sfcc environmental scan office of planning and institutional effectiveness

SFCCENVIRONMENTAL SCANOffice of Planning and Institutional Effectiveness

2

Preface

This Environmental Scan has been completed in support of the Strategic Planning process for SFCC.

The data used for our Environmental Scan came from a great deal of research from many sources, such as the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Lumina Foundation, files prepared for the HED from SFCC data, the 2010 U.S. Census, the Public Education Department, CCSSE, SENSE, Noel-Levitz, the New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions, the SFCC Sustainability Plan, and countless other sources.

We hope that you find this Environmental Scan helpful and informative. As always with institutional research, we know that this will answer some questions and raise many others.

Thank you from the Office of Planning and Institutional Effectiveness.

3

Table of Contents

Workforce/Economic Development

New Mexico and Santa Fe Demographics

Industry and Projected Growth Need for Middle Skills in NM Strategic Priorities for Our

Community

High School to College Pipeline

High School Graduation Poverty Santa Fe School District Developmental Education

Our Student Population Continuing Education Adult Basic Education Credit Students

Non-degree Seeking Dual Credit / High School

Degree Seeking Financial Aid Retention SFCC Students Transferring Out Graduation Student Experience

SFCC Employees Employee Demographics Employee Engagement

Institutional Effectiveness SFCC Organizations Previous Strategic Plan Institutional Finance Debt Management and Finance

Plan Tax Base Information Historical Financials Funding Formula Bonds Campus Security Sustainability Higher Education Trends

WORKFORCE / ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

5

Quick Facts: New Mexico & Santa Fe

Recession has impacted job creation over the past three years Unemployment rate (Jan, 2013):

US = 7.9% NM = 6.2% Santa Fe = 5.4%

Largest projected job growth in NM Health Care Educational Services

69.8% of existing jobs in NM only require high school diploma or short-term on-the-job training

88.7% of existing jobs in NM are in service-providing industries The proportion of government jobs in NM is high

Source: Census 2010

6

Santa Fe County Demographics

Population = 144,170

Under 5 ye

ars

5 to 9

years

10 to 1

4 years

15 to 1

9 years

20 to 2

4 years

25 to 2

9 years

30 to 3

4 years

35 to 3

9 years

40 to 4

4 years

45 to 4

9 years

50 to 5

4 years

55 to 5

9 years

60 to 6

4 years

65 to 6

9 years

70 to 7

4 years

75 to 7

9 years

80 to 8

4 years

85 years

and o

ver

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

8,217 8,275 8,531 8,3877,526

8,0598,569 8,838

9,358

10,72711,624

12,40111,854

8,088

5,297

3,648

2,519 2,252

By Age Range

Source: Census 2010

7

Gender Ethnicity

51.3%48.7%

Female Male

Population = 144,170

Unknown

2 or more

White

Native Hawaiian

Hispanic

Black

Asian

American Indian

0.00% 15.00%30.00%45.00%60.00%

0.23%

1.17%

43.90%

0.04%

50.64%

0.66%

1.09%

2.27%

Santa Fe County Demographics

Source: Census 2010

8Industry and Projected Growth

9

2012 November Regional Nonfarm Employment Growth

UT TX OK AZ CO CA US NV WY NM

3.1%

2.6%2.4% 2.4%

2.3%

1.9%

1.4%1.2%

0.5%

-0.6%

November 12 over November 11 – Not Seasonally Adjusted by States

Source: NMDWS LASER

10

New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions (NMDWS): 1st Quarter, 2011

Los Alamos Eddy Sandoval Lea San Juan Bernalillo Santa Fe Grant Hidalgo Dona Ana $-

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

$60,000

$70,000

$80,000

$68,848

$44,824 $44,356 $43,680 $42,380 $40,612

$37,804 $35,204 $34,840 $33,384

Average Annual Wage

7th

Source: NMDWS LASER

11

NMDWS:1st Quarter, 2011

Los Alamos Eddy Sandoval Lea San Juan Bernalillo Santa Fe Grant Hidalgo Dona Ana -

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

16,557 24,168 29,342 27,196

47,430

307,657

59,989

9,030 1,556

68,178

Total Average Employment

3rd

Source: NMDWS LASER

12

Quick Facts: cont’d from page 5 Education in Santa Fe

High school graduate or higher (age 25+) 86.8% Bachelor’s degree or higher (age 25+) 39.6%

Language in Santa Fe Percentage of other than English spoken at home

35.5% Largest Industry in Santa Fe (GDP)

Real estate Government Retail Health Care & Social Assistance

Source: NMDWS LASER

13

Real Gross Domestic Product by Industry Santa Fe MSA

Source: NMDWS

14

Major Employers# of

Employer Type Employees

State of New Mexico Government 19,749

Los Alamos National Laboratory Government 10,086

Christus St. Vincent Hospital Health Care 2,021

Santa Fe School District Education 1,708

City of Santa Fe Government 1,513

Santa Fe Community College Education 943

County of Santa Fe Government 846

Peters Corporation Real Estate 730

Buffalo Thunder Casino 700

Santa Fe Opera Fine Arts 630

Total Top 10 38,926

Source: Santa Fe Chamber of Commerce, 2013

Source: RBC Capital Market

15

Labor Force

Source: RBC Capital Market

Santa Fe MSA State of New Mexico United StatesLabor Percent Labor Percent Percent

Year Force Unemployed Force Unemployed Unemployed

2012 77,171 5.10% 938,982 6.50% 7.80%

2011 77,601 5.20% 944,552 6.40% 8.50%

2010 77,335 7.00% 959,513 8.20% 9.80%

2009 77,781 5.00% 950,757 5.70% 8.90%

2008 80,586 4.00% 961,145 4.70% 6.10%

2007 76,975 2.90% 934,099 3.50% 4.70%

2006 77,191 3.60% 951,287 4.10% 4.70%

2005 78,046 4.60% 934,667 5.80% 5.60%

2004 84,069 2.90% 910,502 4.80% 5.70%

2003 79,356 3.00% 878,749 6.10% 5.80%

Source: New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions

Labor Force and Percent Unemployed

16

2012 Job Growth in Santa Fe

Public Sector Leisure and hospitality Education and health service Retail trade Financial activities

-100

500

200

100 100

Santa Fe County

Source: NMDWS

17

NMDWS: 3rd Quarter, 2011

Public Adminstration

Health Care and Social Assistance

Retail Trade

Accommodation and Food Services

Education Services

Construction

Professional, Scientific & Technical Svc

Other Services

Administrative & Waste Services

Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation

- 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000

9,845

9,380

8,645

8,700

4,275

3,260

2,365

2,590

2,430

2,275

Number of Employees by Industries

Source: NMDWS

18

Industry for Santa Fe

1. Public Administration : 21%2. Health Care and Social Assistance : 18%3. Retail Trade : 16%4. Accommodation and Food Services : 15%5. Education Services : 9%6. Construction : 5%7. Professional, Scientific and Tech Svc. : 5%8. Other : 5%9. Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation : 4%

Source: NMDWS LASER

19

Projected Employment Change

IndustryNew

Mexico 2009-2019

Santa Fe 2009-2019

Government 7,040 2,000Health Care & Social Assistance 27,020 1,840Educational Services 10,130 1,640Accommodation & Food Services 10,040 1,180Administrative & Support Services 4,480 930Retail Trade 9,000 690Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 6,100 660Construction 5,800 390Other Services 1,480 260Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 1,430 190Finance & Insurance 1,750 110Transportation & Warehousing 1,400 90Real Estate, Rental & Leasing 1,230 40

Source: NMDWS

20

Projected Industry Percent Change

IndustryNew

Mexico 2009-2019

Santa Fe 2009-2019

Administrative & Support Services 10.30% 41.00%Educational Services 12.50% 32.70%Health Care & Social Assistance 23.90% 23.60%Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 10.90% 23.30%Transportation & Warehousing 7.70% 17.80%Accommodation & Food Services 12.30% 14.70%Government 7.50% 14.10%Other Services 13.20% 10.90%Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 10.20% 9.80%Construction 11.10% 8.90%Retail Trade 10.40% 7.50%Finance & Insurance 7.90% 6.10%Real Estate, Rental & Leasing 12.40% 4.30%

Source: NMDWS

21

Estimated Annual Job Openings in Santa Fe County: 2008-2018

Personal and Home Care Aides

Food Prep Workers

Retail Salespersons

Home Health Aides

Elementary School Teachers

Waiters and Waitresses

Construction Laborers

Janitors

Cashiers

Carpenters

Middle School Teachers

Cooks

Supervisors of Food Prep Workers

Supervisors of Construction

Receptionists

Truck Drivers

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

671

574

456

321

268

261

229

208

170

151

136

134

120

120

109

107

Jobs that do not require Community College level of education or require education beyond Community College level

*Less than 40% of job openings require Community College level education or job openings require education beyond Community College

Source: NMDWS LASER

22

Estimated Annual Job Openings in Santa Fe County: 2008-2018

* At least 40% of job openings require Community College level education

Source: NMDWS LASER

23

Emerging Industries to Watch as Defined by NMDWS

Solar Panel Manufacturing Wind Generation Plants Uranium Mining Film

Source: NMDWS State of the Workforce 2012

24

A middle-skill job requires education or training past high school, but not a four-year degree.

The Need for Middle-Skills in NM

25

New Mexico’s Forgotten Middle-Skill Jobs Report (April 2010)

Middle-skill jobs represent the largest share of jobs in New Mexico 48% – and the largest share of future job openings.

The demand for middle-skill workers in the state will remain high in the decade between 2006 and 2016 More than 133,000 middle-skill job openings in New Mexico 40% of all job openings in New Mexico

63% of the people who will be in New Mexico’s workforce in the year 2020 were already working adults in 2005 – long past the traditional high school-to-college pipeline.

Source: Skills2Compete – New Mexico campaign

26

NM Jobs and Total Job Openings by Skill Level, 2006-2016

Source: Calculated by National Skill Coalition from NMDWS data

27

We need to prepare our students now for jobs that we do not know will exist in the future

However, the biggest challenge is…

28

Future Skills Needed - Lumina

Higher learning has taken on new importance in today’s society.

To succeed in the contemporary workplace, today’s students must prepare for jobs that are rapidly changing, use technologies that are still emerging, and work with colleagues from (and often in) all parts of the globe.

The challenges that graduates face as citizens during their lives are similarly complex and also are affected by developments around the world.

Source: Lumina Foundation – Qualification Profile: New Skills for the 21st Century

29

Degree Qualifications Skills Profile Specialized and Broad/Integrative Knowledge

Apply existing knowledge and techniques Evidenced based decision making Broad multidiscipline approach and importance of Liberal Arts education

Ability to approach a challenge from a multifaceted perspective

Intellectual Skills/Analytical Inquiry Analytic inquiry Use of information resources Engaging diverse perspectives information resources Quantitative fluency

Civic Learning Out-of-classroom experience Capacity for analysis and reflection Analytic inquiry Engagement with diverse perspectives

Source: Lumina Foundation – Qualification Profile: New Skills for the 21st Century

30

21st Century Skills Content

Collaboration Working with others respectfully and effectively to create, use and share

knowledge, solutions and innovations.

Information Management Accessing, analyzing, synthesizing, creating and sharing information from

multiple sources.

Effective Use of Technology Creating the capacity to identify and use technology efficiently, effectively and

ethically as a tool to access, organize, evaluate and share information

Career and Life Skills Developing skills for becoming self-directed, independent learners and workers

who can adapt to change, manage projects, take responsibility for their work, lead others and produce results.

Cultural Awareness Developing cultural competence in working with others by recognizing and

respecting cultural differences and working with others from a wide range of cultural and social backgrounds.

Source: Lumina Foundation - Qualifications Profile: New Skills for the 21st Century

31 Strategic Priorities for Our Community

32

City of Santa Fe General Plan

COMMUNITY GOALS:

The General Plan has 14 overall themes, or community goals, that reflect the results of the 1994 community survey. Each chapter contains at least one of these goals in the “Goals & Policies” section at the end of the chapter. The goals are not necessarily listed in order of priority.

1. AFFORDABLE HOUSING

2. QUALITY OF LIFE

3. TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES

4. ECONOMIC DIVERSITY

5. SUSTAINABLE GROWTH

6. REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE

7. WATER

8. CHARACTER

9. URBAN FORM

10.COMMUNITY-ORIENTED DOWNTOWN

11.COMMUNITY-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT

12.MIXED USE

13.REVIEW PROCESS

14.IMPLEMENTATION

Source: City of Santa Fe - General Plan Update 2005-2025

33

Santa Fe County – Strategic Plan

STRATEGIC INITIATIVES

• Funding Santa Fe County Health Programs

• Senior Service Program Operation

• New Judicial Complex• Sustaining Operations

Funding for Correctional Facilities

• Centralized Purchasing and Warehouse

• Citizen Survey• Boards and Committee

Project• Succession Planning• Automate Human

Resources• County Sponsored

Daycare

• Job Description Analysis• College Intern Program• PERA Corrections Plan• Enhance Supervisory

Training Opportunities• Develop Human

Resources Staff Process Manual

• Timekeeping Software System

• In-House Finance Statement

• Recession Planning (SAVE Initiative)

• Sustainable Land Development Plan (DLDP)

• Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)

• Affordable Housing

• Fire Funding• County Re-

Organization• Conjunctive Water

Plan• Renewable Energy

Financing Program• County Building

Permit Program• Santa Fe Canyon

Ranch Property• Santa Fe Studios• Public Information

/ Transparency Program

• County Code Rewrite

Source: Santa Fe County – Strategic Plan Update (Jan 2010 – Jan 2012)

34

Santa Fe Public Schools

Source: SFPS Strategic Planning 2012

GOALS

1. Create an environment that raises expectations and promotes high academic performance of all students at 100% of Santa Fe Public Schools.

2. Recruit and support highly qualified and effective personnel at every level and every function throughout Santa Fe Public School District.

3. Develop a culture of shared responsibility for student success by engaging families and the community

4. Promote a safe, sustainable, healthy and respectful school community

5. Ensure efficient and effective systems, operations, state-of-the art technology and infrastructure to support instruction and student learning

6. Ensure efficient and effective systems, operations, state-of-the art technology and infrastructure to support instruction and student learning.

35

SFCC Adult Basic Education

Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014

KEY SYSTEM

GOALS/OBJECTIVES

1. Leadership A. Build an efficient, creative team by using collaborative managementB. Empower staff and create an environment that recognizes contributionC. Encourage staff to participate in regular professional developmentD. Increase student leadership opportunities

2. Administration and Data

A. Improve staff training on administrative activitiesB. Reduce data bottleneckC. Educate appropriate staff on record-keeping responsibilities

3. Effective Teaching and Learning

A. Develop ABE/ASE assessment processes to align assessments with curriculum, better demonstrate student learning, and support level gains on NRS tests

B. Increase intensity of instruction by offering a variety of instructional delivery options

C. Complete curriculum guidelines and exit standards for all levels of ESLD. Increase supplemental instruction in both workplace and computer

literacy to enhance student learning and persistence

4. Intake A. Improve student persistence in literacy programs through a standardized orientation process

B. Develop cohorts for students during ABE/ASE orientation to build community and encourage retention

C. Improve individualized ABE/ASE student advising and placement process

D. Improve and standardize the ESL orientation process

36

SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.)


KEY SYSTEM

GOALS/OBJECTIVES

5. Integration and Transitions

A. Develop a continuous cycle of student goal setting and reportingB. More accurately survey entering students from all parts of ABE to gain

a fuller understanding of their specific career interests (for Career Pathways planning)

C. Develop a comprehensive framework for class, college, career advising among ABE staff directly involved in these tasks

D. Develop a continuous cycle of advising/career counseling to increase students’ awareness of their own educational and career possibilities

E. Expand contextualized learning experiencesF. Expand use of Work keys testingG. Develop relationship with One-Stops to gain a more comprehensive

understanding of their operations and to increase collaboration

6. Outreach A. Conduct environmental scan of stakeholders: current and potential students, instructors, tutors, businesses, and community partners

B. Convene ABE Advisory BoardC. Develop at least one new funding sourceD. Create a waitlist system for students who cannot receive immediate

services

HIGH SCHOOL TO COLLEGE PIPELINE

38

High School Graduation 2012

Source: NM Public Education Department – 4-Year Graduation Rates, Cohort of 2012

Tierra Encantada

Santa Fe High

Monte Del Sol

Career Academy

Capital High

Academy for Tech

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%

35.7%

67.6%

65.3%

35.8%

60.7%

84.1%

Local High School graduation rate: 61.8%

39

2010-2011 School Year 12th Grade Enrollment and Fall 2012 SFCC Enrollment

MAST

ER PROGRAM

NM S

CHOOL FO

R ARTS

SANTA

FE

HIGH

CAPITA

L HIG

H

CAREER A

CADEMY

MONTE

DEL

SOL

ACADEMY

FOR T

ECH &

CLA

SS

TIER

RA ENCANTA

DA0

50

100

150

200

250

300

26 30

244

187

51 44 411322 4

98 95

9 11 16 10

12th Grade SFCC Enrollment

*Private Schools and Santa Fe Indian School 12th Grade Data Unavailable

Source: SFPS and HED DEAR data

40

Poverty and Education at a Glance 18.4 percent of New Mexicans and 15.6 percent of Santa Feans live below

the poverty level.

Twenty-two percent of children who have lived in poverty do not graduate from high school, compared to 6 percent of those who have never been poor.

The gap in standardized test scores between affluent and low-income students has grown by about 40 percent since the 1960s

Between the late 1970s and mid-1990s, the college graduation rate of American youth

from families in the top quarter of the income distribution increased by 21 percentage points:

33 percent to 54 percent

from families in the bottom quarter of the income distribution increased by just 4 percent

5 percent to 9 percent

New Mexico ranked 46th in the nation in terms of child well-being in an overall ranking of the 2011 Kids Count reportSource:

http://www.s4.brown.edu/us2010/News/inthenews.PDFs/AprToJuly2012/us2010.news.2012.05.26.thenewmexican.pdf

41

Poverty in SFPS High Schools

Source: SFPS 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 School Report Cards

Academy for Tech Capital High Career Academy Monte del Sol Santa Fe High Tierra Encantada0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

26%

68%

39%

20%

50%

27%31%

70% 72%

N/A

48%

N/A

Santa Fe School District Free or Reduced Lunch

2010-2011 2011-2012

42

Santa Fe School District -2010

Acade

my

For T

ech

Capita

l Hig

h

Caree

r Aca

dem

y

Mon

te D

el S

ol

Sant

a Fe

Hig

h

Tier

ra E

ncan

tada

GED0%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

46%

72% 69%

42%

55%

N/A

63%

Developmental Rates

Source: Ready for College 2010

43

Statewide Developmental Education Rates

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 200925.0%

27.0%

29.0%

31.0%

33.0%

35.0%

37.0%

39.0%

41.0%

43.0%

45.0%

37.2%

39.1%

42.5%43.2% 43.4%

40.7%

38.7% 39.0%

40.3%

37.3%

30.6% 31.0%

32.3%31.5%

30.5%

32.6%

31.3%

32.9%31.9%

29.2%

Percentage of NM Public High School Graduates Who Took Remedial Classes Only in Math or Only in Reading: 00-09

Math English

Source: Ready for College 2010

44

Developmental Education Rate

Statewide: Public Statewide: GED Statewide: Capital High FTF DS to SFCC FTF DS to SFCC 17-190%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

54%

63%

72%

87%

93%

Source:

OUR STUDENT POPULATION

46

About SFCC

Established in 1983, SFCC has been providing education to the community for 30 years.

More than 15,000 students are served each year in its credit, non-credit, and adult basic education programs. 7,400 individual students in credit classes every year 5,828 students are degree seeking students 2,805 degree-seeking students receive financial aid More than 200 high school students in dual credit programs each term part-time students: 78%

Over 100 degree and certificate programs offered. Approximately 258 full-time and 51 part-time staff. Approximately 69 regular faculty and 270 adjunct faculty. The SFCC District is identical to the Santa Fe Public School District and

includes the outlying areas of Glorieta, Madrid, Cerrillos, Lamy, La Cienega, Galisteo and Tesuque. It covers most of Santa Fe County which has a population of more than 145,000 residents.

SFCC is one of eighteen community colleges in NM.

Source: Banner, IPEDS, HED DEAR data, Census 2010

47 Continuing Education (CE) Students

48

CE Students by Age

Unduplicated Students = 1,495

17 AND < 18 TO 24 25 TO 34 35 TO 44 45 TO 54 55 TO 64 65 AND >Not Reported0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

4.95% 5.55%

12.44% 12.84%

17.53%

23.68%

20.60%

2.41%

Source: Banner

49

CE Enrollment by Subject

Leisure

Sustainability Tech Cntr

Kids' Stuff

Weatherization

Cooking

Art

Energy Audit

Crafts

Southwest Explorations

Fitness and Wellness

Health Care Professional

OSHA

Languages

0 60 120 180 240 300 360

67

68

80

83

88

88

94

129

130

132

192

288

346

Computes/Macintosh

Creative Writing

Dance

Money Matters

Music

Lead Certification

Computers/Web Design

Photography

Computers/Digital Image

Computer Classes

Computer- Inexperienced

Bus/Professional Skills

Home and Garden

0 60 120 180 240 300 360

17

18

23

23

23

24

29

31

32

34

42

54

62

Total Registration = 2,197Source: Banner

50

CE Number of Courses by Length

1 d

ay

2 d

ays

3 d

ays

4 d

ays

5 d

ays

6 d

ays

7 d

ays

8 d

ays

9 d

ays

10

da

ys

11

da

ys

12

da

ys

15

da

ys

22

da

ys

29

da

ys

31

da

ys

36

da

ys

43

da

ys

50

da

ys

88

da

ys

12

1 d

ays

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

7065

13

20

5 7

1 1

7

15

1 1

7 73

36

16

69

2 3

Total Courses = 216Source: Banner

51 Adult Basic Education

52

SFCC Adult Basic EducationKey Data And Information


Student Data Students with 12 hours or More

Total count of students with 12 hours or more: 1,929

Total contact hours for students with 12 hours or more:

112,162

Average contact hours for students with 12 hours or more:

58.15

Average contact hours for students experiencing level gains:

83.84

Count of all GED graduates with 12 hours or more: 117

Count of GED en Español graduates with 12 hours or more:

26

53

SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.)Key Data And Information


Student Data Students with less than 12 hours

Total count of students with less than 12 hours: 112

Total contact hours for students with less than 12 hours:

505

Count of all GED graduates with less than 12 hours: 2

Count of GED en Español graduates with less than 12 hours:

0

Student Data All Students (regardless of hours)

Total student count: 2,041

Number of total instructional hours: 112,667

54

SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.)Administrative and Fiscal


Cost Per Student

(State dollars spent + Federal dollars spent) (number of students with 12 hours or more)State: $510,357.81Federal: $222,887.00EL/Civics: $ 38,428.00Total: $771,672.81

= $400.04

$771,672.81 ÷ 1,929 fundable students = $400.04/student

$771,672.81 ÷ 112,162 = $6.88 Cost Per Contact Hour

55



Activities 2011-2012

Twelve students took the Work Keys exam, earning Career Readiness Certificates.

Twelve ABE students participated in an Integrated Basic Education and Skills Training (I-BEST) program in the building trades area, working on college certificates in plumbing.

The EL/Civics Coordinator advised, during the academic year, a total of 88 students on career/college choices and class placement within the ABE program, and provided an atmosphere of support with wrap-around services to assist students in their learning endeavorsSeventy three ABE students participated in a series of digital literacy workshops in collaboration with Fast Forward New Mexico to prepare them for technological aspects of career readiness. Several of these workshops were bilingual presentations.

56

SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.)ESL Activities 2011-2012


GOAL ATTAINMENTAY 2011-2012

OUTCOMEAY 2011-2012

Enroll at least 500 students per semester (at least 1000 students per year) in integrated ESL/Civics classes.*

Enrolled 896 total students for the entire year (842 fundable

100% Pre-test rate 75% Post-test rateStudents will achieve the following level gains:ESL 1 Literacy: 40%ESL 2 Low Beginning: 48% ESL 3 High Beginning: 48%ESL 4 Low Intermediate: 36%ESL 5 High Intermediate: 36%ESL 6 Advanced: 14%

100% Pre-test rate 73% Post-test rate Level Gains: Overall: 37.89%ESL 1 Literacy: 60.00%ESL 2 Low Beginning: 68.29%ESL 3 High Beginning: 55.24%ESL 4 Low Intermediate: 39.83%ESL 5 High Intermediate: 34.39%ESL 6 Advanced: 16.48%

*Note that the figure for 1000 students enrolled was based on our original application for full funding of this grant. Our actual allocation was 66% of what was requested, and we served 90% of that original objective

57



Success 2011-2012

Program Improvements Based on HED Self Study: SFCC ABE was highly engaged throughout this year in the HED Self Study process. All of the department’s administrative staff took on significant leadership activities as we worked through the requirements and goals of the Self Study. Continued High Levels of Student Performance: Despite reduced funding, the ESL Program has continued to significantly exceed state averages for level gains. Our students’ level gains at all NRS levels are higher than 2010-11 state averages, ranging from 3 percentage points higher at ESL Low Intermediate to 18 percentage points higher at ESL Low Beginning. Community Support of the ESL Program: This past year, two of our community partners, Santa Fe Civic Housing Authority and United Way, stepped in to provide financial support for classes at their sites.

58



Successes 2011-2012Program Improvements Based on HED Self Study

Continued High Levels of Student Performance

Community Support of the ESL Program

424 students were served in the Literacy program by 143 volunteer tutors who provided 11,495 hours of instruction.

Instructional Staff Implementing as new curriculum

Expansion of an Independent Study Option for Students

Continued offering student orientations and one on one advising

Successfully utilized linked science and social studies classes for transition program

Increased the Intensity of Study through managed enrollment

I-BEST During the spring semester of FY 2011-12, SFCC ABE partnered with New Mexico Skill Up Network to offer an I-BEST project in SFCC’s School of Trades and Technology. Distance Education -During the 2011-12 Fiscal Year, SFCC ABE continued to provide Distance Learning in the ABE/ASE program.In 2011-2012, students were referred for potential Power Path screening and intervention if they scored a 12 or higher on their Learning Needs Assessments and also scored a 6.0 or below in at least one of the TABE areas.

Increase from 65% in 2009-10 to 68% in 2010-11 to 77% of students gaining levels in 2011-12

59



Challenges 2011-2012

Continue refining integrated ESL/Civics model across NRS levels

Continue to increase integration between ESL program and EL/Civics program,Continue to revise and improve EL/Civics writing curriculum across NRS levels continue to improve assessment scoring guides to promote fairness in assessing both language skills and knowledge of content

Increase activities and advisement of ABE students who want to transition to college and careers

Support students on paths to U.S. Citizenship

budget allocations for 2011-12 were again significantly reduced. As we face these continuing reductions, we are working creatively with our partners to continue services through cost-sharing and when we must make service cuts, we look for ways that will have the least impact on students.

60

• Non-degree Seeking• Dual Credit / High School• Degree Seeking

Looking at Credit Students

61

By Gender By Race/Ethnicity

Demographics of Credit Students

Source: HED DEAR data

Fall 2011 Total Enrollment: 6,523 Students

White

Hispan

ic

Unkow

n

Amer

ican

Indian

Black

Asian

Two

or M

ore

Inte

rnat

iona

l

Pacifi

c0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%44%

40%

10%

3% 2% 1% 1% 0% 0%63%

37%

Female Male

62

Degree Seeking Status by Age Group

17 or younger 18-24 25-35 35-44 45-54 55-64 65 or older -

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

125

1,437

1,095

584 434

267 148

220

188

232

274

339 565

615

Degree Seeking Non-Degree Seeking



63

Student Level Credit Load

Student Characteristics

High School

Freshman

Sophomore

Non-Degree

5%

36%

25%

34%

61% De-gree Seek-ing



>0 but <=3

>3 but <=6

>6 but <=9

>9 but <12

>=120%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

39%

18%

11%

6%

26%

64

Student Experience


What are the courses like in a given academic year?Summer

2011 Fall 2011 Spring 2012

# of Courses 327 949 965

Average Class Size 16 18 18

% Taught by Adjunct 71.1% 61.7% 62.4%

Online Courses 49 = 15% 97 = 10% 102 = 11%

Student to Faculty ratio = 17:1

65

Student Credit Hours by College

0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000

10,773

20,691 21,710

33,786

4,329

11,077

22,106 22,971

36,562

4,836 10,208

22,340 23,789

36,732

5,011

FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12


66 Credit Students: Non-degree Seeking

67

Gender Breakdown by Semester

FT/PT Breakdown by Semester

Non-degree Seeking Students


Summer 2011

Fall 2011 Spring 2012

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

891

1517 1517

549

916 931

Female Male

Summer 2011

Fall 2011 Spring 20120

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

105 92 62

1335

2341 2386

Full-time Part-time

68

Non-degree Seeking Students: Race/Ethnicity

Summer 2011 Fall 2011 Spring 20120

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

24 62 6231 38 4113 19 18

351

604 616

838

1418 1418

6 23 220 3 2

177266 269

American Indian Asian Black HispanicWhite 2 or more Non-Resident Alien Unknown


69

Non-degree Seeking Students: Credit Load

Summer 2011 Fall 2011 Spring 20120

250

500

750

1000

1250

1500

935

12171314

400

822 793

77180 171

16122 108

1292 62

LESS THAN 3 3 TO 5.9 6 TO 7.9 8 TO 11.9 12 OR MORE


70

Non-degree Seeking Students:Top 10 Subjects by Enrollment and Age Group Fall 2011

PSYC

HUDV

READ

NURS

MART

OFTC

BIOL

MATH

ENGL

HPER

0 500 1000 1500

278

287

299

306

330

332

403

915

1039

1249

Ages 18 to 34

CULA

MART

OFTC

BIOL

NURS

EDUC

EXSC

ENGL

MATH

HPER

0 200 400 600 8001000

108

110

115

134

153

153

154

192

203

847

Ages 35 to 54

PHOT

ENGL

MUSC

SPAN

SCUL

DRPT

CLAY

WOOD

MART

HPER

0 500 1000 1500

55

56

56

62

62

68

72

94

119

1265

Ages 55 and older


Courses students enroll in are different between those that are 55 years or older and younger

71

Credit Students:Dual Credit / High School Students

72

By Gender By Race/Ethnicity

Dual Credit / High School Students


Fall 2011 – 342 students

49% 51%

Female Male

Hispan

ic

Whi

te

Amer

ican

Indi

an

Unkno

wn

Two

or M

ore

Races

Asian

Black

Non-R

esid

ent A

lien

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%39%

33%

12% 11%

2% 1% 1% 1%

73

Dual Credit / High School Students:School of Origin


Academ

y fo

r Tec

h

Alam

ogor

do Sen

ior H

igh S

choo

l

Capita

l Hig

h Sch

ool

Caree

r Aca

demy

Deser

t Aca

demy

GED

Mon

te D

el S

ol C

harte

r

NM S

choo

l for

the

Arts C

harte

r

Saint M

ichae

ls Hig

h Sch

ool

Santa

Fe

Comm

unity S

choo

l

Santa

Fe

High S

choo

l

Santa

Fe

India

n Sch

ool

Santa

Fe

Prep

Santa

Fe

Secon

dary

Santa

Fe

Waldor

f

The

Mas

ters

Pro

gram

Tier

ra E

ncanta

da Char

ter

Tuto

rial S

choo

l0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

28

2

2414

2 112 7

17

1

36 41

5 1 1

145

2 3


74

Dual Credit / High School Students:Major Declaration Status


>0 but <=3 >3 but <=6 >6 but <=9 >9 but <12 >=120

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

33 3718 11 14

93

55

31

2327

Declared Undeclared


75

Top 10 Subjects by Enrollment

Success Rates

Dual Credit / High School Students


ENVR

ENGL

MATH

HPER

HUDV

FILM

AMSL

MART

PHYS

SPAN

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

70 63

40 43 39 35 28 28 26 23

5

16

2

College Remedial

70.5%

14.8%

14.7%

Success Non-SuccessOther

Grade Definitions: Success (A, B, C, P, IP) Non-Success (D, F, I, PR) Other (AU, W, NR)

76Credit Students:Degree Seeking Students

77

Fall 2011: Gender by Age Fall 2011: Ethnicity

Degree Seeking Students: Demographics


Fall 2011 – 3,977 students

Unknown

65 AND >

55 TO 64

45 TO 54

35 TO 44

25 TO 34

18 TO 24

17 AND <

-

200

400

600

800

1,0

00

1,2

00

1,4

00

1,6

00

80

176

312

404

704

851

68

91

122

180

391

553

Female Male

24-F, 17-M

2-F, 2-M

64%

36%

Hispan

ic

Whi

te

Unkno

wn

Amer

ican

Indi

an

Black

Asian

Non-R

esid

ent A

lien

2 or

mor

e

Nativ

e Haw

aiia

n0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

48.0%

35.3%

8.8%

3.5% 2.0% 1.4% 0.5% 0.4% 0.1%

78

Degree Seeking Students:Credit Load


Fall 2011 – 3,977 students

>0 but <=3 >3 but <=6 >6 but <=9 >9 but <12 >=120.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

19.5%17.5%

14.7%

8.0%

40.3%Full-time: 1,604

Part-time: 2,373

79

Fall 2011 head count of 18 to 24 year olds by credit hours attempted

Degree Seeking Students: Credit Load for 18 to 24 year olds

Full Time (12+ credit hours)

<1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 250

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

3

40

11

11494

34

116

83

5971

84

51

338

246

133

6140

19 193 1 3 1 1

25%

21%

21%

15%

8%

9%

6 or less 7 to 11 12 13 14 15+


80

Degree Seeking Students:Top 20 Declared Majors

NURS

GSTD

BSAD

MART

CRJS

CULAARTS

HUSVPS

YCACCT

ECED

ENVR

TEDU

EXSC

ALEL

FLPD

DNTLPL

ST

GNSTALS

E0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

599

455

314

179142 127 126 122 119 111 103 91 89 78 70 70 67 65 63 61


81

Degree Seeking Students:Top 20 Enrollments by Subject

ENGL

MATH

HPER

HUDV

READ

OFTC

MART

CULA

PSYC

BSAD

NUTR

EMSI

SPAN

ENVR

HUSV

CRJS

FILM

SPCH

FACT

HVAC 0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450400

308 295

208 207

139

71 6039 33 28 26 26 25 22 21 21 20 18 18


82

First-time Degree Seeking Students:School of Origin

17 or younger

18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 or older0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

123 26 19 9 3 54

312

16 12 925

66

2910 4 14 9 8 2 3 1 1

Out of state HS NM HSGED or Home School Other


83

First-time Degree Seeking Students:Math Enrollment

MATH 100

MATH 100X

MATH 101

MATH 102

MATH 102A

MATH 102L

MATH 109

MATH 110

MATH 119

MATH 121

MATH 135

MATH 150

MATH 155

MATH 162

MATH 180

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

33

715

41

4 4

31

81

14

2 5 2 1 1

College Level Developmental85% (143)

2012 Local High School Graduates and Fall 2012 SFCC EnrollmentSource: HED DEAR data

84

First-time Degree Seeking Students:English Enrollment

ENGL 102L ENGL 105L ENGL 107 ENGL 108 ENGL 109 ENGL 111 ENGL 112 ENGL 120 ENGL 2160

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

4 6

3553

40

77

8 2 5

College Level Developmental

60% (138)

2012 Local High School Graduates and Fall 2012 SFCC EnrollmentSource: HED DEAR data

85

First-time Degree Seeking Students:Top 10 Courses by Student Enrollment

ENGL MATH READ HPER HUDV SOAR OFTC PSYC MART HLCR0

50

100

150

200

250

92

26

121 112

7253

29 27 17

138

143

129

College Level Developmental


86 Financial Aid

87

Financial Aid Programs:Enrollments

Loan Lottery PELL Scholarship Work-study0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

698

22

1,039

237

86

826

287

1,464

489

202

Halftime Fulltime

Halftime = 2,082 Fulltime = 3,268 Total = 5,350

(Includes duplicates as students may receive more than one type of aid)Source: Banner

88

Financial Aid Programs:Awards

Work-study

Scholarship

PELL

Lottery

Loan

$0 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000

$488,920

$416,690

$5,397,674

$184,497

$4,836,407

$149,474

$129,663

$2,050,441

$10,407

$3,470,939

Halftime Fulltime

$638,394 total work-study

$546,353 total scholar-ships (excluding Lottery)

$7,448,115total PELL grants

$194,904total Lottery scholarships

$8,307,346 total loans

Source: Banner

89

Financial Aid Programs:Funding Source(s)

99.6% of loans are federally funded The remainder are state (0.3%) and private (0.1%)

100% of Lottery scholarships are state funded 100% of PELL grants are federally funded Other scholarships and work-study: (Below)

Work-study

Scholarship

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

13.5%

1.5%

54.5%

53.9%

32.0%

41.6%1.5%

1.5%

External Federal Institutional Private State

Source: Banner

90

Financial Aid Programs:Is everyone receiving aid?

Fulltime Students Halftime Students

Source: Banner

Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Summer 2012

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

78.1% 80.7% 72.7%

21.9% 19.3% 27.3%

Receiving FA No FA

1,709 stu-

dents

1,616 stu-

dents

44 stu-dents

Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Summer 2012

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

43.0% 43.5%58.7%

57.0% 56.5%41.3%

Receiving FA No FA

1,596 stu-

dents

1,696 stu-

dents

736 stu-

dents

91 Retention

92

Retention:Fall 2009 First-Time-Freshmen Full-Time Degree Seeking Students (323)

Fall 2009 Spring 2010 Fall 2010 Spring 2011 Fall 2011 Spring 20120%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%100%

77%

56%51%

42%37%


93

Retention:Fall to Fall Retention Rate: 2007-2011 AY

07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-120%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

63%59% 56% 58%

53%


94

Retention Cohort Tracking Study

Cohort = 552 students First Time Freshman (FTF) Degree Seeking (DS) Full-time and Part-time

Track 3 academic years (Fall 2010 – Spring 2013) Graduation numbers for Spring and

Summer 2013 not included in this report


95

Retention Cohort Tracking Study:Academic Year 2010-11Semester 1 Semester 2

Fall 2010

Spring 2011

65.4%

34.6%

Full-time Part-time Graduated

Transferred Gone

47.1%

23.4%

0.5%2.9%

26.1%


Transferred Gone

StartSource: HED DEAR data

96


Fall 2011

Spring 2012

25.5%

15.0%

2.2%

12.9%

44.4%


Transferred Gone

31.5%

16.0%

2.2%

11.2%

39.1%


Transferred Gone


97


Fall 2012

Spring 2013

16.7% 13.4%

3.4%

13.2%

53.3%


Transferred Gone

12.7% 12.8%

4.0%

12.7%

57.8%


Transferred Gone

*Graduation numbers for Spring and Summer 2013 not included in this report


98

Retention Cohort Tracking Study:Status Change by Semester

Spring 2011 Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Fall 2012 Spring 20130%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

15% 15%

11%

16%

22%

16%

11%

13%13%

12%

Full-time to Part-time Part-time to Full-time

This is the average % of students who switched from FT to PT status (15.6%)

This is the average % of students who switched from PT to FT status (13.5%)


99

Retention Cohort Tracking Study:Students Who Left and Returned

Gone Transferred Gone Transferred Gone Transferred Gone Transferred0

5

10

15

20

25

30

53

1

5 5

1

9

1

16

19

1

15

2

Full-time Part-time

5.7% of semester

enrollment

8.9% of semes-ter enrollment

15.1% of se-mester enroll-

ment16.3% of se-

mester enroll-ment

Spring 2012 Fall 2012Fall 2011 Spring 2013


100

Retention Cohort Tracking Study:Enrollment: SCH grouping by semester

Fall 2010 Spring 2011 Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Fall 2012 Spring 20130

100

200

300

400

500

600

361

260

174141

92 70

38

27

20

13

1415

58

44

30

40

3023

49

41

25

22

1316

46

17

13

8

1717

>=12 >9 but <12 >6 but <=9 >3 but <=6 >0 but <=3

552

389

262224

166141

10.5%

6.9%

65.4%

8.9%

8.3%

4.4%10.5%

11.3%

6.9%

66.9%

5.0%9.5%

11.5%7.6%

66.4%

3.6%9.8%

17.9%5.8%

62.9%

10.3%7.8%

18.1%8.4%

55.4%

12.1%11.3%16.3%10.6%

49.7%


101SFCC Students Transferring Out

102

Do Students Who Transfer From SFCC Stay at Their New 2-Year Institutions?

CNM UNM Branch

NMSU Branch

LCC ENMU Branch

SJC CCC NMJC IAIA MCC0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450422

110

68

41 38 3120 18

5 3

134

4028 27 18

5

33 34

7 3

Stayed Returned

Source: HED DEAR data, National Student Clearinghouse

103

Are SFCC Students Who Transfer to a 2-Year Institution Full- or Part-Time?

MCC

IAIA

SJC

NMJC

CCC

ENMU Branch

LCC

NMSU Branch

UNM Branch

CNM

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

6

7

24

47

48

48

51

63

126

395

5

12

5

5

8

17

33

24

161

Part-timeFull-time


104

What Happens to SFCC Students Who Transfer to 4-Year Institutions?

UNM NNMC NMHU NMSU NM Tech ENMU WNMU0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

603

187158

114

34 27 18

340

156 169

5227 13 5

Stayed Returned


105

Are SFCC Students Who Transfer to a 4-Year Institution Full-or Part-Time?

WNMU

ENMU

NM Tech

NMSU

NMHU

NNMC

UNM

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

5

11

36

111

95

71

515

18

29

25

55

232

272

428

Part-timeFull-time


106

Future for the Transfer Students:Higher Education Center (HEC)

HEC – a model higher education consortium focused on bringing affordable, accessible bachelor’s completion and graduate degrees to Santa Fe and surrounding communities

Founding four-year partner institutions: University of New Mexico NM Highlands University Institute of American Indian Arts NM State University will become the fourth partner in Fall 2013

On-campus pilot program started in Fall 2011 Currently, bachelor’s and master’s degree programs in: business,

communications, criminal justice, dental hygiene, education, medical laboratory sciences, nursing, radiologic sciences, social work, technology and training, university studies

Facility to house the HEC at the former College of Santa Fe Campus is scheduled to open in Fall 2014

107 Graduation

108

Graduation:What is Our Graduation Rate?

2007 2008 2009 2010 20110%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

8%11% 9%

11%

6%

2%

12%

7%

11%

5%

17%

25%

22%23%

Overall Graduation Rate Hispanic Graduation Rate Transfer Rate


109

Graduation:How do we compare statewide?

CNMCCC

ENMU -

R

ENMU -

RuiLC

CMCC

NMJC

NMMI

NMSU A

NMSU C

NMSU D

A

NMSU G SJC

SFCC

UNM G

UNM LA

UNM T

UNM V

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

8%4%

16%12%

22%

32%

15%

28%

7%4%

12%

25%

14%

6% 8% 9%13%

8%

Graduation Rate Transfer Rate

16th out of 19th

Source: IPEDS data

110

Graduation:Number of Certificates and Associate Degrees Awarded

07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-120

100

200

300

400

500

600

167 146 143180 195

198201 200

276

336

Hispanic Non-Hispanic


111

Graduation:Origin of Completers

39%

61%

Started at SFCC


112

Graduation:Median Number of Semesters Enrolled Prior to Completion

FTF Transfer FTF Transfer FTF TransferCertificate < 1 Certificate 1+ Associate's

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

6

2

6

4

10

7


113

Graduation:Awards by College and Fiscal Year

Arts and Design

Business, Education, and

Professional Studies

Health and Sciences

Liberal Arts and Core Studies

Trades and Technology

FY0910 FY1011 FY1112 FY0910 FY1011 FY1112 FY0910 FY1011 FY1112 FY0910 FY1011 FY1112 FY0910 FY1011 FY11120

50

100

150

200

250

300

87% 59% 77%

58%48%

53%

59%

60%49%

81% 84% 93%50%

49% 50%13% 41% 23%

42%

52%47%

41%

40%

51%

19%16%

8%

50%

51% 50%

Associate Certificate

23 29 31

189

272 281

98

149 139

43 51 4028

53 50


114

Why Graduation Matters

61% of our credit students say they want to earn a degree

58% of jobs in New Mexico will require some form of postsecondary education or training by 2018

87% of our students who fill out the FAFSA are Pell eligible

Our average annual student loan amount is $6,500

Only 6% graduate within 3 years

115

What do the students have to say?• Survey of Entering Student Engagement -SENSE• Community College Survey of Student Engagement –

CCSSE• Student Satisfaction Inventory - Noel-Levitz

Student Experience

116

SENSE and CCSSE

The more actively engaged students are early in their college experience, the more likely they are to learn and to achieve their academic goals.

1. Early Connections2. High Expectations and aspirations3. Clear academic plan and pathway4. Effective track to college readiness5. Engaged learning 6. Academic and social support network

117

SENSE Overview

Look at experiences reported by nearly 75,000 entering students Community colleges

172 institutions 35 states

When is the survey administered? The survey is administered during the fourth and fifth class weeks of the

fall academic term. How is the survey administered?

SENSE is administered as a pencil-and-paper survey in randomly selected classes drawn from a specific group of courses provided in the course schedule file (CSF).

Could you give an example of what is meant by first college-level English and Math courses? First college-level English and Math courses are generally those offered

to first-time college-ready students that did not place into developmental courses. Examples include Comp I and Algebra I.

Source: SENSE

118

SENSE:Benchmarks

Early Connections High Expectations and Aspirations

Clear Academic Plan and Pathway

Effective Track to College Readiness

Engaged Learning Academic and Social Support Network

All Students

42

44

46

48

50

52

54

56

58

60

51.6

49

51.2 50.9

48

50.3

56

50.6

53.5

49.9

51.1 51.2

50 50 50 50 50 50

Your College Small Colleges 2010 Cohort

Source: SENSE

119

SENSE:Part time and full time students

Early Connections

High Expectations and Aspirations



Engaged Learning

Academic and Social Support Network

Part

-Tim

e S

tudents

42 47 52 57

50.5

49.4

50.4

49.7

46.5

48.7

54.5

51

52.7

49

48.3

49.1

50.3

50.7

50.1

49.4

47.6

48.5

2010 Cohort Small Colleges Your College

Early Connections




Engaged Learning


Full-T

ime S

tudents

42444648505254565860

55.8

47.9

53.8

55

53.4

56.1

58.2

49.5

54.5

51

55.4

54

53.5

49.1

51.9

50.7

54.3

52.9


Source: SENSE

120

SENSE:Developmental and Non-Developmental

Early Connections




Engaged Learning


Dev

elop

men

tal S

tude

nts

42 47 52 57

56.7

49.8

57.2

59.7

52.5

54.5

57.4

50.4

54.4

55.7

52.4

51.1

53.2

50.1

52

55.8

51.8

50.3


Early Connections




Engaged Learning


Non-D

evelo

pm

enta

l Stu

dents

35 40 45 50 55 60

45.7

47.7

43.5

39.7

43.6

46.5

54

50.7

51.9

38.2

48.5

51.5

48.5

49.7

48.7

36.4

46.8

50.1


Source: SENSE

121

SENSE:Male and Female Students

Early Connections




Engaged Learning


Male

Stu

dents

35 40 45 50 55 60

49.7

41.3

47.3

44.9

45.6

43.2

56.8

46.6

54

49.4

50

49.4

52.5

46.2

51.5

49.1

48.8

48.9


Early Connections




Engaged Learning


Fem

ale

Stu

dents

42444648505254565860

53.3

55.6

54.4

56

50

56.3

55.4

53.8

53.4

50.3

52.1

52.8

50.7

53.5

50.5

50.5

51.3

51.6


Source: SENSE

122

SENSE:White and Hispanic Students

Early Connections




Engaged Learning


Mal

e W

hite

Stu

dent

s

25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

61.5

48.1

60.5

29.9

32.1

26.1

57.3

47.2

54.9

48.1

48.4

50.1

51.2

46.4

51.1

46.3

47

49.2


Early Connections




Engaged Learning


Male

His

panic

, La

tino, Spanis

h S

tudents

25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

48.3

36.6

44.3

48.6

51.5

49.8

58.1

44.8

54.2

53.1

48.9

48.1

53.4

45.3

51.5

53.1

47.9

48.3


Source: SENSE

123

Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE)

Source: SENSE

CCSSE asks questions that assess institutional practices and student behaviors that are correlated highly with student learning and student retention.

124

CCSSE:Benchmarks

Source: SENSE

125

CCSSE:Aspects of Highest Student Engagement

Source: SENSE

126

CCSSE:Aspects of Lowest Student Engagement

Source: SENSE

127

Noel-Levitz 2010 Student Satisfaction Inventory

Source: Noel-Levitz 2010 Student Satisfaction Inventory

SFCC All

Students

National Communi

ty Colleges

Rate your overall satisfaction with your experience here thus far.

5.81 5.46

1 = Not satisfied at all 0% 1%

2 = Not very satisfied 1% 2%

3 = Somewhat dissatisfied 3% 5%

4 = Neutral 9% 11%

5 = Somewhat satisfied 12% 17%

6 = Satisfied 48% 41%

7 = Very satisfied 26% 19%

SFCC EMPLOYEES

129 Employee Demographics

130

Employee Demographics:Staff/Admin Diversity by Gender

Staff = 247 Administration = 20

Source: IPEDS – Human Resources Report 2012-2013

61.5%

38.5%

Female Male

85.0%

15.0%

Female Male

131

Employee Demographics:Faculty Diversity by Gender

Regular Faculty = 67 Adjunct Faculty = 276


52.2%47.8%

Female Male

39.1%

60.9%

Female Male

132

Employee Demographics:Staff Diversity by Ethnicity

Staff = 247 Administration = 20

Unknown

2 or more

White

Native Hawaiian

Hispanic

Black

Asian

American Indian

-30.0% 0.0% 30.0% 60.0% 90.0%

0.4%

1.6%

40.9%

0.4%

51.8%

1.2%

1.2%

2.5%

Unknown

2 or more

White

Native Hawaiian

Hispanic

Black

Asian

American Indian

0.0% 30.0% 60.0% 90.0%

85.0%

15.0%


133

Employee Demographics:Faculty Diversity by Ethnicity

Regular Faculty = 67 Adjunct Faculty = 276

Unknown

2 or more

White

Native Hawaiian

Hispanic

Black

Asian

American Indian

-30.0% 0.0% 30.0% 60.0% 90.0%

0.0%

0.0%

77.6%

0.0%

20.9%

1.5%

0.0%

0.0%

Unknown

2 or more

White

Native Hawaiian

Hispanic

Black

Asian

American Indian

0.0% 30.0% 60.0% 90.0%

4.0%

0.7%

75.0%

0.3%

16.3%

0.7%

1.5%

1.5%


134

Employee Demographics:Staff Counts by Position and Status

Service

Sales and Related

Production, Transportation, and Material Moving

Offica and Administrative Support

Natural Resources, Construction, and Maintenance

Management

Library and Instructional Support

Computer, Engineering, and Science

Community Service, Legal, Arts, and Media

Business and Financial Operations

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

21

1

0

8

0

0

7

1

7

2

46

1

3

55

8

46

34

17

19

38

Full-time Part-time


135

Employee Demographics:Average Salary: Full-Time Staff

Service

Sales and Related

Production, Transportation, and Material Moving

Office and Administrative Support

Natural Resources, Construction, and Maintenance

Management

Libraray and Instructional Support

Computer, Engineering, and Science

Community Service, Legal, Arts, and Media

Business and Financial Operations

$0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000

$29,058

$22,880

$36,114

$33,645

$38,353

$84,854

$45,801

$48,822

$43,792

$47,108

Overall average salary = $46,958


136

Employee Demographics:Regular Faculty Salary Schedule

Maximum of seven years related experience will be given to determine entry salary. Current faculty will advance one step at the completion of each contract to a maximum of 7 steps.

It is the responsibility of the faculty member to provide official transcripts for proof of degrees at

the time of hiring. Absent proof, pay will be calculated at the Bachelor level. Faculty members are responsible to providing official transcripts to the Office of Human

Resources when there is a change in degree. All adjustments to pay will only affect the contract subsequent to the one in which proof is

supplied.

REGULAR STATUS FACULTY

(9 months)

STEPS Bachelor Masters MA + 45 Doctorate

1 40,484 42,103 43,788 45,539

2 41,293 42,946 44,663 46,450

3 42,120 43,804 45,556 47,379

4 42,962 44,681 46,468 48,327

5 43,821 45,574 47,397 49,293

6 44,698 46,486 48,345 50,279

7 45,591 47,415 49,312 51,285

Source: Human Resources

137

Employee Demographics:Average Salary: Regular Faculty

Assistant Professor

Associate Professor

Professor

$44,000 $48,000 $52,000 $56,000

$48,790

$52,354

$53,808

Overall average salary = $50,260

4 regular faculty

22 regular faculty

41 regular faculty


138

Employee Demographics:Adjunct Faculty Salary Schedule

Adjunct Faculty are hired on a semester-by-semester basis and have “temporary” status. Pay hours equal the combination of lecture and lab/studio hours included in the course credit hours taught.

Lecture hours are compensated at a rate of 1 pay hour per scheduled lecture hour. Lab hours are compensated at a rate of .75 pay hours per scheduled lab/studio hour. Nursing clinical lab courses are compensated at a rate of 3 pay hours per scheduled lab hour.

It is the responsibility of the adjunct faculty member to provide official transcripts for proof of degrees at the time of hiring. Absent proof, pay will be calculated at Level I, Baccalaureate.

Adjunct Faculty members are responsible for providing official transcripts to the Human Resources department when there is a change in degree level.

All adjustments to pay levels will only affect the semesters subsequent to the one in which proof is supplied.

Accumulated pay hours which result in a move to the next highest pay level will be used to calculate the rate of pay for subsequent semester Adjunct Faculty Contracts.

Full-time faculty teaching summer or overloads begin at Level II unless a higher level has been attained in an Adjunct capacity, in which case, compensation will be at that level held; movement to Level IV will occur after three years of full time instructor employment at SFCC.

Only adjunct teaching hours earned at Santa Fe Community College count toward the determination of an adjunct faculty member’s salary schedule pay level.

SFCC Teaching Experience

Degree Attainment

Baccalaureate Masters

Master's +45

Doctorat

e

Level I (0-24 Pay Hrs) $659 $669 $678 $690 Level II (25-48 Pay Hrs) $699 $709 $719 $731 Level III (49-72 Pay Hrs) $740 $752 $762 $775 Level IV ( 73+ Pay Hrs) $784 $795 $809 $820

Source: Human Resources

139

Employee Demographics:Highest Degree Level: Faculty

Regular Faculty Adjunct Faculty

No Deg

ree

Certifi

cate

s

Assoc

iate

s

Bache

lors

Teac

her L

icens

ures

Maste

rs

Prof

essio

nal D

octo

rate

s

Docto

rate

s0

20

40

60

80

100

120

4 1 07

0

46

0

11

No Deg

ree

Certifi

cate

s

Assoc

iate

s

Bache

lors

Teac

her L

icens

ures

Maste

rs

Prof

essio

nal D

octo

rate

s

Docto

rate

s0

20

40

60

80

100

120

96

05

56

1

91

2

19

Source: Banner

140 Employee Engagement

141

Noel Levitz Employee Satisfaction

Source: Noel Levitz

208-239 Respondents 45% of All Full-Time Employees 18% of All Part-Time Employees

Comparable to Responses of Previous 2 Years 43% Faculty 49% Staff 7.6% Administrators

Compared with 23 2-Yr Institutions 16 Different States Largely Western and Mid-Western With Employees of Similar Years of Service and

Faculty/Staff/Admin. Makeup

142

Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011Question (scale 1-5) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of its faculty

3.19 3.38 3.70 3.02 3.12

The institution does a good job of meeting the needs ofits adjunct faculty

2.92 3.00 2.91 2.79 n/a

The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of staff

3.09 3.15 3.21 3.09 3.14

The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of administrators

3.61 3.63 4.58 3.56 3.79

Source: Noel Levitz

143

Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 (continued)Question (scale 1-5) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Faculty take pride in their work

3.89 3.81 3.91 3.84 3.94

Staff take pride in their work 3.68 3.59 3.52 3.65 3.75

Administrators take pride in their work

3.58 3.52 3.63 3.54 3.69

Source: Noel Levitz

144

Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 (continued)Question (scale 1-5) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Employee suggestions are used to improve the institution

2.96 2.98 3.14 2.80 3.01

There is a spirit of teamwork and cooperation at the institution

3.10 3.06 3.09 2.90 3.08

I have adequate opportunities for training to improve my skills

3.49 3.27 3.20 3.11 3.01

Source: Noel Levitz

145

Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 (continued)

Importance Relative To SatisfactionSource: Noel Levitz

Question (scale 1-5)

2008 2009 2010 2011

Importance

Satisfaction

Importance

Satisfaction

Importance

Satisfaction

Importance

Satisfaction

The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of its faculty

4.40 3.38 4.42 3.70 4.53 3.02 4.40 3.12

The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of its Adjunct faculty

4.34 3.00 4.26 2.91 4.52 2.79 NA NA

The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of staff

4.43 3.15 4.40 3.21 4.48 3.09 4.35 3.14

The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of administrators

4.21 3.63 4.04 4.58 4.09 3.56 4.18 3.79

146


Source: Noel Levitz

Importance Relative To Satisfaction

Question(scale 1-5)

2008 2009 2010 2011

Importance

Satisfaction

Importance

Satisfaction

Importance

Satisfaction

Importance

Satisfaction

Faculty take pride in their work

4.66 3.81 4.65 3.91 4.74 3.84 4.68 3.94

Staff take pride in their work

4.59 3.59 4.61 3.52 4.65 3.65 4.68 3.94

Administrators take pride in their work

4.61 3.52 4.79 3.63 4.64 3.54 4.62 3.44

147


Source: NMDWS LASER

Importance Relative To Satisfaction

Question (scale 1-5)

2008 2009 2010 2011

Importance

Satisfaction

Importance

Satisfaction

Importance

Satisfaction

Importance

Satisfaction

Employee suggestions are used to improve the institution

4.19 2.98 4.29 3.14 4.27 2.80 4.27 3.01

There is a spirit of teamwork and cooperation at the institution

4.47 3.06 4.71 3.09 4.59 2.90 4.56 3.08

I have adequate opportunities for training to improve my skills

4.44 3.27 4.15 3.20 4.36 3.11 4.38 3.01

148


Source: Noel Levitz

Gap Between Importance and SatisfactionCAMPUS CULTURE AND

POLICIES 2008 2009 2010 2011

ImportanceSatisfacti

on GAPImportan

ceSatisfactio

n GAPImportanc

eSatisfacti

on GAPImportan

ceSatisfacti

on GAP

Effective Lines of Communications 4.45 2.56 1.89 4.78 2.74 2.04 4.54 2.55 1.99 4.41 2.82 1.59

Following Clear Processes 4.44 2.91 1.53 4.38 2.73 1.65 4.47 2.74 1.73 4.39 2.94 1.44

Teamwork and Cooperation 4.47 3.06 1.41 4.71 3.09 1.62 4.59 2.90 1.69 4.51 3.08 1.43

Consistency in Training New Employees 4.41 3.05 1.36 4.48 2.77 1.71 4.41 2.92 1.49 4.38 2.93 1.45

Good Communication Between Staff and Faculty 4.38 2.96 1.42 4.54 3.00 1.54 4.48 3.00 1.48 4.45 3.07 1.37

Planning Effectively 4.57 2.97 1.60 4.72 3.42 1.30 4.63 3.09 1.54 4.39 3.18 1.20Sharing of Information Between Administrators and Staff 4.45 3.03 1.42 4.74 3.26 1.48 4.43 3.00 1.42 4.45 3.08 1.37

Good Communication Between Faculty and Administration 4.40 3.05 1.35 4.48 3.13 1.35 4.54 2.94 1.60 4.40 3.04 1.36

Clearly Written Procedures 4.34 2.91 1.43 4.35 2.95 1.40 4.36 2.95 1.41 4.29 3.04 1.24

Clear Processes for Recognition of Achievement 4.27 2.88 1.38 4.13 2.91 1.22 4.27 2.67 1.61 4.28 2.97 1.31

149


Source: Noel Levitz

Gap Between Importance and SatisfactionCAMPUS CULTURE AND POLICIES 2008 2009 2010 2011

Importance

Satisfaction GAP

Importance Satisfaction GAP

Importance

Satisfaction GAP

Importance

Satisfaction GAP

Employee Involvement in Planning 4.35 3.04 1.31 4.40 3.13 1.27 4.46 2.86 1.60 4.22 3.00 1.22

Leadership Displaying a Clear Sense of Purpose 4.68 3.44 1.24 4.88 3.46 1.42 4.63 3.21 1.42 4.51 3.43 1.08

Sufficiently Utilizing Budetary Resources 4.52 3.09 1.43 4.58 3.46 1.12 4.51 3.14 1.38 4.42 3.29 1.14

Doing a Good Job Meeting Staff Needs 4.43 3.15 1.28 4.40 3.21 1.19 4.48 3.09 1.39 4.35 3.14 1.22

Utilizing Employee Suggestions for Improvements 4.19 2.98 1.21 4.29 3.14 1.15 4.27 2.80 1.48 4.27 3.01 1.26

Meeting the Needs of Students 4.80 3.51 1.29 4.80 3.54 1.26 4.76 3.52 1.24 4.63 3.69 0.94

Utilizing Staff Resources Appropriately 4.40 3.13 1.27 4.46 3.46 1.00 4.40 2.98 1.42 4.31 3.20 1.11

Treating Students as a Top Priority 4.78 3.52 1.26 4.80 3.63 1.17 4.75 3.62 1.14 4.64 3.68 0.96

Taking Pride in Administrative Work 4.61 3.52 1.09 4.79 3.63 1.16 4.64 3.54 1.10 4.60 3.69 0.91

Meeting the Needs of Faculty 4.40 3.38 1.02 4.42 3.70 0.72 4.53 3.02 1.51 4.40 3.12 1.28

150


Source: Noel Levitz

Gap Between Importance and SatisfactionCAMPUS CULTURE AND POLICIES 2008 2009 2010 2011

Importance

Satisfaction GAP

Importance

Satisfaction GAP

Importance

Satisfaction

GAP

Importance

Satisfaction

GAP

Making Certain the Mission, Purpose and Values are Understood 4.38 3.35 1.03 4.44 3.38

1.06 4.36 3.14

1.22 4.34 3.34

1.00

Making Certain the Mission, Purpose and Values are Supported 4.44 3.46 0.98 4.60 3.42

1.18 4.44 3.31

1.13 4.30 3.48

0.83

Promoting Excellent Student Employee Relationships 4.66 3.56 1.09 4.76 3.67

1.09 4.64 3.57

1.07 4.59 3.68

0.91

Making Certain the Staff Takes Pride in Their Work 4.59 3.59 1.00 4.61 3.521.09 4.65 3.65

1.00 4.62 3.75

0.86

Insuring Efforts to Improve Quality are Paying Off 4.45 3.45 1.00 4.50 3.640.86 4.41 3.27

1.14 4.45 3.47

0.98

Insuring the Goals of the Institution are Consistent With the Mission 4.53 3.48 1.06 4.56 3.71

0.85 4.51 3.42

1.09 4.39 3.49

0.90

Insuring the Faculty Takes Pride in Their Work 4.66 3.81 0.85 4.65 3.910.74 4.74 3.84

0.90 4.68 3.94

0.74

Insuring the Reputation of the Institution Continues to Improve 4.49 3.62 0.87 4.63 4.00

0.63 4.57 3.65

0.92 4.48 3.85

0.63

Insuring the Institution is Well-Respected in the Community 4.63 3.74 0.89 4.67 4.00

0.67 4.70 3.88

0.82 4.63 4.08

0.55

Insuring the Institution Does a Good Job of Meeting the Needs of Administrators 4.21 3.63 0.57 4.04 4.58

-0.54 4.09 3.56

0.53 4.18 3.79

0.39

151

Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2011 (summary)

Source: Noel Levitz

SFCC is statistically above the comparison group in 2011 in five areas:

This institution does a good job of meeting the needs of administrators SFCC = 3.79 vs. Comparison Group = 3.66*

The reputation of this institution continues to improve SFCC = 3.85 vs. Comparison Group = 3.52*

This institution is well-respected in the community SFCC = 4.08 vs. Comparison Group = 3.67*

*Statistically Significant

152

Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2011 (summary)

Source: Noel Levitz

I am paid fairly for the work I do: SFCC = 2.67 vs. Comparison Group = 3.24*

The employee benefits available to me are valuable: SFCC = 3.45 vs. Comparison Group = 3.85*

I have adequate opportunities for advancement: SFCC = 2.66 vs. Comparison Group = 3.12*

I have adequate opportunities for training to improve my skills: SFCC = 3.01 vs. Comparison Group = 3.44*

I have adequate opportunities for professional development: SFCC = 3.03 vs. Comparison Group = 3.45*

SFCC is statistically below the comparison group in 2011 in five areas:

*Statistically Significant

INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS

154 SFCC Organizations

155

Current SFCC Organizational Chart

156

Proposed Reorganization: Academic Affairs

157

Quality Councils

Administrative and

College Services

Institutional

Advancement

Societal

Responsibilit

y

Student

Success &

Academic

Affairs

Marketing and

PR

SocialResponsibility

158

Service to the Community

Kids Campus KSFR radio/TV station Red Dot Gallery Planetarium Fitness Center La Familia Dental Clinic Tax Preparation Services Meeting Space for Organizations

159 Previous Strategic Plan

160

Previous Strategic Plan: Institutional Goals

1. Develop Students’ Potential through Highly Effective Learning Systems

2. Identify & Meet the Community’s Learning Needs

3. Engage Employees in Workplace Success4. Provide Effective Internal Organizational

Support5. Promote External Support for the College6. Promote Institutional Accountability

161

Previous Strategic Plan: Accomplishments

Passed $35 million bond The Higher Education Center was begun on campus New construction and renovations

Health and Sciences Center was completed in 2010 Trades and Advanced Technology Center was completed

in 2011 More than 25 new certificate and degree programs

developed since 2005 Credit Hour Enrollment increased 40.7% (2007-2011) Degree completion has increased:

All completers by 45.5% (2007-2011) Hispanic completers by 16.8% (2007-2011)

162 Institutional Finance

163

SFCC Proposed Budget FY 2013-2014

Revenues Expenditures

79% of funding comes from taxesSource: Finance and Administration – Instruction & General Budget FY 12-13 and

FY 13-14

Tuiti

on &

Fees

Stat

e App

ropr

iatio

ns

Loca

l App

ropr

iatio

ns

Other

Sou

rces

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

20.0%29.0%

50.0%

1.0%$6,575,300

$9,177,900

$15,900,000

$295,000In

stru

ctio

n

Acade

mic

Supp

ort

Stud

ent S

ervi

ces

Inst

itutio

nal S

uppo

rt

Plan

t Ope

ratio

n0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

47%

8%12%

21%12%

$14,317,762

$2,488,363

$3,785,955

$6,329,470

$3,733,504

164

Tuition and Fees

1998-99

1999-00

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

$0.00

$200.00

$400.00

$600.00

$800.00

$1,000.00

$1,200.00

$1,400.00

$240.00

$387.60$474.00

$312.00

$516.00

$618.09$576.00

$930.00

$1,176.00

Full-time tuition for 12 credit hours per semester

In District Out of District Out of State

Source: Banner

165

Tuition Statewide: By Academic Year

Source: IPEDS

NM Mili

tary

Inst

itute

NMSU – A

lam

ogor

do

NMSU – G

rant

s

UNM –

Taos

UNM –

Gallu

p

UNM –

Los Ala

mos

UNM –

Valen

cia

Mesal

ands

Com

mun

ity C

olle

ge

NMSU – D

ona

Ana

East

ern

NMU – R

oswel

l

Sant

a Fe

Com

mun

ity C

olle

ge

CNM Com

mun

ity C

olle

ge

San

Juan

Col

lege

New M

exico

Juni

or C

olle

ge

Clovi

s Com

mun

ity C

olle

ge

NMSU – C

arlsb

ad

Luna

Com

mun

ity C

olle

ge

East

ern

NMU – R

uido

so$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

$4,000

$4,500

$4,030

$1,896$1,782$1,704$1,704$1,608$1,561$1,560$1,536$1,507

$1,329$1,310$1,224$1,176$1,176$1,036

$886 $852

166

Instruction and General

2008-2014

Projected Prelim.Budget2008 2009 2010 2011 2012* 2013 2014

Beginning Balance 3,124,785$ 3,820,502$ 2,750,801$ 3,439,136$ 4,962,743$ 7,663,288$ 4,616,982$

Revenues 28,182,950 28,380,598 28,994,287 30,271,016 31,860,462 31,218,900 32,082,900 Exenditures 25,865,718 27,374,563 26,905,952 27,777,887 29,159,917 30,665,206 30,913,966 Net 2,317,232$ 1,006,035$ 2,088,335$ 2,493,129$ 2,700,545$ 553,694$ 1,168,934$

Transfers 1,621,515 2,075,736 1,400,000 1,800,000 - 3,600,000 2,100,000

Ending Balance 3,820,502$ 2,750,801$ 3,439,136$ 4,132,265$ 7,663,288$ 4,616,982$ 3,685,916$

15% 10% 13% 15% 26% 15% 12%

SFCCInstruction and General2008 to Budgeted 2014

Source: SFCC Finance and Administration

167

Instructional Cost per Student

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12$1,500

$1,750

$2,000

$2,250

$2,500

$2,240

$2,131

$1,770$1,740

$2,105

Source: Balanced Scorecard

168

Statement of Net Assets – 2008 to 2012

Source: Moody Presentation

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Current Assets $38,426,511 $36,426,472 $39,801,371 $42,530,782 $29,084,797

Non-Current Assets 55,069,078 56,941,094 68,367,405 78,718,848 90,556,873

Total Assets $93,495,589 $93,367,566 $108,168,776 $121,249,630 $119,641,670

Current Liabilities $12,877,569 $9,379,047 $14,947,627 $12,530,972 $13,167,482

Non-Current Liabilities 20,015,062 17,850,302 17,124,154 31,542,599 25,281,108

Total Liabilities $32,892,631 $27,229,349 $32,072,141 $44,073,571 $38,448,590

NET ASSETS $60,602,958 $66,138,217 $76,096,635 $77,176,059 $81,193,080

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Current Assets $38,426,511 $36,426,472 $39,801,371 $42,530,782 $29,084,797

Non-Current Assets 55,069,078 56,941,094 68,367,405 78,718,848 90,556,873

Total Assets $93,495,589 $93,367,566 $108,168,776 $121,249,630 $119,641,670

Current Liabilities $12,877,569 $9,379,047 $14,947,627 $12,530,972 $13,167,482

Non-Current Liabilities 20,015,062 17,850,302 17,124,154 31,542,599 25,281,108

Total Liabilities $32,892,631 $27,229,349 $32,072,141 $44,073,571 $38,448,590

NET ASSETS $60,602,958 $66,138,217 $76,096,635 $77,176,059 $81,193,080

169

Unrestricted Cash and Expendable Net Assets


170

Unrestricted Net Assets (Fund Balance) to I&G Expenditures


Target 30%

171

Unrestricted Cash to I&G Expenditures


Target Range 35% to 39%

Target range

172

Key I&G Revenue Streams


173

I&G Total Revenues


174

I&G Revenues/Expenditures


175DEBT MANAGEMENT AND FINANCE PLAN

176

2013 Plan of Finance


District held an election in February 2010 to authorize $35 million of general obligation bonds.

Constitution limits amount of bonds outstanding to 3%.

The 2012 Assessed Valuation is as follows: $6,357,470,139 x .03 = $190,724,104.

After issuance of the 2013 Bonds, the College will be 21% bonded to capacity.

Declining debt service to permit new bonds in future without tax increase.

12 year final maturity.

Retire debt as quickly as $0.93 levy will permit.

Actively manage debt service cash and principal maturities to maintain a stable debt service tax rate and retire debt as quickly as possible.

177

Total Debt Service Requirements


Principal

Year 8/1 Principal Interest Total 8/1 Principal Interest (1) Total Principal Interest Total Retired Cumulative

2013 $5,430,000 $303,344 $5,733,344 $600,000 $109,896 $709,896 $6,030,000 $413,240 $6,443,240 $6,030,000 15.0%

2014 2,000,000 444,275 2,444,275 3,300,000 509,500 3,809,500 5,300,000 953,775 6,253,775 5,300,000 28.3%

2015 3,340,000 406,525 3,746,525 1,300,000 410,500 1,710,500 4,640,000 817,025 5,457,025 4,640,000 39.8%

2016 3,900,000 339,725 4,239,725 1,000,000 371,500 1,371,500 4,900,000 711,225 5,611,225 4,900,000 52.1%

2017 3,580,000 261,725 3,841,725 1,000,000 341,500 1,341,500 4,580,000 603,225 5,183,225 4,580,000 63.5%

2018 1,700,000 181,175 1,881,175 1,000,000 311,500 1,311,500 2,700,000 492,675 3,192,675 2,700,000 70.2%

2019 2,650,000 140,800 2,790,800 1,000,000 281,500 1,281,500 3,650,000 422,300 4,072,300 3,650,000 79.3%

2020 2,485,000 74,550 2,559,550 1,000,000 251,500 1,251,500 3,485,000 326,050 3,811,050 3,485,000 88.0%

2021 1,000,000 201,500 1,201,500 1,000,000 201,500 1,201,500 1,000,000 90.5%

2022 1,250,000 151,500 1,401,500 1,250,000 151,500 1,401,500 1,250,000 93.6%

2023 1,250,000 89,000 1,339,000 1,250,000 89,000 1,339,000 1,250,000 96.8%2024 - - - 1,300,000 39,000 1,339,000 1,300,000 39,000 1,339,000 1,300,000 100.0%

$25,085,000 $2,152,119 $27,237,119 $15,000,000 $3,068,396 $18,068,396 $40,085,000 $5,220,515 $45,305,515 $40,085,000

(1) For illustrational purposes only. Interest calculated using a coupon rate of 3.58%.

PRESENT REQUIREMENTS SERIES 2013 BONDS TOTAL REQUIREMENTS

178 TAX BASE INFORMATION

179

Assessed Valuation

Source: RBC Capital Markets

Tax Growth OverYear Residential Non-Residential Total Previous Year

2003 $2,685,374,933 $1,013,674,395 $3,699,049,328 7.32%

2004 2,967,074,813 1,053,732,235 4,020,807,048 8.70%

2005 3,362,985,020 1,154,730,472 4,517,715,492 12.36%

2006 3,737,819,975 1,270,886,417 5,008,706,392 10.87%

2007 4,152,258,777 1,454,265,011 5,606,523,788 11.94%

2008 4,430,810,953 1,629,371,871 6,060,182,824 8.09%

2009 4,661,806,059 1,546,352,421 6,208,158,480 2.44%

2010 4,828,230,438 1,545,455,467 6,373,685,905 2.67%

2011 4,832,906,555 1,550,015,250 6,382,921,805 0.14%

2012 4,880,347,416 1,477,122,723 6,357,470,139 -0.40%

Source: New Mexico Department of Finance & Administration.

As of 3/25/2013

Total Bond Authorization Approved by Voters in 2010 35,000,000$

2012 Assessed Valuation 6,357,470,139$

Constitutional Debt Limitation (3% of Assessed Valuation) 3.00% 190,724,104$

Less Current Outstanding Debt (100% Fixed Rate) 25,085,000

Less Series 2013 Bonds 15,000,000

Debt Outstanding After Issuance of Series 2013 Bonds 40,085,000$

Available Debt Capacity 150,639,104$

% Bonded to Capacity 21.02%

History of Assessed Valuation

$3,000,000,000

$3,500,000,000

$4,000,000,000

$4,500,000,000

$5,000,000,000

$5,500,000,000

$6,000,000,000

$6,500,000,000

$7,000,000,000

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

-1.00%

1.00%

3.00%

5.00%

7.00%

9.00%

11.00%

13.00%

15.00%

Total AV % Growth Average Growth

180

New vs. Re-Appraisal


2011 New (1) Re-Appraisal (1) 2012

Santa Fe - C In 2,667,575,697$ 15,176,491$ 0.57% 17,321,210$ 0.65% 2,700,073,398$ 1.22%

Santa Fe - C Out 2,165,330,858$ 20,113,278$ 0.93% 8,134,875$ 0.38% 2,193,579,011$ 1.30%

Total Residential 4,832,906,555$ 35,289,769$ 0.73% 25,456,085$ 0.53% 4,893,652,409$ 1.26%

Santa Fe - C In 979,632,876$ 16,927,938$ 1.73% (74,440,388)$ -7.60% 922,120,426$ -5.87%

Santa Fe - C Out 474,262,221$ 18,620,947$ 3.93% (67,001,426)$ -14.13% 425,881,742$ -10.20%

Total Non-Residential 1,453,895,097$ 35,548,885$ 2.45% (141,441,814)$ -9.73% 1,348,002,168$ -7.28%

Total Assessor's Valuation 6,286,801,652$ 70,838,654$ 1.13% (115,985,729)$ -1.84% 6,241,654,577$ -0.72%

Central Assesment 96,120,153$ 97,430,826 1.36%

TOTAL ASSESSED VALUATION 6,382,921,805$ 70,838,654$ 1.13% (115,985,729)$ -1.84% 6,339,085,403$ (2) -0.69%

1) Numbers taken from Santa Fe County PTD-03 Report dated 6/15/2012.

2) Preliminary, does not include protested property. Final assessed value will differ.

SANTA FE COUNTYNEW vs. RE-APPRAISAL

SANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE

181

Major Taxpayers


2012 % of Name Business A.V. A.V.

Public Service Company of NM Electric Utility $43,485,485 0.68%

CenturyLink Telephone Utility 15,094,348 0.24%

Eldorado Partnership Hotel 14,372,973 0.23%

La Posada Inc Hotel 10,236,788 0.16%

Santa Fe Mall LLC Shopping Center 10,120,197 0.16%

Gas Company of New Mexico Gas Utility 9,888,964 0.16%

Santa Fe Railyard Community Co Real Estate 9,398,069 0.15%

Canyon Encantado Real Estate 8,941,923 0.14%

Corporation de la Fonda Hotel 8,640,232 0.14%

New Mexico Hotels Ltd. Hotel 8,098,894 0.13%

Total $138,277,873 2.18%

Source: Santa Fe County Assessor's Office

2.18%

97.82%

Major Taxpayers

182

Direct and Overlapping Debt


Assessed G/O Debt PercentMunicipal Entity Valuation Outstanding Applicable Amount

State of New Mexico $54,490,961,619 $372,700,000 11.67% $43,482,975

Santa Fe County 6,896,495,216 114,445,000 92.18% 105,500,062

City of Santa Fe 3,710,979,288 26,510,000 100.00% 26,510,000

Santa Fe Community College 6,357,470,139 40,085,000 100.00% 40,085,000

Santa Fe Public Schools 6,357,470,139 178,075,000 100.00% 178,075,000

Total Direct & Overlapping Debt $393,653,037

Ratio of Estimated Direct & Overlapping Debt to 2012 Assessed Valuation: 6.19%

Ratio of Estimated Direct & Overlapping Debt to 2012 Actual Valuation: 2.03%

Per Capita Direct & Overlapping Debt: $3,149.22

Est. Population: 125,000

183

Historical Tax Rates: City of Santa Fe

Source: NM Department of Finance & Administration

2012-13 2011-12 2010-11 2009-10 2008-09

State of New Mexico $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000Santa Fe County 5.022 4.891 4.697 4.670 4.507Santa Fe Community College 2.362 2.299 2.205 2.190 2.114City of Santa Fe 1.165 1.135 1.093 1.097 1.055Santa Fe Schools 0.128 0.125 0.120 0.119 0.115 Total $8.677 $8.450 $8.115 $8.076 $7.791

2012-13 2011-12 2010-11 2009-10 2008-09

State of New Mexico $1.360 $1.362 $1.530 $1.150 $1.250Santa Fe County 1.640 1.851 1.873 1.930 1.969Santa Fe Community College 0.930 1.015 1.015 1.046 1.046City of Santa Fe 0.564 0.743 0.679 0.498 0.461Santa Fe Schools 6.920 6.995 6.920 6.919 6.867 Total $11.414 $11.966 $12.017 $11.543 $11.593

2012-13 2011-12 2010-11 2009-10 2008-09

State of New Mexico $1.360 $1.362 $1.530 $1.150 $1.250Santa Fe County 6.662 6.742 6.570 6.600 6.476Santa Fe Community College 3.292 3.314 3.220 3.236 3.160City of Santa Fe 1.729 1.878 1.772 1.595 1.516Santa Fe Schools 7.048 7.120 7.040 7.038 6.982

Total Residential in City of Santa Fe $20.091 $20.416 $20.132 $19.619 $19.384

Total Non-Residential in City of Santa Fe $29.581 $30.123 $29.865 $29.142 $27.502

Total Residential in Unincorporated County $18.362 $18.538 $18.360 $18.024 $17.868

Total Non-Residential in Unincorporated County $26.200 $26.563 $26.618 $26.286 $25.043

Source: New Mexico Department of Finance & Administration

RESIDENTIAL TAX RATES - Per $1,000 Assessed Valuation

Within 20 Mill Limit for General Purposes

Over 20 Mill Limit - Interest, Principal, Judgment, etc.

Total Levy

184 Historical Financials

185

Revenues & Expenses – Unrestricted (Budgetary Basis)

Source: SFCC Audited Financial Statements

FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012

Unrestricted Revenues: Tuition and Fees -$ -$ -$ 4,840,809$ 5,179,171$ Miscellaneous Fees - - 99,701 1,424,399 1,341,221 State Government Appropriations 4,673,400 7,010,030 11,805,998 8,564,500 8,203,400 Local Government Appropriations - 6,053,699 6,404,776 15,266,308 16,730,563 Private Government Contracts/Grants - - 137,956 - - Sales and Services 2,924,689 3,252,986 3,505,955 - 144,239 Other 23,776,259 868,041 8,082,951 175,000 261,868

Total Unrestricted Revenues 31,374,348$ 17,184,756$ 30,037,337$ 30,271,016$ 31,860,462$

Unrestricted Expenditures: Student Social and Cultural 68,585$ 57,355$ 143,235$ -$ -$ Public Service 6,235,074 6,807,116 6,550,109 - - Student Aid, Grants & Stipends 213,843 241,502 402,979 - - Auxiliary Services 1,878,164 1,951,141 2,099,224 - - Capital Outlay 3,323,331 3,920,585 14,192,670 - - Renewal & Replacement 1,187,864 874,796 633,318 - - Retirement of indebtedness 4,799,417 5,236,172 5,961,301 - - Instruction - - - 14,276,050 14,402,925 Academic Support - - - 2,632,074 2,744,907 Student Services - - - 2,395,320 3,022,200 Institutional Support - - - 5,513,937 5,959,902 Operation and Maintenance of Plant - - - 2,960,506 3,029,983

Total Unrestricted Expenditures 17,706,278$ 19,088,667$ 29,982,836$ 27,777,887$ 29,159,917$

Net Transfers 3,288,515 2,075,736 1,400,000 (1,800,000) -

Change in Net Assets 16,956,585 171,825 1,454,501 693,129 2,700,545

Beginning, Net Assets 11,897,418 28,528,919 28,700,743 3,439,137 4,962,743

Ending, Net Assets 28,854,003$ 28,700,744$ 30,155,244$ 4,132,266$ 7,663,288$


Budget Comparison - Unrestricted

186

Revenues & Expenses – Restricted (Budgetary Basis)


FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012

Unrestricted Revenues: Federal Government Contracts/Grants 1,904,678$ 3,843,483$ 6,998,650$ 2,521,128$ 2,602,223$ State Government Contracts/Grants 602,379 1,248,788 1,101,396 1,525,479 980,536 Local Government Contracts/Grants - 124,615 118,171 110,384 11,926 Private Government Contract/Grants 273,810 21,236 118,485 452,650 743,130 Sales and Services 1,800,112 - - - -


Unrestricted Expenditures: Student Social and Cultural -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Public Service 1,955,465 1,790,104 1,854,174 - - Internal Services 196,358 - - - - Student Aid, Grants & Stipends 2,429,156 3,448,018 6,482,528 - - Instruction - - - 3,053,102 2,812,298 Academic Support - - - 1,397,275 1,275,030 Student Services - - - 159,264 260,487 Operation and Maintenance of Plant - - - - (10,000)


Net Transfers - - - -

Change in Net Assets - - - - -

Beginning, Net Assets - - - - -

Ending, Net Assets -$ -$ -$ -$ -$


Budget Comparison - Restricted

187

Revenues & Expenditures - Audited


FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012

Operating Revenues: Tuition and Fees 3,269,608$ 3,452,731$ 4,150,500$ 4,876,173$ 3,627,481$ Government Grants/Contracts 6,971,179 9,431,362 11,543,384 12,819,871 6,776,591 Non-Government Grants/Contracts 860,510 519,545 523,956 674,395 1,007,130 Sales and Services 1,058,484 1,300,142 1,264,895 1,227,492 828,029 Auxiliary Enterprises 1,866,205 1,993,396 2,270,211 2,485,265 2,713,734 Gain/Loss on Disposal Assets - - 3,523 7,640 -


Operating Expenses: Instruction 14,562,153$ 15,318,036$ 14,924,903$ 17,394,268$ 17,215,223$ Academic Support 3,487,522 4,571,262 4,569,549 3,964,233 4,019,937 Student Services 2,835,791 2,793,355 3,005,261 2,545,204 3,282,687 Institutional Support 5,028,923 5,725,648 5,275,671 5,513,937 5,959,902 Operation and Maintenance of Plant 2,821,367 2,825,823 2,728,968 2,969,886 3,019,983 Student Activities 103,585 57,355 143,235 94,344 108,650 Student Aid 1,500,545 2,414,479 5,221,524 6,398,579 6,219,074 Public Services 8,363,825 8,565,549 8,404,283 7,529,909 7,865,839 Auxiliary Enterprises 1,878,164 1,951,141 2,099,224 2,220,157 2,753,916 Building Renewal and Replacements 834,899 539,404 633,318 185,737 807,479 Capital Outlay 401,296 75,187 84,369 3,574,655 2,339,221 Independent operations 199,844 319,032 249,278 304,483 262,068 Depreciation and amortization 2,822,478 2,854,258 3,334,720 2,987,433 3,476,468


Operating (loss) Income (30,814,406) (31,313,353) (30,917,834) (33,591,989) (42,377,482)

Non-operating revenues (expenses) Federal Pell Grant - - - - 7,811,788 State Appropriations 15,756,280 17,097,080 17,142,678 13,209,476 12,324,428 Local Appropriations - Operating 12,495,770 13,460,020 14,559,901 15,266,308 17,364,014 Local Appropriations - Debt Service 5,727,140 6,053,699 6,404,776 6,494,343 7,139,250 General Obligation Bonds 81,990 344,541 3,087,087 - - Investment Income 697,494 256,827 40,267 56,023 (7,401) Interest expense and other related debt (609,660) (788,784) (684,895) (642,088) (759,032) Other Income 370,722 425,229 331,195 293,503 345,993 Other Expense - - (4,757) (6,152) - Loss on Disposal of Assets - - - (26,621) Net Non-Operating Revenues 34,519,736 36,848,612 40,876,252 34,671,413 44,192,419

Increase in Net Assets 3,705,330 5,535,259 9,958,418 1,079,424 1,814,937

Beginning, Net Assets 56,897,628 60,602,958 66,138,217 76,096,635 79,378,143

Ending, Net Assets 60,602,958$ 66,138,217$ 76,096,635$ 77,176,059$ 81,193,080$


Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets (Primary Institution)

188

Statement of Net Assets – Assets


FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012Assets:Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents 7,124,878 6,059,183 9,446,021 6,142,334 7,057,482 Cash and cash equivalents - restricted 6,792,783 7,902,123 8,684,866 6,872,177 5,057,113 Investments 20,398,273 16,903,018 16,328,457 23,391,799 9,544,890 Accounts receivable students, net 749,709 208,307 238,457 1,050,834 1,322,304 Grants and contracts receivable 1,504,329 2,333,778 1,626,347 2,810,737 2,759,177 Mill levy receivable 40,252 34,161 90,882 150,493 1,661,012 Other receivables, net 545,795 1,759,187 1,990,702 1,110,715 268,323 Due from component unit 458,681 431,050 446,420 484,492 612,079 Inventories 345,055 367,476 426,109 434,955 467,085 Prepaid expenses 466,756 428,189 523,110 82,246 335,332

Total Current Assets 38,426,511 36,426,472 39,801,371 42,530,782 29,084,797

Non-Current Assets: Assets held in escrow 127,543 127,543 127,543 127,543 127,543 Mill levy receivable - - - - 1,214,664 Capital assets, net 54,941,535 56,813,551 68,239,862 78,591,305 89,214,666

Total Non-Current Assets 55,069,078 56,941,094 68,367,405 78,718,848 90,556,873

Total Assets 93,495,589 93,367,566 108,168,776 121,249,630 119,641,670

189

Statement of Net Assets – Liabilities


FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012

Liabilities:Current Liabilities: Accounts payable 2,948,539 2,429,400 2,059,011 2,740,071 2,823,502 Contractors payable - - 2,336,981 - - Accrued liabilities 1,356,195 1,075,675 860,692 998,481 991,318 Accrued interest payable 425,231 303,833 265,656 484,797 265,019 Deferred revenue 1,153,312 787,019 893,244 2,071,304 2,328,853 Dure to primary institution - - - - - Accured compensated absences - Current 746,905 776,714 148,690 185,189 846,761 Bonds payable - Current 6,247,387 4,006,406 8,067,018 5,658,939 5,627,122 Other liabilities - - 316,335 392,191 284,907

Total Current Liabilities 12,877,569 9,379,047 14,947,627 12,530,972 13,167,482

Non-Current Liabilities: Accrued compensated absences 137,186 161,260 754,918 830,477 196,108 Bonds payable 19,877,876 17,689,042 16,369,596 30,712,122 25,085,000

Total Non-Current Liabilities 20,015,062 17,850,302 17,124,514 31,542,599 25,281,108

Total Liabilities 32,892,631 27,229,349 32,072,141 44,073,571 38,448,590

Net Assets: Invested in capital assets, net of related debt 28,816,272 35,118,103 43,803,246 42,220,244 58,502,544 Restricted, scholarship and programs 1,956,096 - - - - Restricted, debt service 6,792,783 7,598,290 8,508,070 6,537,873 6,474,118 Restricted, capital projects 17,354,173 13,822,724 13,742,326 19,979,026 5,680,173 Other - - - - 223,046 Unrestricted 5,683,634 9,599,100 10,042,993 8,438,916 10,313,199

Total Net Assets 60,602,958 66,138,217 76,096,635 77,176,059 81,193,080

Total Net Assets and Liabilities 93,495,589 93,367,566 108,168,776 121,249,630 119,641,670


190 Funding Formula

191

State Funding FormulaPerformance Based Formula

192

What is the Base?

193

Inputs and Variables

SCHCompletion

Degrees Awarded

WorkforceIncentive

At- RiskStudents

Mill Levy

Legislative WeightingExecutive Weighting

FY 14

5%

5%

3%

2%

Not Included

Reallocated100% of Last

Year’s Performance

FY 14

48%

8%

12%

8%

Included

Reallocated15% of Last

Year’s Performance

FY 13

82.25%

1.15%

0.95%

2.15%

Included

% is not reallocated

Base

Other Funding Considerations:• ERB• Compensation

Last Year’s Weighting

Source: LFC FY 2014 Budget Recommendations Volume III

195

GROW and Grants

The GROW Foundation supports SFCC by acquiring financial resources outside of the regular SFCC revenue sources through fund-raising and grants.

Grants received in previous academic years:

Grants received 7/1/2012 to 12/31/2012: $736,808.00Total grants reported through 3/31/2013: $1,384,432.67

07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12

$4,941,471 $5,607,033 $5,470,771 $5,322,256 $6,467,148

196

Instruction

197 Bonds

198

Summary of 2013 Bonds

Issues Size: $15,000,000

Sale Date: April 24, 2013

Closing Date: May 16, 2013

Maturity: 2013 - 2024

Current Tax Rate: $0. 93 / $1,000 of A.V.

Future Tax Rate: Maintain tax rate at current level

2012 Assessed Valuation: $6,357,470,139

199

Overview of Series 2013 BondsIssues Size: $15,000,000

Maturity Dates: 2013 - 2024

Average Life (Years): 4.662

Ratings – Moody’s: Aa1

Total Interest: $2,227,333.33

Premium: $1,186,105.00

Net Interest: $1,041,228.33

True Interest Cost (“TIC”): 1.410%

All-In TIC: 1.524%

Purchaser: Robert W. Baird & Co., Incorporated

Red Bank, New Jersey

200

Operations and Facilities

Operations Maintenance Staff: 20 Grounds Staff:15 Total Operations managed: 367 acres, 645,000 square

footage, 7 boiler systems, 76 air conditioning units

FacilitiesHealth & Sciences Center Trades & Advanced

Technology CenterWest Wing Campus Center and Food

ServicesBookstore Culinary ClassroomsFine Arts Studios and Labs Jemez Meeting RoomsWitter Fitness Ed. Center Wastewater Plant

201 Campus Security

202

Campus Safety & Security

Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act requires SFCC to:

Publish an Annual Security Report (ASR) To have a public crime log Disclose crime statistics Issue timely warnings about Clery Act crimes Devise an emergency response, notification

and testing policy Compile and report fire data to the federal

government Enact policies and procedures to handle reports

of missing students

203

Campus Community Emergency Response Team (C-CERT)

Mission StatementTo train selected SFCC staff and faculty members as a Campus Community Emergency Response Team (C-CERT), which will work in cooperation with the SFCC Safety and Security team, local emergency response agencies and law enforcement, either as first responders or as backup resources, as directed by the

Incident Commander.

C-CERT is here to assist with:

Disaster Preparedness Fire Safety Evacuation Disaster Medical

Operations Light Search & Rescue

204

Service to the Community

Kids Campus KSFR radio/TV station Red Dot Gallery Planetarium Fitness Center La Familia Dental Clinic Tax Preparation Services Meeting Space for Organizations

205 Sustainability

206

What is Sustainability?

Source: NMDWS LASER

The design and implementation of systems that emulate the optimization from millions of years of evolution seen in ecosystems and the natural world. Application of this approach results in ...

Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the future

Balance the use and availability of renewable and non-renewable resources.

Reduce, re-use, and recycle human-made waste streams as a resource and manage the by-products of human endeavor.

207

Sustainability:Why should we care?

1. People2. Planet3. Learning

208

Sustainability Plans: State and City State Goal – The Renewable Energy State Support National Economic and Security Issues Cultivating Santa Fe’s Future Economy, Economic

Development Strategy (April 2004) 4. Develop curricula that helps Santa Fe become a water

and energy conservation role model for other cities.

Sustainable Santa Fe Plan – adopted October 29, 2008 In addition to degree accreditation, continuing education

opportunities at Santa Fe Community College are a valuable resource. The Center for Community Sustainability at Santa Fe Community College offers trades skills education that serves both workforce as well as individual needs for sustainable housing, water conservation, and design. In spite of the existing programs, there is considerable room for additional programs and activities.

209

Sustainability:Legislation and OrdinanceIn 2010 the NM State Senate enacted energy efficiency and conservation measures for all State-funded building projects of significant size.

Green Building Councilhttp://www.sfahba.com/index.php/green/

Residential Green Building Codehttp://www.santafenm.gov/index.aspx?NID=1297

City of Santa Fe, New Mexico – Ordinance No. 2009-9

www.santafenm.gov/archives/169/2009-09.pdf

Sustainable Santa Fe PlanCity of Santa Fe, New Mexico – Resolution 2008-93

http://www.santafenm.gov/DocumentCenter/Home/View/702

http://www.sfahba.com/index.php/green/

http://www.santafenm.gov/index.aspx?NID=1297

http://www.santafenm.gov/archives/169/2009-09.pdf

http://www.santafenm.gov/DocumentCenter/Home/View/702

210

Community Involvement

Development of Santa Fe Green Building Codes Joint City/County Energy Task Force Regional Economic Development Initiatives Statewide Biofuels Plan New Mexico Green Collaborative New Mexico Green Chamber of Commerce

211

Sustainability Recognition

The 2013 Sustainable Santa Fe Awards ceremony was held April 27, 2013. The winning categories included:

1. Renewable Energy or Energy Conservation Project 2. Water Conservation Project 3. Low-Carbon Transportation Project 4. Green Building Project5. Ecological or Other Climate Change Adaptation Project 6. Solid Waste Reduction Project7. Food System Project8. Youth-led Project9. Community Outreach Project10. Sustainability Journalism Project11. Environmental Justice Project12. Green Economic Development Project13. Other (An outstanding project that is not covered under one of the other categories)

The 2013 Sustainable Santa Fe Awards are sponsored by the City of Santa Fe’s Sustainable Santa Fe Commission, Earth Care, the Santa Fe Green Chamber of Commerce and the Green Fire Times.

212

Sustainability at SFCC

Santa Fe Community College has strategically sought to develop the opportunity to be the hub of sustainability learning, green campus operations and workforce training for green industry in the northern New Mexico region.

Structure/Areas of Focus Reduce Natural Resource Depletion Reduce Pollution Ensure Healthy Indoor Environments Model and Teach Sustainable Concepts and Practices

Sustainability Steering Committee Linked to Internal and External Groups Tied to Curriculum

213

SFCC Sustainability Plan Goals

1. Reduce Natural Resource DepletionA. Non-renewable fuels

B. Fresh water reserves

C. Non-renewable materials

D. Land and soil

2. Reduce PollutionA. Air pollution

B. Water pollution

C. Land pollution

D. Light pollution

3. Ensure Healthy Indoor EnvironmentsA. Air quality

B. Nutrition

4. Model and Teach Sustainable ConceptsA. Institutional commitment

B. Organizational structure

C. Model and teach sustainability

214

SFCC’s History of Sustainability2006 - Developed a Sustainability Plan (revised 2009)2007 - Signed the American College & University President’s Climate Commitment2008 - Held the Green Jobs Forum - Biomass Heating System2009 - Built the Sustainable Technology Center considered to be the leading green instructional facility in the United States.

- Institutional Master Plan (inclusion of sustainability plan)2010 - Passage of bond for infrastructure improvement - LEED certification* for the Health & Sciences building2011 - Achieved LEED Gold rating for Trades and Advanced Technology Center2012-13 - Developed curricula to teach sustainability for careers in green industry2013-14 - 1.6 MV Solar array installation (approximately 15 acres)

* Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) is a comprehensive green building rating system

215

Sustainability:We are doing our part

Encouraging use of reusable bottles Going paperless in key areas Replacing wastebasket liners only

when needed Turning off lights in the cafeteria

unless really needed Turning off lights and computers in

offices when not in use Introducing solar energy Carpooling and Ride Sharing

underway Use of Solar (Trades and Advanced

Technology Center)

Water Treatment Plant – Graywater irrigation

Biomass Boiler Bicycle Trail Connection Recycling Campus Composting Lighting Design and Retrofits Ride-share parking incentive Standard LEED Checklist for new

buildings Replaced 2 - 300 ton chillers with

efficient ones

SFCC has created internal programs and key practices to reduce natural resource depletion, reduce pollution and ensure healthy indoor environments:

216

Sustainability:Green Programs at SFCC

Associate in Applied Science Sustainable Technologies

(Revision) Building Science & Construction

Technologies (New)

Certificate Programs Biofuels Environmental Technologies Facilities Technologies Green Building Construction

Skills Green Building Systems Heating, Ventilation and Air

Conditioning

Plumbing Solar Energy Sustainable Agriculture (in

development) Water Treatment Operator

Non-Credit Offerings New Mexico Energy $mart

Academy Building Performance Institute

(BPI) Healthy Air Home Energy Rater Systems

(HERS) Weatherization

Lead Abatement Radon Mitigation

SFCC is recognized in ACUPCC’s 2009 Annual Report as one of three schools focusing on sustainability in the curriculum in innovative ways.

217

Sustainability:SFCC Greenhouse Gas by Source

Percentage by source in 2007/08 (baseline)

218

Sustainability:Proposed Project

2013 1.7 MW solar PV

installation Per year will

Generate 3,441 mWh Save 11,734 MMBtu Reduce GHG by 920

metric tons

TATC solar thermal For 1/2 of 2013

Save 725 therms (73 MMBtu)

Reduce GHG by 4 metric tons

TATC adsorption chiller Per year will

Save 14 mWh (47 MMBtu)

Reduce GHG by 4 metric tons

2014 TATC solar thermal

Per year will Save an additional 725

therms Reduce GHG by an

additional 4 metric tons

219

Sustainability:Potential Projects 2014 - 2016

Convert lighting to LED from T8 fluorescent Incrementally over three years - per year will

Save 316 MWh (1,078 MMBtu) Reduce GHG by 85 metric tons

2016 Create electric shuttle fleet

Per year will Save 5% total VMT Reduce GHG by 252 metric tons

220

Sustainability:Campus Greenhouse Gases

*Does not include T&D losses

1 MMbtu gas = .0529 metric tonnes1 MMbtu electricity = .2006 metric tonnes1 MMbtu wood = .0046 metric tonnes

Source:

07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 -

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

1,139

797 763 805 790 786 782 782 782 782

4,549 4,403

4,099

4,414

4,860 4,750

4,038

3,325 3,325 3,325

- - 15 14 21 21 21 21 21 21

5,688

5,200

4,877

5,233

5,671 5,557

4,841

4,128 4,128 4,128

Per year, energy only*

Natural GasElectricityWoodTotal GHG

27% reduc-tion in 2016/17 from 2007/08 base-line

221

Sustainability Challenges

Resource Allocation Funding Staffing

Changing Technology

Accountability Align performance

measures with goals Data collection Assign responsibility

Annual review and update

222

Sustainability Future Goals

Optimization of building resources Micro grid project Sustainable agriculture Zero-waste Platinum LEED certifications Update sustainability plan Expand curriculum support

223

Challenges Opportunities

Higher Education Trends

224

Higher Education Trends & Issues

Focus on increasing graduation rates and degree production

Funding formula shift from access to success Assessment of student learning College readiness Developmental education Accelerate progress to completion Competency-based education Credit for prior learning Online and hybrid learning Economic and workforce development STEM-H Green job training

225

Challenges For SFCC

Aging population in Santa Fe High school graduates projected to flat line Geographic Area of Responsibility Limited opportunities in New Mexico Pockets of poverty Lack of academic preparedness Funding formula changing to degree

completion Emerging technologies

226

Opportunities – Degree Completion Change how we teach developmental

education With the SCH portion of the funding

diminishing we do not have to be restricted in how we tackle developmental education classes

Addresses Funding formula Lack of academic preparedness

227

Opportunities – Degree Completion Expand Programs in Health Care

High growth in jobs creation High wage jobs High state funding Serves the community’s aging population Emerging technologies

Addresses Aging population Brain drain Funding formula Pockets of poverty

228

Opportunities – Degree Completion Expand night and weekend degree

programs Target working adults Our tuition is lower than private colleges Our quality of program is better than

private colleges Addresses

Flat line high school graduates Expanded market

Room utilization issues

229

Opportunities – Degree Completion Expand fully-online programs to out-of-state and

out-of-country Our out-of-state tuition is lower than most instate tuition Our in-state tuition is lower than most institutions in NM Funding formula has changed Technology has changed Geographic Area of Responsibility does not apply Partnership with LANL Partnership with other countries

Addresses Funding formula Flat line high school graduates

sfcc environmental scan office of planning and institutional effectiveness

Documents

santa fe demographicsindustry

santa fe16source

santa fepercentage

industry santa fe msa13

high source

santa fehigh school

new mexico santa fe5recession

community high school