_second seminar leni karlina1

8/7/2019 _Second Seminar Leni Karlina1

1/12

A Comparative Study of Students Listening Comprehension

Achievement Between Students Who Are Taught by Using Video

and Those Who Are Taught by Using Tape Recorder

at First Grade of SMA N 1 Sukoharjo, Pringsewu

By: Leni Karlina0413042036

A Comparative Study of Students Listening Comprehension

Achievement Between Students Who Are Taught by Using Video

and Those Who Are Taught by Using Tape Recorder

at First Grade of SMA N 1 Sukoharjo, Pringsewu

[email protected]

Bandar Lampung, Friday 20th November 2009


2/12

IV. Result and Discussion

A. Result of research

1. Result of Pretest

2. Result of Posttest

B. Hypothesis TestingC. Discussion


3/12

Result of Pretest

Experimental

Class I

Experimental

Class II

N 30 30

Mode 32 20

Median 32.00 32.00

Minimum 16 16

Maximum 44 44

Mean 30.67 30.53


4/12

Homogeneity

Class N MeanStd.

Deviation

Std.

Error

Mean

PretestExperimental I 30 30.67 8.683 1.585

Experimental II 30 30.53 8.169 1.492


5/12

Levene's Test forEquality of

Variances

t-test for Equality of Means

F Sig. t df

Sig.

(2-

taile

d)

Mean

Diffe

rence

Std.

Error

Differe

nce

95% Confidence

Interval of the

Differences

Lower Upper

PretestEqual

variances

assumed

.070 .739 -.061 58 .951 -.133 2.177 -4.491 4.224

Equal

variances not

assumed

-.061 57.785 .951 -.133 2.177 -4.491 4.224


6/12

Experimental

Class I

Experimental

Class II

N 30 30

Mode 32 32Median 44.00 32.00

Minimum 32 20

Maximum 68 60

Mean 46.27 32.53

Result of Posttest


7/12

Levene's Test

for Equality of

Variances

t-test for Equality of Means

F Sig. t df

Sig.

(2-

taile

d)

Mean

Differenc

e

Std.

Error

Differ

ence

95% ConfidenceInterval of the

Differences

Lower Upper

Pretest Equal

variances

assumed

4.467 .039 -.5.273 58 .000 -.13.733 2.604 -18.947 -8.520

Equal

variances

not

assumed

-.5.274 54.470 .000 -.13.733 2.604 -18.954 -8.513

Hypothesis Testing


8/12


9/12

A. ConclusionB. Suggestion

V. Conclusion and Suggestion


10/12

1. There is a significant difference of students listening

comprehension achievement between those who were

taught by using video and those who were taught by using

tape recorder within experimental class I (video class).

2. The use of video could increase the students motivation.

3. The increase of the score of the experimental class II

(tape recorder) shows that the increase is not merelybecause of the use of video, but there were the other

factors that affected the students achievement in the

experimental class II (tape recorder class).

Conclusion


11/12

Suggestion

1. From the conclusion number 1, the use of video gives a

better result than tape recorder. It is suggested that theEnglish teachers to applied video in teaching listening

comprehension.

2. the teacher should have well preparation on the

equipment and also manage the time well in order tomake the learning process effective.

3. it is suggested to the future researcher who wants to do

the similar research to have longer period since the

present research was conducted only for four weeks. This

is intended to see the real and accurate result of theresearch because in learning language there is a process

which might influence the achievement like habit, the

learners characters, motivation, learning strategies, etc.


12/12lenikarlina@teacher com

Thank You

_second seminar leni karlina1

Documents