se40(11)temp02_draft ecc report on mss and ecn at 2 ghz

7/17/2019 SE40(11)TEMP02_Draft ECC Report on MSS and ECN at 2 GHz

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/se4011temp02draft-ecc-report-on-mss-and-ecn-at-2-ghz 1/60

ECC REPORT XXX

Electronic Communications Committee (ECC)

within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT)

COMPATIBILITY STUDIES - MSS TERMINALS TRANSMITTING TO ASATELLITE IN THE BAND 1980 – 2010 MHZ AND ADJACENT CHANNELUMTS SERVICES

Location, Month, Year



ECC REPORT 146

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Xxxxx.

The following conclusions can be drawn based on the analsis in this !eport"

• Aaaa#..

• $bbbb#..

• ...



ECC REPORT xxxPage %

Table of contents

0 EXECUT!E "UMM#RY$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$%

L"T O& #''RE!#TO("$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$4

1 (TRO)UCTO($$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$4*

% &RE+UE(CY U"#E$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$46

2.& 2 ' $A*+............................................................................................................................................................., -

- ".#R( "CE(#RO"$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$4/

4 MET.O)OLOY$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$4

,.& /T0 010TE/ CA!ACTE!0TC0 A*+ PA!A/ETE!0 ............................................................................................., 34.1.1 FDD at 1980 MHz border................................................................................................................................48

4.1.2 TDD at 2010 MHz border................................................................................................................................48

,.2 /00 4T* TE $A*+ &536726&6 /8 CA!ACTE!0TC0 A*+ 010TE/ PA!A/ETE!0 .................. .......... ........., 54.2.1 EN 302 574-2 (wideband................................................................................................................................49

4.2.2 EN 302 574-3 (narrowband............................................................................................................................49

4.2.3 !ntenna and ter"ina# t$%e&........................................................................................................................... 4104.2.4 'adiated ower a&&)"%tion& *or M++ t$%e )&er ter"ina#&...........................................................................410

4.2.5 ,anne# %#an& at te band ede&................................................................................................................... 411

,.% P!9PA'AT9* /9+E:0 ............................................................................................................................. ......... ....., &&4.3.1 Deter"ini&ti/ /a&e..........................................................................................................................................411

4.3.2 Monte ,ar#o &i")#ation.................................................................................................................................411

,., +ETE!/*0TC A*A:100 ............................................................................................................................... ......., &24.4.1 Metodo#o$..................................................................................................................................................412

4.4.2 !&&)"%tion&...................................................................................................................................................413

,.; /9*TE7CA!:9 A*+ 0EA/CAT C9*+T9*0 ......................................................................................................., &%4.5.1 E,N re#eant +E!M,!T re/eier %ara"eter&..............................................................................................413

4.5.2 Metodo#o$..................................................................................................................................................413

* C#LCUL#TO( #(#LY"" #() RE"ULT"$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$414;.& 010TE/0 $E:94 &536 / .................................................................................................................................., &,

5.1.1 +)b re&)#t& *ro" deter"ini&ti/ &t)d$..............................................................................................................414

5.1.2 +)b re&)#t& *ro" Monte ,ar#o &i")#ation&.................................................................................................... 418

;.2 010TE/0 A$9<E 26&6 / ................................................................................................................. ......... ........, 2%5.2.1 +)b re&)#t& *ro" deter"ini&ti/ &t)d$..............................................................................................................423

5.2.2 +)b re&)#t& *ro" Monte ,ar#o &i")#ation&.................................................................................................... 424

;.% 0E*0T<T1 A*A:100 ................................................................................................................................. ......... ., 2,5.3.1 Fre)en/$ %#annin between ,, and M++ )%#in..................................................................................424

6 CO(CLU"O("$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ 4%4

#((EX 1 "PEC&C#TO( &OR ET" "T#()#R)" 'ELO2 130 M.$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ 4%*

#((EX % "PEC&C#TO( &OR ET" "T#()#R)" #'O!E %010 M.$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ 4%6

#((EX - "PEC&C#TO( &OR ET" M"" E" "T#()#R)" 'ET2EE( 130 5 %010 M.$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$4%/

#((EX 4"MUL#TO( P#R#METER" #() "CE(#RO"$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$4%

#((EX * L"T O& RE&ERE(CE"$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$4-4

6 executi=e summar 2:ist of abbre=iations ,& introduction ;2 >re?uenc usage -

2.& 2 '@ band -% 0haring scenarios, methodolog 3

,.& /T0 sstem characteristics and parameters 3,.&.& >++ at &536 /@ border 3,.&.2 T++ at 26&6 /@ border 3

http://var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_3/HYPERLINK%23_Toc297132303







































































































































































































































































ECC REPORT xxxPage ,

,.2 /00 within the band &536726&6 /@8 characteristics and sstem parameters 5,.2.& E* %62 ;,72 (wideband) 5,.2.2 E* %62 ;,7% (narrowband) 5,.2.% Antenna and terminal tpes &6,.2., !adiated Power assumptions for /00 tpe user terminals &6

,.2.; Channel plans at the band edges &&

,.% Propagation models &&,.%.& +eterministic case &&,.%.2 /onte Carlo simulation &&,., +eterministic analsis &2,.,.& /ethodolog &2

,.,.2 Assumptions &%,.; /onte7Carlo and 0EA/CAT conditions &%,.;.& EC* rele=ant 0EA/CAT recei=er parameters &%,.;.2 /ethodolog &%; calculation Analsis and results &,;.& 0stems below &536 /@ &,

;.&.& 0ub results from deterministic stud &,;.&.2 0ub results from /onte Carlo simulations &3

;.2 0stems abo=e 26&6 /@ &3;.2.& 0ub results from deterministic stud &3;.2.2 0ub results from /onte Carlo simulations &3;.% 0ensiti=it analsis &3

;.%.& >re?uenc planning between C'C and /00 uplinB&3- Conclusions &3Annex &" 0pecification for ET0 standards below &536 /@ 26Annex 2" 0pecification for ET0 standards abo=e 26&6 /@ 2&A**EX %" 0pecification for ET0 /00 E0 standards between &536 7 26&6 /@ 22Annex ," :0T 9> !E>E!E*CE0 2%



ECC REPORT xxxPage ;

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

DEditors note" pdate in the end

#bbreiation Ex7lanationAC:! AdFacent Channel :eaBage !atio

AC0 AdFacent Channel 0electi=it

$0 $ase 0tation

$T0 $ase Transcei=er 0tation

$4 $andwidth

CEPT European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations

CG Carrier to nterference ratio

+EC +ecision

+ECT +igital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications

ECA European Common Allocation

ECC European Communications Committee

E!C European !adiocommunications CommitteeE!P Effecti=e !adiated Power

ET0 European Telecommunications 0tandards nstitute

/C: /inimum Coupling :oss

/0 /obile 0tation

0EA/CAT 0pectrum Engineering Ad=anced /onte7Carlo Analsis Tool

/T0 ni=ersal /obile Telecommunications 0stem

/00 T



ECC REPORT xxxPage -

2 INTRODUCTION

ECC +ecision (6-)65 designates the bands &536 7 26&6 /@ and 2&6 7 2266 /@ to /obile 0atellite 0er=ices (/00)8which ma incorporate Complementar 'round Component (C'C). t also states that the ser=ices will be compatible with

adFacent mobile ser=ices. t is8 therefore8 important to determine the extent of an interference issues between /00GC'Cand adFacent band /T ser=ices.

The fre?uenc allocations in the band &536 7 26&6 /@ and adFacent bands are gi=en in Table &. The fre?uenc allocations

in the band 2&6 7 2266 /@ and adFacent bands are gi=en in Table 2. The rele=ant adFacent bands are &566 7 &536 /@826&6 7 262; /@ and 2&&6 7 2&6 /@.

ECC +ecision (6-)6& designates these bands to /T2666G/T0. The band &566 7 &536 /@ is designated as an >++

uplinB band (mobile to base). The band 2&&6 7 2&6 /@ is designated as an >++ downlinB band (base to mobile) and the band 26&6 7 262; /@ is designated as either T++ or >++ uplinB.

E!C !eport -; (in &555) contains comprehensi=e analses of compatibilit between /T0 and se=eral other ser=ices in

the 2'@ band. These other ser=ices include /00 in the bands &536 H 26&6 /@ and 2&6 H 2266 /@. owe=er8 thereport did not co=er the use of C'C base stations.

Although8 not co=ered b !eport -;8 the C'C base station ET0 standards for out of band emissions are similar those of/T0 %'PP base stations that alread exist8 using similar technolog. >urthermore8 we expect that the would use similar power le=els and networB deploment. ence8 the adFacenc issues pertaining to these C'C base stations would essentiall be identical to those that currentl exist between different mobile networB operators within the bands below &536 /@.

The analsis of adFacencies of %'PP e?uipment and the use of >++GT++ technolog has been widel considered in CEPT!eport &5 (for the band 2;6672-56 /@) and the issues are well explained and documented.

The difference between the adFacencies for /00 C'C base stations at 2&672266 /@ and the adFacencies for /T base

stations (2;6672-56 /@) are small. The both use /T e?uipment built to ET0 standards that ha=e out of band emissionmasBs based on the same %'PP standards described in CEPT !eport &5. CEPT !eport &5 includes regulator solutions based on the use of restricted blocBs to mitigate against interference between base stations as ma occur at the 26&6 /@ boundar. Therefore8 it is belie=ed that these issues are alread dealt with.

#llocation to serices

Re8ion 1 Re8ion % Re8ion -

1 3-051 3/0

>XE+

/9$:E ;.%33A ;.%33$

1 3-051 3/0

>XE+

/9$:E ;.%33A ;.%33$

/obile7satellite (Earth7to7space)

1 3-051 3/0

>XE+

/9$:E ;.%33A ;.%33$

;.%33 ;.%33 ;.%33

1 3/051 30 >XE+

/9$:E ;.%33A ;.%33$

;.%331 305% 010 >XE+

/9$:E

/9$:E70ATE::TE (Earth7to7space) ;.%;&A

;.%33 ;.%35A ;.%35$ ;.%35>

% 0105% 0%*

>XE+

/9$:E ;.%33A ;.%33$

;.%33

% 0105% 0%*

>XE+

/9$:E

/9$:E70ATE::TE(Earth7to7space)

;.%33 ;.%35C ;.%35E

% 0105% 0%*

>XE+

/9$:E ;.%33A ;.%33$

;.%33

Table 1 &re9:enc; allocations releant to the ban< 130 5 %010 M.=



ECC REPORT xxxPage

#llocation to serices

Re8ion 1 Re8ion % Re8ion -

% 1%05% 160

>XE+

/9$:E ;.%33A ;.%33$

% 1%05% 160

>XE+

/9$:E ;.%33A ;.%33$

/obile7satellite (space7to7Earth)

% 1%05% 160

>XE+

/9$:E ;.%33A ;.%33$

;.%33 ;.%33 ;.%33

% 1605% 1/0

>XE+

/9$:E ;.%33A ;.%33$

;.%33

% 1605% 1/0

>XE+

/9$:E

/9$:E70ATE::TE(space7to7Earth)

;.%33 ;.%35C ;.%35E

% 1605% 1/0

>XE+

/9$:E ;.%33A ;.%33$

;.%33

% 1/05% %00 >XE+

/9$:E

/9$:E70ATE::TE (space7to7Earth) ;.%;&A

;.%33 ;.%35A ;.%35>

% %005% %30 0PACE 9PE!AT9* (space7to7Earth) (space7to7space)

EA!T EXP:9!AT9*70ATE::TE (space7to7Earth) (space7to7space)

>XE+

/9$:E ;.%5&

0PACE !E0EA!C (space7to7Earth) (space7to7space)

;.%52

Table % &re9:enc; allocations releant to the ban< %1/0 5 %%00 M.=

n the case of /00GC'C user terminals8 two new ET0 standards ha=e recentl been de=eloped. 9ne of these relates to/00GC'C terminals with a bandwidth in the range & 7 ; /@. The other relates to /00 onl terminals with a bandwidth inthe range ;; B@ 7 & /@. The studies in !eport -;8 howe=er8 relate to narrow band satellite transmissions conforming to

ET0 T$! ,2. >urthermore8 the 2 '@ /00 networB pre=iousl considered was /E9 whereas the networB currentlunder consideration is '098 and ma use different tpes of terminals and higher power le=els. The report8 therefore8considers further compatibilit studies using the new ET0 standards8 to determine whether the principal findings of E!C!eport -; are still applicable.Editoria# /o""ent6 Te %arara% need& &o"e rei&ion. Te new ET+ &tandard& &o)#d be

na"ed and identi*ied. Te narrow band &tandard a& no #ower #i"it on te bandwidt. 'e%ort 5 )&e& te )nwanted

e"i&&ion& in T' 42: wi/ i& a%%#i/ab#e to +; and non-+; M++ &$&te"&<."

The 0EA/CAT files used for the calculations are a=ailable in a @ip7file at the www.ecodocdb.dB next to this !eport.

FRE!UENCY USAGE

-$1 % .= ban<

The different ser=ices in 2'@ and adFacent band s are illustrated in >igure &. The more detail situation for the /00 uplinB based on current ECC +ecision 6-(6&) is illustrated in figure 2. Dt should be noted that the ECC +ecision is under re=iew b ECC PT&



&536&526&566

T++ >++ :

/00GC'C

26&6 262; 2&&6

/00GC'C

2&6 2266

>++T++

/@

>08 00(E70) >08 00(07E)+ECT

ECC REPORT xxxPage 3

&i8:re 1 the serices>s;ste?s aro:n< the % .= ban<s$

&i8:re % nfor?ation abo:t the s;ste?s releant for the st:<ies in this Re7ort$

" SHARING SCENARIOS

The purpose of this !eport is to analse the conse?uences of the new ET0 standards for /00 Ts in &536726&6 /@ as

specified in %62 ;,72 (4ide band) and %62 ;,7% (*arrow band). $oth these two standards specif new conditions for the/00 T such as output power8 AC:! etc. This report contains technical studies of adFacent channel compatibilit between/00 terminals transmitting to a satellite in the band &536 H 26&6 /@ and adFacent channel /T0 ser=ices. DThe studiesin=ol=e higher power /00 terminals than those considered in E!C !eport -; which compl with the new ET00tandards.Editoria# note6 it a%%ear& tat 'e%ort 5 did not /on&ider in-band %ower< The satellite networB can also

operate in association with a Complementar 'round Component (C'C) pro=iding additional terrestrial co=erage8 and thedensit of the terminals could exceed that considered in !eport -;. DEditors note" :0 from PT& re?uests information whether the high power in /00 terminals are for satellite onl or also forC'C operation (4ho is to decide /00 operator or regulator) (ET0 E* %62 ;,72 does not preclude the usage of high power terminals together with C'C. Terminal densit will probabl be different if high power terminals also is aloud to

operate together with C'C.)

There are two different fre?uenc borders that are studied8 around &536 /@ and around 26&6.

• "cenario 1 M"" UT @1305%010 M.=A EC( '" @13%05130 M.=A H &)) o7eration

• "cenario % M"" UT @1305%010 M.=A EC( M" an< '" @%0105%0%* M.=A B T)) o7eration

>or the two scenarios the wide band and narrow band /00 Ts are studied both with deterministic anal@e8 /inimumCoupling :oss8 and /onte Carlo calculations.

0EA/CATI is used in this report to calculate the interference probabilit of /00 Ts into the terrestrial /T0 below&536 /@ and abo=e 26&6 /@.

The /inimum Coupling :oss method is used to analse the interference between stations without taBing dnamic aspectsinto account8 and pro=ides the necessar attenuation re?uired between the sstems to enable interference7free operation

under specified conditions. 0stems simulations pro=ide more detailed analsis with realistic dnamic aspects of thein=ol=ed sstems.




# METHODOLOGY

DEditors note" To included some intro text and a figure how the different compatibilit cases looB liBe.

>or the scenario & described in section %8 the $E/ of table && of CEPT !eport %5 is applicable to /00 T (at the &536

/@ boundar) and for the scenario 2 described section %8 the $E/ of table &2 of CEPT !eport %5 is applicable to /00T (at the 26&6 /@ boundar).Therefore8 the most stringent $E/ (table &2) has been applied. The consideration of those $E/ would co=er the impact to

unwanted emissions of the /00 T onl.Additionall to this topic8 this issue of blocBing of EC* $0 (scenarios & and 2) and /0 (scenario 2 onl) b the in7band power of the /00 T is also addressed8 since this issue depends on the expected power of T /00.

*$1 UMT" s;ste? characteristics an< 7ara?eters

The receier characteristics, s:ch as EC( #C", for the s;ste?s in the ban<s a<acent to the ban<s 1305%010 M.=

hae been taDen fro? the recentl; a77roe< Re7ort TU5R M$%0-35% as a basis$

Pro7ose< UMT" 7ara?eters for "E#MC#T si?:lations are liste< in #nnex xx$ E<itors note #nnex xx to be

<eelo7e<$F

5.1.1 FDD at 1980 MHz border

UMT" &)) '" 7ara?eters at fre9:enc; bor<er 130 M.=

Para?eter !al:e Unit

Channel central fre9:enc; 13//$% M.=

Channel ban<Gi<th -$4 M.=

Receier sensitiit; 510- <'?>-$4M.=

#lloGe< interference 5103 <'?>-$4M.=

Receier first a<acent #C" @HfI* M.=A 46 <'

Receier secon< a<acent #C" @HfI10 M.=A * <'

Receier antenna 8ain 13 <'i

!ecei=er antenna feeder loss % d$

Table - UMT" &)) base station 7ara?eters at 130 M.= bor<er$

5.1.2 TDD at 2010 MHz border

UMT" T)) '" 7ara?eters at fre9:enc; bor<er %010 M.=


Channel central fre9:enc; %01%$* M.=


Receier sensitiit; 510- <'?>-$4M.=

#lloGe< interference 5103 <'?>-$4M.=

Receier first a<acent #C" @HfI* M.=A 46 <'

Receier secon< a<acent #C" @HfI10 M.=A * <'


!ecei=er antenna feeder loss % d$

Table 4 UMT" T)) base station 7ara?eters at %010 M.= bor<er$

UMT" T)) UE 7ara?eters at fre9:enc; bor<er %010 M.=


Channel central fre9:enc; %01%$* M.=


Receier sensitiit; 533 <'?>-$4M.=

#lloGe< interference 510* <'?>-$4M.=Receier first a<acent #C" @HfI* M.=A -- <'

Receier secon< a<acent #C" @HfI10 M.=A 4- <'




ECC REPORT xxxPage &6

Table * UMT" T)) :ser e9:i7?ent 7ara?eters at %010 M.= bor<er$

*$% M"" Githin the ban< 1305%010 M.=, characteristics an< s;ste? 7ara?eters

Proposed /00 parameters for 0EA/CAT simulations are listed in Annex x. DEditors note" Annex x to be de=eloped.

5.2.1 EN 302 574-2 (wideband)

This standard applies to wideband Ts8 with channel bandwidth & /@ or greater. +ifferent power classes are defined8 asfollows"

Table 6 PoGer classes1 in E( -0% */45%$

Table 4 in E( -0% */45% shoGs the s7ectr:? e?ission ?asD re9:ire?ents$ The 7ara?eter H7 is :se< to scale the

relatie re9:ire?ents Gith increase< trans?it 7oGer$ ):e to the existence of the H7, <e7en<in8 on antenna 8ain thestan<ar< ?a; i?7l; <ifferent o:t of ban< e?issions for the sa?e ERP$ Therefore, Ge hae assesse< the nee< for a

8:ar< ban< :sin8 7aire< ERP antenna 8ain ass:?7tions$ Table / shoGs calc:late< #CLR al:es fro? the e?ission

?asD Ghen ass:?in8 a -$4 M.= Gi<e carrier in a * M.= channel$

1st a<acent channel %n< a<acent channel

7oGer class Calc:late< #CLR @<'A Calc:late< #CLR @<'A

1 -/$4 *0$4

1bis -/$4 *0$4

% -1$4 44$4

- %$4 41$4

Table / Calc:late< #CLR al:es fro? s7ectr:? e?ission ?asD$

0ection ,.2. of E* %62 ;,72 also contains a re?uired AC:! =alue for first and second adFacent channels. Table 3 showsthe specified =alues as for the calculated =alues in table . A comparison show a difference between AC:! calculated from

emission masB and specified AC:! of ,.- d$ for first adFacent and &.- d$ for second adFacent channel.


7oGer class AC:!(d$)

absolute(d$mG; /@)

AC:! (d$) absolute (d$mG;/@)

1% ,2 7% ;2 7&%

1bis2 ,2 75 ;2 7&5

% %- 75 ,- 7&5- %% 75 ,% 7&5

Table "7ecifie< M"" UT 7oGer in 1st an< %n< a<acent channels

$oth the deterministic calculations and the /onte Carlo simulations will use the spectrum emission masB. $ut since theresult will be a comparison between a terminal with 2, d$m output power and terminals using higher E!P =alues will thisAC:! difference ha=e no impact.Editoria# /o""ent6 +in/e te !,=' a#)e& in Tab#e 8 are te "ore &trinent: te&e

&o)#d be )&ed in te &tati&ti/a# ana#$&i&<

& Power class depends on the T transmit power. Corresponding E!P figure depends on the used antenna gain.2 f necessar a guard band ma be introduced. An necessar guard band here should be added to guard bandre?uirements in chapter ;.



ECC REPORT xxxPage &&

5.2.2 EN 302 574-3 (narrowband)

This standard applies to narrowband Ts8 defined as ha=ing a bandwidth less than & /@. The limits on the out7of7bandemissions from Ts are defined b the limits in Tables %a8 %b8 ,a and ,b in the standard. Tables %a and %b describes thelimits outside &536726&6 /@ band while tables ,a and ,b describes the limits inside the band &536726&6 /@. There areno limits for AC:!8 howe=er using the out7of7band emission limits it is possible to integrate the 99$ limits o=er the first8

second and third adFacent channels of ; /@ to effecti=el determine the maximum power in each channel. This is a

conser=ati=e approach in that it effecti=el assumes that the T 99$ emissions conform exactl to the defined limits foreach ; /@ channel. Table 3 shoGs calc:late< #CLR al:es Ghen :sin8 tables -a, -b an< 4a in the stan<ar< fortwo266 B@ ban<Gi<ths8 ;; B@ and & /@, an< ass:?in8 that these are locate< <irectl; a<acent to 130 M.=

bor<er @centre fre9:encies 130$0%/* M.= an< 130$* M.=A$ #<acent channel is ass:?e< to be sa?e as for table /$

#CLR ** %00 D.= carrier #CLR 1 M.= carrier

ERP @<'?A 1st a< @<'A %n< a<

@<'A

&"st adF (d$) 2"nd adF (d$)

-3 %5.2%-.- ,.5;%.2 %5., ;%.2

-- %%.2%6.- ,&.5,.2 %%., ,.2

%/ 2.22,.- %;.5,&.2 2., ,&.2

%4 2&.-2,.2 %2.5%3.2 2,., %3.2

Table 3 Calc:late< #CLR al:es fro? :nGante< e?ission al:es$

Editoria# note6 Te&e /a#/)#ated !,=' a#)e& need to be /e/ed. Te /a#/)#ation& in do/ +E40(111 ie di**erent

re&)#t&<

5.2.3 ntenna and ter!ina" t#$e%

n order to conduct these studies it is necessar to maBe assumptions about terminal antenna gain. <arious forms of userterminal are a=ailable for terrestrial or satellite communication and we ha=e assumed that 2 '@ user terminalswould de=elop similar characteristics of power le=el and liBel antenna gains. %' terminals used for terrestrial

communication in adFacent bands ha=e ?uite low antenna gains. owe=er8 the antenna gains for /00 tpe user terminals range from low to high. 9=erall8 we ha=e assumed the antenna gains as set out in the figure table &6 below as representati=e of current terminals. 4e used these in our analsis.

Tpe and held H terrestrialandGor satellite operation

PocBet H terrestrial andGorsatellite operation

*otebooB Hterrestrial andGorsatellite operation

Terminal

powerApproximate Antenna gains

2, d$m6d$ &6d$%5 d$m %6 d$m for *arrowband

/E0 %% d$m for 4ideband/E0&;d$

ApproximateAntenna gains

6d$i 6d$i &;d$i

Table 10 #ntenna 8ain to be :se< in st:<;$

Editoria# note6 te )&e o* te 24 d" ande#d ter"ina# in te &t)die& "a$ be reiewed. t i& &)e&ted to )&e ti& a& are*eren/e: b)t ti& doe& not re%re&ent rea# M++ o%eration&.<

The terminal tpe and mapping power class and hence also the linBed AC:! for the /00 T is without antennas. t istherefore important to consider the ade?uate AC:! for the stud cases of different antenna gain.

5.2.4 &adiated 'ower a%%!$tion% or M** t#$e %er ter!ina"%

ser terminals connecting with a C'C base station ma use a power of tpicall 2, d$m. owe=er8 the 2 '@ user terminals considered in this document need to connect to the satellite component8 which orbits at around %;8666Bm. /00 user terminals ha=ing a power of 2, d$m (i.e. the same as terrestrial operation) would not be capableof operating with a satellite. Therefore8 higher E!P is re?uired8 which usuall means there is an increase in theout of band emissions. The narrowband mode in the draft ET0 standard has stricter unwanted emissions limitsthan those for the wideband mode.

The wideband C'C user terminalJs out of band emission le=els increase with transmitter power and the standards indicatethat additional limitations such as guard bands ma appl to protect adFacent ser=ices.




>or user terminals that use the wideband signals8 we ha=e assessed whether or not there are guard band re?uirements to protect ser=ices in adFacent bands at &536 and 26&6/@. These guard bands for the proposed wideband mode/00 tpe user terminal is dependent on the E!P8 which comes from the combination of transmit power and theantenna gain. owe=er8 the wideband ET0 standard has a factor (Kp) reducing the permitted out of bandemissions for different transmit powers(!efer to wideband E* %62 ;,72). +ependent on the transmit powerL a

terminal might need to appl a better AC:!. This factor is not present in similar %'PP e?uipment standards.

+ue to the existence of the Kp factor8 depending on antenna gain the standard ma impl different out of band emissions for the same E!P. Therefore8 we ha=e assessed the need for a guard band using paired E!P antenna gain

assumptions. t is assumed for these assessment of the out of band emissions that a terminal with a radiated E!P power up toof ,6d$m %5d$m might use an omni antenna with 6d$i gain of up to &6d$ and that a user terminalwith an E!P of ;&d$m ,3d$m might use an antenna gain of up to &; d$i.

>or user terminals that use narrowband signals we ha=e assessed the adFacent band edge compatibilit b assuming that a/00 tpe user terminal might ha=e a maximum E!P of %5,6 d$m (with &6d$ antenna gain) or an E!P;&d$m ,;d$m (with &;d$ib antenna gain) to be capable of communication with the satellite component. 4eha=e assessed an re?uirement for guard bands on this basis.

5.2.5 +,anne" $"an% at t,e band ede%

This section outlines the channel plans at the band edges for the /00.

There are two ET0 standards for the /00GC'C user terminals8 one using narrowband signals for satellite use and the other

for wideband signals for satellite or C'C use. $oth ET0 standards ha=e a range of bandwidths within whichmanufacturers and operators can de=elop their networBs. The narrow band terminal bandwidths are from ;; B@to & /@8 the wideband terminals bandwidths from & /@ to ; /@.

>or &536 /@ band edge the channelling of 2'@ terminals adFacent to mobile ser=ices could be" 7

&536 /@ /00 wideband" ;/@ e?uipment centre fre?uencies (/@)

&532.; &53.; Etc.

&536 /@ /00 wideband &/@" e?uipment centre fre?uencies (/@)

&536.; &53&.; Etc.

&536 /@ /00 *arrowband &/@ " e?uipment centre fre?uencies (/@)

&536.; &53&.; Etc.

&536 /@ /00 *arrowband ;;B@ " e?uipment centre fre?uencies (/@)

&536.62; &536.632; Etc.

Table 11

>or 26&6 /@ band edge the channelling of 2'@ terminals adFacent to mobile ser=ices could be" 7

26&6 /@ /00 wideband" ;/@ e?uipment centre fre?uencies (/@)

266.; 2662.; Etc.

26&6 /@ /00 wideband &/@" e?uipment centre fre?uencies (/@)

2665.; 2663.; Etc.

26&6 /@ /00 *arrowband &/@ " e?uipment centre fre?uencies (/@)

2665.; 2663.; Etc.

26&6 /@ /00 *arrowband ;;B@ " e?uipment centre fre?uencies (/@)

2665.52 2665.5& Etc.

Table 1%

Editoria# note6 te aboe tab#e& &o)#d be rei&ed: a& we are )&in M++ bandwidt& o* 200 Hz and 5 MHz<



ECC REPORT xxxPage &%

*$- Pro7a8ation ?o<els

5.3.1 Deter!ini%ti. .a%e

The propagation model will be the path loss model for outdoor to indoor and pedestrian test en=ironment gi=en in 0ection&.&.2 of Appendix & to Annex 2 of !ecommendation T7! /.&22;.

This is expressed as"

: M ,6 :og&6 ! N %6 :og&6f N ,5 (&)

4here" ! M path length (Bm)

f M fre?uenc (/@)

:M loss (d$)

5.3.2 Monte +ar"o %i!"ation

DEditors note" add text for extended ata model used in 0EA/CAT

*$4 )eter?inistic anal;sis

5.4.1 Met,odo"o#

The basic methodolog for this exercise is presented in a report b the European !adio communications Committee (E!C)within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT)&2, and the same definitions

appl.

>igure % below illustrates the basic concept of AC. 9n the one hand8 interference is caused to the =ictim recei=er b out7of7band emissions from the adFacent sstem (blue shaded area on the right of the figure). The AdFacent Channel :eaBage

!atio (AC:!) ?uantifies the degree to which this taBes place.

A second source of interference is the =ictim recei=erJs abilit to reFect signals in the adFacent channel otherwise Bnown asthe AdFacent Channel 0electi=it (AC0). This is illustrated b the red shaded area (left hand shaded area) in >igure %.

4hen considering the adFacent channel interference between two adFacent sstems the AC:! of the interferer and the AC0of the =ictim recei=er should be combined to gi=e the o=erall AdFacent Channel nterference !atio (AC!) using theformula below"

AC! M &G(&GAC:! N &GAC0) (2)

AC! is a measure of the combined interference due to the out7of7band emissions of a transmitter and the non7idealselecti=it of the recei=er. t is a measure of the degree of isolation between adFacent sstems and represents the degree of protection afforded to the recei=er.

The formula shows that where one of the factors in the e?uation is much less than the other then it will tend to limit theo=erall AC! performance of the sstem. This is also e=ident from >igure %8 where the total interfering power is thecombination of the two shaded areas. f one is =er much greater than the other then it will dominate the AC performance

between the two sstems. f8 for example8 the AC:! is &6d$ lower than the AC08 then the o=erall AC! will onl be 6.,d$worse than the AC:!.



ECC REPORT xxxPage &,

&i8:re -

$ased on current %' terminal and base station characteristics we ha=e calculated the separation distance re?uired between atransmitting %' terminal with output power of 2, d$m and antenna gain of 6 d$ and a base station recei=ing on an adFacentchannel separated b ; /@. This distance is 22% metres. Conse?uentl8 in comparing C'C compatibilit with adFacent band %' ser=ices8 the additional margin is compared to that at 22% metres.

To assess adFacent band compatibilit it is necessar to determine the AC:! and AC0 and combine them to deri=e AC! asdescribed in 0ection ,.&.&.G,.&.2. as stated8 we assume AC0 =alues of ,- and ;3 d$ for separations of ; /@ and &6 /@.The AC:! of the terminals can be calculated b integrating the out of band emissions taBen from the rele=ant ET0

standard E* %62 ;,72 or E* %62 ;,7%.>or a %&d$m 2,d$m E!P wideband ; /@ terminal (2,%& d$m transmit power with 6 d$i gain antenna)8 a numericalintegration of the wideband out of band emission masB leads to an E!P in the first ; %.3, /@ channel of a %'PP tpesstem adFacent to &536 /@ (centred on &5.2 /@)"

9ut of $and E!P M 7.%7;.% d$m

The AC:! is the ratio of wanted E!P to the unwanted E!P in the adFacent channel. Thus"

AC:! M %& 2, H (7.%7;.%) d$

M %3.%25.%d$

sing this method8 AC:! =alues ha=e been deri=ed for /00 /0 E!P =alues of 2,8 %5%&8 ,6 and ;& ,3G,; d$m assuming

antenna gains of 68 6 8 &6 and &; d$ respecti=el (as assumed in 0ection %.&,.2.%).

At both the &536 /@ and 26&6 /@ boundar8 the gap between the edge of the /00 band and the first potential %'PPchannel is reduced in/rea&ed< b %66 B@ or 500 Hz< gi=ing slightl higher compared to the &536 /@ boundar. n

this case the AC:! =alues. are slightl lower. The AC:! for the &536 and 26&6 /@ boundaries (%' centred on &5.2and 26&2.; /@ respecti=el) are shown in the Table , below.

5.4.2 %%!$tion%

Dn the analsis we will assume that since existing /T0 networBs can coordinate successfull with each other8 we need toensure that we achie=e the same margin with the higher power /00 terminals. This will be achie=ed b introducing afre?uenc separation between the edge of the /00 channel and the &536 or 26&6 /@ band edge.Editoria# note6 te idea

ere o* )&in te /oordination o* two >MT+ networ& a& a /riterion *or te a&&e&&"ent o* inter*eren/e *ro" M++ i& )nder

di&/)&&ion<

D4e also assume worst case positioning of the /00 terminal and /T0 base station such that the base station is located inthe bore sight of the /00 terminal antenna and the /00 terminal is located in the bore sight of the base station antenna.Conse?uentl8 the coupling between the antennas is subFect to the maximum gain of both antennas $ [Editorial comment:

te wor&t /a&e *or te deter"ini&ti/ and "onte-/ar#o ana#$&e& need to be *)rter de&/ribed <



ECC REPORT xxxPage &;

5.4.3 dditiona" !et,odo"o#/ 2&e%"t%

!esults from a deterministic analsis are contained in Annex D;.T$+

*$* Monte5Carlo an< "E#MC#T con<itions

5.5.1 E+N re"eant *EM+T re.eier $ara!eter%

DEditors note" The ellow marBed text shoud be further de=eloped.The EC* design and recei=er parameters are from the T7! /26%572. The rele=ant 0EA/CAT =ictim recei=er parameters (including cell si@e8 antenna gain8 heights8 carrier fre?uenc assumptions etc.) could be extrapolated from thisspecification. Proposed parameters for 0EA/CAT simulations are listed in Annex ,xx.

5.5.2 Met,odo"o#

n section for deterministic methodolog adFacent band compatibilit between /00 /obile Earth 0tations operating withinthe band &536 7 26&6 /@ and %'PP tpe base stations operating below &536 /@ and abo=e 26&6 /@ has been analsed. These studies suggested the need for a fre?uenc separation within the /00 band8 in which

terminals would not be able to connect to the satellite component in order to protect the base stations. Thissection uses a statistical /onte7Carlo analsis using the CEPT 0EA/CAT analsis tool.

>or simplicit we ha=e used a worst7case analsis using %'PP centre fre?uencies of &5.2; and 26&2.3; and assumed thatthe results at both band edges will be e?ui=alent. Editoria# /o""ent6 te )%%er /anne# *re)en/$ i& 2013

MHz<

n performing the /onte7Carlo analsis we ha=e assumed a densit of acti=e /00 terminals e?ui=alent to either one or fi=e/00 terminals per 566 Bm2 for the rural case and one /00 terminal per 5 Bm% for the urban caseone per /T0

cell. This is considered to represent a worst7case scenario as described in ECC !eport ,;.

DEditors note" Agreement is needed for scenarios and parameters to use. The earlier 9fcom proposal was to onl stud therural case (moti=ated b" in urban areas are C'C more liBel). ECC PT& :0 re?uested someinformationGanswers regarding high power terminal usage connected to C'C $0. !e?uested information fromECC PT& ma re?uire that also other scenarios are studied

The studied scenarios are summarised in Table &%.

ETSI Standard E* %62 ;,72

(4ideband sstems)

E* %62 ;,7%

(*arrowband sstems)

MSS bandwidth ; /@& /@

& /@266 B@;; B@

EIRP (dBm) ,62, ;&%5 ,3,6;&

,62, ;&%5 ,6,;;&

Frequencyseparation3

6 H &6- /@

(& /@ steps)6 H - /@ /@(& /@ steps)

6 H ; &6 /@ /@

(& /@ steps)6 H ; /@ /@(& /@ steps)

Table 1-

Editoria# /o""ent6 &ee /o""ent aboe reardin )&e o* 24 d" eir% ME+&<

$ CALCULATION ANALYSIS AND RESULTS

6$1 ";ste?s beloG 130 M.=

DEditors note" text to be added.

% >re?uenc separation is between the edge of the /00 channel and the edge of the band at 26&6/@ or &536 /@.



ECC REPORT xxxPage &-

6.1.1 *b re%"t% ro! deter!ini%ti. %td#

The deterministic stud is performed as described in ,.,.&.

DEditors note" Added text here should be di=ided between sections ;.&.&. and ;.2.&. 'i=en text is from Annex , of 9ctober26&6 0E,6 meeting and is regarded as preliminar. <alues in blacB are 9fcom calculated and =alues in red arecalculated b Ericsson.

2i<eban< ME"

The calc:late< #CLR for the 130 an< %010 M.= bo:n<aries @- centre< on 13//$% an< %01%$3; M.= res7ectiel;A

are shoGn in the Table 14 beloG

Boundary MTS channe!centre

"requency(M#$)

MSS EIRP(dBm)

EIRP in recei%er channe!(dBm)

&'R (dB)

*+, M#$ *--./

F00

/1 -5.3 2.1-5.3 29.3 /*.129.3

391 -7.3 2.10.7 38.3 34.38.34

180 1.7 1.49.7 38.3 3.138.3

51 12.7 /.4 38.3 3+.1

/,, M#$ /,/.+

T00

/1 -5.3-4.2 -4.4 29.328.2 /+.1

391 0.7-6.2 -4.4 38.337.2 3.1

180 9.72.8 5.6 38.337.2 31.1

51 13.8 13.6 37.2 37.4

Table 14Editoria# /o""ent6 Te&e !,=' a#)e& need to be /e/ed: tain into a//o)nt tat te >MT+ /anne# /entre *re)en/$ i&

2013 MHz<

[Editors comment: the difference between Ofcom nd Ericsson !"#es in tb"e 14 is $robb"% d#e tohow &$ is #sed. '(reement hs to be mde if &$ sho#"d be #sed ccordin( to ct#" #sedtermin" $ower "e!e" or to needed termin" $ower c"ss when #sed to(ether with n e)tern"ntenn.*

2e can noG calc:late #CR al:es base< on the #C" al:e of 46 <' for * M.= se7aration of :sin8 the ?etho<

<escribe< in "ection 4$4$1$ &or the 130 M.= bo:n<ar;, the fre9:enc; se7aration is *$- M.=$ n this case

a al:e of #C" has been calc:late< b; linear inter7olation betGeen the al:es of 46 an< * <' for

se7arations of * M.= an< 10 M.=$



ECC REPORT xxxPage &

BoundaryMSS EIRP

(dBm)'5' &'R

(dB)MTS &'S

(dB)&'IR (dB)

*+, M#$F00

24 29.329.3 /*.146.7 14.446.729.2 /*.329.2

3139 38.338.3 34.146.746.7 14.437.7 34.,37.7

4048 38.338.3 3.146.746.7 14.437.7 3.37.7

51 38.3 3+.1 46.7 14.4 37.7 3-.+

/,,M#$

T00

24 29.328.2 /+.1 46.746 14 29.228.2 /+.3

3139 38.337.2 3.1 46.746 14 37.736.7 3.,

4048 38.337.2 31.1 46.746 14 37.736.7 31.

51 37.2 37.4 46 46 36.7 36.8

Table 1*

The 7ro7a8ation ?o<el Gas :se< to calc:late a<<itional isolation re9:ire< at 22% &55 ?etre, the se7aration <istance

c:rrentl; re9:ire< betGeen a trans?ittin8 - ter?inal Gith o:t7:t 7oGer of %4 <'? an< antenna 8ain of 0 <' i an<

a base station with &; d$i antenna gain receiin8 on an a<acent channel se7arate< b; * M.=$ This calc:lation Gas

base< on a ?axi?:? interference 7oGer of 5103 <'? as 8ien in "ections 4$1$1>4$1$%$Editoria# /o""ent6 a& noted

aboe: te )&e o* a 24 d" a& a re*eren/e i& &o"etin wi/ need& *)rter /on&ideration<

The table also shoGs the re9:ire< fre9:enc; se7aration to achiee co?7atibilit;$ This Gas calc:late< b; chan8in8

the centre fre9:enc; of the M"" channel aGa; fro? the ban< e<8e in s?all ste7s$ #t each ste7 a ?o<ifie< al:e of

#CLR Gas calc:late< b; the inte8ration 7roce<:re 7reio:sl; <escribe< an< a reise< al:e of #C" Gas calc:late<

:sin8 the inter7olation 7roce<:re$ &ro? these al:es the a<<itional isolation Gas calc:late< as before$ '; re7eatin8

this 7roce<:re at each fre9:enc; ste7, the total shift in fre9:enc; at Ghich no a<<itional isolation Gas re9:ire< Gas

locate<$

MTS'hanne

!

MSS EIRP(dBm)

&dditiona!iso!ation

needed at//3 ** m

(dB)

FrequencySeparation

(M#$)

*--./ M#$F00

24 2 0 ,03139 5.6-2.5 30 ,

4048 14.66.5 73.3 1.,

51 17.5 8.3 +.3

/,/.+M#$T00

24 - 0.3 ,.30

3139 5.6-0.5 30 ,.3

4048 14.68.5 73.9 1.

51 19.5 +, 9.0

Table 16




The impro=ed margin at %& d$m compared to 2, d$m is due to an additional out of band restriction in the ET0 standardthat is applied for higher power terminals. Additionall8 since the channel spacing between the adFacent /00 and %'channels is increased b %66 B@ relati=e to the normal ; /@ spacing8 there is an additional & d$ of margin at 2, d$mE!P.

*arrowband /E0

*arrowband user terminals compling with E* %62 ;,7% are primaril intended to operate towards a satellite. Terminalscan operate at ;; B@ to &/@. The standard E* %62 ;,7% has two applicable masBs. 9ne is an absolute masB for E!P=alues up to N&; d$4 (N,; d$m) independent of bandwidth or a bandwidth dependent masB. /anufacturers can opt foreither masB. owe=er8 as the narrow band standard depends mainl on spurious emissions8 there shouldnJt be much

difference between the two cases. 4ith increased power8 the standard re?uires an impro=ed adFacent channel leaBage ratioat the band edges &536 and 26&6/@.$ased on a bandwidth dependent masB for & /@ and ;;266 B@ bandwidth signal and using the numerical integration ofthe out of band and spurious emission masB against an /T0 channel in the adFacent band below &536 /@ and abo=e26&6 /@ we ha=e calculated the AC:! =alues as follows"

MSS Bandwidth6 M/,, 7#$ MSS Bandwidth6 7#$

Boundary MSS EIRP(dBm)

EIRP inrecei%er channe!(dBm)

&'R (dB) EIRP inrecei%e

r channe!(dBm)

&'R (dB)

*+, M#$ 3124 -2.6-2.9 -3.8 26.633.9 34.8 -2.6 -3.5 33.6 34.5

4039 -2.6-2.9 -3.8 41.642.9 43.8 -2.6 -3.5 42.6 43.5

5145 -2.6-2.9 -3.8 47.653.9 54.8 -2.6 -3.5 53.6 54.5

/,, M#$ 3124 -2.62.3 -0.3 26.628.7 31.3 2.4 -0.1 28.6 31.1

4039 -2.62.3 -0.3 41.637.7 40.3 2.4 -0.1 37.6 40.1

5145 -2.62.3 -0.3 47.648.7 51.3 2.4 -0.1 48.6 51.1

Table 1/Editoria# /o""ent6 te !=,' a#)e& need to be /e/ed<

To calc:late the #CR al:es Ge nee< s:itable al:es for #C"$ The ass:?7tions fro? "ection 4$1$&7% are 46 an< *

<' for carrier se7arations of * M.= an< 10 M.=$ The same =alues are assumed to be =alid for both a narrowband and a

wide band interfererowe=er8 in this case since the /00 bandwidth is no longer ; /@8 the separation will not be ; or &6/@. As a worBing assumption we ha=e used a linear interpolationGextrapolation process using the =alues for ; and &6/@ to deri=e the =alues assumed in the calculations$ #CR is then calc:late< :sin8 the ?etho< <escribe< in "ection

4$%$1$




MSS Bandwidth6 /,, M7#$ MSS Bandwidth6 7#$


&'S (dB) &'IR (dB) &'S (dB) &'IR (dB)

*+, M#$ 2431 41.9 41.946 26.533.2 34.0 40.8 40.8 32.8 33.6

3940 41.9 41.946 40.339.4 39.7 40.8 40.8 38.6 38.9

4551 41.9 41.946 43.741.7 41.7 40.8 40.8 40.6 40.6

/,, M#$ 2431 41.2 41.246 26.528.5 30.9 40.1 40.1 28.3 30.6

3940 41.2 41.246 40.336.1 37.7 40.1 40.1 35.7 37.1

4551 41.2 41.246 43.740.5 40.8 40.1 40.1 39.5 39.8

Table 1

The 7ro7a8ation ?o<el Gas :se< to calc:late a<<itional isolation re9:ire< at 22% &55 ?etre, the se7aration <istance

c:rrentl; re9:ire< betGeen a trans?ittin8 - ter?inal Gith o:t7:t 7oGer of %4 <'? an< antenna 8ain of 0 <' an<

a base station receiin8 on an a<acent channel se7arate< b; * M.=$ The table also shoGs the re9:ire< fre9:enc;

se7aration to achiee co?7atibilit;$ This is base< on a ?axi?:? interference 7oGer of 5103 <'? as 8ien in "ection

4$1$1>4$1$%$

MSS Bandwidth6 M/,, 7#$ MSS Bandwidth6 7#$


&dditiona!iso!ation

needed at//3m**m

(dB)

Frequencyseparation

(M#$)

'ddition"iso"tionneededt 223m

(dB)

Frequencyseparation

(M#$)

*+, M#$ 2431 1.93.7 1.251.0 ,.+ 2.3 1.4 .3

3940 4.86.8 3.11.7 .- 5.6 2.2 /./

4551 13.511.0 5.66.3 4.3 14.6 6.8 4.+

/,, M#$ 2431-$/7.5

1.251.4 ./ 7.6 1.9 .-

39406$8.9

3.12.5 /. 9.3 3.0 3.,

4551 11.015.5 5.67.1 -. 16.5 7.6 -.4

Table 13

6.1.2*b re%"t% ro! !et,od 2 deter!ini%ti. %td#

!esults from a deterministic analsis are contained in Annex D;




6.1.3 *b re%"t% ro! Monte +ar"o %i!"ation%

Editoria# note6 Monte-,ar#o &i")#ation& ae been %er*or"ed b$ Eri/&&on: n"ar&at and te E,;. F)rter wor i&

anti/i%ated in a /orre&%onden/e ro)% to re&o#e te di**eren/e& between te re&)#t&. Te %re#i"inar$ re&)#t& in

ti& &e/tion "a$ need to be rei&ed a//ordin#$.<

The /onte Carlo simulations are performed as described in ,.;.

4ideband /E0

Urban "cenario Gith one interferin8 Gi<eban< ME" 7er 3 D?2 The below graph shows /T0 sstem degradation as a function of guard band for % different /E0 power le=els (2, d$m8%5 d$m and %% d$m N &; d$i antenna). DAs comparison8 the degradation between 2 adFacent /T0 urban networBssimulated with %; users per cell is O& for the uplinB.Editoria# /o""ent6 ti& idea o* )&in te /a%a/it$ #o&& between two

>MT+ networ& a& a re*eren/e i& &)b?e/t to di&/)&&ion and reiew. * it )& )&ed: te 1@ a#)e wo)#d need &o"e

?)&ti*i/ation<

The /T0 uplinB capacit loss for single /00 terminal transmitting with 2, d$m as interferer is - without an guardseparation. This =alue is substantiall higher than between 2 /T0 networBs. This is due to the used power control in/T0 networBs. $oth /00 terminals using %5 and ,3 d$m E!P le=els ha=e higher degradation and re?uire a guardseparation to reduce the capacit loss to same le=el as the /00 terminal using 2, d$m E!P. The terminal using %5 d$m

E!P re?uires O%.; /@ fre?uenc separation and the ,3 d$m terminal re?uires O6.; /@ separation. The reason for thisis that the ,3 d$m terminal uses a directi=e antenna pointing somewhat upwards while the %5 d$m terminal uses an 9mniantenna.

R:ral "cenario @4$-- D? cell ra<i:sA Gith one interferin8 Gi<eban< ME" 7er 300 D?2 The below graph shows /T0 sstem degradation as a function of guard band for % different /E0 power le=els (2, d$m8

%5 d$m and %% d$m N &; d$i antenna). DAs comparison8 the degradation between 2 adFacent /T0 rural networBssimulated with %; users per cell is O2 for the uplinB. Editoria# /o""ent6 ti& idea o* )&in te /a%a/it$ #o&& between

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 84

4.5

5

5.5

6

6.5

7

7.5

8

Guard band [MHz]

C a p a c i t y l o s s [ % ]

Urban UMTS macro BS degradation from 1 MES per 9 sqrt km

24dBm EIRP

39dBm EIRP

48dBm EIRP



ECC REPORT xxxPage 2&

two >MT+ networ& a& a re*eren/e i& &)b?e/t to di&/)&&ion and reiew. * it )& )&ed: te 2@ a#)e wo)#d need &o"e

?)&ti*i/ation<

The /T0 uplinB capacit loss for single /00 terminal transmitting with 2, d$m as interferer is -.- without an guardseparation. This =alue is substantiall higher than between 2 /T0 networBs. This is due to the used power control in/T0 networBs. $oth /00 terminals using %5 and ,3 d$m E!P le=els ha=e higher degradation and re?uire a guardseparation to reduce the capacit loss to same le=el as the /00 terminal using 2, d$m E!P. The terminal using %5 d$mE!P re?uires O%.- /@ fre?uenc separation and the ,3 d$m terminal re?uires O&.; /@ separation. The reason for thisis that the ,3 d$m terminal uses a directi=e antenna pointing somewhat upwards while the %5 d$m terminal uses an 9mni

antenna.

R:ral "cenario @4$-- D? cell ra<i:sA Gith fie interferin8 Gi<eban< ME" 7er 300 D?2 The below graph shows /T0 sstem degradation as a function of guard band for % different /E0 power le=els (2, d$m8%5 d$m and %% d$m N &; d$i antenna). DAs comparison8 the degradation between 2 adFacent /T0 rural networBssimulated with %; users per cell is O2 for the uplinB. Editoria# /o""ent6 ti& idea o* )&in te /a%a/it$ #o&& between

two >MT+ networ& a& a re*eren/e i& &)b?e/t to di&/)&&ion and reiew. * it )& )&ed: te 2@ a#)e wo)#d need &o"e

?)&ti*i/ation<

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 85.5

6

6.5

7

7.5

8

8.5

9

Guard band [MHz]

C

a p a c i t y l o s s [ % ]

Rural UMTS macro BS (4.33 km) degradation from 1 MES per 900 sqrt km

24dBm EIRP39dBm EIRP

48dBm EIRP



ECC REPORT xxx

The /T0 uplinB capacit loss for fi=e /00 terminal transmitting with 2, d$m as interferer is &6 without an guardseparation. This =alue is substantiall higher than between 2 /T0 networBs. This is due to the used power control in/T0 networBs. $oth /00 terminals using %5 and ,3 d$m E!P le=els ha=e higher degradation and re?uire a guard

separation to reduce the capacit loss to same le=el as the /00 terminal using 2, d$m E!P. The terminal using %5 d$mE!P re?uires O%. /@ fre?uenc separation and the ,3 d$m terminal re?uires O2.& /@ separation. The reason for thisis that the ,3 d$m terminal uses a directi=e antenna pointing somewhat upwards while the %5 d$m terminal uses an 9mniantenna. 9ne noticeable change when increasing the number of interferer is that the re?uired guard for %5 d$m terminals isroughl the same while the re?uired guard increases for the ,3 d$m terminal. This is due to the increased probabilit withmore interferer that the ,3 d$m terminals directi=e antenna main lobe falls within the main lobe of the =ictim /T0 $0

antenna.

R:ral "cenario @ D? cell ra<i:sA Gith one interferin8 Gi<eban< ME" 7er 300 D?2 The below graph shows /T0 sstem degradation as a function of guard band for % different /E0 power le=els (2, d$m8%5 d$m and %% d$m N &; d$i antenna). As comparison8 the degradation between 2 adFacent /T0 rural networBs

simulated with %; users per cell is O& for the uplinB.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 85

10

15

20

Guard band [MHz]


Rural UMTS macro BS (4.33 km) degradation from 5 MES per 900 sqrt km

24dBm EIRP

39dBm EIRP

48dBm EIRP



ECC REPORT xxxPage 2%

The /T0 uplinB capacit loss for single /00 terminal transmitting with 2, d$m as interferer is ;.; without an guardseparation. This =alue is substantiall higher than between 2 /T0 networBs. This is due to the used power control in/T0 networBs. $oth /00 terminals using %5 and ,3 d$m E!P le=els ha=e higher degradation and re?uire a guard

separation to reduce the capacit loss to same le=el as the /00 terminal using 2, d$m E!P. The terminal using %5 d$mE!P re?uires O%.; /@ fre?uenc separation and the ,3 d$m terminal re?uires O2., /@ separation. The reason for thisis that the ,3 d$m terminal uses a directi=e antenna pointing somewhat upwards while the %5 d$m terminal uses an 9mniantenna.

R:ral "cenario @ D? cell ra<i:sA Gith fie interferin8 Gi<eban< ME" 7er 300 D?2 The below graph shows /T0 sstem degradation as a function of guard band for % different /E0 power le=els (2, d$m8

%5 d$m and %% d$m N &; d$i antenna). As comparison8 the degradation between 2 adFacent /T0 rural networBssimulated with %; users per cell is O& for the uplinB.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 84.5

5

5.5

6

6.5

7

7.5

Guard band [MHz]


Rural UMTS macro BS (8 km) degradation from 1 MES per 900 sqrt km

24dBm EIRP

39dBm EIRP

48dBm EIRP



ECC REPORT xxxPage 2,

The /T0 uplinB capacit loss for fi=e /00 terminal transmitting with 2, d$m as interferer is 5.2 without an guard

separation. This =alue is substantiall higher than between 2 /T0 networBs. This is due to the used power control in/T0 networBs. $oth /00 terminals using %5 and ,3 d$m E!P le=els ha=e higher degradation and re?uire a guardseparation to reduce the capacit loss to same le=el as the /00 terminal using 2, d$m E!P. The terminal using %5 d$mE!P re?uires O%. /@ fre?uenc separation and the ,3 d$m terminal re?uires O2.& /@ separation. The reason for thisis that the ,3 d$m terminal uses a directi=e antenna pointing somewhat upwards while the %5 d$m terminal uses an 9mniantenna.

Concl:sions

/+ de(rdtion from f#"" $ower 24 d,m / termin" s#bstnti""% hi(her thn between 2 /+networs #sin( $ower contro".

s(e of 39 d,m / termin"s re#ires (#rd of 3.5-3.7 / com$red to 24 d,m /termin"s for sme de(rdtion of the /+ #$"in.

s(e of 33 d,m / termin"s 15 d,i directi!e ntenn re#ires (#rd of 0.5-2.4 /com$red to 24 d,m / termin"s for sme de(rdtion of the /+ #$"in.

DT$+

*arrowband /E0

6$% ";ste?s aboe %010 M.=

DEditors note" text to be added.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 84

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Guard band [MHz]


Rural UMTS macro BS (8 km) degradation from 5 MES per 900 sqrt km

24dBm EIRP

39dBm EIRP

48dBm EIRP



ECC REPORT xxxPage 2;

6.2.1 *b re%"t% ro! deter!ini%ti. %td#

>or the #.

6.2.2 *b re%"t% ro! Monte +ar"o %i!"ation%

6$- "ensitiit; anal;sis

DEditors note" text to be added.This section gi=es an analsis on different assumptions8 parameters and factors that ha=e been considered in the stud.

6.3.1 Freen.# $"annin between ++ and M** $"in

% CONCLUSIONS

DEditors note" conclusions to be added.>or the band below &536 /@ ##.

>or the band abo=e 26&6 /@ #

ANNEX 1& SPECIFICATION FOR ETSI STANDARDS BELO' 1980 MHZ

#1$1 ntro<:ction



ECC REPORT xxxPage 2-

ANNEX 2& SPECIFICATION FOR ETSI STANDARDS ABOVE 2010 MHZ

(?bn?b?bn?




ANNEX & SPECIFICATION FOR ETSI MSS ES STANDARDS BET'EEN 1980 - 2010 MHZ

.




ANNEX "&SIMULATION PARAMETERS AND SCENARIOS

n both scenarios8 when studing the urban en=iromnent8 it is assumed that the C'C networB will carr the maFor part of

the load reducing the number of acti=e /00 Ts transmitting to the satellite to onl &.

"cenario 1 M"" UT @1305%010 M.=A EC( '" @13%05130 M.=A B &))

o7eration

Scenario 1.1 : Wideband MSS

0cenario &.&.& " 4ideband /00 7Q EC* $0 in rural en=ironment (/acro cell)

7 & igh gain terminal transmitting at full power to the satellite in %6x%6 BmR7 ; igh gain terminals transmitting at full power to the satellite in %6x%6 BmR operating co7fre?uenc

(assuming C+/A) 7 T$C7 & :ow gain terminal transmitting at full power to the satellite in %6x%6 BmR

7 ; :ow gain terminals transmitting at full power to the satellite in %6x%6 BmR operating co7fre?uenc(assuming C+/A) 7 T$C

7 EC* terminals per EC* cell determined b 0EA/CAT for the full loaded sstem

0cenario &.&.2 " 4ideband /00 7Q EC* $0 in urban en=ironment (/acro cell)

7 & igh gain terminal transmitting at full power to the satellite in %x% BmR7 & :ow gain terminal transmitting at full power to the satellite in %x% BmR

0cenario &.&.% " 4ideband /00 7Q EC* $0 in urban en=ironment (/icro cell)


0cenario &.&., " 4ideband /00 7Q EC* $0 in urban en=ironment (Pico cell)

7 & igh gain terminal transmitting at full power to the satellite in %x% BmR

7 & :ow gain terminal transmitting at full power to the satellite in %x% BmR

Scenario 1.2 : Narrowband MSS

0cenario &.2.& " *arrowband /00 7Q EC* $0 in rural en=ironment (/acro cell)

7 & igh gain terminal transmitting at full power to the satellite in %6x%6 BmR (no C+/A used)7 & :ow gain terminal transmitting at full power to the satellite in %6x%6 BmR (no C+/A used)




0cenario &.2.2 " *arrowband /00 7Q EC* $0 in urban en=ironment (/acro cell)


0cenario &.2.% " *arrowband /00 7Q EC* $0 in urban en=ironment (/icro cell)


0cenario &.2., " *arrowband /00 7Q EC* $0 in urban en=ironment (Pico cell)


"cenario % M"" UT @1305%010 M.=A EC( M" an< '" @%0105%0%* M.=A BT)) o7eration

Assuming that there is no difference between the users load of >++ and T++ networBs8 the figures for the number of

=ictim /0 terminals should be deri=ed from table A of E!C !eport -; reported below"

4ith regards to the number of /00 terminals transmitting to the satellite8 the following scenarios should be considered"

Scenario 2.1 : Wideband MSS

0cenario 2.&.& " 4ideband /00 7Q EC* $0 in rural en=ironment (/acro cell)

7 & igh gain terminal transmitting at full power to the satellite in %6x%6 BmR7 ; igh gain terminals transmitting at full power to the satellite in %6x%6 BmR operating co7fre?uenc

(assuming C+/A) 7 T$C7 & :ow gain terminal transmitting at full power to the satellite in %6x%6 BmR



ECC REPORT xxxPage %6

7 ; :ow gain terminals transmitting at full power to the satellite in %6x%6 BmR operating co7fre?uenc(assuming C+/A) 7 T$C

0cenario 2.&.2 " 4ideband /00 7Q EC* $0 in urban en=ironment (/acro cell)



0cenario 2.&.% " 4ideband /00 7Q EC* $0 in urban en=ironment (/icro cell)



0cenario 2.&., " 4ideband /00 7Q EC* $0 in urban en=ironment (Pico cell)


Scenario 2.2 : Narrowband MSS

0cenario 2.2.& " *arrowband /00 7Q EC* $0 in rural en=ironment (/acro cell)

7 & igh gain terminal transmitting at full power to the satellite in %6x%6 BmR (no C+/A used)7 & :ow gain terminal transmitting at full power to the satellite in %6x%6 BmR (no C+/A used)

0cenario 2.2.2 " *arrowband /00 7Q EC* $0 in urban en=ironment (/acro cell)



0cenario 2.2.% " *arrowband /00 7Q EC* $0 in urban en=ironment (/icro cell)



0cenario 2.2., " *arrowband /00 7Q EC* $0 in urban en=ironment (Pico cell)


Scenario 2.3 : Wideband MSS -> ECN BS

0cenario 2.%.& " 4ideband /00 7Q EC* $0 in rural en=ironment (/acro cell)

0cenario 2.%.2 " 4ideband /00 7Q EC* $0 in urban en=ironment (/acro cell)

0cenario 2.%.% " 4ideband /00 7Q EC* $0 in urban en=ironment (/icro cell)

0cenario 2.%., " 4ideband /00 7Q EC* $0 in urban en=ironment (Pico cell)

Scenario 2.4 : Narrowband MSS -> ECN BS

0cenario 2.,.& " *arrowband /00 7Q EC* $0 in rural en=ironment (/acro cell)

0cenario 2.,.2 " *arrowband /00 7Q EC* $0 in urban en=ironment (/acro cell)



ECC REPORT xxxPage %&

0cenario 2.,.% " *arrowband /00 7Q EC* $0 in urban en=ironment (/icro cell)

0cenario 2.,., " *arrowband /00 7Q EC* $0 in urban en=ironment (Pico cell)

Pro7a8ation ?o<el

The extended hata model as implemented in 0EA/CAT with the parameters defined in the 4iBi for open en=ironment will be used for the studies for rural en=ironment. The extension to free space below & Bm can not be applied in urbanen=ironment because of smaller distances and presence of buildings. Therefore the extended hata model as implemented in0EA/CAT with the parameters defined in the 4iBi for urban en=ironment will be used for the studies for urbanen=ironment.

4hen assessing the E7to7E interference8 PT& noticed that in ECC !eport &%& the free7space propagation model wasused in the deterministic analsis and the EEE 362.&& 7 C propagation model was used for statistical studies.

M"" ter?inals

7 4ideband igh gain " &; d$i8 %% d$m output power8 ;S minimum ele=ation8 26S tpical ele=ation8 &m abo=eaground

7 *arrowband igh gain " &; d$i8 %6 d$m output power8 ;S minimum ele=ation8 26S tpical ele=ation8 &mabo=e ground

°≤θ≤ϕ−

ϕ<θ≤ϕ

ϕθ

−−

ϕ<θ≤ϕ−

ϕ<θ≤

ϕ

θ−

=θ

&36for 3

for log%2&,

&.63for &,

63.&6for &2

)(

2

2&&

6

&%6

%

2

%6

2

2

2

2

(,)

where"

(θ) " gain relati=e to an isotropic antenna (d$i)

6 " the main lobe antenna gain (d$i)

θ " off7axis angle (degrees) ϕ% " the % d$ beamwidth of the low7gain antenna (degrees)

M

6&.6&66662A 2−

× (degrees)

ϕ& M &.5 ϕ% (degrees)

ϕ2 M ϕ& x &6( 6 H -)G%2 (degrees)

7 4ideband and narrowband :ow gain " 6 d$i8 %5 d$m8 omnidirectionnal8 &.;mnwanted emission masB and AC:! for wideband /00 terminals from the standard E* %62 ;,72


7oGer class AC:!(d$)

absolute(d$mG; /@)

AC:! (d$) absolute (d$mG;/@)



ECC REPORT xxxPage %2

14 ,2 7% ;2 7&%

1bis2 ,2 75 ;2 7&5

"7ecifie< M"" UT 7oGer in 1st an< %n< a<acent channels

7nwanted emission masB and AC:! for narrowband /00 terminals from the standard E* %62 ;,7%

:ar< ban<

@D.=A

1st #<acent * M.=

Channel

%n< #<acent * M.=

Channel

-r< #<acent * M.=

Channel

6 %,.2 7&%.6 7&.3

%66 (>++) &;.; 7&%.6 7&.3

;66 (T++) &,.3 7&%.6 7&.3

Calc:lation of #CLR :sin8 li?its in Tables -a, -b an< 4b

@al:es are the eir7 in a * M.= channel in <'?A

The tpical bandwidth for narrowband terminals is 266 B@ (the standard allows for ;; B@).

The bandwidth for wideband terminals is ; /@.

EC( 7ara?eters

&))>T)) 'ase station

• The following parameters are considered applicable to the EC* $0 with regard to wideband /00 terminals. 4ith

regard to narrow band terminals8 the AC0 =alues for a gi=en channel listed in the table below should be considered

constant for the whole channel width.The =alue of AC0 with regard to narrow band /00 terminals should be pro=ided b ECC PT&.

/acro $0 /icro $0 Pico $0

$0 Antenna 'ain (d$i) &3 ; 6

>eeder loss (d$) % 6& 6

!eference sensiti=it (d$m) ; 7&2& 7&&& 7&6

&st channel AC0 (d$) & ,- ,- ,-

2nd channel AC0 (d$) ;3 ;% ;,

/aximum power interferingsignal &st ch. (d$m) 7-2., 7;2., 7,3.,

/aximum power interferingsignal 2nd ch. (d$m) 7;6., 7,;., 7,6.,

Parameters C+/A (>++) 2'@ +:ando=er margin (d$) % d$

Call drop threshold (d$) %

<oice bit rate (Bbps) &2.2

!eference bandwidth (/@) %.3,

<oice acti=it factor 6.;

/inimum coupling loss (d$) 6

:inB le=el data 47C+/AG/T0" ualcomm Europe " &566/@"

plinB & >E!

, f necessar a guard band ma be introduced.; As specified in D,.



ECC REPORT xxxPage %%

LinD s7ecific settin8s @for :7linDA

Target *oise networB rise8 d$ -

/obile station max transmit power8 d$m 2,

/obile station power control range (d$) 2

Power control con=ergence precision8 d$ 6.&

9ptimal capacit for C+/A sstem (users per cell) +efined b 0EA/CAT (%; users)

0stem laout (choice of the reference cell) Center of UinfiniteV networB

Positioning (number of $0 in the sstem) ; (&5 sites x % sectorsGsite)

$0 antenna pattern !ecommendation T7! >.&%%-72

/obile Terminal antenna height8 m &.; m

Terminal antenna gain8 d$ 6

/obilit (BmGh) see illustration of distribution on >ig. %

C)M# &)) '" technical characteristics$

/acroCells

/icroCells

PicoCells

Tpical cell radius (Wm) - ,.%% & 6.%&;

Antenna height (m)

,;(!ural)%6(rban) ; 2

The antenna pattern for $0 " >.&%%-72 peaB sectoral8 A@imuth aperture -;S8 &3 d$i maximum gain8 % d$ feeder loss8 %S

downtilt

T)) 'ase station

T$+

- Cell radius are coherent with D,



ECC REPORT xxxPage %,

ANNEX #&DETERMINISTIC STUDY RESULTS

[Editorial note: the roa!ation model "#ed in the#e re#"lt# need# to be con$irmed%

&i!"re# 3 - 1' show the interference in excess generated b an /00 T at a gi=en distance from an EC* $08 for the %

tpes of cell8 considering different offsets in the alignment between the two antennae.>ollowing the same approach8 &i!"re# 14 ( 1) show the interference in excess generated b an /00 T at a gi=endistance from an EC* T.



ECC REPORT xxxPage %;

n the rele=ant figures8 the different lines correspond to an increase of the off7axis offset in ; degrees steps8 startingfrom 6 up to 56.



C#"E "TU)Y J1 B 2i<eban< .i8h ain Ter?inal s Macro Cell in r:ral eniron?ent

&i!"re 3a *le$t+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 1 &t ad?a/ent /anne# *or di**erent o**&et& between antennae

&i!"re 3b *ri!ht+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 2nd ad?a/ent /anne# *or di**erent o**&et& between antennae

%-

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40UT Excess interference generated

Distance [Km]

M S S

U T e x c e s s i n t e r f e

r e n c e g e n e r a t e d [ d B ]

9ffset M 56 deg

9ffset M 6 deg

9ffset M 6 deg

9ffset M 56 deg

0 0.5 1 1.5-30

-20

-10

0

10

20


Distance [Km]

M S S U T e x c e s s i n t e r f e r e

n c e g e n e r a t e d [ d B ]



C#"E "TU)Y J% B 2i<eban< .i8h ain Ter?inal s Macro Cell in :rban eniron?ent



%

9ffset M 56 deg

9ffset M 6 deg

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40


Distance [Km]

M S S U T e x c e s s i n t e r f e r e n c e

g e n e r a t e d [ d B ]

9ffset M 6 deg

9ffset M 56 deg

0 0.5 1 1.5-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20


Distance [Km]

M S S U T e x c e s s i n t e r f e r e n c e g

e n e r a t e d [ d B ]



C#"E "TU)Y J- B 2i<eban< .i8h ain Ter?inal s Micro Cell in :rban eniron?ent

&i!"re ,a *le$t+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 1 &t ad?a/ent /anne# *or di**erent o**&et& between antennae

%3

9ffset M 56 deg

9ffset M 6 deg

0 0.05 0.1 0.15-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40


Distance [Km]

M S S U T e x c e s s i n t e r f e r e n c e g e n e r a t e d [ d B ]

9ffset M 56 deg

9ffset M 6 deg

0 0.05 0.1 0.15-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30


Distance [Km]




&i!"re ,b *ri!ht+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 2nd ad?a/ent /anne# *or di**erent o**&et& between antennae

%5



C#"E "TU)Y J4 B 2i<eban< .i8h ain Ter?inal s Pico Cell in :rban eniron?ent

&i!"re a *le$t+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 1 &t ad?a/ent /anne# *or di**erent o**&et& between antennae

,6

9ffset M 56 deg

9ffset M 6 deg

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1-60

-40

-20

0

20

40


Distance [Km]

M S S U T e x c e s s i n t e r f e r e n

c e g e n e r a t e d [ d B ]

9ffset M 6 deg

9ffset M 56 deg

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40


Distance [Km]

M S S

U T e x c e s s i n t e r f e r e n c e g e n e r a t e d [ d B ]



&i!"re b *ri!ht+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 2nd ad?a/ent /anne# *or di**erent o**&et& between antennae

C#"E "TU)Y J* B 2i<eban< LoG ain Ter?inal s Macro Cell in r:ral eniron?ent

&i!"re )a *le$t+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 1 &t ad?a/ent /anne# For Eri//&on: te$ et /ro&&oer at 2.5 " *or *i)re )a.%

,&

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30


Distance [Km]



0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15


Distance [Km]

M S S

U T e x c e s s i n t e r f e r e n c

e g e n e r a t e d [ d B ]



&i!"re )b *ri!ht+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 2nd ad?a/ent /anne#

,2



C#"E "TU)Y J6 B 2i<eban< LoG ain Ter?inal s Macro Cell in :rban eniron?ent

&i!"re 'a *le$t+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 1 &t ad?a/ent /anne#

,%

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30


Distance [Km]


0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20


Distance [Km]




&i!"re 'b *ri!ht+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 2nd ad?a/ent /anne#

,,



C#"E "TU)Y J/ B 2i<eban< LoG ain Ter?inal s Micro Cell in :rban eniron?ent

&i!"re a *le$t+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 1 &t ad?a/ent /anne#

,;

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30


Distance [Km]

M S S

U T e x c e s s i n t e r f e r e n


0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20


Distance [Km]

M S S U T e x c e s s i n t e r f e r e

n c e g e n e r a t e d [ d B ]



&i!"re b *ri!ht+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 2nd ad?a/ent /anne#

,-



C#"E "TU)Y J B 2i<eban< LoG ain Ter?inal s Pico Cell in :rban eniron?ent

&i!"re 1/a *le$t+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 1 &t ad?a/ent /anne#

&i!"re 1/b *ri!ht+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 2nd ad?a/ent /anne#

,

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2-60

-40

-20

0

20

40


Distance [Km]

M S S

U T e x c e s s i n t e r f e r e n


0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30


Distance [Km]

M S S




C#"E "TU)Y J3 B (arroGban< .i8h ain Ter?inal s Macro Cell in r:ral eniron?ent



,3

9ffset M 56 deg

9ffset M 6 deg

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30


Distance [Km]

M S S U T e x c e s s i n t e r f e r e n c


9ffset M 6 deg

9ffset M 56 deg

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20


Distance [Km]

M S S U T e x c e s s i n t e r f e r e n




C#"E "TU)Y J10 B (arroGban< .i8h ain Ter?inal s Macro Cell in :rban eniron?ent

&i!"re 12a *le$t+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 1 &t ad?a/ent /anne# *or di**erent o**&et& between antennae &i!"re 12b *ri!ht+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 2nd ad?a/ent /anne# *or di**erent o**&et& between antennae

,5

9ffset M 56 deg

9ffset M 6 deg

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30


Distance [Km]



9ffset M 56 deg

9ffset M 6 deg

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20


Distance [Km]





C#"E "TU)Y J11 B (arroGban< .i8h ain Ter?inal s Micro Cell in :rban eniron?ent

&i!"re 13a *le$t+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 1 &t ad?a/ent /anne# *or di**erent o**&et& between antennae &i!"re 13b *ri!ht+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 2nd ad?a/ent /anne# *or di**erent o**&et& between antennae

;6

9ffset M 56 deg

9ffset M 6 deg

0 0.05 0.1 0.15-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30


Distance [Km]

M S S


9ffset M 6 deg

9ffset M 56 deg

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30


Distance [Km]

M S S




C#"E "TU)Y J1% B (arroGban< .i8h ain Ter?inal s Pico Cell in :rban eniron?ent



;&

9ffset M 56 deg

9ffset M 6 deg

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1-60

-40

-20

0

20

40


Distance [Km]

M S S



9ffset M 56 deg

9ffset M 6 deg

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40


Distance [Km]





C#"E "TU)Y J1- B (arroGban< LoG ain Ter?inal s Macro Cell in r:ral eniron?ent

&i!"re 1,a *le$t+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 1 &t ad?a/ent /anne#

&i!"re 1,b *ri!ht+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 2nd ad?a/ent /anne#

;2

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30


Distance [Km]



0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15


Distance [Km]





C#"E "TU)Y J14 B (arroGban< LoG ain Ter?inal s Macro Cell in :rban eniron?ent

&i!"re 1a *le$t+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 1 &t ad?a/ent /anne#

&i!"re 1b *ri!ht+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 2nd

ad?a/ent /anne#

;%

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30


Distance [Km]



0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5-30

-20

-10

0

10

20


Distance [Km]





C#"E "TU)Y J1* B (arroGban< LoG ain Ter?inal s Micro Cell in :rban eniron?ent

&i!"re 1)a *le$t+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 1 &t ad?a/ent /anne#

&i!"re 1)b *ri!ht+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 2nd ad?a/ent /anne#

;,

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30


Distance [Km]


0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20


Distance [Km]




C#"E "TU)Y J16 B (arroGban< LoG ain Ter?inal s Pico Cell in :rban eniron?ent

&i!"re 1'a *le$t+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 1 &t ad?a/ent /anne#

&i!"re 1'b *ri!ht+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated &. di&tan/e in te 2nd ad?a/ent /anne#

;;

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3-60

-40

-20

0

20

40


Distance [Km]


0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40


Distance [Km]

M S S





C#"E "TU)Y J1/ B 2i<eban< Ter?inal s EC( UT in r:ral eniron?ent @:sin8 0%$11 B C ?o<elA

&i!"re 14a *le$t+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated b$ an M++ i ain >T &. di&tan/e in te 1 &t ad?a/ent /anne# *or di**erent o**&et& between antennae

&i!"re 14b *ri!ht+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated b$ an M++ #ow ain >T &. di&tan/e in te 1

&t

ad?a/ent /anne# *or di**erent o**&et& between antennae

;-

9ffset M 6 deg

9ffset M 56 deg

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7-50

0

50

100

150


Distance [Km]

M S S


0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140


Distance [Km]

M S S




C#"E "TU)Y J1 B 2i<eban< Ter?inal s EC( UT in :rban eniron?ent

&i!"re 1,a *le$t+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated b$ an M++ i ain >T &. di&tan/e in te 1 &t ad?a/ent /anne# *or di**erent o**&et& between antennae

&i!"re 1,b *ri!ht+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated b$ an M++ #ow ain >T &. di&tan/e in te 1

&t


;

9ffset M 56 deg

9ffset M 6 deg

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100


Distance [Km]

M S S


0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100


Distance [Km]

M S S




C#"E "TU)Y J13 B (arroG Ter?inal s EC( UT in r:ral eniron?ent @:sin8 0%$11 B C ?o<elA

&i!"re 1a *le$t+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated b$ an M++ i ain >T &. di&tan/e in te 1 &t ad?a/ent /anne# *or di**erent o**&et& between antennae

&i!"re 1b *ri!ht+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated b$ an M++ #ow ain >T &. di&tan/e in te 1

&t


;3

9ffset M 6 deg

9ffset M 56 deg

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140


Distance [Km]

M S S


0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140


Distance [Km]

M S S




C#"E "TU)Y J%0 B (arroG Ter?inal s EC( UT in :rban eniron?ent

&i!"re 1)a *le$t+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated b$ an M++ i ain >T &. di&tan/e in te 1 &t ad?a/ent /anne# *or di**erent o**&et& between antennae

&i!"re 1)b *ri!ht+: EA/e&& inter*eren/e enerated b$ an M++ #ow ain >T &. di&tan/e in te 1 &t ad?a/ent /anne# *or di**erent o**&et& between antennae

;5

9ffset M 56 deg

9ffset M 6 deg

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100


Distance [Km]


0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100


Distance [Km]

M S S




ANNEX "#& LIST OF REFERENCES

D& 0EA/CAT /anual for 9Bumura7ata modelD2 sfsf*et.

D% 0dfsfsdf

se40(11)temp02_draft ecc report on mss and ecn at 2 ghz

Documents

sub results

monte carlo simulations185

monte carlo simulations45

etsi standards

etsi mss es standards

monte carlo simulation44

monte carlo simulation114

mss uplink