground surface and backfilled withnative soil cuttings

44 / 57

21 / 31

24 / 24

MEASURING POINT:

DATE FINISHED:


0

REG. NO.


DRILLING METHOD:

DRILLING EQUIPMENT:



COMPL.

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.):

Nathan Moxley

Nathan Moxley

4.0

6/11/14 6/11/14

Juneau, AK

GeoTek Alaska

Hand auger

Hand auger

NA

BORING LOCATION:


DROP:

DATE STARTED:

Surface Elevation:

DESCRIPTION


HAMMER WEIGHT:



FIRST

--

Ground Surface

NA

DE

PT

H(f

eet)

SAMPLESREMARKS

Blo

ws/

Foo

t

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

No.

(ppm

)X

RF

(P

b)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15





SB

-15-

1.5-

2.0

SB

-15-

2.0

- 2.

5


Boring terminated at 2.75 feet below ground surface and backfilledwith native soil cuttings

27 / 56

52 / 28

106/331/6304

1200/176/10072555/345

MEASURING POINT:

DATE FINISHED:


0

REG. NO.


DRILLING METHOD:

DRILLING EQUIPMENT:



COMPL.

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.):

Nathan Moxley

Nathan Moxley

2.8

6/11/14 6/11/14

Juneau, AK

GeoTek Alaska

Hand auger

Hand auger

NA

BORING LOCATION:


DROP:

DATE STARTED:

Surface Elevation:

DESCRIPTION


HAMMER WEIGHT:



FIRST

--

Ground Surface

NA

DE

PT

H(f

eet)

SAMPLESREMARKS

Blo

ws/

Foo

t

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

No.

(ppm

)X

RF

(P

b)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15





SB

-16-

2.5-

3.0


Boring terminated at 3 feet below ground surface and backfilled withnative soil cuttings

22

32/11

26/26/17

19/60/26

MEASURING POINT:

DATE FINISHED:


0

REG. NO.


DRILLING METHOD:

DRILLING EQUIPMENT:



COMPL.

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.):

Nathan Moxley

Nathan Moxley

3.0

6/11/14 6/11/14

Juneau, AK

GeoTek Alaska

Hand auger

Hand auger

NA

BORING LOCATION:


DROP:

DATE STARTED:

Surface Elevation:

DESCRIPTION


HAMMER WEIGHT:



FIRST

--

Ground Surface

NA

DE

PT

H(f

eet)

SAMPLESREMARKS

Blo

ws/

Foo

t

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

No.

(ppm

)X

RF

(P

b)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15





SB

-17-

0.0

- 0.

5


Boring terminated at 0.5 foot below ground surface and backfilledwith native soil cuttings

38300

MEASURING POINT:

DATE FINISHED:


0

REG. NO.


DRILLING METHOD:

DRILLING EQUIPMENT:



COMPL.

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.):

Nathan Moxley

Nathan Moxley

0.5

6/11/14 6/11/14

Juneau, AK

GeoTek Alaska

Hand auger

Hand auger

NA

BORING LOCATION:


DROP:

DATE STARTED:

Surface Elevation:

DESCRIPTION


HAMMER WEIGHT:



FIRST

--

Ground Surface

NA

DE

PT

H(f

eet)

SAMPLESREMARKS

Blo

ws/

Foo

t

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

No.

(ppm

)X

RF

(P

b)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15





SB

-18-

0.0

- 1.

0 organic duff



75 / 154

MEASURING POINT:

DATE FINISHED:


0

REG. NO.


DRILLING METHOD:

DRILLING EQUIPMENT:



COMPL.

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.):

Nathan Moxley

Nathan Moxley

1.0

6/11/14 6/11/14

Juneau, AK

GeoTek Alaska

Hand auger

Hand auger

NA

BORING LOCATION:


DROP:

DATE STARTED:

Surface Elevation:

DESCRIPTION


HAMMER WEIGHT:



FIRST

--

Ground Surface

NA

DE

PT

H(f

eet)

SAMPLESREMARKS

Blo

ws/

Foo

t

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

No.

(ppm

)X

RF

(P

b)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15




APPENDIX C

Site Photos

APPENDIX C

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Glacier Highway Battery Investigation

Juneau, Alaska

AMEC Project No. SE14161140 C-1 P:\16114 - ADOT Glacier Hwy\3000 Reports\Char. Rpt and Excavation Plan\App C - select site photos\Photo Log.docx

Photograph 1 Battery debris present in soil at eastern extent of 2008 excavation, between boring locations

SB-15 and SB-17. Photo is looking east.

Photograph 2 Culvert beneath Glacier Highway, view to South.

APPENDIX C


Juneau, Alaska


Photograph 3 Hagemier garage driveway in foreground, view to South. The 2008 excavation is west of the

highway guard rail (to the right in this view), and below the edge of the embankment. Blue paint is marking the approximate location of a water main.

Photograph 4 Hagemier Garage and driveway, view is West. The blue marking paint visible on the driveway is

marking the approximate location of a 12-inch water line. The stake with pink flagging marks the Highway ROW boundary.

APPENDIX C


Juneau, Alaska


Photograph 5 Looking northwest towards the site along Glacier Highway. The Hagemier garage and driveway

are visible just north of the highway guard rail. Blue paint is marking the location of a water main.

Photograph 6 View of the 2008 excavation extent, looking northeast. The previous excavation was covered

with a layer of HDPE and geotextile fabric, then covered with the shot rock visible in this picture. The Hagemier driveway is located just above the embankment to the top left in this view, and the guard rail for the Glacier Highway is out of view behind the vegetation at the top of the embankment. The stake with pink flagging marks the ROW boundary.

APPENDIX C


Juneau, Alaska


Photograph 7 Positioning the drill rig between SB-1 and SB-3. View to the east northeast.

Photograph 8 ROW boundary, looking South from excavation.

APPENDIX D

Laboratory Data Package and Data Quality Review

AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 600 University Street, Suite 600 Seattle, Washington USA 98101-4107 Tel (206) 342-1760 Fax (206) 342-1761 www.amec.com

Memo

To: Tasya Gray Project: 16114 From: Crystal Neirby cc: Project File

Tel: 206-342-1760

Fax: 206-342-1761

Date: June 19, 2014

Subject: Glacier Highway, Battery Dump Site, Soil Investigation

June 2014 Summary Data Quality Review – SDGs YN77 and YN79

This memorandum presents a summary of the samples collected and analyzed, as well as any quality control issues encountered during analysis of 25 primary soil samples collected on June 10 and 11, 2014. The samples were submitted to Analytical Resources, Inc. (ARI), an Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) accredited laboratory located in Tukwila, Washington.

The samples were selectively analyzed for total lead and total Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver) by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 6010C with mercury by EPA Method 7471A.

The samples collected, the sample date, the associated laboratory sample ID, and the analyses conducted on the samples are listed below. Some samples were collected and placed on hold at the laboratory, as indicated in the table below.

Sample ID Date

Collected Laboratory Sample ID Requested Analyses

SB-1-0.0-1.25 6/10/2014 YN77A Total Lead

SB-1-1.25-2.5 6/10/2014 YN77B RCRA 8 Metals

SB-1-5.0-6.75 6/10/2014 YN77C Total Lead SB-2-0.0-1.75 6/10/2014 YN77D Total Lead SB-2-5.0-6.0 6/10/2014 YN77E Total Lead SB-3-0.0-1.5 6/10/2014 YN77F Total Lead SB-4-0.5-2.0 6/10/2014 YN77G Total Lead SB-4-2.0-3.5 6/10/2014 YN77H Total Lead SB-5-0.6-2.0 6/10/2014 YN77I RCRA 8 Metals

SB-5-2.0-3.0 6/10/2014 YN77J Total Lead

SB-6-0.9-2.0 6/10/2014 YN77K RCRA 8 Metals

Appendix D, Page 1 of 64

Memo June 19, 2013 Page 2 of 5

P:\16114 - ADOT Glacier Hwy\3000 Reports\Char. Rpt and Excavation Plan\App D - Data Packages and DV memo\App D - Data Quality Review Memo.doc

Sample ID Date

Collected Laboratory Sample ID Requested Analyses

SB-6-2.0-3.0 6/10/2014 YN77L Total Lead SB-6-5.0-7.0 6/10/2014 YN77M Total Lead SB-7-1.0-2.5 6/10/2014 YN77N Total Lead SB-7-5.0-6.4 6/10/2014 YN77O Total Lead

SB-8-0.0-1.25 6/10/2014 YN77P Total Lead SB-2-1.75-3.5 6/10/2014 YN77Q Archived

SB-3-1.75-3.0 6/10/2014 YN77R Archived SB-3-5.0-6.0 6/10/2014 YN77S Archived SB-7-2.5-4.0 6/10/2014 YN77T Archived

SB-10-1.0-2.5 6/10/2014 YN79A Total Lead SB-11-0.0-1.25 6/10/2014 YN79B Total Lead SB-11-5.0-6.0 6/10/2014 YN79C Total Lead SB-13-0.2-1.0 6/11/2014 YN79D Total Lead SB-15-2.0-2.5 6/11/2014 YN79E Total Lead SB-16-2.5-3.0 6/11/2014 YN79F Total Lead SB-18-0.0-1.0 6/11/2014 YN79G Total Lead SB-15-1.5-2.0 6/11/2014 YN79H RCRA 8 Metals

SB-17-0.0-0.5 6/11/2014 YN79I RCRA 8 Metals

SB-8-1.25-2.5 6/10/2014 YN79K Archived SB-8-5.0-6.0 6/10/2014 YN79L Archived SB-9-0.9-2.0 6/10/2014 YN79M Archived SB-9-2.0-3.5 6/10/2014 YN79N Archived SB-9-5.0-6.0 6/10/2014 YN79O Archived

SB-10-2.5-4.0 6/10/2014 YN79P Archived SB-11-1.25-2.5 6/10/2014 YN79Q Archived SB-12-0.3-1.0 6/11/2014 YN79R Archived SB-14-1.0-2.0 6/11/2014 YN79S Archived

Data review is based on method performance criteria and quality control (QC) criteria as documented by the laboratory and the analytical methods. The laboratory provided validation packages containing summarized sample results and associated quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) data. The most current control limits provided by the laboratory were used to evaluate the QC data. Holding times, method blanks, laboratory control samples (LCS), matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) results, laboratory duplicate results, and reporting limits were reviewed to assess compliance with applicable methods and the QAPP. If data




qualification was required, data were qualified in general accordance with the definitions and use of qualifying flags outlined in the EPA guidance (EPA, 2004).

Samples were received by ARI on June 12, 2014. The temperatures of the coolers were recorded upon receipt and were below the maximum acceptable temperature of 6 degrees Celsius (C).

Samples were analyzed for the analytes and by the methods identified above and were evaluated for the following criteria.

1. Holding Times – Acceptable

2. Blanks – Acceptable

A field blank was not collected during this sampling event, in accordance with the sampling and analysis plan. Sample results are not qualified.

3. LCS (or Blank Spike) – Acceptable

4. MS/MSD – Acceptable except as noted:

The recovery for barium in the MS performed with sample SB-1-1.25-2.50 and associated with SDG YN77 was 131 percent, greater than the control limit of 75 to 125 percent. The barium results in the associated samples were qualified as estimated and flagged with a “J” due to the potential high bias.

The recovery for lead in the MS performed with sample SB-15-1.5-2.0 and associated with SDG YN79 was greater than the control limit of 75 to 125 percent. The concentration of the sample was greater than five times the concentration of the spike added; therefore, the control limits are not applicable and sample results are not qualified.

5. Laboratory Duplicates – Acceptable except as noted:

The relative percent difference (RPD) for chromium in the duplicate performed with sample SB-1-1.25-2.50 and associated with SDG YN77 was 23 percent, greater than the control limit of 20 percent. The chromium results in the associated samples were qualified as estimated with detections flagged with a “J” and non-detected values flagged with a “UJ”.

The RPDs for barium and lead in the duplicate performed with sample SB-15-1.5-2.0 and associated with SDG YN79 were 46.8 and 38.1 percent respectively, greater than the control limit of 20 percent. The primary and duplicate results for cadmium were not both greater than five times the value of the reporting limit, and the absolute




value of the difference between the primary and duplicate results exceeded the value of the reporting limit. Therefore, the barium, cadmium, and lead results in the associated samples were qualified as estimated with detections flagged with a “J” and non-detected values flagged with a “UJ”.

6. Reporting Limits – Acceptable

OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF DATA

The ARI SDGs YN77 and YN79 are 100 percent complete. The data usability is based on EPA’s guidance documents. Few problems were identified and analytical performance was generally within specified limits. The data are acceptable and meet the project’s data quality objectives.

TABLE 1

SAMPLE IDS AND QUALIFIED RESULTS

Sample ID Qualified Analyte

Qualified Result (mg/kg)

Qualifier Reason

SB-1-0.0-1.25 None

SB-1-1.25-2.5 Barium

Chromium 235 J 35.7 J

MS Recovery LD RPD

SB-1-5.0-6.75 None

SB-2-0.0-1.75 None

SB-2-5.0-6.0 None

SB-3-0.0-1.5 None

SB-4-0.5-2.0 None

SB-4-2.0-3.5 None

SB-5-0.6-2.0 Barium


MS Recovery LD RPD

SB-5-2.0-3.0 None

SB-6-0.9-2.0 Barium


MS Recovery LD RPD

SB-6-2.0-3.0 None

SB-6-5.0-7.0 None

SB-7-1.0-2.5 None

SB-7-5.0-6.4 None

SB-8-0.0-1.25 None

SB-10-1.0-2.5 Lead 64 J LD RPD




Sample ID Qualified Analyte

Qualified Result (mg/kg)

Qualifier Reason

SB-11-0.0-1.25 Lead 83 J LD RPD



SB-15-2.0-2.5 Lead 1,330 J LD RPD


SB-18-0.0-1.0 Lead 169 J LD RPD

SB-15-1.5-2.0

Barium Cadmium

Lead

190 J 0.2 J

1,360 J LD RPD

SB-17-0.0-0.5

Barium Cadmium

Lead

126 J 5.2 J

50,400 J LD RPD Notes:

LD = lab duplicate RPD = relative percent difference mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram MS = matrix spike RPD = relative percent difference REFERENCES

AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (AMEC), 2014, Sampling and Analysis Plan, Battery Dump Site Investigation, Glacier Highway, Juneau, Alaska: Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Juneau, Alaska, June.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2013, U.S. EPA National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Superfund Data Review (ISM02.1): EPA 540-R-013-001, October.


J/ E Analytical Resources, Incorporated

-/- Analytical Chemists and Consultants\J

June 18,2014

Tasya GrayAmec Environment & Infrastructure600 University Suite 600Seattle, WA 98101

RE: Client Project: Glacier HighwayARI Job: YN77 and YN79

Dear Tasya:

Please find enclosed the original Chain-of-Custody (COC) record, sample receiptdocumentation, and the final results for samples from the project referenced above. AnalyticalResources, Inc. (ARI) accepted thirty eight soil samples on June 12,2014. For further detailsregarding sample receipt, please refer to the enclosed Cooler Receipt Form.

The samples were analyzed for Total Metals, as requested on the COC.

The matrix spike in association with sample SB-1-1 .25-2.50 is out of control high for bariumwith an RPD for chromium outside of control limits.

The sample duplicate RPD for barium and lead are outside of control limits in associationwith sample SB-15-1 .5-2.0.

An electronic copy of this report and all associated raw data will be kept on file at ARI. If youhave any questions or require additional information, please contact me at your convenience.

Sincerely,

ANALY/ICAL RESOURCES, INC.

#&ffiClient Services Manaser(206) [email protected]

Page 1 of 4.-4611 South 134th Place, Suite 100. TukwilaWAg8l68 o 206-695-6200 o 206-695-62O1 fax


o,G

o=(!ooof

oo)co.9.

oot-o-c

=d(Uoo-oE

o.9o.9cofoo)

oo6Eoo.+o)

o)

q)

(oo(g

(!

oooooEoE(!o.9oo(5-=

o=()=at(l)c-oo-o'-b(Eo<po9EE

{ E=cF>.9 5-oo aEE EE: o-Ex tr(UH 6i;- (/)ori <FS ;ie .99E EFP r*E 69P E€F d9g pE: .EEX

'L€E Eb.!) 6 :ilD Ulg

"8*rrx8 9

$FESFE

$EEdERo=so> csdRt$F: E.s

s* FE[iEqr-F *sGsFE B

$$i8phFE €

"RE €

EE8$ SHEbs;E $

s$gSHE€$FH SF

*$$Foo=r*e-H $;

E€H

$tEI FFg$$I9oIF-Ef *bS€sti.$-qsE.\G$ap

EEEEgEs $E

#ffiffi

!=^ -f;E= €vos

5e; fEE g 3o,vi YEg-P9

= E€ix

=gE:?R x

= -E59li€;3 -s-3 E

e?s3t:

s

f;rdY

s{ss

5 rJa'J:ij

-:t, .ol\- "\ --

o -Jg dT; ;cr

=-*= ;

ootEoE.2o-=(Etr

Lo(E

o.Ct(EJcd

EoC)oEt,oo=ooCCE.Co Appendix D, Page 14 of 64

o(uco6ooo

jo)o)o

.U'

c)o

==ct(gEo_ooE(!

o.9o.9EJ@

o(5o6oo@

oo_-q)

oo(D

(U

o6Eo(uc

ocooooEo13(!

.9.E

oG'=

o_x6Io)c_oo:()'=b(EO<Eo9EE. E-

ctr>.e 5-o;\ 5Ev q0)e E6

o_ _o

(s(o(/)ri <hhi >oo) .)c)5=>I _og

E 69a '89F CYai oy5 5!6 E"': -EEd sFc EiD.!r o=U) ('tg

s-P

5E$gi R9\*dpHoEtQ* trcxo

t$tS 6.s

s$ F*!iEo-S Es6sER.5

$Ft8pb

FE g

"uE€EEE$sHEbsIE H

s $ggHE

EgFH SFs ii$$F$st-Q=*EH$;H$siEHiesXFEBE8ES3qstgE$coXlF-=

R *b

=.€ E

RE$s.E 3S*F

rH$

$E$[ 9,fi -!.d

P=^ -tc= €

8J.^ SsE g 3o rv: YEcL*9i E€ix

=q; qcioo U&U:<R r==-- >Y c'ggs-E-sEi>- :9 >

€€gEH;

s

>

8UFUdsg{Eq:

s6Q€:o!

9.Eq

oo=EoE.12o->(Etr

L0CgLoltoJ

oU

EoooEItoo=ooc(U.co Appendix D, Page 15 of 64

o(uc(l)

=ooo

joo)

-9.2oo.93d(!

o_ooE(E

o-oo.9

fooC'o6oo@

oo_'oooo(go(Uooo)(uc

oooan

o

o)

(!.o

o)

.g

=(E-oo:o'=b(ro<Eo9-x66. E-E 'F>

.o 5-ov @o)E Efr==>3 tr(dh 66_ (/,ottr =ch loo OOs=>E 8EE 69O EJtr tr:/0 9EI O!2

: sE;( CLE- Eb.s) ox(a urg

-RFrr

FetgE R9\*Te$

$HS<Xc\ ;<'-

FigT Sss6sx(/)-

FEH

$ iliFesFEE

"[E€EEE$;sEbs;E H

s $g

SHE€gFH 3F

r$E-(l)oE.\S*Es 91

E$$;€€5EtilE $E€}gEtgE$IPq)tF-ER *b

="$ $riS<€E

r..F IFts*E S

$8fr

g EE Ti:=- +vov:O=c..1UUU) 9Ct cj ro

o,v: Y

E9LP9L.:_-Cv9 F

= E+E- F6 qf)oo u&U:<R N

==F-59t.9.9 .e d n'=i>-'=9 >

€€siH i

8\)Fl$

?$o-glc+oqo,

oo=EoE,oan

.>oc

LoCgLo

.Ct(EJolt!tLoC)oEItoo:oo.=$Eo Appendix D, Page 16 of 64

F$f;

*Et f;SFg :

$EE gqPd .e(l)Ei

E$i€EEE E(l)>* (U

s6p E

EFtEFE € fi

"uE€ g

H:$ FEbs ;;E H €

sf,g s

$$FE

$$$EE$t s

*$EgEITR E€

s*$Tai**bT FE5t g$ =

E

iEgEAE

e*$$'Effifi*ffi

=9^ -€E= 3v6v

55; qsE g 3a,vi YEPL99='=€JX c5 E$co" Fq; qc"ro'O U&U:<R r===>\Y.EI (J O -'ro '=

i>-'59:€€sEH 3

E}(5:E)g"'{(L(

oo=EoEoo.>oc

LooLottCEJc.'!tLoC)oG

!too5oo.Eo.Co Appendix D, Page 17 of 64

trt#

FEIEesF $o:tl,()> tr (l,

$$i€$EE6o'FE tss6s E

$$iE8pG d

FE € fi

$E€ g

E Es E

sE$;

$f,$E€$F E

$$$iE$: E

E$H sHi€r E;;*g 3E

$s$rg€

i$$gFi

EEs 3o6q)

F5; $tr.t] ai t^o',!i Ig€:3r _

E EgF: E

**€fq€': ': 3 -E'3 E

t?s3t i

eu(l'?,e. ,io \lo o(!-

t:O

bT

o'\E{(6

=*

s r-dH d'i5JrF;-: iE Y]-i5f * *

Y$"dlf F: ##S##

tt,o3croE.t2o-=$C

o(!o.ctrgJoil€o(,oE!too:C)

ocTU.co


trtj*

RE€fi

F*$c$E*gSE: ;srt' ;t8p €o'SE H

ggiE

F;Eg$sF F

3:; *

sF$n

e$Ea

$$$EEHF E

*$EgE

gF$*ai

FE$gg$$ E*B FE

Eec 3o6q)

ilS; fc'o di rn

o tv: Ygs:€s_e E+6* F6 q6oro U

*:E5qs€.!8i3 E

eeeEr i

(6r,o-vFtu,XF:qt,c ct-.g\6cc

q*fft, *-f --# c-*,*i*fE*1*--?E ilts E ' -€JEFEJ€,F

g

a,o5ItoE.t2o.>$c

l-ooo.cl(gJod

EoooEItoo5ooct!(J


trd6

HE E fiFFg €

$EE EqPN .eoES

$$$ tSb.s t

F*F g

TSS H€;:oc

g$E;Fgil E

sEE fi

$E € g

E Fs :-

$E$ f,;E fr €

sHg g

gHE E

EiF E

F$$EE sii A$$; I

E$EgE:RE E€

$F$rai

iFFEIfiF$eIEp$ E*

g FE

ffiffi

eE^f;c = €

ilS; Ect oi to

o'6 6 IEPLP'o;ESF:EJU:<R Na=E59-?6€.:3-i3'Eai-';: ;iigEH

=s

toofC'oE.12o->otr

LocltoItoJ

od

EoooEttoo3oo.soC) Appendix D, Page 20 of 64

trg*

FE$fi

FE$s

$teEs+g g;std 6< $e €t$l E

Efr H E

ss$€eEE E

$E s 5

E:fi 6tbs ;[E H €

ssg f,

g$t;irE E

$$$EE$s E

E$$ FC;q$ ;;

$F$EiEri$ s ;F E g E sE

$rst Eg*H g g sa

$ E$B FE

f;E5 €!O: 6rUU- 9tr'o ai 4O !9J Ygg:s8 -AEsF:E^Y- - <'O v;--€>$3=== >\Y (!

-g.gss n :--._>-': I i€€eFH I

(D+E.!({*;z-r()\(D r,,

9'so-d

qfts t-.r-? d'ffi f-R#i&rff*{l}E fiE i E '*..dEFEJF##

oo5EToE

.9,eD

-ao

o(u

o..ct(uJdtto(JoEItoa5ootrnt

oAppendix D, Page 21 of 64

Sample ID Cross Reference Report

ARI Job No: YN77Cl-ient: AMEC Environment & Inf rastructur

Project Event: N/AProject Name: Glacier Highway Battery Inves.

irs5fisr!@INGORPORATED

Sarple IDARI

Lab IDARI

LIMS ID Matrix Sample Date/Time \,1TSR

1. SB-1-0 .0-L.252. SB-1-1 .25-2.505. 5b-r-r. u-b. /34. SB-2-0.0-1.75

b. >iJ-J-u.u-l-.3? cD-/l -n

q,-, n

t. 5b-4-2.u-J.JY. bIJ-3-U.O-Z.U1U . >tr-3-2. U-J . U

,L_1 . Ju-O-U.Y-Z.U)-2. >B-o-2. u-J. u1J. 5u-b-J. U- / . U

).q- srj-/-I.v-z.a15. sij-/-3.U-b.416. SB-8-0.0-L.251.1 . SB-2-1.75-3.51u. Su-J--1 .5-J. U

10 eD-?-tr n-6 n

20. sB-1-2.5-4.0

06/1,2/L4 12:2006/1,2/1,4 12:2006 / 12 / 1,4 L2:2006/L2/14 12:2006/1,2/1-4 L2:2006/12/1-4 12:2006/1,2/1,4 12:20

YN7 7AYN7 7BYN7 7CYN77DYN77EYN77FYN7 7GYN77HYN77]YN77JYN77KYN77LYN7 7MYN7 7NYN7 7OYN77PYN7 7QYN77RYN77SYN7 7T

L4-LL44r1,4-1,r 4 42r4-1,L443L4-LL444L4-LL445L4-i'1_4461,4-174 471,4-11,4 48L4-L1,44914-1145014 - 114 51I4-LL45214-11453I4-LL45414 - 114 55I4-LL456r4-L145114-11458I4-Ir4591,4-1L460

Soi ISoi f5 01.l-5OI.LSoi ISoi ISoi-l-50r.1-501.1-Soil-SoilSoil-Soil-Soil-Soil-Soil-Soil-501-t501 1

s011

06/L0/1,4 08:4006/1,0/14 08:4506/I0/14 08:5506/I0/14 09:4506/10/1,4 10:0006/1,0 /14 1O:5506/I0/74 11:4006/1,0/I4 11:4506/10/14 t2:L006/10/1,4 12:L506/70/14 13:5006/70/14 13:5506/I0/14 14:0006/1-0/L4 1.4:2506/IO/14 14:3506/I0/t4 15:05O6/I0/14 09:5006/I0/14 11:0006/I0/1,4 11:1006/I0 /14 14 :30

06/12/14 L2|2006/12/1,4 12:2006 / 12 / 1,4 12:2006/L2/14 1.2:2006/12/L4 L2:2006/12/L4 12:2006/12/1,4 12:2006/12/14 12:2006/L2/14 12:2006/12/1-4 L2.2006/1,2/L4 12:2006/12/74 L2:2006/12/14 12:20

Printed 06/13/14 Page 1of

qd-S,,*-Tr-f fRf;ftfm 'q fEg s-s * E aJ*s#&#Appendix D, Page 22 of 64

Sample ID Cross Reference Report ir3sn:tb@INCORPORATED

ARI Job No: YN79Client: AMEC Environment & Infrastructur

Project. Event: N/APro j ect Name: Gl-acier Highway Battery Inv

Sample IDARI

Lab IDARI

LIMS ID Matrix Sample Date,/Time VTSR

t- . 5u-_LU--L . V-Z .:)2. SB-11-0 .0-r.253. SB-11-5.0-6.0q. 5b--LJ-U.Z-r.U5. SB-15-2 .0-2.5b. 5u-_Lo-2.3-J. u1 . SB-18-0.0-1.0d. SlJ-_Ll-_1 .3-Z.U9. SB-17-0.0-0.510. sB-8-1 .25-2.511. SB-8-5.0-6.012. sB-9-0.9-2.013. SB-9-2.0-3.514. sB-9-5.0-6.0_LJ. StJ-LU-Z.l-4.UI6. SB-11-1 .25-2.5L1 . SB-12-0.3-1.018. SB-14-1 .0-2.0

06/1,0/I4 16:3006/10/14 17:0506/I0/14 I7:2006/17/14 09:2506/II/14 10:3006/II/14 1O:4006/1I/14 II:2506/II/1,4 L0z2506/I7/14 11:0006/70/74 15:1006/10/14 15:4006/10/L4 16:0006/L0/14 16:0506/I0/14 16:1006/I0/14 16:3506/10/14 17:1006/Il/14 09:.20O6/11,/74 09:15

06/1-2/L4 12:2006/12/14 1,222006/12/14 12:2006/L2/L4 12:2006/12/14 L2:2006 / 12 / 1,4 12:2006 / L2 / 14 1-2:2006/L2/I4 12:2006/12/1,4 12:2006/12/1,4 12:2006/L2/L4 1222006/12/14 1,2:2006/12/L4 12:2006/12/14 12:2006/L2/L4 12:2006/1"2/L4 L2:2006 / 12 / 1,4 12:2006 / 12 / 1,4 12:20

YN7 9AYN7 9BYN7 9CYN7 9DYN7 9EYN7 9FYN7 9GYN7 9HYN79IYN7 9KYN7 9LYN7 9MYN7 9NYN7 90YN7 9PYN7 9QYN7 9RYN7 95

1_4-LL46LL4-L]-462L4-LL463I4-1L464I4-II465r4-LL466r4-7r467r4-71468r4-11,469L4-LL41 L

L4-LL4'7 2L4-II41 374-r741 4

14-I141 514-1"r4"7 6r4-7L41 1

I4-I141 8

L4-L141 9

SoilSoi-l-501-L501_.1_

501_.1_

50r-l-5 0t_.1_

Soil-Soi-1SolfSoi ISoil5 0_L -L

Soil-SoifSoil501.1-501-.1-

Printed 06/13/14 D: na lof

-q-i tu- 4 "-? *J- fr* tr*ff.* "{ ,*i F *4 i r -ai;s E;i €J-_- ji, LAppendix D, Page 23 of 64

-.JlE Analytical R.esources, lncorporateda'D Analytical Chemists and Consultants

-

CoeBer ReeeEpt FormA

ARlclient l\ mgC laciv nry lrtuCOC No(s)

Assigned ARI Job No:

Preliminary Examination Phase:

were intact, properly signed and dated custody seals attached to the outsrde of to cooler?

Were custody papers included wrth the cooler?

Were custody papers properly frlled out (ink, signed, etc.) .. . . . . ... .

Temperatur?tffoole(s) ('C) (recommended 2 0-6.0 .C for chemrstry)nme t vb\)lf cooler temperature is out of compliance frll

Cooler Accepted by:

NA

n11

t^., l77O

Were all bottle labels complete and legible?

Drd the number of containers listed on COC match wrth the number of containers received?

Drd all bottle labels and tags agree with custody papers? ... ... .

Were all bottles used correct for the requested analyses?

Do any of the analyses (bottles) requtre preservatron? (altach preservatton sheet, excludrng VOCs),..

Were all VOC vrals free of air bubbles?

Was suffrcient amount of sample sent in each bottle? .

Date VOC Trip Blank was made at ARl..

Was Sample Splrt byARl , W YES Date/Time

N{6{"/

samples Logged ov. 't/J o"t",

Equipment:_ Split by

latl'* Notify Project Manager of discrepSncies or concems **

WNo*4 No

*cNoAE" No

YES NO

YES NO

@No

Sample lD on Bottle sample lD on COC Sample lD on Bottle Sample lD on GOC

Additi onal Notes, Di screpancies, E Reso/utions;

By: Date:

Ak Brfrblec ll rtefi|l6tla*'-'zrn$ ll f.{ rnm

' -' ii *.trlSmalt)'sm" (<2mm)

Peebubbles ) "pb" (2 to <4 mm )

Lrrge)"1g"(4to<6mm)Ileadsprce * "hs" (>6 mm)

0016F3t2t1o

Revision 014

Er"fr{ i-F *F f=Sr'H"*ih "f ffi HE { i A.d€iEF.E.,€"

Cooler Receipt Form


INORGAIIICS AT.IAI,YSIS DATA SHEETTOTAI, METALSPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: YN77ALIMS ID: 14-L744IMatrix: SoifData Refease AuthorizedRonnrf orl . 06/1R /14

Percent Total- Sofidsz 9L.22

iissnstb@INCORPORATED

SampJ.e ID: SB-1-0 .O-L.25SAI'{PLE

or- Qannrf rrTn. vN177-AI{EC EnvirOnment & InfrastruqturProject: Glacier Highway Battery Inves.

Date Sampled: 06/L0/14Date Received: 06/1,2/1,4

PrepMeth

PrepDate

Analysis AnalysisMethod Date CAS Nunber Anal-yte LOQ ng,/kg-d1.j,

30508 06/16/1,4 6010C 06/17 /r4

U-Analyte undetected at given LOQLOQ-Limit of Quantitation

7 439-92-t Lead 2s3

FORM-I\.ee,.{"?'ir ' fftrli&dF,{ "T*


TNORGA}TICS ATiIAIYSIS DATA SIIEETTOTAI, METALSPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: YN778LIMS 1D:. I4-1,I442Matrix: SoiLData Refease Authorized:Ronnri-cd. O6/1o'/I4

firsbfisrb@INCORPORATED

Sample ID: SB-1-1 .25-2.5OSAI"IPLE

OC Rcnnrl- Nn: YN77-AMEC Environment & InfraStructurProject: GLacier Highway Battery Inves.

Date Sampled: 06/I0/I4Date Received: 06/12/L4

Percent Total- Soli-ds: 8'7.6eo

Prep Prep Analysis AnalysisMeth Date Method Date CAS Nunber Analyte LOQ nglkg-dry a

30508 06/16/14 6010c 06/11 /1,4 7440-38-2 Arsenic 5 L230508 06/1,6/74 6010c 06/I'7 /I4 7440-39-3 Barium 0.3 23530508 06/16/14 6010C 06/11 /74 7440-43-9 Ca.r-iun 0.2 1.830508 06/76/1,4 6010C 06/17 /1"4 7440-47-3 Chromiun 0.5 35.730508 06/1,6/14 6010C 06/L7 /L4 7439-92-L Lead 2 L,460CLP 06/1,6/1,4 747IA 06/11/1,4 7439-97-6 Mercury 0.02 0.0330508 06/1,6/1,4 6010C 06/17 /14 7182-49-2 SeLenium 5 5 U

30508 06/1,6/14 6010C 06/17/1,4 1440-22-4 Sil-ver 0.3 0.3 U


FORM-IY'f-$?? : Wffiffi $, ag


INORGAIIICS AI.IAIYSIS DATA SI{EETTOTAL METAI,SPage 1 of 1

T,:l-r S:mnle TD: YN77BLIMS IDt I4-II442Matrix: SoiIData Release Authorized:Rpnorl- crl : O6 / 1A / I4r\vyv! uvs.

fiIsbil:tb@INCORPORATED

Samp1e ID: SB-1-1.25-2.5ODUPLICATE

oC Renorf No: YN77-AMEC Environment & InfrastructurProject: Gl-acier Highway Battery Inves.

Date Sampled: 06/70/I4Date Received: 06/I2/14

I{ATRIX DUPLICATE QUAI,ITY CONTROL REPORT

Analysis Contro1Analyte Method Sample Duplicate RPD Linit I

Arsenic 6010C L2 1-2 0.0% +/- 5 L

Barium 6010C 235 251 8.98 +/- 202

Cadmium 6010C 1.8 1.5 1-8.22 +/- 202

Chromium 6010C 35.7 45.0 23.02 +/- 20e" *

Lead 6010c r,460 1,370 6.42 +/- 20e.

Mercury '7411-A 0.03 0.03 0.0? +/- 0.O2 L

Sel-enium 6010C 5 U 5 U 0.0? +/- 5 L

Silver 6010C 0.3 U 0.3 U 0.0? +/- 0.3 L

Reported in mglkg-dry

*-Control Limit Not MetL-RPD Invalid, Limit : Detection Lj-mit

FORM-VI

Y$€?? I ### S- ffiAppendix D, Page 27 of 64

INORGAI{ICS AI{AJ,YSIS DATA SI{EETTOTAT. METAI,Svada I nT I

Lab Sample ID: YN778LIMS ID: 74-LL442Matrix: SoifData Refease AuthorizedRennrtprl' O6/19/I4

Arsbnst:@INCORPORATED

Sanple ID: SB-1-1.25-2.5OMATRIX SPIKE

OC Rcnnrt No: YN77-AMEC Environment & InfraStructurProject: Gl-acier Highway Battery Inves.

F)rf a e:mnt ort . 06/I0 /74Date Received: 06/12/1,4

T'IATRIX SPIKE QUALITY CONTROL REPORT

Analysis Spike tAnalyte Method SanpJ.e Spike Added Recovery A

Arsenic 6010CBarium 6010CCadmium 6010CChromium 6010C 35.7Lead 6010c 7,460Mercury 1 417A 0.03Se]enium 6010CsL-LVET OUIUU

5UN ? II q6 ?

105%

131? N

10 6%

113 ?

1232 H

TI2Z105810 6%

L2235-L.tt

23451-2

58.195.6

L,1200 .28zzz

2L2212

53.053.0

2L20.223

2L253.0


N-Control- Limit Not MetH-? Recovery Not AppJ-icable, Sample Concentration Too HighNA-Not Applicable, Analyte Not Spiked

Percent Recoverv Limits z 75-125e"

FORM-V

Y*"4??: {*#g#9ffiAppendix D, Page 28 of 64

TNORGAI\IICS ATiIALYSIS DATA SHEETTOTAI, METAI,SPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: YN77CLIMS ID: L4-LL443 ^ / ./'Matrix: soil- (y>/Data Rel-ease Authorized:V I

Ronnrfcd . .i6'/1R/1A t\/l,/

Percent Totaf Sofids: 88.9%

Ar*nst:@INCORPORATED

Sanple ID: SB-1-5.0-6.75SA!!PLE

of- Ponar1- IrIa. vNI77-A!{EC Environment & InfraStructurProject: Gl-acier Highway Battery Inves.

Date SampJ-ed: 06/I0/14Date Received: 06/12/14

PrepMeth

PrepDate

Anal-ysis Analysisl4ethod Date CAS Nunber Analyte LOQ n9lkg-dry

30508 06/L6/14 6010C 06/I7 /1,4 7439-92-L Lead

U-AnaJ-yte undetected at given LOQLOQ-Limit of Quantitation

FORM-I

h.tr€T?. #wqryg?Appendix D, Page 29 of 64

INORGAI{ICS AI.IALYSTS DATA SHEETTOTAI METATSPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: YN77DLIMS ID t L4-LL444 ./

i:::'il;r:3ll o".n.ri.zed,WPannrr-aA.

^^/1a/I4 tjvvl rv' a,.,

Percent Total- Sol-idsl. 94.32

firs5nstb@INCORPORATED

SampJ.e ID: SB-2-0.0-1.75SAI"IPLE

Af Dannr+ l\ra. vr!77-AIV{EC Envj_ronment & InfrastructurYv r\vI-vr

Project: Gl-acier Highway Battery Inves.

Date SampJ-ed: 06 / I0 / 14Date Received: 06/1"2/L4

Prep Prep Analysis AnalysisMeth Date Method Date CAS Nunber Anal-yte LOA nglkg-dry O

3050B 06/16/14 6010C 06/I7 /1-4 7439-92-L Lead

U-AnaIyte undetected at given LOQLOQ-Limit of Quantitation

15

FORM-I'c*#6k€*;tr*F - fi&**i&gft,* u:1'* E€ d tr - g"d#5gl tr ff-,


INORGA}UCS ANAIYSIS DATA SHEETTOTAI METALSPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample lD: YN77ELIMS ID: 1,4-71445Matri-x: Soil-Data Release AuthorizedReported: 06/I8/L4

A:sbf;:tb@INCORFORATED

Sample ID: SB-2-5.0-6.0SAI4PLE

OC Renort No: YN77-AMEC Environment & InfrastructurProject: Gfacier Highway Battery Inves.

f)at- o (amnl arl . 06/I0/I4Date Received: 06/12/14

Percent Total Sofids. 90.4eo

Prep Prep Analysis AnalysisMeth Date Method Date CAS Nurnber Analyte LOQ ug/kg-dry A

30508 o6/16/I4 6010C 06/I1 /14 7439-92-L Lead


FORM-Iqe"R f,=-,f "F tt*{'*".P& ,* f?5 E€ 5 F . €$AiE-'-i,;.}


INORGAT.IICS AIIALYSIS DATA SHEETTOTAJ. METAI,SPage 1 of 1

Lab SampJ-e f D: YN77FLIMS ID: L4-LL446Matri-x: SoilData Rel-ease Authorized:Renortecl : O6 /18 /I4

Ais5fi:*@INGORPORATED

Sanple ID: SB-3-0.0-1.5SAt'{PLE

Af- Panarl- rrln. vN77-AMEC EnvirOnment & fnfraStrugturProject: Gfacier Highway Battery Inves.

Date Sampled: 06/L0/L4Date Received: 06/72/14

Percent Total- Sol-ids: 93. O?

Prep Prep Analysis AnalysisMeth Date Method Date CAS Nuuber Analyte LOQ nglkg-dry O

30508 06/16/14 6010C 06/1,1/1,4 7439-92-L Lead


2L3

FORM-Itdrts.ET*F' f.ffi'sffi fffi frS r1&


INORGAI{ICS AI.IAIYSIS DATA SI{EETTOTA], METAI,SPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: YN77GLIMS ID: I4-7I441 n /Matrix: Soif I\n | /

1^^^^ n..!udLd nerso-= ^.rho rized,rlY\YPonnr1- od. n6,/19./1A Y. IvvtLvtLa

v

Percent Total- Sofids: 88.34

Arstfiseb@INCORPORATED

Sample ID: SB-4-0.5-2.0SAMPLE

QC Report No: YN77-AMEC Environment & fnfrastructurProject: Gl-acier Highway Battery Inves.


Prep Prep Analysis AnalysisMeth Date Method Date CAS Nunber Analyte LOQ ng/kg-dry A

3050B 06/16/14 6010C 06/I1 /14 7439-92-L Lead

U-AnaJ-yte undetected at given LOQLOQ-Limit of Quantitati-on

2 239

FORM-I"**.*-T ? e"Fhrffirl#** J{'

i i€ 'i E drqeF6:#ffi-.**


ti3bfis*@INCORPORATED

INORGA}IICS A}.TAIYSIS DATA SHEETTOTAI METATSPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: YN77HLIMS ID: I4-!I448 h^ t ./Marrix: Soil- IWData Ref ease Authorized:t/ )'Reported : 06 / 1-B / 14 r-/

Percent Total- Sol-ids: 90.0%

Sample ID: SB-4-2.0-3.5SAMPLE

QC Report No: YN77-AMEC Environment & InfrastructurProject: Gl-acier Highway Battery lnves.

Date Sampled: 06/I0/14Date Received: 06/12/1,4

Prep Prep Analysis AnalysisMeth Date l4ethod Date CAS Nr.rnber Analyte LOQ ng/kg-dry A

30508 06/16/14 6010C 06/L1 /L4 7439-92-L Lead

U-Analyte undetected at given LOQT.OO-T.i mi f nf OrrantitationlvY lrrLrr u v! Ygs

81

FORM-Iw&.$3"tr a'i&.{-Rf=&F-tryE Sq i s " E*4:#*&


A$bn:*@INGORPORATED

INORGANICS A}IATYSIS DATA SHEETTOTAI METAI,SPage 1 of 1

T,ah Snmnlc TD. YN77ILIMS IDI 14-1L449Matrix: Soil-Data Refease Authorized:RcnorJ-ecl 'O6/1R/I4

Sample ID: SB-5-0.6-2.OSAI"!PLE

Af- Pannrf lrln. vt{77-AMEC EnvirOnment & InfraStructurYv r\vvv!

eroject: Gl-acier Hi-ghway Battery Inves.

Date SampJ-ed: 06/L0/14Date Received: 06/12/14

Percent Total- Sol-ids: 93.2eo

Prep Prep Analysis AnalysisMeth Date Method Date CAS Nunber Analyte LOQ ng/kg-dry a

3050B 06/16/74 6010c 06/I7 /14 7 440-38-2 Arsenic3050B 06/1,6/14 6010C 06/I1 /14 7440-39-3 Barium3050B 06/16/1,4 6010C 06/I1/1,4 7440-43-9 Cadnium3050B 06/1,6/1,4 6010c 06/1,1/14 7440-47-3 Chroniun3050B 06/1,6/1,4 6010c 06/11/1"4 7439-92-L LeadCLP 06/16/14 1 41IA 06/I1 /1,4 7439-97-6 Mercury3050B 06/16/14 6010C 06/I1 /14 1782-49-2 Sel-enium3050B 06/1,6/14 6010c 06/),'7 /14 '7 440-22-4 Sil-ver

U-AnaIyte undetected at given LOQLOQ-Lj-mit of Quantitation

5n?0.2nq

2

0 .025

0.3

5U1030.4

19. 1

7360. 03

5U0.3 U

FORM-I-Y"$d"Tf : ffiWWEI3


INORGAI{ICS AI{AI,YSIS DATA SHEETTOTAI, METAI,SPage 1 of 1

T,:h S:mnl o TD. YN77JLIMS ID: 14-11450Matrix: Soil-Data Rel-ease Authorized:Renortccl: O6/1R/74

firsfis*@INCORPORATED

Sample ID: SB-5-2.0-3.0SAI{PLE

Ar'- Dannrt- lrln. vN77-AMEC Environment & lnfraStructurProject: Glacier Highway Battery Inves.

Date Sampled: 06/I0/L4Date Received: 06/12/14

Percent Tota.l- Sofids: 87.2%

Prep Prep Analysis AnalysisMeth Date I'tethod Date CAS Nunber Ana].yte LOQ nglkg-dry A

30508 06/I6/L4 6010c 06/11/14 7439-92-1, Lead 6 6 U

U-Analyte undetected at given LOQT,OO-T,i mi i of Orrantitation

FORM-Irq*f*LE -:P=F ' f-Rs*fft'= * ii f,ts E- E €JEi€jg*T


AXsbf;srb@INCORPORATED

INORGA}TICS A}IALYSIS DATA SHEETTOTAL METAI,SPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: YN77KLIMS ID z I4-II45I

Reported : 06 / 1,8 / I4 tJ

Sanple ID: S8-6-0.9-2.OSA}4PLE

OC Renorf No: YN77-AMEC Environment & InfrastructurProject: Glacier Highway Battery Inves.


Percent Total Sofids:. 97.6eo

Prep Prep Analysis AnalysisMeth Date Method Date CAS Nunber Analyte LOQ mg/kS-dl,.ru A

3050B 06/16/1,4 6010C 06/I'7 /L4 7440-38-2 Arsenic3050B 06/16/1,4 6010C O6/I7 /14 7440-39-3 Barium3050B 06/16/14 6010C 06/I7 /1,4 7440-43-9 Cadnium3050B 06/16/74 6010C 06/I1 /14 7440-47-3 Chrouiun30s0B 06/16/74 6010c 06/I1 /14 7439-92-L LeadCLP 06/16/I4 147IA 06/71 /14 7439-97-6 Mercurlr3050B 06/L6/I4 6010C 06/11 /1,4 1782-49-2 Sefenium3050B 06/16/I4 6010C 06/1,1 /1,4 1440-22-4 Sif ver

U-Analyte undetected at given LOQT,OO-T,i mi t of Orrantitation

5

n?0.2nq

)0.02

5

0.3

103561.9

39.2150

0. 035U

0.3 u

FORM-Ind'e*d?-F r'ftelFffiflrffir3EIE.E,*Ei*Fm/.f;#


ANALYTICALARE$i;;E;VINCORPORATED

INORGAT{ICS AI{ATYSIS DATA SHEETTOTAI METALS Sample ID: S8-6-2.0-3.0Page 1of1 SAMPLE

Lab Sample ID: YN77L QC Report No: YN77-AMEC Environment & InfrastructurLIMS ID:. 1,4-1,7452 Project: Gl-acier Highway Battery fnves.Matrix: Soil- fh,1 z'

Data Release Authorized rl$ Date Sampled: 06/1-0/14Rannrfort. n6/1R/I4 t I Date Received: 06/12/14!\vyv!uuv.v

Percent Total- Sol-ids z 9'7.4%

Prep Prep Analysis AnalysisMeth Date lnethod Date CAS Nunber Analyte LOQ nglkg-dry A

30508 06/76/14 6010C 06/I1 /74 7439-92-L Lead

U-Analyte undetected at given LOQLOQ-Limit of Quantj-tatj-on

FORM-IYFSF?: ff#ffiff.#


INORGAI{ICS AI{AIYSIS DATA SHEETTOTAI, METALSPage 1 of 1

Lab SampJ-e ID: YN77MLIMS ID:14-11453Matrix: Soif A\i /Data Release AuthorizedlXTPanart-ad. n6'/1g./1A t" 1r\eyvrLcu. ww/ Lvt Ll I I

firs5fis*@INCORPORATED

Sample ID: SB-6-5.0-7.0SA}4PLE

QC Report No: YN77-AMEC Environment & InfrastructurProject: Gl-aci-er Highway Battery Inves.

Date Sampled: 06/I0/14Date Received: 06/12/14

Percent Total Solids: 89.1%

Prep Prep Analysis AnalysisMeth Date Method Date CAS Nunber Analyte LOQ nglkg-drl' O

30508 06/16/1,4 6010c 06/I1 /14 7439-92-L Lead


FORM-Icd'-*-g':tr-Tr d;ffiiimffi.FT TF


INORGANICS AT.IAIYSIS DATA SHEETTOTAL METAI.SDraa 'l nf 1

T,ah S:mn l o T D' YN7 7NLIMS ID. L4-LL454Matrix: Soil-Data Refease Authorized:Rennricrl . n6 /1R /I4

*rsbfiseb@INCORPORATED

Samp1e ID: SB-7-1 .0-2.5SAI'{PLE

QC Report No: YN77-AMEC Environment & InfrastructurProject: Gfacier Highway Battery Inves.

Date Sampled: 06/1,0/14Date Received: 06/12/1,4h'

Percent Total So.l-ids : 96. 0?

Prep Prep Analysis AnalysisMeth Date !4ethod Date CAS Nunber Analyte LOQ ng/kg-drlf A

30508 06/16/I4 6010C 06/I1 /74 7439-92-L Lead

U-Analyte undetected at given LOQLOQ-Li-mit of Quantitation

55

FORM-IYf{T?: $Sffiffitr&


INORGAI{ICS AT{AI,YSIS DATA SHEETTOTAI METALSPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: YN77OLIMS ID:14-11455Matrix: SoifData Release Authorized:Renorterl : O6/1R/!4

Arsffs*@INCORPORATED

Samp1e ID: SB-7-5.0-5.4SAI'{PLE

OC Ronort No: YN77-AMEC Environment & InfrastructurProject: Gl-acier Highway Battery Inves.

Date Sampled: 06/I0/L4Date Received: 06/12/74

Percent Total Sofids:. 93.4%

Prep Prep Analysis AnalysisMeth Date Method Date CAS Nunber Anal-yte LOQ ng/kg-dry a

3050B 06/L6/1,4 6010C 06/1,1 /1,4 1 439-92-1. Lead 2 2 U

U-AnaIyte undetected at given LOQLOQ-Limit of Quantitation

FORM-T-\r*iL6'*F -;F rRaGtr5h {3ffS


ANA|\rTr^^r a

"="bl'#ft9INCORPORATEDINORGANICS A}TAI,YSIS DATA SHEETTOTAI METAIS Sanple ID: SB-8-0.O-L.25Paqe 1of 1 SAIVIPLE

Tah Qrmnla rh. vN77P QC Report No: YN77-AMEC Environment & InfrastructurLIMS ID: 74-11456 t Project: Glacier Highway Battery Inves.Matrix: SoiL NA-J,Data Release Authorized rv\l/ Date Sampted: 06/10/14Pannrf ar,l . AA /1a /I4 | ) Date Received: 06/12/I4

Percent Total Sol-ids: 84.22

Prep Prep Arralysis AnalysisMeth Date Method Date CAS Nunber Analyte LOO nglkg-dr!' a

30508 06/16/14 6010C 06/1,1/1,4 7439-92-L Lead


237

FORM-IEu* .i\ f --3' -F - t-iir r'R f,Tl {3 d'-REErdi i Ei€3*5#*-=d


*Is5ff:rb@INCORPORATED

INORGA}TICS AI{ALYSIS DATATOTAI METAI,SPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: YN77MBLIMS ID: I4-II449Matri-x: Soil-Data Rel-ease Authorized:Reported : 06 / I8 / I4

Percent Total Sofids: NA

Sample ID: METHOD BLAI{K

OC Rennrf Nn: YN77-AMEC Environment &

Project: Glacier Highway Battery

Date Sampled: NADate Received: NA

InfrastructurInves.

LOQ nglkg-dry a

SHEET

PrepMeth

PrepDate

Analysis AnalysisMethod Date CAS Nunber Analyte

3050B3050B3050B3050B3050BCLP3050830508

06/16/1406/16/1406/16/7406/r6/1.406/1,6/7406/16/7406/16/1406/16/14

6010c6010c6010c6010c6010c1417A6010c6010c

06/71 /r406/r7 /r406/71/1.406/r1/r406/r7 /7406/77 /1,406/77 /7406/11/r4

1 440-38-27 440-39-37 440-43-97 440-47-37 439-92-I7 439-97 -61 1 82- 49-27 440-22-4

ArsenicBariumCadmiumChromiumT ^^i!eau

Marcrrrrr

SeleniumSllver

5n?0.2nq

z

0.025

n?

5

0.30.20.5

2

0.025

n?

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

IT-An: I rri- a rrnda1- aaf arl rl- ai rran

LOQ-Limit of QuantitationLOQ

FORM-IYFdT? : S-*wffiS g


i:sbfisrb@INCORPORATED

INORGA}iIICS AI{ALYSIS DATA SHEETTOTAI. METAI,SPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: YNTTLCSLIMS IDz 14-71449Matrix: Soi-fData Release AuthorizedRcnnried' 06/1R/14

AnaJ-yteAnalysisMethod

SampJ-e ID: LAB CONTROL

QC Report No: YN77-AMEC Environment &

Project: Gl-acier Highway Battery

Date Sampled: NADate Recei-ved: NA

BI,AI{K SPIKE QUAIITY CONTROL REPORT

InfrastructurInves.

SpikeFound

SpikeAdded

tRecovery o

ArsenicBariumCadmiumChromiumLeadMo rcr r rtl

SeleniumSiIver

6010c6010c6010c6010c6 010c1 4'7IA6010c6010c

2712r5

51.752.5

206n 5?

21053. 0

200200

50.050.0

2000. s0

20050.0

106%

108%

103%

105 %

103%

106%

105%

10 6%


N-Control l-imit not metNA-Not Applicable, Analyte Not SpikedControl Limits: 80-720%

FORM-VTI-i*/ R *';' "-* ffi' ilf**r,ffi "--'} ":F.i E .a€ i' 5 €i Egs {d.F "=,9,


ANALYTICALARE$id;EVINCORPORATED

INORGA}TICS ANAI.YSIS DATA SHEETTOTAL METALS Sample ID: S8-10-1.0-2.5Page 1of 1 SAI"IPLE

Lab Sample ID: YN79A QC Report No: YN79-AMEC Environment & InfrastructurLIMS ID: I4-M6I Project: Glacier Highway Battery lnvMatrix: SoiI A^ //Data Release AuthorizedrlVtY Date Sampled: 06/10/14Fonnr1-ari. n6'/1Q/'1 A (/ I,\sl,vr usu. uu, -u,14 '() Date Received: 06/1"2/14

Percent Total- Sofids: 95.3%

Prep Prep Analysis Anal.ysisMeth Date Method Date CAS Nunber Analyte LOQ ng/kg-dry A

3050B 06/1,6/14 6010C 06/I1 /I4 7439-92-t Lead


64

FORM-Tar*P-q*f -F " fRs:Rs'E'T ffEeEeE'gG#*#


ANALYTICAL ARESOURCESVINCORPORATED

INORGA}TICS A}IAI,YSIS DATA SHEETTOTAI METAJ.S SanpJ-e ID: SB-11-0.O-L.25Page 1of 1 SAI"IPLE

Lab Sample ID: YN79B QC Report No: YN79-AMEC Environment & InfrastructurLIMS ID: 14-11462 A Project: Gl-acier Highway Battery InvMatrix: Soif IV' /,Data Release Authorized'lW Date Sampled: 06/10/14Pannrrorl . nG/aoi.-"--.""'-| |

r\evvr Lsu. - -, -- , 14 (,/ Date Received: 06 / 12 / 14

Percent Totaf Solids: 88.5?

Prep Prep Analysis AnalysisMeth Date t'tethod Date CAS Nunber Anatyte LOQ ng/kg-dr]' a

3050B 06/16/I4 6010C 06/1,1/1,4 7439-92-L Lead


83

FORM-Tw$'{T=F fftffidft,,=.{ EE itg E: 5 EJ€jWF#-


INORGAI{ICS AT\TAIYSIS DATA SHEETTOTAI, METAISPage 1 of 1

T.:l-r S:mnl a TD: YN7 9CLIMS IDz 1,4-17463Matrix: Soil-Data Release Authorized:Ronnrfccl. 06/14/14

Arsbffseb@INCORPORATED

Sa.mp1e ID: SB-11-5. 0-6. 0SAI"IPLE

OC Ranorf No: YN79-AMEC Environment & lnfrastructurProject: Glacier Highway Battery lnv

Date SampJ-ed: 06/70/1,4Date Received: 06/12/14

Percent Tota] So]ids : 13 .6e"

Prep Prep Anal.ysis AnalysisMeth Date Method Date CAS Nunber Analyte LOQ nSlkg-dr]' A

3050B 06/16/14 6010C 06/1.7 /14 7439-92-L Lead

U-Analyte undetected at given LOQLOQ-Llmit of Quantitation

67

FORM-IErr& t:F? " d*[f,3";ffi {l'fr*:.


INORGAI{ICS AIIAI,YSIS DATA SHEETTOTAT METAf,SPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: YN79DLIMS IDz 14-11464 ' /Matrix: So11 A^ l/Data Release Authorized \fYRannrfarl . n6/1R/1A I ir\e}Jv!LUu. vv/ f v/ f : \ /

firs5#Srb@INCORPORATED

SanpJ-e ID: SB-13-0.2-L.0SAI'{PLE

rtr- Ponnrf NIn. vN179-A|,{EC Environment & InfrastructurYv r\vyv!

Project: Glacier Hi-ghway Battery fnv

Date Sampled: 06/LL/14Date Received: 06/12/14

Percent Total Solids: 85.9?

Prep Prep Analysis AnalysisMeth Date Method Date CAS Nunber Anal-yte LOQ ng/kg-dtl' A

3050B 06/16/14 6010c 06/I7 /1,4 7439-92-L Lead

U-Analyte undetected at given LOQT,On-T.imif ^f Orranlil4li6nlvv lfrrrf u v! vsu

245

FORM-IYF,d??: ffiEffiE#


INORGANICS AT\TAIYSIS DATA SI{EETTOTAI METALSPage 1 of 1

T,:h Semnlp TD: YN79ELIMS ID. L4-11465 , ,/Matrix: Soif l\/\ I /Data Refease Authorized {fYRpnorfod. 06/1R/14 \ /'\/

Als:ffSrb@INCORPORATED

Samp1e ID: SB-15-2 .O-2.5SAII{PLE

of Pannrt rrln. vN79-AMEC EnvirOnment & InfraStructurYv r\v}/v!

Project: Gl-acier Highway Battery Inv

Date Sampled: 06/II/I4Date Received: 06/L2/14

Percent Total- Solids:. 93.'7eo

Prep Prep Analysis Analysisr'teth Date t'tethod Date CAS Nunber Ana].yte LOQ ng/kg-dry O

30508 06/16/14 6010c 06/11 /I4 7439-92-l Lead 2 t,33O


FORM_I*1d-&.8:p-=? f-F,{Fffi *-;FiEEET,ES=##r


INORGANICS A}iIALYSIS DATA SHEETTOTAT METAT,SPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: YN79FLIMS IDz L4-L7466Matri-x: SoifData Refease Authorized:Rcnnrfcrl. O6/14/I4

Ars:ff:*@INCORPORATED

Sanp1e ID: SB-15-2.5-3.0SAI'4PLE

.)r- Ponarf lrln. vl.T7g-AMEC EnvirOnment & InfrastrUCtUrYv r\vt-vr

Project: Gl-acier Highway Battery Inv

Date Sampled: 06/II/14Date Received: 06/L2/14

Percent Tota-I Sof ids: A;. iZ

Prep Prep Analysis AnalysisMeth Date Method Date CAS Nunber Analyte LOQ ng/kg-&l' O

30508 06/t6/1,4 6010C 06/1,1/1,4 1439-92-t Lead 2 42

U-AnaJ-yte undetected at given LOQLOQ-Limit of Quantitation

FORM-I\f's.,,r T "]tr . fffi rE{F,',= #FE'{ei.r###Gs#


ANAIvrr^ar a*=r'iL"iEE"9INCORPORATED

INORGANTCS AI{ATYSIS DATA SHEETTOTAL METAIS SampJ-e ID: S8-18-0.0-1.0Page 1of1 SAMPLE

Lab Sample ID: YN79G QC Report No: YN79-AMEC Environment & InfrastructurLIMS ID: 14-1746'7 n^ / , Project: Gfacier Highway Battery InvMatrix: Soil- l\-2d\/Data Rel-ease Autho tir"a\\/ Date Sampled: 06/l:_/14Reported: 06/78/14 \J Date Received: 06/12/1,4

Percent Total Sofidst 63.7%

Prep Prep Analysis Anal-ysisMeth Date Method Date CAS Nunber Anatyte LOQ ng/kg-dry A

3050B 06/L6/I4 6010C 06/I1 /I4 7439-92-L Lead


3 169

FORM-Iq*fF*fi*f"3'dl4f&{&"8&EF€ffE.EF##*#


INORGAIIICS A}IAIYSIS DATATOTAI, META].SPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: YN79HLIMS ID:. 14-17468Matrix: SoifData Refease AuthorizedReported: 06/1,8/1"4

Percent Total- Solids: 92.2eo

ANALYT|C.:LG@

ft=""3JJot*o'=o

Sample ID: SB-15-1.5-2.0SAI'{PLE

oC Rcnnrt No: YN79-AMEC Environment & InfrastructurProject: Gl-aci-er Highway Battery Inv

Date Sampl-ed: 06 / II / I4Date Received: 06/L2/14

SHEET

PrepMeth

PrepDate

Anal-ysis AnalysisD4ethod Date CAS Nr:nber Anal-yte LOQ nglks-dry

305083050B3050B3050B3050BCLP305 0B

3050B

06/L6/1"406/16/1406/16/1406/L6/7406/1,6/1,406/L6/1.406/16/L406/1.6/1.4

6 010c6 010c6010c6010c6010c1417A6010c6010c

06/17 /r406/r1/r406/L7 /r406/r'7 /1406/r1/1406/r1/1406/17 /1406/r7 /r4

7 440-38-27440-39-37 440-43-97 440-47 -37 439-92-L7 439-97 -61 7 82- 49-21 440-22-4

ArsenicBariunCadniumCtrromiunLeadMo rnr r rrr

SeleniumSilver

5

190o.2

2L.81 ,360

o .025

n?

5

n?0.2nq

2

0.025

U

U

U

II-An: l rrf o rrndoJ- acf od :f ci rzanv aurqrl


FORM-I

YE..,gT r' ffiffims$mAppendix D, Page 52 of 64

INORGANICS AT.TAJ,YSIS DATATOTAI METALSPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: YN79HLIMS IDz L4-LL468Matrlx: Soil-Data Re.l-ease Authori-zed:Reported : 06 / 18 / L4

SHEET

AnalysisMethod SampJ.e

fiis5fiSrb@INCORPORATED

Sanple ID: SB-15-1.5-2.0DUPLICATE

QC Report No: YN79-AMEC Environment & InfrastructurProject: Gfacier Highway Battery lnv

Date SampJ-ed: 06/II/14Date Received: 06/L2/14

I'IATRIX DUPLICATE OUAIITY CONTROL REPORT

Analyte DuplicateContro]-Linit a

ArsenlcBari-umCadmi-umChromiumLeadMarnrr rrr

Sel-eniumSilver

Pannrl-ad i n

6 010c6 010c6 010c6010c6010c147LA6010c6010c

mglkg-dry

5U190a)

zr-d1,3600.02 u

5U0.3 u

+/- 5

+/- 202+/- 0.2+/- 202+/- 202+/- 0.02

+/- 0.3

5

1180.6

25.82,0000.02

5n?

0.0?46.8?

100?16.8?38.1?

0.0%0.0?0.0?

U

U

U

L

L*

LLL

*-Control- Li-mit Not MetL-RPD Invafid, Limit : Detection Limit

FORM-VIh-rF iH i " if ;F ffn i'R &*,S, d f ,x=d d+* !i 4 tEr€i&i=€ E


ANA|vrt^ar a

"="5L'iEEEVINCORFORATEDINORGA}TICS AI{AIYSIS DATA SHEETTOTAI METAIS Sample ID: SB-15-1.5-2.OPage 1 of 1 I'IATRIX SPIKE

T.al-r Qrmnla rr-|. vN79H QC Report No: YN79-AMEC Environment & InfrastructurLIMS ID: 14-11468 A , Project: Gl-acier Highway Battery InvMatrix: Soil- / \rr LData Rel-ease Authorized rl W Date Sampled: 06/1,1,/1,4Rannrforr' n6/1e/r4 \l I Date Received: 06/12/14,, ,/

I'IATRIX SPIKE QUALITY CONTROL REPORT

Analysis Spike tAnalyte !4ethod Sample Spike Added Recoverlr a

Chromium 6010C 27.8

Arsenic 6010CBarium 6010CCadmium 6010C

Lead

118 %

1002r1.22

-L-LJ6

36402 H

110 ?1 11%

7r2Z

5U1900.2

240394

51 .2

a ?an

204204

q1 n

51.0204

0.279204

51.0

6010c 1,360Mercury 7 477A 0.02 U 0.24Selenium 6010CSilver 6010C


N-Control- Limit Not Met

221

H-% Recovery Not Applicable, Samp1e Concentration Too HighNA-Not Applj-cable, Anal-yte Not Spiked

Percent Recoverv Limits: 15-125%

3U0.3 u 57.1.

FORM-VW $q ; 1r -F . tr1,ft ,i*ffi f;r S !t €S n=+ E 5 tf*'re"Jqgi*4.


INORGATiIICS AI.TALYSIS DATA SHEETTOTAL METALSPage 1 of 1

Lab Samp1e ID: YN79ILIMS ID: 74-11469Matrix: Soil-Data Rel-ease Authorized:Ronnrf orl . O6/1R /I4

ilsSfi:t!@INCORPORATED

SanpJ-e ID: SB-17-0. 0-0.5SAI"IPLE

flr'- Pannrf \Tn. vt\17!-AMEC EnvirOnment & InfrastructurProject: Glacier Highway Battery Inv

Date Sampled: 06/17/14Date Received: 06/72/74

Percent Totaf Solids . '7 6 .9e"

Prep Prep Analysis AnalysisMeth Date Method Date CAS Nunber Analyte LOQ nglkg-dry O

30508 06/16/1,4 6010C 06/1.1/I4 7440-38-2 Arsenic 20 4030508 06/16/14 6010C 06/1,1 /I4 7440-39-3 Barium 0.9 L263050B 06/16/14 6010C 06/L1 /14 7440-43-9 Cadnium 0. 6 5.230508 06/!6/74 6010C 06/1,1 /74 7440-47-3 Chromium 2 4330508 06/16/1,4 6010c 06/11 /I4 7439-92-L Lead 6 50,400CLP 06/16/14 147IA 06/71 /I4 7439-97-6 t'Iercury 0.02 0.5630508 06/16/14 6010C 06/11 /14 1182-49-2 Sefeni-um 20 20 U

30508 O6/I6/L4 6010c O6/L'7 /14 7440-22-4 Si-Iver 0. 9 L.2

U-Analyte undetected at given LOQT,oo-T,imit of orrantitation

FORM-I.rtd$L4 -F -F' tr:ft {-,s.-{ft t E'SlBE*t'#H%-#


ils:fiStb@INCORPORATED

TNORGANICS AI.IALYSIS DATA SHEETTOTAL METATSPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: YN79MBLIMS ID: 14-71469Matrix: Soil- lA/Data Refease Authorized:[]z\Danarfa^ .

^c /1 a /I4 Y I

'v/

Percent Total Soli-ds: NA

Sanple ID: METHOD BLAI{K

OC Renorf No: YN79-AMEC Envj-ronment &

iroject: Gl-acier Highway Baccery


InfrastructurInv

LOQ nglkg-dr1' APrepMeth

PrepDate

Analysis Analysj.sMethod Date CAS Nunber Anal.yte

3050B3050B3050830s0830508CLP

3050B305 0B

06/L6/L406/16/L406/16/7406/1.6/t406/1.6/1406/1.6/1,406/16/1406/76/14

6010c6 010c6 010c6010c6 010c1417A6 010c6010c

06/r7 /7406/1,7 /L406/L7 /L406/t7 /7406/r7 /L406/!7 /1406/1.7 /r406/L7 /14

'7 440-38-2-t 440-39-37 440-43-91 440-41 -3'7 439-92-1,'7 439-91-617 82-49-27 440-22-4

ArsenicBari-umCadmiumChromiumLeadMarnrrrrz

Sel-eniumSilver

5

0.30.2nq

Z

0.025

n?

5

0.30.20.5

2

0.025

0.3

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

IT-An: l rrl. o rrndo1- oaf arl rf ai rrons u Y r v vrl

T,nn-T,i mi I nf Orr:pl jl6l j9n!vY !frLrr u v! Yug

LOQ

FORM-IyF4?T I ffiffiWryq


Arstfisrb@INCORPORATED

INORGA}TICS AI{ATYSIS DATATOTAI, METALSPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: YNT9LCSLIMS ID: 74-1]-469Matrix: SoilData Release Authorized:Reported: 06/I8/I4

Sample fD: LAB CONTROL

.)t'- Qanarl- rrln. vI\T79-AI{EC Envj-rOnment &Yv r\v vv!

Project: Gl-acier Highway Baccery


BI,AI.IK SPIKE QUAI,ITY CONTROL REPORT

SITEET

AnalysisMethod

InfrastructurInv

AnaJ.yteSpikeFound

SpikeAdded

tRecovery a

ArsenlcBariumCadmiumChromiumLeadMcrcrr rrz

Sel-eniumSifver

Ponnrfad i n

6010c6 010c6010c6010c6010c7 41LA6010c6010c

mq/kq-dry

201270

s0.551.8

2020.54

20152.r

200200

50.050.0

2000.50

200s0.0

I04Z105?101%

104U101U108?104?L04Z

N-Control- l-imit not metNA-Not Applicable, Analyte Not SpikedControl- Limits: 80-120?

FORM-VIItu' e- f ':*' -'? **S, rB f& I * ffii6EF i "€S&*6€JTg"#


J/ E Analytical Resources, Incorporated

-J/- Analytical Chemists and Consultants\JJune 18,2014

Tasya GrayAmec Environment & Infrastructure600 University Suite 600Seattle, WA 98101

RE: Client Project: Glacier HighwayARI Job: YN84

Dear Tasya:

Please find enclosed the original Chain-of-Custody (CoC) record, sample receiptdocumentation, and the final results for samples from the project referenced above. AnalyticalResources, Inc. (ARI) accepted one soil sample on June 12,2014. For further detailsregarding sample receipt, please refer to the enclosed Cooler Receipt Form.

The samples were analyzed for Total Metals, as requested on the COC.

An electronic copy of this report and all associated raw data will be kept on file at ARI. If youhave any questions or require additional information, please contact me at your convenience.

Sincerely,

ANAL/TPAL RESOURCES, INC.

"{J*hoftClient Services Manaser(206) [email protected]

Page 1 of 74611 South 134th Place, Suite 100 . TukwilaWAg8l68 o 2O6-695-6200 o 206-695-62O1 fax


F$*

*E € fi

F$$g

$Ee€$iE at8p €s E! E

$g$EgE E E

"RE€ E

Fs$Ft:; *

€Fg g

ggBE

F$te

s$gE'

$F$Eif *B'! EE5E 8$ e 6

iE$$Fg

3Es ESE- bvov

5s; ftr'u oi rl)

$I#uE; ;SF: EEU:<R X;=E59ii.ggsssE

e?sEt i

aC'g"rb r":i()-*.s"{*C)

;i\(tr:6*:o^:

id .-!6"Jz -).

V&dq.S{{ 'fdF-d66Fffi d

oo3EToE,2th.>ru

o(E

octoJdE.o()oEItoQ5ootr(!

C)Appendix D, Page 59 of 64

sample rD Cross Reference Report iljifieq:@INCORPORATED

ARI Job No: YNB4Client: AMEC Environment & Infrastructur

Project Event: N/APro j ect Name: Gl-acier Highway Battery Inv

Sample IDARI ARI

Lab ID LIMS ID t{atrix Sarrple Date/Time VTSR

t-. IDW-Soi1-061114 YN84A 14-II41 0 Soil 06/1L/14 13:40 06/12/14 12:.20

Printed 06/13/14 Page 1 of 1

h" *.f #* f * J**r*;"is, IlT.{ rnF,i;3= , +J€iiEr=ir=


ffl F_ Analytical R.esotorces, lncorporatedU#,D Analytical Chemists and Consultants GooBen Reeeupt Fornm

AARlcrienr: l\ neC '] {,rr,iu, iA/dProlect Name

Assigned ARI Job No'

Preliminary Exarnination Phase:

were intact, property signed and dated custody seals attached to the outsrde of to cooler?

Were custody papers included with the cooler? . , . .. . . , .

Were custody papers properly filled out (ink, signed, etc.)

NO

NO

NO

_uiremneraturt

ely'gter(s) ("C) (recommended 2.0-6.0'C for chemistry)

f f cooler temperature is out of complian ce trW!.torn O

,-.:;i-1-r_*,.- _

nce jp!,torm 00070F

r'::}' a-1---'*' - -

'J3ELCooler Accepted by:

lzt4aTime: J A,tU

torms and attaeh all shipping documents

Was sufficient ice used (if appropriate)? .......,...,......

Were all bottles sealed in rndrvidual plastic bags?

Did all bottles arrive in good condition (unbroken)?

Were all boftle labels complete and legible?

Drd the number of containers listed on COC match with the number of containers received?

Drd all bottle labels and tags agree with custody papers?

Were all bottles used conect for the requested analyses?

Do any of the analyses (bottles) require preservation? (attach preservation sheet, excludrng VOCs)...

Were all VOC vials free of air bubbles? .. ..

Was sufficieni amount of sample sent in each bottle? .

Date VOC Trip Blank was made at ARl. . . . .

Was Sample Split byARl NA, YES Date/Time:_ Equtpment

Was a temperature blank included in the cooler? .

What kind of packing material was used? ... pubble Wia[r$let rc'ehet Packs Baggies

Time-i' Notify P*1"ct Manager of discredncies or concems oo

Foam Block Paper

NA

r{a-..

YES

Other:

YES

Est'uEs

YES

YES

Y.ES,

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

,NA'-<-'.l[A,

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

Split by:

sampres Lossed on, i%fl o","

SamDle lD on Bottle Sample lD on COC Samole lD on Bottle Sample lD on COC

Additional N ote-s, Di screpancieg E Resolufions;

BJ Date:

AT-'Awfi [ *"f rntn

a 5 " ll @^F*Go-*

E-fiSBrltf*eri> * tflHl

ttSmell)*sm" (<2mm)

Perbubbles ) "pb" (2 to< 4 mm )

Large)alg"(4to<6mm)

Hcadsprcc?"hs" (>5mm)

0016F3/2t10

Revision O14

V$"j#L$ ffiffiW#L$

Cooler Receipt Form


INORGAI{ICS AI\TAIYSIS DATA SHEETTOTAJ, METALSPage 1 of 1

T,ah S:mnl e TD: YN84Alqv vuILtsf

LIMS ID. I4-II470Matrix: Soil-Data Release AuthorizedRenortecl: O6/1R/I4

itsbHsr!@INCORPORATED

Saople ID: IDII-Soil-061114SAMPLE

QC Report No: YNB4-AMEC Environment & InfrastructurProject: Gl-acier Highway Battery Inv

Date SampJ-ed: 06/L1"/I4Date Received: 06/12/1,4

Percent Total- Solids: 89.9%

Prep Prep Analysis Ana1YsisMeth Date Method Date CAS Nuuber Analyte LOQ ng/kg-dr1' A

3050B 06/16/1.4 6010C 06/1-1/14 1440-38-2 Arsenic3050B 06/16/L4 6010c 06/1'1 /14 7440-39-3 Barium3050B 06/L6/14 6010C 06/1'7 /14 1440-43-9 Carrnium3050B 06/1-6/74 6010C 06/1'7 /I4 744O-47-3 Chromium3050B 06/L6/14 6010C 06/77 /I4 7439-92-L LeadCLP 06/76/14 141IA 06/71 /74 7439-91-6 Mercury3050B 06/L6/14 6010c 06/I'7 /1'4 1182-49-2 Selenium3050B 06/1,6/14 6010C 06/I7 /14 7 440-22-4 Sil-ver

U-Analyte undetected at given LOQT,nO-T.i mi I nf OrrantitatiOn!vY !frrLr

5

n?0.2

5U2L10.3

L20.02 u

5U0.3 u

0. s 29.o-z

0.025

n?

FORM_I

Y tr4#L$ : SSWffi*ffiAppendix D, Page 62 of 64

firsbfis*@INCORPORATED

INORGA}IICS A}iIA],YSIS DATATOTAT METAISPage 1 of 1

Lab Samp1e ID: YN84MBLIMS ID: 14-7L4'70Matri-x: Soil-Data Rel-ease Authorized:Rcnnrfprl . n6/1R/74

Percent Total- Sol-ids: NA

Sample ID: METHOD BLANK

OC Renorf No: YN84-AMEC Environment &

Project: Gl-acier Highway Battery


Infrastructurfnv

LOQ nglkg-drl' A

SHEET

PrepMeth

PrepDate

Ana1ysis AnalysisMethod Date CAS Nunber Analyte

3050B3050B3050B3050B3050BCLP3050B30508

06/16/1406/\6/1406/16/1406/16/1406/1,6/1,406/16/1406/1,6/1406/16/14

6010c6010c6010c6010c6010c141IA6010c6010c

06/1.7 /1406/1.7 /r406/71/r406/77 /r406/r1/7406/77 /L406/1.1/r406/1.7 /r4

1 440-38-21 440-39-31 440-43-91440-41-3'7 439-92-I1 439-91 -6'7 7 82- 49-21 440-22-4

ArsenicBari-umCadmiumChromlumLeadMarnrrrrr

Sel-eniumSilver

5n?0.20.5

2

0 .025

n?

5

0.30.2nq

2

0 .025

0.3

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Il-Anr'l rria rrnrlatanf ad al- ai rzanv rrrrsrJ


FORM-I

Ys4+:$s-$ ; ##ffi##Appendix D, Page 63 of 64

fiIs5fi:rb@INCORPORATED

INORGAI.IICS ATiIAJ.YSIS DATA SI{EETTOTAL METALSPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: YNS4LCSLIMS ID: I4-I1,410 .

Matrix: Soil /U l/Data Rel-ease Autho rrzed,lffi'Pannrf ar1 . iA /1A /14 | Il/

AnalyteAnalysiEI'lethod

SanpJ-e ID: LAB CONTROL

QC Report No: YN84-AMEC Environment &

iroject: Gl-aci-er Highway Battery

Dafe Semnled: NADate Received: NA

BI,A}IK SPIKE QUATITY CONTROL REPORT

InfrastructurInv

SpikeFound

SpikeAdded

tRecoverl a

Arseni-cBariumCadmiumChromiumLeadMararrrrr

SefenlumSiIver

Dannrr-aA i n

6 010c6 010c6 010c6010c6010c1 41IA6010c6010c

mn / ltn-Artt

2082L0

50.75r.1203

0.53201

E' A

200200

50.0s0.0

2000. s0

200s0.0

I04Z1058101?103%

L02Z106U70 4eo

105%

N-Controf fimit not metNA-Not AppJ-icable, Analyte Not SpikedControl Limits: 80-120%

FORM-VII\d-SLsf;I $ I' fA*'ftffi ffi -T


APPENDIX E

Draft Interim Action Removal Plan

Plo

tD

ate

:0

6/2

7/1

4-

12

:55

pm

,P

lott

ed

by:

ad

am

.ste

nber

gD

raw

ing

Pa

th:

S:\

16

11

4\0

01

_S

AP

\,D

raw

ing

Na

me

:Ju

ne

au

_S

iteM

ap_0

6231

4.dw

g

DRAWN

DESIGNED

CHECKED

REVIEWED

PLANS

REFERENCES:

DATUM

DRAWING1

??

HOT SPOT REMEDIATION

GLACIER HIGHWAY

??

??

??

TITLE SHEETAMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc600 University StreetSuite 600Seattle, Washington 98101

PROJECT NO.: SE14161140

DATE:NO. REVISION DATE APRVD 06/27/14

DRAWING LIST

HOT SPOT REMEDIATIONGLACIER HIGHWAYJUNEAU, ALASKA

TITLE SHEET

SITE PLAN

EXCAVATION AND GRADING PLAN

CROSS SECTIONS AND DETAIL

1

2

3

4

OWNER INFORMATION:AKDOT&PF ROWOWNER: ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIESPARCEL:LEGAL:

DRAFT

GLA

CIE

RH

I GH

WA

YSITE

SITEA K U K E B A Y

AKUKELAKE

7

MENDENHALLVALLEY

HAGMEIERPROPERTY

NOAAPROPERTY

AKDOT&PFROW

Appendix E, Page 1 of 4

site characterization report and source removal … · sap sampling and analysis plan xrf x-ray...

Documents