scipp - november 14, 20061 ionization imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? david nygren...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
215 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 1
Ionization Imaging:a better way to search for
0-v decay?
David Nygren
LBNL Physics Division
![Page 2: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 2
Two Types of Double Beta Decay
This process not yet observedparticle = antiparticle
Neutrinoless double beta decay lifetime
Neutrino effective
mass
A known background process and an important calibration tool
Z
0
2
22
2
1
1mG
T×Μ×=
.1019
2
1 yrsT ≈
![Page 3: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 3
0-v Decay
• If 0-v decays occur, then:– Neutrino mass ≠0 (now we know this!)
– Decay rate measures effective mass mv
– Neutrinos are Majorana particles– Lepton number is not conserved
• Because the physics impact is so great, the experimental result must be robust.
![Page 4: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 4
Uncertainties…
• Hierarchy uncertaino Determines needed sensitivity
• Matrix element calculations uncertaino Order of magnitude in rate
• Effective mass uncertaino Phases enter: mv
= |∑ |Uei|2 imi |• Direct tests by 3H kinematics uncertain
o For mv << 1 eV, technically very difficult!
• Best experimental approach: uncertain!
![Page 5: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 5
A “Robust” Experiment:
Only
2-v decays!
Rate
Energy Q-value
Only
0-v decays!
No backgrounds above Q-value!
The experimental result is a spectrum of all events, with very small or negligible backgrounds.
0
![Page 6: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 6
A robust experiment:
• Has negligible overlap of 0- and 2- events – excellent energy resolution is essential!
• Selects 0-v and 2-v events identically– does not depend solely on end-point energy!
• Scales to large active mass – M ~ 1/ mv2 >1000 kg needed?
• Rejects all backgrounds effectively– no insensitive surfaces!
![Page 7: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 7
Energy Resolution
Germanium Detectors:– Excellent electron and hole mobilities
• Complete charge collection
– Small level of recombination• Charge collection independent of track topology
– Small energy per ion/electron pair • Fluctuations small
The Gold Standard:
Energy resolution with Germanium detector:
E/E ~ 1.25 x 10-3 FWHM at 2.6 MeV
![Page 8: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 8
Energy Resolution
“Extra margin in energy resolution is very desirable because non-gaussian characteristics are often present in the tails of the experimental distribution.”
“To realize an energy resolution near the limit imposed by physical processes, the detector and target must be the same.”
![Page 9: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 9
Using Energy to Detect
Spectra from Ludwig DeBraekeleer
1. Get a large quantity of candidate nuclei2. Put them in an electron detector3. Shield and purify4. Acquire data for a few years (“plug and pray”)5. Cut on energy to select out the neutrinoless events
100’s of kg target - Condensed matter strongly preferred
Theory
Practice
Spectra from Klapdor Kleingrothaus et. al.
positive signal claim is disputed!
Background rejection is essential - energy resolution may not be enough !
Esum of 2 final state electrons
![Page 10: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 10
Present Status
• Heidelberg-Moscow (H-M) claim:
mv = 0.44 +0.14-0.20 eV (best value) disputed!
0v1/2 = (8 — 18.3) x 1024 y (95% c.l.)
Scale: ~11 kg of 76Ge, for ~7 years
No other claim for a positive result exists
![Page 11: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 11
Worldwide Activity• CAMEO.........• CANDLES.....• COBRA.........• CUORE.........• DCBA............• EXO..............• GERDA.........• GSO..............• Majorana.......• MOON...........• Nano-crystals• Super-NEMO• Xe.................• XMASS.........
CdWO4 crystals in liquid scintillator
CaF2 crystals in liquid scintillatorCdTe semiconductors
TeO2 bolometers, Cuoricino nowNd foils and tracking chambersXe TPC; liquid now, maybe gas laterGermanium crystals in LN
Gd2SiO5 crystals in liquid scintillatorSegmented Ge crystalsMo foils and plastic scintillatorsSuspended nanoparticlesFoils with trackingXe dissolved in liquid scintillatorLiquid xenon
![Page 12: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 12
Present Perspective…
• Cuoricino (130Te): background-limited
E/E only Cuore needs factor of ~20
• Majorana (76Ge): pre-construction stage
E/E + multi-site rejection (x10), but – a factor of several 100 needed beyond HM
• Common to both:– Multi-detector coincidences can reject many
backgrounds, but:– Large rejection factor needed for success
![Page 13: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 13
Xenon
• Qv = 2.49 MeV (136Xe)• Previous experiments inconclusive
– HPXe TPC in Gotthard tunnel (5 bar, no start time)
– Russian experiments with various MWPC
• EXO– EXO-200 underway with LXe @ WIPP– No laser tagging of barium daughter: R&D stage – Strong anti-correlation of ionization/scintillation– Results eagerly awaited
![Page 14: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 14
NUSAG Recommendations:
• “…support research in two or more 0-v experiments to explore the region of degenerate neutrino masses (mv > 100 meV)…”
• “The knowledge gained and the technology developed in the first phase should then be used in a second phase to extend exploration into the inverted hierarchy region of (mv > 10 - 20 meV) with a single experiment.”
But: no explicit encouragement for new ideas!
![Page 15: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 15
Experimental Approach
“We believe that an
Imaging Ionization Chamber is most likely to meet all criteria imposed
for a robust experiment.”
An Imaging Ionization Chamber (IIC) is
a TPC without gain at the readout plane
![Page 16: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 16
Imaging Ionization Chamber
-HV planePixel Readout planePixel Readout plane
.
ionselectrons
~99%Xe + ~1% CH4
@ 20 bars
![Page 17: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 17
Proportional Gain: good results for low-energy x-rays
MWPC, GEM, micromegas all work well...
but:why are there so many events below the peak?
![Page 18: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 18
Proportional Gain: poor resolution for MeV energies
Typical E/E: 4 - 6.6% FWHM @ 2.5 MeV– Gain variations?
• gas density, composition • mechanics, calibration maps
– Extended tracks? • ballistic deficit in signal processing• impact of space charge on gain
– Intrinsic physical phenomena?• sensitivity to dE/dx density variations
• large scintillation/ionization fluctuations
![Page 19: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 19
Ionization Chamber Mode
• Reason # 1:– “Best energy resolution can only be
obtained through direct charge integration”• There is a lot to learn here...
• Reason # 2:– “Gain may be needed at HV plane…”
• This is a new, but very speculative aspect
![Page 20: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 20
Imaging Ionization Chamber is filled with 136Xe gas
• Xe is relatively safe and easy to enrich• EXO has 200 kg highly enriched in 136Xe
• high density is desirable to contain event• But there is an upper limit: < 0.55 g/cm3
• working density: ~ 0.1 g/cm3 (LXe = 2.95 g/cm3)• ~20 bars; critical point P = 58 bars, T = 290° K• 1000 kg in ~10 m3 : = 200 cm, L =300 cm• dn/dx ~ 1 fC/cm = 6000 electron/ion pairs/cm
![Page 21: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 21
UV Scintillation in HPXe
• N ~ Nelectron/ion pairs ~ 118,000 at Q = 2.49 MeV – can use for event start time– ratio depends on E field
– spectrum peaks at ~170 nm ~ 7 eV
• However, small amount of “CH4” is necessary– to cool electron drift and keep diffusion low for tracking
• Does methane absorb 170 nm light? - No• Does methane quench scintillation? - don’t know, but
– 2% added to LXe without loss! – Does HPXe behave similarly? maybe...
![Page 22: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 22
Imaging Ionization Chamber…
• “provides adequate S/N for good tracking”– detailed imaging of event topologies
• “provides fully closed, active fiducial surface”– ex post facto variable definition with mm resolution
• “provides energy resolution of 1% FWHM”– avoids scintillation/ionization anti-correlation
• “may permit detection of birth of Ba daughter”– automatic process tags both space and time
![Page 23: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 23
Event Characteristics in IIC
– High density of xenon constrains event:• Total track length ~10 - 20 cm max
– Multiple scattering will be prominent in xenon• Unclear if B-field would help identification
– True events will have two “blobby” ends• Shown to reject background by ~30 in Gotthard TPC
– Bremsstrahlung and fluorescence ’s• Distinct satellite “blobs” may be visible
![Page 24: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 24
Imaging Ionization Chamber
has a fully “decorated” pixel readout plane – no grids or wires: eliminates microphonics
– pixel size is 5 mm x 5 mm (4 x 104 /m2)• ~ 40 - 80 contiguous “hit” pixels for E = Q
• dn/dx = ~3000 electrons/(5mm)
– ultra-low noise readout electronics - BNL ASIC• <n> = ~30 e– rms for 4 s shaping time, with pixel!
• Other noise terms must be included <n>= 60 e– rms?
– “waveform capture” essential for extended tracks
![Page 25: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 25
Pixel geometry
A low capacitance solution: a 7-pixel hexagonal sub-module:
Or, a 16 channel 4x4 rectangular array…
![Page 26: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 26
Imaging Ionization Chamber
collects electrons on pixel readout plane– all energy information is derived from q = Idt– current is very small until electrons approach pixel– pixels with no net charge have bipolar currents
– drift velocity is small, 0.1< Vd <0.5 cm/s
– diffusion after 1.5 m drift is ~ 2 mm rms– event is reconstructed from contiguous hit pixels– noise adds only from hit pixels + some neighbors
![Page 27: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 28
Energy Resolution…
Q-value of 136Xe = 2.48 MeVW = E per ion/electron pair = 21 eVN = number of ion pairs = Q/WN 2.49 x 106 eV/21 eV = 118,350
N2 = FN (0.05 < F < 0.17)
F = 0.17 for pure noble gases (theory)
N = (FN)1/2 ~ 140 electrons rms
![Page 28: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 29
Energy Resolution…
• If ionization were the only issue:E/E = 2.9 x 10-3 FWHM
• Other contributions:– electronic noise from N = 49 pixels in event
• N1/2 x <n> if noise is gaussian ~ 7 x 60 = 430 e–
– ballistic deficit in signal processing – “locked” charge caused by slow-moving ions
E/E < 10.0 x 10-3 FWHM
![Page 29: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 31
IIC and Imaging Power
• The 3-D imaging of the IIC provides:– Topology reconstruction– Energy resolution independent of scale– Active and continuous fiducial surfaces– Variable fiducial surfaces ex post facto
Rejection of ionizing backgrounds from surfaces can be essentially 100%
![Page 30: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 32
Perspective
• The basic IIC concept offers:– Stable operation: ionization mode– Excellent energy resolution: ~1% FWHM– Good scaling: active mass ~1000 kg– No dead surfaces: 3-D event placement– Active, adjustable fiducial boundaries– Topological rejection of backgrounds– Possibility to evolve further…
![Page 31: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 33
Barium Daughter Atom
– In a volume of ~1027 xenon atoms, a event creates one barium atomic ion.
– The Ba ion drifts out to the HV plane, and in ~ 1 second, the ion will be lost!
– Is this a hopeless situation?
![Page 32: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 34
Barium Daughter Atom
– In xenon/CH4, the Ba++ ion will survive:
• IP(Xe) = 12.13 eV, IP(CH4) = 13.0 eV• First IP(Ba+) = 5.212 eV• Second IP(Ba++) = 10.004 eV
– if impurities exist with IP less than 10 eV:• Ba++ becomes Ba+ through charge exchange
![Page 33: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 35
Ion Mobilities
Is there a straightforward way to detect and identify the barium daughter?
• Ba and Xe ion masses are ~identical…
• Ba+ and Xe+ ion charges are identical…
• Ion mobilities should be the ~same, Right??
![Page 34: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 36
Ion Mobilities…
• But: Ion mobilities are quite different!– The cause is resonant charge exchange– RCE is macroscopic quantum mechanics
• occurs only for ions in their parent gases • no energy barrier exists for Xe+ in xenon • energy barrier exists for Ba ions in xenon• resonant charge exchange is a long-range
process; glancing collisions = back-scatter
– RCE increases viscosity of ions
![Page 35: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 37
Ion Mobilities in Xenon
– Mobility differences have been measured at low pressures, where clustering effects are small: (Xe+) = 0.6 cm2/V-sec (Cs+) = 0.88 cm2/V-sec (Cs is between Ba and Xe)
– So, the barium ion should move faster by ~50%! (maybe even faster if Ba++ is stable)
RCE can provide a way to detect Ba daughter!
![Page 36: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 38
Ion mobility in dense gases?
• Ion mobility data at high pressure does not apparently exist in the literature.– Clustering may be prominent at 20 bars.– Clustering phenomena are complex, and
may introduce very different behavior• Not clear whether this will help or hurt!• Low pressure measurements not adaptable to
high pressures like 20 bars - need new method
![Page 37: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 39
Ba Daughter Detection
• If we assume that barium ion mobility is not identical to xenon ion mobility, then:
• A barium ion will arrive at the HV plane at a different time than the Xe+ ion track image.
• If event time origin and mobilities of the barium and xenon ions are known, an arrival time for the barium daughter at HV plane is predicted.
• The unique t between Xe+ and Ba+ ions is a robust signature for a true event.
![Page 38: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 40
Arrival Time Separation
• Assume low-pressure data…– Assume drift distance: L= T = 250 mm– Thermal transport diffusion: ~ .25 mm
/L = 0.25/250 = 1/1000
/(L) = 21/2/(Ba - Xe)T ~ 1/235
– Arrival times are very precisely determined
![Page 39: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 41
Detection of Ion Arrival
• Detection of ion arrival may be possible:– Ions drift at thermal energies to HV plane…
Then: – Ions are attracted to “high field pore (HFP)”
• Very high electric field inside HFP • Ions can enter, but electrons are blocked• High energy tail of M-B distribution relevant• Ba++ may be critical for desired outcome • Hoped-for outcome: ≥1 electron appears
![Page 40: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 42
Blind GEM or “Microwell”
Drift region: Low E-field
ions
Very High E-field inside pore; low work-function surface?
Resistive back side blocked to electrons
HV plane
![Page 41: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 43
The barium daughter “Echo”
– If a single electron appears, high E-field in blind GEM causes electron avalanche.
– Electron avalanche will saturate, producing a large pulse of electrons, more than 103.
– Electron pulse returns to pixel plane, at a spot on the projected event track.
– This spot on the projected track is very close to origin of the barium daughter.
![Page 42: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 44
“Birth Detection”
Because the echo tagging is so precise
in space and time
(if it can be done at all)
I refer to this process as
“Birth detection”
![Page 43: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 45
The Return Image Echo
• The Xe+ ions will also enter HFP, producing an “echo” of the track.
• The track echo time will be distinct from the pulse due to the barium daughter.
• Maybe: transfer charge to C2H4: IP =11.6 eV– Complex organic molecule may be much less
likely to liberate electrons than Ba++ or Ba+
– Will a mobility difference still exist?
![Page 44: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 46
Event Quality
• strong primary UV scintillation gives to
– Enough intensity, even at low visible energy
• electron track image provides topology– Energy resolution limited by electronic noise
• ion track echo also places event in space– Don’t need all 115,000 echoes from HV plane
• barium daughter echo is elegant tag method– Can some detection scheme be found?
• an over-constrained reconstruction possible.
![Page 45: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 47
Imaging Ionization Chamber
-HV planePixel Readout planePixel Readout plane
.
ionselectrons
![Page 46: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 48
What to do?
• An R&D (and library) effort is needed to:– Develop good simulation tools– Optimize S/N with real electronics– Measure E/E in HPXe IIC with rays– Investigate benefits of organic additives– Determine ion mobilities in HPXe.– Explore ion-induced avalanche processes
![Page 47: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 49
What to do?
• An R&D (and library) effort is needed to:– Develop good simulation tools– Optimize S/N with real electronics– Measure E/E in HPXe IIC with rays– Investigate benefits of organic additives– Determine ion mobilities in HPXe.– Explore ion-induced avalanche processes
• A proposal has been rejected by DOE!
![Page 48: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 50
![Page 49: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 51
![Page 50: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 52
![Page 51: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 53
Summary
• A novel concept for a robust 0- decay search has been developed: E/E ~ 1% FWHM – Detailed & constrained 3-D event topology – Active, variable fiducial boundaries– Identification of Ba daughter possible, in
principle, by exploitation of macroscopic quantum mechanical phenomenon, RCE
![Page 52: SCIPP - November 14, 20061 Ionization Imaging: a better way to search for 0- v decay? David Nygren LBNL Physics Division](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d575503460f94a36739/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
SCIPP - November 14, 2006 54
Acknowledgments
• Azriel Goldschmidt - LBNL
• Adam Bernstein - LLNL
• Mike Heffner - LLNL
• Jacques Millaud - LLNL/LBNL
• Leslie Rosenberg - UW