second language acquisition and learning - nicolÁs - feb 2013.pdf

Upload: virginia-canabal

Post on 02-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    1/26

    SECOND LANGUAGESECOND LANGUAGESECOND LANGUAGESECOND LANGUAGEACQUISITION ANDACQUISITION ANDACQUISITION ANDACQUISITION AND

    LEARNINGLEARNINGLEARNINGLEARNINGNICOLNICOLNICOLNICOLS BRIANS BRIANS BRIANS BRIAN

    Training Course for English Teachers

    Montevideo, Uruguay

    ANEP CEIPDepartamento de Segundas Lenguas y Lenguas Extranjeras

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    2/26

    possible

    resultsof

    classroom

    activities

    reasonswhy some

    activities

    succeed

    and others

    fail

    THEORIES

    & MODELS

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    3/26

    SECOND LANGUAGESECOND LANGUAGESECOND LANGUAGESECOND LANGUAGEACQUISITION THEORYACQUISITION THEORYACQUISITION THEORYACQUISITION THEORY

    explain childrens acquisition FL / L2

    help make the classroom a better place for

    FLA

    Psychologicalinterpretations

    Linguisticinterpretations

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    4/26

    Input in First Language AcquisitionChomsky Language Acquisition Device (LAD)

    LAD outputinput

    Content of sentencesheard by children fromparents, adults andother children,television, etc..

    Adult competence in alanguage that isformally described bya grammar of thatlanguage.

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    5/26

    CaretakerCaretakerCaretakerCaretaker SpeechSpeechSpeechSpeech

    Slowerrate of speech Distinct pronunciation Less complex sentences Rephrasing andrepetition Meaningchecks Gesturesandvisual reinforcement Concrete reference Scaffoldingincreasing childrens responsibility

    as participants in the conversation

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    6/26

    MEANINGFULNESSMEANINGFULNESSMEANINGFULNESSMEANINGFULNESSCOMMUNICATIVE APPROACH

    patterns connections

    context

    emotion

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    7/26

    KKKKrrrraaaasssshhhheeeennnn''''ssss

    5 Hypotheses5 Hypotheses5 Hypotheses5 Hypotheses

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    8/26

    The Acquisition vs. Learning

    Hypothesis2 independent systems of FL performance

    Acquisition

    to L1 acquisitionrequires meaningful interaction and naturalcommunicationspeakers concentrated in the communicative

    actimplicit, subconsciousinformal situationsattitudestable order of acquisition

    Learning

    formal instruction productexplicit, consciousconscious knowledge about thelanguage (e.g.: grammar rules)

    formal situationssimple to complex order of learning

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    9/26

    communicative language:communicative language:communicative language:communicative language:

    acquisitionacquisitionacquisitionacquisition

    fluencyfluencyfluencyfluency: consequence of: consequence of: consequence of: consequence of

    acquisitionacquisitionacquisitionacquisition

    teaching about the language:teaching about the language:teaching about the language:teaching about the language:

    enables to develop theirenables to develop theirenables to develop theirenables to develop theirmonitormonitormonitormonitor

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    10/26

    The Monitor Hypothesis

    Rules learned formally MONITOR used to check on

    output as it arrives in the

    mind

    Monitor functions:-Planning

    -Editing-Correcting

    Conditions: 1) the language learner has sufficient time 2) he/she focuses on form andcorrectness 3) he/she knows the ruleThe learner can only apply formally learned rules

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    11/26

    The Natural Order Hypothesis

    Students acquire different grammatical morphemes inregular and predictable sequences (natural order)

    Studies: Dulay & Burt, 1974; Fathman, 1975; Makino, 1980; Krashen, 1987.

    A language programsyllabus should not be

    based on this order- it should be based on

    communicative uses of thelanguage.

    Ease of learning is not the same thing as apparentsimplicity or complexity.

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    12/26

    Krashen suggests the following is the common order ofacquisition of grammatical morphemes for learners of

    English as a Foreign Language (adults and children alike):

    I.

    Progressive (-ing) Plural

    Verb "to be"

    II. Auxiliary verbs

    Articles (a, an, the)

    III. Irregular past

    IV.

    Regular past

    Third person singular (-s)

    Possessive(s)

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    13/26

    SLA STAGESSLA STAGESSLA STAGESSLA STAGES

    StageStageStageStageAbout howAbout howAbout howAbout how

    many words?many words?many words?many words?Pre-production (the "Silent

    Period")500 receptive words

    Early Production 1000 receptive/active words

    Speech Emergence 3000 active words

    Intermediate Fluency 6000 active words

    Continued Language

    DevelopmentContent Area Vocabulary

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    14/26

    The Input Hypothesis Linguistic progress lies in the effort made to comprehend

    comprehensible input.

    Stagei +1

    Secondlanguage

    comprehensibleinput one stepbeyond his / herpresent stage.

    Stage i

    Learnerscurrent stageof linguisticcompetence.

    Learner

    EXPO

    S

    ED

    TO

    Acquisition takes place when:

    Natural communicative input - each learner will receive somei+1 input

    Enough non-linguistic cues to enable the learner to decipher

    the message without understanding everything in the text.

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    15/26

    INPUTINPUTINPUTINPUTISISISIS

    NECESSARY,NECESSARY,NECESSARY,NECESSARY,

    BUTBUTBUTBUT OUTPUTOUTPUTOUTPUTOUTPUTISISISIS

    CRUCIALCRUCIALCRUCIALCRUCIAL

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    16/26

    NecessaryNecessaryNecessaryNecessary conditionconditionconditioncondition::::

    COMPREHENSIBLE OUTPUT (Swain, Snow)

    REGULAR, PLANNED, SCAFFOLDED,

    MEANINGFUL OPPORTUNITIES FORPRODUCTION

    Attempts at communication should be:

    valued

    shapedto make them acceptable and understandable

    ( communicative means of correction)

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    17/26

    The Affective Filter Hypothesis

    Input must be experienced under conditions that lower theanxiety, and raise the motivation and self-imageof thelearner.

    Learner

    Self-confidenceMotivation

    Anxiety

    The affective filter is a mental block.

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    18/26

    INTERLANGUAGEINTERLANGUAGEINTERLANGUAGEINTERLANGUAGE

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    19/26

    FL LEARNERS ERRORS:

    native language foreign language systematic, not random

    The learner progresses along an acquisitioncontinuum (Seliger, 1988) from zero competence to

    near native competence in the FL

    Teacher, teacher, dame un pencil

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    20/26

    InterlanguageInterlanguageInterlanguageInterlanguage

    Separate linguistic system used in communication

    while progressing toward nativelike speaker FLcompetence.

    This interlanguage:

    not the Native Language not the FL contains elements of both.

    gradually develops towards the rule-system of the FL

    INTERLANGUAGE: the various shapes of the

    learner's language competence.

    (Selinker, 1972

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    21/26

    Interlanguage and SLAInterlanguage and SLAInterlanguage and SLAInterlanguage and SLA

    L1L1L1L1

    FLFLFLFL

    Interlanguage 1

    Interlanguage n

    Interlanguage ....

    Interlanguage 3

    Interlanguage 2

    LE

    ARNING

    ST

    AGES

    All FL speakers are on some stage of interlanguage.

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    22/26

    Errors are not signs of failure, but evidenceof the learner's developing system.

    These forms WILL emerge when thelearner is attempting to expressmeaning in the FL, as opposed topracticing structured exercises.

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    23/26

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    24/26

    INTERLANGUAGE FEATURESINTERLANGUAGE FEATURESINTERLANGUAGE FEATURESINTERLANGUAGE FEATURES

    REGRESSIONREGRESSIONREGRESSIONREGRESSION

    The learner fails to express herself in areas(phraseology, style or vocabulary) he mastered earlier

    OVERGENERALIZATIONOVERGENERALIZATIONOVERGENERALIZATIONOVERGENERALIZATION

    The learner searches for a logical grammar of the

    FL that would cover every aspect of it, or seeks to findevery aspect of existing grammars confirmed in theFL.

    The learner draws on aspects of the FL alreadylearned and overuses them.

    E.g.: dont= negative

    I dont eat. You dont eat. They dont eat. *She dont eat.

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    25/26

    OVERELABORATIONOVERELABORATIONOVERELABORATIONOVERELABORATION

    The learner wants to apply complex theoreticalstructures to contexts that may call for simpler

    expression.

    INTERFERENCE FROM L1INTERFERENCE FROM L1INTERFERENCE FROM L1INTERFERENCE FROM L1

    "Language interference, i.e. transferring linguistic habitsof the L1 to the FL (and possibly vice versa), is an

    inevitable outcome of the language contact which occurs in the process of learning a FL" (Krzeszowski 1967: 34)

  • 8/11/2019 Second Language Acquisition and Learning - NICOLS - Feb 2013.pdf

    26/26

    It is natural, and affects all levels of language: accent pronunciation syntax morphology vocabulary, etc.

    While phonological interferenceis the most common

    example, syntactic interferenceand semantic interferenceare also possible (e.g., so called false friends)

    First Language Influence on Interlanguage example:Transfer:

    Yo tengo diez aos* I have ten years