sedentary behavior and inactivity physiology slideshare presentation
DESCRIPTION
Lecture about the effect of sedentary behavior in our health.TRANSCRIPT
Sedentary Behavior and Inactivity Physiology
Killing you softly and gently
Yannis GuerraEndocrinology DepartmentJohn H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook [email protected]@yannisguerra on Twitter
CC www.TheNounProject.com
In this presentation
• Definition of Sedentarism• Distribution of Human Energy Expenditure
– Concept of NEAT (Non Exercise Activity Thermogenesis)
• Inactivity Physiology and Epidemiology– 4 principles
• Solving the problem…or not?
What is to be sedentary?
Is it the: • Baseline exercise amount?
– Minutes/Steps
• Baseline energy used?• Presence or lack of a particular behavior?• Leisure/Work/House based?
What does the literature says?
Seems that we don’t agree.
And these definitions concentrate in the presence/absence of exercise
A more “big picture” approach
A distinct class of behaviors (e.g., sitting, watching TV, driving) characterized by little physical movement and low energy expenditure ( Less/equal to 1.5 METs)
Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 35: 725–740 (2010)
CC www.TheNounProject.com
Not only the lack of exercise
For a real life example
• 34 years old male, no PMHx
• Fit him with one of these:
– Measures movement with three axis accelerometer.
CC http://www.flickr.com/photos/oskay/1193147290/sizes/o/in/photostream/http://www.flickr.com/photos/terrypaton/4613655114/http://www.flickr.com/photos/zzathras777/2071956401/sizes/o/in/photostream/
Accelerometers are all around us!
For a real life example (cont)
• Choose one very “active day”–11452 steps (5.4 miles)–Exercised 30 minutes
This is the result of the “active day”
And over the long run?
Active Couch Potato
Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev., Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 105Y113, 2010
Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 35: 725–740 (2010)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ptooey/5018659279/
Does it make any difference?
Mayo Clin Proc. • December 2010;85(12):1138-1141
Understanding the Distribution of Energy Expenditure in
Humans
European Journal of CliniCiI Nutrition (1996) 50, 72-92
European Journal of CliniCiI Nutrition (1996) 50, 72-92
Tota
l exe
rcis
e ex
pend
iture
(TEE
) , M
ega
Joul
es
Components
0 Kcal/day
2000 Kcal/day
1000 Kcal/day
Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR)
Activity Thermogenesis
Thermal effect of food
European Journal of ClinicaI Nutrition (1996) 50, 72-92
Weight+Height+Gender Predict 86% of BMR
Basa
l Met
abol
ic R
ate
(BM
R), M
egaJ
oule
s
• Coeficient of Variation (CV) within individual for BMR 3-8%
• Thermal effect of food 10% of TEE– CV 20%
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 7:599–605.
Weight+Height+Gender Predict only 7%
Phys
ical
Acti
vity
Lev
el
Returning to the Total Energy Expenditure
0 Kcal/day
2000 Kcal/day
1000 Kcal/day
Basal Metabolic Rate
Activity Thermogenesis
Thermal effect of food
More detailed!
0 Kcal/day
2000 Kcal/day
1000 Kcal/day
Non Exercise Activity Thermogenesis
(NEAT)
Exercise
Which one is more affected by Sedentary
behaviors?Some arguments in favor of NEAT
Circulation. 2007;116:1081-1093
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2006;26;729-736
Easy solution, right?Just tell them to exercise more!
I think you’ll find it’s a bit more complicated than that
Ben Goldacre, www.Bad Science.net
Am J Clin Nutr 1995;62:722-9.
• 20 females, BMI 32• 8 weeks of low energy diet
– 500 kcal x 4w– 850 kcal x 4 w
• 2 groups– Exercise 3/w x 90 minutes– No exercise
• Measured Average Daily and Sleeping Metabolic Rates
Am J Clin Nutr 1995;62:722-9.
Non Exercise Activity Thermogenesis
(NEAT)
Exercise
Non Exercise Activity Thermogenesis
(NEAT)
Exercise
What we thought would happen
Non Exercise Activity Thermogenesis
(NEAT)
Exercise
Non Exercise Activity Thermogenesis
(NEAT)
Exercise
What really happened
Revising concepts is NEAT!
• Stable “Exercise” levels• Obesity levels increase• We do “more” with “less”(movement)• NEAT decreases with inactivity.• NEAT decrease may be the main factor in
energy overload
http://xkcd.com/552/
Science 307:584-586
164 min
152 min
Science 283: 212-214
• 16 non obese people, asked not to exercise extra
• 8 weeks of overfeeding– 1000 kcal
Science 283: 212-214
Weight changed from 0.36 kg to 4.23 kg, mainly correlated to activity thermogenesis.
How does this affect our current paradigm of thinking about activity
and weight/metabolic effects?
To decrease NEAT, increase inactivity
Diabetes 56:2655–2667, 2007
• 4 tenets of inactivity physiology– 2 are logical consequences of the argument– 2 are areas where research can prove/disprove
the argument
First
Second
• In cohorts of people who do not exercise– Increased rates of
• DM• CAD• Obesity
Cannot be caused by additional exercise deficiency!
Third
• Cellular and molecular processes of inactivity physiology vs exercise physiology are QUALITATIVELY different from each other
http://xkcd.com/285/
CC www.TheNounProject.com
www.wikipedia.org
Evidence at all levels
Image: Acta ortop. bras. vol.12 no.1 São Paulo Jan./Mar. 2004
What did they do?
• 60 rats. • 12 hours of Hind limb unloading (remember
picture?)then 4 hours of low intensity ambulatory activity.
• Measured gene expression in muscles.• Only used genes that changed more than 1.5x
expression to decrease false positives.
Three types of pattern
Down and up to normal
Up and staying up Up and down to normal
Showing
• 2 types of muscles, that react very differently to both– Exercise– Lack of movement (Sedentarism)
Oh, the Humanity!
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:2650-2656
Metabolism Clinical and Experimental
Image: Br J Sports Med 2006;40:779-784 doi:10.1136/bjsm.2006.027276
• Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle (AusDiab Study)
• 173 patient, underwent OGTT• Accelerometer based
Diabetes Care 30:1384–1389, 2007
Important: Effect even when adjusted for higher intensity activity
Diabetes Care 31:369–371, 2008
• Same population• Relationship of sedentarism and
– Waist circumference• 3.1 cm difference
– Cluster of metabolic risk factors
Evidence for the 3rd tenet
• Changes in RNAm production – Baseline is different than inactivity AND post
inactivity
• Decrease in Lipoprotein lipase production– Difference in between “exercise” muscles and
“posture” muscles
• Metabolic changes – Insulin and glucose levels, OGTT
CC www.TheNounProject.com
What about the 4th tenet?
Times that people spend sitting versus participating in exercise based leisure
time physical activity are different classes of behavior with distinct determinants AND INDEPENDENT RISKS FOR DISEASE
Diabetes 56:2655–2667, 2007
PLoS Med 3(12): e488. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030488
• Cross sectional study of 1921 children,– 9-10 yold and 15-16 yolds
• Accelerometer based activity• Self reported TV viewing• Metabolic risk score• TV viewing was NOT correlated with PA
(r=0.013, p=0.58)
Obes Res. 2005;13:608–614
Epidemiology 1998; 9: 632-35
NEAT
NEA
T
Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 998–1005, 2009
ExercisersNon Exercisers
Even if you exercise, the effects are still there!
J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:292–9
And the beat goes on, and on, and on
CC www.TheNounProject.com
Statistics of direct measurement
No, it’s not Pac-man eating pie
European Heart Journal doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq451http://www.bionetics.ca/exercise/mti%20actigraph.htm
JAMA. 2006;296:171-179
Absolute risk
12%
17.6%
24.7%
Evidence for the 4th tenet
• Different effects of sedentary behavior compared to “exercise”
• Metabolic and Mortality effects seen– Through age groups– Through ethnic groups
• Newer objective data seems to support larger self reported data
http://www.flickr.com/photos/knitbunny/753713999/
What can we do about it?
Diabetes Care 31:661–666, 2008
But besides that study…
http://www.flickr.com/photos/cobalt/205542600
But do not despair!
IDLE Breaks Study
• Baker IDI Heart & Diabetes Institute• Effects of acute bout of sitting time in post
prandial Glc/Tg – With and Without Breaks
Unpublished DataGlucose Insulin
Breaking news: New data All are statistically significative!
Hot off the presses
• Treatment group burns 0.18 kcal/min more (17% more) 300 calories/week
• In obese/overweight group, increases to 0.38 kcal/min (32% more) 575 calories/week
Am J Public Health. 2011 Mar 18. [Epub ahead of print]
General Ending Points
We have changed as a species
Int. J. Sports Med 19: 328-35, 1998
Estim
ated
dai
ly e
nerg
y ex
pend
iture
We have changed as a species
http://www.flickr.com/photos/xuxiaohui/15902318/
But not so much
We are failing
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8185675@N07/3902633122/
exercise
But we may be missing something big
Exercise
NEAT inactivity
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tedmurphy/3830352762/
We want to avoid this
And we need to accomplish this!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/31364755@N08/2942780396/in/photostream
Thanks to
David DunstanAssociate Professor Baker IDI Heart & Diabetes Institute
Travis SaundersHealthy Active Living andObesity Research GroupObesity Panacea Blog
Mark E. BendenAssociate ProfessorTexas A&M Health Science CenterSchool of Rural Public Health