shadow integration, an excerpt from your unique self _ unique self

9/22/2014 Shadow Integration, An Excerpt from Your Unique Self | Unique Self

http://uniqueself.com/unique-self-theory/unique-self-basics/marc-gafni-on-unique-self/understanding-shadow-integration/ 1/17

Unique Self

The Radical Democratization of Enlightenment

Home

Unique Self Book Awakening Your Unique Self CourseContactUpdatesEvents

CWS Main Site

Unique Self TimelineUnique Self Basics Unique Self Dialogues

Deeper Dive Learning Centers Videos

Shadow Integration, An Excerpt from Your Unique Self



By Marc Gafni

INTEGRATE YOUR SHADOW has become the battle cry of spiritual growth. Shadow integration is now seen as essential to personal

development, success, and fulillment. The centrality of shadow integration in these areas is most certainly a welcome evolution of enormous

significance.

The only problem is that people, teachers included, often throw around highly charged words like darkness and shadow without actually explainingthem or having a genuine understanding of what the words actually mean.

The reason the shadow conversation works at all, even without clear understanding, is that people have some natural idea of what shadow means.

The word shadow automatically associates certain images, feelings, and ideas. When Shakespeare talks about this thing of darkness I acknowledge

mine, you understand he is talking about shadow, even if you cant fully articulate it.

Shadow is usually understood to refer to the darker sides of human consciousness. Pettiness, jealousy, betrayal, rage, violence, malicethese are allconsidered to be shadow material. Sexual misdeeds are also often associated with the use of the term shadow.

In this line of spiritual and psychological teaching, shadow is explained to mean those qualities that live in you but that you are unable to hold in your

first-person consciousness. Your refusal to own these qualities pushes them into shadow, where they exert enormous unconscious influence over yourlife choices. Some of the shadow teachers add that there is powerful energy in shadow that isthey sayliberated when you make your shadow

conscious. Whether or not energy is liberated, and control over your life direction reclaimed by making shadow conscious, is at best not clear. Fromall my years of teaching, studying, and doing shadow work, I simply do not think it is true. Nonetheless, the explanations for shadow work offered bythese teachers are helpful as far as they go. But they do not go nearly far enough. For the raison dtre of shadow work is said to be shadow



integration.

Why would you want to integrate your darkest impulses? Perhaps those impulses need to be transmuted and evolved. At the very least, it would

appear that they need to be disciplined and controlled. Is shadow integration merely a sophisticated license for ethical libertines, as some spiritualmoralists have wanted to claim? And if it is not, if shadow integration points to some profound and important intuition about our wholeness andenlightenment, as others have loudly claimed, but not explained, then what is it?

A once-popular spiritual book called The Book of Qualities says, The spiritual practice of shadow encourages us to make peace with those parts ofourselves we find despicable, unworthy, and embarrassing, our anger, jealousy, pride, selfishness, violence, and other evil deeds. The purpose ofshadow work is said to be a way of achieving wholeness by unifying the dark and the light, taking responsibility, and embracing your full humanity.

What exactly does it mean to unify light and darkness? Did the writer miss Aristotles law of the excluded middle, which says that opposites do notunify? How do we unify that which is good and that which the writer calls despicable? And what does it mean to embrace your impulse towardmurder, rape, and mayhem as part of your full humanity?

Perhaps a little bit of holy war is in order. Is it not possible that making peace with your shadow is just a saccharine way to let you off the hook of thefull, powerful, and sacred obligation to evolve out of your darkness and into your light?

This confused understanding of shadow is the rule rather than the exception. For example, a similar approach to shadow is shot through poet RobertBlys well-known and oft-cited A Little Book on the Human Shadow. Although I am a fan of his poetry, his explanation of shadow does not offer usanything near an in-depth understanding of what shadow integration might mean. For Bly, shadow is composed of what you had to suppress as a child

to please the grown-ups around you:

When we were one or two years old we had what we might visualize as a 360-degree personality. Energy radiated out from all parts of

our body and all parts of our psyche. A child running is a living globe of energy. We had a ball of energy, all right; but one day wenoticed that our parents didnt like certain parts of that ball. They said things like: Cant you be still? Or It isnt nice to try and kill yourbrother. Behind us we have an invisible bad, and the part of us our parents dont like, we, to keep our parents love, put in the bag. By

the time we go to school our bag is quite large. Then our teachers have their say: Good children dont get angry over such little things.So we take our anger and put it in the bag. By the time my brother and I were twelve in Madison, Minnesota, we were known as thenice Bly boys. Our bags were already a mile long.

With great respect to Bly, this paradigmatic passage is confusing. What is so bad about going through the ethical socialization required to become anice Bly boy? Is it so heinous to leave behind your attempts to suffocate your brother with a pillow? Isnt growing beyond the murderous rage thatspawned the first fratricide a good and noble goal of human evolution?

Shouldnt authentic teachers help us discern between legitimate and inappropriate anger? Finally, Blys implicit idea is regressive in the extreme: the



one- or two-year-old with an energy-radiating 360-degree personality.

Naturally, the understanding of shadow integration that I have outlined until this point is not without wisdom. It is true but partial. This teaching assumes

that shadow means jealousy, rage, pettiness, violence, and all the other negative ethical expressions. Shadow integration simply means to own the factthat you are jealous, angry, filled with rage, insanely promiscuous, addicted to all forms of comfort, and much more. Bring your disowned shadow intofirst person. Shadow integration comes to mean something like, Get out of denial and admit that you are an asshole. And free up the energy youhave used to cover up being an asshole.

Now, this is not a bad idea. Indeed, it is absolutely critical for any form of spiritual or psychological growth. Someone who owns their dark side isgenerally more tolerable than someone who does not. When you are in denial, you are more dangerous, because it is impossible to engage in authentic

conversation around any genuine issue. A good rule of life might be: self-acknowledged assholes are easier and more fun to hang out with thanassholes in denial.

This understanding of owning your shadow, however, might be called more accurately something like shadow confession. So where does the

integration piece come in? How do you integrate your night virtues, and why would you want to?

Some psychological teachers explain shadow integration as making a place within your own psyche for your rage, envy, greed, dishonesty, and

pettiness, so that you do not project them onto everyone else.

This good and important teaching is generally attributed to Carl Jung. Shadow is understood by Jung to be your dark side, that part of yourself thatyou hide awayafraid to expose it to the light of day. Shadow is anything that you cannot hold as I in your self-definitionyour less-than-noble

qualities, including fear, rage, uncontrolled sexing, envy, greed, egoic pettiness, violence, frustration, depression, and more. It is in this context that Jungwrote the most terrifying thing is to accept oneself completely.

Taking back shadow projection is a huge evolutionary leap forward and needs to be taught, practiced, and applauded. It allows for a more honestpicture of reality, which always opens the heart up for deeper and more stable loving. But taking back projection still does not explain the coreteaching of shadow integration

The above excerpt is from Your Unique Self (pp. 211-214) by Marc Gafni



Unique Self Announcements

Evolutionary Eros in Full Bloom at the 2014 Summer Festival of Love

by Kerstin Zohar Tuschik

Summer Festival of Love 2014

This Summer Festival of Love at our Teaching Center at the Integral Practice CommunityVenwoude in Holland has again exceeded all expectations. More than 175 participants came to love and be loved open, to break the boundaries oftheir smallness, and to participate in the evolution of love itself. Read more>



Unique Self: Reclaiming the Personal and Democratizing Enlightenment An Excerptfrom Zak Steins Review of Radical Kabbalah

Zachary Stein, Senior Analyst for the Developmental Testing, Deputy Director at Lectica, Inc., and as of late AcademicDirector of the Center for Integral Wisdom, has written a beautiful review about Marc Gafnis Radical Kabbalah for the Integral Review March2014.

Here is a little excerpt:

Unique Self: Reclaiming the Personal and Democratizing Enlightenment

To my mind the core value of these books is that they reconfirm (in a compelling scholarly fashion) some of the most central ethicaltenants of Western Civilization. Moreover, they do so by reminding us that the Judeo-Christian tradition contains a radical Enlightenmentteaching, with a message about the collective Awakening of everyone everywhere. Gafni calls this the democratization of Enlightenment.This is a theological metaphysics justifying the reign of an Absolute Democracy, in which each must live so that all have the ability anddignity to be heard, known, and counted. The mystical core of the great democratic political revolutions can be found in the cipher of

ancient texts, reinterpreted in each age, and again today, in order to enliven the struggle to create a world-order conducive to humanliberation. As Habermas has stressed, there is currently no replacement for the world-disclosing power of religious language, especially inits capacity to give voice to the profound vulnerabilities, interdependencies, and potentialities of human social life.

The core theoretical innovation enabling the democratization of Enlightenment is what Gafni calls, the reclaiming of the personal. This ideais presented most clearly where he offers a comparison between two models of Self, his own model of Unique Self and Andrew Cohens

Authentic Self or Evolutionary Self (a comparison undertaken in detail in Gafnis forthcoming book Two Models of Self and Why TheyMatter). He notes that in classic Enlightenment teachingsfrom the East the key move is from the personal to the impersonal. For example, Cohens community was for many years called theImpersonal Enlightenment Fellowship. This is the classic understanding of enlightenment, which finds expression in many Eastern schoolsof thought, including Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta. In Cohens book Evolutionary Enlightenment, for example, the word personal is



used dozens of times throughout the text, but always with a negative and pejorative connotation. The personal is not to be embraced; it is

to be transcended. Leave your story behind has become virtually the clarion call of Enlightenment teaching in the Western adaption ofmost Eastern models.

Gafni (2012a, Ch. 7) points out that the conflation of the personal with the conditioned personality is a confusion that needs to be

corrected. In Gafnis model an essential distinction is posited between the personal before realization (of non-dual radically impersonalEmptiness or God) and the personal that re-emerges after this realization. The former he terms separate self and the latter Unique Self.Unique Self is thus likened to a structure-stage of consciousness suggesting that to confuse the personal before realization with thepersonal that manifest postrealization is to fall into what Wilber terms a pre-trans fallacy. No less serious a mistake in Gafnis reading is todenigrate the personal in favor of an impersonal process, such as cosmic evolution, without distinguishing which level of the personal isbeing addressed. True enough, cosmic evolution (conceived as a panentheistic unfolding) is hierarchically beyond the pre-realizationconditioned personality, but it doesnt efface the irreducible dignity of the post-realized personal, i.e. the Unique Self; in fact it find its

expression in an infinite variety of uniquely personal forms. This is a lesson that cannot be stressed enough, especially in a context ofdiscourse where an evolutionary ethic has emerged that turns a blind eye toward the tragedy of injustices that resulted from theenthusiasms of previous generations of evolutionary thinkers, from Dialectical Materialism to Eugenics.

Gafnis reclaiming of the personal is the ground of his non-dual humanism and sourced deep in the lineage uponwhich he draws. The following passage from the Introduction to Radical Kabbalah engages this point and is worth quoting at length:

..It is in this sense that we can begin to understand Lainers provocative idea that the Torah was given by a Moses who is mergedwith Godnot in the voice of God, but in the voice of Moses. Lainer uses the Zoharic phrase The Shekhinah speaks throughthe voice of Moses as a foundation for his position. This Zoharic phrase, describing the authorship of Deuteronomy, wasunderstood in two very different ways. The theocentric understanding, reflected in most Hasidic works, is that Moses was socompletely effaced that he became a kind of channel for the divine voice. For Lainer this is only the first instrumental level ofenlightenment. The second possible understanding of the phrase the Shekhinah speaks through the voice of Moses, corresponding



to the higher level of enlightenment in Lainer, is almost the opposite: Moses is not effaced, but is rather so completely present that hisvoice and the voice of the Shekhinah become one. Moses unique persona, his voice and personality, incarnate the Shekhinah;

through radical uniqueness, he participates in ontic unity with God.the Shekhinah speaking comes through the intensification ofindividuality, rather than through its effacement. Because the human is a part of God, the principle of acosmism does not negate butrather empowers the individual. The divine voice finds expression in the voice of the unique spirit, modeled by the prophet whomanifests Gods voice through the clear prism of his unique individuality. This is the core of Lainers nondualhumanism. Lainer argues, both explicitly and implicitly, that the unique individual is the portal through which comes the revelation ofthe unmediated divine will, the new Torah that can override the law of Sinai. In various writings I have called this pivot in Lainers

thought sacred autobiography or unique self. (Gafni, 2012, p. liii-liv)

Now what is especially critical is that this capacity to incarnate the Shekhinah is understood in Gafnis writing, emergent from all of hissources, not as the domain of the elite but as an innate capacity available to every human being. He adduces relevant texts to overturn thedominant reading of Lainers model as only referring to the elite and asserts, in Lainers name, what he terms the democratization of

Enlightenment. Again, from the Introduction to Radical Kabbalah:

The goal of Lainers teaching is no less than the full democratization of enlightenment. He implicitly identifies and distinguishes

between two forms of enlightened consciousness. The first is what we might call the instrumental level. At this stage of realization,the person is an instrument, like a flute or shofar, played by the divine. Images describing this stage of illumination were replete in the

Hasidic teachings and writings which constituted Lainers intellectual framework. This is the level of utter surrender to the divine. As

one internalizes this level and transcends it, one comes to another level, which Lainer associates with Temple energy and the Judaharchetype. At this level, God does not move through the person as an external force animating and filling the persons voice, but

rather God is incarnate within the person, who achieves a radical identity with the divine. Lainer makes clear that this enlightenmentis a possibility for every member of the community. Every human being has the potential of Moses. (Gafni, 2012, p.lii)

This teaching principle of democratization is a pivotal focus in the more popular and accessible companion toRadical Kabbalah, entitled Your Unique Self. It is the one the defining characteristics of Gafnis work which seeks not only the

evolution of the leading edge but the articulation of a world spirituality that can potentially become a shared spiritual language for large

swaths of the mainstream. This language revolves around the idea of higher individuation beyond ego, tracing its roots to an



enlightenment lineage which places sacred autobiography at the center of the awakening realization. [...]

This notion of Unique Self changes the fundamental way we think about Enlightenment. Gafnis overarching point is that what is

commonly referred to as Enlightenment or Awakening is available to every human being. This move towards the democratization ofenlightenment is a core structure not of Eastern but classic Judeo-Christian thought. Gafni points out that a failure to understand the true

nature of Enlightenment has kept it from having its critically needed impact as a legitimate modern belief, which would serve as anevolutionary strange attractor for human motivation and aspiration. Gafni redefines Enlightenment in its most basic terms as sanity. Once

you understand Enlightenment as sanity then the democratization of sanity (aka Enlightenment) becomes a self-evident requirement. What

stands in the way is the incorrect conflation of uniqueness and separateness (or personal with personality) which moves Enlightenmentteachers to reject uniqueness; this in tern moves the mainstream population, who intuit personal uniqueness to be a critical source of

human dignity, to reject Enlightenment. [...]

These kinds of theological and philosophical arguments for inviolable uniqueness and individual dignity pile up until a fundamentally new

image of divinity and awakening dawns on the reader. It is not through the extinguishing of personality or the self that awakening unfolds.The goal of spiritual practice is not to merge ones personal uniqueness into some vast impersonal process. Instead, the goal of the

religiosity argued for by Gafni is to become, to borrow his nomenclature, outrageously sane, to be so fully human, so fully yourself,

that you liberate the powers needed to actualize the stunning uniqueness of your life. That is, the goal is to lift up your head and becounted, to affirm your irreducible individual dignity, and be empowered to participate as only you can in the evolution of humanity.

Toward a New Language of Liberation and Social Emancipation

This is all very different from lowering your head to look at your navel in meditation. Why be counted when you are really nobody? Why

work to build a world that affirms the dignity of each and every persons illusory self? The radical teachings in Gafnis books expose the

a-political, apathetic, and defeatist underbelly of so much of Western Buddhism, where the teaching of meditation is combined withaffluence and liberal values to create an insular and self-affirming escape from the obligations of uniqueness. Who is left to stand up for

the inviolable rights of individuals when everyone is sitting down, counting their breaths, and spending a small fortune on retreats from theworld? There is no better ideological lubricant to grease our decline into a global corporate dystopia than a form of religiosity that

denigrates the individual, promotes quiescence, and calls for a personal disappearance into some larger structure or process. [...]



The point here is not to critique Buddhism as a whole (some of my best friends are Buddhists) but rather

just to point out that the most rapidly spreading religion in the Western world (Buddhism) is not a form of spirituality that has been leadingits adherents to perpetrate disruptive social change in the name of social justice. The last time that happened on a large scale in this

county it was a movement firmly rooted in the Judeo-Christian tradition, under the leadership of a reverend with a dream about thedignity of each individual, the inviolability of human rights regardless of race, and the unique expression of humanity represented by

African Americans. Today our enthusiasms for Eastern spiritual imports are leading us away from the discourse about individual rights

and democracy leveraged so eloquently by Dr. King, which has served as the most powerful catalyst of social change in history. Thislanguage of liberation that is our heritage is being replaced by a language of liberation that is predominantly about the qualities of our own

minds and emotional states and which includes the remarkable idea that by sitting for an hour a day on our $90 buckwheat meditationcushion we are somehow helping to change the world. There is perhaps no more iconic representation of the new American post-modern

spiritual landscape than a room full of homogenized white people sitting on sets of standardized cushions facing the wall.

In recent decades we have become increasingly homogenized and standardized, as individuals lives have been forced into a matrix oftechno-economic and political institutions of unprecedented reach and invasiveness. Counterintuitively, reported increases in

individualism, narcissism, and entitlement reflect exactly these trends marking the twilight of the individual. The post-modern narcissistor entitled millennial are in fact suffering from radical doubt about their own self-worth and unbearable uncertainty about the value of their

contributions to the world. As Kohut (1971) and other self-psychologists have taught us, the narcissistic personality is in fact anextremely fragile self-system, one almost totally dependent upon the affirmations of others. Conspicuous displays of self through social

media, self-aggrandizing do-gooding, demands for special treatment and attentionthese are not signs of the a self blown out of

proportion, they are signs of a self desperate to be seen, a self needing to be counted among the worthy, needing to be affirmed in itsunique worth.

The cure for the dysfunctions of post-modern identity formation is not a spiritual teaching that tells individuals to look through the illusionsof their unique personal essence and beyond the unique time and place in which they live. In fact, the post-modern reader of spiritual



books is already tenuously connected to their unique gifts (as opposed to the gifts the media leads them to wish they had) and the uniqueresponsibilities of their time and place (as opposed to those directed toward a world represented through social media). Most spiritual

books offer a weak balm for the stinging anonymity and de-personalization of mass-customized lifestyles and posthistorical

consciousness. These books tell us that our particular personalities and places are to be devalued in favor of some abstract Universal (beit Evolution, Big-Mind, or The Great Perfection), leaving the reader confirmed in their suspicion that their unique life has no special value.

As a way of bringing this point home and as a kind of poetic closing it is worth quoting at length a teaching delivered by Gafni at EsalenInstitute in 2012:

Artwork by Megwyn White

Your Unique Self is your irreducibly unique perspective which fosters your unique insight which creates your unique gift which

engenders your unique responsibility to address the unique needs in your circle of intimacy and influence. Are you willing [as a



seeker of Enlightenment] to play a larger game? Let me state the core premise clearly. We live in a world of outrageous pain. Theonly response to outrageous pain is outrageous love. Why can we not access the outrageous love necessary to engage in the

evolutionary healing and transformation of ourselves and our reality? Because we shut our hearts to the unbearable pain of theworld. Not merely because, as the classic Enlightenment teachers reprimand us, we are stuck in ego. Rather because the gap

between our ability to feel and our ability to heal has become too great. It simply hurts too much. Through the virtues of the virtual

media we are almost omniscient. We are aware today of a level of suffering that only God was aware of a hundred years ago. Butunlike the classic vision of an omniscient but also omnipotent God, we are largely impotent to heal the suffering. Because the gap

between our ability to feel and our ability to heal has become too great we shut our hearts and turn inwards in varying mixtures ofovert narcissism and more subtle spiritual materialism in the form of soothing meditations and various pseudo-realizations of oneness

and enlightenment. This is in marked distinction to the realization of Unique Self that closes the gap between the ability to feel andthe ability to heal. We now come back to our core premise. We live in a world of outrageous pain. The only response to

outrageous pain is outrageous love. What does an outrageous lover do? She commits outrageous acts of love. Which outrageous

acts of love? Those acts of love that are a function of her Unique Self. In this way the Enlightened Unique Self who is the incarnationof all that is, living in her as her and through her, intimately addresses the unique needs in her circle of intimacy and influence. In

doing so she reclaims her potent powerthe power of the Shekhinah the power to heal and transform. The gap between theability to feel and heal is closed. The heart opens once again and a sacred activism sourced in outrageous love perfumes all of

reality. (Gafni, 2012b)

Gafnis work is a dramatic evolution of the languages of liberation that constitute the profound dignity of our Western traditionslanguages of liberation that allow us to understand Enlightenment as a potent force for social transformation. This is why I argue for

reading some books instead of others. It is in books that we find the images that catalyze our transformation and the words that we use toremind ourselves of who we are and what we are about.

Gafnis books are unrivaled in their provision of a profoundly new language of liberation. These are teachings for our time, which is a timeto practice spirituality in the world, fearlessly, with eyes open, and to participate in a planet needing to be transformed by the power

justice and love.

So I will do something out of character and say: read these books. You will be compelled by the rigor and depth of thescholarship, while at the same time swooning from the depth of the ideas.

Works like this come along once in a generation.

Zachary Stein

You can download the whole review by Zachary Stein here.



The Unique Self: A Bridge Between Psychology and Spirituality Part 2: Unique Self &Shadow

In part 2 of their dialogue, Dr. Elliott Ingersoll and Dr. Marc Gafni discuss how the Unique Self teaching

adds a whole dimension to the more classical psychological teachings on Shadow. Amongst others they explore how mainstream psychology reducesour authentic grandeur to grandiosity and how to let anger show us the way to our vitality.

Elliott Ingersoll in this talk:

I recommend your book [Your Unique Self] to anybody whos listening, and if a student of mine is listening, they know I dont say this

lightly: I really think your book is the best bridge between psychology and spirituality.

Elliott Ingersoll is a licensed psychologist and clinical counselor in Ohio. He is professor of counseling/counseling psychology and Distinguished

Faculty Member at Cleveland State University. His research interests span a broad spectrum including psychopathology, mental health diagnosis,psycho-pharmacology, and spirituality in counseling and psychotherapy. He has authored or co-authored six books and dozens of peer-reviewed

papers and book chapters on mental health related topics. Elliott has been inspired and influenced by the Free Thought movement of the late 19th

century and particularly by Robert Green Ingersoll, a leading freethinker of that time. He believes the most important skill for a human being is criticalthinking seasoned with compassion. Elliott also is a singer/songwriter and creator of FreeThought Folk Music which he performs throughout

Northeast Ohio. His CD American Infidel was released early this year.

Dr. Gafni is a passionate philosopher, brilliant author and wisdom teacher, and is the founder, with Ken Wilber, of the Center for Integral Wisdom,

an activist think tank dedicated to evolving and articulating a shared global framework of meaning and responsibility. He is the author of ten books,

including the award-winning Your Unique Self The Radical Path to Personal Enlightenment.



The Unique Self: A Bridge Between Psychology and Spirituality Part 1

In this dialogue, Dr. Elliott Ingersoll and Dr. Marc Gafni have partnered up to explore how the Unique Self

teaching can act as a bridge between Psychology and Spirituality.

Elliott Ingersoll during the dialogue:

I look at your book [Your Unique Self] as also a book about what I would call transcendent Psychology because you have really

mapped what is going on: How do you find yourself on the Western path and lose yourself on the Eastern path?

And then why hasnt it gone further? Are people really that lazy or stupid? Or is there a piece missing?

And I think you have found this missing piece, what you are calling the Unique Self.

Elliott Ingersoll is a licensed psychologist and clinical counselor in Ohio. He is professor of counseling/counseling psychology and Distinguished

Faculty Member at Cleveland State University. His research interests span a broad spectrum including psychopathology, mental health diagnosis,

psycho-pharmacology, and spirituality in counseling and psychotherapy. He has authored or co-authored six books and dozens of peer-reviewedpapers and book chapters on mental health related topics. Elliott has been inspired and influenced by the Free Thought movement of the late 19th

century and particularly by Robert Green Ingersoll, a leading freethinker of that time. He believes the most important skill for a human being is criticalthinking seasoned with compassion. Elliott also is a singer/songwriter and creator of FreeThought Folk Music which he performs throughout

Northeast Ohio. His CD American Infidel was released early this year.

Dr. Gafni is a passionate philosopher, brilliant author and wisdom teacher, and is the founder, with Ken Wilber, of the Center for Integral Wisdom,

an activist think tank dedicated to evolving and articulating a shared global framework of meaning and responsibility. He is the author of ten books,



including the award-winning Your Unique Self The Radical Path to Personal Enlightenment.

Read Older Announcements...

Available from Integral Publishers

Buy today at Amazon

Get the Unique Self Newsletter

Join Our Worldwide Unique SelfLearning CommunitySign up to receive periodic updatesfrom the Center for World Spirituality.Enter Your Email Address:

Join Now

Follow Us on Twitter



The 5th Annual World Spirituality Retreat

with Marc Gafni & Sally Kempton is

coming right up -- Nov 21-23 at...

fb.me/3Wi9iLxKz

World Spirituality

@SpiritsNextMove

Momentum for the Success 3.0 Summit is

escalating if you are interested in

successful conscious...

fb.me/6HIMNGGks

World Spirituality

@SpiritsNextMove

Momentum for the Success 3.0 Summit is

World Spirituality

@SpiritsNextMove

18 Sep

17 Sep

16 Sep

Tweets Follow

Tweet to @SpiritsNextMove

Find Us on Facebook



Unique Self

3,415 people like Unique Self.

Facebook social plugin

Like

Find us on Google+

Search This Site

Search this website Search

Return to top of page

Copyright 2014 Center for World Spirituality

shadow integration, an excerpt from your unique self _ unique self

Documents

shadow teachers

shadow conscious

word shadow

term shadow

shadow conversation

unique self unique selfhttp

raison dtre of shadow

bythese teachers