sirikt 2013
TRANSCRIPT
Goedemiddag collega's. Fijn jullie te mogen ontmoeten
Drs. E.D. (Erik) Bolhuis Windesheim University
Pozdravljeni kolegi.Lepo vas je spoznati vas
Good afternoon colleagues.Nice to meet you you
CongratulationsYou’re in the top of
ICT rankings!
7
Food for thought
• Liao & Hao (2008) concluded, based on 44 meta-analyses (30 f2f-studies and 14 distance education, 1376 + 968 studies) that on cognitive aspects .29 effect and .06 effect on affective aspects
• Means et al. (2010) based on 176 studies (k-12, 99 studies with an (quasi) experimental design): students in online conditions performed better (overall effect size .20). Instruction combine f2f with online is better than only online (.35). Effect size was larger where students work corraboratively. The results appears quite broad across different content and learner types
• Higgins (2003): “[t]here is evidence from research that ICT can help pupils to learn and teachers to teach more effectively. However there is not a simple message in such evidence that ICT will make a difference simply by being used. Findings suggest that although ICT can improve learning there are a number of issues that need to be considered if such technology is going to make a difference”
Ziggy: interactive trigonometry
http://goo.gl/OcVTS
TCP
Research 1. Experimental and control group ( N =
54/45)
2. Pre-test - post-test design
3. It makes no difference
What doe we learn from Ubersence en
Ziggy? 1. Deepen: It’s not the app that enhance
learning, so schools/teachers have to construct knowledge about how ICT enhance learning (context matters)
2. Broaden: We have to develop new strategies to reach all those colleagues who ignore ICT or use ICT superficial
How?1. Deepen: Learning communities in and
outside the schools. Old school and new school like coursera..
2. Broaden: Keep on speaking terms... What stories from the Sirikt do you spread?
How do we reach colleagues who ignore ICT?
Slides on slideshare: http://goo.gl/v5WKJ