self assessment report 12-1-2012

Self Assessment Report (SAR)for NBA Accreditation of Undergraduate

Engineering Programme

Mechanical Engineering

Vidyavardhaka College of Engineering, III Stage, Gokulam, Mysore-570 002

Karnataka, India

National Board of Accreditation New Delhi, India

May 2011

Version.3.0 May, 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled of 60

Organization of the SAR :

The Self Assessment Report(SAR) should be submitted using the format which is organized in the following four parts:

Part I: Institutional Summary for Criteria I, II and III.

Part II: Department/Programme Summary for Criteria IV to X.

Part III: Curricula and syllabi for the degree programme along with Programme Educational Objectives (PEOs), Programme Outcomes and Assessment.

Part IV: List of Documents to be made available during the accreditation visit.

Abbreviations:

CAY -- Current Academic Year e.g., __2010 – 11___CAYm1 --- Current Academic Year minus one e.g., __2009 – 10___CAYm2 --- Current Academic Year minus two e.g., __2008 – 09___LYG -- Latest Year of Graduation e.g., __2007 – 08___LYGm1 --- Latest Year of Graduation minus one e.g., __2006 – 07___CFY -- Current Financial Year e.g., __2010 – 11___CFYm1 --- Current Financial Year minus one e.g., __2009 – 10___

Notes:

1. It would be greatly appreciated if precise and specific details, as requested in this format, are provided in tabular form and/or using bullets as far as possible. No detailed description should be included anywhere; do not include any detail/information which is not asked for. In case, you wish to add any data/information which is not asked for, kindly add in the annexures.

2. Include data for three consecutive years, unless otherwise specified.

3. Information sought is mostly meant to be the “Average” over sufficient samples, as applicable.

4. In this manuscript, “Institution” is used interchangeably for college/Institute/ University and “Head of the Institution” for Principal/Director/Vice-Chancellor.


CAY 2010-11 LYG 2007-08 CFY 2010-11

Declaration

This Self Assessment Report (SAR) is prepared for the Current Academic Year (2011-12) and the Current Financial Year (2011-12) on behalf of the Institution.

I certify that the information provided in this SAR is extracted from the records and to the best of my knowledge, is correct and complete.

I understand that any false statement/information of consequence may lead to rejection of the application for accreditation for a period of two or more years. I also understand that the National Board of Accreditation (NBA) or its sub-committees will have the right to decide on the basis of the submitted SAR whether the Institution should be considered for an accreditation visit.

If the information of consequence was found to be wrong during the visit or subsequent to grant of accreditation, NBA has right to withdraw the grant of accreditation and no accreditation will be allowed for a period of next two years or more.

Place: Mysore Signature, Name and Designation of the Date: Head of the Institution with seal


PART I

INSTITUTIONAL SUMMARY (Criteria I, II and III)

I.0.1. Name and Address of the Institution and affiliated University:

Vidyavardhaka College of Engineering /

Visvesvaraya Technological University

I.0.2. Name, Designation, Telephone, Mobile Numbers and E-mail ids of the contact person for NBA:

I.0.3. History of the Institution (including dates of introduction and number of seats of various programmes of study along with NBA accreditation, if any), in tabular form:

Year Description……… Institution started with the following programmes (Intake

strength) . . . . .

………(date) NBA-AICTE Accreditation visits and accreditation granted, if any . . . .

……… Addition of new programmes, increase in intake strength of the existing programmes and/or accreditation status . . . .

I.0.4. Ownership Status : Govt.(Central/State) / Trust / Society (Govt. / NGO / Private) / Private/ Other (specify)_______

I.0.5. Financial Status : Govt.(Central/State) / Grants-in-aid / Not-for-profit / Private-Self financing / Other(specify)______

I.0.6. Nature of Trust / Society : _________________________________ List other Institutions/colleges run by the Trust/Society

I.0.7. External Sources of Funds :

Name of the External Source CFY CFYm1 CFYm2

……………..

……………..

I.0.8. Internally Acquired Funds :


Name of the internal Source CFY CFYm1 CFYm2

Student’s Fee

……………..

I.0.9. Scholarships or any Financial Assistance provided to Students ? YES NO if provided, basis of scholarship/assistance : Merit/Merit-cum-means/other ________ Total number ___________ Amount ____________ in CFY Total number ___________ Amount ____________ in CFY minus 1 Total number ___________ Amount ____________ in CFY minus 2

I.0.10 Basis/Criterion for Admission to the Institution:All India entrance / State level entrance / University entrance / 12th level mark sheet/ other (specify)__________________

I.0.11. Total Number of Engineering Students _________Boys _______ Girls _______Total Number of other Students, if any _________Boys _______ Girls _______

I.0.12.Total Number of Employees _______ Male _______ Female _________

I.0.13. Minimum and Maximum Number of Faculty and Staff on roll in the Engineering Institution, during the CAY and the previous CAYs (1st July to 30th June):

ItemsCAY CAYm1 CAYm2

Min Max Min Max Min MaxTeaching Faculty in Engineering

20 20 14 15 13 13

Teaching Faculty in Science & Humanities

18 18 14 14 13 13

Non-teaching Staff 13 13 11 11 10 11

Criterion I: Organization and Governance, Resources, Institutional Support, Development and Planning (100)

I-I.1 Campus Infrastructure and Facility (20)*I-I.1.1 Land, built-up area and academic infrastructure (4)

-Physical resource availableA. Exclusive for this Institution Land _____acres Built-up floor space ___

sq.m.B. Shared with other institutions

in this campus, if any Land _____acres Built-up floor space ___ sq.m.

I-I.1.2 Maintenance of academic infrastructure and facilities (4)


*Assessment criterion/specification is available in AICTE website.Specify distinct features . . ……

I-I.1.3 Ambience, green cover, water harvesting, environment preservation, barrier-free structure, etc. (4)

Specify distinct features . . . …

I-I.1.4 Hostel (Boys and girls), Transportation facility and canteen (4)

Hostel for Boys? Yes / No Exclusive/Shared/Rented Number of Rooms _____ Number of accommodated students _____ Number in waiting ______

Hostel for Girls? Yes / No Exclusive/Shared/Rented Number of Rooms _____ Number of accommodated students _____ Number in waiting ______

Transport? Yes/No Exclusive/Public transport Number of Buses ___.Facility availed by___ % of students___&___ % of

faculty

Canteen? Yes/No Number of Canteen(s) _______ Sitting space _________ Daily Usage

_______

I-I.1.5 Electricity, power backup, telecom facility, drinking water and security (4) -- specific details in respect of installed capacity, quality, availability, etc.

I-I.2 Organization, Governance and Transparency (20) I-I.2.1 Governing body, administrative setup and functions of various bodies (5)

List Governing, Senate and all other Academic and Administrative bodies, their memberships, functions and responsibilities, frequency of the meetings and attendance therein, in tabular form. A few sample minutes of the meetings and action taken reports should be annexed.

I-I.2.2 Defined rules, procedures, recruitment and promotional policies etc (5)

List of the published rules, policies and procedures, year of publications, awareness among the employees/students, availability on web etc.

I-I.2.3 Decentralization in working including delegation of financial power and grievance redressal system (5)

– List of faculty members who are administrators/decision makers for various responsibilities


– Specify the mechanism and composition of grievance redressal system, including faculty association, staff-union, if any.

I-I.2.4 Transparency and availability of correct/unambiguous information (5) – Dissemination and Availability of institute and programme specific information

through the web – Information provisioning in accordance with Right To Information Act, 2005,

provide details

I-I.3 Budget Allocation, Utilization and Public Accounting (15)

Summary of current financial year’s budget and the actual expenditures incurred (exclusively for the institution) for three preceding financial years

ItemBudgeted in CFY

Expenses in CFY

(till…….)

Expenses in CFYm1

Expenses in CFYm2

Acquisition of land; new buildings and infrastructural built-up

Library

Laboratory Equipment

Laboratory consumables

Teaching and Non-Teaching staff salary

Travel

Other, specify…..

Total

I-I.3.1 Adequacy of budget allocation (5)

I-I.3.3 Utilization of allocated funds (5)

I-I.3.3 Availability of the audited statements through Institute’s web-site (5)

CFYm3 …………………. No Yes URL………………………………

CFYm2 …………………. No Yes URL…………………………………

CFYm1 …………………. No Yes URL…………………………………

I-I.4 Library (20) *I-I.4.1 Library space and ambience, timings and usage, availability of a qualified

librarian and other staff, Library automation, online access, networking (4)


* Assessment criterion/specification is available in AICTE

website

Carpet area of library ____ sq m. Reading space _____ sq m Number of seats in reading space ___ Number of users (issue book) ______ per day Number of users (Reading space) _______ per day

Timings: Academic (Working day) __________ Academic (Weekend) __________ Vacation _______________

Number of library staff __________________ Number of library staff with degree in Library Mgmt. _____

Computerization for search, indexing, issue/return records ? Yes No Bar-coding used ? Yes No Lib services on internet/intranet ? Yes No INDEST or other similar membership ? specify ___________ Yes No

Archival ___________I-I.4.2 Titles and volumes per title (4)

Number of titles _________________Number of volumes _______________

Number of New Titles added

Number of New editions added

Number of New Volumes added

CFYm2

CFYm1

CFY

I-I.4.3 Scholarly journal subscription (4)

Year

Number of Technical

Magazines / Periodicals

Number of total Technical Journals

subscribedScholarly journal titles (in originals,

reprints)In Hardcopy

In Softcopy

CFYm2

CFYm1

CFY

I-I.4.4 Digital library (4)

Availability of Digital Library contents ? Yes No


If available,

Number of Courses ______ Number of e-Books ______ Any other____ ? Availability of an exclusive server ? Yes NoAvailability over intranet/internet ? Yes NoAvailability of exclusive space/room? Yes NoNumber of Users __________ per day.

I-I.4.5 Library expenditures on books, magazines/journals, and miscellaneous contents (4)

Year Expenditures CommentsBooks Magazine /

Journals (for hard copy

subscription)

Magazines / Journals (for

soft copy subscription

Misc. Contents

CFYm2CFYm1

CFY

I-I.5 Internet (5)Internet Provider ___________ Bandwidth ____________Access Speed ? Poor Good Very Good

AvailabilityAvailability in an exclusive lab for Internet use ? Yes NoAvailability in most computing labs ? Yes NoAvailability in departments and other units ? Yes NoAvailability in faculty rooms ? Yes NoInstitute’s own Email facility to faculty/students Yes NoSecurity/privacy to Email/Internet users? Yes No

I-I.6 Safety Norms and Checks (10) I-I.6.1 Checks for wiring and electrical installations for leakage and earthing (3)

Specify . . ..

I-I.6.2 Fire fighting measurements : Effective safety arrangements with emergency/ multiple exits and ventilation/exhausts in auditoriums and large class rooms/labs, Fire fighting equipments and training, Availability of water, and such other facilities (3)

Specify . . . .

I-I.6.3 Safety of Civil Structure (2)I-I.6.4 Handling of hazardous chemicals and such other activities (2)


Specify . . . .

I-I.7 Counseling and Emergency Medical Care and First-aid (10)

I-I.7.1 Availability of psychological and psychiatric counseling (5)

Specify the counselor(s), their qualifications and availability

Specify number of cases handled on per month basis

I-I.7.2 Medical staff to provide first-aid/medical help in emergency, and Availability of ambulance services (5)

Number of Medical practitioners _______ Number of nursing staff ________

Specify Medical facility within the Institution ?

Medical facility nearby ?

Availability of ambulance services (response times and medical facility, critical care);

Number of ambulances within the Institution _____ Facility in ambulances _______Response-time in calling ambulance services from outside ________

Criterion II: Teaching and Learning Processes (100)

II-I.1 Academic Process (15)

II-I.1.1 Published time-table with sufficient hours for lectures, labs, self-learning and extra-curricular activities (5)

Specify the time-table contents

II-I.1.2 Published schedule in academic calendar for assignments/tests/examinations and distribution of corrected scripts (5)

Items in Academic CalendarConduct during the

period or in the academic week

Performance Feedback / Distribution of Scripts during the period or in the academic week

Assignments…Tests…

Mid-sem. Examination

End-sem. Examination


Other activities…

II-I.1.3 Attendance Monitoring : Reward for good attendance and penalty for poor (5)

System of attendance and how it is monitored and analyzed. Produce cases of rewards and penalty to students (may be to faculty too).

II-I.2 Academic Support Units and Common facilities for First Year Courses

(20) II-I.2.1 Basic Science/Engineering laboratories (Adequacy of space, number of

students per batch, quality and availability of measuring instruments, laboratory manuals, list of experiments) (10)

Lab DescriptionSpace, Number

of StudentsSoftware used

Type of experiments

Quality of instruments

Lab Manuals

…..

……

II-I.2.2 Central computing laboratory (4)

Computing Lab Space Number of Computers

Variety of SWs

Usage / Timings

Lab Assistance?

……

……

II-I.2.3 Manufacturing practices (mechanical/electrical) workshop (4)

Workshop DescriptionSpace, Number

of StudentsNumber of

experimentsQuality of

instrumentsLab Manuals

…..

……

II-I.2.4 Language Laboratory (2)

Language LabSpace,

Number of Students

SoftwareUsed

Type of experiments


Guidance / Learning

…..

……

II-I.3 Tutorial Classes/ Remedial Classes/ Mentoring (15)Version.3.0 May, 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled of

60

II-I.3.1 Tutorial classes to address personal level doubts and queries : size of tutorial classes, hours per subject in timetable (5)

Provision of Tutorial classes in time-table ? YES NOTutorial Sheets ? YES NOTutorial classes taken by : Faculty / Teaching Assistants / Senior Students / Other (specify)_______Number of tutorial classes per subject ____ per week Number of students ____ per tutorial class

Number of subjects with tutorials : 1st year ____ 2nd year _____ 3rd year ______ 4th year ______

II-I.3.2 Remedial classes and additional make-up tests to help academically weaker students : list of remedial classes, schedule of classes/tests and students’ lists (5)

Provision of Remedial Classes in Time Table ? YES NO

Number of subjects having Remedial Classes ____ subjects out of total _____ subjects per semester

Number of students having Remedial Classes _____ students out of total _____ students in a semester

Number of hours of Remedial classes _______ per-subject per week

Provision of Makeup Tests in Academic Calendar ? YES NO

Number of subjects having Makeup Tests ______ subjects out of total ______ subjects per semester

Number of students having Makeup Tests ______ students out of total ______ students in a semester

Number of hours of Makeup Tests _______ per-subject per week

II-I.3.3 Mentoring system to help at individual levels (5)Type of Mentoring : Professional guidance/Career advancement/Course

work specific/Lab specific/Total development/Number of faculty mentors _________ Number of students __________ per mentorFrequency of Meeting: Weekly/ Monthly/ . . . . .per semester/ Need based/ other

II-I.4 Teaching Evaluation Process : Feedback System (15)II-I.4.1 Design of proforma and process for feedback evaluation (5)

Number of Feedback Items _____________ Number of Feedback levels_______Space for descriptive feedback/suggestion etc. ? YES NOAny consistency check? YES NOAny performance/attendance profile ? YES NO


Frequency of feedback collection : Once/Twice in a semesterFeedback collection : Hard-copy/Web-based

II-I.4.2 Feedback analysis and reward/corrective measures taken, if any (5)Feedback collected for all courses ? YES NOSpecify the feedback collection process __________________________

Who collects the feedback? ______________________________When feedback is collected ? ____________________________Percentage of students participating _______________________

Specify the feedback analysis process _____________________________ Is this done manually ? YES NOWhat metrics are calculated ? _____________________________ What is inferred from the metrics ? _________________________ How are the comments used ?_____________________________

Basis of reward/corrective measures, if any, ____________________________Were extraneous factors, like hard-/soft-attitude of the instructor considered ? YES NO Was result considered? YES NO Number of awards in CAY ______ in CAYm1 ________ in CAYm2 _______ Number of corrective actions in CAY ______ in CAYm1 ________ in CAYm2 _______

II-I.4.3 Feedback mechanism from alumni, parents and industry, if any (5)

Specify the mechanism of feedback collection and analysis _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Number of feedback received in CAY _____ in CAYm1 _____ in CAYm2

_______ Specify typical corrective actions taken, if any

_______________________________

II-I.5 Self Learning and Learning beyond Syllabus (15) II-I.5.1 Generation of self-learning facilities, and availability of materials for learning

beyond syllabus (5)

Specify self-learning mode and modules _________________________________

II-I.5.2 Possibility, motivation and scope for self-learning/learning-beyond-syllabus (5) Specify __________________________________

II-!.5.3 Flexibility in academics with scope for self learning (5) Specify components

II-I.6 Career Guidance, Training, Placement and Entrepreneurship Cell (10)


II-I.6.1 Effective career guidance services including counseling for higher studies (4) Specify – facility, management and impact?

II-I.6.2 Training and placement facility with training and placement officer (TPO), industry interaction for training/internship/placement (4)

Specify – facility, management and impact?

II-I.6.3 Entrepreneurship cell and incubation facility (2)

Specify – facility, management and impact ?

II-I.7 Co-curricular and Extra Curricular Activities (10) II-I.7.1 Co-curricular and extra-curricular activities, e.g., NCC/ NSS, cultural activities etc. (5)

Specify – facilities and usages in brief?

II-I.7.2 Sports grounds, facilities and qualified sports instructors (5)

Specify – facility, management and usages?

Criterion III: Students’ Admission and First Year Performance (75)

III-I.1 Students Admission (15)

III-I.1.1 Admission Intake (5)

ItemCAY

(2010-11)

CAYm1(2009-2010)

CAYm2(2008-

09)

CAYm3(2007-

08)

Sanctioned Intake Strength in the Institute (N) 90 90 60 60

Number of students, admitted on merit (N1) 90-0 84-2 59-1 59-3

Number of students, admitted on management quota/otherwise (N2)

10 1112

6

Number of total admitted students in the Institute (N1 + N2)

100 9370

62

III-I.1.2 Admission Quality (10) Divide the total admitted ranks (or percentage-marks) into 5 or a few more meaningful ranges

Rank Range CAY CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3

Above 98 percentile

95 – 98 percentile




…..

…..

Admitted without rank

Tabular data for estimating Student Teacher Ratio and Faculty Qualification for FIRST YEAR

Common Courses List of faculty members teaching first year courses:

Name of Faculty

Qualification Designation Date of joining

institution

Dept. with which

associated

Distribution of teaching load (%-age)

1st Year UG PG

III-I.2 Assessment of First-Year Student Teacher Ratio (FYSTR) of 25 or Superior (20)Three years of data for first year courses to calculate the Student Teacher Ratio (FYSTR):

YearNumber of students (Approved intake

strength)

Number of faculty members (considering

fractional load)FYSTR

Assessment = 20 * 25 * 0.8 / FYSTR (Max.

is20)

CAYm2

CAYm1

CAY

Av. Assessment

III-I.3 Assessment of Faculty Qualification teaching First Year Common Courses (FYFQ) (20)

Assessment of Qualification = 2*(10 * x + 6 * y + 4 * z) / N Where X = Number of Faculty Members with Ph. D

y = Number of Faculty Members with M. E / M. Tech./NET-Qualified/M. Phil z = Number of Faculty Members with B. E / B. Tech./M.Sc./M.C.A./M.A N = Total Number of Faculty Members (considering fractional load) or

Number of Faculty needed for FYSTR of 25, whichever is higher.

Year x y z NAssessment of faculty

qualification

CAYm2

CAYm1

CAY

Average Assessment of Faculty Qualification (FYFQ)

III-I.4 Academic Performance in First Year Common Courses (20)

Academic Performance = 20 * FYSI


where FYSI = First Year Success Index = (No. of students who have cleared all the subjects in a single

attempt + 0.5 * Number of students who cleared all but one subject in a single attempt) DIVIDED BY (Total Number of students admitted in the first year)

Item CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3

Number of students admitted in First Year (N)

Number of students who have cleared all subjects in single attempt (x)Number of students who have cleared all subject but one subject in single attempt (y)

First Year Success Index (FYSI) = (x + 0.5y) / N

Av. FYSI = ___________________________________

Academic Performance = 20 * Av. FYSI = __________


PART IIDepartment / Programme Summary

(Criteria IV to X)

D.0.1 Name and Address of the Department: Mechanical EngineeringVidyavardhaka College of Engineering, III Stage,

Gokulam, Mysore 570 002

D.0.2 Name, Designation, Telephone Numbers and E-mail ids of the contact person for NBA:

G.B. Krishnappa, Associate Professor and Head of the Department, 0821-4276260/[email protected], [email protected]

D.0.3 History of the Department (including dates of introduction and Number of seats of various programmes of study, which are run by the department along with NBA accreditation, if any), in tabular form:

Programme of Study Description

UG in Mechanical Engineering

Started with 60 seats in 1997Intake increased to 90 in 2009

PG…..M Tech in Mechanical Engineering:Computational Analysis in Mechanical SciencesStarted with 18 seats in 2009

D.0.4 List of the Programmes / Departments which share human resources and/or the facilities of this Department / Programmes ---------

D.0.5. Total Number of Students 269 Boys 263 Girls 06

D.0.6. Total Number of Employees 39 Male 35 Female 04

D.0.7. Minimum and Maximum number of faculty and staff on roll during the current and previous two academic years (1st July to 30th June) in the Department:

ItemsCAY (2011-12) CAYm1(2010-11) CAYm2(2009-10)Min Max Min Max Min Max

Teaching Faculty in the Department

19 18 14 16 12 13

Teaching Faculty with the Programme

17 18 14 16 12 13

Non-teaching Staff 17 16 17 16 16 16


mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

D.0.8. Summary of Budget for the CFY and the Actual Expenditures Incurred in the CFYm1 and CFYm2 (exclusively for this Programme in the Department)

Items Budgeted in CFY(2010-

11)

Actual expenses in CFY ( till Dec 2011)

Budgeted in CFYm1

(2009-2010)

Actual Expenses

in CFYm1(2009-

2010)

Budgeted in CFYm2(2008-

2009)

Actual Expenses

in CFYm2(2008-

2009)

Laboratory Equipments

41,00,000 34,96,727 28,00,000 23,18,357 5,00,000 3,89,900

SW purchase 9,10,000 7,61,250 11,00,000 9,48,450 - NIL

Laboratory consumables

2,00,000 1,69,849 90,000 71,373 1,60,000 1,32,748.5

Maintenance and spares

22,000 19,896.6 24,000 19,610 - NIL

Travel 10,000 -

Miscellaneous expenses for academic activities

25,000 24,950 60,000 45,5227 - NIL

Total 52,67,000 44,72,672.6 40,74,000 38,13,017 6,60,000 5,22,648.5

Criterion IV : Students’ Performance in the Programme (75)

Admission Intake in the Programme

Items 2010-11 2009-10 2008-09 2007-08

Sanctioned Intake Strength in the program (N) 90 90 60 60

Number of total admitted students in First year minus

Number of students migrated to other programmes at the

end of 1st year (N1)

90-0 84-2 59-1 59-3

Number of laterally admitted students in 2nd year in the

same batch (N2)12 12 6 6

Number of total admitted students in the program (N1 +

N2)102 94 64 62

Supporting document:

1. Annual report of lateral entry students for third semester for 2010-11, 2009-10, 2008-

09, 2007-08.

2. Admission register and annual report for 2010-11, 2009-10, 2008-09, 2007-08.


IV-P.1 Success Rate (20)

Provide data for the past 7 batches of students (Successfully completed implies Zero Backlogs)

Year of Entry (in reverse

chronological order

Number of Students

Admitted in 1st year

+Admitted

laterally in 2nd

year (N1 + N2)

Numbers of Students

successfully completed

1st year

Numbers of Students

successfully completed 2nd year

Numbers of Students

successfully completed 3rd year

Numbers of Students

successfully completed

4th year

2010-11 90+19=109 2009-10 82+11=93 82-25=57 2008-09 58+12=70 58-7=51 70-26=44 2007-08 56+6=62 56-14=42 62-16=46 62-29=33 2006-07 57+6=63 57-20=37 63-24=39 63-29=34 63-22=41

2005-06 59+6=65 59-39=20 65-54=11 65-51=14 65-40=25

2004-05 50+6=56 50-23=27 56-34=22 56-29=27 56-23=33

Success Rate = 20 * Mean of Success Index (SI) for past 3 batchesSI = (Number of students who cleared the program in the minimum period

of course duration)DIVIDED BY(Number of students admitted in the first year of that batch and laterally admitted in 2nd year)

ItemLYG

(CAYm4)LYGm1

(CAYm5)LYGm2

(CAYM6)

Number of students admitted in the corresponding First Year + laterally admitted in 2nd year

2006-07 2005-06 2004-05

Number of students who have graduated in 4 years 57+6=63 59+6=65 50+6=56

Success Index (SI) 41 25 33

0.65 0.38 0.59

Av. SI = __ (0.65+0.38+0.59)/3 = 0.54Success Rate = 20 * Av. SI = 20 * Av. SI = 10.8Supporting Documents: Result sheet and annual report for the respective year.

IV-P.2 Academic Performance (20)

Academic Performance = 2 * API Where API = Academic Performance Index

= Mean of Cumulative Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point CGPA System

OR


= Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful students / 10


5th Sem to 8th Sem %

Items2007-08Batch

2006-07Batch

2005-06Batch

2004-05Batch

Approximating the API by the following mid-point analysisNumber of students in 100 <= % < 90 0 0 0 0Number of students in 90 <= % < 80 2 0 0 1Number of students in 80 <= % < 70 21 17 14 9Number of students in 70 <= % < 60 23 19 24 17Number of students in 60 <= % < 50 9 5 4 06Number of students in 50 <= % < 40 0 0 0 0

Total 55 41 42 33

Approximating API by Mid-% 66.24 67.2 67.44 66

Exact Mean of CGPA or Percentage of all the students/10 (API) 6.62

6.72 6.74 6.6

Av. API = 6.67Academic Performance = 2 x Av. API = __13.34

Supporting documents: Result sheet of the respective year.

IV-P.3 Placement and Higher Studies (20) Assessment Points = 20 * (x + 1.25 * y) / N

Where x = Number of students placed, y = Number of students admitted for higher studies with

valid qualifying scores/ranks, N = Total number of students who were admitted in the

batch including lateral entry. subject to Max. Assessment Points = 20.

ItemLYG

2011-12LYGm12010-11

LYGm22009-10

Number of Admitted students corresponding to LYG including lateral entry (N)

7073

55

Number of students who obtained jobs as per the record of placement office (x1)

1527

14

Number of students who found employment otherwise at the end of the final year (x2)

-17

1

x = x1+ x2 15 44 15

Number of students who went for higher studies with valid qualifying scores/ranks (y)

- 6 4

Assessment Point 4.28 14.1 7.27

Av. Assessment Points = 8.55___________


IV-P.4 Professional Activities (15)Provide data for the past 3 years – CAY, CAYm1 and CAYm2

IV-P.4.1 Professional societies/ chapters and organizing engineering events (3)

List the above in Tabular formSl. No

Date Description of Event Supporting Document

1. 8 & 8.4.2011 Crusades 2011 Poster Photo, Programme List, Invitation



4. 26.9.2009 ISHRAE Student Summit-2009 Invitation Card, Poster,5. 3 & 4.4.2008 Crusades 2008 Poster Photo, Programme List6. 15.12.2008 S E T M E Technical Talk Photo7. 19 & 20.4.2006 Crusades 2006 Poster Photo, Programme List8. 18 & 19.4.2007 Crusades 2007 Poster Photo, Programme List

IV-P.4.2 Organization of paper contests, design contests etc. and their achievements (3)

List the above in Tabular form

IV-P.4.3 Publication of technical magazines, newsletters etc. (3) – V Think Monthly News Letter

List the above publications along with the names of the editors, publishers etc.

Vol. 1 Issue 1 October 2011

V Think TeamDr. B. Sadashive GowdaEditor-in-ChiefProf. Manjula N.Sub-EditorSusmera V JStudent ReporterSwaraj SarkarStudent ReporterSathyananda M RStudent ReporterNikhil FurtadaDesigner

Vol. 2 Issue 2 November 2011 -------Do--------

IV-P.4.4 Entrepreneurship initiatives, product designs, innovations (3)

Specify the efforts and achievements


IV-P.4.5 Publications and awards in inter institute events by students of the programme of study (3)

Sl. No

Student Name

Title of the Paper Proceedings Remarks

1 Vignesh “Forced convection heat transfer through an array of rectangular solid & drilled fins on a horizontal base plates with different fin spacing”

A National Level Tech Symposium

(TRENTECH 2010-11). A dept of

Mechanical Engg M.P. Nachimuthu, M-

Jaganathan Engg. College Chinnimalli,

Erode – 638112 Oct 1st 2010

Best Paper Award

Won a Cash Prize

of ` 2000/-

Include a Table having those publications, which fetch awards by students in the events/conferences organized by other institutes. Include a tabulated list of all other student publications in a separate annexure.


Criterion V: Faculty (150)

List of Faculty: Exclusively for the Program / Shared with other Programs

2008-09 (Odd Semester)

Name of the Faculty

Qualification, University and year of graduation

Designationand Date of Joining the Institution

Distribution of teaching Load

(% -age)

Number of Research

Publications in Journals

and conferences

since joining(nJ, nC)

IPRs

R&D andConsultancy

with amount

Interaction with

outside world1st

YUG

PG

Dr B Sadashivegowda

Phd, IISc, Bangalore, 1997

Professor, 18-5-2007

100

H RamakrishnaM.Tech,IITK, 1992

Asst. Professor5-9-2003

47.64 52.36

G B Krishnappa ME, Bangalore university, 1999

Asst Professor,10-9-2004

36.36 63.64

L J Sudev M.Tech, VTU, 2003

Asst Professor, 08-10-1999

86.95 13.05

D V Satish M.Tech, VTU, 2005

Lecturer27-12-1999

19.35 80.65

G V Naveen Prakash

M.Tech, VTU,2002

Lecturer,26-3-2001

26.66 73.34 0,2 2

K B Vinay M.Tech, VTU,2003

Lecturer,31-08-2005

21.42 78.58

K S Ravi M.Tech, VTU, 2008

Sr Lecturer,20-11-1999

21.42 78.58

N Jayashankar BE, UOM .1997

Lecturer,13-11-2000

45.16 54.84

Khalid Imran BE, VTU,2004

Lecturer, 30-08-2005

15.38 84.62

S A Mohan Krishna

BE, VTU,2003

Lecturer8-10-2005

100

S Suresh Kumar M.EBU,2008

Lecturer14-7-2008

100

B Pushpadatta M.Tech, VTU, 2007

Lecturer,14-7-2008

25 75


2008-09 (Even Semester)

Name of the Faculty




(% -age)

Number of Research


and conferences


IPRs

R&D andConsultancy

with amount

Interaction with

outside world1st

YUG

PG

Dr B Sadashivegowda



100



25.80 74.20


AsstProfessor,10-9-2004

100



51.61 48.39


Lecturer1-9-2004

37.50 62.50

G V Naveen Prakash

M.Tech, VTU,2002

Lecturer,26-3-2001

18.75 81.25 0,2 2


Lecturer,31-8-2005

23.52 76.48



19.35 80.65

N Jayashankar M.Tech, VTU, 2010

Lecturer,13-11-2000

24.24 75.76

Khalid Imran M.Tech, VTU,2009

Lecturer, 30-8-2005

23.52 76.48

S A Mohan Krishna

M.Tech, VTU,2010

Sr. Lecturer8-10-2005

24.24 75.76

Devappa BE, University of Mysore, 1997

Lecturer, 13-2-2009

11.42 88.57

B Pushpadatta M.Tech, VTU, 2007

Lecturer,14-7-2008

50 50



`Name of the Faculty




(% -age)

Number of Research


and conferences


IPRs

R&D andConsultancy

with amount

Interaction with

outside world1st

YUG

PG

Dr B Sadashivegowda



42.10 57.90



36.36 63.64



60.71 39.29 0,1 1



50 50


Lecturer1-9-2004

41.37 58.63

G V Naveen Prakash

M.Tech, VTU,2002

Lecturer,26-3-2001

51.72 10.34 37.93


Lecturer,31-8-2005

24.13 75.87



21.42 78.58


Lecturer,13-11-2000

31.03 68.97


Lecturer, 6-10-2005

3.44 96.56

S A Mohan krishna

M.Tech, VTU,2010


24.13 75.87

Girish BEVTU,2008

Lecturer5-8-2009

79.31 20.69

Venkata Rajesh M.Tech, VTU, 2005

Lecturer,5-8-2009

31.03 68.97

Gnanashekar BEVTU,2008

Lecturer7-8-2009

44.82 55.18


2009-10 (Even Semester)

Name of the Faculty




(% -age)

Number of Research


and conferences


IPRs

R&D andConsultancy

with amount

Interaction with

outside world1st

YUG

PG

Dr B Sadashivegowda



25 75



55.55 44.45 0,1 1



29.62 25.92 44.45


Asst Professor1-9-2004

29.03 70.97

G V Naveen prakash

M.Tech, VTU,2002

AsstProfessor26-3-2001

19.35 48.38 32.26


Lecturer,31-08-2005

29.03 70.97 1,0 1



23.33 76.67


Lecturer,13-11-2000

32.25 67.75


Lecturer, 30-8-2005

100

S A Mohan krishna

M.Tech, VTU,2010


18.75 81.25

Girish BEVTU,2008

Lecturer5-8-2009

18.75 81.25


Lecturer,5-8-2009

53.12 46.88

Gnanashekar BEVTU,2008

Lecturer7-8-2009

18.75 81.25

Gurukiran M.Tech, VTU, 2004

Lecturer,1-2-2010

21.87 46.87 31.25

Chandan v BE

VTU, 2004

Lecturer,1-2-2010

18.75 81.25



Name of the Faculty




(% -age)

Number of Research


and conferences


IPRs

R&D andConsultancy

with amount

Interaction with

outside world

1st

YUG

PG

Dr Mahadevappa

Ph.DIITM, 1992

Professor16-5-2011

16.66 83.34



47.82 52.18 0,1 1



32 20 48



60 40

G V Naveen prakash

M.Tech, VTU,2002


32 20 48



22.22 77.78



22.22 48.14 29.63



42.85 57.15


Sr Lecturer, 30-8-2005

6.89 93.11

S A Mohan krishna

M.Tech, VTU,2010

Lecturer8-10-2005

24.13 75.87

K S Shylesh BE,VTU,2008

Lecturer,26-7-2010

22.58 77.42


Lecturer,5-8-2009

29.03 70.97

K N Arun kumar

M.Tech, VTU,2010

Lecturer,26-7-2010

3.22 96.78


Lecturer,1-2-2010

32.25 35.48 32.35

Chandan v BEVTU, 2004

Lecturer,1-2-2010

3.22 96.78

Ganesh B B M.Tech, VTU,2010

Lecturer,26-7-2010

3.22 96.78 0,2 2

Y P Mamatha M.Tech, VTU, 2009

Lecturer, 22-7-2010

12.90 87.10

Naviin M.Tech, Lecturer, 22.58 77.42Version.3.0 May, 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled of

60

VTU, 2004 22-7-20102010-11 (Even Semester)

Name of the Faculty




(% -age)

Number of Research


and conferences


IPRsR&D and

Consultancy with amount

Interaction with

outside world1st

YUG

PG

Dr Mahadevappa

Ph.DIITM, 1992

Professor16-5-2011

14.28 85.72

G B Krishnappa

ME, Bangalore university, 1999


22.22 77.78 0,1 1



46.15 53.85



33.33 66.67

G V Naveen prakash

M.Tech, VTU,2002


46.15 53.85



48.38 51.61 0,1 1



25 75 1,0 1

N Jayashankar

M.Tech, VTU, 2010


20.68 79.32


Sr Lecturer, 30-8-2005

27.58 72.42

S A Mohan Krishna

M.Tech, VTU,2010


18.75 81.25

Ganesh B B M.Tech, VTU,2010

Lecturer,26-7-2010

21.21 78.79 0,1 1

K S Shylesh BEVTU, 2010

Lecturer22-7-2010

21.21 78.79

Venkata Rajesh

M.Tech, VTU, 2005

Lecturer,5-8-2009

25 75

K N Arun kumar

M.Tech, VTU,2010

Lecturer,26-7-2010

21.21 78.79


Lecturer,1-2-2010

3.7 88.8 7.4

Chandan v BEVTU, 2004

Lecturer,1-2-2010

100

Y P Mamatha M.Tech, VTU, 2009

Lecturer, 22-7-2010

18.75 81.25


Naviin M.Tech, VTU, 2004

Lecturer, 22-7-2010

32.25 67.75

Supporting documents: Individual Time table, attendance of college, certificates submitted to office, appointment order.

V-P.1 Student Teacher Ratio (STR) (20) : STR is desired to be 15 or superiorAssessment = 20 * 15 * 0.8 / STR ;subject to Max. Assessment of 20.

Where STR = Student Teacher Ratio= (x + y + z) / N1

Where x = Number of students in 2nd year of the programy = Number of students in 3rd year of the programz = Number of students in 4th year of the programN1 = Total Number Faculty Members in the program (by considering

fractional load)

Year x y z x + y + z N1 STRAssessment(Max. is 20)

2008-09 63 66 56 185 14-3=11 16.81 14.282009-10 72 67 56 195 16-4=12 16.25 14.772010-11 94 72 73 239 18-4=14 17.07 14.072011-12 108 91 70 269 21-4=17 15.82 15.17

Av. assessment 14.57

For Item Nos. V-P.2 to V-P.8, the denominator term (N) is computed as follows:-- N = Maximum {N1, N2},

where N1 = Total Number of Faculty Members in the programme (considering the fractional load),

N2 = Number of Faculty positions needed for Student Teacher Ratio (STR) of 15.

Year N1 N2 N=Max. (N1, N2)2008-09 11 13 132009-10 12 13 132010-11 14 16 162011-12 17 18 18

V-P.2 Faculty Cadre Ratio (20)Assessment = 20 * CRI

Where CRI = Cadre Ratio Index = 2.25 ( 2x + y ) / N ;subject to Max. CRI = 1.0;

where x = Number of professors in the programme y = Number of associate professors in the programme

Year x y N CRI Assessment

2008-09 1 3 13 0.865 17.30

2009-10 1 4 15 0.90 18

2010-11 1 4 18 0.75 15

Avg. assessment 16.76

Supporting documents: Appointment order


V-P.3 Faculty Qualifications (30) Assessment = 3 * FQI

Where FQI = Faculty Qualification Index = (10 * x + 6 * y + 4 * z) / N

Where x = Number of Faculty Members with Ph. D.y = Number of Faculty Members with M. E / M. Tech z = Number of Faculty Members with B. E / B. Tech./M.Sc.

Year x Y Z N FQI Assessment2008-09 1 11 1 13 6.15 18.462009-10 1 11 3 15 5.86 17.62010-11 1 15 2 18 6 18.0Avg. Assessment 18.02

Supporting documents: Degree Certificates

V-P.4 Faculty Retention (20) Assessment = 4 * RPI / N Where RPI = Retention Point Index

= Points assigned to all Faculty Where Points assigned to a faculty = 1 point for each year of experience at the Institute but not exceeding 5.

Item 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Number of faculty with less than 1y (x0) 03 05 6Number of faculty with 1y <= period < 2y (x1)

-- 1 03

Number of faculty with 2y <= period < 3y (x2)

3 -- --


2 3 --


-- 2 3

Number of faculty with more than 5y (x5) 5 4 6N 13 15 18RPI = x1 + 2x2 + 3x3 + 4x4 + 5x5 23 38 45Assessment 11.69 10.13 10

Av. Assessment 10.6

Supporting documents: Attendance register, relieving/resignation letters

V-P.5 Faculty Research Publications (20)

Assessment of FRP = 4 * Sum of the Research Publication Points scored by each Faculty member DIVIDED BY (N)

Guidelines: A faculty member scores at most 5 Research publication points depending upon the quality of the research papers and books published in the past 3 years.


The research papers considered are those (i) which can be located on Internet and/or are included in hard-copy volumes/ proceedings, published by well known publishers, and (ii) the faculty member’s affiliation, in the published papers/books, is of the current institution.

Include a list of all such publications and IPRs along with details of DOI, publisher, month/year, etc.

Name of faculty(contributing to FRP)

FRP Points (Max. 5 per year per faculty)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

NC IC NJ IJ NC IC NJ IJ NC IC NJ IJH RamaKrishna 5G B Krishnappa - - - - 5 5Dr. G V Naveen Prakash 5 5 5L J Sudev 5 - - - - - - -K S Ravi - - - - - - - 5K B Vinay - - - - 5 5B B Ganesh - - - - - - - - 5SUM 15 15 25N (Number of faculty positions required for an STR of 15)

13 13 16

Assessment FRP = 4 x Sum/N

4.61 4.61 6.25

Av. Assessment : 5.16

NC=National Conference NJ=National journalIC=International conference IJ=International journal

V-P.6 Faculty Intellectual Property Rights (10) Assessment of FIPR = 2 * Sum of the FIPR points scored by each Faculty

member DIVIDED BY (N) Guidelines: A faculty member scores at most 5 FIPR points. FIPR includes awarded national/international patents, design and copyrights.

Name of faculty(contributing to FIPR)

FIPR Points (Max. 5 per year per faculty)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

. . .Nil Nil Nil. . . . .

. . . . . . .Sum 0 0 0N 0 0 0Assessment FIPR = 2 x Sum/N

0 0 0

Av. Assessment 0


V-P.7 Externally funded R & D Projects and Consultancy Work (20)

Assessment of R&D and Consultancy Projects = 4 * Sum of FPPC by each faculty DIVIDED BY (N)

Guidelines: A faculty member gets atmost 5 points, depending upon the amount. A suggestive scheme is given below for a minimum amount of Rs. 1 lakh:-5 points for funding by National Agency, 4 points for funding by State Agency, 3 points for funding by private sector, and 2 points for funding by the sponsoring Trust/Society.

Name of faculty(contributing to FRDC)

FRDC Points (Max. 5 per year per faculty)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11. . .

Nil Nil Nil. . . . .. . . . . . .Sum 0 0 0N 0 0 0Assessment FRDC = 4 x Sum/N

0 0 0

Av. Assessment 0

V-P.8 Faculty Interactions with Outside World (10)Assessment = 2 * Sum of FIP by each faculty DIVIDED BY (N) Guidelines : A faculty member gets at the most 5 Interaction Points, depending upon the type of Institution or R&D Lab or Industry, as given below:

5 points for interaction with a well known Institution abroad, Institution of Eminence in India or National Research Labs,

3 points for interaction with Institution/Industry (not covered) above, 2 points for interaction with State Level Institutions and others.

Point to be warded, are for those activities, which result in joint efforts in publication of books/research paper, pursuing externally funded R & D/consultancy projects and/or development of semester-long course/teaching modules.

Sl No. Name of the facultyFIP points

2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-20111 H Ramakrishna 5 0 02 G. B. Krishnappa 0 5 53 L. J. Sudev 5 0 04 Dr. G. V. Naveen Prakash 5 5 55 K. S. Ravi 0 0 56 K. B. Vinay 0 5 57 Ganesh B B 0 0 5

Sum 15 15 25Total number of Faculty (N)

13 15 18

Assessment FIP 2.3 2 2.7Version.3.0 May, 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled of

60

Average Assessment 6.27


Supporting documents: Individual Faculty Members Documents

Interaction Details with outside world

Sl. No

Title DOI Interacted by Interacted with Month/year

1 Numerical Modeling OF Pulse Tube Refrigerator

Proceedings of the national conferences on advances in mechanical engineering 2009 VVIT

G B Krishnappa

D. Madhu,

S Kasthuri Rangan

October 5, 2009-10

2. Comparison of different numerical models for the analysis two stage pulse tube refrigerator

Proceedings of the National Symposium on Cryogenics

(NSC 23) NIT Rourkela

G B Krishnappa,

D. Madhu,

S Kasthuri Rangan

October 29-30, 2010-11

3. Study of thermal aspect of bearings in machine tools using finite element method

National Conference on Emerging Trends n Mechanical Engineering ETIME -2008 BMS College of Engineering, Bangalore

Dr. G V Naveen Prakash

Sathish Kumar K M

Dr.H V Ravindra

August 28 – 29,

2008-2009

4. Exerimental and Finite Element Analysis of Heat Distribution in Machine Tools

National Conference on Recent Developments in Mechanical Engineering RDME-2009

Sree Chaitra Thirunal College of Engineering, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala


Sathish Kumar K M

Dr. H V Ravindra

March 5- 6

2008-2009


5 Numerical Modeling OF Pulse Tube Refrigerator

Proceedings of international conference on convergence of science and engg in Education and Research

G B Krishnappa,

D. Madhu,

S Kasthuri Rangan

April 21 -23, 2009-2010

6 Comparison of 1 D & 2 D Flow numerical analysis applied to two stage pulse tube cry color

Proceedings of Cryogenics Engg Conferences and international cryogenic materials conference (CEC-ICMC 2011)

G B Krishnappa,

D. Madhu,

S Kasthuri Rangan

June 13 - 17, 2010-11

7 Monitoring of the Machine Elements in Drilling Machine using Vibration Signals by FEM”, ASME 2008

International Congress and Exposition (IMECE) Boston Massachusetts, United States of America


Sathish Kumar K M

H V Ravindra

October 3 to November 6, 2008-2009.

8 Estimation of AE Parameters for Monitoring Spindle Bearing in a Drilling Machine using Multiple Regression and GMDH”

2nd International Conference on Recent Advances in Material Processing Technology

National Engineering. College, Kovilpatti (TN),


Sathish Kumar K M

H V Ravindra

Feb. 25- 27,

2008 -

2009

9 E- Learning Initiatives in Technical Education an Indian Prospective

International Conference of International Academy of Management & Business Orlando (USA)

K B Vinay Dr. Santhosh Kumar

Jan, 17 -19

2010-2011


10 Forced Convection Heat Transfer through an array of Rectangular solid and drilled fins on a horizontal base plate with different fin spacing’s

International Conference on advanced Materials, Manufacturing Management and Thermal Sciences, SIT Tumkar

B B Ganesh Nov18-19,

2010-2011

Criterion VI: Facilities and Technical Support (75)

VI-P.1 Class Rooms in the Department (20)

VI-P.1.1 Adequate number of rooms for lectures (core/electives), seminars, tutorials, etc for the program (10)

Assessment based on the information provided in the above table

VI-P.1.2 Teaching aids – black/white-board, multimedia projectors, etc. (5)


VI-P.1.3 Acoustics, class room size, conditions of chairs/benches, air circulation,

lighting, exits, ambiance, and such other amenities/facilities (5) Description of Class rooms, faculty rooms, and seminar and conference halls: (Entries in the following table are sampler entries)

Room Description UsageShared /Exclusive?

capacity Rooms Equipped with

Class Room Number 05 Exclusive 60 Desks, Board & Podium

Tutorial rooms 01 Exclusive 25LCD Projector, Internet (WiFi), Desks, Board & Podium

Examination hall 05 Shared 32 Desks, Board & Podium

Seminar Room Number 01 Exclusive 70

LCD Projector, Internet (WiFi), Cordless microphone and speakers, Desks, Board & Podium

Meeting room Number 01 Shared 20 PC and Internet (WiFi)

Faculty rooms (n) 07 Shared 20Laptop, Internet (WiFi), Intercom, Bookrack, Office tables etc.


Supporting documents: Respective Purchase order and bills of

1. LCD Projectors.2. Cordless microphone and speakers.3. Internet Wi-Fi connection.4. Laptops.5. Intercom.6. Book rack (Almirah) and office tables.7. Mechanical department building plan.

Assessment based on the information provided in the above table and the

inspection thereof

VI-P.2 Faculty Rooms in the Department (15) VI-P.2.1 Availability of individual faculty rooms (5) Sl. No Faculty Rooms on No. of Faculty Rooms1. Ground Floor

11

2. First Floor 9


VI-P.2.2 Room equipped with white/black board, computer, internet, and such other amenities/facilities (5) Sl. No Faculty Room No. of Faculty Rooms1. Ground Floor

1


VI-P.2.3 Usage of room for discussion/counseling with students (5)

Sl. No Faculty Rooms on No. of Faculty Rooms1. Ground Floor

11

2. First Floor 9

Assessment based on the information provided in the above table and the inspection thereof


I-P.3 Laboratories in the Department to Meet the Curriculum Requirements as well as the PEOs (25)

Curriculum LaboratoryDescription

Exclusive use/Shared?

Space, in Sq Meters

Number of Students

Number of experiments


Laboratory manuals

Basic Workshop Shared 217 15 8

Working in Good

Condition Yes Prepared

R & D Center Exclusive 66 - -Smithy Exclusive 123 15 8Foundry & Sand Testing Lab Exclusive 129 15 12M S M T Lab Exclusive 86 15 10Fluid Mechanics Lab Shared 67.5 15 7Fluid Machinery Lab Shared 67.5 15 7Energy Conversion LabFuel Testing lab

Exclusive 67.5 15 8

Energy Conversion LabIC Engine Lab

Exclusive 67.5 15 8

Machine shop Exclusive 270 15 8CAED Shared 195 60 8CAMD Exclusive 195 60 4CAD & CAM Lab Exclusive 76 15 10Design Lab Exclusive 100 15 10HMT Lab Exclusive 100 15 12Metrology Lab Exclusive 98 15 22

VI-P.3.1 Adequate well equipped labs to run the entire program specific curriculum (10) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table


VI-P.3.2 Availability of computing facilities available exclusively in the department (5)Computer Facilities for the existing Programme(s)

Sl. No.

Particulars Specification Availability

1. No. of Computer terminals

Lenovo, Dell Intel Core2duoIntel Pentium D & Intel Core2duo

125

2. No of terminals of LAN/WAN

LAN 111

3. Software

Application System Application SystemSolid Edge V18 Windows XP SP2 60 60

Catia V2 R7 Windows 2003 & 2008 Server

22 10+10

CADEM, - 10Cadian 2004A 10

AMESIM 10Ansys

12- 25

MAT Lab - 10

4. Peripherals / Printers

Panasonic projector, Philips Projector, PD115 DLP Projector, HP Scanner 2400/

HP Laser Jet 1320, HP Design jet 30n (Plotter)

HP Laser jet 1020HP Laser Jet M1005 3 in 1

Each 01

5. Internet Accessibility 24 Hours 10Mbps


VI-P.3.3 Availability of laboratories and students project labs with tech. support within and beyond working hours (5)

Curriculum LaboratoryDescription

Exclusive use/Shared?

Space, in Sq Meters

Number of Students


Basic Workshop Shared 217 15Working in

Good Condition

R & D Center Exclusive 80 -M S M T Lab Exclusive 86 15Machine shop Exclusive 270 15CAD & CAM Lab Exclusive 76 15


VI-P.3.4 Equipments to run experiments and their maintenance, Number of students per experimental set up, Size of the laboratories, overall ambience etc. (5)

Assessment based on the information provided in the above table Same as I-P.3


VI-P.4 Technical Manpower Support in the Department (15)

Name of the Tech Staff

Designation (Pay – scale)

Exclusive /Shared work?

Date of Joining

Qualification Other Technical Skills gained?

ResponsibilityAt Joining

Now ?

SundarForeman10500-250-18150

Exclusive 17.11.97 DMEDME/DIT (KSOU)

CNC Training

General Supervision of all labs & Class rooms, Dept. library Incharge, Supervision of DG Maintenance, Stock maintenance & record keeping etc. Metrology Lab & MSMT Lab Incharge

M. N. MalleshInstructor8805-225-16000

Shared 12.10.98 DME DMECNC Training

MSMT, FM & Basic workshop Lab Incharge

K. B. Chandrakantha

Instructor8805-225-16000

Exclusive 3.01.08 DME DMECNC Training

EC & HMT Lab Incharge

P. NagabushanInstructor8805-225-16000

Exclusive 12.10.2000 DME DMECNC Training

Design, Machine Shop & Basic Workshop Incharge

Mahendra MInstructor8805-225-16000

Exclusive 26.8.2010 DME DME

CNC Programming & operation, Typewriting

CAED, CAMD & Cad, CIM Lab Incharge

M. L. Renuka Asst. Instructor6250-125-12000

Exclusive 4.10.2009 I T I I T I

CNC Training

Smithy & Basic work shop Lab Incharge

M. Janardhan Rao

Asst. Instructor6250-125-12000


CNC Training

Foundry & Basic work shop Lab Incharge

S. V. Yamuna Asst. Instructor6250-125-12000

Exclusive 25.9.2007 DCS DCS

CNC Training

CAED lab Incharge & Office Work


Shivakumar M Asst. Instructor6250-125-12000

Shared 26.8.2010 DME DME

CNC Programming

CAED, CAMD & Incharge


K. R. SatishaMechanic5800-100-10500


CNC Training

Foundry, Machine Shop & Basic Workshop & DG Maintenance

H. S. Nagendra

Mechanic5800-100-10500

Shared 27.01.2003 I T I I T ICNC Training

Basic Workshop & DG Maintenance

D. R. Jagdeesha

Mechanic5800-100-10500

Shared 1.9.2008 I T I I T ICNC Training

Basic Workshop & DG Maintenance

VI-P.4.1 Availability of adequate and qualified technical supporting staff for program specific labs (10) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table

VI-P.4.2 Incentives, skill-up gradation and professional advancement (5) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table

Criterion VII: Continuous Improvements (75)

VII-P.1 Improvement in Success Index of Students (10)

From IV-P.1 Items LYG LYGm1 LYGm2 Aggregate

Success Index

VII-P.2 Improvement in Academic Performance Index of Students (10)

From IV-P.2 Items LYG LYGm1 LYGm2 Aggregate

API

VII-P.3 Improvement in Student Teacher Ratio (10)

From V-P.1 Items LYG LYGm1 LYGm2 Aggregate

STR

VII-P.4 Enhancement of Faculty Qualification Index (10)

From V-P.3 Items LYG LYGm1 LYGm2 Aggregate


FQI


VII-P.5 Improvement in Faculty Research Publications, R & D work and Consultancy work (10)

From V-P.5 and V-P.7 Items LYG LYGm1 LYGm2 Aggregate

FRP

FPPC

VII-P.6 Continuing Education (10) Specify the contributory efforts made by the faculty by developing the course/lab modules, conducting short-term courses/workshops etc., for continuing education:

Module Description

Any other contributory Inst./

Industry

Developed / organized by

DurationResource Persons

Target Audience

Usage and citation etc.

CFD fundamentals

and its Application

VTUMechanical Engg Dept.

1 Week

Scientists & Professors from NAL, ADA, IISc,

VVCE

Faculty

…….

VII-P.7 New Facility Created (10)

Specify new facilities created for strengthening the curriculum and/or meeting the PEOs:

Module Description

Any other contributory Inst./

Industry

Developed / organized by

DurationResource Persons

Target Audience

Usage and citation etc.

In CAYm2

…….

In CAYm1

……..

In CAY

…..


VII-P.8 Overall Improvements since Last Accreditation, if any, otherwise, since establishment (5)

Specify the overall improvements: Specify the strengths/ weakness

Improvement brought in

Contributed byList the PEO(s),

which are strengthened

Comments, if any

In CAYm2

…

In CAYm1

…..

In CAY

…..

……

Criterion VIII: Curriculum (100)

List all the course modules along with their objectives and outcomes (Ref. Part III):

Course

Units Science / HSS / Professional

Core, Elective or Breadth?

PEOs specified by Affiliating Institution

Additional theory / lab / assignments /

tests needed to meet objectives?

CommentsTheory Lab

……

…….

……

VIII-P.1 Contents of Basic Science, Humanities and Professional Courses – Core, Elective, and Breadth (30)

Assessment must evaluate the balance in the composition of basic science, humanities, professional courses and their distribution in core and elective and breadth offerings, so that the PEOs are satisfied.

If such components are not included in the curriculum provided by the affiliated university then the Institution should make additional efforts to impart such knowledge by covering such aspects through “contents beyond syllabi”.

VIII-P.2 Content Delivery (30)

Assessment must evaluate the effectivity of teaching content including e-tutorials and delivery. Innovation, if any should be specified including e Tutorials..


VIII-P.3 Laboratory and Project Work (20)

Assessment must evaluate the balance between laboratory /project work and theory, so that the PEOs are satisfied.

If enough lab/design/experimentation components are not included in the curriculum provided by the affiliated university then the Institution should make additional efforts to impart such knowledge by covering such aspects through “contents beyond syllabi”.

VIII-P.4 Additional Contents to Bridge Curriculum Gaps (20)

Assessment must evaluate program specific contents which are added to bridge curriculum gaps across the courses in order to achieve PEOs and the specific course objectives.

Criterion IX: Programme Educational Objectives (PEOs) (150)

List all the course modules along with their PEOs (Ref. Part III) along with Course-files etc.: Refer to course files of Individual Faculty Members.

PEOs Assessment(Poor / Average / Good / Excellent)

Comments(e.g., needs, re-working, strengthening, etc.

Course

Units (Theory

– Tutorial – Lab)

Theory LabAssignments

/ Tests / Exams

Project / Independent

StudyTheory Lab

Assignments / Tests / Exams

Project / Independent

Study

…..

…..

…..

…..

IX-P.1 PEOs Mapping with Curriculum (30)

Assessment must be based on the PEOs defined for a course or a set of courses, and their mapping with the curriculum.


IX-P.2 PEOs Mapping with Content Delivery – Theory and Labs (30)

Assessment must be based on the PEOs defined for a course or a set of courses, and their mapping with (i) content delivery and (ii) knowledge gained through theory classes and laboratory work.

Produce sample course files (best and average quality), handouts showing course deliveries mapped to the identified PEOs. In case of an affiliated institution, there may be a provision for teaching additional topics and holding supplementary tests/examinations in order to achieve the identified PEOs. Produce sample laboratory assignment sheets (best and average quality).

This exercise is aimed at assessing the possibility and provision for PEOs’ mapping with content delivery and the capability of the Institution to do so.

IX-P.3 PEOs Mapping with Evaluation (Examinations/Tests/Assignments) (30)

Assessment must be based on the PEOs defined for a course or a set of courses, and their mapping with examinations, class tests, and take-home work (assignments and independent study).

Produce sample (best and average quality) examination/tests question papers, assignment sheets along with model solutions to assess how the PEOs are achieved through such evaluations. In case of an affiliated institution, there may be a provision for additional/supplementary tests/examinations in order to cater to additional subject topics, required for achieving the identified PEOs.

This exercise is aimed at assessing the possibility, provision and capability of the institution to do the above in order to achieve the stated PEOs.


IX-P.4 PEOs Mapping with Final Year Project work (30)

Assessment of final year students’ projects must be done considering criteria such as – (i) their quality, (ii) the state-of-the-art technology used in execution, (iii) their relevance to industry and academics, (iv) the use and development of theoretical and experimental methods, and (v) the coverage of border areas of the programme.

Include a list of five best and average projects from each of the three years – CAY, CAYm1 and CAYm2 – along with their contributions.

Name of the Student(s)

Project TitleArea of

Specialization

Project Supervisor

(s)

Contribution / Achievements

/ Research Output

Matching with stated

PEOsPublication

In CAYm22008-09

…….Coupling of a Reaction

Turbine with an Impulse Turbine

Thermal Engg.

G B Krishnappa

Design And Fabrication of Paddy Separator

DesignEngg

H Ramakrishna

Design & Abrication Of Linear Gear Mechanism

Voice Based Control System for

Vehicle/Robot

Control Engg.

Sudev L J

DESIGN & FABRICATION OF

ROTARY VIBRATOR & DIE

In CAYm12009-10

……..

Design And Fabrication Of Automatic

Emergency Exit Window Opening For

Railway Coach

DesignEngg.

S A Mohan Krishna

LOW COST AUTOMATION OF PROFILE WELDING MACHINE FOR THE LOWER ARM OF A PASSENGER CAR

DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF

UNIVERSAL VIBRATION TESTING

RIG WITH GRAPHICAL INTERFACE

REDUCTION OF ENGINE

CONTAMINATIONFEASIBILITY STUDYOF

MINIATURIZATION OF A SUGAR INDUSTRY


In CAY 2010-11

…..

Rework Reduction In Vehicle Assembly Of

Scooty Pep And Scooty Streak

Maintenance Engg


Optimization of Mechanical Process in the

Manufacture of Printed Circuit Board

Manufacturing Jayashanka

r N

Design And Fabrication of Multipurpose Machine

Design Engg.G B

Krishnappa

Deccan Herald, Star of Mysore and Prajavani

Design & Fabricationof a System to convertBI – Directional Input

Into Unidirectional output

Design Engg. L J Sudev

Design & Fabrication of Foot step Power

Generation SystemDesign Engg. D V Satish

Deccan HeraldStar of MysoreTimes of India

Utilization of Upstream Air for the Generation of

Power in AutomobilesThermal Engg

B B Ganesh

Star of Mysore

Design and Fabrication of robotic Drilling Arm

Manufacturing. K S Ravi


IX-P.5 Continuous Improvement in the Process of PEOs Mapping and Assessment (30)

Viewing the process of PEOs’ mapping to the above mentioned criteria as a continuously improving process over the years, attempts must be made to document the effectivity of the mapping processes. This continuous process may also refine/revise the targeted PEOs and their mappings.

Criterion X: Programme Outcomes and Assessment (100)

X-P.1 Demonstration of Attainment of the Mandatory a-to-k outcomes (Ref. Part III) (50)

Evaluation is based on outcome assessment from students, faculty and placement attainments.

X-P.1.1 Assessment of outcomes from students’ attainment (15)

Academic and professional achievements by students in terms of a-to-k-outcomes must be evaluated out as per documented processes.

X-P.1.2 Assessment of outcomes due to faculty contributions and achievements (15)

Academic and professional contributions of the faculty leading to a-to-k-outcomes and their achievements must be evaluated as per documented processes.

X-P.1.3 Assessment of outcomes from placement (10)

Assessment of achieved objectives as revealed through placement data (type of jobs, nature of companies, higher studies etc.) must be evaluated as per documented processes.

X-P.1.4 Assessment of achievements as disseminated in media/public fora (10)

Assessment of achievements, as published in the media/public fora of repute (excluding the internal publications of the Institute, its media partners) must be done based on their impact.

X-P.2 Assessment of Outcomes by External Stakeholders (30)

X-P.2.1 Documented process and assessment from Industries (10)

Evaluation must be done based on documented processes for repeatedly assessing the outcomes by the relevant industries.

X-P.2.2 Documented process and assessment from Almuni (10)

Evaluation must be done based on documented processes for repeatedly assessing the outcomes by the qualified and relevant alumni.


X-P.2.3 Documented process and assessment from Professional Bodies (10)

Evaluation must be done based on documented processes for repeatedly assessing the outcomes by the applicable and recognized national/international professional bodies.

X-P.3 Effectivity and Efficiency of the Mechanism/Procedure for Continuous Review and Outcome Measurements (20) Viewing the review and outcome measurement processes as continuously improving, attempts must be made to document the effectivity and efficiency of the mechanism/procedures


PART III Curriculum, Syllabi, PEOs and Outcomes

In this part of SAR, the course modules and/or groups of course modules in the programme, should provide the following information:

1. Programme Educational Objectives (PEOs) and Course Objectives, 2. Programme Outcomes as attainable through a course module or a group of course

modules, 3. Defined outcomes vis-à-vis the subset of achievable outcomes for a course module

and/or group of course modules, 4. Additional contents beyond the syllabi, if needed, to be provided to meet the

outcomes with the course objectives, and 5. How to make provisions for the additional contents, if needed to bridge the gaps,

in the academic calendar.

The following excerpts are taken from the ABET’s Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programmes:--

Programme Educational Objectives (PEOs) – Programme educational objectives are broad statements that describe the career and professional accomplishments that the programme is preparing the graduates to achieve.

Each programme for which an institution seeks accreditation or reaccreditation must have in place:

(a) published educational objectives that are consistent with the mission of the institution and these criteria,

(b) a process that periodically documents and demonstrates that the objectives are based on the needs of the programme's various constituents, and

(c) an assessment and evaluation process that periodically documents and demonstrates the degree to which these objectives are attained.

Programme Outcomes – Programme outcomes are narrower statements that describe what students are expected to know and be able to do by the time of graduation. These relate to the skills, knowledge, and behaviors that students acquire in their matriculation through the programme.

Engineering programmes must demonstrate that their students attain the following outcomes:

(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering, (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret

data, (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within

realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability,

(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams, (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems,


(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility, (g) an ability to communicate effectively, (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions

in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context, (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning, (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues, and (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary

for engineering practice.

Programme outcomes are outcomes (a) through (k) plus any additional outcomes that may be articulated by the programme. Programme outcomes must foster attainment of programme educational objectives.

Assessment – Assessment is one or more processes that identify, collect, and prepare data to evaluate the achievement of programme outcomes and programme educational objectives.

Evaluation – Evaluation is one or more processes for interpreting the data and evidence accumulated through assessment practices. Evaluation determines the extent to which programme outcomes or programme educational objectives are being achieved and results in decisions and actions to improve the programme.

There must be an assessment and evaluation process that periodically documents and demonstrates the degree to which the programme outcomes are attained.


PART IV List of documents / records to be made available during the visit

(Records of three years to be made available, wherever applicable)

Institute Specific I.1. Land papers, built-plan and approval etc. I.2. Composition of GC/GB, Senate and other Academic and Administrative

bodies, their functions and responsibilities. List of all the meetings held in the past 3 years along with the attendance records. Representative minutes and action-taken reports of a few meetings of such bodies along with the list of current faculty members who are members of such bodies.

I.3. Rules, policies and procedures published by the Institution including service book and academic regulations and other along with the proof that the employees/students are aware of the rules and procedures.

I.4. Budgeted allocation and utilization : Audited statement of accounts I.5. Informative web site I.6. Library resources – books and journal holdings, I.7. Listing of core, computing and manufacturing etc. labs I.8. Records of T & P and career and guidance cells I.9. Records of safety checks and critical installations I.10. Medical care records and usages of ambulance etc. I.11. Academic calendar, schedule of tutorial and makeup classes I.12. Course handouts/files along with PEOs; list of additional topics to meet

PEOs and outcomes. I.13. Set of question papers, assignments, evaluation schemes etc. I.14. Feedback proforma, analysis and corrective actions I.15. Documented feedback received from the stake-holders (e.g.,

Industries, Parents, Alumni, Financiers etc.) of the Institution I.16. List of faculty who teach first year courses along with their

qualifications I.17. First year results.

Programme Specific P.1 NBA accreditation reports of the past visits, if any P.2 Department budget and allocations of the past 3 years P.3 Admission – seats filled and ranks (3y data) P.4 List/Number of students who clear the programme in 4y (3y data) P.5 Av. Grade point (CGPA) (3y data of students CGPA/percentage) P.6 Placement and higher studies data (3y data) P.7 Professional society activities, events, conferences organized etc. P.8 List of students’ papers along with hard-copies of the publications;

professional society publications/magazines etc. P.9 Sample best and average project reports/theses P.10 Details of faculty student ratio P.11 Faculty details with their service books, salary details, sample


appointment letters, promotion and award letters/certificates P.12 Faculty list with designation, qualification, joining date, publication, R

& D, interaction details P.13 List of faculty publications along with DOIs and publication/citation

details P.14 List of R & D and consultancy projects along with approvals and

project completion reports P.15 List and proofs of faculty interaction with outside world P.16 List of class rooms, faculty rooms, P.17 List of programme specific labs and computing facility within dept. P.18 List of non-teaching staff with their appointment letters etc P.19 List of short-term courses, workshop arranged and course-modules

developed P.20 Records of new programme specific facility created, if any P.21 Records of overall programme specific improvements, if any P.22 Curriculum, PEO/Course objectives and Outcomes, P.23 Known gaps in the curriculum vis-à-vis PEOs and Outcomes P.24 List of contents beyond syllabi and schedule in academic calendar, if

any P.25 Course files, plan of course delivery, question papers, assignments, list

of experiments etc. * * *
