september 26, 2013 mr. cliff guffey president 7013 1090 ......7013 1090 0002 4435 2784 as...

September 26, 2013

Mr. Cliff Guffey President American Postal Workers

Union (APWU), AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20005-4128

Dear Cliff:

Certified Mail Tracking Number: 7013 1090 0002 4435 2784

As information, enclosed is a copy of the second and final Post Implementation Review for the Alexandria, Louisiana Customer Service Mail Processing Center (CSMPC) Area Mail Processing (AMP).

In accordance with the Non-Disclosure Agreement dated February 11, 2013, the Postal Service is providing both redacted and unredacted copies of the PIR.

If you have any questions, please contact Rickey Dean at extension 7412.

Sincerely,

Patrick M. Devine Manager Contract Administration (APWU)

Enclosures

(CA2013-850)

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Facility Name & Type: Alexandria CSMPC

Street Address: 1715 Odom Street City: Alexandria

State: LA 50 Facility ZIP Code: 71301

District: Louisiana Area: Southwest

Finance Number: 210143 Current 30 ZIP Code(s): 713,714

Miles to Gaining Facility: 122 EXFC office: Yes

Plant Manager: Abel Garza Senior Plant Manager: Juan W. Gonzalez

District Manager: Bruno L. Tristan

Facility Name & Type: Shreveport P&DC Street Address: 2400 Texas Avenue

City: Shreveport State: LA

50 Facility ZIP Code: 71102 District: Louisiana

Area: Southwest Finance Number: 217957

Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 710-712 EXFC office: Yes

Plant Manager: Jonathan E Carver Senior Plant Manager: Juan W. Gonzalez

District Manager: Bruno L. Tristan

Approval Date: April 15, 2011 Implementation Date: Oct-01-2011

PIR Type: Final PIR Date Range of Data: Oct-01-2011:

Processing Days per Year: 310 Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,742

EAS Hours per Year: 1,819 Date of HQ memo, DAR Factors/Cost of Borrowing!

New Facility Start-up Costs Update

Date & Time this workbook was last saved:

Area Vice President: Jo Ann Feindt Vice President, Network Operations: David E. Williams

Area AMP Coordinator: Richard C. Enriquez I Steve Jackson NAI Contact: Doris Billingslea I Sarah Grover

REDACTED

Sep-30-2012

May 7, 2010

08-29-2013 11 :26

PIR Data Entry Page

Executive Summary Last Saved August 29, 2013

Losing Facility Name and Type: Street Address:

City:

State:

Current SCF ZIP Code(s):

Type of Distribution Consolidated: ..::O::..r:.:'ig~&:..=D.::e.::s:._t ----

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Street Address:

City:

State:

Savings/Costs

Staffing

Service

Function 1 Workhour Savings

Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings (less Maint!Trans)

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings

Transportation Savings

Maintenance Savings

Space Savings

Total Annual Savings

Total One-Time Costs

Total First Year Savings

Craft Position Loss

PCES/EAS Position Loss

First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 0/N)

First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 2 Day)

First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 3 Day)

Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Residential at PFC level

Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Small Business at PFC level

Final PIR vs Pre AMP

Losing Current Qtr

95,75%

92.25%

92.64%

Date Range of Data

Final PIR vs Approved

Gaining Current Qtr

94.98%

93.99%

93.20%

PIR Type: Final PIR Oct-01-2011 Sep-30-2012

from Workhour Costs - Combined

from Other Curr vs Prop

from Other Curr vs Prop

from Transportation HCR and Transportation PVS

from Maintenance

from Space Evaluation and Other Costs

from Space Evaluation and Other Costs

from Staffing-Craft

from Stafflng-PCESIEAS

from Service Performance & CSM



from Se!Vice Performance & CSM

from Service Petformance & CSM

PIR Executive Summary

Calculation References Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data: PreAMP Proposed Final PIR

Function 1 Workhour Costs 8,974,559 $18,524,110 $22,672,987 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs

$3,059,254 $3,028,682 $2,470,161 (less Maintenance & Transportation}

PCES/EAS Workhour Costs $2,634,198 $2,362,149 $2,424,424 Transportation Costs $3,287,298 $3,210,909 $2,336,620

Maintenance Costs $6,890,330 $6,236,135 $6,793,560 Space Savings $0 $0 $0

Total Annual Cost $34,845,639 $33,361,986 $36,697,752

Total One-Time Costs $0 $489,279 $26,972

Total First Year $34,845,639 $33,851 ,265 $36,724,724

Staffing

Craft Position Total On-Rolls 388 355 403 PCES/EAS Position Total On-Rolls 23 21 20

Final PIR vs Proposed

Final PIR vs Pre-AMP (Approved) AMP Approved AMP

Function 1 Workhour Savings ($4, 1 $450,449 Non-Processing Craft Work hour Savings $589,093 $558,522 $30,572 (less Maint!Trans)

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings $209,774 $272,049 Transportation Savings $950,677 $874,289 $76,389

Maintenance Savings $96,770 $654,195 Space Savings $0 $0 $0

Total Annual Savings ($1 ,852, 113) ($3,335, 766) $1,483,653

Total One-Time Costs ($26,972) $462,307 ($489,279)

Total First Year Savings $994,374

Staffing Craft Position Loss (15) (48) 33

PCES/EAS Position Loss 3 1 2

PIR Executive Summary

Summary Narrative Last Saved: August29, 2013

Losing Facility Name and Type: Alexandria CSMPC Current SCF ZIP Code(s): 713,714

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Current SCF ZIP Code(s):

Background:

Shreveport P&DC 710-712

This is the Final Post Implementation Review (PIR) of the Alexandria CSMPC Originating and Destinating AMP into the Shreveport LA P&DC. The AMP study called for the consolidation of originating and destinating mail volumes due to the decline in mail volumes. The Alexandria CSMPC is approximately 122 miles from the Shreveport LA P&DC.

Financial Summary:

The Final PIR baseline data was from the period October 1, 2011 to September 30, 2012.

The Final PIR Financial PIR Summary is as follows:

Total Annual Savings Total Final Year Savings

Final PIR vs. Pre AMP

$(1 .852, 1 13) $(1 ,879,085)

Final PIR vs. Approved

Two concurrent initiatives {the Texarkana TX CSMPC AMP (SCF 718 & 755), and the consolidation of the Monroe LA DDU (SCF 712)), have added work hours and costs to this Final PIR that were not accounted for in the original approved AMP work study.

Other Concurrent Initiatives and Timelines

Below is the time line of events that have affected this PIR:

July 2009- June 2010 January 2011 July 2011 August 2011

Original Work Study Data Period Monroe DDU move (SCF 712) Texarkana CSMPC consolidation Alexandria CSMPC consolidation

In January 2011, the Monroe DDU (SCF 712) was consolidated into Shreveport P&DC as part of a Louisiana District initiative that was not due to an approved AMP. There was no discussion of the Monroe move in the 2 AMP studies (Texarkana CSMPC & Alexandria CSMPC) nor were the work hours and costs associated included in either. In the Final PIR, the Monroe DDU consolidation accounts for approximately $1.34 Min additional Function 1 expenses to the bottom line at the Shreveport P&DC.

In July 2011, the Texarkana CSMPC was consolidated into Shreveport P&DC according to an approved AMP. The Texarkana move also caused added hours and costs to be associated with this Final PIR that were not in the AMP study while it was in the approval process. This negatively affected the total savings of the Alexandria Final PIR. In the Final PIR, the Texarkana CSMPC consolidation accounts for approximately $3.2 M in additional Function 1 expenses to the bottom line at the Shreveport P&DC.

The Monroe DDU & Texarkana CSMPC consolidation also added machinery to the Shreveport P&DC that was not in the Alexandria AMP. Approximately 19% of the LDC 36 cost at Shreveport can be accounted to the other consolidations, equating to approximately $618,605.

Taking into account the additional costs of the Texarkana CSMPC & Monroe DDU operations hours as outlined above, the Final PIR shows a total Final year savings of $3,312,532.

PIR Summary Narrative

Customer & Service Impacts:

There were no changes to the business hours of the Retail Unit or Business Mail Acceptance Unit at the Alexandria office. There were upgrades to service standards for Final-Class Mail by processing the originating Alexandria collection mail at the Shreveport P&DC.

Transportation:

The Final PIR shows an Annual Savings of $950,677. This was achieved by mileage adjustments and the terminations of Highway Contract Routes.

HCR routes 70510 and 38693 were eliminated due to the AMP. HCR routes 77613, 707L3 and 71268 had mileage reductions. 77613 had an Alexandria stop eliminated. 707L3 eliminated a trip from Baton Rouge to Shreveport. 71268 a trip was eliminated between Monroe and Alexandria.

Staffing Impacts:

The Mail Processing staffing impacts for the Final PIR resulted in 15 total craft position gained from the Pre AMP to the Final PIR numbers and 48 gained total craft position from the Final PIR versus the proposed numbers. EAS positions were reduced by 3 FTE from Pre AMP numbers.

As of this PIR, Alexandria CSMPC had 3 EAS On-Rolls with a total of 38 employees at this facility compared to the proposed 21. Tow of the three EAS employees reports to Customer service.

As of this PIR, the Shreveport P&DC added 31 additional craft positions in excess of the proposed level due to the Monroe DDU and Texarkana TX CSMPC consolidations.

1 Craft = Career + Non.career

1 Craft = Career + Non-career 2 Craft F1 + F4 at Loslng·, F1 only at Gaining

All affected employees that were reassigned to other Postal facilities were subject to processes outlined in the National Labor Agreements.


Maintenance Impacts:

The overall Maintenance Savings for the approved AMP was $654,195. As of this PIR, the maintenance was a cost of $557K versus the proposed total. There are still 9 maintenance employees under Alexandria's finance number where the study called for 5 employees in Function 3B.

Also, the overlap of the Monroe and Texarkana consolidations for the entire PIR data period must be taken into account as detailed in the Financial Summary.

Mail Processing Equipment movement: The overall approved machine count for Shreveport (including all consolidations) called for the increase in the DBCS total by 8 and the DIOSS total by 1. In the proposed numbers, 4 DBCS and 1 DIOSS were to be moved to process the Texarkana TX mail and 3 DBCS for the Alexandria LA mail. During the Final PIR, the major MPE count increased from 30 proposed to 34 (Powered Industrial Vehicles not included)

One Time Cost:

In the Approved AMP Study, $489,279 was allocated for total One-Time Costs, including $414,000 for employee relocation costs, $31,920 for MPE relocation costs and $43,359 for Facility costs. During this Final PIR period, there was only $26,972 spent for MPE relocation costs.

Space Impacts:

There were no Space Savings associated with this AMP. Carriers from Southpark Station moved into the Alexandria facility November 2012, not affecting the data for this PIR.


Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement Last Saved: August 29, 2013

Losing Facility: Alexandria CSMPC District: Louisiana

Gaining Facility: Shreveport P&DC District: Louisiana

After AMP

PIRType: Final PIR Implementation Date: 10/01/11

(15) Notes: _____________________ _

Satisfaction Measurement (CSM) became Customer Experience Measurement ( reflects most recently completed quarter available in GEM.

Overall Satisfaction (Overall Experience)

Satisfaction with Receiving (Experience with receiving)

Satisfaction wrth Sending (Experience with sending)

Satisfaction with most frequently visited PO (Experience with most frequently visited PO)

Satisfaction with most recent contact with USPS (Experience with most recent contact with

'----:::..:..::;_ __ .____;:.:..:_.:..;..;..:_ _ __;_.:...:..;:;.::._:.:;____.Likely to recommend the USPS

PIR Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement

I Combined Facilities I

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & oest

Workhour Costs - Combined Facilities last Saved August 29, 2013

Function 1

., ~~""I'"G~-WA~ 44 L$3519/G-N/A

LS41811G-NIA

47 4fl L$39_73/G-N/A

PIR Type*: :~:·:·,:~~~ ""~~~.~;;~~TP!R

Date Range of Data: ·- Oct..01~2t:l11 to Sep.J0-20~_2 __ _

PlR Workhour Costs~ Combined Facilities

PlR Workhour Costs- Combined Facilities

PIR Workhour Costs- Combined Facilities

(V)NOTES:================================================================================================================================================--==--==--=-=~==- ~1(1J~

PIR Workhour Costs ~ Combined F aci!ities

Losing Facility: Alexandria CSMPC

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Oest

Workhour Costs -Losing Facility Last Saved August 29, 2013

PIR Type": nna1 nr"\ ~'"'··•~ •~ r><r> nnlo, -~ ;_ --~,,-j, _ _..-1 fn, r;,~,

Date Range of Data: Oct-01-2011 to Sep-3_0:::-2:::_01:_::2 __ _

PlR Workhour Costs- Losing

PIR Workhour Costs- Losing

PIR Workhour Costs Losing

P!R Workhour Costs Losing

PJ R Work hour Costs Losing

Workhour Costs - Gaining Facility Last Saved- August 29_ 2013

Gaining Facility: Shreveport P&DC

PIR Type•: :~~~:·.: ~·.~ ,,,, --,c •• , ..... ~ ... c ... ~ ... D

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Des! Date Range of Data: Oct..01-2011 to Sep-30~2012 ___ _

PIR Workhour Costs ~ Gaining

PIR Workhour Costs - Gaining

PlR Work.hour Costs- Gaining

P!R Workhour Cos1s Gaining

(27)NOTESo ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ·-----------------------------------------

P!R Workhour Costs Gaining

[ - Other Workhour Move Analysis I

PI R Other Work hour Costs

P!R Other Workhour Costs

PI R Other Work hour Costs

PI R Other Workhour Costs

PIR Other Workhour Costs

"Other Craft" Ops{less Ops gomg to 'Trans-PVS'

Transportation Ops (going to Trans-PVS

Maintenance Ops 9,921

1,575

8,143 -164

-16

7.92"

3 41° $62,275

424 02" $168,313 -007 $125,509

·007'X 125,50

PIR Other Workhour Costs

Staffing -Craft LastSaved:August29,2013

PIR Type: Final PIR Data Extraction Date: 10112112


Craft Positions

Fnc 4 Clerks: 2 Mail Processing clerks, 3 Expeditors, 1 secrete!) Rest are Window & Sales


Craft Positions

r------;23)-----r-----(2;;)·----~

j Final PIR vs Pre AMP j Final PIR vs Proposed j Total Craft Position Loss: j (15) j (48) j

____________________ .. ___________________ A

(Above numbers are carried forward to the Executive Summary)

Finance#: 210143

PIR Staffing - Craft

Staffing - PCES/EAS Last Saved: August 29, 2013

PIR Type: Final PIR

Losing Facility: Alexandria CSMPC Finance# .:2:,:.10::,:1:..:4.:.3 ____ _

Data Extraction Date· 10/12/2012

PCES/EAS Positions Authorized Staffing On-Rolls

(1) (2)

I p,~:P (4) (5)> (6) (7)

Lin Position Title Level I. •"

Final P!R Proposed Final PIR

1 POSTMASTER (F) EAS-24 1 ·. 0 0 0

2 MGR MAIL PROCESSING OPERATIONS EAS-19 · .. ;.A 0 () 1

3 MGR MAINTENANCE EAS-17 b 0 0 0

4 SUPV CUSTOMER SERVICES EAS-17 < 1 1 () 1

~UPV DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-17 ' 0 '.· 0 0

UPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS-17 2 0 .•; 0 0

OSTMASTER EAS-22 '<< 1 1

8 i; 0 II 'i .... 0

9 '.• 0 II ·;·. ,· 0

10 0

t~ 0

11 · .... ,·· .. · .. 0 0

12 >'' 0 0

13 ' .·. 0 0

14 · ...... : 0 0

15 -, ' 0 :·: : 0

16 ., ,, ..

0 I : Y< 0

17 : ·.·• 0 (/ .: .. 0

18 ....... 0 ,·: ... ·;: 0

19 : ' 0 :,: ·.: 0

20 r:· 0 : : -- 0

21 0 •> ',' 0

22 •:, 0 •' 0 23 ... ·.·

' 0 - ; . '" : ~ 0

24 ·.; .·•. 0 0

25 0 T': 0

26 . : 0 ...... ·: 0 27 0 ' ,,: .. 0

28 :

0 ~

0

29 ' < 0 : ' 0

30 . ·:, < 0 .. ': .. 0

31 0 ·: 0

32 ,•, ' 0 ' 0

33 ' 0 0 34 .... 0

•

·.:·,:r 0 35 I :·:.:,· 0 ... ··:.:• .. · . 0 36 0 , ... :· 0 37 0 ···:· 0 38 0 .•' 0 39 ',' 0 '•. 0 40 0 I :.: 0 41 0 0 42 : 0

.,--0

43 0 .··:. 0 44 0 1." 0 45 0

::-··.:· 0

46 : 0 0 47 0 I 0 48 ' 0 : 0 49 0 ... 0 50 ..•.. / 0 'T 0 51 . ' 0 ... 0 52 1·· ... ·. ' 0 1', : 0 53 ' :'. 0 I : -·:

0 54 ····,.· 0 I•.

,, 0

55 ? .. ::• 0 0 56 0 .. ::·.;: 0

Totals 2 a 0 3

~><J Variances Total On-Rolls

(15) (16)

Change Final PIR vs Final P1R vs Analysis PreAMP Proposed

Positions 0 3 Percent 0.0% #OIV/01

PIR Staffing- PCES/EAS

Gaining Facility: Shreveport P&DC Finance# -'-2"-17..;9..;.57 ____ _ Data Extraction Date: 10/12/2012

PCES/EAS Positions Authorized

On-Rolls Staffing

(19) (20)

- (21) . ••••••

(22) I p~zL (24) (25)

Line Position Title Level PI'<AMP ..•• Final P!R Proposed Final P!R

1 MGR PROCESSING/DISTRIBUTION EAS-25 1 1 I 1 1 1

2 MGR MAINTENANCE EAS-22 j ... 1 I 1 1 0

3 MGR IN-PLANT SUPPORT EAS-21 ... 1 1 I 1 1 1

4 MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-20 2 2 1 1 1

5 OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS-17 .• 3 ·. 3 g 3 2

6 SUPV DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-17 9

·····

12 .9 10 7

7 SUPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS-17 .. 4 4 .2 2 3

8 NETWORKS SPECIALIST EAS-16 l 1 1; .. 1 1 9 SECRETARY (FLO) EAS-12 0 1 1 0 10 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (FLD) EAS-12 ·. 1 · .. -.... 1

11 . . ·.· 0 0

12 . •i •

0 I! 0

13 •••• ; 0 ··. 0 14

••• 0

•••• 0

15 I 0 ··-.··

.... 0 16 . .;:: .

• •• 0 I'- ·\··· 0 17 . 0 I . 0 18 •• ; 0 I ; 0 19 . 0 . .... 0 20 I .•.-... 0 , .. .··.· 0 21 . ···· ... 0 0 22 0 . 0 23 . 0 I.

•• 0

24 0 0 25 0 .. 0 26 •••• ·.· .. 0 1.:·-· \ 0 27 0 0 28 .; 0 I•.• . 0 29 .. .· . 0 I• 0 30

••• 0 1•. . ... 0

31 0 0 32 0 0 33 0 I 0 34 .. . 0 0 35 0 .·. 0 36 0 ····.·· 0 37 •• 0 0 38 .. · .. 0 ... ········ 0 39 • . 0 .... ... 0 40 0 . ·.· 0 41 0

•• 0

42 . .... . 0 .... 0 43 0 ·.• 0 44 . 0 0 45 . 0 0 46 ..... 0

•••• ... 0

47 ; 0 ····-· ... 0 48 ... · .. 0 ... ·_· .. .• 0 49 0 ..... ·.· 0 50 0 0 51

•• 0 I. • 0 52 ...... 0

•• 0

53 • ·.·····_· .... 0 I• 0

54 ... ~ 0 ;•: 0

55

•...... <

0 •• 0 56 0 ... .. 0 57 0 . 0 58 < •. · ..•.• 0 "--·· ......... 0 59 . ·•·.· 0 ...... 0 60

• . 0 0

Iota Is za 26 7,U 7.1

~ Variances Total On~Rolls

(33) (34)

Change Final PIR vs Final PIR vs Analysis

PreAMP Proposed

Positions (3) (4) Percent -15.0% -19.0%

r~-------------·--~--------------~-~-----------, ! Total PCES/EAS, c37l , c3s) ,

! Position Loss! 3 ! 1 ! ... _________________ ..t.. _____________ ..~.. ____________ _,

(Above numbers are carried forward to the Executive Summary)

PIR Staffing - PCES/EAS

Transportation- PVS Last Saved: August 29, 2013

Losing Facility: Alexandria CSMPC Finance Number: 210143

~~~------------

(1) (2)

PreAMP·•··. Proposed .. · .. ,·.·

PVS Owned Equipment . Seven Ton Trucks 0 0 Eleven Ton Trucks . 0 0 Single Axle Tractors .·.· 0 0 Tandem Axle Tractors 0 0 Spotters > 0 0

PVS Transportation . .. · ....... Number of Schedules > · .•.. q 0 Total Annual Mileage

···. 0 0

Total Mileage Costs .·· ··•··. $0

$0 ..

PVS Leases I' .· Total Vehicles Leased >'' 0 0

Total Lease Costs .· .. < .• $0 $0

.. ··•········· ..

PVS Workhour Costs ••.• · ..•••••••... >

LDC 31 (617, 679, 764) $0 $0 LDC 34 (765, 766) • $0 $0

Total Workhour Costs . > ••.• $0 $0

...._ .:.:.....

(3) (4) (5) Variance Variance

Final PIR Final PIR vs Final PIR vs PreAMP Proposed

$0 $0

0

$0 $0 $0

$0

$85 $85 $85

$85 $85 $85

(11) Total Final PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-PVS Savings: ($4,930) (This number added to the Executive Summary

I

PIR Type: Final PIR

Date Range of Data Oct-01-2011 --to -- Sep-30-2012

Gaining Facility: Shreveport P&DC Finance Number: ..::2;_1_7-'-95_7 ______ _

(6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Variance Variance

PreAMP Proposed PIR Final PIR vs Final PIR vs PreAMP Pro nosed

PVS Owned Equipment .··· ,·· ...

Seven Ton Trucks 0 .····· .. 0

Eleven Ton Trucks ·. 0 .•.. 0

Sinale Axle Tractors 0 0

Tandem Axle Tractors •.. ·.· 0 0

Spotters 0 0

PVS Transportation ·.· ·•

Number of Schedules 0 0

Total Annual Mileage . 0 0

Total Mileage Costs ..... / () $0 $0 $0

PVS Leases ... Total Vehicles Leased 0 0 0

Total Lease Costs ·>: < • $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

.•'

PVS Workhour Costs LDC 31 (617, 679, 764) $87,079 $87,079 $82,063 ($5,()16} {$5,016;

LDC 34 (765, 766) $0 $0 $0

Total Workhour Costs .... $87,Q79 $87,079 $82,063 ($5,015)j ($5,015)

(12) Total Final PIR vs Proposed Transportation-PVS Savings: ($4,930) (This number added to the Executive Summary)

(13) Notes=--------------------------------------------------

PIR Transportation- PVS



Data of HCR Data File: 11/01/12

Transportation - HCR LastSaved:August29,2013

(7)

Final PIR Annual Cost

PIR Type: Final PIR

CT for Outbound Dock:

(10)

Final PIR

PIR Transportation HCR- Losing

Change Analysis Final PIR vs

PIR Transportation HCR- Losing



Date of HCR Data File:

(3) (4)

Final PIR Annual

Transportation - HCR Last Saved: August 29, 2013

CET for Inbound Dock:

CET for Cancellations:

(6)

Proposed I Final PIR Annual Annual Cost Cost

PIR Type: Orig & Dest

CETforOGP:

CT for Outbound Dock: ------

(10)

Final PIR Annual Cost/Mile

PIR Transportation HCR- Gaining

Summary HCR Losing & Gaining

(13) 1 (14)

Losing

Gaining

(13) Total Final PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities)

(14) Total Final PIR vs Proposed Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities)

HCR

PVS

(15) Total Final PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation (PVS & HeR):

Total Transportation

(15)

Final PIR vs Pre AMP

(This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

(16) Total Final PIR vs Proposed Transportation (PVS & HeR): (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

Final PIR vs

(16)

Final PIR vs

PIR Transportation HCR -Gaining

MPE Inventory Last Saved: August29,2013

Data Extraction Date: ----- Date Range of Data: Oct-01-2011 --to -- Sep-30-2012 PIR Type: Final PIR

Losing Facility: Alexandria CSMPC Gaining Facility: Shreveport P&DC

(1} (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)

PreAMP. Proposed Final PIR Equipment

Proposed Final PIR Variance in I PreAMP Proposed Final PIR Relocation Relocation

Costs Equipment .. .··. Costs Costs

AFCS 2 0 0 AFCS ._- .. 4 -· 4 4 $0 $0 $0

AFSM-ALL 0 .. ·.---.· 0 0 AFSM-ALL 2 2 2 $0 $0 so APPS .·- 0 0 0 APPS I ·-·· 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0

ClOSS 0 ._ ... 0 0 ClOSS . < 1 .. · 1 1 $0 $0 $(1

CSBCS 0 0 0 CSBCS 0 0 0 $0 $0 so DBCS ···--·- 2 0 0 DBCS 12 14 21 $15,960 $16,120 $160

DBCS-OSS .1 0 0 DBCS-OSS 1'·-· 1 2 0 $7,980 $0 ($7,980)

DIOSS •. ·. . 1 . 0 0 DIOSS ·-. 2.-.-. 3 3 $7,980 $0 ($ 7,!)_80)

FSS --····

0 0 0 •

FSS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $.6 SBPS ·_ .•• - .0 .··- 0 0 SBPS ·.·_ 1 .·. ... 1 1 $0 $0 50

UFSM 1 0 0 UFSM 1 1 0 $0 $0 $0

FC I MICRO MARK 0 0 0 FC I MICRO MARK 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0

ROBOT GANTRY I -.. -.-- 0 .. 0 0 ROBOT GANTRY 1 ···-.... _

1 0 $0 $0 $o HSTSIHSUS I 0

·-

0 0 •

HSTS I HSUS 0 0 0 $0 $0 -so LCTSI LCUS 0 0 0 LCTS I LCUS 1

__. 1 1 $0 $0 $0

LIPS 0 -.. · 0 0 •

LIPS · ... ·-• 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0

MLOCR-ISS 0 0 0 MLOCR-ISS .-. 0 0 0 $0 $0 so MPBCS-OSS > 0 0 0 MPBCS-OSS 0 0 0 $0 $0 so

TABBER __ / 0 .... 0 0 TABBER 0 •• 0 0 $0 $0 $0

POWERED POWERED INDUSTRIAL 0 0 0 INDUSTRIAL 0 $0 $0

VEHICLE . .··· VEHICLE · .

LCREM I >> -··· LCREM . 1

•. < .... •. <

. . __ ·.-.. I I ·- •• >

.• : -······-. ._ .•.•... 0 -_ / -. ·o Totals I- 26 30 > --·34 i $31,920 $16,120 ($15,8_()1)1

(10) Notes: ;:,. ..::::: "::::>.

Carried to I Space Evaluation and

-················- Other Costs

PIR MPE Inventory

LDC36


Workhour Activity

Building Services $ (Custodial Cleanmg)

(1)

PreAMP Costs

643,282 $

$

170,734 $

(2)

Proposed Costs

0 $

324,121 $

170,734 $

(3)

Final PIR Costs

481,626 $ ---345,999 $

120,911 $ --

(4) Variance

Final PIR to PreAMP

---······-···········--········-

Maintenance Last Saved: August 29, 2013

(5) Variance

Final PIR to Proposed

LDC 36

LDC38

PIR Type*: _F-.in;.::a-..1 _PI-..R'------Date Range of Data: Oct-01-2011 : Sep-30-2012

Gaining Facility: P&DC ----~--------------------------------

Workhour Activity

Building Equipment $

(7)

Proposed Costs

(8)

Final PIR Costs

$ 2,259,238 $ 2,598,140 $

llOQ,4St $ 838,688 $ 731,164 $

Building Services $ 1;3os,277 $ 1,305.277 $ 1,106.425 $ (Custodial Cleanmg)

(9) Variance

Final PIR to PreAMP

453.977

(10) Variance

Final PIR to Pre

338.904

'"" $ 0 $ 12,516 $ 270,411 $ LDC 39 Maintenance Operations$ Support

270,411 $ 48,993 319,404 $ $

$ 0 $ 0 $

--494,855 961,053 $ $ 466,198

Parts and Supplies

0 $ 140,564 $ $ 140,564

- ---0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

--· Grand Total 494,855 $ 1,101,617 $ $ 606,762

--- ---(11) Final PIR vs Pre AMP- Maintenance Savings:

(12) Final PIR vs Proposed- Maintenance Savings:

(13)

Parts and Supplies

Grand Total

$557,425

$ 7,532 $ 86,480 $. 78,948

4,681,125 4,841,613 $ 313,778

1,060,155 850,330 $ 83,675

$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $

5,741,280 $ 5,691,943 $ 397,453 $

(These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)


•Data m PIR columns IS annua!tt:ed fur First PIR

f~ 11812£108

160,488

0

PIR Maintenance

(1)

Distribution Changes Last Saved: August 29, 2013

Losing Facility : Alexandria CSMPC PIR Type: Final PIR

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Date Range of Data: Oct-01-2011 --to-- Sep-30-2012

Place a "X" next to the DMM labeling list(s) revised as result of the approved AMP. Identify the date of the Postal Bulletin that contained DMM labeling list revisions.

DMM L001

X DMM L002

DMM L003

DMM L004

X DMM L005

DMM L006

X DMM L007

DMM L008

X DMM L009

' DMM L010

-·····-

X

X

X

X

X

DMM L011

DMM L201

DMM L601

DMM L602

DMM L603

DMM L604

DMM L605

DMM L606

DMM L607

DMM L801

(2)

Was the Service Standard Directory updated for the approved AMP?

(3) Yes

(4) Drop Shipments for Destination Entry Discounts

FAST Appointment Summary Report NASS

Facility Name Total No-Show Late Arrival Open

Month Losing I Gaining Facility Code Schd Count % Count % Count %

Aug '12 Losing Facility N/A NO DATA AVAILABLE N/A

Sep '12 Losing Facility N/A NO DATA AVAILABLE N/A

Aug '12 Gaining Facility 710 SHREVEPORT 506 112 22.13% 87 17.19% 0 0.00%

Sep '12 Gaining Facility 710 SHREVEPORT 508 182 35.83% 80 15.75% 0 0.00% -

Count

394

326

Closed %

77.87%

64.17% '--

(5JNotes: ________________________________________________________________________ -========================

Unschd Count

9

14

PIR Distribution Changes

Customer Service Issues

Losing Facility: Alexandria CSMPC 5-Digit ZIP Code: _7_13_0_1 ______ _

Data Extraction Date:---------

3-Digit ZIP Code: 713

1. Collection Points Number picked up before 1 p m

Number picked up between 1-5 p m

Number picked up after 5 p.m.

Total Number of Collection Points

,~ PreAMP

Mon.-fri. ··:· .. ··, Si¢

8 G4

1$2 35

7 0

.· 147. .,.' 99 ...

Mon. -Fri.

5

124

18

147

2. How many collection boxes are currently designated for "local delivery"?

3. How many "local delivery" boxes were removed as a result of AMP?

4. Delivery Performance Report

PIR

_,

PreAMP Final PIR

QuarteriFY. P~J'Cl>nl Quarter!FY

%Carriers returning before 5 p.m Qj 2011 &$.9% Q1 2012

Ql! 2011 &-7% Q2 2012

Q3 2011 56.3% Q3 2012

Q4 2011 4M% Q4 2012

Last Saved: August 29, 2013

3-Digit ZIP Code: 714

... , •. · PreAMP / PIR Sat. Mon .. - Frt: .. ,_:··~ Sal. Mon.-Fri.

59 14 91 8

33 139 2G 138

5 0 Q ·. ~,. 0

97 ' 153 ' . 117 146

Percent

44.5°/o

61.1%

69.3%

75.4%

3-Digit ZIP Code:

.···. PreAMP PIR Sat. ·Mon.-Fri. sat. Mon. -Fri. Sat. 85 )0 0

25 0 0

0 Q ·_.· .··· 0 . ·.··~ 110 0 •.. · ... ,) 0 - 0 0

5. Retail Unit Inside Losing Facility {Window Service Times) 6. Business {Bulk) Mail Acceptance Hours

-"- ···- Proposed FinaiPIR Start End Start End

N!A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A NIA N/A

NIA N/A N/A N/A

N!A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A

,.·.·.·.-·.··preAMP

Start

y ~:00

y .· .. 9:00

Monda

Tuesda

Wednesda

Thursda·

Frida

Saturda

y 9:00

y 9:00

y 9:0tl

y 0:00

End • 16:30

16:30

.16:30 .·· .. 16:30 ·.

.16:30

0:()0

7. Can customers obtain a local postmark in accordance with applicable policies in the Postal Operations Manual? Yes

8. Notes:


9. What postmark is printed on collection mail?

SHREVEPORT LA 710

DATE/TIME

Proposed Final PIR Start End Start End

9:00 16:30 900 16:30

9:00 16:30 9:00 1630

9:00 16:30 9:00 1630

9:00 16:30 9:00 16:30

9:00 16:30 9:00 16:30

0:00 0:00 000 0:00

!I>V1/9/~

3-Digit ZIP Code:

PreAMP PIR Mon~--Fri~ $at. Mon. -Fri. Sat.

0 .. ' ~ . 0

> 0 ' 0 .• 0 ... •.. 0

'- ~· .o:. 0 ' 0 0

P!R Customer Service Issues

Space Evaluation and Other Costs Last Saved August 29, 2013

Losing Facility: Alexandria CSMPC Date: ________ _

1, Affected Facility

2, One-Time Costs

Enter any one-time costs: _._;::$.;.43"''"'35;.;9'-- $10,852 ($32,507) (These numbers shown below under One~ Time Costs section.)

3, Savings lnfonmation

Space Savings{$): __ .;.s:;.;o __ _ $0 $0


4, Did you utilize the acquired space as planned? Explain,

5, Notes: $10,852 in one-time costs were equipment moves managed by local maintenance, Facilities did not spend any funds on this AMP,

Employee Relocation Costs

Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs (from MPE Inventory)

Facility Costs (from above)

Total One-Time Costs


Pre-AMP FY 2011

$31,920 ($15,800)

$43,359

$489,279 $26,972 {$462,307) PIR costs carried foJWard to Executive Summary)

Range of Report

(6)

Product


PIR: FY 2012 YTD

(9)

Final PIR

(10)

Final PIR Cost per 1,000 Images

PIR Space Evaluation and Other Costs

september 26, 2013 mr. cliff guffey president 7013 1090 ......7013 1090 0002 4435 2784 as...

Documents