session c-21
DESCRIPTION
Session C-21. Promote Student Success, Manage Delinquency and Prevent Defaults. John Pierson Mark Walsh U.S. Department of Education. Topics For Today. Recent Cohort Default Rate Data A Changing Landscape Default Prevention Strategies Traditional Non-Traditional - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Session C-21
Promote Student Success,Manage Delinquency
and Prevent Defaults
John Pierson Mark Walsh
U.S. Department of Education
2
Topics For Today• Recent Cohort Default Rate Data• A Changing Landscape • Default Prevention Strategies
– Traditional– Non-Traditional
• Understanding the intersection of loan default and student success/retention
• Risk and Opportunity: Identifying the solutions
• State projects• Career school project
3
Official Cohort Default Rates
4
Cohort Default Rate By Sector
5
National Borrowers in Default
* 2006 total includes 150 defaulters from foreign schools not reflected on next graph (slide #6)
6
Defaulted Borrowers By Sector
7
Fast Facts – 2006 Official CDR
• National rate increased from 4.6% in 2005 to 5.2% in 2006, a 13% increase
• Career schools experienced the most significant CDR rise, from 8.2% in 2005 to 9.7% in 2006, an 18% increase
• Defaulted borrowers increased 26.3% between 2005 and 2006 (2004-2005 = 12.4%)
• Public and private 4-year schools continue to maintain the lowest CDRs at 3.4%/2.4%– How can these statistics be misleading?
8
The College Opportunity and Affordability Act (HEA Reauthorization)
• Calculation period for CDRs expanded from 2 years to 3 years beginning in 2012
• Threshold for sanctions due to high rates increases from 25% for 3 consecutive years to 30% beginning in 2012
• Raises from 10% to 15% the CDR which schools must fall below to be exempt from multiple disbursements and first year student endorsement regulation
9
A Changing Landscape in Higher Education Funding• Educational costs continue to rise• More students borrowing larger amounts• Increased use of Stafford and private loans
result in greater loan debt • Higher debt equals increased default risk• Schools require uninterrupted loan capital
to operate and higher default rates may result in access problems
• Elevated default risk equals an increased risk to private loan capital
10
Private Loans• Often marketed directly to students• Approval is typically based on factors such as
the school attended and credit score• Interest rates are variable with no cap• No loan limits or restrictions on fees• May lack borrower protections available in
Federal Student Loans • Shorter time frame before default • Are generally more expensive and should not
be used until Federal Student Aid has been exhausted
11
Federal Aid First
• Distinctions between federal and private loans
• Types, amounts of federal aid available
• On-line ordering at: http://edpubs.ed.gov
• Order by phone at: 1-877- 4ED-PUBS
FEDERAL AID
FIRST
www.federalstudentaid.ed.gov
12
Prevent Default At Your School
Making Strategic Choices
With unlimited time/resources, you would…
But of course your resources are limited, soyou must consider how to best use availableresources to reduce loan default among yourStafford and private loan borrowers.
Use of traditional and non-traditional defaultprevention strategies can be effective.
13
Traditional Approaches to Successful Default Prevention
Financial Aid • Teach borrowers financial literacy • Help borrowers prepare for repayment
(especially those who did not complete) • Assist borrowers during repayment, and
“rescue” delinquent borrowers utilizing Late Stage Delinquency Assistance (LSDA) – Successful at DL and FFEL schools
14
Financial Literacy
• Correlation exists between increased financial literacy and decreased defaults
• DCL GEN 05-14 lists financial literacy as one of nine key elements to include in a default prevention and management plan– 14% of students who left college
without completing a degree cited financial reasons*
* National Center for Education Statistics
15
Financial Literacy Programs
Things to consider in developing a financialliteracy program include:
• Identification of objectives• Developing your program• Implementing your program • Promoting your program• Measuring outcomes• Refining
16
Financial Literacy Resources
Money Smart - A Financial Education Program
U.S. Federal Reserve System
- Federal
17
Assisting Borrowers As They Approach Repayment
Of the borrowers who defaulted, 91% didnot receive their full 6 month grace perioddue to late or inaccurate enrollmentnotification by the school.
Source: August 2008 Analysis of Federal Direct Loan Portfolio
How critical is this?
18
Servicers Do Pre-Repayment Counseling During Grace Period• Establish relationship with borrower• Ensure correct repayment status• Discuss appropriate repayment plan• Promote self-service through the Web • Update/enhance borrower contact info • Review consolidation options, if appropriate• Crucial for those who drop out…why?
19
Key Defaulter Characteristic
Of the borrowers who defaulted, the majority had contact issues: • 49% had bad telephone numbers (actual
population)• 95% were not successfully contacted by
phone during the 360-day collection effort leading up to default (sample)
Source: August 2008 Analysis of Federal Direct Loan Portfolio
20
What Can You Do To Ensure Borrowers Can Be Reached?
• Obtain “enhanced” contact info• Verify borrower references• Identify or develop an “early warning”
system to let you know when borrowers leave school
• Encourage the use of NSLDS for students• Review school records to see if you have
better contact information…use it and/or share with your servicer
21
Assisting Borrowers in Repayment
Late Stage Delinquency Assistance (LSDA)involves school personnel reaching out toseriously delinquent borrowers (240+ days),and facilitating the critical contact with theloan servicer to prevent borrowers from goinginto default.• Direct Loan Schools: (888) 877-7658 • FFELP Schools: Contact your guarantor(s)
and lenders for details
22
What you need to get started• List of delinquent borrowers in the current
cohort: – Request Late Stage Delinquency reports
from guarantor or DL Servicer
• School-based contact information: – Compare with school records and update
guarantor or DL Servicer
• Staff training:– DL Servicer and/or guarantor can help
prepare your staff for this effort
23
LSDA Contact Methods
• Phone calls – Are the most effective – Borrowers will sometimes take calls
from school personnel and not lenders or guarantors
• Letters – Can be useful, but the other players
have used them unsuccessfully• Email
24
Phone Calls Are Most Effective
• Only a few calls are needed each month to make a difference in your CDR
• Initiate calls when borrowers are most likely to be home (6:00 PM – 9:00 PM)
• Utilize school-issued calling cards to make calls outside of traditional work hours (Saturday)
• When leaving a voice message avoid using the words “loan” or “delinquency”
25
Phone Calls Are Most Effective • Utilize a call script until practiced• Explain that you are calling to help
(use a soft touch – you are not a loan collector)
• Make it clear “what’s in it for them” to listen and take action on their own behalf. Stress the urgency of their situation! (the consequences of default)
• Present possible solutions• Initiate a three-way call with the
guarantor or DL Servicer (stay on the line to provide moral support)
26
If you decide to send a letter…
• First, get the borrower to open it! – Hand-address regular envelopes – Use a stamp – not a postage meter– Consider colored envelopes or paper– Personalize the letter – sign it– Postcards can also be effective
• The content– Stress the urgency of the situation - these
borrowers are at imminent risk of default – Include contact information for yourself
and for the guarantor or DL Servicer – Help the borrower understand the
consequences of default in plain language
27
If you decide to send a letter…
• Include information on repayment options, deferments, and forbearance
• Stress that they need to call you, that you can help them resolve their situation
• Once the borrower is contacted, if you cannot easily resolve the delinquency, consider a three-way call with the loan servicer. Representatives are trained to resolve delinquencies.
28
If you use email…
• Utilize school email addresses (allow students to keep school accounts for a year or two after they leave)
• Attach deferment or forbearance forms requested by the borrower
• Forward any email responses or completed forms to the right person at the guarantor and/or the Direct Loan Servicer
29
Borrowers Who Graduate… and Borrowers Who Don’t…. What does this mean for your defaultprevention efforts?
Let’s take a look at both of these groups
30
Borrowers Who Do Graduate …….And Then Default• This is becoming
more common. Why?
• What are the implications for default prevention?
31
Borrowers Who Don’t Graduate ….…And Then Default
The Direct Loan program serves 6-7 millionstudent loan borrowers. Of the borrowers whodefaulted, 70% withdrew without completingtheir academic program. (actual population)
While different measures of success exist,this is an important indicator that students whofail to complete are at high-risk to default.
Source: August 2008 Analysis of Federal Direct Loan Portfolio
32
What are the consequences when a borrower leaves school without completing?
• Did not achieve academic credential • Earning power may be reduced • No benefit from school job placement• Has one or more loans to repay• May not have received exit counseling• If the borrower leaves without notifying the
financial aid office, they may lose part/all of their grace period
33
Non-Traditional Approach: The Methodology• Driven by the fact that borrowers who do
not complete are at high-risk of default (Remember the 70%)
• Goal is to increase student success, as successful students are typically in the best position to repay their loans
• This strategy cannot be implemented by the financial aid office alone. Allies are others on campus who are working to increase retention and graduation rates.
34
Non-Traditional Approach: The Methodology
• Student Success Solutions– Support borrower relationship to their
education. (Most defaulters do not complete their academic program)
– Increase student success by•Increasing retention/graduation rates•Decreasing program completion time•Help non-completers find employment
35
Non-Traditional Approach: The Methodology• Understanding the unique connections
between loan default and student success at your school
– Conduct a defaulter data analysis– Where does the trail lead? – What steps do you take?– Who needs to be involved?
36
Methodology: Option #1
• Conduct an analysis to identify default factors in your student population
• Obtain Loan Record Detail Report (LRDR)• Query your internal system to obtain
demographic data• Goal is to create a picture of your at-risk
students so you can properly target your default prevention efforts
• Seek assistance from your lenders, guarantor, servicer or FSA
37
Methodology: Option #2• Present your defaulter list (for last 3 years)
to the folks on campus involved in:– Institutional research, and/or– Enrollment management, and/or– Student success activities
• Explain:– You are interested in the same students– Their efforts can reduce loan default
• Ask their help in understanding how your school can address both student success and loan default
38
To Achieve Maximum ResultsSchool strategies should help students
• Be more successful as students (as successful students tend to become successful borrowers)
• Limit indebtedness• Who are headed into repayment (teach
financial literacy, ensure understanding of repayment obligations, obtain current contact info)
• When in repayment, and particularly with those who are struggling, use LSDA
39
Efforts in Support of Default Prevention Across the U.S.
• State projects: Georgia Nevada Arkansas Ohio
• School organizations: FAPSC, CCA
• Accrediting agencies
40
Two State Project Examples
41
State Project – Nevada Team
Joint project included representatives fromstate financial aid association; two-yearand four-year public institutions across thestate; and the Nevada System of HigherEducation (NSHE).
NSHE identified borrower characteristicssuitable for a data analysis, then consultedwith schools to finalize the list.
42
Nevada Project - Data Elements
• Age• GPA • EFC• First generation
status• Enrolled in one or
more remedial courses
• Selected for verification
• Graduated Y/N• SAP Y/N• Withdrew last term
of enrollment?• Late registration?• Distance ED only
last term• Credits attempted
versus credits completed
43
Nevada Project - Methodology
• Schools completed the initial data collection
• Shared data with NSHE which in turn completed both school by school and system-wide analysis
• Findings were published in a report in May 2008 (Copies at DP booth in PC Lab)
44
What They Found
NEVADANEVADANEVADA
45
Nevada Project Next Steps
• Report authors meet with system VPs of academic and student affairs to discuss the data and– Begin to understand the relationship
between student success measures and the risk of loan default; and
– For individual schools and the system • Determine next steps for current data set• Identify whether additional data is needed• Next phase to be initiated in early FY 2009
46
State Project – Georgia Team
• Worked with the Regents Advisory Council on Student Financial Aid (RACSFA)
• Met with University System of Georgia (USG) to outline project and goals, and explain relationship between student success and loan default
• Interfaced with USG retention, graduation and time-to-completion projects
• Created advisory team composed of USG, members of RACSFA, and the Georgia Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators (GASFAA)
47
Georgia Project - Methodology
• Advisory team mapped out the project details, goals, and timeframes
• Advisory team identified data elements they wished to query in two stages:Stage one: USG runs list of all defaultersfor 3 years against their database Stage two: additional data elements were collected locally by each school
48
Georgia Project – Data Elements
Stage Two (school collection)
• Initial registration date• EFC• FASFA file date• Marital status• Private loan amount (if known)• Additional unsub amount• Dependency status• Military deployment• Exit counseling method
(in-person or on-line)
Stage One (USG collection)
• Incorporated the nearly 100 data points that are maintained in the University System of Georgia Data mart
• Data was queried against 3 years of defaulted borrowers
• USG chose to cast a wide net initially, and then narrow the focus in Stage Two
49
What They Found
GEORGIA
50
Georgia Project - Status Report
• The University System of Georgia (USG) – Gathered stage one and stage two data and
merged it into one large data set– Conducted an initial analysis of the data and
prepared a summary report– Shared the summary report with the Advisory
team in September 2008, and with RACSFA membership at their quarterly meeting in October 2008 (Copies at DP booth in PC Lab)
– Held meetings to discuss the findings with USG staff, and will schedule meetings with university system VPs for academic and student affairs in early FY 2009
51
National Career School Project
CCareer CCollege AAssociation
52
CCA Default Prevention Project
• Initiated in 2007• Brought together a project team composed
of the largest CCA member schools • Project goals
– Reduce delinquency and default among project team schools
– Explore the relationship between student success and loan default
– Identify a set of methodologies and best practices to share with the higher education community through default prevention training
53
CCA Project - Methodology
• Advisory team mapped out the project details, goals, timeframes
• Advisory team identified the data elements they wished to investigate, including: GPA, program of study, degree type, dependent/independent, gender, preparation type (GED, ATB, HS grad), OPB at default, private loan, first generation, probation/SAP, reason left school, race and ethnicity
• Schools are actively collecting and analyzing data
54
CCA Project - Drilling DownAn example of school-based activity withinthis project:
Kaplan Higher Education (KHEC) is a memberof the CCA Default Prevention ProjectAdvisory team.
• Strategies utilized by KHEC and other members of this team
55
CCA Project - Drilling DownKHEC began their participation by analyzing asingle school - Heritage College in Las Vegas.
• Let’s consider– How they approached their evaluation of student
loan defaults at Heritage– What resources were required– What the analysis revealed– The steps they took to reduce the risk of loan
default– The results achieved– Future plans
56
CCA Project – Status Report
The CCA project will continue throughout2009 with completion of the data analysisand the development of default preventiontraining materials and media.
57
Conference PC Lab
Come visit us at the Default PreventionTable in the PC Lab:
• Obtain answers to questions on default prevention strategies or topics
• Learn more about the CCA and state projects
• Collect FSA brochures and handouts• Receive a copy of your Unique School
Report containing 2004-2006 Official CDR data
58
Contact InformationWe appreciate your feedback and comments. We can be reached at:
Mark Walsh• Phone: 816-268-0412• Email: [email protected]• Fax: 816-268-0441
John Pierson• Phone: 404-562-6269• Email: [email protected]• Fax: 404-562-6283